NC0032875_Permit Issuance_19990702

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
July 2, 1999
Mr. T.J. Rich
Philips Pipe Line Company
370 Adams Building
Bartlesville, Oklahoma 74004
AtWA
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit NC0032875
Selma Terminal
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Rich:
In accordance with the application for a discharge permit received on October 21, 1997, the Division is
forwarding herewith the subject NPDES permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency dated December 6, 1983.
There are several changes to the permit that are the result of either the oil terminal permitting guidance
or the Neuse River Basin Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) Management Strategy which are both explained in the
following paragraphs. Please refer to the Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements page of the permit as
you read the following explanations.
Oil Terminal Permitting Guidance
In 1996, DWQ developed standard permitting guidance and requirements for all ter
minals in North
Carolina. As oil terminal permits are submitted to the Division for renewal, the requirements are implemented.
EPA Methods 624/625 series is one of the standard requirements. The series is a comprehensive list of over 100
compounds. This requirement allows DWQ to identify which of the compounds identified by 624/625 are
discharged by the terminals. EPA Methods 624/625 contains a greater number of compounds than the organics
list in your previous permit.
Xylene is not included in the 624/625 series and individual monitoring is required for this compound.
Benzene is included in the 624/625 series, but is a carcinogen and is expected to be present in oil terminal
discharges; monthly monitoring is required for this parameter. Review of data from several oil terminals across
North Carolina indicated that oil and grease is generally not a problem in oil terminal discharges. Thus, oil and
grease monitoring (but no limit) is required in the majority of oil terminal permits. This permit is consistent with
Division policy.
Phenol and chlorinated phenols are separate and distinct and should not be grouped in the same
category when determining discharge limits (as has been inadvertently done in the past). Phenol is a common
component of petroleum compounds stored in terminals, can result in tainting of fish tissue, and can cause taste
and odor (organoleptic) problems in drinking water. There is no water quality standard for phenol, although
phenol discharged from terminals can combine with chlorine in water treatment facilities to form chlorinated
phenols for which there is a state water quality standard of 1.0 µg/l.
Minimizing the discharge of phenol into water supply classified waters could reduce chlorinated phenol
formation and their concentration in drinking water. As a result of the possible occurrence of phenol in oil
terminal facility discharges and the possibility of chlorinated phenol formation, phenol is monitored (but not
limited) on a monthly basis at those terminals that discharge to water supply classified waters.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper

There is limited toxicity data for chlorinated phenols, and the 1.0 µg/1 standard protects water supplies
from taste and odor problems. Chlorinated phenols are not expected to be discharged from oil terminals and
would not a problem with oil terminal discharges into non -water supply classified waters. Monitoring for certain
chlorinated phenols will occur under EPA 624/625 for all oil terminal discharges. If one or more chlorinated
phenols are detected at concentrations greater than 50 µg/l, additional monitoring will be required of those
terminals that discharge to water supply classified waters.
Lead monitoring has been eliminated. When developing the oil terminal permitting guidance, lead was
not believed to be a parameter of concern because leaded petroleum products have likely not been stored in the
terminals for several years. Any residual lead would have been washed from the tank during the tank cleaning
which occurs every five years.
Neuse River Basin NWS Management Strategy
Implementation of the Neuse River Basin NSW Management Strategy requires Total Nitrogen and Total
Phosphorus monitoring for all individually permitted facilities that discharge to surface waters in the Neuse River
Basin. A special condition has also been added to the permit that explains some of the calculations associated
with the new nutrient monitoring requirements.
Response to Specific Comments
In an April 30, 1998, Mr. D.C. Gill raised four concerns that are addressed as follows:
• Comment # 1: The Division has not changed the Supplement to Permit Cover Sheet as indicated because the
existing wording does not imply that treatment of stormwater is needed to comply with the permit.
• Comment #2: The Division concurs and item #2 on the Supplement to Permit Cover Sheet has been
eliminated from the permit.
• Comments #3 and #4: The Division agrees that nitrogen and phosphorus are not expected to be discharged
from the terminal. To confirm this hypothesis and to be consistent with all other facilities that discharge in
the Neuse River Basin, monitoring for these two nutrients will be required. Thus, the permit will not be
changed as was requested.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days
following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B
of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer
27447, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7447. Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and
binding.
Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division
may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal
requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required
by the Division of Land Resources or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Charles Weaver at telephone number
[phone], extension 511.
Sincerely,
Original Signed By
David A. Goodrich
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Central Files
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Mr. Roosevelt Childress, EPA
NPDES Unit
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Aquatic Toxicology

Permit NC0032875
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards
and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management
Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Phillips Pipe Line Company
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
Selma Terminal
NCSR 1003 Q NCSR 1929
northwest of Selma
Johnston County
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Mill Creek in the Neuse
River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other
conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective August 1, 1999.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on March 31, 2003.
Signed this day July 2, 1999.
Original Signed By
David A. Goodrich
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
Phillips Pipe Line Company
is hereby authorized to:
Permit No. NC0032875
1. Continue to operate treatment facilities consisting of an oil/water separator, product tank, and
earthen diked containment area (with gate valves at outfalls 001 and 002) located at Selma
Terminal, on Highway 1003 and 1929, Selma, Johnston County (See Part III of this permit),
and
2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into an
unnamed tributary to Mill Creek which is classified WS-IV NSW waters in the Neuse River
Basin.

rommiRa
ROAD CLASSIFICATION
PRIMARY HIGHWAY
HARD SURFACE
SECONDARY HIGHWAY
HARD SURFACE i=1.0
LIGHT -DUTY ROAD, HARD OR
IMPROVED SURFACE
UNIMPROVED ROAD
001 -Latitude35°33'06ongitude
002-Latitude 35°33'06" Longitude
Map # E25SE Sub -basin 30402
Stream Class WS-IV NSW
78°1 8'00"
78°17'58"
Discharge Class 37 39 73
Receiving Stream UT to Mill Creek
Design Q No Limit
Permit expires 03/31/03
SCALE 1:24 000
1 MILE
7000 FEET
1
F----1
0
1 KILOMETER
CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
Philips Pipeline Company
Selma Terminal
NC0032875
Johnston County

A(1). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Permit No. NC0032875
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge
stormwater from outfall(s) serial numbers 001 and 002. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average
Weekly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Frequency _
Sample
Type
,
Sample
Location 1
Flows
Monthly
'
Effluent _
Total Suspended Solids
45.0 mg/I
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Oil and Grease `
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Phenol
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Benzene
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 + TKN) 3
NL (mg/I)
NL (Ib/mo)
NL (Ib/yr)
Monthly
Monthly
Annually
Grab
Calculated
Calculated
Effluent
Total Phosphorus
NL (mg/I)
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Xylene
Semi -Annually
Grab
Effluent
EPA Methods 624/625 4
Semi -Annually
Grab
Effluent
Acute Toxicity 5
_
Annually
Grab
Effluent
Notes:
NL: No Limit
Where no measurable discharge occurs, "no discharge" should be clearly noted on the submitted monthly discharge monitoring report.
Flow may be monitored in one of four ways: a) Measure flow continuously, b) Calculate flow based on the area draining to the outfall, the built upon area,
and the total rainfall (this method of flow measurement should not be used at facilities that have large ponds to collect surface water
runoff), c) Estimate by flow measurement at 20 minute intervals during the entire discharge event, or d) Base flow on pump logs.
2 Where possible, the grab sample for oil and grease should be skimmed from the surface of a quiescent (calm water) zone.
3 See Supplement to Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements - Special Condition A(2), Total Nitrogen Monitoring.
4 EPA Method 625 includes five (5) chlorophenols. If one or more chlorophenol(s) is detected at concentrations greater than or equal to 50 pg/I, the
permittee will be required to analyze for the eight chlorophenols (listed below) in addition to EPA Method 625. This additional required monitoring will begin
with the permittee's next scheduled monitoring event, occur on a semi-annual basis, and will last for the duration of the permit. Eight chlorophenols include
the following: 3-chlorophenol, 4-chlorophenol, 2,3-dichlorophenol, 2,5-dichlorophenol, 2,6-dichlorophenol, 3,4-dichlorophenol, 2,3,4,6-
tetrachlorophenol, and 3-methyl-6-chlorophenol.
5 Monitoring shall be conducted during the first five discrete discharge events after the effective date of this Permit, and then on an annual basis thereafter,
with the annual period beginning January of the next calendar year. The annual test must be performed and reported by June 30. If no discharge occurs by
June 30, notification must be made to the Division by this date, and monitoring must be performed on the next discharge event for the annual monitoring
requirement. See Supplement to Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements - Special Condition A(3).
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
There shall be no direct discharge of tank solids, tank bottom water, or the rag layer.
There shall be no direct discharge of tank (or pipe) contents following hydrostatic testing unless benzene concentration is Tess than 1.19 ug/I and toluene
concentration is less than 11 ug/I in the tank discharge.

