NC0021971_Permit Issuance_20150330

OUR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
Mr. Greg Moore
Blanchard Terminal Company, LLC
539 South Main Street
Findlay, OH 45840-3229
Dear Mr. Moore:
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
March 30, 2015
Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit NCO021971
Blanchard Terminal Company,
LLC Charlotte Terminal
Mecklenburg County
The Division of Water Resources (the Division) hereby issues the attached NPDES permit for the subject
facility. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1
and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency dated October 15, 2007, or as subsequently amended.
The Division understands that you intend to make significant changes to your facility in the near future.
Therefore, we have made the following updates to your previous permit:
• added updates to facility map, outfall locations and parameter codes
• added new Outfall 010 with effluent limitations and monitoring requirements in Section A. (2.)
• added monthly Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) monitoring with limit.
We have made the following updates to the final permit:
• added the following statement to footnote 5 for TRC: Limit and monitoring only apply if the
facility uses chlorinated water for hydrostatic testing
• added instream turbidity monitoring that applies if effluent turbidity exceeds 50NTU.
Proposed federal regulations require electronic submittal of all discharge monitoring reports (DMRs) and
specify that, if a state does not establish a system to receive such submittals, then permittees must submit
DMRs electronically to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Division anticipates that these
regulations will be adopted and is beginning implementation.
The requirement to begin reporting discharge monitoring data electronically using the NC DWR's
Electronic Discharge Monitoring Report (eDMR) intemet application has been added to your NPDES
permit. [See Special Condition A. (5.)] For information on eDMR, registering for eDMR and obtaining
an eDMR user account, please visit the following web page:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/admin/bog/ipu/edmr.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St Ralegh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: 919b07-630M Fax:919M7-64921Customer Service:1-877-623-6748
Internet:: www.ncwater.org
An Equal OppmtunityWffinnative Action Employer

Mr. Moore
March 30, 2015
Page 2 of 2
or information on EPA's proposed NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule, please visit the following web site
http://www2.epa.gov./compliance/proposed-npdes-electronic-reporting-rule.
If any parts, measurement frequencies, or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing, upon written request submitted within thirty
(30) days after receiving this letter. Your request must take the form of a written petition conforming to
Chapter 150B of North Carolina General Statutes, and you must file it with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714. Unless such a demand is
made, this permit shall remain final and binding.
Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division may
require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal
requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Resources or any
other Federal, State, or Local governmental permits that may be required.
If you have questions, or if we can be of further service, please contact Derek Denard at
[[e-mail]] or call [phone].
esp tfully,
S. Jay Zimmerman, Direct
Division of Water Resources, NC NR
Enclosure: NPDES Permit NC0021971 (Issuance Final)
hc: Central Files
NPDES Program Files
MRO Files/ Attn: Michael Parker
Mecklenburg County DEH
ec: Aquatic Toxicology Unit, Susan Meadows [[e-mail]]
Greg Moore, Blanchard Terminal Company, LLC [[e-mail]]
Thomas G. Leigh, Senor HES Professional, Marathon Petroleum Company LP
[tgleigh@marathonpetroleum. com]
Terry L. Swick, Terminal Manager, Marathon Petroleum Company LP [[e-mail]]

Permit NCO021971
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
(NPDES)
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards
and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management
Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Blanchard Terminal Company, LLC
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from outfalls located at the
Blanchard Terminal Company, LLC — Charlotte Terminal
7401 Old Mount Holly Road, Charlotte 28214
Mecklenburg County
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Paw Creek, subbasin 03-08-34 within the
Catawba River Basin in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other
conditions set forth in Parts I,11, III and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective July 1, 2015.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on June 30, 2020.
Signed this day March 30, 2015.
ay Zimmerman, Director
Division of Water Resources
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Page 1 of 10

Permit NCO021971 ,
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby
revoked, and as of this issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective.
Therefore, the exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit
conditions, requirements, terms, and provisions described herein.
Blanchard Terminal Company, LLC
is hereby authorized to:
1. continue to operate a Surface -Water Pollution Prevention System for stormwater in proximity to
aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) providing surface bulk -storage of petroleum hydrocarbon
fuels in excess of one million gallons, and fuel -truck loading racks; utilizing
• secondary -containment basins (for ASTs)
• point -source discharge valve (normally closed — manually controlled)
• retention pond (Outfall 010)
located at the Blanchard Terminal Company, LLC — Charlotte Terminal, 7401 Old Mount Holly
Road, near Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, and
2. discharge from said treatment works at a point, designated on the attached map, via Outfalls 009
and 010 into an unnamed tributary to Paw Creek [stream segment I 1-124], a waterbody currently
classified C within subbasin 03-08-34 of the Catawba River Basin.
Page 2 of 10

Permit NCO021971
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
[15A NCAC 02B .0400 et seq., 02B .0500 et seq.]
Beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to
discharge from Outfall 009. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored' by the Permittee as
specified below:
EFFLUENT
CHARACTERISTIC
LIMITS,
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS I
Monthly
Daily
Measurement
Sample Type
Sample
[Parameter Codes]
Avera a
g
Maximum
Fre uenc
9 y
Location Z
Flow 3 MGD
50050
Episodic
3
E
Total Suspended Solids (TSS) (m
00530
45.0 m
Monthly
Grab
E
Oil and Grease 4
00556
Monthly
Grab
E
Total Residual Chlorine TRC 5 ( )
50060
17 5
Monthly
Grab
E
6 (NTil)
Turbidity
00070
50 NTU
Monthly
Grab
E
Turbidity TU
00070
Monthly
Grab
U & D
Benzene ( g/L)
34030
Quarterly
Grab
E
Toluene )
34010
Quarterly
Grab
E
Ethyl Benzene µ )
34371
Quarterly
Grab
E
X lene
81551
Quarterly
Grab
E
Ethanol )
77004
Quarterly
Grab
E
Naphthalene 8
34696
Monthly
Grab
E
9
Acute Toxicity µ )
TAE6C
Annually
Y
Grab
E
Footnotes:
1. No later than 270 days from the effective date of this permit, the permittee shall begin submitting
discharge monitoring reports electronically using the Division's eDMR application system
[see A. (5)].
2. E = Effluent; I = Influent; U = upstream at least 50 feet from the outfall; D = downstream at least 50
feet from the outfall.
3. Flow - During periods of no flow, the Permittee shall submit a monthly Discharge Monitoring
Report (DMR) indicating "No discharge." Flow must be measured with each discharge event and
may be monitored in one of four ways:
a) measure flow continuously;
b) calculate flow based on total rainfall per area draining to the outfall; exclude built -
upon area [See Section A. (4.)]; best method for facilities with large runoff -
collection ponds;.
c) estimate flow at 20-minute intervals during the entire discharge event; or
d) report flow based on discharge pump logs.
4. Oil and Grease - Where possible, the grab sample for oil and grease should be skimmed from
the surface of a quiescent zone.
Page 3 of 10

Permit NCO02197J
5. Limit and monitoring only apply if the facility uses chlorinated water for hydrostatic
testing. The Division shall consider TRC effluent values reported below 50 µg/L to be
compliant with the permit. However, the Permittee shall continue to record and submit all
values reported by a North Carolina -certified laboratory method (including field certified), even
if these values fall below 50µg/L.
6. Turbidity - Effluent shall not cause receiving stream turbidity to exceed 50 NTU. If receiving
stream background turbidity exceeds 50 NTU, effluent shall not cause this background value to
increase.
7. Upstream and downstream Turbidity — Monitoring only applies if effluent turbidity exceeds
50 NTU. Upstream and downstream monitoring shall be used to determine occurrence of
stream impacts.
8. Naphthalene - Monitoring requirement applies to facilities that store, or historically stored,
diesel or other heavy fuels on site.
9. Acute Toxicity (Fathead Minnow, 24-hour P/F), Annual [see Special Condition A. (1)]. .
Permittee shall sample for acute toxicity and BTEX concurrently.
Comments:
The Permittee shall discharge no floating solids or foam visible in other than trace amounts.
The Permittee shall discharge no tank solids, tank bottom water, or the rag layer.
There shall be no direct discharge of tank (or pipe) contents following hydrostatic testing unless
benzene concentration is less than 71.4 µg/L and toluene concentration is less than I I µg/L.
Page 4 of 10

Permit NCO021971
A. (2.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
[15A NCAC 02B .0400 et seq., 02B .0500 et seq.]
Beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to
discharge from Outfall 010. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored' by the Permittee as
specified below:
EFFLUENT
CHARACTERISTIC
LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS I
Monthly
Daily
Measurement
Sam T e
le
p yp
Sample
[Parameter Codes]
Average
Maximum
Frequency
Location Z
Flow 3 (MGD)
50050
Episodic
3
E
Total Suspended Solids (TSS) (m
00530
45.0 m
Monthly
Grab
E
Oil and Grease 4
00556
Monthly
Grab
E
Total Residual Chlorine TRC 5 ( )
50060
17 5
Monthly
Grab
E
6
Turbidity
00070
50 NTU
Monthly
Grab
E
Turbidity 7 (NTU)
00070
Monthly
Grab
U & D
Benzene µg/L
34030
Quarterly
Grab
E
Toluene µg/L)
34010
Quarterly
Grab
E
Ethyl Benzene
34371
Quarterly
Grab
E
X lene )
81551
Quarterly
Grab
E
Ethanol )
77004
Quarterly
Grab
E
Naphthalene S µ)
3469 6
Monthly
Grab
E
Acute Toxicity 9 µ )
TAE6C
Annually
Grab
E
Footnotes:
1. No later than 270 days from the effective date of this permit, the permittee shall begin submitting
discharge monitoring reports electronically using the Division's eDMR application system
[see A. (5)].
2. E = Effluent; I = Influent; U = upstream at least 50 feet from the outfall; D = downstream at least 50
feet from the outfall.
3. Flow - During periods of no flow, the Permittee shall submit a monthly Discharge Monitoring
Report (DMR) indicating "No discharge." Flow must be measured with each discharge event and
may be monitored in one of four ways:
a) measure flow continuously;
b) calculate flow based on total rainfall per area draining to, the outfall; exclude built -
upon area [See Section A. (4.)]; best method for facilities with large runoff -
collection ponds;.
c) estimate flow at 20-minute intervals during the entire discharge event; or
e) report flow based on discharge pump logs.
4. Oil and Grease - Where possible, the grab sample for oil and grease should be skimmed from
the surface of a quiescent zone.
Page 5 of 10

