The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20150113 Ver 1_Application_20150128r�..��o-"�. � :.�, �� u � STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPAR'1`MENT OF TIZANSPORTATION PAT MCCRORY GOVCRNOR US Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Attn: Mr. David Bailey 3331 Heritage Trade Dr., Ste. 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587 ANTHONYJ.TATA SECRETARY January 27, 2015 NC Division of Water Resources Winston-Salem Regional Office Attn: Mr. David Wanucha 450 West Hanes Mill Rd., Ste. 300 Winston-Salem, NC 27105 I2E: Bridge #136 on Pearson Road (SR 1544) over South Fork Littie River, Orange County; NC DOT Project No. 17.BP.7.R.62 Dear Mr. Bailey and Mr. Wanucha: The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NC DOT) is scheduled to replace Bridge No. 136 with a single span structure at the same location. As the proposed project is a bridge-to-bridge replacement with proposed permanent and temporary stream impacts, the NC DOT is requesting written concurrence from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) that the activities proposed below may proceed under Nationwide Permit (NWP) 14 and General Water Quality Certification (GC) 3886. Additionally, the project is within the Neuse River Basin and there are minor riparian buffer impacts proposed in order to complete this project. Therefore, NC DOT is also requesting a Neuse River Riparian Buffer Authorization Certificate for this bridge replacement. Please contact Mr. Jerry Parker at (336) 256-2063 if you have any questions or require additional infoimation. PROJECT SUMMARY Project Name Bridge No. 136; NC DOT Project No. 17BP.7.R.62 Project Type Bridge to bridge replacement Owner / Applicant NC Dept. of Transportation County Orange Nearest Town Hillsborough Waterbody Name South Fork Little River Index Number 27-2-21-2 Class WS-II; HQW;NSW; 03-04-01 USGS Cataloging Unit 03020201 IMPACT SUMMARY Stream Impact (acres): <0.01 Wetland Impact (acres): 0 Open Water Impact (acres): 0 Total Ixnpactto Waters ofthe U.S. (acres) <0.01 Total St�•eam Impact (linear feet): 20 LF Perxn. / 18 LF Temp. Total Riparian Buffer Impact (square feet) 6,766 sq. ft. (4,111 sq. ft. Zone 1& 2,655 sq. ft. Zone 2) Sincerely, / a�/J� J.M. Mills, PE Divisi ngineer, Division 7 Attachments: Pre-construction Notification (PCi� Application Foim USGS Topographic Site Vicinity Map NRCS Soil Survey Site Vicinity Map Impact Maps (ll X7 7) Impact Summary Sheet Cultural Review & Archaeological Review Letters Cc: Tim Powers, NCDOT Bairy Harrington, Roadside Environmental Field Operations Engineer Ch�ck Edwards, Dishict 1, District Engineer File Copy o�pF WA7EROG � � �i > O < O�ce Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit Corps: 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number: 1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? � Yes ❑ No 1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (ch8ck all that apply): � 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express � Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certification: ❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � yes ❑ No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h ❑ Yes � No below. 1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Bridge No.136 over South Fork Little River 2b. County: Orange 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Hillsborough 2d. Subdivision name: N/A 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state 176P.7.R.62 (SF-670136) project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NC Department of Transportation 3b. Deed Book and Page No. N/A 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if N/A applicable): 3d. Street address: PO Box 14996 3e. City, state, zip: Greensboro, NC 27415 3f. Telephane no.: (336) 334-3297 3g. Fax no.: (336) 334-3637 3h. Email address: mmills@ncdot.gov Page 1 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent � Other, specify: NC DOT Highway Division 7 4b. Name: Division Engineer NC DOT Division 7, Mr. Mike Mills, PE 4c. Business name NC DOT 4d. Streetaddress: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h Email address• PO Box 14996 Greensboro, NC 27415 (336)334-3297 (336)334-3637 *note: piease also copy Mr. Jerry Parker, Highway Division 7 Environmenfal � ' � Supervisor on aIl corresponaence —/parHer�caor.gov 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: Mr. Jerry Parker 5b. Business name NC DOT Highway Division 7, Division Environmental Supervisor ,. ___ .__ �_�. 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: PO Box 14996 Greensboro, NC 27415 (336)256-2063 (336)334-4149 Page 2 of 10 B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): N/A - Bridge Replacement 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 36.177869 Longitude: - 79.088422 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: N!A - Bridge Replacement acres 2. Surtace Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to South Fork Little River proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: 27-2-21-2; WS-II; HQW; NSW; 03-04-01 2c. River basin: Neuse River Basin (HUC 03020201) 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: The existing infrastructure consists of a two (2) lane rural highway with ten-foot travel lanes and existing roadside ditches. The surrounding landuse consists of a few single family residences, some agricultural land and undisturbed forest. The total project length is 0.057 miles. 3b. List the totai estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: There are no wetlands within the project area. 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: Project occurs over South Fork Little River; Ray's Creek has iYs confluence with South Fork to the south of the existing bridge. — approximately 75 LF of stream within the NC DOT right-of-way. 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The proposed project is to remove the existing timber deck bridge which is on timber piers and replace it with a cored slab, 55-foot spanning structure. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Equipment typical to roadway infrastructure construction including dump trucks, cranes, back hoes, etc. will be utilized. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property! � Yes � No ❑ Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type � preliminary ❑ Final of determination was made? 