20100099 Ver 3_Year 2 Monitoring Report Final_20150113

January 13, 2015
Attn: Ms. Katie Merritt
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality- Wetland and Stormwater Branch
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
Subject: Pancho Nutri — ina mittal of Year 2 (2014) Monitoring Report — DWR
Referenc 2010- 00990
Dear Ms. Merritt:
As requested please find attached a hard copy of the Final Year 2 (2014) Monitoring Report for the
Pancho Nutrient Bank Parcel. If you I can be of further assistance please do not hesitate to contact me
directly at 919.604.9314
Sincerely,
Raymond Holz
Project Manager
Attachments:
- One (1) hard copy of report
1101 Haynes St., Suite 211 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • www.restorationsystems.com • Ph 919.755.9490 • Fx 919.755.9492

ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
YEAR 2 (2014)
Pancho Bank Parcel
Pursuant to:
Restoration Systems' Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument for
Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Credits - Neuse River Basin
PREPARED BY:
RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC
1101 HAYNES STREET, SUITE 211
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27604
and
AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
218 SNOW AVENUE
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27603
January 2015

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Restoration Systems (Sponsor) is pleased to provide the North Carolina Division of Water
Resources ( NCDWR) this Year 2 (2014) AnnuaLMonitortng Report for the Pancho Bank Parcel
('Parcel) pursuant to the Restoration Systems" Neuse, River" Bastn� Riparian Buffer & Nutrient
Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument (Banking Instrument) signed March 17, 2008 between
the Sponsor and the NCDWR.
The Pancho Bank Parcel is located approximately 13 miles west of Goldsboro in western Wayne
County;, north of U.S. Highway 13 near the, intersection of State Road' -100& (Stevens Mill' Road)
and State Road 1105 (Dobbersville Road) (Figure 1, Appendix A). Encompassing 65.62 acres of
land, the Parcel is within the Neuse River Basin 14 -digit United States Geological Survey (USES)
Cataloging Unit 03020201150050 of the South Atlantic /Gulf Region (North Carolina Division of
Water Quality [ NCDWQ] Subbasm Number -03 -04 =04).
The Parcel was designed and constructed to provide mitigation credits for unavoidable impacts
due to development within, the Neuse RiverBasin. Neuse River,riparian,buffer mitigation credits,
provided by this Parcel are available over the entire Neuse River Basin, United States Geological
Survey (USGS) 6 -digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC)'l 030202, per 15A NCAC 02B .0242 (Neuse
River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy: Mitigation Program for Protection
and Maintenance of Existing Riparian Buffers). Mitigation credits for Nutrient Offset are made
available within the Neuse River Basin USGS 8 -digit HUC. 03020201 excluding .the Falls Lake
Drainage; Basin.
Prior to construction activities, Parcel land use was agricultural based and utilized for livestock
grazing and row crop production with degraded forest pockets. Pasture areas were accessible to
livestock and were routinely cleared for hay production, resulting in, local disturbances to stream
banks and wetland soil surfaces. Additional land use practicest included the maintenance and
removal of riparian vegetation; ditching of adjacent'riparian wetland's; and relocation, dredging,
and channelization of onsite streams resulting in degraded water quality and excessive
sedimentation °resulting from unstable banks (stream entrenchment, erosion, and bank collapse).
Adjacent land use is currently characterized by pasture land for hay production and livestock
grazing. Prior `to construction adjacent landowners installed and will be responsible, for the
maintenance of fencing,to protect from livestock trespass and damage to Parcel assets.
Parcel construction activities were concluded in, early April 2013. An onstte determination for
applicability to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233) was conducted in
June 2013 and NCDWR approved the Pancho Bank Parcel Development Package on October 4,
2013. The Sponsor currently owns the property in fee simple, a perpetual Conservation Easement
was placed over the Parcel on April 18, 2012. This Parcel was designed and implemented' in
concurrence, with the Pancho Steam & Wetland Mitigation Bank (Corps Action ID # SAW -2010-
00142).
Restoration of riparian corridors was accomplished in conjuncture with the objectives and methods
outlined by the Pancho Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank. Primary objectives of the riparian
restoration, focused on improving water quality; enhancing flood ;attenuation, and - restoring wildlife
Year 2 (2014) Monitoring Report Executive Summary
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

