20150053 Ver 1_Application_20150114

� STni�a
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PAT L. MCCRORY
GOVERNOR
January 14, 2015
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801 -5006
ATTN: Ms. Lori Beckwith
NCDOT Coordinator
ANTHONY J. TATA
SECRETARY
Subject: Application for an Individual Section 404 Permit and Section 401
Water Quality Certification for the US 64 Safety Improvements Project
from West of NC 281 at Lake Toxaway to Indian Creek in Transylvania
County. FA Project No. HPP -0064 (115), Division 14, TIP R- 2409C.
Debit $570 from WBS Number 34428.1.1
Dear Madam:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation ( NCDOT) proposes transportation
improvements to US 64 from 0.3 miles to west of NC 281 at Lake Toxaway to Indian
Creek in Transylvania County. The R -2409C project, approximately 1.5 miles in length,
consists of straightening the road alignment, widening the travel lanes to standard width
including unpaved shoulders, and adding a westbound climbing lane.
This application consists o£ the cover letter, ENG form 4345, EEP Mitigation
Acceptance Letter, NC Wildlife Resources comments, US Fish and Wildlife Concurrence
Letter, Project Meeting Minutes, House Bill 1139, Stormwater Management Plan, Permit
Drawings, Roadway Plan Sheets, 404 land owner labels and property contact labels.
Purpose and Need:
The purpose of the project is improve safety and traffic flow by correcting roadway
deficiencies and constructing a climbing lane to enable motorists to pass slower moving
cars or trucks. US 64 near Lake Toxaway is characterized by a substandard roadway
width and narrow shoulders, a poor horizontal /vertical alignment, and a design speed that
is lower than the posted speed limit. Wide vehicles, such as tractor trailer trucks, cross the
centerline into opposing traffic when navigating sharp curves. Consequently, the accident
rate exceeds the statewide average as well as critical crash rates for similar facilities.
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS UNIT
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699 -1548
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE:NCDOT.GOV
LOCATION:
CENTURY CENTER, BUILDING B
1020 BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE
RALEIGH NC 27610

Summary of Jurisdictional Impacts:
Overall, the project will permanently impact 1,070 linear feet of stream (983 if of
permanent fill and 87 if of bank stabilization) and will temporarily impact 0.03 acre of
streams. The project is will have no impacts to wetlands.
Summary of Utility pacts:
There will be no impacts to jurisdictional resources as a result of utility relocations.
Summary of Mitigation: -
The project has been design to avoid and minimize impacts to jurisdictional areas
throughout the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and design process.
However, project impacts will necessitate compensatory mitigation for the unavoidable
impacts. EEP will provide mitigation for 983 if of permanent stream impacts. Please
refer to the Compensatory Mitigation Section of this Cover Letter for details on impacts
and mitigation.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
R -2409C is currently scheduled to Let on July 21, 2015 with a Let review date of June 2,
2015. The Right of Way for the project was obtained on November 6, 2013.
NEPA DOCUMENT STATUS
The Categorical Exclusion (CE) for R -2409C was approved October 28, 2013. The CE
can be found on the NCDOT website: https: / /connect.ncdot.gov /resources /Environmental
INDEPENDENT UTILITY
The subject project is in compliance with 23 CFR Part 771.111(f) which lists the Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA) characteristics of independent utility of a project:
(1) The project connects logical termini and is of sufficient length to address
environmental matters on a broad scope,
(2) The project is usable and a reasonable expenditure, even if no additional
transportation improvements are made in the area,
(3) The project does not restrict consideration of alternatives for any other reasonable
foreseeable transportation improvements.
RESOURCE STATUS
Project R -2409C is located within sub -basin 03 -01 -02 of the Savannah River Basin
Watershed (HUC 03060101). Three tributaries to the Toxaway River carry the North
Carolina Division of Water Resources's ( NCDWR) stream classification of C; and four
tributaries of Indian Creek have the NCDWR designation of C; Tr.
2

Stream determinations for R -2409C were conducted using the field delineation method
outlined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. The project was
verified by Dave Baker of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE) and Brian Wrenn
of the NCDWQ on November 29, 2007. The project was reverified on November 25,
2014 by Lori Beckwith of the USACE with a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
(PJD) issued on December 5, 2014.
303 (d) Impaired Waters:
There are no streams in the R -2409C project footprint listed on the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR's) 2012 Final 303 (d)
Lists for impaired waters.
IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE U.S.
Tables 1 and 2 summarize the project -wide impacts to jurisdictional water resources for
R- 2409C. Site impact numbers correspond with the permit (hydraulic) drawings included
in this application. No wetlands or ponds were verified in the project study area. Brief
descriptions of each impact site will follow Table 2.
Table 1. Impacts to iurisdictional streams
Project
Section
Design Stage
Impact Type
Impact
Length (linear feet)
Temporary Impacts
(acres)
R-2409C
Final Impacts
Perm. Fill
983
--
Bank Stabilization
87
Temp. Fill
--
0.03
Total Permanent Impacts Perm. Fill +Bank Stabilization):
1,070
--
Total Temporary Impacts:
--
0.03
3

Table 2. R -2409C — Final Design Stream Impacts
Permit
Site
No.
Stream Name
Stream
JD
Reference
Impact Type
Impact
Length
linear feet
USACE
Mitigation
NCDWQ
Mitigation
Perm. Fill
42
42
Bank
Stabilization
10
1
UT to the
Toxaway River
UT1
Temp. Fill
73
Perm. Fill
37
37
Bank
Stabilization
15
2
UT to the
Toxaway River
UT2
Temp. Fill
23
Perm. Fill
265
265
265
3
UT to the
Toxaway River
UT3
Bank
Stabilization
10
10
Temp. Fill
28
Perm. Fill
76
76
4
UT to the
Toxaway River
UT8
Bank
Stabilization
1 1
Temp. Fill
29
Perm. Fill
0
Bank
Stabilization
10
5
UT to the
Toxaway River
UT9
Temp. Fill
15
Perm. Fill
96
96
6A
UT to Indian
Creek
UT5
Bank
Stabilization
Temp. Fill
20
Perm. Fill
263
263
263
6B
UT to Indian
Creek
UT4
Bank
Stabilization
10
10
Temp. Fill
84
Perm. Fill
32
32
7
UT to Indian
Creek
UT6
Bank
Stabilization
11
Temp. Fill
26
Perm. Fill
172
172
172
8
UT to Indian
Creek
UT7
Bank
Stabilization
10
10
Temp. Fill
26
Total Permanent Impacts Perm. Fill +Bank Stabilization):
1,070
Impacts requiring Mitigation by USACE:
983
Impact requiring Mitigation by NCDWR:
730
Note: Bank stabilization is not considered a loss of waters according to the USACE.
Mitigable impacts calculated for NCDWQ are considering length of impacts to a
stream that are greater than or equal to 150 linear feet.
El

R -2409C Permit Site Descriptions:
Permit Site 1: Stream UT 1 is a perennial unnamed tributary to the Toxaway River that
will be impacted by the extension of a new 66" reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) from an
existing 4' x 4' reinforced concrete box culvert (CMP) with bank stabilization placed at
the outlet.
Permanent Stream Impacts: 421f
Temporary Stream Impacts: <0.01 ac
Bank Stabilization: 10 if
Permit Site 2: Stream UT2 is a perennial unnamed tributary to the Toxaway River that
will be impacted by the replacement of a 24" CMP with a new, longer, 30" reinforced
concrete pipe (RCP) with bank stabilization placed at the outlet.
Permanent Stream Impacts: 371f
Temporary Stream Impacts: <0.01 ac
Bank Stabilization: 15 if
Permit Site 3: Stream UT3 is a perennial unnamed tributary to the Toxaway River that
will be impacted by its relocation into 30" corrugated steel pipe (CSP) with bank
stabilization placed at the outlet.
Permanent Stream Impacts (Stream 213): 265 if
Temporary Stream Impacts (Stream 213): <0.01 ac
Bank Stabilization: 10 if
Permit Site 4: Stream UT8 is a intermittent unnamed tributary to the Toxaway River
that will be impacted by its relocation into 18" RCP with bank stabilization placed at the
outlet.
Permanent Stream Impacts: 761f
Temporary Stream Impacts: <0.01 ac
Bank Stabilization: 11 if
Permit Site 5: Stream UT9 is an intermittent unnamed tributary to the Toxaway River
that will be impacted by bank stabilization placed at the outlet of an 18" RCP.
Permanent Stream Impacts: 0 if
Temporary Stream Impacts: <0.01 ac
Bank Stabilization: 10 if
Permit Site 6A: Stream UT5 is a perennial unnamed tributary to Indian Creek that will
be impacted by its relocation into a 30" CSP.
Permanent Stream Impacts: 3591f
Temporary Stream Impacts: <0.01 ac
Permit Site 6B: Stream UT4 is perennial unnamed tributary to Indian Creek that will be
impacted by its relocation into a 42" RCP with bank stabilization placed at the outlet.
Permanent Stream Impacts: 3591f
Temporary Stream Impacts: <0.01 ac
Bank Stabilization: 10 if
5

Permit Site 7: Stream UT6 is a perennial unnamed tributary to Indian Creek that will be
impacted by the replacement of a 24" CMP with a new, longer, 30" reinforced concrete
pipe (RCP) with bank stabilization placed at the outlet.
Permanent Stream Impacts: 321f
Temporary Stream Impacts: <0.01 ac
Bank Stabilization: 11 if
Permit Site 8: Stream UT7 is a perennial unnamed tributary to Indian Creek that will be
impacted by the replacement of a 24" CMP with a new, longer, 24" CSP with bank
stabilization placed at the outlet.
Permanent Stream Impacts: 1721f
Temporary Stream Impacts: <0.01 ac
Bank Stabilization: 10 if
MORATORIUM
Email correspondence from Marla Chambers of the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission ( NCWRC) dated November 20, 2006 stated there were no trout
moratoriums for this project. By copy of this letter and attachment, NCDOT hereby
requests NCWRC review. NCDOT requests that NCWRC forward their comments to the
Corps of Engineers and the NCDOT within 30 calendar days of receipt of this
application.
FEDERALLY PROTECTED SPECIES
Plants and animals with Federal classification of Endangered (E) or Threatened (T) are
protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended. As of August 7, 2014 the USFWS lists ten federally protected species
for Transylvania County (Table 3).
Table 3. Federally protected species listed for Transylvania County.
Scientific Name
Common Name
Federal
Status
Habitat
present
Biological
Conclusion
Glyptemys muhlenbergii
Bog turtle
T(S /A)
No
Not Required
Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus
Carolina northern flying squirrel
E
No
No Effect
Myotis grisescens
Gray bat
E
No
No Effect
Alasmidonta raveneliana
Appalachian elktoe
E
No
No Effect
Sarracenia rubra jonesii
Mountain sweet pitcher plant
E
No
No Effect
Isotria medeoloides
Small whorled pogonia
T
Yes
MANLTAA
Geum radiatum
Spreading avens
E
No
No Effect
Helonias bullata
Swamp pink
T
No
No Effect
Spiraea virginiana
Virginia spiraea
T
Yes
No Effect
Gymnoderma lineare
Rock gnome lichen
E
No
No Effect
0

Summary of Species with Habitat
Small whorled pogonia — Concurrence for this species was received from USFWS on
October 24, 2013 for May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect.
A US Fish and Wildlife Service proposal for listing the Northern Long -eared Bat (Myotis
septentrionalis) as an Endangered species was published in the Federal Register in
October 2013. The listing will become effective on or before April, 2015. Furthermore,
this species is included in USFWS's current list of protected species for Transylvania
County. NCDOT is working closely with the USFWS to understand how this proposed
listing may impact NCDOT projects. NCDOT will continue to coordinate appropriately
with USFWS to determine if this project will incur potential effects to the Northern long -
eared bat, and how to address these potential effects, if necessary.
INDIRECT CUMULATIVE IMPACT ANALYSIS
Existing rules for the 401 Water Quality Certification Program (15A NCAC 2H
.0506(b)(4)) require that the NCDWR determine that a project "does not result in
cumulative impacts, based on past or reasonably anticipated future impacts, that cause or
will cause a violation of downstream water quality standards."
Indirect and Cumulative Effects
Existing land use in the vicinity of the project is comprised primarily of undeveloped,
forested land, large lot single - family residential subdivisions (the majority of which are
vacation homes) and widely scattered and infrequent commercial and institutional land
uses.
According to the Transylvania County Comprehensive Plan (February 2005) a large
portion of land within the Future Land Use Study Area (FLUSA) is designated as Rural
Resources (parcels > 200 acres) which is defined as "land currently committed to rural
agriculture, forestry or residential development and not requiring public water or
services. The greatest percentage of non - forest land in the County is rural. This category
also includes private lands where each parcel is greater than 200 acres. These lands are
identified for natural resource management and have high potential for commercial,
agriculture and forestry use. These lands often have one or more limitations that would
make development costly and /or hazardous; and lands containing irreplaceable, limited,
or significant natural, wildlife, recreational or scenic resources." The Plan further states
that "based on existing trends, the County will remain a predominately rural, residential
County."
While the attraction of natural resources is seen as an asset for the economy in terms of
the tourism draw, the presence of protected land (Gorges State Park), steep topography
and slopes and the lack of water and sewer infrastructure are also a hindrance to large
scale commercial and industrial development and more dense residential development.
In addition, the potential for change in land use will also be tempered by the relatively
low market for development, in part because of low projected population (annual growth
7

of about 0.7% for Transylvania County between 2010 and 2030) and relatively low
employment growth projections (1.6% annualized growth through 2020 for the Mountain
Area WDB).
Based upon the analysis and the output of the ICE Screening Matrix, this project has
minimal likelihood to increase the development potential of and intensity in the areas
adjacent to the STIP R -2409C corridor. With the exception of a slight decrease in travel
time, estimated to be below 2 minutes if traveling the length of the project, the project
will not result in other transportation impact causing activities (TICA) which have
potential to influence land development decisions such as an increase in exposure, change
in access, creation of a transportation/land use node or a change in travel patterns.
Although some development is expected to continue to occur in the FLUSA in the No-
Build scenario, it will occur at an even lesser degree.
Minimal potential exists for water resources within the FLUSA to be impacted given the
level of past, present, and planned public and private development projects. No
designated High Quality Waters (HQW), Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), or
Protected or Critical Water Supply Watershed areas occur within one mile of the project
study area. HQW waters do exist within the Bearwallow Creek watershed approximately
1.8 miles south of the project study area. Waterways within the Gorges State Park are
classified as Trout Waters, High Quality Waters (HQW) and Outstanding Resource
Waters (ORW). However, comprehensive planning in the form of County ordinances,
NPDES storm water permitting requirements and the implementation of Best
Management Practices during construction, including sediment and erosion control
measures, will minimize any potential indirect and cumulative effects on these resources.
Because minimal indirect impacts are anticipated, the cumulative effect of this project
when considered in the context of other past present and future actions, and the resulting
impact on the notable human and natural features, should be minimal. Therefore, this
project will likely not result in a significant change in impervious surface and potential
indirect and cumulative effects to downstream water quality should be minimal.
Direct natural environmental impacts by NCDOT projects will be addressed by
programmatic agreements with resource agencies, and will be further evaluated by the
NCDOT Natural Environment Unit during project permitting. Natural environmental
impacts that may result from any induced development may be avoided or minimized
through the implementation of local, state and federal regulations.
CULTURAL RESOURCES
Archaeology
This project will not impact any archaeological sites
Historic Architecture
The project area contains no properties listed on or eligible for the National Register of
Historic Places thus the project will have no affect on any historic properties.

SECTION 4(f)
Section 4(f) and de minimis
Approximately 7.26 acres of park property are located with the proposed right of way
limits. A portion will be replaced by acquiring and transferring approximately 2.58 acres
of private property between US 64 and the park. This action was approved by the North
Carolina General Assembly in House Bill 1139 on July 7, 2014.
FHWA considers the impacts from the project to this 4(f) protected site to be minimal.
FHWA has made a 4(f) "de minimis" determination [23 CFR 774.17(5) (2)] based on
concurrence from NC DENR Division of Parks and Recreation that the project will not
adversely affect the features, attributes, or activities qualifying the property for protection
under Section 4(f).
FEMA COMPLIANCE
The project has been coordinated with appropriate state and local officials and the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to assure compliance with FEMA,
state, and local floodway regulations.
WILD AND SCENIC RIVER SYSTEM
The project will not impact any designated Wild and Scenic Rivers or any rivers included
in the list of Study Rivers (Public Law -542, as amended).
MITIGATION OPTIONS
The NCDOT is committed to incorporating all reasonable and practicable design features
to avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts, and to provide either on -site or
compensatory mitigation of all remaining, unavoidable jurisdictional impacts. Avoidance
measures were taken during the planning and NEPA compliance stages; minimization
measures were incorporated as part of the project design.
Avoidance and Minimization
Avoidance and minimization measures for the Planning and Design Phase include the
following items:
• The design was shifted to avoid a colony of threatened small whorled pogonia
plants
• A retaining wall will be constructed to stabilize the slope and prevent erosion in
the hillside below the plants
• The alignment was shifted to preserve the tree canopy above the plants to
minimize disturbance to the plants microclimate
• Retaining walls were utilized at Permit Sites 3 and 8 to minimize impacts to
jurisdictional streams.
9

Compensatory Mitigation
There is no onsite mitigation propped for this project.
Proposed Mitigation for R -2409C
Permanent Stream Impacts on Project 1,070 If
Impacts Requiring Mitigation from USACE (See Table 2) 983 if
(Impacts Requiring Mitigation from NCDWQ) 7301f
Impacts requiring Mitigation from EEP 983 if
REGULATORY APPROVALS
Application is hereby made for a USACE Individual 404 Permit as required for the
above - described activities. Application is hereby made for a Section 401 Water Quality
Certification from the N.C. Division of Water Quality. In compliance with Section 143 -
215.3DC of the NCAC we have provided a method of debiting $570, as noted in the
subject line of this application, as payment for processing the Section 401 Water Quality
Certification application. We are providing five copies of this application to DWQ, for
their use.
A copy of this permit application will be posted to the DOT website at:
http: / /www.nedot.org/ doh / preconstruct /pe /neu/permit.html. If you have any questions or
need additional information, please contact Jeff Hemphill at iemphill a,ncdot. og_v or
(919) 707 -6126.
Sincerely,
Richard W. Hancock, P.E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit
cc:
NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List
10

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-0003
EXPIRES: 28 FEBRUARY 2013
33 CFR 325. The proponent agency is CECW -CO -R.
Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to average 11 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect of the collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense,
Washington Headquarters, Executive Services and Communications Directorate, Information Management Division and to the Office of Management and
Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710- 0003). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be
subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please DO NOT
RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of
the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries
Act, Section 103, 33 USC 1413; Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers; Final Rule 33 CFR 320 -332. Principal Purpose: Information provided on
this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other
federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by Federal law. Submission
of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit be issued. One set
of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application (see
sample drawings and /or instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application
that is not completed in full will be returned.
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO.
2. FIELD OFFICE CODE
3. DATE RECEIVED
4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETE
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BYAPPLICANT)
5. APPLICANT'S NAME
8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (agent is not required)
First - Richard Middle -W. Last - Hancock
First - Phil Middle - Last - Harris
Company - NCDOT -PDEA
Company - NCDOT NES
E -mail Address - rwhancock @ncdot.gov
E -mail Address - pharris @ncdot.gov
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS:
9. AGENT'S ADDRESS:
Address-
Address -
City - State - Zip - Country -
City - State - Zip - Country -
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOs. w /AREA CODE
10. AGENTS PHONE NOs. WAREA CODE
a. Residence b. Business c. Fax
a. Residence b. Business c. Fax
919- 707 -6000
STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
11. 1 hereby authorize, to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request,
supplemental information in support of this permit application.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE
NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
US 64 Safety Improvement Project from West of NC 281 at Lake Toxaway to Indian Creek in Transylvania County
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable)
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
See permit drawings and cover letter
Address
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Latitude: -N 35.12433 Longitude: -W 82.91965
City - State- Zip -
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions)
State Tax Parcel ID Municipality
Section - Township - Range -
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. Page 1 of 3

17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
Please see attached vicinity map and cover letter.
18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features)
The improvement and expansion of the existing roadway to a multi -lane road facility.
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions)
The purpose of the project is to add traffic capacity, system linkage and safety to US 64.
USE BLOCKS 20 -23 IF DREDGED AND /OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
Roadway fill (in wetlands and surface water), pipe /culvert construction, stream relocation.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards:
Type Type Type
Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards
See attached cover letter.
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)
Acres See attached cover letter.
or
Linear Feet See attached cover letter.
23. Description of Avoidance, Minimization, and Compensation (see instructions)
See attached cover letter.
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 Page 2 of 3

24. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes ONo IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
25. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (it more than can be entered here, please attach a supplemental list).
a. Address- See attached permit drawings.
City - State - Zip -
b. Address -
City - State - Zip -
c. Address -
City - State - Zip -
d. Address -
city - State - Zip -
e. Address -
City - State - Zip -
26. List of Other Certificates or Approvals /Denials received from other Federal, State, or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL' IDENTIFICATION DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
NUMBER
Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building, and flood plain permits
27. Application is hereby made for permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that this information in this application is
complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the
applicant.
SIGNATURE OF PPI�(CANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
For P%C1q. JC6 1 . ffAA1cCPc4C
The Application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled outond signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both:. , ,
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 Page 3 of 3

A rit
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Ecosystem Enhancement Program Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
January 13, 2015
Mr. Richard W. Hancock, P.E.
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1548
Dear Mr. Hancock:
Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
R- 2409C, US 64 from Cashiers to Rosman, Transylvania County
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) will provide the
compensatory stream mitigation for the subject project. Based on the information supplied by you on January 8,
2015, the impacts are located in CU 03060101 of the Savannah River basin in the Southern Mountains (SM) Eco-
Region, and are as follows:
Savannah
Stream
Wetlands
Buffer (Sq. Ft.)
03060101
SM
Cold
Cool
Warm
Riparian
Non-
Coastal
Zone 1
Zone 2
Riparian
Marsh
Impacts (feet/acres)
983.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Some of the stream impacts may be proposed to be mitigated at a 1:1 mitigation ratio. See permit application for details.
EEP commits to implementing sufficient compensatory stream mitigation credits to offset the impacts
associated with this project as determined by the regulatory agencies in accordance with the N.C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources' Ecosystem Enhancement Program In -Lieu Fee Instrument dated July 28, 2010.
If the above referenced impact amounts are revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter will no longer be valid and
a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required from EEP.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Beth Harmon at 919- 707 -8420.
Sincerely,
VB. gement Supervisor
cc: Ms. Lori Beckwith, USACE — Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Mr. Kevin Barrett, NCDWR — Swannanoa Office
Ms. Linda Fitzpatrick, NCDOT — PDEA
File: R -2409C
1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1652
Phone: [phone] Internet: hfp: / /po0al.ncdenr.org /web /eep
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — Made in part by recycled paper

Hemphill, Jeffrey L
From: Marla Chambers <chambersmj @carolina.rr.com>
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 1:24 PM
To: 'Shay Garriock'
Subject: RE: Your message
I don't believe I've formally commented, I'm way behind on scoping comments. But I have checked with our biologists and we don't
have trout or smallmouth bass concerns for this project. However, blackbanded darter, Percina nigrofasciata (NCSR); rosyface chub,
Hybopsis rubrifrons (NCT); yellowfin shiner, Notropis lutipinnis (NCSC); turquoise darter, Etheostoma inscriptum (NCSC); and
Oconee stream crayfish, Cambarus chaugaensis (NCSC) are known from the Toxoway River in NC downstream from the project area
(upstream from Lake Jocassee). Additionally, Oconee stream crayfish occurs in Indian Creek. Sediment and erosion control for
sensitive watersheds should apply to reduce impacts to these aquatic resources occurring downstream.
NCSR - state Significantly Rare
NCT - state Threatened
NCSC - state Special Concern
I hope this is helpful. Let me know if you need anything further.
Marla J. Chambers
Western NCDOT Permit Coordinator
N.C. Wildlife Resources Comm.
4614 Wilgrove -Mint Hill Rd., Suite M
Charlotte, NC 28227
chambersmi n.carolina.rr.com
phone: [phone]
fax: [phone]
cell: 704 - 984 -1070
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Shay Garriock [mailto:shaYgn,mindspring coin]
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 12:29 PM
To: Marla Chambers
Subject: Re: Your message
Hi Marla,
Thanks for the update. I am contacting you to inquire if you have formally
commented on R- 2409C, the widening of a section of US 64 between Indian
Creek and Lake Toxoway in Transylvania Co. We are doing the NRTR and have
received comments on the draft from NCDOT. They questioned if we had
corresponded on the project with WRC concerning trout waters and if a
construction moritorium would be required.
Thank you,
Shay Garriock
The Catena Group
Office: 919- 732 -1300
Mobile: [phone]
- - - -- Original Message - - - --

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
October 24, 2013
Ms. Deborah Barbour, P.E.
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1598
Dear Ms. Barbour:
Subject: Endangered Species Concurrence for the Proposed Construction of North Carolina
Department of Transportation Project R -2409C - Improvement to US 64 from West of
NC 281 to Indian Creek, Transylvania County, North Carolina
On September 17, 2013, we received your letter (via email) requesting section 7 concurrence on
effects the subject bridge project may have on the federally threatened small whorled pogonia
(Isotria medeoloides). The following comments are provided in accordance with section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 -1543) (Act).
Your concurrence request letter states that the small whorled pogonia is present adjacent to the
existing right -of -way and could be affected by some of the project alternatives. It appears that
the selection of the recommended alternative, plus the addition of a retaining wall to avoid a cut
slope which may have affected small whorled pogonia habitat, will allow for the avoidance of all
known small whorled pogonias at this site. With these conservation measures, we believe the
probability that there will be negative effects to the species is low and concur with your
biological conclusion of may affect, not likely to adversely affect. Therefore, we believe the
requirements under section 7(c) of the Act are fulfilled. However, obligations under section 7 of
the Act must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action
that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this
action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new
species is listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the identified action.