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Name (if known): Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 3 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version C. Proposed impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands � Streams - tributaries � Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres) Tem orar T W1 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 0 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non-404, width (linear Temporary (T) ONT)� other) (feet) feet) S1 � P � T Bank stabilization South Fork Little � PER � Corps +(- 14 18 River ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Temporary Work South Fork Little � PER � Corps S2 ❑ P� T Pad/Existing River ❑ INT ❑ DWQ +�-14 20 Abutment Removal 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 38 3i. Comments: The proposed permanent impacts only occur on the stream banks and are solely for bank stabilization purposes. Stream flow will not be impeded. Rip rap will be keyed into the bank of the channel, rather than the thalweg. The temporary work pad will be removed following removal of the existing bent. 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of waterbody impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or Tem orar 01 ❑POT 4f. Total open water impacts 0 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below. Page 4 of 10 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. Se. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or purpose of (acres) number pond Floode d Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 Sf. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond sufface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project wili impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individualiy list all buffer impacts below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. � Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number— Reason for Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or impact Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Tem orar re uired? 61 � P 0 T Road Crossing South Fork Little ❑ Yes 1,726 2,135 River � No B2 � P 0 T Bridge South Fork Little ❑ Yes 2 Z�3 0 River � No B3 � P❑ T Parallel Impact Rays Creek � YeS 112 517 (Road Widening) ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 3,752 2,817 6i. Comments: The bridge replacement necessitates the widening of existing fill slopes beyond their current location. Rays Creek is immediately adjacent and parallel to the existing road. While Rays Creek is not impacted with this project, the associated riparian buffers are. These unavoidable impacts will be mitigated for as required within Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules (see attached EEP acceptance letter). Page 5 of 10 D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The current bridge over South Fork Little River is a timber deck bridge on timber piers which needs replacement based upon its current age and associated deterioration of the structure. The existing bridge is functionally obsolete and structurally insufficient. NC DOT proposes to replace the bridge with a 55-foot spanning structure which will span the entire stream. Rip rap is proposed to be keyed into the channel bank below the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) which will result in permanent stream impacts; however, it is important to note that the rip rap is on the banks only and is not proposed within fhe thalweg of the channel and therefore, will not impede flow or aquatic life passage. The existing bridge has deck drains which discharge storm runoff directly into the stream channel. The new proposed bridge deck will capture and convey the stormwater into an existing 2' base ditch where it will discharge outside the riparian buffer zone. Ditch dimensions and drainage area are not changing and the natural drainage patterns are not being disturbed or modified. Roadway approach work is minimized as much as is practicai to reduce the overall project footprint. Impacts to the associated protected riparian buffers have also been reduced by out-letting drainage pipes outside the riparian buffer (where possible) and proposing rip rap aprons to reduce the flow to non-erosive velocities, as well as providing grass shoulders to increase surface infiltration. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Impacts will be minimized by strict enforcement of Best Management Practices for the protection of surface waters, restrictions against the staging of equipment in or adjacent to waters of the US and coordination (including a pre- construction meeting) with the Division Environmental Supervisor. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for � Yes ❑ No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): � DWQ ❑ Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? � Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. � Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 112 sq.ft. Zone 1& 517 sq. ft. Zone 2 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: Page 6 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires � Yes ❑ No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. Zone Zone 1 Zone 2 Reason for impact Road widening (parallel Road widening (parallel Total impact (square feet) 112 517 Multiplier 3 (2 for Catawbaj 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation 6e. Required mitigation (square feet) 336 776 1,112 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). Mitigation will be satisfed through the use of the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP). Please see attached acceptance letter. 6h. Comments: Page 7 of 10 E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes ❑ No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules7 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. Comments: The project is utilizing existing roadside ditches and swales to capture any stormwater from the road. The project drainage system also consists of grated inlets and pipe outfalis that drain to the existing roadside ditches. Minimal new impervious surtace is being added to the area and the outlets are discharging to rip � Yes � No rap aprons outside the buffer areas (where possible) at non-erosive velocities. Additionally, the current bridge has deck drains that discharge storm runoff directly into the stream channel. The new bridge will capture the storm flow and convey it off the roadway the northwest side of the road where it will discharge to an undisturbed, natural area outside the riparian buffer zone. 