NC0056863_Permit Issuance_20120725

ern
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P. E. Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
July 25, 2012
Mr. Bobby Cavenaugh
Public Utilities Director
Town of Rose Hill
P.O. Box 8
Rose Hill, NC 28458
Subject: NPDES Permit Issuance
Permit No. NC0056863
Rose Hill WWTP
Facility Class II
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Cavenaugh:
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for renewal of
the subject permit. Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached NPDES discharge
permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General
Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated October 15, 2007 (or as subsequently
amended).
The permit authorizes the Town of Rose Hill to discharge up to 0.450 MGD of
treated wastewater from the Rose Hill WWTP to Reedy Branch, a class C Swamp water
in the Cape Fear River Basin. The permit includes discharge limitations/or monitoring
for flow, BOD5, ammonia nitrogen, total suspended solids, dissolved oxygen, total
residual chlorine, fecal coliform, beryllium, chromium, copper, zinc,
dichlorobromomethane and mercury, along with other parameters.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service:1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterqualitv.orq
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
None Carolina
�tura!!y

Mr. Cavenaugh
July 25, 2012
Page 2 of 3
The following procedure has been implemented by DWQ: Total residual
chlorine (TRC) compliance level changed to 50 ug/1. Effective March 1, 2008, the
Division received EPA approval to allow a 50 ug/1 TRC compliance level. This change
is due to analytical difficulties with TRC measurements.. Facilities will still be required
to report actual results on their monthly discharge monitoring report (DMR) submittals,
but for compliance purposes, all TRC values below 50 ug/1 will be treated as zero. A
footnote regarding this has been added to the effluent page.
The following modifications in the draft remain in the final permit:
• Quarterly monitoring for beryllium, chromium, mercury, copper, silver, zinc
and dichlorobromomethane were added based on the results of the
reasonable potential analysis and Division procedures for toxicants. Please
note that mercury must be sampled using EPA Method 1631E (low level
mercury test).
• A special condition requiring that Rose Hill conduct a solids depth survey
and submit a solids removal plan was included in the permit.
• A special condition for Effluent Pollutant Scan was added to the permit
based on facility's status as a major discharger effective in 2009. Language
has been updated to note three scans must be completed during the permit
cycle,
• The treatment component, dechlorination, has been added to the supplement
to permit cover sheet.
• The number of sludge drying beds (five) has now been included.
• Language in the chronic toxicity testing requirement was updated.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in
this permit are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing
upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This
request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings,
6714. Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714. Unless such a demand
is made, this permit shall be final and binding.
Please take notice that this permit is not transferable. The Division may require
modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect
the legal requirements to obtain other permits, which may be required by the Division
of Water Quality, or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area
Management Act, or any other Federal or Local governmental permits may be
required.

Mr. Cavenaugh
July 25, 2012
Page 3 of 3
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms.
Jacquelyn Nowell at telephone number [phone].
Respectfully,
JO'1/1/1
&Charles Wakild, P.E.
Attachments
cc: Wilmington Regional Office/Surface Water Protection Section
PERCS/Attn: Sarah Morrison (ecopy)
EPA Region IV/Attn: Karrie Jo Shell (e_cop y,
Aquatic Toxicology/Attn: Susie Meadows (ecopy)
NPDES File
Central Files

Permit NC0056863
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards
and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management
Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, the
Town of Rose Hill
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
Rose Hill WWTP
287 Charlie Teachey Road (NCSR 1931)
Duplin County
to receiving waters designated as Reedy Branch in the Cape Fear River Basin in accordance with
effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III and IV
hereof.
This permit shall become effective September 1, 2012.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on January 31, 2017.
Signed this day July 25., 2012.
LAQ._
#files Wakild, P.E.
I7Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit NC0056863
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby
revoked, and as of this issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer
effective. Therefore, the exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under
the permit conditions, requirements, terms, and provisions included herein.
The Town of Rose Hill is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate an existing 0.45 MGD wastewater treatment system with the following
components:
• Lift station with dual screws and mechanical lift pump
• Bar screen
• Oxidation ditch
• Three clarifiers
• Aerated sludge holding tank
• Five sludge drying beds
• Gaseous chlorination
• Chlorine contact tank
• Dechlorination
• Flow measuring and recording
• Post aeration basin
The facility is located at 287 Charlie Teachey Road (NCSR 1931), Rose Hill, in Duplin County.
2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into Reedy
Branch, classified C-Swamp waters in the Cape Fear River Basin.

• • ..........____.„._
______
„.„.._,_____.
. 1____yoc...._),..----......._, ,fit, 1 v
.- cf,', (.....-------, )
(____-),_,,v
Ty,
-.....
.-:
.
;i�.
.
Gs
0
.
,,��
�j
. ••s +:
he
n u.
4 c Y}
,ra t r'a..
� rye3
i=.
f' ,`i7S-. �. �>/.
, 't f ,4i.i
"fS .h
,ter! �..:
s
% ,nii l5 b ,.i. f.. {' Ne v . Pil.-----''"
„ f, 4 g t
j.i.' ,qt_ S r } "Says ,r`r
a2cg ; 1 3 g4,.. J2 I~�.\k ,
Tk�s` .. l - 7 1 ,may.. •' „� .
is.• > ���4• �^' •'
�F.:. r'�.E•. • 55 �� �
%
Q8 q 0 4 .Se... r (.;J,,•
tom. ,
•
--'
�S �_r
�i\
`F•,�
c
(\
+ t
f\
C
\V
N \
\ �,
� �1
`/
\�
f
C
r
r
.I
1r
, a
r
• l�~\
'i
iM C... 0
r' iv .�rys tiN
DISCHARGE
—
; , . y
POINT
I P
'
•
far ~ _
-
ISu �
�\
, ation`
�..—. .
_
•
J
J1 f�
e �
��-1_,
ii
'e
CO•'1
a•1\
CI
85
5
Ro-.-'.,
.
ihk
:.-.- :��•,
fss a' 0
L
C::::)
O IlZ:S / _ �r
J• '
'
•
r
Town of Rose Hill
Rose Hill WWTP
County: Duplin Stream Class: C-Swamp
�.
Facility
Location
(not to scale) X `
Receiving Stream: Reedy Branch Sub -Basin: 03-06-22
Latitude: 34° 49' 02" Grid/Quad: Rose Ilill
Longitude: 78° 00' 26" HUC#: 03030005
NORTH
NPDES Permit No. NC0056863

Permit NC0056863
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is
authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee
as specified below:
EFFLUENT
CHARACTERISTICS
LIMITS
MONMTOG
RINREQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average;:,
Weekly
Average..
Daily
Maximum._
'Measurement
,., Frequency.;
Sample'
type.,.
' Sample
..Locations.
Flow
0.45 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Influent or
Effluent
BOD, 5-day (20°C)2
(April 1— October 31)
10.0 mg/L
15.0 mg/L
Weekly
Composite
Influent &
Effluent
BOD, 5-day (20°C) 2
(November 1— March 31)
18.0 mg/L
•
27.0 mg/L
• Weekly
Composite
Influent &
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids2
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Weekly
Composite
Influent &
Effluent
NH3 as N
(April 1— October 31)
2.0 mg/L
6.0 mg/L
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
NH3 as N
(November 1— March 31)
4.0 mg/L
12.0 mg/L
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen3
Weekly
Grab
Effluent,
Upstream &
Downstream
Fecal Coliform
(geometric mean)
200/100 ml
400/100 ml
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine4
• 17ug/L
2/Week
Grab
Effluent
Temperature (°C)
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature (°C)
Weekly
Grab
Upstream &
Downstream
Total Nitrogen
(NO2+NO3+TKN)
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Phosphorus
Quarterly
Composite
- Effluent
Total Beryllium
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Chromium
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Mercury
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Copper
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Silver
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Zinc
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Dichlorobromomethane
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Chronic Toxicity5
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
pH6
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Effluent Pollutant Scan'
Footnote 7
Footnote 7
Effluent
Footnotes on the next page.

