20221741 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20221209

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
6/28/2022
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20221741 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
What amout is owed?*
$240.00
$570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Wilmington Regional Office - [phone] Holley Snider:eads\hasnider:[e-mail]
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
Ocean Ridge Plantation Park
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Morgan Gilbert
1 b. Primary Contact Email:* lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
12/9/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Saw Pit Swamp
Basin
Lumber
Water Classification
C; SW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
33.926407
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Brunswick
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project? *
Yes No
Longitude:
-78.478728

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 42 - Recreation Facility
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1 i. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
Id. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Ocean Ridge Master Association INC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
04509, pg 0491
2c. Contact Person:
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
Unknown
Yes No
Yes No

2d. Address
Street Address
190 Ocean Ridge Parkway Southwest
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Ocean Isle Beach NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
28469 USA
2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Andy Osterlund
3b. Business Name:
Osterlund Architects, PLLC
3c. Address
Street Address
PO Box 568
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27602
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Morgan Gilbert
4b. Business Name:
Timmons Group
4c. Address
Street Address
5410 Trinity Road, Suite 102
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27607
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
3e. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
1 b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Ocean Isle Beach
2. Project Identification

2a. Property Identification Number:
105616840631
2b. Property size:
29.46
2c. Project Address
Street Address
East of Summerhill Glen Southwest and west of Dartmoor Way Southwest
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Ocean Isle Beach NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
28469 USA
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Saw Pit Swamp
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
C; SW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Lumber
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030402080201
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The project Site is a planned recreational park that consists of an approximately 30-acre area located east of Summerhill Glen Southwest and west of Dartmoor Way Southwest in Ocean
Isle, North Carolina within Brunswick County. The project Site is bound by golf courses and residential developments to the north, east, and south, and by undeveloped forest and
residential development to the west. The Site is comprised of mixed hardwood -pine forest.
The proposed recreational development will consist of an oceanfront beach house, a picnic pavilion, tennis and pickle -ball courts, an indoor/outdoor swimming pool, sauna, hot tub, a
fitness center, miles of walking and bike paths, a members' meeting/activity center, roadway, and utility improvements (i.e. public water supply and sanitary sewer alignment).
A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request was submitted by Timmons Group to the USACE on October 6, 2022. Information regarding permits for the adjoining development was
received on November 8, 2022. Permitting information for SAW-2002-00088 is provided in Appendix B.
This permit included 0.31 acres of impacts to Waters of the US. There's a note in the permit that reads "Remaining wetlands and waters within the tract shall be preserved in perpetuity."
This statement does not include the Site or any portions of PIN 105616840631.
A delineation of the western portion of the Site was completed by Headwater Environmental Inc. on February 26 and March 1, 2019, and a Jurisdictional Determination was received from
USACE on July 1, 2019. 2019 (SAW-2019-01167). Delineation data is included in Appendix B.
A second delineation of the areas outside parcel 105616840631 was completed by Headwater Environmental Inc. on September 6, 2022. 2022 updated delineation data is included in
Appendix B. At the time of this permit application, the additional area has not been confirmed by the USACE.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
8.246
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
0
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The purpose of the project is to construct a recreational park with community cohesion and the necessary amenities within the southwestern portion of Brunswick County.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
Ocean Ridge is a single -phased recreational development project that is located at east of Summerhill Glen Southwest and west of Dartmoor Way Southwest in Ocean Isle, North Carolina
(Brunswick County).
The project site will include the construction of a recreational park with associated amenities (including roads, stormwater control measures (SCMs), and utility improvements).
All work will be conducted in accordance with local, state, and federal regulations. Traditional equipment will be used consisting of front-end loaders, bulldozers, paving equipment,
graders, and earth movers. SCMs are required and will be used.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes No
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Unknown

Corps AID Number:
SAW-2019-01167
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
Headwater Environmental Inc.
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
02/26/2019 & 03/01/2019 — Delineation completed by Headwater Environmental personnel
07/01/2019 — Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (SAW-2019-01167) received from USACE
09/06/2022 — Additional area delineation completed by Headwater Environmental personnel; this additional area has not been confirmed.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes • No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permit(s) are intended to be used for development of the proposed project. All project impacts are being accounted for in this
permit application.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams -tributaries
Open Waters Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
Buffers
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type*(?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name
2e. Forested *
2f. Type of Jurisdicition *
(?)
2g. Impact
area*
4
Site Grading &
Development
P
Hardwood Flat
C
Yes
Both
0.006
(acres)
7
Site Grading &
Development
P
Headwater Forest
A
Yes
Both
0.005
(acres)
10
Site Grading &
Development
P
Headwater Forest
A
Yes
Both
0.136
(acres)
11
Site Grading &
Development
P
Headwater Forest
A
Yes
Both
0.019
(acres)
12
Site Grading &
Development
P
Headwater Forest
A
Yes
Both
0.005
(acres)
13
Site Grading &
Development
P
Headwater Forest
A
Yes
Both
0.000
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.171
2i. Comments:
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.171
Sites 4, 7, 10, 11, 12, and 13 (Impact Numbers 4, 7, 10, 11, 12, and 13) consists of 7,400-sq.ft. (0.1699-acre) of total permanent wetland impacts
necessary for road construction and grading associated for the road construction. The road is necessary to provide access throughout the Site. Impact
13 is shown as 0.000-acre impacts but the actual impact area is 0.000419-acre.
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
S1
Site Grading & Development
Permanent
Fill
Ditch
Jurisdictional Ditch
Corps
9
Average (feet)
6
(linear feet)
S2
Rip Rap
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
Ditch
Jurisdictional Ditch
Corps
9
Average (feet)
8
(linear feet)

S3
Site Grading & Development
Permanent
Fill
Ditch
Jurisdictional Ditch
Corps
9
Average (feet)
9
(linear feet)
S4
Rip Rap
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
Ditch
Jurisdictional Ditch
Corps
9
Average (feet)
10
(linear feet)
s5
Site Grading & Development
Permanent
Fill
Ditch
Jurisdictional Ditch
Corps
9
Average (feet)
12
(linear feet)
S6
Rip Rap
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
Ditch
Jurisdictional Ditch
Corps
9
Average (feet)
5
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
450
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
50
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
50
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
0
3j. Comments:
Impacts 5, 8, and 14 consist of 35-If (666-sq.ft./0.015-ac.) of permanent stream impacts associated with site development and construction, and
installation of stormwater dissipation devices.
Impacts 6, 9, and 15 consist of 23-If (213-sq.ft./0.005) of permanent— no loss stream impacts associated with the construction of rip rap dissipation pad.
4. Open Water Impacts
4a. Site #
4a1. Impact Reason
4b. Impact type
4c. Name of waterbody
4d. Activity type
4e. Waterbody type
4f. Impact area
1
Site Grading &
Development
P
Pond 1
Fill
Pond
0.00
2
Rip Rap
P
Pond 1
Other
Pond
0.00
3
Rip Rap
P
Pond 1
Other
Pond
0.00
4g. Total temporary open water Impacts:
0.00
4g. Total open water impacts:
0.00
4h. Comments:
4g. Total permanent open water impacts:
0.00
Site #1 (Impact Number 1) consists of 201-sq.ft. of permanent open water impacts necessary for road construction and grading associated for the road
construction. The road is necessary to provide access to the Site. Impact 1 is shown as 0.00-acre in the table but the actual impact is 0.0046-acre.
Sites #2 and #3 (Impact Numbers 2 and 3) consist of 378-sq.ft. of permanent — no loss open water impact necessary for the installation of a rip rap
dissipator pad. Impact 2 is shown as 0.00-acre in the table but the actual impact is 0.0048-acre. Impact 3 is shown as 0.00-acre in the table but the
actual impact is 0.0039-acre.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Impacts to jurisdictional features have been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable by incorporating resourceful site planning,
including utilization of the wetland/stream delineation to adjust the layout of the Site design to avoid and minimize impacts. The remaining impacts
proposed are necessary in order for the project's goals to be realized.
Additional avoidance and minimization measures were taken in response to the permitting information for SAW-2002-00088 received under the FOIA
request. Site plans were re-evaluated to reduce the total impacts to jurisdictional features to stay within the NWP 42 permitting thresholds. Retaining
walls were placed to reduce impacts to wetlands and open waters. Road accesses have been shifted to further reduce impacts.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Proper sedimentation and erosion control methods will be utilized during all phases of construction and installation as described in accordance with the
requirements of the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources: Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual (May 2013) and
local codes. All work will take place during dry conditions and can be facilitated from high, non -jurisdictional, stable ground. The contractor shall install
silt fence, inlet protection, sediment traps, division ditches, temporary coffer dams, tree protection, and clearing only as necessary to install devices. All
erosion and sediment control measures will be checked for stability and operation following every runoff producing rainfall, but in no case less than once
every week. Any needed repairs will be made immediately to maintain all measures designed. An erosion control inspections report is required and will
be kept by the owner's representative.
Temporary seeding and permanent seeding plans are included to restore impacted areas. The project will meet all relative requirements of Best
Management Practices and Engineered Stormwater Control Structures as outlined through State and Local Stormwater Rules. Measures will be taken to
prevent oil, tar, trash, debris, and other pollutants from entering adjacent jurisdictional features. Any excess excavated materials not utilized as back fill
will be placed and contained within upland areas and permanently stabilized to prevent erosion into adjacent jurisdictional features. Therefore,
stockpiling of excavated material within jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will be strictly prohibited as part of the construction of this project. All project
construction activities initiated within jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will be carried to completion in an expeditious manner to minimize the period of
disturbance within jurisdictional waters.

2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
DWR Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
Mitigation bank Payment to in -lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
Yes No
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
(linear feet)
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
(square feet)
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
0.170
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres) (acres)
4h. Comments
The project is proposing a total of 0.1699-ac. of wetland impacts that will require mitigation. An amount of 0.17-ac. of wetland impact was requested via
the ILF form. Please note that the impacts are proposed to be mitigated at a 2:1 ratio, requiring the purchase of 0.3398-ac. of wetland mitigation credits.
At the time of this submittal, Timmons Group has reached out to the Stone Farm Mitigation Bank, the only private mitigation bank with mitigation sites
within the project's HUC, on September 20 and November 28, 2022. A response has not yet been received from the private mitigation bank.
An ILF acceptance letter dated December 1, 2022 from NC DMS for the requested credits is included in the attached deliverables package. If the
amount of credits needed to be purchased from NC DMS changes due to credit availability within the private banks, the ILF request will be amended and
an SOA will be provided.
6. Buffer mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWR
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? If yes, you must fill out this entire form - please contact DWR for more information.
Yes No
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
If no, explain why:
Proposed Site is not located within a protected riparian buffer area.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program?
Yes No
N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
Local Government State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
Phase II NSW USMP Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Ocean Isle Beach and Brunswick County
State Stormwater Programs
Phase II Coastal Counties
HWQ or ORW Other

Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project is a single and complete project that will not result in additional impacts. All impacts associated with the project are accounted for
herein.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
A search of the USFWS IPaC database on December 6, 2022 identified thirteen federally protected species as potentially occurring within the project
area, including the northern long-eared bat, piping plover, red knot, red -cockaded woodpecker, American alligator, green sea turtle, Kemp's Ridley sea
turtle, leatherback sea turtle, loggerhead sea turtle, Cooley's meadowrue, rough -leaved loosestrife, and seabeach amaranth. The IPaC database further
identified two candidate species for listing, the magnificent ramshorn and the monarch butterfly, as potentially occurring within the project area. The IPaC
database also included the tri-colored bat as proposed endangered. No critical habitats were identified within the project area or a 1-mile radius.
Additionally, a search of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database on December 6, 2022 did not identify any Federally threatened or
endangered species within the project area. However, the NHP report did identify multiple elemental occurrences within a 1-mile radius of the project
area. These elemental occurrences are for the red -cockaded woodpecker (EO ID 11834) and the American alligator (EO ID 7407). Other State listed
species were found within the project area as listed in the attached NHP report. No natural areas were identified within the project area.
The majority of the Site consists of mixed hardwood and pine forests greater than 30-years of age interspersed with forested wetlands in the central
portions of the Site. Based on the age of the forest, the site may contain several trees that could represent potentially suitable summer roosting habitat
for the northern long-eared bat. Timmons Group is not aware of known maternity roost trees or hibernacula in the vicinity of the Site. According to the
USFWS Eastern North Carolina Ecological Services website, Brunswick County is not a county with known roosting sites and is located more than 50
miles from the nearest 12-digit USGS Hydrologic Unit Map (HUC) with a known winter roosting site. Therefore, it is the opinion of Timmons that any
development of the Site may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the northern long-eared bat. Further, per the findings of the Final 4(d) Rule on the
northern long-eared bat, disturbance activities associated with the Site would qualify as exempt, unintentional take. On November 30, 2022, the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service published a final rule to reclassify the northern long-eared bat as endangered under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
Because the northern long-eared bat has been reclassified from a threatened to an endangered species, the 4(d) of the Act is no longer effective after
January 30, 2023. Once available, the project will need to be reevaluated for northern long-eared bat using the Rangewide Determination Key on the

USFWS IPaC website to ensure the project will have no effect or is not likely to adversely affect the northern long-eared bat.
According to information obtained from the USFWS Online Database, the red -cockaded woodpecker prefers to nest in mature pine stands with low
understory vegetation. Additionally, the red -cockaded woodpecker prefers to forage in mixed pine and hardwood stands greater than 30 years of age
and consisting of trees with an average diameter greater than 8-inches diameter at breast height (dbh). The majority of the Site consists of mature
mixed -hardwood forests with some pine forests scattered throughout. Forested wetlands are located in the central and northern portions of the Site . No
occurrences of red -cockaded woodpecker were noted on the NCNHP database search. One element occurrence of the red -cockaded woodpecker was
noted in 1991 within a one -mile radius of the Site. Therefore, it is the opinion of Timmons that any proposed disturbance may affect, but not likely to
adversely effect on the red -cockaded woodpecker.
According to information obtained from the USFWS Online Database, the American alligator is a large, semi -aquatic, armored reptile that ranges from 6
to 14-ft in length (body only). Typical habitat includes freshwater swamps, marshes, rivers, lakes, and other smaller bodies of water. It sometimes
creates burrows near these environments. The majority of the site consists of mature mixed hardwood and pine forests with forested wetlands in the
northern and central portions of the Site. No occurrences of the American alligator were noted on the NCNHP database search. One element occurrence
of the American alligator was noted in 2017 within a one -mile radius of the Site. Based on the habitat preferences of the American alligator and the
current habitat in the vicinity of the proposed action area, it is the opinion of Timmons that potentially low quality habitat for the American alligator exists
within the proposed action area in the open water and ditches on -site. Because the American alligator is listed as threatened due to similarity of
appearance, USFWS ESA Section 7 consultation is not required for the species.
According to information obtained from the USFWS Online Database, Kemp's Ridley sea turtle is the smallest of the sea turtles, reaching about 2 feet in
length and occurs in bays and coastal waters in the Atlantic Ocean. The leatherback sea turtle is the largest of the sea turtles, reaching 4 to 8 feet in
length and occurs in marine waters throughout the Atlantic Ocean. The majority of the Site consists of mature mixed -hardwood and pine forests with
forested wetlands in the northern and central portions of the Site. No potentially suitable habitat for Kemp's Ridley sea turtle and the leatherback sea
turtle were located within the project area. No occurrences of either species were noted on the NCNHP database search. Therefore, it is the opinion of
Timmons that any proposed disturbance with have no effect on Kemp's Ridley sea turtle and the leatherback sea turtle.
According to information obtained from the USFWS Online Database, the green sea turtle is the largest hard -shelled sea turtle, reaching up to 3 to 4 feet
in length and it nests annually in North Carolina. The loggerhead sea turtle is reddish -brown with relatively large heads and also nest in North Carolina.
The majority of the Site consists of mature mixed -hardwood and pine forests with forested wetlands in the northern and central portions of the Site. No
potentially suitable habitat for the green sea turtle and the loggerhead sea turtle were located within the project area. No occurrences of either species
were noted on the NCNHP database search. Therefore, it is the opinion of Timmons that any proposed disturbance will have no effect on the green sea
turtle and the loggerhead sea turtle.
According to information obtained from the USFWS Online Database, Cooley's meadowrue is a perennial herb that is typically found in wet pine
savannas that are kept open by frequent fire and/or other disturbances such as forest clearings and roadside ditches . The majority of the Site consists
of mature mixed hardwood and pine forests with forested wetlands in the northern and central portions of the Site. The ditches on -site are rather deep
and do not provide suitable habitat. There is no evidence of fire and/or other disturbances within the forested areas. Forest clearings along the
boundaries of the Site are regularly mowed and maintained. The understory of the Site is not clear enough to provide a conducive habitat for Cooley's
meadowrue. Therefore, it is the opinion of Timmons that any proposed disturbance with have no effect on Cooley's meadowrue.
Based on the habitat description provided by the USFWS, rough -leaved loosestrife is a perennial herb that grows 11.8-23.6 inches in height, has
triangular leaves and yellow flowers. The species typically occurs in maintained (fire and/or regular mowing) ecotones or edges between longleaf pine
uplands and pond pine pocosins, as well as within Carolina bays. The majority of the Site consists of mature mixed hardwood and pine forests with
forested wetlands in the northern and central portions of the Site. Pond pine pocosins were not noted onsite and the Site is not regularly maintained by
fire. Therefore, the Site does not have habitat that would be conducive to rough -leaved loosestrife. No occurrences of rough -leaved loosestrife were
noted on the NCNHP database search. Therefore, it is the opinion of Timmons that any proposed disturbance will have no effect on rough -leaved
loosestrife.
According to information obtained from the USFWS Online Database, seabeach amaranth is a plant species found in barrier island beach environments
and it grown in overwash flats on frontal dunes. The piping plover is a bird species that lives on tidal flats, shoals, and sandbars within inlets. The red
knot is also a bird species that lives along the ocean shore and feeds on horseshoe crab eggs. The majority of the Site consists of mature mixed -
hardwood and pine forests with forested wetlands in the northern and central portions of the Site. No occurrences of seabeach amaranth were noted on
the NCNHP database search. Based on the lack of ocean shore and sand dunes, which represent suitable habitat, it is the opinion of Timmons that any
proposed disturbance will have no effect on the seabeach amaranth, piping plover, and red knot.
According to information obtained from the USFWS Online Database, the magnificent ramshorn is a salt intolerant snail endemic to the lower Cape Fear
River Basin. The majority of the Site consists of mature mixed -hardwood pine forests and forested wetlands in the northern portion of the Site. No
occurrences of magnificent ramshorn were noted on the NCNHP database search. The magnificent ramshorn is an air -breathing snail, historically
documented from only four sites in the lower Cape Fear River Basin in southeastern North Carolina. In the past 40 years, repeated surveys conducted
by USFWS in suitable habitat within the known historical range have yielded no observations of the magnificent ramshorn. All known magnificent
ramshorn snails are currently in captivity and are descendants of adult snails from two distinct populations from Pleasant Oaks Pond and Orton Pond in
Brunswick County, North Carolina. Therefore, it is the opinion of Timmons Group that the proposed disturbance will have no effect on the magnificent
ramshorn.
The majority of the Site consists of mixed hardwood and pine forests greater than 30-years of age interspersed with forested wetlands in the central
portions of the Site. Based on the age of the forest, the site may contain several trees that could represent potentially suitable summer roosting habitat
for the tri-colored bat. Timmons Group is not aware of known maternity roost trees or hibernacula in the vicinity of the Site. Therefore, it is the opinion of
Timmons Group that the proposed project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the tri-colored bat.
The majority of the Site consists of mature mixed -hardwood and pine forests. The monarch butterfly's habitat is ubiquitous throughout the state and
disturbance to areas with potentially suitable habitat is minimal. Therefore, it is the opinion of Timmons Group that the proposed project will have no
effect on the monarch butterfly.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)

