NC0021971_Wasteload Allocation_19940803

�f1bAc� - - �D--- -=y Drainage Area (M12): 0.3 Average Streamflow (cfs): 0.4
I �3� NPDES WASTE LO s7e10 (cfs): 0.0 w7010 (cts): 0.0 30Q2 (cfs): 0.0
'PERMIT NO.: NCO021971
pERNIITTEE NAME; Louis Dreyfus Energy
FACUM NAME: Southeast Terminal
Facility Status: _ Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity:
Minor
Indeterminant
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow):
Comments:
0%
j�•Mu�.-\og�y+toJ.rarriLOar�.e- tS•t-G+.es�ri�t.xal: �••„
�1. i1v..�. �- �- S�orrrl.�•r �t-a.�-rr.'�
RECEIVING STREAM: an taaurrted tributary to Paw Creek
Class: C
Sub -Basin: 03-08-34
Reference USGS Quad: F15SW (please attach)
County; Mecklenburg
Regional Office:_ Mooresville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 11/30/94 Treatment Plant Class:
Classification changes within three miles:
Requested by:,
Susan
Y
Date; 2/8/94
Prepared by: Date:(Ar,-vrrr. lg»4
Reviewed by: 9U
-C>BDk
Outfall 001
Annual Acute [Fathead Minnow] 24 hr. Toxicity Test —�
Mon. Avg. Daily Max. Frequency
Flaw (MGD) variable variable
Oil and Grease (mgft 45 2/month
pH (SU): 6-9 2/month
Settleable Solids (m1A): nr nr
TSS (mg/1): 45 2/month
Tubidity (NTU) 50 2/month
Benzene (µgA): 71.4
Toluene (µg/I): 11
Xylene (µgA): monitor on sane schedule as whole effluent toxicity last
MTBE (µV): monitor on same schedule as whale effluent toxicity lest
Ethylbenzene (µg/l): monitor on sane schedule as whole effluent toxicity lest
Lead ' A : monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity lest
'montor T leaded fuels are stored
The discharge shall not cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTU. If the
turbididly exceeds these levels due to natural background conditions, the discharge level cannot
cause any increase in the turbidity of the receiving water.
Outfall 002 through Outfall 008
Episodic Acute [Fathead Minnow] 24 hr. Toxicity TesYik
Mon. Avg. Daily Max. Frequency
Flow (MM)
variable variable
Oil and Grease (mg/I):
45 2/month
pH (SU):
6-9 2/month
TSS (mg/1):
45 2/month
Tubidity (NTU)
50 2/month
Benzene (µg/I):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Toluene (µg/1):
moo itor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Xylene (µgA):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
MTBE (µg/1):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Ethylbenzene (µg/I):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Lead ' fugA):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
'monar i leaded fuels are stored
'• The 6scharge shall net cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTU If the
lurbidicity exceeds these levels due to natural background conditions, the discharge level cannot
cause any increase in the turbidly of the receiving water.
Outfall 001
All volumes of wastewater leaving the facility must be monitored. It continuous monitoring is not
feasible, than the discharger shall record the approximate times that discharge began and ended,
Ethyl benzene with the sand Xyyllemusing as flow n EPA approved method tot the time of effluorit ga detectionI leveling l at least 1 ppb. Also
recommend monitoring for methyl ten -butyl ether (MTBE) and lead, if leaded fuels are stored, using
an EPA approved method. This monitoring should be performed at the same lime that the whole
effluent toxicity test sample is taken annual)'y A reopener clause should be placed in the permit to
allow limits to be placed on toxicants should the facility fail its whole effluent toxicity lest.
Special Instructions or Conditions Outtall(s) 002 - 008
All volumes of wastewater leaving the facility must be monitored. If continuous monitoring is not
feasible, then the discharger shall record the approximate times that discharge began and ended,
along with the instantaneous flow at the time of effluent sampling Sampling for Benzene, Toluene,
Ethyl benzene and Xylene using an EPA appmved method to a detection level of at least 1 ppb. Also
recommend monitoring for methyl tan -butyl ether (MTBE) and lead, a leaded fuels are stored, using
an EPA approved method This monitoring should be performed during the first five discrete
discharge events, and annually thereafter. A reopener clause should be placed in the permit to allow
limits to be placed on loxicants should the facility fad as whole effluent toxicity test

lk
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Regl.g bEPT. 0;736
...mac I,e
FacilityName:
Louis Dreyfus
ENVIRONMENT, HEAL NMr
NPDES No.:
NCO021971
& NATURAL RESOURC
Att7R,
Type of Waste:
Industrial - 100%
Facility Status:
Existing
MAY 11 19QA
MAY r
Permit Status:
Renewal
Receiving Stream:
unnamed tributary to Paw
Creek
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MA
Iff 91WR0':
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
C
03-08-34
L'_ttolON
MHRESVILLE REGIONAL UNU M RiblAAl y rlyF
County:
Mecklenburg
Stream Characteristic:
Regional Office:
Mooresville ,Ok
USGS #
Requestor:
Robson
Date:
Date of Request:
2/8/94
Drainage Area (mi2):
0.3
TopoQuad:
F15SW
Summer 7Q 10 (cfs):
0.0
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
0.0
Average Flow (cfs):
0.4
30Q2 (cfs):
0.0
IWC (%):
100 %
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Note: eight outfalls exist at this facility. One WLA requested to ease tracking.
Note: benzene and toluene limits for outfall 001, due to high levels and Region request;
etheylbenzene and MTBE monitoring due to current SOP.
Turbididty levels excessive..., since this is a zero flow stream, effluent turbididty may well
represent background conditions for comparison. The levels submitted on the DMR's may
well represent violations.
PE2 SOP, -Ta7ST6 C.[.CDmmoNdccL f6c Ov?4A lla 00z-00$
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
Recommended bv:----i —
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment:
Regional Supervisor: _
Permits & Engineering:
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SUPPORT BY:
JUN 0 , 1994
1.rtv
'Es
..,ENT

TOXICS/CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Outfall 001
Flow (MGD)
Oil and Grease (mg/1):
pH (SU):
Settleable Solids (ml/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Tubidity ** (NTU)
Benzene (µg/1):
Toluene (µg/1):
Xylene (µg/l):
MTBE (µgft
Ethylbenzene (µg/1):
Lead * (µg/1):
Mon. Avg.
variable
30
0.1
Daily Max.
variable
60
6-9
0.2
Frequency
2/month
2/month
2/month
nr
50 2Jmonth
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
*monitor if leaded fuels are stored
** The discharge shall cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTU. If the turbididty exceeds these
levels due to natural background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity of the
receiving water.
Flow (MGD)
Oil and Grease (mg/1):
pH (SU):
Settleable Solids (ml/l):
TSS (mg/1):
Tubidity (NTU)"
Benzene (µg/l):
Toluene (µg/1):
Xylene (µg/1):
MTBE (µg/1):
Ethylbenzene (µg/1):
Lead * (µg/1):
Outrall 001
Mon. Avg. Daily Max. Frequency WQ/EL
variable variable
45 2/month
6-9 2/month
nr nr
45 2/month
50 2/month
71.4
11
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
*monitor if leaded fuel�s,�re stored
** The discharge shall cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTU. If the turbididty exceeds these
levels due to natural background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity of the
receiving water.
Type of Toxicity Test: Acute / Fathead Minnow 24 hr
Monitoring Schedule: Annual
Instream Monitoring nr
Upstream Location
Downstream Location
_x_ Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

TOXICS/CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Recommended Limits nntrall
002
Mon. Avg. Daily Max. Frequency WQ/EL
Flow (MGD)
variable variable
Oil and Grease (mg/1):
45 2/month
pH (SU):
6-9 2/month
TSS (mg/1):
45 2/month
Tubidity (NTU)
50 2/month
Benzene (µg/1):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Toluene (µg/1):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Xylene (µg/1):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
MTBE (µg/1):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Ethylbenzene (µgft
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Lead * (µg/1):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
*monitor if leaded fuels are stored
** The discharge shall"cwse the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTU. If the turbididty exceeds these
levels due to natural background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity of the
receiving water.
Recomm
Mon. Avg. Daily Max. Frequency WQIFL
Flow (MGD)
variable variable
Oil and Grease (mg/1):
45 2lmonth
pH (SU):
6-9 2/month
TSS (mg/1):
45 2/month
Tubidity QM)
50 2/month
Benzene (µg/1):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Toluene (µg/1):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Xylene (µg/1):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
MTBE (µgft
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Ethylbenzene (µg/1):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Lead * (µg/1):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
*monitor if leaded fuels are stored
** The discharge shall 'cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTU. If the turbididty exceeds these
levels due to natural background conditions, the discharge level canna cause any increase in the turbidity of the
receiving water.
Recommended Limits
Mon. Avg. Daily Max. Frequency WQ/EL
Flow (MGD)
variable variable
Oil and Grease (mg/1):
45 2/month
pH (SU):
6-9 2/month
TSS (mg/1):
45 2/month
Tubidity (NTU)
50 2/month
Benzene (11g/1):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Toluene (µgft
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Xylene (µg/1):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
MTBE (µg/1):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Ethylbenzene (µgft
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Lead * (µg/1):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
*monitor if leaded fuels are stored
** The discharge shall'cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTU. If the turbididty exceeds these
levels due to natural background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity of the
receiving water.

TOXICS/CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Recommended Limits Outran
nos
Mon. Avg. Daily Max. Frequency WQ/EL.
Flow (MGD)
variable variable
Oil and Grease (mg/1):
45 2/month
pH (SU):
6-9 2/month
TSS (mg/1):
45 2/month
Tubidity (NTU)
50 21rnonth
Benzene (µg/1):
monitor during fast five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Toluene (µg/1):
monitor during fast five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Xylene (µg/1):
monitor during fast five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
MTBE (µg/1):
monitor during fast five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Ethylbenzene (µg/1):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Lead * (µg/1):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
*monitor if leaded fuels are stored
** The discharge shall cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTU. If the turbididty exceeds these
levels due to natural background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity of the
receiving water.
Recommended Limits Outfan
om
Mon. Avg. Daily Max. Frequency WQ/EL
Flow (MGD)
variable variable
Oil and Grease (mg/1):
45 2/month
pH (SU):
6-9 Vrnonth
TSS (mg/1):
45 2/month
Tubidity (NTU)
50 2/month
Benzene (µg/1):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Toluene (µg/1):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Xylene (µg/l):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
MTBE (µg/1):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Ethylbenzene (µg/l):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Lead * (µg/1):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
*monitor if leaded fuels are stored
** The discharge shall cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTU. If the unbididty exceeds these
levels due to natural background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity of the
receiving water.
Recommended Limits Oatfan
007
Mon. Avg. Daily Max. Frequency WQ/EL
Flow (MGD)
variable variable
Oil and Grease (mg/1):
45 2/month
pH (SU):
6-9 2/month
TSS (mg/1):
45 Vnionth
Tubidity WM)
50 2/month
Benzene (µg/1):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Toluene (µg/1):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Xylene (µg/l):
monitor during fast five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
MTBE (µg/1):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Ethylbenzene (µg/1):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Lead * (µg/1):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
*monitor if leaded fuels are stored
** The discharge shall cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTU. If the turbididty exceeds these
levels due to natural background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity of the
receiving water.

TOXICS/CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Recommended Limits Ontfall009
Mon. Avg. Daily Max. Freque-my WQ/EL
Flow (MGD)
variable variable
OR and Grease (mg/1):
45 2/month
pH (SU):
6-9 2/month
TSS (mg/1):
45 2/month
Tubidity (NTU)
50 2/month
Benzene (µg/l):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Toluene (µg/1):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Xylene (lt.g/1):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
MTBE (lig/1):
monitor during first five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Ethylbenzene (lig/1):
monitor during fast five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
Lead * (µg/1):
monitor during fast five discrete discharge events and annually thereafter
*monitor if leaded fuels are stored
** The discharge shall cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTU. If the urrbididty exceeds these
levels due to natural background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity of the
receiving water.
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDMONS
Suecial Instructions or Conditions Outfall 001
All volumes of wastewater leaving the facility must be monitored. If continuous monitoring is not feasible, then the
discharger shall record the approximate times that discharge began and ended, along with the instantaneous flow at the
time of effluent sampling. Sampling for Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl benzene and Xylene using an EPA approved method to a
detection level of at least 1 ppb. Also recommend monitoring for methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) and lead, if leaded fuels
are stored, using an EPA approved method. This monitoring should be performed at the same time that the whole effluent
toxicity test sample is taken annually. A reopener clause should be placed in the permit to allow limits to be placed on
toxicants should the facility fail its whole effluent toxicity test.
RwRaMmUrmirmarn a oiaTi a 61W.119111 I I:
All volumes of wastewater leaving the facility must be monitored. If continuous monitoring is not feasible, then the
discharger shall record the approximate times that discharge began and ended, along with the instantaneous flow at the
time of effluent sampling. Sampling for Benzine, Toluene, Ethyl benzene and Xylene using an EPA approved method to a
detection level of at least I ppb. Also recommend monitoring for methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) and lead, if leaded fuels
are stored, using an EPA approved method. This monitoring should be performed during the first five discrete discharge
events, and annually thereafter. A reopener clause should be placed in the permit to allow limits to be placed on toxicants
should the facility fail its whole effluent toxicity test.
Explain exact pathway of discharge ( i.e. storm sewer to tributary, etc.)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

Facility Name Louis Dreyfus Energy Permit # NCO021971 Pipe # 001
ACUTE TOXICITY MONITORING (ANNUAL)
The permittee shall conduct annual toxicity tests using protocols defined as definitive in E.P.A. Documet
600/4-85/013 entitled "The Acute Toxicity of Effluents to Freshwater and Marine Organisms." The
monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas) 24 hour static test, using of
collected as a single grab sample. Effluent samples for self -monitoring purposes must be obtained belov
waste treatment. The perrnittee will conduct one test annually, with the annual period beginning in Janua
the calendar year of the effective date of the permit. The annual test requirement must be performed and
reported by June 30. If no discharge occurs by June 30, notification will be made to the Division by this
Toxicity testing will be performed on the next discharge event for the annual test requirement.
The parameter code for this test is TAE6C. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit
condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was perform
using the appropriate parameter code. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the folio,
address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Rd.
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical
measurements performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response dat
Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorit
employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit ma
re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test. Failure to sub:
suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10
0.0 cfs
Permitted Flow
n/a MGD
IWC
100 %
Basin & Sub -basin 03-08-34
Receiving Stream
ut Paw Creek
County
Mecklenburg
AAM Fathead 24 Version 10191
Recommended by:
Date 6 mov. Lwti

Facility Name Louis Dreyfus Permit # NC0021971 Pipe(s) # 002 - 008
ACUTE TOXICITY MONITORING (EPISODIC)
The pemrittee shall conduct FIVE acute toxicity tests using protocols defined as definitive in
E.P.A. Document 600/4-85/013 entitled "The Acute Toxicity of Effluents to Freshwater and
Marine Organisms." The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead Minnow (Pimephales
promelas) 24 hour static test, using effluent collected as a single grab sample. Effluent samples
for self -monitoring purposes must be obtained below all waste treatment. Sampling and
subsequent testing will occur during the first five discrete discharge events after the effective date
of this permit. After monitoring of the first five toxicity tests, the permittee will conduct one test
annually, with the annual period beginning in January of the next calendar year. The annual test
requirement must be performed and reported by June 30. If no discharge occurs by June 30,
notification will be made to the Division by this date. Toxicity testing will be performed on the
next discharge event for the annual test requirement.
The parameter code for this test is TAE6C. All toxicity testing results required as part of this
permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Form (MR-1) for the month in which it
was performed, using the appropriate parameter code. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is
to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Rd.
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual
chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream,
this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test.
Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10
0.0 cfs
Permitted Flow variable MGD
[WC
100 %
Basin & Sub -basin
03-08-34
Receiving Stream
ut Paw Creek
County
Mecklenburg
EAM Fathead 24 Version 10191
Recommended by!t---- -
FarrcU Ke g6

Pegs 1
Note for Marcia Toler-McCullen
From: Dave Goodrich
Date: Sun, Jul 31, 1994 10:01 AM
Subject: RE: WLAs in region
To: Carla Sanderson
Cc: Marcia Toler-McCullen
All WLA's were received and were accidentally kept in the permit files. This was my fault.
They came in during a cutoff period in late May/early June when I was pushing everyone
hard to get as many permits as possible to notice. I made the decision to allow some folks to
draft permits directly from the fact sheet and told them to put the fact sheet in Marcia's box
after the draft was completed. I know this is not normal procedure but I felt it was necessary
at the time. I gathered together the three fact sheets and placed them in Marcia's box today. I
assure you I am NOT continuing this practice and I apologize for any confusion it caused.
From: Carla Sanderson on Wed, Jul 13, 1994 8:59 AM
Subject: WLAs in region
To: Dave Goodrich
I got a call from Mike P. this morning about three WLAs they know they sent back but are on
the >45 day list sent to the region.
1. Precedent-36871
2. Star Enterprise-22187
3. Louis Dreyfus Energy-21971
Do you know anything about these. Did any go to GP?
Please let me know and I will get Marcia to change the log.
Thanks!

Facility Name: Louis Dreyfus Energy - Southeast Terminal
Permit Number: NCO021971
Engineer: Robson
Subbasln:
Receiving Stream:
USGS quad #:
Request Number:
Date:
Expiration date:
Existing WLA checked:
x
Staff Report:
x
Topo checked:
x
USGS Flows confirmed:
PIRF / APAMS:
nr
IWC Spreadsheet:
x
Stream Ciass'rfication:
x
Nutrient Sensitivity:
x
instream Data:
x
Brief of WLA Analysis
Previous WLA's
1984: permitted with Oil & Grease and pH limits under the name Union Oil Co. of California
1989: renewed with Setteable Solids limits, Turbididty and Lead limits as well as Episodic Acute Toxicity test and
benzene, toluene, and xylene monitoring in conjunction with the tox test, under the name Unocal - Southeast
Terminal name changed again in 1992 and 1993, with Lousi Dreyfus being the current permittee name.
I talked with P & E about the eight outfalls for this facility. They requested I keep this as one WLA request to make
tracking easier, ( and so that none of the recommendations get lost). Per Region request, and P & E concurrence, I will
apply Benzene and Toluene limits to all outfalls, (with monitoring for ethylbenzene, xylene, and lead) but only outtall 001
will recieve a continuation of their toxicity test requirement, (it will now be an annual requirement).
DMR's
Turbidity often exceeding 50 NTU. Since this is a zero flow stream, this may constitute a violation; no up and downstream
monitoring was performed to assess this against.
Turbidity has continued to be a problem for this facility: I will note this on the Fact Sheet for Region comment.
Oil & Grease have also had violations.
Toxicity Tests
Facility has a long record of either passing or no significant LC50 at greater than 100 %
Ve M.7
MA--v ..-. 4'I. �
6kovlc '�qv,
ZS he, «a�•. +.qr. M� LC �...vl„ f 5�
Parameter
Quantity Detected
Month
comments...
Benzene
< 1 µg/I
3/22/94
standard 71 A µgA [C classification]
< 10 µgA
8/20/93
6/14/93
<1 µg/l
6/15/92
< 10 µgA
Toluene
<1 µg/I
3/22/94
standard 11 µgA [Cclassification]
<10 µgA
8/20193
6/14/93
<1 µg/I
6/15/92
< 10 MA
Xylene
<1 µg/I
3/22/94
no standard: monitor
< 10 µgA
8/20/93
342 119 /I
6/14/93
6 / 15192
< 10 µgA
Ethylbenzene
< 1 µg/I
3/22/94
n :monitor
µ9Ag
8/20/93
6/14/93
325Alfl
<10 µ
V
516(9 If
fPev-- 'TaIGPWYJs 4N
a�L1�nt; nw-To lu6Mts
o"/ 6itr A1]3 001—baS
/No�lV �p1L 11 Al rt'�
ZrA

�ta",
rlltd
1
"eao7 hbu�av�
�Mh�a(1 elnm�
(�'Ii�Modaa� cigH vdvz�ub
dlw WMa d hnadwo�
cwawoJ
7(fl'6�p(vyj/-fix -Mlss��Mm» cv oxx3
ilo "rz�lls
"JIVI 'tY °bnaM�x x
,
\ annveid
� 6ao
da X
�.. (•munuryld
x
x
wn310elid
YX Mlwead
Wrdion�d oy1JV x
x
••1 /acln�amwds
f.ntl
x 1
sm�y hNetlW°'o
EnNOI °�

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
AF��'
y
�
C)EHN11
May 26, 1993
Ms. Barbara Castleberry
Environmental Coordinator
Louis Dreyfus Energy
8800 Roswell Road
Atlanta, GA 30350-1843
Subject: NPDES No. NC0026247,
NC0021971, NCO068063
Louis Dreyfus Energy
BP Oil Terminal
Permit Modification Requests
Guilford and Mecklenburg Counties
Dear Ms. Shaw:
In accordance with Louis Dreyfus Energy's request originally dated June 4, 1992, we
are forwarding herewith the subject permits. The only changes in these permits are in name
and ownership as outlined in a letter from Mr. Robert H. Mitchell, Jr. dated November 20,
1992. We also updated V— permits to current DEM regulations. These permits are issued
pursuant to i`. requs! r ;rats of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the
Memorandum of a.a aomeni between North Carolina and the U. S. Environmental Protection
Agency dated Decembor 6, 1983.
If any paM;, rn�' SLID- nt! n', frequencies or sampling requirements contained in these
permits are unacceNtroio to ~di, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written
request within thirty !.30 days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the
form of a written pefitin n, r(�Yiforinieq to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes,
and filed with the Offics of Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer 27447, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27611 7447. Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Please take notice that these permits are not transferable. Part II, EA. addresses the
requirements to be followed to case of change in ownership or control of these discharges.
These permits do not affect the legal requirement to obtain other permits which may be
required by the Division of Environmental Management or permits required by the Division of
Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental
permit that may be required.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Page 2
May 26, 1993
Louis Dreyfus Energy
If you have any questions concerning these permits, please contact Susan Robson at telephone
number 919/733-5083.
cc: Mr. Jim Patrick, EPA
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Mooresville Regional Office
Compliance
Central Files
Technical Support Branch
Kim Brantley
Si rely,
I
Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
Director
+i RECEIVED
MAY ? 8 IQ03
TECHMal. SUPPORT BRANCH

SEP 0 1 1992
TECHNICAL SUPPORT BRANCH
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Na+al Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27626.0535
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
August 21, 1992
Mr. Robert H. Mitchell, Jr.
Louis Dreyfus Energy Corp.
8800 Roswell Road Suite 200
Atlanta, GA 30350-1843
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
Acting Director
Subject: NPDES No. NCO021971
NC0068063, NCO026247
Louis Dreyfus Energy Corp.
formerly issued to
UNOCAL, Inc.
Guilford and Mecklenburg Counties
Dear Mr. Mitchell:
In accordance with your request received July 28, 1992, we are forwarding herewith
the subject permits now issued to the Louis Dreyfus Energy Corp. The only changes in these
permits are in name and ownership as well as update the permit to current DEM regulations.
These permits is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-
215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U. S. Environmental
Protection Agency dated December 6, 1983.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in these
permits are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written
request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the
form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150E of the North Carolina General Statutes,
and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer 27447, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27611-7447. Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Please take notice that these permits is not transferable. Part II, EA. addresses the
requirements to be followed in case of change in ownership or control of this discharge.
These permits does not affect the legal requirement to obtain other permits which may
be required by the Division of Environmental Management or permits required by the Division
of Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental
permit that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning these permits, please contact Susan Robson at
telephone number 919/733-5083.
Sincerely,
�✓ A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.
cc: Mr. Jim Patrick, EPA
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Mooresville Regional Office
Compliance
Central Files
Technical Support Branch
Kim Brantley