NC0032875
SUPPLEMENT TO EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
A(2). TOTAL NITROGEN MONITORING
The Permittee shall calculate Annual total nitrogen mass loading as the sum of monthly loadings, according to
the following equations:
(1) Monthly Loading (lb) = Days x TN x Q,, x 8.34
where:
Days = the number of discharge days in that month
TN = the average total nitrogen concentration (mg/1) of the grab samples collected during the
month
Qy, = the average daily waste flow (MGD) for the month
8.34 = conversion factor, from (mgll x MGD) to pounds
The annual mass loading is the sum of the monthly loadings:
(2) Annual Mass Loading (lb/yr)= E (Monthly Loadings) for the calendar year
The pernuttee shall report the total nitrogen concentration for each sample and the monthly mass loading, in the
appropriate monthly self -monitoring report; and the annual total nitrogen mass loading, in the self -monitoring
report for December of each year.
A(3). ACUTE TOXICITY MONITORING (EPISODIC)
The permittee shall conduct FIVE acute toxicity tests using protocols defined as defmitive in E.P.A. Document
EPA/600/4-90/027 entitled "Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents to Freshwater and Marine
Organisms." The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead Minnow (Pimephales prornelas) 24 hour static
test. Effluent .samples for self -monitoring purposes must be obtained below all waste treatment. Sampling and
subsequent testingwill occur during the first five discrete discharge events after the effective date of this
permit. After monitoring of the first five toxicity tests, the permittee will conduct one test annually, with the
annual period beginning in January of the next calendar year. The annual test requirement must be performed
and reported by June 30. If no discharge occurs by June 30, notification will be made to the Division by this
date. Toxicity testing will be performed on the next discharge event for the annual test requirement.
The parameter code for this test is TAE6C. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition
will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the •
appropriate parameter code. Additionally, DWQ. Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Rd.
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed n
with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample mt
measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.

__.
,1:1
PPIPE LINEHILLIPS
COMPANY
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. David Goodrich
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
NPDES Group
P. O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Dear Mr. Goodrich:
April 30, 1998
Selma Terminal - Draft NPDES
Permit NC0032875
q,ggEtWit
MAY U S looc,
POINT SOURCE BRANCH
After reviewing the Draft NPDES Permit No. NC0032875 for Philips Pipe Line
Company's, Selma Terminal, Phillips submits the following comments for incorporation
into the final permit:
• Comment #1: On the "Supplement to Permit Cover Sheet" page, the statement
"Continue to operate an oillwater separator, product tank, and earthen diked
containment area" should be changed to read: "Continue to discharge stormwater at
outfall 001 and 002 located at...." This facility may discharge stormwater that
accumulates in the secondary containment area. Treatment of stormwater is not
needed to comply with the discharge parameters specified in the permit.
• Comment #2: On the "Supplement to Permit Cover Sheet" page, item #2 should be
removed from the permit. Rack water and tank bottom water is transported off -site to
a facility that reclaims the product and treats the water accordingly. Selma Terminal
may at times discharge only stormwater that accumulates in the secondary containment
dikes. Tank bottom water and rack water is not treated on -site and discharged from
the facility.
• Comment #3: On the "Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements" page,
monitoring for Total Nitrogen and Phosphorus is unnecessary and should be removed
from the monitoring requirements. Selma Terminal is a petroleum products storage
and distribution facility (SIC 5171) and does not have a process, chemical, or anything
else that would be a source of nitrogen or phosphorus. The stormwater that may be
discharged is simply rainwater that has accumulated in the containment dikes.

• Comment #4: On the "Special Conditions" page, remove the Total Nitrogen
Monitoring requirements for the same reason discussed previously.
Phillips Pipe Line Company appreciates the opportunity to review and comment on the
proposed permit renewal prior to final issuance. If you have any questions regarding this
submittal, please contact me at 918/ 661-7539.
Sincerely,
ve
,4
D. C. (Clint) Gill, Jr.

AIM
NCDENR
JAMES B. HUNTJR.
• GOVERNOR
WAYNE MCDEVITT
SECRETARY
5,1
•
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEAL fH
PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY
MEMORANDUM
TO: David Goodrich
Discharge Permits Unit
Division of Environmental Management
FROM: Linda Sewall
Division Director
Division of Environmental Health
DATE: April 30, 1998
SUBJECT: Draft National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System Permit #NC0032875
Selma Terminal
on Highway 1003 and 1929, Northwest of Selma
Johnston County
Reference is made to the above mentioned Draft National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System Permit. We have reviewed this permit
application and determined that the proposed discharge will not be
sufficiently dose to any existing or known proposed public water supply
intake so as to create an adverse effect on water quality.
We concur with the issuance of this permit provided the facility is
operated and maintained properly, the stated effluent limits are met prior to
discharge, and the discharge does not contravene the designated water
quality standards.
If we can be of further assistance, please contact us.
LS/MLD/ncp
cc: J. Wayne Munden
3800 BARRETT DRIVE, SUITE 101, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

flO
bpir
f
c• v�
PJ'
yo � �
G�• � y •`2 '�S d�
Pd�a _Is
4'
e `7p J
o'e/
d,„
DAVIT OF PUBLICATION
9 q/ GP �1•
lc, s •
y 0y cfco
�G�/ et: • °�s o� •
co 00
it
6>. J. °oo • •. •. / Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said
O ° GI- • °
xs o <!o ?•
,c o `,- cjodo/s j• G�•
0o�'o
s••
,c . 9Ai!• .o
s
A&'. •4 •� • • • • - . - . i
o ��9G� s y �.
$ a 0 / •s
•s •i•6�
06)
• / ?6
v
ci
lunty and State, duly commissioned and authorized to
,dminister oaths, affirmations, etc., personally appeared
Robert M. Woronoff, Jr., who, being duly sworn or affirmed,
according to law, loth depose and say that he is Treasurer of
THE NEWS AND OBSERVER PUBLISHING COMPANY,
a corporation organized and doing business under the Laws of
the State of North Carolina, and publishing a newspaper
known as THE NEWS AND OBSERVER, in the City of
Raleigh, County an State aforesaid, the said newspaper in
which such notice, paper, document, or legal advertisement
was published was, at the time of each and every such
publication, a newspaper meeting all of the requirements and
qualifications of Seciton 1-597 of the General Statutes of
North Carolina and was a qualified newspaper within the
meaning of Section 1-597 of the General Statutes of North
Carolina, and that as such he makes this affidavit; that he is
familiar with the books, files and business of said corporation
and by reference to the files of said publication the attached
advertisement for NC DEPT OF EHNR was inserted in the
aforesaid newspaper on dates as follows: 04/18/98
Account Number: 73370150
,iThe above is correctly copied from the books and file aforesaid Corporation and publication.
••rl/liiliill���
Treasurer
Sworn or affirmed to, and subscribed before me, this
23 day of APRIL , A.D. 1998
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand
and affixed my official seal, the day and year aforesaid.
Pv
Notary Public
My commission expires 2nd day of JULY , 2000.

