20150100 Ver 1_401 Application_20150115

ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE
January 22, 2015
Mr Joshua Mitchell
Regulatory Specialist
U S Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Ave
Wilmington NC, 28403
2 0 1 5 0 1 0 0
RE: PRE - CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION PACKAGE
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS, 2015 LINE 1 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT PROJECT
SITE 7 — INTERMITTENT STREAM CULVERT AND RELOCATION
ANSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Enclosed please find a Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) package for Site 7 of the proposed 2015 Line
1 Class Location Replacement project in Anson County, North Carolina The applicant for this project is
Piedmont Natural Gas, 4720 Piedmont Row Drive, Charlotte, North Carolina 28210
The proposed project will replace a portion of natural gas pipeline As part of the project, PNG would like
to replace an undersized culvert and relocate a stream that currently flows on top of the gas line At this
time, we are applying for coverage under a USACE Nationwide permit and NC DENR Water Quality
Cerhfication No 3884
Thank you for your consideration of this application If you have questions or need additional information
please contact Suzanne Herron at (615) 383 -6300 or by email at suzanne herron @elrllc com
Sincerely,
ENERGY LAND 8 INFRASTRUCTURE, PLLC
Suzan a Herron, P E, CPESC
cc Mr Jim Kalish, PNG
NC DWQ WBSCP Unit
Enclosures
1420 Donelson Pike, Suite A -12, Nashville, Tennessee 37217 www.eii- lic.com 615.383 6300
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL

O��INAT $,,?
r --
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
DENR • w-AT R RE50URCES
401 &BUFFER PERMITTING
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1
Processing
la
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
lb
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 12 or General Permit (GP) number 3884
1c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑X Yes ❑ No
1d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ❑X No
if
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program
❑ Yes ❑X No
1g
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes ❑X No
1h Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a
Name of protect
2015 Line 1 Class Location Replacement Project - Site 7
2b
County
Anson
2c
Nearest municipality /town:
Burnsville
2d
Subdivision name
NA
2e
NCDOT only, T I P or state project no
NA
3
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
Piedmont Natural Gas easement - Individual owners listed on Supplemental Info
3b
Deed Book and Page No
- --
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
Jim Kalish, Piedmont Natural Gas
3d
Street address
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
3e
City, state, zip
Charlotte, NC 28210 nh
3f
Telephone no
(704) 731 -4598
e --�• __. _ .
3g
Fax no
(704) 731 -4098
3h
Email address
lim kalish @piedmontng corn
DENR • w-AT R RE50URCES
401 &BUFFER PERMITTING
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

4
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify Party responsible for construction
4b
Name
Jim Kalish
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
Piedmont Natural Gas
4d
Street address
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
4e
City, state, zip
Charlotte, NC 28210
4f
Telephone no
(704) 731 -4598
4g
Fax no
(704) 731 -4098
4h
Email address
lim kalish @piedmontng corn
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Suzanne Herron
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
Energy Land & Infrastructure, PLLC
5c
Street address
1420 Donelson Pike, Suite A -12
5d
City, state, zip
Nashville, TN 37217
5e
Telephone no
(615) 383 -6300
5f
Fax no
(615) 360 -8476
5g
Email address
suzanne herron @eli -11c corn
Page 2 of 10

B
Project Information and Prior Project History
7
Property Identification
1a
Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
See Supplemental Information
1b
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
I Latitude 35 0979 Longitude -80 1953
1c
Property size
075 acres
2
Surface Waters
2a
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project
Unnamed tributary of Lanes Creek
2b
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
Intermittent stream
2c
River basin
Rocky River
3.
Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use In the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
Upland hardwood forests dominate the hilly landscape Two streams are on the site A 16" gas line crosses the site
3b
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property 0
3c
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property 325
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
The proposed project will place a new natural gas line The new gas line is being installed to replace an existing line
3e Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
See the Supplemental Information page for the overall project description
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past'?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
Comments
4b
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known)
Agency /Consultant Company Dial Cordy
Other
4d
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation,
5.
Project History
5a
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes X❑ No ❑ Unknown
5b
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
6
Future Project Plans
6a
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes X❑ No
6b
If yes, explain
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b
Type of impact
2c
Type of wetland
2d
Forested
2e
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
2g Total Wetland Impacts:
2h Comments
3 Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b
Type of impact
3c
Stream name
3d
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e
Type of
jurisdiction
3f
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
Unnamed stream 1
INT
Corps
6
50
S2 P
Relocation
Unnamed stream 2
INT
Corps
6
180
S3
Choose one
S4
Choose one
-
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
230
31 Comments
Along Unnamed stream 1, a 24" RCP will be removed from under the gravel drive and will be replaced with 56 LF of 53'x43" HERC,
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c
Type of impact
4d
Waterbody
type
4e
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f Total open water impacts
4g Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below
5a
Pond ID number
5b
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f Total:
5g Comments.
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres).
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a Protect is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other
6b
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Stream name
Be
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
Yes /No
B2
Yes /No
B3
Yes /No
B4
Yes /No
B5
Yes /No
B6
Yes /No
6h Total Buffer Impacts:
61 Comments
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1 Avoidance and Minimization
la Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed Impacts in designing project
This protect will replace a natural gas pipeline The underground gas line is located under the stream channel An existing undersized culvert under the
gravel access drive is being replaced with a larger culvert due to flooding issues A small portion of the stream is being relocated so that it will not
undermine the stability of the natural gas pipeline and cause safety Issues
7 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S. or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply),
❑X DWQ ❑ Corps
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3 Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type Choose one
Type Choose one
Type Choose one
Quantity
Quantity
Quantity
3c Comments
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
Choose one
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
PNG plans to relocated the stream to the north of the existing stream
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 14 January 2009

6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes No
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
I
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
15
6f Total buffer mitigation required:
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h Comments-
Page 7 of 10

E
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 b
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0%
2b
Does this protect require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑ No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan-
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local qovernment's jurisdiction is this protect?
3b
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
E] Water Supply Watershed
Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
El Yes ❑ No
4. DWQ Stormwater Proqram Review
4a
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply)
[]Coastal counties
❑HQW
❑ORW
❑Session Law 2006 -246
[:]Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 14 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
7
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal /state) land?
lb
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA /SEPA)?
1c
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter)
Comments
2
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b
Is this an after- the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ❑ No
2c
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
4
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed protect, or available capacity of the subject facility
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form —Version 14 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
-
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑ No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
❑ Yes ❑ No
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA - designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplam determination?
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
t(AgntVtp�gPnature llcant/Agent's Signature
is valid only if an authorization
r from the applicant is provided
Page 10 of 10

