Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout#5352_05_2014_final INSPECTION REPORT ROUTING SHEET To be attached to all inspection reports in-house only. Laboratory Cert. #: 5352 Laboratory Name: Wallace Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant Inspection Type: Field Maintenance Inspector Name(s): Todd Crawford Inspection Date: May 8, 2014 Date Report Completed: May 12, 2014 Date Forwarded to Reviewer: May 12, 2014 Reviewed by: Tonja Springer Date Review Completed: May 23, 2014 Cover Letter to use: Insp. Initial Insp. Reg. Insp. No Finding Insp. CP Corrected Unit Supervisor/Chemist III: Dana Satterwhite Date Received: 5/23/2014 Date Forwarded to Linda: 5/29/2014 Date Mailed: 5/30/2014 _____________________________________________________________________ On-Site Inspection Report LABORATORY NAME: Wallace Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant NPDES PERMIT #: NC0003450 ADDRESS: 311 E. Murphy St. Wallace, NC 28466 CERTIFICATE #: 5352 DATE OF INSPECTION: May 8, 2014 TYPE OF INSPECTION: Field Maintenance AUDITOR(S): Todd Crawford LOCAL PERSON(S) CONTACTED: Brent Dean I. INTRODUCTION: This laboratory was inspected by a representative of the North Carolina Wastewater/Groundwater Laboratory Certification (NC WW/GW LC) program to verify its compliance with the requirements of 15A NCAC 2H .0800 for the analysis of environmental samples. II. GENERAL COMMENTS: The laboratory was clean and well organized. The facility has all the equipment necessary to perform the analyses. Records were also well organized and quickly retrieved upon request. Proficiency Testing (PT) samples for the 2014 proficiency testing calendar year have not yet been analyzed. The laboratory is reminded that these results must be submitted to this office directly from the vendor by September 30, 2014. Current quality assurance policies for Field Laboratories and approved procedures for the analysis of the facility’s currently certified parameters were provided at the time of the inspection. Contracted analyses are performed by Environmental Chemists, Inc. (Certification #94). III. FINDINGS, REQUIREMENTS, COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Documentation Comment: Instrument identification for the meters used for Temperature, pH and Dissolved Oxygen was not documented on the field logs. The NC WW/GW LC Approved Procedure for the Analysis of Temperature, NC WW/GW LC Approved Procedure for the Analysis of pH and NC WW/GW LC Approved Procedure for the Analysis of Dissolved Oxygen documents state: The following must be documented in indelible ink whenever sample analysis is performed: Instrument identification. This requirement is a new policy that has been implemented by our program since the last inspection. All meter identifications were added to the field logs during the inspection. No further response is necessary for this finding. Page 2 #5352 Wallace Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant Comment: The laboratory needed to increase the documentation of purchased materials and reagents. The Quality Assurance Policies for Field Laboratories document states: All chemicals, reagents, standards and consumables used by the laboratory must have the following information documented: Date Received, Date Opened (in use), Vendor, Lot Number, and Expiration Date. A system (e.g., traceable identifiers) must be in place that links standard/reagent preparation information to analytical batches in which the solutions are used. Documentation of solution preparation must include the analyst’s initials, date of preparation, the volume or weight of standard(s) used, the solvent and final volume of the solution. This information as well as the vendor and/or manufacturer, lot number, and expiration date must be retained for chemicals, reagents, standards and consumables used for a period of five years. Consumable materials such as pH buffers, Total Residual Chlorine reagents and lots of pre-made standards are included in this requirement. This requirement is a new policy that has been implemented by our program since the last inspection. Demonstration of acceptable corrective action (i.e.,a traceability log sheet showing traceability information for all pH buffers currently in-house) was received via email on May 12, 2014. No further response is necessary for this finding. Dissolved Oxygen – Standard Methods, 4500 O G-2001 Comment: The sponge in the bottom of the probe well appeared to be too thick. The perimeter of the sponge was mashed down so as to create a raised center circle that was able to slide inside of the probe’s protective guard and push up against the membrane. This would mean that water from the sponge was being analyzed during the air calibration. The sponge must be damp but not in contact with the probe during the calibration. The YSI 550A manual states: Put 3 to 6 drops of clean water into the sponge. Turn the instrument over and allow any excess water to drain out of the chamber. The wet sponge creates a 100% water saturated air environment for the probe. This environment is ideal for dissolved oxygen calibration and for storage of the probe during transport and non-use. Notification of acceptable corrective action (i.e., a written statement that the sponge had been replaced with a thinner sponge and that there was no longer any contact with the probe tip) was received via email on May 22, 2014. No further response is necessary for this finding. IV. PAPER TRAIL INVESTIGATION: The paper trail consisted of comparing field testing records and contract lab reports to Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) submitted to the North Carolina Division of Water Resources. Data were reviewed for January, February and March, 2014. No transcription errors were detected; however, the monthly averages for Fecal Coliform were not being calculated correctly. Prior to this inspection, all “less than” Fecal Coliform values were being treated as “zero” when calculating the monthly average. Fecal Coliform data is averaged using the geometric mean. When calculating a geometric mean, you may consider a "less than" value as equal to “one”. Therefore, if all monthly values are “less than” values, the monthly geometric average would be “one”. The difference between the arithmetic and geometric means was discussed during the inspection and the NC DWQ NPDES Permitting Guidance for DMR Calculations and Directions for Completing Monthly Discharge Monitoring Reports documents were provided at the time for additional guidance. In order to avoid questions of legality, it is recommended that you contact the appropriate Regional Office for guidance as to whether an amended Discharge Monitoring Report will be required. A copy of this report will be made available to the Regional Office. Page 3 #5352 Wallace Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant V. CONCLUSIONS: All findings noted during the inspection were adequately addressed prior to the completion of this report. The inspector would like to thank the staff for its assistance during the inspection and data review process. No response is required. Report prepared by: Todd Crawford Date: May 12, 2014 Report reviewed by: Tonja Springer Date: May 23, 2014