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N!A % 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: The current bridge and roadway approaches drain to existing ditches which parallel the road. Grated inlets will be added to capture any drainage from the bridge itself, rather than allowing it to discharge through deck drains to the stream. The outlets drain to roadside ditches which are designed per the NC DOT BMP Toolbox. The ditch design will be reviewed and approved by the Roadside Environmental Unit of NC DOT. ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program � DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached7 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW • (check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No Page 8 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ yes ❑ No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/statellocal) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes � No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surtace Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)7 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � Yes � No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. Per the NC DWQ April 10, 2004 Version 2.1 Cumulative Impacts policy, small scale public transportation projects — such as widening projects, bridge replacements and intersection improvements — have a"low potential for cumulative impact since little (if any) new impervious surface is added and the projects are usually in already developed locales." This proposed project is within a somewhat developed landscape (i.e. existing residential homes in the vicinity), and while it drains to South Fork Little Creek which is Water Supply (WS) II; Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW), High Quality Waters (HQW), this is not a road on a new location (i.e. there is an existing road and bridge structure and thus, the area already contains impervious surfaces). We anticipate the NC DWQ will advise us if a qualitative or quantitative analysis is needed. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. It is not anticipated that this project will generate any wastewater as it is a roadway project. Page 9 of 10 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes � No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes � No impacts? ❑ Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? http://www.ncnhp.orglweb/nhp/nhp-map-viewer Utilizing the NHP Virtual Workroom Map Viewer, a 2-mile radius search yielded no results of Federal or State species listings. Further, NCDOT Staff conducted surveys in August 2012 for Michaux's sumac and Smooth Coneflower. While habitat was found, no species were observed. Therefore, the biological conclusion is No Effect for both flora species. Additionaily, there was no habitat present for neither the Red- cockaded Woodpecker nor the Bald Eagle. Therefore, the biological conclusion is No Effect for both species. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whefher your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? This bridge replacement project takes place in Orange County which is not near any coastal or tidal habitat that would support EFH (i.e. salt marshes, oyster reefs, etc.). 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? Please see attached Cultural and Archaeological Resources Ietters. 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: MOA 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? http://fris.nc.gov/fris/Index.aspx?FIPS=135&ST=NC&user=General Public �,l Mr. Mike Mills, PE ��y� l�// I`Y��.,�/,if/�(p January< � 2015 Applicant/AgenYs Printed Name ApplicanUAgenPs Signature Date (AgenYs signature is valid oNy if an authorization letter from the applicant is rovided. Page 10 of 10 HighwaV North Carolina Department of Transportation � Sto rmwa ter _ M ,,,�,,.,�,,, Highway Stormwater Program � �=�� STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN _. (Version 12; Released July 2012) FOR LINEAR ROADWAY PROJECTS Project/TIP No.: 17BP.7.R.62 County(ies): Oran e Page 1 of 1 General Project Information Project No.: 17BP.7.R.62 Pro�ect T e: Brid e Re lacement Date: 6/11/2014 NCDOT Contact: Galen Cail, PE Contractor / Designer: RK&K En ineers - Core Cavalier, PE Address: 1590 Mail Service Center Address: g00 Ridgefield Drive Raleigh, NC 27699-1590 Suite 350 Ralei h, NC 27609 Phone: 919.707.6711 Phone: 919-878-9560 Email: cail ncdot. ov Email: ccavalier@rkk.com City/Town: N/A Count (ies): Oran e River Basin(s): Neuse CAMA Count ? No Primary Receiving Water: South Fork Little River NCDWQ Stream Index No.: 27-2-21-2 NCDWQ Surface Water Classification for Primary Receiving Water Primar : Water Su I II WS-II Supplemental: Hi h Qualit Waters (HQW) Nutrient sensitive waters (NSw) Other Stream Classification: None 303(d) Impairments: None Buffer Rules in Effect Neuse Project Description Project Length (lin. Miles or feet): Total 0.103 mi Surrounding Land Use: Rural Proposed Project Existing Site Pro'ect Built-U on Area (ac.) 0.23 ac. 0.15 ac. Typical Cross Section Description: 2-lanes at 10' each with 3'-0" to 4'-0" paved shoulder 2-lanes at 10'-0" each with 4'-0" grassed shoulder Average Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Desi n/Future: 140 Existin : 140 General Project Narrative: This project replaces existing BR #670136, 1@16'-9", 1@17'-0" spans timber floor, 20'-2" wide bridge, with a 1@55'-0" span 21 " cored slab, 27'-10" wide bridge. No deck drains will be required. There is a slight increase in the impervious area of the project, however, there is no real increase in drainage due to the increased impervious area. Runoff from the bridge will be captured and discharged into a rip rap pad in a relocated existing 2' base ditch outside of Buffer Zone 2. The discharge velocity from the rip rap pad is non-erosive at 1.5 fps. A temporary work pad will be utilized to remove the interior bent with concrete footing. Details of the work pad can be seen in permit drawings sheet 5 as well as in plan and profile on sheets 10 and 11 of 11. References _ __ � � . .. � . ;� . . , . 6.�..._ ..... ..