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Application for Department of the Army Permit
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form Supplemental Information
Piedmont Natural Gas 2015 Line 1 Class Location Replacement Project
Site 7 — Intermittent Stream Culvert and Relocation
Anson County, North Carolina
The information listed here is in addition to that provided on the permit application
The proposed project will replace seven portions of natural gas pipeline along Piedmont Natural
Gas's (PNG's) Line 1 The sections to be replaced are in Robeson, Scotland, Richmond, and
Anson Counties Many of the crossings do not have impacts to waters of the U S , therefore do
not require permitting This site, Site 7, is proposed to add a stream culvert'and relocate a small
section of an intermittent stream Therefore, it will need a Section 404 permit (NW 12) and a 401
Water Quality Certification (No 3884) Site 2 crosses the Lumber River in Robeson County and
is required to have a Section 10 Permit Permit applications for Site 2 were submitted
separately
The main objective of the proposed project is to replace a 223 -foot length of 16" gas pipeline
This portion of the pipeline replacement project is near Burnsville in Anson County PNG has an
existing natural gas pipeline and permanent easement at this crossing that is 50 -feet wide The
pipeline easement is in a rural area that consists almost entirely of wooded uplands Two
intermittent stream channels intersect near the center of the site Stream 1 flows under the
gravel drive that is used to access the gas line easement This stream flows through a 24"
culvert under the gravel access drive Stream 2 flows along the same route as the underground
gas pipeline The estimated disturbed area for the project is 0 75 acres Only temporary
easement will be acquired for the project
The new gas line will be installed using the open cut method The existing pipeline will be
removed from its current location and replaced in the same ditch
The existing 24" RCP under the gravel access drive is undersized for the acreage that flows to
it Therefore, the 24" pipe will be removed and replaced with a 56 -feet long section of 53" x 43"
HERC pipe The length of pipe being replaced is being extended so that the pipe outfall crosses
the gas pipeline Lengthening the culvert requires stream 2 to be relocated so that it does not
flow along the same location as the gas pipeline At the current culvert location, the outfall
releases the water into stream 2 above the underground gas line The stream flow in the same
corridor as the pipe could undermine the stability of the natural gas pipeline and cause safety
issues
Approximately 180 feet of stream 2 will need to be relocated The existing stream bed is
approximately 5 feet wide Assuming a 10 -foot wide stream impact over 180 feet, the impact to
stream 2 is 1,800 square feet The impact to stream 1 is approximately 50 feet in length 40 feet
of the length is currently culverted The total square footage of stream impact is approximately
2,300 square feet (0 05 acre) The proposed new stream location will be dust outside the gas
line easement The north side of the stream is and will continue to be an upland wooded area
The south side of the stream will be the existing 50 -foot wide cleared (of trees), but vegetated,
natural gas line easement Class B rip -rap (5" to 15" in size, 2' thick) over filter fabric will be
used at either end of the culvert to stabilize the channel A small amount of Class B rip -rap will
11 Page

also be used on the north side of the relocated stream channel to keep the flow coming out of
the culvert from washing out the stream bank Pipe velocities vary based on the outlet
conditions at the pipe (water level in the creek) Pipe calculations show velocities of
approximately 10 cfs, which can be extremely erosive to the stream and stream banks Pipe
velocity calculations are attached
The Agent Authorization form signed by Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG) is attached PNG is in
the process of obtaining easements from the property owners along the route Easement
drawings for the project are additionally attached
The wetland study letter dated December 24, 2014 from Dial Cordy and Associates, Inc is
attached This letter presents the findings of a preliminary jurisdictional wetland assessment for
the site Wetlands were not found to be on the site
A coordination letter has been sent to the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
(SHPO) Once the SHPO coordination is received, it will be forwarded to the USACE and DWQ
Property owners
• Tract 1 Owner(s) Robert E Sikes
• PIN 644900241038
• Deed book and page 933/100
• Property address 1664 Cedar Grove Church Road
• Tract 2 Owner(s) Raeford Dean Lingerfelt and Laura C Lingerfelt
• PIN 644900214874
• Deed book and page 959/211
• Property address Cedar Grove Church Road
21 Page

Figure 1. Location of proposed construction activity west of Lanes Creek, PNG Line 1, Anson County, North Carolina.

ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Date: December 3, 2014
Proiect Information
Project Name: 2015 Line 1 Class Location Replacement Project
Type of Project: Installation of new natural gas line
Location: Robeson, Scotland, and Richmond Counties, NC
Property Owner /Representative Information
Business Name: Piedmont Natural Gas
Mailing Address: 4720 Piedmont Row Drive
City, State, Zip Code: Charlotte, NC 28210
Telephone No.: (704) 731 -4598
Contact Name: Jim Kalish, Senior Project Manager
Agent Information
Business Name: Energy Land & Infrastructure, PLLC
Street Address: 1420 Donelson Pike, Suite Al2
City, State, Zip Code: Nashville, TN 37217
Telephone No.: (615) 383 -6300
Contact Name: Suzanne Herron
Authorization
E, c. 0,121111,
I, 4wa-4a4s -h of Piedmont Natural Gas hereby authorize Energy
Land & Infrastructure, PLLC to act as agent with the U S Army Corps of Engineers and the N C
Division of Water Quality pursuant to obtaining the necessary Section 10 /404/401 /Buffer
permits, as applicable, related to the above - referenced project(s)
Signature:
'Z -_ �' &L
Date: 1 --2, 1 Lf I I `{
1420 Dcneison PikE Su,ts A -:2 Nashville, T enn=_ssEE 37217 www eli -Ilc com GIS 383 63GO
ENGINEERS o SURVEYORS a INFRASTRUCTURE a ENVIRONMENTAL

DIYA%,L CORDY
AND ASS_ OC_IA_TES_IN_C
EnUlronmE ntol C01- 1SU1t0nts
24 December 2014
Suzanne Herron
1420 Donelson Pike
Suite A -12
Nashville, TN 37217
RE Piedmont Natural Gas - Line 1, Site 7 near Burnsville, NC
Dear Ms. Herron:
This letter report presents the findings of a preliminary jurisdictional wetland assessment for
the Line 1, Site 7 natural gas line corridor near Burnsville, in Anson County, North Carolina
As described in the following sections, the property contains potential wetlands and waters
that may be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act (CWA) Please note that the attached
maps show approximate boundaries of potential jurisdictional features In order to determine
the precise limits of jurisdiction, wetlands and waters should be delineated and reviewed with
the appropriate U S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) regulatory field office.
General Site Description
The site is located in Anson County, NC in a forested landscape The wetland assessment
area encompasses an approximately 100 -feet wide corridor centered along approximately
1,000 linear feet of the existing PNG gas line corridor. The corridor is situated east of Cedar
Grove Church Road, near Burnsville, NC. The portions of the site not maintained as gas line
easement consist entirely of wooded uplands, with the exception of two intermittent stream
channels that intersect near the center of the site
Methods
Prior to entering the field, soil survey maps, aerial photographs, and USGS topographic
maps were evaluated for evidence of hydric soils, wetlands, and streams at Site7 of the PNG
Line 1 project An on -site field investigation was conducted on 29 October 2014 Potential
jurisdictional wetlands and waters were evaluated in accordance with the 1987 Corps of
Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region,�(Version 2.0), and
the Corps of Engineers /EPA memorandum- Clean Water Act Jurisdiction Following the U S
Supreme Court's Decision in Rapanos v United States and Carabell v United States (dated
12/02/08) In accordance with the Corps Manuals, potential wetlands were evaluated for
indicators of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology Ditches were
evaluated for the presence of an ordinary high water mark and other indicators of sustained
flow
Results
Pre -Field Investigation
According to the Soil Cedar Survey of Anson County, soil types occurring on the property
include Goldston channery silt loam (2 to 8 percent slopes) and Goldston channery silt loam
THE MURCHWN BI.ILDIN(� • $t IFE 307 • 201 NORTH FRONI $iREEr • \%1L,IIVGIO.\ NOR IH C-ROINA 24401
910 -251 -9790 • IAh 910 -251 -9409 • F -,FAIL mfbOdiacordvcom
JOCfSCW,11_1LBLACH FtORID� • HOLI1 FOOD FLORID %- Tvtp,, FIORIDA

