Re_ FW_ Bridge 354 Gaston Co temp impacts

Carpenter, Kristi
From: BrabbleRose (AMT Engineering), Matthew C
Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2022 7:45 AM
To: Wanucha, Dave
Cc: Wyatt, Jeffrey L
Subject: Re: FW: Bridge 354 Gaston Co temp impacts
Dave,
The 80' of temp. Impacts from the summarytable is what we'll use. Eric raised the same question last
week, and that's what we decided to go with. Sorry for the error, and thank you for your time. Please let
me know if you have any more questions.
M. Caleb BrabbleRose
Environmental Specialist I
Division 12
North Carolina Department of Transportation
980.552.4219 office
252.236.8106 mobile
ext-mcbrabblerose(a)ncdot.L-ov
P.O. Box 47
Shelby, NC 28151
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
On Nov 30, 2022 at 11:57 AM -0500, Wanucha <[e-mail]>, wrote:
Hi Jeff,
The impact summary tables show 80' if temp impacts for cofferdams, but the PCN lists impacts
at 100'. Which is correct?
Dave W.
Dave Wanucha
Environmental Specialist 11

Transportation Permitting Branch for NCDOT Divisions 9 and 11
Division of Water Resources, Department of Environmental Quality
Office/Cell: [phone]
[e-mail]
<Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>