E. N'?DES ivo. !JCo030716. Tne Johnston County Board of Commissioners, Pest Office Box 1048, Smithfiela IlY2?577 no_ ccplied for c permit renewcl for e facility locoiea °t the Cemrol Johnston County :'Ep; 1.l'1Tp.0nE051HUnLes'Street.Smdnlie1O.J0hn5tonc .r.s,.Theis:ilii�':_re.^,ihdis.narg¢5;.5%d.�e�;; treoleCcomes1�:anylnaL'Stria,y.osletvoterfromon¢outfollinlotheNe:sseRiver,0Cloos
.\ ,, stream in the Neuse River Basin ono is outnorizeo iG ex00na 10..9. k1G✓. 60D5, ammonia. iota resiauol a lio-inc. 10t0. Pn0SpnorVS ono dissolved oxygen are water quo lits limited. For some
.^.rc ,,c'e.rs. the available 1000 0000Cify ol ine immediate recelvine water will ae consumed. This mow cite; voter quciis pose° effluent limitations for odditionol dischorgers wi in ih• rtion of the
i:Cie7Sned.
7. t<='-,E: No. N00051222. Ccroi,no wale' Service Inc. of N.C., Post Office Box 240705. Charlotte, NC 2E2.- r.zs applied ter o permit renewal for c facility located a1 Ashiey Hills Su vision. o NCSR 2232.
,�-n cc KniOhlaale. Woke Co. ws. The lac;:,-. mschorges 0.125 WD of treated eomestic wastewater from one c;1t011 into Poplar Creek, a Class C•NSW stream in the Neuse River Basin which hos a 7010
i::• a` 0.7 c's, The focilm ,5 permitted is increase Plant c000city 100 250 MGD. SOD. ommonia, total residual chlorine ono dissolved oxygen ore water quality limited. For some parameters, the avoiloble
ioac co pain os the immediate receiving v.mer wilt be consumed. This may often future water quality based effluent limitations for additional dischargers wit in his ton �%�
o f ��'�tershed.
N E. POES Nc. NC0353746. irc D. Lee ono Associates, PO Box 764, Woke Forest, NC 27587 hos moiled for o Permit renewal for a facility located of Deer Chose Subdivi n, , o C R 2�sS'74o=1heast of
Roieig•. *, Tne facility discha-ge_0.50MGD ono will exponatodischarpe0.220MGD oftreated aomesticwastewater trom one 0u1to11into TomsCreek,aClass C•NSVVstream inthe Neuse River
Sus,:'tiow0i0cfs and a3C..:flow of0.50cis. Ammonia,GODS, and dissolvedoxypenore woterquality limited. For some parameters, the available load mpacnyofthe immediate receiving
wale.. ;;med. This may often' future water quolits based effluent limitations for additional discnargers within this portion of Inc watershed.
.4
9. NPDES '.. ': C0o4560E. ward Transformer Comoony, PO Box 30005, Raleigh, NC 27612 has opolied for o Permit renewal for a facility located of a site on NCSR 1646, nnoortn est o1 Roteipn, Woke County.
Tne foam:, v o .:norpes 0.05.1 /' G D of treetec :noustria l wostevxter trom one oufoll irn0 an unnamed trioulory 10 Little Brier Creek, a Class C•NSW stream in the Neuse River Basin which has c 7010 flow 0f 0
cfs and a 3Ci2S flow of E. us. No parometers ore water quolity limited, but this discharge may affect future ollocolions. ryt(nrtire
10. NPDES No. NC0062219. Coroiino Water Service. Inc. of N.C., Post Office Box 24075, Charlotte, NC 28224 has applied fora permit renewol for o facility located at Kings Grant Subdivision WV,TP, on NCSR
2505. southwest of 5hatweil, Woke County. Tne facility currently discharges 0.070 MGD of treated domestic wdstewater from one outfall into an unnamed tributary to Poplar Creek, a Class C•NSW stream in
the Neuse River Basin within has a 7010 floor of G CIS and o 3002 flow of 0.08 cfs. The foci lily is Permitted to increase plant capacity to0.210 MGD. 60D5, ammonia, total residual chlorine and dissolved oxygen
ore water quolity limited. For some parameters. the a ollobJeloload capacity of the immediate receiving water will be consumed. this moy affect future water quality bused effluent limitations for additional
dischorgers within this Portion of Inc wotersned. ,/
11.NPDES No. N00065714.TradewindsHomeowners ociation,Inc.,302PeebleCreekDrive,NC27511hasopoliedforaPermitrenewalforofacilityIocatedalTrodewinasSubdivision,offNCSR227,soinn
of Woke Crossroods, Woke County. The Facility discharges 0.050 MGD of treated domestic wastewater from one oufoll into Harris Creek, a Class C•NSW stream in the Neuse River Basin which hos a 7010
fios:' of 1.1 cis. Ammonia is water quality limited. For some parameters, the available loud c city of the immediate receiving water Will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent
limitations for odditionol dischargers within this portion of the watershed. /v
12.NPD=_SNo. N0006440E.WnitewoodFroperties, Inc. db0 Neuse Crossing Utility ta era ion, PO Box 9853E.Raleigh, NC 27624-8583 hos applied for a permit renewal for c facility located at Neuse Crossings
Wesley: ater Treatment Plant, Neuse Crossings Subdivision, northeast of Raleigh. off Mitchell Mill R000, Woke county. The facility presently discnorges 0.150 MGD (witn expansion 10 0.300 MGD) of treated
domestic wastewater from one outfoll into Neuse River, o Class C-NSW stream in the Neuse River Basin whicn hos 0 7010 flow of 75.0 cfs. Ammonia B0D5 and dissolved oxygen ore water quolity limited.
For same oorameters, Inc ovoilobte load copocify of Inc immediate receiving water will _ co, A consumed. This mac affect future water quality based effluent limitations tor oa0dion0l dischorgers within this
portion of the watershed. [,[li•'L '
13. NPDES N0. NC0064149. Jones Dairy Form Utilities, Inc., PO Box 1108 Wake Forest. NC 27587 hos applied for o Permit renewal fora facility located at Jones Dairy Form Subdivision, Jones Dairy Form
: Rood, Wake Forest, Woke County. The fociiitycurrently discharges 0.09MGD oftreated domestic wastewater from one outfollimoAustin Creek. oClass CNSW stream inthe Neuse River Basinwhichhoso ' 7010 flow of 0.15 cfs. B0D5 5, ommonia, and dissolved oxygen are water quality -limited. For these parometers, ine available load capacity of the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may
affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this Portion of the watershed. Be/mac_
14. NPDES No. NC0031011. Colonial Pipeline Company, Past Office Box 18403, Greensboro, NC 27419 hos applied for a permit renewol for a facility located at the Selma Delivery facility, on NCSR 1003,
northwest of Selma, Johnston County. The facility i5 permitted to discnorge, stormwater, woshwaler, and hydrostatic test water from one outfall into on unncmed tributary to Mill Creek, o Class WS I V•NSW
stream in ine Neuse River Bosin. For some aerometers, the ovanl'°ble load capacity of Inc immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for
odditionol dischargers within this portion c' t.r_ wotersned. l I/j L/
15- NPDES No. NC0027006. Exxon Como-- 2555 West Dos Street Selma, NC 27576 hos applied for o Permit renewol for o facility located at Inc Exxon Terminol. 0ok Street, northwest of Selma,
Johnston County. The facility is permitter ' _ ::: - . :r pe stormwoter, w 05hwater, and nydrostof is test water from one outfoll into on unnamed tributary to Mill Creek, a Class WS-IV NSW stream in Inc Neuse
River Basin. For some parameters, thee. coPatityofIneimmediatereceivingwaterwillbeconsumed.Thismayaffectfuturewaterquatitybasedeffluentlimitationsforadditionatdischargers
within this portion of the watershed. f' - , IL/
16. 14PDES No. NC0065706. Crosby UI: = s :-..rated, 2117 Averehe Rood, Woke Forest, NC 27587 hos applied for a permit renewol for a facility located at CattonwoodlBoywood Subdivision, 12 mile
north of Poole Rood on Bethlehem RE::: ' -- _ NC in Wake County- The facility dischorges 0.0575 MGD of treated domestic wostewater from one outfoll into Poolor Creek, a Class C-NSW stream in the
Neuse River Basin whicn has a7010i,c:::•.�, ::L. BOO, ommonia, on dissolved oxygen are water quality I imitet. For Mese parameters, the °vol.:ate loop capacity of the immediate receiving water will
be consumed. This may affect future _ - cattily based effluent limitations for odditionol dischorgers within this portion of the wotersned. BetA (Gam.
17. NPDES No. NC0003549. Amerada Hess _ : -coration,1 Hess Plaza. Woodbridge, NJ 07095 hos applied for 0 permit renewal for a facility Iocateo at Inc Selmo Distributiorr5outh Terminal, 2427 West Oak
Street,Selma, Johnston County. The facil.'. zermined to dischorge hydrostat ic test water, wash water, ono siormwater f rem °whin nos. 001 and 032 into an unnamed tributary lo Mill Creek, °Class WS-IV
NSW stream in the Neuse River Bosin wnz i -a a 7010 flow of 0 cfs ono a 3002 flow of 0 cfs. This permit will be modified during this renewol to inclucie discharge from the Selmo Distribution North Terminal
which was currently permitted under pert r rc. NC0076589. Thus, this facility will also be permitted to discrarge hydrostatic test water, wash water, and stormwater from outfoll 003 into on unnamed
t tributary to Mill Creek, o Class A'S-IV NSW streom in the Neuse River Basin. For some parometers, the avoiloble load capacity of the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This mac affect future
' water quality based effluent limitations fcr cadltional dischargers within this portion o1 the watershed. C,i a („.
18. NPDES No. NC0049034. County of Wake, Wake counit.' Mt.. Auburn Sheriff's Troining Center, PO Box 550, Raleigh, NC 27602 has applied for a permit renewol for 0 facility located at Woke County Mt.
Auburn T raining Center on NCSR 1004, east c' : uourn, W ke County. The facility discharges 0.0024 MGD of treated dom¢siit wastewater from One outfall into on unnamed tributary 10 White 00k Creek, a Class C-NSW streome ine the Neuse River basin v:nith has a 1Q10 flow of 0 cts ana o 30Q2 flow of 0,02 cfs, B0D5, ommonia ono dissolved oxygen is voter quality limited. For some parameters, ine ovoilable load capacity of the immediate receiving water will be Consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent,Ijrr2IoiJpnr additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
19. NPDES No. NC0064378. Cording Water Services, Inc., of N.C., Post Office Box 240705. Charlotte, NC 28224 nes applied fora 0 oernnmiitt renewal for c facility located at Willowbrook Subdivision WWTP, on
' NCSR1004,northwestofCloyton,WokeCounr..Thefacilitycurrentlydischarges0.03MGDoftreateddomesticy:astewate•fromoneoutfol!intoonunnamediribuorytoBeadingfieldCreek,oClossWS•111
J
• NEAR. slrecm in the Neuse River Basin whicr -as a 7Q 10 flow of 0 cfs ono a 30021iow of 0.05 cfs. The 'cattily is permitted to increase piont capacity to 0.06 MGD. BODS, ammonia, tote! residual chlorine and
•- dissolved oxygen ore water quoins- limitec Fa• some parameters, Inc available load capacity of the immediate receiving water will oe consumed. this may offect future water quolits' based effluent
limitations for additional discnargers wit'.,-' this portion of the watershed. /,(,,. C _
1 20. NPDES No. NC0080S19. Lompe and Molchrs' Lumber Comoony, formerly Guy C. Lee Lumber Co., PO Box 150, Smithfield, NC 27577 hos applied for o permit renewol for a facility locmeo of 210 North
Tenth Street, Smithfield. Johnston Counts'. T,:, '_-ii iry discnorges :naasf riol wostev. pier from wet decking facilities through Iwo oulfolls into on unnamed tributary to Buffalo Creek, d Class C-NSW stream
in Ine Neuse River Basin, No parometers pre water Amity limit¢°, but Tnis discnorge may affect future allocations.
• 21. NPDES No. N00027227. Crown Central Pe•rc• eum Corporation, One North Charles Street, Post office Sox 116E, Baltimore, Maryland 21203 hos applied fora permit renewal for a facility located at Selma
Terminal, on West 0ok Street, northwest of Selma, Johnston County. The facility is permitted to discharge stormy:bier and hyorostolix test water from one outfoll into an unnamed tributary 10 the Neuse
River, a Class WS•IV NSW stream in the Neuse River Basin which has 0 7Q10 flow of 0 cfs and b 3002 flow of 0 cfs. No parameters ore water awl It docile, but this discharge may affect future allocations.
22. NPDES No. NC0036764. Mr. Thomas Tilley, Poole Rood, Raleigh, NC 27514 has applied for o permit renewal for o facility located a1 Riverview Mobile Home Park on NCSR 1007 (Poole Rood), east of
Raleigh, Woke County. The facility discharges 0.035 MGD of treated domestic wastewater from one outfall into the Neuse River, a Class C•NSW Stream in the Neuse River Bosin which has 0 regulated flow
from Falls Lake Dom. No parameters ore water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations. M( f n-., ee,
l 23. NPDES No. N00025453. The Town of Clayton, PO Box 879, Clayton, NC 27520 hos ¢°plied for o permit renewal for o facility located at Clayton WWTP, on Durham Street Extention, Clayton, Johnston
County. The facility discharges 1.9 MGD of treated oomestic and industrial wastewater from one oulfon into ine Neuse River, a ClassWS•IV NSW CA stream in the Neuse River Basin which hos o 7010 flow of
186 cis, BODS, ammonio, dissolved oxygen, ono total residual chlorine are water quality limited. For some porometers, the available load capacity of the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This
may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of Inc wotersned. a Q,
24. NPDES No. NC0039292. Uniprop, lncorporctea 280 Daines St., Suite #300, Birmingham, MI 48009 has applied for o permit renewal for a facility located al River Wolk Mobile Home Park, 5112 Buffalo
Rood, Raleigh, Woke County. The facility discrcrges 0.051 MGD of treated domestic wastewater from one outfoll into the Neuse River, a Class C-NSW stream in the Neuse River Basin which hos 0 7010 flow
Of 50 cfs. BOD5, ammonia and dissolved oxygen are water quolity limited. For some parameters, the available Awo.o ,co city of the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water
quality based effluent limitations for °edmona, dischargers within this portion of Inc watershed. IN
25. NPDES No. NC0036145. BP 0i1 Company, 20: Public Square, Clevelnod, OH 44114 hos applied for a permit renewal for a facility located 0t Selmo Terminol, on NCSR 1003 (Buffotoe Road), northwest of
Selma, Johnston County. The facility is permitted. to dischorge stormwater, washwater, and hydrostatic test water from two outfolis into on unnamed tributary to Mill Creek. 0 Class WS I V•NSW strum in
the Neuse River Basin whicn hos a 7010 floe.' o' 0 cfs and 0 3002 flow of Oafs. For some porometers, the ovally Ie toad cop0city of the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future
water quality based effluent iimitctions to- ear:lion ! dischargers within this portion of the wolershec ,, � �_
- 26. NPDES NC. NC0382376. Cite c' F ieign, p_ 0:.. 596, Room 402, Raieioh„ NC 27602 has caplied fora permit renewci ffacility located of Inc E.M. Jonnson Water Treatment Plant 10301 Fells of Neuse
Road, Raleigh, Woke County. Toe wilily 0iscnarges water treatment backwash water from two outfol ls. Dulfoll 001 discharges into on unnamed tributary la the NeuSe River and is classified os C-NSW.
Ouf oL L 002 discnorges into an unnamed lribuary to Honeycut Creek which is classified os WS• I V•NS W-CA waters in the Neuse River Basin. No parameters °rewater quaf icy limited, but this dischorge may
affect future allocations, t_
27. NPDES No. NC0056278. River I orm�eowners Association, PO Box 51728, Raleigh, NC.27609 hos applied for a permit renewal for a facility located on Folls of Neuse Road, Raleigh, Woke County. The
facility discharges 0.02 MGD of Ireoted domestic wostewoter tram one outfolt into the Neese River, Class C•NSW steam in the Neuse River Basin which hos o regulated flow from the Falls lake dom. No
Parameters are water quolits' limited, but Tnis discharge mac affect future allocations. to C. Inil w(
0
northwest o Selma, JohnstonCou ty. hefoc ety usrpermInittedtediiOschargeslormwaterandhydro5atiictesttwaterd romr a oneoutifalentoonunnameditriblutaarlyto ht eN useRiter,Cs lassWS•IVNSWstream2n
Inc Neuse River Basin which hos o 7010 flow of 0 cfs and o 3002 flow of 0 cfs. No parameters ore water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.
29. NPDES No. N00007528. Town of Wake Forest, 401 Elm Avenue, Woke Forest, NC 27587 hos applied for o permit renewal for a facility located at Woke Forest Water Treatment Focil ity, 1143 Wait Avenue,
Woke Forest, Wake County. The facility dis,c^horges filter backwash from one outfall into Smith Creek. o Class C•NSW stream in Inc Neuse River Basin. No parameters are water quality limited, but this
discharge may affect future allocations. V `1+
30. NPDES No. NC0073318. Ira D. Lee and ASs:dates. Inc., PO Box 762. Woke Forest. NC 275E7 hos cootie fa- c re -gna
t renec:c! for o facility located at Whippoorwill Valley Wastewater Treatment Plant,
`'.c"t••IlRoadONCSF,2u_s:,leoksForest.,.ekeCounty.Tnetaciiiiycurrentdrscnorges0.050MGD(witnexpansiontoC.200MGD)oftreateddomesticwastewaterframoneoutfollintoSmithCreek,0
Class 2-NSW stream in ine Neuse River Basin wnich hos o 7010 flow of 015 cfs. BOD, ammonia, and dissolved oxygen ore water Quality limited. For some parameters, the ovoiloble toad capacity of the
immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for odditionol dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
i 31. NPDES No. N00060771. Bannister and Glover Properties, Indian Creek Overlook, 1113 Indian Creek Trail, Garner, NC 27529 has applied for 0 Permit renewol for o facility located at Indion Creek
Overlook, NC Highway 50, near Gorner, Woke County. The facility discharges 0.064 MGD of treated domestic wastewater, and is permitted for the dischorge of up 160.112 MGD, from one outfall into Swift
' Creek d C loss C. NSW strum in the Neuse River Bosin which has 0 7010 flow of 0.90 cis. BOPS, ammonia an dissolved oxygen ore water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immeciate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.M(/44
32. NPDES No, N00083348, Town of Smithfield, PO Box 761, Smithfield, NC 27577 has applied for a permit renewal for a facility located of Smithfield Water Treatment Plant on 2nd Street, Smithfield,
Johnston County, The facility discharges filter backwash woler from one outfall into Buffalo Creek, o Class C-NSW Stream in the Neuse River Basin. No parameters are water quality limited, but this
dischorge may affect future allocations.
`• (///��� 33. NPDES No. NC0032875, Phillips Pipe Li donanny, 370 Adams Building, Bartlesville, OK 74004 hos applied for o permit renewal for o facility located at Selma Terminal, on Highway 1003 and 1929,
the
northwest of Selma, Johnston County. The facility is permitted to dischorge stormwoter and hydrostatic test water from two outfalis into on unnamed tributary to Mill Creek, a Class WS•�IV-N 3W stream in
Neuse River Basin which has a 7010 floe: of 0 cfs and a 3002 flow f 0 cis. No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations. di (�CI��
34. NPDES No. N00084735. Johnston County, PO Box 2263. Smithfield, NC 27577 has applied for a permit renewal for a facility located at the Johnston County Water Treatment Foc i lity, 600 Clearwater Drive,
Smithfield, Johnston County. The facility discharges treated ft'Iter backwash water from one outfall into an unnamed tributary to the Neuse River, a Class WS-IV NSW CA stream in Inc Neuse River Basin.
No ohmmeters ore water quality Limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations. w. N80: April 18. 1998 �Y�(� k^iX-