7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
A search of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Preservation Office's (HPO) online database and the North Carolina Department of Environmental and
Natural Resources (DENR) Division of Historical Resources (DHR) data did not identify any historical resources within the project limits or within a 1-mile
radius of the proposed project limits.
Considering the proposed project's consistency with the surrounding land use, along with all proposed work being limited to the project area, the project
area's distance from all listings, and existing land use between the site and listings, the proposed project should have no effect on historical resources.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
According to FEMA FIRM panel 3720105600K (effective 08/28/2018), the subject property is located within Zone X, an area of minimal flood hazard.
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
2022.12.09_Ocean Ridge_PCN Attachments Package (reduced).pdf 12.89MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Morgan Gilbert
Signature
Date
12/9/2022

• •0060
5410 Trinity Road P 919.866.4951
919.859.5663
T I M M 4 N S GROUP Raleigh,, NC 27607 Suite 102Fvwwvtimmons.com
December 9, 2022
Gary Beecher
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers — Wilmington District
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
Holley Snider
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
NCDEQ — Division of Water Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Re: Electronic Pre -Construction Notification Attachments
Ocean Ridge
Ocean Isle, Brunswick County, North Carolina
Project No.: 52770
Dear Mr. Beecher and Mrs. Snider,
On behalf of Osterlund Architects, PLLC, we are providing additional attachments and information
to aid in the review of the electronic Pre -Construction Notification of the Ocean Ridge, an
approximately 29.46-acre site located east of Summerhill Glenn Southwest and west of Dartmoor
Way Southwest in Ocean Isle, North Carolina, within Brunswick County (the Site).
Please review the below attachments and contact Morgan Gilbert at [phone] or
[e-mail] if additional information is required.
Sincerely,
Timmons Group
Morgan Gilbert, WPIT
Environmental Scientist I
<.
Nick Tu or
Senior Environmental Scientist
ENGINEERING I DESIGN I TECHNOLOGY

Enclosures
ATTACHMENTS
Appendix A
Figure 1 — Vicinity Map
Figure 2 — NRCS Soil Survey Map
Figure 3 — Wetland Delineation Map
Appendix B
Agent Authorization Form
2019 Delineation Map and Jurisdictional Determination
2022 Data Collection Report
FOIA Report — SAW-2002-00088560070
DWR Pre -Filing Request
Appendix C
Environmental Impacts Set
Appendix D
Mitigation Acceptance Letter
Appendix E
IPaC Official Species Report
NCNHP Database Report
Appendix F
SHPO Map and List

Appendix A

Path: Y:\805\52770 - Ocean Ridge\GIS\52770-JD-VIC.mxd
r. 9A DR
5LY
._r AAAN
NORTH
] CAROLINA s
NH Y
l
r7
a.ly Pit SAY' o I5
�o —
Z
r
O
'{PP
Site Limits
IpHS rpr'1 Pf `'•':
i
t�
..�CF. I'L -
Site limits are approximate.
Topographic imagery from USGS.
0 21000 4,000 6,000 8,000
Feet
OCEAN RIDGE TIMMONS GROUP s■ `'��
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER:52770 U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE(S):SHALLOTTE
PROJECT STUDY LIMITS: 29.5ACRES DATE(S):2019
LATITUDE: 33.926407 WATERS HED(S): COASTAL CAROLINA (LOWER PEE DEE RIVER BASIN)
LONGITUDE:-78.478728 HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S):03040208
These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIM MONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not
limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.

Path: Y:\805\52770 - Ocean Ridge\GIS\52770-JD-NRCS.mxd
These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not
limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.

E o
N a >, a a
^,U N N cQ •- cN 3 as
W L C c CD 0) O C
ti z �O a)UU o �,� a Q`O
L L .= N ul -0 H U
(n
6> H O Y CO � � N a) ro a L V � � a)
O Q Q U O'U as UO QC -0 = }' v �
W O O� O U W N as N `° O 0 0 ro _0 L� E N
� z 70 c Co fig`° � Co °O° W n aj ro O � � 0 2
cc:W ��ms� _ m E O rnzvi n 0 - NQU Q=o
0 C L .(0 a) Um� W 0 a +)o a) j> O O O nm
g fo
0 a) O yV+ d' N Q z E i J (n C ?� -0 > ti O O 0.0
Qz =cCo
z� U) E o
c Z U) co o O z r, O
0 Q U H � a) N Q ._
a 3 O J ;� E� IE z
U o
p/aa�
N
m U)Ms�°
1)s
�U)2C
E� =;
0NU)
o
>��'�
C U
d
LLJ
as 8L
2 0 L
TE
�JO
E
a) Q
O
��G�O 3
Zj
E
Q u) N
O
fn
EONS
a
of
U °'
m`
L
Ca
s
��Ea)
U
��
0 o Q o
76
od
C CO
0
o
N
o
mo
V 0L
CL
a) (7
0
p
o
(6 � U C
a) O N .O
Uo ul ul
00
,
(?
> a3 N
~ U) O C
♦
d
a)2i�'o
C
E o!EU
Q o
,
errace S
isburn TW
aa)
CL z
Lisburn-Terrace
m ao) �
a3 C U a3 a)
O m O W .0
0 a>i
0) U)
U) �Da
t �U m C
�0)Q- x
Of U)
aae
0o asp o
> aUOf>W
♦, �a
N a3 2i D
>
0
-Z
7_ C
Ul
as u) 0
♦
U au a)
� J 'O
♦ N
.0
'
a) o as
a)
O
a) .N
S
Ul � �
t Ul
cnCa3>�
:s
o�Qo�
. o
U (0 O
CLN 7
:L-
o�
Q D C
D o E
N
Q
Oa-0
O a) = Q
N ON
O ->
a) _ U
L.L
U) O
7 > N
Ul N U) 0
U) OQ E a)
a)� cc: U)
> U)
a3 .-, CL O a)
(6
a)
rn
C
as
m > U)
2� O a) C
fn -0
a) a) � ul
" '� o- U)
w O
CA O
Ew a3
w�> Eas
L L a5 2i
�2� 0
7

Appendix B

The Department of the Army
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
To Whom It May Concern:
• � f
TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
All Blanks to be Filled in by Applicant
NCDEQ — Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
I, the undersigned, current applicant designate, authorize representatives of Timmons Group to
act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request
supplemental information in support of applications, etc., from this day forward.
This the 5th day of December 120 22
(number) (Month) (Year)
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
Project Name: Ocean Ridge
Applicant Name (Print): Andrew Osterlund, AIA
Applicant Signature: ;/„�
Applicant Mailing AdMss: PO BOX 568, Raleigh, NC 27602
Applicant Fax
Telephone: [phone] No.
Applicant Email
Address: [e-mail]
L
0
Ln
Ln
rn
co
M
r-I
CT
w
E
0
U
U)
c
0
E
E
3
3
3

TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVE[? T, ROi1GH OORF,.
AGENT AUTHORIZATION and
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION FORM
i
All Blanks to be Filled in by Current Landowner
The Department of the Army NCDEQ — Division of Water Resources
US Army Corps of Engineers 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Wilmington District 1650 Mail Sery ce Center
P❑ Box 1890 Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the undersigned, current property owner designate, authorize representatives of Timmons
Group to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon
request supplemental information in support of applications, etc., from this day forward_
This the a b day of [•t r , 20-A
(number) Month) (Year)
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S_ Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
and NCDEQ Division of Water Resources (DWR) to enter upon the property herein described
for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with
Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 401 and 404 of the Clean Water
Act, and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
Project Name: Ocean Ridge
Parcel ID: 105616840631
Site Address: East of Summerhill GIn SW and west of Dartmoor Way SW
Ocean Isle, NC
Property Owner's Name (Print): Ocean d e M ter "SAtio/INC
Property Owner's Signature:
Property Owner's Mailing �]
Address: I � 0 Xer , F GQ LA -cc c4 S�
Property Owner's ��yy —7 Fax
Telephone: `7 73 3 1) 3 q ■ No.
Property Owner's
Email Address: / 0 0)1) l J o e, F la
0
E
6
u
sn
C
0
E
E
3
i

40
Headwater
, ENVIRONMENTAL INC.
July 1, 2019
Mr. Henry Orejuela
Ocean Ridge Master Association
PO Box 867
New Bern, North Carolina 28562
910-777-3908 > 1844 Sir Tyler Dr. Wilmington, NC 28405
Reference: Wetland Delineation
Ocean Ridge Site
Summerhill Glen SW
Ocean Isle Beach, Brunswick County, North Carolina
Headwater Project #201902
Dear Mr. Orejuela:
www.headwaterenvironmental.com
Headwater Environmental, Inc. (Headwater) is pleased to provide the results of our wetland
delineation. On January 12, 2019, Ocean Ridge Master Association (ORMA) retained Headwater
to perform a wetland delineation at the above referenced property. The purpose of this report is
to document and locate the extent of wetlands and streams within the site boundary.
PROJECT INFORMATION
The site is located northeast and adjacent to the intersection of Lisburn Terrace and Summerhill
Glenn SW in Ocean Isle Beach, Brunswick County, North Carolina. According to Brunswick
County GIS, the site is identified as Parcel ID 22800014 (27.17 acres) and is owned by Reaves
Thomas HRS.
The proposed use of the site is to develop community amenities for the Ocean Ridge
Neighborhood. The limits of the project area are to be defined by the ORMA; their successors or
assigns.
Regulatory Summary
In order to identify wetlands at the site, Headwater utilized the "Regional Supplement to the Corps
of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont", issued April 2012.
Identification of wetlands is based on a three -factor approach involving indicators of hydrophytic
vegetation, hydric soil, and wetland hydrology.
Federal authority to regulate activities in wetlands is contained in Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (33 USC 1344) and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC 403). These Acts
established a program for regulating the discharge of dredged and fill material into the "Waters of
the United States", which includes wetlands and streams. Section 401 of the Clean Water Act
authorizes States and Tribes to administer the water quality certification process to protect
wetlands and other aquatic resources.
Based the Rapanos v. United States and Carabell v. United State Supreme Court cases in
2005/2006, the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) issued guidance requiring that a significant nexus determination must be

Wetland Delineation: Ocean Ridge Site
Headwater Project #201902
July 1, 2019
completed in order to identify the connectivity of wetlands to traditionally navigable waters. The
Wilmington District of the USACE in conjunction with the EPA, administers the federal wetlands
program in this area. In addition, the North Carolina Department of Water Resources (DWR)
administers the wetlands and stream buffer program for the State of North Carolina as per Section
401 of the Clean Water Act.
Stream buffers are not implemented by the DWR in this watershed. According to Stormwater
Management Policy 15A NCAC 02H .1006, a 30-foot vegetative buffer is required along all
streams or rivers classified as High Quality Waters (HQW). The stream located north of the site
boundary is classified as HQW, therefore a 30-foot vegetative buffer is required along this feature.
METHODOLOGY
Office Review
Headwater reviewed the 7.5-minute United States Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic
Quadrangle, Shallotte, North Carolina dated 1991 (Figure 1). According to the topographic
quadrangle, the site is situated between 40 and 55 feet above mean sea level (MSL). The site is
mapped as wooded land and generally slopes downgradient to the north. An unnamed stream is
mapped on the northeastern portion of the site. The unnamed stream flows northwest to the
Shallotte River.
Headwater reviewed the printed Soil Survey for Brunswick County, North Carolina provided by
the NRCS, dated 1986 (Figure 2). There are no aquatic resources mapped within the site
boundary.
According to the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), Web Soil Survey (WSS), there
are four soil series mapped within the site boundary (Figure 3). Foreston loamy fine sand (Fo) is
mapped on the northern portion of the site. Torhunta mucky fine sand (To) is mapped on the
northern and western portions of the site. Leon fine sand (Lo) is mapped on the northwestern and
central portions of the site. Murville mucky fine sand (Mu) is mapped on the southern portion of
the site.
The Foreston series is a moderately well drained soil found on interstream divides of the coastal
plain. The Torhunta series consist of very poorly drained soils found in "bays" and on stream
terraces in the Coastal Plain. The Leon series is a poorly to very poorly drained soil, found on
upland flats, stream terraces and depressions. The Murville series is a very poorly drained soil
found in flat or slight depression on broad interstream divides, such as the area between the Cape
Fear River and Northeast Cape Fear River. All four soil series are identified as hydric soils in
Brunswick County.
Headwater reviewed the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate
Map (FIRM), Panel Number 3720105600K, dated August 8, 2018. The site is located outside of
the 500-year floodplain (Figure 4).
Headwater reviewed the United States U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetland
Inventory (NWI). According to the NWI mapping (Figure 5), a "Riverine" feature is mapped along
the northeastern site boundary.
Headwater reviewed Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data provided by the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Elevation at the site generally slopes downgradient to
2

Wetland Delineation: Ocean Ridge Site
Headwater Project #201902
July 1, 2019
the north, in the direction of a stream (Figure 6).
The site drains to the upper Shallotte River. The Shallotte River is classified as Class C, Swamp
Waters, High Quality Waters and is located within the Lumber River basin. Stream buffers are not
implemented by the DWR in this watershed.
Site Reconnaissance
Following the office review, the site reconnaissance was completed February 26 and March 1,
2019. The field reconnaissance involved a general site inspection, wetland observations, and a
wetland boundary delineation. The purpose of the site reconnaissance was to verify the published
data, inspect the site for the presence of wetlands, and delineate (flag) the wetland/upland
boundaries. Headwater utilized the Trimble Geo7x GPS device to locate and map the wetland
features.
During the field review, examination of wetland characteristics was conducted. Data Points were
established and are attached to this report. The Data Points were used to record field data on
vegetation, soils, and hydrology. Information collected at each data point includes the following:
Characterization of Vegetation
Vegetation at each Data Point was characterized as per the appropriate regional
supplement to the USACE Wetland Delineation Manual for the following stratum (layer):
A. Trees: Woody plants, excluding vines, approximately 20 feet or more in height
and three inches or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
B. Saplings: Woody plants, excluding vines, 20 feet or more in height and less than
3 inches DBH.
C. Shrubs: Woody plants approximately 3 to 20 feet in height.
D. Herbs: All, non -woody, herbaceous plants less than 3 feet in height.
E. Vines: All woody vines, regardless of length or height.
Soil Characterization
Soil characteristics at each data point were reviewed with the use of a 2-inch diameter
Dutch auger. Soil samples were obtained from the ground surface to the depth necessary
to identify hydric soil characteristics. The matrix color of each sample was identified and
recorded using the standard Munsell Soil Color Chart. Other soil characteristics (i.e.:
textures, concretions, structure) of each sample were also examined and recorded.
Particular emphasis was placed on the identification of (or lack of) certain hydric soil
indicators such as low chroma and/or mottled soils.
Hydrology
Each data point was examined for evidence of surface and subsurface hydrology. Field
indicators (i.e.: water stained leaves, oxidized root channels, morphological plant
adaptations, etc.) were identified and recorded. Each point was evaluated for primary and
secondary indications of wetlands hydrology.
FINDINGS AND OBSERVATIONS
The weather at the time of reconnaissance was cloudy with temperatures near 70 (degrees
Fahrenheit). Headwater was not accompanied during the delineation. The site boundaries were
visually discernable based on woodlines and roads. The Trimble Geo7x GPS device was also
3

