HomeMy WebLinkAbout030013_Inspection_20221209Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
99 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Departure Time:
Title:
Type of Visit:
Reason for Visit:
Date of Visit: I q Arrival Time:
Farm Name:60k9 A-O n Lori rick r l
ff \,0''N 6VGIVI� Mailing Address: ,4-3 �VVOS v'E tht')/\,Q, , .) (� Y'q G 2 6'15
Physical Address:
Owner Name:
Coun
Region:
Facility Contact:
Owner Email:
Phone:
\ 1moi e-V(Vb
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: I Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: \A v � VQ }15 Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Phone:
-tJ 7T14VJ 9 Z71 N--7Ncici el4- too —7(9PIGCZ-7OrenoVey-=7�TAe 5an1- -f-ktvvis,
IPHMUUIfft
�b A Y' �' % 'k'##�t SQ @AkiPri :s a y,
o-z"ta`a°a ms°
s I BY x.4Ckxiu5s na#aw
9i
Wean to Finish
Layer
'
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Li
Non Layer
`
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
ire & l e a > s pa i
��+d�&
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
f
as sr}ffls� ns# ? r Jntn q
+s�rx�as r *sq,t tit##,�Ag�r� {�'
a
Dry Cow
4
Farrow to Feeder
�'�:4xa a#$V5 uxa utm b% 1
��a3,�.fy;�+��t!'Y�}lt a��GY��l$ �w,g
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
:s
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
t
Boars
t r
Pullets
#
Beef Brood Cow
rbr
u$e'�sa* }aw"a a sr>an'l I"s. ark axe rra
#d •.-�AitR'u#9&��
Turke s
Y
i, ffC rd'ttaa
�aa� : :�stff�+�
ar
_g
ttt' #v R
p<.�ea+,#t&� bra �C�*C$$r
Turkey Poults
t t 1 Fv #
sff
� sr
4'
g
Other
-u.
tae=
i
a$$%
b Y$S .
x m43. vtkV, $j6 #a k'. +6AArS �#�e: %%.x
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes [%No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
El Yes XI No ❑NA ❑NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued
Facility Number: n) - 1?j
Date of Inspection:' a- n''7-1
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 1
oosP
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
t]No ❑NA El NE
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No p NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
El Yes XNo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
❑ Yes XJNo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes cgiNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
GDoes the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ['Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes tgl No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 7�,}'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes S No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Other:
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement?� 9h_ _,t the arp„ v kel isa\Th el ❑ Yes [ No
R-waste pi l at .. Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis ❑ 3Jri A„uly„i.r Q Ware Tr^nsf^r^
T
p Rainfall C]SEssking CI up Y;,,k1—[]2__
^ M'.'_ I- p *Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [a No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 2 of 3
❑NA ❑NE
❑ W„ath.,1 s
❑mil
❑ NA ❑ NE
NA ❑ NE
5/12/2020 Continued
Facility Number: W - \'3
Date of Inspection: ‘a-
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes
E Yes
['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
74 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ No [RNA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
CA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes IN No % NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 71No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
G
asuvrL 'Ran? c .1C- u\)j swat
501t5 Sled
6 lets; ny sunnc -Pie Ids ►ou+ s+ill cd ote 1 Svfead uoc Ova %tf 's
peen Atv Qat WJYtels-. boc ` orrea(at,_cio,4-PA
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Vexcc a Nat/010 y
Reviewer/Inspector Signatua
Page 3 of 3
Phone`/9XflTo_ MOS
Val
IX
5/12/202
Date: