20230044 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20230106

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
10/7/2021
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20230044 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
What amout is owed?*
$240.00
$570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone] Zachary Thomas:eadstztthomas:[e-mail]
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
Olive Branch Reserve
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Deborah Shirley
1 b. Primary Contact Email:* lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
1/6/2023
Nearest Body of Water
Martin Creek
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
WS-IV;NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.9490 -78.7703
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Durham
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project? *
Yes No

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 29 - Residential Developments
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
NWP 58 (offsite utility)
Id. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
ld. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Olive Branch Reserve LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
009397 / 000467
2c. Contact Person:
2d. Address
Street Address
555 S Mangum
Address Line 2
City
Durham
Postal /Zip Code
27701
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
Yes No
Yes No

2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
MF Development LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
009717 / 000994
2c. Contact Person:
2d. Address
Street Address
5448 Apex Peakway
Address Line 2
City
Apex
Postal / Zip Code
27502
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
William Morris
3b. Business Name:
McREF SFR 1 Brier Creek, LLC
3c. Address
Street Address
1001 Morehead Square Dr.
Address Line 2
Ste. 350
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28203
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Deborah Shirley
4b. Business Name:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
4c. Address
Street Address
8412 Falls of Neuse Road
Address Line 2
Suite 104
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27615
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
3e. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]

C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Durham
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
0860-80-04-0749, 0860-91-11-4776, & 0870-
01-34-3416
2c. Project Address
Street Address
802 Virgil Road & 1607 Olive Branch Road
Address Line 2
City
Durham
Postal / Zip Code
27703
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Martin Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
WS-IV;NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202010502
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
113.579
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
Existing conditions onsite consists of forested land with a residential structure and outbuildings near Olive Branch Road. Specifically there is one perennial stream, four intermittent
streams, three wetlands areas and a pond constructed in uplands and determined to not be a water of the US. Please see Jurisdictional Determination. General land use in the vicinity of
the project consists of forested land. Olive Branch Road bounds the road to the west and Virgil Road bounds the property to the east.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Approximately 8.10 acres
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
Approximately 6,623 LF
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The purpose of this project is to construct a residential development and its necessary infrastructure.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
The overall project consists of the construction of a residential development consisting of single family lots and multi -family units, including but not limited to; roadway infrastructure,
residential lots, utilities, SCMs, and amenities. Equipment typically used for construction and earthwork such as backhoes, bulldozers, excavators, graders, pavers etc. will be utilized for
this project.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes
Comments:
No Unknown
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2019-02436

5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
Neil Allen
Horvath Associates, PA
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
USACE: PJD & AJD issued 8/24/2022
NCDWR: Buffer Determination letter issued 12/02/2019 (RRO #19-403)
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes No
6b. If yes, explain.
This project will be constructed in five phases. There will not be any future phases not included within the existing site plan.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
It is my understanding that there are no intended future phases beyond the property boundaries shown. Therefore, no additional NWP, Regional General Permits, or IP are anticipated.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
u
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams -tributaries
Open Waters Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
Buffers
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type* (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition*
(?)
2g. Impact
area*
1
Sanitary Sewer
Crossing: Permanent -No
Permanent Loss
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
W2 (offsite)
Yes
Both
0.239
(acres)
4
Sanitary Sewer
Crossing: Permanent -No
Permanent Loss
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
W2
Yes
Both
0.011
(acres)
5
Road Crossing -Fill
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
W3
Yes
Both
0.342
(acres)
5
Road Crossing-
Construction Access
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
W3
Yes
Both
0.066
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.066
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.658
21. Comments:
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.592
Total permanent loss wetland = 0.342 acres; Total permanent -no permanent loss wetland = 0.250 acres; Total temporary stream = 0.066 acres.
Temporary wetland impacts will be brought back to pre -construction contours and the existing adjacent wetland source will assist in the restoration of the
wetland vegetation.
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.Impact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
S1
2- Sanitary Sewer Crossing &
Boardwalk
Temporary
Other
Feature C
Intermittent
Both
3
Average (feet)
36
(linear feet)
S2
3- Road Crossing: Fill
Permanent
Fill
Feature B
Intermittent
Both
3
Average (feet)
8
(linear feet)
S3
3- Road Crossing:
Construction Access
Temporary
Other
Feature B
Intermittent
Both
3
Average (feet)
2
(linear feet)
S4
7- Sanitary Sewer Crossing
(Offsite)
Temporary
Other
Offsite
Perennial
Both
4
Average (feet)
51
(linear feet)

S5
8- Water Line Crossing
(Offsite)
Temporary
Other
Feature I
Perennial
Both
18
Average (feet)
20
(linear feet)
S6
11- Sanitary Sewer Crossing
(Offsite)
Temporary
Other
Feature B
Perennial
Both
10
Average (feet)
55
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
8
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
172
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
164
3j. Comments:
Total permanent loss stream = 8 LF; Total temporary stream = 164 LF; Temporary stream impacts will be brought back to pre -construction stream bed
elevations and the stream banks will be stabilized.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)7
Check all that apply.
Neuse
Catawba
Goose Creek
Other
Tar -Pamlico
Randleman
Jordan Lake
6b. Impact Type
6c. Per or Temp
6d. Stream name
6e. Buffer mitigation required?
6f. Zone 1 impact
6g. Zone 2 impact
5- Road Crossing (Bottomless Arch
Culvert/Span/Bridge) and Sanitary Sewer
P
Feature D
No
10,675
6,667
6- Sanitary Sewer
P
Feature E
No
1,184
819
7- Sanitary Sewer Crossing
P
Offsite
No
3,048
2,033
8 - Water Line Crossing
P
Feature I
No
1,813
490
9 - Water Line Crossing
P
Offsite
No
749
501
10- Water Line Crossing
P
Offsite
No
752
504
11- Sanitary Sewer Crossing
P
Feature B
No
2,377
1,723
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Total Temporary impacts:
Total Permanent impacts:
Total combined buffer impacts:
6i. Comments:
Zone 1
0.00
Zone 1
20,598.00
Zone 2
0.00
Zone 2
12,737.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
20,598.00 12,737.00
Impact #5 is utilizing an Bottomless Arch Culvert/Span or bridge style construction method to avoid stream impacts.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
S&EC completed a wetland delineation and Neuse River Buffer evaluation for the entire property and offsite utility locations in order to identify natural
resources so that impacts could be avoided & minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Proposed impacts include two (2) road crossings with one
utilizing a Bottomless Arch Culvert/Span, and nine (9) impacts associated with utilities, three (3) onsite and six (6) offsite. Impacts 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 &
11 are all either sanitary sewer or water line impacts crossings streams, wetlands and/or riparian buffers. Impacts have been minimized by crossing at
near perpendicular angles. Compensatory mitigation is proposed for all permanent -no permanent loss wetland crossings at a 1:1 mitigation ratio for the
change in wetland function. Temporary stream crossings will be brought back to pre -construction stream bed elevations and the stream banks will be
stabilized. Impact 3 is a proposed road crossing necessary to provide access to lots and Virgil Road. Impacts have been reduced by utilizing retaining
walls. Impact 5 is a proposed road crossing necessary to provide access from Olive Branch Road. Impacts have been reduced by crossing the stream,
wetland and riparian buffers at a perpendicular angle, and utilizing a Bottomless Arch Culvert/Span. No stream impacts are proposed at this location.
Compensatory mitigation is proposed for the permanent loss wetlands at a 2:1 mitigation ratio. Temporary wetland impacts will be brought back to pre -
construction contours and the adjacent wetland seed source will reestablish wetland vegetation.

lb. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
There are five sediment basins in the final E&S plan, and two temporary sediment basins in the initial E&S plan to minimize impacts. There are seven
temporary diversion ditches. Double silt fence and double silt fence outlets have been used along the stream buffers. A pump and dike stream crossing
plan with construction sequence has been provided.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
DWR Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
Mitigation bank Payment to in -lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Falling Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank: Falling Creek Mitigation Site, Granthan Branch Mitigation
Site, and McClenny Acres II Mitigation Site
3b. Credits Purchased/Requested (attach receipt and letter)
Type:
Riparian wetland
3c. Comments
Quantity:
0.94
Permanent Wetland loss impact = 0.0.342 acres; 0.342 @ 2:1 mitigation ratio = 0.684 acres
Permanent, No Permanent loss impact = 0.25 acres; 0.25 @ 1:1 mitigation ratio = 0.25 acres
Total mitigation requested = 0.94 acres
6. Buffer mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWR
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? If yes, you must fill out this entire form - please contact DWR for more information.
Yes No
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
What type of SCM are you providing?
Level Spreader
Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program?
Yes No
N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
Local Government State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
Phase II NSW USMP Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
City of Durham
Comments:
This project will utilize four wet detention basins, one level spreader with vegetative filter strip, and one stormwater wetland.

G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We have reviewed the "Draft Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and Isolated Wetlands Programs" document
prepared by the NC Division of Water Quality on April 10, 2004, version 2.1. The draft states that many private developments are unlikely to cause
cumulative impacts, including projects such as urban in -fill, most residential subdivisions and small commercial developments as well as agricultural and
silvicultural operations. The Olive Branch Reserve project is a residential development. Additionally, the project is located within Durhams jurisdiction,
therefore the adjacent properties that have potential for development will have the following regulations to protect downstream waters: 1) the Neuse
River Basin Riparian Buffer Protection regulations, these regulations require limited development within the riparian buffer area, in addition Best
Management Practices may be required that control nitrogen if diffuse flow cannot be achieved; 2) the Phase II NPDES Stormwater Permit Program, this
program includes permitting requirements for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) in addition to post -construction stormwater
management requirements; and 3) the Water Supply, Watershed Protection Program which limits development densities as well as requires protective
riparian buffers. We anticipate that the NCDWR will advise us if any additional information is needed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Non -Discharge
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
S&EC completed a Threatened & Endangered Species Report, to include a Self -Certification letter through the US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS), a
query through the NC Natural Heritage Program database, and an official Species List through the iPac. A formal request was sent to the USFWS on
October 27, 2022. The USFWS has 30 days to respond from the date of the sent request. The S&EC determinations were that the proposed project is
not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or threatened species, their formally designated critical habitat, or species currently
proposed for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Please see attached S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species report and response from
USFWS.

6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
The NOAA Habitat Conservation/Habitat Protection: National Marine Fish Service; Essential Fish Habitat Mapper website was referenced. No Essential
Fish Habitat was identified near the project.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service interactive map was referenced on September 28,2021, no historic listings or study list
entries or determined eligible listings were identified within the property boundaries. An Environmental Review request was submitted to SHPO on
October 6, 2021. SHPO provided a response letter indicating that they have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources
which would be affected by the project, therefore they had no comment on the project as proposed. See ER 21-2392.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The FEMA 100-year Floodplain is within the property boundaries along feature D. Offsite sanitary sewer crosses through the floodplain. Manhole rims
have been set two feet above the floodplain elevation per the requirements. Ground within the sewer easement will be restored to existing grade.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NC Flood Risk Information System Floodplain Mapping Program and confirmation from the project engineer.
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
OBR Attachments.pdf
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
29.94MB
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Deborah Shirley
Signature
Ogere2l1/ u_9r tdey
Date
1/6/2023

WILDLANDS
HOLDINGS
Neuse Wetland Credits Statement of Availability
December 22, 2022
MCREF SFR 1 Brier Creek, LLC
1001 Morehead Sq. Dr., Ste. 350
Charlotte, NC 28203
Attn: Mr. William Morris
RE: Availability of Stream and Riparian Wetland Credits for the "Olive Branch Reserve" project
Bank Name: Falling Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Bank Sites: Falling Creek Mitigation Site / Grantham Branch Mitigation Site / McClenny Acres II
Mitigation Site
Bank Sponsor: Wildlands Holdings III, LLC
USACE Action ID No.: SAW-2015-00940 / SAW-2017-00549 / SAW-2017-00552
Permittee: MCREF SFR 1 Brier Creek, LLC
Riparian Wetland Credits Needed: 0.94 acres
Riparian Wetland Credits Available: 2.63 acres
Future Riparian Wetland Credit Release: 8.92 acres (Feb. 2023)
Neuse 03020201 River Basin
Dear Mr. Hester,
Wildlands Holdings III, LLC, owned and operated by Wildlands Engineering, Inc., currently has sufficient riparian
wetland credits from the Falling Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank: Falling Creek Mitigation Site, Grantham
Branch Mitigation Site, and McClenny Acres II Mitigation Site to satisfy the stream and/or wetland mitigation
requirements related to the above -mentioned project. The project is located within the Neuse River Basin of the
service area (HUC 03020201) of the Bank.
This letter is simply a statement of availability of credits as of the date written. It is neither a guarantee of
future credit availability, nor a guarantee of credit pricing. Credits are sold on a first come, first serve basis at
the Bank's price at the time an invoice is requested. Invoices reserve both the credits and the price for a period
of 30 days. Credits and associated pricing may be reserved for up to 6 months with a signed reservation
agreement and a 10% deposit.
Final transfer of the credits will be made upon receipt of a copy of the US Army Corps of Engineers
Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form approving the Stream and/or wetland mitigation
purchase from the Bank and upon receipt of your payment to Wildlands Holdings III, LLC.
We appreciate the opportunity to assist you with your mitigation requirements. Please contact me at (704) 332-
7754 x114 or [e-mail] if you have any questions or need any additional information.
Wildlands Holdings III, LLC • Wildlands Engineering, Inc • 1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 28203

WILDLANDS
HOLDINGS
Sincerely,
Camden M. Brunick
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Mitigation Credit Sales
[e-mail]
0: [phone] ext. 114
M: [phone]
Cc: Ms. April Norton, Regulatory Agent I USACE
Ms. Debbie Shirley, Project Manager -Regulatory Specialist 1 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Wildlands Holdings III, LLC • Wildlands Engineering, Inc • 1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 28203

PCN Attachments
1. AGENT AUTHORIZATION
2. NCDWR PRE -FILING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
3. USGS TOPO VICINITY MAP
4. NRCS COUNTY SOIL SURVEY VICINITY MAP
5. USACE JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD/AJD/CONCURRENCE
EMAIL)
6. NCDWR BUFFER DETERMINATION LETTER
7. EXISTING CONDITIONS & PROPOSED CONDITIONS MAPS
8. IMPACT EXHIBITS WITH CULVERT PROFILES
9. MITIGATION ACCEPTANCE LETTER
10. POST -CONSTRUCTION DRAINAGE AREA MAP
11. S&EC THREATENED & ENDANGERED SPECIES REPORT
12.T&E SUBMITTAL EMAIL & FWS WITH CONCURRENCE
13. SHPO ER LETTER
14. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
sandec corn
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Project Name/Description: Olive Branch Reserve S&EC Project # 14928
Date:
ichl-5
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attn: April Norton Field Office: Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
I, the undersigned, authorizes S&EC, as my agent, to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for
the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or certification and any and all associated standard
and special conditions. This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for
this project.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 0860-80-04-0749, 0860-91-11-4776 & 0870-01-34-3416
Site Address: 802 Virgil Road & 1607 Olive Branch Rd
City, County, State: Durham, Durham County, NC
APPLICANT INFORMATION:
Name: Ai - REF 5F 12. it T� e.r ree lrz LLL
Mailing Address: /a0/ i'tb,-c-1-ee4_ S-L be , �j 4�, 350 /CIS-I°tie. 4'c -z 2 d
Telephone Number: 4L( 3 -3, Z7 'G di
Email: Jf
WA. o e g® rA4 c �yvt tol
n }ram 5 k. �
` i I i l'A(, i o v-e- 5 II/6/ 3
Applicant (please print) Date
-4c1;z(,
Applicant Signature
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.

Deborah Shirley
From: [e-mail]
Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2021 2:53 PM
To: Deborah Shirley
Subject: Pre -Filing Meeting Request Acknowledgement - Olive Branch Reserve
Attachments: DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form.pdf
The North Carolina Division of Water Resources has received the Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form for Olive
Branch Reserve that you submitted on 10/7/2021. Attached is a copy of your request.
All certification requests (applications) must include documentation that a pre -filing meeting request was
submitted to the certifying authority at least 30 days prior to submitting the certification request.
The Division can not accept an application for your project earlier than 30 days from this pre -filing meeting
request. Applications that do not meet this 30-day requirement will be returned.
Please save this email/attachment; it must be submitted with your application to document that this
requirement has been met.
This email was automatically generated by Laserfiche workflow. Please do not respond to this email address,
as responses are not monitored.
i

Project Number:
14928.W1
Project Manager:
DS
scale• 1 1000'
Date:
09/10/2021
Map Title:
USGS Map
Olive Branch Reserve
Durham County, NC
Source: USGS
Southeast Durham 2019 Quad
0
I
S&
EC
{
NC Center for`eog iaphic 4nfiormat on Analysis
1,000 2,000
Feet
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
sandeaeom

roject Number:
14928.W1
Project Manager:
DS
Scale: 1 1000'
Date:
09/10/2021
Ysc
Wsc
i •
WsE
WsE • WsE wsB\ WsE
Map Title:
Soil Survey Map
Olive Branch Reserve
Durham County, NC
Source: Durham County
Soil Survey Sheets 28 & 33
•
WsE
Ws7
WsE
Wsc
Pf E.
MC N i Clentr for Geo,,graphiicthnf`rn atiori &Analysis'-
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
S&
EC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
sandeaeom

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2019-02436 County: Durham U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -Southeast Durham
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor:
Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail:
Size (acres)
Nearest Waterway
USGS HUC
Horvath Associates, P.A.
Attn: Neil Allen
16 Consultant Pl. Suite 201
Durham, North Carolina 27707
919.490.4990
neil.allen(a,horvathassociates.com
—114
Lick Creek
03020201
Nearest Town Durham
River Basin Neuse
Coordinates Latitude: 35.9515
Longitude: -78.7653
Location description: The project area is located at 802 Virgil Road in Durham, Durham County, North Carolina.
The Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) portion of this determination is highlighted as the red
polygon on the attached "Stream and Wetland Map". The Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) portion is
highlighted as the "AJD" polygon on the attached "Stream and Wetland Map". The aquatic features for the AJD
and PJD are also shown on the attached "Preliminary Plat".
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be
subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and
Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The waters, including wetlands have been delineated, and the delineation
has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these
waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated 1/11/2022. Therefore, this preliminary jurisdiction
determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory mitigation.
For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection
measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that
would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S.
This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative
Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an
appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA)
(33 USC § 403). However, since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this preliminary
jurisdiction determination may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation,
this preliminary determination is merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters,
including wetlands at the project area, which is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit
decision. We recommend that you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As
the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a
consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

SAW-2019-02436
❑ There are waters, including wetlandson the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps
may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to
conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
❑ The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated .
We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and
verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA
jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied
upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed
by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above -described project area/property
which are subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless
there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period
not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management
Act (CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to
determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Depai linent of the Army
permit may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill
material, construction or placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a
Depai Intent of the Army permit may constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC
§ 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please
contact April Norton at 919-441-3637 or April.R.NortonAusace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: See the Approved and Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Forms dated
08/24/2022.
D. Remarks: Based on the information submitted by Horvath Associates, P.A., the pond shown on the referenced maps
has indicators of Ordinary High -Water Marks. However, this feature was constructed entirely in uplands. There are no
features with Ordinary High -Water Marks or hydric soils or wetland hydrology above the pond which drain into the pond.
Further, the area immediately below the earthen dam of the pond had neither hydric soils nor hydrology indicators. As
such, per Federal Register pg. 41218, Vol. 51, No. 219, 11/13/1986, this pond constructed in uplands is not considered
waters of the US.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate
participation in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural
Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)

SAW-2019-02436
If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and Request for Appeal (RFA) form. If you
request to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr. Philip A. Shannin
Administrative Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Floor M9
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8803
AND
PHILIP.A. [e-mail]
For an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date of JD: 08/24/2022 Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable
Expiration Date for AJD: 8/24/2027
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
https://regulatory.ops.usace.army.mil/customer-service-survey/.
Property Owner:
Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail:
Property Owner:
Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail:
Dees Family Manager, LLC.
Attn: Elizabeth D. Pulley
3428 Sheridan Dr.
Durham, North Carolina 27707
N/A
N/A
Marie Moses
1607 Olive Branch Road
Durham, North Carolina 27703
N/A
N/A

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant:
Allen
Horvath Associates, P.A., Attn: Neil
File Number: SAW-2019-02436
Date: 08/24/2022
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
•
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
•
PERMIT DENIAL
C
•
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
©
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
©
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative
Additional information may be found at or
http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx or
appeal of the above decision.
the Corps regulations at 33 CFR
Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer
for final authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is
authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its
entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional
determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may
request that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the
district engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or
you will forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will
evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to
address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as
previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your
reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer
for final authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is
authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its
entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional
determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions
therein, you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the
division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
Appeal
form must be received by

D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of
the date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved
JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This
form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION:
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If
You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be
Also you may provide new information for further
TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an
initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where
your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum
for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined
is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to
the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the
administrative record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION: 1
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appeal process you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: April Norton
Raleigh Regulatory Office
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
also contact:
MR. PHILIP A. SHANNIN
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL REVIEW OFFICER
CESAD-PDS-O
60 FORSYTH STREET SOUTHWEST, FLOOR M9
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8803
PHONE: [phone]; FAX [phone]
EMAIL: [e-mail]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15-
day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: April Norton, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:

Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Philip Shannin,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 08/24/2022
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Horvath Associates, P.A., Attn: Neil
Allen, 16 Consultant Pl. Suite 201, Durham, North Carolina 27707
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, 802 Virgil Road, SAW-2019-
02436
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The project area is located at 802
Virgil Road in Durham, Durham County, North Carolina. The Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD)
portion of this determination is highlighted as the red polygon on the attached "Stream and Wetland Map".
The Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) portion is highlighted as the "AJD" polygon on the
attached "Stream and Wetland Map". The aquatic features for the AJD and PJD are also shown on the
attached "Preliminary Plat".
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES
AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Durham City: Durham
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.9515 Longitude: -78.7653
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Lick Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑x Office (Desk) Determination. Date: 8/24/2022
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO
REGULATORY JURISDICTION
Site Number
Latitude
Longitude
Estimated
Type of aquatic
Geographic authority to
(decimal
degrees)
(decimal
degrees)
amount of
aquatic
resources in
review area
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section 404
or Section 10/404)
(acreage and
linear feet, if
applicable
Site Number
Latitude
Longitude
Estimated
Type of aquatic
Geographic authority to
(decimal
degrees)
(decimal
degrees)
amount of
aquatic
resource in
review area
resource (i.e.,
wetland vs.
non -wetland
waters)
which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section 404
or Section 10/404)
(acreage and
linear feet, if
applicable)

A/B
35.9531
-78.7621
2434 feet
Non -wetland
waters
Section 404
C
35.9527
-78.7692
184 feet
Non -wetland
waters
Section 404
D
35.9527
-78.7693
2359 feet
Non -wetland
waters
Section 404
E
35.9481
-78.7673
1459 feet
Non -wetland
waters
Section 404
I
35.9509
-78.7702
502 feet
Non -wetland
waters
Section 404
W2
35.9502
-78.769
5.59 acres
Wetland
Section 404
W3
35.9495
-78.769
2.57 acres
Wetland
Section 404
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN),
or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant
has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the
permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make
an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to
request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that
basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation
being required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual
permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit
authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with
all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps
has determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit
authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or
undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD
constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that
activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any
administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in
any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will
be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make
an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review
area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the
Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that
there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of the U.S. on the
subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could be affected by
the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply) Checked items are included in the
administrative record and are appropriately cited:
❑X Maps, plans, plots, or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Stream & Wetland Map
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor. Datasheets:
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters' study:
❑U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑USGS NHD data:
❑USGS 8- and 12-digit HUC maps:
▪ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1" =500 & SE Durham Quad
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Durham County Soil Survey, Sheet 33
❑X National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: NWI
D State/local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps: 3720086000K, 3720087000K
O 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
ahotographs: ❑X Aerial (Name & Date): ArcGIS 2017
or ® Other (Name & Date): Field Photos, 6/18/2019
❑Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
EDther information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the
Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
08/24/2022
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable) 1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not
respond within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow
up is necessary prior to finalizing an action.

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): 08/24/2022
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:Raleigh, 802 Virgil Road, SAW-2019-02436
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State:North Carolina County/parish/borough: Durham City: Durham
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.9515° N, Long. -78.7653° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17
Name of nearest waterbody: Lick Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Neuse River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03020201
E] Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date: 08/24/2022
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): 1
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
❑ Relatively permanent waters (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non -wetland waters: linear feet: width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: Pick List
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non -regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
® Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain: Based on the information submitted by Horvath Associates, PA, the pond shown on the referenced maps has
indicators of Ordinary High Water Marks. However, this feature was constructed entirely in uplands. There are no
features with Ordinary High Water Marks or hydric soils or wetland hydrology above the pond which drain into the
pond. Further, the area immediately below the earthen dam of the pond had neither hydric soils nor hydrology
Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

indicators. As such, per Federal Register pg. 41218, Vol. 51, No. 219, 11/13/1986, this pond constructed in uplands is
not considered waters of the US..

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section HI.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non -navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i)
General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5:
Tributary stream order, if known:
° Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the arid
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man-made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man -altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: =Mt.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Sands
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type/% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
❑ Concrete
❑ Muck
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Pick List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope):
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: Pick List
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑ changes in the character of soil
El shelving
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑ sediment deposition
❑ water staining
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:
❑❑❑❑❑❑❑
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ High Tide Line indicated by: ❑ Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i)
Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial:
❑ Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
D Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non-RPWs8 that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
▪ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section IILD.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
e Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.'
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
'See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
▪ Wetlands: acres.
F. NON -JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
❑ Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
® Other: (explain, if not covered above): Based on the information submitted by Horvath Associates, P.A., the pond shown on
the referenced maps has indicators of Ordinary High Water Marks. However, this feature was constructed entirely in uplands.
There are no features with Ordinary High Water Marks or hydric soils or wetland hydrology above the pond which drain into the
pond. Further, the area immediately below the earthen dam of the pond had neither hydric soils nor hydrology indicators. As such,
per Federal Register pg. 41218, Vol. 51, No. 219, 11/13/1986, this pond constructed in uplands is not considered waters of the US..
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
IMaps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: .
❑ Corps navigable waters' study: .
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:1" =500 & SE Durham Quad.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:Durham County Soil Survey, Sheet 33.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:NWI.
State/Local wetland inventory map(s): .
FEMA/FIRM maps:3720086000K, 3720087000K.
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):ArcGIS, 2017.
or ® Other (Name & Date):Field Photos, 6/18/2019.
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
Applicable/supporting case law: .
Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
Other information (please specify): .
❑❑❑❑ ®❑®❑®®®

B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD: N/A.

z
aofl., 0I8 M9; ;e SM
a)reon,ki,aONod, W
ro& ( %S zisa
e
xLA
,oy
N33210 171,1

FEATURE D
PERENNIAL DWR
1
4
i
1
i
1
rFEATURE!
01 10-
1
000100
•i'.11114
AJD
W3
FEATURE D
PERENNIAL DWR
(CONTINUED)
FLAG LOCATIONS,
TYP.
INE
FEATURE C
NON -BUFFERED
JURISDICTIONAL
INTERMITTENT USACE
(NOT SUBJECT)
1, i
•
W2
100*
FEATURE C
INTERMITTENT DWR
(SUBJECT)
•'* FEATURE F
(NOT SUBJECT)
•
P-• ♦i
it
i
mor aa
WI
FEATURE A
NON -BUFFERED
JURISDICTIONAL
INTERMITTENT USACE
(NOT SUBJECT)
FEATURE B
NON -BUFFERED
JURISDICTIONAL
INTERMITTENT USACE
(NOT SUBJECT)
FEATURE G
(NOT SUBJECT)
,0 ,.liMnai4,0611I1..IIa
41
.1Ir 011.`A114/
FEATURE E
INTERMITTENT DWR
r "
FEATURE H
(NOT SUBJECT)
1
ft "."‘un�
*onto
41,n.n♦
0 250 500
1000
SCALE: 1"= 500'
HORVATH
ASSOCIATES
16 CONSULTANT PLACE, SUITE 201
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27707
P 919.490.4990 F 919.490.8953
537 MARKET STREET, SUITE LL20
CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE 37402
P 423.266.4990 F 423.266.5700
www.horvathassociates.com
STREAM AND WETLAND MAP
802 VIRGIL ROAD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWN BY:
EA
CHECKED BY:
N DA
SCALE
1 "=500'
DATE
01/11/2022
PROJECT NO
1931

G k.
ROY COOPER
Gorernor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secreta.y
LINDA CULPEPPER
Director
The Dees Family, LLC
3428 Sheridan Drive
Durham, NC 27707
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
December 2, 2019
Marie Moses
1607 Olive Branch Rd
Durham, NC 27703
Subject: Buffer Determination Letter
RRO #19-403
Durham County
Determination Type:
Buffer
Intermittent/Perennial
i1 Neuse (15A NCAC 2B .0233)
❑ Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B .0259)
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 2B .0267) (governmental
and/or interjurisdictional projects)
8 Intermittent/Perennial Determination (where local
buffer ordinances apply)
Project Name:
Address/Location:
Stream(s):
(I
Virgil Road
802 Virgil Rd/1607 Olive Branch Rd
Martin Branch
Determination Date: 11/25/2019
•
Stream
Feature
E/I/P(1)
Not Subject(2)Subject
Start@
Stop@
Soil
Survey
y
USGS
Topo
B
E
X
X
X
C
I
X
DWR Flagging
"Start C"
DWR flagging
"Stop C"
X
D
P
X
throughout
X
X
E
I
X
throughout
X
X
J
E
X
X
Martin
Branch
P
X
throughout
X
X
(2) Refers to State riparian buffer rules only. Stream, wetland, or pond impacts are still subject to applicable water quality standards and permitting requirements.
Explanation: The streams)/pond(s) listed above has been located on the most recent published NRCS Soil Survey
of Durham County, North Carolina and/or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1: 24,000 scale.
Each feature that is checked "Not Subject" has been determined to not be an intermittent stream, perennial stream, a
pond connected to a stream feature, or the feature is determined not to be present. Stream features that are checked
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be subject to the buffer
rules. There may be other streams located on the property that do not show up on the maps referenced above and are
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources I Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive 11628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628

Virgil Road
Durham County
12/2/19
Page 2 of 2
therefore not subject to the buffer rules. However, if the stream features are present on the tract they are subject to
all other applicable North Carolina stream standards and permitting requirements as outlined in 15A NCAC 02B and
may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers.
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by the Director. An
appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing. If sending via US Postal Service: c/o Karen Higgins;
DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit; 1617 Mail Service Center; Raleigh, NC 27699-1617. If sending via
delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.): Karen Higgins; DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit; 512 N. Salisbury
Street; Raleigh, NC 27604.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, an appeal is requested within sixty (60)
days.
This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the US Army Corp of Engineers (Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-554-4884.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact Gary Kreiser at [phone].
Sincerely,
Scott Vinson, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Raleigh Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
cc: RRO DWR File Copy
Neil Allen, Horvath Associates, P.A. (electronic copy) neil.allen(horvathassociates.com
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources I Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive 1628 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628
010 70.1 A')/1n

Virgil Road
Durham County, NC-DWR Project # 19-403
4:4.51w .r.{.*,;,:wq,..t.--...._:•vvi.ictovivg,1"..;,'ViNlei.rW,:ifgal,:',4-M,,....AVNIFf'4.114W3**
" ?
NRCS Soil Survey
Durham Co., NC
Legend:
-project boundary
:: Locations are approximate
and are provided for refer-
ence only ::
t
EJ

Virgil Road
Durham County, NC-DWR Project # 19-403
USGS Topographical Map
Legend:
-Project boundary
:: Locations are approximate
and are provided for refer-
ence only ::

OLIVE BRANCH RESERVE
OWNER/DEVELOPER/HOME BUILDER
MILL CREEK RESIDENTIAL
JEREMIA MURPHY
1001 MOREHEAD SQUARE DRIVE, SUITE 350
CHARLOTTE, NC 28203
[e-mail]
ENGINEER/LAND PLANNER
HORVATH ASSOCIATES, PA
TIM SIVERS
16 CONSULTANT PLACE, SUITE 201
DURHAM, N.C. 27707
P: [phone]
F: [phone]
[e-mail]
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
STEVEN BALL
8412 FALLS OF NEUSE ROAD, SUITE 104
RALEIGH, NC 27615
[phone]
1607 OLIVE BRANCH ROAD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
O
�O �2
CFFS�7C�FR0
VICINITY MAP
NO SCALE
SITE
CARPENTER
POND ROAD
INDEX OF DRAWINGS:
IM-00 COVER SHEET
IM-01 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS
IM-02 OVERALL EXISTING CONDITIONS
IM-02A ENLARGED EXISTING CONDITIONS
IM-02B ENLARGED EXISTING CONDITIONS
IM-03 OVERALL PROPOSED CONDITIONS
IM-03A ENLARGED PROPOSED CONDITIONS
IM-03B ENLARGED PROPOSED CONDITIONS
IM-03C ENLARGED PROPOSED CONDITIONS
IM-1 IMPACT 1 PLAN
IM-1A IMPACT 1 PROFILE
IM-1 B IMPACT 1 PROFILE
IM-2 IMPACT 2
IM-3 IMPACT 3
IM-4 IMPACT 4
IM-5 IMPACT 5
IM-6 IMPACT 6
IM-7 IMPACT 7
IM-8 IMPACT 8
IM-9 IMPACT 9
IM-10 IMPACT 10
IM-1 1 IMPACT 11
HORVATH
ASSOCIATES
16 CONSULTANT PLACE, SUITE 201
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27707
P 919.490.4990 F 919.490.8953
NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF
EXAMINERS FOR ENGINEERS AND
SURVEYORS LICENSE NO C-0676
www.horvathassociates.com
OLIVE BRANCH RESERVE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1607 OLIVE BRANCH ROAD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
COVER
DRAWN BY CHECK BY
EA NNA
PROJECT #2217
'0/14/2022
!WOO
SCALE AS SHOWN
© COPYRIGHT 2022 THIS DOCUMENT AND THE DESIGN ARE THE PROPERTY OF HORVATH ASSOCIATES, P.A. ANY REPRODUCTION WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT IS PROHIBITED

Fl1
HORVATH
ASSOCIATES
16 CONSULTANT PLACE. SUITE 201
DURHAM. NORTH CAROLINA 27707
P 919 490 4990 F 919.490.8953
NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF
EXAMINERS FOR ENGINEERS AND
SURVEYORS LICENSE NO.: C-0676
www.horvathossociotes.com
SUMMARY OF IMPACTS
BUFFER
STREAM
WETLAND
IMPACT NUMBER
TYPE
ZONE
PERMANENT
PERMANENT
TEMPORARY
PERMANENT
PERMANENT -NO -
PERMANENT LOSS
TEMPORARY
ZONE 1
1
SANITARY SEWER PIPE
ZONE 2
N/A
N/A
10,445 SF 0.2398 AC
N/A
ZONE 1
36
LF
2
SANITARY SEWER PIPE
ZONE 2
N/A
138 SF 0.003
AC
N/A
ZONE 1
N/A
8
LF
2
LF
N/A
3
ROAD CROSSING
ZONE 2
26 SF 0.001
AC
9 SF 0.0002
AC
N/A
N/A
ZONE 1
4
SANITARY SEWER PIPE
ZONE 2
499 SF
0.0115 AC
N/A
ROAD CROSSING AND
ZONE 1
10,675 SF
0.2451 AC
5
SANITARY SEWER PIPE
ZONE 2
6,667 SF
0.1531 AC
N/A
14913 SF
0.34236 AC
2886 SF 0.066253 AC
ZONE 1
1184 SF
0.0272 AC
N/A
6
SANITARY SEWER PIPE
ZONE 2
819 SF
0.0188 AC
N/A
N/A
ZONE 1
3048 SF
0.0700 AC
51
LF
7
SANITARY SEWER PIPE
ZONE 2
2033 SF
0.0467 AC
N/A
203 SF 0.005
AC
N/A
N/A
N/A
ZONE 1
1813 SF
0.0416 AC
20
LF
8
WATER LINE
ZONE 2
490 SF
0.0112 AC
N/A
356 SF 0.008
AC
N/A
N/A
N/A
ZONE 1
749 SF
0.0172 AC
9
WATER LINE
ZONE 2
501 SF
0.0115 AC
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
ZONE 1
752
SF
0.0173
AC
10
WATER LINE
ZONE 2
504
SF
0.0116
AC
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
ZONE 1
2377
SF
0.0546
AC
55
LF
11
SANITARY SEWER PIPE
ZONE 2
1723
SF
0.0396
AC
N/A
539 SF
0.0124
AC
N/A
N/A
N/A
' �' �:'...:.. ......:...:.:... .....«..........
......e.e„...n.. ....e..a......e ..a...n.....e.. .. a...n....a...n a......e..a...n
.e.m.a.e... e.m.a.e.m
e.a...n.e..e . a...n.«.a...n.«.....a.«.....e...n.
..n.«......«.
ZONE 1
20,598 SF
0.4729 SF
8 LF
164
LF
TOTALS
ZONE 2
12,737 SF
0.2924 SF
26 SF 0.001 AC
1245 SF 0.029
AC
14 913 SF 0.3424 AC
10 944 SF 0.2512 AC
2 886 SF 0.0663 AC
OLIVE BRANCH RESERVE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1607 OLIVE BRANCH ROAD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
SUMMARY OF IMPACTS
DRAWN BY CHECK BY
EA NNA
PROJECT #2217
'°" 4/2022
I M - 0 1
SCALE AS SHOWN
© COPYRIGHT 2022 THIS DOCUMENT AND THE DESIGN ARE THE PROPERTY OF HORVATH ASSOCIATES, P.A. ANY REPRODUCTION WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT IS PROHIBITED

SEE SHEET
IM-02B FOR
ENLARGED
PLAN
IMPACT 8
BREAKLINE 1
SEE SHEET IM-02A FOR
ENLARGED PLAN
-
FEATUREI-8
Z2
•
i
u-- ZZ 1z ==-=Z_
- Z2 _ ZI _ 7� - -- -
IMPACT 7
•. •. •.•.�,L a eiI ZI - -::"Z2
..'....4( ` tstt�ttn
(t.144
14LI---Z2ZI-'-221 kett
-.-J l IMPACT 11
``�
t 22•} I
11.11
II IMPACT 1
:*ATURE D j
IMPACT 2
FEATURE C 1Z
7;4°
FEATURE 0 2•J\
4*
IMPACT 4
•1.
12 ti32 ---- `--12
SEE SHEET IM-02A FOR
ENLARGED PLAN
IMPACT 5
IMPACT 31
FEATURE E
IMPACT 6
FEATURE B
EXISTING CONDITIONS
SCALE: 1 "=400'
i
0 200 400
IMPACT 9
IMPACT 10
SEE SHEET IM-02B
FOR ENLARGED
PLAN
800
SCALE: 1" = 400'
BREAKLINE 1
OFFSITE WATER
IM-02 SCALE: 1 "=400'
0 200 400
HORVATH
ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
LAND PLANNING STORMWALER MANAGEMENT
16 CONSULTANT PLACE, SUITE 201
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27707
P 919.490.4990 F 919.490.8953
NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF
EXAMINERS FOR ENGINEERS AND
SURVEYORS LICENSE NO.: C-0676
,.Horvolhassociates.com
800
SCALE: 1" = 400'
OLIVE BRANCH RESERVE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1607 OLIVE BRANCH ROAD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
OVERALL EXISTING CONDITIONS
DRAWN BY CHECK BY
EA NNA
PROJECT #2217
'°" 4/2022
I M - 02
SCALE AS SHOWN
© COPYRIGHT 2022 THIS DOCUMENT AND THE DESIGN ARE THE PROPERTY OF HORVATH ASSOCIATES, P.A. ANY REPRODUCTION WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT IS PROHIBITED

/
°O \\\\\\\ \\ \\\\
E I.1 = \�I\t--...`1.1�11i-//,i•11 I I Il I Il l i-i/ 1l)) \\ 1\ \ % \\\ \\T ,:,...• \\\
L d•;\Q�' /`•> ` :" r' c,� �' ^III►1111T\1\11\r i!.///1j1111 1 l \�� �\\ \Il\\1\1\ 1 /"\�\�\\\�\�\ \��`\\\�l
!tI `yf i ? o, -�♦, '\\ o \\�'\ \\ \\\\\\ \\\\ \\\ \\\ / \\\ �C\`\\\�\\\\\ J 1 1 \�`/l \
/ �� S� IMPACT 2 ���\` J\\\ "'s\\\ • •\\\\\ \\\ \ \ \ •\ •\) l• \\• \gin \ \\\\\\ \\\ '+�\\. ) 0.„\\\\\
•,y /• � �/�/���// 3 +tic+• • \\ \�\`a��������\� �\�\=_ �\\\\ rn\\\� ��\ l \\.\�\l \\ ��i\\•�\\��lr�l�1�� \\\\\ 1%�J �/• •
Z 1j/% //, s3(�OCy �. �� =_ .37 �`� i \: \\ �\a\� �_\\S�\\� ��� �\ �J, i \ �`3j�J�O \ \ \�\11 .,I• �•igi\�i\ (350j A . <\ - ^ 11
• I///// /:( l f _ s,_ \�Z�. • \ \\Q0��\\�\l•\\\l`\ .'\ `\\� \ T�^..I:t\���Ild►15� \\�`�.�\� Y
iz
. • 41.1 /� ts'-fff �,s. ,,� l.,,a\, \ ,),\\\\\\ 1 IMPACT 3 , . ••\
r I ll.I/i//iil i/ FEATURE C= ,� \\�\`\\\1��� I l\\\\\\\\\\\) /// 11 \�\\\\\\\\.I
l 1( II//\\IIII/ lIl i '/ �- i^i / \V`\\ti l\I\\\)Illlll\���\`\�ii �\\\\�1//////J� �1( :‘,:l.isti.:::,...c.i;-\\ \\\\`\\�\L► \�•.2t�.41 IIIIIIIIIIIIUIII)111�1//%�c="'/S� €▪ %_��\�-� \\��\��``�\\\\�\1\\11�11(I111� l�aj1 ///\��l\��I1I11111M�, i''j]��,`^',. ll I1%1'0 I IIII !//////ii-i�// -_'�'/ ��_ \e.\\ \\\\\ \'' \\\\1\II lam\\��\\1/` Ill,--\tl\\\\lllllll�\\/!f'f L,. lIIII\\IIII Illlltllllllltll ////���//�-/ ''^//%J?�\\ `i - l:f \1\\ /\ 1111�\ /�� IIII//�1�_` •a.�^ \\\\"\\II\\' '�\���� c
/ �•1� 1\\�Vii 1,%11\\\\\1011to(I I f/r/�%/_��2`4 =,e/ \ ��� �s ��'i l\Illl/111111�11"1'11/l��%/�lllj'�j/��`/� \\ '♦,`;\`\\\\�\t'�\\ ����=�\..�
^ppr'` i \l 11,1)))1111111)0'111j1%Ill,(II)////�-_�/ _:-,6r s iri/�� _-- Viz`` ^ \1)\Ih1\'' (ci 1\11�11111f11\d)`I!(% _`�*_\/.. til.1�l(\\�`<1� �
cik
i. /. .• %%%/ ik) i„.,/1. "/IJl1Jj / • Ijj1j 11////r// �/J i ����/' - =� ��%�i'� ��t. ��\\\--�� 111\\\``I\I\\\\\1%01)110.4 e•-- ifs// /'..�� \'� \\)l!)1\�\\\�`\`\ �_��`\\
• ?�;M • •` /// //////1 II / //•/ / I Ill / / / // r-'ice :. -� �\=�/ll 11\ t I II\\ t /Ji/\ /// / \o\l��t il-_Q\\\..�4�\\t
^>t•� � /////II)ill/l)11111111/�/� %/��/ �l�j//j /%% //// % V i%j �- _�ii�-'ii =� �-��L�;- ���11��11)%1l\I)lX�Xt��+�+i\tlt ; l�$Gjl � � \\�'t\(j\ ��� \`\;� `� )\1
Illlll 111 / / / /�/� \\ \\� / /�'/ Ale(?) , \ \\ \
• ?, .•.•.,...,„,,,„.‘,..,,,,,,,„,,,,,,I1�l/1111/I1/!/?II/ jl/�/)/4//#//rJ,# ,./>-_t`,j, -; ��\�• `\�C W. .���))killl/J%/)ll),.,.(% I%J1 / ) tl\\ `i\`��, ,,` \\\�
• • y1t," t II 111/1 ', 11 //J\ t>J / /// // //, ///// i/ii__�1 /-// .--0 =\ %e.)1r ,1QI11110111(1 / 1/^\ I \ \� � \"\\\\\�\`
:Y1. :I,54 `. . • i��;J/1l1'Ul\\�1 11t11►1111\Illlllll+..l,111111 1 ////,/// 1 f% j j r j/1 / / Il \ j l /'/�'Vri% 1��^/��,_ L i �i )„,,111//(T'/1II , I 1/!\ t l\\. � \� ���� �;,�\�\\\4.%
> ., • • • • • • • / ►`s trim I lI% 1\t\11 %. t111t111 \ 1 1 1 1 J /t 1 ! / /I i - /i \����� % `�i� i -..f' -/// 11 1 I I / ) l .� .
a`T4,-: ��, /y/ Jf/,11\111\\\\�\ kr tIIli\Ij111\\\\IIIil)lllll/t I111\�`��\l'/ 1!)1llJ/i1�ii11 =�\�_� � �is�`-\�"SS.///i:(380)/(lii/'/ ��1�� %%�`���\`\`\`\1\l \%
�r//)III \\\AV 4 Ill\\\\\,\\\ 1 tt •,• 1q r \\\\.� i//ii/ '/ / l / / _ \ \\ 11
�'; t `•'•'•'(l II)////II 1\\1�\\1111\\1q\\\\IIII \\\\\gal I VI III (I(; rc/(/l/ 1 \ \\\.���� I //`� �\����� ��i��/ i ��<)��� / /�� •�♦\`\\illl7j\1
/ / /// ///! > )NIIII'\\\\\\\r ��MI/ t \ I)J I 1) J (\ \ \ \t! \ 1 11I\ \\\\1 11)1
111
♦ • • /f//// ///� \( I 1 IIII 1 \ .\ c / / <- \
!' `"\ • `Y l�\Ijll\ 1 /Ole)(!IJ/\\\/OM
� \\111t (\� \L♦( f!'"l)`Il)�\\ tx � �\��\��� i\ty- /'I- ••, - ! \ ( �__� �\�� /���-� 1-'I� 1=` "y \\ l I 1\\� \l\��
1
•
• t �' 1 a„\\\\\,) `i��\�\%\\\\`\�l\))\\`�=`�\ // 111/ 1\\I�I11/Illl\ Illlll tl\ \ \�\j /--\�/--�iL_�\\=� ♦> \ \ `- \ \ `•• \ .
••J .1 J�.\ \\ \\ `O\\\.�\� �.- \ /// , /I I //IIII •
\�ts�` \ / J.\.5^ \_ �`♦`� ����.��\ . \\\ �\ ^v
1� \\\\\\\`\cl\\\\ ♦v�1 // I1 II I It</1/1( l 11\\\\\ cP`\�// \.�/ c /rQ� \�\\_ \\ l .�„•
t ) /` I. l) �`\ \\\\�^ll\ ' dap,/ / i e/ i1lit 1 /sllt! •• \I I \\ ` \� o-�._-/\ J�\� �� r�\ 1 l_�\ \ \\`� ♦\ (<<
1`1 Ql ll/r J� ll))) //I/// II \ I\ \\ t .;\\�-/J_�� \�" �/ \ /i /\;�-�. \\ -• \ \ \\�\�•
(It ,it?
\ w1\�• \, t11)1`)\\1 \T Td�i�. •, 1t �� ��\\TI/r�6/11\\ �O"c \�/\=� \`--%\
•
•
I/// ll J1 )111(375)\\� /"�\ // /= q \.\\\\ \\`\\ —` . `,•
/./Ill\ •�'' //i I )}t\��V! \`t �1,_1 ��/ j/�=`\\"\\ \\\..♦� \�\ \`C,
a1 /•/.�./`.!/c c%
11 IMPACT 4 l\I%�'1 1 ce\ //// /\`\\\, `� \�♦ ��\`_,^ \ _�
\ \ 1 \\•
• •\ • X%11 Illllj1111\��\IJI`\\•�\ ••3o\ L• ,5*.\\`ssi\Ill I• • \ \ ti • �.� \ /J.V.-•�\-••mil\ ��\ �_\`�\\�_
tlll\t\ \\\ r'• P••\ / If,\\1/ l j \JI
l\\\ ♦ I \\�S.\�II,J/l\� ()!C1 1' ,\ ) \ / // �)( mot\ �� \ \
\\ •
• • " Y •'1\".l l t
/ Z• • •\\\l\\!•• \\ \\\\\\\�cP\�, F .
Z')•?- ///////I/l/10111% \\\\ 1\\\\\ I \ -- _ �\ • �;•/� �//////
,sill /�/�11111 111t \\N I1)' �_\�.\ j j//
I '\ 1\" IMPACT 5 '
`\\• o ,' tl\ 1\\��: FEATURED j'.
' I\; \ � ` _ , .11; j 111). •```\'\ Z� �' \\`\ \\) l\ 1\1\ITI , paw .
rc
�\\ \\`sl\I111111)1111•\ \ \-001\\t11\Ili/%%%/1 11'\ r
• \ \\ \\j1 11111 1 1 / /?? Iriil l ///// f/ fly �//V/i\)\h
• W3
\ l \\ I\�\ ..\\ •\\\\1111II 1111/ /11III' \� • • K�
1 \ \\ • % r// �/ ( / \ n ii \\\�_� /i// ////// 11
• \l�r��� Ilu/�y/1/ 1 1 % \ ��(� `- _���ii/ %/ \\\\a`\`\ _ _ _ / lllljN\J \♦�\h_ \%iv///i7 1h1 t,i1A lljllll
1111I1111(II\\\� ♦-•\� _�_ _ `_///� /IIII\� .'�� �� ��` � i�/ jlfig I/1111/1t11\
\ �4\ 1111 1111111\\\\\`\::^. 1`• i�_�•_ _ _ / �:� �1I1:�1: •` \ �:� r-%;%%! II 1�11\\I\` \
A 'N111110111 t\ \_1\ 11\\�' % ▪ _ ////1��r�. -off` __ / j?♦1��>�� ate; =�- �_�._j ' \\1 11\�\•
♦ \\.� Illnlll. E.1L_ ;% —`= yt1/i."1;,.z ��v�=_'t=�\�,"�s'%�F• ,r \111c�\�
a, \III 11 1111// \ tt 1\\\\♦
- •- �� �� � �`�\\1\11111111)Illl j1111t/`` `\�\
*/13_75)�` \�� •• .�•-4 1 \\\\\11�\\ \\♦�� -•• . 1 %04
/At ��a�3� i +t�.. . 1.1.. \� \\:�.���\\l\\\\\ll�l\l1\ill\\\\(1\F�R�1L.
�.d
\
\` ��♦/\• " \�\\L •`' i SIC\II 111 J111\) ,1 �)1 "t • I \ \ \ -
gi: • . a /) y'// / /'l / /// J///11111'1)1/1\I\\��(‘\ II\\\\t111111\\\ j 1 \ l / t ! l \ \ l \ \ \\ ,.\\� , ... -\ \ \ \'- // ' (/ / J 11 \\ 11 \ I /' �-\ \ 1 \ \ 1 � \\\\>! I
• . 1.� I(I//////J///\t1t11tl11\\\\``1)11`ll\►\\\\\\l\\\`\\ \\� -\ .\ /- 1A)� )l \� . / / / 1(3 t 111 /c --� Il \\` \)♦\\.`ti
1\2)111(1 \�►�
MATCHLINE------ •THIS
of = / I / / �/� // /A* l / / //i /%ll 1 I►►IIt 11 i 1 { t )� 1` '" t J i� •1 . \\_ \ 1- ` �i �` ::‘,,ii:011
/'
/14 / // / ///l/// / / / // // // / fl1/ 111 \ /�rl \ \! \ \ \.� \ \\\\\ 1 IIlllll
J/!!/// /!f //%///l/ /I I / / /// / --// / tl\IIIIO 1 1)(/// I I 1 \•1) \ 1 1 \\\`:.... \ ' ••••• �,.\� ':1"tit!ti
\IIII.-•14-44.t•.ri(.4.-- tl\\Illf(/lr/(111///111111111I11,11/I(llr-'_'/1,f1))l\111( (1111\,11 I )\\ !(\\`\`��```e��\"���)�\� / \111,\
til• \�-\-/� . �' (315) Np\\n'cs \♦/(\I\�\\� \\\, \\ \\ \ \\ ( \\ \\\\\\ ! h��\\1i�\\\ \\ \\ OI1�\\\
•
•
.•'•\II )\III I\ 11 I/l Jff`)/`\l/\\\♦♦\\\\11\♦`-♦�\\\\• ' !/1 II / \ /�Ptr
•`. z�•• •.t(t••• \\ \\ \111�/1\ll11}\I,(1\1\1.� ♦r\\♦\\ .\\\ /I1)/J I ) S c I�l I (\v \ ♦ .; � ♦\ \\ \
/
\\ ; r J( J., I Ili 1 I 1 lI)11 \ , ( \\/ I \ _..
• \\\It`\ ? 0`)1'1\ \\\t \\\)\, 1 )• lC/\`1 \ \\ \ \� �/ /./l L i%////j /i-,, .\j!(ll 1ky4 ��` \\: >\\\
\\\\���\1 1 \ 2pr,11(! e///1 I)\I /'Ill/ I \\ \- \\���- .�.,�^ \.�// /,// 7 \ �\ �\ \•.
\\\11111111111I I%)(,/,,l// �i^i/>Itt) 1 �� L\^�.��.. � \�\` •r
o\����\\111 \IIII 11 ll (l \1\IIII' l ( (\ \. ` / \� ��.\� �� \\\ �.; r/l ri
►► 1 I IIIIIIIII IIII 1\111 l \\\\\�\ /` _ `\\♦/, -,\l \ / 110/ I�
• //// / 11 ) 1 IIII.._./i//
.\\IIII\(too l 111t\\\\\t \Q1 \\\\l1\\\ /tom-
\l ll \ \ 1
\\\\\\\\\\ \, \\\\\�\\l \\\\\\\\ • .�`- •
l/r/ ,Ill\\ \/' ^�� i\ �'1i
\`\�\��_�� —� \\\• Il\\`\\\\\ \\.
•
\\\\\\\\\•\\\\\\� ill l\\\\\l) \�`�� ��.-�i � \•\`\\1•` (J jr-Y/1/ `^FP / I J//��(�� l;It.��%i !j >
� \\`\` i•61\l\ Il)\ j\I \\\ \��� -- .�\ ^./// 4% 444A I(fU/// //iii�/ 1 \\\I\
N \Ill\ l \III\\ \\ \\\\\\\\ \ •( \`\ -.\ \\ �/ / / 1 (/'. \ \\ \ , •
\ � 111 l ( \ \ �//Jl..�.� \I .., � �/ ///// I')�1(/ /// K( 11 --� � �e�=y' 1
r\il\\\\\\\\\\\�M \\\\ ••• • - l• \\-%Ai� / \ \\tl\\\ /i 1(/%/1)I"Njllllt� 1I1\ \ \♦\.�r l//
•1 %\\\II►IKA\ \‘‘‘\\\\ ♦��: \\-\\1(•s.l ! /i/ii5.
\\\'\\ \\\ i/ Al % )IIII 14\\'l\.-\� / /�i/iiry� ` / 1
T�41 \ \ \\\`\ �*,,a •• N l rtJ \�dH>,/ r \�/ ///fir \\\\\�\`\ � /^ ��/i/ii/i Illll�llll\I:�\�i �� It 1/I/j/%/
•
• 370)"► -��\ \��.\ \\�•••••• \\111t1•\t\t, \\\\\` `s• 1
\ _ \l 11 ll \ \\•\ \\\\\\\ \\\\\
1 1 - Y // j//i •\\\ \\� ., ./=�.///iiie III 11 I \\ \.. .\,_ .__%..:// //„ ..) 1\1, ///
•
FEATURE E
IMPACT 6
71-121
ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
LAND PLANNING STORMWALER MANAGEMENT
16 CONSULTANT PLACE, SUITE 201
NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF
EXAMINERS FOR ENGINEERS AND
SURVEYORS LICENSE NO.: C-0676
Ito (iv
::\::::t ,,..:17:_,(1)111:1:1-:::101,111111iiiiiiiiiitittil 1
.. _ 5) - - 9-1 1 ji : it 11111:Ni‘111:1011 .1111:1%,%1 :ll \\ \‘:" :::i \1\1:1 \‘‘‘I • : : ‘. ‘t:init-ti•it- ‘:
.r.,I.C1. . * .,, 1.1,•••/••,(•%,,,,,,,,,A;,,,,- ......,\,.,,,\,„\\:\\:„...0‘,........\\ \‘‘,.0.‘.\.\\‘‘‘‘‘),
..._: rifl'7:*\Nii....: .4 ** ;'''' trajtle/g/741‘i,,,aitill/iiiiiiiiiif‘ukit%figarlil)-1;l1;ir.:44i-L: \ik.‘1:‘11.1:11kiimuliIiitli illIllicill:11:111:11:iiiiiiliji::11111::11:11:
MATCH LINE t
ENLARGED EXISTING CONDITIONS
141.11
rail 1\11%11;1Ni
wit
ENLARGED EXISTING CONDITIONS
400
OLIVE BRANCH RESERVE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1607 OLIVE BRANCH ROAD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
ENLARGED EXISTING CONDITIONS
DRAWN BY CHECK BY
EA NNA
PROJECT #2217
10/14/2022
SCALE AS SHOWN
Y\`\� ♦/ \t!t \\\1\\(t\\\ll \tl%iItu I111\\\\I11\\\\\\1tI\N \'.'.. (lr► \ �J\ `� \ /\\t. \ . r�tl t/����/_/\\ ��.-.-- - >`
C.) COPYRIGHT 2022 THIS DOCUMENT AND THE DESIGN ARE THE PROPERTY OF HORVATH ASSOCIATES, P.A. ANY REPRODUCTION WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT IS PROHIBITED

IMPACT 8
11
FEATURE I
0
/ 0
o
_= 'r=s#ate;. _ `\\ 1
r'.
•
17'
:::
r �`\�/1/�.::/�� Q \\\\\\\q \\\\\ 3
� � \' r l 1r �iii' \ \\\1,\\\ \\\\\1 \\ll �f
.0..., \\ \\ // i i � - �11\\\l\\ \I\\� \
....x- /////i///�= \ 2 \\\\\\ .,
. oz`" ,..,‘,?\,,t,\:\k1.7::4-.-;.,-, \,1" -4.:
4.4 "---- .....=:_... 1 1"- *::::"...W--.17::::17.—':::',
,..,.,:‘: --\ \ _
\\\\\\,\11111//''__—_1,\\\Ks,\\,� /M",-���\N\r-- c�,� i
\�NVt. / / Ns. \\\• .*•♦%/ice \\ \\♦,- 2
\\�\\\\\\‘I ►\ \\\' I1 \ �A\\ �ii�, \\I.
•\\q\�\Q���\>;�� 1 �i\����\\�\ _ LT,�\ i ail •\\il`\,;
vq\\\\\\\\\��\\`\\ \t \��`:� .\ -� \ ' .� i 111 ►\\ 1 \\ 1\
...,\\\\\\\\I\\\\\\\\ �%\�z.��„��, \\�\ \\\�1tlI1t111//\
`fil��\\�\\\\\\\�\\�\\ t -‘ \�‘\\\�sJ\\\jli'/-/>�t%)tip/� �/I
�1/�\\\\\\\\\\\1/4 K It\\t \ \tl/t Iy�',Zs /\.\\
i ‘ ..., \::::::;‘/.,-,....k\t1„....‘ iz:
/4//‘i \\ \,`;i.,,,...` ,_/.....1 1 i \‘`‘‘,1`‘`‘‘‘`‘,,:i,
/ /.\ \ ` \.. , 1 1 \ \ \ / a+\ \ +TES"
\- 1I 1\ \s �.\-\\ \��:
/ \\\\\y.� / r / 1 ��`��\��•
...�
ra
i --:N.\\ \V '2'ii%ice-�i( 5 P N\,' .'
�1\\1..♦=%%///�•,n \ \ \\ ♦.
(.
IMPACT 8 PLAN
IM-2B SCALE:1"=200'
0 100 200
400
SCALE: 1" = 200'
•
IMPACT 9
- Zt' tti%
IMPACT 10 ,gm m-mkg
3J
IMPACT 9 & 10 PLAN
SCALE: 1 "=200'
0 100 200
400
SCALE: 1" = 200'
HORVATH
ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
LAND PLANNING STORMWALER MANAGEMENT
16 CONSULTANT PLACE, SUITE 201
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27707
P 919.490.4990 F 919.490.8953
NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF
EXAMINERS FOR ENGINEERS AND
SURVEYORS LICENSE NO.: C-0676
www.horvolhassociates.com
OLIVE BRANCH RESERVE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1607 OLIVE BRANCH ROAD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
ENLARGED EXISTING CONDITIONS
DRAWN BY CHECK BY
EA NNA
PROJECT #2217
10/14/2022
IM-02B
SCALE AS SHOWN
© COPYRIGHT 2022 THIS DOCUMENT AND THE DESIGN ARE THE PROPERTY OF HORVATH ASSOCIATES, P.A. ANY REPRODUCTION WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT IS PROHIBITED

z
\ \\\
\\\
\‘‘
`1
\1
\\
\\\ FEATURE I
/; ry
IMPACT 8
SEE SHEET
IM-03B
2
BREAKLINE 1 -\_
SEE SHEET
IM-03A
FATURE D
•
PF - TPF
7P
ei4- c5 r5559 a pdFS, lip r�
!MI WAN WPM MI! .!! 11%19 I il_
1i;i1 V .7
IMPACT 2 Ad/
rT �
.1111PAP4 mg,
Willi
■ ' S'S�r.f� awaw aka '7 rFrrI
ROM MY�� J titi14L1 iiatii1Gii? tidGiE11li`11111
FEATURE E
IMPACT 6
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
IM-03 SCALE: 1 "=400'
i
i
200 400
800
SCALE: 1" = 400'
BREAKLINE 1
HORVATH
ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
LAND PLANNING STORMWALER MANAGEMENT
16 CONSULTANT PLACE, SUITE 201
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27707
P 919.490.4990 F 919.490.8953
NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF
EXAMINERS FOR ENGINEERS AND
SURVEYORS LICENSE NO.: C-0676
www.horvathassociates.com
'\�
IMPACT 9
IMPACT 10
SEE SHEET
IM-03B
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
SCALE: 1 "=400'
0 200 400
800
SCALE: 1" = 400'
OLIVE BRANCH RESERVE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1607 OLIVE BRANCH ROAD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
OVERALL PROPOSED CONDITIONS
DRAWN BY CHECK BY
EA NNA
PROJECT #2217
'0/14/2022
VA-03
SCALE AS SHOWN
© COPYRIGHT 2022 THIS DOCUMENT AND THE DESIGN ARE THE PROPERTY OF HORVATH ASSOCIATES, P.A. ANY REPRODUCTION WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT IS PROHIBITED

in•1'
) MATCHLINE A THIS SHEET
til•c\%`t4..... •..r
1
r, tyJ, 4y
•l If. /O//
• M J
si7,• zz.,,
1 • �\ \\ \� \. Nit
Inv' ‘...\!t:\\‘'.1/40‘‘k*.\)."Itil':,.../•'-''...\:.-‘::3•!\\*.%\\‘ \k‘\\‘‘ • :6A‘'‘I'1":„:*
Es\7\ I \ 1\1 �\\\�\tlt1\al\: \Z.�
_ ♦A_ .\._ \ \ \\\ u111_\\\�
\I \ I Il I\1 E1 , \\\\\
Z •\
ATc 71te\1N
FEATURE C
r / //// //r/ \ ■■ iJIL / H�-1I1I>l
1 /%%ljlljlj�lj ,�• _,%/��/�11 U\\ l 111Il 11`
1\\\\\//111II1i�111L�11\�c�i/i▪ /1j,011It\`\�Iy\�"
IMPACT 2 �1
,I•Ii•11��//If /////r/
4111I 11111 I 1 I / 1� 1 �1 /////1/7
/jltl�11j t\\\\;�(4//rI�l1A1
�Ilt1VAt A)VAI11j %, " y : �
\1NI110\ \\
▪ / ` \
j/ \\' \ \\11Hi \
111j1' \� \ \\ \\\',
\\ \ \ II Il \\ \. \\ \\\
\��: FEATURED •a •.`. 1 \\ \ \ \\\\\\
\' `\`,\\\\\\\\ \11111110111' �k1•' •• q \ C'
•
\\`\\III\Ur%U!ii/%!///1/11 /If•11 •
.'��
\ / / // // `•
1Ii
IMPACT 4
III•.'t\\��. \\ A`� AAA_>V v v� v \\\J, \vi \ \ � \ \J, . � y�
\ Ilr \1\•
\ •( \I\' \.
\
IT
." ;, � \ ��\\\ \ 1!,\�V "tom .\\\\\\\\\ \�N\ a% '�'7
r \, \ \_ ,z \ a\Iiltcll\Ilt\ \lip\', — -\\\\: \\ ‘\\\\ \ ,.
Ir.. _ t ..I. id 1... N. , N,\•:- \\.••••-a.•..lI1A_-..\6 11
0 100 200 400
SCALE: 1" = 200'
OLIVE BRANCH RESERVE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1607 OLIVE BRANCH ROAD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
`\_ I Me
���
21
a •ter ��- ���.�:.
1111!1 ,_141101
IMPACT 3
_ ___
'
i 4u i — - ice•✓// . �/l`� \— �% ` 14�>�fl�=_�� ���� \\ �l /
soh
•
FEATURE E
- IMPACT 6
1 ENLARGED PROPOSED IMPACTS
�M-03 SCALE: 1 "=2001
ENLARGED PROPOSED IMPACTS
J +
•
f12 i 1
•. • I •
• �• .r.
• H • 13.
•
•I• • 1
w •3
• •
.I.
I• .' • • y
v
•
"mot. i%J
zt
:-�T7- . I.
r• . •`�.
.• 1.
• .
• • • • •
• •1;a
ir
FEATURE
•
•
'}
-
---- f7"
-tir
Z2
Z1
T �� • z
Z2 Z2
Z2
. Z1 ----- 21 _ Zi
--- Z2 -- --'• Z1 -
71 _____21 _tiry __-12 'Z1
IMPAC1
Il
rat I\
hilliiii11 III 1 111111 I11 \iitililr/t��/'/'l l
! J III /I 111 11.,1I�111r//11111 I'\III
�1(1/I ir'i.S;�'IIl)11t11 1�%1(U
T-�1.
`, •. It•rj1111 t11N41
In /rlu�jl�l}�tj�
11 ,11I/11111%1
Ilil1(111I(\�� A►�.,
III4.lI
J61
IMPACT 1
7fil�(il r '1'_
MATCHLINE A
11
IMPACT 7 HORVATH
2 ENLARGED PROPOSED IMPACTS
M-03 ' SCALE: 111=200'
0 100
200
400
SCALE: 1" = 200'
ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
LAND PLANNING STORMWALER MANAGEMENT
16 CONSULTANT PLACE, SUITE 201
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27707
P 919.490.4990 F 919.490.8953
NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF
EXAMINERS FOR ENGINEERS AND
SURVEYORS LICENSE NO.: C-0676
www.horvathassociates.com
DRAWN BY CHECK BY
EA NNA
PROJECT #2217
'0/14/2022
IM-03A
SCALE AS SHOWN
© COPYRIGHT 2022 THIS DOCUMENT AND THE DESIGN ARE THE PROPERTY OF HORVATH ASSOCIATES, P.A. ANY REPRODUCTION WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT IS PROHIBITED

1l;
PACT 5
\i'
\ram•
4411
Ili Sind Ir 7Bid IN -1Ealai434.
100 200 400
SCALE: 1" = 200'
J/
A
1 ENLARGED PROPOSED IMPACTS
M-03
SCALE: 1 "=200'
HORVATH
ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
LAND PLANNING STORMWALER MANAGEMENT
16 CONSULTANT PLACE, SUITE 201
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27707
P 919 490 4990 F 919 490 8953
NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF
EXAMINERS FOR ENGINEERS AND
SURVEYORS LICENSE NO.: C-0676
www.horvathassociates.com
OLIVE BRANCH RESERVE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1607 OLIVE BRANCH ROAD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
ENLARGED PROPOSED IMPACTS
DRAWN BY CHECK BY
EA NNA
PROJECT #2217
'0/14/2022
VA-03B
SCALE AS SHOWN
© COPYRIGHT 2022 THIS DOCUMENT AND THE DESIGN ARE THE PROPERTY OF HORVATH ASSOCIATES, P.A. ANY REPRODUCTION WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT IS PROHIBITED

IMPACT 8
FEATURE I
O
l�L ';,A fj�1''
1-
O
73,
IMPACT 8 PLAN
SCALE: 1 "=200' SCALE: 1 "=200'
1J
0 100 200
400
SCALE: 1"= 200'
k
IMPACT 9
21 --ono.
-1
IMPACT 10
/ 2 IMPACT 9 & 10 PLAN
M-03
SCALE: 1 "=40'
•
-+
1
1
0 100 200
400
SCALE: 1" = 200'
HORVATH
ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
LAND PLANNING STORMWALER MANAGEMENT
16 CONSULTANT PLACE, SUITE 201
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27707
P 919.490.4990 F 919.490.8953
NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF
EXAMINERS FOR ENGINEERS AND
SURVEYORS LICENSE NO.: C-0676
www.horvathassociates.com
OLIVE BRANCH RESERVE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1607 OLIVE BRANCH ROAD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
ENLARGED PROPOSED IMPACTS
DRAWN BY CHECK BY
EA NNA
PROJECT #2217
'0/14/2022
IM-03C
SCALE AS SHOWN
© COPYRIGHT 2022 THIS DOCUMENT AND THE DESIGN ARE THE PROPERTY OF HORVATH ASSOCIATES, P.A. ANY REPRODUCTION WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT IS PROHIBITED

10' WIDE ASPHALT
GREENWAY TRAIL
GRADE SHALL BE RESTORED
TO PRE -CONSTRUCTION
ELEVATION AND CONTOURS
TCE�
\� — � �= •• ... .._,.ri+.;iK�.•:•'ia:ii�iilFii�'�y�i�`T\���.rW9i� �--_____.3'�':;::� •: :::. y���
` --- _�—__����� .;E>�r. .„�;;:::•:::'�r ASSOCIATES
�.—�\ --__ 'y;:::•:::::::•::•:::., LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
uNOPaNNINGCIVIL naRMw.�aM.N.GEMEN.
SANITARY SEWER __ a^� \�-- wC�ia ::.:: 6 CONSULTANT PLACE, SUITE zoi
PIPE ---__ ---�� -- DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27707
P 919. 490. 4990 F 919. 490. 8953
- `\ ------ \\ _ NT \ _ 10`� �/ ___ NORTH CAROLINA CAROLINA
2
30' SANITARY SEWER..• ...........�—' - EXAMINERS FOR ENGINEERS AND
SURVEYORS LICENSE NO.: C-0676
EASEMENT—' i.-- e. m
SANITARY SEWER \ \ �_��� �� I ;
\_ \ —____
\•-1 \
PIPE \ —� \ \ —•a__
FEATURE 02,
OLIVE BRANCH RESERVE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1607 OLIVE BRANCH ROAD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
IMPACT 1
HORVATH
WETLAND IMPACT - TEMPORARY
WETLAND IMPACT -
PERMANENT -NO PERMANENT LOSS
STREAM IMPACT - PERMANENT -NO
PERMANENT LOSS
STREAM BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACT -
PERMANENT
STREAM BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACT -
PERMANENT
TREE PROTECTION FENCING/
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
LIMITS OF WETLAND
— TCE - TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
SUMMARY OF IMPACTS
IMPACT NUMBER
TYPE
PERMANENT
W ETLAN ❑
PERMANENT -NO -
PERMANENT LOSS
1
SANITARY SEWER PIPE
198 SF
0.0045 AC 10,246 SF
0.2352 AC
DRAWN BY CHECK BY
EA NNA
PROJECT #2217
10/14/2022
I M - 1
SCALE AS SHOWN
© COPYRIGHT 2022 THIS DOCUMENT AND THE DESIGN ARE THE PROPERTY OF HORVATH ASSOCIATES, P.A. ANY REPRODUCTION WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT IS PROHIBITED

1
ODE _
zo
;.:?-1
$
ggo
+ p
"=289.94 (100-8 (6' MH)
)UT=289.84
J = 298.62' (MH 497)
IDE DROP INV IN = 290.E
WTL Wit WTL Wrl
o
0,,,,zzz0
♦
Q
n
»>>
i
-'
1co
•
!
) (6' MH)
1+82.16
>99.10
1=289.50 (100-9 (6' MH))
0
Oo
1-1
/
100 YR FLOOD
ELEV — 2�°
NOTE:
MANHOLE
VENT
F-OODPLAIN
RLEASE SEE NOTE
♦ '
' \♦ '
WATER TIGHT
COVER. EXTEND
PIPE 2' ABOVE
#1 FOR SAFETY
REQUIREMENTS.
C
(/)r z
z
ADJACENT FUTURE STR
CROSSING (WEST) ELE
ON SURVEY INFORMA
CENTERLINE OF THE ST
FROM OUTFACE
AM
ATION BASED
ON = 294.0
EAM 200-FT
um WTL wry----
/
\
XISTING GRA
E
" PVC 213 LF
S/S © 9.90%
WETLANDZ
i
i ;
i
INISHED
GRADE
I
\
MANHOLE
243LF1I8"
PVC S/i@0.14%
i
1
1
-
SANITARY
SEWER PIPE
368 LF
18" PVC S/S @ 0.33%
29+50
30+00
30+50
31+00
31+50
32+00
32+50
IMPACT 1 PROFILE
SCALE: 1"=40' SCALE 1"=40'H / 1"=4'V
33+00
33+50
310
300
290
285
34+00
0 20 40
HORVATH
ASSOCIATES
16 CONSULTANT PLACE. SUITE 201
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27707
P 919.490.4990 F 919.490.8953
NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF
EXAMINERS FOR ENGINEERS AND
SURVEYORS LICENSE NO.: C-0676
www.horvathassociotes.com
80
SCALE: 1" = 40'
OLIVE BRANCH RESERVE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1607 OLIVE BRANCH ROAD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
IMPACT 1 PROFILE
DRAWN BY CHECK BY
EA NNA
PROJECT #2217
' °„ 4,2022
I M -1 A
SCALE AS SHOWN
© COPYRIGHT 2022 THIS DOCUMENT AND THE DESIGN ARE THE PROPERTY OF HORVATH ASSOCIATES, P.A. ANY REPRODUCTION WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT IS PROHIBITED

EXISTING GRADE
0
0
co
2 0 00 c0
o MANHOLE -,o oL a co N
M N Z Q
Ez z
ADJACENT FUTURE STREA
CROSSING (WEST) ELEVATION BASED
ON SURVEY INFORMATION = 292.5
CENTERLINE OF THE STREAM 120-FT
FROM OUTFALL
0
.ti
368 L
F 18" PVC S/S @ 0.33%
SANITARY SEWER PIPE
300
290
285
33+50 34+00 34+50 35+00 35+50 36+00
1 IMPACT 1 PROFILE
IM-1B SCALE: 1 "=40'
0 20 40 80
SCALE: 1" = 40'
NOTES:
1. RIM ELEVATIONS ALONG OUTFALLS ARE TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3-FEET ABOVE EXISTING GROUND
ELEVATION. IF 4 FEET OR
HIGHER, THE CITY OF DURHAM ENGINEERING DIVISION SHALL REQUIRE FLAT MANHOLES, EXTERIOR
STEPS AND SAFETY
BARS ON TOP OF MANHOLE.
O
O
co
2 0 W
' O W N
O O l c
Lou"O'I(Ni— O
N z
O
o -( >
z z
.ti
LEASE SEE NOTE
REQUIREMENTS.
WETLAND
1#1 FOR SAFETY
\/ 100 YR FLOOD ELEV = 297.0
5
EXISTING GRADE
MANHOLE
5
SANITARY SEWER PIPE
345 LF 18" P'C S/S @ 0.14P%
35+50 36+00 36+50 37+00 37+50
IMPACT 1 PROFILE
SCALE: 1 "=40'
0 20 40 80
SCALE 1"=40'H / 1"=4'V
SCALE: 1" = 40'
280
270
HORVATH
ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
LAND PLANNING STORMWALER MANAGEMENT
16 CONSULTANT PLACE, SUITE 201
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27707
P 919.490.4990 F 919.490.8953
NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF
EXAMINERS FOR ENGINEERS AND
SURVEYORS LICENSE NO.: C-0676
www.horvathassociates.com
OLIVE BRANCH RESERVE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1607 OLIVE BRANCH ROAD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
IMPACT 1 PROFILE
DRAWN BY CHECK BY
EA NNA
PROJECT #2217
'0„4/2022
IM-1 B
SCALE AS SHOWN
© COPYRIGHT 2022 THIS DOCUMENT AND THE DESIGN ARE THE PROPERTY OF HORVATH ASSOCIATES, P.A. ANY REPRODUCTION WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT IS PROHIBITED

FEATURE C
JURISDICTIONAL
INTERMITTENT
STREAM
FEATURE W2
STREAM IMPACT
10' WIDE ASPHALT
GREENWAY TRAIL
PROPOSED
SANITARY SEWER
Ag‘t
y
i /
/
X \\\\\\sue'=_s
•
\•
_
�� ----- :; STREAM CROSSING r
��____�315),�`�` ABOVE GRADE —
IMPACT 2 PLAN i
SCALE: 1 "=40'
20
40
80
SCALE: 1" = 40'
SUMMARY OF IMPACTS
IMPACT NUMBER
TYPE
STREAM
PERMANENT
TEMPORARY
2
SANITARY SEWER PIPE AND
BOARDWALK
N/A
36
LF
138 SF 0.003
AC
30' SANITARY SEWER
EASEMENT
'''' ++++
+ + + + +
+ + + +
WETLAND IMPACT - PERMANENT
WETLAND IMPACT - TEMPORARY
WETLAND IMPACT -
PERMANENT -NO PERMANENT LOSS
STREAM IMPACT - PERMANENT
STREAM IMPACT - TEMPORARY
STREAM IMPACT - PERMANENT -NO
PERMANENT LOSS
STREAM BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACT -
PERMANENT
STREAM BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACT -
PERMANENT
—••ZI ••— ZONE 1 LIMIT
•• 72 ••— ZONE 2 LIMIT
— TPF
TREE PROTECTION FENCING/
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
LIMITS OF WETLAND
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
NOTES:
1. POST CONSTRUCTION THE STREAM BED WILL BE
BROUGHT BACK TO PRE -CONSTRUCTION ELEVATION AND
THE STREAM BANKS WILL BE STABILIZED AND
REVEGETATED. ANY EXCESS MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED
TO HIGH GROUND DISPOSAL AREA.
EXISTING GRADE
2(.
E.
N
co
O
H-
N
STREAM TOP OF
BANK
OF DIF FIFE
196LF13"PVC S/S
BOARDWALK
MANHOLE
. 14/o
SANITARY SEWER
PIPE
26+50
27+00
27+50
IMPACT 2 PROFILE
SCALE: 1 "=40'
28+00
SCALE 1"=40'H / 1"=4'V
HORVATH
ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
LANG PLANNING STOPLAWATER MANAGEMENT
16 CONSULTANT PLACE, SUITE 201
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27707
P 919.490.4990 F 919.490.8953
NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF
EXAMINERS FOR ENGINEERS AND
SURVEYORS LICENSE NO.: C-0676
,.Horvomassociates.aom
OLIVE BRANCH RESERVE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1607 OLIVE BRANCH ROAD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
IMPACT 2
DRAWN BY CHECK BY
EA NNA
PROJECT #2217
10/14/2022
I M - 2
SCALE AS SHOWN
© COPYRIGHT 2022 THIS DOCUMENT AND THE DESIGN ARE THE PROPERTY OF HORVATH ASSOCIATES, P.A. ANY REPRODUCTION WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT IS PROHIBITED

PROPOSED
RETAINING WALL
PROPOSED
SIDEWALK, TYP
PROPOSED
WATER MAIN
PROPOSED
STORM PIPE
PROPOSED SANITARY
SEWER MAIN
STREAM IMPACT
IMPACT 3 PLAN
SCALE: 1 "=40'
FEATURE B
JURISDICTIONAL
INTERMITTENT STREAM
0 20 40
PROPOSED
GRADE
80
SCALE: 1" = 40'
SUMMARY OF IMPACTS
IMPACT NUMBER
TYPE
STREAM
PERMANENT
TEMPORARY
3
ROAD CROSSING
8
LF
2
LF
26 SF 0.001
AC
9 SF 0.0002
AC
+ + + +
+ + + + +
+ + + +
88
WETLAND IMPACT - PERMANENT
WETLAND IMPACT - TEMPORARY
WETLAND IMPACT -
PERMANENT -NO PERMANENT LOSS
STREAM IMPACT - PERMANENT
STREAM IMPACT - TEMPORARY
STREAM IMPACT - PERMANENT -NO
PERMANENT LOSS
STREAM BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACT -
PERMANENT
STREAM BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACT -
PERMANENT
•— ZONE 1 LIMIT
- •• Z2 ••— ZONE 2 LIMIT
— TPF
- WIt
- LD
—TcE—
TREE PROTECTION FENCING/
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
LIMITS OF WETLAND
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
IMPACT 3 PROFILE
SCALE: 1 "=40'
SCALE 1"=40'H / 1"=4'V
i
co ,
00 vO '
cy.-1-m •
=355.96 (4-24)
UT=355.15
BVCS:
1 1
I I
r PROPOSED
PVI STA=15+84.07
PVI ELEV=357.94
A.D.=6.70%
K=32.45
ROAD
-2
RIM=359.71
INV OUT=356..
4-11
� I
J e,
•m v
b
I
II
RIM=358.79
INV IN=353.83 (4
INV OUT=353.73
H - 505
TA 15+49.09
IM=359.13
V IN=351.52 (MH - (50
V OUT=351.32
II
25 LF
24" RCP-
@ 1.02%
II
MANHOLE
FIRE HYDR/I NTI
STORM PIPE
-
PROPOSED
LNE
89 LF 18" RCP -III @ 1.
WATER I I
1
II
.3N
T
—�
_7\
— —
I
\i i
\.1 I
\ 1
i
.\ •
, \
•PCA
1
BOUNDARY
•
I I
STREAM I I
I`,
\
\
\
EXISTING GRADE
`'---°
..--- -
/
/
2j /
\
/`/
I I
14+50
15+00
15+50
16+00
HORVATH
ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
16 CONSULTANT PLACE, SUITE 201
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27707
P 919.490.4990 F 919.490.8953
NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF
EXAMINERS FOR ENGINEERS AND
SURVEYORS LICENSE NO.: C-0676
www.norvalhassociafes.com
PROPOSED
SANITARY SEWER
PIPE
OLIVE BRANCH RESERVE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1607 OLIVE BRANCH ROAD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
IMPACT 3
DRAWN BY CHECK BY
EA NNA
PROJECT #2217
10/14/2022
I M - 3
SCALE AS SHOWN
© COPYRIGHT 2022 THIS DOCUMENT AND THE DESIGN ARE THE PROPERTY OF HORVATH ASSOCIATES, P.A. ANY REPRODUCTION WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT IS PROHIBITED

PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MAIN
10' WIDE ASPHALT
GREENWAY TRAIL
FEATURE W2
30' SANITARY SEWER
EASEMENT
,
\ / / \\
\ 1 1 \ \\
\'- \\ \ 1 1 \ \ • \\
\♦\
+41. �� \\ \\ 11\\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \a \ \ \ \ \ \ \
• `\ 0 .\ \\ 1 \\ \\ \\ \\\
\ !+......\..„...‘
; \ 11 \ \\ \\ \\ \
\ / 1 /:•'•:iii i 1 I \
•
/ \// 1 t' \ \ 1 l 1
•
\1/ / �/ \\\ \lil .' \-� 1 i /�i
-----•\ 1 A /— / 1 \
\l/•
\�\ 1‘!
i 1 1
i...•.•. \
1 I 1
OFF q:.". \ 1 1
\
1
\ \\\ \
\� \�\ 1 i \I a' \ \
\ 1 U ;•.. •• \ \
IMPACT 4 PLAN
0 20 40
80
SCALE: 1" = 40'
++++
+ + + + +
+ + + +
WETLAND IMPACT - PERMANENT
WETLAND IMPACT - TEMPORARY
WETLAND IMPACT -
PERMANENT -NO PERMANENT LOSS
STREAM IMPACT - PERMANENT
STREAM IMPACT - TEMPORARY
STREAM IMPACT - PERMANENT -NO
PERMANENT LOSS
STREAM BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACT -
PERMANENT
STREAM BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACT -
PERMANENT
—•• , ••— ZONE 1 LIMIT
—••,2 ••— ZONE 2 LIMIT
TREE PROTECTION FENCING/
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
--- LIMITS OF WETLAND
— LD LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
- TCE - TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
SUMMARY OF IMPACTS
IMPACT
NUMBER
TYPE
WETLAND
PERMANENT -NO -
PERMANENT LOSS
4
SANITARY SEWER
PIPE
499 SF
0.0115 AC
NOTES:
1. THE PERMITTEE SHALL RESTORE THE WETLAND CONTOURS TO PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS.
ANY EXCESS MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED TO A HIGH GROUND DISPOSAL AREA.
1
I
WETLAND
WETLAND
PROPOSED GRADE
EXISTING
GRADE
I
I
I
PROPOSED
SANITARY
SEWER PIPE
3001F15"
I
PVC S/S@0.1
18+50
19+00
IMPACT 4 PROFILE
SCALE: 1 "=40'
19+50
20+00
SCALE 1"=40'H / 1"=4'V
HORVATH
ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
LANG PLANNING STOPLAWATER MANAGEMENT
16 CONSULTANT PLACE, SUITE 201
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27707
P 919.490.4990 F 919.490.8953
NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF
EXAMINERS FOR ENGINEERS AND
SURVEYORS LICENSE NO.: C-0676
+.Horvomassociafes.aom
OLIVE BRANCH RESERVE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1607 OLIVE BRANCH ROAD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
IMPACT 4
DRAWN BY CHECK BY
EA NNA
PROJECT #2217
10/14/2022
I M - 4
SCALE AS SHOWN
© COPYRIGHT 2022 THIS DOCUMENT AND THE DESIGN ARE THE PROPERTY OF HORVATH ASSOCIATES, P.A. ANY REPRODUCTION WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT IS PROHIBITED

• \ \• \
i W
•
FEATURE D JURISDICTIONAL
PERENNIAL STREAM
�\\ ;%
\
STREAM BUFFER \lam •.•• 11\l/
ZONE 1 11
\ J •
STREAM BUFFER
ZONE 2
\ \ 1 1
\\ FEATURE W3
I
•.0 -.•\
\
••
PROPOSED
POND OUTFALL
_-�
PERMANENT ifr,"0- *�
WETLAND#j
IMPACT 444
POt-io'
SIDEWALK
PROPOSED
i
�i.1.• ,, ,, ,
i
i
/ •.<, \
1 .• \
\ •.• \
\• / \\ ‘-:=\ •.• \ •.
•
PROPOSED
BOTTOMLESS
\ \•\ \\\ ARCH
.,1vv vim' CULVERT
�,-��-��;�� 1 i �\�V�_ (!\\�\\ PROPOSED
TEMPORARY .\ •��\\ \\ \\ HEADWALL
WETLAND • ����� 11\ 11111\
IMPACT : \l/ \ \\-\ 1 j lj tioiR
■ -c - \ \. \ ?),1) la I I I \
IMPACT 5 PLAN anD
IMPACT 5
SCALE: 1 "=40'
0 20 40
80
NOTE: DEEMED ALLOWABLE
PER NEUSE RIVER BUFFER RULES
PROPOSED
SANITARY SEWER
PROPOSED
STORM PIPE
7- PROPOSED
WATER LINE
1
++_+T+
+++++
+ + + +
11•• 72 ••
— TPF
— LD
SCALE: 1" = 40'
NOTES:
1. POST CONSTRUCTION THE STREAM BED WILL BE BROUGHT BACK TO
PRE -CONSTRUCTION ELEVATION AND THE STREAM BANKS WILL BE
STABILIZED AND REVEGETATED. ANY EXCESS MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED
TO HIGH GROUND DISPOSAL AREA.
WETLAND IMPACT- PERMANENT
WETLAND IMPACT - TEMPORARY
WETLAND IMPACT -
PERMANENT -NO PERMANENT LOSS
STREAM IMPACT - PERMANENT
STREAM IMPACT - TEMPORARY
STREAM IMPACT - PERMANENT -NO
PERMANENT LOSS
STREAM BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACT -
PERMANENT
STREAM BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACT -
PERMANENT
- ZONE 1 LIMIT
ZONE 2 LIMIT
TREE PROTECTION FENCING/
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
LIMITS OF WETLAND
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TO - TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
IMPACT 5
SCALE: 1 "=40'
SUMMARY OF IMPACTS
IMPACT NUMBER
TYPE
BUFFER
WETLAND
ZONE
PERMANENT
PREMANENT
TEMPORARY
5
ROAD CROSSING AND
SANITARY SEWER PIPE
ZONE 1
10,675 SF
0.2451 AC
14913
SF
0.342355
AC
2886 SF
0.066253 AC
ZONE 2
6,667 SF
0.1531 AC
-12-4
STA 20+82.72
RIM=323.19
INV OUT=319.94
v
20---- Z2 Z2 ---
O
S
DE
RISE=9'
A 21 +96.90
•
,,,
m.
of
M• 23
V
0 -. •
Iri M
NaMI�
STREAM ZOI`
&ZONE2
m IUU-I (5' MH)
STA 23+36.68
N
PROPOSED.
SORM
��
'IP
N
a`
II
csi M J
Qc‘i -I °
~EZ.Z
_
o
M
IA 22+21.00
=319.56
---- --- - 22 Z2 - - Z2 -IT
\f 316.3 (2-4)
,BOUT=315.57
\\ D
\�
/
I
18 LE
18" RCP -II
@ l.bl%a
'
- PROPOSED I
WATER LINE
1 ' • a
/
�<
STREAM
LF PVC S�
2.1,y,
ZONE 1
& ZONE 2
PROPOSEDANITARY-
SEWER FIPE;
�_•
"
•
1 ,:
,
I
I
�%
n 131
'
N
LF
24" R 'P-III
/`
/ /
/ /
1.00%
/
_
90/
rRoroS
BOTTOMLESS
1
:D- ,
;
0
1
SECTIO
OF DIPNN ;
N
I
V
'/1/
,
I
1�
' '
,
- (5' MH)
22+71.10
A=320.39
.0ARCHOCULVERT
rn
ii
GRADE
STREAM TOP CIF
BAN
-
,
I
\ : \I
iEXISTING
Lit)�
1 ,I
-
-
_
-
66 LF
16" DIP
St
OUTSIDE
DROF
10
O
ro
(..0.p
p O
co 17
O
O O
coM
o 00
O O
17
CO
O
co
r` )
M
313.76
21+00
21+50
22+00
IMPACT 5 PROFILE
SCALE 1"=40'H / 1"=4'V
22+50
23+00
HORVATH
ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
LAND PLANNING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
16 CONSULTANT PLACE, SUITE 201
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27707
P 919.490.4990 F 919.490.8953
NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF
EXAMINERS FOR ENGINEERS AND
SURVEYORS LICENSE NO.: C-0676
www.horvotbassociates.con,
PROPOSED
WATER LINE
OLIVE BRANCH RESERVE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1607 OLIVE BRANCH ROAD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
IMPACT 5
DRAWN BY CHECK BY
EA NNA
PROJECT #2217
10/14/2022
I M - 5
SCALE AS SHOWN
© COPYRIGHT 2022 THIS DOCUMENT AND THE DESIGN ARE THE PROPERTY OF HORVATH ASSOCIATES, P.A. ANY REPRODUCTION WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT IS PROHIBITED

10' WIDE ASPHALT
GREENWAY TRAIL
PROPOSED SANITARY
SEWER MAIN
ZONE 1
FEATURE E
— //
tQe � /I / /
/� / / / I /
L'----
\/ ,,/ / / / ``\,� ---
�/ t Z // / \, _ __ ��
S / ' :.
sk / \ ,sr)/ ��-- // //
\ \ // / \ �---- /
, A \ -, / \ -- .A9'_ --' -
\ \ 1 \\-_- • �--- _.:4.,, _--,
\ \ I - — _--ice'
*1 \ ` .1r-- —� —�_—----'-- //
4 / �- •\ __ �'• � ////f
��/.�*'
0
,•/
\ •
IMPACT 6 PLAN
IMPACT 6
SCALE: 1 "=40'
0 20 40
80
SCALE: 1" = 40'
SUMMARY OF IMPACTS
IMPACT NUMBER
6
TYPE
SANITARY SEWER PIPE
BUFFER
ZONE
PERMANENT
1184 SF
819 SF
' ' ' +++`+
+ + + + +
+ + + +
WETLAND IMPACT - PERMANENT
WETLAND IMPACT - TEMPORARY
WETLAND IMPACT -
PERMANENT -NO PERMANENT LOSS
STREAM IMPACT - PERMANENT
STREAM IMPACT - TEMPORARY
STREAM IMPACT - PERMANENT -NO
PERMANENT LOSS
STREAM BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACT -
PERMANENT
STREAM BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACT -
PERMANENT
• ••— ZONE 1 LIMIT
�•• 22 .•— ZONE 2 LIMIT
TPF
LD
TREE PROTECTION FENCING/
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
LIMITS OF WETLAND
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
— ICE — TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
IMPACT 6
SCALE: 1 "=40'
330
320
310
300
MANHOLE
STREAM TOI
B
9+00
OF
NK
9+50
2
0
0
to
N
0
MANHOLE
PROPO
SANITAI
PIPE
J A2 LF 15" PVC S/S @
1
10+00
IMPACT 6 PROFILE
SCALE 1"=40'H / 1"=4'V
;ED
SE
.17
10+50
I I
< > >
z z
W
ER
ZONE 2
HORVATH
ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
LANG PLANNING STOPLAWATER MANAGEMENT
16 CONSULTANT PLACE, SUITE 201
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27707
P 919.490.4990 F 919.490.8953
NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF
EXAMINERS FOR ENGINEERS AND
SURVEYORS LICENSE NO.: C-0676
.horvo,hassociafes.aom
OLIVE BRANCH RESERVE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1607 OLIVE BRANCH ROAD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
IMPACT 6
DRAWN BY CHECK BY
EA NNA
PROJECT #2217
10/14/2022
I II ■ 6
SCALE AS SHOWN
© COPYRIGHT 2022 THIS DOCUMENT AND THE DESIGN ARE THE PROPERTY OF HORVATH ASSOCIATES, P.A. ANY REPRODUCTION WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT IS PROHIBITED

30' SANITARY
SEWER EASEMENT
AND PERMANENT
MAINTENANCE
CORRIDOR
PROPOSED SANITARY
SEWER MAIN
FEATURE W2
IMPACT 7 PLAN
IMPACT 7
SCALE: 1 "=40'
STREAM TOP OF
BANK
0 20 40
80
SCALE: 1" = 40'
+ + + +
+ + + + +
aag
WETLAND IMPACT - PERMANENT
WETLAND IMPACT - TEMPORARY
WETLAND IMPACT -
PERMANENT -NO PERMANENT LOSS
STREAM IMPACT - PERMANENT
STREAM IMPACT - TEMPORARY
STREAM IMPACT - PERMANENT -NO
PERMANENT LOSS
STREAM BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACT -
PERMANENT
STREAM BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACT -
PERMANENT
••- ZONE 1 LIMIT
�.. Z2 ••
- TPF
- LD
ZONE 2 LIMIT
TREE PROTECTION FENCING/
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
LIMITS OF WETLAND
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
- TCE - TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
NOTES:
1. POST CONSTRUCTION THE STREAM BED WILL BE BROUGHT BACK TO
PRE -CONSTRUCTION ELEVATION AND THE STREAM BANKS WILL BE STABILIZED
AND REVEGETATED. ANY EXCESS MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED TO HIGH
GROUND DISPOSAL AREA.
SUMMARY OF IMPACTS
IMPACT NUMBER
TYPE
BUFFER
STREAM
ZONE
PERMANENT
PERMANENT
TEMPORARY
7
SANITARY SEWER PIPE
ZONE 1
3048 SF
0.0700 AC
N/A
51
LF
ZONE 2
2033 SF
0.0467 AC
203 SF 0.005
AC
IMPACT 7
SCALE: 1 "=40'
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
1
I �
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
• I
I
1
II
I
I
I
I
:EXISTING GRADE
1
1
I
I
STREAg1
-OP OF;BANK
I
I
I
I
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
II1 A------
I
-
'_i-
I
V
•
1
I
1 1
1
I
1
1
I
I
1
1
1
1
I
I
I I
I
I
II
1 I
1
1
1
II1
I
I
I
1
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
•
I
I
I
I
SANITARY
SEWER PIPE 1
�
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
•
I
I
III
I
1
1
I
I
I
I
•
324 LF 1"IDVCS/S@0.14%
•
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I •
1
1
I
I
I
I
I I
II
•
I
I
I
I
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
ZONE 1
ZONE 2 1
1
I
I
1
1
1
1
I
I
I I
I
I
II
1
1
I
I
1
1
1
1
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
II
I
I
•
I
I
I
I
II
1
1
I
I
II
42+00
42+50
43+00
IMPACT 7 PROFILE
SCALE 1"=40'H / 1"=4'V
43+50
HORVATH
ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
LAND PLANNING STORMWALER MANAGEMENT
16 CONSULTANT PLACE, SUITE 201
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27707
P 919.490.4990 F 919.490.8953
NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF
EXAMINERS FOR ENGINEERS AND
SURVEYORS LICENSE NO.: C-0676
www.horvothassociates.com
OLIVE BRANCH RESERVE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1607 OLIVE BRANCH ROAD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
IMPACT 7
DRAWN BY CHECK BY
EA NNA
PROJECT #2217
10/14/2022
I M - 7
SCALE AS SHOWN
© COPYRIGHT 2022 THIS DOCUMENT AND THE DESIGN ARE THE PROPERTY OF HORVATH ASSOCIATES, P.A. ANY REPRODUCTION WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT IS PROHIBITED

PROPOSED WATERLINE
STREAM TOP OF BANK
\\:\\ \\,‘
\/
/
\ H 1
\ �\ I II
\ \ `\ \,‘ \ 1. AO -/0 \ \ \\ I
\\ \\\ \`\\\t` \\� A T \\\ \\ , a lit
,� \ `�.�®\i"'J, s, O \`\ \\ \ \
titi, \ \ �yi 1 7D \ \.
♦\ \ I
' ��ti' \\\\ 1 \ ' \
\
\ 0 s, \'
-0. \\ S`\ \\\ '/
\\;\\ Si
AI
JayV A \\ I
A. I
i• • • ' ` s k\\\� ` \ 6
i•% / _ \1
�l\
/ / /, il L . _�A
•� • ,/f / /lilt N-
f / / i;1 01, \
/ / /,, 1 \�\ ,\ /
/ / 7>l' \ \w\ \
/ \ \\\ \ \
/ / .'/ \ \
--- /1� 1 /ti" I► 1
___..../
21 = I / / I
/
1
\
•
\
IM-8
IMPACT 8 PLAN °
SCALE: 1 "=40'
20 40
80
SCALE: 1" = 40'
EXISTING TWIN 6' X 8'
CMP
+ + + +
+ + + + +
+ + + +
WETLAND IMPACT - PERMANENT
WETLAND IMPACT - TEMPORARY
WETLAND IMPACT -
PERMANENT -NO PERMANENT LOSS
STREAM IMPACT - PERMANENT
STREAM IMPACT - TEMPORARY
STREAM IMPACT - PERMANENT -NO
PERMANENT LOSS
STREAM BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACT -
PERMANENT
STREAM BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACT -
PERMANENT
�••=1 ••— ZONE 1 LIMIT
�••__ ••— ZONE 2 LIMIT
— TPF
WTL
— LD
TREE PROTECTION FENCING/
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
LIMITS OF WETLAND
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TCE — TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
SUMMARY OF IMPACTS
IMPACT NUMBER
TYPE
BUFFER
STREAM
ZONE
PERMANENT
PERMANENT
TEMPORARY
8
WATER LINE
ZONE 1
1813 SF
0.0416 AC
N/A
20
LF
ZONE 2
490 SF
0.0112 AC
356 SF 0.008
AC
NOTES:
1. POST CONSTRUCTION THE STREAM BED WILL BE BROUGHT BACK TO
PRE -CONSTRUCTION ELEVATION AND THE STREAM BANKS WILL BE STABILIZED
AND REVEGETATED. ANY EXCESS MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED TO HIGH
GROUND DISPOSAL AREA.
I
I I
I
I
.
I I
I
ZONE
1
'
I�
n
N
I
STREAM
TOP OF I
BANK
I
•
I
••
EXISTING GRADE
I
I
I
ZONE 2
/�
I ��
Y r
I
I
I
I I
I
•
N
I
.
I
i
/
M
I I
I I
�
'
`
1
\
\
`,
I
I.
T
1
1 /
�
1 '
I I
I : ; XISTING TWIN
I
6' X 8' CMP
I
I
I,
•
I
: 3
I SE•ARAtION
r
II
I I
I I
I I
1I
MIN.:VERTICAL
FROM
1
I
I
WrillyWN24"
'
ii///�
V AV
I
DIA.,
THICKNESS
ENCASEMENT
I I SPIDERS,
AND JACK
0.25" WALL
STEEL
PIPE WITH
INSTALLED VIA
�� -
A
85'
I
I
►I
I
11+00
11+50
/ 2 IMPACT 8 PROFILE
12+00
IM-8
SCALE: 1 "=40'
12+50
SCALE 1"=40'H / 1"=4'V
320 HORVATH
310
300
ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
LAND PLANNING STORMWALER MANAGEMENT
16 CONSULTANT PLACE, SUITE 201
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27707
P 919.490.4990 F 919.490.8953
NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF
EXAMINERS FOR ENGINEERS AND
SURVEYORS LICENSE NO.: C-0676
.Horvo,nassociafes.aom
OLIVE BRANCH RESERVE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1607 OLIVE BRANCH ROAD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
IMPACT 8
DRAWN BY CHECK BY
EA NNA
PROJECT #2217
10/14/2022
I M - 8
SCALE AS SHOWN
© COPYRIGHT 2022 THIS DOCUMENT AND THE DESIGN ARE THE PROPERTY OF HORVATH ASSOCIATES, P.A. ANY REPRODUCTION WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT IS PROHIBITED

EXISTING EDGE OF
PAVEMENT
EXISTING STORM PIPE
STREAM TOP OF BANK
ZONE 2 IMPACTS
DEEMED ALLOWABLE
a
ZONE 1 IMPACTS
DEEMED ALLOWABLE
PfZOOOSED WATERLJHE1,
' tti i
\
\
0 20
40
IMPACT 9 PLAN
SCALE: 1 "=40'
80
SCALE: 1" = 40'
SUMMARY OF IMPACTS
IMPACT NUMBER
TYPE
BUFFER
ZONE
PERMANENT
9
WATER LINE
ZONE 1
501 SF
0.0115 AC
ZONE 2
749 SF
0.0172 AC
+ + + +
WETLAND IMPACT - PERMANENT
WETLAND IMPACT - TEMPORARY
WETLAND IMPACT -
PERMANENT -NO PERMANENT LOSS
STREAM IMPACT - PERMANENT
STREAM IMPACT - TEMPORARY
STREAM IMPACT - PERMANENT -NO
PERMANENT LOSS
STREAM BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACT -
PERMANENT
STREAM BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACT -
PERMANENT
—•• _ ••— ZONE 1 LIMIT
—•• __ ••— ZONE 2 LIMIT
- TPF
--- WTL
- LD
TREE PROTECTION FENCING/
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
LIMITS OF WETLAND
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
70+50
— PROPOSED WATERL
71+00
71+50
9 PROFILE
E2)IMPACT
SCALE:1"=40'
SCALE 1"=40'H / 1"=4'V
EXISTING GRADE
470
460
72+00
HORVATH
ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
LAND PLANNING STORMWALER MANAGEMENT
16 CONSULTANT PLACE, SUITE 201
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27707
P 919.490.4990 F 919.490.8953
NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF
EXAMINERS FOR ENGINEERS AND
SURVEYORS LICENSE NO.: C-0676
,.Horvomassociates.aom
OLIVE BRANCH RESERVE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1607 OLIVE BRANCH ROAD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
IMPACT 9
DRAWN BY CHECK BY
EA NNA
PROJECT #2217
10/14/2022
I M - 9
SCALE AS SHOWN
© COPYRIGHT 2022 THIS DOCUMENT AND THE DESIGN ARE THE PROPERTY OF HORVATH ASSOCIATES, P.A. ANY REPRODUCTION WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT IS PROHIBITED

PROPOSED WATER LINE
TOP OF BANK -
ZONE 1 IMPACTS
DEEMED ALLOWABLE
EXISTING STORM PIPE
IMPACT 10 PLAN 0
20 40
IMPACT 10 PLAN
SCALE: 1 "=40'
ZONE 2 IMPACTS
DEEMED ALLOWABLE
80
SCALE: 1" = 40'
SUMMARY OF IMPACTS
IMPACT NUMBER
TYPE
BUFFER
ZONE
PERMANENT
10
WATER LINE
ZONE 1
299 SF
0.0069 AC
ZONE 2
202 SF
0.0046 AC
+ + + +
+ + + + +
+ + + +
WETLAND IMPACT- PERMANENT
WETLAND IMPACT - TEMPORARY
WETLAND IMPACT -
PERMANENT -NO PERMANENT LOSS
STREAM IMPACT - PERMANENT
STREAM IMPACT - TEMPORARY
STREAM IMPACT - PERMANENT -NO
PERMANENT LOSS
STREAM BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACT -
PERMANENT
STREAM BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACT -
PERMANENT
- ZONE 1 LIMIT
•• 22 ••- ZONE 2 LIMIT
- TPF
- LD
TREE PROTECTION FENCING/
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
LIMITS OF WETLAND
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TCE - TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
HORVATH
ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
LANG PLANNING STOPLAWATER MANAGEMENT
16 CONSULTANT PLACE, SUITE 201
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27707
P 919.490.4990 F 919.490.8953
NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF
EXAMINERS FOR ENGINEERS AND
SURVEYORS LICENSE NO.: C-0676
.horvo,hassociafes.aom
I
I I
__�
ZONE 1
, \ _�- ,
EXISTING G2ADE
f
ZONE 2
1
-
12" GATE
VALVE
PROPOSED
WATER LINE.
12" MIN.
tEPARATION
E). 24" RC
i
INSTALL BY OPEN
CUT
78+00
78+50
IMPACT 10 PROFILE
IM-10 SCALE: 1 "=40'
SCALE 1 "=40'H / 1 "=4'V
79+00
79+50
470
460
80+00
OLIVE BRANCH RESERVE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1607 OLIVE BRANCH ROAD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
IMPACT 10
DRAWN BY CHECK BY
EA NNA
PROJECT #2217
10/14/2022
I M - 1 0
SCALE AS SHOWN
© COPYRIGHT 2022 THIS DOCUMENT AND THE DESIGN ARE THE PROPERTY OF HORVATH ASSOCIATES, P.A. ANY REPRODUCTION WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT IS PROHIBITED

OLIVE BRANCH RESERVE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1607 OLIVE BRANCH ROAD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
IMPACT 11
PF-
-SAN TAJ?Y 1
PIPE
HORVATH
ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
LANG PLANNING STOPLAWATER MANAGEMENT
16 CONSULTANT PLACE, SUITE 201
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27707
P 919.490.4990 F 919.490.8953
NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF
EXAMINERS FOR ENGINEERS AND
SURVEYORS LICENSE NO.: C-0676
WETLAND IMPACT - TEMPORARY
WETLAND IMPACT -
PERMANENT -NO PERMANENT LOSS
STREAM IMPACT - PERMANENT -NO
PERMANENT LOSS
STREAM BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACT -
PERMANENT
STREAM BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACT -
PERMANENT
TREE PROTECTION FENCING/
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
LIMITS OF WETLAND
- TCE - TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
SUMMARY OF IMPACTS
IMPACT NUMBER
TYPE
BUFFER
STREAM
ZONE PERMANENT
PERMANENT
TEMPORARY
11
SANITARY SEWER PIPE
ZONE 1
2377
SF
0.0546
AC
N/A
55 LF
ZONE 2
1723
SF
0.0396
AC
539 SF I 0.0124 AC
DRAWN BY CHECK BY
EA NNA
PROJECT #2217
10/14/2022
I W 1 1
SCALE AS SHOWN
© COPYRIGHT 2022 THIS DOCUMENT AND THE DESIGN ARE THE PROPERTY OF HORVATH ASSOCIATES, P.A. ANY REPRODUCTION WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT IS PROHIBITED

WILDLANDS
HOLDINGS
Neuse Wetland Credits Statement of Availability
December 22, 2022
MCREF SFR 1 Brier Creek, LLC
1001 Morehead Sq. Dr., Ste. 350
Charlotte, NC 28203
Attn: Mr. William Morris
RE: Availability of Stream and Riparian Wetland Credits for the "Olive Branch Reserve" project
Bank Name: Falling Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Bank Sites: Falling Creek Mitigation Site / Grantham Branch Mitigation Site / McClenny Acres II
Mitigation Site
Bank Sponsor: Wildlands Holdings III, LLC
USACE Action ID No.: SAW-2015-00940 / SAW-2017-00549 / SAW-2017-00552
Permittee: MCREF SFR 1 Brier Creek, LLC
Riparian Wetland Credits Needed: 0.94 acres
Riparian Wetland Credits Available: 2.63 acres
Future Riparian Wetland Credit Release: 8.92 acres (Feb. 2023)
Neuse 03020201 River Basin
Dear Mr. Hester,
Wildlands Holdings III, LLC, owned and operated by Wildlands Engineering, Inc., currently has sufficient riparian
wetland credits from the Falling Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank: Falling Creek Mitigation Site, Grantham
Branch Mitigation Site, and McClenny Acres II Mitigation Site to satisfy the stream and/or wetland mitigation
requirements related to the above -mentioned project. The project is located within the Neuse River Basin of the
service area (HUC 03020201) of the Bank.
This letter is simply a statement of availability of credits as of the date written. It is neither a guarantee of
future credit availability, nor a guarantee of credit pricing. Credits are sold on a first come, first serve basis at
the Bank's price at the time an invoice is requested. Invoices reserve both the credits and the price for a period
of 30 days. Credits and associated pricing may be reserved for up to 6 months with a signed reservation
agreement and a 10% deposit.
Final transfer of the credits will be made upon receipt of a copy of the US Army Corps of Engineers
Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form approving the Stream and/or wetland mitigation
purchase from the Bank and upon receipt of your payment to Wildlands Holdings III, LLC.
We appreciate the opportunity to assist you with your mitigation requirements. Please contact me at (704) 332-
7754 x114 or [e-mail] if you have any questions or need any additional information.
Wildlands Holdings III, LLC • Wildlands Engineering, Inc • 1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 28203

WILDLANDS
HOLDINGS
Sincerely,
Camden M. Brunick
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Mitigation Credit Sales
[e-mail]
0: [phone] ext. 114
M: [phone]
Cc: Ms. April Norton, Regulatory Agent I USACE
Ms. Debbie Shirley, Project Manager -Regulatory Specialist 1 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Wildlands Holdings III, LLC • Wildlands Engineering, Inc • 1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 28203

•=7e:igie:il
i
`— — —
PP!P, �'! , !1►I�I11 ii!Li:il
I_y■L_y!r� =1:11�1���:��\a�,� ���1►S.l■I�\11.t ■ I
%f 4 S «<I ([[[[NL[[[ 1 f�:7
"""4ttttt r i (�tt«�[ef Irlt *A'
:11
1
--:- -or .i'l-P.-- i 1 „di if_:74:_rr_vriii_91 Tirmi..,,,,,,,,, ,. 4
..414e-- V _ 3* _lc ''
liv
• ,___,w,___ _
\\
\
\
\
\
\
SITE POST -DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE MAP
SCALE: 1 "=200'
0 100
TO DP#1
AREA = 4.98 AC "
200 400
SCALE: 1" = 200'
TC PATH
SHALLOW FLOW
LENGTH = 232'
(I
it
4
II
\\ C T
• •SHA 0 FL
LNGTH = 19
7a)
PIN: 0870-01-34-3458
PID: 194241
PIN: 0860-91-1 1-4757
PID: 227750
PIN: 0860-80-04-1650
PID: 194204
© COPYRIGHT 2021 THIS DOCUMENT AND THE DESIGN ARE THE PROPERTY OF HORVATH ASSOCIATES, P.A. ANY REPRODUCTION WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT IS PROHIBITED
■
■
�r
,1
HORVATH
■
■
■
■
■
■
ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
• LAND PLANNING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
16 CONSULTANT PLACE, SUITE 201
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27707
P 919.490.4990 F 919.490.8953
■
■
■
NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF
EXAMINERS FOR ENGINEERS AND
• SURVEYORS LICENSE NO.: C-0676
• www.horvathassociates.com
■
■
■
■
•
• QZ
. V oo
• ZLU
■ � U U
• Q�
■ COW m�
• LJJ t/iz
■
■ LJJ aw
ocQ
• J Cs
• �o
• 0
■
■
•
•
• POST
• • DRAINAGE
■ MAP
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■ PLANNING REVIEW
■ 2 I COMMENTS I TJS
09/24/2021
PLANNING REVIEW
1 I COMMENTS
08/02/2021
ITJS
• PLANNING REVIEW
■ 3 I COMMENTS I TJS
11/04/2021
■
■
•
•
•
•
•
• 811 - CALL BEFORE YOU DIG
• DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:
• MJ TS
•
•
PROJECT NO.
• 1931
• SHEET NO.
■
■ DA-3
■
• PRELIMINARY PLAT
DATE
MAY 7, 2021

S&
EC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
sandec.com
To: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
October 10, 2022
S&EC Project No: 14928.W6
Re: Online Project Review Request, Olive Branch Reserve, Durham — Durham County, North
Carolina
We have reviewed the referenced project using the USFWS North Carolina Field Office's online project
review process and have followed all guidance and instructions in completing the review. We completed
our review October 10, 2022 and are submitting our project review package in accordance with the
instructions for further review.
This report was previously submitted to FWS on November 1st, 2021. FWS did not provide any
comments.
Our proposed action consists of: A planned residential development that is proposing impacts to streams.
The location of the project and the action area are identified on the enclosed maps.
Olive Branch Reserve (35.951419, -78.767177). The site is located at 1607 Olive Branch Road, Durham —
Durham County, North Carolina.
Construction will commence following the anticipated Section 404 & 401 Approvals and should be
completed by the Nationwide Permit Expiration date of March 15, 2026.
This project review is needed under provisions of Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), and per
General Condition 18 of Nationwide Permit 29.
The enclosed project review package provides the information about the species and critical habitat
considered in our review. The species conclusions table included in the package identifies our
determinations for the resources that may be affected by the project.
For additional information, please contact Mason Montgomery at [e-mail]
Sincerely,
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
Mason Montgomery
Environmental Scientist, Wetlands Department
1. Project Request Review Package
2. S&EC T&E Species Report
3. Vicinity Maps
4. S&EC Photo Report
5. Overall Site Plan
6. FWS Official Species List
7. NHP Report
8. FWS Species Conclusion Table
9. FWS Self -Certification Letter

S&
EC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 1•alls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
sandcc.com
October 10, 2022
S&EC Project No.: 14928.W6
To: MCREF 1 Brier Creek, LLC
Attn: William Morris
1001 Morehead Square Drive
Charlotte, NC 28203
Re: THREATENED & ENDANGERED SPECIES REPORT
Olive Branch Reserve (+/-114 acres)
1607 Olive Branch Road, Durham, Durham County, NC
Dear Mr. Sivers:
On September 29, 2021, Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) evaluated the Olive Branch
Reserve property shown on the attached maps for potential endangered species. The property is located at
1607 Olive Branch Road in Durham County, NC. Surface waters on -site flow into Martin Creek in the
Neuse River Basin, which has been classified in the "Classification and NC DWQ Standards Applicable
to Surface Waters and Wetlands of North Carolina" as WS-IV; NSW.
We obtained the attached automatically generated official species list from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife
Service (FWS) and N.C. Natural Heritage Program (NHP) report identifying the protected species on or
within one mile of the project area that could potentially be affected by the project. These FWS & NHP
reports were updated as of the date of this report. The official species list is valid for 90 days.
We conducted site assessments to identify potential suitable habitat and preliminary surveys for the
individual species listed on the official species list. This included assessing the physical characteristics of
the streams, identifying forest types, and looking for evidence of the listed species on -site. This survey
did not include any detailed sampling or netting. The results of the search are discussed below.
Olive Branch Reserve - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 1 of 5

October 10, 2022
S&EC Project #14928.W6
RESULTS:
The FWS official species list identified the following species for the Evaluation limits:
• Neuse River Waterdog (Necturus lewisi), Proposed Threatened
• Cape Fear Shiner (Notropis mekistocholas), Endangered
• Carolina Madtom (Noturus furiosus), Proposed Endangered
• Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxii), Endangered
• Smooth Coneflower (Echinacea laevigata), Endangered
Of the species identified on the official species list, the NHP report did not identify any Federally
threatened or endangered species within the project area or within one mile of the project area. Other
State listed species were found within the project area as listed in the attached NHP report. The NHP
report identified one natural area within one mile of the project area. These are listed out in the
attached NHP Report.
NEUSE RIVER WATERDOG (Necturus lewisi):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of the streams on -site for potential suitable habitat for
the Neuse River Waterdog. The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within the
project area or within one mile of the site. This species is found in the Neuse River and Tar River
basins. The suitable habitat this species is found in is typically medium to large streams and rivers with
a moderate gradient and large bed material. The Neuse River Waterdog also needs riffles, runs, and
pools. While we did not specifically sample for the species, we also did not find any evidence of the
species while conducting our preliminary surveys of the streams for potential suitable habitat.
Our preliminary survey concluded that potential suitable habitat does not exist on -site. Martin's Creek
was +/-4 feet wide with no baseflow and had a sandy substrate. Additionally, the other streams on -site
did not have suitable habitat. Due to these observations, we have concluded that the project would have
"No effect" on the Neuse River Waterdog.
CAROLINA MADTOM (Noturus furiosus):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of the streams on -site for potential suitable habitat for
the Carolina Madtom. The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within the project
Olive Branch Reserve - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 2 of 5

October 10, 2022
S&EC Project #14928.W6
area or within one mile of the site. This species is found in the Neuse River and Tar River basins. The
suitable habitat this species is found in is also medium to large streams and rivers with a moderate
gradient and large bed material. The Carolina Madtom also needs continuous year-round flow and
cover for nesting habitat. While we did not specifically sample for the species, we also did not find any
evidence of the species while conducting our preliminary surveys of the streams for potential suitable
habitat.
Our preliminary survey concluded that potential suitable habitat does not exist on -site. Martin's Creek
was +/-4 feet wide with no baseflow and had a sandy substrate. Additionally, the other streams on -site
did not have suitable habitat. Due to these observations, we have concluded that the project would have
"No effect" on the Carolina Madtom.
MICHAUX'S SUMAC (Rhus michauxii):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat within the project area. We visited
a known population of Michaux's sumac within Wake County prior to conducting our preliminary
surveys. We found no individual Michaux's Sumac species within the project area. The NHP report
did not list any known elemental occurrence within the project area. We found suitable habitat within
the project areas to include primarily disturb open areas along roads and easements. Given the lack of
species present within the areas believed to be suitable habitat, we concluded that the project would
have "No effect" on Michaux's sumac.
SMOOTH CONEFLOWER (Echinacea laevijiata):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat within the project area. We found
no individual Smooth Coneflower species within the project area. The NHP report did not list any
known elemental occurrence within the project area. We found suitable habitat within the project areas
to include primarily disturbed open areas along easements and paths. We found suitable habitat within
the project areas to include primarily disturb open areas along roads and easements. Given the lack of
species present within the areas believed to be suitable habitat, we concluded that the project would
have "No effect" on Smooth Coneflower.
Olive Branch Reserve - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 3 of 5

October 10, 2022
S&EC Project #14928.W6
BALD EAGLE (Haliaeetus leucocephalus):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat, nesting sites, and individual Bald
Eagles within the project area. During our survey, we found no evidence of Bald Eagles or any nesting
sites within the project area. The NHP report did not identify any known nests on -site or within one
mile of the site. Given the lack of species present, we have concluded that the project is "Unlikely to
disturb nesting bald eagles". We believe no Eagle Act Permit is required.
NORTHERN LONG-EARED BAT (Mvotis septentrionalis):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys for suitable habitat and individual Northern Long-
eared Bats (NLEB's) within the project area. During our survey, we found no individual species.
Relying upon the findings of the 1/5/2016 Programmatic Biological Opinion for Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern Long -Eared Bat and Activities Excepted from Take Prohibitions to fulfill our project -specific
section 7 responsibilities." Due to the nature of the project being residential development, we
concluded that the project would "May affect, but not likely to adversely affect" NLEB's.
CONCLUSION:
After completing the habitat assessments and preliminary surveys, S&EC completed the attached
"Species Conclusion Table" and "Self -Certification Letter". Using language typically used by the FWS
in their conclusion letters, we have concluded that it appears the proposed project is not likely to
adversely affect any federally listed endangered or threatened species, their formally designated
critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
We strongly recommend requesting a concurrence letter from the FWS.
Sincerely,
SOIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
Mason Montgomery
Environmental Scientist, Wetlands Department
Olive Branch Reserve - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 4 of 5

October 10, 2022
S&EC Project #14928.W6
Attachments:
1. USGS Vicinity Map
2. Soil Survey Vicinity Map
3. Aerial Map
4. Photo Report
5. Overall Site Plan
6. FWS List of threatened and endangered species that occur in your proposed location, and/or may be affected
by your proposed project. Official Species List. October 3, 2022.
7. NHP report: September 29, 2022.
8. S&EC — FWS Species Conclusion Table. October 10, 2022.
9. S&EC — FWS Self -Certification Letter. October 10, 2022.
References:
-North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. 2017. Biotics Database. Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Raleigh, North Carolina.
-US Fish and Wildlife Service. Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) & Raleigh Ecological Services Field
Office Online Project Reviews website.
-U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1993. Michaux's Sumac Recovery Plan. Atlanta, Georgia:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 3Opp.
-U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service/ Southeast Region. 2019. Carolina Madtom. Species Profile.
https://www.fws.gov/southeast/wildlife/fishes/Carolina-madtom/.
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service/ Southeast Region. 2019. Neuse River Waterdog... Species Profile.
http s : //www. fws.gov/southeast/wi ldlife/amphibians/neuse-river-waterdog/
Olive Branch Reserve — S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 5 of 5

Project Number:
14928.W6
Project Manager:
DS
Scale: 1" 1000'
Date:
1 0/1 0/2022
Map Title:
USGS Map
Olive Branch Reserve
Durham County, NC
Source: USGS
Southeast Durham 2019 Quad
,tzt
NC Center for`eog'aphic Infiorrnat�on &Analysis
0 1,000
1 1 1 1 1
S&
EC
Feet
2,000
1
Soli & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falk of Neuac Road. Sukc 104. Raleigt NC 17615 • Phone, (91911465900 • Fax: [phone]

Wsc
WsE
•.is l3
roject Number:
14928.W6
Project Manager:
DS
Scale: 1 1000'
Date:
10/10/2022
\rVsB
WsE • WsE wsB\ WsE
Map Title:
Soil Survey Map
Olive Branch Reserve
Durham County, NC
Source: Durham County
Soil Survey Sheets 28 & 33
•
WsE
Ws7
WsE
WsC
Pf E.
MC N i Clentr for Geographlicthnf`rn atiori &Analysis'-
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
84 L2 Falk of Neux• Rued Suer I W. Rak'gh NC 376 L5 • Phew, 9919) *46-3960 • Faa: [919, g16-9467

f� If..
\`! / / /f5 1/
f
X.11. 1 /
-/ 1/ 4
/ I F
1 TT
f 1
•
1/ I{'•/.. i
11 ///.47
/! 1 Irl /////I,r
/i %% I \\111.1'111 1
/11//� _\11
lit [n y
J I I/ t/—_-/ 11111111 11 1 1 I
1\\1f ,- .//11111\\\\11Ir
/ NI. \\�'"\\A1.tI(/11//311/1'%
�'_��11111 I:Ihrr/./%/l/ l/ /-
i�� llll1.1 1t\\1'14' it /% //�—
✓/./ j /% f / 1 1 1111 1 17.' 1�? //
i \ \ / /y✓-• 1 t i, 1 + \ \ \ F \ * \\R\ \ \\ \ \\ ! /!/
IIII F 1 ♦ •\ v \\ �\�\� Ci\• 1 / I,"t% �`—i\1�� — �L \ t \\\
dLLJ
111 1 11 I\fU(.U.J
I1 1 1 .L . /� \\\\ \\\\\\\\�\\\C\\\\ \\\\\\\ \\\\\ \\\\\\\\ \\I\\\\�\d.' 1. i Iti is 1 `)111 1 I '„I i 1 i 7 . f —\ \ \�\aa\\\\�\\ \\ 1�\a\`\a,ii\��'li.\\\\\�w\��a\�\\•\�I
4_ 1 , ' 1 f'I j l l - v ., I ' I al I •p r A \ ` y; . \ \ 'O N\: V \'\ .V,N vii&\, \
-F-, (•. II \
77
\. C-4A \ \C.. �,.\V.` \ • \ \\\71�\ \`\\>\\\\C\\\\\\1‘= �\ \��- ti � �- 5�}� \l am`\\►`,� y
44 \ ♦ \\\ �it \'\ j \ \.•q\• \ 11' \ \\\`l\`\4\\\\\� \0\\\. .!' /i / 1` I / �'�i_i_��— /xii ___� ^_K_ \14. 1\4`a " _
I \\ \ lf� Y +\ �\ \ 1 \ ; ;\ `�s\`\ ` \\\���� / /j i /'--1/41.
/./ � \ \ �\\ � ♦ - _\_\� \ \ \\\
// i">'i✓ /!!i �/ �)ti j. 11 14 1:t .' \\ d\\_'`.' \�\�\Y\\\`\ \1: \ \\\\\ \ 111,161 / f�r/i i" i \\.%� 11 j :
1. I 1 1 { I I I -\\ \1'\\\.. \\\\ y`'k\\s 0 I IIP 11
L, LyTC I l.. •I . 1 ' / . \\ N -\ • . \ \ >� \`�\\�`\•\ ` �\\��i�`\ 1 � \`{\\�� \'c
.%l vt �-_?f _ ♦\\\\\\'���� '���y ' •\ \-\ E•\1A /4 \ \\ .- _ ^ \3/
/// i{*����2,� \�\ \�\\♦ \ \: \\\,�\� \1— 1 1 If III111i#1i '• sr`�_ \\ \•\.• .�.
�//4// -_- _ ==y.:4\ �\\���\.. �\ \\`\\\\ ��ti \ \ fi \\ \` \�'\\\ >t'1I (11 1F ll 5' \\1\ N.:34'
l'/ //%y -- _ \\ ` ,p.\\\♦ \ \ \+ 1` I \.\\\\\\\•" \ \\\:Ill
I'll{ 1 IL1�ir-\1,1a.,.IIlIl7/7 - -Y -__ f�==cf-i \\\\\ \\\\�c\\'. I. \ \\\\\ \9� \'11 IIA1� � _\ \ I 11111110
/F/.// J� r _ =-=''=-s=----•• . . \-'-\\\�\\ &`')A-.\\\ '."I. i /� .>\\`\�.\-\ \\\\\\\ \11II\ 1 1\1 \ •r_,`. - �.\1 # P/�f //. /131 �=-�3—^---__a-�:,----��!i \'�\\\\�J\4\4 =1'" / - \♦ \\��.\ \\\ \\l\\I \II{\\ \\,�` ✓,. \-\Il�l.rll 1 /:
T I.IIII // /,� - '•` ___z--t / 1 1 \ \\ 4\` 1. Z\\ \ \ 1 \ \\ \\ \�\L-i// \\1 I 1 I I i
jl rllrl / / ' ii/ice--� G • -= __ 1 \\,\`\\\\\\\1 1 7' % /-�\\7�\\\\�\\��\ \\\C\\\- \1\\\\\\\\�\k\\ fi 111�11i11'1 I1 ��/}/
111 t rl, � � � ii =—f%�\`. i �J i� 5 \�\ 11 11 It*1 �F% • la1 j r/.�\ ,\\♦ \ \ d\`\\\0\\ „,.�� _ i \\\\��\ :.3 A 1.11,10 i-\\�9\ �•\ : ��/1
�IIFI,�(/ \ �\\����.\\� �'\T. \\\ \\\\\\k\\\\ ��
' .. •\\� /!/111 1' j'11 I11 rd+l l' /'~/r L %.J`P Li %_ /. * %,, �'/ //� .f/'/x%�: Z; 1
/ ;:.. I I11" Ili, II IIII I 1 l / l P./ 4:i // .t. /lei r yye - 1� -•-'•-••
/If I1'I II II(I j / /..
I.
j/�, ____^`\ ` �i./• r \\
/;, i % /;k11...� 1 { `1\1\Itioil1 \ ` 1'1.1.1. 1' 1 j _1 L 1.-1 I ><* .!'-_-- •N ::: "fir // / / 1 -1 -7
- r, j 1 C\ {•. 1 I\ ' \ \.\.\ 1 Ill
I I I til. �1�// i •/ �. / �//--
,,��/ /r/ie /, 141 111111� \\\1I1III I I (' l I I '\ \\a\\A 1 / � �_. / P /
•P J./ / / / ./F/' 1: I. 11'L\.\ \ \ 11 1 1 \ .\' \': \ \ -\ \ 1 /+ \•\ . / / / 1. I A, I,.
I1le\ \\\k\\\\\RF\\ rC Caa�\ A'
\.... //� %/j . •—�\\ — / / — \ ` \ {. \ , \ \ .rc k • / 1 1 1 \ \•_ - \
• .\1 /i '_\`\\\\\ \\\\\\\ a !•n1-•ia '�',. -\\1\ \ \ \\�\\ ry\. \„ 1t7ll'(<?1('/T
• \ \-/./i'- \\\\\\\\\\\{\\\\\7 I \ \\ \ ll \- 1\/-\1\ .j \\�1 I H-1 1 1•I 1 ,• \'_ w - !fi�: ;_ !r ?♦ \ �
1111/!/1�' ' �� 4r \\\;\\\\\\\\\ \
I I 111
/r t 1�/* \��\ 1 X "\\\\\ \``\\\\\\\\ :\ �.., ;•}, \ \\�i. \\ 1-1 11'•I 1' 1 1 1`1-I t 1 ..1 \\� \\ � \Z _/2 \ \\
\ 11111I1/"�/ j ♦.\ A. I\ \\\\ \\\\`\\>!\\ ♦1� \ \ \ I I I I I J 1 ♦ t`' \ / /! r ^,�\ \\`R � +\
f
1 1 I \ \
/r
♦
IIII 1 1 / �`�_>\\ —�` +r --- / / \'* \t' • \ \ ' 1 \; >
I loot /�•/ \`'�\it \' \°\11\\\\\\\ .. \ \ r 1lI 1 \ .'_ \yq\.: / Mi]}ti ! \� I I.•1 \ _ \ 1.1 // I .\. \
111111r.F+ P. \♦\\----'- \ �c \\ \\\ \� {\\ \\\\♦n` $ �\\'..!'_ , ,4 y ,41- \ \ \ \
!4 I-I\I\�,:Yl'. - .- , `:\\ \• • . \ `\ `\ \\ .\..\ \ \\\\C� \\\\\\\\\\v \♦\r \ l 1 1 \ 1 \ -\ 71 \'\ \ \ \ \ \ N. \- -• •-\\• \•-.- i�` \ / / // \ 1 1: J!� I,JI / / j \ . \ \ s\ 1 \ \\ 1
\A.V. lir y.� \ \ \ \ \ \�\ !` \\ \ \ t tr \ 4 \ \ \ L 'T /', ! 4, 1 } \'ref J /
\�\ \, \\(t\ 1 111111 I,l lt.l\ll1
W '
\ r 1 'Al".
l . s / I. \
_t Al - -'-ti •\ \ \ .1• \ 1 .-
.w \
♦
- 1
\ \ _ 7 t I I 1 \
44 / \ A C\"'e"1.‘• \ ,\\ -.\ \A. \ r t. i 1 \ N.
\ \\ \• i \ I 1 I _ III 111.
\�I,la \\\\�\\\. �\�'.\\. \. \. i' \� 1 ),), • //pi,
b e-ice \��--�_��\\ ,.1 I � 1 s slu,\
k\�
al tr.'/ 1
• .. -/'1
.., / : : ;�i/i�/
.—.:
1,7:,?/`
�T 1Y11\1r1,+ �_- / /% '
opIll I/1 / \ I-//
J1 11►►j�11IV7/1 \!\\\♦-IIII.
/ \
{
► //. /
li I
�1:
/
/
/
I / / /r�
1
\ \ I
Ilr'r\\\\\IIII IJ! / c�__ \\ ,
\\ -=\ _
11'1 \ \ \ 1 \III ! I\♦/ %��%/%// / //°�.c \\\� �
\��\jllllll�-/'f %�//%/�/'� '� mow'
\ \
/
\
yy \l i _ �.:. y .1 ,\ \ .+e:�`_r,Py//i 1// f/ I \ ----� . \ \ \ \ \ 1 -I I /•\ /
I � \\♦\\ M { \ \ \�� {i �\� 1 I I
�\ \ \ I I \\... \,x\i / \, � • -\ \ \ \ . \+r:� .�/.. 1 1 �i '�"��• \�1 I I i k \,
\�`�\♦\�\\l\(I11j r .l
#%. `\ \11 - 1.1 ; { ♦ \` `♦�`'- �. � i �w '� =J ' ♦ \ � . `� \���� ��� \\1l1 {I\�;``'' \ ^�- - \ \\ ; ♦� j \ L I 1 Nl M I i \
,\ \{Al IA\1,1\ \_. `_ i'�. + r�^\\�\\\
. , il+ \ \ . \_�-- "f ' o ' ;\
»//� /f / / // / . il., \ \. \• ,
L. h``� \ //
. k / f
F" \C \��'r✓i�:.r �'i'1 /i xj/ice_ /i/ T ^�`__�. 1/1/1/1
/1/1II14l l
_/��-=_= w'r--__ __ / / I \ 1 1 1 1 1 ( r
• /iiii "/i //i%-=c- _ ._..� �.1.. �`\\\\\\; \\\�\r`\\�\��4\ ♦.'\�.�
_ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\'l\ -4-.t / / / r// /// / �' — =L! //i__ ��— \ — \ \\ -� . ;\\\\\\\\.\. •1• Wit;,
,. !'! i �.--..•. .-\. \'V'.
\\.. \,. \ t \(F �\ Iy Y4 I�• ' /III\\\\\\\�1I1\\ �\ I I � �r / __-=;`�:��i ":-�tl`O ✓/��_
\C. Yr.1=i G=1 }. III\ \\\ 'i\ \\\\\\`\1\\\�\\\�\\ I i 1 4 r: \\'��;- ,/i.-\ ♦\\\
Olive Branch Reserve
Durham County, NC
raphic Information & Analysis
8412 Falls of Neusc Road, Suite 104, Raleigh. NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: (919) k
sandec.com

Job #: 14928.W6
October 10, 2022
Threatened and Endangered Species Photo Report for the Olive Branch Reserve
Property
Photo 1: Pond
Photo 2: Martins Creek (Martins Branch
1

Job #: 14928.W6
October 10, 2022
Photo 3: Proposed crossing
Photo 4: Olive Branch Road ROW
2

Job #: 14928.W6
October 10, 2022
Photo 5: Virgil Road ROW
Photo 6: Powerline easement
3

IMPACT 8
SEE SHEET
IM-03B
BREAKLINE 1 -\_
FEATURE I
0
03
O
0
W2
IMPACT 1 A
11
-11 (6' MH)
II
II IMPACT 1
MH
SEE SHEET
IM-03A
TPF
TPF
5P
ddl
IMPACT 7
- Tz
SEE SHEET
IM-03A
di-
el.E-f15.i1-5E+ gwilF�gl�p RCS
!'•T^' : 414 1 I I I
�\ V
:CM1111111
rllr=
IF .,
\ \\\ �_ _ AI
•
— -Pe; '._—' IZ
FEATURE B
n \� aa>• �� de0
MA
sr-rEMZEll
-�
MICIMMMI
w
fr-j,.47--J I14 �a
rI
���� 4P�q r:
)n�1r �r�r �rir i v. 'Il..i'
i.t �I: 111 !maw.
��11L��fi e11111N11i1� IIIII�A�� .W's ..!.ri
ACTS -1■";•��: %R
Ini JIrlIr I1 r1111i�"11=�jj�11
FEATURE E
IMPACT 6
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
SCALE: 1 "=400'
INDIO
200 400
1800
SCALE: 1" = 400'
BREAKLINE 1
HORVATH
ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
LAND PLANNING STORMWALER MANAGEMENT
16 CONSULTANT PLACE, SUITE 201
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27707
P 919.490.4990 F 919.490.8953
NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF
EXAMINERS FOR ENGINEERS AND
SURVEYORS LICENSE NO.: C-0676
:\\
IMPACT 9
SEE SHEET
IM-03B
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
SCALE: 1 "=400'
0 200 400
800
SCALE: 1" = 400'
,.Horvomo:sociate:.00m
OLIVE BRANCH RESERVE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1607 OLIVE BRANCH ROAD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
OVERALL PROPOSED CONDITIONS
DRAWN BY CHECK BY
EA NNA
PROJECT #2217
10/14/2022
VA-03
SCALE AS SHOWN
© COPYRIGHT 2022 THIS DOCUMENT AND THE DESIGN ARE THE PROPERTY OF HORVATH ASSOCIATES, P.A. ANY REPRODUCTION WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT IS PROHIBITED

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2022-0090277
Project Name: Olive Branch Reserve
October 03, 2022
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

10/03/2022 2
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186.php.

10/03/2022 3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
■ Official Species List
• Migratory Birds

10/03/2022 1
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

10/03/2022 2
Project Summary
Project Code: 2022-0090277
Project Name: Olive Branch Reserve
Project Type: Residential Construction
Project Description: This project is located in Durham County, NC and is approximately 114
acres.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/@35.9507158,-78.7668275100622,14z
Counties: Durham County, North Carolina

10/03/2022 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 5 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries1, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Amphibians
NAME STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Fishes
NAME
STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Insects
NAME
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Endangered
STATUS
Candidate

10/03/2022 4
Flowering Plants
NAME
STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Smooth Coneflower Echinacea laevigata Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3473
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

10/03/2022
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Actl and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Cerulean Warbler Dendroica cerulea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2974
BREEDING
SEASON
Breeds Sep 1 to
Jul 31
Breeds Apr 28
to Jul 20

10/03/2022 2
NAME
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus vociferus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
BREEDING
SEASON
Breeds Mar 15
to Aug 25
Breeds May 1
to Aug 20
Breeds Apr 20
to Aug 20
Breeds May 1
to Jul 31
Breeds Apr 1 to
Jul 31
Breeds May 10
to Sep 10
Breeds
elsewhere
Breeds May 10
to Aug 31
Probability Of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.

10/03/2022 3
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (I)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
• probability of presence breeding season 1 survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Ea
Non-BCCe 11111111"ill Oil 1111 U-+ Mr MI 111!''1+ 1111 1111
Vulnerable
BCC1ean Rangewlbder ++++ ++++ ++++ ++ +++'t+ + + I!+- +-++ ++++ ++++ ++++ I +++
(CON) ����

10/03/2022 4
Chimney Swift
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
++++ ++++ +III 111111111::1:11. !=11111111i+ ++++ ++++
Eastern Whip -poor- ++++ ++++ ++++ 1+11 VVII
will
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Kentucky Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Prothonotary
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Rusty Blackbird
BCC - BCR
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
191■
III+ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
++++ ++++ ++++ ++ 7177111111111111+ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
++++ ++++ ++++ 11i111111 +-+I +„+++++++++++++
++++ ++++ ++++ ilil ilil in 7111 +1+11+++ ++++ ++++ ++++
11+111+111+11111111111u !!! 111111m11111 ' I i r t!!!
++.+ ++++ +++, ++++ ++++ +_+ +++- +-++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
++++ ++++ ++++ +++1 1 111111111111111 ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.

10/03/2022 5
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information
Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look
at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each
bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated
with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point
within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not
breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and

10/03/2022 6
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell

10/03/2022 7
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

10/03/2022 8
IPaC User Contact Information
Agency:
Name:
Address:
Address Line
City:
State:
Zip:
Email
Phone:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mason Montgomery
8412 Falls of Neuse Road
2: Suite 104
Raleigh
NC
27615
[e-mail]
7047732837

Roy Cooper, Governor
al ■••
■■ R NC DEPARTMENT OF
■ !
■ ■k■A NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■■■
September 29, 2022
Robert Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
RE: Olive Branch Reserve; 14928.W6
Dear Robert Zarzecki:
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Dire ttrr, Natural Heritage Program
NCN H DE-19477
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/officestDirectory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL. AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
1) 1:1 W. JONES STREET, RALEIGI I. NC 27603 1OS1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH. NC 27699
OFC 919707.9120 • FAx 919.707.912i

Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name
Group
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Olive Branch Reserve
Project No. 14928.W6
September 29, 2022
NCNHDE-19477
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
' Last Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
Date Rank
\latural 40073 Dry-Mesic 2020-07 B 2-High
:ommunity Oak --Hickory Forest
(Piedmont Subtype)
G4G5 S4
Natural 40075 Dry Oak --Hickory
Community Forest (Piedmont
Subtype)
2020-07
B 2-High
G4G5 S4
Natural 40072 Mesic Mixed Hardwood--- 2020-07 C 2-High G3G4 S4
Community Forest (Piedmont
Subtype)
Natural
Community
40071 Piedmont Levee Forest---
(Typic Subtype)
Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
2020-07 B 2-High
Site Name
Middle Lick Creek Bottomlands
Representational Rating Collective Rating
R3 (High) C4 (Moderate)
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name wne Owner Ty
NC Land and Water Fund Project NC DNCR, NC Land and Water Fund State
G3G4 S3S4
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.orq/help. Data query generated on September 29, 2022; source: NCNHP, Q2, July 2022.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

September 29, 2022
' ! Managed Area (MAREA)
❑ NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
❑ Buffered Project Boundary
❑ Project Boundary
NCNHDE-19477: Olive Branch Reserve
Sources: Esn, Anbus OS. USGS. NGA NASA. CGIAR. N Robinson. NCEAS.
NLS. OS. NMA. Geodalaslyrelser . Rgkswaterstaal. GSA Geoland. FERIA,
Inlermap and the GIS user GAmmunily
Sources: Esri. HERE. Garmin FAO. NOAA. USGS. S OpenSVeelMap
ccnlnbutors. and the GIS User Community
Page 3 of 3

Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: Olive Branch Reserve
Date: October 10, 2022
Species / Resource Name
Conclusion
ESA Section 7 / Eagle Act Determination
Notes / Documentation
Neuse River Waterdog
Necturus lewisi
No suitable habitat present
No effect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by
S&EC staff on September 29, 2021.
Carolina Madtom Noturus
furiosus
No suitable habitat present
No effect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by
S&EC staff on September 29, 2021.
Michaux's Sumac Rhus
michauxii
Suitable habitat present,
species not present
No effect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by
S&EC staff on September 29, 2021.
Smooth Coneflower
Echinacea Iaevigata
Suitable habitat present,
species not present
No effect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by
S&EC staff on September 29, 2021.
Bald Eagle
Haliaeetus Ieucocephalus
Unlikely to disturb nesting
Bald Eagles
No Eagle Act permit required
Preliminary habitat survey completed by
S&EC staff on September 29, 2021.
Northern Long-eared Bat
Myotis septentrionalis
Suitable habitat present,
species not present
May affect, not likely to adversely affect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by
S&EC staff on September 29, 2021.
Relying upon the findings of the 1/5/2016
Programmatic Biological Opinion for Final
4(d) Rule on the Northern Long -Eared Bat
and Activities Excepted from Take
Prohibitions to fulfill our project -specific
section 7 responsibilities.
Critical Habitat
No critical habitat present
No effect
Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an
informed decision about impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.
Mason Montgomery / Environmental Scientist, Wetlands Department at S&EC, PA
Signature /Title
October 10, 2022
Date

U.S. 411.
FISH & WILDLIFE
SEkvICI
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Date: 1 0/10/2022
Self -Certification Letter
Project NameOlive Branch Reserve
Dear Applicant:
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
"may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
"may affect, likely to adversely affect" determination for the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
n"no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the "no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html.
If you have any questions, you can write to us at [e-mail] or please contact
Leigh Mann of this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures - project review package

Deborah Shirley
From: Ellis, John <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2022 4:44 PM
To: Mason Montgomery; Mann, Leigh
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Olive Branch Reserve
Mason,
The Service concurs with your determinations for the project as proposed.
John
From: Mason Montgomery <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2022 11:33 AM
To: Ellis, John <[e-mail]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Olive Branch Reserve
rThis email has been received from outside of DOI - Use caution before clicking on links, opening attachments, or
responding.
John,
Just following up on this. Attached is the updated T&E report. The site plan has not changed, only the developer
involved. Let me know if you had any concerns with this project, as I did not receive any comments from you last year
when I originally submitted the project for review.
Thank you,
Mason L. Montgomery
Soil And Environmental Consultants, PA
North Quarter Office Park
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
Office [phone]
Direct [phone]
Mobile [phone]
[e-mail]
Visit us at sandec.com
This electronic communication, including all attachments, is intended only for the named addressee (s) and may contain confidential information. This electronic
communication may not have passed through our standard review/quality control process. Design data and recommendations included herein are provided as a matter of
convenience and should not be used for final design. Rely only on final, hardcopy materials bearing the consultant's original signature and seal. If you are not the named
addressee (s), any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this electronic communication in error, please notify
the sender by return e-mail and delete the original communication from your system. Thank you.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
From: Mason Montgomery
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 12:11 PM
1

To: Ellis, John <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: Olive Branch Reserve
John,
I am emailing to confirm if the service had any comments on this report. We are providing an updated report for a new
client. I can provide the updated report for you if needed.
Thank you,
Mason
From: Mason Montgomery
Sent: Monday, November 1, 2021 1:17 PM
To: Raleigh, FW4 <[e-mail]>
Subject: Olive Branch Reserve
Hello,
Attached is the threatened and endangered species report for the Olive Branch Reserve property located in Durham
County, NC. S&EC is submitting for concurrence. Please let me know if any additional information is needed to make the
determinations.
Thank you,
Mason L. Montgomery
Soil And Environmental Consultants, PA
North Quarter Office Park
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
Office [phone]
Direct [phone]
Mobile [phone]
[e-mail]
Visit us at sandec.com
This electronic communication, including all attachments, is intended only for the named addressee (s) and may contain confidential information. This electronic
communication may not have passed through our standard review/quality control process. Design data and recommendations included herein are provided as a matter of
convenience and should not be used for final design. Rely only on final, hardcopy materials bearing the consultant's original signature and seal. If you are not the named
addressee (s), any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this electronic communication in error, please notify
the sender by return e-mail and delete the original communication from your system. Thank you.
APlease consider the environment before printing this email.
2

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and History
Secretary D. Reid Wilson Deputy Secretary, Darin J. Waters, Ph.D.
November 17, 2021
Camden Brunick
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
North Quarter Office Park
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
[e-mail]
Re: Construct Olive Branch Reserve, mixed -used residential development, 1607 Olive Branch Road,
Durham, Durham County, ER 21-2392
Dear Mr. Brunick:
Thank you for your letter of October 6, 2021, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We have
reviewed the submission and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or [e-mail]. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
U
State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

SUMMIT
ENGINEERING • LABORATORY • TESTING
A Universal Engineering Sciences Company
Report of Subsurface Exploration &
Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation
(SUMMIT Project No. 8066.G0019)
November 23, 2022
Olive Branch Reserve
Durham, North Carolina
Prepared for:
MCREF 1 SFR Brier Creek
Attn: Mr. Jeremia Murphy, PE
1710 Camden Road, Suite 5
Charlotte, NC 28203
Email: [e-mail]
CONTACT:
SUMMIT Engineering, Laboratory and Testing, Inc
Jason B. Coble, PE
919.380.9991 Office
919.706.9505 Cell
[e-mail]
3070 Hammond Business Place, Suite 171, Raleigh, NC 27603 suill mit-companies.com

November 23, 2022
MCREF 1 SFR Brier Creek
Mr. Jeremia Murphy, PE
Director, Land Entitlement — Carolina Division
1710 Camden Road, Suite 5
Charlotte, NC 28203
Phone Number: 704.548.7973
Email: [e-mail]
/ML
SUMMIT
ENGINEERING - LABORATORY - TESTING
A UnirersoF Engineering Sciences Company
Subject: Report of Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation
Olive Branch Reserve
Durham, North Carolina
SUMMIT Project No. 8066.G0019
Dear Mr. Murphy:
SUMMIT ENGINEERING, LABORATORY & TESTING, INC. (SUMMIT) is pleased to submit our
Report of Subsurface Exploration and Engineering Evaluation for the proposed Olive Branch
Reserve located at 1607 Olive Branch Road in Durham, North Carolina. This investigation was
performed in general accordance with our Proposal P2022R-150 dated October 25, 2022. This
report contains a brief description of the project information provided to us, general site and
subsurface conditions revealed during our geotechnical exploration and our general
recommendations based on subsurface conditions for the proposed construction.
SUMMIT appreciates the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any
questions concerning the information presented herein or if we can be of further assistance,
please feel free to call us at [phone].
Sincerely,
SUMMIT ENGINEERING, LABORATORY & TESTING, INC. (SUMMIT)
‘tttC14
_�• .o iC,y'7 y
SEAL 7S.':
036193 •
Jason B. Coble, PE �I { ;-/ le,
Senior Geotechnical Engii
Jeff A. Taylor, PE
Geotechnical Engineer
3070 Hammond Business Place, Suite 171, Raleigh, NC 27603 summit-cornpanies.com

Report of Subsurface Exploration & Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation November 23, 2022
Olive Branch Reserve (Durham, North Carolina) SUMMIT Project No. 8066.G0019
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3
1.0 INTRODUCTION 4
1.1 Project Description 4
1.2 Site Description 4
1.3 Purpose of Study 4
2.0 FIELD EVALUATION PROCEDURES 5
3.0 AREA GEOLOGY AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 6
3.1 Physiography and Area Geology 7
3.2 Generalized Subsurface Stratigraphy 7
3.2.1 Topsoil 8
3.2.2 Residual Soils 8
3.2.3 Partially Weathered Rock (PWR) 8
3.2.4 Auger Refusal 8
4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 9
4.1 General 9
4.2 Structural Fill Material 10
4.3 Culvert Installation 10
4.4 Pond Installations 11
4.5 Estimated Seasonal High Water Table (ESHWT) 12
4.6 General Construction Considerations 13
5.0 CONTINUATION OF SERVICES 13
6.0 QUALIFICATIONS OF REPORT 15
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1
Figure 2a
Figure 2b
Figures 3 & 4
APPENDIX
Soil Boring Logs
Site Location Map
Soil Boring Location Plan
Soil Boring Location Plan (Aerial)
Subsurface Profiles (SP-1 & SP-2)
3070 Hammond Business Place, Suite 171, Raleigh, NC 27603 summit-companies.com

Report of Subsurface Exploration & Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation November 23, 2022
Olive Branch Reserve (Durham, North Carolina) SUMMIT Project No. 8066.G0019
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
SUMMIT ENGINEERING, LABORATORY & TESTING, INC. (SUMMIT) has completed the
additional Subsurface Exploration for the planned development for the Olive Branch Reserve
project located at 1607 Olive Branch Road in Durham, North Carolina.
A total of six (6) soil test borings (B-1 to B-6) were performed at the approximate locations
shown on the attached "Soil Boring Location Plans," Figure Nos. 2a and 2b included at the end
of this report. It should be noted that soil boring B-7 could not be drilled due to site access
issues. These soil test borings were established in the field by a SUMMIT representative using a
handheld GPS unit as well as pacing distances and estimating right angles from existing site
features. The indicated soil test boring locations should be considered approximate.
Based on our review of soils, geologic information, and the results of the SPT soil test borings,
the presence of shallow partially weathered rock may affect the proposed construction depending
on the final grades that will be established.
A bottomless culvert is proposed to be constructed at the creek crossing located on the southern
portion of the site. The foundation of the culvert is proposed to be at an approximate elevation
of 301 feet. Conventional shallow footings for the proposed culvert bearing on partially
weathered rock (PWR) may be designed for a net allowable bearing pressure of 4,000 pounds per
square foot (psf).
Groundwater was not encountered at any of our soil boring locations at time of drilling.
Regional groundwater levels will fluctuate with seasonal and climatic changes and may be
different at other times. The near surface soils can be conducive to the development of a
temporarily perched water condition (water ponding at the surface or within the sandy soils
located above less permeable clays and silts) following periods of inclement weather or during
the wetter winter months. Therefore, we recommend that grading be conducted during the drier
months of the year between May and October, when water levels are typically lower, if possible.
More detailed recommendations for site preparation, construction considerations, foundation
design and related matters are presented in the following sections of this report.
3070 Hammond Business Place, Suite 171, Raleigh, NC 27603 summit-companies.corn

Report of Subsurface Exploration & Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation November 23, 2022
Olive Branch Reserve (Durham, North Carolina) SUMMIT Project No. 8066.G0019
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Description
The proposed development will consist of the construction of 350 multi -family (townhome)
residential lots and single-family residential lots. The project will also include five (5)
stormwater control measures (SCM's) and associated paved drives and parking areas. Our
borings were performed in the areas of the proposed SCM ponds and the proposed culvert.
1.2 Site Description
Based on our review of the 3rd submittal construction plans of the site, the proposed development
will be located at 1607 Olive Branch Road in Durham, North Carolina and is approximately
113.6 acres in size. The proposed site consists of three parcels (Durham County PINs 0860-80-
04-0749, 0860-91-11-4776, and 0870-01-34-3416). The eastern portion of the site generally
descends from a knoll at the southeastern portion of the site near Virgil Road and descends to the
west. The elevation change of the two eastern parcels is on the order of approximately 104 feet
(elevations from approximately 402 to 298) based on our review of Durham County GIS. The
western portion of the site generally descends from Olive Branch Road to the east. The elevation
change of the western parcel is on the order of approximately 76 feet (elevations from
approximately 374 to 298) based on our review of Durham County GIS. Presently, the subject
site is mostly densely wooded with a single-family home located on the western parcel. The
surrounding properties are primarily wooded areas.
3070 Hammond Business Place, Suite 171, Raleigh, NC 27603 summit-companies.corn

Report of Subsurface Exploration & Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation November 23, 2022
Olive Branch Reserve (Durham, North Carolina) SUMMIT Project No. 8066.G0019
1.3 Purpose of Study
The purpose of this report is to summarize findings from our subsurface exploration and provide
site preparation, general construction, and foundation recommendations with respect to the
proposed culvert crossing. The following services are provided in order to achieve the following
objectives:
• Geologic review of the project site.
• Subsurface conditions encountered, including pertinent soil properties.
• Soil or rock data review/analysis which could impact development.
• Comments regarding unsuitable soils, if encountered, and recommendations for
remediation (i.e., moisture condition, undercutting and removal, etc.),
• Civil site recommendations for site preparation, placement and compaction of
structural fill, and the re -use of in -situ materials as structural fill, and earthwork
recommendations such as general guidelines and criteria for project fill material,
minimum compaction and soil moisture requirements, and testing criteria and
frequency to evaluate fill and compaction.
• Comments relating to observed geotechnical conditions such as shallow refusal
material, depth to groundwater, or seasonal groundwater fluctuations which could
impact development.
• Provide Estimated Seasonal High Water Table (ESHWT) for proposed SCM
ponds.
3070 Hammond Business Place, Suite 171, Raleigh, NC 27603 summit-companies.corn

Report of Subsurface Exploration & Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation November 23, 2022
Olive Branch Reserve (Durham, North Carolina) SUMMIT Project No. 8066.G0019
2.0 FIELD EVALUATION PROCEDURES
A total of six (6) soil test borings (B-1 to B-6) were performed at the approximate locations
shown on the attached "Soil Boring Location Plans," Figure Nos. 2a and 2b included at the end
of this report. As stated previously, soil boring B-7 could not be drilled due to site access issues.
These soil test borings were established in the field by a SUMMIT representative using a
handheld GPS unit as well as pacing distances and estimating right angles from existing site
features. The indicated soil test boring locations should be considered approximate.
The borings were performed using a CME-550, rubber tire, low ground pressure, ATV mounted
drill rig equipped with an automatic, 140-pound hammer. Borings were advanced to depths
ranging from approximately 8.6 to 13.6 feet beneath the existing ground surface.
Hollow -stem, continuous flight auger drilling techniques were utilized to advance the borings
into the ground. The collected soil samples were transported to SUMMIT's office to be visually
examined and classified in general accordance with ASTM D 2488. The classification symbols
are depicted on the attached "Boring Logs." Standard Penetration Tests (SPTs) were performed,
in general accordance with ASTM D-1586-08a, at designated intervals as the augers were
advanced to evaluate consistency, relative density and engineering characteristics of the soils
encountered. A split -barrel sampler is driven a depth of 18 inches (three 6-inch increments) with
a 140-pound automatic drop hammer falling from a height of 30 inches. The SPT "N" value
represents the sum of blows required to drive the split -barrel sampler into the last two 6-inch
increments of material sampled. The N-values are depicted numerically on the individual
"Boring Logs" at the respective test depth. Water level measurements were attempted at the
termination of drilling. Boreholes were backfilled to the existing surface with auger cuttings
upon completion of field work.
3070 Hammond Business Place, Suite 171, Raleigh, NC 27603 summit-companies.corn

Report of Subsurface Exploration & Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation November 23, 2022
Olive Branch Reserve (Durham, North Carolina) SUMMIT Project No. 8066.G0019
3.0 AREA GEOLOGY AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
3.1 Physiography and Area Geology
This tract of land is located within the Middle Piedmont Physiographic Province. The Piedmont
Province is typically characterized by gently rolling, well rounded hills and long low ridges with
a few hundred feet of elevation difference between the hills and the valleys.
According to the Geologic Map of North Carolina (1985), the property is located within the
Triassic basin. The Triassic Basin was formed during the Triassic and early Jurassic periods as a
result of faulting and regional subsidence approximately 190 to 200 million years ago. Over
time, the basins were filled in with mud, silt, sand and gravel sediments eroded from the adjacent
igneous and metamorphic highland formations into adjacent valleys and streams.
Sedimentary sandstone, siltstone, mudstone and conglomerates are the predominant rock types
within the Triassic Basin. Igneous intrusions (dikes and sills) are present within the sedimentary
rocks in many areas. Near the ground surface, Triassic rocks and igneous intrusions are often
discontinuous with depth. The Triassic rocks can be present as relatively thin layers and the
intrusions in the form of boulders. Typical soils within the Triassic basin consist of silts, clays
and clayey/silty sands. Near the surface, the silts and clays are often moderately to highly
plastic. Where present, residual soils formed by weathering of igneous intrusions can be of a
softer/wetter consistency than surrounding Triassic sediments (silts and clays).
3.2 Generalized Subsurface Stratigraphy
General subsurface conditions encountered during our geotechnical exploration are described
herein. For more detailed soil descriptions and stratifications at a particular soil test boring, the
respective "Boring Logs," located in the Appendix should be reviewed. The horizontal
stratification lines designating the interface between various strata represents approximate
boundaries. Actual transitions between different strata in the field may be gradual in both the
horizontal and vertical directions. Generalized subsurface profiles have been prepared from the
test boring data are attached to this report as Figures 3 and 4 (SP-1 & SP-2) to graphically
3070 Hammond Business Place, Suite 171, Raleigh, NC 27603 summit-companies.corn

Report of Subsurface Exploration & Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation November 23, 2022
Olive Branch Reserve (Durham, North Carolina) SUMMIT Project No. 8066.G0019
illustrate subsurface conditions encountered at this site. More detailed descriptions of the
conditions encountered at each test boring location are presented on the attached test boring logs.
3.2.1 Topsoil was encountered in all of the soil borings and was on the order of approximately
5 to 8 inches thick.
3.2.2 Residual Soils (Native - undisturbed) were present beneath the topsoil in each soil
boring. Residual soils were encountered until partially weathered rock was encountered
at depths ranging from 3 to 8 feet below the existing ground surface. The residual soils
generally consist of very soft to very stiff low elasticity sandy SILTs (ML) and medium
dense to dense silty and clayey SANDs (SM and SC). The Standard Penetration
Resistances (N-values) obtained in the residual soils ranged from 2 to 49 blows per foot
(bpf) with the majority exhibiting N-values ranging from 12 to 24 bpf.
3.2.3 Partially Weathered Rock (PWR) was encountered in each soil boring (B-1 to B-6).
PWR was encountered at depths ranging from 3 to 8 feet below the existing site grade.
When sampled, the PWR appears predominantly as silty sand to sandy silt. PWR is
defined as soil -like material exhibiting N-values in excess of 100 bpf. The Standard
Penetration Resistances (N-values) obtained in the PWR ranged from 50 blows per
5 inches (50/5") to 50 blows per 1 inch penetration (50/1").
3.2.4 Auger Refusal was encountered in soil borings B-3 to B-6. Auger refusal was
encountered at approximate depths ranging from 8.6 to 13.6 feet below the existing
ground surface. Auger refusal is defined as material that could not be penetrated with
the drilling equipment utilized on the project. Auger refusal material may consist of
large boulders, rock ledges, or lenses/seams of PWR present just above the top of parent
bedrock. Core drilling techniques would be required to evaluate the character and
continuity of the refusal material; however, rock coring was beyond our scope for this
study.
30701-lammond Business Place, Suite 171, Raleigh, NC 27603 summit-companies.corn

Report of Subsurface Exploration & Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation November 23, 2022
Olive Branch Reserve (Durham, North Carolina) SUMMIT Project No. 8066.G0019
3.3 Water Level Measurements
Groundwater measurements were performed at the completion of each boring. Groundwater was
not encountered at any of the soil boring locations at the time of drilling, Due to the hazard of
leaving soil boring holes open, each soil boring location was backfilled with cuttings before the
drillers departed the site.
It should be noted that regional groundwater levels will fluctuate with seasonal and climatic
changes as well as with some types of construction activities and may be different at other times.
Additionally, the near surface soils can be conducive to the development of a temporarily higher
perched groundwater conditions following periods of inclement weather or during the wetter
winter months.
4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1 General
Our conclusions and recommendations are based on the project information outlined previously,
our past experience on similar type projects, and on the data obtained from the field testing
program. If the structural loading, geometry, or proposed subdivision layout is changed or
significantly differ from those outlined, or if subsurface conditions encountered during
construction vary greatly from the soil test boring information, SUMMIT requests the
opportunity to review our recommendations based on the new information and make the
necessary changes in writing.
The field investigation performed by SUMMIT was conducted in order to log and characterize
subsurface materials, presence of groundwater and identifying potential conditions that could
affect the feasibility of the proposed residential construction.
3070 Hammond Business Place, Suite 171, Raleigh, NC 27603 summit-companies.corn

Report of Subsurface Exploration & Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation November 23, 2022
Olive Branch Reserve (Durham, North Carolina) SUMMIT Project No. 8066.G0019
4.2 Structural Fill Material
All structural fill and backfill material should be placed in approximate eight to ten (8-10) inch
loose lifts and compacted to 95 percent of the standard Proctor dry density within (+/-) 3 percent
of the fills optimum moisture content as determined by ASTM D-698. Field density tests should
be performed by SUMMIT on each lift of structural fill placed and at a frequency determined by
the geotechnical engineer to verify compliance with project compaction specifications.
Existing on -site soils that will need to be removed from the ponds and culvert areas (ML, SC and
SM) may be used as structural fill provided these soils are non -plastic and free of deleterious
and/or organic material (topsoil or root mat), and is at a moisture content that facilitates
compaction in accordance with the project specifications. When moderately to highly elastic
silts or moderately to highly plastic clay soils are encountered during grading operations, these
soils should not be used during grading activities as structural fill within the top 3 feet of
subgrade elevation due to their shrink/swell potential. These soils may be used in non-structural
or landscaped areas. In addition, structural fill material should have particle sizes of less than
three (3) inches in diameter and should not have a maximum dry density of less than 90 pounds
per cubic foot as determined by ASTM D-698 without approval from the geotechnical engineer.
Structural fill soils should also have less than 5 percent organic content.
If off -site soils are brought in to be used as structural fill, these soils should be free of
organic/deleterious material, and should be tested and approved by SUMMIT for compliance
with the above criteria prior to use on -site. If off -site soils are used, these soils should generally
have low to moderate plasticity characteristics consistent with USCS material classifications of
CL, ML, SC, SM, SP, SW, GC, GM, GP, and GW, as determined by ASTM D-2487.
4.3 Culvert Installation
The foundation elevation of the proposed culvert is approximately 301 feet. Soil boring B-6 was
drilled at the proposed culvert crossing and encountered auger refusal at an approximate
elevation of 302.5 within very hard PWR. The culvert foundation may be designed for a net
allowable bearing pressure of 4,000 pounds per square foot (psf).
3070 Hammond Business Place, Suite 171, Raleigh, NC 27603 summit-companies.Corn

Report of Subsurface Exploration & Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation November 23, 2022
Olive Branch Reserve (Durham, North Carolina) SUMMIT Project No. 8066.G0019
Difficult excavation will likely be encountered in order to reach the bottom of culvert foundation
elevation. In order to expedite the excavation of the culvert, rock blasting may be considered.
With the possibility of difficult excavation being encountered, a unit price can be established in
the bid documents for rock encountered at the culvert area. To reduce difficult excavation
quantities, bottom of culvert depth should be kept as shallow as possible.
Footing excavations should be evaluated to verify that the subsurface soils are capable of
supporting the required structural load. We recommend utilizing a Dynamic Cone Penetrometer
(DCP) throughout the proposed foundation area to confirm that the soils/PWR at the bearing
grade are capable to support the required load. We recommend that all foundation excavations
be observed by a qualified SUMMIT geotechnical engineer or his representative prior to
placement of concrete. The purpose of the engineering observation would be to determine that
the foundations bear on suitable soils at the proper embedment depths, and that unsuitable soft or
loose materials are undercut and backfilled with approved structural fill material.
4.4 Pond Installations
PWR was encountered at each pond location B-1 to B-5 at depths ranging from the 3 to 6 feet
below the existing ground surface. Additionally, we encountered auger refusal at depths ranging
from 8.6 to 13.6 feet below the existing ground surface at soil boring location B-3 to B-5. PWR
encountered exhibited Standard Penetration Resistances (N-values) ranging from 50 blows per
1 inch penetration (50/1") to 50 blows per 5 inches (50/5"). A table has been provided to
provide the bottom of pond elevation and the depths at which auger refusal (AR) and PWR was
encountered. The table also presents the estimated elevation at which the auger refusal occurred
or where PWR was encountered.
3070 Hammond Business Place, Suite 171, Raleigh, NC 27603 summit-companies.corn

Report of Subsurface Exploration & Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation November 23, 2022
Olive Branch Reserve (Durham, North Carolina) SUMMIT Project No. 8066.G0019
Soil Borings/
(Pond #)
AR — Depth
Below Existing
Grade (feet)
PWR — Depth
Below Existing
Grade (feet)
AR — Elevation
(Feet)
PWR —
Elevation (Feet)
Bottom of
Pond
Elevation
(Feet)
B-1 (Pond 1)
--
3
--
341
335
B-2 (Pond 2)
--
6
--
317
309
B-3 (Pond 3
8.6
6
336.5
339
325
B-4 (Pond 4)
13.6
3
345.5
356
326
B-5 (Pond 5)
8.6
3
315.5
321
308
Difficult excavation will likely be encountered at each pond location. Larger mass grading
equipment such as a CAT 330 equipped with rock teeth and a three foot wide bucket can
generally excavate materials exhibiting penetration resistances in the range of 50 blows per 4 to
2 inches of penetration, however, the process can be slow. In order to expedite the excavations
of the ponds, rock blasting should be considered. With the possibility of difficult excavation
being encountered, a unit price can be established in the bid documents for rock encountered
within ponds. To reduce difficult excavation quantities, bottom of pond depths should be kept as
shallow as possible.
If blasting is performed to achieve the bottom of pond elevations, the blasted material can be
reused as fill material provided the blasted materials are reduced to particle sizes not exceeding
an average diameter size of 3 inches. If larger blast rock is generated, it should be utilized in
non-structural areas such as landscaped areas or within future parking areas where it can be
covered with a minimum of 3 feet of well compacted structural fill.
3070 Hammond Business Place, Suite 171, Raleigh, NC 27603 summit-companies.corn

Report of Subsurface Exploration & Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation November 23, 2022
Olive Branch Reserve (Durham, North Carolina) SUMMIT Project No. 8066.G0019
4.5 Estimated Seasonal High Water Table (ESHWT)
Soil borings B-1 to B-5 were drilled at proposed SCM pond areas and were extended to
approximate depths ranging from 8.6 to 13.7 feet below the existing ground surface. Water level
measurements were attempted at the termination of drilling. Groundwater was not encountered
in any of the soil boring locations at time of drilling.
The Estimated Seasonal High Water Table (ESHWT) indicators were not encountered within
borings B-1 to B-5. The USGS Web Soil Survey for the area identifies the depth to water table
at approximately 12 to 18 inches due to perched groundwater conditions that may form at ponds
2 through 5 and at more than 80 inches for pond 1. The ESHWT is defined as a change in the
color of the soil layer due to water staining (typically, gray redoximorphic depletions and
mottling). Spots or blotches of different color or shades of color interspersed with a dominant
color in soil, commonly referred to as mottling. Mottling is a historic indication for the presence
of ground water caused by intermittent periods of saturation and drying, and may be indicative of
poor aeration and impeded drainage. Mottling is a "general indication of groundwater" flow
through this layer, but it is not known whether the groundwater flow was recent.
4.6 General Construction Considerations
Design and implementation of temporary slopes, shoring systems and dewatering systems is the
responsibility of the contractor. It is recommended that the contractor follow all city, state, and
federal safety guidelines.
3070 Hammond Business Place, Suite 171, Raleigh, NC 27603 summit-companies.corn

Report of Subsurface Exploration & Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation November 23, 2022
Olive Branch Reserve (Durham, North Carolina) SUMMIT Project No. 8066.G0019
5.0 CONTINUATION OF SERVICES
We recommend that we be given the opportunity to review the foundation plan, grading plan, and
project specifications when construction documents approach completion. This review evaluates
whether the recommendations and comments provided herein have been understood and properly
implemented. We also recommend that SUMMIT be retained for professional and construction
materials testing services during construction. Our continued involvement on the project helps
provide continuity for proper implementation of the recommendations discussed herein.
The Geotechnical Engineer of Record should be retained to monitor and test earthwork activities,
and subgrade preparations for foundations and excavations. It should be noted that the actual soil
conditions at the various subgrade levels and footing bearing grades may vary across the site and
thus the presence of the Geotechnical Engineer and/or his representative during construction will
serve to validate the subsurface conditions and recommendations presented in this report. We
recommend that SUMMIT be employed to monitor the earthwork and foundation construction, and
to report that the recommendations contained in this report are completed in a satisfactory manner.
Our involvement on the project will aid in the proper implementation of the recommendations
discussed herein. The following is a recommended scope of services:
• Review of project plans and construction specifications to verify that the recommendations
presented in this report have been properly interpreted and implemented;
• Observe and perform testing during earthwork to document that subsurface conditions
encountered during construction are consistent with those anticipated in this report;
• Observe subgrade preparation including any proof -rolling operations, undercutting of
soft/loose unsuitable soils, installation of drainage materials, geotextiles and fill placement;
• Observe the placement and compaction of any engineered fill soils and perform
laboratory and field compaction testing of the fill soils;
• Observe all foundation excavations and footing bearing grades for compliance with the
geotechnical recommendations.
3070 Hammond Business Place, Suite 171, Raleigh, NC 27603 summit-companies.corn

Report of Subsurface Exploration & Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation November 23, 2022
Olive Branch Reserve (Durham, North Carolina) SUMMIT Project No. 8066.G0019
6.0 QUALIFICATIONS OF REPORT
The analyses and recommendations submitted in this report were based, in part, on data obtained
from the subsurface exploration. If the above -described project conditions are incorrect or
changed after the issuing of this report, or subsurface conditions encountered during construction
are different from those reported, SUMMIT should be notified and these recommendations
should be re-evaluated based on the changed conditions to make appropriate revisions. We have
prepared this report according to generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices. No
warranty, express or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this report.
The engineering recommendations provided in this report are based on the information obtained
from the subsurface exploration. However, unlike other engineering materials like steel and
concrete, the extent and properties of geologic materials (soil) may vary significantly.
Regardless of the thoroughness of a geotechnical engineering exploration, there is always a
possibility that conditions between borings will be different from those at the boring locations,
that conditions are not as anticipated by the designers, or that the construction process has altered
the subsurface conditions. This report does not reflect variations that may occur between the
boring locations. Therefore, conditions on the site may vary between the discrete locations
observed at the time of our subsurface exploration.
3070 Hammond Business Place, Suite 171, Raleigh, NC 27603 summit-companies.corn

Report of Subsurface Exploration & Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation November 23, 2022
Olive Branch Reserve (Durham, North Carolina) SUMMIT Project No. 8066.G0019
Figure 1
Figure 2a
Figure 2b
Figures 3 & 4
FIGURES
Site Location Map
Soil Boring Location Plan
Soil Boring Location Plan (Aerial)
Soil Profiles (SP-1 & SP-2)
3070 Hammond Business Place, Suite 171, Raleigh, NC 27603 summit -co mpanies.corn

Courtesy: Durham GIS Maps
Figure 1: Site Location
Plan
/
SUMMIT
ENGINEERING • LABORATORY. TCSTING
Project #: 8066.G0019
Olive Branch Reserve
Durham, North Carolina
A Universal Engineering Sciences Company

Figure 2a: Soil Boring
Location Plan
/
SUMMIT
ENGINEERING • LABORATORY • TESTING
Project #: 8066.G0019
Olive Branch Reserve
Durham, North Carolina
A Universal Engineering Sciences Company

Figure 2b: Soil Boring
Location Plan
/
SUMMIT
ENGINEERING • LABORATORY • TESTING
Project #: 8066.G0019
Olive Branch Reserve
Durham, North Carolina
A Universal Engineering Sciences Company

B-4
360
355
350
345
28
5 /5-
50/4"
50/.i
B-3
B-1 — — — 50/'r
—
Topsoil
SM
PWR —
PWR —
— — P-MR —
360
355
350
345
w 335
C
O
7.
ct
d 330
W
325
3202
315
310
33
5-0/3'
50/3"
5-0/2
—
Topsoil
SM
PWR
— - 13-W� PWR
2
5
50/2
50/4"
50/2"
B-2-
1111
1111
15
15
50/5"
50/1"
Topsoil
ML
M L
PWR
PWR
PWR
r tl�l�
IN SM
jj —
I1fi340
PWR
���
-
—
—
—
—
—
340
335
330
325
320
315
310
305 305
MATERIAL GRAPHIC SYMBOLS
1
•
111111
SILT, SILT w/SAND, SANDY SILT (ML) 11
1 ill
Silty SAND (SM)
SUMMIT Engineering, Laboratory & Testing,
�j
1
Partially Weathered Rock ■ Surficial Organic Soils
Inc.
3070 Hammond Business Place, Suite 171
Raleigh, NC 27603
Olive Branch Reserve
Durham, North Carolina
Project No.
Figure No. 3
8066.G0019
SP-1

Elevation (feet)
) W W 0., 0.,
ON 0 01 0 011I
18
-50/3"
50/4"
50L1"
B
B-5
Topsoil
I
a 1 SM
PWR
PWR
12
24
49
50/1"
B-6
—
—315
Topsoil
—
SC
—
13WP
—
325
320
310
305
300
Zao 295
MATERIAL GRAPHIC SYMBOLS
•=
1
Partially Weathered Rock 1
1 iiii• !I
Silty SAND (SM)
SUMMIT Engineering, Laboratory & Testing,
n
Clayey SAND (SC) ■ Surficial Organic Soils
Inc.
3070 Hammond Business Place, Suite 171
Raleigh, NC 27603
Olive Branch Reserve
Durham, North Carolina
Project No.
Figure No. 4
8066.G0019
SP-2

Report of Subsurface Exploration & Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation November 23, 2022
Olive Branch Reserve (Durham, North Carolina) SUMMIT Project No. 8066.G0019
APPENDIX
SOIL BORING LOGS
3070 Hammond Business Place, Suite 171, Raleigh, NC 276003 summit-€ompanies.corri

Project: Olive Branch Reserve
Project Location: Durham, North Carolina
Project Number: 8066.G0019
Key to Log of Boring
Sheet 1 of 1
Elevation (feet)
a)
N
L
a)
a)
0
a)
o_
H
a)
E
m
0)
COLUMN DESCRIPTIONS
0)
O
J
0
Q
C7
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
1 Elevation (feet): Elevation (MSL, feet).
2 Depth (feet): Depth in feet below the ground surface.
Sample Type: Type of soil sample collected at the depth interval
shown.
® Sampling Resistance, blows/ft: Number of blows to advance driven
sampler one foot (or distance shown) beyond seating interval
using the hammer identified on the boring log.
E Graphic Log: Graphic depiction of the subsurface material
encountered.
3
FIELD AND LABORATORY TEST ABBREVIATIONS
CHEM: Chemical tests to assess corrosivity
COMP: Compaction test
CONS: One-dimensional consolidation test
LL: Liquid Limit, percent
MATERIAL GRAPHIC SYMBOLS
SILT, SILT w/SAND, SANDY SILT (ML)
Partially Weathered Rock
TYPICAL SAMPLER GRAPHIC SYMBOLS
Water Level
Cave -In Depth (feet)
REMARKS AND
OTHER TESTS
© MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Description of material encountered.
May include consistency, moisture, color, and other descriptive
text.
7 Water Level: Water Level (feet)
8 Cave -In Depth (feet): Boring Hole Cave -In Depth (feet)
REMARKS AND OTHER TESTS: Comments and observations
regarding drilling or sampling made by driller or field personnel.
9
PI: Plasticity Index, percent
SA: Sieve analysis (percent passing No. 200 Sieve)
UC: Unconfined compressive strength test, Qu, in ksf
WA: Wash sieve (percent passing No. 200 Sieve)
Clayey SAND (SC)
Silty SAND (SM)
■ Surficial Organic Soils
OTHER GRAPHIC SYMBOLS
2-inch-OD unlined split ° Water level (at time of drilling, ATD)
spoon (SPT)
Water level (after waiting)
Minor change in material properties within a
stratum
— - Inferred/gradational contact between strata
—7- Queried contact between strata
GENERAL NOTES
1: Soil classifications are based on the Unified Soil Classification System. Descriptions and stratum lines are interpretive, and actual lithologic changes may be
gradual. Field descriptions may have been modified to reflect results of lab tests.
2: Descriptions on these logs apply only at the specific boring locations and at the time the borings were advanced. They are not warranted to be representative
of subsurface conditions at other locations or times.
,
SUMMIT

Project: Olive Branch Reserve
Project Location: Durham, North Carolina
Project Number: 8066.G0019
Log of Boring B-1
Sheet 1 of 1
Date(s) November 16, 2022
Drilled
Logged By Adam D. Perry, El
Checked By Jason B. Coble, PE
Drilling
Method Hollow Stem Augers
Drill Bit
Size/Type 6-Inch (OD) - Soil Bit
Total Depth
of Borehole 8.6
Drill Rig CME 550
Type
Drilling gridger Drilling
Contractor
Approximate 344
Surface Elevation
Groundwater Level Not Encountered ATD
and Date Measured
Sampling SPT
Method(s)
Hammer 140 Ib, 30-Inch Drop, Auto Trip
Data
Borehole Cuttings
Backfill
Location See Soil Boring Location Plan
,
w w A Elevation (feet)
D A (0 A
I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
; , a o Depth (feet)
a)
:z
T
H
d
E
u)
Sampling Resistance,
blows/ft
Graphic Log
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Water Level
Cave -In Depth (feet)
REMARKS AND
OTHER TESTS
33
50/3"
50/3"
50/2"
Surficial Organic Soils (Topsoil)
<-- HC (8')
1
` a
1
RESIDUAL: Dense Moist Brown and Gray Silty Fine to
- Medium SAND (SM) -
—
—
- xdi,Fine
MI
a
Partially Weathered Rock (PWR) - Sampled as Moist Red
Sandy Silt (PWR)
Z
alp
Partially Weathered Rock (PWR) - Sampled as Moist
Red -Brown Silty Fine to Medium Sand (PWR)
—
al
Partially Weathered Rock (PWR) - Sampled as Dry
Red -Brown Silty Fine to Medium Sand (PWR)
_ Boring Terminated at 8.6 Feet Below the Existing Ground _
Surface
/UM
SUMMIT

Project: Olive Branch Reserve
Project Location: Durham, North Carolina
Project Number: 8066.G0019
Log of Boring B-2
Sheet 1 of 1
Date(s) November 14, 2022
Drilled
Logged By Adam D. Perry, El
Checked By Jason B. Coble, PE
Drilling
Method Hollow Stem Augers
Drill Bit
Size/Type 6-Inch (OD) - Soil Bit
Total Depth
of Borehole 13.7
Drill Rig CME 550
Type
Drilling Bridger Drilling
Contractor
Approximate 323
Surface Elevation
Groundwater Level Not Encountered ATD
and Date Measured
Sampling SPT
Method(s)
Hammer 140 Ib, 30-Inch Drop, Auto Trip
Data
Borehole Cuttings
Backfill
Location See Soil Boring Location Plan
,
N Elevation (feet)
b W O W
I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I
; , a o Depth (feet)
I I I I
a)
Iz
T
H
d
E
u)
Sampling Resistance,
blows/ft
Graphic Log
K
D
H
m
X
D
r
0
m
0
X
O
z
Water Level
Cave -In Depth (feet)
REMARKS AND
OTHER TESTS
2
25
so/2"
soia^
50/2"
Surficial Organic Soils (Topsoil)
RESIDUAL: Very Soft Moist Brown -Orange Fine Sandy
- SILT (ML) -
—
Very Stiff Moist Red Fine Sandy SILT (ML)
XI
g
;
•
Partially Weathered Rock (PWR) - Sampled as Moist Red
Fine Sandy Silt (PWR)
-
al
•
JP
•
:L
•
•
Partially Weathered Rock (PWR) - Sampled as Moist Red
Fine to Medium Sandy Silt (PWR)
— _
_
16
MIL
Partially Weathered Rock (PWR) - Sampled as Moist Red
Fine to Medium Sandy Silt (PWR) _
_ Boring Terminated at 13.7 Feet Below the Existing Ground _
Surface
/UM
SUMMIT

Project: Olive Branch Reserve
Project Location: Durham, North Carolina
Project Number: 8066.G0019
Log of Boring B-3
Sheet 1 of 1
Date(s) November 14, 2022
Drilled
Logged By Adam D. Perry, El
Checked By Jason B. Coble, PE
Drilling
Method Hollow Stem Augers
Drill Bit
Size/Type 6-Inch (OD) - Soil Bit
Total Depth
of Borehole 8.6
Drill Rig CME 550
Type
Drilling Bridger Drilling
Contractor
Approximate 345
Surface Elevation
Groundwater Level Not Encountered ATD
and Date Measured
Sampling SPT
Method(s)
Hammer 140 Ib, 30-Inch Drop, Auto Trip
Data
Borehole Cuttings
Backfill
Location See Soil Boring Location Plan
,
a w w A Elevation (feet)
D UI 0 01
; , o 0 o Depth (feet)
I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I
a)
:z
T
H
d
E
U)
Sampling Resistance,
blows/ft
Graphic Log
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Water Level
Cave -In Depth (feet)
REMARKS AND
OTHER TESTS
15
49
50/5'
50m
Surficial Organic Soils (Topsoil)
<__ HC (7')
1 RESIDUAL: Medium Dense Moist Brown Silty Fine to
- Medium SAND (SM) w/ Small Roots -
a
a
—
—
1 Dense Dry Red -Brown Silty Fine to Coarse SAND (SM)
f _
$— —
a
—
MIL-
•
Partially Weathered Rock (PWR) - Sampled as Dry Red
Silty Fine to Medium Sand (PWR)
—
s
al Partially Weathered Rock (PWR) - Sampled as Dry Red
Fine to Medium Sandy Silt (PWR)
_ Auger Refusal at 8.6 Feet Below the Existing Ground _
Surface
/UM
SUMMIT

Project: Olive Branch Reserve
Project Location: Durham, North Carolina
Project Number: 8066.G0019
Log of Boring B-4
Sheet 1 of 1
Date(s) November 14, 2022
Drilled
Logged By Adam D. Perry, El
Checked By Jason B. Coble, PE
Drilling
Method Hollow Stem Augers
Drill Bit
Size/Type 6-Inch (OD) - Soil Bit
Total Depth
of Borehole 13.6
Drill Rig CME 550
Type
Drilling Bridger Drilling
Contractor
Approximate 359
Surface Elevation
Groundwater Level Not Encountered ATD
and Date Measured
Sampling SPT
Method(s)
Hammer 140 Ib, 30-Inch Drop, Auto Trip
Data
Borehole Cuttings
Backfill
Location See Soil Boring Location Plan
,
A w N Elevation (feet)
(0 A (0
I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I
; , o o Depth (feet)
I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I
a)
Iz
T
H
d
E
u)
Sampling Resistance,
blows/ft
Graphic Log
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Water Level
Cave -In Depth (feet)
REMARKS AND
OTHER TESTS
28
50/5"
50/4"
50/5"
50/1"
Surficial Organic Soils (Topsoil)
<__ HC (12')
111
i1 !
11 Ihil
i� a
RESIDUAL: Medium Dense Moist Orange -Red Silty Fine to _
Medium SAND (SM)
-
_
—
•
;
a
•
0
•
Partially Weathered Rock (PWR) - Sampled as Dry
Red -Gray Silty Fine to Medium Sand (PWR)
-
—
g
;
•
1-
•
a
•
•
ft
•
ft
I AI
Partially Weathered Rock (PWR) - Sampled as Dry Red
Fine to Medium Sandy Silt (PWR)
- -
- _
r -
- -
—
a
Auger Refusal at 13.6 Feet Below the Existing Ground
- Surface
/UM
SUMMIT

Project: Olive Branch Reserve
Project Location: Durham, North Carolina
Project Number: 8066.G0019
Log of Boring B-5
Sheet 1 of 1
Date(s) November 14, 2022
Drilled
Logged By Adam D. Perry, El
Checked By Jason B. Coble, PE
Drilling
Method Hollow Stem Augers
Drill Bit
Size/Type 6-Inch (OD) - Soil Bit
Total Depth
of Borehole 8.6
Drill Rig CME 550
Type
Drilling Bridger Drilling
Contractor
Approximate 324
Surface Elevation
Groundwater Level Not Encountered ATD
and Date Measured
Sampling SPT
Method(s)
Hammer 140 Ib, 30-Inch Drop, Auto Trip
Data
Borehole Cuttings
Backfill
Location See Soil Boring Location Plan
,
W N Elevation (feet)
D A p A
I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I
; , a o Depth (feet)
a)
:z
T
H-
d
E
U)
Sampling Resistance,
blows/ft
Graphic Log
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Water Level
Cave -In Depth (feet)
REMARKS AND
OTHER TESTS
18
50/3"
50/4"
50/1"
Surficial Organic Soils (Topsoil)
<__ HC (7.5')
1
a
RESIDUAL: Medium Dense Moist Brown -Orange Silty Fine
- to Medium SAND (SM) -
—
—
I
•
116
Or
•
a
•
Wi
•
Partially Weathered Rock (PWR) - Sampled as Dry
Brown -Red Silty Fine to Medium Sand (PWR)
-
_
—
a
Auger Refusal at 8.6 Feet Below the Existing Ground
- Surface
/UM
SUMMIT

Project: Olive Branch Reserve
Project Location: Durham, North Carolina
Project Number: 8066.G0019
Log of Boring B-6
Sheet 1 of 1
Date(s) November 16, 2022
Drilled
Logged By Adam D. Perry, El
Checked By Jason B. Coble, PE
Drilling
Method Hollow Stem Augers
Drill Bit
Size/Type 6-Inch (OD) - Soil Bit
Total Depth
of Borehole 8.6
Drill Rig CME 550
Type
Drilling gridger Drilling
Contractor
Approximate 311
Surface Elevation
Groundwater Level Not Encountered ATD
and Date Measured
Sampling SPT
Method(s)
Hammer 140 Ib, 30-Inch Drop, Auto Trip
Data
Borehole Cuttings
Backfill
Location See Soil Boring Location Plan
p o o ; Elevation (feet)
n
; , a o Depth (feet)
I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I
a)
Iz
T
H-
d
E
u)
Sampling Resistance,
blows/ft
Graphic Log
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Water Level
Cave -In Depth (feet)
REMARKS AND
OTHER TESTS
12
49
50/1"
TSurficial
•
•
k
mil,
Organic Soils (Topsoil)
<-- HC (7.5')
RESIDUAL: Medium Dense to Dense Moist Brown -Orange Clayey Fine to Medium SAND (SC) _
_
-
_
X241
a
a
Partially Weathered Rock (PWR) - Sampled as Dry Red
Silty Fine to Medium Sand (PWR)
_ Auger Refusal at 8.6 Feet Below the Existing Ground _
Surface
/UM
SUMMIT