(25 to 45 percent slopes) (see attached soil map). Goldston channery sods are not listed as
hydnc soils by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), thus providing an
indication that wetlands are not likely to occur on the property The USGS topographic
quadrangle (Polkton, NC) depicts the western channel as a blue -line stream feature within
the boundaries of Site 7
Field Investigation
Upland hardwood forest dominates the hilly landscape of Site 7, and potential jurisdictional
wetlands were not observed on the site Although there were no wetlands present, two
streams that are likely jurisdictional do fall within the site's boundaries (see attached
Potential Wetlands and Waters Map). Two first -order intermittent streams enter and
intersect near the middle of the site One channel enters from the west and the other comes
from the north Downstream of the confluence of the two first -order channels, the stream is
second -order and continues southeast adjacent to the existing gas line corridor and off the
site to its confluence with Lanes Creek Lanes Creek flows northward to its confluence with
the Rocky River There was no water or saturated soils in stream channels on the site at the
time of inspection
Recommendations
The preliminary wetland analysis indicates that extensive waters are present within the
assessment area. Therefore, it is recommended that a formal wetland Jurisdictional
Determination be obtained from the Wilmington District Corps The process of obtaining a
wetland determination from the Corps is a multi -step process requiring the support of
environmental consultants and land surveyors. A qualified consultant will fully evaluate the
property, flag all jurisdictional wetlands and waters, and complete routine wetland
determination and Rapanos data forms Once the flags are surveyed by a registered land
surveyor, the resulting wetland survey plat and wetland data forms are submitted to the
appropriate Wilmington District regulatory field office along with a request for a wetland
jurisdictional determination The consultant will conduct an on -site meeting with the Corps
representative to review the wetland lines Once the final wetland survey plat is approved
and signed by the Corps, the plat can be used to quantify wetland impacts and determine the
level of permitting required for the project
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding the results of
this assessment. If you decide to move forward with the project, Dial Cordy and Associates
Inc. would be pleased to provide additional wetland delineation and permitting services
Sincerely,
Jeffrey T Coward
Dial Cordy and Associates Inc
Attachments
Potential Wetlands and Waters Map
Anson County Soil Survey Map
Site Photographs

Map Unit
Map Unit Name
Symbol
BaB
Badin channery, silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
BaC
Badin channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
GoB
Goldston channery� silt loam, 2 to 8 percent
slopes
GoD
Goldston channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent
slopes
GoE
Goldston channery silt loam, 25 to 45 percent
slopes
W
Water
Totals for Area of Interest
Acres in Percent of
AOI AOI
4.3 10.0%
0.1 0.2%
3.3 7.6%
4.6 10.6%
30.8 70.5%
j0.5 1.,1%
43.6 100.0%

Site 7. View to southeast, looking at existing gas line corridor from northwest end of the corridor.
SiteT View to northwest, looking at existing gas line corridor from southeast end of corridor

Site 7. View of main stream channel, looking northwest from southeastern end of gas line corridor.
Site7. View of tributary to main stream channel, looking southeast from northwest end of gas line
corridor.

Site7. View of main stream channel, looking southwest from the southern edge of the existing gas line
corridor.

50101 Governor's Drive
Suite 250
Chapel Hill, NC 27517
919 530 8446 PHONE
919 530.8525 Fax
wwwJ13Csolutions com
December 31, 2014
Ms Renee Gledhill- Earley
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -4617
Re Piedmont Natural Gas Line 1, Proposed Construction North of Polkton, Anson County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Gledhill - Earley
On behalf of Energy Land and Infrastructure, PLLC, and Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc, enclosed
for your review please find information on proposed construction activities along an unnamed tributary to
Lanes Creek north of Polkton in Anson County (Figure 1). The work at this location is subject to Corps of
Engineers regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
The proposed construction will consist of replacement of a section of pipeline at a location that is
currently subject to erosion from a tributary to Lane Creek All activity will be confined to the existing
pipeline right -of -way and an adjacent ca 35- foot -wide temporary workspace, which will extend along a
ca 300 -foot segment of the pipeline at the stream crossing (Figure 2)
Via this letter, we are requesting any comments that your office might wish to provide concerning the
potential impact of this proposed construction project on historic properties
We look forward to the results of your review Please do not hesitate to contact me at (919) 530 -8446
x222, or via email at pwebb@tresolutions com, should you have any questions or concerns regarding the
proposed construction.
Sincerely,
C::3a, 1 C� �,
Paul Webb
Principal Archaeologist, Chapel Hill
cc Suzanne Herron, Energy Land & Infrastructure, PLLC

Figure 1. Location of proposed construction activity west of Lanes Creek, PNG Line 1, Anson County, North Carolina.

�
I
1
I
I
I
1
I
I
1 I �
I f
I
I I
1
( I
I
I I
I I
I � I
i
I
II
'
I
1
I
1 I
I I
I 1
I '
I I i
1 I
I
I
'
IW '
� I
■ I I
Q I I 1
o eve I
I I
W �aa
x fx S I I
I
I II
el11111
1
II
�I
i II
I
�
1
I I
I
I
I
I I I
� I ;
I
I
1
I
�
I
1
I
I
I
1
I
I
1 I �
I f
I
I I
1
( I
I
I I
I I
I � I
i
I
II
'
I
1
I
1 I
I I
I 1
I '
I I i
1 I
I
I
'
IW '
� I
■ I I
Q I I 1
o eve I
I I
W �aa
x fx S I I
I
I II
,
I
1
I i
II
1
1
II
�I
i II
I
�
1
I I
I
I
I
I I I
� I ;
I
I
1
I
I I '1 '11 _•_ �
, ; '�I�ri , l ,
f�
II
1
I I
II I
I I
I I
\I I all t I 'il l;li 1�; Ii
•`�\, '', ' - 1' 11i; , � ; li I ifrl'I � �'�1 � ; I I
,',�,' \\,'• 'I- -''li; ll t � iJLL�Ii,if'ill i(1� ';
II
.1 'l •, ' ; ' ' , ' "i' �s I ' 11 1' fill l u l l l ; f j ; ; t ,
— - -;'ll;
I ',1 \`i'ti -` —`j1 I,'ll, 111 •
•1 111f
1I ,
,
`, ', 'III', S'1
SI,
II , ; 1,':l' •
1 ,
t
1
1 I
- 1t.
I
o
'I gj I g
I
�
I
1
I
I
I
1
I
I
1 I �
I f
I
I I
1
( I
I
I I
I I
I � I
i
I
II
'
I
1
I
1 I
I I
I 1
I '
I I i
1 I
I
I
'
IW '
� I
■ I I
Q I I 1
o eve I
I I
W �aa
x fx S I I
I
I II
,
I
1
I i
II
1
1
II
�I
i II
I
�
1
I I
I
I
I
I I I
� I ;
I
I
1
I
l
1
I I I
I I
I
'
I
I
I
�
II
1
I I
II I
I I
44 Ig
bs Sg ly
1�
_ Q
F
w4
4 a�
�
r a a ^H
w 6
Q,: C
a 4�
=r '
a zr7
Wa
Ws
y1
i
K
I r
3 '
I