habitat by planting a forested riparian buffer adjacent to stream channels, Primary objectiyes were
accomplished by the following.
1. Removing nonpoint sources of pollution associated with agricultural production including
a) removing °livestock and b) ceasing,the'broadcast application of'fertilizer, pesticides, and
other agricultural materials into and adjacent to Parcel streams through treatment of runoff
within the forested buffer.
2. Reducing sedimentation within onsite and downstream receiving waters by a) reducing
bankierosion, vegetation,maintenance, plowing, and-hoof shear adjacent to Parcel,streams,,
and b) removing livestock from the Parcel.
3. Promoting floodwater attenuation by increasing frictional resistance on floodwaters
crossing Parcel floodplains.
4., Improving aquatic habitat by enhancing stream bed shading and natural detritus input.
5: Providing a terrestrial_ wildlife corridor and refuge in an area extensively, developed for
agricultural production.
6. Restoring and reestablishing natural community structure, habitat diversity, and functional
continuity. .
7. Protecting the Parcel's full potential of stream and riparian buffer functions and values in
perpetuity.
The primary objectives were achieved by implementing a two phase restoration plan, which
consisted of the following.
1. Re- establishment of riparian buffer forest up to 200 linear feet from channel margins.
2.- Permanentoprotection,of the Parcel in a conservation easement.
Year 2 (2014) vegetation sampling occurred October 2, 20,14. Stem density across the Parcel was
above the required average, density with 659 planted tree' stems per acre (excluding livestakes)
surviving in year 2-(2014). In addition,, all individual plots exceeded success criteria with the
exception of Plots `8 and 9, which were each't'wo stems ashy of success. The area surrounding these
plots is characterized by compacted soils from previous agricultural land -use, so planted stem
survival is low. The Year 1 (2013) Annual Monitoring report indicated that a ,supplemental
planting would occur in this area prior to March 15, 2014; however, the report was submitted
March 5, 2014 and approved on March 6, 2014, which was ,too late to procure additional trees for
replanting. This area will be replanted with 200 -300 bare root saplings in February 2015.
Additionally,, a small area (soil borrow area from Site construction) between the ,roam tributary
and Kennedy Mill Branch was observed to have bare, eroded, nutrient poor soil and low planted
stem survival. If needed, a remedial action plan for this area will be developed and may include
fertilization, `installation of erosion control, matting, and replanting. Further correspondence with
the DWR wily occur prior to any action' and' is anticipated to begin during a Site.visit in April of
2015.
Overall, Parcel conditions remained stable during Year 2 (2014). No signs of herbivory, easement
encroachment, mowing,, pruning, or mulching were observed. The fences' protecting the easement
from livestock ,intrusion are intact and effective. Additionally, minimal 'invasive species were
observed on the Parcel, continual monitoring and treatment of invasive species will be conducted
by Carolina Silvics, a NCDA & CS Licensed Pesticide Applicator.
Year 2 (2014) Monitoring Report Executive Summary
Pancho'Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

'TABLE OY CONTENTS
EXECUTIVESUMMARY ............................................................................... ............................... 1
1.0 MONITORING AND SUCCESS CRITERIA ...................................... ............................... I
2.0 MITIGATION POTENTIAL ............................................................... ............................... 1
3.0 MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY. . .......... :..... .-:....... ........... .:.................................... 1
4.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................... ............................... 2
APPENDICES
APPENDIX,A.
SITE LOCATION MAP AND BACKGROUND TABLES,
Figure 1.
Site Location
Table 1.
Project Components and Mitigation Units
Table 2.
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3.
Project Contacts Table
Table4.
Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Table 5.
Reference Forest Ecosystem
Table 6.
Planted Tree Species
APPENDIX B.
VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figure, 2.
Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3:
Mitigation Components and' Assets,
Marsh Treatment Area Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
APPENDIX C.
VEGETATION PLOT DATA
Table 7.'
Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
`Year 2 (2014) Mondonng Report Table of'Contents page i
Pancho Bank Parcel