Permit NC0056863
Footnotes:
71. Upstream = 100 feet above outfall; Downstream = at the NCSR 1933 bridge
The monthly average effluent BODS and Total Suspended Residue concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the
respective influent value (85% removal).
-3 The daily average dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be less than 6.0 mg/L.
4. The Division shall consider all effluent total residual chlorine values reported below 50 µg/1 to be in compliance with
the permit. However, the Permittee shall continue to record and submit all values reported by a North Carolina
certified laboratory (including field certified), even if these values fall below 50 µg/1.
5. See Special Condition A. (3).
6. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units.
7. The permittee shall perform three Effluent Pollutant Scans during the term of this permit. (See Special Condition A. (5)
THERE SHALL BE NO DISCHARGE OF FLOATING SOLIDS OR VISIBLE FOAM IN OTHER THAN TRACE AMOUNTS
A.(2.) PERMIT RE -OPENER: TMDL IMPLEMENTATION
The Division may, upon written notification to the Permittee, re -open this Permit in order to
incorporate or modify effluent limitations, monitoring and reporting requirements, and other permit
conditions when it deems such action is necessary to implement TMDL(s) approved by the USEPA.
A.(3). CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant
mortality to Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 90%.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined in
the "North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or
subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure"
(Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed during the months of
January, April, July and October. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES
permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below
the permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the
two following months as described in `North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test
Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will . be determined using the geometric mean of the
highest concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest
concentration that does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of
"detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are
specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -
February 1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed. If reporting
pass/fail results using the parameter code TGP3B, DWQ Form AT-1 (original) is sent to the below
address. If reporting Chronic Value results using the parameter code THP3B, DWQ Form AT-3
(original) is to be sent to the following address:

Permit NC0056863
A.(3). CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY) (con't)
Attention: NC DENR / DWQ / Environmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Section no
later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all
concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate
signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if
chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is
required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test
form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the
report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted
to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required,
monitoring will be required during the following month. Should any test data from this monitoring
requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality indicate potential
impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate
monitoring requirements or limits.
If the Permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently than required by this permit, the results of such
monitoring shall be included in the calculation and reporting of the data submitted on the DMR. and all
AT Forms submitted.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls,
shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later
than the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring.
A.(4). Solids Depth Survey and Removal Plan
By March 1, 2013, the Permittee shall conduct a gridded solids depth survey in the oxidation ditch
versus its total depth. This information should be used to calculate the volume of accumulated solids
in comparison to the total ditch volume for determination as to how much treatment volume has been
lost to accumulated grit and solids. The Permittee shall submit the survey results and calculated data to
the Division's Surface Water Protection Section in the Wilmington Regional Office at 127 Cardinal
Drive Extension, Wilmington NC 28405.
A review of the submitted information will be conducted to determine if a reduction is needed. If it is
deemed that a reduction plan is necessary to ensure adequate and efficient treatment quality, then the
Permittee shall develop and implement such plan within 180 days of written notification by the
Wilmington Regional Office.

Permit NC0056863
A. (5.) Effluent Pollutant Scan
The Permittee shall perform a total of three (3) Effluent Pollutant Scans for all parameters listed below. One scan must be
performed in each of the following years: 2013, 2014, and 2015. Analytical methods shall be in accordance with 40 CFR
Part 136 and shall be sufficiently sensitive to determine whether parameters are present in concentrations greater than
applicable standards and criteria. Samples should be collected with one quarterly toxicity test each year, and must represent
seasonal variation [i.e. do not sample in the same quarter every year]. Unless otherwise indicated, metals shall be analyzed
as "total recoverable."
Ammonia (as N)
Chlorine (total residual, TRC)
Dissolved oxygen
Nitrate/Nitrite
Kjeldahl nitrogen
Oil and grease
Phosphorus
Total dissolved solids
Hardness
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury -(EPA Method 1631E )
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
Cyanide
Total phenolic compounds
Volatile organic compounds:
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Benzene
• Bromoform
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chlorodibromomethane
Chloroethane
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Dichlorobromomethane
1,1-dichloroethane
1,2-dichloroethane
Trans- 1,2-dichloroethylene
1, 1-dichloroethylene
1,2-dichloropropane
1,3-dichloropropylene
Ethylbenzene
Methyl bromide
Methyl chloride
Methylene chloride
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1, 1, 1 -trichloroethane
1,1,2-trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
Acid -extractable compounds:
P-chloro-m-cresol
2-chlorophenol
2,4-dichlorophenol
2,4-dimethylphenol
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
2,4-dinitrophenol
2-nitrophenol
4-nitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
Base -neutral compounds:
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
3,4 benzofluoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Butyl benzyl phthalate
2-chloronaphthalene
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Chrysene
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,2-dichlorobenzene
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1,4-dichlorobenzene
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
2,4-dinitrotoluene
2,6-dinitrotoluene
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
Hexachloroethane
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
. N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
N-nitrosodimethylamine
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
Reporting. Test results shall be reported on DWQ Form- A MR PPA 1(or in a form approved by the Director)
by December 31 s` of each designated sampling year. The report shall be submitted to the following address:
NCDENR/DWQ/Central Files, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617.

DENR/ DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NC0056863
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility Name:
Town of Rose Hill/ Rose Hill WWTP
Applicant Address:
P.O. Box 8, Rose Hill, NC 28458
Facility Address:
287 Charlie Teachey Road (NCSR 1931), Rose Hill, NC 28458
Permitted Flow
0.45 MGD
Type of Waste:
Municipal '
Facility/Permit Status:
Renewal
County:
Duplin
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream:
Reedy Branch
Regional Office:
WiRO
Stream Classification:
C Swamp
Quad
Rose Hill (H26SE)
303(d) Listed?:
NO
Permit Writer:
Jackie Nowell
Subbasin:
030622
Date:
May 14, 2012
HUC#
03030005
Drainage Area (mi2):
0.12 mi2
Summer 7Q10 (cfs)
0.0 cfs
Winter 7Q 10 (cfs):
0.0 cfs
Average Flow (cfs):
0.2 cfs
IWC (%):
100
Primary SIC Code:
4952
SUMMARY
The Town of Rose Hill operates a 0.45 MGD wastewater treatment facility that discharges into
Reedy Branch in the Cape Fear River Basin. The WWTP serves 1,430 people. In September
2010, the facility status of the Rose Hill WWTP was revised to be classified as a major facility.
This change was based on the facility being a publicly owned treatment work with a
pretreatment program. The modified pretreatment program for the Rose Hill facility began in
2009. The application and WiRO staff report indicate that a winery and a rendering plant send
wastewater to the facility. Although the rendering plant has had some violations, there have M w
not been any upsets at the treatment plant. It is recommended that this modified,
/1"_
pretreatment program be continued.
C•Z .2(
The Rose Hill WWTP discharges into a stream with an estimated 7Q10 flow of 0 cfs and an
estimated 30Q2 flow of 0 cfs. Based on the receiving stream flow, the Rose Hill WWTP will not pre._ A
be allowed to expand at this current discharge site. The facility requested speculative limits for
expansion in December 2011, and DWQ responded that an increase in flow would not be
allowed. It was recommended that Rose Hill review other options should as nondischarge or
relocation to a stream with a positive stream flow (Janu 3 2008 DWQ corre
Town).
Existing permit limits at 0.45 MGD:
BOD5=10 mg/1 (summer); 18 mg/1 (winter)
TSS=30 mg/1
NH3 as N = 2 mg/1 (summer); 4 mg/1 (winter)
DO = daily average not less than 6 mg/1
Fecal =200/ 100m1
Total Residual Chlorine=17 ug/1
pH=6-9 S.U.
Quarterly monitoring for Total Nitrogen and Tot
Quarterly Chronic toxicity limit at 90%
n,kt
-P. sec h 'i O vt 01.)kke IH art e if
ay?. _iedi c,it104 QO til
r..v I- i c 1J1i 1 'Fen/jell
Phosphorus. �� 0 11
I-1A
17
/c Vi v1
The average flow for the WWTP was 0.229 MGD in
in 2009. The plant is at about 51% of capacity.
41. 1/ty/i
11, 0.239 MGD in 20 1 - . . 0.260 MGD
1
NC0056853- Rose Hill WWTP
NPDES Renewal
Page 1