atv)
DENR/DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NC0032875
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility Name
Phillips Pipe Line Company/Selma Terminal
Permitted Flow:
none specified
Facility Class:
I
Facility/Permit Status:
(i.e. New, Modification,
Existing or Renewal)
Renewal
•
County:
Johnston
Stream Characteristics
Receiving Stream:
UT to Mill Creek
Stream Classification:
WS IV NSW
Subbasin:
030402
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs)
0
Winter 7Q 10 (cfs):
0
30Q2 (cfs):
0
Average Flow (cfs):
0
IWC (%):
100
•
Miscellaneous
Regional Office:
Raleigh
USGS Topo Quad:
E25SE
Changes Incorporated into Permit Renewal
Proposed Changes
Parameters Affected
Basis for change(s)
Change monitoring
frequencies from weekly or
2/month to monthly
Flow, Oil and Grease, Total
Suspended Solids, Turbidity,
Phenol(s)
Terminal Permitting Guidance
Elimination of limit
Oil and Grease
Terminal Permitting Guidance
Change of solids parameter
Settleable Solids/TSS
Terminal Permitting Guidance
Elimination of limit and
monitoring
Lead
Terminal Permitting Guidance
no discharge in 7 years, any
residual lead likely dissipated
Elimination of limit
Phenol
Terminal Permitting Guidance
Elimination of limit and
monitoring .
Turbidity
Terminal Permitting Guidance
Addition of monthly
monitoring
Benzene, Xylene
Terminal Permitting Guidance
Addition of monthly
monitoring with special
condition
Total Nitrogen
Neuse NSW Management
Strategy
Addition of monthly
monitoring
Total Phosphorus
Neuse NSW Management
Strategy
Addition of monitoring
EPA Methods 624/625
Terminal Permitting Guidance
Elimination of monitoring
(Special Condition G)
Organics
EPA 624/625 will cover
monitoring previously covered
by organics
Elimination of monitoring
pH
Terminal Permitting Guidance
Elimination of Special
Condition F
Oil and Grease
No longer applicable w/ no oil
and grease limit
Page 1 of 3

DENR/DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NC0032875
The treatment system consists of an oil/water separator, product tank and diked
containment area for stormwater runoff. The containment area is valved (valve kept
closed). The facility can discharge from the containment area through outfall 001 or 002.
However, most of the runoff/rainwater in the containment area evaporates or percolates
through the soil. There has been no discharge since 1991.
Compliance Summary
The acute toxicity test is required for this facility, however, it has been many years since
they have discharged and there is no record of the facility having conducted toxicity
testing.
WLA Summary
In 1996, DWQ developed standard permitting guidance and requirements for all terminals
in North Carolina. These requirements will be implemented. The EPA Methods 624/625
monitoring requirement is one of these standard requirements. This requirement allows
DWQ to identify which of the compounds that are part of 624/625 are discharged by the
terminals.
Lead monitoring has been eliminated. When developing the standard permitting guidance
and requirements for all terminals in North Carolina, lead was not believed to be a
parameter of concern because leaded petroleum products have likely not been stored in the
terminals for several years. Any residual lead would have been washed from the tank
during the tank cleaning which occur every five years.
Phenol and chlorinated phenols are separate and distinct and should not be grouped in the
same category when determining discharge limits (as has been inadvertently done in the
past). Phenol is a common component of petroleum compounds stored in terminals, can
result in tainting of fish tissue, and can cause taste and odor (organoleptic) problems in
drinking water. There is no water quality standard for phenol, although phenol
discharged from terminals can combine with chlorine in water treatment facilities to form
chlorinated phenols for which there is a state water quality standard of 1.0 pg/1.
Minimizing the discharge of phenol into water supply classified waters could reduce
chlorinated phenol formation and their concentration in drinking water. As a result of the
possible occurrence of phenol in oil terminal facility discharges and the possibility of
chlorinated phenol formation, phenol is monitored (but not limited) on a monthly basis at
those terminals that discharge to water supply classified waters.
There is limited toxicity data for chlorinated phenols, and the 1.0 pg/1 standard protects
water supplies from taste and odor problems. Chlorinated phenols are not expected to be
discharged from oil terminals and would not a problem with oil terminal discharges into
non -water supply classified waters. Monitoring for certain chlorinated phenols will occur
under EPA 624/625 for all oil terminal discharges. If one or more chlorinated phenols are
detected, additional monitoring will be required of those terminals that discharge to water
supply classified waters.
Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus will be monitored and special conditions have been
added to the permit which explain conditions related to the Neuse River Basin NSW
Management Strategy. Please refer to Neuse River Basin NSW Management Strategy
NPDES Permitted Facilities Requirements Summary (prepared by NPDES Unit).
Page/ of 3