1.0 MONITORING AND SUCCESS CRITERIA
Restoration monitoring procedures for vegetation will include periodic visual inspection and annual
plant survival and species diversity survey reports. Quantitative sampling of vegetation will be
performed as outlined in the CVS Level 1 -2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version -4.2 (Lee �et
al. 2008). Detailed qualitative, and quantitative monitoring is proposed for vegetated riparian areas.
Marsh treatment areas will be visually inspected periodically and reported qualitatively'withm -the,
annual monitoring report, which will 'include -photographic, record of `the Pa'rcel's assets.
Monitoring of the restoration eff6rts will be performed for five years or until success criteria are
fulfilled. Restoration Systems shall submit annual monitoring reports to NCDWR no later than
December 31" of each year. Quantitative monitoring will occur at seventeen (17) 10x10 meter
vegetation plots (Figure 2, Appendix B). Vegetation sampling will be performed as outlined in the
CVS Level 1 -2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4 2 (Lee et al. 2008) in September or
October forthe remainder of the monitoring period or until vegetation success criteria are achieved.
Dunng; the first year, vegetation will receive ,a cursory, visual evaluation on a periodic basis to
ascertain the, degree of overtopping of planted elements by nuisancespecies. ,Success criteria within
the riparian buffer and nutrient offset restoration areas will be, based on the survival of planted'
species at a density of 320 stems per acre after five years of monitoring. Natural recruits will not
count towards annual success criteria, but may be taken into account during review by the NCDWR.
2.0 MITIGATION POTENTIAL
Riparian areas suitable to generate mitigation credit were calculated by measuring 50 linear feet
horizontally from the top of bank on all subject streams for Neuse ,npanan buffer credit and.200
linear feet from the top of bank on all hydrologically connected conveyances for nutrient offset
mitigation. Riparian `buffer credits were measured by the hundredth of an acre and converted, into
,square feet.
'The Parcel will generate 16.35 acres of restored riparian area; of that 11.33 acres will be used
specifically 'for nutrient offset credit, generating 25 „753.31 pounds of nitrogen offset credit (the
NCDWR determined that restored riparian areas at the Parcel would abate 2273.02 pounds per, acre
of nitrogen), and the remaining 5.02 acres (218,671.2 sq. ft.) will be used for Neuse riparian buffer
credits. The mitigation provided_ in the Neuse riparian buffer can be used for either Neuse riparian
buffer credits or nutrient offset credits; but not both. The Sponsor'will request,and receive approval.
of the transfer of any mitigation credits from NCDWR. All mitigation credit assets shall be shown
on the credit ledgers. Figure 3 (Appendix B) and Table 1 (Appendix A) summarize the Ta_rcel's.
,components and mitigation credits.
3.0 MAINTENANCE AND' CONTINGENCY
A remedial action plan will be developed and implemented with the approval of NCDWR in the
event that the Parcel or a specific component of the Parcel fails to achieve.success criteria as outlined
above. Other vegetation maintenance and repair activities may include pruning, mulching, and
fertilizing. In the event that exotic invasive,plant species require treatment, such species will be
controlled by mechanical (physical removal with the use of a chainsaw) and/or chemical methods
(aquatic approved herbicide) in accordance,with North Carolina D_ epartment of Agriculture (NCDA)
rules and regulations.
Year-2 (2014) Morntonng Report Page•1
Pancho Bank; Parcel

4.0 REFE`RENCE5
Griffith, G.E., J.M. Omernik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W:H. McNab, D.R. Lenat, T.F.
MacPherson, J.B. Glover, and V.B. Shelboume., 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina and South
Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS -EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation. Version 4.2. North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Neuse River Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy 15A.NCAC 2B .0233,
15A NCAC 02B .024 1, and 15A,NCAC 02B .0242
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement
Program. Guidelines for Riparian,Buffer Restoration. October 2004
Schafale, M P. and A.S-. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural, Communities of North
Carolina: Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks
and Recreation, N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. Raleigh,
North Carolina.
Year 2 (2614) Morntonng Report Page 2
Pancho Bank Parcel

APPENDIX A.
SITE LOCATION MAP
AND BACKGROUND TABLES
Figure 1. Site Location
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Units
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Table 5. Reference Forest Ecosystem
Table 6. Planted Tree Species
Year2 (2014) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank,Parcel

I CA
IN
JOHNSTON REEN
h 1
f�.... `- ham` •,
WAYNE — •,_ ° -
N-
' ENOIS La
SAMPSON 1144p
Int P14i
Ji
e
f
1 s ,
Goldsboro
- � I tt � =`l-0 1 `. ! •
a r
i den -
Mill r', � - .�•�'
-- - Jen:. .�.�^ �� � i
Pancho
Bank
Parcel
Directions to the Site from Raleigh, NC:
Travel east on U.S. Highway 70
Travel — 37 miles on U.S. Highway 70 to the intersection
< c4 with Martin Livestock Road
Turn right at Martin Livestock Road (0.7 mile)
Turn right at Progressive Church Road (4 miles)
Turn left at Brogden Road (0.5 mile)
Turn right at Richardson Bridge Road (5.3 miles)
-> Turn left at T- intersection onto Harper House Road,
0 0.5 1 2 3 4 which becomes Stevens Mill Road (1.3 miles)
Miles -> The Bank is located where Kennedy Mill Branch crosses
/ Stevens Mill Road
Scale 1:120,000 " ' -> Latitude: 35.333755° N, Longitude: 78.192699° W
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
" 2ta Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
SITE LOCATION
PANCHO BANK PARCEL
Dwn. By:
CLF /KRJ
Date:
Jan 2014
FIGURE
919- 215 -1693
Wayne County, North Carolina
Project:
��E y
13 -010