� . . .. . � . ...'tl : : . ,:. � : . �.. , .. �. .. .. ',... ... . �. . . � � � .. ' .. _ , ,�•� .. \ . . ' .. � I i , �, . -� � ti50 .ti. � � ._ - l -'-� -- . . , i, ��I P `. }�� /. . .. � � 1� . i '� /� /�' i '� �� :/I, �_ � . � . � - ��`� � � \`1 ' / / . ' � _. - `, . , . � WHITETAfLff1JN � � � • � ' I � � / �� : r i �1� � -�� ' —! �' � � i � / -`�j � �- _ � ' -� �,� �' � � �1 � . .-_J 1 ��' % . �� j / � � \ ... 5.. � / .} y� �, i + "�I . � I: i � I __ . . i,� . � ` .. 111 \ I I - �I,r I� i . �. . 1 i 1i _: �, � �1 ' � ' � � � � �� r , � ��, � � _ ;�" I ! I � . . \�_ / � / � i ,\ J .,,' ` t .. c) -•f l `"y , v '� , I i.. �� ' �� f��j � � � � t � ,_ � � sso� e�l''�{ ; � ) �. eia ��at�Haa� �oRaaNHna �. .��' �� I �.--�� ; � � A z :.�A / \�1 � � J ��V � e5 V � ll � �, ,��l;j 1.�� `-� ��i� � -ze -y �� ;� �y� AJ �I-\% �} p t � �� o z� I � , �, 1 ,` �� I , r1 ' ; r � � l �, � ;\ \ �''� // ' , Q: _. ' J \ '� I� l � � . . i I �� `\ J �,f_.,�� 1 !�' �_ _��` � �__! /` � � . . w � �� I �. g � �i. � � � � r , _ - ,� � / '.� �' � - _✓ /- . �. r X � _ I' �� v ° � � ; _ _�� '1^ -_ � i 1 � - r �/ I /� . . - t�+ o . ' r - . 3 . - r' - : � � ; .. Y r - � _� � � ' " , 9... � q . �'.. " , . � �i kF� r ��, � -� � � � � /�- —; � � =,= aprin�;eri s ` ', :�. �ti Hall °� - a ow n - i � A ) � � , `� Me• d ..., p �_ v�"„' �` ,, . `-�_- % � i� _ r `� � l � �� i � \ � � - '� , 650 � i � - SAWMILL RD SAW MILL ft � � �� ', �. � � � � � I � �Y � � .�v� . ��_�� ' l� r �� ' �. '� i ��_ •J �� r � _ i _ - . . � / �� . � � � � � , ��\`� � �`�� , _ � � � . - � -� . . ��' � . , — _ / � I � � � �� , � . , :?� / i y . � � `*. ' ��fl�i l i/ ; r � Bridge 136 - � > � i � 1 -� •' = �:' � � - � , , ' �, � ,, ,� , i �� ; � � j � � �`�y � � � /� �� , i r ,; ; �� , . � t,-� .. . f . , �� '!i C! i i� \ �, ( !( �� / � �� _ PEaR50NkD � � r� � `�- � � v i � 1 ' ✓� ?`t � �� ' r i � � � �; � � t � - �— � -- i � ��: — � +-�-�-.�— � `. � � _.i •_ � � _ �� ,� � -�� f l �� / � r� :- �" 1 " , j bOaJ��- � / � �1, � �� ',A i A � 1 � � ,� � " � �'�� _ ,� � �? � � � -�� / j _� �� % � ",',.� / /\,;hl� ��',, f\i � � 11� s��,� � W = - � � i , � �--_-, f.�-, _-,� ; � � �� ; - •-- - � 850�-.� . o ` �- � �',i �1 � I� �, �� -. �.�,� � ^ r � �!i ` -�A ��'� � .1 ,i-�� i I � � I I i, l i � �__ . {�- �sMEaen � � �� `r� � 7 111: � �l �V� i� � / .� � 4''I l� ��,�, ;�`�.;��, � � � �1 �/ 1 �� il ��, / � � �i �/( ' ��\i I (�� i il�, r^\ �� ' . ` �'�I ti �: � � \ '� i I j ; i . t l l � �\ ��3 � 1 ^,f' ^ '� J r � 1 " , � �7_�, ,`��,� � _ ��ocfl�P�ac�� __�-- .� � �,' , ` ,,. ` ,� (, , � , .l - - � i %� � � I �� w�ODSCOO � � ` ' _ i � , ,� ( i . '° 1; ; � �� F,�� "+ / , � � /I �� / � I , SCNLEVRD � � �� ..�� I � �� ✓/ • + . � (� � ! .� ' I�'.. 650- . � �� - �r \�� _ -.. _ �'L-_ , �% ..1,\ ._-. �.��_�. .� , - � , , . , � \ � � . , -- � r-°, � � � ' .: � �� , � � � , , � , ; _ � y � � � �� ,,' � x�� ; �- m �� _� � , � � �, , �� , �� , , _ r � �� , - � � � , � t��i r� ' � �� _� ��, aso� ��"' �� //,� � � � ii _t � . / � i ' � r r : _` i �I � � ��,/ � � [ � � - � � ��Q`�r-r� / � � ? �i � 'I . � , � > > i � �� o � i ° , �. / _ �-, t .. / � � � % /� r � � � \.�" I �� / �� —� �� . � ��'-� /1 ! 1 �� a �� j �; r i � 1 � � � Sy0-. ��,� �� / i � � � _�� , � . �,t �, . F � �� - " "� ��\ j �� (. � I i � �, � - l� � _/ � ♦ ��,� '��, M �I r �.", � i �`�. � � .- \ i �� '� � �° QI �-.r.,. `b'4� .1' � �' �k, ��'� P' i I--_� � i ��._1�� e t � -'1/ I �r'. - i � - + �� _ � hI, ,A i �ti � � F. ---�. f`.\ . r `' /f . � �l I� -- i '\.i. - . . � I(�/� ti �� 1��.� � ��,,� ./ `j �' � � vP � �� --. j � � ��_: � � . . 4.. Y � �� , ,1� . I � � � i � � . t .. � , � � . . � � rf � � _..� � ♦� J /� � �- � �700 �,� . L ' � '� �1� � , ___ � f i ` �l �' � � ,�� p��S�R � �� ' .' � _ '� � , _ � _ r \ �� = , i _ I h � f . rti ,' � � � i 1 �� . , ��_ ` � -- ' ' ' �- t.� , s.' � _, � i / `J; , � ,1 � / - % � � � ��``�� - � �� J' � .I�I {t� �` -- / LI � �� I' ,l � fy J_/� `�' `1` �J ,'� i ✓/\ -�� ' �/�. . � � � � �a � ' �L�� , �� /, / � �i �� '� � � � �: —.r ��., ,/ � , _ �`� �� V j � ) �,;;� �;.. , k, _ ,� f .. � . - , - - ; � _ _ _ - � �� 'J �_ ��. I� '��' -- j ) �'j�. - - '� � � � / I �� 't!! `� `� i _ . ^�c �� . -� r `, ��' _ , 1 / I i . r /' �- . 1 ; --... `, ' ---�_.�, �' -, ' - �o 'L Jf'� ' J^ � ( ' ;' ' � - chley , � s. �i � , � , � ' 4i� `� _,� J i . � cRanMrs nrr '` � V� � �--: f � /�� /�) ' � � � I {� ' � i i �,.� � � �r� � A `�J �� i I �_.` `/} �� , � � � � �� 'a : " ' � � � 650 ��l f �_ � i � � � � � � _ . _ .� �� \ I �� . , � � � � . .. =".. '��, �� I ,.� .� , � � �JOSEPN RD -.... ` ',I / i ,-� /� J I'� / \r '� � .-, �.�' . , " . `° � _ . -i�_i- ��a� �I� -__� � - FlJMll�,n TF HO � `�.. .. _. . "� � / '.�� -, ,` i � j �`7 � �`� .�T . � � ,'� _ - . I . . ; . ;, � � . , , . V '' ' - I _ . i .�_.. . . . .. . ... ... .. . . .: . . ' :' .. �' . . . . �� I • . , . . � . i :� , . - . � � � �. Map Location USGS Map Figure 1 NC DOT Bridge 136 CASWELL PERSON over South Fork Little River 1,�� °�"�c-�,�¢!� Pearson Road, Hurdle Mills, NC N ,�- � ,t,`�, Orange County ��'� ' • �*� : ,- � Caldwell Quadrangle � � -`�,.�� aLAMANC ORANGE � Q � USGS Topography 2013 . DURHAM October 13, 2014 ��` � �� 1 inch = 2,917 feet �Tor r�r�Se� �� NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Pat McCrory Ecosystem Enhancement Program Governor January 13, 2015 Mr. Jerry Parker NCDOT Division 7 Environmental Supervisor North Carolina Department of Transportation Post Office Box 14996 Greensboro, North Carolina 27415-4996 Dear Mr. Parker. Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter: Donald R. van der Vaart Secretary Division 7 Project, Replace Bridge 136 over Ray's Creek on SR 1544 (Pearson Road), Orange County, WBS Element 17BP.7.R.62 The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) will provide the buffer mitigation for the subject project. Based on the information supplied by you on January 13, 2015, the buffer impacts are located in CU 03020201 of tbe Neuse River basin in the Central Piedmont (CP) Eco-Region and are as follows: Buffer Impacts (in square feet) Buffer River Basin CU Location Eco-Region Zone 1 Zone 2 TOTAL Impacts Neuse 03020201 CP 112.0 517.0 629.0 All buffer mitigation requests and approvals are administrated through the Riparian Restoration Buffer Fund. The NCDOT will be responsible to ensure that appropriate compensation for the buffer mitigation will be provided in the agreed upon method of fund transfer. Upon receipt of the NCDWQ's Buffer Authorization Certification, EEP will transfer funds from the NCDOT 2984 Fund into the Riparian Restoration Buffer Fund. Upon completion of transfer payment, NCDOT will have completed its riparian buffer mitigation responsibility for this bridge replacement project. Subsequently, EEP will conduct a review of current NCDOT ILF Program mitigation projects in the river basin to determine if available buffer mitigation credits exist. If there are buffer mitigarion credits available, then the Riparian Restoration Buffer Fund will purchase the appropriate amount of buffer mitigation credits from NCDOT ILF Program. cc: If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Beth Harmon at 919-707-8420. Sincerely, � �� . Stanfill E ' sset Management Supervisor Ms. Amy Chapman, Division of Water Resources, 401/Wetlands Ms. Nicole Thomson, NCDOT Division 7 Ms. Linda Fitzpatrick, NCDOT — PDEA File: SR 1544 — Bridge 136 — Division 7 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652 Phone: 919-707-89761 Internet: http:/lportal.ncdenr.orglweb/eep An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Aciion Employer— Made in part by recycled paper BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY IMPACT BUFFER TYPE ALLOWABLE MITIGABLE REPLACEMENT STRUCTURE SIZE / STATION ROAD PARALLEL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 SITE NO. TYPE (FROM/TO) CROSSING BRIDGE IMPACT (ft2) (ftZ) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) 1 Roadway 12+05to13+58 x 1726 2138 3864 1 Bridge 12+54 to 13+11 x 2273 0 2273 1 Roadway 11+61 to 12+13 x 112.0 517.0 TOTAL: 3sss 2138 6137 112.0 517.0 0.0 NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS ORANGECOUNTY WBS - 17BP.7.R.62 (670136) EET 2 of 11 11/18/2014 WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetiands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (tt) (ft) (tt) 1 12+54 to 13+11 Bridge <0.01 <0.01 20 18 12+85 to 12+99 Temp. Work Pad 0.01 TOTALS: <0.01 0.01 20 18 Notes: Permanent Surface Water Impacts required for the removal of the existing concrete footing at each end bent and the installation of the proposed Class II rip rap behind the existing footing. Temporary Surtace Water Impacts requred for construction access to remove the existing concrete footing and install the Class II rip rap at each end bent. Temporary Surface Water Impacts = 235 sf for Temporary Work Pad (an additional 100 sf will be used for the Temporary Work Pad but is considered Permanent Surface Water Impacts due to the removal of the existing concrete footing at End Bent 2- quantity induded in the Permanent SW impacts column for the Bridge). The entire work pad will be removed following the removal of the interior bent. No length is noted for the impacts since it is covered by the impacts associated with the existing end bent removal. Revised 3/31/OS �AIEg�]E]L I��o ia 15 �� N�1�[1�� lI�II� l�TA1�lIlE� LLQD�ll9 ff8ANd9�L�1H[ �.�I�LE�' 31[8. ,V.�N ]HES an� wa&e LES]LdE ]L. H[]ES �� 8�� AI[��]1EglE��]E� lilA ll�IE.�IB��:V I8�.5\�➢, 1H[L7R➢�V.� NdIII,II,�, NC 2i54Il 2Il18 ��.�d$��N I$�.�Il9, II-][UI$Il�1LIE NgIi,]L�, NC 2554ll �� N�°Il° °1[°� �CA1L1E WIDTH OF EXISTING END BENT FOOTING CLASS A RIP RAP TOP ELEVATION = TOP OF EXIST. CONC. FOOTING � ��. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC CHANNEL BED NWS EL. = 584.3' � CLASS II RIP RAP SECTION A-A � , , , � ; FACE OF EXISTING � END BENT 2 �; -REMOVE EXISTING ! CONCRETE FOOTING ! NWS EL. CLASS A RIP RAP ' NATURAL GROUND = 584.3' ; TOB EL. APPROX. = 584.6' � ------------- 1.0' I �, _ �y� CHANNEL BOTTOM APPROX. EL. = 580.6' CLASS II RIP RAP �GEOTEXTILE FABRIC RETAIN EXISTING CONCRETE FOOTWG , SECTION B-6 �O ' I 0 � V � � A � � M � M O N V � � � V � � O V � � Bridge No. 670136 �„�.,ur�`�`� � ch�,�mx s��0a� � � x + ,-'Sf�? (n A '+ n • � �s 4� . .�� 8r , a 1�v°n�d ��_ � -� ` - �., � � �� o � 2P5� Z s � ?S� v� =Y �� 1 q� �, � i ,�;; • �� OFFSITE DETOUR ♦ �.. � �- ;ti .� NorES: VICIIIIITY MAP 1. CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II. 2. THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. � /��°�^ � 2�.ay� � ��I� �� 1U1� �Y 1L�� ll' 1L1111L�1LJl V'V' � �l � ORAI�GE CO U1�T Y LOCATI011I: BRIDGE NO. 670136 OVER SOUTH FORK LITTLE RIVER O1V SR 1�44 (PEARS0111 RD) TYPE OF WORK GRADING, DRAi11lAGE, PAVING, STRUCTURES A11tD RES URFACI11lG B UFFER IMPACTS PERMIT BEGI11t BRIDGE —L— STA. l2 + 53.88 � BEGI11t PROJECT � —L— STA. IO + 00.00 —" lSqq ��1,� `'RSO�v Rd c�URcl`�'UT ��GR��E BRIDGE 1110.670136 N � ? I T p Ij � �'' � m A� \ A \` I '� - o - ', � � �� ,_ � � T �� I � � �•y!V � I � % \ : 2�i�1 � I m � � � A BEGI11t C011tSTRUCTI0111 E11tD BRIDGE —L— STA.13 + 11.13 END PROJECT —L— STA. IS + 45.00 i � is si _ � �'o �� s� � —L— STA. Il + 00.00 E11tD C01�tSTR UCTI0111 � —L— STA.14 + 60.00 PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 6 OF Il I�1E�lE1LdA�IN.��B`� 1P1LAN� DO NOT USE FOR CONSTftIiCTION GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH RUMMEL, KLEPPER & KAHL, LLP HYDRAULICS R� � 900 RIDGEFIEL� �RIVE SUITE 350 CONTRACTOR : ENGINEER RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 ADT = 140 NC LICENSE NO. F-0712 1-888-521-4455 OR 919-878-9560 � 50 �00 LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT 670136........0.057 mi �� Oqp� DHV WA ` MPSON �� Q`g T — b /o �-�-----��" `�`p °°o PLANS D_ w� �* Za,2 STANDARDIVISI0111 OF HIGHWAYS �� ARrHUR va�� ,,E � D LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT 670136.......0.011 mi TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT 670736 ............... 0.103 mi (•� 50 0 50 100 V= 35 MPH B. Keith Sktnner, P.E. srcxarUxE: � g * TTST = 3°/a DUAL 3% PROJECT ENGIhEER R�`9DW`9Y D` � RIGHT OF WAY DATE: � 1 DESIGN PROFILE HORIZONTAL FUNC CLASS = — � p o � ) JUNE 4, 2013 Michael T. Merritt P.E. ENGINEER ��'� Qa,� P720JECT DESIGN ENGINEER iHOMP50N ARTHUR � �Q l0 0 l0 2p RURAL LOCAL 30o s.arNQOw RoAn �� SUBREGIONAL TIER LETTInIG DATE: nrcnor coxzecr: c�tECNSeoRO.NORrr> caROUNA 2�a92 JUNE 4, 2013 Virginia Mabry r.E. PROFILE (VERTICAL) PR/ORITY PROJECTS OFF/CE MANAGER SIGNATURE: 6 DETAIL A SPECIAL CUT BASE DITCH ^ INof�o Scole� � x c�o��d a:� ti`°� '•�" ^\ d � F��Ne, o+<e � iF ^O� Geo�e.�ae B � y Min. D= 1.1 Ft. �Cr� Max. d= 2.3 ft. y B= 2.0 F1. � Type of Liner= Class B Rip-Rap FROM STA.10+86 TO STA.11+25 LT STA.14+00 TO STA.14+36 LT �� DETAIL B O SPECIAL NT BASE DITCH �P BEGIN CONSTRUCTION '"°��° s`°1e' -L- POC Sto. 11+00.00 Ho��ei � o< _ F Ground 1.