Permit NCO021971 ,
5. Limit and monitoring only apply if the facility uses chlorinated water for hydrostatic
testing. The Division shall consider TRC effluent values reported below 50 µg/L to be
compliant with the permit. However, the Permittee shall continue to record and submit all
values reported by a North Carolina -certified laboratory method (including field certified), even
if these values fall below 50µg/L.
6. Turbidity - Effluent shall not cause receiving stream turbidity to exceed 50 NTU. If receiving
stream background turbidity exceeds 50 NTU, effluent shall not cause this background value to
increase.
7. Upstream and downstream Turbidity — Monitoring only applies if effluent turbidity exceeds
50 NTU. Upstream and downstream monitoring shall be used to determine occurrence of .
stream impacts.
8. Naphthalene - Monitoring requirement applies to facilities that store, or historically stored,
diesel or other heavy fuels on site.
9. Acute Toxicity (Fathead Minnow, 24-hour P/F), Annual [see Special Condition A. (1)].
Permittee shall sample for acute toxicity and BTEX concurrently.
Comments:
The Permittee shall discharge no floating solids or foam visible in other than trace amounts.
The Permittee shall discharge no tank solids, tank bottom water, or the rag layer.
There shall be no direct discharge of tank (or pipe) contents following hydrostatic testing unless
benzene concentration is less than 71.4 µg/L and toluene concentration is less than 11 µg/L.
Page 6 of 10

Permit NCO021971
A. (3.) ACUTE TOXICITY MONITORING (ANNUAL)
[15A NCAC 02B .0500 et seq.]
The permittee shall conduct acute toxicity tests on an annual basis using protocols defined as definitive
in EPA Document EPA-821-R-02-012 entitled "Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents
and Receiving Waters to Freshwater and Marine Organisms." The monitoring shall be performed as a
Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas) 24 hour static test. Effluent samples for self -monitoring
purposes must be obtained during representative effluent discharge and shall be performed at the
NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all waste treatment processes.
The parameter code for Pimephales promelas is TAE6C. All toxicity testing results required as part of
this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Form (MR-1) for the month in which it
was performed, using the appropriate parameter code. Additionally, DWR Form AT-1 (original) is to be
sent to the following address:
Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Resources
Water Sciences Section/Aquatic Toxicology Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Water Sciences Section no later than 30
days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine
of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of
the waste stream.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re-
opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will
require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the
month of the initial monitoring.
Page 7 of 10

Permit NC0021971
A. (4.) FLOW MEASUREMENT RATIONAL [G.S. 143-215.1(b)]
The Rational uation: Q=KuCIA, where:
Q = flow (peak flow rate (cfs or m3/sec)
Ku = units conversation factor = 1.008 for U.S. standard units (usually ignored
because it is so close to 1), or 0.278 for SI units
C = dimensionless runoff coefficient for the watershed, loosely defined as the
ratio of runoff to rainfall
I = intensity of rainfall taken from the intensity -duration -frequency curves
for the specified design return period at the time of concentration, tc
(in/h or mm/h). tc = time of concentration (time after the beginning of
rainfall excess when all portions of the drainage basin are contributing
simultaneously to flow at the outlet).
A = area of tributary watershed (acres or km2)
The rational equation is used to calculate the runoff from a region, given:
• the runoff coefficient which accounts for infiltration and other potential
losses in the region,
• the rainfall intensity to the region,
• the time it takes for runoff to travel from the region's upper reaches to its
outlet, and the region's drainage area.
Page 8 of 10

Permit NC0021971
A. (5.) ELECTRONIC REPORTING OF DISCHARGE MONITORING
REPORTS [G.S. 143-215.1(b)]
Proposed federal regulations require electronic submittal of all discharge monitoring reports (DMRs)
and specify that, if a state does not establish a system to receive such submittals, then permittees must
submit DMRs electronically to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Division anticipates
that these regulations will be adopted and is beginning implementation in late 2013.
NOTE: This special condition supplements or supersedes the following sections within Part II of this
permit (Standard Conditions for NPDES Permits):
• Section B. (11.)
• Section D. (2.)
• Section D. (6.)
• Section E. (5.)
Signatory Requirements
Reporting
Records Retention
Monitoring Reports
1. Reporting (Supersedes Section D. (2.) and Section E. (5.) (a)1
Beginning no later than 270 days from the effective date of this permit, the permittee shall begin
reporting discharge monitoring data electronically using the NC DWR's Electronic Discharge
Monitoring Report (eDMR) internet application.
Monitoring results obtained during the previous month(s) shall be summarized for each month and
submitted electronically using eDMR The eDMR system allows permitted facilities to enter
monitoring data and submit DMRs electronically using the internet. Until such time that the state's
eDMR application is compliant with EPA's Cross -Media Electronic Reporting Regulation
(CROMERR), permittees will be required to submit all discharge monitoring data to the state
electronically using eDMR and will be required to complete the eDMR submission by printing,
signing, and submitting one signed original and a copy of the computer printed eDMR to the
following address:
NC DENR / DWR / Information Processing Unit
ATTENTION: Central Files / eDMR
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
If a permittee is unable to use the eDMR system due to a demonstrated hardship or due to the facility
being physically located in an area where less than 10 percent of the households have broadband
access, then a temporary waiver from the NPDES electronic reporting requirements may be granted
and discharge monitoring data may be submitted on paper DMR forms (MR 1, 1. 1, 2, 3) or
alternative forms approved by the Director. Duplicate signed copies shall be submitted to the
mailing address above.
Requests for temporary waivers from the NPDES electronic reporting requirements must be
submitted in writing to the Division for written approval at least sixty (60) days prior to the date the
facility would be required under this permit to begin using eDMR. Temporary waivers shall be valid
Page 9 of 10

Permit NCO021971
for twelve (12) months and shall thereupon expire. At such time, DMRs shall be submitted
electronically to the Division unless the permittee re -applies for and is granted a new temporary
waiver by the Division.
Information on eDMR and application for a temporary waiver from the NPDES electronic reporting
requirements is found on the following web page:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wg/admin/bog/ipu/edmr
Regardless of the submission method, the first DMR is due on the last day of the month following
the issuance of the permit or in the case of a new facility, on the last day of the month following the
commencement of discharge.
2. Si oatory Requirements [Supplements Section B (11) (b) and supersedes Section B (11) (d)1
All eDMRs submitted to the permit issuing authority shall be signed by a person described in Part 11,
Section B. (I 1.)(a) or by a duly authorized representative of that person as described in Part II,
Section B. (I 1)(b). A person, and not a position, must be delegated signatory authority for eDMR
reporting purposes.
For eDMR submissions, the person signing and submitting the DMR must obtain an eDMR user
account and login credentials to access the eDMR system. For more information on North
Carolina's eDMR system, registering for eDMR and obtaining an eDMR user account, please visit
the following web page:
http://i)ortal.ncdenr.or web/wq/adminibog/ipu/edmr
Certification. Any person submitting an electronic DMR using the state's eDMR system shall make
the following certification [40 CFR 122.22]. NO OTHER STATEMENTS OF CERTIFICATION
WILL BE ACCEPTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel
properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or
persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information,
the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility offnes and imprisonment for knowing violations. "
3. Records Retention [Supplements Section D. (6.)1
The permittee shall retain records of all Discharge Monitoring Reports, including eDMR
submissions. These records or copies shall be maintained for a period of at least 3 years from the
date of the report. This period may be extended by request of the Director at any time [40 CFR
122.41].
Page 10 of 10

Outfall010
Latitude: 35° 16' 35"
Longitude: 80' 55' 50"
Outfall 009
Latitude: 35' 16' 33"
Longitude: 80' 55' 53"
Mt Holly Rd
17 • ~ ,
asa—. • , e 1
y Wei
UT to Paw Creek
(flows south)
Blanchard Terminal Company LLC
Charlotte Terminal
7401 Old Mount Holly Road, Charlotte 28214
Receiving Stream: UT to Paw Creek Stream Segment: I1-124
Draina�eBasinBasin: Catawba River Basin Sob -Basin: 03-08-34
Stream Class: C HUC: 03050101
State Grid/USGS Ouad: FISSW/ Mt. Island Lake, ITC-
-
0
27
t Old Mt Holly Rd
Approximate
Facility Boundary
Paw Creek
rp"
(flows southwest)
Facility
Location
Scale 1:12,000
NOrth NPDES Permit NCO021971
Mecklenburg County

Denard, Derek
From: Denard, Derek
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 1:01 PM
To: 'Leigh, Thomas G. (MPC)'
Subject: Updated draft for NC0021971BIanchard Terminal Company LLC - Charlotte Terminal
Attachments: Derek C Denard.vd, NCO021971 Permit and EFF 2015 2.pdf
Tom,
Please find an updated draft for the subject permit. Please noted the addition of instream turbidity only if effluent is
>50 NTU and TRC monitoring footnote for monitoring on if hydrostatic test with chlorinated water occurs.
Sincerely,
Derek
f Derek C Denard
Emironmentw 5pxar�
NCDENR Dilsion of Water ft a wcr
Water qj" Permitting secficn
Compliance & ape ki d Permitting UrIt
(919)E07-6W7
derekdernard@mde 4m
1617 MA Sani=a Ce m,, Ratigh. W 270-1617
httpJ/porta0.n W w r.org,MabM�,rw9/Cr„'^pda
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
From: Leigh, Thomas G. (MPC)fmailto:tgleioh(&marathonpetroleum.comj
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 1:55 PM
To: Denard, Derek
Cc: Allocco, Marcia
Subject: RE: Quick Clarification on Draft Permit NCO021971 Blanchard Terminal Company LLC - Charlotte Terminal
• Thank you Derek. I just missed it. I am slipping up there on my reading ability.
• That would be good if the TRC for hydrostatic testing only. That would be the only time we would have any
possible chlorine present in the discharge.
Thank you again Tom
From: Denard, Derek fmailto:derek.denard(@ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 1:50 PM
To: Leigh, Thomas G. (MPC)
Subject: RE: Quick Clarification on Draft Permit NCO021971 Blanchard Terminal Company LLC - Charlotte Terminal
Tom,

The NPDES standard conditions Section D. 3. say once per year for flow meter calibration. The standard
conditions can be found on our website and will be attached to the final permit.
I may add something to the footnote about TRC for the final. Some W WTP that install UV and still have
Chlorination equipment not used have a special footnote to monitor only if Cl is used. Something similar could
be put in the TRC footnote for hydrostatic tests. Have to wait and see if my supervisor agrees.
Derek
Sent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy® Note 4.
-------- Original message --------
From: "Leigh, Thomas G. (MPC)" <tgleighQmarathonpetroleum.com>
Date: 02/18/2015 1:23 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: "Denard, Derek" <derek.denardAncdenr.gov>
Cc: "Allocco, Marcia" <marcia.alloccolal cl� denr.gov>
Subject: Quick Clarification on Draft Permit NCO021971 Blanchard Terminal Company LLC - Charlotte
Terminal
Derek:
Just a quick clarification on the Draft Permit.
1. Is the Total Residual Chlorine monthly requirement on when we conduct a hydrostatic test or is it each month
and the regular discharge?
2. We plan to install flow meters on both Outfalls. Is there a required or suggested calibration of the meters
listed in one of the NC Guidance or Rules that we can establish Protocol and Standard to make sure it meets the
Divisions requirements?
Let me know your thoughts. Thank you Tom
Thomas G. Leigh
Marathon Petroleum Company LP
Senior HES Professional
TT&R Environmental Compliance, Southern Region
Telephone: [phone] Extension 237
Cell Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Denard, Derek
From: Allocco, Marcia
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 2:13 PM
To: Denard, Derek
Subject: RE: Draft permit renewal NC0021971 Blanchard Terminal Company LLC-Charlotte
Terminal
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
That would be wonderful!!
-----Original Message -----
From: Denard, Derek
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 2:08 PM
To: Allocco, Marcia
Subject: RE: Draft permit renewal NC0021971 Blanchard Terminal Company LLC-Charlotte Terminal
Marcia,
Yes I can bring it up with the NPDES unit. I have to let John and maybe Joe look at my changes first. I'm thinking I may
apply this to other oil terminal permits I'm working on if its ok with folks here.
Derek
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
From: Allocco, Marcia
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 1:33 PM
To: Denard, Derek
Subject: RE: Draft permit renewal NC0021971 Blanchard Terminal Company LLC-Charlotte Terminal
Derek,
Your clarification of the turbidity requirements and upstream/downstream monitoring makes this requirement much
clearer to the permittee and helps the region with enforcement of the permit. Would it be possible for you to update
the permitting guidance document for bulk terminals so all permit writers have the same guidance? All other
requirements are much clearer; thanks!
Marcia

-----Original Message -----
From: Denard, Derek
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 12:26 PM
To: Allocco, Marcia
Subject: RE: Draft permit renewal NC0021971 Blanchard Terminal Company LLC-Charlotte Terminal
Marcia,
I made the corrections and some of the changes you suggested. I left TRC in the table and added a sentence to the
footnote. I also added up and down stream sampling for turbidity with a footnote. Adding another section for two
outfalls for hydrostatic tests seemed to make this permit too complicated in my opinion. I wanted to be consistent with
formatting I have used for others permits that simply made addendums to footnotes. I placed the bullet notes at the end
under the header "comments" to be consistent with other permits I have seen. I also assumed the point -source
discharge value applied to 009, but I did not want to limit the permittee if they planned on installing a similar valve to
outfall 010. Therefore, I omitted any reference to outfall 009. However, the retention pond was unique to outfall 010.
I will correct the factsheet. I believe I got PC-1 from BIMS (not sure as I am working from home today). I will have to
check with Steve Reid if BIMS in not up-to-date.
If you have any other comments, please let me know.
Thanks,
Derek
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
From: Allocco, Marcia
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 9:13 AM
To: Denard, Derek

Cc: Parker, Michael
Subject: RE: Draft permit renewal NC0021971 Blanchard Terminal Company LLC-Charlotte Terminal
Hi Derek,
Here are my comments regarding the draft permit for the Blanchard bulk terminal facility. If you have any questions
please let me know. I would like to discuss my comment regarding the turbidity testing noted below in blue with you
and possibly John in more detail since this is standard language in your bulk storage permitting guidance document and
any changes to it would affect multiple permits. As I note below, as written it does not give the regional office clear
guidance on enforcing this permit requirement.
Aboveground is commonly spelled as one word not two hyphenated words (above -ground)
On the Supplement to permit cover sheet page section 1 it specifically notes that Outfall 010 is for the retention
pond. I assume the point -source discharge valve is describing Outfall 009 so perhaps we should add this descriptor
On the Supplement to permit cover sheet page section 2 it notes "discharge from said treatment works at a point';
they will have two discharge points going forward so adjust to "at points designated on the attached map"
To aid in eDMR completion please add units of measure to the following parameters: flow, oil & grease, benzene,
toluene, ethyl benzene, xylene, ethanol and naphthalene
The parameter code for total suspended solids needs to be changed from 000530 to CO530
The parameter code for turbidity needs to be changed from 00076 to 00070
The bullets that appear below footnote 7 on page 3 appear to be related to this footnote (0) since there is no
space between the two lines. However, these bullets are related to general conditions of the permit or to discharges of
hydrostatic tank testing water. Add space between information and perhaps remove bullets. I would also suggest
separating the hydrostatic testing requirements and moving them into a separate section noted as A. (6.). since it
appears that all bullets are related to each other and there are separate and distinct permit requirements.

Since any discharges from Outfalls 009 or 010 would not contain chlorine as a pollutant unless the water originated
from hydrostatic tank testing I would suggest we remove the total residual chlorine monitoring from A.(1.) and associate
TRC monitoring requirements with discharges only of hydrostatic tank testing water (in suggested section A.(6.).
While I understand the turbidity footnote as written is taken directly from the bulk storage permitting guidance
document, as written it does not lend itself to easy enforcement by the regional office. The footnote does not clearly
tell the permittee that they need to conduct upstream and downstream turbidity monitoring to demonstrate they have
not raised the turbidity of the stream above 50 NTU. The question becomes does the regional office issue an NOV or
NOD if the permittee's effluent has a turbidity>50 NTU (since it is listed as a daily maximum limit) or do we defer that
decision until after we review any instream turbidity readings taken by the permittee? The permittee had exceedances
of 50 NTU in their effluent but no instream turbidity monitoring was performed so the regional office was unsure of
what enforcement actions to take due to the current wording of the footnote. Footnote #5 would be more effective if it
was rewritten so that the 50 NTU in the effluent is a trigger that requires upstream/downstream monitoring to
determine if any stream impacts occurred. Enforcement would then only occur if there were instream turbidity impacts
not just a daily maximum turbidity of 50 NTU were exceeded.
The factsheet notes that the facility is classified as PC-1. However, this classification was removed by TACU in 2012
since there is no physical/chemical treatment of the effluent.
The facility summary notes the facility is a minor "municipal" facility, which is incorrect.
The facility summary section notes the addition of outfall 011; this should be noted as outfall 010
Line 5 notes "storm water conveyance carrying stormwater"; the word "system" should be inserted between
conveyance and carrying
Outfall 009 should be noted at the end of the bulleted line that begins with "point -source discharge"...
Thanks for the opportunity to comment on the draft permit.
Regards,
Marcia

From: Denard, Derek
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 2:43 PM
To: Parker, Michael; Allocco, Marcia; Meadows, Susan; Reid, Steve
Subject: FW: Draft permit renewal NCO021971 Blanchard Terminal Company LLC-Charlotte Terminal
With factsheet.
From: Denard, Derek
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 2:42 PM
To:'[e-mail]'; Leigh, Thomas G. (MPC)
(tgleigh @marathonpetroleum.com<ma ilto:tgleigh@ma rathonpetroleum.com<mailto:tgleigh @ marathonpetroleum.com
%3cmailto:[e-mail]>>); '[e-mail]'
Cc: Parker, Michael; Allocco, Marcia; Meadows, Susan; Reid, Steve
Subject: Draft permit renewal NCO021971 Blanchard Terminal Company LLC-Charlotte Terminal
Please find the attached draft permit renewal for NCO021971 Blanchard Terminal Company LLC-Charlotte Terminal.
Concurrent with this notification, the Division will solicit public comment on this draft by publishing a notice in
newspapers having circulation in the general Mecklenburg County area, as required by the NPDES Program. Please
provide your comments, if any, to me via email [[e-mail]) or write to my attention care of DENR /
DWR / NPDES Program no later than March 20, 2015. Your written comments are welcome but not mandatory.
Following the mandatory 30-day public comment period, the Division will review all pertinent comments on your permit
draft, and take appropriate action prior to issuing your NPDES permit final. If you have questions concerning this draft,
please e-mail me or call my direct line [phone].
Sincerely,

Derek Denard
(Description: cid:[e-mail]4E8BOj
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.

Denard, Derek
From: Leigh, Thomas G. (MPC) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 1:55 PM
To: Denard, Derek
Cc: Allocco, Marcia
Subject: RE: Quick Clarification on Draft Permit NCO021971 Blanchard Terminal Company LLC -
Charlotte Terminal
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Thank you Derek. I just missed it. I am slipping up there on my reading ability.
That would be good if the TRC for hydrostatic testing only. That would be the only time we would have any
possible chlorine present in the discharge.
Thank you again Tom
From: Denard, Derek fmailto:derek.denardColncdenr.aovl
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 1:50 PM
To: Leigh, Thomas G. (MPC)
Subject: RE: Quick Clarification on Draft Permit NCO021971 Blanchard Terminal Company LLC - Charlotte Terminal
Tom,
The NPDES standard conditions Section D. 3. say once per year for flow meter calibration. The standard
conditions can be found on our website and will be attached to the final permit.
I may add something to the footnote about TRC for the final. Some WWTP that install UV and still have
Chlorination equipment not used have a special footnote to monitor only if Cl is used. Something similar could
be put in the TRC footnote for hydrostatic tests. Have to wait and see if my supervisor agrees.
Derek
Sent from my Sprint Samsung GalaxyV Note 4.
-------- Original message --------
From: "Leigh, Thomas G. (MPC)" <t 1g eieh(amarathonpetroleum.com>
Date: 02/18/2015 1:23 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: "Denard, Derek" <derek.denard(a)ncdenr.gov>
Cc: "Allocco, Marcia" <marcia.allocco(&ncdenr.gov>
Subject: Quick Clarification on Draft Permit NCO021971 Blanchard Terminal Company LLC - Charlotte
Terminal
Derek:
Just a quick clarification on the Draft Permit.
1. Is the Total Residual Chlorine monthly requirement on when we conduct a hydrostatic test or is it each month
and the regular discharge?

2. We plan to install flow meters on both Outfalls. Is there a required or suggested calibration of the meters
listed in one of the NC Guidance or Rules that we can establish Protocol and Standard to make sure it meets the
Divisions requirements?
Let me know your thoughts. Thank you Tom
Thomas G. Leigh
Marathon Petroleum Company LP
Senior HES Professional
TT&R Environmental Compliance, Southern Region
Telephone: [phone] Extension 237
Cell Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Denard, Derek
From: Allocco, Marcia
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 11:08 AM
To: Leigh, Thomas G. (MPC); Denard, Derek
Subject: RE: Draft NPDES Permit NC0021971 - Blanchard Terminal Company, LLC
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Good morning Thomas,
Our office provided some training last week to the Mecklenburg County inspectors since they have new staff. In an
effort to ensure the inspections conducted by County staff are equivalent to those performed by staff in our office we
will be conducting joint inspections. So you may see someone from our office along with Mr. Friday.
Regards,
Marcia
From: Leigh, Thomas G. (MPC)[mailto•toleioh@marathonpetroleum com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 10:37 AM
To: Denard, Derek
Cc: Allocco, Marcia
Subject: Draft NPDES Permit NC0021971 - Blanchard Terminal Company, LLC
Derek:
MPC/Blanchard appreciates your and Marcia's efforts in developing the revised and updated Draft NPDES Permit
NC0021971 for the Blanchard Charlotte East Terminal. After review of the above listed Draft Permit, MPC/Blanchard
does not have any comments or errors observed. We look forward to receiving the final version. As stated
previously, you and Marcia are always welcome to conduct an on -site review. Once the re -grading and new outfall
project is completed you should observe the improvements.
Terry Swick, Terminal Manager, provided me with the new Mecklenburg County assigned inspector, Mr. Ken Friday
(704.336.4519). We look forward to working with Ken. He will provide a local contact for us. However, I guarantee that
you and Marcia will be on our "first to call" list. Again, thank you for your assistance in MPC/Blanchard's continual
efforts with environmental compliance.
Thomas G. Leigh
Marathon Petroleum Company LP
Senior HES Professional
TT&R Environmental Compliance, Southern Region
Telephone: [phone] Extension 237
Cell Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: teleigh(la marathonpetroleum.com

The Charlotte Observer Publishing Co.
Charlotte, NC
North Carolina } ss Affidavit of Publication
Mecklenburg County }
Charlotte Observer
REFERENCE: 145583 NCDENR/DWQ/POINT SOURCE
0001566179 Public Notice North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission/NPDES Unit 1617
Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said County and
State, duly authorized to administer oaths affirmations, etc.,
personally appeared, being duly sworn or affirmed according
to law, doth depose and say that he/she is a representative of
The Charlotte Observer Publishing Company, a corporation
organized and doing business under the laws of the State of
Delaware, and publishing a newspaper known as The
Charlotte Observer in the city of Charlotte, County of
Mecklenburg, and State of North Carolina and that as such
he/she is familiar with the books, records, files, and business
of said Corporation and by reference to the files of said
publication, the attached advertisement was inserted. The
following is correctly copied from the books and files of the
aforesaid Corporation and Publication.
PUBLISHED ON: 02/13/2015
AD SPACE: 55 LINES
FILED ON: 02/16/2015
7 F-ITIT, Fill
PUBLIC NOTICE
NoM Cardire Ernhonrnemal Menagment
CpmmbsidyNPDES UM
1617 Mail sgNCe Canter,
Raleigh. NC 276 1617
Noon of Inane to Issue a NPDES
Wastewater Rabbi
The North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission prooses pto
issue a NPOEs aateeater discharge
Word to the W.() listed below. Wood
comments regarding Me dmdoea l derma
will be attepted until W days alter the
publiah data of thb notlm The Director of
the NC Division of Water Resources (DWR)
may hold a public hawing abquld Mere be a
agoormmall comnmaants and/or information requests
to DWR at the above address. Interested
persons may visa the DWR at 612 N.
Salisbury street. Raleigh NC to mvlew
Information on file. Addrional mlormati m on
NPDES permits and this notice may be
found on nor eebsae'
ssPcalon.aeelopelood
nda.or y cing 9t )W7
Barld,dd Terminal Company, LLCG
Ohaddre Terminal, Mecklenburg Courry,
eppphetl 10 r w NPDES perof
INCAp2tg'lI for as audace-weler pu:lutlon
prevaribmi eyetand di chei treated
atoonwst ater/waewater to Pa Creek.
Catawba River Basin.
Westlnehmee Real Errata Develr,--t
N req..l. swat of NPDES derma
AgWm sfte/Meckarrourg
County. Gaolity discharges romenumad
groundemor to an unnamed mount, to
Steele CreerCatawba River Barn.
Cunenty Carbon Tetrachloride and
idrachl Woothene are water quohry limited
Mariners Watch HOA requested renewal of
TITLE:
DATE:
In Testimonpphereof I have hereunto setpm land and affixed my seal, the day and year aforesaid.
Notary a AA Z6l 1-1 A" .4 A My commission Expires:
FES 1 9 2015
—/-1—
My Commission Expires May 27, 2016

Denard, Derek
From: Leigh, Thomas G. (MPC) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 3:58 PM
To: Allocco, Marcia; Denard, Derek
Subject: RE: MPC's Blanchard Charlotte East Terminal - Permit Number: NC002971
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Marica:
Thank you for your quick and detailed response. We are on the same page. This way the Charlotte East Terminal will
stay in compliance. Our Project Team and Operations appreciates the Divisions guidance. Tom
Thomas G. Leigh
Marathon Petroleum Company LP
Senior HES Professional
TT&R Environmental Compliance, Southern Region
Telephone: [phone] Extension 237
Cell Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
From: Allocco, Marcia (mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 3:53 PM
To: Leigh, Thomas G. (MPC); Denard, Derek
Subject: RE: MPC's Blanchard Charlotte East Terminal - Permit Number: NC002971
Hi Thomas,
Just back from a training class; see answers noted below.
Regards,
Marcia
From: Leigh, Thomas G. (MPC) rmailto:tgleighCalmarathonpetroleum.coml
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 10:53 AM
To: Denard, Derek; Allocco, Marcia
Subject: RE: MPC's Blanchard Charlotte East Terminal - Permit Number: NC002971
Derek and Marcia:
I appreciated both of your responses. I have one more question/clarification on this project.
Question/Cla rification

1. In that your Division is able to modify the existing permit for the additional Outfall, it is my understanding that
the permit must be issued prior to us discharging out the new Outfall? Correct —since your current permit only
authorizes discharges through Outfall 009 to waters of the state, Blanchard must wait until an additional outfall
is included in the reissued permit before discharging through it. Please refer to North Carolina General Statute
143-215.1 http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/HTML/BySection/Chapter 143/GS 143-
215.1.html
2. If that is not the case and we can begin to discharge prior to the issuance, then we would keep records on the
discharge flow and sample for the current parameters?
3. If we need to wait on the permit's issuance prior to utilizing the new Outfall, then we can divert the new tertiary
containment's water through the existing Outfall 009. Yes you may divert water from the new outfall to the
permit authorized outfall until the permit is reissued.
I just want to make sure that we are within NPDES compliance and not jumping the gun on discharging out the new
Outfall.
Thank you for your patience with my questions. Tom
Thomas G. Leigh
Marathon Petroleum Company LP
Senior HES Professional
TT&R Environmental Compliance, Southern Region
Telephone: [phone] Extension 237
Cell Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
From: Denard, Derek fmailto:derek.denardCalncdenr.aovl
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 2:54 PM
To: Leigh, Thomas G. (MPC); Allocco, Marcia
Subject: RE: MPC's Blanchard Charlotte East Terminal - Permit Number: NC002971
Tom,
I don't believe I will need any additional application. I will be able to modify the existing permit for the additional
outfall. I have a few projects ahead of this one, but I should be working on it along with other permits in this basin
sometime next month. I will let you know if I have any questions.
Thanks,
Derek

MCI
C Denard
oCI Em mmeMal Specoyst
NCOENR Dirsion of Water Re wce;
water Quakt)• PmmftN Sn_ bw
Compha e & &pe6ted Permitting thxt
(919)SD7-6307
derekdenard@ MdhWAjW
1617 MiS n.0 wAahijh. NC Z709-I 7
httvOO al .,w 9 h+Arp Vda
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
From: Leigh, Thomas G. (MPC) rmailto:taleiah(o)marathonpetroleum.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 2:44 PM
To: Denard, Derek; Allocco, Marcia
Subject: MPC's Blanchard Charlotte East Terminal - Permit Number: NCO02971
Derek and Marcia:
I hope you both had good holiday season and new year. Florida has been cooler than normal but still within the
pleasant range. Plus, based on what I have been viewing on the Weather Channel I will not complain. With this email I
am following up on our December 16, 2014, on -site walk around and NPDES discussion.
1. 1 understand that your Division received the NPDES Permit Number NCO021971 Renewal Application for the
Blanchard Terminal Company LLC—Charlotte Terminal.
2. 1 understand from MPC's Project Lead, Eli Reichenbach, that he is currently working with Mecklenburg County
on a Land Disturbance Permit.
3. It is my understanding (please correct me if I have it wrong), that since the Blanchard Terminal has a NC NPDES
Permit, once we receive Mecklenburg County's Land Disturbance Permit, the construction and reworking of the
terminal's drainage flow and tertiary retention pond creation can commence.
4. It is my understanding from our December 16, 2014, meeting that Derek and you were going to investigate
whether or not a permit modification or new permit application would be required for creating another outfall
to discharge the water from the new tertiary retention pond into the unnamed tributary to Paw Creek. As we
discussed, this is the same tributary that Outfall 009 currently discharges into. The water captured and retained
in the new tertiary pond is from the same water sources that now discharged via Outfall 009. The projectis to
eliminate potential TSS and Turbidity concerns due to the current steep slope and subsequent run-off of storm
water moving rapidly across and through the terminal property.
5. 1 understand that Blanchard cannot discharge via this new Outfall until the Division of Water Quality has decided
on whether a permit for the new Outfall is required and issued, or that a "no permit application required"
decision is made (by just adding it to the current permit). This new Outfall would have the same permit
parameters and limits as NPDES Permit Number: NC002971.
Look forward to working with your Division on this TSS and Turbidity control type project. Let me know if you need any
additional information from Eli or me to assist you in making this permit decision. Thank you Tom
Thomas G. Leigh
Marathon Petroleum Company LP
Senior HES Professional
TT&R Environmental Compliance, Southern Region
Telephone: [phone] Extension 237
Cell Phone: [phone]

Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Denard, Derek
From:
Allocco, Marcia
Sent:
Wednesday, December 17, 2014 2:37 PM
To:
Leigh, Thomas G. (MPC); Denard, Derek
Cc:
Benjamin, Dawn M. (MPC)
Subject:
RE: NPDES renewal application submittal dates for Charlotte -West & East
Attachments:
Blanchard Permit Renewal.docx
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Thomas,
It was a pleasure meeting with you as well yesterday as site visits always assists in developing the associated NPDES
permit. Your e-mail prompted me to check our database on the status of your renewal application today. Ironically,
while we were at the facility yesterday, administrative staff in Raleigh acknowledged receipt of your permit renewal
package that was received by the Division on December 11, 2014 (see attached file).
Derek will follow-up with you regarding any additional information he may need as part of permit renewal.
If I can be of further assistance please let me know.
Regards,
Marcia
From: Leigh, Thomas G. (MPC)(mailto:tgleioh(almarathonoetroleum.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 1:58 PM
To: Denard, Derek; Allocco, Marcia
Cc: Benjamin, Dawn M. (MPC)
Subject: FW: NPDES renewal application submittal dates for Charlotte -West & East
Importance: High
Derek and Marcia:
Terry, Brandon and I certainly appreciated your visit and guidance yesterday at our Charlotte East Terminal. It was good
to have direction for our environmental permitting, engineering & non -environmental permitting. Pleases see the email
below from Dawn Benjamin, MPC Findlay TT&R HES Group, stating that the Charlotte East NPDES Permit Renewal
Application was submitted on 12/10/2014. You should have it at your office. If not please let me know so that we can
re -submit.
Look forward to hearing from your group on the permitting or modification permitting for the Charlotte East re -work of
its drainage flow, tertiary retention pond and new NPDES Outfall. Also please let me know if we need to resend the
Renewal Application for Charlotte East. Tom
Thomas G. Leigh
Marathon Petroleum Company LP
Senior HES Professional
TT&R Environmental Compliance, Southern Region
Telephone: [phone] Extension 237

Cell Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
From: Benjamin, Dawn M. (MPC)
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 8:30 AM
To: Swick, Terry L. (MPC); Leigh, Thomas G. (MPC)
Subject: NPDES renewal application submittal dates for Charlotte -West & East
Importance: High
Terry & Tom,
I apologize for missing your calls yesterday. Hopefully you were able to locate this information while the agency was still
at the terminal. If not, the renewal application for Charlotte -West was submitted 11/19/2014 and the renewal
application for Charlotte -East was submitted 12/10/2014.
Let me know if you need anything else.
Dawn

Denard, Derek
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Thomas,
Allocco, Marcia
Wednesday, November 12, 2014 3:44 PM
Leigh, Thomas G. (MPC)
Denard, Derek; Sharkey, Bernie (MPC); Swick, Terry L. (MPC); Lyon, Brandon M. (MPC);
Reichenbach, Eli J. (MPC)
RE: Blanchard Terminal Permit Number NCO021971 On -Site Meeting to Discuss Plans
for Reworking Storm Water to Eliminate Potential TSS and Turbidity Concerns
Follow up
Flagged
1:00 p.m. on Tuesday December 16`" works for me.
Regards,
Marcia
From: Leigh, Thomas G. (MPC) rmailto:taleiah(ubmarathonoetroleum.coml
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 8:42 AM
To: Allocco, Marcia
Cc: Denard, Derek; Sharkey, Bernie (MPC); Swick, Terry L. (MPC); Lyon, Brandon M. (MPC); Reichenbach, Eli J. (MPC)
Subject: RE: Blanchard Terminal Permit Number NCO021971 On -Site Meeting to Discuss Plans for Reworking Storm
Water to Eliminate Potential TSS and Turbidity Concerns
Marcia:
If it is OK with you and Derek I propose to set the date for the on -site walk around and plan review for Tuesday,
December 16th. We could meet around 1:00 PM to give you time to travel and still get some morning work
completed. That way we also would not be time limited to lunch, etc. Or if 10:00 AM would be better that would work
also. Let me know which you prefer. On this end either way is fine. Thank you Tom
Thomas G. Leigh
Marathon Petroleum Company LP
Senior HES Professional
TT&R Environmental Compliance, Southern Region
Telephone: [phone] Extension 237
Cell Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
From: Allocco, Marcia[mailto:marcia.alloccoCalncdenr.gov1
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 3:11 PM
To: Leigh, Thomas G. (MPC)
Cc: Denard, Derek; Sharkey, Bernie (MPC); Swick, Terry L.
(MPC); Lyon, Brandon M. (MPC); Reichenbach, Eli J. (MPC)

Subject: RE: Blanchard Terminal Permit Number NC0021971 On -Site Meeting to Discuss Plans for Reworking Storm
Water to Eliminate Potential TSS and Turbidity Concerns
Thomas,
Either the 15th or 161h works for me at this point; just left me know the proposed time (either mid -morning or afternoon
works best for travel from Mooresville to Charlotte area) and I'll place it on my calendar.
Regards,
Marcia
From: Leigh, Thomas G. (MPQ[mailto:tgleiah(dmarathonpetroleum.com]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 1:38 PM
To: Allocco, Marcia
Cc: Denard, Derek; Sharkey, Bernie (MPQ Swick, Terry L. (MPQ Lyon, Brandon M. (MPQ Reichenbach, Eli J. (MPQ
Subject: Blanchard Terminal Permit Number NC0021971 On -Site Meeting to Discuss Plans for Reworking Storm Water to
Eliminate Potential TSS and Turbidity Concerns
Marcia:
I appreciate the time that you and Derek have provided to discuss Marathon's plans to revise the Storm Water flow at
our Blanchard Terminal in Charlotte, NC. (Mecklenburg County). As we discussed, I have completed the renewal
application for the Blanchard Terminal Company LP's Charlotte Terminal (Charlotte East). It is in Findlay for
Management Signature. It is projected to be submitted to the Division of Water Quality-NPDES Unit the week of
November 17, 2014. The required deadline for the submittal is December 31th.
I have been discussing Marathon's plan to revise the Storm Water flow at the Blanchard Terminal with Derek over the
past month. I also included a short write up on the plan in the Charlotte East NPDES Permit Renewal. We plan on
revising the Storm Water flow, installing a retention pond, developing a Storm Water conveyance to carry storm water
around the outside of the terminal and creating a new Outfall. This Outfall will handle the same water as currently exits
Outfall 009 and it will discharge into the same receiving steam as Outfall 009 (unnamed tributary to Paw Creek).
As we discussed today, it would be great if you and Derek could meet us at the Charlotte East Terminal for a walk -about
and "Plan Review". Based on your, my and the terminal management's schedule, the week of December 15`h would
work best. I suggest a Tuesday, December 16v' meeting. If that does not work, then perhaps a Monday, December 15r6
date. You stated that Derek was busy on the 17`h. Thursday, December 18'h would be another choice but that would be
pushing it close to the Christmas travel period. Not a good time to be in the air.
Let me know which date works best for you and Derek. Once you confirm, then I can book my flight and hotel. Look
forward to covering our plan to reduce the potential for TSS and/or Turbidity concerns at the Blanchard Terminal. Thank
you Tom
Note: I have copied the Terminal Management Team, Project Engineer and the Southern Area Environmental Supervisor
so that they can make the appropriate arrangements for travel, etc.
Thomas G. Leigh
Marathon Petroleum Company LP
Senior HES Professional
TT&R Environmental Compliance, Southern Region
Telephone: [phone] Extension 237
Cell Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

