20071679 Ver 1_Application_20071004

v I~
~v
n ~t7 `1
(/
l;~T~ of C~ O `~~'
SgNn~ lygJFk ~Q~, ~%
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA ~~~qr~'~- ~"
g.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION `~~'~f<~
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
October 2, 2007
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1000
Washington, N.C. 27889-1000
Attention: Bill Biddlecome
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
071679
Subject: NW 3 request for the replacement of Bridge # 18 on SR 1103 in Washington County.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is requesting a NW 3 permit for the replacement
of bridge # 18 on SR 1103 in Washington County. The existing bridge is 22 ft. X 60 ft. concrete deck and
caps on wooden pilings. This bridge will be replaced with a 30 ft. X 70 ft. cored slab concrete bridge. The
new bridge will span Welch's Creek with no interior bents. Some minor widening of the roadway
approaches will be necessary to provide safe travel from the roadway on to the bridge. This will result in
0.011 acres of wetland impact. This impact has been minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Slopes
within the impact area have been set at 1.5:1. The PCN, location maps and permit drawings are included
with this letter. If you need any additional information or have any questions concerning this project please
call me at 252-482-7977.
Sincerely,
Jerry Jennings, P.E.
Division One Engineer
G~%v" ~'
~v
Clay Willis
Division One Envir ental Officer
Cc: Garcy Ward, DWQ
Sonja Gregory, DWQ
Travis Wilson, WRC

.. ,
,, ;r.
B~r~~ge 1 ~ o,n~ ,~R 155
N

.. Bridge 18 on ~R 1,~~~~ ...._
~wi ~ .-.
N
0 750 1,500 3,000 Feet

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
20071 679
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NW 3
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Divisior of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here:
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: NCDOT Division One
Mailing Address: 113 Airport Drive
Edenton, N.C. 27932
Telephone Number: 252-482-7977 Fax Number: 252-482-8722
E-mail Address: tcwillis(a~dot.state.nc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
Updated 11 / 1 /2005
Page 5 of 13

III. Project Information
5.
8
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USAGE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Bridge Replacement # 18 on SR 1103 ,Washington County
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only)
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
WBS# 33650.1.1
4. Location
County: Washington County Nearest Town: Plymouth
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): In Washington Count
take US 64 east, at the intersection of US 64 and SR 1100 take a right turn. Travel for
approximately 5 miles and then turn right on SR 1103, the bridge is 0.6 miles.
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.7686111 °N 76.8073583
6. Property size (acres):
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Welch's Creek
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps!.)
River Basin: Roanoke
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The existing conditions consist of a 22 ft. X 60ft. concrete
deck and caps on wooden pile brid eg that spans over Welch's Creek. The land use within the
project vicinity is primarily woodland.
sheet that
oW
Updated I 1 / 1 /2005
Page 6 of 13

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
existing 22 ft. X 60 ft. bridge deck and piles will be removed accordins; to NCDOT brid>;e
demolition guidelines. The new bridge structure will be placed on the same alignment. The
new bridge will be constructed using precast concrete slabs on concrete bents and piles. The
new bridge will have one span that is 70 ft. and spans across Welch's Creek. There are no
interior bents. The bridge approaches will need to be widened to provide safe transition from
the roadway to the bridge deck. This will impact 490 sq. ft of 404 wetlands. Equipment use
during the bridge replacement includes excavators, crane, dumptrucks and backhoe.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work : To replace a brid eg that provides access across
Welch's Creek and maintain the state road stem in Washington County.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. A permit from the DCM was applied for on Oct. 2, 2007, Welch's Creek
is considered a "public trust water".
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
NONE
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 13

wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: There will be 0.011 acres of
404 jursidictional wetland impact associated with the roadway approaches to the bridge.
These approaches are having to be widened to provide safe transition from the roadway onto
the new bride
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding. NONE
3
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
Wetland Fill Permanent Fill Roadside fringe riverine Yes 5 0.011

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.011
4. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 1 acres
5. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
None
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial 07
Intermittent. Average
Stream Width
Before Im act Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) NONE NONE
Updated 11/1/2005
Page8ofl3

6. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc. NONE
Open Water Impact

Site Number
(indicate on map)
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)

Type of Impact Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of

Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres) NONE
7. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): NONE
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.011
Open Water Impact (acres): NONE
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.011
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): NONE
8. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
9. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw--down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond:
Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 13

techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Impacts to wetlands have been
avoided and minimized by routing_traffic during construction to an off-site detour. Impacts from
the widening of the roadway approaches have been minimized to the maximum extent
practicable Slopes within the wetland impact have been set to a 1.5:1 slope. The wider roadway
~proaches are necessary_to provide safe transition from the roadway onto the bridge deck.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USAGE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that maybe appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USAGE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina (see DWQ website for most current
version.).
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 10 of 13

2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http:/;'vvww.nceep.net/pages/inlieureplace.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed,
please check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
Updated 11 / 1 /2005
Page 11 of 13

2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(s uare feet) Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 1.5 N/A
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. The existing impervious surface consist of the
roadway on SR 1103 This surface will increase b 8y 00 sq. feet. NCDOT BMP's for soil and
erosion control will be implemented during the project construction.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater will be generated from this project
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
Updated 1 I / l /2005
Page 12 of 13

XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
htt~/%h?o.enr.state.nc.us~'ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
2/0
Applicant/Agent's Sig~iature ~Datle
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 13 of 13

I
„~~s
O I
~ END
5
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
sra r2+50,00
REMOVE EMIST. 30' CMP & 34' x 72' CMP
REPLACE WITH 2 - 48' Ca~AP,,J~~ ,~
_ _- m
~~-TO JAMESVIiCE
----~-I-~_ :~
~ .
- -~ - --
REMOVE 18'CP
INSTALL IB' RCP EN~ TAf
J

P! Sto 12+0634
o = 2roa'ss~'(Rr,
D = 509' 567'
L = 408A!'
T =20634'
R = lJO9J5'
O
O ~
d. O ~
WOODED SWAMP
-~ r4'n??, 'owe ~~-
u~7 , - , l,~r ~~-.-0
ARDRAIL
4+54 ~
APPROACH SLAB
TYPE 350 (TYPI
GR. ANCHOR
(TYPI BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
STA. 15+79.427
EXISTING R/W~_ DROP INLET ITYP)
SEE NOTES
~ ~- ~- _.
30.00' F
~~ o ~
o SR 1552 N -~ --- _~
~ o JERDEN TRICXf7 RD
o ExIS7.2EyesT NN'
-~--
- 30.Op __ _"
F _ --
EXISTWG R/w _ ~ •' F
5'SHOULDER BERM
TELEPHONE GUTTER (TYPI
~ PEDESTAI,• WORK POINT ^I
~ -BL- 4 ~ STA. 15+90.42 j
0 - -~ -- PINC 9+23.75
X Ii r`I ~ ~~.
d ~~~ -~'
_ P~~
b WOODED SWAMP ~G
~~``' /
u __. Pt~hri °'-~~~)-1 RFC
ti
J ' J
~o
~ ~~ J~
Q ~o
~P T(
/ o~
~°
/ ~~
~P
DRAWN BYt P. BYRD DATE; MAY 2006
CHECKED BY: J. YANNACCONE DATE: FEB. 2007
~y PI Sto l9+6725
~
oo~ ~ = 50r03'(LTl
~y
~~~ D = 0'50'385'
~
P~
°J
~
~ T = 297b6'
G.~o`' R = 6,788376'
5~~~
O ~~a
~ ~
g
`~ g

'~ ~ ~ S
~ BRIDGE ST,4/6+265! 01 ~.