i 4
RECEIVING STREAM
The Rose Hill WWTP discharges into Reedy Branch, a class C Swamp stream. Stream flows at
the discharge point indicate that the summer 7Q10 is zero and 30Q2 is zero. Reedy Branch is
not listed on the 2010 NC 303 (d) list of impaired streams or the 2012 draft 303(d) list.
TOXICITY TESTING:
Current Requirements: At 0.45 MGD, Chronic Toxicity P/F at 90%; Testing in Jan Apr Jul Oct;
Since the last renewal in April 2007, the facility passed the tox test in July and October 2007.
There was one failure in January 2008. The failure was followed by two passes in February
and March 2008. Since April 2008, the facility has passed all fourteen (14) quarterly toxicity
tests.
Recommendation: renewal of quarterly chronic toxicity test at 90%.
COMPLIANCE SUMMARY:
There have been some compliance issues with this facility. There were several DO frequency
violations from July 2007 through April 2008 which appear to be corrected. There was an NH3
violation in April 2007; along with monthly average exceedances in April, July and August
2008, weekly average exceedances in April -June 2010 and August 2010. There were BOD5
violations in April 2008, June 2010, and August 2010. A review of compliance data also
showed problems with TRC, however these were not true exceedances because of the 50 ug/1
threshold. All recent values are within the 50 ug/1 threshold that DWQ designated in 2008
memo regarding TRC.
Between September 2008 and November 2010, DWQ enforcement cases against the Rose Hill
WWTP totaled approximately $4518.
INSTREAM MONITORING:
Parameters: Dissolved oxygen and temperature
Upstream: 100 feet above outfall
Downstream: at NCSR 1933 bridge
A review of instream DO monitored by Rose Hill show that in most instances the .downstream
DO values are always below 5 mg/ 1, even if the upstream values are above 5 mg/ 1. In the
summer months of May through August 2011, upstream DO values ranged between 1.99 - 3.14
mg/1, and downstream DOs ranged between 1.29 mg/1 - 3.04 mg/1. However in September
through December 2011 there were instances when upstream DOs ranged from 5.3 to 6.16
mg/1 but corresponding downstream DOs ranged from 1.29 - 3.33 mg/1. In the winter
months, it is assumed that instream DOs would be higher because of the lower instream
temperatures but this was not the case. In 2010 and 2009, nearly all upstream DOs were
above 6 mg/ 1, however nearly all downstream values were less than 4 mg/ 1.
Recommend the continuation of instream monitoring for temperature and DO.
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
A review of submitted priority pollutant scans was a limited dataset of only two samples for
selected parameters. Parameters with no detections were not evaluated for reasonable
potential.
Based on the reasonable potential analysis, and the results which indicated a reasonable
potential to exceed the water quality standard or action level standards, it is recommended that
the following parameters be monitored quarterly in the permit: Total copper, total zinc,
total silver, total beryllium, total chromium, total mercury and dichlorobromomethane.
It is recommended that copper, silver and zinc should monitor quarterly in conjunction with
the whole effluent toxicity test. In addition, because the pretreatment short term monitoring
program will not provide adequate data for evaluation at the next permit renewal, quarterly
monitoring for the metals was recommended.
NC0056853- Rose Hill WWTP
NPDES Renewal
Page 2

PROPOSED CHANGES:
• The treatment component, dechlorination, has been added to the supplement to permit
cover sheet.
• The number of sludge drying beds (five) has now been included.
• The following procedure has been implemented by DWQ: Total residual chlorine (TRC)
compliance level changed to 50 ug/l. Effective March 1, 2008, the Division received
EPA approval to allow a 50 ug/1 TRC compliance level. This change is due to analytical
difficulties with TRC measurements. Facilities will still be required to report actual
results on their monthly discharge monitoring report (DMR) submittals, but for
compliance purposes, all TRC values below 50 ug/1 will be treated as zero. A footnote
regarding this change has been added to the effluent limitations page in the draft
permit.
• Quarterly monitoring for beryllium, chromium, mercury, copper, silver, zinc and
dichlorobromomethane is recommended based on the results of the reasonable potential
analysis and Division procedures for toxicants.
• A special condition requiring that Rose Hill conduct a solids depth survey and submit a
solids removal plan was included in the permit.
• Language in the chronic toxicity testing requirement was updated.
• Special condition for Effluent Pollutant Scan was added to the permit based on facility's
status as a major discharger effective in 2009.
PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
Draft Permit to Public Notice: May 23, 2012
Permit Scheduled to Issue (Tentative): September, 2012 (est.)
STATE CONTACT:
If you have any questions on any of the above information or on the attached permit, please
contact Ja• •e Nowell at [phone] or [e-mail].
NAME:
li
f
RE • NAL OFFICE CO MENT:
NAME:
DATE: 6 -
RO SUPERVISOR:
DATE:
DATE:
NC0056853- Rose Hill WWTP
NPDES Renewal
Page 3

7/o2-
Belnick, Tom
From: Belnick, Tom
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 1:23 PM
To: Hunkele, Dean; Nowell, Jackie
Cc: Belnick, Tom
Subject: Town of Rose Hill NC0056863
Dean/Jackie- I just signed this permit renewal. Per Jackie's Fact Sheet, looks like there might be some impact on
downstream DO in winter, although WWTP generally shows good BOD treatment and good DO levels in effluent at that
time. Might be worth a follow-up by Wilmington Region in winter, to recheck instream DO recordings relative to
effluent BOD/DO levels.
TY1 20i7 loteloutd, (0414
dokietikca.ot D � vaii4fer,
1

Nowell, Jackie
al co avi
From: Pamala Myers [[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 10:33 AM
To: Nowell, Jackie; Belnick, Tom
Cc: Mark Nuhfer; [e-mail]
Subject: Rose Hill Wastewater Treatment Plant (NC0056863) = No Comments
Subject: No Comment for Draft National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Review
Rose Hill Wastewater Treatment Plant (NC0056863)
Dear Mr. Poupart:
In accordance with the EPA/NC Memorandum of Agreement, we have completed our review of the draft
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit referenced above and initially received on
May 29, 2012, with new data received on June 14, 2012 as requested. We have no comments to the proposed
conditions. The EPA requests that we be afforded an additional review opportunity only if significant changes
are made to the draft permit prior to issuance, or if significant objections to the draft permit are received.
Otherwise, please send Region 4 one copy of the final permit when issued with a signed cover letter. If you
have any questions, please call me at [phone] or send me an email at cr,,.h,intalct a ci-K1.uoN
Sincerely,
Pamala Myers
404.562.9421
myers.pamalaCd epa.gov
Environmental Engineer and Technical Advisor I Pollution Control and Implementation Branch
Water Protection Division I Municipal and Industrial NPDES Section
U.S. EPA, Region 4 161 Forsyth St. SW I Atlanta, GA 30303
i

