HomeMy WebLinkAbout410001_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20221220,OJDivision of Water Resources
Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of visit: Compliance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 1011outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: I I GIB 1Arrival Time: Departure Time: ,� . ,� U U� County: %IA it ffir 1
Farm Name: QQ�)Q{� �``Q1i?t Y`QI� Owner Email:
Owner Name: 1palt Tt64 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: o A t Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
TOther
I I
Integrator:
Region:
Phone: ?A3 Z(p- ZLi-;I-�
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -La er
Design Current
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
lBeef Brood Cow I I I
[—]Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
V�'LNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued
Facility Number: Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
g,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: Lam
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
'
u
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any inunediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
[—]Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
J�rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
�Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
�-�r
I X No
r
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
��{
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
t;YrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
[—]Yes
ErNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
-ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
EZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
ED-Wa�t ISJ meekly Freeboard rna c iuuiya;e Q Sjsis— -CI aste TrancPerc �e
❑ Rainfall - s AMonthly and V Rainfall Inspections �3ivdge3mve
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [—]Yes 05-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes RrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 5/1212020 Continuer!
Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes D�No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ;KNo
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
FZ[NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
V No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
ONA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ;`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ;ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes allo
❑ Yes] No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
q NPwes� Qedv�n k Availab�22 y PS NI 116)e kvv,
hvti1CIA I i"shu
(GU}C'�Iib�/Gk��.� (%tt2 1AZ3.� w�a1�1'��1-terse.
Q ok Ay\imulhdle%_
re VAkeC11 S6lma AI'llnnal tholes �se�� IYlofnL�jV�}y
�1 Sp`.\s�u2 ZoZZ. having M6b`rl�A� rssM'�) LA) o�e� N�e�vtaSsb�v� U`6e,b\e
0LS 51uc1r'o scxovey1 6,VeCalOAAOA<, �Df 7,01` If G.l� �0.��;gS wP�resolcl
\4 V GUVt o\t\e ()L ttt_ 1,tled �b `(s�e8
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 3&p-Igl'o gogq
Date: 1 %.I %Q 1 yn�7
___ ""51112212'020