� - D F�ol�ec Di+ch d_ s,ope -L- PC Sta. 10+64.48 B Min. D= 0.8 FI. Max. d= 1.9 Ff. 6= 2.0 Ft. Type of Liner- PSRM FROM STA.11+25 TO srn. iz+a� �r BEGIN PROJECT DETAIL C -L- POT StO. 10+00.00 SPECIAL CUT BASE DITCH �nmm s�aie� Naw,oi F,o�� cro��d 2:/ p 2� e< o'��n '�rAOr o r ixrs I °I i� ` Slope Q-� � M n. D- 7.3 Ff "�o °/ B 3.0 H. c5- FROM STA.13�11 TO STA.74+00 LT MITIGAOLE IMPACTS ZONE 1 � MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2 �� ,�� ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2 _ J I�-__ ____ _____ 610 ' � � � ° 600 0 � � Q 590 � �� Q, 580 � �v � � � 570 � E � 0 �� w a � � o.L �s =;r DIV7A - BRIDGE 670136 - ORANGE COUNTY I 74 15 -L- PT Sta. /2+69./7 -L- POC Sta. 12+5 SPECIAL CUT BASE DITCH E5T 30 TONS CLASS 6 RIP EST 50 SY FF T SEE DETAIL A EXISTING N 72° 36' S3.2" E-' � F SPEGIAL BASE CUT DITCH EST 130 SY PSRM SEE DETAIL B h0 ~0 BE6/N APPR ACH� S� -L- POT Stq. l2 42. u -i> �`� 3��a�� 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � 10+00 BEGIN BRIDGE -L- POC STA. END Bf7/DGE -L- POr STA.l3+//./3 � oR ol I/ .I �r.& Rr. GRAU 350 (TL-2) TY E-III IYP -III GRAU 3501jTL-2) BE�IN APPROACH SLAB � END APPROACH SLAB -L- POC STA. /2+42.89 -L- POT STA /3+22.L END BRIDGE SKETCH SHOWING ROADWAY IN RELATION TO PROPOSED STRUCTURE -L- POT Sto. l3+1/.l3 CL4S5 II RIP RP.P SPECIAL BASE CUT DITCH esr 9s roNS -L- PCC Sta. 14+4276 EST 100 SY FF CLA55 6 RIP RAP E5T 20 TONS TIE INTO EST 30 SY FF EXISTING DI7CH SEE DETAIL A SPECIAL BASE NT END CONSTRUCTION oircr+ -L- POC Sto. 14+60.00 SEE DETAIL C oao oao END PROJECT nuowna�e iMPncrs-, s ToN a e -L- POC Sto. 15+45.00 ouFFER zoNE z � � RIP RAP � W/7 SY �� m w FIL FAB � ,.N -L-PT , M ��P��r� o�w n.F p F ES i� -- � --__ C � . TB ��°� p�F �� F , � -- 75'oRGP-IV __ � , / _/ _ P _ _' - �' . � � - ��., \ F I H�� _- ___ 2 t-yr._ ___ --- -, 0401 TEMP RARY ' �/ WORK PAD �2'�CLP,55 II IP R � 8 i esr 7e ron+s � I ,r �� EST SY � I . � / `� � � ';, / � ^ I N I� � I J PC Sto. I3+70.03 END APPROACH SLAB -L- POT Sto. 13+22.13 79° 2/' 3/.4" E MITIGABLE IMPACTS� BUFFER ZONE 2 MITIGABLE IMPF BUFFER ZONE 1 PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. 670136 4 RhV SHEET NO. ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER PERMIT DRA WING SHEET 7 OF 11 �-ALLOWABLE IMPACTS I BUFFER ZONE 2 �' N 0/H POW & TE � LINES � C_ , i� /T/- ' ___e - � F � � �� l ` _-__--' _ ---' � % �� BENCH EXCAVATION HATCHING NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY SCALE ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ��-rj0� BUFFER ZONE ? __ �_,= 2 -�4 - TEMPORARY WORK PAD '___________________�___ I�� I��u��u�� V � � ....................... � ....................... � ....................... . � � ....................... � ....................... I :::::::::::::::::::::� I :::::::::::::::::::::°' I ::::::::::::::::::::::: � ....................... iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii . 1 1 I�� I�� I�� I�� I�� ....................... • � � ........ .............. � ........................ � ....................... � ....................... I :::::::::::::::::::::::. � ....................... I ::::::::.:::::::::::::: � ........................ : � I :::::::::::::::::::::::: I ::::::::::::::::::::::: � ....................... I ::::::::.:::::::::::::: I :::::::::::::::::::::::' � ........................ � � ....................... � ....................... � ....................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 11 +00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 PLANS PREPARED BY : R�C �C RUMMEL, KLEPPER 8 KAHL, LLP 900 RIDGEFIELD ORIVE SUITE 350 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609-3960 NC LICENSE NO. F-0112 •�919) 876-9560 6 DETAIL A SPECIAL CUT BASE DITCH ^ INof�o Scole� � x c�o��d a:� ti`°� '•�" ^\ d � F��Ne, o+<e � iF ^O� Geo�e.�ae B � y Min. D= 1.1 Ft. �Cr� Max. d= 2.3 ft. y B= 2.0 F1. � Type of Liner= Class B Rip-Rap FROM STA.10+86 TO STA.11+25 LT STA.14+00 TO STA.14+36 LT �� DETAIL B O SPECIAL NT BASE DITCH �P BEGIN CONSTRUCTION '"°��° s`°1e' -L- POC Sto. 11+00.00 Ho��ei � o< _ F G`°""' ?, - o F��"e` �^�^ -L- PC Sta. 10+64.48 d _ :ioPe B Min. D= 0.8 FI. Max. d= 1.9 Ff. 6= 2.0 Ft. Type of Liner- PSRM FROM STA.11+25 TO srn. iz+a� �r BEGIN PROJECT DETAIL C -L- POT StO. 10+00.00 SPECIAL CUT BASE DITCH � � n , m s�aie� Nm�,oi F,o�� Ground 2:/ p 2� e� �'�cn ��rAOr o r iNes I °I i� ` Slape p-� � M n. D- 7.3 Ff "�� °/ x B= 3.0 H. c5- FROM STA.13�11 TO STA.74+00 LT MITIGAOLE IMPACTS ZONE 1 � MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2 �� ,�� ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2 _ J I�-__ ____ _____ 610 ' 600 590 , 580 570 �� w a � � o.L �s =;r DIV7A - BRIDGE 670136 - ORANGE COUNTY I 74 15 -L- PT Sta. /2+69./7 -L- POC Sta. 12+5 SPECIAL CUT BASE DITCH E5T 30 TONS CLA55 6 RIP EST 50 SV FF T SEE DETAIL A EXISTING BEGIN BRIDGE -L- POC STA. END Bf7/DGE -L- POr STA.l3+//./3 � oR ol I/ .I �r.& Rr. GRAU 350 (TL-2) TY E-III IYP -III GRAU 3501jTL-2) BE�IN APPROACH SLAB � END APPROACH SLAB -L- POC STA. /2+42.89 -L- POT STA /3+22.L END BRIDGE SKETCH SHOWING ROADWAY IN RELATION TO PROPOSED STRUCTURE -L- POT Sto. l3+1/.l3 CL4S5 II RIP RP.P SPECIAL BASE CUT DITCH esr 9s roNS -L- PCC Sta. 14+4276 EST 100 SY FF CLA55 6 RIP RAP E5T 20 TONS TIE INTO EST 30 SY FF EXISTING DI7CH SEE DETAIL A � SPECIAL BASE NT END CONSTRUCTION oircr+ -L- POC Sto. 14+60.00 PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. 670136 4 RhV SHEET NO. ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER PERMIT DRA WING SHEET 8 OF 11 I SEE DETAIL C �-ALLOWABLE IMPACTS '' I BUFFER ZONE 2 oao oao END PROJECT nuowna�e iMPacrs-, i s ToN a e -L- POC Sto. 15+45.00 ouFFER zoNE z ��I � RIP RAP \� }1 � m w FIL FAB � W� I � I ��N ��l I N -L- PT � �. � l / \ ,q p ES � PROP�'�0/H POW & TE � LINES � rB ` �� _ C � � � �, � � � C \ �, o�F , F ; , - s h --- F , - -1- - �� - - 15'oRCP-IV , --- _ _ -- � � �� o niFs N 72° 36' S3.2" E-' � F ��T - - - _ � -L- P � -- ' ' - - SPECIAL BASE CUT DITCH / , \ - - ----- F , . EST 130 SY PSRM -- _ F o2 t-f�.�. � SEE DETAIL B - "�\ . / .�'�� A II P ..'