Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout#5059_11_2014_final INSPECTION REPORT ROUTING SHEET To be attached to all inspection reports in-house only. Laboratory Cert. #: 5059 Laboratory Name: Bladenboro WWTP Inspection Type: Field Municipal Inspector Name(s): Tonja Springer Inspection Date: 11/19/2014 Date Report Completed: 12/5/2014 Date Forwarded to Reviewer: 12/10/2014 Reviewed by: Nick Jones Date Review Completed: 12/11/2014 Cover Letter to use: Insp. Initial Insp. Reg. Insp. No Finding Insp. CP Corrected Insp. Reg. Delay Unit Supervisor/Chemist III: Dana Satterwhite Date Received: 12/12/2014 Date Forwarded to Linda: 12/15/2014 Date Mailed: 12/16/2014 _____________________________________________________________________ On-Site Inspection Report LABORATORY NAME: Bladenboro WWTP ADDRESS: P.O. Box 455 Bladenboro, NC 28320 NPDES PERMIT # NC0026352 CERTIFICATE #: 5059 DATE OF INSPECTION: November 19, 2014 TYPE OF INSPECTION: Field Municipal AUDITOR(S): Tonja Springer LOCAL PERSON(S) CONTACTED: Philip Schroeder I. INTRODUCTION: This laboratory was inspected by a representative of the North Carolina Wastewater/Groundwater Laboratory Certification (NC WW/GW LC) program to verify its compliance with the requirements of 15A NCAC 2H .0800 for the analysis of environmental samples. II. GENERAL COMMENTS: The facility has all the equipment necessary to perform the analyses. Contracted analyses are performed by Environmental Chemists, Inc. (Envirochem) (Certification #94). Current quality assurance policies for Field Laboratories and approved procedures for the analysis of the facility’s currently certified parameters were provided at the time of the inspection. The requirements associated with Findings A and B have been implemented by our program since the last inspection. III. FINDINGS, REQUIREMENTS, COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Proficiency Testing Comment: The preparation of Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) Proficiency Testing (PT) samples was not documented. The Proficiency Testing Requirements, February 20, 2012, Revision 1.2 document states: PT samples received as ampules must be diluted according to the PT provider’s instructions. The preparation of PT samples must be documented in a traceable log or other traceable format. The diluted PT sample becomes a routine environmental sample and is added to a routine sample batch for analysis. Dating and initialing the instruction sheet for the preparation of the TRC PT would satisfy the documentation requirement. This requirement is a new policy that has been implemented by our program since the last inspection. Notification of acceptable corrective action (i.e., a statement that preparation of the TRC PT will be documented) was received by email on 12/4/2014. No further response is necessary for this finding. Page 2 #5059 Bladenboro WWTP A. Finding: The laboratory is not analyzing PT samples in the same manner as environmental samples. Requirement: All PT samples are to be analyzed and the results reported in a manner consistent with the routine analysis and reporting requirements of compliance samples and any other samples analyzed according to the requirements of 15A NCAC 2H .0800. Ref: Proficiency Testing Requirements, February 20, 2012, Revision 1.2. Comment: Known standards are being analyzed with the unknown samples and the PT sample is analyzed more than once and the average reported. These constituted an additional level of quality control (QC) that is not analyzed with routine compliance samples. B. Finding: The laboratory benchsheets for Temperature, pH, Dissolved Oxygen (DO) and TRC were lacking pertinent data: Instrument identification. Requirement: The following must be documented in indelible ink whenever sample analysis is performed: Instrument Identification. Ref: The NC WW/GW LC Approved Procedure for the Analysis of Temperature, The NC WW/GW LC Approved Procedure for the Analysis of pH, The NC WW/GW LC Approved Procedure for the Analysis of Dissolved Oxygen and NC WW/GW LC Approved Procedure for the Analysis of Total Residual Chlorine. Total Residual Chlorine – Standard Methods, 4500 Cl G-2000 C. Finding: The annual verification curve does not bracket the PT sample analyzed for 2014. Requirement: The concentrations of the calibration standards must bracket the concentrations of the samples analyzed. Ref: The NC WW/GW LC Approved Procedure for the Analysis of Total Residual Chlorine. Please submit a copy of the curve verification upon completion. Comment: The annual verification curve highest standard was 200 µg/L. The PT sample reported results were 204 µg/L. Recommend: It is recommended that the laboratory verify the internal calibration using the concentrations: 10 (or 15), 20, 50, 200 and 400 µg/L. This will verify the analytical range used to measure Proficiency Testing (PT) samples, gel standards as well as environmental samples. D. Finding: The meter calibration time is not being documented. Requirement: The following must be documented in indelible ink whenever sample analysis is performed: Meter calibration time. Ref: The NC WW/GW LC Approved Procedure for the Analysis of Total Residual Chlorine. IV. PAPER TRAIL INVESTIGATION: The paper trail consisted of comparing original records (e.g., laboratory benchsheets, logbooks, etc.) and contract lab reports to Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) submitted to the North Carolina Division of Water Resources. Data were reviewed for July and August, 2014. No transcription errors were detected. It appears the facility is doing a good job of accurately transcribing data. Page 3 #5059 Bladenboro WWTP V. CONCLUSIONS: Correcting the above-cited findings and implementing the recommendation will help this lab to produce quality data and meet certification requirements. The inspector would like to thank the staff for its assistance during the inspection and data review process. Please respond to all findings Report prepared by: Tonja Springer Date: December 5, 2014 Report reviewed by: Nick Jones Date: December 11, 2014