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Pancho Bank Parcel. Wavne Countv. NC
Mitigation Credits
Nutrient Offset'(Niirogen
d > _ —,
Restoration,
Restoration,;�quivalent
11.33
--
Projects Components
September 2013
Restoration
NA
April 2012
Construction
Existing
April 20 D
Restoration
Mitigation !
March 2013
As -Built & Baseline Monitoring Document
/
January 2014
Year 1 (2013) Annual Momtormg
Comment
Acreage
Year 2 (2014) Annual Momtoring
Acreage
Acre
Mit. Ratio
Restoration
2273 02 lbs. /
Cessation of current land use practices,,
11.33
11.33
removing invasive species, and planting
(1 „1)
acre
with native 'forest vegetation
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Nutrient Offset Credits (lbs.)
Restoration
11.33 acres = 25,753.31 lbs.
Totals
11.33 acres = 25,753.3-1 lbs
f &ease Riparian' Buffer
Restoration
Restoration Equivalent
502
--
Projects Components
Restoration
Existing
Restoration
Mitigation /
/
Comment
Acreage
Acreage
Acre
Mit. Ratio
Restoration
43,560 sq. ft. /
Cessation of current land use practices,
5.02
5.02
removing invasive species, ands planting
(1:1)
acre
wrth,native forest vegetation
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Ne_use Riparian Buffer Credits (sq. ft.
Restoration
5.02 acres = 218,671.2 sq ft.
Totals-
5.02 acres = 218,671.2 sq ft.
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting,History
Pancho Bank Parcel, Wayne County, NC
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Completion or Delivery
Restoration Systems Neuse UMBI
NA
March 2008
BPDP
NA
September 2013
Conservation Easement
NA
April 2012
Construction
NA
April 20 D
Bare RootTlanting
NA
March 2013
As -Built & Baseline Monitoring Document
July 2013
January 2014
Year 1 (2013) Annual Momtormg
October 2013
January 2014
Year 2 (2014) Annual Momtoring
November 2014
January 2015
Year 2 (2014) Mondonng Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Pancho Mitigation Bank
Mitigation Provider
Restoration Systems
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
County
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Wayne
George Howard and John Pre er 919 - 75.5 -9490
Designer
Axiom`Envir`onmental, Inc.
Project Coordinates (latitude,and
longitude)
218 Snow Avenue
35.333755° N, - 78.192699° W (NAD 83/WGS 84)
Raleigh, NC 27603
Physiographic Province
Grant Lewis 919- 215 -1693
Construction and Seeding Contractor
Land Mechanic Designs
780 Landmark,Road
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
Willow Sprmg, NC'27592
Lloyd Glover 919- 639 - 6132_
Planting Contractor
Carolina Silvics
908 Indian Trail Road
Project Drainage Area, Total Outfall (miles)
Edenton, NC 27932
+/-3.3 - -
Mary M -8491 a , 4
Nurser Stock Su liens
ArborGeri 888- 888 -7158
As -built Surveyor
K2 Design Group
Cropland and Pasture
5688 US Highway 70 East
Goldsboro,.NC 27534
John Rudolph 919 - 751 -0075
Baseline Data Collection &
Axiom Environmental, Inc
Annual Monitnfing
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Grant Lewis 919 - 215 -1693
Table 4. Project Baseline Information & Attributes Table
Pancho Bank Parcel, Wayne County, NC
Project Information
Project Name
Pancho
County
Wayne
Project Area (acres)
65.62
Project Coordinates (latitude,and
longitude)
35.333755° N, - 78.192699° W (NAD 83/WGS 84)
Project Watershed Summary Information,
Physiographic Province
Southeastern Floodplains and Low - Terraces &
Rolling Coastal Plain
River Basin
Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
03020201
USGS Hydrologic Unit
14 -digit
03020201150050
DWQ Sub -basin
03-04-06
Project Drainage Area, Total Outfall (miles)
+/-3.3 - -
Project Drainage Area Impervious Area
< 5%
CGIA Land Use -Classift_cation
Cropland and Pasture
Year 2 (2014) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

Table 5. Reference Forest Ecosystem
Pancho Bank Parcel, Wayne County; NC
Onsite Observations + Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest & Coastal -Plain Bottomland Hardwoods
Canopy Species,
Understory Species
Red maple Acer rubrum
Red ma -le Acer rubrum
River birch Betula ni a- _
River btrch (Betula na a
Pecan Ca " "a'dhhoinensis,
Ironwood `'Cor rnus carokniana
American beech_ F, d " s rdndi oha
Coastal _swee a erbush Clethra alni oha
American holly Ilex o aca,
Dogwood Cornus orida
Sweet m. Lt uidambar s race ua
Sourwood (6iospyros vtr" iniana
Tulip poplar Liriodendrum tuli i era
American holly Ilex'o aca
Black- N ssa bi ora
Virginia sweets ire (Itea vir imca
Water oak (Quercus m a)
Sweetgum (Li uidambar styraci ua
Swamp chestnut oak uercus_ michauxrr
Tulip poplar Drrodendrum tuli i era
Che" bark oak (Quercus pagoda) )
Common,sweetleaf (S m locos tinctoria)
Willow oak uereus hellos
Winged elm Ulmus alaia
Winged elm Ulmus alak7 '
Hi hbush bluebe T y(Vaccin'ium co mbosum
American elm Ulmus amerrcana
Yearn (2014) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