�� `: 0401 � \ 0 ,�,0 � :� TEMP RARY / 1, � /, , Q 55 I R 1I `�i �'`�ORK PAD BE6/N APPR ACH( SLAB esr qe ro�as o, EST SY R'� w��uaM Huc�s aGE-: -L- POT StQ. l2 42.89 �j I �,� � H wi�LinM .1UGES 6REEIF � I � �� '.. H ANN C�REEZE SEBE„��. , � ; �� `, � � S 79° 2/' 3/.4" E � I J PC Sto. I3+70.03 END APPROACH SLAB -L- POT Sto. 13+22.13 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � 10+00 MITIGABLE IMPACTS� BUFFER ZONE 2 MITIGABLE IMPF BUFFER ZONE 1 ��wwii �sew��r_� . r_�� ,., F � ��' \� . - ----- _� t. � BENCH EXCAVATION / HATCHING NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY SCALE ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ��-rj0� BUFFER ZONE ? -- � , 2 -J4 TEMPORARY WORK PAD '___________________�___ I�� I��u��u�� V � � ....................... � ....................... � ....................... . � � ....................... � ....................... I :::::::::::::::::::::� I :::::::::::::::::::::°' I ::::::::::::::::::::::: � ....................... iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii . 1 1 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii� iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii i�� ....................... • � I ::::::: :::::::::::::::. I ::::::::::::::::::::::: I :::::::::::::::::::::::. � ....................... I ::::::::.:::::::::::::: � ........................ : � I :::::::::::::::::::::::: I ::::::::::::::::::::::: � ....................... I ::::::::.:::::::::::::: I :::::::::::::::::::::::' � ........................ � I ::::::::::::::::::::::: � ....................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 11 +00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 PLANS PREPARED BY : R�C �C RUMMEL, KLEPPER 8 KAHL, LLP 900 RIDGEFIELD ORIVE SUITE 350 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609-3960 NC LICENSE NO. F-0112 •�919) 876-9560 �O ' I 0 � V � � A � � M � M O N V � � � V � � O V � � Bridge No. 670136 �„�.,ur�`�`� � ch�,�mx s��0a� � � x + ,-'Sf�? (n A '+ n • � �s 4� . .�� 8r , a 1�v°n�d ��_ � -� ` - �., � � �� o � 2P5� Z s � ?S� v� =Y �� 1 q� �, � i ,�;; • �� OFFSITE DETOUR ♦ �.. � �- ;ti .� NorES: VICIIIIITY MAP 1. CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II. 2. THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. ��I� �� 1U1� �Y 1L�� ll' 1L1111L�1LJl V'V' � �l � ORAI�GE CO U1�T Y LOCATI011I: BRIDGE NO. 670136 OVER SOUTH FORK LITTLE RIVER O1V SR 1�44 (PEARS0111 RD) TYPE OF WORK GRADING, DRAi11lAGE, PAVING, STRUCTURES A11tD RES URFACI11lG WETLA11tD A1�D STREAM IMPACTS PERMIT � /��°�^ � 2�.ay� � BEGI11t BRIDGE —L— STA. l2 + 53.88 � BEGI11t PROJECT � —L— STA. IO + 00.00 —" lSqq ��1,� `'RSO�v Rd c�URcl`�'UT ��GR��E BRIDGE 1110.670136 N � ? I T p Ij � �'' � m A� \ A \` I '� - o - ', � � �� ,_ � � T �� I � � �•y!V � I � % \ : 2�i�1 � I m � � � A BEGI11t C011tSTRUCTI0111 E11tD BRIDGE —L— STA.13 + 11.13 END PROJECT —L— STA. IS + 45.00 i � is si _ � �'o �� s� � —L— STA. Il + 00.00 E11tD C01�tSTR UCTI0111 � —L— STA.14 + 60.00 PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 9 OF Il I�1E�lE1LdA�IN.��B`� 1P1LAN� DO NOT USE FOR CONSTftIiCTION GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH RUMMEL, KLEPPER & KAHL, LLP HYDRAULICS R� � 900 RIDGEFIEL� �RIVE SUITE 350 CONTRACTOR : ENGINEER RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 ADT = 140 NC LICENSE NO. F-0712 1-888-521-4455 OR 919-878-9560 � 50 �00 LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT 670136........0.057 mi �� Oqp� DHV WA ` MPSON �� Q`g T — b /o �-�-----��" `�`p °°o PLANS D_ w� �* Za,2 STANDARDIVISI0111 OF HIGHWAYS �� ARrHUR va�� ,,E � D LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT 670136.......0.011 mi TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT 670736 ............... 0.103 mi (•� 50 0 50 100 V= 35 MPH B. Keith Sktnner, P.E. srcxarUxE: � g * TTST = 3°/a DUAL 3% PROJECT ENGIhEER R�`9DW`9Y D` � RIGHT OF WAY DATE: � 1 DESIGN PROFILE HORIZONTAL FUNC CLASS = — � p o � ) JUNE 4, 2013 Michael T. Merritt P.E. ENGINEER ��'� Qa,� P720JECT DESIGN ENGINEER iHOMP50N ARTHUR � �Q l0 0 l0 2p RURAL LOCAL 30o s.arNQOw RoAn �� SUBREGIONAL TIER LETTInIG DATE: nrcnor coxzecr: c�tECNSeoRO.NORrr> caROUNA 2�a92 JUNE 4, 2013 Virginia Mabry r.E. PROFILE (VERTICAL) PR/ORITY PROJECTS OFF/CE MANAGER SIGNATURE: 6 DETAIL A SPECIAL CUT BASE DITCH DIV7A - BRIDGE 670136 - ORANGE COUNTY �Nof�o Scole� � x c�o��d a:� ti`°� '•�" ^\ d � F��Ne, o+<e � iF O oeo�e.�,ie a �' 74 Min. D= 1.1 Ft. �Cr� 15 Max. d= 2.3 ft. y B= 2.0 F1. � � � Type of Liner= Class B Rip-Rap FROM STA.10+86 TO STA.11+25 LT � Aj � � STA.14+00 TO STA.14+36 LT � �� w a � � o.L �s =;r BEGIN BRIDGE -L- POC STA. END Bf7/DGE -L- POr STA.l3+//./3 � oR ol I/ .I �r.& Rr. GRAU 350 TL-2 TY E-III IYP -III DETAIL B O � � ; GanU 35o rL-2� SPECIAL NT BASE DITCH �Q' BEGIN CONSTRUCTION -L- PT Sta. /2+69./7 BEGIN APPROACH SLAB � END APPROACH SLAB �"°��°s`°1e� -L- POC Sto.11+00.00 -L- POC STAJ2+42.89 -L- POT STA/3+22.L Ho��ei F c.o��a 1.� -- ti�� i�e+ -p.�°h END BRIDGE SKETCH SHOWING ROADWAY IN RELATION TO PROPOSED STRUCTURE d_ p F`° s;ope -L- PC Sta. 10+64.48 -L- POT Sto. l3+1/.l3 CL4S5 II RIP RP.P SPECIAL BASE CUT DITCH B Min. D= 0.8 F�. � esr 9s ToNS -L- PCC Sta. 14+4276 Max. d= 1.9 Ff. EST 100 SY FF CLA55 6 RIP RAP 6= 2.0 Ft. E5T 20 TONS BEGIN BRIDGE TIE INTO EST 30 SY FF Type or u„e�- PsRM -L- POC Sta. 12+53.88 EXISTING DI7CH SEE DETAIL A FROM STA.11+25 TO STA.12+47 LT BEGIN PROJECT SPECIAL CUT BASE DITCH I SPECIAL BASE NT END CONSTRUCTION -L- POT Sta. 10+00.00 E5T 30 TONS CLASS 6 RIP P I o�TC" -L- POC Sto. 14+60.00 DETAIL C EST 50 SY FF TIE NTO SEE DETAIL C SPECIAL CUT BASE DITCH SEE DETAIL A EXISTING ITCH �. (no��o scole� oao oao END PROJECT Na��,a� 2,. �' , •�PAOP o, s ToN a e -- o. 15+45.00 cro��d 2:/ p \o�te o�'��n � wrs I I i Slope I °I DUE �� wi � sv � Min.D- 7.3 Ff. "�o �/ '� w FIL FAB B= 3.0 H. , C DUE �� ', Du N DuE -L- PT Sta. 15+45.77 �� N FROM STA.13�11 TO STA.74+00 LT ' � C Pp O F -, F C --__ ' --- I ' TB � '� Pow i�vES �'.or� v� x r ��rve. _ n I �_ �c o _ '', '' - --o---- ,'_- o F F P� -''-�, ° -- o o '- � ` �F \ 75" RGP-IV � � N 72° 36' S3.2" E SPEGIAL BASE CUT DITCH / j � -- -- ----_ �� -L- POT Sta. 15+56.70 '' EST 130 SY PSRM F - f__ SEE DETAIL B � 2 � A � � . i `� . 0401 �• � ' \ � . � 0 TEMP RAR -- �.0 ~ WORK PAD IMPAGTS IN --- 1, ` /��CLP,55 II IP R _ i i BE6/N APPR ACH�SLAB /�, ; EsT � To� __ suRFnce wnreR CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE -�- Por sfi�.