Nowell, Jackie
From: Hunkele, Dean
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 1:44 PM
To: Nowell, Jackie
Subject: RE: Rose Hill WWTP Draft Permit Comments
No I haven't. Feel free to pass it along to see if clear enough for him & town manager.
Dean Hunkele, Senior Environmental Specialist
Wilmington Regional Office
Division of Water Quality, Surface Water Protection Section
http://www.ncwaterquality.org/
Direct Phone: [phone]
Main Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Address: 127 Cardinal Drive Ext
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
To report a SSO, WWTP Bypass, or Spill after hours, holidays, or weekends
call The NC Division of Emergency Management @ 1-800-858-0368
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Nowell, Jackie
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 1:40 PM
To: Hunkele, Dean
Subject: RE: Rose Hill WWTP Draft Permit Comments
Thank you, Dean. Have you spoken with Mr. Cavenaugh of Rose Hill? I'll probably forward this to him so he can see this
condition before its placed in the final permit. If he has additional questions, I will forward him to you.
From: Hunkele, Dean
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 12:24 PM
To: Nowell, Jackie; Gregson, Jim
Subject: RE: Rose Hill WWTP Draft Permit Comments
Jackie,
1

•
Replace condition with this as it should clear it up.
A.(4). Solids Depth Survey and Removal Plan
Within 180 days of the effective date of this permit, the Permittee shall conduct a gridded solids depth survey in
the oxidation ditch versus its total depth. This information should be used to calculate the volume of
accumulated solids in comparison to the total ditch volume for determination as to how much treatment volume
has been lost to accumulated grit & solids. The Permittee shall submit the survey results and calculated data to
the Division's Surface Water Protection Section in the Wilmington Regional Office at 127 Cardinal Drive
Extension, Wilmington NC 28405.
A review of the submitted information will be conducted to determine if a reduction is needed. If it is deemed
that a reduction plan is necessary to ensure adequate and efficient treatment quality, then the Permittee shall
develop and implement such plan within 180 days of written notification by the Wilmington Regional Office.
Dean Hunkele, Senior Environmental Specialist
Wilmington Regional Office
Division of Water Quality, Surface Water Protection Section
http://www.ncwaterquality.org/
Wa ercli
-e eayn+ce N ti k now I I y
re a eree ct a� tech^
Direct Phone: [phone]
Main Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Address: 127 Cardinal Drive Ext
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
To report a SSO, WWTP Bypass, or Spill after hours, holidays, or weekends
call The NC Division of Emergency Management @ 1-800-858-0368
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Nowell, Jackie
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 10:21 AM
To: Gregson, Jim; Hunkele, Dean
Subject: FW: Rose Hill WWTP Draft Permit Comments
Good morning,
Per the comments below from Mr. Cavenaugh regarding the solids depth survey and removal plan. Since this
recommendation came from the Wilmington Regional Office, could you review the permit condition included in the
draft and then flesh out what the specific steps to this depth survey and removal plan that are required? I didn't
provide enough information for him to understand what is needed.
Thanks in advance for your help with this.
2

Jackie
From: Public Works Dept. [mailto:rosehillpw@ embargmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 6:55 AM
To: Nowell, Jackie
Cc: rosehill
Subject: Rose Hill WWTP Draft Permit Comments
Jackie,
Po„ fhll �... h
We have received the draft copy of our WWTP Permit. I do have a couple of comments regarding the draft.
First, could you give me some clarification on Solids Depth Survey and Removal Plan A.(4). Second, we
have a spry irrigation with the plant (WQ0020970); we irrigate from the dechlorination chamber. Should this
be added to the SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET?
Please contact me if you have questions concerning this matter.
Thanks,
Bobby Cavenaugh
Rose Hill Public Utilities Director
PO Box, 8
Rose Hill, NC 28458
Office: [phone]
Cell: [phone]
rosehillpw cr,embargmail.com
3

AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNT' OF SAMPSON .
JULES MOLENDA, PUBLISHER, of the Sampson Independent, a newspaper published in
Sampson County, N.C. being duly sworn, says that at the time the attached notice was
published in the- SAMPSON INDEPENDENT, said newspaper met all of the requirements
and qualifications prescribed by North Carolina General Statue 1-597; that said newspaper had
a general circulation to actual paid subscribers; and was admitted to the United States mail as
second class matter in Sampson County, N.C.; and further, that the attached notice was
pu. ; .,. - d in the AMPS ON INDEPENDENT on
, 2012.
Publisher
Legals • Swo to and subscribed before me this the /.03/ day
PUBLIC NOTICE
North Carolina Environmental 0 , 2012.
ComManagement Ot-e/,
1617 Mil Service SC Unit
er1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Notice of Intent to Issue a I NOTARY PUBLIC
NPDES Wastewater Permit
The North Carolina Envir-
onmental Management
Commission proposes to is-
sue a NPDES wastewater
discharge permit to the
person(s) listed below.
Written comments regarding
the proposed permit will be
accepted until 30 days after
the publish date of this notice.
The Director of the NC Divi-
sion of Water Quality (DWQ)
may hold a public hearing
should there be a significant
degree of public interest.
Please mail comments and/or
information requests to DWQ
at the above address. In-
terested persons may visit the
DWQ at 512 N. Salisbury
Street, Raleigh, NC to review
information on file. Additional
information on NPDES per-
mits and this notice may be
found on our website:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq
/swp/ps/npdes/calendar, or by
calling [phone].
Town of Rose Hill requested
renewal of permit NC0056863
for Rose Hill WWTP in Duplin
County. This permitted dis-
charge is treated municipal
wastewater to Reedy Branch,
Cape Fear River Basin.
The Sampson Independent
May 29, 2012.c.
My commission expires: June 20, 2015

Nowell, Jackie
From: Hunkele, Dean
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 10:22 AM
To: Nowell, Jackie
Cc: Gregson, Jim; Meadows, Susan
Subject: RE: Draft permit for Rose Hill WWTP
Attachments: 56863draft2012 comments.doc
Importance: High
Jackie,
Please see the system description changes in red. Check the map info box.
Also, please add parameter codes and units -of -measure to the table. Also, need to sync up
known toxicants like zinc & copper to toxicity sampling event.
Please advise with any questions.
Thanks, Dean
Dean Hunkele, Senior Environmental Specialist Wilmington Regional Office Division of Water
Quality, Surface Water Protection Section http://www.ncwaterquality.org/
Direct Phone: [phone]
Main Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Address: 127 Cardinal Drive Ext
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
To report a SSO, WWTP Bypass, or Spill after hours, holidays, or weekends call The NC
Division of Emergency Management @ 1-800-858-0368
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
> Original Message
> From: Gregson, Jim
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 10:36 PM
> To: Hunkele, Dean
> Subject: Fw: Draft permit for Rose Hill WWTP
> Original Message
> From: Nowell, Jackie
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 08:34 PM
> To: Gregson, Jim; Meadows, Susan; Morrison, Sarah; Reid, Steve
> Subject: Draft permit for Rose Hill WWTP
> Hello,
1

Permit NC0056863
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby
revoked, and as of this issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer
effective. Therefore, the exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under
the permit conditions, requirements, terms, and provisions included herein.
The Town of Rose Hill is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate an existing 0.45 MGD wastewater treatment system with the following
components:
Influent composite sampler (proportional from effluent meter)
Archimedes mechanical dual screws lift pump
Manual bar screen & grit trough
�:• ti5
Single oxidation ditch with dual surface brushes/rotors
Three secondary clarifiers
WAS/RAS diversion basin
Aerated sludge holding basin
Five sludge drying beds
Gaseous chlorination
Chlorine contact basin
Liquid Dechlorination ,
Effluent flow meter with flow proportional composite sampler
Post aeration basin
The facility is located at 287 Charlie Teachey Road (NCSR 1931), Rose Hill, in Duplin County.
2. Discharge from said treatment ;works at the location specified on the attached map into Reedy
Branch, classified C-Swamp waters in the Cape Fear River Basin.