If we can be of assistance or if you have any questions about these comments, please contact
Mr. Jason Mays of our staff at 828/258 -3939, Ext. 226. In any future correspondence concerning
this project, please reference our Log Number 4 -2 -07 -001.
Sincerely,
anet A. Mizzi
Field Supervisor

December 7, 2007
To: Paul White, P.E., Design Construction Engineer
NCDOT Division 14 Office
From: Brian Wiles, PE, Project Manager
Ko & Associates, P.C. Consulting Engineers
Subject: R- 2409C, US 64, Safety Improvements and Climbing Lanes from Lake
Toxaway to Indian Creek, Transylvania County, North Carolina
On November 29, 2007, an interagency meeting was held to discuss revisions to
the project since the 10 /10 /06 interagency meeting. These revisions were made
to avoid a small - whorled pogonia plant population while minimizing impacts to
streams and Gorges State Park land. The following people attended the
meeting:
Troy Wilson
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Carolyn Wells
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Dave Baker
US Army Corps of Engineers
Donnie Brew
Federal Highway Administration
Marshall Ellis
DENR Division of Parks and Recreation
Brian Wrenn
DENR Division of Water Quality
Mike Parker
DENR Division of Water Quality
Joel Setzer
NCDOT Division 14 Office
Jamie Wilson
NCDOT Division 14 Office
Mark Davis
NCDOT Division 14 Office
Paul White
NCDOT Division 14 Office
Owen Anderson
NCDOT Division 14 Office
Jeff Hemphill
NCDOT PD &EA Branch
Steve Mitchell
NCDOT PD &EA Branch
Dennis Herman
NCDOT PD &EA Branch
Shay Garriock
The Catena Group
Brian Wiles
Ko & Associates
Mark Reep
Ko & Associates
Two alternatives are being studied in detail (see meeting handout for additional
project information).
• Alternate 2 realigns portions of the roadway to provide flatter horizontal
curves and achieves a minimum design speed of 30 mph. It avoids the
small - whorled pogonia plant population.

December 7, 2007
R- 2409C, US 64, Transylvania County
Page 2
• Alternate 4 corrects more of the alignment deficiencies, straightens curves,
and increases the design speed to 40 mph. It also avoids the small - whorled
pogonia population.
The following is a summary of major items discussed during the meeting.
Small- whorled pogonia
Alternates 2 and 4 will not directly disturb the embankment where the plant
population is located. The side slope is currently eroding. US Fish and Wildlife
( USFWS) representatives request this roadway slope be stabilized and asked to
review the revegetation plans for the project when available. Ideas may
include planting native vegetation and /or installing mesh fabric with anchor
units. To preserve the tree canopy, tree clearing can be limited to the slope
stake line near the plant population. These items will be considered as
environmental commitments for the project.
It was suggested that NCDOT send a letter to USFWS requesting concurrence
that the project will have no effect on the small - whorled pogonia. Ko &
Associates agreed to email a copy of the alternate design concepts near the
plant population for Troy Wilson and Carolyn Wells to review.
Stream Crossings
Army Corps of Engineers (COE) and NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
representatives asked that the designs be refined to minimize impacts to the
following:
• Perennial streams
• The parallel unnamed tributaries 4 and 5
• The unnamed tributary 1 at NC 281
Based on a jurisdictional field review of the streams, some of the perennial and
intermittent stream limits will need to be revised. Also, the revised Alternate 2
and 4 footprints appear to extend beyond the original stream delineation limits
in some areas. NCDOT, Ko & Associates, and The Catena Group will determine
the extent of additional studies needed to update the stream delineations and
the Natural Resources Technical Report.
Gorges State Park
Gorges State Park officials are most concerned about the following issues:
• Minimization of water quality impacts through stringent erosion control

December 7, 2007
R- 2409C, US 64, Transylvania County
Page 3
• Use of native plant species (no invasive species) for stabilizing the
construction slopes after construction in the area of the park boundaries
• Request for new park boundaries to join the roadway right of way with no
private parcels in between
Based on the interagency meeting input, the following action items are
proposed:
• Email a copy of the alternate design concepts near the plant population
for USFWS to review (Ko & Associates)
• Continue refining Alternates 2 and 4 to minimize impacts and update
stream limits and other natural resource issues (Ko & Associates and The
Catena Group with work with NCDOT to define the additional work effort
for surveys, roadway designs, and natural systems studies.)
• Provide refined designs and impact calculations to the meeting
participants
• Schedule a future interagency conference call to review the alternatives
• Additional public involvement opportunities will be considered
cc: Meeting Participants

KO & ASSOCIATES, R C.
Consulting Engineers
October 22, 2008
To: Interagency Meeting Participants
From: Brian Wiles, PE, Project Manager
Ko & Associates, P.C. Consulting Engineers
Subject: R- 2409C, US 64, Safety Improvements and Climbing Lanes from Lake
Toxaway to Indian Creek, Transylvania County, North Carolina
This is to update you on the R -24090 planned improvements to US 64 in
Transylvania County. This follows an 11 /29/07 interagency meeting for input on
the project alternatives (see attached meeting minutes). We will be contacting
you to schedule a conference call to discuss the latest project developments.
The primary issues of concern have been: avoiding a population of small -
whorled pogonia plants, minimizing impacts to Gorges State Park, and
minimizing impacts to perennial streams. Since the November meeting, natural
system surveys and design adjustments have been completed. Additional
stream limits were delineated. No new federally protected species were
identified, The initial alternatives included 12 foot travel lanes and 4 foot
shoulders, The updated alternatives were shifted at Indian Creek, UT 1, UT 4, and
UT 5, Shoulders have increased to 6 feet and lane widths have increased to as
wide as 16 feet in curves to better contain trucks. A summary of updated
stream impacts is provided as follows:
Alternatives
• Alternate 2 realigns portions of the roadway to provide flatter horizontal
curves and achieves a minimum design speed of 30 mph. It avoids the
small- whorled pogonia plant population.
• Alternate 4 corrects more of the alignment deficiencies, straightens curves,
and increases the design speed to 40 mph. It also avoids the small- whorled
pogonia population.
Small- whorled pogonia
• A Small - whorled pogonia population (8 plants) was identified in June 2006. It
is located on the north side of US 64 at the eastern end of the project,
approximately 50 feet from the existing road.
• Alternatives 2 and 4 avoid the population by following the existing alignment
in the area of the plants.
5121 Kingdom way, Suite 100 • Raleigh, NC 27607 • Phone: 919 - 851 -6066 • Fax. 919 - 851 -6846

October 22, 2008
R- 2409C, US 64, Transylvania County
Page 2
Gorges State Park
• Gorges State Park is part of the NC State Parks System and is located along
the south side of US 64 at the western end of the project.
• All alternatives would require temporary construction easements of
permanent use of park land.
Water Resources
The following jurisdictional stream systems are located within the project study
area: UT's 1 -3 and 8 -9 to Toxaway River, UT's 4 -7 to Indian Creek, and Indian
Creek (see Figure 3 for locations).
• UT1 is a large perennial stream with a sand, gravel, and cobble substrate
(R3UB1 /2) approximately 12 feet wide with banks 4 to 6 feet high. - no
change
• UT2 is a perennial stream with a sand, gravel, and cobble substrate (R4UB1 /2)
approximately 4 feet wide with banks 2 feet high.
• UT3 enters the project study area as a perennial stream approximately 4 feet
wide with banks 2 feet high; it goes underground upstream of the culvert.
Downstream of the culvert, it emerges as an intermittent stream
approximately 3 feet wide with banks 3 feet high, and then becomes
perennial before leaving the project area. It has a sand, gravel, and cobble
substrate (R4UB1 /2) throughout,
• UT4 is a small perennial stream with a bedrock substrate (R3UB1 /2)
approximately 4 feet wide with banks 6 feet high, - no change
• UT5 is a perennial stream with a sand, gravel, and cobble substrate (R4UB1 /2)
approximately 3 feet wide with banks 3 feet high.
• UT6 is a perennial stream with a sand, gravel, and cobble substrate (R4UB1 /2)
approximately 3 feet wide with banks 2 feet high.
• North of US 64, UT7 is an intermittent stream; after flowing under the road, UT7
emerges as a perennial stream. UT7 has a sand, gravel, cobble, and boulder
substrate (R4UB1 /2) and is approximately 3 feet wide with banks 3 feet high
throughout.
• UT8 is an intermittent stream with a sand, gravel, and cobble substrate
(R4UB1 /2) approximately 2 -3 feet wide with banks ranging to 5 feet high,
• UT9 is an intermittent stream with a sand, gravel, and cobble substrate
(R4UB1 /2) approximately 2 -3 feet wide with banks approximately 2 feet high.
• Indian Creek is a large perennial stream with a bedrock substrate (R2RB1 /2)
approximately 20 feet wide with banks up to 6 feet.

October 22, 2008
R- 24090, US 64, Trans&ania County
Page 3
Table 1. Jurisdictional Areas within Proposed Alternates' Cut -Fill Boundaries
Site
Alternate 2
Alternate 4
Linear
Area
Linear
Area
Distance
cres)
Distance
(acres)
UT 1
12
0.003
20
0.006
UT 2
-
--
37
0.003
UT 3
16
0.001
309
0.021
UT 4
281
0,026
105
0.010
UT 5
75
0.005
180
0.12
UT 6
43
0.003
9
0.001
UT 7
180
0.012
216
0.015
UT 8
--
--
28
0.003
UT 9
--
Indian
Creek
TOTAL
607
0,051
934
0.071

R- 2409C, US 64, Safety Improvements and Climbing Lanes from Lake
Toxaway to Indian Creek, Transylvania County, North Carolina
Interagency Meeting Participants
Troy Wilson
US Fish and Wildlife Service
[e-mail]
Carolyn Wells
US Fish and Wildlife Service
[e-mail]
Marella Buncick
US Fish and Wildlife Service
marella_buncick @fws. ov
David Baker
US Army Corps of Engineers
[e-mail]
Donnie Brew
Federal Highway Administration
Donnie, Brew @fhwa.dot, ov
Marla Chambers
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
marla.chambers @ctc.net
Marshall Ellis
DENR Division of Parks &
Recreation
[e-mail]
Rob Evans
DENR Division of Parks &
Recreation
rob.evans @ncmail.net
Steve Pagano
Gorges State Park
[e-mail]
Brian Wrenn
DENR Division of Water Quality
brian.wrenn @ncmail.net
Mike Parker
DENR Division of Water Quality
[e-mail]
Joel Setzer
NCDOT Division 14 Office
[e-mail]
Jamie Wilson
NCDOT Division 14 Office
[e-mail]
Steve Williams
NCDOT Division 14 Office
[e-mail]
Mark Davis
NCDOT Division 14 Office
[e-mail]
Owen Anderson
NCDOT Division 14 Office
[e-mail]
Carla Da nino
NCDOT PD &EA Branch
cda nino @ncdot. ov
Jeff Hemphill
NCDOT PD &EA Branch
jhem hill@ncdot. ov
Steve Mitchell
NCDOT PD &EA Branch
srmifchell @ncdot. ov
Dennis Herman
NCDOT PD &EA Branch
[e-mail]
Kris J. Dramb
NCDOT PD &EA Branch
Kate Montieth
The Cotena Group
montieth @thecatena rou .com
Brian Wiles
Ko & Associates
wiles @koassociates.com
Clay Oliver
Ko & Associates
coliver @koassociates.com
Mark Reep
Ko & Associates
mreep @koassociates.com

•its - •
New Project Boundary N
y f ;
f6 t .� V' Alternate 2 Cut -Fill Boundary
~ Cut
' \yt
The
Catena
Gf ©Up
�� .� , �r Alternate 4 -Fill Boundary
Streams
Date:
µ •' '� is
+� '
July 2008
Scale:
As Shown
UT1 .�, UT , ;: h., ' -': ti '.'. I
w ;,
' � . ���� i�' "' � ��� •.,jam
6105
.2+ yr7•
ti ' • ��:�� i
7 +.
lk
OL
y
Boundaries:
,�
+ L UT3 ; � � �.
Alternates
2 and 4
'R 1" r
•+
TIP R -24690
',�� Alternate 2 '� UT 7
r+
US 64 From Lake
Toxaway to
t
'
Indian Creek
- uT 6
Transylvania County,
- r °
''
North Carolina
.. Alternate 4
y
# ti ti UT 4 a,
Client:
Indian Creek
UT 8 _..
Kn & Associates
UT 5 � �
t ' k
UT 9
r r
r.
t ` -
*N"
g u e
�, r
0 250 500 1,000 Feet ► tf ; ♦ �,/�� f \ #vim ".,," _ �; .

KO & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
Consulting Engineers
December 7, 2007
To: Paul White, P.E., Design Construction Engineer
NCDOT Division 14 Office
From: Brian Wiles, PE, Project Manager
Ko & Associates, P.C. Consulting Engineers
Subject: R- 2409C, US 64, Safety Improvements and Climbing Lanes from Lake
Toxaway to Indian Creek, Transylvania County, North Carolina
On November 29, 2007, an interagency meeting was held to discuss revisions to
the project since the 10/10/06 interagency meeting. These revisions were made
to avoid a small- whorled pogonia plant population while minimizing impacts to
streams and Gorges State Park land. The following people attended the
meeting:
Troy Wilson
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Carolyn Wells
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Dave Baker
US Army Corps of Engineers
Donnie Brew
Federal Highway Administration
Marshall Ellis
DENR Division of Parks and Recreation
Brian Wrenn
DENR Division of Water Quality
Mike Parker
DENR Division of Water Quality
Joel Setzer
NCDOT Division 14 Office
Jamie Wilson
NCDOT Division 14 Office
Mark Davis
NCDOT Division 14 Office
Paul White
NCDOT Division 14 Office
Owen Anderson
NCDOT Division 14 Office
Jeff Hemphill
NCDOT PD &EA Branch
Steve Mitchell
NCDOT PD &EA Branch
Dennis Herman
NCDOT PD &EA Branch
Shay Garriock
The Catena Group
Brian Wiles
Ko & Associates
Mark Reep
Ko & Associates
Two alternatives are being studied in detail (see meeting handout for additional
project information).
• Alternate 2 realigns portions of the roadway to provide flatter horizontal
curves and achieves a minimum design speed of 30 mph. It avoids the
small - whorled pogonia plant population.
5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100 • Raleigh, IBC 27607 - Phone: 919 - 851 -6066 • Fax: [phone]

December 7, 2007
R- 24090, US 64, Transylvania County
Page 2
• alternate 4 corrects more of the alignment deficiencies, straightens curves,
and increases the design speed to 40 mph. It also avoids the small- whorled
pogonia population.
The following is a summary of major items discussed during the meeting.
Small - whorled pogonia
Alternates 2 and 4 will not directly disturb the embankment where the plant
population is located. The side slope is currently eroding. US Fish and Wildlife
(USFWS) representatives request this roadway slope be stabilized and asked to
review the revegetation plans for the project when available. Ideas may
include planting native vegetation and /or installing mesh fabric with anchor
units. To preserve the tree canopy, tree clearing can be limited to the slope
stake line near the plant population. These items will be considered as
environmental commitments for the project.
It was suggested that NCDOT send a letter to USFWS requesting concurrence
that the project will have no effect on the small- whorled pogonia. Ko &
Associates agreed to email a copy of the alternate design concepts near the
plant population for Troy Wilson and Carolyn Wells to review.
Stream Crossin s
Army Corps of Engineers (COE) and NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
representatives asked that the designs be refined to minimize impacts to the
following:
• Perennial streams
• The parallel unnamed tributaries 4 and 5
• The unnamed tributary 1 at NC 281
Based on a jurisdictional field review of the streams, some of the perennial and
intermittent stream limits will need to be revised. Also, the revised Alternate 2
and 4 footprints appear to extend beyond the original stream delineation limits
in some areas. NCDOT, Ko & Associates, and The Catena Group will determine
the extent of additional studies needed to update the stream delineations and
the Natural Resources Technical Report.
Gorges State Park
Gorges State Park officials are most concerned about the following issues:
• Minimization of water quality impacts through stringent erosion control

December 7, 2007
R- 24090, US 64, Transylvania County
Page 3
• Use of native plant species (no invasive species) for stabilizing the
construction slopes after construction in the area of the park boundaries
• Request for new park boundaries to join the roadway right of way with no
private parcels in between
Based on the interagency meeting input, the following action items are
proposed:
• Email a copy of the alternate design concepts near the plant population
for USFWS to review (Ko & Associates)
• Continue refining Alternates 2 and 4 to minimize impacts and update
stream limits and other natural resource issues (Ko & Associates and The
Catena Group with work with NCDOT to define the additional work effort
for surveys, roadway designs, and natural systems studies.)
• Provide refined designs and impact calculations to the meeting
participants
• Schedule a future interagency conference call to review the alternatives
• Additional public involvement opportunities will be considered
cc: Meeting Participants

as
PI Stu 62 +83J2
ZS = 97' 34' 16.4' (RT)
D = E6 02'36.7'
1 = 374.65'
T = 25IJBI U
R = 220,W
SE = 0.08
rW 7n "M-
0
P/ Sto 73 +2629
A = V02'45EW)
D = 26 02,36T
L = 157.61'
T = 82-36'
R 220.00'
SE = 0.08
DS = 30 MPH
END CLIMBING LANE 0
POC Sto 69+00-00
idusl Plants pogonia, Indiv
,Mali \Nhoried
PI Sto 65 +50.49
L = 65*0937L"(LT)
D 26 02' 367'
L = 250.20'
T = 140,59'
R = 220.W
SE = 0D8
DS = 30 MPH
k*'
02
Id
P1 Sto 75-k8698
A = 10'53'465'(RT)
L 104j67 It ,t4 I F� ACED dy CM /C
No SORVE
T 52.46'
R 550j09
SE = 0.06
DS = 40 MPH
Z"
PC stc
N\ 48f
\4
C,
--------------
P1 Sta 70+27D4
A = 5Z4-'J'24Z(LT)
D = 260Z JG.P
L 202BY
T 10926'
R 220.W
SE = 0.08
DS = 30 MPH
444
P1 Sto 74 +4451
A = 14'5Z IL� T),
D = 17'21' 44-5*
L 85.65'
T 43j96
R 33ODLY
SE 0.08
72i-4j,94 DS JS MPH
LOTS 1-8
SECTION ONE
CATATGGA FALLS COTTAGES
1EXCEPTION)
FILE $0. SLIDE 971
P1 Ste 78*99-30
A 14'4F42V(RT)
D Ir 2T jjxr
L 128-97'
T 64.84'
R 500.W
SE = 0.08
05 = 40 MPH
R-2409C, US 64, Safety Improvements and
Climbing Lanes, Transylvania County
Alternate 2 (Near Indian Creek)
Scale: 1 " =100'

END CLIMBING LANE
Pl Sta 69+02A6
A = 45' 43'07Z (LT) }
D = 12 43'-%.F
L = 359D7'
T = 1897!'
R = 450.00'
S£ = 0218
DS = 40 MPH
Small \Nl)orled P090nla, lndlvldual Plants
1�0
ff
+' P1 Ste 63 +46,63
A - I7'29'07L(LT)
D _ 9'3,;57.5'
L = 183!1'
T = 92.27'
R - 600A0'
S£ = 0.08
DS = 40 MPH
.pM
"d
y �
END PR(
POTSta 75 +7
4A — I J4 '/1J on,
D - 5 43'46-5'
/
.a
�.
L = 13750'
T - 68.86'
-=
S£ 0,08
DS = 40 MPH
71 t
_
I
LOTS 1 -8
SECTION ONE
-��-ae r• I
CATATOGA
FALLS COTTAGES
(EXCEPTION)
I
�
FILE 1@, SLOE 3T(
f
�
��\
O�V
if
fffff
s
//' �•
'S1�
!V
PI Sta 72 +80.44
z = 2r 33' 40.9' (RT)
D = 12 43' 56.6'
L = 169.34'
T = 85.68
R = 450.OD
DS = 40 MPH
Pl Sta 69+02A6
A = 45' 43'07Z (LT) }
D = 12 43'-%.F
L = 359D7'
T = 1897!'
R = 450.00'
S£ = 0218
DS = 40 MPH
Small \Nl)orled P090nla, lndlvldual Plants
1�0
ff
+' P1 Ste 63 +46,63
A - I7'29'07L(LT)
D _ 9'3,;57.5'
L = 183!1'
T = 92.27'
R - 600A0'
S£ = 0.08
DS = 40 MPH
.pM
"d
y �
END PR(
POTSta 75 +7
E
/
POTENTIAL
END PROJECT R -2409C
PDSta 67 +1234
R- 24040, US 64, Safety Improvements and
Climbing Lanes, Transylvania County
Alternate 4 (Near Indian Creek)
Scale: V=
71 t
_
I
LOTS 1 -8
SECTION ONE
-��-ae r• I
CATATOGA
FALLS COTTAGES
(EXCEPTION)
I
�
FILE 1@, SLOE 3T(
E
/
POTENTIAL
END PROJECT R -2409C
PDSta 67 +1234
R- 24040, US 64, Safety Improvements and
Climbing Lanes, Transylvania County
Alternate 4 (Near Indian Creek)
Scale: V=

r KO &A SSOCIA TES, P.C.
Consulting Engineers
November 5, 2008
To: Steve Williams, Design Construction Engineer
NCDOT -Division 14 Office
From: Brian A. Wiles, PE, Project Managers, -�
Ko & Associates, P.C. Consulting Engineers
Subject: R- 24090, US 64, Safety Improvements and Climbing Lanes
from Lake Toxaway to Indian Creek, Transylvania County,
North Carolina
On October 31, 2008, a conference call was held to discuss the following
project developments: avoiding a population of the small- whorled
pogonia plants, minimizing impacts to Gorges State Park and to perennial
streams. The following people participated in the conference call:
Troy Wilson
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Dave Baker
US Army Corps of Engineers
Clarence Coleman
FHWA
Pete Caldwell
DENR, Parks & Recreation
Marla Chambers
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Steve Pagano
Gorges State Park
Brian Wrenn
DENR Division of Water Quality
Jamie Wilson
NCDOT Division 14 Office
Steve Williams
NCDOT Division 14 Office
Mark Davis
NCDOT Division 14 Office
Zac Lail
NCDOT Division 14 Office
Jeff Hemphill
NCDOT PD &EA Branch
Steve Mitchell
NCDOT PD &EA Branch
Dennis Herman
NCDOT PD &EA Branch
Kate Montieth
The Catena Group
Michael Wood
The Catena Group
Brian Wiles
Ko & Associates
Mark Reep
Ko & Associates
Clay Oliver
Ko & Associates
Two alternatives are being studied in detail.
• Alternate 2 realigns portions of the roadway to provide flatter
horizontal curves and achieves a minimum design speed of 30 mph.
It avoids the small- whorled pogonia plant population.
5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100 • Raleigh, NC 27607 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

-2-
• Alternate 4 corrects more of the alignment deficiencies, straightens
curves, and increases the design speed to 40 mph. It also avoids
the small- whorled pogonia population.
The following is a summary of major items discussed during the
conference call.
o Alternative 2 has less impact to streams and is further from the
population of small whorled pogonia plants. However, it involves
substantial grade differences (on the eastern end) compared to
existing US 64, making the temporary detours costly and difficult to
maintain traffic on site.
o Alternative 4 has greater stream impacts and is closer to the small
whorled pogonia population. On-site traffic maintenance for this
alternative is less problematic.
o Representatives from DWQ, the US Army Corps of Engineers, US Fish
and Wildlife, and WRC prefer Alternative 2 due to lesser stream
impacts, less construction outside of the existing right of way, and its
greater distance from the small whorled pogonia.
o Preserving the tree canopy in the area of the small whorled
pogonia is a major concern. It was agreed the alignment for
Alternative 4 would be changed to closely match the alignment of
Alternative 2 at the eastern end of the project. Pile panel walls, top
down construction, and geotechnical fabrics will be considered to
limit tree canopy removal in this area.
o Gorges State Park representatives favor Alternative 4. The Park
Advisory Committee supports this alternative for improving the road
conditions and taking less private property. Their concerns were
reiterated:
o Revising the park boundary to the new road boundary
without allowing any private parcels to remain between the
park and road right of way.
o Protecting water quality
o The USAGE noted that 300 feet of single stream impact is the limit for
which a nationwide permit is applicable. NCD ©T will utilize design
measures to address pipe end treatments, such as larger head walls
or rock plate walls, to further reduce the impacts below 300 feet,
particularly at UT 3.

-3-
a NCDOT favors Alternative 4 for its consfructability and design speed
improvements. It was agreed that Ko and Associates would adjust
the Alternative 4 design and send the revised information to the
interagency team to review before a follow up conference call in
the coming months.
Action Items:
a The NCDOT Division 14 Office will contact the Geotechnical Unit
regarding maximum acceptable slopes and retaining wall
construction issues. They will also contact the Right of Way Branch
regarding the process for transferring land between NCDOT and
Gorges State Park.
• NCDOT and Ko & Associates will revise the designs for Alternative 4
to avoid the small whorled pogonia population and to include pipe
end treatments to reduce impacts to larger stream crossings.
• More details will be provided on potential stream restoration in the
areas where existing pipes will be removed.
• NCDOT and Ko & Associates will revise the design, send the
information to the interagency team, and schedule a follow up
conference call.
• NCDOT and Ko & Associates will follow up with a letter to the NC
Division of Parks and Recreation requesting their comments in
support of the preferred alternative.
BW /lh
cc: Meeting Participants

Ko & ASSOCIATES, R C.
Consulting Engineers
October 26, 2006
To: Paul White, P.E., Design Construction Engineer
NCDOT Division 14 Office
From: Brian Wiles, PE, Project Manager
Ko & Associates, P.C. Consulting Engineers
Subject: R- 2409C, US 64, Safety Improvements and Climbing Lanes from Lake Toxaway to
Indian Creek, Transylvania County, North Carolina
On October 10, 2006, an interagency meeting (including a project site visit) was held to discuss NCDOT's
planned safety improvements to US 64 in Transylvania County. The purpose of the meeting was to
receive input from state and federal agencies on ways to reduce the project's effect on streams, a Small -
whorled pogonia plant population, and Gorges State Park.
The following people attended the meeting:
Denise Moldenhauer
Carolyn Wells
Dave Baker
Jake Riggsbee
Marshall Ellis
Brian Wrenn
Jane Conolly
Steve Pagano
Mark Davis
Jeff Hemphill
Cherri Smith
Steve Mitchell
Dennis Herman
Michael Turchy
Shay Garriock
Brian Wiles
Clay Oliver
Mark Reep
US Fish and Wildlife Service
US Fish and Wildlife Service
US Army Corps of Engineers
Federal Highway Administration
DENR Division of Parks and Recreation
DENR Division of Water Quality
Gorges State Park
Gorges State Park
NCDOT Division 14 Office
NCDOT Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
NCDOT Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
NCDOT Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
NCDOT Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
NCDOT Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
The Catena Group
Ko & Associates
Ko & Associates
Ko & Associates
An Environmental Assessment is underway for upgrading the narrow, curved, 1.5 -mile, two -lane portion
of US 64 near Lake Toxaway. The project proposes to straighten the roadway, where possible, provide
wider travel lanes and shoulders, and add a westbound climbing lane. Three alternatives have been
considered.
Alternate 1 follows the existing alignment without flattening any of the sharp horizontal curves.
This alternative maintains a minimum design speed of 20 mph.
Alternate 2 realigns portions of the roadway to provide flatter horizontal curves and achieves a
minimum design speed of 30 mph.
1011 Schaub Dr., Suite 202 9 Raleigh, NC 27606 • Phone: 919 - 851 -6066 • Fax: 919 - 851 -6846

Page 2 11/15/2012
• Alternate 3 requires the most realignment of horizontal curves. This alternative provides a minimum
design speed of 40 mph.
The meeting discussion focused on regulatory requirements and potential effects on the park.
Small- whorled pogonia
US Fish and Wildlife ( USFWS) representatives commented on indirect impacts to the small - whorled
pogonia species associated with micro - climate changes (tree canopy removal and drainage pattern
changes) and invasive plant species. The plants are located on the north side of the road at the top of the
cut slope at the eastern end of the project. This population is one of 14 known in the state. Some of the
known sites are declining in population.
With the proposed Alternate 3 alignment, the plants would remain on high ground above the road beds on
either side. Realigning the road to the north side in this area is not desirable from the USFWS perspective
and would not minimize the effect on the plants. In addition, the USFWS representatives request input on
the vegetation to be replanted with the project in the area of the Small- whorled pogonia. A management
plan will also need to be developed for monitoring the species in the fixture. An idea was mentioned for a
proposed conservation easement with long -term monitoring by agencies such as the State Park or
NCDOT.
In an effort to lessen the impacts, the meeting participants agreed that a modification of Alternate 3
should be considered. This concept would follow the existing road in the area of the plants, holding the
current cut slope in place and rejoining the Alternate 3 alignment west of the plant population. USFWS
representatives requested a second field review after the preliminary designs are available for the revised
option.
Gorges State Park
Gorges State Park officials favored the Alternate 3 alignment concept because it appears to have less of
an effect on the park land. Another benefit is the improved alignment design near the park. The park
officials expressed three main concerns with the project:
• Minimization of water quality impacts through stringent erosion control
• Use of native plant species (no invasive species) for stabilizing the construction slopes after
construction in the area of the park boundaries
• Request for new park boundaries to join the roadway right of way with no private parcels in
between
The NC Division of Parks and Recreation can agree with the proposed use of park land long as these
concerns are satisfactorily resolved.
The Park Superintendent noted that the landowner of property containing the small - whorled pogonia
plants is on the advisory board for Gorges State Park. The landowner prefers less impact on his property
in this area.
Stream Crossings and Permitting
Army Corps of Engineers (COE) and NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ) representatives commented
that Alternate 3 has the largest amount of stream impact compared to Alternates 1 or 2. They noted that a
strong purpose and need for the project needs to be demonstrated. If Alternate 1 is determined to meet the
purpose and need of the project, Alternate 3 could not be justified for permitting as the preferred
alternative since it has a much greater impacts on streams. Avoidance and minimization efforts will need
KO & ASSOCIATES, PC. Page 2
Consulting Enginccrs

Page 3 11/15/2012
to be demonstrated. The DWQ representative requested the project be added to the Merger 01
interagency review process since an individual Section 404 permit may be needed for the total length of
streams impacted. If it is determined not to follow the Merger 01 process, the DWQ representative
requested an interagency scoping meeting for more input on the project.
There was some question as to the funding source for the project (federal or state). A review of the draft
2007 -2013 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) shows the project to be federally funded for right
of way acquisition (Surface Transportation Program funds) and construction (High Priority funds).
Federally - funded highway improvements are subject to National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
requirements.
Based on the interagency meeting input, the NCDOT Division 14 Office will consider the following items
in the project study:
• Modify Alternate 3 to avoid/ minimize impacts to the Small- whorled pogonia as well as stream
crossings
Plan for a follow -up field meeting with USFWS and other opportunities for future interagency
involvement by scoping meeting or Merger 01 review process
Investigate native vegetation options for roadside stabilization and consider measures for
stringent sedimentation and erosion control
Proposal for making the proposed road right of way boundary (on the south side) the new park
boundary
cc: Meeting Participants
F' KO & ASSOCIATES, PC. Page 3
Consulting Engineers

Page 4

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA
SESSION 2013
SESSION LAW 2014 -62
HOUSE BILL 1139
AN ACT TO DEDICATE AND ACCEPT CERTAIN PROPERTIES AS PART OF THE
STATE NATURE AND HISTORIC PRESERVE AND TO REMOVE CERTAIN LANDS
FROM THE STATE NATURE AND HISTORIC PRESERVE.
Whereas, Section 5 of Article XIV of the North Carolina Constitution authorizes the
dedication of State and local government properties as part of the State Nature and Historic
Preserve upon acceptance by a law enacted by a three -fifths vote of the members of each house
of the General Assembly and provides for removal of properties from the State Nature and
Historic Preserve by a law enacted by a three -fifths vote of the members of each house of the
General Assembly; and
Whereas, the General Assembly enacted the State Nature and Historic Preserve
Dedication Act, Chapter 443 of the 1973 Session Laws, to prescribe the conditions and
procedures under which properties may be specifically dedicated for the purposes set out in
Section 5 of Article XIV of the North Carolina Constitution; and
Whereas, more than 17,000 acres have been added to the State Parks System since
the last dedication and acceptance of properties as part of the State Nature and Historic
Preserve pursuant to a petition to the Council of State dated May 5, 2009; and
Whereas, in accordance with G.S. 143 - 260.8, on May 6, 2014, the Council of State
voted to petition to the General Assembly to enact a law pursuant to Section 5 of Article XIV
of the North Carolina Constitution to dedicate and accept properties added to the State Parks
System and designated in the petition for inclusion as parts of the State Nature and Historic
Preserve; and
Whereas, as a part of its petition of May 6, 2014, the Council of State also requested
the General Assembly to remove certain properties from the State Nature and Historic
Preserve; and
Whereas, G.S. 113 -44.14 provides for additions to, and deletions from, the State
Parks System upon authorization by the General Assembly; Now, therefore,
The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts:
SECTION 1. G.S. 143 - 260.10 reads as rewritten:
"§ 143 - 260.10. Components of State Nature and Historic Preserve.
The following are components of the State Nature and Historic Preserve accepted by the
North Carolina General Assembly pursuant to G.S. 143 - 260.8:
(1) All lands and waters within the boundaries of the following units of the State
Parks System as of May 6, 2014: Baldhead Island State
Natural Area, Bay Tree Lake State Park, Bear Paw State Natural Area,
Beech Creek Bog State Natural Area, Bullhead Mountain State Natural
Area, Bushy Lake State Natural Area, Carolina Beach State Park, Carvers
Creek State Park, Cliffs of the Neuse State Park, Chowan Swamp State
Natural Area, Deep River State Trail, Dismal Swamp State Park, Elk Knob
State Park, Fort Fisher State Recreation Area, Fort Macon State Park, Goose
Creek State Park, Gorges State Parr, Grandfather Mountain State Park, Haw
River State Park, Hammocks Beach State Park, Jones Lake State Park, Lake
Norman State Park, Lea Island State Natural Area, Lower- 14aw River- State
Na+urArea, Lumber- River- St 4e Tlafk, Mayo River State Park, Medoc
Mountain State Park, Merchants Millpond State Park, Mitehells M;4pen
State ,.T,,,,,, -a n ,-o.,� Mount Mitchell State Park, Occoneechee Mountain State

Natural Area, Pettigrew State Park, Pilot Mountain State Park, Pineola Bog
State Natural Area, Raven Rock State Park, Run Hill State Natural Area,
Sandy Run Savannas State Natural Area, Singletary Lake State Park, Sugar
Mountain State Natural Area, Theodore Roosevelt State Natural Area, ;md
Weymouth Woods- Sandhills'` Nature PfvserveState Natural Area, and Yellow
Mountain State Natural Area.
(2) All lands and waters within the boundaries of William B. Umstead State
Park as of May 5, 2009;May 6, 2014, with the exception of Tract Number
65, containing 22.93140 acres as shown on a survey prepared by John S.
Lawrence (RLS) and Bennie R. Smith (RLS), entitled "Property of The State
of North Carolina William B. Umstead State Park ", dated January 14, 1977
and filed in the State Property Office, which was removed from the State
Nature and Historic Preserve by Chapter 450, Section 1 of the 1985 Session
Laws. The tract excluded from the State Nature and Historic Preserve under
this subdivision is deleted from the State Parks System in accordance with
G. S. 113- 44.14. The State of North Carolina may only exchange this land for
other land for the expansion of William B. Umstead State Park or sell and
use the proceeds for that purpose. The State of North Carolina may not
otherwise sell or exchange this land.
(3) Repealed by Session Laws 1999 -268, s. 2.
(4) All lands within the boundaries of Morrow Mountain State Park as of May 55-,
2009; -May 6, 2014, with the exception of the following tract: That certain
tract or parcel of land at Morrow Mountain State Park in Stanly County,
North Albemarle Township, containing 0.303 acres, more or less, as
surveyed and platted by Thomas W. Harris R.L.S., on a map dated August
27, 1988, and filed in the State Property Office, reference to which is hereby
made for a more complete description.
(5) Repealed by Session Laws 1999 -268, s. 2.
(6) All land within the boundaries of Crowders Mountain State Park as of May
�, 20)9-,--May 6,2014
, with the exception of the following tracts. The tracts
excluded from the State Nature and Historic Preserve under this subdivision
are deleted from the State Parks System in accordance with G.S. 113 - 44.14.
The State of North Carolina may only exchange this land for other land for
the expansion of Crowders Mountain State Park or sell this land and use the
proceeds for that purpose. The State may not otherwise sell or exchange this
land.
a. The portion of that certain tract or parcel of land at Crowders
Mountain State Park in Gaston County, Crowders Mountain
Township, described in Deed Book 1939, page 800, and containing
757.28 square feet and as shown in a survey by Tanner and
McConnaughey, P.A. dated July 22, 1988 and filed in the State
Property Office.
b. The portion of that certain tract or parcel of land at Crowders
Mountain State Park in Gaston County, east of and including the
right -of -way along and across Old Peach Orchard Road, as shown in
a survey by the City of Gastonia, File No. 400 -194, dated November
23, 1998, and filed in the State Property Office.
C. The portion of that certain tract or parcel of land at Crowders
Mountain State Park in Cleveland County, described in Deed Book
1286, Page No. 85, located on the north side of SR 2245 (Bethlehem
Road) and containing 14,964 square feet as shown on the survey
entitled "Survey for Crowders Mountain State Park, Deed Book
1103 -107, Township 4 Kings Mountain, Cleveland County, N.C." by
David W. Dickson, P.A. dated February 28, 2008.
d. The portion of that certain tract or parcel of land at Crowders
Mountain State Park in Cleveland County, described in Deed Book
1286, Page 85, and containing 0.06 acres and 0.515 acres as shown
on the survey entitled 'Boundary Survey for the State of N.C.
Department of Administration, Township No. Four Cleveland
Page 2 Session Law 2014 -62 House Bill 1139- Ratified

County, N.C." by Carolinas Design Group, PLLC, dated November
6, 2007.
e. The portion of that certain tract or parcel of land at Crowders
Mountain State Park in Gaston County, described in Deed Book
2829, page 518, and containing 0.15 acres as shown on the survey
entitled "Survey Made at Request of Larry Hyde, Park
Superintendent, Crowders Mountain State Park" by Gray Survey
Co., Inc., dated September 12, 2012.
(7) All lands owned in fee simple by the State within the boundaries of New
River State Park as of May 5 ,2099-.May 6, 2014.
(8) All lands and waters within the boundaries of Stone Mountain State Park as
of May - S, 2009-,May 6, 2014, with the exception of the following tracts: The
portion of that certain tract or parcel of land at Stone Mountain State Park in
Wilkes County, Traphill Township, described as parcel 33 -02 in Deed Book
633 -193, and more particularly described as all of the land in this parcel
lying to the west of the eastern edge of the Air Bellows Road, as shown on
the National Park Service Land Status Map 33 dated March 24, 1981 and
filed in the State Property Office, containing approximately 72 acres. The
tract excluded from the State Nature and Historic Preserve under this
subdivision is deleted from the State Parks System in accordance with
G. S. 113- 44.14.
(9) All lands and waters located within the boundaries of the following State
Historic Sites as of May 5n2049-.May 6, 2014: Alamance Battleground,
Charles B. Aycock Birthplace, Historic Bath, Bennett Place, Bentonville
Battleground, Brunswick Town/Fort Anderson, C.S.S. Neuse and Governor
Caswell Memorial, Charlotte Hawkins Brown Memorial, Duke Homestead,
Historic Edenton, Fort Dobbs, Fort Fisher, Historic Halifax, Horne Creek
Living Historical Farm, House in the Horseshoe, North Carolina
Transportation Museum, James K. Polk Memorial, Reed Gold Mine,
Somerset Place, Stagville, State Capitol, Town Creek Indian Mound, Tryon
Palace Historic Sites & Gardens, Zebulon B. Vance Birthplace, and Thomas
Wolfe Memorial.
(10), (11) Repealed by Session Laws 2001 -217, s. 2, effective June 15, 2001.
(12) All lands and waters located within the boundaries of Hanging Rock State
Park as of May 5, 2009-,May 6, 2014, with the exception of the following
tract: The portion of that tract or property at Hanging Rock State Park in
Stokes County, Danbury Township, described in Deed Book 360, Page 160,
for a 30 -foot wide right -of -way beginning approximately 183 feet south of
SR 1001 and extending in a southerly direction approximately 1,479 feet to
the southwest corner of the Bobby Joe Lankford tract and more particularly
shown on a survey entitled, "J. Spot Taylor Heirs Survey, Danbury
Township, Stokes County, N.C. ", by Grinski Surveying Company, dated
June 1985, and filed in the State Property Office. The tract excluded from
the State Nature and Historic Preserve under this subdivision is deleted from
the State Parks System in accordance with G.S. 113 - 44.14.
(13) All lands and waters located within the boundaries of South Mountains State
Park as of May 5, 2009-,Mqy 6, 2014, with the exception of the following
tracts. The tracts excluded from the State Nature and Historic Preserve under
this subdivision are deleted from the State Parks System in accordance with
G. S. 113- 44.14.
a, b. Repealed by Session Laws 2007 -307, s. 1, effective July 28, 2007.
C. The portions of land at South Mountains State Park that lie south of
the centerline of the CCC road as shown on the drawing entitled
"Land Trade between South Mountains State Park and Adjacent
Game Lands along CCC Road" prepared by the Division of Par 4s
and eer-eatiendated Mar -eh 15 ,199 — Wildlife Resources
Commission in January 2013 and filed in the State Property Office
and that lie within: (i) the tract or property in Burke County, Lower
Fork Township, described in Deed Book 495, Page 501; (ii) the tract
House Bill 1139- Ratified Session Law 2014 -62 Page 3

or property in Burke County, Lower Fork and Upper Fork
Townships, described in Deed Book 715, Page 719; or-,(iii) within
the tracts or property in Burke County, Upper Fork Township,
described in Deed Book 860, Page 341, and Deed Book 884, Page
1640.1640; (iv) within that tract or property in Burke County, Silver
Creek Township, described in Deed Book 1847, Page 287; (v ) within
that tract or property in Burke County, Upper Creek Township
described in Deed Book 882, Page 2347; NO within that tract or
property in Burke County, Upper Creek Township, described in
Deed Book 882, Page 2352; (vii) within that tract or property in
Burke County, Upper Fork Township, described in Deed Book 886,
Page 1964; (viii) within that tract or property in Burke County,
Upper Fork Township, Deed Book 767, Page 1360; (ix) within that
tract or property in Burke County, Upper Fork Township, Deed Book
884, Page 1648; or (x) within that tract or property in Burke County,
Upper Fork Township, Book 886, Page 2228. The State of North
Carolina may only exchange this land for other land for the
expansion of South Mountains State Park or sell this land and use the
proceeds for that purpose. The State may not otherwise sell or
exchange this land.
d. Repealed by Session Laws 2007 -307, s. 1, effective July 28, 2007.
(14) Repealed by Session Laws 2003 -234, s. 1, effective June 19, 2003.
(15) All lands and waters within the boundaries of Jockey's Ridge State Park as
of May 5, 2009-,May 6, 2014, with the exception of the following tracts: The
portion of those certain tracts or parcels of land at Jockey's Ridge State Park
in Dare County, Nags Head Township, described in Deed Book 227, Page
499, and Deed Book 227, Page 501, and containing 33,901 square feet as
shown on the survey prepared by Styons Surveying Services entitled "Raw
Water Well Site 13 Jockey's Ridge State Park" dated March 7, 2001, and
filed in the State Property Office; the portion of that certain tract or parcel of
land at Jockey's Ridge State Park in Dare County, Nags Head Township,
described in Deed Book 222, Page 726, and containing 42,909 square feet as
shown on the survey prepared by Styons Surveying Services entitled "Raw
Water Well Site 14 Jockey's Ridge State Park" dated March 7, 2001, and
filed in the State Property Office; and the portion of that certain tract or
parcel of land at Jockey's Ridge State Park in Dare County, Nags Head
Township, described in Deed Book 224, Page 790, and Deed Book 224,
Page 794, and containing 34,471 square feet as shown on the survey
prepared by Styons Surveying Services entitled "Raw Water Well Site 15
Jockey's Ridge State Park" dated March 7, 2001, and filed in the State
Property Office Office; and the portion of those certain tracts or parcels of
land at Jockey's Ridge State Park in Dare County, Nags Head Township:
described in Deed Book 227, Page 501, and Deed Book 230, Page 525, and
containing 12,655 square feet as shown on the preliminary plat entitled
"Easement Survey for Town of Nags Head" prepared by Seaboard Surveying
& Planning, Inc., dated August 29, 2012.
(16) All lands and waters located within the boundaries of Mount Jefferson State
Natural Area as of .May 6, 2014. With respect to the
communications tower site on the top of Mount Jefferson and located on that
certain tract or parcel of land at Mount Jefferson State Natural Area in Ashe
County, West Jefferson Township, described in Deed Book F -3, Page 94, the
State may provide space at the communications tower site to State public
safety and emergency management agencies for the placement of antennas,
repeaters, and other communications devices for public communications
purposes. Notwithstanding G.S. 146 -29.2, the State may lease space at the
communications tower site to local governments in Ashe County for the
placement of antennas, repeaters, and other communications devices for
public communications purposes. State agencies and local governments that
are authorized to place communications devices at the communications
Page 4 Session Law 2014 -62 House Bill 1139 - Ratified

tower site pursuant to this subdivision may also locate at or near the
communications tower site communications equipment that is necessary for
the proper operation of the communications devices. The use of the
communications tower site pursuant to this subdivision is authorized by the
General Assembly as a purpose other than the public purposes specified in
Article XIV, Section 5, of the North Carolina Constitution, Article 25B of
Chapter 143 of the General Statutes, and Article 2C of Chapter 113 of the
General Statutes.
(17) All lands and waters within the Eno River State Park as of May 5, 2009-iMay
6, 2014, with the exception of the following tracts:
a. The portion of that certain tract or parcel of land at Eno River State
Park in Durham County, Durham Outside Township, described in
Deed Book 435, Page 673, and Plat Book 87, Page 66, containing
11,000 square feet and being the portion of Lot No. 2 shown as the
existing scenic easement hereby removed on the drawing prepared by
Sear -Brown entitled "Recombination Plat Eno Forest Subdivision"
bearing the preparer's file name 00- 208- 07.dwg, and filed with State
Property Office. The tract excluded from the State Nature and
Historic Preserve under this subdivision is deleted from the State
Parks System pursuant to G.S. 113 - 44.14. The State of North
Carolina may only exchange this land for other land for the
expansion of Eno River State Park or sell this land and use the
proceeds for that purpose. The State may not otherwise sell or
exchange this land.
b. The portion of that certain tract or parcel of land at Eno River State
Park in Orange County, described in Deed Book 3878, Page 461, and
Plat Book 98, Page 11, containing 5,313 square feet and required for
the permanent easements for bridge replacement project B -4216 on
SR 1002 (St. Mary's Road), as shown in the drawing entitled
"Preliminary Plans, Project Reference No. B- 4216" prepared for
North Carolina Department of Transportation by Mulkey Engineers
and Consultants dated March 10, 2009, and filed with the State
Property Office. The tracts excluded from the State Nature and
Historic Preserve under this section are deleted from the State Parks
System pursuant to G.S. 113- 44.14. The State of North Carolina may
only exchange this land for other land for the expansion of Eno River
State Park or sell this land and use the proceeds for that purpose. The
State may not otherwise sell or exchange this land.
(18) All land and waters within the boundaries of Hemlock Bluffs State Natural
Area as of May 5, 2009-,May 6, 2014, with the exception of the following
tracts: The portion of that certain tract or parcel of land at Hemlock Bluffs
State Natural Area in Wake County, Swift Creek Township, described in
Deed Book 2461, Page 037, containing 2,025 square feet and being the
portion of this tract shown as proposed R/W on the drawing prepared by
Titan Atlantic Group entitled "Right of Way Acquisition Map for Town of
Cary Widening of Kildaire Farm Road (SR 1300) from Autumgate Drive to
Palace Green" sheet 1 of 3 bearing the preparer's file name Town of Cary
Case File No. TOC 01 -37, dated 26 September 2003, and filed with the State
Property Office; and the portion of those certain tracts or parcels of land at
Hemlock Bluffs State Natural Area in Wake County, Swift Creek Township,
described in Deed Book 4670, Page 420, containing 24,092 square feet and
being the portion of these tracts shown as proposed R/W on the drawing
prepared by Titan Atlantic Group entitled "Right of Way Acquisition Map
for Town of Cary Widening of Kildaire Farm Road (SR 1300) from
Autumgate Drive to Palace Green" sheet 3 of 3 bearing the preparer's file
name Town of Cary Case File No. TOC 01 -37, dated 26 September 2003,
and filed with the State Property Office. The tracts excluded from the State
Nature and Historic Preserve under this subdivision are deleted from the
State Parks System pursuant to G.S. 113 - 44.14. The State of North Carolina
House Bill 1139- Ratified Session Law 2014 -62 Page 5

