WQ0035049_Monitoring - 10-2022_20221129

Monitoring Report Submittal
Permit Number #*
Name of Facility:*
Month: * October
Report Information
WQ0035049
Maple Hill WWTF
Type *
NDMR, NDAR-1, NDAR-2, NDMLR
Confirmation Email Address:*
Name of Submitter: *
Signature:
Date of submittal:
Initial Review
Year:* 2022
Upload Document*
October2022_N D M R_N DA... 2.35M B
PDF Only
Please upload one PDF containing all applicable monitoring reports
(i.e., NDMR, NDAR-1, NDAR-2, NDMLR, GW-59).
[e-mail]
Kenny Keel
Reviewer: Gerald, Wanda
11 /29/2022
This will be filled in automatically

Is the project number correct?* WQ0035049
Is the monitoring report accepted?* Yes No
Regional Office* Wilmington
Reviewer: _anonymous
Review Date: 12/12/2022

FORM: NDMR 10-13 NOWDISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT (NDMR) Page _11 of -2-
Permit No.: W00035049
Facility Name: -- Maple Hill WWTF
County: Pender -T-Month:
October -T
-Year 2022
Ppl: 001 --
Flow Measuring - Point-, 0influent -- 12 Effluent 13 No flow generated
Parameter Monitoring Point: ❑ Influent Ej Effluent 2 Groundwater Lowering 0 Surface water
Parameter Code 0
60060
00400
00310
00630
00610
00620
00625
31616
00600
006-66
00940
70300
>0
%
0
CK
0
0
Ua
E
4
Aa
z
fto
-6
A I
=
CL
V
0
> .9
- 1 -5
24-hr
08:00
hn;
GPD
14654
su
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
*100 mL,
mg/L
mg/L
21
08:00
8,069
-
3
08:00
6
7,226
7.3
4
08:00
6
8,646
7.4
5
08:00
7
9,006
7.2
6
08:00
6
7,601
7.2
7-
08:00
7
8,508
7.4
8
08:00
8,511
9
08:00
9,168
10
08:00
-7
10,604
7.6
11
08:00
6
8,733
7.5
12
08:00
5
9,218
7.7
28
10.7
<0,2
17.5
1.5
35
17.5
8.46
13
08:00
5
8,953
7.6
14
08:00
7--j
8,611
7.6
15
08:00
11,373
16
08:00
9,116
17
08:00
7
10,126
7.6
18
08:00
6
8,594
7.6
19
08:00
6
8,743
7.8
20
08:00
5
7,224
7,6
21
08:00
6
7,832
7.4
22
08:00
9,749
23
08:00
8,269
24
08:00
6
9,746
7.6
25
08:00
6
8,125
7.4
26
08:00
7
10,046
7.6
27
08:00
7
12,387
7.6
28
08:00
6
8,976
7.5
29
08:00
9,007
30
1
08:00
9,652
31
08:00
6
7,581
7.6
Average:
91095
28.00
10.70
0,00
17,50
1.50
35.00
17.50
8.46
Daily Maximum:
12,654
--,224
7,80
28,00
10.70
0.20
17.50
1.50
35.00
17.50
8.46
Daily Minimum:
7.20
28.00
10.70
0.20
17M
1 M
36.00
17.60
8.46
Sampling Type:
Monthly Avg. Limit:
Recorder
42,000
Grab
n/a
Composite
30
Composite
30
Composite
15
Composite
n/a
Composite
n/a 1
Grab
200
Composite
n/a
Grab
n/a
Composite
n/a
Composite
n/a
Daily Limit:
n/a
6 to 9
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a I
n/a
We
n/a I
n/a
n/a
Sample Frequency:
Continous
5XWK
Weekly
Weekly-l-W-eekly
IWeeklyIWeekly
Weekly
Monthly
Montly,. I
3XYR
3XYR

I
w
I
I
E
0
u
a
CL
E
0
0
in
qD
co
Tj
0
>1
o
,aCD
2
IL
E
0
-6
c
<
04
00
CL
x
ui
cL
0
CL
-oT
�SE
to
'Fa
7jj
qi
'wo EF
Cs wa
-,o
6 m 5
c
C"
U*)
4)
o-
c
C
C)
'a
E a
6
m o 95
0)
v
w ra
t:
ca
0
ra
.10
ri
O
C7
r-
Ci
C)
0)
as
ca
E
IN
:3
z
0
M
0
n
CA
m
CL
0
LO
QO
py
!t
0

. N. ire i s.
0602 VVi nntnanl➢l "Way, r'ihmrrurgton, NC 28405 . 910,92 tlQ731Lab . 91C..u92,4424Fax
710 13ow aertaawn Road, Manteo, NC27954 a 252.473.5702 t.Lal°;urFa a
25�5.,A Wiiann n ta:aaa ttn hwaay, Jaaanlrsoranautlnn, NC: 28540 a 91 0,4l.5843 Lab/Fax.
in',�b(aUm`IlWkad'q➢an'mitaWlchR„rV"4ktscom
Ponder County Utility Operations
Date ofReport-, Oct 28, 2022
Post Office Lox 995
Customer PO ;
Burgaw NC 2 425
Customer i; 08100095
Attention:
Report . 202 -2O383
Project ID. Maple pl HH11 I
Lake ID Sample ID: �
Collect Date/TimDate/Time Matrix Sampled by a
22-499 4 Site: Effluent
10/12/2022
'10:00 AM Water JCS / ravirochern
... Est._.._.__�..,_._.�..__o,,_.._....��..n_......m__..i9i��u�..._.._...,___.,,.,,,...,o..._w�,.��,..,,..�.�,.�..,......_....�,...o..�,�..m....�._....�,.,�,....__.
Results Date Analyzed
Ap"r1rp'ionia Nitrogen
EPA 350.1, Rev, 2.0, 1993
< 0,2 mg/i._ '10/20/2022
Total I jeldsh l Nitrogen (I"KN)
EPA 351.2, Rev. 2.0,1993
1.5 g/L. 10/20/2022
Residue Suspended (T )
sin 2540 D-2015
10.7 mg/L 10/14/20 2
BOD
SM 5210 s-2016
23 rig/L. 10/13/2422
Nitrate itrog n (C a[c)
Nitrite Nitrogen
EPA 353.2, Rev. 2.0, 1993
< 0.02 g/L 10/12/2022
N+titr te+Nitrit -N itrog n
EPA353.2, Rev. 2.0,1993
17. mg/L 10/14/2022
Nitrate Nitrogen
Siubtrntion Method
11 7./3 rng/L,. 1 O/26/2022
�.�....
L u�) api ta
...�,�.,.�.�..��
��iit Date/Time MatrixSampled by
22-499 Site: Effluent - Grab
10/12/2022
11:30 A Water JC B/ nviroch errs
Test
Method
Results � � � Date Analyzed
Fecal C: o itorm
6dexx c olflert-1a
35 MPIN/100rni 1 O/12/2Ci22
'"r rny" er ture
SM2550 B-2510
22,8 C 10/12/2022
pH SM 4500 H s-2011 7.3 units '10/12/2022
Total Phosphorus orus SM 4500 P (r•at)-2011 3.4 g/'L 1 O/2 /2022
Comment
Reviewed Roy: __ . ..... ..w_ ._.. .o.._ ....
R poit 0, 2022-20353 Page °& of a

Date: _ 1Ca1 1Zj 2.Z
Analyst:r �eAr
j� ` V# 94
ocation
Facility Name- 1 CL jJ a (—t_
Permit #• ON f= i LC;
pH
Reference Method- SM4500 H+R -201 t tnern,mnm m
Calibration Time
Cal Buffer4.0 sm,
Cal Buffer 10.0 s.u.
Check Buffer 7.0 s.u.
Comments
'pH check buffer must read within t 0.1 pH units ofthe buffer's true value,
4 su buffer Lot#/: Ricca 4112869 Exp 11/22 7 su buffer Lot#/: Ricca 2 i 12A38 Exo, 12123 10 su buffer Lot#, RICCA 2112750 Exp.5,13
Sample location
p
Sample Collection
Times
Sample Analysis
Time*
pH Result
s.0
`7 • ze>
P-Post-analysis Buffer
Check value s.u.
CommentslData Qualifiers
r Nost analysts butter check is required when performing analyses at multiple sampling locations and must be within _- 0,1 units of the buffer's true value
All pH values in pH units (i.e., s.u.). Record all data to the nearest 0.01 s.u. and report to the nearest 0.1 s u
Total Residual Chlorine (TRC)
Reference Method: SM 4500 CI-G2011: Hach 8I67 HR: ( Please circle onnlicable Method Instrument It),
Daily Check
Post -analysis
Check Std.
Time check
Sample
Sample
Sample
---------------
TRC Result
Standard Result
(when analyzing
Standard
Location
Collection
Analysis
µglL or mgtL
Comments`Data Qualifiers
µgtL or mg1L
at multi le sites}
Analyzed
Time
Time
TRC Daily Check Standard true value µglL or mg1L acceptance range µg/L or mg/L
Check standards must recover within u+10%of the check standard's true value
Annual Calibration Curve Verification Date: LOT # IDEXX 220129 (Free
l Exp. Date: 212823 IDEXX 220130 (Total) Exp. Date: 228t23
Reagent Blank Value: (When applicable- Analyze and document a reagent blank when standards, sample dilutions or PT Samples are prepared)
Dissolved Oxygen (DO)
Reference Method7SM 4500 Q Gr2011 Instrument ID:
Calibration/
Verification
Calibration variable
Meter reading
or % efficiency
oPost-analysis calibration
verification (when necessary)
Comments
Temperature
Barometric
pressure
Time
after calibration
Theoretical Calculated
Value m Value m L
Use this row when performing a verification-Wit—caiTf—
calibration
Sample Location
Sample Collection
Time
*Sample Analysis
Time
DO reading
InComments(Data
Qualifiers
o When performing analyses at multiple locations, the meter must be recalibmted at each site before analysis or a post -analysis calibration verification must be performed
I f sample is measured directly in the stream and/or onsite, only time analyzed would be recorded with a note that they are measured in situ or immediately
Temperature
Sample Location + Collection Analysis °C
Time Time
0 1i ?� �2•k
on
Annual Verification Date
Field Personnel Note:
Comments/Data Qualifiers
would be recorded, with a note that they are measured in situ or
QA.001
Rev 1-2022