~~~~% '~1. r- :J~~ ~ N

U
_ -~ /_. II
. i~ ~.7
_- ,, .,,
u
WOODED SWAMP
2~• , `-~~I'
',L. ~J r
~

~
I ~
CLASS II RIP RAP
~ ~ W/FILTER FABRIC
'SHOULDER BERM
m +TYPI END CONSTRUCTION
I
~
GUTTER (TYPI ~~
STA20+50,00
~
~
+-100' TAPER
I - REMOVE 15'CP
~
T2.17 I INSTALL 16'RCP

,-
~` ~ ~ ~ _ ~ END GUARDRAIL a
! _ ~ STA,19+20 ~
c82-A F -~ I ~ I
i ~ L.. -... F . - _ I
I
_-
~ ___ `
-,----r--F_-_-_
5p' rPV ~~ SURVEY _ _
_
_~SR 1103- p ` p
-BL'

-~ _
_ I
JORDAN THICK RD o ~
P ~
N N
--4
1 _ ~ F- - =r- F - ~ - ~ TAPER 70 EX157.

~
-- F - - ~
-.. F•~ -~.-L=100'
ENC GUARDRAIL' I 1 REMOvE IS'C -~
~C STA. 11+90 , I _
{YORK POINT •2 I I of INSTALL IB'RCP
STA. 16+62,593 I '' 1
~ I ~ I
END APPROACH SLAB ~ I 1
STA. I6+13.593 1 ~
~
~ ~ WOODS
~
~ `
1,
y
~
~

-~- STA 1+36 ~ - . _
WOODED >wAMP
42' RIGHT , _
,
- - , _
ELEv- 2&65
• > ; } j, ; +. , r R/R SPIKE IN IS' MAPLE
~
- '` Nfl T1 9nJP} R1-
~I : Ir._~ : ~ { ~:~ ~ -#'y, PROJECT NO.336501,1
ALAN couNTy wASxINGTON
STATION' 16+26.51
a.'.-~£e 1 " • 5d REPLACES BRIDGE N0~ !8
NOTES: SEE SHEET 2
EXISTING BRIDGE INFORMATION:SEE SHEET 2
~,Lt
Isa I
~ rw1A Is-aro la•o• -
T - 70 '-0'
ruDi Iraro lo~a ,~- tr~u.wm ro sr4:o•soao
vW[Sr ruRS ~ruIES
vuICS
: i I rTm 2
I~ IL .~.. , ..,:r ~. ~. .:. ;r , JI ~1
I I
vN7E5 7'•M Yss•
(Tri1 EiIST. P•rCldrr •-•~BiL4
a~U I D7INOU10MIOACIII
T`fPIGAI ROADNAY SECTION
601 IEiIDp R LIOUOER CO41D1C1[OLSFE Apl1'.SI0.560.DP N01 10 SCAE
6TATE OF EIOPITH CAWOL9HA
®E:PAWTOA~P@T ®I~ TWAA9IIP®~9TAT0®P9
!ALlION
BRIDG~{E~~.ppN0~.~1p8~O~N~ S~Rp~1I03
OYG[l IIGI..Vl7 VttAiG{~
!lvulolle "~* "'
!0. DY DAT! !0. !tl DAT! I
9 9 nrn ~
- - _ ~~~~~~~unrnnnunuw~^u~