n�°n.Ifid III avi
1. All property lines and comers established using existing comers
found, existing boundary evidence, and deeds and plats of
record In the Anson County Register of Deeds office.
2. Area by coordinate computation.
3. All distances are horizontal grid distances, in feet the gnd factor
for this project is 0.99986393. to compute ground coordinates for
this project, mulliply by the inverse of 0.99986393.
4. Subject to any and all easements. rightof -gray, streets and
assessments, as the same may appear of record in the Register r/
of Deeds office, Clerk of Court, town or county tax offices, or
winch may have been acquired by prescriptive use
5. This survey is intended for PNG easement acquisition
6. NC grid coordinates as shown hereon are based upon GPS
observations utilizing NCGs' network RTK system and are
referenced to the NAD 83 (NSRS 2007) datum
7. This map is not a certified survey and has not been reviewed by
a local government agency for compliance with any applicable
land development regulations..
B. A title report was not furnished to this surveyor, therefore, this
survey is subject to the findings of an accurate title examination
and report.
SITE
L
® VICINITY MAP
• "o�roacNE
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE LINE TABLE
JAMES R. AND I
DIRECTION
YVONNE0.HOOD
\
BOOK 237, PAGE 62
177.89'
PINS 6449001377478
S36' 41'65"E
100.22'
%%
`
PROPERTY LINE
♦♦
\
AS PER DEED
♦♦
(TYPICAL)
♦
N44' 22'23"W
ssr�♦
,�♦, 4 � ♦`♦♦
/
N13' 57'35"E
IRON ROD OLD
`♦♦
` ♦♦ /�. S13 °5T35 "W 28.08
SITE
L
® VICINITY MAP
• "o�roacNE
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE LINE TABLE
LINE
DIRECTION
LENGTH
T1
S44' 22'23"E
177.89'
T2
S36' 41'65"E
100.22'
T3
S52' 55' 25"W
35.00'
T4
N36' 41'55-W
98.10'
T5
N44' 22'23"W
153.96'
T6
N13' 57'35"E
41.17
`r -% -
N 492020 79
E = 1642462.19 `♦ �♦
SAID POINT OF BEGINNING
BEING S13'5735'W 28.08' ♦ , , ROBERT E.
FROM THE SOUTHEAST \
CORNER OF THE PROPERTY ♦ SIKES
CONVEYED TO JAMES R `♦ "tv BOOK 933, PAGE 100
AND YVONNE 0 HOOD OF ♦% PINS 644900241038
62 CORD IN BOOK 237, PAGE ♦♦ ♦ REFERENCED TO
♦♦ f • NC STATE PLANE
DRIP LINE
`4, TS PROPOSED NAD 83 GRID
♦ Sso
(TYPICAL) I ♦vE t ♦♦ TEMPORARY
♦ WORKSPACE
f ♦,
TRACT 2 `♦
RAEFORD DEAN LINGERFELT AND / �s ♦ ♦♦
LAURA C. LINGERFELT /�
BOOK 959, PAGE 211 y .o
PIN# 644900214874 y q- `♦
I 'C/
I, MICHAEL J. MOORE, PLS L -5088, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION ♦♦
FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MV SUPERVISION, THAT THE BOUNDARY LINES NOT ♦
SURVEYED ARE INDICATED WITH DASHED LINES AS DRAWN FROM INFORMATION DERIVED FROM ♦
THE ANSON COUNTY, NC REGISTER OF DEED'S OFFICE THAT THE RATIO OF PRECISION IS ♦♦ .�3
GREATER THAN 110,000, THAT THIS PLAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARDS OF ♦ EXISTING GAS LINE
PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYING IN NORTH CAROLINA (21 NCAC 56 1600), `♦♦ ♦♦ (TYPICAL)
THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSE OF EASEMENT ACQUISITION ONLY AND IS ♦, \`
NOT INTENDED TO BE A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON IT IS THE
INTENT OF THIS PLAT THE EASEMENT SHALL CROSS THE ENTIRE PARCEL,
THAT THE CONTROL AND TIES TO THIS SURVEY WERE PERFORMED USING GPS METHODS THAT GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET
THIS SURVEY IS OF ANOTHER CATEGORY, SUCH AS THE RECOMBINATION OF EXISTING PARCELS, )
A COURT - ORDERED SURVEY, OR OTHER EXCEPTION TO THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISION. 80 0 30 W 120
MICHAEL J. MOORE, PLS DATE GRANTOR'S INITIALS 1 inch = 60 ft.
LEGEND EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO., INC.
PROPERTY LINE ROBERT E. SIKES
EXISTING MONUMENT FOUND 0 1664 Cedar Grove Church Road
PROPOSED PERMANENT LINE 1 LOCATION 1 -032 - SITE 7
EASEMENT PROJECT # 2239873 DATE: 12/09/2014
PROPOSED TEMPORARY EXISTING PERMANENT
WORKSPACE EASEMENT ' 1 ANSON - SIKES - TRACT 1
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION
S0. FT.
ACREAGE
Temporary Workspace
9.278
0213
rd 2 i
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE. PLLC
14RO OONELSON PIKE. SUITE Al2 • NASHVILLE. TN 37217
OFFICE 615 -383 -6300 • WWW.ELI- ILC.COM- LICENSE 0 P -1289
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL

NOTES
LINE
1. All property lines and comers established using existing comers
LENGTH
found, existing boundary evidence deeds and plats of
S13" 57' 35 "W
record in the Anson County Register of Deeds office.
T2
2. Area by coordinate computation.
53.18'
3. All distances are horizontal grid distances, in feet the grid factor
N45* IV 23 "E
for this project is 0.99986393. to compute ground Coordinates for
F
this project . multiply by the inverse of 0 99986393.
31.79'
4. Subject to any and all easements, right -of -way, streets and
1,
BEING S13 28.08'
assessments, as the same may appear of record in the Register
\
de
of Deeds office, Clerk of Court, town or county tax offices. or
FOR LAND SURVEYING IN NORTH CAROLINA (21 NCAC 58.1800);
\
which may have been acquired by prescriptive use
CORNER OF THE PROPERTY
5 This survey is intended for PNG easement acquisition.
•
6 NC grid coordinates as shown hereon are based upon GPS
SITE
observations utilizing NCGs' network RTK system and are
\
referenced to the NAD 83 (NSRS 2007) datum
AND YVONNE O. HOOD OF
7 This map is not a certified survey and has not been reviewed by
a local government agency for compliance with any applicable
RECORD IN BOOK 237, PAGE
land development regulations..
islb
VICINITY MAP
8. A title report was not furnished to this surveyor, therefore, this
/
survey is subject to the findings of an accurate title examination
N
TEMPORARY
and report.
LINE 1 LOCATION 1 -032 - SITE 7
WORKSPACE
e
JAMES R. AND
YVONNE 0. HOOD I
BOOK 237, PAGE 62
PIN# 6449001377478 f
I
REFERENCED TO /
NC STATE PLANE PROPERTY LINE
NAD 83 GRID \ v AS PER DEED
\ \ • (TYPICAL) 1
•
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE LINE TABLE
LINE
DIRECTION
LENGTH
Ti
S13" 57' 35 "W
41.12'
T2
N44" 22' 2Y W
53.18'
T3
N45* IV 23 "E
35.00'
T4
S44' 22' 23 "E
31.79'
f \ ,% \ \
DESCRIPTION
SQ. FT.
ACREAGE
Temporary Workspace
I 1,467
\ 1�� 150,,x+ \
\ • IRON ROD OLD
P.O.B.
N = 492820.79
\
\
\
E - 1642482.19
\
\
\ �•
\
SAID POINT OF BEGINNING
°5T35 "W
I. MICHAEL J MOORE, PLS L-50810, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION
A
FROM AN ACTUL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION, THAT THE BOUNDARY LINES NOT
\
\
BEING S13 28.08'
THE ANSON COUNTY, NC REGISTER OF DEED'S OFFICE. THAT THE RATIO OF PRECISION IS
\
GREATER THAN 1:10,000; THAT THIS PLAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARDS OF
PRACTICE
FROM THE SOUTHEAST
FOR LAND SURVEYING IN NORTH CAROLINA (21 NCAC 58.1800);
\
THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSE OF EASEMENT ACQUISITION ONLY AND IS
CORNER OF THE PROPERTY
NOT INTENDED TO BE A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON IT IS THE
\
INTENT OF THIS PLAT THE EASEMENT SHALL CROSS THE ENTIRE PARCEL.
CONVEYED TO JAMES R.
THAT THE CONTROL AND TIES TO THIS SURVEY WERE PERFORMED USING GPS METHODS THAT
\
\
AND YVONNE O. HOOD OF
A COURT - ORDERED SURVEY, OR OTHER EXCEPTION TO THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISION.
r� \
RECORD IN BOOK 237, PAGE
MICHAEL J. MOORE, PLS DATE GRANTOR'S INITIALS
PROPOSED
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO., INC.
62
RAEFORD DEAN LINGERFELT and wife, LAURA C. LINGERFELT
TEMPORARY
\ \
LINE 1 LOCATION 1 -032 - SITE 7
WORKSPACE
\ \
EASEMENT
PROJECT # 2239873 1 DATE: 12/09/2014
PROPOSED TEMPORARY EXISTING PERMANENT r
WORKSPACE EASEMENT
`�
TRACT 1
r/av " NIMUM ral am
f
ROBERT E.
RAEFORD D FELT AND
l\ \ (�1q�
\rtr
SIKES
\ BOOK 933, PAGE 100
LAURA C. LINGERFELT
BOOK 959, PAGE 211
\ A \ \ `l
\
PIN# 644900241038
\
PIN* 6449002 874
�� V, \
f \ ,% \ \
DESCRIPTION
SQ. FT.
ACREAGE
Temporary Workspace
I 1,467
0.034
f DRIP LINE
EXISTING GAS LINE
\ �` \
(TYPICAL) f
(TYPICAL)
I\
\
I. MICHAEL J MOORE, PLS L-50810, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION
A
FROM AN ACTUL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION, THAT THE BOUNDARY LINES NOT
SURVEYED ARE INDICATED WITH DASHED LINES AS DRAWN FROM INFORMATION DERIVED FROM
THE ANSON COUNTY, NC REGISTER OF DEED'S OFFICE. THAT THE RATIO OF PRECISION IS
\ /
\
GREATER THAN 1:10,000; THAT THIS PLAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARDS OF
PRACTICE
\ \
FOR LAND SURVEYING IN NORTH CAROLINA (21 NCAC 58.1800);
THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSE OF EASEMENT ACQUISITION ONLY AND IS
NOT INTENDED TO BE A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON IT IS THE
INTENT OF THIS PLAT THE EASEMENT SHALL CROSS THE ENTIRE PARCEL.
THAT THE CONTROL AND TIES TO THIS SURVEY WERE PERFORMED USING GPS METHODS THAT
GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)
THIS SURVEY IS OF ANOTHER CATEGORY, SUCH AS THE RECOMBINATION OF EXISTING PARCELS,
80 0 50 120
A COURT - ORDERED SURVEY, OR OTHER EXCEPTION TO THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISION.
1 inch= 60 ft.
MICHAEL J. MOORE, PLS DATE GRANTOR'S INITIALS
LEGEND
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO., INC.
PROPERTY LINE — — — — — — — — — —
RAEFORD DEAN LINGERFELT and wife, LAURA C. LINGERFELT
EXISTING MONUMENT FOUND O
Cedar Crave Church Road
LINE 1 LOCATION 1 -032 - SITE 7
PROPOSED PERMANENT
EASEMENT
PROJECT # 2239873 1 DATE: 12/09/2014
PROPOSED TEMPORARY EXISTING PERMANENT r
WORKSPACE EASEMENT
ANSON - LINGERFELT - TRACT 2
r/av " NIMUM ral am
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION
SQ. FT.
ACREAGE
Temporary Workspace
I 1,467
0.034
PREPARED BI
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE, PLLC
1420 DONELSON PIKE. SUITE Al2 • NASHVILLE. TN 37217
OFFICE 615 -383 -6300 WWW.ELI- LLC.COM•LICENSE X P -1289
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL

Streamflow Statistics Report
Streamstats Ungaged Site Report
Date: Thu ]an 15 2015 13:11:09 Mountain Standard Time
Site Location: North-Carolina
NAD27 Latitude: 35.0978 (35 05 52)
NAD27 Longitude: - 80.1958 ( -80 11 45)
NAD83 Latitude: 35.0979 (35 05 53)
NAD83 Longitude: - 80.1956 ( -80 11 44)
Drainage Area: 0.13 mil
Percent Urban: 6.5
Percent Impervious: 0.5
Peak Flows Region Grid Basin Characteristics
00% Peak Southeast US 2009 5158 0.13 mil
Parameter
Value
ression Equation Valid Ran
Min Max
Drainage Area (square miles)
0.13 (below min value 11) 900
Percent Area in Region 1 (percent)
1 100.000 10
Percent Area in Region 2 (percent)
1 0.000 10
Percent Area in Regio-W 3 (percent)
0.0001 10
Percent Area in Region 4 (percent)
0.000 10
Percent Area in Region 5 (percent)
o . onol E 10
Page 1 of
Warning: Some parameters are outside the suggested range. Estimates will be extrapolations with unknown errors.
rban Flows R ion Grid Basin Characteristics
100% Peak urban Blue Ridge-Piedmont FS007 -00 0.13 mil
Parameter
Value
11 Regression Equation Valid Ran
Min Max
Drainage Area (square miles) 0.13
41
Area of Impervious Surfaces (percent) 1 0.50 (below min
Warning: Some parameters are outside the suggested range. Estimates will be extrapolations with unknown errors.
Peak Flows Region Grid Streamflow Statistics
tatisti
Flow (ft' /s
rediction Error (percent
Equivalent
years of
record
0- Percent Prediction Interva
Minimum Maximum
PK2
PK5
PK10
PK25
PK50
PK100 231 ���
PK200 268 ���
PK500 326 ���
http: // streamstatsags. cr. usgs. gov /gisimg/ Reports /FlowStatsReport2977500 201511513119... 1/15/2015

USGS StreamStats
StreamStats Print Page
PNG Line 1, Site 7
i
1/15/2015 1:22:52 PM
Explanation
GlobalWatershedPoint ► Gaging Station. Continuous Record
SIp1085Point
Low Flow, Partial Record
• NCDOT Points
Peak Flow. Partial Record
. LocalGages
Peak and Low Flow, Partial Record
LocaINHD2
• Stage Only
— LongestFlowpath3D
• Low Flow. Partial Record, Stage
Stream Grid
❑ GlobalWatershed
Miscellaneous Record
C I Pilot Study Area
A Unknown
❑ hucpoly
Page I of 1
U.S. Department of the Interior I U.S. Geological Survey "e� gv dIP��
URL:
Page Contact Information: streamstals rr us[ts.l:ov
http:// streamstatsags. cr. usgs. gov/ nc _ss /defauIt.aspx ?stabbr= nc &dt= 1421352083942 1/15/2015

Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Thursday, Jan 22 2015
PNG Line 1 Class Location Replacements - Site 7 Pipe Replacement
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 301.00
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
= 56.00
Qmin (cfs)
= 42.20
Slope ( %)
= 3.57
Qmax (cfs)
= 326.00
Invert Elev Up (ft)
= 303.00
Tailwater Elev (ft)
= Crown
Rise (in)
= 43.0
Shape
= Elliptical
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 53.0
Qtotal (cfs)
= 63.20
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
= 63.20
n -Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
= 0.00
Culvert Type
= Horizontal Ellipse Concrete
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
= 5.08
Culvert Entrance
= Square edge w /headwall (H)
Veloc Up (ft/s)
= 9.78
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.01, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5
HGL Dn (ft)
= 304.58
HGL Up (ft)
= 304.86
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
= 306.54
Top Elevation (ft)
= 306.60
Hw /D (ft)
= 0.99
Top Width (ft)
= 50.00
Flow Regime
= Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft)
= 100.00
X7 cc
X6 CU
X6&0
YA 00
XS M
xa oc
X11
xo X.
PMG Line t Coss LocWm tteptecemeats - S,+e 7 Pipe Replacement
*W Dep1h it;
400
].00
2.00
I 00
000
-IM
-zoo
-s 00
RMCh ie;
Buooni C'A-1 HGL E~k

Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Thursday, Jan 22 2015
PNG Line 1 Class Location Replacements - Site 7 Plpe Replacement
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 301.00
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
= 56.00
Qmin (cfs)
= 42.20
Slope ( %)
= 3.57
Qmax (cfs)
= 326.00
Invert Elev Up (ft)
= 303.00
Tailwater Elev (ft)
= Crown
Rise (in)
= 43.0
Shape
= Elliptical
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 53.0
Qtotal (cfs)
= 42.20
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
= 42.20
n -Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
= 0.00
Culvert Type
= Horizontal Ellipse Concrete
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
= 3.40
Culvert Entrance
= Square edge w /headwall (H)
Veloc Up (ft/s)
= 7.07
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.01, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5
HGL Dn (ft)
= 304.58
HGL Up (ft)
= 304.72
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
= 305.67
Top Elevation (ft)
= 306.60
Hw /D (ft)
= 0.74
Top Width (ft)
= 50.00
Flow Regime
= Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft)
= 100.00
X.! X
]ce M.
105 X
x+ u
X,. u,
102 CO
X1.00
X0 00
PNG Line 1 Class Loca6nn ihplaeeanft - Si* 1 Pipe Pepawanwo
e4 0wca —t HGL E bs k
.x
z
2 OD
1x
000
-fro
-zoo
- ;00
R.1h IR)

a
m
0
s
0
N
N
N
REVISION
REV I DATE DESCRIPTION
PREPARED BY:
MA'
MK NO I QTY
Know below.
Call bdore you dig.
a
ENERGY LAND INFRASTRUCTURE
® 1420 DONELSON PIKE, SUITE Ail • NASHVILLE, TN 37217
615 - 383 -6300 O WWW.ELI- I.LC.COM • LICENSE # P -1289
ENGINEERS 6 SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL
0 2)94 ENERGY LAND S INFRASTRUCTURE, LLC, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
SCALE: DESGNED BY:
AS SHOWN SWH
\ ISSUE DATE: DRR'-WN BY:
JAN 21, 2014 CAJ
ELI PROJECT NO: CHECKED BY:
_- 14 -21 -3007 SWH
CLIENT:
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
i CLIENT PROJECT NO:
PNG 2014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
ANSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE 7 - CEDAR GROVE ROAD
OVERALL SITE LAYOUT
REVISION: -- -- I DRAWING NO: 3007-07-024

a
s
\ r
♦ e
♦ ♦, ♦ee ` r
r
ee o®
e ♦ 1
1 /
Doe's ♦ ® ® ®e
1 ,
s A i r�
♦ ®a
SILT FENCE (TYP.)
(SEE EPSC DETAILS SHEET) ♦'e °�
♦® o PROPOSED
` ® ®`� boo x / / °.y t \ \ \\ �\ ® °® CONTOUR
° // / r ee t \ \\ \ \ LINES
®®
FLOW / 6 ♦i
ARROW `,: \ .\ �'�• / \\ \ ®`... 1 \ `�. \`\ \ / /
7.*kTm��
II MK NO I QTY
m
REVISION
o ,
\
r
Z \
EXISTING
\ \ \\ �\ \ �� °e\ �. ^\ ��� CONTOUR
..� � �� \ � ♦ / � \ \ LINES
\ \\ \ t \
\ r \ \ \\
r
e
\\ \ \ \ \ \
\ \ \ \\ \ \ \
e
1
1 \
a
\
t
\ \ t
\
\ \
% \
\ \
y
1
r \
,
\ e
\ l ,
\ o\ \ \ \ \ \
\ \ e
\ \ o \ .
\ \ \\ .\ \.
1
\
\
\\
\
\ \
\ 1
0
\
Know vmars below.
Call before you dig.
' 1 \
SCALE:
AS SHOWN
ISSUE DATE:
JAN 21, 2014
ELI PROJECT NO:
14 -21 -3007
CLIENT:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL INSTALL A NEW GAS LINE CROSSING MILTON RD
FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS. THE DISTURBED AREA IS APPROXIMATELY 0.75
ACRES.
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
THE SITE IS COMPRISED OF GRASSED RESIDENTIAL; EXISTING UTILITY
EASEMENTS; AND EXISTING ROAD R.O.W.
SCHEDULE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE PIPELINE IS SCHEDULED TO BEGIN AUGUST 2014 AND
BE COMPLETE BY NOVEMBER 2014.
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NARRATIVE
THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES FOR THIS PROJECT
INVOLVE THE STRATEGIC PLACEMENT OF A VARIETY OF DEVICES INCLUDING:
• SILT FENCE
• TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT
MOST OF THESE DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CLEARING AND
GRADING. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE
PROPERLY MAINTAINED DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION UNTIL
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE CEASED AND ALL DISTURBED AREA HAVE
BEEN STABILIZED. ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES
MAY BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION. ALL TEMPORARY CONTROL
DEVICES SHALL BE REMOVED ONCE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND THE
SITE IS STABILIZED. DUST CONTROL ON SITE SHALL BE KEPT WITHIN
ACCEPTABLE LIMITS BY SPRINKLING WITH WATER OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE
METHODS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL OF
SEDIMENT ON SITE. IF THE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
MEASURES PROVE INSUFFICIENT, THE CONTRACTOR MUST TAKE THOSE
ADDITIONAL STEPS NECESSARY TO STOP SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING THE SITE.
THE PIEDMONT SITE REPRESENTATIVE MAY ADJUST EPSC PLANS BASED ON
SITE CONDITIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES.
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
1. OBTAIN PLAN APPROVAL AND PERMITS.
2. HOLD PRE - CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE.
3. FLAG CONSTRUCTION LIMITS.
4. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
5. BEGIN CLEARING.
6. REPLACE OR INSTALL REMAINING EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
7. BEGIN INSTALLING PIPE.
8. COMPLETED AREA SHOULD BE SEEDED WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER PIPE HAS
BEEN INSTALLED AND FINAL GRADING OR AS SOON AS PRACTICAL. ALL
DISTURBED AREA SHALL BE SEEDED WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER WORK HAS
CEASED.
9. ALL DISTURBED AREA SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH SEED AND STRAW,
HYDROSEEDING, OR SOD.
10. REMOVE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS FOLLOWING FINAL INSPECTION
AND SIGNOFF FROM LOCAL STORMWATER OR ENGINEERING
REPRESENTATIVE.
11. PROVIDE PERMANENT VEGETATION.
EROSION CONTROL DEVICE NOTES
1. ALL STREAM AND /OR WETLAND CROSSING LOCATIONS NOTED ON THE PLANS
ARE APPROXIMATE.
2. SEDIMENT TRAPS SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 20 FEET OUTSIDE
STREAMS AND WETLANDS.
3. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED DOWN - GRADIENT OF THE CONSTRUCTION
AREA AS NOTED ON THE PLANS AND AS SHOWN IN THE DETAILS.
4. ANY FAILURE OF ANY EROSION CONTROL DEVICE TO FUNCTION AS INTENDED
FOR ANY REASON SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY.
5. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY
AFTER GROUND DISTURBANCE OCCURS. THE LOCATION OF SOME OF THE
EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MAY HAVE TO BE ALTERED FROM THAT SHOWN
ON THE PLANS IF DRAINAGE PATTERNS DURING CONSTRUCTION
ARE '
DIFFERENT FROM THE FINAL 'PROPOSED 'DRAINAGE PATTERNS. IT IS THE
CONTRACTOR S RESPONSIBILITY S ONSIBILITY TO ACCOMPLISH EROSION CONTROL FOR
ALL DRAINAGE PATTERNS CREATED AT VARIOUS STAGES DURING
CONSTRUCTION.
6. BUFFER DISTURBANCES AS NOTED ON THE PLANS SHALL BE SEEDED AT A
RATE OF 20 GALLONS PER 100 L.F. OF BUFFER DISTURBANCE USING THE
FOLLOWING MIX: KENTUCKY 31 FESCUE (55D/ %), ENGLISH RYE (20%), KOREAN
LESPEDEZA (15%), GERMAN MILLET (10 %).
7. HYDROSEEDING OR CURLEX (OR APPROVED EQUAL) IS REQUIRED FOR FINAL
STABILIZATION ON STEEP SLOPES.
MAINTENANCE
1. ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL DEVICES INCLUDING PLANTED AREAS
SHALL BE INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK AND WITHIN 24 HOURS
AFTER ANY STORM EVENT GREATER THAN A HALF INCH(DURING A 24 HOUR
PERIOD). DAMAGED OR INEFFECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE REPAIRED OR
REPLACED AS NECESSARY BY THE END OF THE DAY.
2. CLEAN SILT BARRIERS WHEN THEY ARE APPROXIMATELY 50% OBSTRUCTED
BY SEDIMENT OR AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.
GENERAL NOTES
1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION AND
MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES.
2. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOULD BE LOCATED AND MARKED IN THE
FIELD PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION.
3. DISTURBED AREA SHALL
S E BE STABILIZED AS SOON AS PRACTICALLY POSSIBLE
C OSS BLE
FOR PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN
COMPLETED. THESE AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED NO LATER THAN 14 DAYS
AFTER CONSTRUCTION HAS CEASED.
4. FILL, COVER, AND TEMPORARY STABILIZATION AT THE END OF EACH DAY IS
RECOMMENDED WHERE PRACTICAL, IT IS IMPORTANT TO CLOSE AND
STABILIZE OPEN TRENCHES ON STEEP SLOPES AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL REGULARLY
SWEEP SITE TO AVOID TRANSPORTING
SILT OR SEDIMENT FROM SITE.
6. STREAM AND WETLANDS, IF PRESENT, SHALL BE RETURNED TO ORIGINAL
GRADE UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.
7. SILT FENCE SHALL REMAIN OR BE INSTALLED ALONG STREAMS FOLLOWING
PIPELINE INSTALLATION AND FINAL GRADING UNTIL THE AREA IS STABILIZED.
8. ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROTECT AREA STREAM
AND /OR WETLANDS IF PRESENT.
9 THESE PLANS ARE FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PURPOSES ONLY
AND DO NOT APPLY TO CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES.
10. IF A FRACTURE IS OBSERVED DURING THE BORING OF A STREAM CROSSING,
WORK MUST BE IMMEDIATELY
S HALTED AND ALL T
LOS LUBRIC _ MUST
BE REMOVED FROM THE STREAM. THE FRACTURE HOLE WILL V7 FP
f
y,
I�
AND THE SITE WILL BE EVALUATED BEFORE CONTINUATION O INS. .;e r, I
11. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARA OF 24" ` <r?
BETWEEN THE PIPELINE AN D A
ry • .
LL EXISTING AND PROPOSED Ul "ILI 1i4g.N
q �
STANDARDS �,"w
ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS SHALL BE IN ACCORDA - � _
NPDES STORMWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND
THE NORTH CAROLINA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND
DESIGN MANUAL.
DESB-NED BY:
SWH
DRNOiN BY:
CAJ
CHECKED BY:
SWH
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
CLIENT PROJECT NO:
PNG 2014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
ANSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE 7 - CEDAR GROVE ROAD