> The Rose Hill permit will go to public notice this week. I apologize for the late
> submittal. Please forward any comments to me by June 30, 2012. Thank you.
> Jackie Nowell
> Your message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments:
> 56863draft2012
> 56863draftltr2012
> 56863fct2012
> Note: To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may prevent sending or
> receiving certain types of file attachments. Check your e-mail security settings to
> determine how attachments are handled.
2

Nowell, Jackie
From: Hunkele, Dean
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 2:29 PM
To: Nowell, Jackie
Subject: NC0056863 Rose Hill staff report
Attachments: NC0056863 Rose Hill CEI 2-15-2012.pdf; NC0056863 Rose Hill CEI 3-10-2010.pdf
Importance: High
Jackie,
Attached are last 2 inspection reports.
The facility is just now becoming a major due to a new pretreatment program. Thus I wonder if monitoring
should be increased for any standard parameter or anything new added. They now serve a winery (Duplin
Winery) and a rendering plant (Carolina By -Products) in addition to 2 poultry hatcheries that have been on
their system for years.
I would suggest we reduce effluent Temp to weekly or the most frequent of other items. The application did
not mention W0002O97O which is a minor conjunctive -use spray irrigation system/permit. They use a
contractor, Triple S, for sludge.
The facility address and lat/long for the Supplement have been updated in BIMS. The outfall lat/long is
accurate, but discharge point on map is a little off, it is on north side of the road.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Dean Hunkele, Senior Environmental Specialist
Wilmington Regional Office
Division of Water Quality, Surface Water Protection Section
http://www.ncwaterguality.org/
Wate r
QUa1lty
. c max* d a, cctc+o
Direct Phone: [phone]
Main Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Address: 127 Cardinal Drive Ext
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
To report a SSO, WWTP Bypass, or Spill after hours, holidays, or weekends
call The NC Division of Emergency Management @ 1-800-858-0368
1

Cape Fear River Basin - 2011
Proposed NPDES Permitting Actions for Permit Renewals
RRO
1. NC0035866, Bynum WWTP (permit assigned to Bob S.) — see region.
2. NC0038849, Hill Forest Rest Home (permit assigned to Bob S.) — see region
3. NC0039331, Bonlee Elementary School (permit assigned to Bob S.) — see region
4. NC0039349, Waters Elementary School WWTP (permit assigned to Bob S.) — see region
5. NC0039471, Bennett Elementary School WWTP (permit assigned to Bob 5.) — see region
6. NC0042803, Birchwood MHP (permit assigned to Bob S.) — see region
7. NC0048429, Cedar Village Apartments (permit assigned to Bob S.) — see region
8. NC0051314, Cole Park Plaza Shopping Center WWTP (permit assigned to Maureen S.) — see
region
9. NC0063096, Holly Springs WWTP (permit assigned to Gil V.) — see region
10. NC0074446, Hilltop MHP WWTP (permit assigned to Bob 5.) — see region
WARO
1. NC0020575, Mount Olive WWTP (permit assigned to Jackie N.) — No action recommended.
However, the permit writer may want to follow-up with the region to ascertain any new
developments post the region's planned site inspection. The permit was modified years ago to
address the non-compliance issues. Currently, the town is in litigation with its consulting
engineering firm regarding the design & oversight of the construction project.
WIRO
1. NC0003344, Wallace Chicken Processing Plant (permit assigned to Jim M.) —This facility is under
a Judicial Order by Consent. Recommend referencing the JOC in the renewed permit.
2. NC0020346, Magnolia WWTP (permit assigned to Maureen S.) — No action recommended.
Compliance problems relate to plant design flaws and construction issues. For the most part,
issues have been resolved or a work -around established. Permit writer may want to follow-up
with the region.
3. NC0020702, Wallace WWTP (permit assigned to Ron 8.) — No action recommended. Past
compliance issues attributed to poor O&M by the old ORC. Facility is now operating under an
SOC and a new plant is under construction. Plant has I/1 issues that should be resolved with the
new plant.
4. NC0056863, Rose Hill WWTP (permit assigned to Jackie N.) — Special condition requesting a
solids depth survey and submittal of a plan for solids removal; follow-up with the region. Lack
of proper O&M (ex., solids volume maintenance and proper oversight of treatment
volume/detention in the oxidation ditch) is attributed to compliance issues. Because the facility
is classified as a major, need to consider increasing monitoring frequency and adding daily limit
requirements. Currently, influent monitoring is controlled by the effluent meter. Need a
special condition inserted in renewed permit that upon expansion or significant upgrade that
this issue is addressed.
2

Cape Fear River Basin - 2011 1
Proposed NPDES Permitting Actions for Permit Renewals
February 28, 2011
To: NPDES Permit Files
From: Vanessa Manuel
Subject: Proposed NPDES Permitting Actions for 2011 Permit Renewals
Cape Fear River Basin
In January 2011, BIMS was queried to ascertain those permitted facilities in the Cape Fear Basin
exceeding a subjective compliance threshold (>_5 civil penalty assessments or n0 NOVs issued within
the last 3+ years). This resulted in the identification of 26 facilities for possible permitting actions. A list
of the facilities was routed to the 5 regional offices in the Cape Fear Basin for staff recommendations. A
summary of the recommendations are included below. Assigned permit writers should incorporate
recommended actions or conduct follow-ups with the regions and/or the appropriate ROC as necessary.
Breakdown by region:
Region NPDES ROC # Permits in CFRB # Exceeding Compliance Threshold
FRIG Ja.e �C
RRO Bob S.
r� WAR(? _... _ Bob ....___ ..°____
WIRO Maureen S..
4
WSBO. Charles, W
_Totals .-
47
66
►65
10
6
3�
.. J
219
26
FRO
1. NC0001406, Erwin WWTP #2 (permit assigned to Jim M.) — No action recommended. Scheduled
to eliminate discharge via connection to the new North Harnett regional plant in a couple of
years.
2. NC0026671, Elizabethtown WWTP (permit assigned to Jim M.) — No action recommended.
Problems seem to be resolved.
3. NC0058548, Star WWTP (permit assigned to Jim M.) — No action recommended. Problems
caused by a lack of flow to the plant (loss of industry).
4. NC0061719, Woodlake Country Club WWTP (permit assigned to Maureen S.) — No permitting
action recommended. This is an older plant that does not have a clarifier. The operators would
like a small clarifier added to the treatment plant, but the owners will not make the purchase.
Region feels this would be a good candidate for an Administrative Order (Special Order without
Consent).
5. NC0064521, Erwin WWTP (permit assigned to Jim M.) — No permitting action recommended.
Major 1/1 work has been done at the plant. It is scheduled to close and tie in to the North
Harnett regional plant in the next few years. Region feels this would be a good candidate for an
Administrative Order (Special Order without Consent).
6. NC0072877, Newton Grove WWTP (permit assigned to Maureen S.) — No action recommended.
This is a well operated, 100% domestic plant. Good compliance during the past year.