xOTES
!. DRNE PILES AT ExD BENT x0.1 AND END BENT NQ2 TO A REQUIRED
BEARING CAPACRI' Of ~ 7ONS PER Fll£. THE REOUN2ED BEARING
~aPACIT)' IS EQUAL TO THE ALCawABLE BEARING CAPACRY WITH A
WNIMUL FACTOR OF SAFELY OF TIYO PLUS ANY ADDITAaNAt CAPACr1Y TO
ACCWNf FOR pOwN DRAG OR NEGATNE STUN fACTOR AND SCOUR
2 AND E~BEM' ~ ~ 45~ON5 PE~ ~ S AT END BENT Iq.rAxD
J, E(EVATIpN NO NIGHER T AN -q F7,lAND END BENT ND2 TO ATIP
4. TESTrxG P1LES wRH THE PR£ DR11/rNG ANALYZER (ppp-DURING DRNING
RE,STy~~ OR REDRN1xG uAY REpU1REDTHE ENGWEER Wlu
DETERMINE THE NEED FOR PDA TESTING; SEE PRE DRN1xG ANALYZER
SPECIAL PROVISILW.
5. THIS STRUCTURE HAS BEEN DESiG<4ED rN ACCORDAxCE W1TH HEC 18.
'EYALUATDYG $(X1UR AT BRJOGES:'NA1;2O(X.
Q REMpvAt pF THE EXISTING BRlOGE SHALL BE PREFORMED Sd AS NOT TO
402-2 Of~ ET STANDARD SPECIFiCATEXWS E w?H Ah7>ClE
7. THE QUANT1/1'OF RIP RAP TO 8E Pa0 FOR wQt BE THE ACTUAL NUMBER
OP TONS OF EACH CIA45 OF R1P RAP WHICH HAS BEEN IXCQRPORATED
N4T0 THE OOYPIETED AND ,ICCEPTEO WORK. THE RIP RAP WILL BE MEASURED
BY BEING wEX>nE0 1N TAUCKS ON CERTIFIED Pf.ATFORM SCALES OR OTHER
CERTIFIED wErGHNIG DEVICES. THE OUANTIIY OF RIP RAP wlLi BE PALO
FOR AJ THE CQNTRACT UNrT PRK;E.
PLNN RrP RAP CLASS n f2'-O'THA;IU
fND BENT N0.1 150 TOxS
fND BENT N0.2 15O taws
iOfAt Ja0 TONS
B.AOT 600 FOR TEAR 20Oa
9 n4STALL TRAFfN; BEARING DRLU' INLET WITH CAST UdON DOUBLE fRAME ANO
GRATES AND A LINEAR FEET ~ 15'CORRGGATED ALUMINUM ALLOY PIPE rCAAPI
CLASSE'~P R P w x~LL ~ f~ABR~ aT ~ d1-'LET. SE~~ rx5l'A(L
STANDARDS 84035.84604 AND 87602
9 DENOTES GEO-TECH90MbNG IrOLE LOCATANS rSEf SHEET ri

STA1ZtXJLA!
f ATH R T XISTI
ar t0O0O ~ STa15+9O.427
GRADE ELEV.- 27.44 wORx AOINT •r o Ex0 BENT •I
FILL FACE
-3
~ _~_...___.____ ___ r~pbOOOY __
1 ~ I I I I
Q ~ ----------J-----~-----I-----~-----!- ----~-----~-----J-----~-----i-----~-----L-----~----~-----~-----1-----`----r-----~----- --
11 12----~- 13 14 15 16
PROFILE ALONG y
5T.
...L..-....-_..._......___
8
----1- ---~-----,-----1- ----~-----~-----~----~-----~-----~-----1-----~-----~-----~----~-----,-----1-----------
\---- -----~- 17 18 19
10 21 2
SCA(E f " - 80'
OuYT •2 0
FILL FACE
RDt,DWAY ~ ,
_ ; °.
PROJECT NO.33650.11
COUNTYr WASHINGTON
STATION: 16+26.51
REPLACES BRIDGE NO.IB
iNG aorM,F INFQRYATA7N
EXISTING STRUCTURE CONSISTS Gf FOUR 15'$PANS ON PRESTRESSEO
C~NCR£TE CHANNELSrENO BENTS AND BENT 2 ARE PRESTRESSED PRECAST
CONCRETE CAPS ON TIMBER PnFS:BENi LAND 3 ARE STEEL CRUTCH BENTS:
246'CLEAR ROADNAY AND AAL= 60'
STATE OF N001TN CAIAO6E9lA
®LPAR46AfE~V 0~ QRAPdffiP®RVA4U®~8
IIALlIOH
PROFILE ALONG
E SURVEY OP BRIDGE #18
ON SR-1103 OVER
WELGH CREEK
11tlY161ON~ tour ~'
ND. ~tl DAT! N0. !T DAT! 2
' tofu rend
1
NdWAt A: lICMd GIs; ~O' ~
~m mF-~~ 31T&ldsM
00)<4 ti trytQp9~H•2GOT lTdl tii=irttpHfffi+ffA0G11=11itf1iilgftiAitifi