may only exchange this land for other land for the expansion of Hemlock
Bluffs State Natural Area or sell this land and use the proceeds for that
purpose. The State may not otherwise sell or exchange this land.
(19) All lands and waters within the boundaries of Lake James State Park as of
May 5, ,May 6,2014
, with the exception of the following tracts:
a. The portion of that certain tract or parcel of land at Lake James State
Park containing 13.85 acres, and being 100 feet to the east and 150
feet to the west of a centerline shown on a survey by Witherspoon
Surveying PLLC, dated February 9, 2007, and filed in the State
Property Office. The State of North Carolina may grant a temporary
easement to Duke Energy Corporation across this tract to facilitate
the Catawba Dam Embankment Seismic Stability Improvements
Project. The grant of the easement within Lake James State Park to
Duke Energy Corporation under this sub - subdivision constitutes
authorization by the General Assembly that the described tract of
land may be used for a purpose other than the public purposes
specified in Article XIV, Section 5, of the North Carolina
Constitution, Article 25B of Chapter 143 of the General Statutes, and
Article 2C of Chapter 113 of the General Statutes. The State of North
Carolina may use the proceeds from the easement only for the
expansion or improvement of Lake James State Park or another State
park. The State may not otherwise sell or exchange this land.
b. The portion of that certain tract or parcel of land at Lake James State
Park in McDowell County, Nebo Township, described in Deed Book
377, Page 423, and also shown as Tract B on the plat of survey
prepared by Kenneth D. Suttles, RLS, dated December 4, 1987,
entitled "Lake James State Park," Sheet 1 of 2, recorded in Plat Book
4, Page 275 of the McDowell County Registry, for a 40 -foot
right -of -way beginning at the southwest corner of Tract B and
continuing along the southern boundary 86 38' 51" E for 400 feet to
the now or former John D. Walker property. The State of North
Carolina may grant an easement across this tract to extinguish
prescriptive easements on Tract B to improve management of the
State park property. The State may not otherwise sell or exchange
this land. The easement excluded from the State Nature and Historic
Preserve under this subdivision is deleted from the State Parks
System pursuant to G. S. 113 - 44.14.
C.. That portion of that certain tract or parcel of land at Lake James State
Park in Burke County, Linville Township, described in Deed Book
1431, Page 859, and shown on the survey prepared by Suttles
Surveying, PA dated May 2, 2014, entitled "Survey for State of
North Carolina," containing 3.41 acres and on file with the State
Property Office. The tracts excluded from the State Nature and
Historic Preserve under this subdivision are deleted from the State
Parks System in accordance with G.S. 113- 44.14. The State of North
Carolina may only exchange this land for other land for the
expansion of Lake James State Park or sell this land and use the
proceeds for that purpose. The State may not otherwise sell or
exchange this land.
(20) All lands and waters within the boundaries of Lake Waccamaw State Park as
of May 5, 2009-,Mqy 6, 2014, with the exception of the following tracts: The
portions of that certain tract or parcel of land at Lake Waccamaw State Park
in Columbus County described in Deed Book 835, Page 590, containing
48,210 square feet and being the portion of this tract shown as new R/W and
permanent utility easement on drawing prepared by State of North Carolina
Department of Transportation entitled "Map of Proposed Right of Way
Property of State of North Carolina (Parks and Recreation) Columbus
County" for Tip B -3830 on SR 1947 (Bella Coola Road) done by John E.
Kaukola, PLS No. 3999 and compiled 1 -18 -2008, and filed with the State
Page 6 Session Law 2014 -62 House Bill 1139 - Ratified

Property Office. The tracts excluded from the State Nature and Historic
Preserve under this section are deleted from the State Parks System pursuant
to G.S. 113 - 44.14. The State of North Carolina may only exchange this land
for other land for the expansion of Lake Waccamaw State Park or sell this
land and use the proceeds for that purpose. The State may not otherwise sell
or exchange this land.
(21) All lands and waters within the boundaries of Chimney Rock State Park as
of May };May 6, 2014, with the exception of the following 4a4 tracts:
The portion of that certain tract or parcel of land at Chimney Rock State
Park in Rutherford County being a portion of Parcel 2 as described in Deed
Book 933, Page 598, containing 346 square feet and being shown as
proposed right -of -way for bridge replacement project B -4258 on U.S. 64
over the Broad River on drawing prepared by Kimley -Horn and Associates
for the North Carolina Department of Transportation and revised October
26, 2007, and filed with the State Property Office. The portion of that certain
tract or parcel of land at Chimney Rock State Park in Polk County, Cooper
Gap Township, Deed Book 393, Page 1402, containing 6.5 acres more or
less and shown on the survey entitled "Plat of Survey for The State of North
Carolina" prepared by Stacy Kent Rhodes dated May 15, 2014, and filed
with the State Property Office. The tracts excluded from the State Nature
and Historic Preserve under this section are deleted from the State Parks
System pursuant to G.S. 113 - 44.14. The State of North Carolina may only
exchange this land for other land for the expansion of Chimney Rock State
Park or sell this land and use the proceeds for that purpose. The State may
not otherwise sell or exchange this land.
(22) All State -owned land and waters within the boundaries of the
Mountains -to -Sea Trail as of May 5, 2009 -;May 6, 2014, with the exception
of the following tract: The portion of that certain tract or parcel in Johnston
County described in Deed Book 3634, Page 278, containing 4.72 acres and
being described as proposed easement area for Piedmont Natural Gas
Company transmission line on drawing entitled "Easement Survey Prepared
for Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Line 142, Easement to be Acquired
from the State of North Carolina" by McKim & Creed and dated July 31,
2008, and revised March 11, 2009. The State of North Carolina may grant an
easement to Piedmont Natural Gas Company across this tract to facilitate the
transmission of natural gas. The grant of the easement within the
Mountains -to -Sea Trail to Piedmont Natural Gas Company under this
section constitutes authorization by the General Assembly that the described
tract of land may be used for a purpose other than the public purposes
specified in Section 5 of Article XIV of the North Carolina Constitution,
Article 25B of Chapter 143 of the General Statutes, and Article 2C of
Chapter 113 of the General Statutes. The State of North Carolina may use
the proceeds from the easement only for the expansion or improvement of
the Mountains -to -Sea Trail or another State park. The State may not
otherwise sell or exchange this land.
23 All State -owned land and waters within the boundaries of Gorges State Park
as of May 6, 2014, with the exception of the following tracts: The portions
of that certain tract or parcel of land in Transylvania County, described in
Deed Book 267, Page 838, containing a total of 7.26 acres for the North
Carolina Department of Transportation project TIP R -2409C US 64 Safety
Improvements. As shown on right -of -way drawing from the North Carolina
Department of Transportation dated May 22, 2014, for TIP R- 2409C, Parcel
002, on file with the State Property Office. The tract excluded from the State
Nature and Historic Preserve under this subdivision is deleted from the State
Parks System in accordance with G.S. 113 - 44.14. The State of North
Carolina may only exchange this land for other land for the expansion of
Gorges State Park or sell this land and use the proceeds for that purpose. The
State may not otherwise sell or exchange this land.
House Bill 1139- Ratified Session Law 2014 -62 Page 7

2014.
All State -owned land and waters within the boundaries of Lower Haw State
Natural Area as of May 6, 2014, with the exception of the following - tract:
the portion of that certain tract or parcels in Chatham County, described in
Deed Book 1319, Page 1047, containing 12,501 square feet and shown on a
survey entitled "Recombination Survey for the North Carolina Division of
Parks and Recreation and PK Ventures I LTD Partnership" prepared by
Puckett and Associates dated April 22, 2014, and on file with the State
Property Office. The tract excluded from the State Nature and Historic
Preserve under this subdivision is deleted from the State Parks System in
accordance with G.S. 113 - 44.14. The State of North Carolina may only
exchange this land for other land for the expansion of Lower Haw State
Natural Area or sell this land and use the proceeds for that purpose. The
State may not otherwise sell or exchange this land.
25 All State -owned land and waters within the boundaries of Lumber River
State Park as of May 6, 2014, with the exception of the following tracts: The
portions of those certain tracts or parcels of land in Robeson County,
described in Deed Book 919, Page 862, Deed Book 1097, Page 837, Deed
Book 935, Page 170, Deed Book 1125, Page 562, and Deed Book 1117,
Page 680, containing a total of 3.39 acres for the North Carolina Department
of Transportation secondary road project 6C.078030 SR 2245 (VC Britt
Road) and shown on the survey entitled "Survey of Tracts IA and 1B, VC
Britt Rd, Orrum NC" prepared by the North Carolina Department of
Transportation. The tracts excluded from the State Nature and Historic
Preserve under this subdivision are deleted from the State Parks System in
accordance with G.S. 113 - 44.14. The State of North Carolina may only
exchange this land for other land for the expansion of Lumber River State
Park or sell this land and use the proceeds for that purpose. The State may
not otherwise sell or exchange this land.
26 All State -owned land and waters within the boundaries of Mitchells
Millpond State Natural Area as of May 6, 2014, with the exception of the
following tract: the portions of that certain tract or parcel in Wake County,
described in Deed Book 2445, Page 62, containing approximately 0.215
acres as shown on the right -of -way plan for SR 2224 (Mitchell Mill Road)
bridge No. 162 replacement project and on file with the State Property
Office. The tract excluded from the State Nature and Historic Preserve under
this subdivision is deleted from the State Parks System in accordance with
G.S. 113 - 44.14. The State of North Carolina may only exchange this land for
other land for the expansion of the State Parks system or sell this land and
use the proceeds for that purpose. The State may not otherwise sell or
exchange this land."
SECTION 2. This act is effective when it becomes law.
In the General Assembly read three times and ratified this the 301h day of June,
s/ Daniel J. Forest
President of the Senate
s/ Tim Moore
Presiding Officer of the House of Representatives
s/ Pat McCrory
Governor
Approved 4:17 p.m. this 7th day of July, 2014
Page 8 Session Law 2014 -62 House Bill 1139 - Ratified

I lit i ivv �i 4
(Version 1.2; Released September 2011)
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Highway Stormwater Program =1
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN --
FOR LINEAR ROADWAY PROJECTS
Project /TIP No.: R -2409C
County(ies):
Transylvania Page 1 of 3
General Project Information
Project No.:
R -2409C
Project Type: Roadway Relocation Date: 10/15/2014
NCDOT Contact:
Stephen Williams / Mark Davis
Contractor / Designer:
Stacey Bailey, PE - ICA Engineering
Address:
Highway Division 14
253 Webster Road
S Iva, NC 28779
Address:
5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
Phone:
828-586-2141
Phone:
919-900-1602
Email:
[e-mail] / [e-mail]
Email:
sbaile icaen .com
City/Town:
Lake Toxaway / Bervard
Count ies :
Transylvania
River Basin(s):
Savannah
CAMA County?
I No
Primary Receiving Water:
Toxaway River / Indian Creek
NCDWQ Stream Index No.:
NCDWQ Surface Water Classification for Primary Receiving Water
Primary:
—4-(4);4-5-(3)
Class C
Supplemental:
Trout Waters Tr
Indian Creek Only
Other Stream Classification:
Designated Public Mountain Trout Waters
303(d) Impairments:
None
Buffer Rules in Effect
ITrout Buffer
Project Description
Project Length (Iin. Miles or feet):
1.268 miles
Surrounding Land Use: NC Park Land and Rural Mountainous
Proposed Project
Existing Site
Project Built -Upon Area ac.
5.88
ac.
4.76 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description:
Two 12' lanes with 6' shoulders.
Average Daily Traffic (veh /hr /day):
Design /Future:
3700
Existing: 3700
General Project Narrative:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation propose transportation improvements to US 64 from 0.3 mile west of NC 281 at Lake Toxaway to Indian Creek, Transylvavia
County. The project consists of upgrading this 1.5 mile, two -lane roadway to improve geometric design conditions and add climbing lane. The project straightens the roadway
alignment, provided standard -width travel lanes, includes unpaved shoulders, and adds a westbound climbing lane.
References

f- li�t;llti ay North Carolina Department of Transportation
Slor11 water,
„ ... Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN` °~
(Version 1.2; Released September 2011) FOR LINEAR ROADWAY PROJECTS
Project /TIP No.: R -2409C County (ies): Transylvania Page 2 of 3
Project Environmental Summary
Surface Water Impacts
Sheet
No.
Station
From / To
Feature
Impacted
Water / Wetland /
Buffer Type
Receiving Surface
Water Name
NRTR Map
ID
NCDWQ Stream
Index
NCDWQ Surface
Water Classification
303(d)
Impairments
Type of
Impact
Existing
SCM
Proposed
SCM
5
27 +63 -L-
Stream
Perennial
UT toToxaway River
UT -1
4 -(4)
C
None
Culvert
N/A
Swale
28 +18 -L-
6
31 +87 L
Stream
Perennial
UT toToxaway River
UT -2
4 -(4)
C
None
Culvert
N/A
33 +20 -L-
7
43 +05 -L-
Stream
Perennial
UT toToxaway River
UT -3
4 -(4)
C
None
Culvert
N/A
Swale
43 +31 -L-
7
51 +62 -L-
Stream
Intermittent
UT toToxaway River
UT -8
4 -(4)
C
None
Culvert
N/A
51 +62 -L-
8
54 +28 -L-
Stream
Intermittent
UT toToxaway River
UT -9
4 -(4)
C
None
Stabilization
N/A
54 +33 -L-
8
61 +60 -L-
Stream
Perennial
Ut to Indian Creek
UTA
4 -5 -(3)
C; TR
None
Culvert
N/A
62 +77 -L-
8
60 +75 -L-
Stream
Perennial
UT to Indian creek
UT -5
4 -5 -(3)
C; TR
None
Culvert
N/A
61 +53 -L-
8
65 +26 -L-
Stream
Perennial
Ut to Indian Creek
UT -6
4 -5 -(3)
C; TR
None
Culvert
N/A
Swale
65 +30 -L-
9
69 +79 L
Stream
Perennial
Ut to Indian Creek
UT -7
4 -5 -(3)
C; TR
None
Culvert
N/A
Swale
70 +84 -L-
List all stream and surface water impact locations regardless of jurisdiction or size.
Equalizer Pipes to be noted as a minimization of impacts.
All proposed SCMs listed must also be listed under Swales, Preformed Sour Holes and other Energy Dissipators, or Other Stormwater Control Measures.
Description of Minimization of Impacts or Mitigation
The extreme mountainous terrian prohibited the use of many stormwater control measures. Retaining walls were used at the UT -3 and UT -7 sites to minimize the impacts to the stream. The retaining
walls at these two sites kept the impact to the streams below 300 feet. Stormwater swales were used to treat the runoff coming from the shoulder berm sections where possible. The typical for the
standard roadway ditch is a 4:1 front slope with a 1:1 to 1.5:1 back slope, therefore the roadside ditches do not count as swales. The roadside ditches are also typically steeper than 4% on this project.
References

I- Iit;hwav North Carolina Department of Transportation
�tfJT11 Highway Stormwater Program
- -®
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
(Version 1.2; Released September 2011) FOR LINEAR ROADWAY PROJECTS
Project/TIP No.: R -2409C Count ies : Transylvania Page 3 of 3
Swales
Sheet
No.
Station
(From / To)
Stream
Crossing
Station
Base Width
(ft)
Front Slope
(H:V)
Back Slope
(H:V)
Drainage
Area
(ac)
Recommended
Treatment Length
(ft)
Actual
Length
(ft)
Longitudinal
Slope
(%)
Q2
(cfs)
V2
(fps)
Q10
(cfs)
V10
(fps)
Rock
Checks
Used
5
28 +50 -L-
27 +80 -L-
0.0
4
3
0.22
22
50
2.04%
0.9
1.7
1.2
1.8
No
29 +00 -L-
6
40 +00 -L-
43 +00 -L-
0.0
4
3
0.42
42
134
0.32%
1.7
0.6
2.3
0.6
No
41 +34 -L-
7
46 +50 -L-
43 +00 -L-
0.0
4
3
0.14
14
50
3.00%
0.6
2.0
0.8
2.1
No
47 +00 -L-
8
62 +80 -L-
65 +30 -L-
0.0
4
3
0.32
32
45
3.69%
0.3
1.2
0.9
1.3
No
63 +25 -L-
9
69 +25 -L-
70 +50 -L-
0.0
4
3
1.21
121
50
3.80%
3.3
1.8
4.4
1.9
No
69 +75 -L-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Yes 0 No Have minimum design criteria, as presented in the NCDOT Best Management Practices Toolbox, Version 1 (March 2008), been met and verified? If No,
provide further explanantion of why design criteria was not met.
Additional Comments
The extreme mountainous terrian prohibited the use of many stormwater control measures. Stormwater swales were used to treat the runoff coming from the shoulder berm sections where possible.
The typical for the standard roadway ditch is a 4:1 front slope with a 1:1 to 1.5:1 back slope, therefore the roadside ditches do not count as swales. The roadside ditches are also typically steeper than
4% on this project.

00
0
c
v
L
t
t
m
3
E
L
n
v
T
L
V
01
O
T
N
L
al
O
C
�z
V
\O
V -
N
C�
V
0
0i
U
O
.V�
See Sheet t -A For Index of Sheets
See Sheet 1 -B For ConVentlal Plan Sheet Symbols
•• �U�� ' 1304
L a
281
• �� TO4AWAY
k13'0"
1398-
4 A610
i
O y
C rrr
_ �] PI17C• L�!]_ �Yi�L tK•L6�I:i�l�l1C•L�9►Cr]LL�3:i
(YI(APHIC; J'GALLJ DBNI(iN UAIA
50 25 0 50 100 ADT 2008 = 3,700
ADT =
PLANS DHV = %
D = %
50 25 0 50 100 T =
V = 40 MPH
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) * TTST = DUAL
10 5 0 10 20 FUNC CLASS =
MINOR ARTERIAL
PROFILE (VERTICAL) STATEWIDE TIER
V JL A 11 JL JLd Vi' R d 'I V JL 1. JL 1L JL t/ d 11 JL '�L IkO JLd JL A. \ A 11
TIMNSYLVANIA COUNTY
LOCATION: US 64 from LAKE TOXAW.AY to INDIAN CREEK
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING &
RETAINING WALLS
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT R -2409C = 1.268 MI.
LENGTH STRUCTURES TIP PROJECT R -2409C = 0.000 MI.
TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT R -2409C = 1.268 MI.
i-reparoa to rna urr:ca or:
HYDRAULIUN L'NUINL'L'R
Suite ILN)
1 512E K�ngdoin Way,
7w:
Naleiµh, N� 2]60]
R -2409C
1:17:
P.E.
SIGNATURE.-
for the North Coroltna //��.,,,,,,,rhwnt of Trans ortanon
"`�W N^ I
2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
34428.1.1
P.E.
DAVID C. WALLER, P.E.
ENGINEER
R/W
DECEMBER 20, 2013
LETTING DATE:
, 2014
^ ^ _ ^^ P.E.
N 4 DEPT OF MtAN001UATION
DIVISION OF MOHWAY$
Z'RANOLVANIA 01 WrrY
P1�O�E��f4�,1.1
u,Q 44 MOM
LAKE TOXAWAY TO
INDIA3d (3WEK
AYr OF
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 12
GLI
i-reparoa to rna urr:ca or:
HYDRAULIUN L'NUINL'L'R
Suite ILN)
1 512E K�ngdoin Way,
Naleiµh, N� 2]60]
Engineering��
171— F1,.... o d I NI, , u, inr.
P.E.
SIGNATURE.-
for the North Coroltna //��.,,,,,,,rhwnt of Trans ortanon
"`�W N^ I
2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
ROADWAY DESIGN
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
DAVID C. WALLER, P.E.
ENGINEER
PROJECT ENGINEER
DECEMBER 20, 2013
LETTING DATE:
, 2014
^ ^ _ ^^ P.E.
0
e
4
TA

Z
W
0
Z W
Z m
O H
N —
w 2
� U
2
3
Q
3
0
F!
cD
ad
0
Z
F-
X
w
0
Z F-
Z
0
W
Q
V
O
O
d
DETAIL A
STANDARD CUT DITCH
IN— Smlo)
Front
OMrh
Grvun I y4R/ A �O et slope
D e
d
Min. D= 1 Ft.
Type of Liner= PSRM Mo.. d= 1 H.
FROM STA. 21 +00 TO STA. 25 +75 -L- LT
FROM STA. 21 +75 TO STA. 26 +40 -L- RT
DETAIL D
]E ]PLANS
BERM 'V' DITCH
/ W ACOUISCITON
(Notto Scale)
Outside Ditch
~Traffic
6
Flow
Ground
d
I
RD-
Min.
Mox. d= 1 Ft .
GeoleMile
H
6= 5 .
Type of Uner=
CL.'B' Riprap
DETAIL C
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
(Nato Smie)
From
o Dimh
Ground �) A o o` Slope
d D
Type of Liner= PSRM Max d- —I Ft.
FROM STA. 21 +00 TO STA. 21 +58 -L- RT
DETAIL I o
]E ]PLANS
FALSE SUMP
N
/ W ACOUISCITON
( Not fo Smle) G
Outside Ditch
~Traffic
20:1 'I
Flow
GI
r 5 —
S =Ditch Sloe
(E Proposed Ditch
STA. 26 +40 -L- RT
FROM STA. 21 +00 TO STA. 26 +10 LT DETAIL S
BANK STABILIZATION
DETAIL DI DETAIL III
SPECIAL CUT DITCH FALSE SUMP
(Nor. Scolel ( Not to Scale)
1s' 1. From Outside Ditch
Fllmr 4 Ditch Traffic Flow
Fabric ,\ec Slope 2,
O Greun s '
3:/ Min. D= 1 Ft. GI
Type of Liner= CLASS TRIP RAP D t 5 _ etc.
-L- STA.27 +63 RT N FROM STA.28 +50 TO STA. 29 +00 -L- RT S =Ditch Slope 4 Proposed Ditch
STA. 21 +58 -L-1
STA. 25 +75 -L- LT
0
2
' 2
N�A
'y
00
N� -
Ny�
1?
100 0
50 100
Z. o =LL SCALE- I "= 100' HORIZe
STANDARD BERM DITCH
W/CL.'B' RIP RAP
SEE DETAIL D
EST. TONS
EST. SYFF
—L— PC 23
G
G
C
Engineering
f/k/a Florence &Hutcheson, Inc.
• � � oa
�o
BDO
24" C `
W /ELBOWS
W /ROD & LUG \ `KODS
COUPLINGS
W/SLEEVE GASKETS BEGIN SBG \
STA. 26 +50 -L- RT GRADE TO\ C ECI T $
DRAIN
ROADWAY Y CUT DITCH 2GI /baJ NC BUR SITE 1
SEE DETAIL A INV. 7'
EST SY PRSM FS-III 4" / 0 I —L— STA. 2 7 + 80
=BADE TO DRAIN
_ C CC/ '6 RIP
/�t�sS 2 TONS
C C C //EST 7 SY
J
BANK
WOODS
HW
[REMOVE _��
CLASS B RIPRAP
EST 2 TONS
EST 7 Sy GT
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
W /PSRM
SEE DETAIL C O
EST Sy PSRM 2
LEGE D
®DENOTES PERMANENT
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
®DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
'1♦DoOS
TOE PROTECTION J
W /CLASS B RIPRAP
SEE DETAIL F
BANK STABILIZATION /
SEE DETAIL S
CLASS I RIPRAP
EST 48 TONS
EST 87 Sy G7
SITE 1 \
PLAN VIEW \
� c
bb rAL 1 END SBG
S TB 2 STA. 28 +50 -L- RT \
/
T$
Ia \
BURY
INV. 1' 0,
TION
PROTEC
:LASS B RIPRAP. C \r
DETAIL F \ \
�\ �\
\\\
I SF \ \\\
BUS \\C�
B RIPRAP SEECD
EST 21-T S \� `
EST 7 SY `GTl, A\
Q
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
SHEET NO.
RM/ SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
IINCOM P]L]E
]E ]PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR
/ W ACOUISCITON
]PRELIIMIIN
RY PLANS
DO NOT USE FO
CONSTRUCTION
N `' DEPT, OF TRANPOkTATION
DIVIOION OF M011WAY0
TRANOYLVANIA OIINTY
PROaB�M,;44 4"
U$ 44 MOM
LAKE TOXAWAY TO
INDIAN (`REEK
PERMIT DRAWING I SHEET 2 OF 12 �—LI

