Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0032166_Wasteload Allocation_19920210NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION PERMIT NO.: NC0032166 PERMITTEE NAME: Appalachian State University FACILITY NAME: Camp Broadstone Facility Status: Existing Permit Status: Renewal Major Minor Pipe No.: 001 Design Capacity: 0.0075 MGD Domestic (% of Flow): 100 % Industrial (% of Flow): Comments: Refer : Basinwide / Streamline WLA File Completed By Permits & Engineering At Front Of Subbasin STREAM INDEX: 8-(1) RECEIVING STREAM: an unnamed tributary to the Watauga River Class: B-Trout HQW Sub -Basin: 04-02-01 Reference USGS Quad: C11NE, Valle Crucis (please attach) County: Watauga Regional Office: Winston-Salem Regional Office Previous Exp. Date: 2/29/92 Treatment Plant Class: II Classification changes within three miles: n/a, ca. 8 mi. to B HQW. Requested by: Jule Shanklin Prepared by: ;/)tra( Reviewed by: (ia.11,/k<xj?ji(.1& 'l Arrri /,1 220o Zf3 S boa,A 79. S 643 yr✓s tea. . ��G l✓ wC.� Date: 11/4/91 Date: - 6 9 Z Date: Z /0 Modeler Date Rec. SM� 1k\ 4 1 514 Drainage Area (mi2 ) D. DC— Avg. Streamflow (cfs): 0 0 7Q10 (cfs) 0. 0 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 0. 0 30Q2 (cfs) D .0 Toxicity Limits: IWC % Acute/Chronic Instream Monitoring: Parameters 720-/ /e.ny Lo y n / Upstream l!T>b itafitay ire, Location 557) ApS. fu/6/( Downstreamtfllalarf a, Location N5 "CAS. of of i// EffluentStnittim Characteristics Fbg t> e 5 Et le- t 3 Yemes Winto 5ww► '%v1tr.✓ BOD5 (mg/1) /70 GJ l Li NH3-N (mg/1) /2. 0 r l IC D.O. (mom) - C C So TSS (mg/1) 3 0.0 ? p 3 C F. Col. (/100 ml) 7b0. 0 Zap IOC pH (SU) 6— 1 6- I 6- y Clhkrim y/0) 2. 0 a. ° a. 0 Thrtahwt-06) menprov no/7;m' view rry- P u ,ii tr 1pr,. • 1 Comments: --/Itk,cirteirnil rIfiie-/- be %nCf���ie mart- AAA, 0-Svc A r.5e/1 71fte disc G�'ri no sc exCLI02c C. ROAD CLASSIFICATION PRIMARY HIGHWAY HARD SURFACE SECONDARY HIGHWAY HARD SURFACE LIGHT -DUTY ROAD. HARD OR IMPROVED SURFACE UNIMPROVED ROAD = = = Latitude 36°11'38" Longitude 81 °45'33" Map # C11 NE Sub -basin 40201 Stream Class B-Trout HOW Discharge Class 13 Receiving Stream UT to Watauga River Design Q 0.0075 MGDPermit expires 9/30/02 0 SCALE 1:24 000 —1 1 1 MILE 1 7000 FEET 1 1----{ 0 1 KILOMETER CONTOUR INTERVAL 40 FEET Appalacian State University Camp Broadstone NC0032166 Watauga County Facility Name: NPDES No.: Type of Waste: Facility Status: Permit Status: Receiving Stream: Stream Classification: Subbasin: County: Regional Office: Requestor: Date of Request: Topo Quad: FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION Request # 6563 Appalachian State University/Camp Broadstone NC0032166 Domestic - 100% Existing Renewal UT to Watauga River B-Trout HQW 040201 Watauga Winston-Salem Shanklin 11/4/'91 CI1NE Stream Characteristic: USGS # Date: Drainage Area (mi2): Summer 7Q10 (cfs): Winter 7Q10 (cfs): Average Flow (cfs): 30Q2 (cfs): IWC (%): • RECEIVED N.C. Dept. NRCD JAN 16 1992 Winston-Salem Regional Office 03.4787.1928 1986 0.05 0:0 0:0 0:0 0.0 100 Wasteload Allocation Summary (approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.) Facility discharges to stream with 7Q10/30Q2 = O. Removal of discharge is recommended in three years or new limits (page 2) will apply at that time. Facility must submit an engineering report within 12 months of the effective date of this permit showing no alternative to surface water discharge. Fecal coliform limit should be changed to 200/100 ml. Chlorine limit should be changed to 17 µg/I to be consistent with current procedures. According to Johnston (WSRO), there should only be an upstream sample in times of wet weather, yet the facility is reporting upstream data every month. Where are they collecting these samples from? Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers: Recommended by: Date: / 2 2-- Reviewed by rr Instream Assessment: Lt emir.— %.111/Date: )73/g a Regional Supervisor: £ Date: / 2 Z-1 L pp Permits & Engineering: f, on D. D vetch oPA Date: //0.7/92— FEB 13 1992 RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: Existing Limits: Wasteflow (MGD): BOD5 (mg/1): NH3N (mg/1): DO (mg/1): TSS (mg/1): Fecal Col. (/100 ml): pH (SU): Residual Chlorine (µg/1): Temperature (°C): TP (mg/1): TN (mg/1): Recommended Limits: Wasteflow (MGD): BOD5 (mg/1): NH3N (mg/1): DO (mg/I): TSS (mg/1): Fecal Col. (/100 ml): pH (SU): Residual Chlorine (1.tg/1): Temperature (°C): TP (mg/1): TN (mg/1): 2 PARAMETERS Monthly Average 0.0075 17.0 12.0 6.0 30.0 1000.0 6-9 2.0 monitor For three years: Monthly Average WQ or EL 0.0075 17.0 12.0 6.0 30.0 200.0 6-9 0..0 monitor* WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ or EL WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ After three years: Monthly Average Summer Winter WQ or EL 5.0 10.0 WQ 1.0 1.8 WQ 6.0 6.0 WQ 30.0 30.0 WQ 200.0 200.0 WQ 6.0 - 9.0 6.0 - 9.0 WQ a .0 ..0 WQ monitor* monitor* *Temperature shall not be increased by more than 0.5 degrees C as a result of the discharge of heated liquids, but in no case to exceed 20 degrees C. Limits Changes Due To: Change in 7Q10 data New regulations/standards New procedures New facility information Change in stream classification Other Parameter(s) Affected Fecal coliform BOD5, NH3, Chlorine x Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed. OR No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations. 3 INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Upstream Location: UT to Watauga River approximately 50 feet upstream of the outfall Downstream Location: UT to Watauga River approximately 50 feet downstream of the outfall Parameters: D.O., Temperature, Conductivity, Fecal Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies: MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Adequacy of Existing Treatment Has the facility dem trated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment facilities? Yes No If no, which parameters cannot be met? Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional office recommendations: If no, why not? Spec}a1 Instructions or Con._ ions Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N) (If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan) Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments. / cl /&o,fp,r4� c; ; .j(%5,ri GIT7 fproro Oyou)/ 2;1 j cc ti 4 , zcefrei //pvt/ IL cnf /17 (& ad o erzid a kve/ ,ode/ //am hJJ. 7h/> /5 a Z - /2d ..� �ni' 4/ rhi }Veils lre-?-vi19Z ( . L/77 /7i8). ?� ,00kt w / J�/mx/» t() 5( CI 4/4 fig i/(S f/li� pi 7 . //L i sal rA�C 4 , i Ma( l(i k 46m 14 ke-k /7/ - G65 G/(4 ,i,e. anfr/itn,Se/it, /a/7 ri/G Wha>7 71? Sff Lvtzrs' /d 6e - /hit all'61a1s .( Weld. . / 11-E UVl /l be-- e/Olt %yl a C L err (614; C_. pt,)! /6 P041 zerr-176,) logik 6;6:0fily 4,11;15 v/.// 4e. 9/pzid lha reev►- 21i .1n%/r/ea'l f / - r?/FY /' 1 /i // � J lam" � ails c le,r5 q �t/bcivli es . 7,11q140I 6ia/ /odca1 7red £[.t f %4n- 1 50i hc, u/{ OW sue yl 41/ sire A-m 4/5c/ c, .�c ,4;1d 1 01/10 e"IV t,%/ fi Peet I ave. cc/lec6 7 dice // / � owl-nalds rrrnovi/ T `f frea m „y /4L orml'f 7" df 7 'f 41/e -714,s /5 Jsf f,�4/G efi pas-0 cc- Ale o A. , /64Aff) &(gnu .Z7` 0075-/cr6,o GeT-/r Ot/ti 1am'i e, vcr Oho 2`c c3. 477.1928 (e ) C,-mp fieNt I : C. CT"+i z �1r( 63 =Petit - R J I •fr?s) DATE (7 C rt 9C /0 (7c /C 6- /9 C. S. D 7- 3 // 3 // v 3 5-3 /DO 7I 5a / S ‘k' /07 INSTREAM DATA !LD 70 6 ds L.),0 /7 i� 7 z, /i.o 9-ci /L /3 3Z 3z1 140 die 7 4.0 6o C7 4.0 5-0 6.2 851