DENR/DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NC0032875
Proposed Schedule for Permit Issuance
Draft Permit to Public Notice: 4/22/98
Permit Scheduled to Issue: 6/8/98
State Contact
If you have any questions on any of the above information or on the attached
permit, please contact Paul Clark at [phone], extension 580.
Copies of the following are attached to provide further information on the permit
development:
• Existing permit effluent sheets with changes noted (existing facilities only)
• Draft Permit
NPDES Recommendation by:
6 av Date:
q
Regional Office Comments Pe Duey 9T1LA, Sicrp ivv i (/G) 7(ATCrf}i `MI 5-o/.J )
Si6'7t t� ti/r14 o _ - ll n i nJ k 5 , lA0 4 o ctvc ti /2 -; q u I Td'1 7 P
Morf 41R--fId Ttl(5 1`FUL f f 4
`?). Regional Recommendation by: / `X7'-' Date: 5/j /irk
. /r
Reviewed By:
Regional Supervisor: Date:
NPDES Unit:
Date:
Page/of 3

A. (). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FINAL Pcrmit No. NC0032875
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from
outfall(s) serial number 002. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permitter as specified below:
Effluent Characteristic
Flow"
Oil and Grease
Seale-lidsy 7s5
urbidity
Acute Toxicity """"
Organics
rp
Lbs/day
Discharge Limitation!
Units (specify
Mon. Ave. Daily Max Mon. Avc . Daily Max.
Monitoring
Measurement
Frequency
weeRiy /GI
2/4vtearth
2LMAAtb
2/40 th
2tM!mlh
• • • • •
• • • • •
Requirements
Sample
Type
Instantaneous
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
'Sample
Location
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
* Sample Locations: E - Effluent .
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements specified above shall be taken at the following location(s): the nearest
accessible point after final treatment but prior to actual discharge to or mixing with the receiving waters.
Monitoring will be conducted during normal work hours. .
** All volumes of wastewater leaving the facility shall be monitored. If continuous flow monitoring is not feasible, then the discharger shall
record the approximate time that discharge began and ended, along with the instantaneous flow at the time of effluent sampling.
This Permit imposes no limitation of the discharge of storm water runoff uncontaminated by any industrial or commercial activity and not
discharged through any oil/water separator or other treatment equipment or facility.
*** The discharge shall not cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTIJ. If the turbidity exceeds these levels due to natural
background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity in the receiving water.
**** Acute Toxicity (Fathead 24 hour) Monitoring, Episodic, See Part III, Condition E.
***** Monitoring shall be conducted during the first five discrete discharge events after the effective date of this Permit, and then on an annual
basis thereafter, with the annual period beginning January of the next calendar year. The annual test must be performed and reported by June
30. If no discharge occurs by June 30, notification must be made to the Division by this date, and monitoring must be performed on the next
discharge event for the annual monitoring requirement.
ATh
See Part III, Condition G.
e pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored 2/month at the effluent by grab
samples.
ere shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

A. (). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FINAL Permit No. NC0032875
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from
outfall(s) serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittce as specified below:
Effluent Characteristic
Flow"
Oil and Grease
Total Suspended Residue
Lead
Phenols
Turbidity "'
Acute Toxicity
Organics ++
•1••
Lbs/day
Discharge Limitation! Monitoring
Units (specify Measurement
Mon. Avg. Daily Max Mon. Avg. Daily Max. Frequency
Weekly
45.0 mg/I 2/Month
45.0 mg/I 2/Month
25.0 µg/I 2/Month
1.0 µg/I 2/Month
2/Month
* Sample Locations: E - Effluent
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements specified above shall be taken at the following location(s): the nearest
accessible point after final treatment but prior to actual discharge to or mixing with the receiving waters.
Monitoring will be conducted during normal work hours.
** All volumes of wastewater leaving the facility shall be monitored. If continuous flow monitoring is not feasible, then the discharger shall
record the approximate time that discharge began and ended, along with the instantaneous flow at the time of effluent sampling.
This Permit imposes no limitation of the discharge of storm water runoff uncontaminated by any industrial or commercial activity and not
discharged through any oil/water separator or other treatment equipment or facility.
*** The discharge shall not cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTU. If the turbidity exceeds these levels due to natural
background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity in the receiving water.
**** Acute Toxicity (Fathead 24 hour) Monitoring, Episodic, See Part III, Condition E.
***** Monitoring shall be conducted during the first five discrete discharge events after the effective date of this Permit, and then on an annual
basis thereafter, with the annual period beginning January of the next calendar year. The annual test must be performed and reported by June
30. if no discharge occurs by June 30, notification must be made to the Division by this date, and monitoring must be performed on the next
discharge event for the annual monitoring requirement.
++ See Part III, Condition G.
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored 2/month at the effluent by grab
samples.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
Requirements
Sample
Type
Instantaneous
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
*Sample
Location
rs
E
E �
E y
E
E
E U

Part III �)V ST//UG f e-T 4l/7
Permit No. NC0032875
E. ACUTE TOXICITY MONITORING (EPISODIC)
The permittee shall conduct FIVE acute toxicity tests using protocols defined as definitive in
E.P.A. Document 600/4-85/013 entitled "The Acute Toxicity of Effluents to Freshwater and
Marine Organisms." The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead Minnow (Pimephales
promelas) 24 hour static test, using effluent collected as a single grab sample. Effluent samples
for self -monitoring purposes must be obtained below all waste treatment. Sampling and
subsequent testing will occur during the first five discrete discharge events after the effective date
of this permit. After monitoring of the first five toxicity tests, the permittee will conduct one test
annually, with the annual period beginning in January of the next calendar year. The annual test
requirement must be performed and reported by June 30. If no discharge occurs by June 30,
notification will be made to the Division by this date. Toxicity testing will be performed on the
next discharge event for the annual test requirement,
The parameter code for this test is TAE6C. All toxicity testing results required as part of this
permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Form (MR-1) for the month in which it
was performed, using the appropriate parameter code. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is
to be sent to the following address:
Attention:
Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual
chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving.stream,
this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test.
Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
F. Oil Terminal Condition
The "daily maximum" limitations for oil and grease stated in Part I., A. shall be deemed to have
been exceeded if:
a. the analysis of a single sample (when it is the only one taken during the day by the permittee)
exceeds 45.0 mg/l.
Each sample taken by either the permittee or the State shall be presumed to be representative.
However, due to the variability of the sampling and analysis of oil and grease discharges from
petroleum marketing terminals, the permittee may in good ,faith declare a maximum of 10% of the
samples taken by it during a calendar year, but not more than one sample taken during any calendar
month, to be non -representative. No sample may be so excluded if it is the only sample taken by
the permittee during a calendar month. Such a declaration must be included in writing with the
next Discharge Monitoring Report submitted in accordance with Part I., C., 2. of this permit, and
must include the results of the analysis of the excluded sample, and a written explanation for the

faL-
72/y
`exclusion of that sample. If any sample is so excluded, the '`daily average" concentration shall be r
the arithmetic average of the analyses of the remaining non -excluded samples.
Other petroleum company officials have contended that, while the discharges from most of their
marketing and bulk terminals are capable of meeting this "daily maximum" limitation as stated
above, certain of their facilities cannot be so equipped to meet this limitation as stated above. If
the permittee can present sufficient evidence to demonstrate that this facility cannot be so equipped,
the State will modify this limitation to the extent needed (in no case to exceed 100.0 mg/l) to assure
reasonable compliance with the "daily maximum" limitation.
It is recognized that influent quality changes, equipment malfunction, or other circumstances may
sometimes result in effluent concentrations exceeding the permit limitations despite the exercise of
appropriate care and maintenance measures, *and corrective measures by the permittee. The
permittee may come forward to demonstrate to the State that such circumstances exist in any case
where effluent concentrations exceed those set forth in this permit. The State will consider such
information in determining appropriate enforcement measures, if any, to be taken.
A calendar day is defined as any consecutive 24 hour period.
The "daily maximum" concentration is defined as the arithmetic average of one or more
representative grab samples taken during any calendar day. Should effluent sampling be done on
more than one calendar day during the month, the arithmetic average indicating the largest "daily
maximum" concentration shall be reported on the Discharge Monitoring Report Form.
Collection of representative samples shall be required during periods of discharges. Should there
be no discharge during normal working hours, the permittee shall report "no discharge" for that
reporting period.
The reported flow shall be the arithmetic average of the total volume discharged on each of the
sampling days during the reporting period. Flow may be calculated utilizing a flow recorder, rain
gauge, or any other similar device.
In connection with submission of records and reports required under this permit, the permittee
shall not be deemed to have waived such privilege against self-incrimination as may be offered
under or by the Fifth Amendment of the United States' Constitution.
G. Organics Monitoring Condition
Monitoring shall be performed during the first five discrete discharge events (annually
thereafter) after the effective date of the NPDES permit. Monitoring of these parameters should
occur at the same time that the whole - effluent toxicity sample is collected during the discharge
event, (samples should be collected within 24 hours of the beginning of the event).
Benzene
Toluene
Xylene
Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)
Ethylbenzene
Naphthalene

CALCULATION SHEET
NCDENR PROJECT b P UkIT Rat LIW
CiLo ►) CENITRAL.1 glaAk
NORTH CaROuNa DLMRrMCM co,
ENV.RQooCMT AND NEURAL R=souRCCZ SUBJEC T
BY ML DATE 3P-196
CHKD BY
SHEET OF I
N C_ Go 22_9-
DATE
i
aril-
C.
713
• 'u
t
Una'TS
r-
R-
NJ,-
PhRAmMtE94
N
i
dE
i
I
!r
-
"N-
vcisICS
,_
si
h:4
N
dS
0,4
Rod,
P
fr AL
1
s tS
:
V1Ais
71k1S
D
►t=
FOIL
IRE !Aoki
.,0.
1
1
-
u) l
A.E. (
131% Peg
r
�-)
70 t
t 4 OF i
S
c1-04444,,
�blzcAl
—
t4 ,r ctL r r
1
i-rEti-iw,6
1
coy.oLtP e )SS
V� ,! ?
et CO Da PKL ,
L Fe()-
At To' cow
i
r
;
I
j
1 1
uuPs
1 f'tP
r1/41c
—I
I
c
,
H
1
1
;,
J
1

NC0032875 Summary
March 25, 1998
Phillips Pipe Line Company has applied to renew their permit to discharge stormwater to an
unnamed tributary to Mill Creek (WS-IV NSW) in the Neuse River basin (030402).
The treatment system consists of an oil/water separator, product tank and diked
containment area for stormwater runoff. The containment area is valved (valve kept
closed). The facility can discharge from the containment area through outfall 001 or 002.
However, most of the runoff/rainwater in the containment area evaporates or percolates
through the soil. There has been no discharge since 1991.
Compliance Summary
The acute toxicity test is required for this facility, however, it has been many years since
they have discharged and there is no record of the facility having conducted toxicity testing.
WLA Summary
In 1996, DWQ developed standard permitting guidance and requirements for all terminals
in North Carolina. These requirements will be implemented. The EPA Methods 624/625
monitoring requirement is one of these standard requirements. This requirement allows
DWQ to identify which of the compounds that are part of 624/625 are discharged by the
terminals.
Lead monitoring has been eliminated. When developing the standard permitting guidance
and requirements for all terminals in North Carolina, lead was not believed to be a
parameter of concern because leaded petroleum products have likely not been stored in the
terminals for several years. Any residual lead would have been washed from the tank
during the tank cleaning which occur every five years.
Phenol and chlorinated phenols are separate and distinct and should not be grouped in the
same category when determining discharge limits (as has been inadvertently done in the
past). Phenol is a common component of petroleum compounds stored in terminals, can
result in tainting of fish tissue, and can cause taste and odor (organoleptic) problems in
drinking water. There is no water quality standard for phenol, although phenol discharged
from terminals can combine with chlorine in water treatment facilities to form chlorinated
phenols for which there is a state water quality standard of 1.0 µg/1.
Minimizing the discharge of phenol into water supply classified waters could reduce
chlorinated phenol formation and their concentration in drinking water. As a result of the
possible occurrence of phenol in oil terminal facility discharges and the possibility of
chlorinated phenol formation, phenol is monitored (but not limited) on a monthly basis at
those terminals that discharge to water supply classified waters.
There is limited toxicity data for chlorinated phenols, and the 1.0 µg/1 standard protects
water supplies from taste and odor problems. Chlorinated phenols are not expected to be
discharged from oil terminals and would not a problem with oil terminal discharges into
non -water supply classified waters. Monitoring for certain chlorinated phenols will occur
under EPA 624/625 for all oil terminal discharges. If one or more chlorinated phenols are
detected, additional monitoring will be required of those terminals that discharge to water
supply classified waters.
Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus will be monitored and special conditions have been
added to the permit which explain conditions related to the Neuse River Basin NSW
Management Strategy. Please refer to Neuse River Basin NSW Management Strategy
NPDES Permitted Facilities Requirements Summary (prepared by NPDES Unit).
Page 1 of 1

SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes: No: X
If Yes, SOC No.:
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR PHILLIPS PIPE LINE COMPANY
Date: 2/4/98
To: NPDES Unit
Water Quality Section
Attention: Paul Clark
County: Johnston
Permit No.: NC0032875
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
(. Facility and Address: Philips Pipe Line Company/ Selma Terminal
Environmental Services Manager
364 Adams Building
Bartlesville, OK 74004
Location: 4086 Buffalo Road
Selma, NC 27576
2. Date of Investigation: December 12, 1997
3. Report Prepared by: Susan A. Wilson (from notes prepared by Paul Clark,
NPDES Unit).
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: Jerry Fowler, (919) 965 - 5232.
Paul Ressel
5. Directions to Site: From Raleigh take I-440 east, Highway 70 east, exit onto
NCSR 1003 (Buffalo Road). Philips Pipe Line is on the right.
6. Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge points:
001 002
Latitude: 35 ° 33' 06" 35 ° 33' 06"
Longitude: 78 ° 18' 00" 78 ° 17' 58"
Attach a USGS map extract and indicate treatment facility site and discharge point
on map.
NPDES Staff Report
Phillips Pipe Line Co. NC0032875
Page 1

U.S.G.S. Quad No.: E25SE U.S.G.S. Quad Name: Selma
7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application? Yes: X
No: If No, explain:
8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): 0 - 3% slopes.
9. Location of nearest dwelling: No nearby dwellings noted.
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Unnamed tributary to Mill Creek,
Neuse River Basin.
a. Classification: WS-IV, NSW
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: 030402, SI: 27-40
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent
downstream uses: The unnamed tributary is the receiving water
for the majority of the oil terminals. The tributary flows to
Mill Creek to the Neuse River (drinking water supply for
Smithfield).
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Volume of Wastewater to be permitted: N/A. Any discharge is washdown water/
stormwater dependent.
b. What is the current permitted capacity of the Waste Water Treatment facility?
N/A (The oil/water separator most likely has a certain design capacity,
but it is unknown at this time.)
c. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility (current design capacity)?
N/A
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous Authorization to
Construct issued in the previous two years: N/A.
e. Please provide a description of existing or substantially constructed
wastewater treatment facilities: The existing treatment facility consists of
an oil/water separator with product tank and diked containment area for
stormwater runoff. The containment area is valved, with the valve kept
closed. The facility can discharge from outfall 001 or 002 in containment
area if necessary. However, most of the runoff/rainwater in the
containment area evaporates or percolates through the soil. There has
been no discharge since 1991. Any wastewater stored in the product
tank is hauled away by contractor.
NPDES Staff Report
Phillips Pipe Line Co. NC0032875
Page 2

f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater treatment facilities: N/A
g.
Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: Potentially, the typical petroleum
constituents (BTEX, and phenol(s)).
h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N/A
2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme: Residuals, if generated, are hauled
by contractor and properly disposed of.
3. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating sheet) : Class I, by definition.
4. SIC Code(s): 5171
Wastewater Code(s) of actual wastewater, not particular facilities i.e.., non -contact
cooling water discharge from a metal plating company would be 14, not 56.
Primary: 39, 73
Main Treatment Unit Code: 530x0
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant Funds or are any public
monies involved. (municipals only)? N/A
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests:The phenol(s) limit
should be modified.
3. Important SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: (Please indicate) N/A
4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated all of the non -discharge
options available? Please provide regional perspective for each option evaluated.
N/A - existing facility, minimal discharge.
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Philips Pipe Line terminal receives unleaded gasoline, kerosene, high and low sulfur
diesel.
The facility has had no discharge in many years, and does not plan to discharge.
The RRO has no objection to reissuance of the permit, pending approval by the NPDES
Unit.
NPDES Staff Report
Phillips Pipe Line Co. NC0032875
Page 3

Paul Ressel currently signs the DMR's, but there is no signature delegation in the RRO
files (this was to be forwarded after the inspection, but this office has not received it)(4)
Please note that previous correspondence with this facility indicated that they preferred
the mailing list above (please note this on IMS).
C4.) 4 1 R O Drt
z?)
ota__
-3/6siqe
ignature of report preparer (Susan A. Wilson)
WafieQual
h:132875.sr
ateeit
qV
Regional Supervisor Da e
NPDES Staff Report
Phillips Pipe Line Co. NC0032875
Page 4

0.0
'di() Tower'—
WMPM)
_ffalo
••
ndwood
sigh
80 .
0 • •
ff:
$4<
n 47
10
OMB
Grad_%-•
/i
ravel
Pities
•
,Substation
• Walls '
Cem

DITCH LEADING TO
A NEUSE RIVER
i
--x------iE----x
TANK 201
KEROSENE
6
LEADS TO
NEUSE RIVER
TANK 403
DPFU
543 vor B
TANK 402
REG UL
Doc. j3
T.
002
1 rK
• °o C6Z
F rNA IVOL
STORAGE
TANK 202
REG UL
0,00,08
J
CAMPY
�U j SFPAP_A4 L
G.4Lj `J
x x x x x x x x x x
&infp,o, atiEvrEG
SELMA TERMINAL
SURFACE FLOW
DIAGRAM
vw
0
\Nj
ORAaN 001066-(linnibAk )

Gcog. P
JDPHILLIPS
PIPE LINE
COMPANY
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. David A. Goodrich
Division of Water Quality/ WQ Section
NPDES Group
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
Dear Mr. Goodrich:
October 16, 1997 P. Cif . f r
1.
Phillips Pipe Line Company `�
Selma Terminal "'-' ft
NPDES Renewal �0/./
Permit NC0032875 (G ,_Z 3 -- cr 2
Attached is a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Application for
Permit to Discharge - Short Form C (in triplicate) for Phillips Pipe Line Company's Selma
Terminal. This facility is seeking a permit to discharge only stormwater that accumulates
in secondary containment dikes. Petroleum contaminated water/sludge that accumulates
in the bottom of storage tanks is transported offsite to a facility that reclaims the
petroleum and treats the water and sludge prior to discharge or disposal. Therefore,
stormwater is the only discharge considered in the permit application. If a General Permit
is available for this type of facility and discharge, then Phillips would appreciate being
considered for a General Permit. Also, the following dot points clarify information
provided in Form C:
• This facility does not produce a product or consume a raw material, but rather stores
and distributes refined petroleum products. An estimated 3 million barrels of product
was distributed through this facility in 1996.
• This facility discharges or may discharge only stormwater. The discharge occurrence is
dependent on the amount of rainwater that can accumulate in the containment dikes
before it is necessary to discharge. This facility has not discharged stormwater in the
last three years. The facility maintains a permit just in case discharge is necessary.
This facility is classified under Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code 5171 -
"Petroleum bulk stations and terminals - wholesale". SIC 5171 is not a Primary Industry
listed in Appendix A of 40 CFR part 122. Therefore, a priority pollutant analysis is not
being submitted with this permit application.
BARTLESVILLE. OKLAHOMA 74004 918 661-6600

If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact me at 918/ 661-7539.
Sincerely,
( ,e(2
D. C. (Clint) Gill, Jr.
Environmental Scientist
Attachment