Rose Hill WWTP
NC0056863
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Qw (MGD) = 0.45
IQIOS(cfs)= 0.00
7QIOS (cfs) = 0.00
7QIOW (cfs) = 0.00
30Q2 (cfs) = 0.00
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) = 0.20
Receiving Stream: Reedy Branch
WWTP/WTP Class: II
IWC (Qa 1Q1OS = 100.00%
IWC' @ 7Q 1 OS = 100.00%
IWC @ 7QIOW = 100.00%
IWC @ 30Q2 = 100.00%
IWC @QA= 77.72%
Stream Class: C Swamp
Outfall 001
Qw = 0.45 MGD
CHRONIC TEST CONCENTRATION = DEFAULT %
=90%
PARAMETER
APE
(1)
STANDARDS & CRITERIA (2)
a
co
m
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
NC WQS / Applied '/2 FAV /
Chronic Standard Acute
n # Det. Max Pred Allowable Cw
Cw
Arsenic
Arsenic
C
C
50 FW(7Q10s)
10 HH/WS(Qavg)
ug/L
ug/L
2 0
Note: n < 9
Limited data set
2 0
Note: n < 9
3.7
Default C.V.
3.7
Default C.V.
Acute: NO WQS
__ __ _—_—__ __—_
Chronic: 50.0
N_ o value > Allowable C_w
Chronic: 12.9
No value > Allowable Cw
__—_—_-----_—__-------------
No RP, Predicted Max < 50% of Allowable Cw - No
Monitoring required
No RP, Predicted Max 7 50% 07 Allowable Cw - No
Monitoring required
Beryllium
NC
6.5 FW(7Q10s)
ug/L
2 1
Note: n < 9
Limited data set
14.8
Default C.V.
Acute: NO WQS
__ __ _—_—__ __—_
Chronic: 6.5
No value > Allowable Cw
__—_—_—_-----_--_--------_--
RP for Limited Dataset (n<8 samples) - apply
Quarterly Monitoring
Cadmium
NC
2 FW(7Q10s) 15
ug/L
2 0
Note: n _< 9
Limited data set
3.7
Default C.V.
Acute: 15.0
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Chronic: 2.0
No value > Allowable Cw
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
RP for a limited dataset (n<8) but no values >Detect -
No monitoring recommended
Chlorides (AL)
NC
230 FW(7Q10s)
mg/L
0 0
N/A
Acute: NO WQS
_ _ _
Chronic----- 230-------------------------------
Chlorinated Phenolic Compounds
NC
1 A(30Q2)
ug/L
0 0
N/A
Acute: NO WQS
_ ____----_ _---
Chronic: 1.0
----------------- -----------
Total Phenolic Compounds
NC
300 A(30Q2)
ug/L
0 0
N/A
Acute: NO WQS
_ ____—_—_ _ --
Chronic: 300.0
__—_—_—_—_—_—_—_---------_—.
Chromlum
NC
50 FW(7Q10s) 1022
.
ug/L
2 1
Note: n <_ 9
Limited data set
147.8
Default C.V.
Acute: 1,022.0
_ _ _____ ____
Chronic: 50.0
No value > Allowable Cw
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____
RP for Limited Dataset (n<8 samples) - apply
Quarterly Monitoring
Copper(AL)
NC
7 FW(7Q10s) 7
ug/L
2 1
Note: n < 9
Limited data set
74
Default C.V.
Acute: 7.3
__-----_—_—_—_------------------
Chronic: 7.0
1 value(s) > Allowable Cw
RP for AL(Cu,Zn,Ag,Fe,CI) - apply Quarterly
Monitoring in conjunction with TOX Test
Cyanide
NC
5 FW(7Q10s) 22
10
ug/L
2 1
Note: n <_ 9
Limited data set
37.0
Default C.V.
Acute: 22.0
_ _ _____ ____
Chronic: 5.0
No value > Allowable Cw
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___
RP for Limited Dataset (n<8 samples) - apply -
Quarterly Monitoring
Page 1 of 2
56863rpa2012, rpa
5/22/2012

Rose Hill WWTP
NC0056863
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Outfall 001
Qw=0.45MGD
Fluoride
NC
1800 FW(7Q10s)
ug/L
0 0
N/A
Acute: NO WQS
_ __ _—_—__ _ __
Chronic: 1,800.0
—_—_—_-----_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—
Lead
NC
25 FW(7Q10s) 33.8
ug/L
2 0
Note: n <— 9
Limited data set
3.7
Default C.V.
Acute: 33.8
_ ____—_—__ __—_
Chronic: 25.0
No value > Allowable Cw
—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—.
No RP, Predicted Max < 50% of Allowable Cw- No
Monitoring required
Mercury
NC
12 FW(7Q10s)
0.5
ng/L
2 0
Note: n < 9
Limited data set
739.0
Default C.V.
Acute: NO WQS
_ ____—_—_ __--
Chronic: 12.0
2 value(s) > Allowable Cw
---------_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—.
RP but no values >Detect - apply Quarterly
Monitoring (Low level Hg data needed)
Molybdenum
NC
2000 HH(7Q10s)
ug/L
0 0
N/A
Acute: NO WQS
_ ____—_—__ _ _-
Chronic: 2,000.0
_----------_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—
Nickel
.
NC
88 FW(7Q10s) 261
ug/L
2 2
Note: n < 9
Limited data set
22.2
Default C.V.
Acute: 261.0
_ __ _—_—__ __—_
Chronic: 88.0
No value > Allowable Cw
—_—_—_—_—_ _----_—_—_—_—_—.
No RP, Predicted Max < 50% of Allowable Cw - No
Monitoring required
.
Selenium
NC
5 FW(7Q10s) 56
ug/L
2 0
Note: n < 9
Limited data sei
•
3.7__—_—_—_—_---_---_—_—_---_—
Default C.V.
Acute: 56.0
Chronic: 5.0
No value > Allowable Cw
No RP, both values below detection. No monitoring
required.
Silver(AL)
NC
0.06 FW(7Q10s) 1.23
ug/L
2 1
Note: n < 9 •
Limited data set
14.780
Default C.V.
Acute: 1.230
_ __ _—_—__ _ —_
Chronic: 0.060
2 value(s) > Allowable Cw
—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—.
RP for AL(Cu,Zn,Ag,Fe,CI) - apply Quarterly
Monitoring in conjunction with TOX Test
Zinc(AL)
NC
50 FW(7Q10s) 67
ug/L
2 1
Note: n <— 9
Limited data set
362.1
Default C.V.
Acute: 67.0
_ ____—_—__ __—_
Chronic: 50.0
No value > Allowable Cw
__—_— ——_—_—_—_—__—_—_—__
RP for AL(Cu,Zn,Ag,Fe,CI) - apply Quarterly
Monitoring in conjunction with TOX Test
bromodlchloromethane
NC
17 HH(7Q10s)
µg/I
2 2
Note: n < 9
Limited data set
11.15890
Default C.V.
Acute: NO WQS
_ __ _—__ _ _ __
Chronic: 17.00000
No value > Allowable Cw
_--_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—�
No RP , Predicted Max z 50% of Allowable Cw -
apply Quarterly Monitoring
chloroform
NC
170 HH(7Q10s)
µg/I
2 2
Note: n < 9
Limited data set
83.50700
Default C.V.
Acute: NO WQS
_ __ —__ _ _ __—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_
Chronic: 170.00000
No value > Allowable Cw -
No RP, Predicted Max < 50% of Allowable Cw- No
Monitoring required
0 0
N/A
Acute:
- ---------------------------------------
Chronic:
0 0
N/A
Acute:
- - ---------------------------------------
Chronic:
Page 2of2
56863rpa2012, rpa
5/22/2012

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
USE ONLY
"PASTE
Arsenic - FW Standard SPECIAL -
Values" WITH
2
Arsenic - HH/WS Standards NO "COPY"
THIS SECTION
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results "COP_Y" Date Data BDL=II2DL Results
1 0.5 Std Dev. 0.0000 1 12/30/2011 < 1 0.5 Std Dev. 0.0000
2 0.5 Mean 0.5000 2 1/0/1900 < 1 0.5 Mean 0.5000
3 C.V. (default) 0.6000 3 C.V. (default) 0.6000
4 n 2 4 n 2
12/30/2011 <
1
1
5 5
6 Mult Factor = 7.39 6
7 Max. Value 0.5 ug/L 7
8 Max. Pred Cw 3.7 ug/L 8
9 9
Mult Factor = 7.39
Max. Value 0.5 ug/L
Max. Pred Cw 3.7 ug/L
58863rpa2012, data
- 1 - 5/22/2012

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Beryllium
Date Data BDL=112DL Results
USE ONLY
"PASTE
SPECIAL -
Values" WITH
"COPY"
Cadmium
1 0.5 Std Dev. 1.0607 1
2 2 Mean 1.2500 2
3 C.V. (default) 0.6000 3
4 n 2 4
5 5
6 Mult Factor = 7.39 6
7 Max. Value 2.0 ug/L 7
8 Max. Pred Cw 14.8 ug/L 8
9 9
12/30/2011 <
1
2
Date Data BDL=II2DL Results
1
1
USE ONLY
"PASTE
SPECIAL -
Values" WITH
"COPY"
0.5 Std Dev. 0.0000
0.5 Mean 0.5000
C.V. (default) 0.6000
n 2
Mult Factor = 7.39
Max. Value 0.5 ug/L
Max. Pred Cw 3.7 ug/L
56863rpa2012, data
- 2 - 5/22/2012

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
USE ONLY.
"PAST
SPECIA
Values" WIT
Chromium
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
Copper (AL)
1 12/30/2011 < 1 0.5 Std Dev. 13.7886
2 20 20 Mean 10.2500
3 C.V. (default) 0.6000
4 n 2
5
6
7
8
9
Mult Factor = 7.39
Max. Value 20.0 ug/L
Max. Pred Cw 147.8 ug/L
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1 12/30/2011 10 10 Std Dev. 5.6589
2 < 4 2 Mean . 6.0000
3 C.V. (default) 0.6000
4 n 2
5
6
7
8
9
USE ONLY
"PASTE
SPECIAL -
Values" WITH
"COPY"
Mult Factor = 7.39
Max. Value 10.0 ug/L
Max. Pred Cw 73.9 ug/L
56863rpa2012, data
- 3 - 5/22/2012

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
10
Cyanide
USE ONLY
"PASTE
SPECIAL -
Values" WITH
"COPY"
11
Fluoride
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1 5 Std Dev. 0.0000 1
2 5 Mean 5.00 2
3 C.V. (default) 0.6000 3
4 n 2 4
5 5
6 Mult Factor = 7.39 6
7 Max. Value 5.0 ug/L 7
8 Max. Pred Cw 37.0 ug/L 8
9 9
12/30/2011
6
5
Date Data BDL=112DL Results
USE ONLY
"PASTE'
SPECIAL -
Values" WITH
"COPY"
Std Dev. NO DATA
Mean NO DATA
C.V. NO DATA
n 0
Mult Factor = N/A
Max. Value N/A ug/L
Max. Pred Cw N/A ug/L
56863rpa2012, data
- 4 - 5/22/2012

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
12
USE ONLY
"PAST
Lead SPEC/A
Values" WIT
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results " •
1 12/30/2011 < 1 0.5 Std Dev. 0.0000 1
2 < 1 0.5 Mean 0.5000 2
3 C.V. (default) 0.6000 3
4 n 2 4
5 5
6 Mult Factor = 7.39 6
7 Max. Value 0.5 ug/L 7
8 Max. Pred Cw 3.7 ug/L 8
9 9
13
Mercury
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
200
< 200
USE ONLY
"PASTE
SPECIAL -
Values" WITH
"COPY"
100 Std Dev. 0.0000
100 Mean 100.0000
C.V. (default) 0.6000
n 2
Mult Factor = 7.39
Max. Value 100.0 ng/L
Max. Pred Cw 739.0 ng/L
56863rpa2012, data
- 5 - 5/22/2012

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
14
USE ONLY
"PASTE
Molybdenum SPECIAL -
Values" WITH
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results " • - "
1 Std Dev. NO DATA 1
2 Mean NO DATA 2
3 C.V. NO DATA 3
4 n 0 4
5 5
6 Mult Factor = N/A 6
7 Max. Value N/A ug/L 7
8 Max. Pred Cw N/A ug/L 8
9 9
15
Nickel
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
12/30/2011
2
3
USE ONLY
"PASTE
SPECIAL -
Values" WITH
"COPY"
2 Std Dev. 0.7071
3 Mean 2.5000
C.V. (default) 0.6000
n 2
Mult Factor = 7.39
Max. Value 3.0 ug/L
Max. Pred Cw 22.2 ug/L
56863rpa2012, data
- 6 - 5/22/2012

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
16
Selenium
Date Data BDL=I/2DL Results
1 < 1 0.5 Std Dev.
2 < 1 0.5 Mean
3 C.V. (default)
4 n
5
6
7
8
9
MuIt Factor =
Max. Value
Max. Pred Cw
USE ONLY
"PASTE
SPECIAL -
Values" WITH
PO
0.0000
0.5000
0.6000
2
7.39
0.5 ug/L
3.7 ug/L
17
Silver (AL)
Date Data BDL=112DL Results
1 < 1 0.5 Std Dev. 1.0607
2 2 2 Mean 1.2500
3 C.V. (default) 0.6000
4 n 2
5
6
7
8
9
USE ONLY
"PASTE
SPECIAL -
Values" WITH
"COPY"
Mult Factor = 7.39
Max. Value 2.000 ug/L
Max. Pred Cw 14.780 ug/L
56863rpa2012, data
- 7 - 5/22/2012

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
18
Zinc (AL)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Date Data BDL=1l2DL Results
49 Std Dev.
20 Mean
C.V. (default)
n
12/30/2011
49
< 40
Mult Factor =
Max. Value
Max. Pred Cw
USE ONLY
"PASTE
SPECIAL -
Values" WITH.
20.5061
34.5000
0.6000
2
7.39
49.0 ug/L
362.1 ug/L
19
bromodichloromethane
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
12/30/2011
1.51
1.3
USE ONLY
"PASTS
SPECIAL -
Values" WITH
"COPY"
1.51 Std Dev. 0.1485
1.3 Mean 1.4050
C.V. (default) 0.6000
n 2
Mult Factor = 7.39
Max. Value 1.510000 pg/I
Max. Pred Cw 11.158900 pg/I
56863rpa2012, data
- 8 - 5/22/2012

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
20
chloroform
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Date Data
11.3
9.42
BDL=1/2DL Results
11.3 Std Dev. 1.3294
9.42 Mean 10.3600
C.V. (default) 0.6000
n 2
USE ONLY
"PASTE
SPECIAL -
Values" WITH
"COPY"
Mult Factor = 7.39
Max. Value 11.300000 pg/I
Max. Fred Cw 83.507000 pg/I
56863rpa2012, data
- 9 - 5/22/2012