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor George T. Everett, Ph. D.
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary ector
March 28, 1990 e .
Mr. David R. Keasey
Unocal Refining & Marketing Division
Unocal Corporation
PO Box 4147
Atlanta, Georgia 30302
Dear Mr. Keasey:
MAR 2 7 1990
Subject: Modification to NPDES
Permit No. NCO021971
Unocal Corporation -Charlotte
Mecklenburg County
I BRANCH
The Division of Environmental Management is forwarding herewith a modification to the
subject permit. This modification is to replace the 48-hour LC50 Ceriodaphnia toxicity
requirement with a 24-hour LC50 Fathead Minnow toxicity requirement since this latter toxicity
test is more appropriate for facilities of the subject type which have infrequent and relatively small
discharges.
A revised Part III, Condition G is attached and should be inserted into your NPDES
permit. Please discard the old Part III, Condition G.
All other terms and conditions contained in the original permit remain unchanged and in full
effect. This modification is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute
143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency dated December 6, 1983. This permit modification becomes
effective immediately.
If this decision is unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon
written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the
form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes,
and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer 11666, Raleigh, North
Carolina, 27604. Unless such a demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Mr. Dale Overcash at
telephone number [phone].
S' erely,^,',
ct
George T. Everett
Enclosure
cc: Central Files
Mooresville Re on Office
Mach
Mr. Jim Patrick, EPA

Part Iii
Permit No. NC0021971
G. ACUTE TOXICITY TESTING REQUIREMENT
Fathead Minnow 24 hr - Monitoring (Annual) for Episodic Events
The permittee shall conduct FIVE acute toxicity tests using protocols defined
in E.P.A. Document 600/4-85/013 entitled "The Acute Toxicity of Effluents to
Freshwater and Marine Organisms". The monitoring shall be performed as a
Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas) 24 hour static test, using effluent
collected as a single grab sample. Effluent samples for self -monitoring
purposes must be obtained below all waste treatment. Sampling and subsequent
testing will occur during the first five discrete discharge events after the
effective date of this permit. After monitoring of the first five toxicity
tests, the permittee will conduct one test annually, with the annual period
beginning in January of the next calendar year. The annual test requirement
must be performed and reported by June 30. If no discharge occurs by June 30,
notification will be made to the Division by this date. Toxicity testing will
be performed on the next discharge event for the annual test requirement.
The parameter code for this test is TAE6C. All toxicity testing results
required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the
appropriate parameter code. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be
sent to the following address:
Attention:
Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting
chemical/physical measurements performed in association with the toxicity
tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the
effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed
for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests
performed by the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management indicate
potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be reopened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document,
such as minimum control organism survival and appropriate environmental
controls, shall constitute an invalid test. Failure to submit suitable test
results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements.

CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Certified No.
P 095 425 894
Dear Mr. Eagleson:
P
Unocal Refining & Marketing Division
Unocal Corporation
P.O. Box 4147 ;
Piaaff-
Atlanta, Georgia 30302 J
Telephone [phone]
!i
{- >
UM0004 1.
March 9, 1990
F. Si.C,q u
090'
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and
Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Attn: Mr. Ken W. Eagleson
Assistant Water Quality Section Chief
REVISION OF BIOMONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Southeast Terminal (Charlotte)
NPDES No. NC0021971, Mecklenburg County
Southeast Terminal (Greensboro)
NPDES No. NC0026247, Guilford County
I am writing to confirm that the biomonitoring requirements contained in the NPDES
permits for the subject facilities are to modified.
During a recent telephone conversation with your office I was informed that the current
monitoring protocol, which specifies a 48-hour LC50 determination using Ceriodaphnia
dubia as the test organism, is not now considered an appropriate test method. It was
indicated that this test is now considered inappropriate for facilities which have only
infrequent and relatively small discharges.
The monitoring requirement that was considered to be more appropriate was cited as a 24-
hour L.C50 test utilizing Fathead Minnows (Pimephales promelas) as the test species. It was
indicated that we should proceed with the use of the new biomonitoring procedure for
future testing, and that the NPDES permits for both of the facilities in question would be
modified.
Unocal is to change the biomonitoring program at the Greensboro and Charlotte Southeast
Terminals. At each facility we will arrange to have five sequential discharges tested with
the new procedure, and will continue with annual biomonitoring thereafter.

I was advised during the telephone conversation that the NPDES permits for the subject
facilities would be modified to show the changes described above, and that Unocal could
proceed immediately to implement the changes. If there is any reason that we should wait
to make the monitoring changes, please let me know as soon as possible. Unless we are
advised otherwise, we will proceed with the new monitoring program.
If you require additional information, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone].
Very truly yours,
David R. Keasey
Manager
Marketing Environmental
DRK/bmc
cc: R. E. Van Deusen
C. E. Wells
S. B. Guin