Environmental Chemist, Inc., Wilmington, NC Lab #94
6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
910.392-0223
Sample Receipt Checklist
Client Date: 4112- a � Report Number:_ tN- �-Cp- �O�
[Receipt of Sample:
ECHEM Pickup Client Delivery 0 UPS 171 FedEx 0 Other 0
❑
YE
N/A 1. Were custody seals present on the cooler?
❑
YES
2. If custody seals were present, were they intact/unbroken?
Original temperature upon receipt IC Corrected
How temperature taken:
EJ Temperature Blank IR Against Bottles
IR Gun ID: Thomas Traceable S/N 192511657 IR Gun Correction Factor *C: 0.0
YES
0
NO
3. If temperature of cooler exceeded 6°C, was Project Mgr./QA notified?
YES
0
NO
A IA/nre Proper custody procedures (relinquished/received) followed?
YES
11
NO
5Were - sample I D's listed on The COC?
Ea
YES
-- 0
NO
6- Were samples ID's listed on sample containers?
[14
YES
0
NO
7. Were collection date and time listed on the COC?
YES
0
NO
8. Were tests to be performed listed on the COC?
YES
0
NO
9. Did samples arrive in Proper containers for each test?
YES
11
NO
.....
10. Did samples arrive in good condition for each test?
YES
0
NO
11. Was adequate sample volume availableT
Ik
YES
El
NO
12. Were samples received —within proper holding time for requested tests?
YES
0
NO
13. Were acid preserved samples received at a PH of , <2?
YES
0
NO
14. Were cyanide samples received at a PH >1-2?
❑
YES
0
NO
15. Were sulfide samples received at a PH >9?
YES
III
NO
11; Were hfw3/TKN/Phenol received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 n1/L?
0
YES
EJ
NO
17. Were Sulfide/Cyanide received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L?
13
YE
0
NO
18. Were orthophosphate samples filtered in the field within 15 minutes?
TOC/Volatiles are pH checked at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
Bacteria samples are checked for Chlorine at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet,
imple Preservation: (Must be completed for any sample(s) incorrectly preserved or with headspace)
mple(s) were received incorrectly preserved and were adjusted accordingly
adding (circle one): H2SO4 HNO3 HCI NaOH
ne of preservation: If more than one preservative is needed., notate in comments below
te: Notify customer service immediately for incorrectly preserved samples. Obtain a new sample or
ify the state tab if directed to analyzed by the customer. Who was notified, date and time:
ladles Sample(s)
were received with headsDace
COMMENTS:
DOC. QA.002 Rev 1
0C