�z 4z.a9 �z,� Es� �'�* �� ;� 1. PLACE TEMPORARY WORK PAD TO PROTECT STREAM AS SHOWN ON DRAWWGS. � '�� I SEE SHEET 5 FOR DETAILS OF TEMPORARY WORK PAD. [1- PC Sto. I3+70.03 NO MORE THAN HALF THE STREAM SHALL BE BLOCKED DURING THIS OPERATION. END APPROACH SLAB 2. ROLL EXISTING CONCRETE FOOTING ONTO WORK PAD FOR REMOVAL FROM STREAM. -L- POT Sto. /3+22./3 3. REMOVE TEMPORARY WORK PAD FROM STREAM BED. _ : _�_�_ _ � - : . _� ---- ---- �i-i`1-'i iL'i I-I i iL'i I i'i 'i i i i 'i 'i I i IJi i i i'i 'i 'i '� i iL'i I i� 'I 610 ' 600 590 , 580 570 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � 10+00 79° 2/' 3/.4" E BENCH EXCAVATION- HATCHING NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. 670136 4 RhV SHEET NO. ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER PERMIT DRA WING SHEET 10 OF 11 %� oeNOrES iMPacrs iN j SURFACE WATER � DUE '� \ --PROP��O/H POW & TE LINE �'a F �/-- -- �__ _ ,., \ . _ � �IMPACTS IN - SURFACE WATER V ` F - / \ TEMPORARY WORK PAD � _ � rJ nAR1' \ SURFACE �:- SCALE 1"-50' - - � _ _ ----------------------- iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiii°iiiii°iiiiiiu� � ....................... � ....................... � ....................... . � � ....................... � ....................... I :::::::::::::::::::::� I :::::::::::::::::::::°' I ::::::::::::::::::::::: � ....................... iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii . 1 1 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii� iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii i�� ....................... • � I ::::::: :::::::::::::::. I ::::::::::::::::::::::: I :::::::::::::::::::::::. � ....................... I ::::::::.:::::::::::::: � ........................ : � I :::::::::::::::::::::::: I ::::::::::::::::::::::: � ....................... I ::::::::.:::::::::::::: I :::::::::::::::::::::::' � ........................ � I ::::::::::::::::::::::: � ....................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 11 +00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 PLANS PREPARED BY : R�C �C RUMMEL, KLEPPER 8 KAHL, LLP 900 RIDGEFIELD ORIVE SUITE 350 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609-3960 NC LICENSE NO. F-0112 •�919) 876-9560 � DETAIL A SPECIAL CUT BASE DITCH DIV7A - BRIDGE 670136 - ORANGE COUNTY eECiN eRiocE iHo��o s�oiei -L- POC STA.12+53.88 � x c�o��e d z:� D F\ONe� oi° e O/�\ RAU 350 (TL-2) TYPE-III Sit<F ^O� Geo�e.�ae B � y Min. D= 1.1 Ft. �Cr� �4 O b� Max. d= 2.3 ft. Type of Liner= Class B Rip-Rap B= 2.0 F1. 'y � � . 15 � p N ll � FROM STA.10+86 TO STA.11+25 LT � Aj � � STA.14+00 TO STA.14+36 LT � �� w a � � o.L �s =;r END Bf7/DGE -L- POr STA.l3+//./3 �r. & Rr. GRAU 350 TL-2 N E-III IYr -III DETAIL B O ( � Ga,aU 35o�rL-2) � SPECIAL NT BASE DITCH �Q' BEGIN CONSTRUCTION -L- PT Sta. /2+69./7 BEGIN APPROACH SLAB � END APPROACH SLAB �"°��°s`°�e� -L- POC Sto.11+00.00 -L- POC STAJ2+42.89 -L- POT STA/3+22./3 Ho��ei F c.o��a 1.� -- ti�� i�e+ -p.�°h END BRIDGE SKETCH SHOWING ROADWAY IN RELATION TO PROPOSED STRUCTURE d_ p F`° s;ope -L- PC Sta. 10+64.48 -L- POT Sto. l3+1/.l3 CL4S5 II RIP RP.P SPECIAL BASE CUT DITCH B Min. D= 0.8 F�. � esr 9s ToNS -L- PCC Sta. 14+4276 Max. d= 1.9 Ff. EST 100 SY FF CLA55 6 RIP RAP 6= 2.0 Ft. E5T 20 TONS BEGIN BRIDGE riE wro EST 30 SY FF Type or u„e�- PsRM -L- POC Sta. 12+53.88 EXISTING DI7CH SEE DETAIL A FROM STA.11+25 TO STA.12+47 LT BEGIN PRO.IECT SPECIAL CUT BASE DITCH � I� SPECIAL BASE NT END CONSTRUCTION -L- POT Sta. 10+00.00 E5T 30 TONS CLA55 6 RIP r o�TC" -L- POC Sto. 14+60.00 DETAIL C EST 50 SV FF TIE NTO I SEE DETAIL C SPECIAL CUT BASE DITCH � . SEE DETAIL A EXISTING ITCH '�. (no��o scole� �� oao oao END PROJECT �o°�a' a,�� p,,°� •�PAOPO �,Nr i s ToN a e -- o. 15+45.00 2:/ D F�o�te< Slape s I °I DUE i wi � sv � Min.D- 7.3 Ff. "�� / rv ��, w FIL FAB i B= 3.0 H. , C DUE � I�. �', Du N DuE -L- PT Sta. 15+45.77 _,, � FROM STA.13�11 TO STA.74+00 LT �� °P � F . O -�_ F � --TB � . � ' C �,__ wo o -- - - FP,° p r _,,`\` _ o � ,- �F \ 75"oRCP-IV � �_-' _� \ N 72° 36' S3.2" E F= --- - ° -L- POT Sta. 15+56.70 '' SPECIAL BASE CUT DITCH � � / '\ -- -- ----- - E . EST 130 SY PSRM / i� _ "�',� F 2 I-A SEE DETAIL B ' . / /, . . _ � � 0401 � � � � / � \ • � 1 � - �� ,�,0 . ., . '�. , � �, TEMP RAR . _: - � - , . �+ % /,•� ;'QA55 II IP R �� WORK PAD IMPAGTS IN � BE6/N APPR ACHI SLAB esr qe ro�as �� suRFnce wnreR esr sY gk -L- POT SiQ. /2 42.89 i �- I � � � � CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE ' ,�,' � '� � " N j' `, S 79° 2/' 3/.4" E 1. PLACE TEMPORARY WORK PAD TO PROTECT STREAM AS SHOWN ON DRAWWGS. � � i I �I SEE SHEET 5 FOR DETAILS OF TEMPORARY WORK PAD. [I- PC Sto. I3+70.03 NO MORE THAN HALF THE STREAM SHALL BE BLOCKED DURING THIS OPERATION. END APPROACH SLAB 2. ROLL EXISTING CONCRETE FOOTING ONTO WORK PAD FOR REMOVAL FROM STREAM. -L- POT Sto. /3+22./3 3. REMOVE TEMPORARY WORK PAD FROM STREAM BED. _ : _�_�_ _ � - : . _� ---- ---- �i-i`1-'i iL'i I-I i iL'i I i'i 'i i i i 'i 'i I i IJi i i i'i 'i 'i '� i iL'i I i� 'I 610 ' 600 590 , 580 570 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � 10+00 BENCH EXCAVATION- HATCHING NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. 670136 4 RhV SHEET NO. ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER PERMIT DRA WING SHEET 11 OF 11 %� oeNOrES iMPacrs iN j SURFACE WATER DUE '� � 0/H POW & T�E LINE III .. ,�- �31-` / / /-� I � __ I __ �IMPACTS IN � - SURFACE WATER _ f` �, � TEMPORARY � � � WORK PAD -�Ji�AR1' ,� '�� SURFACE �:- SCALE 1"-50' - - � _ _ ----------------------- iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiii°iiiii°iiiiiiu� � ....................... � ....................... � ....................... . � � ....................... � ....................... I :::::::::::::::::::::� I :::::::::::::::::::::°' I ::::::::::::::::::::::: � ....................... iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii . 1 1 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii� iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii i�� ....................... • � I ::::::: :::::::::::::::. I ::::::::::::::::::::::: I :::::::::::::::::::::::. � ....................... I ::::::::.:::::::::::::: � ........................ : � I :::::::::::::::::::::::: I ::::::::::::::::::::::: � ....................... I ::::::::.:::::::::::::: I :::::::::::::::::::::::' � ........................ � I ::::::::::::::::::::::: � ....................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 11 +00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 PLANS PREPARED BY : R�C �C RUMMEL, KLEPPER 8 KAHL, LLP 900 RIDGEFIELD ORIVE SUITE 350 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609-3960 NC LICENSE NO. F-0112 •�919) 876-9560