Wetland Delineation: Ocean Ridge Site
Headwater Project #201902
July 1, 2019
utilized to discern the site boundaries. Photographs taken during the site visit are attached to this
report.
The site is wooded. A network of ditches is located throughout the site and along the boundaries.
Headwater identified two wetland areas and one pond within the site boundary (Figure 7). Wetland
Area A is located on the central portion of the site. Wetland A abuts a perennial stream northeast
and adjacent of the site. Wetland C is located on the southern portion of the site. Pond A is located
on the northeastern portion of the site. Several ditches connect to the pond. Two upland islands
were identified on the central eastern portion of the site.
The soils in the wetland areas have low chroma and low value colors. The wetland area is
dominated by hydrophytic vegetation and exhibits wetland hydrology indicators. Standing water
and saturated soils are located throughout Wetland A. Wetland Determination Data Forms that
support our findings are included as attachments. Data Point 1 (DP-1) was recorded within an
upland island on the eastern -central portion of the site. DP-2 was recorded within Wetland A.
Headwater marked the wetland boundaries with pink surveyor tape. The wetland labeling scheme
is included on Table 1.
Table 1. Wetland and stream labeling scheme.
Wetland/Stream Identifier
Location
Flag Numbers
Wetland A
Central portion of the site
W-A1 to W-A53
Wetland C
Southern portion of the site
W-Cl to W-C9
Upland Island AA
Northeastern portion of the site
W-AA1 to W-AA11
Upland Island A
Central eastern portion of the site
U-Al to U-Al2
Upland Island B
Eastern portion of the site
U-131 to U-1317
Headwater observed the remainder of the site for the presence of surface waters or wetlands.
Headwater traversed the perimeter boundaries and made several transects across the interior of
the site. The soils in other areas of the site are bright and appear well drained. Headwater did not
observe additional surface waters or wetlands on the site. Figure 7 shows the approximate
locations of the wetlands, streams, and data points.
REGULATORY VERIFICATION
Headwater completed a Jurisdictional Determination (JD) site visit with Mr. Gary Beecher of the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) on May 14, 2019. Mr. Beecher agreed with the wetland
boundaries. Mr. Beecher identified the excavated area on the northern portion of the site as a
borrow pit within an upland area and therefore is not a jurisdictional feature. The site has been
assigned Action ID SAW-2019-01167.
If impacted to wetlands or other aquatic resources are to occur, additional coordination with the
USACE and the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR) may be warranted.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Two wetland area was identified and mapped in the field by Headwater. Based on our
preliminary calculations, Wetland Area A is 7.65 acres and Wetland Area C is 0.41 acre.
Wetland Area A is abutting a perennial stream northeast of the site.
• Three upland islands were identified and mapped among Wetland A on the eastern portion of
the site. Based on our preliminary calculations, Upland Island AA is 1.27 acres, Upland Island
12

Wetland Delineation: Ocean Ridge Site
Headwater Project #201902
July 1, 2019
A is 0.72 acre, and Upland Island B is 0.76 acre.
A network of ditches is located throughout the site and along the boundaries. Jurisdictional
ditches are located along the northern and eastern site boundaries, respectively.
If the wetlands, streams, and/or buffers are impacted by development, they should be
accurately located and mapped by a licensed North Carolina surveyor. Such a survey would
show the exact location and extent of jurisdictional wetlands and isolated wetlands. The
survey could serve as a preliminary site plan that could be also be used for a permit application
to the USACE and DWR. USACE and DWR authorization should be obtained prior to
impacting wetlands.
LIMITATIONS
Observations, conclusions, and/or recommendations pertaining to the potential jurisdictional
wetland areas and stream features within the subject site are limited to the conditions observed,
and/or materials reviewed at the time this study was undertaken.
This report is provided for the use of the ORMA; their successors or assigns, and is not intended
to be used or relied upon in connection with other projects or by other unidentified third parties.
The use of this report by an undesignated third party or parties will be at such party's sole risk
and Headwater disclaims liability for such third -party use or reliance.
Headwater appreciates the opportunity to provide our environmental services for this project. If you
have questions or need additional information, please contact us at [phone].
Respectfully submitted,
Headwater Environmental, Inc.
C. Paul Pascarosa Nick Creidler
President Environmental Scientist
Enclosure: Figures 1 to 7
Data Forms
Photographs
Jurisdictional Determination SAW-2019-01167
5

�y
'�.Ip:
Q
�
4
l
- u
� I
Legend
Site boundary _ Feet
0 1,000 2,000 4,000
SOURCE FIGURE 1
Headwater LOCATION MAP
ENVIRONMENTAL I NC. USGS Ocean Ridge Site
7.5-minute Topographic Quadrangle
Shalotte, North Carolina (1991) Summerhill Glenn SW
Date: 1/4/2019 Contour Interval = 5 feet Ocean Isle North Carolina
Headwater Project # 201902
1 inch = 2,000 feet
Prepared by: NJC

Noe I,a.
tr 8 a8 Fv
oA
Noe
-
� krg
nee L4
L v G oA
GoA
To rQ
TO
fo Mu
L o�
Mu Tr 0
La
Mu
Mu
L ra
LoiZ
u
?� —,
LG
mu
10
Mu
Mu
%A S 4I
F
{n
F❑ Mu !
-Ba1 Kr9
My ToJP . ) Lo
Legend v
9 - Feet
Approximate site boundary F 0 200 400 800
SOURCE FIGURE 2
Headwater USDA PRINTED SOIL MAP
E N V I R 0 N M E N T A L I N C. Printed Soil Survey Ocean Ridge Site
Brunswick County, North Carolina Summerhill Glenn SW
Date: 2/25/2019 Dated 1986 Ocean Isle North Carolina
Headwater Project # 201902
Prepared by: NJC �� Note: Map is not to scale.

x } 7 JMIWF
TO
y ,
-Np
�• 4.�
� ,
4A
Lo - _ �• �,
5, Mu
Legend
g Site boundary k • Y -A F
Soil boundary
Fo Foreston loamy fine sand
Lo Leon fine sand
Mu Murville mucky fine sand Feet
To Torhunta mucky fine sand 0 200 400 800
SOURCE FIGURE 3
Headwater USDA WEB SOIL SURVEY MAP
ENV I RON MENTAL INC. Web Soil Survey (WSS) Ocean Ridge Site
Summerhill Glenn SW
ESRI Ocean Isle North Carolina
Date: 1/4/2019 World Basemap Imagery (2016)
Headwater Project # 201902
Prepared by: NJC AA'� 1 inch = 400 feet

LEGEND
APM@ r •
INUND F1ikYs IIA7AN aRrl4 FFtCs) GfiiiFiT TO
' � � �1 - � � • � '� � ii8s� [NUNDi1i70N 13Y T}iF s0.6 hNHI/pl C1-�a�NCF Ft COD
Inn !% annuai chw� Now (Iw fva• Ilaw1. al a on1w ac ae nar. " Ir Ihv nuui M4
T� a S4` d(s ehf Leem P ko w o�m1� In miy gh� Imr. Re Sp -al Ihad ILv ,d
! l +• '4a a MNRa �rpll.t M 1gc AQ -f' my PC a l f"Wo fkW 4"Qi, of WUM Kwd
�Imeird If 1wk liars i AL W. Ab. Irk• AA V. a?O Vt. lie - as Fis tl r
^� nS f. SJ Farr MyrXrn �I IFr6 V6 A1" dfAhb &l a
`y C17 ZME A ri- E9W ✓:,dcd brorhm dem i r-ed I .
• P _ ` G 2FQKF AE FU50 P" FKvilfan¢ 60r6mYne.
• 2 rOhtt All Pktid depde of 1 b -i kd ivaudy men. d p—lnul; Xasr I li-d tl-&
A ii}r� • :i � + enrwmaga
IOKE AD FlMd DOOM; 4I t u] Y fear {LIU02y SiMt nY ill VgHv] Wnark a•fr.,W
`•- ' • _ `"� e+! uEVFhs L.rirandrxl Fnf m ut a14w1 fan FOKN . WkMbn dbD
' � � • - LONE A4 Spavl cY" IfsmM Arta InfinenY pewtnd rrdn M I•+, annum ifarce
I4v.i M a Mod ranml 4aem rhx .as srpKru.entlf mrct>rt/4.1 70W AR
trK abz that the %, P.. Hind m Inp %YAM I: b[P0 m3ka d to Vw&.
7 l""W"Knn nr" I R* ti°s FnrWl fH.iry +r dlWmf rLryra! +
20KE A" A WA In tm prfW%WA If17H 1% anfwW OVIRW IIMC trf .l k. JP rlr.4
- J �. It # r+atenf7.' •.rs[an under ev.fllnnlon RD Bete flood EY.dborf5 dramvied,
so 74KE Vt M9 WI W-W 19W YAO vI"Y Irdeid iYtil 2 a(W1; 104 FWYX Fkt;W'i
fYYEfmfr'.1
FLOLVH'AY AREAS IN KLME AE
• rnr lk�" e, qm dwlt" ar a masts r- Far mpt tk-dpwrn arms drat M-r l tr fat
f.e8 N er*Y 4dw.lf4 iv llr2[ iflE 7`fr dnrr •:han[e /bod tan {k c2r.i90 �Crill r l Ax.N
_ - UMFR FLCOP ARf k1
J low X Arm d Q-W.6 er 1 flmdl awes d 11% ara.+al dm*. Ik= nln
A iPWF p Will14 p5R Ihan 1 (W or am 0onw xhYr kWh 1190 S ;(PAW
ndr, sd arms F i:ibzm cl by t.m hm. o% ean" d-- flmr3
L y - 0THFR ARM
• - - - 900 % Aj a demar.w m Le Wk"% Its afniX crmf lilddaf I.
•E ��, , 21 E K A.rf r..Ulr •.e 4I 404 a•. r. rPrar•aA..d. W+"fr
�'•' F.t ® COASTAL BARR]Ek RESOURCES 5YSTR4 (CERS) AREAS
. - [1MMWISE PR0FECTED AREAS (09As)
CBIL`. drkM7 AXd 0PA6 are i10ffm]IN br" w6W dI a%VAM W `A9 FJ W H?C1kd A16aS
1
J M tmta "a%T mmbiam llm mw
— — — - Fbna.nf 0"'KWY
bf .................... EBAS ad EPA Rd.6Yr
76 aiI} MurdaN dwmip `Smo flood •1s and kcr ZZ nid Imrm"
f 4'n S ` 1 d.*yMIR Fnoe mw-.,l Aral 7 -%E.- sear onion
ft%W n,. fn.e aaln v rinn.w..r..
J � . , --r+t 513 ilrRw n..a n.rw.' i.r. r.. Mn.-.r•+I.rr n aAr
' art cfvi ew.fr.r, w.r rarw mn....nw r+r. rwwNn r
wwwrwl U. ma nci m rms W" DmN- (I V71e
I.19
r 1 n aa) Tr -d I-
ZIti: tp I
nT !A .0` 1
• t } i� •_ 7
.} C ■ .``r F .i~t~.
1 s■�
��y s
� �' , �►1JaY S W
� a � � C wst� ,y,,•�
4.
Legend
.
r >' � !� E • �,�«k.>rn,� �, Feet
Site boundary �` ! _ �'� ` v
• a 0 200 400 800
SOURCE FIGURE 4
Headwater FEMA FEMA MAP
A0 ENVIRONMENTAL INC. Online Flood Service Center Ocean Ridge Site
Map Panel # 3720105600K Summerhill Glenn SW
Date: 1/4/2019 Dated August 8, 2018 Ocean Isle North Carolina
1 inch = 400 feet Headwater Project # 201902
Prepared by: NJC 0

PUBHx
Legend
Site boundary
Wetland Type
FIFreshwater Pond
- Riverine
Headwater
ENVIRONMENTAL INC.
Date: 1 1 /4/2019
Prepared Prepared byINJC
BH
,R
P B h
UB
r
PUBHx
•
s PU
�r
•.
PUBH
H
+�1 � R5UBH
{*,
1PUB s� ■ PU H
r
F�.
PUBHx
_ PUBHx k 101�•'
1 1^
�.7 !
P U B H
P B x'y
AWL
s
PUBH PUBHx
y
B H x
PUBHx PUBHx
PUB x *�
�.lm a
PUBHx
PUBHx - .- Feet
0 200 400 800
SOURCE
USFWS
National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
NC CGIA
Orthoimagery (2016)
1 inch = 400 feet
ff
FIGURE 5
NATIONAL WETLANDS
INVENTORY MAP
Ocean Ridge Site
Summerhill Glenn SW
Ocean Isle North Carolina
Headwater Project # 201902

Legend
Site boundary
DEM
Elevation (ft) above MSL
- High : 60.4
Low: 34.9 h ��
- Feet
0 175 350 700
SOURCE FIGURE 6
Headwater NOAA LIDAR MAP
L N v I R o N M E N TA L i N c• Office for Coastal Management Ocean Ridge Site
Coastal Inundation Digital Elevation Summerhill Glenn SW
Date: 2/27/2019 Model (DEM): Ocean Isle North Carolina
'� Aggregate Record Headwater Project # 201902
Prepared by: NJC W 1 inch = 350 feet

This is not a survey. All locations depicted on this figure are approximate. This Wetland Determination was completed by Headwater
Environmental, Inc. (Headwater) on February 26 and March 1, 2019. This wetland delineation was verified in the field with Mr. Gary Beecher of the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) on May 14, 2019 (Action Id. SAW-2019-01167). If impacts to wetlands/streams occur from development, additional coordination with
the USACE and North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR) may be warranted. Wetland and stream locations were recorded with the Trimble Geo 7x GPS
device.
The site drains to the Upper Shallotte River.
The Shallotte River is located within the Lumber
River Basin. The Shallotte River is classified
as Class C, Swamp Waters, High Quality Waters.
Riparian buffers are not implemented by the
DWR along streams in this river basin.
a
w1b
Legend
Site boundary
Wetland
Borrow Pit
Perennial stream
I 30ft stream buffer
• Data point
Site 27.17 acres
Wetland A
7.65 acres
Wetland C
0.41 acre
Total Wetland
8.06 acres
Total Upland
19.11 acres
." �.
�4A
DP-2
-StreaCn fl
A
DP-1
• #' M.
C
a�Y
0
SOURCE
Headwater ESRI
A0 ENVIRONMENTAL INC. World Basemap Imagery (2016)
Date: 3/7/2019 Site Reconnaissance
Revised 5/14/19 February 26 and Marach 1, 2019
Prepared by: NJC ,P 1 inch = 350 feet
Feet
175 350 700
FIGURE 7
WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
Ocean Ridge Site
Summerhill Glenn SW
Ocean Isle North Carolina
Headwater Project # 201902

Ocean Ridge Home Owners Association
Table 1. Wetland A flag labeling scheme and coordinates.
Wetland A
Wetland Flag
Latitude
Longitude
W-Al
33.92835293
-78.47826613
W-A2
33.92821185
-78.4783214
W-A3
33.92811709
-78.47836546
W-A4
33.92786212
-78.47842237
W-A5
33.92786561
-78.47859561
W-A6
33.92774266
-78.47867366
W-A7
33.92759909
-78.47887651
W-A8
33.92734003
-78.47896814
W-A9
33.92714806
-78.47898078
W-A10
33.92691563
-78.47898432
W-All
33.92680529
-78.47921849
W-Al2
33.92683893
-78.47944941
W-A13
33.92689709
-78.47962122
W-A14
33.926888
-78.47980213
W-A15
33.92670371
-78.4798252
W-A16
33.92662231
-78.47982939
W-A17
33.92648942
-78.47975274
W-A18
33.92645343
-78.4797276
W-A19
33.9265281
-78.47968001
W-A20
33.9266532
-78.47955951
W-A21
33.9267153
-78.47931416
W-A22
33.92670635
-78.47908576
W-A22
33.92661336
-78.47888801
W-A24
33.92653428
-78.4786819
W-A25
33.92643027
-78.47880447
W-A26
33.9262521
-78.47896333
W-A27
33.92615406
-78.47892948
W-Al
W-AA
AAa
NI-AF -Ai
- A.AR
.A8
J' A7 -AAZ
-AA7
A9 W
.Atfl
W-A1a
-ATE w-A21 W-A22 A U-AT
•AT6 W -A23 U-
,N A 7 1T -A19 W-A24
A18 -A2� A10
A26 -A9
W-A3a W-A27 tFAB -A
9 At
-A28
"Map not to scale.
Notes:
1. This is not a survey. Locations recorded using Trimble Geo7x GPS device. Data recorded in NAD83, State Plane
(North Carolina 3900 feet).
2. This is not a survey. All locations depicted on this figure are approximate. This Wetland Determination was
completed by Headwater Environmental, Inc. (Headwater) on February 26 and March 1, 2019. The wetland, stream,
and ditch locations were recorded with the Trimble Geo7x GPS devise. Headwater recommends coordinating with the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Resources.

'Table 1 continued.
--------------- -----------------------------------------
W-A28 33.92608864-78.47904593
W-A29
33.9261431
-78.47921105
W-A30
33.92614774
-78.47929896
W-A31
33.92598774
-78.47938069
W-A32
33.92599295
-78.47946424
W-A33
33.92591035
-78.479477
W-A34
33.92580843
-78.47949186
W-A35
33.92571839
-78.47961287
W-A36
33.92569319
-78.47977259
W-A37
33.92560272
-78.47980384
W-A38
33.92531521
-78.47967866
W-A39
33.92538117
-78.47943804
W-A40
33.92509832
-78.47930433
W-A41
33.92514033
-78.47914349
W-A42
33.92524466
-78.47906204
W-A43
33.92523715
-78.47887544
W-A44
33.92513508
-78.47880302
W-A45
33.92503405
-78.47870437
W-A46
33.92502628
-78.47872551
W-A47
33.92505222
-78.4788769
W-A48
33.92498651
-78.47898035
W-A49
33.92496179
-78.47889191
W-A50
33.92482573
-78.47865024
W-A51
33.92473652
-78.47859068
W-A52
33.92467227
-78.47839684
W-A53
33.92467566
-78.47820597
Notes:
w.Asa
n'-An
as
s
u-A9
s
�
vr•A
u
A31
If
-A33
-A34
A35
vW
IF
A
lF-9fD _
-A37
U-
LF-
U-9"3
W-A39
u•sta
W A42 W-Aa3
441 w-Aaa
W.
w-A47
-A46
W-A47
u•B3
W-Aa9
W-Aw
w-A51
W-A52
WA°=
"Map not to scale.
1. This is not a survey. Locations recorded using Trimble Geo7x GPS device. Data recorded in NAD83, State Plane
(North Carolina 3900 feet).
2. This is not a survey. All locations depicted on this figure are approximate. This Wetland Determination was
completed by Headwater Environmental, Inc. (Headwater) on February 26 and March 1, 2019. The wetland, stream,
and ditch locations were recorded with the Trimble Geo7x GPS devise. Headwater recommends coordinating with the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Resources.

Table 2. Upland AA flag labeling scheme and coordinates.
Upland AA
W-AA2
33.92823648
-78.47817931
W-AA3
33.928148
-78.47819015
W-AA4
33.92792248
-78.47819938
W-AA5
33.92777802
-78.47822921
W-AA6
33.92757243
-78.47826595
W-AA7
33.92739982
-78.47823189
W-AA8
33.92716556
-78.4781071
W-AA9
33.92700772
-78.47783537
W-AA10
1 33.92707193
-78.47770101
W-AA11
1 33.92706831
-78.4775124
Table 3. Upland A flag labeling scheme and coordinates.
Upland A
U-Al
33.92666666
-78.47815954
U-A2
33.92657709
-78.47799711
U-A3
33.92644737
-78.47796361
U-A4
33.92631697
-78.47804341
U-A5
33.92614797
-78.47813262
U-A6
33.92607111
-78.47821583
U-A7
33.92598914
-78.47838106
U-A8
33.92612114
-78.47849519
U-A9
33.92627599
-78.47862289
U-A10
33.92641132
-78.47861193
U-A11
33.92651447
-78.47852261
U-Al2
33.92662589
-78.47832732
Notes:
W-Al
w-AA?
A2
,N-AA3
A3
AAA
-AAC
AA.
VV,AAe
"Map not to scale.
"Map not to scale.
1. This is not a survey. Locations recorded using Trimble Geo7x GPS device. Data recorded in NAD83, State Plane
(North Carolina 3900 feet).
2. This is not a survey. All locations depicted on this figure are approximate. This Wetland Determination was
completed by Headwater Environmental, Inc. (Headwater) on February 26 and March 1, 2019. The wetland, stream,
and ditch locations were recorded with the Trimble Geo7x GPS devise. Headwater recommends coordinating with
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Resources.

Table 4. Upland B flag labeling scheme and coordinates.
Upland B
U-B1
33.9262672
-78.47772476
U-B2
33.92629022
-78.47785372
U-B3
33.92622764
-78.47789806
U-B4
33.92606709
-78.47793664
U-B5
33.92603064
-78.47800383
U-B6
33.92578779
-78.47805876
U-B7
33.92575836
-78.478086
U-B8
33.92576412
-78.4781319
U-B9
33.92568386
-78.47820413
U-B10
33.92566311
-78.47847646
U-B11
33.92561745
-78.4786136
U-B12
33.92555808
-78.47879165
U-B13
33.92543491
-78.47864378
U-B14
33.92538174
-78.47850242
U-B15
33.92519086
-78.47829036
U-B16
33.92512645
-78.47818693
U-B17
33.92499668
-78.4781143
Table 5. Wetland C flag labeling scheme and coordinates.
Wetland C
W-C2
33.92290787
-78.4787418
W-C3
33.92300501
-78.47869316
W-C4
33.92318232
-78.4786822
W-05
33.92329955
-78.47862587
W-C6
33.92344177
-78.47877032
W-C7
33.92345113
-78.47882925
W-C8
33.92348881
-78.47893651
W-C9
33.92335727
-78.47906862
Notes
1. This is not a survey. Locations recorded using Trimble Geo7x GPS
device. Data recorded in NAD83, State Plane (North Carolina 3900
feet).
2. This is not a survey. All locations depicted on this figure are
approximate. This Wetland Determination was completed by Headwater
Environmental, Inc. (Headwater) on February 26 and March 1, 2019.
The wetland, stream, and ditch locations were recorded with the Trimble
Geo7x GPS devise. Headwater recommends coordinating with the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water
Resources.
-A4
AS B2 U- 61
- 3
_qs
tJ-AB
Ae a
-
u-
u.
U-B13
U-B14
A43
�r-Add u_
-
W-A45
"Map not to scale
"Map not to scale

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site:
Reeves Site
County: Brunswick
Applicant/Owner:
Applicant: Ocean Ridge HOA
State:
INC
Investigator(s):
Nick Creidler w/ Headwater Env.
Section, Township, Range:
Ocean Isle Beach
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.) upland "island"
Local Relief (concave, convex, none):
mostly flat
Subregion(LRRorMLRA)
LRRP Lat: 33.926278
Long:-78.47833
Soil Map Unit Name:
Leon fine sand
NWI Classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of yea0 yes ❑ no (If no, explain
in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ signiciantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? p
Are Vegetation ❑ Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ signiciantly disturbed? (if needed, please explain in Remarks)
Sampling Date: 02/26/19
Sampling Point: DP-1
Slope (%): 0-1%
Datum: WGS 84
n/a
Yes ❑ No
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No 0 within a wetland? Yes ❑ No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No I]
Remarks: DP-1 is located in an upland island on the eastern -central portion of the site. Similar conditions were observed at other upland locations
throughout the site.
see attached.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply):
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑
Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑
Thin Much Surface (C7)
❑
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
❑
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (69)
❑
Sphangum moss (D8) (LRRT,U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ no
p
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ no
0
Depth (inches): >16"
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ no
i]
Depth (inches): >16"
Wetland Hydrology
Present? yes ❑ no i]
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks: Wetland hydrology is absent from DP-1
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use sclentlflc names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP-1
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Tree Stratum
(Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
Pinus toeda
20
Y
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 11
(A)
2.
Acer rubrum
10
Y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Quercus nigra
10
Y
FAC
Species Across All Strata: 11
(B)
4.
Symplocos tinctoria
10
Y
FAC
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100%
(A/B)
6.
50
= Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover: 25
20% of total cover:
10
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling
Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
FACW species 25 x 2 = 50
1.
Quercus nigro
10
Y
FAC
FAC species 100 x 3 = 300
2.
Symplocos tinctoria
10
Y
FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
Magnolia virginiono
15
Y
FACW
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Ilex opoca
10
Y
FAC
Column Totals: 125 (A) 350
(B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.8
45
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover: 22.5
20%of total cover:
9
Shrub Stratum
(Plot size: 30' )
❑ Dominance Test is > 50%
1.
Morello cerifera
10
Y
FAC
❑ Prevalence Index is <_ 3.0'
2.
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
- - -
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
6.
10
= Total Cover
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 5
20%of total cover:
2
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1.
Chosmanthium laxum
10
FACW
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6
2.
cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
3.
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3
5.
in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
6.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
7.
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
8•
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
9.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
10.
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1
11.
m) in height.
10
= Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
50% of total cover: 5
20%of total cover:
2
Woody
Vine Stratun (Plot size: 30' )
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
5
Y
FAC
2.
Gelsemium sempervirens
5
Y
FAC
3.
Hydrophytic
4.
Vegetation Yes p No ❑
5.
Present?
10
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5
20%of total cover:
2
Remarks:
(If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Hydrophytic vegetation present at DP-1
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc'
Texture Remarks
0-2
10YR 3/1
70
sandy loam
30% uncoated sand grains
2-9
10 YR 4/1
100
sandy loam
9-24+
2.5 Y 5/6
90
5 YR 5/6
10
C
M
sandy loa
'Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains
zLocation: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S,T,U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P,S,T)
❑ Stratified Layers (AS)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P,T,U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P,T,U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P,T)
❑
Marl (1`10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR O,P,T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P,T,U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O,S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C,
153D)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P,S,T,U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No 0
Remarks:
Non-Hydric soils present
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site:
Reeves Site
County: Brunswick
Applicant/Owner:
Applicant: Ocean Ridge HOA
State:
INC
Investigator(s):
Nick Creidler w/ Headwater Env.
Section, Township, Range:
Ocean Isle Beach
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.) broad flat
Local Relief (concave, convex, none):
mostly flat
Subregion(LRRorMLRA)
LRRP Lat: 33.927018
Long:-78.47830
Soil Map Unit Name:
Leon fine sand
NWI Classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of yea0 yes ❑ no (If no, explain
in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ signiciantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? p
Are Vegetation ❑ Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ signiciantly disturbed? (if needed, please explain in Remarks)
Sampling Date: 02/26/19
Sampling Point: DP-2
Slope (%): 0-1%
Datum: WGS 84
n/a
Yes ❑ No
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No ❑ within a wetland? Yes 0 No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 2 No ❑
Remarks: DP-1 is located in a a wetland. Saturated and inundated conditions observed in wetland area, outside data plot.
see attached.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply):
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑
Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑
Thin Much Surface (C7)
❑
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
0
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
0
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
p Water -Stained Leaves (69)
❑
Sphangum moss (D8) (LRRT,U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ no
p
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ no
0
Depth (inches): >16"
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ no
i]
Depth (inches): >16"
Wetland Hydrology
Present? yes I] no ❑
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks: Wetland hydrology is present. Buttressed roots observed.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use sclentlflc names of plants.
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1.
Pinus toedo
15
Y
FAC
2.
Acer rubrum
10
Y
FAC
3.
Quercus nigra
15
Y
FAC
4.
5.
6.
40
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20 20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1. Quercus nigro
2. Symplocos tinctoria
3. Magnolia virginiono
4. Ilex opoca
5. Persea borbonia
6. Pinus toedo
50% of total cover: 32.5
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Morello cerifera
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover: 2.5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratun (Plot size: 30' )
1. Smilax rotundifolia
2. Gelsemium sempervirens
3.
4.
5.
10
FAC
10
FAC
15 Y
FACW
10
FAC
15 Y
FACW
5
FAC
65 =Total Cover
20% of total cover:
5 Y FAC
5 =Total Cover
20% of total cover:
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
5 Y FAC
5 Y FAC
10 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Hydrophytic vegetation present at DP-2
Sampling Point: DP-2
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100%
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 30 x 2 = 60
FAC species 90 x 3 = 270
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 120 (A) 330
(B)
Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.8
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ Dominance Test is > 50%
❑ Prevalence Index is <_ 3.0'
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6
cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3
in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1
m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation Yes p No ❑
Present?
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-8 10 YR 4/2 1 90 15 YR 5/6 1 10 1C IM 11oarn
8-16+ 10 YR 5/1 1 80 15 YR 5/6 1 20 IC IM 11oarn
C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains
Soil Indicators:
Histosol(A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (AS)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P,T,U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P,T,U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P,T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O,S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P,S,T,U)
tive Layer (if observed):
(inches)
Hydric soils present
2Location: PL= Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S,T,U)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
❑
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P,S,T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (1`10) (LRR U)
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O,P,T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P,T,U)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes p No ❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SITE PHOTOS
Headwater Project #201902
Photographs taken on February 26, 2019
Photograph 1. DP-1, Upland island on the eastern portion of the site.
Photograph 2. DP-2, Wetland A located on the central portion of the site.

SITE PHOTOS
Headwater Project #201902
Photographs taken on March 1, 2019
Photograph 3. Open water man made pond on the eastern portion of the site.

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2019-01167 County: Brunswick County U. S.G.S. Quad: Shallotte
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION
Property Owner/Applicant: Reaves Thomas
Address:
Telephone Number:
Size (acres)
Nearest Waterway
USGS HUC
PO Box 185
Supply, NC 28462
[phone]
29.46 acres
Shallotte River
03040208
Nearest Town Ocean Isle Beach, NC
River Basin Lower Pee Dee
Coordinates Latitude: 33.926411
Longitude:-78.478874
Location description: This 29.46 acre undeveloped site is located within the Ocean Ridte Subdivision on Summerhill Glenn
SW in Ocean Isle, Brunswick County, NC.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
X There are waters, including wetlands, on the above described project area, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands, have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. Therefore this preliminaa jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including
determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other
resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that
would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U. S. This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part
331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further
instruction.
_ There are wetlands on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33
USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the
waters, including wetlands, have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be used in the
permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an effective
presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction overall of the waters, including wetlands, at the project area, which is not sufficiently
accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters of the U.S. on your
property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to
obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC §
1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
Page 1 of 2

SAW-2019-01167
_ We recommend you have the waters of the U. S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish
this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by
the Corps.
_ The waters of the U. S., including wetlands, on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been verified
by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and
verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on
your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years.
_ The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed
by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
X The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Wilmington, NC [phone] to determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Gary Beecher at [phone] or
Garv.H.BeecherC&u sace. army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: This site exhibits wetland criteria as described in the 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation
Manual and the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Regional Supplement.
D. Remarks:
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information for Approved Jurisdiction Determinations (as indicated in Section B. above)
If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed
you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and Request for Appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by August 29, 2019.
It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.

saw-�olg-at i�7
Corps Regulat-ory Official.`
Date; .1111�- 1, 2019 1 xpirafmi bate: NIA (pJD does not expire)
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensue we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
htt :llco sma u.usace.arm j.miI/cm a ex1P?=13G:4:0.
CopyFlornished via c-mail to:
Nick Creid]er
11eadwater Enyironmenza1
1944 Sir Tyler Drive
WilminF_tnn, NC 2840S
[phone]
nickQZheadivatereoVir(IAFnerlL.1I.C4111

SAW-2019-01167
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Reaves Thomas
File Number: SAW-2019-01167
Date: Ju1v 1, 2019
Attached
is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The followin dentifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information maybe found at http://www.usace.anny.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatorvProgramandPennits.aspx or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

SAW-2019-01167
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION 11- REQUEST FOR APPEAL or JECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR
ORMATIO
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: Gary Beecher
CESAD-PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Gary Beecher, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

This is not a survey. All locations depicted on this figure are approximate. This Wetland Determination was completed by Headwater
Environmental, Inc. (Headwater) on February 26 and March 1, 2019. This wetland delineation was verified in the field with Mr. Gary Beecher of
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) on May 14, 2019. If impacts to wetlands/streams occur from development, additional coordination with the
USACE and North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR) may be warranted. Wetland and stream locations were recorded with the Trimble Geo 7x
GPS device.
The site drains to the Upper Shallotte River. Site 27.17 acres
The Shallotte River is located within the Lumber Wetland A 7.65 acres
River Basin. The Shallotte River is classified Wetland C 0.41 acre
as Class C, Swamp Waters, High Quality Waters.
Riparian buffers are not implemented by the Total Wetland 8.06 acres
DWR along streams in this river basin. Total Upland 19.11 acres
d
r• < 4f4fi!
ly
-1, ilp,.
Legend
Site boundary
Wetland
I�!
C
A
SOURCE
Headwater ESRI
ENVIRONMENTAL INC. World Basemap Imagery (2016)
Date: 3/7/2019 Site Reconnaissance
Revised 5/14/19 February 26 and Marach 1, 2019
Prepared by: NJC , 1 inch = 350 feet
Y !I-
w
Feet
0 175 350 700
FIGURE 7
WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
Ocean Ridge Site
Summerhill Glenn SW
Ocean Isle North Carolina
Headwater Project # 201902

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: July 1, 2019
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Nick Creidler; 1844 Sir Tyler Dr., Wilmington, NC 28405
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington Office, Ocean Ridge
Project, SAW-2019-01167
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Brunswick City: Ocean Isle Beach
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 33.926411 Long.:-78.478874
Universal Transverse Mercator: WGS 1984
Name of nearest waterbody: ShallOtte River
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑X Field Determination. Date(s): May 14, 2019
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
Wetland A
33.925861
-78.478842
7.67 acres
wetland
404
Wetland C
33.923228
-78.478824
0.41 acre
wetland
404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject fife. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
LXf Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
F] Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
0 U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: HUG: 030402080201 Upper Shallotte River
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps_
❑� U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 7.5-minute, Shallotte, NC dated 1991
9 Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: = "dFme ecnec2llIyAV-1hiVed 1986. NIRCS WSS
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s): _
0 1 EMAIFIRM maps: FEMA Online Flood Map Service Center Map # 3720105600K dated 8/8/2018
❑ 100-year Floodpiain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ❑Aerial (Name &Date):
Site Photographs dated Feb 26 and March 1, 2019
or 0 Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s)_ File no, and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPDRTANT NQTFz, The in orma ion -recorded on this orm as not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
14 3/19/2019
Signaturla-31, date of Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member person requesting PJD
completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
4 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Headwater
/ ENVIRONMENTAL INC.
September 7, 2022
Will Altman
Timmons Group
will iam.altman(cDtimmons.com
919-866-4938
Reference: Data Collection
Ocean Ridge Site
Summerhill Glen SW
Ocean Isle Beach, Brunswick County, North Carolina
Headwater Project 201902B
ri M
910.777.3908 • Wilmington, NC 28405
www.headwaterenvironmental.com
Headwater Environmental, Inc. (Headwater) is pleased to provide the results of our Wetland Data
Collection.
PROJECT INFORMATION
The site is located northeast and adjacent to the intersection of Lisburn Terrace and Summerhill
Glenn SW in Ocean Isle Beach, Brunswick County, North Carolina. The site is identified as Parcel
ID 22800014 (27.17 acres) and was formerly owned by Reaves Thomas HRS.
The proposed use of the site is to develop a community amenity campus for the Ocean Ridge
Neighborhood. According to site plans prepared by Timmons Group titled "Ridge Campus", dated
August 19, 2022 (Project 52770), the proposed project includes development of a pool, club
house, parking lots, and other amenity structures. Two access roads are proposed; one access
road shall extend east Summerhill Glen and another access road shall extend west from Dartmoor
Way.
On July 1, 2019, Headwater provided the Ocean Ridge Master Association with a Wetland
Delineation report and Jurisdictional Determination. At that time, the subject site did not include
the proposed access roads to the east and west of the site, nor did it extend to the Limits of
Disturbance (LOD), as depicted on the "Ridge Campus" site plans. Headwater was retained by
Timmons Group determine if wetlands, streams or open water features were located within the
access corridors and LOD.
Regulatory Summary
In order to identify wetlands at the site, Headwater utilized the "Regional Supplement to the Corps
of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region", issued
November 2010. Identification of wetlands is based on a three -factor approach involving
indicators of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soil, and wetland hydrology.
Federal authority to regulate activities in wetlands is contained in Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (33 USC 1344) and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC 403). These Acts
established a program for regulating the discharge of dredged and fill material into the "Waters of
the United States", which includes wetlands and streams. Section 401 of the Clean Water Act

Ocean Ridge
Headwater Project 201902B
September 8, 2022
authorizes States and Tribes to administer the water quality certification process to protect
wetlands and other aquatic resources.
On December 7, 2021, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) issued the revised definition of "Waters of the United States". The
issuance of this revised rule rescinds regulations issued under the Navigable Waters Protection
Rule (2020) and The Clean Water Rule (2015).
It is Headwaters understanding that the USACE is regulating Waters of the U.S. as per the rules
set forth prior to 2015. The pre-2015 rules are based on the Rapanos v. United States and
Carabell v. United State Supreme Court cases in 2005/2006. The USACE and EPA issued
guidance requiring that a significant nexus determination must be completed to identify the
connectivity of wetlands to traditionally navigable waters. The Wilmington District of the USACE
in conjunction with the EPA, administers the federal wetlands program in this area. In addition,
the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) administers the wetlands and
stream buffer program for the State of North Carolina as per Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
SITE RECONAISSANCE
The weather during the reconnaissance was sunny with temperatures in the 80s (degrees
Fahrenheit). Two data points (DPs) were collected. DP-3 was collected within the western access
corridor and DP-4 was collected in the eastern access corridor.
There are no wetlands or streams within the off -parcel access corridors. DP-3 and DP-4 confirm
this finding (enclosed with this report). The previously identified wetlands extend to the LOD
boundary.
Two ponds (formerly off -site during delineation in 2019) are located along the eastern access
corridor. Pond 1 ties to the jurisdictional ditch. Pond 2 is situated along the eastern access
corridor and appears to be off -site. Pond 2 discharges to a culvert, that drains to Pond 1, which
drains to a Jurisdictional Ditch.
The Jurisdictional Ditch flows north, along the eastern boundary. The Jurisdictional Ditch begins
at the northern end of the Pond 1.
Headwater updated our Wetland Delineation Map from 2019 and enclosed for your review. The
map has been revised to include the access road corridors and LOD (as designed by Timmons).
REGULATORY VERIFICATION
Headwater was not tasked with coordinating with regulatory agencies.
LIMITATIONS
Observations, conclusions, and/or recommendations pertaining to the potential jurisdictional
wetland areas within the subject site are limited to the conditions observed, and/or materials
reviewed at the time this study was undertaken.
This report is provided for the exclusive use of Atlantic Shores Environmental Services, Ltd; their
successors and/or assigns and is not intended to be used or relied upon in connection with other
projects or by other unidentified third parties. The use of this report by an undesignated third party
2

Ocean Ridge
Headwater Project 201902B
September 8, 2022
or parties will be at such party's sole risk and Headwater disclaims liability for such third -party use
or reliance.
Headwater appreciates the opportunity to provide our environmental services for this project. If you
have questions or need additional information, please contact us at [phone].
Respectfully submitted,
Headwater Environmental, Inc.
C. Paul Pascarosa
President
Enclosure: Figures 7, revised on September 7, 2022
Data Points
Photographs

C O
a ra IL T
�--i N Q N m
CM CF)
U L, L N �.rn
i�J z 0 a) U) C) 2 u a "� Q°
1� "= O Y CO N N fo 3 L V ~Co
CO a)
rZ 69 H in O•U Cis m�0 QC 7 N +_+ 2
z �z -�� ocoU OC W cn to O..
N- C9W -E CO D- p 0 E 0)N W � _ �° ++ ro Q
O aj� in d'Nt Zmv J O ro N V > 0 ��� CC
O o E C
w
a OLU J k ��� I • ?~
�s
wcpi MS/dp/a i►� ■ zi
Q N p �nS @
D zi E ?�p '
'..
o ° U) o
>
w
� o o •�"�� r, ry ba i
m Q ° m A� y ,V. yL i.
(1) — s CO
CL �� a
> E �J° c
E '- p
Q (n N E O fl)
EN� a o�
0
U coo - _ !4- _ cQ) C9
U) NN
a`) �
� w 2 U tN 0
U 3
0 Q p O Od
mO
o
0
o�
�-09
=o
-0 U (6 C
N 6 N .°
O N N
> O N ♦ d
N 2i � Oi
E o�U ♦♦
Q o ♦ ♦ ♦ ��Spurn Terrace SW
CL z
m� aoi� ♦
♦
(6 C U O N
N N N W .0
U > \
U) t = d N U N 0) ♦
0o m-- o > �UOfW ♦♦ �a
p N M 2i N
° _-o c0r E ° ♦ z�
U (u .0 N N J N N ♦ N
L + 6 N
N i 0 (6 0 0 N ♦�
-O (6 E
._ 6
p Q O N U)
- C U
(6 N N N
p N� N Q 7
O O 2i -p E
°? > >_ Y - N
Q 30)� a�i
p r o p E l fi- �
N N U .J u) O /k. r S
3 L.L O -
U) c
(6 > U) >
N ^� O N N C
C (6 CL
> U) O-N
O O H N N
N -p N 'O ° N O E- (U
U) > E m
L= 7 O U L L CO) 7
� -0 N

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Ocean Ridge Access Roads City/County: Brunswick Sampling Date: 9/6122
Applicant/Owner: Applicant: Ocean Ridge HOA State: NC Sampling Point: DP-3
Investigator(s): Headwater Environmental, Inc. Section, Township, Range: Ocean Isle Beach
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): mowed/maintained upland Local relief (concave, convex, none): flat Slope (%): 0-1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T, MLRA 153A Lat: Long: Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Leon fine sand NWI classification: n/a
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil or Hydrology X significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No I Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
It is our opinion, the area around DP-3 has been effectively drained. The vegetation is routinely mowed. Summerhill Glen SW is located —30 feet west of DP-3. The
road is approximately 2 to 3 feet lower in elevation with curbside gutters, thus, effecting hydrology. Hydrophytic vegetation is present. However, the salt and pepper
A -horizon is indicative of a drained soil. A jurisdictional wetland is located in the wooded land to the east.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum oftwo required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_High Water Table (A2)
_Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
_Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_Water Marks (131)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133)
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 22
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
augured to 24". Water table not encountered. Headwater personnel investigated the wetland to the east, in the wooded land, as a representative point for hydrology.
Saturation was observed at 3", and water table at 8", in the wetland. Hydrology is lacking at DP-3
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sam pl i ng Poi nt: DP-3
Absolute %
Dominant
Indicator
Tree
Stratum (Plot size:
NY )
Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Pinus serotina
10
Yes
FACW
Number of Dominant Species That
2.
Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant Species
4.
Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species That Are
6.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
10
=Total Cover
OBI -species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
5 20%
of total cover:
2
FACW species x 2 =
S^dinq/Shrub
Stratum
(Plot size: NY
)
FAC species x 3 =
1.
Perseaborbonia
2
No
FACW
FACU species x4=
2.
UPI -species x 5 =
3.
Col um n Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Preval ence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_1 - Rapid Testfor Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 -Dominance Testis >50%
8.
3- Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2
=Total Cover
_Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
1 20%
of total cover:
1
Herb
Stratum (Plot size:
NY )
1.
Clethra alnifolia
3
Yes
FACW
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
2.
Pteridium aquilinum
1
Yes
FACU
unless disturbed or problematic.
3.
Woodwardia virginica
1
Yes
OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4.
Tree- Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in
5.
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
6.
7.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in.
8.
DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
10.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size,
11.
and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
5 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: NY )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Unidentified grassy species present
E
WoodyVine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP-3
Profile Description:
(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
% Color (moist) % Type' LOCI
Texture
Remarks
0-6
10YR 2/1
70
sandy
30/70 "salt and pepper"
10YR 7/1
30
sandy
6-10
10YR 411
100
sandy
some striping occurring below 6"
10-22
10YR 611
100
sandy
22-24
10YR 3/2
100
Loamy/Clayey
spodic
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless
otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol (Al)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
_Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 150B)
_5cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
_Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 153B)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
30/70 "salt and pepper" appearance in A -horizon, indicative of drainage
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain —Version 2.0

SITE PHOTOS
Headwater Project #201902B
Photographs taken on September 6, 2022
Photograph 1 and 2. Soils at DP-3. The striped areas start below 6 inches of the soil surface, does
not meet S6 — Strioed Matrix. Uncoated sand arains also eliminate S8 — Polvvalue Below Surface
IWL
.. y
Photograph 3. Facing west at DP-3, towards Summerhill Glen SW.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Ocean Ridge Access Roads City/County: Brunswick Sampling Date: 9/6122
Applicant/Owner: Applicant: Ocean Ridge HOA State: NC Sampling Point: DP-4
Investigator(s): Headwater Environmental, Inc. Section, Township, Range: Ocean Isle Beach
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): mowed/maintained upland Local relief (concave, convex, none): flat Slope (%): 0-1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T, MLRA 153A Lat: 33.922385 Long:-78.478008 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Leon fine sand NWI classification: n/a
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No I Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
It is our opinion, the area around DP-4 is located in an upland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum oftwo required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_High Water Table (A2)
_Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
_Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_Water Marks (131)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133)
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Hydrology is lacking at DP-4
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sam pl i ng Poi nt: DP-4
Absolute %
Dominant
Indicator
Tree
Stratum (Plot size: NY )
Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Pinus taeda
30
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species That
2.
Diospyros virginiana
25
Yes
FAC
Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Quercus laurifolia
10
No
FACW
Total Number of Dominant Species
4.
Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species That Are
6.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
65
=Total Cover
OBI -species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
33 20%
of total cover:
13
FACW species x 2 =
S^dina/Shrub
Stratum (Plot size: NY
)
FAC species x 3 =
1.
Juniperus virginiana
2
No
FACU
FACU species x 4=
2.
Morellacerifera
20
Yes
FAC
UPI -species x5=
3.
Col um n Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Preval ence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_1 - Rapid Testfor Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 -Dominance Testis >50%
8.
3- Prevalence Index is 53.0'
22
=Total Cover
_Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
11 20%
of total cover:
5
Herb
Stratum (Plot size: NY )
1.
Sesbania herbacea
10
Yes
FACW
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
2.
Helenium amarum
20
Yes
FACU
unless disturbed or problematic.
3.
Lespedeza cuneata
12
Yes
FACU
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4.
Eupatorium capillifolium
5
No
FACU
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in
5.
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
6.
7.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in.
8.
DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
10.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size,
11.
and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
47 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 24 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: NY )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Unidentified grassy species present
10
WoodyVine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP-4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LOCI Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 2/1 50 sandy 50/50 "salt and pepper"
10YR 7/1 50 sandy
8-16 10YR 3/2 100 sandy
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless
otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol (Al)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
_Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 150B)
_5cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
_Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 153B)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
50/50 "salt and pepper" appearance in A -horizon, indicative of well drained soil.
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain —Version 2.0

SITE PHOTOS
Headwater Project #20190213
Photographs taken on September 6, 2022
Photograph 3. Soils at DP-4
Photograph 4. Facing southwest, towards DP-4. Off -site pond on left side of image.

MillillimillillillillIIIIIIIIIIIIII
SEE BELOW
LX' � _L✓C�(J U
4-3
�• r
= L
� G!
Permit
Number:
Conversion services provided by:
_Af1CR(%tP CRA PHI C%9-
The Information and Image Managers
1925-A NW Second Street
Gainesville, FL 32609
Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
On-line: www.micrographicsinc.com

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEER
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
COPY
Action ID.: 200200088 c, County: Brunswick
Quad: nallvtte
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner: Ed Gore Agent: Craig Turner
Ocean Ridge Farms, Incorporated Land Management Group, Incorporated
Address: 351 Ocean Ridge Parkway Y Post Office Box 2522
Ocean Isle Beach, NC 28469 Wilmington, NC 28402
Telephone Number: [phone]
[phone]
Gone: 17 UTNf or LAT/LONG; North: 3756230 East: 733630
Size and Location of project (waterway, road name/number, town, etc.): A 634.37-acre tract located in headwaters of the
Shallotte River, northeast of intersection of NC Highway 904 and NC State Road 1163, north of Ocean Isle Beach, Brunswick County.
North Carolina.
Description of Activity: Discharge fill material into 0.31 acre of waters of the US for construction of 3 road crossings of 70
linear feet, 60 linear feet, and 30 linear feet respectively. Special Conditions for mitigation: 1.) Remove existing road crossing
of 0.05 acre and restore wetlands to original grade level. 2.) All remaining wetlands and waters of the U.S. within the tract
shall be preserved in perpetuity in their natural condition, and any Filling, grading, excavating, land disturbance; cutting,
removing, or harming vegetation; construction of any structure; or use of these areas for livestock or other agricultural
Purpose is prohibited. This condition is to run with the land and shall be binding on the Permittee and all parties claiming
under it. 3.) Pernzittee shall establish and maintain legally -protected vegetated buffers adjacent to both sides of all open
waters on the tract. Width of all buffers shall be at least 50 feet and in no case less than 25 feet. Vegetated buffers shall be
maintained entirely in natural vegetation and shall be subject to preservation and maintenance requirements as stated in 2.)
above. Property maps for owners of all lots containing or adjacent to wetlands or waters to be preserved under these Special
Conditions shall include statement of the above S,pecial Conditions on said maps.
APplicable Law: X Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1344)
Section 10 (River and Harbor Act of 1899)
Authorization: X Nationwide Permit Number 39
Regional General Permit Number
Your work is authorized by this Regional General (RGP) or Nationwide (NWP) Permit provided it is accomplished in strict
accordance with the attached conditions and your submitted plans. If your activity is subject to Section 404 (if Section 404 block
above is checked), before beginning work you must also receive a Section 401 water quality certification from the N.C. Division of
Environmental Management, telephone [phone]. For any activity within the twenty coastal counties, before beginning work
You must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management, telephone [phone].
Please read and carefully comply with the attached conditions of the RGP or NWP. Any violation of the conditions of the RGP or
NWP referenced above may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, and/or appropriate legal action. This
Department of the Army RGP or NWP verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required
Federal, State, or local approvals/permits. The permittee may need to contact appropriate State and local agencies before beginnin8
work.
If there are any questions regarding this authorization or any of the conditions of the RGP or NWP, please contact the Corps
Regulatory Official specified below.
Date 2 November 2001
Corps Regulatory Official Allen Davis Telephone No. 9I0 2sI 4466
Fxpiration Date of Verification 1 I Februar 2002
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORM, ETC,, MUST BE AT,
THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.