�U
z
O
0
0
�U
� o
H
0 ci
Ha
�
�-
O
�
M
00
Ci0
00
O
M
O
O
00
�
00
00
Ci0
Ci0
O
�
N
H
N
N
.--I
W
N
W
N
N
N
N
N
N
tn
M
M
M
00
r--
N
00
\°
A
[�
C
00
L. 'b
N
►,y
w
U
CC
O
oO0
000
000
000
O
O
N
a"
N
(V
N
-
N
O (9
N
O
t!)
O
O
�t
p
cn
r
0
�
r
1 ^d
r
°
x
O
O
O
tn
O
C>
O
in
O,
O
OM
0
O
O
G
O
00
00
00
O
0
0
00
'
W
z
0
O
C 9
00
N
L7
;d Cd
t!1
C
cz
y
rl
Cd
un
1.
4w
d
d
a
o
o
0
o
0
E
rn
u
a
�+
N
M
O
0
w
H
°o
0
�
x
q
o
i
^
O
Ei
.a
tb
o
'"
'� '
��
a
C)
o
x
�
i+
..fir
�C�y
'�i
�
�
�
�
b
�
V
Gyp
„�
_�
,�
,�ia.
crj
>
Q
to
04
d
Z
G�1
a
w
r°
ti
3
0
m��
iIm
U
U
C
d
`a
Q
0
a
I�
I�
t, °'7jD
0` m
I C
f0
N m
N 0
U
'tea

APPENDIX B.
VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figure 2. Current, Conditions Plan View
Figure 3,. Mitigation Components and Assets
Marsh Treatment Area Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Year 2 (2014) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

Pancho Bank Parcel
Marsh Treatment Area
Fixed Station Photographs
Taken November, 2014
Year 2 (2014) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

Pancho Bank Parcel
Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken August 12 -13, 2014
Plot 6
Year 2 (2014) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

Pancho Bank Parcel
Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken August 12 -13, 2014 (continued)
Plot 7
Plot 9
Plot 8
Plot 11
Year 2 (2014) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

Pancho Bank Parcel
Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken August 12 -13, 2014 (continued)
i
Plot 13
Plot 15
Year 2 (2014) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

APPENDIX C.
VEGETATION PLOT DATA
Table `7. Total and Planted Stems by,Plot,and Species
Year, 2 (2014) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

Table 7. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Pancho Bank Parcel
exLeeu�, I equ1rernenLs uy LU7o
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
PnoLS = Pianung excivaing nvestaKes
P -all = Planting including livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits
Current Plot Data (MY2 2014)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
001 -01 -0001
001 -01 -0002
001 -01 -0003
001 -01 -0004
001 -01- 0005
001 -01 -0006
001 -01 -0007
001 -01 -0008
001 -01 -0009
001 -01 -0010
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
jPnoLS
P -all
IT
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Acer floridanum
Southern Sugar Maple, Flori
Tree
1
1
8
8
8
1
1
1
2
2
2
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
16
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
5
1
1
31
12
8
8
8
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
Carya
hickory
Tree
Carya cordiformis
bitternut hickory
Tree
4
4
4
Carya ovata
shagbark hickory
Tree
1
1
1
Cornus amornum
silky dogwood
Shrub
3
3
3
Cornus Florida
flowering dogwood
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
Fagus grandifolia
American beech
Tree
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
S
5
13
1
1
1
3
3
3
Ilex opaca
American holly
Tree
luglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
23
80
26
10
5
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
Nyssa
tupelo
Tree
1
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
3
3
3
3
3
3
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
4
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
Quercus
oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
7
7
7
2
2
2
8
8
8
7
7
7
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
3
3
3
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
5
5
5
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
9
9
9
Ulmus alata
winged elm
Tree
Ulmus americana
American elm
Tree
1
Vaccinium corymbosum
highbush blueberry
Shrub
5
S
5
1
1
1
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species counti
Stems per ACRE
131
131
13
10
10
41
14
14
115
16
16
73
-171
17
39
221
221
22
21
21
22
61
61
11
6
6
6
13
13
17
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
41
41
41
5
-51
6
41
41
71
51
51
71
51
51
7
71
71
7
41
41
S1
5
5
6
5 5
A242.8
6
6
7
526.1
526.1
526.1
404.7
404.7
1659
566.6
566.6
4654
647.5
647.5
2954
688
688
1578
890.3
890.3
890.3
849.8
849.8
890.3
242.8
242.8
445.2
242.8 242.8
526.1
526.1
688
exLeeu�, I equ1rernenLs uy LU7o
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
PnoLS = Pianung excivaing nvestaKes
P -all = Planting including livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits

Table 7. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species (cont'd)
Pancho Bank Parcel
-c !cIJW.. cn is a vy ivio
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
rllUL.3 - rldllL11% t!ALIUUIIIr, IIVe�.Ld Key
P -all = Planting including livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits
Current Plot Data (MY2 2014)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
001 -01 -0011
001 -01 -0012
001 -01 -0013
001 -01 -0014
001 -01 -0015
001 -01 -0016
001 -01 -0017
MY2 (2014)
MY1 (2013)
MYO (2013)
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
IT
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
IT
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Acer floridanum
Southern Sugar Maple, Flor
Tree
11
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
6
6
6
5
5
5
27
27
27
28
28
28
311
31
31
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
16
15
1
27
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
8
8
8
2
2
2
2
2
2
271
21
21
95
19
19
19
19
19
19
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
11
2
2
2
1
1
1
Carya
hickory
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Carya cordiformis
bitternut hickory
Tree
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Carya ovata
shagbark hickory
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
Cornus florida
flowering dogwood
Tree
1
3
3
3
11
8
8
8
10
10
10
9
9
9
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
5
5
5
7
7
7
1
1
1
4
4
4
22
22
22
21
21
21
22
22
22
Fagus grandifolia
American beech
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
4
4
4
3
3
3
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
4
4
41
2
2
2
15
15
23
16
16
16
15
15
15
Ilex opaca
American holly
Tree
3
3
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
6
11
24
177
72
61
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
7
7
7
31
3
3
5
51
5
21
211
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
Nyssa
tupelo
Tree
1
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
7
7
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
4
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
1
1
1
4
4
4
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
23
23
23
21
21
21
231
23
23
Quercus
oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
7
7
7
5
5
5
2
2
2
4
4
41
26
26
26
22
22
22
221
22
22
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
3
3
3
1
27
27
27
24
24
24
24
24
24
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
6
6
6
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
41
4
4
4
4
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
11
21
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
6
6
6
20
201
20
17
17
17
17
17
17
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
3
31
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
5
5
5
1
11
1
1
1
1
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
11
11
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
9
9
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
Ulmus alata
winged elm
Tree
2
2
Ulmus americana
American elm
Tree
1
Vaccinium corymbosum
highbush blueberry
Shrub
6
6
6
9
9
9
9
9
9
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
c.,......A ,. L.. , nei
27
27
27
28
28
36
22
22
23
24
24
25
12
12
23
11
11
12
15
15
69
277
277
574
263
263
350
267
267
355
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
17
16
16
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.42
0.40
0.40
91
91
91
81
81
10
81
81
91
111
111
121
4
4
5
31
31
4
61
61
9
241
241
321
191
191
211
201
201
22
10931
10931
10931
11331
11331
14571
890.31
890.31
930.81
971.21971.21
10121485.61485.61
930.8
445.21
445.21
485.6
6071
6071
2792_659.41
659.41
13661665.21
665.21
885.21
675.31
675.3
897.9
-c !cIJW.. cn is a vy ivio
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
rllUL.3 - rldllL11% t!ALIUUIIIr, IIVe�.Ld Key
P -all = Planting including livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits