HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0032166_Wasteload Allocation_19920210NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0032166
PERMITTEE NAME: Appalachian State University
FACILITY NAME: Camp Broadstone
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major Minor
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: 0.0075 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): 100 %
Industrial (% of Flow):
Comments:
Refer : Basinwide / Streamline WLA File
Completed By Permits & Engineering
At Front Of Subbasin
STREAM INDEX: 8-(1)
RECEIVING STREAM: an unnamed tributary to the Watauga River
Class: B-Trout HQW
Sub -Basin: 04-02-01
Reference USGS Quad: C11NE, Valle Crucis (please attach)
County: Watauga
Regional Office: Winston-Salem Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 2/29/92 Treatment Plant Class: II
Classification changes within three miles:
n/a, ca. 8 mi. to B HQW.
Requested by: Jule Shanklin
Prepared by: ;/)tra(
Reviewed by: (ia.11,/k<xj?ji(.1& 'l
Arrri /,1 220o Zf3 S boa,A 79. S
643 yr✓s tea. . ��G l✓ wC.�
Date: 11/4/91
Date: - 6 9 Z
Date:
Z /0
Modeler
Date Rec.
SM�
1k\ 4 1
514
Drainage Area (mi2 ) D. DC— Avg. Streamflow (cfs): 0 0
7Q10 (cfs) 0. 0 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 0. 0 30Q2 (cfs) D .0
Toxicity Limits: IWC % Acute/Chronic
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters 720-/ /e.ny Lo y n /
Upstream l!T>b itafitay ire, Location 557) ApS. fu/6/(
Downstreamtfllalarf a, Location N5 "CAS. of of i//
EffluentStnittim
Characteristics
Fbg t> e 5
Et le- t 3 Yemes
Winto
5ww► '%v1tr.✓
BOD5 (mg/1)
/70
GJ
l Li
NH3-N (mg/1)
/2. 0
r
l IC
D.O. (mom)
- C
C
So
TSS (mg/1)
3 0.0
? p
3 C
F. Col. (/100 ml)
7b0. 0
Zap
IOC
pH (SU)
6— 1
6- I
6- y
Clhkrim y/0)
2. 0
a. °
a. 0
Thrtahwt-06)
menprov
no/7;m'
view rry-
P u ,ii
tr 1pr,. •
1
Comments: --/Itk,cirteirnil rIfiie-/- be %nCf���ie
mart- AAA, 0-Svc A r.5e/1 71fte disc G�'ri no
sc exCLI02c C.
ROAD CLASSIFICATION
PRIMARY HIGHWAY
HARD SURFACE
SECONDARY HIGHWAY
HARD SURFACE
LIGHT -DUTY ROAD. HARD OR
IMPROVED SURFACE
UNIMPROVED ROAD = = =
Latitude 36°11'38" Longitude 81 °45'33"
Map # C11 NE Sub -basin 40201
Stream Class B-Trout HOW
Discharge Class 13
Receiving Stream UT to Watauga River
Design Q 0.0075 MGDPermit expires 9/30/02
0
SCALE 1:24 000
—1
1
1 MILE
1
7000 FEET
1
1----{
0
1 KILOMETER
CONTOUR INTERVAL 40 FEET
Appalacian State University
Camp Broadstone
NC0032166
Watauga County
Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Request # 6563
Appalachian State University/Camp Broadstone
NC0032166
Domestic - 100%
Existing
Renewal
UT to Watauga River
B-Trout HQW
040201
Watauga
Winston-Salem
Shanklin
11/4/'91
CI1NE
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%):
•
RECEIVED
N.C. Dept. NRCD
JAN 16 1992
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
03.4787.1928
1986
0.05
0:0
0:0
0:0
0.0
100
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Facility discharges to stream with 7Q10/30Q2 = O. Removal of discharge is recommended in
three years or new limits (page 2) will apply at that time. Facility must submit an engineering
report within 12 months of the effective date of this permit showing no alternative to surface water
discharge.
Fecal coliform limit should be changed to 200/100 ml. Chlorine limit should be changed to 17
µg/I to be consistent with current procedures. According to Johnston (WSRO), there should only
be an upstream sample in times of wet weather, yet the facility is reporting upstream data every
month. Where are they collecting these samples from?
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
Recommended by: Date: / 2 2--
Reviewed by rr
Instream Assessment: Lt emir.— %.111/Date:
)73/g a
Regional Supervisor: £ Date: / 2 Z-1 L
pp
Permits & Engineering: f, on D. D vetch oPA Date: //0.7/92—
FEB 13 1992
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY:
Existing Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
Temperature (°C):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
Recommended Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/I):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (1.tg/1):
Temperature (°C):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
2
PARAMETERS
Monthly Average
0.0075
17.0
12.0
6.0
30.0
1000.0
6-9
2.0
monitor
For three years:
Monthly Average
WQ or EL
0.0075
17.0
12.0
6.0
30.0
200.0
6-9
0..0
monitor*
WQ
WQ
WQ
WQ
WQ
WQ
WQ
WQ or EL
WQ
WQ
WQ
WQ
WQ
WQ
WQ
After three years:
Monthly Average
Summer Winter WQ or EL
5.0 10.0 WQ
1.0 1.8 WQ
6.0 6.0 WQ
30.0 30.0 WQ
200.0 200.0 WQ
6.0 - 9.0 6.0 - 9.0 WQ
a .0 ..0 WQ
monitor* monitor*
*Temperature shall not be increased by more than 0.5 degrees C as a result of the discharge of
heated liquids, but in no case to exceed 20 degrees C.
Limits Changes Due To:
Change in 7Q10 data
New regulations/standards
New procedures
New facility information
Change in stream classification
Other
Parameter(s) Affected
Fecal coliform
BOD5, NH3, Chlorine
x Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.
3
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: UT to Watauga River approximately 50 feet upstream of the outfall
Downstream Location: UT to Watauga River approximately 50 feet downstream of the outfall
Parameters: D.O., Temperature, Conductivity, Fecal
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility dem trated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Spec}a1 Instructions or Con._ ions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.
/ cl /&o,fp,r4�
c; ; .j(%5,ri
GIT7 fproro
Oyou)/
2;1 j cc ti 4 , zcefrei //pvt/ IL cnf
/17 (& ad o erzid a kve/ ,ode/
//am hJJ. 7h/> /5 a Z - /2d ..� �ni' 4/
rhi }Veils lre-?-vi19Z ( . L/77 /7i8).
?� ,00kt w / J�/mx/» t() 5( CI
4/4 fig i/(S f/li� pi 7 . //L i sal rA�C
4 , i Ma( l(i k 46m 14 ke-k /7/ - G65 G/(4 ,i,e.
anfr/itn,Se/it, /a/7 ri/G Wha>7 71? Sff
Lvtzrs' /d 6e - /hit all'61a1s .( Weld. .
/ 11-E UVl /l be-- e/Olt %yl a C L err (614; C_. pt,)! /6
P041 zerr-176,) logik 6;6:0fily 4,11;15 v/.// 4e. 9/pzid
lha reev►- 21i .1n%/r/ea'l f / - r?/FY /' 1 /i //
� J lam" �
ails c le,r5 q �t/bcivli es .
7,11q140I 6ia/ /odca1 7red £[.t f %4n- 1
50i hc, u/{ OW sue yl 41/ sire A-m
4/5c/ c, .�c ,4;1d 1 01/10 e"IV t,%/ fi
Peet I ave. cc/lec6 7 dice // / �
owl-nalds rrrnovi/ T `f frea m „y /4L
orml'f 7" df 7 'f 41/e -714,s /5 Jsf f,�4/G efi pas-0
cc-
Ale o
A. , /64Aff) &(gnu .Z7`
0075-/cr6,o
GeT-/r Ot/ti 1am'i e, vcr
Oho 2`c
c3. 477.1928 (e )
C,-mp fieNt
I : C. CT"+i z
�1r(
63 =Petit - R J I •fr?s)
DATE
(7 C
rt 9C
/0 (7c
/C
6-
/9
C.
S. D
7- 3
// 3
// v
3 5-3
/DO
7I
5a
/ S
‘k'
/07
INSTREAM DATA
!LD
70
6
ds
L.),0
/7
i�
7
z,
/i.o
9-ci
/L
/3
3Z
3z1
140
die 7
4.0
6o
C7
4.0
5-0
6.2 851