W
Z
H
0
N W
Z m
O H
N
w 2
� U
3
Q
3
w
O
x
f,i
ex
ILD
z
F-
X
w
0
F-
Z
z
O
W
Q
a
0
d
DETAIL A
STANDARD CUT DITCH
IN— Smle)
F—f
Dilrh
Grvun' y"fR/ slope
D e
d
Min. D= 1 11.
Type of Liner= PSRM Mo.. d= 1 H.
FROM STA. 21 +00 TO STA. 25 +75 -L- LT
FROM STA. 21 +75 TO STA. 26 +40 -L- RT
DETAIL C
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
(Nato smiel
From
o Dirch
Ground �) A o e` Slope
d D
1 F.
Type of Liner= PSRM Max d= 1 Ft.
FROM STA. 21 +00 TO STA. 21 +58 -L- RT
PROJECT REFERENCE NO SHEET NO
DETAIL
FALSE Se ' J F
R- 9HE
5
(NO° s Ml)P Q 276 ()7 R M SHEET NO. $
\ \ ° ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
Outside Ditch Iz O,� Elig liieeillig ENGINEER ENGINEER
°�\ 20 :1 �I \ / f/k/a Florence & Hutcheson, Inc.
GI X r
S =Ditch sloe (E Proposed Ditch /
STA. 26 +40 -L- RT
FROM STA. 21 +00 TO STA. 26 +10 LT UtIAIL
BANK STABILIZATION
DETAIL DI DETAIL III /
SPECIAL CUT DITCH FALSE SUMP /
(N°Im smlel (Not to Scale)
I.s'4 1.' Fmm Outside Ditch ` n `N, 6' DEP✓P OF TRANPORTATION
Filter Nws Dpch TraiF ow
< Fl
Fabric A'� p`ee Slope /
Greun !s P°� 'I 2' _
/ a :, Min. o= 1 F1. DIVISION OF HI(iiIWAYO
O Type of Liner= CIASS I RIP RAP D� t S _ He / ° TRANOYLVANIA OUNTY
-L- STA. 27 +63 RT FROM STA. 28 +50 TO STA. 29 +00 -L- RT S =Ditch Sloe Pro
N P CL Posed Ditch R��n✓ y`if�' y t (�Sy(J�
STA. 21 +58 -L- LT
STA. 25 +75 -L- irrl 1 i',L', LAKE TOO WAY TO us 44
r r rlrr ' /r/ rry 'rhli rl 0 1 r rrrrr '/� ;i it
\ -_I
\\�
�r
it
/r
r/ m
r
Ir ;i
, r
/
r � �
`r "1 IIII Irr !„,10 Ir irl, / . ', /'r'i /rrr rrlr �i r /ii r'rr it `I � "A•'r /rrrrr i %i/
r
`,,I Ili lli' r� r,pr,1 1111 ;', .i. i �° /` /iji rr,yhi irilr " /rrirl rl rl 'I Ir ,'rr 1, i; _- -•90 i, i /tir'r /rrn %rrr %5;, _ �° ,
r \ I l r l r rM r n i I � I I, • , �,° r / r r lam° r / i r ' / r r r 1 I I , , r r , f , i (/ :_ _ = -- ��' rrr 'r / r r r,i;;ry,,,r �r;. �:,� � = -- --- - - FlP OF
-
PERMIT DRAWING
/s,r:r
SHEET 3 �F 12
- �
GLI
/, ,r r /r',Ir''o 1 lo•''4iri rr9, ri' ,/r r/r r/ , Ir I '1, 1 - - ^`3Q05'
_ -
--
-
' /i'
-
,r /'r -
' /r,rr /rrr','
-77
.rf- fi � ti
-
rTrL. -
r
r ,
r/
-_' - --
1 -
r'rrlrr' -
6
-'S96Z \.\\�
0
2A°i SP
STAADARD 9y1�M DITCJ'I' °j / rW /yµ9 /OWS - \'_ r,/`.a 4� „rll 1 '(\\\:R, _f= SS6 _
F1o/�"�S' �B'- RIP/RAP / ^�o ' r i `�yAtO r,�!, L,U Z_�
r�C= 9EtA D. ' i� ''G 1N -� - \ `-
�,; 'S'tj i' •'( i ,' YY^ -
i :_
EST, oti° ::� ,.'i� / r -', .y ' L �BE�l�
SL� KE 5 \ -
o °r5. �0 '� �- iTT��$ @� &T ��GRAbE 70\ C PEGYAL Ta'
I _
_-
5
t •- _ 0-9- - -- _
DIT KF SITE 1 ------- - - - no _
-L- STA. 27 + 80 _ ---- ---- ` --
- -
,r
-- -6Z - _- '- ---'-�_
dr o 1
,
r = ,
1 - -
-_ `
r
rr r: ,.'r -
.; °' °fig' ,'�r 'r;var, - --------------- -
_-- - " - -- - _
, - -'
.A 30_ 25 _-
. ,,, -0 ,fi�r//[ -_ -
;rT
�,
bIT' G
ECID S
EST 7r SY
2lj�i 50 L- I
_-__. / � - gg�"i'y ✓� 0`' ,/� 4 n ) 'i ;' � ,I i \ I' r'i' 'gip,_ _-__ __
\
BANK r,l I' I, /r ^1 i i i \ \\ I i - -
y STABILIZATION p /r /vrr 'i / \ J �l i ---- -- - --
' rn'
i f/
p \ \I ,✓ N':!' _ _ 9Ja'� oTFyxb / / ;r A/` �' 1'" ilililf I r `\, `, �, I r l rr - - - -
_ _ r
O
`,r4r ' \ , "'v", ,
�
—4z _BEST- -40W-
r
I SF
;R.IPRAP b`PECIA
EE D\
\ V`
w
-
,��235�5„_
EST 7 SY GT -,,,; , :.0 . , r _- '_- - -^' ri i r I` .\. -_ -__ � _ •� - -�_ --'
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
W /PSRM
SEE DETAIL G O
EST Sy PSRM 2
SITE 1
PLAN VIEW \
IINCOM P]L]E
rE ]PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR
/ W ACQUISFFION
]PR ELIIMIIN
RY PLANS
M1 NOT USE M:
CONSTRUCTION
100 0 LEGE D
®DENOTES PERMANENT
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
h Z. h O 10 O ® IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
Z. SCALE- I "= 100' HORIZe
—Hl
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT

V_
3
'a
3
Q
u
i
F
Z$
O
n �
U Z
F
Z
O
O ZZZ
AS
o O
O p
Q Q
d
u
TOR NROTECl
17� I
EETAIII fg DUAL III nETA1L G `asm.E
IRba til
r ,. S.w A- EI AT ST..sT..s +LT
EEae sw.wm ro aw n.s� +LT
DETAIL P r DEfAAIIL S
S.o. ITw s... -RE +swn.nET O4
rt
h
ICAW . .
Engineering
INCOM_PLE
E PLANS
'
PRELIMIN
Y PLANS
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTAI
DIVISION OF MIGMWAYS
TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY
PROMCT.3148.1.1 IR-4409C1
US " FROM
LAKE TO%AWAY TO
INDIAN CRMEK
100 0
50 100
SCALE: `= 100' HORIZ.
I EGENft
® iSm.
RII 3 PEKE R
® IMPACTS N SURMC. WATER
WETLAND AND
FOR -L- PROFILE SEE SHEET 13

3
3
Q
u RC
i
Ef
0
A,
Y
'z
z i
O
2�
w w
0 °a
°a a
� d
O d
°morzLCno °Erna 1 f Y DUAL nI
TOR °� usps�M "' _ I� �tiI
rosr a.00
1 . EEA .�, ... .. I T . TO ,. c rwd a om, e mrq.e oi.n
r ow. SEA.v +m ro nu. v.11 +I swots s...wm ro as n.s� +1.r SEA rwwm arA.vf.e ro srn.v +rs+ x..v,eo +rr srA.ISA— r
CONA RADIAL STA DETAIL D DETAIL P DETAIL S
wlHam�q n Iw. ue DAND, wa
swM S.. s..m +.r +s... F".. w!
MOM s.A V,so TO Su.n+oo u
h
h
SITE 2
—L— STAR. 32 +30
100 0
50 100
SCALE: `= 100' HORIZ.
'El CIA
r
r
I�
F ;
UMILUMTJON
4
A
O
lcK.. ;.
Engineering
11" .3-1. . A r
"
_ c
a� \6 °
-
>a
s � �
/ � 3
PLAN VIEW
2p
'.
-- --
LFr:Ftin — �; — _ - -= � __
P "OTI rte.
E.FlACE MATE,
® IMPACTS N SURMC.wATER WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
INCOM_PL6
E PLANS
'
PRELIMIN
Y PLANS
FAP
N. C. DEEM OF TRANSPORTAI
DIVISION OF MIGMWAYS
TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY
PROMCT:34 ,08.1.1 IR-4409C1
US " FROM
LAKE TO%AWAY TO
INDIAN CRMEK
w
DO
FOR -L- PROFIIE SEE SHEET 13
FAP
s�
m
FOR -L- PROFIIE SEE SHEET 13

O
Z
w
N m
Z
O yT
w 2
2
3
'a
3
0
c�
z
H
X
O
V F-
J Z
u
O
0
w
d
� W
� Q
Q
O
N N
,0 0
tT
� Z.
GUY
e —
US 64 \
O \ \ \ \\ GF
TOE PROTECTION
CLASS B RIP RAP
SE \\
SEE DETAIL F \
TOE PROTECTION TOE PROTECTION
@ BASE OF WALL @ BASE OF WALL
CLASS B RIP RAP CLASS 8 RIP RAP
SE SE \
SEE DETAIL Q SEE DETAIL Q \\ \\
T$ —L— PT 43 +89.94
LIJ
GUYS
TOE PROTECTION
co
\
$ W /CLASS B RIP RAP
LIJ
TOP OF F SEE DETAIL F \ \\ ETAIIG
ET
ALLNIDITCH F F
SEE DETAIL J F \\
+ F
SITE 3 Q F F F c
—L— STA. 43 + 00 o
� 75..
OHO H TB 2GI
j y 2U #4 S 4P59'335•E
BEGIN SBG
/ STA.44 +73 L RT
` 3 _
S F F F F**
TOP OF RETAINING �F �F
SPECIAL MH WALL DITCH
D =34.5' SEE DETAIL J �i� F R
�F F
F
F
BANK ���� F
F
STABILIZATION R F F
TS CLASS B RIP RAP
EST 5 TONS
EST 14 SY GT
O
CLASS B RIP RAP
lE ]PLANS
/ W ACOUISFITON
EST 2 TONS
RY PLANS
CONSTRUCTION
EST 7 SY GT
F
END SBG
E-
46 +50 -L- LT
�STA.
F
`` —L— PC 50 +1
PECIAL CUT DITCH
PUE
WE
PUE PUE
EST 3 TONS
RA DE
r
TO
- r r°
\
_ DRAIN ROADWAY CUT DITCH
W /PSRM sGUY
Y _
SEE A
FO
C --
64
— = _ c C c c
•
W/CLASS B RIP RAP 1 \
SEE DETAIL F J \`
TOE PROTECTION -
TOE PROTECTION BANK STABILIZATION SE CLASS B RIP RAP
@ BASE OF WALL SEE DETAIL S SEE DETAIL F
W /CLASS B RIP RAP CLASS IRIP RAP
SEE DETAIL Q EST 11 TONS
30" CSP, 8 GA EST 21 SY GT
W /ROD 8 LUG Z
COUPLINGS
W /SLEEVE GASKETS
DETAIL A DETAIL Q DETAIL S
STANDARD CUT DITCH TOE PROTECTION
I Nam swio) AT BASE (, RETAINING WALL BANK STABILIZATION
I Nam s<olol Nm m smlel
Front 4:1 FILL SLOPE
Nroem1 A.1 °t Dddr 5.
n °� Slope Nolur° 1
D Ground RETAINING 1.S NWS 1.S
d d WALL F;Iter Q
Min. D= 1 Ft. F,b
Type of Liner= PSRM M°x. d= 1 H. d= 1 F. Geoteaile
Type of Uner= CL 'B' Ripmp
FROM STA. 47 +00 TO STA. 53 +00 -L- LT Type of uner= cuss IRIP RAP
FROM STA. 42 +75 TO STA. 43 +29 -L- LT
FROM STA. 43 +37 TO STA. 43 +85 -L- LT -L- STA. 43 +0 5 RT
DETAIL F FROM STA. 42 +80 TO STA. 43 +00 -L- RT -L- STA. 51 +62 RT
TOE PROTECTION
No Scae) DETAIL H DETAIL J
S \o es DETAIL G STANDARD 'V' DITCH PAVED DITCH
pe SPECIAL CUT DITCH (N., to Sea.) (N.- Salo)
Goend B N''`Q� \S \° (Nam -1.)
` Fmm Npre.pl Nomrol
DiKh Geun 7.
b= 57. Geote file Namml IS \o es slope d ' D Rem +leq I7.5;� \.5:1 1
Ground
T Wol T
Type of Liner= CL 'B' Ripr°p f 3.1 Min. D= 1 F. Geotezfile Min. D= 1 F.
CONCRETE LINED
FROM STA. 42 +50 TO STA. 42 +75 -L- IT Type &U-­ Cl— B Rip—R. Max. d= 1 Ft.
FROM STA. 42 +50 TO STA. 42 +80 -L- RT FROM STA. 46 +50 TO STA. 47 +00 -L- LT
FROM STA. 43 +84 TO STA. 46 +00 -L- LT FROM STA. 50 +75 TO STA. 51 +43 -L- LT FROM STA. 42 +75 TO STA. 43 +85 -L- LT
FROM STA. 46 +75 TO STA. 49 +25 -L- RT FROM STA. 42 +80 TO STA. 43 +65 -L- RT
FROM STA. 50 +23 TO STA. 51 +00 -L- RT
I$?
HEAD 'V' DITCH
W/CLA5� RIPPf
CUT DI - -
SEE DITCH
SEE DETAIL H �
GI
a3��y
END SBG
STA. 49 +30 -L- RT
�3oow
3U3 SITE 4
—L— STA. 51 + 60
T lieu
Engineering
1/1,/a & Holchcsnn, Inc.
SHEET NO.
RM/ SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULIC
ENGINEER ENGINEER
INCOM P]L]E
DO NOT USE FOR
lE ]PLANS
/ W ACOUISFITON
]PRE➢ IMIN
DO NOT USE FO
RY PLANS
CONSTRUCTION
N 6' DBP✓P OF TRAN$P0kTATI0N
DIVI(ION OF MOHWAYO
TRANOYLVANIA OUNTY
Plk_WB�Mj(4.I I"
us 0 mom
LAKE TOXAWAY TO
INDIAN (TZBK
FlP OF
PERMIT DRAWING � �
SHEET 6 OF 12 A
/ 100 0
50 100
SCALE: III= 100' HORIZe
R
LEGE D
DENOTES PERMANENT
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
18- CSP
W /E
W /RLBOWS
OD 8 LUG DENOTES TEMPORARY
COUPLINGS IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
W / / N
' SLEEVE GA9KC�FS /
k
EMOSE6 N�
ABANDONE Ny
Gu CP
10
/1uy
JB y MH / G
DETAIL III
FALSE SUMP
( Nof I. ScDIe)
Outside Ditch
Traffic Fl-
12,
_S_ GI
S =Ditch Slope fL ProposedeDit<h
STA. 51 +50 -L- LT WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
F
STABILIZATION
F
TS
�i
BANK STABILIZATION
CLASS I RIPRAP
F
F
SEE DETAIL S
EST 3 TONS
F
CLASS I RIPRAP
EST 7 SY GT
EST 4 TONS
EST 9 SY GT
TOE PROTECTION
W /CLASS B RIP RAP
SEE DETAIL F
SITE 3
& 4
PLAN
VIEW
DETAIL III
FALSE SUMP
( Nof I. ScDIe)
Outside Ditch
Traffic Fl-
12,
_S_ GI
S =Ditch Slope fL ProposedeDit<h
STA. 51 +50 -L- LT WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT

PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
R-2409C 1 7
------------- -- -------- ... I. ` ",;;;,,,,,,,,,;` „,a;;;; ....... 1I46ffAiN1mWRcd,',g'I,,V 27607 PIW SHEET NO.
---- 30205 ---- --- 11 �­­, 11 1 � il
. . ..... .... .
4
-- --- ------
............
ja___zaL __ - _ I , , , ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
E igineering ENGINEER ENGINEER
------------
........ ............ ..... .
&
2_ t
,, r S
------ - N 21=1
RY PLANS
CONSTRUCTION
7D---
DBOT, OF VILANOOkTATION
DIVI(90N OF H1011WAY0
rsl - - - -z qTANOYLVANIA OUNTY
7
_7
I`\ IVI 1 1 us mom
0
LAKE IrOXAWAY TO
-----------------
INDIAN OUBK
IX ------- --------- 6MBT
OF
- ------ PERMIT DRAWING
v�
SHEET 7 OF 12
A%,
--- - --- eKGLIZ
/Z
l4 IN,
e
­\I I 'I , I , I ''
v
Tl­\ \11 . ....... .
11V 11 Z7� - - ” ",;" 11
No '01'' "I"N 9. 100 0
\r',` \1
_ t4l
x
lum
------- 50 100
On VYAI.1. -B RIP
ONS
-- ------- SCALE: P= 100/ HORIZ.
P1 43+89 Gr- - ------------
z-----------
9 - -------------
Guy ------
E PR(5UCTIO-N
Y vi I ,
-7 LEGEN ❑
E \DETAIL �1\ �A
E­ -- ------- DENOTES PERMANENT
co -C
am N SURFACE WATER Cry,
DENOTES TEMPORARY
0 N SURFACE WATER
SITE 3 F
tl i�7
US t
_L_ STA. 43 + 00 0)
7-- C
C7 2 I ----
2
S
V------
- - - -------
7-w
N\\1 ♦-------
0
SI, _--r-7
F ------
"t -"\ 1 1, CP ♦ F-
SEE DETAk1_ J rA ♦
-IF
F", ---- ---
z
0 BAN K -2905
v-
STABILIZATION F
0
4S B`RJp
Ts ;0 ---�ST 3 , TONS, 1,7
Z��_----- - - - - -= SITE 4
EST 14'\SY GT". 11­,R1,�111,'Il1Il`
ji,,oily,
z-z7 -L- STA .51 +60
*TF,(qF)7
�31 ,rd o
F
Ni5_
0,
A
TGE, 0 PAT S BI JZ TI -S, SEE' _DEYA11,
_5 __ - __
C, v;, ol\",�­\�'\'�'Nl
EE T],��A
'o - -----------
o'
I I""ov U1
.Pk,�p
- -----------
S,5
S, "A ;T VXT'
W /SLEEVE GASKETS \\ ` \\\ \0 \EST SY'G1 ♦
o'
0
DETAIL Q
DETAIL A 0
STANDARD CUT DITCH DETAILS
N BANK STABILIZATION 0, ON" 0 F01 PROTECTION
TOE PROTECTION
(N. I. s I SE OF RETAINING WALL 0 %1" W CLASS 6 RIP PAT
AT BA
IN, _1 (N., t. s� I I \ " -1 � "\�, 1 0
to \ I \, - I "
Df� �:I FILL S- SEE DETAIL F
N.-I -------
roan 'qq, W�1_ A
'I, , ­v\ .....
N I 1\ \ \ " ­­ '' ♦, \ I \ , I '' I, ,
d
.. vv
'R RETAINING D
Mn.D= 1 Ft. F
Type of Liner= PSRM M... d= I Ff. d Ft, �..h SITE 3 & 4
FROM STA. 47 +00 TO STA. 53 +00 -L- LT T,,. I CL Type of C1_l,SSIRIPw
FROM STA. 42+75TO STA. 43 +29 -L- LT
FROM STA. 43+31TO STA. 43+85-L-LT -L- STA. 43 + 05 KT PLAN VIEW
DETAIL F FROM STA. 42 +80 TO STA. 43 +00 -L- RT -L STA. 51 +62 RT
TOE, PROTECTION
No DETAIL H DETAIL J DETAIL III
DETAIL G STANDARD 'V' DITCH PAVED DITCH FALSE SUMP
I ............
SPECIAL CUT DITCH (Nt to S.I.) IN- Sro1e) N.i I. Scale)
Naomi (N.. s.I.) Outside Ditch
Ground b F` < from N-1 N.f­1 Traffic Flow
-N G,­ .7
D 2•
N .1 N; st.p.
b= 5 Ft. G -d
Type of Liner= CL'B'Rip,.p Min. D= I Ft. ­11 _�CONM. LINED
GI
Type fLi­­ I­ B Rip-R.p rK
FROM STA. 42 +50 TO STA. 42 175 -L- LT M­ D=
d 1 Ft. 1 S=D,ich Slope Proposed itch I
FROM STA. 42 +50 TO STA. 42 +80 -L- RT FROM STA. 46 +50 TO STA. 47 +00 -L_ LT — WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
m Z. n FROM STA. 43 +84 TO STA. 46 +00 -L_ LT FROM STA. 50+75 TO STA. 51+43 -L_ LT FROM STA. 42 + 75 TO STA. 43 + 85 -L_ LT STA. 51 + 50 -L- LT
FROM STA. 46 +75 TO STA. 49 +25 -L_ RT FROM STA. 42 +80 TO STA. 43 +65 -L_ ITT
S FROM STA. 50 +23 TO STA. 51 +00 -L- RT
DO NOT USE FOR
DO NOT UBE I'O

0
W
Z
Q
H
W
Z
y W
Z m
O �
N
w x
V_
x
3
r
3
0
FL
x
o!
c7
Z
F-
w
x
0
F-
v r
J Z
Q
d 0
0
H
W
d
Q cl
cl
0
Q Q
N Ii
1� 2
a O
///V,�
co
E
�Zw
o?LL
DETAIL S
1C PLANS
1 W ACQUISITION
BANK STABILIZATION
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEETT NO.
I Nol b 5_1.)
1.5NW515
F. Q
Fobnc
/l -2 Jl' V
Type of Liner= CLASS I RIP RAP
—L— STA. 54 +33 RT
RM/ SHEET NO.
-L- STA. 62 +77 RT
I\ ra
-L- STA. 65 +26 RT
O
ENGINEER
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
WPSRM
EST SY PSRM
SEE DETAIL K
—YP— POT 13 +88.43
WOODS
SITE 5, 6 & 7
PLAN VIEW
loo 0
50 100
SCALE: III= 100' HORIZ.
FROM STA. 55 +00 TO STA. 55 +33 -L- RT
FROM STA. 13 +00 TO STA. 13 +50 -Y2- LT
FROM STA. 61 +60 TO STA. 62 +50 -L- LT
FROM STA. 60 +75 TO STA. 62 +72 -L- RT
FROM STA. 62 +80 TO STA. 63 +15 -L- RT
FROM STA. 64 +50 TO STA. 66 +00 -L- LT
N
dN� ®A'ii IfD]L]E
DO NOT USE FOR
1C PLANS
1 W ACQUISITION
]PI81E]LIIl�i[IIN
DO NOT USE FO
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEETT NO.
1 21 Kiig��m WaV
/l -2 Jl' V
Rale�gn, NC 2Lfiir�
RM/ SHEET NO.
I\ ra
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
Engineering
ENGINEER
ENGINEER
1,7; /s F'Iniiic Z; Ilwchc.m. till.
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
WOODS
SITE 5, 6 & 7
PLAN VIEW
loo 0
50 100
SCALE: III= 100' HORIZ.
FROM STA. 55 +00 TO STA. 55 +33 -L- RT
FROM STA. 13 +00 TO STA. 13 +50 -Y2- LT
FROM STA. 61 +60 TO STA. 62 +50 -L- LT
FROM STA. 60 +75 TO STA. 62 +72 -L- RT
FROM STA. 62 +80 TO STA. 63 +15 -L- RT
FROM STA. 64 +50 TO STA. 66 +00 -L- LT
N
dN� ®A'ii IfD]L]E
DO NOT USE FOR
1C PLANS
1 W ACQUISITION
]PI81E]LIIl�i[IIN
DO NOT USE FO
d8�' 'P]L.�N�
CONSTRUCTION
N. (,� I)BPT OF IT(AN"TUAMON
DIVIOON OF HIOHWAT�
TRANOTLVANU OURrY
p" ';w ¢"
% 4*
LASE TO%AWAY TO
BOLAN K
HT OF
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 8 OF 12GLIS'
LEGE D
®DENOTES PERMANENT
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
®DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
FROM STA. 53 +00 TO STA. 54 +00 —L— LT
FROM STA. 55 +00 TO STA. 59 +75 —L— LT
FROM STA. 56 +00 TO STA. 59 +75 —L— RT
FROM STA. 63 +25 TO STA. 64 +50 —L— LT
FROM STA. 10 +15 TO STA. 13 +00 —Y2— LT
FROM STA. 10 +50 TO STA. 13 +00 —Y2— RT
FROM STA. 62 +80 TO STA. 63 +25 —L— LT

PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
A —2-CSIC
IC R
U
RW SHEET NO.
K STABILIZATION
IS
J 6
DETAIL S
UI
P
I,) t ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
BAN I ENGINEER ENGINEER
A,�
"k, Engineering
m .. ...... INCOMPLE FE PLANS
".;- , _5 V
125
------ .............. , . .... DO NOT USE FOR UAW ACQUISITION
A
PRF-LIMINA. RY PLANS
Typ..fD-- CtASSIRIPRAP INETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PER,
W NOT USE FOI CONSTRUCTION
IT
/A,
-L STA. 54 + 33 RT
-L- STA. 62 + 77 RT
L STA 65+26 RT
4
7
V 111­l',
M I)BPT. OF ITCAN$POTUAMON
j,�0 -- -----
"In— All, 11,
Iv,.
DMOON OF HIOHWAT�
A I N\ \N
"ll"ll", U
N$YLVAMA OURrY
..................
............
AA
-7� P";B�Ajll
v
44 P"M
LAXRyMXAWAY IM
'RMK
OF
�-7
PERMIT DRAWING
/ . �., ,rrrrr,, 1 1 1111 /r'r r /rrr 1 11 `.`�� -� ,,\ , r / - ,, 1, 1 ,,, \,,,\ , \ 1'Ii`\ ` ,, `,
'Ot
SHEET 9 OF 12
I LG �Ll
E E. --\
-L- POT 55TID0.01 ----------
_-s- ;�ucLASS= a4tITRAP -c
-- 4cBEEflEfA16F... -y2—, SITE 6113
---- ------- ­06T 9+89jo R1,
I'S
Vk
-t�z�z `-� - , ',''\ NA"',
E3�1_7
I. ..........
+60 ---------
FUE -11— STA. 61
0,
............ .......... I, 0,\� IP RAP
�CT
\Q "k.
RY-'
-T
V'v\
"1`
l
Ci)
1 1111
ul
'P CTIOH
v
BEGIN S9G I Lu
STA. I PO 4- q uj
...... TF PC71w+
'T CQADW`Ai�
\Sk�\DETA(L A Cy
rb P' Cm)
C:)
/ o
+
-4
0
FL
A,,
Z
UlWvi�w-- ?T— I l I I I 11 1 i, ULI
-3
F-
Ln - -- ------- ,irr x
ROADW Y
Ers- 31
qty
0 L
BANK SEE. 10 A
STABILIZATION
F
q,
11 11 Z
27
A',
nF. 4r
Sr
w
z 7-:71-L-1
IQ/G YTILITIES',TLAK
11A
SITE 5
RV
o 'BANK STABILIZATION
SEE BET IL
Z�L
RETAIN`
RAP 06
7
-11— STA. 541+ 33 R SITE 6A
V1,
SITE 7
lA
A,
-11— STA. 65 + 3
-11— STA. 60 + 75
c)
�-2 - �)F-C//+38�.677
� 11,1, rr rr 1,1 ,11,.11 1.. 1111 1 1 /r -. , sl rr /'r '/' '' /rriiN /, p /� ` `„ \.. ,\F'„11,,,,1,, ,1 , " \,' 1
-v9- pry, 11 1:zz
q i��, ROADWAY CUT DITCH
20
W PGRI,
;A FT 12+62,
',EST 5
F,1001010 SEE QETAIL A,
y
LEGEND
DETAIL K
C.)
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
L e,
DENOTES PERMANENT
% .. .... EM
F-1 IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
US 64 D DENOTES TEMPORARY
Min. D- I Ft.
;--avez CIAt'CUT,bITCH �1 I TYP,,f Liner - PERM M.. d- 1 Ft.
KRM 0 STA. 55 +33 -L- RT
EST. ♦ Sy FROM STA. 55 +00 T
B2 —' ,
pf? /.9+7/11i SEE DyfAIUK FROM STA. 13 +00 TO STA. 13 +50 -Y2- LT
F SITE 5, 6
& 7
DETAIL F
DETAIL A DETAIL G
TOE PROTECTION STANDARD CUT DITCH
—1. -1.) SPECIAL CUT DITCH
PLAN VIEW PR
N t t S I ( Not t. S-1.1
F—t
D t.h
F
J —1,
N., I ..\I N.—I Ground y D —G "LI
d
a�l Mm� D- 1 R
END -------
100 0 d Mi.. D 1 Ff.
F t ..d.
5 F M... d I F. DT
-- ----- Type f LI PSRM
-gt Type f U-r- CL 'B'Ripmp
FROM STA. 62 +80 TO STA. 63 +25 -L LT
9z, FROM STA. 53 +00 TO STA. 54 +00 -L- LT
FROM STA. 54 +00 TO STA. 55 +00 FT FROM STA. 55 +00 TO STA. 59 + 75 -L- LT
77 -Y2- PT 13+70.82, --------- 50 100 FROM STA. 54 + 35 TO STA. 54 +75 -L- RT FROM STA. 56 +00 TO STA. 59 +75 -L- RT
---- FROM STA. 60 +75 TO STA. 61 +50 -L- LT FROM STA. 63+25 TO STA. 64 +50 5 -L- LT
FROM STA 61 +60 6 TO STA 62 +50 -L LT STA. 10+1
FROM STA. 60 + 75 TO STA. 62 + 72 -L- RT 10+55 To STA.13+ 00 Y2- LT
13+88.43 --- M 0 TO STA. 13 +00 -Y2- RT
FROM
SCALE: III= 100' HORIZ. FROM STA.
t� FROM STA. 62 + 80 TO STA. 63 5 -L- RT
FROM STA. 64 +50 TO STA. 66 +00 -L LT

0
W
Z
Q
H
W
L7
Z
y W
Z m
O �
N —
w x
U_
x
3
r
3
LL
O
FL
x
L7
0
Z
F-
w
X
w
0
N
r
J Z
W W
Q
d O
O
H
W
d
Q C)
0
0
Q Q
N r
1� 2
�Zw
FROM STA. 74 +11 TO STA. 76 +45 L LT
DETAIL M
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
(N°I to Scple)
�Dif<h
Mii�..D–
FROM STA. 69 +25 TO STA. 69 +75 -L- LT
DETAIL III
FALSE SUMP
I
Outside Ditch Notto Scole)
Traffic
2
Flow
- ,1_
--S— etc.
S- Ditch Slope fL Proposed Ditch
STA. 71 +50 -L- RT
STA. 73 +75 -L- LT
100 0
50 100
SCALE: III= 100' HORIZ.
DETAIL J
PAVED DITCH
R I�Nol to stole)
I I
1'
vtall 1.5:11 S:T
Tc -CRETE LINED
FROM STA. 67 +75 TO STA. 68 +66 –L– LT
FROM STA. 68 +65 TO STA. 69 +62 –L– RT
DETAIL N
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
( N.1 to Scale)
Dtch
°` slepe
Ground �S, D
Min. D= 1 H.
FROM STA. 69 +00 TO STA. 69 +25 –L– LT
FROM STA. 71 +50 TO STA. 72 +25 –L– RT
ZZ
DETAIL L
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
(Not m Scote)
FPM
slDdcn
3' ope
Ground J� D
Min_ D= 1 Ft.
FROM STA. 72 +25 TO STA. 73 +00 -L- RT
DETAIL O
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
N°I la Scale)
Noluml prF 1 °` �O�ch
Group /her D pF�O °` Slope
d
Filler F°bdc Min. D= I Ft.
Type of Liner= CL 'B' Riprop Max. d= 1 Ft.
FROM STA. 69 +75 TO STA. 70 +60 -L- LT
LEGE D
®DENOTES PERMANENT
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
®DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DETAIL R
TOE PROTECTION
AT BASE OF RETAINING WALL
I Not t° Stole)
Natural ��`
Ground RFfA1NING
d WALL
d= 1 Ft. MIN. Geote.lile
Type p(Liner= CL'B'Riprep
FROM STA. 68 +62 TO STA. 68 +86 –L– RT
O
DETAIL S
BANK STABILIZATION
I Nol to semel
Filfer `S NWS t
Fabric Q
Type °f Liner= CLASS I RIP RAP
-L- STA. 69 +79 RT
r-
-L— PC 75+21.76
SITE 8
PLAN VIEW
1� SR.fli� i�u" IItll2l( illy
Engineering
I;'R/s F'Inilic Z; Hwchc.m. till.
—L— PT 76 +18.44
SHEET NO.
RW SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
IINCOA'ii 1P]L]E
DO NOT USE FOR
DETAIL D
]PRE]LIIMIIN
DO NOT USE FO
BERM 'V' DITCH
I Not to Smlel
b
Noluml
5,�
�S� �
Ground
d
p
RDM
Min. D= 1 Ft.
Me,. d= 1 Ft.
GeataNile
Type of Liner=
CL.'B' Riprap
FROM STA. 74 +11 TO STA. 76 +45 L LT
DETAIL M
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
(N°I to Scple)
�Dif<h
Mii�..D–
FROM STA. 69 +25 TO STA. 69 +75 -L- LT
DETAIL III
FALSE SUMP
I
Outside Ditch Notto Scole)
Traffic
2
Flow
- ,1_
--S— etc.
S- Ditch Slope fL Proposed Ditch
STA. 71 +50 -L- RT
STA. 73 +75 -L- LT
100 0
50 100
SCALE: III= 100' HORIZ.
DETAIL J
PAVED DITCH
R I�Nol to stole)
I I
1'
vtall 1.5:11 S:T
Tc -CRETE LINED
FROM STA. 67 +75 TO STA. 68 +66 –L– LT
FROM STA. 68 +65 TO STA. 69 +62 –L– RT
DETAIL N
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
( N.1 to Scale)
Dtch
°` slepe
Ground �S, D
Min. D= 1 H.
FROM STA. 69 +00 TO STA. 69 +25 –L– LT
FROM STA. 71 +50 TO STA. 72 +25 –L– RT
ZZ
DETAIL L
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
(Not m Scote)
FPM
slDdcn
3' ope
Ground J� D
Min_ D= 1 Ft.
FROM STA. 72 +25 TO STA. 73 +00 -L- RT
DETAIL O
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
N°I la Scale)
Noluml prF 1 °` �O�ch
Group /her D pF�O °` Slope
d
Filler F°bdc Min. D= I Ft.
Type of Liner= CL 'B' Riprop Max. d= 1 Ft.
FROM STA. 69 +75 TO STA. 70 +60 -L- LT
LEGE D
®DENOTES PERMANENT
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
®DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DETAIL R
TOE PROTECTION
AT BASE OF RETAINING WALL
I Not t° Stole)
Natural ��`
Ground RFfA1NING
d WALL
d= 1 Ft. MIN. Geote.lile
Type p(Liner= CL'B'Riprep
FROM STA. 68 +62 TO STA. 68 +86 –L– RT
O
DETAIL S
BANK STABILIZATION
I Nol to semel
Filfer `S NWS t
Fabric Q
Type °f Liner= CLASS I RIP RAP
-L- STA. 69 +79 RT
r-
-L— PC 75+21.76
SITE 8
PLAN VIEW
1� SR.fli� i�u" IItll2l( illy
Engineering
I;'R/s F'Inilic Z; Hwchc.m. till.
—L— PT 76 +18.44
SHEET NO.
RW SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
IINCOA'ii 1P]L]E
DO NOT USE FOR
E P1LANS
1 W ACQUISITION
]PRE]LIIMIIN
DO NOT USE FO
RY PLANS
CONSTRUCTION
DIVIOON OF HIOHWAY�
TRANOTLVA1•TIA OUWrY
PRo; J� i>s �"
% 44 P"m
LASE TO%AWAY TO
IIOUN (ROES
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 10 OF 12 1 r
�® t15 64
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT

0
Z
w
z m
z
O y,
w 2
v
x
3
'a
3
LL
0
x
Z
N
w
O0
r
J Z
G-. <
O
O
d
� W
Q
Q
s�
N N
� O
oa
� Z.
o =_LL
DETAIL D DETAIL J DETAIL L DETAIL R
BERM 'V' DITCH PAVED DITCH SPECIAL CUT DITCH TOE PROTECTION
( Not to Scale) (N— Sale) (Nmm Scale) AT BASE OF RETAINING WALL
(Nuf fa Scale)
Ground '�,D 5\ � 1� Groan 3., Nofurol \b REfA1NING
ro d y� Fj''��75:/15:1� D Ground
RDWY walic� FI.- f WALL
\' 2:) Z:
Min. D= 1 Ff.� `CONCRETE LINED
Max.d= t H. FROM STA. 72 +25 TO STA. 73 +00 L RT d= 1 Ff. MIN. Geo eAl.
Geaferaile Typo o! Liner= CL 'B' Riprap
Type of near= CL. T' Riprap FROM STA. 67 +75 TO STA. 68 +66 -L- LT FROM STA. 68 +62 TO STA. 68 +86 -L- RT
FROM STA. 68 +65 TO STA. 69 +62 -L- RT
FROM STA. 74 +11 TO STA. 76 +45 L LT
DETAIL M DETAIL N DETAIL O
SPECIAL CUT DITCH SPECIAL CUT DITCH SPECIAL CUT DITCH
(NOf fo Scale) (Nmfa Scale) (N.- Scale) Front
Front from FI-
Dikh ( Dihh N furol p� �5 p.� (te( Slape
ti Slope Nmu 1' o Siop. Groun
Groan — F \d`e( Ground �5., D F \tea( d h,. D
Min. D= 1 R. Min. D= 1 H. Filter IlLm
Min. D= 1 H.
CL 'E' Riprap Max. d= 1 Ft.
FROM STA. 69 +25 TO STA. 69 +75 -L- LT FROM STA. 69 +00 TO STA. 69 +25 -L- LT Type of Liner=
FROM STA. 71 +50 TO STA. 72 +25 -L- RT FROM STA. 69 +75 TO STA. 70 +60 -L- LT
DETAIL III
FALSE SUMP
Outside Ditch ( Not to Scale)
Traffic Flow
:7 - 2,1_
`GI
t $ — etc.
S =Ditch Slope fL Proposed Ditch
STA. 71 +50 -L- RT
STA. 73 +75 -L- LT
...........
/ r rrr /r 1 - /
a
.,rrrr/,.,,,, qq.1 /rrr) i i f
'r /, r /rr /rr Nrulyulm Hr. .. . ......... . .... .............................. ' 1
,/, r, `.;;;'.';,',''
' „rri,.,......rl 'luu /rrr, nrr /rrrrlun/rur , 1,1,1,y,
....... ir/rrrib rinnj
1 '
. .
\'',\ ���r,'�I �I
,r,urr /rri rrri % / /i,%, 1
P �
n /rrrr
,/ it ,rrrr /`111 I j
's sF�E4Ak7_ -nTTCH
SEE -DET;9 '
-L- PT 69+30.48
CID S ?EC AL CUT DITCH CLASS 3 RIPRAP
SEF DETAIL N EST 2 TONS �\\
EST 7 SY G 1
1 s IP4oDS_ -_
`sEEt�DETAJIL 1g0p -
O� \emu
F ` Rr ja
o -
-2765=
,
1 1 .
11
—L— PC 66+22.06 TO STA. 7 STA.. It 11
"�
_ I
1a1 ,
h
�`e I
69+6804 %I"�R y
]E ]PLANS
L— PT
n
PISEIIDIIN
I8Y PLANS
DO NOT USE Ir0
CONSTRUCTION
V4,
`„ hb
�0i
100 0 LEGEND
DENOTES PERMANENT
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
50 100 RY
® M TS INE S RFACE WATER
SCALE- I "= 100' HORIZn AC
1
1
I '
I - r
I vIl T� g4wG O
I _
DETAIL S
BANK STABILIZATION
IN_ Scale)
5'NWS i.
Filter y-
Fabric
Type of Liner= CLASS 1 RIP RAP
-L- STA. 69 +79 RT
i2
— PC 75 +21.76
M
\
\ v \
Engineering
1/k/a Fill lce & Hatches., h-
-L- PT 76+18.44
=L- PC 76y
NO.
RM/ SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULIC
ENGINEER ENGINEER
INCOM P]L]E
]E ]PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR
/W AUDI Smom
PISEIIDIIN
I8Y PLANS
DO NOT USE Ir0
CONSTRUCTION
N `' DEPT, OF TRANPOkTATION
DIVISION OF M011WAY0
TRANOYLVANIA (OIINTY
U$ 44 FROM
LAKE TOXAWAY TO
INDIAN (`REEK
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 11 OF 12 GLI
----------
-7
/
2745' -n
--
US 64 i
in S
1'�
-e RT --
q
h BANK - t Sti sf _ -,
- -
r
nz. Y
STAB ILIZATlO]`�_ j Ax oo�
L PT 77+85.3/
i
6
- -- - -- �P ' PC 73+08
O
9A ,Jiriil(�,•r'
a,f -o,
r - - --
- - - -- -: ,IS , 1 i 1 ._ i � ,iii i'r /ii 'iY n, S,,• I / ,. 1 i ' --
.__-
1
'I-a-
_- � �- = 11 ,0Q1•, AI i'�: , 0= '�,../ / � ',Ill I � I pb _ II l; _ r
' rrrr r� r
�6(;,�� ;' / 'r;� SITE 8
�, rw,irN, 1 I I,
�, r I
S�LZ -- -'' „- \ {)j) %f /r irrri' "4 i', -
PiAN VIEW '
SITE 8
r 1
-L- TA. 0+ 0 „ ,rrr,, r/ ,rr /, 1 `,: �, �� --- - - - - -7 -
S 7 5 -__
-+= '; r;' r, 11 '`�'_
-. -- �-
�:p0,:
r/ rr r
/r A 8
n - 9 -
-
_ � r rr r r r r I , v •• �
��-
'.'�,'
\
`
111 1 - , A,,,` \"r,l ,111 1 I 1 1`” 1 I � r ' ' I � 2 3 _ , � ♦ I i 1 i � �` ``� �
,
ol 1 � � ( � 1 1 \\ �, r1 ♦ _ , 1 r r 1 1 111,11111 I I 01 IVd 1 ,
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT

WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Site
No.
Station
(From/To)
Structure
Size / Type
Permanent
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp.
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac)
Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)
1
-L-27+80(LT)
66" RCP -IV
< 0.01
58
-L- 27 +80 (RT)
66" RCP -IV
< 0.01
< 0.01
42
15
BANK STABILIZATION
< 0.01
10
2
-L- 32 +30 (RT)
30" RCP -III
< 0.01
11
-L-32+30(LT)
30" RCP -III
< 0.01
< 0.01
37
12
BANK STABILIZATION
< 0.01
15
3
-L-43+00
30" CSP
< 0.01
< 0.01
265
28
BANK STABILIZATION
< 0.01
10
4
-L- 51 +60 (RT)
18" CSP
< 0.01
< 0.01
76
29
BANK STABILIZATION
< 0.01
11
5
-L- 54 +33 (RT)
18" ALTERNATE PIPE
< 0.01
15
BANK STABILIZATION
< 0.01
10
6A
-L-60+75
30" ALT PIPE
< 0.01
< 0.01
96
20
6B
- L -61 +60
42" RCP -IV
0.02
< 0.01
263
84
BANK STABILIZATION
< 0.01
10
7
-L-65+30
30" WELDED STEEL
< 0.01
< 0.01
32
26
BANK STABILIZATION
< 0.01
11
8
- L -70 +50
24" CSP
< 0.01
< 0.01
172
26
BANK STABILIZATION
< 0.01
10
TOTALS`:
0.06
0.03
1070
324
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:

(-n
E
0)
L
c�
0
L
z
1z,W
o D
UC
_
0 ow
NO
,Lwn
Ch
0
N
440
* i
:4
V
P4IL
H
0 i
U
O
U
See Sheet I -A For Index of Sheets
See Sheet I -B For Conventi al Plan Sheet Symbols
1306 281 1314 � 1313
�- -� A 1322
1301
1309
1304
ENO PROJEC7C \,
1398 QU2b2C 64 4
281 1316�`� -
i� 1143
Lz X147
64 1143
BEGIN ]PROJECT
281 Y-
1143
1142
-- 1
STATE OF NORTli CAROLINA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
TRA11tSYLVA11tIA
COUNTY
LOCATION: US 64 from LAKE TOXAWAY to INDIAN CREEK
TYPE OF WORK.- GRADING, DRAINA GE, PA TVING &
RETAINING WALLS
STATE
STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
N.C.
R -2409C
I
STATE PROJ. NO.
F. A. PROJ. NO.
DESCRIPTION
3442 8.1.1
E.
DP..
R/
NkC UU I C.UN IAt I : J I trr1tN WILLIAMJ,
DIVISION DESIGN CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER
PRELIMINARY PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH Prepared in the Office of: HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
ADT 2008 = 3, 700 51216 to 100 Way,
50 25 0 50 100 _ Raleign,NC27607 aoap
ADT — NC License NoI Cl; _ o LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT R -2409C = 1.268 MI. Engineering
PLANS DHV /o
f /k /a Florence &Hutcheson, Inc.
D = % LENGTH STRUCTURES TIP PROJECT R -2409C = 0.000 MI. for the North Carolina Department of Transportation SIGNATURE. PE
50 25 0 50 100 T = % * 2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS p a°
V = 40 MPH TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT R -2409C = 1.268 MI. ROADWAY DESIGN
RIGHT OF WAY DATE: DAVID C. WALLER/ P.E. ENGINEER p Oil 'FnkAlQ°
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) * TTST = DUAL DECEMBER 20, 2013 PROJECT ENGINEER
10 5 0 10 20 FUNC CLASS =
MINOR ARTERIAL LETTING DATE:
PROFILE (VERTICAL) STATEWIDE TIER , 2014 PE
SIGNATURE:

V)
Z
0
V_)
W
w
£4
fll�
fA
fA
{fl
£4
ka
ff}
If
ka
llpf
z
LD
'Ao
-64-0
6'�k4
w
U��4
> -kpf
U�YQ4
��kpf
�k4
�qkpf
�4k4
•OQO
�E
�DETOUR 2�
—L-
Pl Sta 52 +69.6/
0 =
57° 57' 13.8" (LT)
D =
12° 43-56.6"
L =
455.17'
T =
249.20'
R =
450.00'
CF
= n nR
Detour 2
P/ Sta 11+33.33
A
= 21° 57' 14.0" (LT)
D
= 43° 18' 43.4"
L =
50.69'
T
= 25.66'
R
= 132.29'
Detour 2
P1 Sta 11+79.54
0
= 27° 58' 54.9" (LT)
D
= 67° 24' 24.5"
L =
41.51'
T
= 21.18'
R
= 85.00'
Detour 2
P1 Sta 14 +83.0/
0
= 89° 27' 04.5" (RT)
D
= 52° 05' 13.5"
L =
171.73'
T
= 108.95'
R
= 110.00'
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
R —2409C
R/W/ SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
SHEET NO.
2—D
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
PREL][M][NJR Y PLANS
DO NOT USE FO CONS°Il°RUCTI ®N
5121 Kingdom Way,
ICAI
Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
NC License No F -0255
Engineering
t /k/a llormce & Hutcheson, Inc.
FOR - DETOUR 2- PROFILE SEE SHEET 17

i
�_T PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
R -2409C 2-E
RAW SHEET NO.
DETOUR 1 ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
Detour l Detour l Detour l Detour l ENGINEER ENGINEER
P/ Sta 13 +91.64 P/ Sta 20 +43.73 P/ Sta 2/ +59.60 P/ Sta 22 +32.59
0 = 54° 13' 49.1" (LT) 0 = 69° 19' 26.1" (LT) 0 = 21° l9' 37.7" (RT) 0 = 70° I3' 49.0" (RT)
D = 16° 22' 12.8" D = 29° 22' 56.8" D = 88° 08' 50.5" D = 66° 00' 46.0"
FROM STA. 11 +25 TO STA. 20 +00 -DETI- LT FROM STA. 20 +00 TO STA. 21 +50 -DETI- LT L = 331.27' L = 235.94' L = 24.19' L = 106.39'
FROM STA. 17 + 00 TO STA. 20 + 00 -DETI- RT FROM STA. 20 + 00 TO STA. 20 + 50 -DETI- RT T = 179.22' T = 134.83' T = 12.24' T = 61.03'
INCO MPLE
]E PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR
/ W ACQUISIITI ®N
PRELIMINARY
PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR,
CONSTRUCTI ®N
�0 R - 350.00 R - 195.00 R - 65.00 R - 86.80'
I
I
I
I
5121 Kingdom Way,
Detour/ POT 10 +00.00
Suite 100
ICA
Raleigh, NC 27607
NC License No F -0255
Engineering
t /k/a llormce & Hutcheson, Inc.
L
I
,oG 51 max,
T F
• o x °%J
BEGIN DETOUR l P/ Sta 52 +69.6/
° 0 = 57 57 /3.8 (LT)
I
Detour / POT 11+15.20 D = l2° 43' 56.6"
o F o_ BEGIN 97.22 TAPER LT & RT
L = 455.17
o o � T = 249.20'
mss, .� E R = 450.00' o
SE = 0.08
Gj0 DS = 40 MPH
Detour I PC 12 +12.42 Detour l FCC 21+71.56 Detour l PT 22 +77.95
O� \ END 97.22' TAPER LT & RT 4
I
WOODS Detour l POT 22 +84.23
\ px F LBM INDUSTRIES, INC.
\ O� \ • AG� �p DB 428 PG 262
FILE 7 PG 435 +74.00
, 278.96' -BL -417 PINC 70 +89.56
Z x Ln O +79.66
O\6'� \ x 259.3 276.21'
LU-
o DetotyL 44W 6tj467• + 6 0.5 0 /
-BL -413 PINC 55 +69.09 ° 15210
Detour l PT 15+"00" . o' +00.00 N I4 22 42.1 E E �° - 0`3'S
� F 230.00' \ \� �
END DET
Fo
W00%s E E E E Our l PT 2/ +44.$3- 16 6
o G 3/.42
� -FEQT 55 +65.87 = CLASS B RIPRAP 225.07' \ \\ \ \
\ - EST 2 TONS I / \� GUY \ GU
�L. PT 54 +75.57 -Y2 POT --989.10 _ EST 7 SY G _ / +07.70
\\ P C / +87.47 - - - - _� °' \ 166.03'
00 173.02 +95.00 x // / WOODS \ \
PU ROADWA +Y2,�C�� DITCH 155.00' SPECIAL CUT DITCH
W /PSR 140.00' W/PSRM
"G R +8 D TAIL A SEE DETAIL C 140.00' \ \ c
Y +42.72 w o o D s
C4 i i ' 115.00'
lg4o � V o �� �i< � i 100.0 ��
STOUR /- o "
0 GUY
0 �
C4 I I•
08E o o \
WOODS
.3 \
EXIS R
x � F< D� \� TYP r I
• F
Detour l PC I9 +08.90 I SPECIAL CUT DITCH
W/PSRM
• PROPOSED GUARDRAIL SEE DETAIL C
\ ROADWAY CUT DITCH \
W /PSRM oODS
I EST. SY I I \ \
SEE DETAIL A /
/ I I-N 80° 03' 12.7" E
I
+75.00
I LBM INDUSTRIES, INC. / / .GUY s
70.00' -L- I DB 428 PG 262
\ I FILE 7 PG 435 R
I
��` ►N GUY o / / R
I I
I I ,
+20.59
Q / / 85.00' -L-
+25.00 'P 30.00, v
115.00' -L- 5 .00 0 U/G UTILITIES PLACED BY RECORD / / WOODS
� s NO FIELD SURVEYS
£g tl I /IB" CMP -
X I
I
01,
� SS 5.75
+ I N / '- -
50.008.6 2- I I O DS - WOODS / 349.6 Y2
-Y2 PC 11 +38.67 -BL -415 PINC 65 +69.57
fa Q
I {{} � I F� / GUY +04.23 5
y 50.00*87.63 Y2- / 321.00' -Y2-
Z STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA I I - - /
I I I Y2 PCC 11 +87.63 / .���`� 584•11
14 o WOODS A ��' 279.48' -Y2- INDIAN CREEK RESORTS, LLC
-64 10 DB 267 PG 838 D13 68 PG 808
1 DB385 PG 390 1 / T
YA� DB 404 PG 271 W \\ -Y2- PT 12 +62.90. FILE 0,SSHE T3969
wk4 FILE 10 SLIDE 934 I\ �° /
�» \ +99.17
�� +62.90
`�
>'- 50.00' -Y2- O \ 206.58' -Y2-
\� //
±12.58
I EI}ff
FOR - DETOUR 1- PROFILE SEE SHEET 16
I
I
I
I

V1
O
N
w
W
CF'
7,
cx�
0
W
Z
H
W
0
w
m
c�
U J
3 °
0
Q Ln
3
LL a
1-
O N
V W
W
0 CL
Z
N_ O
H
X
W Z
O O
U
N W
H Z
Z Z
W O
U
Z
0 3
W
0
W W
a a
O O
CV CV
O
r CV
I I
O O
12
ka
kpf
10
z
'ALD
°
-64
ffl -0
w
z�
U��4
>--kpf
U�k4
�4k4
_�4_0
DETAIL 1
FALSE SUMP
( Not to Scale) �0
Outside Ditch �2.0,�
Traffic Flow ��•� 20:
GI
t S — etc.
S =Ditch Slope CL Proposed Ditch
STA. 19 + 75 -L- RT
DETAIL D
BERM 'V' DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Min. D= 1 Ft. \
Max. d = 1 Ft.
b = 5 Ft.
Type of Liner= CL. 'B' Riprap
'111�
FROM STA. 19 + 37 TO STA. 21 + 00 LT
PER
R
EyJS� \NG
DETAIL III
i°
FALSE SUMP ono
Outside Ditch ( Not to Scale)
Traffic Flow �p
20', 7 2'
GI
S — etc.
S = Ditch Slope CL Proposed Ditch
STA. 17 + 50 -L- LT
STA. 19 + 62 -L- LT
EXISTI PER�
'O<q
NS
re,
J4�O
(-n LA
W �
N p
6?
r�
O9 /�F
DETAIL A
STANDARD CUT DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Front
o Ditch
Natural lId b" Aet Slope
Ground R /acs D \d
Min. D= 1 Ft.
Type of Liner- PSRM Max. d= 1 Ft.
FROM STA. 10 + 75 TO STA. 12 + 25 -L- LT
FROM STA. 15 + 25 TO STA. 21 + 00 -L- LT
FROM STA. 17 + 75 TO STA. 19 + 00 -L- RT
r/ sic/ iiT -Ii .cc
0
= 45° 46' 51.5" (LT)
D
= l7° 21' 44.5"
L =
263.68'
T
= 139.33'
R
= 330.00'
I1CTA 11 Q
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Front
Ditch
Natural
Ground 6.7
ISlope
D
d
Type of Liner= PSRM
Min. D= 1 Ft.
Max d = 1 Ft.
FROM STA. 17 +15 TO STA. 17 + 62 -L- RT
(3
REGINALD D. HEINITSH, JR
DB 162 PG 28
DB 436 PG 352
FILE IO SLIDE 91
DETAIL C
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Front
of Ditch
Natural Q.1 het Slope
Ground ?'7 D F \o
d
Type of Liner= PSRM
Min. D= 1 Ft.
Max d = 1 Ft.
FROM STA. 19 + 00 TO STA. 19 + 75 —L— RT
-L-
F/ Sto 17 +93.46
0 =
64° 58' 39.1" (LT)
D =
12° 43' 56.6"
L =
510.33'
T =
286.56'
R =
450.00'
SE
= 0.08
-L- PC 15 +06.90
2
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DB 267 PG 838
DB385 PG 390
DB 404 PG 271
FILE 10 SLIDE 934
SHOWN AS N.C. DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION
TRACT NO. 18 OF
GORGES STATE PARK
ON A SURVEY BY E. ROGER RAXTER, PLS RECORDED IN FILE 10, SLIDE 934
TRANSYLVANIA REGISTER OF DEEDS
CAJZS7R 1 Kingdom Way,
Suite 100
eig h, NC 27607
NC License No F-0258
Engineering
f /k /a Florence & IIutcheson, Inc.
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
R -2409C
R/W/ SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
SHEET NO.
4
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
PREL][MIN R Y PLANS
DO NOT USE 1F® CONS°Il°R1TCTION
M,q 7.c
STq 21
'ANDARD BERM DITCH 00 S'
P
E DETAIL D FF SH
,T TONS �• FFTs
,T SY GT
CLASS B RIPRAP
EST 2 TONS
EST 7 SY GT
-1-41.62 EST SY PSRM
56.61'
+13.95
Q7 nOl
p" +08.60
040 Woos 73.10'
CLASS B RIPRAP
EST 3 TONS
EST 10 SY GT
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
W /PSRM
SEE DETAIL C
EST SY PSRM
- ROADWAY CUT DITCH
W /PSRM
SEE DETAIL A
EST SY PRSM
C 14 +97.51
FOR -L- PROFILE SEE SHEET 10

W
a
W
Z
V1 LU
Z
O N
N
w 2
V
2
3
Q
3
I
0
H
0
Z
5-<
0
N
H
w
O
LU
0
a
O
CV I
O
I
O
CT'
C7J
12
ka
ka
z
LD
'Ao
-64-0
64_�4
_61�f74
'Ay'q
w
U��4
>_ "p,
U�'A
-6�
DETAIL A
STANDARD CUT DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Front
° Ditch
Natural V �.1 het Slope
Ground At,acs ID F \O
d
Min. D= 1 Ft.
Type of Liner= PSRM Max. d= 1 Ft.
FROM STA. 21 + 00 TO STA. 25 + 75 -L- LT
FROM STA. 21 +75 TO STA. 26 +40 -L- RT
DETAIL D
BERM 'V' DITCH
( Not to Scale)
b
Natural Ny.Nr
Ground S•� D
d RDWY
I
Min. D= 1 Ft. `r
i
Max. d= 1 Ft. Geotextile
b = 5 Ft.
Type of Liner= CL. 'B' Riprap
FROM STA. 21 + 00 TO STA. 26 + 10 LT
O
DETAIL C
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Front
of Ditch
Natural �\e< Slope
Ground ?'I D F \d
d
Min. D= 1 Ft.
Type of Liner= PSRM Max d= 1 Ft.
FROM STA. 21 + 00 TO STA. 21 + 58 -L- RT
REGINALD D. HEINITSH, JR
DB 162 PG 28
DB 436 PG 352
FILE 10 SLIDE 91
+46.56
DETAIL S
BANK STABILIZATION
( Not to Scale)
1.5' NWS 1.5'
Filter Q
Fabric
Type of Liner= CLASS I RIP RAP
-L- STA. 2 7 + 63 RT
+50.00
195.00'
DETAIL F
TOE PROTECTION
( Not to Scale)
Natural ,L.\ °\ \c� \oQe
Ground I I Fs
d
d= 1 Ft.
b= 5 Ft. Geotextile
Type of Liner= CL 'B' Riprap
FROM STA. 27 +00 TO STA. 27 +58 -L- RT
FROM STA. 27 +68 TO STA. 28 +25 -L- RT
DETAIL G
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Front
N of Ditch
Natural IS Slope
Ground
3:7 Min. D= 1 Ft.
D
FROM STA. 28 + 50 TO STA. 29 + 00 -L- RT
N
DETAIL 1 = a
FALSE SUMP
( Not to Scale)
o -
Outside Ditch �J2.0,�
Traffic Flow \�•\ 0:7
GI
t $ etc.
S = Ditch Slope (F, Proposed Ditch
STA. 26 +40 -L- RT
DETAIL III "`
FALSE SUMP
�? o
( Not to Scale)
Outside Ditch
Traffic Flow
2' I<
�$_
S = Ditch Slope
STA. 21 +58 -L- LT
STA. 25 + 75 -L- LT
el rc•I
Proposed Ditch
-bL- F'INU Z5 +bb.1y =
-BYI- POT 13 +97.32
GPS -1
BEGIN 300' TAPER LT & RT
-L- STA 22 +00
��A
0501
FS
2G
N a
xo ° °° 5
O
050
R W
ILI - Iv
WOODS
°s 9 GRADE TO DRAIN
� k
t o
2� 0 0 _ —C —� � C
o i C G
of /
i G +64.22 +68.34
65.29'
/ C +23.27 PROPOSED
CON 141.09'
GUARDRAIL
W
5121 Kingdom Way,
Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
"C ", ense No F -0258
Engineering
f /k /a Florence & IIutcheson, Inc.
WOODS
WOODS
/ / Y
LBM INDUSTRIES, INC
) DB 99 PG 524
WOODS �o� FILE 9 SLIDE 662
L JBk�
TB 2
0512 /
WOODS � I -TOE PROTECTION
W /CLASS B RIPRAP IC INV. 1'
SEE DETAIL F +4 .00
/ G 0� TOE PROTECTION —
WOODS / BANK STABILIZATION W /CLASS B RIPRAP
SEE DETAIL S SEE DETAIL F
® / / \15535' CLASS I RIPRAP 78.86
is EST 48 TONS BM2
CHW EST 87 SY GT �� N 524466 E 826073
+96.97 H w
" 183.46'
is
WOODS
+82.02
+49.53 185.96'
+82.42 183.41'
0503 165.17' +18.24
+20.6 +\ 3 921
165.92'
l2 /.l 0'
CLASS B RIPRAP
C
EST 2 TONS
157J6'
EST 7 SY GT
DB
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
FILE
W /PSRM
SEE DETAIL C
EST SY PSRM
i
BDO
050
4'
24" CSP
\ +
C C
STANDARD BERM DITCH
W /ELBOWS
\
W /CL. 'B' RIP RAP
W /ROD & LUG
SEE DETAIL D
END 300' TAPER LT & RT
COUPLINGS
\
EST. SYO FS
-L- STA 25+00
W /SLEEVE GASKETS
BEGIN SBG
STA. 26 +50 -L- RT
GRADE TO\ C
DRAIN \
°'
ROADWAY CUT DITCH
0505
23 +46.56
W /PSRM
2G1
SEE DETAIL A
EST SY PRSM
-
—
FS -III
\
BEGIN 300' TAPER LT & RT
-L- STA 22 +00
��A
0501
FS
2G
N a
xo ° °° 5
O
050
R W
ILI - Iv
WOODS
°s 9 GRADE TO DRAIN
� k
t o
2� 0 0 _ —C —� � C
o i C G
of /
i G +64.22 +68.34
65.29'
/ C +23.27 PROPOSED
CON 141.09'
GUARDRAIL
W
5121 Kingdom Way,
Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
"C ", ense No F -0258
Engineering
f /k /a Florence & IIutcheson, Inc.
WOODS
WOODS
/ / Y
LBM INDUSTRIES, INC
) DB 99 PG 524
WOODS �o� FILE 9 SLIDE 662
L JBk�
TB 2
0512 /
WOODS � I -TOE PROTECTION
W /CLASS B RIPRAP IC INV. 1'
SEE DETAIL F +4 .00
/ G 0� TOE PROTECTION —
WOODS / BANK STABILIZATION W /CLASS B RIPRAP
SEE DETAIL S SEE DETAIL F
® / / \15535' CLASS I RIPRAP 78.86
is EST 48 TONS BM2
CHW EST 87 SY GT �� N 524466 E 826073
+96.97 H w
" 183.46'
is
WOODS
+82.02
+49.53 185.96'
+82.42 183.41'
0503 165.17' +18.24
+20.6 +\ 3 921
165.92'
l2 /.l 0'
CLASS B RIPRAP
+09.62
EST 2 TONS
157J6'
EST 7 SY GT
DB
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
FILE
W /PSRM
SEE DETAIL C
EST SY PSRM
-BL -405 PINC 19 +60.94
-L-
ll BL-ESP STA 27 +62 14 RT
ELEV= 2916,53
RR SPIKE IN BASE 16" OAK
s
CPo -BL -406 PING' 27 +�;R_16
sue,
s
P/ Sta 41+56.64
0 = 152° 04' 39.7' (RT)
D = 12° 43' 56.6"
L = 1,194.42'
T = 1,810.08'
R = 450.00'
SE = 0.08
DS = 40 MPH
SHOWN AS N.C. DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION
TRACT NO. 18 OF
GORGES STATE PARK
ON A SURVEY BY E. ROGER RAXTER, PLS RECORDED IN FILE 10, SLIDE 934
TRANSYLVANIA REGISTER OF DEEDS
1 SF
BUS
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
R -2409C
RiW/ SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
SHEET NO.
5
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
PREL][MIN R Y PLANS
DO NOT USE 1F® CONSTRUCTION
/ 6c
j / y
b�
0.
I I
jam✓
&i-7 ' R
r
IN
HI
2
STATE OF
NORTH CAROLINA
DB
267 PG 838
DB385 PG 390
DB
404 PG 271
FILE
10 SLIDE 934
-L-
ll BL-ESP STA 27 +62 14 RT
ELEV= 2916,53
RR SPIKE IN BASE 16" OAK
s
CPo -BL -406 PING' 27 +�;R_16
sue,
s
P/ Sta 41+56.64
0 = 152° 04' 39.7' (RT)
D = 12° 43' 56.6"
L = 1,194.42'
T = 1,810.08'
R = 450.00'
SE = 0.08
DS = 40 MPH
SHOWN AS N.C. DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION
TRACT NO. 18 OF
GORGES STATE PARK
ON A SURVEY BY E. ROGER RAXTER, PLS RECORDED IN FILE 10, SLIDE 934
TRANSYLVANIA REGISTER OF DEEDS
1 SF
BUS
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
R -2409C
RiW/ SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
SHEET NO.
5
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
PREL][MIN R Y PLANS
DO NOT USE 1F® CONSTRUCTION
/ 6c
j / y
b�
0.
I I
jam✓
&i-7 ' R
r
IN
HI
GEORGE D FARIS
DB 305 PG 671
a6 33 36E
N
WOODS
ALTERNATE PIPE DESIGN FOR CROSS PIPE AT STA. 28 +70 -
INSTEAD OF RETAINING THE EXISTING 4'x4' RCBC UNDER -L-
-BURY
INV. 1' 66" WELDED STEEL PIPE COULD BE INSTALLED USING TRENC
INSTALLATION FROM THE INLET OF THE EXISTING 48" CMP T
/+43.89 OUTLET OF THE EXISTING 4'x4' RCBC. A JB WOULD BE NEE
101.70' EXTEND THE PIPE TO THE PROPOSED OUTLET.
BEGIN 300' TAPER LT & RT
-L- STA 28 +50
r� C
\\
END SBG +00.00
STA. 2 8 + 50 -L- RT \ 140.001
o
o�,�G \ \ o
C'
\ WOODS
IUT 6
s�
S� P•
.M
4
LBM INDUSTRIES, INC.
DB 428 PG 262
FILE 7 PG 435
+50.00
155.00'
FOR -L- PROFILE SEE SHEET 11
C B RIPRAP
T'2 S
EST 7 SY
3
WOODS
GEORGE D FARIS
DB 305 PG 671
a6 33 36E
N
WOODS
ALTERNATE PIPE DESIGN FOR CROSS PIPE AT STA. 28 +70 -
INSTEAD OF RETAINING THE EXISTING 4'x4' RCBC UNDER -L-
-BURY
INV. 1' 66" WELDED STEEL PIPE COULD BE INSTALLED USING TRENC
INSTALLATION FROM THE INLET OF THE EXISTING 48" CMP T
/+43.89 OUTLET OF THE EXISTING 4'x4' RCBC. A JB WOULD BE NEE
101.70' EXTEND THE PIPE TO THE PROPOSED OUTLET.
BEGIN 300' TAPER LT & RT
-L- STA 28 +50
r� C
\\
END SBG +00.00
STA. 2 8 + 50 -L- RT \ 140.001
o
o�,�G \ \ o
C'
\ WOODS
IUT 6
s�
S� P•
.M
4
LBM INDUSTRIES, INC.
DB 428 PG 262
FILE 7 PG 435
+50.00
155.00'
FOR -L- PROFILE SEE SHEET 11

N
O
N
W
W
CT
CT
co
0
W
Z
Q
W
V
Z
w
m
N
v_
3
Q
3
0
0
De
Z
H
N_
X
W
O
H
M N M
H
-i Z W
U
a �
CL Z CL
O
ZO O
LU
W
CL 0
0 0
0 LU
0 0
Q a° ° a
O O
C)f
� O O
0% r-
t4
fr�r
�r
c,9
44
Z
4A 4�4 4�
>-14_
�-U�-c
cn
DETAIL F
TOE PROTECTION
( Not to Scale)
F�
e
Natural
Ground b
d
d = 1 Ft.
b= 5 Ft. Geotextile
Type of Liner= CL 'B' Riprap
FROM
STA. 32 + 00
TO
STA. 32 + 38
-L-
LT
FROM
STA. 32 + 43
TO
STA. 32 + 75
-L-
LT
FROM
STA. 41 + 00
TO
STA. 42 + 50
-L-
RT
FROM
STA. 41 + 50
TO
STA. 42 + 50
-L-
LT
DETAIL D
BERM 'V' DITCH
( Not to Scale)
b
Natural y 113 ��
•;,
Ground S•� D
d RDWY
Min. D= 1 Ft. `r
•i
Max. d = 1 Ft. Geotextile
b= 5 Ft.
Type of Liner= CL. 'B' Riprap
FROM STA. 37 + 50 TO STA. 38 + 00 LT
DETAIL G
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Front
� Ditch
Natural I %S FSoet Slope
Ground
3:) Min. D= 1 Ft.
D
FROM STA. 40 + 00 TO STA. 41 + 34 -L- LT
DETAIL P
STANDARD BASE DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Natural Natural
Ground Z•J D Ground
d
Geotextile B Min. D= 1 Ft.
Max. d = 1 Ft.
*When B is < 6.0' 6= 2 Ft.
Type of Liner= Class 'B' Rip -Rap
FROM STA. 28 +00 -L- RT
SEE DETAIL F
END 300/ TAPER LT & RT PROPOSED
-L- STA 31+50 +50.00 GUARDRAIL
120.00' + /0.00
NIII +00.00 50.00'
150.00' R
� f
..Iv
if 'r►1111�
.�11111�
11 ~11��
T
DETAIL I = a
FALSE SUMP
( Not to Scale)
or
Outside Ditch
Traffic Flow �E 20:7
GI
S - etc.
S = Ditch Slope Proposed Ditch
STA. 31 + 25 -L- RT
STA. 37 + 80 -L- LT
DETAIL S
BANK STABILIZATION
( Not to Scale)
1.5' NWS 1.5'
Filter Q
Fabric
Type of Liner= CLASS I RIP RAP
-L- STA. 31 + 88 RT
Ln
n
DETAIL III "`
a
FALSE SUMP ono
(
Outside Ditch Not to Scale)
Traffic Flow
20.E 7 2' f
GI
E S
S = Ditch Slope Proposed Ditch
STA. 31 + 75 -L- LT
STA. 33 + 25 -L- RT
STA. 37 + 85 -L- LT
4
LBM INDUSTRIES, INC.
DB 428 PG 262
FILE 7 PG 435
n
u
STANDARD BERM DITCH
W /CL. B RIP RAP
SEE DETAIL D
EST TONS
EST SY GT
5121 Kingdom Way,
Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
NC License No� F -0255
Engineering
11./a Florence & Hutcheson, Inc.
-L-
P/ Sta 42 +47.38
=
16° 27' 00.6" (LT)
D =
5° 43' 46.5"
\
P/ Sto 41+56.64
RO
0 =
152° 04' 39.7" (RT)
SS° R11 RAP
D =
12° 43' 56.6"
TAIL \
L =
/,/94.42'
T =
/,8/0.08;
R =
450.00
SE
= 0.08
\SEE
DS
= 40 MPH
I
I �
30" RCP
p
TOE PROTECTION
W /CLASS B RIP RAP
GODS N I
SEE DETAIL F
END 300/ TAPER LT & RT PROPOSED
-L- STA 31+50 +50.00 GUARDRAIL
120.00' + /0.00
NIII +00.00 50.00'
150.00' R
� f
..Iv
if 'r►1111�
.�11111�
11 ~11��
T
DETAIL I = a
FALSE SUMP
( Not to Scale)
or
Outside Ditch
Traffic Flow �E 20:7
GI
S - etc.
S = Ditch Slope Proposed Ditch
STA. 31 + 25 -L- RT
STA. 37 + 80 -L- LT
DETAIL S
BANK STABILIZATION
( Not to Scale)
1.5' NWS 1.5'
Filter Q
Fabric
Type of Liner= CLASS I RIP RAP
-L- STA. 31 + 88 RT
Ln
n
DETAIL III "`
a
FALSE SUMP ono
(
Outside Ditch Not to Scale)
Traffic Flow
20.E 7 2' f
GI
E S
S = Ditch Slope Proposed Ditch
STA. 31 + 75 -L- LT
STA. 33 + 25 -L- RT
STA. 37 + 85 -L- LT
4
LBM INDUSTRIES, INC.
DB 428 PG 262
FILE 7 PG 435
n
u
STANDARD BERM DITCH
W /CL. B RIP RAP
SEE DETAIL D
EST TONS
EST SY GT
5121 Kingdom Way,
Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
NC License No� F -0255
Engineering
11./a Florence & Hutcheson, Inc.
-L-
P/ Sta 42 +47.38
=
16° 27' 00.6" (LT)
D =
5° 43' 46.5"
L =
287.11'
T =
144.55'
R =
1,000.00'
SE
= 0.06
DS
= 40 MPH
145.00' , C R V
TOE PROTECTION -
/'� W /CLASS B RIP RAP
C C C SEE DETAIL F
/C - - - - C C - ` C BEGIN SBG
C c
R �� C� 0612 DO = _� STA. 41 +30 -L- LT
+00.00 C C
110.00' C / BEGIN 400' TAPER LT J C R +38.64
-L- STA 36 +00 N C 120.00'
c
-L- PT 35 +40.97 3 a C CLASS B RIPRAP
l O�
/ mQ�w �\ T 2 TONS
G / 0 w END 400' TAPER LT T 7 SY FF
�0 /// 333 -L- STA 40 +00 >Lt02.8D C
C 20.75'
-BL -407 PING 30 +87.96 00 TYP FS -1 2G1 SEED DETAIL G 20-A
c +�
/0613 ° 20.67'
GRADE
TO DRAIN o o N 10
+ -
B w�S
.04' wo=
+92.54 ,o
97.54' O
WOODS
+37./7
104.00'
+34.24
6.28'
0609
+54.
FS -III
--' 060 I BEGIN 160' TAPER RT
2GI - - - - _ -L- STA 34 +85.64
-__
C C C C------- - -____
0 C C C C C C C \C C 0615
S_
END 160' TAPER RT 4 CLASS B RIPRAP--------
-L- STA 36 +45.64 0 EST 3 TONS
T F0 EST 10 SY FF
::. �� ��i11�1111�V1�a4�111111111� -�� _ �♦ ��1111��11
. • � .. " I�`1,, u�1111111 �►1 *1 �1� �� �� 4 &4 FIR1'11111111111
ryIIIIIIA 'WA- - 11111111111111�11�� �.
f �1i�111�►i��:1: 111 :1111:1111:1111:11�1:1111:�11 X1.1
+74,2411 +07.50
NV= 2869.82' 186.64' 188.77'
+05.98
20/.72'
✓� BANK STABILIZATION
\ SEE DETAIL S
CLASS I RIPRAP
EST 11 TONS
EST 21 SY FF
+
-BL -408 PINC 33 +97.10
-� S25' E
2G1 0614
Lc_
C C 7 C C
E
II GUY
GUY +74.0/
0 /27./2'
2' BASE TAIL DITCH
W /CLASS B RIPRAP
WOODS SEE DETAIL P
EST 14 TONS
EST 20 SY GT
EST DDE =95 CY
2
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DB 267 PG 838
DB385 PG 390
DB 404 PG 271
FILE 10 SLIDE 934
N
o N
_N
° o
+63.92
/00.2/'
BOG
u
GRAU -3,-�6
Tom- ­,,_ - GUY
*GUY
-BL -409 PINC 38 +93.78
SHOWN AS N.C. DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION
TRACT NO. 18 OF
GORGES STATE PARK
ON A SURVEY BY E. ROGER RAXTER, PLS RECORDED IN FILE 10, SLIDE 934
TRANSYLVANIA REGISTER OF DEEDS
111♦
-PROPOSED GUARDRAIL
TOE PROTECTION -
W /CLASS B RIP RAP
SEE DETAIL F
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
R -2409C
R/W SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
SHEET NO.
6
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
D® NOT USE FO CONS°IClEBiTCTII ®N
F-
G
t
FOR -L- PROFILE SEE SHEET 12