CESA W-RG-L
MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD
DATE: 2 November 2001
SUBJECT: Consideration of Compensatory Mitigation and Potential Impacts to Endangered
Species, Cultural Resources and Essential Fish Habitat.
1. Action ID: 200200088
2. Project Name and Location: Ed Gore/Ocean Ridge Farms, Inc.
Discharge into 0.31 AC wetlands for construction of subdivision road crossings.
3. Mitigation [Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines].
a. Has applicant avoided and minimized impacts to the maximum practicable extent? YES
b. Is compensatory mitigation necessary? YES. Explain: Remove existing 0.05 AC road crossing
and restore wetlands; preserve all remaining wetlands/waters on property; vegetated buffers maintained
adjacent to all waters of U.S.
4. Endangered Species (Section 7 of the ESA).
a. Will any threatened or endangered species or their critical habitats be affected by this
project? NO. Explain: NA
b. If YES, have the concerns been addressed pursuant to the SLOPES? NA.
5. Cultural Resources (Section 106 of the NHPA).
a. Will any Cultural Resources be impacted by this project? NO.
b. If YES, describe steps taken to address concerns: NA.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (50 CFR Part 600, Magnuson -Stevens Act).
a. Is this a project that "may adversely affect essential fish habitat?" NO.
b. If YES, did the appropriate consultation procedures (50 CFR 600.920) address NMFS
concerns? NA. Explain:

n
11

cc C-) no�( co�,

4A
o
C z
'N U W
d 0
CN 0) c
O OO ' Mo�0
^ �} iE o
zCD N
� L
c n
O �~ m o
` O 4-oCO) z a
O
U
N O Z3 cn a
U
cn
O `
0.
0
O 0
O Lo
U
O
�U _cn E
XCY3cn
w tV
FL
a

M

1111
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS C(DIPY
GM A+- WILMINGT [� �- ON DISTRICT
6e., " -ram C, IJZ F
Action ID.: 200200088 5-� "it I County: Brunswick Quad: Shallotte
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner: Ed Gore Agent: Craig Turner
Ocean Ridge Farms, Incorporated Land Management Group, Incorporated
Addrm-. 351 Ocean Ridge Parkway Post Office Box 2522
Ocean Isle Beach, NC 28469 Wilmington, NC 28402
Telephone Number: [phone] [phone]
Gone: 17 UTM or LAT/LONG; North: 3756230 East: 733630
Sire and Location of project (waterway, road name/number, town, etc.): A 634,37-acre tract located in headwaters of the
Shallatte River, northeast of intersection of NC Highway 904 and NC State Road 1163, north of Ocean Isle Beach, Brunswick County,
North Carolina.
Description of Activity: Discharge fill material into 0.31 acre of waters of the US for construction of 3 road crossings of 70
linear feet, 60 linear feet, and 30 linear feet respectively. Special Conditions for mitigation: 1.) Remove existing road crossing
of 0.05 acre and restore wetlands to original grade level. 2.) All remaining wetlands and waters of the U.S. within the tract
shall be preserved in perpetuity in their natural condition, and any filling, grading, excavating, land disturbance; cutting,
removing, or harming vegetation; construction of any structure; or use of these areas for livestock or other agricultural
purpose is prohibited. This condition is to run with the land and shall be binding on the Permittee and all parties claiming
under it. 3.) Permittee shall establish and maintain legally -protected vegetated buffers adjacent to both sides of all open
waters on the tract. Width of all buffers shall he at least 50 feet and in no case less than 25 feet. Vegetated buffers shall be
maintained entirely in natural vegetation and shall be subject to preservation and maintenance requirements as stated in 2.)
above. Property mains for owners of all lots containing or adjacent to wetlands or waters to be preserved under these Special
Conditions shall include statement of the above Special Conditions on said maps.
Applicable Law: X Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1344)
Section 10 (River and Harbor Act of 1899)
Authorization: X Nationwide Permit Number 39
Regional General Permit Number
Your work is authorized by this Regional General (RGP) or Nationwide (NWP) Permit provided it is accomplished in stria
accordance with the attached conditions and your submitted plans. If your activity is subject to Section 404 (if Section 404 block
above is checked), before beginning work you must also receive a Section 401 water quality certification from the N.C. Division of
Environmental Management, telephone [phone]. For any activity within the twenty coastal counties, before beginning work
you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management, telephone [phone].
Please read and carefully comply with the attached conditions of the RGP or NWP. Any violation of the conditions of the RGP or
NWP referenced above may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, and/or appropriate legal action. This
Department of the Army RGP or NWP verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required
Federal, State, or local approvals/permits. The permittee may need to contact appropriate State and local agencies before beginning
work.
If there are any questions regarding this authorization or any of the conditions of the RGP or NWP, please contact the Corps
Regulatory Official specified below.
Date 2 November 2001
Corps Regulatory Official Allen Davis Telephone No._ [phone]
Expiration Date of Verification 11 February 2002
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORM, ETC., MUST BE ATTACHED TO
THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.

CESAW-RG-L
MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD
DATE: 2 November 2001
SUBJECT: Consideration of Compensatory Mitigation and Potential Impacts to Endangered
Species, Cultural Resources and Essential Fish Habitat.
1. Action ID: 200200088
2. Project Name and Location: Ed Gore/Ocean Ridge Farms, Inc.
Discharge into 0.31 AC wetlands for construction of subdivision road crossings.
3. Mitigation [Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines].
a. Has applicant avoided and minimized impacts to the maximum practicable extent? YES
b. Is compensatory mitigation necessary? YES. Explain: Remove existing 0.05 AC road crossing
and restore wetlands; preserve all remaining wetlands/waters on property; vegetated buffers maintained
adjacent to all waters of U.S.
4. Endangered Species (Section 7 of the ESA).
a. Will any threatened or endangered species or their critical habitats be affected by this
project? NO. Explain: NA
b. If YES, have the concerns been addressed pursuant to the SLOPES? NA.
5. Cultural Resources (Section 106 of the NHPA).
a. Will any Cultural Resources be impacted by this project? NO.
b. If YES, describe steps taken to address concerns: NA.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (50 CFR Part 600, Magnuson -Stevens Act).
a. Is this a project that "may adversely affect essential fish habitat?" NO.
b. If YES, did the appropriate consultation procedures (50 CFR 600.920) address NMFS
concerns? NA. Explain:

-71
Ra M
as sn%tea kHksabRRsz axks0a #asagkk a sRWR axF tie$ k $k ak^ asxssRk a -xW zAea^as z a r
? 66ax§ $# sea Ra xR 9YldRrtari 0s_.: apdwWaagascWR~ Ra cR9d R 2#g dpgax . a �; RzagapNa R k H^g c A ,.ti. q µ' a OWN
a"' g 1
fl y a xRE$ .88u Cyks kRRgS d SbRk8p2Ca888 S s ka4x3aR% H.xaB Rq -a8�W $k `,� . g R x3B3RE;S a k R k.&RffiS .F Bl6BAHa,C kRpk6 aC 8&ARR SR$" R a..':.w�}gp g •,�+
6ya�sR & ¢ P5 3F ¢'P¢ € R£S RRPRA ad sY 6AR A, d..aaxRpRs3RP$RPGad HxRp48#aN sRxxx R ..: di 8i '
'° sH P• ,RAW EaR 'a§ z as xaek a 6Ra aqs.: xs 4st kAa as.• a aas t y_ ; �• y d
R ® ® Sou gxxgR55RRRgkR�¢N#nWfi i f{pg{gRx a4pgad4G� a^ -g STR S 'x k4k a8 MRk$kG}!Wh 89k @@ RS8 �k(., ak$$C xR kYbRNKkSC+KRtCt i l k y q h
BERQR,_$¢ a Rkxk3p CR vRq..¢RCBN6'8s�^RkaAR3Gk RS {W ask sWix v'' S
d� �� a xtik MB OpSgg¢ggRJRR WgTFg.8S88E8888�MPW gSxgR RGaRP J '� '
W
a " Z '.>•a w } i yy a $a, sRak a k sWk hkR Fsk fi Ek;k s § CRR3: Wkxak % a s I
,�q'? xsd k 8 x d R q6 xa6846 NC4 aCP pAxP V^Ppd�@a882 SRG A6 £rtdSB$••EHSCN kap@ >�t � >��,
10
[.� • .. Y � p .} �- ..'--�'� � C 8 ¢PP¢ �. j$ N WN P9 RY 9Y8} a R 6p ¢'2 a,y R8 S6 pBxR t A
Y"R_G ct.t- -,_ •
e,R xR E
'8 aaeBak P .. ;• ^8`4 xgRSRRRaPRx
-ERRYu»F ?f3
-
�kn
WR SA-dR C_..RR Re .aRxA 8 akRkRS RF B h
d# R adG6Pxx_x .a,R#dadeaRf..0..aae zl
'� y eaaRNiRkkhkxRsxS9 N R S Rka aH k kk sk- A kA
»« RF a -aF x$Ra fi8R88 W^, %R x M a R .............
.... a P4 ...vz u.... zxA?Akn 8 8C d8 '
,, s � � aagy$ A xg ga;%aysgR paag oxca s s a a ss �Y
E -2& dR dqR d � � V 68 k SRR a SA gxx C z 6R M R S 8 4R. Rd6 a R a8 SA R8 k R xE W8S%E
^ � kaR 8 P R xp Wff4 RkB § "!R a R-Ma aR YS'+ R#W -88a We -6 R RP4P rc
NMa^ »..».._».•_.._»..»..». ,.xfraR p �k p ak k'a R 'Zk .e3
» xx z< kkSRkfd"2 as RSp 4 TC R � aA W .p y"S Rakp^ -
.&H»a3'
9 4
k R 8 8R S3p--9 R8 Milan � a��#Raa�R
`� � � et $ �::s.RxRadMakxa„ksRN H b kx
A xW6aE,p A.g'a
R' IR
-
a
aa¢x-rcAa^.^•eY^ee^sgdk,kFa�k�p �:on:P:dcecec•t:�aaaaaaaaeckeezeeCkeeaggges�aasg=.gFa=.¢s,=ae:;za p ',I j
G . S C R kb aA6C 81 k. R i ?• j
" ••' G R G d k R A e`sG S#R aPRSE.6.;N:..NxRG% H:..Bs„a:a SS aa R.«:8, RRR$.<Y.;R.0 88 a,. .:.!$,; ` kR a BSaP 5 R ..0 A . .. � M � .
6Ra .88..«RRS,;....R^^.d#,xax.a . - •• •_ akT R,RN..R,Ra„.- R^.Wak_M..•...»__#P..R.•.d_XR S
± .. R 8RS xRa x 3 pkq Rk R R & R k + 4 - - A• �x S .. w V IM .
a V PRISM
kkk ZM. .. ^_...'
aoI8...,..zu.».... tl .x=8:xx a3, %aR p ..uu.«uu. RR NR«x uEuu u M »u FR>=K=zSzx Rx<=. RR R Hudua:..8z>2x ax nA xaWz e:xxxu 9d :a, =puxu»=5kR..»u«ku«.•...px:«ua>.E«uuLu.�S�CS..pdt..,ffiEA -g C ih
-.
P%a8aiS8oSC8aaaaPBSxR�#Rkd�ceR�k§:^•.••dax9k:kNzy§R' �W6Na.N.�RS.Xx`ax>SHx @dRRR{M^fix 'i
i
^ffiry& aRF RRY 8 p a § k a$K S a 8E RBRRka Sn 7 8S R..akRR
S a k Y RNx W «
..$
Witt
Bx
d R % xkka z R . .. # Rbx pa pp K s fd p k a¢ss F$ s R
a« . Rx>a.
$ a..n�x • .»rsfi..,..-¢,aka ..»R; .; «_.W » . . x x x xx . .,, . , N „„R,a.x.-a R .a« a ,<Rxs.«.a,a5saa . I
C C §:R£:»'^p:,:Rk"i:3 $«'«§:6:£}+ u SEdba'dEdRGp.".Ea3aiY aSBSx.a.aaS"..f RRAna xMxnSCR'naaxSx�RRE:hadCa£af GanaZRAdWa%aaaia:¢SBaR.c.,nRFR u. xzx,xu«».....«u..<. x.:x«»«xz=u«x>z.uuu u b.8 I
" ^Ra f :=x: xx.«uu«„.,.u..,»«u«x=$ '_..»_u..0 .u'.:.u:.uu ..'.�. :'. .. "'•a'^_� ' ^i:',:^::»::::: -^--q::t:^: T-a:'r. z. «., ...... ...., u
p _ .».. 'Pet5 3k?ekke¢2g:.,.dxexrxeH aap§ &Q inn
gk ly
a ..rr.„kR�$a��g#aba� it k
" ..__.,_�.<..,.,..._.. ,»__.,.,., ..
k, ff N
ER R y I»
-
y
y� a SkFS a 8 Gk W •, C G a k R EA a §+ F GSpR 8 f88Ra8 k M% 8R E % F W a SEE_nk^e � �^fi®4 ' ±yy x
•• R & 6 a RR � S ux xcaaaMRe^axaa£XRRaRCRaRg PRKWR a aiRaRSG^paE^p3R pRFFaxazxRS RRB Y' j Pa �� i
zz zx: x..u,.u,u zez uvz.u... eez ev E'x xa uux xz x=z x xxz:z: s� �
4 ^
a
R aRR R P Rp ARS%8P 8 k •F BS .CYC � _1j
o a G k8
RR 9#RRW
4 gg A
RXS.a.^.<.aRx...a..C.SRRu_x8.^B.RRu.SR„A»a6.uA..»R k_8p R5 BC6 kR a 8
rF
�.s.

by dT
—J OCEAN—
_��
baro
AU
.lam• _ y `.'�+ 5
' -
�GEORGET011/N TRCT.1a�
irJ' Tf'-a'S. ; � .� - t -. y � _.__J'�/f L ;;�"�,��.•l , f �a. r -
N
FIGURE 1
Prepared for Ocean Ridge Plantation
Phase 2, Section 4
File: c/data/brunswick/ocean ridge/flood.cdr LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
Scale: 1 in. = 2915 ft. 10 16 O1

SOILS Project/Site: Ocean Ridge Geor etown Tract
Page 2 of 2
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase):
Leon
Drainage Class:
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup):
Aeric Haplaquods
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
No
Profile Description:
Depth
Matrix Color
Mottle
Texture, Concretions,
(inches)
Horizon (Munsell Moist)
Abundance/Contrast
Structure, etc.
0-6
A 10YR 3/1
sand
6--12
E 10YR 6/1
sand
12+
Bh 10Yr 2/1
s odic
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Concretions
_
Histic Epipedon
_
_High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_Sulfidic
Odor
_Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_Aquic
Moisture Regime
_ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_Reducing
Conditions
_Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_Gleyed
or Low-Chroma Colors
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
No greasy modifier with abundant uncoated sand grains in the top layer. Very friable
WE TLANU UL I EKMINA
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es No (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes N Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland?
Wetland/upland boundary is marked with pink and black stripped ribbons
Longitude W 78129' 18"
Latitude N 35155' 42"
(Circle)
Yes No
Applicantlowner; Ocean Ridge Farms Land Management Group, Inc.
Ed Gore Post Office Box 2522
351 ocean Ridge Parkway SW Wilmington N.C. 28402
Ocean Isle Beach, NC 28469 910-452-0001

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
V L
;etown Tract Date: 09/15/01
County: _ New Hanover
State: North Carolina
es o Community ID: wetland
? TransectlD:
Yes o Plot1O:
Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
FACW
9. Taxodium distichum Tree OBL
FACW
10.
FACW
11.
FAG
12,
FAC
11
FACW
14.
FACW
15.
OBL
16.
or FAC
100%
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators
Inundated
_
x Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
_Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
1.)
Water -Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
mple areas

SOILS Project/Site: Ocean Ridge - Georgetown Tract Paae 2 of 2
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase):
Muckalee
Drainage Class:
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquents
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth
Matrix Color
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches)
Horizon (Munsell Moist)
Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0--12
A 10YR 3/2,3/1
mucky loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Concretions
_
Histic Epipedon
_ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor
_Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_Aquic
Moisture Regime
x Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_
Reducing Conditions
x Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
x Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Appears to meet mucky modifier
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? es No
Hydric Soils Present? es No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetlan es No
Wetland/upland boundary is marked with pink and black stripped ribbons
Longtitude W 780 29.342'
Latitude N 330 55.288'
Applicantlowner; Ocean Ridge Farms Land Management Group, Inc.
attn: Ed Gore Post Office Box 2522
351 Ocean Ridge Parkway SW Wilmington N.C. 28402
Ocean Isle Beach, NC 28469 910-452-0001

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Page 1 of 2
Project/Site: Ocean Ridge Georgetown Tract Date: 10/15/01
Applicant/Owner: Ed Gore County: Brunswick
Investigator. Paul Farley State: North Carolina
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? fes
Community I uplands
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? TransectID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? o Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum
Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Pinus taeda Tree
FAC
9.
2. Pinus taeda Shrub
FAC
10.
Ilex glabra Shrub
FACW
11.
4. Vaccinium corymbosum Shrub
FACW
12.
D. Pteridium aquilinum Herb
FACU
13.
14.
15.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or
FAC
(exclu(uding FAC-)
80%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Primary Indicators
Stream,Lake, or Tide Gauge
_Aerial Photographs
_Inundated
_Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Other
Water Marks
_
No Recorded Data Available
_
Drift Lines
_
_Sediment Deposits
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
Depth of Surface Water. (in.)
_Water -Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >12 (in.)
_FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: >12 (in.)
Remarks:

Typical uplands - Georgetown Tract
Ocean Ridge North & Land Management Group, Inc.
Georgetown Tracts Environmental Consultants Site Documentation
Brunswick County, NC Wilmington, N.C. Photos
October, 2001

4-18-1995 7:51PM
Sent By: LAND MANAGEMENT;
FROM P. 2
910 452 0060 ; Oct-22-01 8:55AM; Page 2/2
st"t 2 .46d
R., Jra6"..
5t sue,..
Yand Iewt ywro' J,6c.
�hu�itosr�xonr� �eoa�alo
&- sro-ass-ow
AGENT DISCLOSURE FORM
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
sera H
=w9K*4&4&.A"w
thee, the undersigned, hereby authorize Land Management Group, Inc., to act
as our agent in the preparation and representation of information submitted
within the 404/401 and/or CAMA applications and/or septic permits. All
questions in regards to this application should be directed to Land
Management Group, Inc.
Sincerely,
Owner/ FZaint
—
i0`ZZ1��
Owe

26007 3 - &(*e-, �lyr, �a,�i Q!!
G e
5w"A' inc.
7�
9&46Z .T. Awl
%(: 92'�44.
At O Ax 2522
VdmMp&a, Aodh Wa2,84,02
5r� 9YO-452-000i
RECEWEL
OCT 2 4 29bl
REGIiI.�TORY
Mr. Allen Davis �II�, tr; FiELDOFFICE
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
99.& f4
yA—A6�Ad
sacs 7h*A&" .gA,we
M 2SW3
October 23, 2001
RE: 404 Wetland Delineation Approval/404 Permit Application for Ocean Ridge
Farms Tracts,
Mr. Davis:
Attached are data packages for two tracts owned by Ocean Ridges Farms, Inc. in the
Grissettown Area, Brunswick County, NC. and Figure 1 shows the location of each
tract. Land Management Group, Inc, flagged the 404 wetlands and had them
surveyed. Attached are: location maps, project maps, surveys for each property,
typical site photos of uplands and wetlands and data sheets. Attachment A contains
past history of LMG work on this tract. I am requesting your review of this information
and either: 1 ] signoff on the large plats and retain the 11 X 17 copy for your file, or 2)
set a date for field visit to review the delineations.
Also attached is a NWP 39 application for 0.31 acres of wetland fill for two separate
road crossings and one driveway crossing. Pertinent information on prior work and
history on this site is contained in Attachment B for this permit. Please contact me if
you have questions.
�psr� ecr�tfulllyy
G. Craig Turner
Vice President
Land Management Group, Inc.
NC Licensed Soil Scientist, # 1091
Cc: F. Gibson
GA01d Hard Ddve\Datal6RUN5WICK10CEAN R I DGB404 letter.doc Craig Turner
1 QtZ312001

RkR£R,
Wasx%n wm;qKS�R "fi$�'
"2�
a
a
e e s
1f
�\ r
3 4 Ir I
1
} 'I
a 2 3 �1
I
g
I Y
% % h t
7
3
t
rf �
w
�
a x
Wa'a s

From: Morgan Gilbert
To: 401PreFileCa ncdenr.aov
Cc: Nick Tudor; colleen.cohn(a ncdenr.aov
Subject: Pre -filing Request - Ocean Ridge Plantation Park - Brunswick County, NC
Date: Tuesday, June 28, 2022 4:37:00 PM
Good afternoon,
I would like to submit a Pre -filing Notice for the following project:
Project Name: Ocean Ridge Plantation Park
Project County: Brunswick
Project Owner/Applicant: Osterlund Architects, PLLC
Project Owner/Applicant Contact: Andy Osterlund
Owner/Applicant Email: [e-mail]
Owner/Applicant Phone: [phone]
Owner/Applicant Address: 5 W Hargett Street, Suite 310, Raleigh, NC 27601
Type of project/Approval Sought: NWP 29 for residential development
Best,
Morgan Gilbert, WPIT (she her)
Environmental Scientist 1
TIMMONS GROUP I www.timmons.com
5410 Trinity Rd, Suite 102 1 Raleigh, NC 27607
Office: 984.255.2351 1 Fax: [phone]
Mobile: [phone] [e-mail]
Your Vision Achieved Through Ours

Appendix C

k r INIII-D H-N 'Hwa —1 NVH�o O
- NOI LVIDOSSb 2i�1SVW 39aRi NVDO w
N 11+ t.....
...G Xtl6 iSG1 '996'G ifi-31 O u 9 O I
L09LZ J '451a1eL'� ZOI alln5 'Peoy A�Ol t3 y-y oiidGoaiu mv�i qv von- innot • • _
43LtldBydl3ltlll ' •
3H M `JNIA'1F21a 5[H1 •�• •
£8 4VN
z 00
ON
�z
Cn g J
.. o °
n
coQIL
� o ���c
Q 7 _ ro
A C O
N ` u ._ u `y 0 c
5 LL 1 �
W ry C w F N
(� U) O Z
a F-
U az
Q LU
0
w C)
V !n a
�! o
— Q Q w � � a
m o
�/ LL w ar
LL Z J o
W
Ow
U
O
W U
J W Q
N
N M
V
U W O
ULQ
v(��w
w
d
ui v�w0w
J Oioz W,�
m N z 1 0 0
~ wgwwo
~ a3�¢a
0 J J J J J
W Q F Q Q Q
F 00000
y H H H H H
�
Z
a
Q
W
�
�
J
J
z
Q
~
W
Q
�
Q
Q
Q
Q
0
�
w
U
a
�
O
U
z
a
a
a
a
a
cLn
J
c~.>
cn
�
�
�
F
�
O
W
�
o
o
cy
U
z
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W

_-- -_ _._ _-- _-- -_ -
muSNOIlIONOD ONIlSIYrl o ;
k r vNnoatlo H-N 'H—O ]ISI NVH�o O
- NOIIVIDOSSb di ]ISVW 39aRi NVIDO w
N 11+ t........G Xtl6 iSG'996'Gifi-31 O � O I
L09LZJ 451a1eL'�ZOl allnS Peoy All Ol t3 y-y oiidGoaiumv�igvvo�-innot • • _
43LtldBydl3ltlll ' •
3H M `JNIA'1F21a 5[H1 •�• •
O
O
� \ N
i \
U o
W N
z co
O x o vvv�
z
o� a w
z
I` \
W
r
I

_-- -_ - ___._ _ __-- _ _-- -_ --_.
_ _1JHdWI
"
k ry
d
dHW'
IIV'dr]AO��
o
?"
is o
w
INIIII
NOIIVDOSSV d2 ]ISVW53JaRi NV130
L09LZJ 451alea ZOl allnS Peoy Allu1—T
t........G Xtl6 iSGb'996'Gifi-31
N
y-y oiidGoaiumv�igvvo�-innot
'
• • _ •
•�• O � !)
O I
3H M
11+
43LtldByd9l3ltlll
`JNIA'1F21a
5[H1
•
O
J
z
R
=
~
O
z
U
W
u z
O
�\
`J
Q
Q Q
DE
d
w
O��
zz
\
N
❑
z
z
[o
U_
S S
z
J
Q Q
\
J N
LLJ U
w
W
❑
F F
W
d d
W
O
l/// V
/
i�\\ \�
\\
J
❑ ❑
CC
W
I� I�
�i�\ I /
a
LL
o
O
z z
z
0
F
< <
i w _
W

" 3l9H1 dHW 17HdWI o ;
k ry d 5 NOI-LVDOSSV d2 ]ISVW3JaRi NVIDO ?" w
N11+ti I8'EEB'GiG1 iEGb'996'G ifi-31 d o Om e) S N O W W I
L99 rZ 3H !aleL'1Z9I =11n5 'Peoy A9iu,a1 Olt9 'snfo ysfoaiu m.v�noAr vo�s_ir nnox •• • -�
43btld3Ld9131�
M `JNIA'1F21a 1—•�� �
CO
Z
U
O
O
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
p
W
Q
o
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Z
0
0
a
�
W
0
0
0
0
0
o
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q
W
U)
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
CD
O
O
N
�
a
z
co
W
U
q
o
o
q
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
co
0
d
U)
Q
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
p
0
0
0
0
J
O
LL
o
m
O
o
o
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
m
Z
(n
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
o
0
0
0
LL
o
0
0
0
o
00
m
o
0
0
0
0
N
o
J
O
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
z
w
r
M
QU
Q
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Q
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
�
w
U
d
LL
o
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
rn
o
0
a
U)o
0
0
0
o
o
o
0
0
0
0
o
�
a
=
m
0
d
U
J
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
=
Q
U
O
o
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
m
0
0
0
0
0
0
fl
0
rn
0
(�
J
Q
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
z
z
LL
o
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
z
Q
z
(,�
O
o
O
Ln
0
O
o
co
p
O
O
M
Ln
_�
a
O
O
O
LU
Q
O
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
0
O
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
O
0
Q U
Za
¢
F
LL
O
O
O
O
O
M
O
O
O
IN"
O
O
O
O
W
U)
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
l7J
om
O
O
a
w
0
odF
06F
06F
-aF
-aF
-ate
-aF
06F
-aF
LL
(9 Z
CD z
CD z
CD z
(D z
(D z
(D z
(D z
CD z
(D z
>
z w
d
d
z w
z w
W
z w
z W
W
z W
z w
z W
z w
z W
d
o�
¢
¢
ID
o�
¢
¢
o�
o�
o�
o:
o�
O
w
O
o
o
o
IL
0
0
0
0
0
U
J
a
a
J
J
d
J
J
d
m
J
J
J
X
J
J
d
Q
�W
( W
(D
(W
CD
(D
�W
(W
0W
CAW
LL
w>
w>
w>
w>
w>
w>
w>
w>
w>
w>
�w
tzw
w
w
t:w
W
w
tzw
W
Lw
Fw
W
Fw
UQ
�p
U)❑
0)0
")W
U)
U)p
U)
U)p
U)
U)❑
a
L
J
W
0
m
�
z
N
M
-4
in
to
r
00
6)
r
U
a
a

n.pw 'SdVW
k ry
d
1OVdPWI�tl�s�
o
N
Is
NOIIVDOSSbINIIIy2i�lSVW53JaRi NV130
?"
w
I8'EEB'GiG Xtl6 iEGb'996'Gifi
L09LZ JN451a1ea ZOI alln5Peoy Aliu�l Olt3
y-y oiidEoaiu
mv�i qv von- �nnot
'�
•
0,..*
•�•
d o Ou o
S N O W W I I
3H 11+ti
43Ltld8yd9l3ltlll
M `JNIA'1F21a
5[H1
�
�
I
IIII II��I
- III IIIII
W
>
III IIII
IIII IIIII
v>
�
o
W
S
`�
III III1�
U
in
v
68'Lb
o
N
�
I11 IIII
III IIII
6 Lb
+
o
IIII IIIII
� F
W u)
F
III IIII
III IIII
8S OS
o
+
> w
U
III I I I I
ZlY3133HS 3NIIHOlVW
909
❑
u') w
o
U
v
-----
—
—
I--�I---------
LX3133HS 3NI�HOIVW
a❑
w
p❑
a
O
J
i
ac�7
o
wCD
v
U
iii ii1
6VoS
+
o
Wcn
III I I I I
b'05
SL'oS
o
> W
`'
w U
iIi; i y1
Lr) w
N
LO
z
V
LL,
W
Cl
d0
>
m
p
W (7
d O
8l'lS
o
N
w J
oo
6b'09
+
j O
909
U
n
cl
Ln
o I ii1
i t I;I
z
zoU)
W Q I.
�
U
w
W co -i Yl i f
I I
0') 0 � II
Q
0-
I
d
�
Ik
M�z��II1
j
Q W
F- Q
>
0
o
W O� a
W Q Ur
Q o H z/
,
0
z o w ¢CY)
4pNNzw
(D
-_
0 W
Lu H
CND 0- fA
� W
O
\
w
w
J
w
J
}
0
=
x
O IL
v o
W U
N
w K
\
W F Q
\ > I
a U)
J I
W
Z
LU
U I
U)
O
0 p
\
a 0
D�
ao� m
z
�
� m
I
S8'Lb
M11,111111111111M
HIM
w c V VS
Lni U� uoi C7w a v m
wino Zp
w o �1 a
❑ V coV D �
lo uu' U W a In
w 89'Lb
0
LU
co
O
_a
p N �
o;wa
aw L
Z J
Z U
•
1
I
I�
019
to u') V V M
oo
m
JO
2
~ Z
❑ F
U
O
J
z
p
w
z
F
a a a
Z
0
d
z
F
�
a
F
p
w
LU
J
�
❑
U U O
H H
❑ ❑
F
W
�
d
a
cG
Q
d
LU
a
Q
d
(n
o
LL
O
d'
U, W W
Z z Z
W
z
�
a
�
a
0
a
❑ CD
z Z
o
o
o
m
cn
❑
Z
~�
J
oe oe
x w w
W a IL
w
Lu
a
z
a
0
z
a
0
r Ln
w x
2i W
w
0
g
w
3
rn

n.pw 'SdHW 1OHdPWI�tl�s� o Is
M
k na� � � � � � vNoo H1aoN 'Hw�a a�sl Nv��o a SSb 2i�1 NOI LVDOSVW 3JaRi NV' 130 Is
n
J" s w
I8'EEB'GiG Xtl6 iEGb'996'Gifi-31
L09LZJN451a1eL' I"I allnS Peoy Aliu�l Olt3
y-y oii�Eoaiumv�igvvo�-�nnot
• •
o
11+ti
3H M `JNIA'1F21a 5[Hl
•_
•�• d Ou o
S N O W W I I
Z w
11: co
m
I I I I I I
W Q
c+> Z L�
N
uM'>
11 ID�
O
<oo Ln'� W CDWZU
co
z 0
+o
O
pf IIII 111.
I
LL
K:4b
01 I r l 11 11
JI I I I
I IIj I
IIII
I IIIII
O
I I I I
I IIII
i�
I I I I
I I I I
I IIII
I IIII;
w
o
I I I
III I
I IIIII
IIIII
J
Q
I I I
I
IIIII
cn
I I
Imov III I
IIII
IIIII
m
— I I j l
�jlll
❑
;\ III
IIIII
Q
o
\ 1 1 1 1
IIIII
Z
\ I I I
I III
cOo
u�'S
I
u0'�
5 05
V V
/ \ I III
I IIIII
I
p
W
goo
I I
I I
I I I III
1 IIII;
I
W
W
I
I
I i I I
I i II lit
W
�
I\
I
I IIj
I IIj
I IIII;
I III111
,
v
o
I
v
i iIi
i i i i i
d Q
1
I
1
fA
U O U)
O
\
� LL J
JO
CO 00 Z
\
v
�
I 111
Illl
i
U
—
\ IIII
\ ; III l
IIII I
I I; 1
_
\
Q Q w w
I
iiil
iIli H^
LL H H
\
\
a O z
o Q
P
�� \\ IIIII
J \ I 1 1
III] U Q
1 1 1 I IL L
Z
J Z LU
O z
0 00
� O
Z
/
IIII
I111� O
I
\
\
41
I'
W
Ll L�L.j LU
Q a- i
J w
��
i
II I I
IIII
IIIII
I I11; p
IIII = .�
IIII ; U
O
J
L1J W
\k\
Q
N
\
I
III;
I
II; II F—�
I�
0- i
W
g
>LLJ
1I�1
IIIII
IIIII
\
AV
j IIIII IIII;
l
z
Z
Q
l l l j IIIII
0
01
A III; IIIII
LU
H
�
�
ICI IIIII
IIII IIIII
U)
\
\
I III IIIII
II IIII 1111�
I I III IIIII
I I III IIIII
I I III IIII
\
I
Illil IIIII
I I I IIIII
I III
\
\
IIIII
I III IIIII
I
�
p
JO
� I
jIIII IIIII
11 11j1 IIIII
IIII IIIII
O
Z
IIII I I;
I;
Z O
H z
U
W
0
z
<
Ij IIIII
I
1
w
a ¢
S
I IIII
Qw
\
O
w
¢O
'133HS3NIlHOlbW
w
J
p
z
p¢
z z�
K a
---
o
O
HOlW
LX33HNIl
g
z¢¢¢¢
z
\\
\
U
III I
L/)
v
V Q
III I I I I
o
z�
X W
W a
W W
W a
d
0
d
0�
w x
w
vv
vv
v
iii l
3
°
W
�4
\
�
IIII
Q O
�I

n.pw 'PWI�tl1S—
SdHW 1JHd
�.. ��,�.�.... NOI LVDOSSb di ]1SVW 39aRi NV130 �" x
u wwp'xxM ti l8'EEB'fiifi Xtl3 iSfib'996'fi91t9ts
L99rZ JN45ialey Z9I a]!n5Peoy lllu,�1
43btld3Ld9131�
/ 3H11tl \9N[A1b21a 5[H1
W
049 oa4 a v. „ o.,-,n •., �,..• d n O b J S N O W W 11
V
w Ln
co
Ln
U
w
4 z w
W O
o w
O v o
LU
Q Lu
— 06
p LO z
Q q w \
J o Z \
LULL<(�
(n
W
1 w 7)
0
o z
= J
W
~ ? U O
U z d d ❑
❑ z O�� z F F
w' W U O U r a a
LLJ V) F o o w a I
Q F F F <
U j W W W F F FO `11
dLL ❑
O z ¢ < ¢ ¢ z `
(n ~ L d' E d' w W F \ l
❑ x w w w d d w x \
z 7 w a a a o o w
30I�00�00
n V V
na'nn
b`J�b
L GG
w
IWi
a
IL
IL
y in
Z8'9b
F
—
I
O
9 96
w
w¢
w
z
O
w
ua—
w
LZ'6b
n
p
E'66
a
z
6L'6b
z
S'66
d
U
l 09
w
F
d
O
I
F
W
�
N
F
bb' OS
I
O
0
0
O
b 09
Io
v
b8'OS
8'09
O
z
LZ'lS
09'LS
co
0
0
0
Ln
0
00
rn
in a v
�I
z I I I I 1 I
LL1 I �II1 I111
_
II
1
LU 1,II
U 111
LU'
�/
11' I 1111
�� p
_
06
�O Z III 11/ I1
O L�
CD
cn ;
LL Erw aQ I
\<b
a � III = O
6b 00
(n
a
I
a U
LL
I III 0 J
� J
rn h z
� o I
9P
III I/ 1 II
1I / I11/
1/I ,II
M
\ I aI61„I' �Il
L O
W M
I�jj/
U
I II11,�
/I��1 it 111
�
I I1 Il i i
l II ,Ill
Z
111 ,/l

n.pw 'SdHW 1JHdPWI�tl�S� o n
k r i VNIII-D H—N 'HJtl —1 Ntl3JD Is n ? H
- NOIIVDOSSb 2i�1SVW 3JaRi NV' 130 w
N 11+ t.G Xtl6 iSGb'996'Gifi-31 O u 9S N O I
L09LZ J '451a1eL'I .......ZOI alln5 'Peoy Aliu�l Olt3 y-y oiiNGoaiu mv�i qv von- innot • • _
43LtldByd9l3ltlll ' •
3H M `JNIA'1F21a 5[H1 •�• •
LU
Lu
LU
~ > \\ \\\ \\\ U
\ U LU \ `\ \
\ \ Q 0 ` \\` \ ` S
LLJ
J Q \\\ \
\ \ p H L Z \
W _ -- \ J �O�W �- �\ \
/ O Q' ~
W
vv �v
I
/ 1 �
\
\ I
\
_ Z
\ \ W
\ n J
U w
Q
rl 0
Q
z(3) H Z i
\\ \ QOZW D -
i
\� LU LL (
` �
\ \ uJ /
0 Of
<oo 0-
F \
z u> ¢Lu
\ ZS
U U \
a
z O \ \
z F F \
m U x x ¢ U LU
F v) j o o w W m
U LL W W W ~
a O z¢ Q¢ Q z
0 x w w w m m w x
z 7 W a a a 0 0 2i w
w p

nepw 'SdHW 1JHdPWI�tl�S�
k i VNIII-D H—N' H—O 3l5]Ntl3JD
a NOIlb'I�OSSV 2i�I1SbW 39aI2i Nb300 w
N1l I "I
+ti I8'EEB'GiG1 iEGb'996'Gifi-31 d o Om e) S N O W W I
L99rZ 3H1M `JNIAlaF=11n5 'Peoy A9iu,a1 Olt9 'snfo ysfoaiu m.v�noAr vo�s_i�nnox •• • - �
4..... E9131�
'1F21a SIH1 •�e .
77
❑
O
J
Z
W
O
J
W
� ❑
-
//'/�
— Q U
Z o Z
QOZ❑
LLJ
H /'
/
�— Z
W ¢ (D
w
MwW
t
p,
rNd(n
F- W
U >
¢ W
fl
❑ Q U /'
r0
Z H Z
Z
J C)
o
\li
wOQ�
�LL2
s
i U) x w
W
=
H
U
O
J
Z
U UO
z
Z
W
U z
z O
d
d ❑ r
z r
r
F
b
w
w
V
U)
U
o
U F d
o
d
w O
w m
J
U
a
V)
❑ j
o z
H
Z
¢
H H
Z Z
¢ ¢
d
Q FO
¢ z
J
U
n
❑
~ L
x
w
w
w w m
w
m
F-
w
w
z o
3
0
0 0
0
0
/
O U)
LL
f_n J O d
LL H H
/ U U J Z Z
Q f W W
/ c�c � Z
C) Q
_ O r
U >
W
❑ T
O
Z_
❑
Q
C�
W
H
z U) �o

nS-1IVI1 Kl (INV S310N
k r i y z VNIII-D H—N 'HJtl —1 Ntl3JD ? n ^I
- NOI LVDOSSb 2i�1SVW 39aRi NVIDO w
N 11+ t........G Xtl6 iSGb'996'Gifi-31 O � 9 O I
L09LZ J '41a1eL'� "Ialln5 'Peoy 1u�1 Ol t3 y-y oiiNGoaiu mv�i qv von- innot • • _
431ftldBydl3ltlll ' •
3H M `INII—I IN. •�••
m aNa
E Q W
dQ
Z
L_ Q
- - 3 L ❑w w
Y o d
o E ¢
- m v' O O IF m U w
II111111111= J w o z
M U
E c w I I IFI II III, p
E m >-III-_ _
wp aII W-- o
EHwr
` �a oo w =_Illi Uo
v _- -
¢ ¢ - _ t - - - Q u, O
s d N a EH 0
- ¢ r m
-I E m --
w O
o @ o z uJ Oo
Z O Ir <
N E m f o E U �' U❑ ❑ r ❑ zr z Uo
V
r 5
n r U m E o= L E' 02, ¢ ❑ ❑ O m
�`� wg > w » az v Jy
¢ 3 - m o ELL z m z Z _o O O ¢ s
Uvi �Ua NLL m �¢ c o s� v�i d V ff oo ~ d W m¢ Nx o?r 5 o3
wy tw/9 a riri K a o ° a(9
f/Jm � � W K rCI.7 � ❑x
o
E rw o xv =o J G wm W
Nr Qw OZ Or p Z
�X o o wUww z
w z w z z rc o 11=IiWlilli m o Q
x0 r ram- zw wo
E � � - o cD �� gm w' irITI�TIl1 pw =
3- d a w z p p W-lir-u=u w J 3 U
° E `" - ❑ w$ w J s a II lllilTililT z oo o
o ¢ E oc wa _l_I��. QN�
:Il�li wao W
° = a'S¢ - _ �m w� z o ¢= �w¢ zwz Z
¢E zw U LL
�d �o ¢Z F z M 7 ��° W
-- m.a a❑ a �- -� J
aN L_
a`m =
¢ W
m - - 0
= E m -moo - t _3 L Z
E
F m m= E E U E V Q
❑ d a _ d
E+U -� - c E-7�, ¢ 3 q rn3 mt'L Q
J
U) LL
O
Q < LLB
5 0
`
t U
� \ /
ui
W
w W a
- Z �w o
NLU
UWj w
E o = U ¢ — O
w a tt o d d a
c vEE 137
°_ �E O o 3 p
z
cn aU 0 m =¢co s=E F U g w
z
M w
W (n
og
aaamamm
� U
W
N_
V1 Z
M
M M
(D M
(O
t0
w
Y Z
N
N N
N N
N
N
U -
F
x
~
Z w
0
�
0 0
iD N
0 0
cD of
o
LV
0
LV
H
v
CO
M
In In
C V
IfJ O
V (O
O
m
O
m
N
o
Sri
Iri
3
cri
� �
�
w
N
w
a
a
N M
a a
a a
a
a
K
Ir c�
K K
of
K

Appendix D

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
MARC RECKTENWALD
Director
Andy Osterlund
Osterlund Architects PLLC
5 West Hargett Street, Suite 310
Raleigh, NC 27601
Project: Ocean Ridge Plantation Park
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quafiry
December 1, 2022
Expiration of Acceptance: 6/1/2023
County: Brunswick
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
8-di it HUC
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Lumber
03040207
Riparian Wetland
0.170
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact [e-mail].
Sincerely,
lk4v�t_&�
FOR James. B Stanfill
Deputy Director
cc: Morgan Gilbert, agent
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Diviston of Mitigation Services
217 West Janes Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
oeoiunenimm�I�Aw
�e 919.707.8976

Appendix E

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2022-0074567
Project Name: Ocean Ridge
e x
hSai k 4YYFJiYJft
+cfln7i�
i�
August 15, 2022
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

08/15/2022
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186. php.

08/15/2022
3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• Migratory Birds

08/15/2022
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

08/15/2022
Project Summary
Project Code:
2022-0074567
Project Name:
Ocean Ridge
Project Type:
Residential Construction
Project Description:
Residential development
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www. google.com/maps/(a)33.9253909,-78.47888548113797,14z
S N,
Counties: Brunswick County, North Carolina

08/15/2022 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 15 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Mammals
NAME
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Birds
NAME
Piping Plover Charadrius melodus
Population: [Atlantic Coast and Northern Great Plains populations] - Wherever found, except
those areas where listed as endangered.
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6039
Red Knot Calidris canutus ru fa
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not
available.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1864
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Wood Stork Mycteria americana
Population: AL, FL, GA, MS, NC, SC
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8477
STATUS
Threatened
STATUS
Threatened
Threatened
Endangered
Threatened

08/15/2022
4
Reptiles
NAME
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
STATUS
Similarity of
Appearance
(Threatened)
Green Sea Turtle Chelonia mydas Threatened
Population: North Atlantic DPS
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6199
Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle Lepidochelys kempii Endangered
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not
available.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5523
Leatherback Sea Turtle Dermochelys coriacea Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1493
Loggerhead Sea Turtle Caretta caretta Threatened
Population: Northwest Atlantic Ocean DPS
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1110
Snails
NAME STATUS
Magnificent Ramshorn Planorbella magni fica Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6216
Insects
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743

08/15/2022
5
Flowering Plants
NAME
Cooley's Meadowrue Thalictrum cooleyi
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3281
STATUS
Endangered
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
Seabeach Amaranth Amaranthus pumilus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8549
Threatened
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

08/15/2022
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Actz.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treat. Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions Aug 31
(BCRs) in the continental USA
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9587
American Oystercatcher Haematopus palliates Breeds Apr 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 31
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8935

08/15/2022
KA
NAME
BREEDING
SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Black Skimmer Rynchops niger Breeds May 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Sep 15
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/523
Brown -headed Nuthatch Sitta pusilla Breeds Mar 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions Jul 15
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA t0 Aug 25
and Alaska.
Gull -billed Tern Gelochelidon nilotica Breeds May 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Jul 31
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9501
Lesser Yellowlegs Tringa flavipes Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA elsewhere
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9679
Marbled Godwit Limosa fedoa Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA elsewhere
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9481
Painted Bunting Passerina ciris Breeds Apr 25
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions to Aug 15
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Jul 31
and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Jul 31
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA t0 Sep 10
and Alaska.

08/15/2022
3
NAME
BREEDING
SEASON
Ruddy Turnstone Arenaria interpres morinella Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions elsewhere
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions elsewhere
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Short -billed Dowitcher Limnodromus griseus Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA elsewhere
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9480
Willet Tringa semipalmata Breeds Apr 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 5
and Alaska.
Wilson's Plover Charadrius wilsonia Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Aug 20
and Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 31
and Alaska.
Probability Of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.

08/15/2022
4
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
American
BCRestrel Ell +++ +111 +t�� �+++ +001IL
American
Oystercatcher 11+11111 loll 10111111 HE 111111111111 IIII —+I+
BCC Rangewide EM
(CON)
Bald Non -BCC +11111+1 mill Oil I I I I I 1++00 it 1 1 1 mill 1101111, ills
Vulnerable TT
Black Skimmer 11,+ 1,+' +111 1,11 1111 11�1 1111 ��■■ ■�J I.1 1111 1l1 I r I Tt
BCC Rangewide
(CON) —'

08/15/2022 5
Brown -headed Nuthatch 11//1111 mill Jill iii'+++++ +++111+0 $*1 ■+111+11—++0
BCC -BCR _ _ _ JOE.
--
Chimney Swift
BCC Rangewide I I I I 11401 1 1 III '11+ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1. 1 1 1
(CON)
Gull -billed Tern 1111
BCC Rangewide ++++ ++++ ++++ ++1+■t ■t ■t■t`t, 0+1+ ++++ ++++ —+++
(CON)
Lesser BCC Rangewide es +1++ JOIN 0+++ ++p +0011000 001+ +10+ ++++ —1++
(CON)
Marbled Godwit
BCC Rangewide +�++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++�+ ++,+ ++„ ++++ —+++
(CON)
Painted Bunting —+++
BCC -BCR
e Warbler
BCC 1Rangewide ++++ ++++ +++, ++++ Jill TITT � ++++ ++�+ ++++ ++++ —+++
(CON) MENE
Prothonotary +++
Warbler I +++ + 1 1 1 1 1 1-+++ *+ 1 1 1+*+ ++++ ++++ —+++
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Red-headed Woodpecker +0++ AU +++­00111+++ V I I I I I I I I I
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Ruddy Tumstone 0+1+ 11+1 +01+ 0/110011 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN 0111 ON IN++ 1++11110 —++1
BCC -BCR
Rusty Blackbird ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC -BCR
Short -billed Dowitcher IN 1+11 mill 1111+111 Jill 1111111111111111-111
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
C BC Rangewide 111111 IIII 111111111111 Mill 1111111111111111—III
BCC
(CON)
Cs Plover BC R++++ ++++ +111 �1�1 l��l �,���1111��+ +1�+ ++++
BCC Rangewide —+++
(CON) ---- ---
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ �+ � � � � � L ++ ++++ ++++ ++++ —+++
(CON)

08/15/2022 6
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information
Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and

08/15/2022
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look
at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each
bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated
with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point
within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not
breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Lorin.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.

08/15/2022 8
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

08/15/2022
IPaC User Contact Information
Agency: Timmons Group
Name: Morgan Gilbert
Address: 5410 Trinity Road, Suite 102
City: Raleigh
State: NC
Zip: 27606
Email [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]

Roy Cooper, Governor
9" 0 INC DEPARTMENT OF
""i ■
WMk.M 1 NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■-000
August 14, 2022
Morgan Gilbert
Timmons Group
5410 Trinity Road
Raleigh, NC 27606
RE: Ocean Ridge
Dear Morgan Gilbert:
13. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
Nr ►�70IdD73E:1'4001,01
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httr)s://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler�ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 1N. JON S STREET, RALEIGI I_ NC 27603 - 16Sl MAOL SERVICE CENTER. PAL EIGH. rkc 276�0
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAK 919.707.9421

/
CO
/
\
/
/ / / /
\
CO
s 2
x
a a
v
v
\
\ /
/
\
/
/ / / \
\
CO
§
\
»
/
uCO
\
COCO
\ \ CO/
\
\
s
e
ee=e
=
0
7
e
e e o e
w
\
\
\
u
/
CO
\
\\
A:�:)
CO
/\
»
H
/
<
t
G}
y
E
E
E E
\
3/
%_
=
_
`:
\
\\\
\ /\
\
\\
^
�
}O
�\
e
4 /
72
°
-±
\(®
a
6mo
\
E\/ƒ
ƒ
G
x o 2 0
-\
3u
/
a°\\
\.z
a y
(
=
\
/ y /
2
e
±
\
e \ E N
\
\ \ /
CO
CO
\ /
\
ƒ
/ \ \
e
2 \
CO
m
1
\ \ \ \
/
© %
o
»
% \ \ 3
±
\ 2
\
CO< z
u
0
\
CO
\
®_
0
/
°
\
_
\
g
\
_
/\
CO
_
CO
Z
e
E
CO
%
CO
»
/
%
2
±
u
»
J`
\ \
/
r
\
s
_
e E
z z
2 2 z
m
y
\
` z
u
5
/
\ ®
\
> _ 0
_
t
E
CO
)
\
CO
_y CO
L~ 2
CO
\
0
®
�
0
D
\
° \
\ \
\
\
\ /
\
> > / \
/
\
\ \
\
0
\
-°
E
CO
z
2 2 m\
CO%
H
/e
CO
\\\\
/
\
\/
\
\
e
a
\
\
\ \ / o
/
`
°
\
2
\
u
/
U /
_
\
\ \ \
\
§
\
®
\ z
%
t
CO
o.e
2
-
e m.= o
»
/
_
: :
z
e
3
% 6
e./
e e e=
e
2 E
\
\
�
®
J
o > u
§
\
o
\
/
o
/ \
\
\
.o
3 3 0 /
/
\
\
\ \
Z
z
o
E
COMO
//
u
v
/
»
e v a
§
D
e co
\
/
\
/
/ / \ \
CO
/
E 2
/
\
e
»
v v CC) CC)COoCO
/ 3
x\
§
±
%
CO /
: \
O \ \
4
±
±
/
\
CO
6 6 6 6
/
g
x x
co««
g
%/
/-
(D
z
=
o z
s
z
=___
u u u u
CO
Z
s
m
s
m
\\
(
j /
?
2 /
)
% % % %
o
/
/ /
-
3
5 3
3
0 0
2
> > > >
Z
§
\
/

paean Isle sea
Q jean Isle Beach Rd SW
3 �
v N
�7J G
CIO N
-P., 80
�F je nni25 4
FI
Q
c9
� 7's
G �
O
6'
l{770� O
d
�4p ID
4
"�aaa� ysn4nla�
m o
rn
g � a
y�V
� m
a
5
e ® a
w lO]Gui ppel�.
a
a
c
3
m
y� a
m� o
o �
� aV
rc 0 7
C m_
V�
2x
o.F
z'r
E
Owl
f C72l
ada
gz
F �+
CH
A -_A�
ro
W
0
Q m
m
ru d
O �
Q d 7
0
N - m
a]
N W
� m a
M
O
M
N
a

Appendix F

TIMMONS GROUP ` ``
Ocean Ridge Plantation Park
OCIEN ISLE BEACH, BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
NC HPO LISTINGS MAP