VQ
Analytical & Consulting Chemists
Client: Pender County Utilities
ADDRESS:
:'0'a
Sample Identification
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC
NCDENR: DWO CERTIFICATION # 94 NCDHHS: OLS CERTIFICATION # 37729
COLLECTION AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY
r) PROJECT NAME: Maple Hill WWTP (PPI 001)
CONTACT NAME: Chris Pickett, ORC
REPORT TO: ORC
ICOPY TO:
Date Time T
PPI 001 (composite
PPI 001
site) Triannuals
3-1
Effluent (oral
ez.�
due 1/month
BOD 30 mg/L, TSS 30 mg/L, NH3 15 mg/L, Fecal 200 colonlesiloo Ml
Transfer 1
1. — 2.
Temperaturewhen
Delivered By: !11
6602 Windmill Way Wilmington, NC 28406
OFFICE: 910-392-0223 FAX [phone]
[e-mail]
REPORT NO: 2,05jr.5
PO NO:
PHONEIFAX:—
email:
To
-
Ilk .1illill
A
owl
l
ANALYSIS REQUESTED
BOD, TSS, NO2
NO3, NH3 TKN
Mimi
I otal Phos
Fecal Coliform
loss
0
By;
Date/Time Received By: -Date/Time
Resample
Date: j
T1
UND:

FORM: NDAR-1 10-13 NON -DISCHARGE APPLICATION REPORT (NDAR-1) Page _1_ of —4—
PermitWQ0035049
Facility Name: Maple Hill WWTF
County: Pender
iiiilMonth: October
Field Name:
Cover Crop:,
Cover Crop:;
M
Hourly Rate (i
Annual Rate (In):I
Annual Rate I
UM
M
NUTno
i 1M
/ i
Monthly Loading:
.MI
MI
0 il7�
ks.71
i
U
A_'7

FORM: NDAR-1 10-13 NON -DISCHARGE APPLICATION REPORT (NDAR-1) Page _2_ of —4—
Permit No.: W00035049 Facility Name: Maple Hill VVWTF
County: Pender Month: October
Did irrigation occur rug Field Name:,
at this facility? llllllllllllll�N Area (acres): I liq* I UIR r4nl
Cover C z
121 YES 13 NO
Annual Rate (in):, Annual Rate (in):,'
zz
E3 MMM MM
ng:, 410M Loadi
ME M. N
2 -
—_
Monthly
119211 N

FORM: NDAR-1 10-13 NON -DISCHARGE APPLICATION REPORT (NDAR-1) Page __;L_ of —4—
Permit No.: WQ0035049 Facility Name: MAPLE HILL\NWTF County: Pender
Month: October
Field Na
Area (acres):
Hourly Rate (Ift I Hourly Rate (In):
ILU"Imatallf W
�a -am M­ r-ru 111111111111MV11115 MR.
•
dr, 01 - - - - - -
Ear, =11151111112_! 1111B RMEMPM14 'Bil -1 W411, 1-

FORM: NDAR-1 10-13 NON -DISCHARGE APPLICATION REPORT (NDAR-1) Page —4— of —4—
Did the application rates exceed the limits in Attachment B of your permit?
Were adequate measures taken to prevent effluent ponding in or runoff from the sites?
Was a suitable vegetative cover maintained on all sites as specified in your permit?
Were all setbacks listed is permit maintained for every application to each permitted site?
Were all freeboards maintained in accordance WRY, t tnnnri
171 Compliant 0 Non -Compliant
E Compliant _- Non -Compliant
Z Compliant E Non -Compliant
C. Compliant 0 Non -Compliant
If the facility is non -compliant, please explain in the space below the reason(s) the facility was not in compliance. Provide in your explanation the date(s) ofthe non-compliance and describe the corrective
acticlit(s) taker.AttacWgieVifianol _qiizPt,, if -sAnaccort
Operator In Responsible Charge (ORC) Certification Permittee Certification
ORC: Christopher Pickett Permittes: Fender County Utilities
Certification No.: 1010919 Signing Official: Kenneth Keel
Grade: WW-SI Phone Number: 910-259-1570 Signing Official's Title: Director
Has the ORC changed since the previous NDAR-17 Yes
2 NO Phone Number: 910-259-1570 Permit Exp.: 8/31/26
-Z�
Signature Date Signature Date
By this signature. i certify that this report is accurrate and compiete to the best of my knowedge certify. under penalty of law. that this document and atl attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that all qualified personnel property gathered and evaluated the information subrri Med. used on
My inquiry -of the person or persons wric, manage the system- or those persons directly, esponsible for gathering the information. U e
nformalion submitted is. to the pest of my knaMedge and belief, true. accurate, and romptete. 1 am aviare that there are signifirant
penalties for submitting false info, mation, including the possittflity of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations,
thall Original and Two Copies to:
Division of Water Resources
Information Processing Unit
1617 Mail Service Center