V1
N
w
�_T
O�
0
W
Z
a
H
w
Z
w
m
N
V_
2
3
Q
3
O
H
0
Z
N
X
W
0
J
LU W
U
CL
O
o
W
CL
0
LU
LU
0 0
0 0
a a
� o
O CV
04
1O O
I
O- O
ff}
IdIf
k4
z
u
n
0 'f�
W�
(n ffl
_�4119
_�4 111)
+02.00
338.99'
+7'
3/4
GUY
+80.07 GUY GUY Y
289.81' ��"_r
D mss
lij
co
L N
N
co
i
N TB 2G1 07
CID J <v
Cky
Z2"�`� o mum* S 4/059'
,3
� IQ *,
�� <° C0,44, BEGIN SBG
/ STA. 44 + 73 -L- RT
070 F F F
TOP OF RETAINING F F
`SPECIAL MH WALL DITCH / F
D =34.5' SEE DETAIL J / F R
F
0703 F
� F
�o F +00.00 +75.00
\ F F F 75.00' 65.00'
-L-
P/ Sto 42 +47.38
0 = 16° 27' 00.6" (LT)
D = 5° 43' 46.5"
L = 287.1/'
T = 144.55'
R = 1,000.00'
SE = 0.06
DS = 40 MPH
-BL -410 PINC 43 +50.27
2
TOE PROTECTION F
W /CLASS B RIP RAP
r---SEE DETAIL F
TOE PROTECTION
@ BASE OF WALL /
W /CLASS B RIP RAP C;
SEE DETAIL Q­7 /
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL
TOE PROTECTION
@ BASE OF WALL
W /CLASS B RIP RAP
SEE DETAIL Q
-L- PT 43 +89.94
F
+22.25
A�
F
\T
'moo
C
x
TOE PROTECTION I
W /CLASS B RIP RAP
SEE DETAIL F
TOE PROTECTION
@ BASE OF WALL
W /CLASS B RIP RAP
SEE DETAIL Q
30" CSP, 8 GA-
W /ROD & LUG
COUPLINGS
W /SLEEVE GASKETS
DETAIL A
STANDARD CUT DITCH
( Not to Scale)
t Front
o Ditch
Natural Vq �.1 �e� Slope
Gnd REFS D F \o
rou
d
Min. D= 1 Ft.
Type of Liner= PSRM Max. d= 1 Ft.
FROM STA. 47 + 00 TO STA. 53 + 00 -L- LT
DETAIL F
TOE PROTECTION
( Not to Scale)
aX\
Q�
e
Natural .L \�O`\S op
Ground b
d
d= 1 Ft.
b= 5 Ft. Geotextile
Type of Liner= CL 'B' Riprap
FROM
STA. 42 + 50 TO
STA. 42 + 75
-L-
LT
FROM
STA. 42 + 50
TO
STA. 42 + 80
-L-
RT
FROM
STA. 43 + 84
TO
STA. 46 + 00
-L- LT
FROM
STA. 46 + 75
TO
STA. 49 + 25
-L-
RT
FROM
STA. 50 +23
TO
STA. 51 +00
-L-
RT
CLASS B RIP RAP
\ EST 5 TONS
EST 14 SY GT
+80.00
175.00'
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL
BANK STABILIZATION
SEE DETAIL S
CLASS I RIP RAP
EST 11 TONS
EST 21 SY GT
DETAIL Q
TOE PROTECTION
AT BASE OF RETAINING WALL
( Not to Scale)
4:1 FILL SLOPE
Natural
Ground RETAINING
d WALL
d = 1 Ft. Geotextile
Type of Liner= CL 'B' Riprap
FROM
STA. 42 + 75 TO
STA. 43 + 29
-L- LT
FROM
STA. 43 + 31 TO
STA. 43 + 85
-L- LT
FROM
STA. 42 + 80 TO
STA. 43 + 00
-L- RT
DETAIL G
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Front
o� Ditch
1 t Slope
Natural I * 00 ,�e
Ground
3 :7 Min. D= 1 Ft.
D
FROM STA. 46 + 50 TO STA. 47 + 00 -L- LT
DETAIL S
BANK STABILIZATION
( Not to Scale)
1.5' NWS 1.5'
Filter
Fabric
Type of Liner= CLASS I RIP RAP
-L- STA. 43 + 05 RT
-L- STA. 51 + 62 RT
DETAIL H
STANDARD 'V' DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Natural Natural
Ground �.� L.� Ground
D
d
Geotextile
Min. D= 1 Ft.
Type of Liner= Class B Rip -Rap Max. d= 1 Ft.
=ROM STA. 50 + 75 TO STA. 51 + 43 -L- Ll
4
LBM INDUSTRIES, INC.
DB 428 PG 262
FILE 7 PG 435
CAJZS7R 1 Kingdom Way,
Suite 100
eig h, NC 27607
NC License No F -0258
Engineering
f /k /a Florence IIutcheson, Inc.
+00.00
230.00'
CLASS B RIP RAP E
EST 2 EST 7 TONS
GT +00.00 E +64.44
+27.22 175.00 +71.26 161.60
END SBG 118.5/' E 162.03' +00.00
STA. 46 + 5 -L- LT END 200' T PER LT
-BL -411 INC 47 +14.39 +60.46 -L- STA 50 75°73 /70.00' R
138.96 -L- PC 50 +20.40
HEAD 'DITCH
�SPIAL CUT DITCH W /CLAS RIPRAP
ME PUE PUE PUE TIES TO *RIPRAP
C G �
+52.28
+52.29 GRADE BEGIN 200' TAPER LT SEE DE AIL H
52.e TO -L- STA 48+75.73 C y
r ° DRAIN R/ O SDRWMAY CUT DITCH 18" CSP
*GUY +20.40 W /ELBOWS
S- . SY W /ROD & LUG
-INC R SEED A 84.16' r F0 COUPLINGS (J�
I W /SLEEVE GA S o /
Y� F
J` T F
E
- 1 GUY
F
TOE PROTECTION -
W /CLASS B RIP RAP
SEE DETAIL F
2
O =
STATE OF NORTH
CAROLINA
DB 267 PG
838
DB385 PG
390
DB 404 PG
271
FILE 10 SLIDE 934
D"
GI 1
PROPOSED GUARDRAIL 20.75
O 0711 NP
Ln
o_ 3 0 END SBG
U m 0d ? I STA. 49 + 30 -L- RT
9 rl
F 3 o
F
F 0712
F - - -��
F F F
F
+25.00
150.0(Y
SHOWN AS N.C. DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION
TRACT NO. 18 OF
GORGES STATE PARK
ON A SURVEY BY E. ROGER RAXTER, PLS RECORDED IN FILE 10, SLIDE 934
TRANSYLVANIA REGISTER OF DEEDS
DETAIL J
PAVED DITCH
( Not to Scale)
1'
Retaining �•5 :i x.5.1
Wall
CONCRETE LINED
FROM STA. 42 + 75 TO STA. 43 + 85 -L- LT
FROM STA. 42 + 80 TO STA. 43 + 65 -L- RT
DETAIL III
( Not to Scale)
Outside Ditch /
Traffic Flow
E-S -
S = Ditch Slope
STA. 51 + 50 -L- LT
CLASS I RIPRAP
EST 3 TONS
EST 7 SY GT
etc.
Proposed Ditch
C BbO XO
REMOVE i N
Wo
M ABANDONED y
/W
C�
o^ o GUY CP
_ \ /
/BUY _ G �
J B w/MH
0708 (t
\ � /
O
P,0 rtt°
rro -0 Um Cl /
0Zs:°���F
Ln
+35.00
0709 �
/ 85.00'
J B w/MH
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
R -2409C
R/W/ SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
071 +80.00
155.00'
/F
F BANK STABILIZATION
- BL-412 PINC 53 +01.55
F F SEE DETAIL S
CLASS I RIPRAP
EST 4 TONS
EST 9 SY GT
TOE PROTECTION -
W /CLASS B RIP RAP
SEE DETAIL F
-L -
P/ Sto 52 +69.61
O =
57 57' 13.8" (LT )
D =
12° 43' 56.6"
L =
455.17'
T =
249.20'
R =
450.00'
SE
= 0.08
DS
= 40 MPH
SHEET NO.
7
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
PREL][M][NJR Y PLANS
DO NOT USE FO CONSTRUCTION
FOR -L- PROFILE SEE SHEET 13

�-T
D
LU
Z
H
W
Z_
V) W
Z Ib
O N
w =
V
2
3
Q
3
0
0
w
QD
Z
X
W
0
J
LU W
U ::E
CL O
0
W
CL
° 0
LU
a Q
� o
O CV
04
� O
Cy- O
12
ka
ff}
114
10
z
'ALD
ff}-0
w�
£4
U�{4
> -kpf
U�k4
�4k4
-�4-0
-L-
0 =
57° 57' 13.8" (LT)
D =
12° 43' 56.6"
L =
455.17'
T =
249.20'
R =
450.00'
SE
= 0.08
DS
= 40 MPH
DETAIL S
BANK STABILIZATION
( Not to Scale)
Filt 1.5' 1.5'
NWS
er Q
Fabric
Type of Liner= CLASS I RIP RAP
-L- STA. 54 + 33 RT
-L- STA. 62 + 77 RT
-L- STA. 65 + 26 RT
4
LBM INDUSTRIES, INC.
DB 428 PG 262
FILE 7 PG 435
Ln
In
ROADWAY CUT DITCH - BL-4I3 PINC 55 +69.09
EST. SY +75L7
SEE DETAIL A 230.00
Woos E E E-
TOE PROTECTI -L- POT 55 +65.87 =
W /CLASS B RIP P
-L- PT 54 +75.57 SEE DETAIL F -Y2- POT 9+89.10
+87.47
/73.02'
+62 38 PU
-BL -416 PINC 68 +60.50
+00.00
230.00'
E -\�� E
0
WOODS
+74.00
278.96'
F°
+3/.n7
\� GU
+07.7
WOODS 166.0;
+79.66
276.2/'
T
\Fo
-BL -417 PINC 70 +89.56
CAJZS7R 1 Kingdom Way,
Suite 100
eig h, NC 27607
NC License No F-0258
Engineering
f /k /a Florence &- IIutcheson, Inc.
4
LBM INDUSTRIES, INC.
DB 428 PG 262
FILE 7 PG 435
CLASS B RIPRAP BEGIN 250' TAPi
EST 2 TONS -L- STA 64 +50
EST 7 SY GT
+25.00
155.54'
T FO +00.00
140.00' 140.00'
EX \51 \NG FIC +861
44 125.08'
+42.72 w ODS +00.00
Y
C C C +15.43 ifs
115.00' 120.00'
ff
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
R -2409C 8
RAW SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER I ENGINEER
PREL][M][NJR Y PLANS
DO NOT USE FO CONSTRUCTION
TOE PROTECTION
W /CLASS B RIP RAP
SEE DETAIL F
C C 100.00 \ END SBG yv.vv W/ BO
C �c S . 62 + 85 -L- LT W /ELBOWS 0
C GUY \ , � R W /ROD & LUG
C R 0 GRADE CTO Df�IN COUPLINGS W
_ _ C W /SLEEVE GASKETS Uj
R =
EXISTING �/ C END 200' TAPER \ C WOODS
\ 0811 C / _ \
+60./7 TOE PROTECTION �c C �, 0817
BEGIN 2 4PER +60.1 -L- STA 56- (20.24 C W /CLASS B RIP RAP ` BURY I ERT SPECIAL CUT DITCH C
M
46 WOODS ROADWAY CUT DITCH \ BEGIN SBG SEE DETAIL F H/ SEE DETAIL G \ F 01
WO DS W
- - (20.24 W /PSRM STA. 59 + 60 -L- LT F F 0 LIJ
0.7s' 0801 \\ EST. SY F F F F i -L- PC 63 +21.15 tJO
71'P F \ SEE DETAIL A \ C - - F ROADWAY CUT
F C / II C 2G1 080 / F TYP Lo DSTC SY W/PSRM 0816 F MH _35 0
o / PROPOSED GUARDRAIL '7 o
r� IFS -III SEE DETAIL A - / }
'IT 1
AU -3 0 °
TB
0
r l p O tJ
v�V O O O O O O I J ~ 2GI' N N 01
Ln 1.01 N N 80 03 / 12.7ll E N
�Q N
BEG
O o N I B
_� -L STA 59 + 2.5 -L RT
0 1J 1
2G1 GR - o FILL W/ 20'7 z
C C 1 'CSP g
/ELBOWS /MH is„ 080 A� /' 15" CSP 15" 082 / FLOW 0819 TY� J
� 0810 ��;; � _
/ O & LUG I ELB 1 2 \ 0812 F F \ HLESS MH
COUPLINGS W/ ELBOWS 0806 - FS -1 // O F F NSTALLATION U
Wjs CS JB w /MH PROPOSED GUARDRAIL Jg w /MH S 30" WELDED STEEL I F �-
W /SLEEVES 0803 - I /2 ROADWAY CUT DITCH W /ROD & LUG / C _
+ W /PSRM COUPLINGS C 080 WiRO� BOWS ND SBG _ F Q
+75.00 0821 FS -111 W /SLEEVE GASKETS C (g F \ _ F �� - - „
70.00' -L- F w H /2 SEE DETAIL A LBM INDUSTRIES, INC. GUY W�SiEO APL /N LUG 30" F F F F F F 42S RCP -III 85 -L WOODS F 36
PROPOSED GUARDRAIL \ DB 428 PG 262 / GAS F
TOE PROTECTION I FILE 7 PG 435 / C R KFTS R 0813
O - -- JS
080 F W/E ASS B FIPRAP I\j GUY / C o ���
SPECIAL CUT DI T i I C"� 4 / C 0809 TOE PROTECTION +75.00 +40.00
C C +20.59 O W /CLASS B RIP RAP 8/.00' 95.00' RIPRAP W/PSRM � I
SEE DETAIL F CLASS I TONS
EST SY PSRM � I � (C � - - C C 85.00' -L- +00.00 EST 15 TONS
+25.00 SEE DETAIL K .00 0 0' C C BURY INVERT 0.7' 90.00' EST 30 SY GT
I U/G UTILITIES PLACED BY RECORD WOODS BANK STABILIZATION
/15.00' -L- BANK STABILIZATION 0 NO FIELD SURVEYS
SEE DETAILS C I I I - SEE DETAIL S -L- PT 65 +30.35
CLASS I RIPRAP I - -
EST 10 TONS CLASS I RIPRAP
EST 18 SY GT I I I C 7 5.75 EST 20 TONS
+38.67 N I DS I WOODS 349. ' -Y2- EST 39 SY GT
50.00' -Y2- -Y2- PC 11 +38.67 -BL -415 PINC 65 +69.57
-BL -418 PINC 74 +18.48
2 Fo GUY +04.23 5
+87.63 C f c 32/.00' -Y2-
50.00' -Y2- �i�
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA WOODS I I -Y2- PCC 1I +87.63 �`' +84.11 I �+ 279.48 -Y2- INDIAN CREEK RESORTS, LLC
DB 267 PG 838 ROADWAY CUT DITCH C DB 68 PG 808
DB385 PG 390 W/PSRM �, -Y - PT 12 +62.90. ' "
FILE 2, SHEET 355A
DB 404 PG 271 SEE DETAIL A W, FILE 10, SHEET 969
FILE 10 SLIDE 934
+62.90 +99.17
50.00' -Y2- � �\
CD
+7/./5
50.00' -Y2- GUY \\ 4 /C'
-Y2- PC 12 +7/.15 GUY
Y I F
i
+70.82
50.00' -Y2- i EIP
+70.82
27.24' -Y2- Q
-BL -414 PINC 60 +93.51 Q d'
/ +24./4
119.60' -Y2-
WOODS
PECIAL CUT DITCH
W/PSRM
EST SY PSRM
;U UY SEE DETAIL K
90.87' -Y2-
+37.03
64.14' -Y2-
+70.82 BM3
38.78' -Y2- N 522649 E 828028
BL -ESP STA 61 +27 31 RT
ELEV= 2866.40
RR SPIKE IN BASE 12" OAK
END CONSTRUCTION
-Y2- POC 13 +55.00
-Y2- PT 13 +70.82
-Y2- POT 13 +88.43
-Y2-
-Y2-
-Y2-
0
= 5° 09' 11.3" (LT)
0
= 26° 08' 11.6" (LT)
A
= 38° 04' 11.8" (RT)
D
= 10° 3/' 27.4"
D
= 34° 43' 29.0"
D
= 38° 11' 49.9"
L =
48.96'
L =
75.27'
L =
99.67'
T
= 24.50'
T
= 38.30'
T
= 51.75'
R
= 544.41'
R
= 165.00'
R
= 150.00'
DETAIL K
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Front
of Ditch
Natural j �•\ e< Slope
Ground
D
d
Min. D= 1 Ft.
Type of Liner= PSRM Max d= 1 Ft.
FROM STA. 55 + 00 TO STA. 55 + 33 -L- RT
FROM STA. 13 + 00 TO STA. 13 + 50 -Y2- LT
DETAIL F
TOE PROTECTION
( Not to Scale)
F�
Natural
Ground b
d
d = 1 Ft.
b= 5 Ft. Geotextile
Type of Liner= CL 'B' Riprap
FROM
STA. 54 + 00
TO
STA. 55 + 00
-L- LT
FROM
STA. 54 + 35
TO
STA. 54 + 75
-L-
RT
FROM
STA. 60 + 75
TO
STA. 61 + 50
-L-
LT
FROM
STA. 61 + 60
TO
STA. 62 + 50
-L-
LT
FROM
STA. 60 + 75
TO
STA. 62 + 72
-L-
RT
FROM
STA. 62 + 80
TO
STA. 63 +15
-L-
RT
FROM
STA. 64+50
TO
STA. 66 + 00
-L-
LT
-L-
P/ Sta 64 +25.90
0 =
7° 29' 30.0" (LT)
D =
3° 34' 5/.6"
L =
209.2/'
T =
104.75'
R =
1,600.00'
SE
= 0.05
DS
= 40 MPH
DETAIL A
STANDARD CUT DITCH
( Not to Scale)
t Front
o
Natural Ditch
Vq b1 e� Slope
Ground RjFS D F \o
d
Min. D= 1 Ft.
Type of Liner= PSRM Max. d= 1 Ft.
FROM
STA. 53 + 00
TO
STA. 54 + 00
-L-
LT
FROM
STA. 55 + 00
TO
STA. 59 + 75
-L-
LT
FROM
STA. 56 + 00
TO
STA. 59 + 75
-L-
RT
FROM
STA. 63 + 25
TO
STA. 64 + 50
-L-
LT
FROM
STA. 10 + 15
TO
STA. 13 + 00 -Y2-
LT
FROM
STA. 10 + 50
TO
STA. 13 + 00
-Y2-
RT
DETAIL G
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Front
o� Ditch
Natural I js N, Slope
Ground
3:I Min. D= 1 Ft.
D
FROM STA. 62 + 80 TO STA. 63 + 25 -L- LT
FOR -L- PROFILE SEE SHEET 14
FOR -Y2- PROFILE SEE SHEET 15

BEAVER CREEK CONSERVANCY LLC
' • mis
SAPPHIRE, NC 28774
TRANSYLVANIA RESORTS LLC
8000 CAPPS FERRY RD
LBM INDUSTRIES INC
'• C• u1,
SAPPHIRE, NC 28774
CATATOGA INVESTMENTS LLC
541 N PALMETTO AVE STE 105
TRAURIG EDWARD A & LESLEE
28 CORMORAN ISLAND LN
KIAWAIT ISLAND, SC 29455
FARIS GEORGE D & SHARON H
PO BOX 553
DOUGLASVILLE, GA 30135 SANFORD, FL 32771 OOLTEWAH, TN 37363
Edwards L Warren & Annette C
44207 Millcreek Ave
Alpharetta, GA 30005

GEORGE D FARIS
PO BOX 553
OOLTEWAH, TN 37363
LBM INDUSTRIES INC
PO BOX 40
SAPPHIRE, NC 28774 -0040
INDIAN CREEK RESORT LLC
975 JOHNSON FERRY RD STE 450
ATLANTA, GA 30342
REGINALD D HEINITSH JR ETAL
'• o. 1
LAKE TOXAWAY, NC 28747
INDIAN CREEK RESORT LLC
976 JOHNSON FERRY RD STE 450
ATLANTA, GA 30342
LBM INDUSTRIES INC
'• C• u1,
SAPPHIRE, NC 28774 -0040