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
BID SET
REVISION: ---- I DRAWING NO: 3007 -07 -027
PREPARED BY:
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE
It
j , G 4 a
p i, ts d ml ftl ml 0% n
1420 DONELSON PIKE, SUITE Al2 • NASHVILLE, TN 37217
615- 383 -6300 W.ELI- LLC.COM • LICENSE # P -1289
WI
zr
G
ok mato mm00%l G*%ek
11 Ul
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL
CA 00
f
080141 ENERGY LAND S INFRASTRUCTURE . U.CALL RIGHTS RESERVED
' 1 \
SCALE:
AS SHOWN
ISSUE DATE:
JAN 21, 2014
ELI PROJECT NO:
14 -21 -3007
CLIENT:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL INSTALL A NEW GAS LINE CROSSING MILTON RD
FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS. THE DISTURBED AREA IS APPROXIMATELY 0.75
ACRES.
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
THE SITE IS COMPRISED OF GRASSED RESIDENTIAL; EXISTING UTILITY
EASEMENTS; AND EXISTING ROAD R.O.W.
SCHEDULE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE PIPELINE IS SCHEDULED TO BEGIN AUGUST 2014 AND
BE COMPLETE BY NOVEMBER 2014.
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NARRATIVE
THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES FOR THIS PROJECT
INVOLVE THE STRATEGIC PLACEMENT OF A VARIETY OF DEVICES INCLUDING:
• SILT FENCE
• TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT
MOST OF THESE DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CLEARING AND
GRADING. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE
PROPERLY MAINTAINED DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION UNTIL
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE CEASED AND ALL DISTURBED AREA HAVE
BEEN STABILIZED. ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES
MAY BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION. ALL TEMPORARY CONTROL
DEVICES SHALL BE REMOVED ONCE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND THE
SITE IS STABILIZED. DUST CONTROL ON SITE SHALL BE KEPT WITHIN
ACCEPTABLE LIMITS BY SPRINKLING WITH WATER OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE
METHODS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL OF
SEDIMENT ON SITE. IF THE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
MEASURES PROVE INSUFFICIENT, THE CONTRACTOR MUST TAKE THOSE
ADDITIONAL STEPS NECESSARY TO STOP SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING THE SITE.
THE PIEDMONT SITE REPRESENTATIVE MAY ADJUST EPSC PLANS BASED ON
SITE CONDITIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES.
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
1. OBTAIN PLAN APPROVAL AND PERMITS.
2. HOLD PRE - CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE.
3. FLAG CONSTRUCTION LIMITS.
4. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
5. BEGIN CLEARING.
6. REPLACE OR INSTALL REMAINING EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
7. BEGIN INSTALLING PIPE.
8. COMPLETED AREA SHOULD BE SEEDED WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER PIPE HAS
BEEN INSTALLED AND FINAL GRADING OR AS SOON AS PRACTICAL. ALL
DISTURBED AREA SHALL BE SEEDED WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER WORK HAS
CEASED.
9. ALL DISTURBED AREA SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH SEED AND STRAW,
HYDROSEEDING, OR SOD.
10. REMOVE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS FOLLOWING FINAL INSPECTION
AND SIGNOFF FROM LOCAL STORMWATER OR ENGINEERING
REPRESENTATIVE.
11. PROVIDE PERMANENT VEGETATION.
EROSION CONTROL DEVICE NOTES
1. ALL STREAM AND /OR WETLAND CROSSING LOCATIONS NOTED ON THE PLANS
ARE APPROXIMATE.
2. SEDIMENT TRAPS SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 20 FEET OUTSIDE
STREAMS AND WETLANDS.
3. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED DOWN - GRADIENT OF THE CONSTRUCTION
AREA AS NOTED ON THE PLANS AND AS SHOWN IN THE DETAILS.
4. ANY FAILURE OF ANY EROSION CONTROL DEVICE TO FUNCTION AS INTENDED
FOR ANY REASON SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY.
5. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY
AFTER GROUND DISTURBANCE OCCURS. THE LOCATION OF SOME OF THE
EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MAY HAVE TO BE ALTERED FROM THAT SHOWN
ON THE PLANS IF DRAINAGE PATTERNS DURING CONSTRUCTION
ARE '
DIFFERENT FROM THE FINAL 'PROPOSED 'DRAINAGE PATTERNS. IT IS THE
CONTRACTOR S RESPONSIBILITY S ONSIBILITY TO ACCOMPLISH EROSION CONTROL FOR
ALL DRAINAGE PATTERNS CREATED AT VARIOUS STAGES DURING
CONSTRUCTION.
6. BUFFER DISTURBANCES AS NOTED ON THE PLANS SHALL BE SEEDED AT A
RATE OF 20 GALLONS PER 100 L.F. OF BUFFER DISTURBANCE USING THE
FOLLOWING MIX: KENTUCKY 31 FESCUE (55D/ %), ENGLISH RYE (20%), KOREAN
LESPEDEZA (15%), GERMAN MILLET (10 %).
7. HYDROSEEDING OR CURLEX (OR APPROVED EQUAL) IS REQUIRED FOR FINAL
STABILIZATION ON STEEP SLOPES.
MAINTENANCE
1. ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL DEVICES INCLUDING PLANTED AREAS
SHALL BE INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK AND WITHIN 24 HOURS
AFTER ANY STORM EVENT GREATER THAN A HALF INCH(DURING A 24 HOUR
PERIOD). DAMAGED OR INEFFECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE REPAIRED OR
REPLACED AS NECESSARY BY THE END OF THE DAY.
2. CLEAN SILT BARRIERS WHEN THEY ARE APPROXIMATELY 50% OBSTRUCTED
BY SEDIMENT OR AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.
GENERAL NOTES
1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION AND
MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES.
2. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOULD BE LOCATED AND MARKED IN THE
FIELD PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION.
3. DISTURBED AREA SHALL
S E BE STABILIZED AS SOON AS PRACTICALLY POSSIBLE
C OSS BLE
FOR PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN
COMPLETED. THESE AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED NO LATER THAN 14 DAYS
AFTER CONSTRUCTION HAS CEASED.
4. FILL, COVER, AND TEMPORARY STABILIZATION AT THE END OF EACH DAY IS
RECOMMENDED WHERE PRACTICAL, IT IS IMPORTANT TO CLOSE AND
STABILIZE OPEN TRENCHES ON STEEP SLOPES AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL REGULARLY
SWEEP SITE TO AVOID TRANSPORTING
SILT OR SEDIMENT FROM SITE.
6. STREAM AND WETLANDS, IF PRESENT, SHALL BE RETURNED TO ORIGINAL
GRADE UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.
7. SILT FENCE SHALL REMAIN OR BE INSTALLED ALONG STREAMS FOLLOWING
PIPELINE INSTALLATION AND FINAL GRADING UNTIL THE AREA IS STABILIZED.
8. ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROTECT AREA STREAM
AND /OR WETLANDS IF PRESENT.
9 THESE PLANS ARE FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PURPOSES ONLY
AND DO NOT APPLY TO CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES.
10. IF A FRACTURE IS OBSERVED DURING THE BORING OF A STREAM CROSSING,
WORK MUST BE IMMEDIATELY
S HALTED AND ALL T
LOS LUBRIC _ MUST
BE REMOVED FROM THE STREAM. THE FRACTURE HOLE WILL V7 FP
f
y,
I�
AND THE SITE WILL BE EVALUATED BEFORE CONTINUATION O INS. .;e r, I
11. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARA OF 24" ` <r?
BETWEEN THE PIPELINE AN D A
ry • .
LL EXISTING AND PROPOSED Ul "ILI 1i4g.N
q �
STANDARDS �,"w
ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS SHALL BE IN ACCORDA - � _
NPDES STORMWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND
THE NORTH CAROLINA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND
DESIGN MANUAL.
DESB-NED BY:
SWH
DRNOiN BY:
CAJ
CHECKED BY:
SWH
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
CLIENT PROJECT NO:
PNG 2014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
ANSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE 7 - CEDAR GROVE ROAD
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
BID SET
REVISION: ---- I DRAWING NO: 3007 -07 -027