DENR / DWR / NPDES
EXPEDITED FACT SHEET - NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES Permit NCO021971
Derek Denard, Compliance & Expedited Permitting Unit / 919-807-6307 101` 62015
Facility Information
Applicant/FacilityName
Blanchard Terminal Company, LLC
Applicant Address
539 South Main Street, Findlay, OH 45840-3229
Facility Address
7401 Old Mount Holly Road, Charlotte 28214
Pennitted Flow (MGD)
not limited
Type of Waste
100% Industrial, fuel (bulk storage)
Facility Class
PC-1
County
Mecklenburg
Permit Status
Renewal
Regional
Office
MRO
Stream Characteristics
Receiving Stream
LIT to Paw Creek
Stream Classification
C
Stream Segment
[11-124]
Drainage basin
Catawba
Summer 7Q10 (cfs)
0
Subbasin
03-08-34
Winter 7Q10 (cfs)
0
Use Support
No Data
30Q2 (cfs)
0
303(d) Listed
No
Average Flow (cfs)
0
State Grid
F15SW
IWC (%)
100%
USGS Topo Quad
Mt. Island Lake, NC
Facility Summary
This facility is a minor municipal facility (flow <1 MGD) that receives 100% industrial from a Surface -
Water Pollution Prevention System for stormwater in proximity to above -ground storage tanks (ASTs)
providing surface bulk -storage of petroleum hydrocarbon fuels in excess of one million gallons, and fuel -
truck loading racks. Significant changes to this facility since the last permit renewal is the addition of
Outfall 011, which consists of a retention pond, a revised storm water conveyance carrying storm water
around the outside of the terminal. The facility consists of the following wastewater treatment units:
• secondary -containment basins (for ASTs)
• point -source discharge valve (normally closed— manually controlled)
• retention pond (Outfall 010)
Monthly average FLOW (MGD) —Last 22 months 1762012-Nov2014:
[Ave 0.045 MGD; Maximum, Monthly average flow = 0.132 MGD]
Toxici —This permit requires Acute Toxicity Monitoring testing using Pimephales promelas to be
performed on an annual basis as a 24-hour static [TAE6C]. The facility has passed toxicity monitoring for
over the past five years. See attached data spreadsheet and compliance history.
Compliance History— The facility received on NOD for a 10/17/13 TSS exceedance with 51 mg/L (45
mg/L limit). The turbidity limit of 50 ntu was exceeded, with "no action, BPY, three (3) times on
12/29/13, 02/20/13 and 03/19/13 with values of 51.4, 84.5 and 58.8 ntu, respectively.
Fact Sheet
Renewal 2015 -- NPDES Permit NCO021971
Page I

For Renewal —This permit reflects discharge at Outfall 001. DWR updated Map; added parameter codes
to Section A. (L); added Outfall 010 with effluent limitations and monitoring Section A.(2.); added
monthly'fRC monitoring with limit and added Electronic Reporting - Discharge Monitoring Reports page
Section A. (5.).
Stream - Discharge from W WTP for outfall 009 & 010 is into an unnamed tributary to Paw Creek
[Stream Segment 11-124]. The segment is not list in the 2012 North Carolina Integrated report or 303(d)
list.
RPA — A Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA) was conducted on toluene, benzene, ethyl benzene,
naphthalene and xylene (mixture) effluent parameters data with no reasonable potential to exceed standards
because Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) reported concentration below method -detection levels
(MDLs) for June2010-Nov2014 data. [See attached RPA summary sheets.]
Fact Sheet
Renewal 2015 — NPDES NC0021971
Page 2

Blanchard Therminal Company LLC
REEAS®NIABL+-9®ITrB►d[T1fAls5AfG4tti"6 Outfall 009
NCO021971
MAXIMUM DATA POINTS = 58 Qw = 0.13 MGD
Qw(MGD)= 0.13
WWTP/WTP Class: PC-1
IQIOS(afs)= 0.00
lWC @ IQ10S = 100.0%
7QIOS(cfs)= 0.00
IWC @7QIOS= 100.0%
7Q10W (cfs) = 0.00
IWC @ 7QI OW = 100.0%
30Q2 (cfs) = 0.00
IWC @ 30Q2 = 100.0%
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (efs) = 0.00
WC @ CA = 100.0%
Receiving Stream: UT to Paw Creek Stream Class: C
PARAMETER
STANDARDS & CRITERIA (2)
u1
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
(1)TYPE
NC WQS / Applied '/a FAV /
i
i
Max Pied
'
n 9 DeL Allowable Cw
Chronic Standard Acute
Cw
Acute: NO WQS
Toluene
NC
II FW
µg/L
20 n
0.6
_
_
Chronic:---- 11.00
----—---—————_
NORP
No value > Allowable Cw
Acute: NO WQS
Benzene
C
1,19 INS
µp/L
20
0.7
Chronic: 119_—
No value > Allowable Cw
NO RP
Acute: NO WQS
acnzene
C
51 III]
pg/h
20 0
0.7
Chronic: 51.00
NO RP
No value > Allowable Cw
Acute: NO WQS
Ethylbomens
NC
97 I III
20
0.6
Chronic'--�97.00---——
No value > Allowable Cw
Acute: NO WQS
Naphthalene
NC
12 1'VC
µg/L
33 0
66
Chronic:---- 1200.
_—_-----
NO RP
No value > Allowable Cw
Acute: NO WQS
xy:ene. mlxn�ie
NC
670 FW
ue/I.
19 0
1.9_______
Chronic 670.00
NO RP
No value > Allowable Cw
NCO021971 9695 GENERIC RPA2014 21.zlsm, paPage 1 of 1 2110/2015

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Use"PASTE
SPECIAL -Values"
then "COPY-.
2
Use'PASTE
SPECIAL -Values'
then COPY-.
Toluene
_
Benzene
Maximum data points
Maxlnmm data poin
-se
=sa
Date
Data
BDL=112DL
Results
Date
Data
BDL=112DL
Results
2010
< 1
0.5
Std Dev.
0.1649
1 2010
< 1
0.5
Std Dev.
0,1599
2010
< 1
0.5
Mean
0,3450
2 2010
< 1
0.5
Mean
0.3185
2011
< 1
0.5
C.V.
0.4779
3 2011
< 1
0.5
C.V.
0.5019
2011
< 1
0.6
n
20
4 2011
< 1
0.5
n
20
2011
< 1
0.5
5 2011
< 1
0.5
2012
< 1
0.5
Mult Factor=
1.2900
6 2012
< 1
0.5
Mult Factor=
1.3000
2012
< 0.3
0.13
Max. Value
0.5 pg/L
7 2012
< 03
0.125
Max. Value
0.5 pg/L
2012
0.3
0.13
Max, Fred Cl
0.6 pg/L
8 2012
0.3
0.125
Max. Pred Ce
0.7 pg/L
2012
< 0.3
0.13
9 2012
< 0.2
0.12
2012
< 0.3
0.13
10 2012
< 0.3
0.125
2013
< 0.3
0.13
11 2013
0.3
0.125
2013
< 1
0.5
12 2013
< 1
0.5
2013
< 1
0.5
13 2013
< 1
0.5
2013
< 1
0.5
14 2013
< 05
0.25
2013
< 1
0.5
15 2013
< 0.5
0.25
2013
c 0.5
0.25
16 2013
< 0.5
0.26
2014
< 0.5
0.25
17 2014
< 0.5
0.25
NCO021971 9595 GENERIC RPA2014_21.xlsm, data
- 1 - 2/10/2015

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
3
Benzene
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
1 2010
<
1
0.5
Sld Dev.
2 2010
<
1
0.5
Mean
3 2011
<
1
0.5
C.V.
4 2011
<
1
0.5
n
5 2011
<
1
0.5
6 2012
<
1
0.5
Mult Factor=
7 2012
<
025
0.125
Max, Value
8 2012
<
0.25
0.125
Max. Fired Cw
9 2012
<
0.24
0.12
10 2012
<
0.25
0.125
11 2013
<
0.25
0.125
12 2013
<
1
0.5
13 2013
<
1
0.5
14 2013
<
0.5
0.25
15 2013
<
0.5
0.25
16 2013
<
0.5
0.25
17 2014
<
0.5
0.25
then"COPY'.
n data point
88
0.3185
0.5019
20
1.3000
0.5 Ng/L
0.7 Ng/L
4
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
1 2010
<
1
0.5
2 2010
<
1
0.5
3 2011
<
1
0.5
4 2011
<
1
0.5
5 2011
<
1
0.5
6 2012
<
1
0.5
7 2012
<
0
0.15
8 2012
<
0
0.15
9 2012
<
0
0.15
10 2012
<
0
0.15
11 2013
<
0
0.15
12 2013
<
1
0.5
13 2013
<
1
0.5
14 2013
<
1
0.5
15 2013
<
1
0.5
16 2013
<
1
0.25
17 2014
<
1
0.25
Use "PASTE SPECIAL -Values'
then "DOPY" . Maximum data
points - 68
Results
Std Dev. 0.1581
Mean 0.3500
C.V. 0.4518
in 20
Mull Factor = 1.2700
Max. Value 0.5 pg/L
Max. Pred Cw 0.6 yg/L
_2_
NGD021971 9595 GENERIC RPA2014 21.xlsm. data
2/10/2015

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
5
Use -PASTE SPECIAL -
Naphthalene
v I ea'thmn Corr,.
Maximum ,at. ro,
58
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
-
t-2.3224
1
2010
<
1
0.5
Sid Dev.
2
2010
<
1
0.5
Mean
3.1848
3
2011
<
1
0.5
C.V.
0.7292
4
2011
<
1
0.6
n
33
5
2011
<
1
0.5
6
2012
<
1
0.5
Mull Factor=
1.2000
7
2012
<
024
0.12
Max. Value
5.5 pg/L
8
2012
<
024
0.12
Max. Pred Cw
6.6 pg/L
9
2012
c
0.24
0.12
10
2012
<
0.24
0.12
11
2013
<
0.24
0.12
12
2013
<
1
0.5
13
2013
<
1
0.5
14
2013
<
10
5
15
2013
<
10
5
16
2013
<
10
5
17
2013
<
10
5
6
Xylene, mixture
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
1
2010
<
2
1
Still Dev.
2
2010
<
2
1
Mean
3
2011
<
2
1
C.V.
4
2011
<
2
1
n
5
2011
<
2
1
6
2012
<
2
1
Mull Factor=
7
2012
<
0.7
0.33
Max. Value
8
2012
<
0.7
0.33
Max. Pred Cw
9
2012
<
0.7
0.33
10
2013
<
0.7
0.33
11
2013
<
2
1
12
2013
<
2
1
13
2013
<
3
1.5
14
2013
<
3
1.5
15
2013
<
1.5
0.75
16
2014
<
1.5
0.75
17
2014
<
1.5
0.75
Use 'PASTE
SPECIAL -Values"
then'COPP.
Maximum data
mints = 58
0.8458
0.4092
19
1.2600
1.5 pg/L
1.9 pg/L
NC0021971 9595 GENERIC RPA2014_21.xlsm, data
-3- 2/10/2016

2014 Generic RPA - 95% Probability/95% Confidence
MAXIMUM DATA POINTS = 58
REQUIRED DATA ENTRY
Table 1. Project Information
❑ CHECK IF HEW OR ORW
Facility Name
Blanchard Therminal Company LLC
WWTP/WTP Class
PC-1
NPDES Permit
NCO021971
Outfall
009
Flow, Qw (MGD)
0.132
Receiving Stream
UT to Paw Creek
Stream Class
C
7Q10s (cfs)
0.00
7Q10w (cfs)
0.00
30Q2 (cfs)
0.00
QA (cfs)
0.00
1 Q10s (cfs)
_ 0.00
Data Source(s)
❑ CHECK TO APPLY MODEL
Follow directions for data entry. In some cases a
comment menu list the available choices or a
dropdown menu will provide a list you may select
from. Error message occur if data entry does not
meet input criteria.
Fi
Par02
Par03
Par04
Par05
Parts
Par07
Par08
Paro9
Par10
Peril
Par12
Par13
Par14
Par15
Paris
Par17
Par18
Par19
Par20
Par21
Par22
Table 2. Parameters of Concern
Name Type Chronic Modifier Acute PQL
NCO021971 9595 GENERIC RPA2014_21.xlsm, input
2/10/2015

IWC Calculations
Facility: Blanchard Therminal Company, LLC
NC0021971
Prepared By: Derek Denard
Enter Design Flow (MGD): 0.132
Enter s7Q10 (cfs): 0
Enter w7Q10 cfs : 0
Total Residual Chlorine (TRC)
Daily Maximum Limit (ug/1)
Ammonia (Summer)
Monthly Average Limit (mg NH3-N/1)
s7Q10 (CFS)
0
s7Q10 (CFS)
0
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
0.132
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
0.132
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
0.2046
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
0.2046
STREAM STD (UG/L)
17.0
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.0
Upstream Bkgd (ug/1)
0
Upstream Bkgd (mg/1)
0.22
IWC (%)
100.00
IWC (%)
100.00
Allowable Conc. (ug/1)
17
Allowable Conc. (mg/1)
1.0
Ammonia (Winter)
Monthly Average Limit (mg NH3-N/1)
Fecal Coliiform
w7Q10 (CFS)
0
Monthly Average Limit:
200n00mi
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
0.132
(If DF >331; Monitor)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
0.2046
(If DF<331; Limit)
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.8
Dilution Factor (DF)
1.00
Upstream Bkgd (mg/1)
0.22
IWC (%)
100.00
Allowable Conc. (mg/1)
1.8
Total Residual Chlorine
1. Cap Daily Max limit at 28 ug/I to protect for acute toxicity
Ammonia (as NH3-N)
1. If Allowable Conc > 35 mg/I, Monitor Only
2. Monthly Avg limit x 3 = Weekly Avg limit (Municipals); capped at 35 mg/I
3. Monthly Avg limit x 5 = Daily Max limit (Non-Munis); capped at 35 mg/1
4. BAT for Minor Domestics: 2 mg/I (summer) and 4 mg/I (winter)
5. BAT for Major Municipals: 1 mg/I (year-round)
Fecal Coliform
1. Monthly Avg limit x 2 = 400/100 ml = Weekly Avg limit (Municipals) = Daily Max limit (Non -Muni)
NPDES Server/Current Versions/WLA; TB 1/16/2009

epe,o;
vzz//s
O�Q
Permit Reviewer Notes - Derek Denard
Permit Number: (
i q
�� DQ2I1
Applicant/Facility Name: 4
�anc�..
Permit Status:
At h f we 'l
Regional Office:
Latitude: rp 33-.2'7a 7 3-T.I G, 33
35.276 1 q 3S-t)b,35'
Longitude: C7Ui
olv JS 2g 20,S5
Facility Class:
County:
Outfall:
(7Uq b1®
Flow:
Applicant Address:
SAS Mu: Sf ;-,, ,Jk 6# 9-J"9vu , z2
Facility Address: L
/soak f 14 I?d C
Type of Waste:
�C Y N7 � ✓l 4
Stream Notes
Receiving Stream: n
�Qw
Stream Segmen : I ` (2
Stream Classification: G
Drainage Basin: C /
Summer &Q10 (cfs):
Subbasin:
U 3- og_
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
HUC Code:
U3c5 Olpl
30Q2 (cfs):
State Grid:
Average Flow (cfs):
USGS Topo Quad: /k
IWC (%):
b-43
303 (d): N9
Use:
Notes
s'3
`,5 D
/Y

Blanchard Terminal Company Lic
539 South Main Street
Findlay, OH 45840
Tel: [phone]
December 9, 2014
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality— NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Services Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Phone: [phone]
Subject: NPDES Permit Application —Short Form C— Minor Industrial
Permit Renewal Request
Blanchard Terminal Company LLC —Charlotte Terminal
Permit Number: NC0021971
Division Representative:
RECEIVED/DENR/DwR
DEC j 1 2014
Permitting
Quality
ermitting Section
Blanchard Terminal Company LLC (Blanchard), a subsidiary of Marathon Petroleum Company LP
(Marathon), owns and operates the Petroleum Bulk Storage and Distribution Terminal located at 7401
Old Mount Holly Road in Charlotte. The facility is covered under the above -referenced National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit (NPDES).
The subject permit is scheduled to expire on June 30, 2015. Blanchard is hereby requesting that the
permit be renewed. As required, Blanchard is including one (1) original and two (2) copies of the
application.
Renewal Attachments:
1. Completed and Signed NPDES Permit Application —Short Form C— Minor Industrial
2. Topological Map showing location of Terminal and Outfall 009
3. Spread Sheet providing information on the Blanchard Terminal Company LLC's Discharge Data
4. Applicable pages of the Blanchard Terminal Company LLC's DMRs
Blanchard's Charlotte Terminal does not generate sludge as part of a manufacturing process. Due to the
fad that the majority of the terminal is open to the environment, there is sludge (dust, dirt, grime)
which occasionally builds up within the facility drains. If the sludge originates in an area of the facility
where contact with petroleum products is possible, the sludge is collected, drummed, evaluated, labeled
and properly disposed of at an off -site location.
As discussed with Mr. Derek Denard, Specialist with the North Carolina NPDES Permitting Staff,
Marathon/Blanchard assumed ownership of the Charlotte Terminal from BP Products North America,
Inc. on February 1, 2013. Blanchard only has the DMR submittals from the purchase date and was not
able to obtain past BP DMR submittals. Mr. Denard confirmed that the NC NPDES Permitting Section
would be able to use their copies of the BP DMR submittals for the renewal of this permit.

N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Page 2
December 9, 2014
Blanchard is currently planning on revising the terminal's storm water flow, creating a retention pond,
developing a storm water conveyance to carry storm wa er roun a ou sl e o t e termina and
installing a ne 11 1orm water outfall (same receiving stream as its current Out'fall 00 ischarges into).
Is scheduled to start during mid-2015. Blanchard has had conversations with r. bereV enarr
concerning this project. Blanchard will be scheduling a meeting with Mr. Denard to present the revised
liLi7 Cr storm water flow plan once the scope of the project is confirmed. This storm water flow work will assist
with TSS & turbidity compliance and prevent erosion.
If you or any of the Division's staff should have any questions or require additional information, please
contact me at 813.344.7504 or via email at [e-mail].
Respectfully,
Thomas G. Leigh
Senior HES Professional
TT&R Environmental Compliance, Southern Region
Enclosures
cc: posted to electronic Environmental Manual (Water; NPDES; NPDES Permit Application) RECEIVEDIDENRIDWR
DEC 11 2014
Water Quality
Permitting Section

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION — SHORT FORM C — Minor Industrial
Minor industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities.
Mail the complete application to:
N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
NPDES Permit Number
Please print or type.
1. Contact Information:
Owner Name gt.Qu cbaf-4 TermuJat, (:OuealJy U e_ (RTrij: GeEs MooR6
Facility Name Bt4s Chm8
T'Q omA&G
(T17+11 gd Liz-
&Arioffe TermiI AL
Mailing Address y a q
SO tI f6
Maw Smei- —
city
State / Zip Code pl�tD
4 59 do
- 3 2 2 9
RECEIVED/DENR/DWR
Telephone Number %cf .
4Z( , 377q
DEC 11 2014
Fax Number 4 t 9.
4 2(.
4 Z 1(0
_
e-mail Address wt moo
a etw M4 r"ou peiyn (eUM
. COrn Permitting Section
tion of facility producing discharge:
Check he if same as above ❑
Streeor State Road r%tto I OLI( MWO* 66111 ROctd
City Cha2.10+e.
State / Zip Code N000 C-aeo hak 28Z I `i
County IZ I e CK, Very bU rq
3. Operator Information:
Name of the firm, consultant or other entity that operates the facility. (Note that this is not referring to the
Operator in Responsible Charge or ORC)
Name
Mailing Address
city
State / Zip Code
Telephone Number
Fax Number
4. Ownership Status:
Federal ❑
(3catict4aa'd TQrmlnra(. Co,mpatiq UC.
5 31 Sod+1+ ►''ksul SMEF (
Ftud. 41
0 1+ 10 45846- 322q
411 • 421. 377q
t (j 42.1 . 411(o
State ❑
Private Dq
Public ❑
D..- 1 -$ A P \II VIMO

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - Minor Industrial
Minor industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities.
5. Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code(s): Sli
6. Number of employees: 5
7. Describe the treatment system List all installed waste treatment components with capacities,
describe the processes that generate wastewaters. If the space provided is not sufficient attach a
separate sheet of paper with the system description. A wasTc yvai-Cr Tt4r {-+xeorr Sy sreni
IsnoT cc AofmAL P'eA+-Uf'P' 5(QC2 StatrYb W4ier I iv-.&ffvG)O('wr'ier`
d„lscharped eow*d uNJ,,a-t'a(Z4r/1rF. (F, as ckeser.b,ec( ll! secTiou A. I. Or -
hydro Stvhc. Teir Wa+er is P14 Nbd-d Doi btinl& dLS C1Wf,-d tle-
beuZcNo, 6o&xi9v (Qi1 N h1vsT be less +haU r71. y uX/I, ro l arum
cwtcea+f4fWN Il less th4U 11 u.q/L . 8611 h-Vd Witt are-SukP(e f•o
GO-Uwl w't bF auyy 4a4m or.witsty, wc4irr +-6 �fixev4 wM 6e fie{ Jtre.Q h
� ,i- CW aepl( tct it, Mw,rt- OvAd ch 0ua .
S. Is facility covered under federal effluent limitation guidelines? No 9 Yes ❑
If yes, specify the category?
9. Principal product(s) produced: P/A
Principal raw material(s) consumed: u
Briefly describe the manufacturing process(es):
W+,(ateoen :56rac1 e f t is+n by +(. o Fa ca. (til . pa4cr's ate.
NC•etV-eA t)(.a. (J,(1eLi0J,--' or- 'C7UdCS- * 0[lsi4',6J4ee or --a*( e
Vlss uct<S• Rroduc-c (ruc[ude' D1(►ve�c!<<fIllet i"'D #/atu�-rc(
n--- 1 -1 c 1 n11 .nrno

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - Minor Industrial
Minor industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities.
10. Amount of principal product produced or raw material consumed
/fief cnorifir nmmm}c rnn aimvri nrr11nr IlnitC of nmrhirtinn n1/Pr the last three uears)
Product Produced or Raw Material
Consumed
AVERAGE
Product Produced or Raw Material
Consumed
PE
per Day
1.f p,
1J A
per Month
WA
UIA,
per Year
ki/ l4
NIA
11. Frequency of discharge: Continuous ❑ Intermittent
If intermittent: kPPIOx
NouMN
Days per weeb discharge occurs:Duration: VAiZLES With 9(rr1r4f-ttt0Aj
D 4 sC ha,rles are, de Pe►.xlA& ev PmGkfwO
12. Types of wastewater discharged to surface waters only
Discharge
Flow
GALLONS PER DAY)
Sanitary - monthly average
Utility water, etc. - monthly average
Process water - monthly average
u/A,
Stormwater- monthly average
I ,Z0)0oo t41100i 408A v0y' Llom/Dm
Other - monthly average
Explain: 1Ayjr0!5kT&LTcaT W,�
¢. ZTKS lS
A.r(Itpt.
:Z�C4-V5Perd&=
t 000 0a
Monthly Average
total discharge (all types)
of hPPllcc*iQA Fod ne ISdays
T dt
13. Number of separate discharge points: ) Outfall Identification number(s) 60
14. Name of receiving stream(s) (Provide a map shouting the exact location of each outfall, including
latitude and lonaitude.
QUA14 nu.t +n 6t 4j iD P&W U49 _ c ,"Sul 8 3 - M 8 - 34 tu+lw 4?%&
cataw60, RL~1*CSkN
n--- 0 -1 . r ui "ino

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION — SHORT FORM C — Minor Industrial
Minor industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities.
15. Effluent Data [for new or proposed discharges]
Provide data for the parameters listed. Temperature and pH shall be grab samples, for all other parameters 24-hour
composite sampling shall be used. If more than one analysis is reported, report daily maximum and monthly average.
If only one analysis is reported, report as daily maximum.
NOTE: Permittees requesting renewal should complete the table ONLY for the parameters
currently monitored. Summarize the I xLsrt 3 years of e went datm
Parameter
Daily
Maximum
Monthly
Average
Units of
Measurement
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (30135)
j1 A
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
Total Organic Carbon
tVA
Total Suspended Solids
5[
q
RA
L
Ammonia as N
Temperature (Summer)
k
Temperature (Winter)
h
pH
Fecal Coliform Of sanitary waste is
present)
Pt
Total Residual Chlorine (if chlorine is
used)
N1A
htso See, 0.4+MDv4 ttiFFtueafr V0Wgc,:TGvsT-1c.S fwON-S IWItdsksr+;
Vk%h .sT rsS Ar--leCted dur1N,� 1Q ppit0 rtaa t. V"te PA4(64P
16. List all permits, construction apprbbais and/or applications (check all that apply and provide permit
numbers or check none if not applicable):
Type Permit Number Type Permit Number
Hazardous Waste (RCRA) W/A NESHAPS (CAA) KV.4
UIC (SDWA) 6.4& Ocean Dumping (MPRSA) W/l4
NPDES W_ oe21V/ Dredge or fill (Section 404 or CWA) W1A
PSD (CAA) N/A Other 'Meekl<Abjr, (ouoTt MR
Non -attainment program (CAA) W/A FerMlr Alb: l4_p05. (41,9
>f. '%grAlual. GenrsaiOr TD: NGD�o(oOctg82
17. List any chemicals that may be discharged (Please list and explain source and potential
amounts.)
tip c.l anu of L s Shot)I.tl % d%5c.�t614 ect • �6 4ieVQP cm f%g+ fk(I (S a.
Balk rejQ( M Stawa(ye IL F,— V0<4 $
Senalyoc s I"il- a a o(—q ""o • reTleNT((&'
Far al oruJ e l� Ll j& $A, - eisl' wx.`12r.

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - Minor Industrial
Minor industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities.
18. Is this facility located on Indian country? (check one)
Yes ❑ No
19. Applicant Certification
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application and that to the
best of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
Blanchard Terminal COmDanY LLC
name of Person Signing Title
of
Date
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 (b)(2) provides that: Any person who knowingly makes any false
statement representation, or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other document files or
required to be maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management Commission
implementing that Article, or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or
monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the
Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable
by a fine not to exceed $25,000, or by imprisonment not to exceed six months, or by both. (18 U.S.C. Section
1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $25,000 or imprisonment not more than 5 years, or both,
for a similar offense.)
o....., c .a c r ui 4 mno

0 , r1 _ • y�� ..C.
%y `,a y
a n
�«Y JP
4 w
5 y
..RAC... 6 ,—
Y - .
Blanchard Terminal Company LLC
��tl'�{ Charloae North Carolina OA Of Oi5
s.........c Charlotte Terminal ,.+ Scale (moss)
VulneratAly AnWvss Oraxung
ioeual WGS h{+cpVUJ F.
o' - eWG VO REV
o.i.. M013 anee °•e Map Locator

Discharge Data***
NPDES Permit NCO021971 - Blanchard Terminal Company LLC - Charlotte Terminal
Date
Monthly Requirements
Quarterly Requirements
Annual
y/M
Daily Flow
TSS
O & G
Turbidity
Naphthalene
Benzene
Toluene
Xylene
Ethyl
Benzene
Ethanol
Acute
Toxicity
MGD
mg/I
mg/I
NTU
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
2014-09
0.003
17
<5.0
3
<11
2014-09*
0.123
<2.5
7.8
1.3
<10
<0.50
<0.50
<1.5
<0.50
<200
2014-08
0.021
10
<5.0
30
<10
2014-07
0.001
4.3
<5.0
6.6
<10
<0.50
<0.50
<1.5 1
<0.50
<200
2014-06
0.02
10
11
28
<10
2014-05
0.033
11
<5.0
12
<10
2014-04
0.002
9.8
<5.0
21
<10
<0.50
<0.50
<1.5
<0.50
<200
2014-03
0.029
5.6
<5.0
29
<10
2014-02
0.147
<5.0
<5.0
1.8
<10
<0.50
<0.50
<1.5
<0.50
<200
Pass
2014-02**
0.147
<5.0
<5.0
1.6
<10
<0.50
1 <0.50
<1.5
<0.50
<200
2014-01
1 0.043
7.2
<5.0
18
<10
2013-12
0.024
6.6
20
IS
<10
2013-11
0.001
<5.0
<5.0
7.4
<10
2013-10
0.004
51
<5.0
1.7
<10
<0.50
<0.50
<1.5
<0.50
<200
2013-09
0.015
8.6
<5.0
17.9
QO
2013-08
0.043
6
<5.0
9.8
<10
2013-07
0.009
9.6
1 <5.0
12
1 <10
<0.50
<1.0
<3.0
<1.0
<200
2031-06
0.069
9.8
<5.0
16
<10
2013-05
0.054
<5.0
<5.0
11
<10
1
2013-04
0.054
11
<5.0
24
<10
<0.50
<1.0
<3.0
<1.0
<200
Pass
2013-03
0.063
27.7
<5.0
58.8
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<2.0
<1.0
<200
2013-02
0.099
34.6
<5.0
84.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
i <2.0
<1.0
<200
* Hydro Test for Tank 118
** Hydro Test for Tank 116 plus extra sample analysis: Phenol @ <10 ug/I & MTBE @ <1.0 ug/I
*** Marathon Purchased the BP Terminal effective 02/01/2013. No NPDES DMR Data is available prior to this date
Page 1 of 1