NPDESIAquifer Protection Permitting Unit Pretreatment Information Request Form
PERMIT WRITER COMPLETES THIS PART:
PERMIT WRITERS - AFTER you get this form back
Check that
from PERCS:
all apply
Notify PERCS if LTMP/STMP data we said should be
Date of Request
5/14/2012
municipal renewal
x
on DMRs is not realty there, so we can get it for you
Requestor
Nowell
new industries
(or NOV POTW).
Facility Name
Rose Hill
WWTP expansion
- Notify PERCS if you want us to keep a specific POC
Permit Number
NC0056863
Speculative limits
in LTMP/STMP so you will have data for next permit
renewal.
Region
WiRO
stream reclass.
- Email PERCS draft permit, fact sheet, RPA.
Basin
CPF
outfall relocation
- Send PERCS paper copy of permit (w/o NPDES
7Q10 change
boilerplate), cover letter, final fact sheet. Email RPA if
other
changes.
other
check
applicable PERCS staff:
Other Comments to PERCS:
X
BRD, CPF, CTB, FRB, TAR - Sarah Morrison (807-6310)
CHO, HIW, LUM, LTN, NES, NEW, ROA, YAD - Monti
Hassan (807-6314)
PERCS
PRETREATMENT STAFF COMPLETES THIS PART:
Status
of Pretreatment Program (check all that apply)
1) facility has no SIU's, does have Division approved Pretreatment Program that is INACTIVE
2) facility has no SIU's, does not have Division approved Pretreatment Program
X
3) facility has SlUs and DWQ approved Pretreatment Program (list "DEV" if program still under development)
3a) Full Program with LTMP
X
3b) Modified Program with STMP
4) additional conditions regarding Pretreatment attached or listed below
Flow, MGD
Permitted
Actual
Time period for Actual
STMP time frame:
Industrial
0.061
Most recent:
N/A
Uncontrollable
n/a
0.2484
2008
Next Cycle:
TBD
POC In LTMP!
STMP
Parameter of
Concern (POC)
Check List
POC due to
U gDhSP Nrt1�t
Limit
Required- by
Required
by 503
Sludge""
POC e
to SIU'�"
POTW POC
(plain
below)""
STMP
Effluent
Freq
LTMP
Effluent
Freq
X
BOD
Limit
X
4
X
TSS
Limit
X
4
Q = Quarterly
X
NH3
Limit
X
4
M = Monthly
X
Arsenic
X
4
4
Cadmium
d
X
4
.4
Chromium
4
4
.4
Copper
4
X
4
X
Cyanide
4
Is all data on DMRs?
4
Lead
'1
X
4
YES
X
Mercury
X
4
NO (attach data)
X
Molybdenum
X
4
4
Nickel
4
X
4
X
Silver
4
X
Selenium
X
4
I
Zinc
4
X
4
Is data in spreadsheet?
X
Total Nitrogen
Monitor
4
YES (email to writer)
X
Phosphorus
Monitor
X
4
NO
X
X
TKN
X
4
COD
X
O& G
X
'Always in the LTMP/STMP
" Only in LTMP/STMP if sludge land app or composte (dif POCs for incinerators)
"' Only in LTMP/STMP while SIU still discharges to POTW "" Only in LTMP/STMP when pollutant is still of concern to POTW
Comments to Permit Writer (ex., explanation of any POCs; info you have on IU related investigations into NPDES problems):
The Headworks Analysis currently in house is a design HWA and was performed prior to the POTW receiving wastewater from significant
industrial users; therefore, we do not have documentation of the actual industrial flow. A site specific due date for the next HWA has not yet
been determined.
rosehillpirf2012
Revised: July 24, 2007

OTHER VIOLATIONS for.
Report Date: 05/15/12
Page: 1 of 1
Permit:
Facility Name:
Region:
County:
Violation Category: Other Violations program Category:
Violation Action:
PERMIT: NC0056863
FACILITY: Town of Rose Hill - Rose Hill WWTP
COUNTY: Duplin
REGION: Wilmington
Other Violation
VIOLATION
DATE
01/01/89
04/01 /99
10/01/99
10/07/02
12/02/02
12/02/02
01/01/03
01/05/04
01/14/08
03/10/10
03/10/10
VIOLATION TYPE
Conversion violation - Other Cat
Conversion violation - Other Cat
Conversion violation - Other Cat
Aquatic toxicity permit limit violation
Aquatic toxicity permit limit violation
Aquatic toxicity permit limit violation
Conversion violation - Other Cat
Aquatic toxicity permit limit violation
Aquatic toxicity permit limit violation
Permit conditions violation
Violation detected during inspection
!If 2v(o
7/2(0
the,
/ 6)a
Ox) 4 v
VIOLATION ACTION
Proceed to Enforcement Case
Proceed to Enforcement Case
Proceed to Enforcement Case
Proceed to NOV
Proceed to Enforcement Case
Proceed to NOV
Proceed to Enforcement Case
Proceed to NOV
Proceed to NOV
Proceed to NOV
Proceed to NOV
OPERATOR NAME
CERT NUMBER
NN3 /30,0 �� ,�(• �KLfsE�2,��,
/ _ U o 3--- wlc, .NJ, � Cif4
30 7, CI'3 w%L `mod -2e�� �YE Ul d
D GJ r/I-zi
cy3, or
1
1S/7 3S
ORC CLASS
//3 ,9 407, SU
PERMIT CLASS

COVER LETTER
Rose Hill Wastewater Treatment Plant #1
Permit No. NC 0056863
Section B3 Narrative Revised
Mrs. Dina Sprinkle
NC DENR / DWQ / NPDES
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Mrs. Sprinkle,
Please revise our permit submittal package to include a revision to Section B3 Narrative. The revised
narrative includes five (5) sludge drying beds that were omitted in the original narrative.
If you have any comments or questions concerning this I can be contacted via phone at [phone]
or email at [e-mail].
Bobby W. Cavenaugh
Town of Rose Hill
Public Utilities Director
RN@LEP79
JUL 13 2011
POINT SOURCE BRANCH

Revised Narrative
Rose Hill Wastewater Treatment Plant #1
Permit No. NC 0056863
Section B3 Narrative
General Information
Facility/System Name: Rose Hill Wastewater Treatment Plant
Responsible Entity: Town of Rose Hill
Person in Charge/Contact: Bobby W. Cavenaugh
Applicable Permit: NC 0056863
The treatment facility has a permitted flow 0.45 MGD which consists of influent
screw pumps, bar screen, oxidation ditch, three clarifiers, aerated sludge holding
tank, five sludge drying beds, chlorine disinfection basin and post aeration basin.
Influent enters by gravity to the head works of the plant. From this unit, flow is
conveyed by two screw pumps to a channel which consist of two bar screens.
Wastewater then flows to an oxidation ditch which provides secondary treatment
utilizing the activated sludge process. Oxidation ditch effluent flows in equal
proportion to three clarifiers acting in parallel. Flow from the clarifiers then travels
through piping to a chlorine contact chamber where disinfection is achieved by gas
chlorine injection. The effluent is then dechlorinated and discharged by gravity
outfall to Reedy Creek which is classified Class C — Swamp waters in the Cape Fear
River Basin.
Waste Activated sludge from the clarifiers flows to a wet well which is then pumped
into the aerobic digester or one of the five drying beds. Return activated sludge
gravity flows back to the head works and the process is repeated. The waste sludge is
periodically hauled from the plant site by a contractor to a permitted land disposal
site.

COVER LETTER
Rose Hill Wastewater Treatment Plant #1
Permit No. NC 0056863
PART D. EXPANDED EFFLUENT TESTING DATA
AMENDED
Jackie Nowell
NC DENR / DWQ / NPDES
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Mrs. Nowell,
Please amend our permit submittal package to include a revision/correction to the effluent testing data.
We have checked with our lab and verified that incorrect information was reported on the permit.
Please find attached the corrected data on sheets 11, 12, & 13 of 22.
We have also corrected the 'Flow Schematic' by including the dechlorination system location.
If you have any comments or questions, I can be contacted via phone at [phone] or email at
[e-mail].
Bobby W. Cavenaugh
Town of Rose Hill
Public Utilities Director

1
1Chlorine
Basin --
Effluent
d
Post
4--Aeration l
Basin
Flow Meter
Influent
0.45 HGD Rose Hill WWTP
Flow Schematic
Sludge
Drying
Beds
Sludge
Hold.ng
Tank ti`
FIGURE 1
Oxidation Ditch
Waste Sludge
Pumping Station
WAS
Y
Z—P----Supernatant line
Y RAS
No. 1
RAS -
WAS
Flow Splitter Box
Raw Sewage/Liquid Lines
Sludge Lines
Return Activated Sludge
Waste Activated Sludge
A-1
Control
Building
aaaaa
Comminuter/
\--
Bar Screen
Screw Pump .1
1
1
RAS
•
Chemical Feed
Building

COVER LETTER
The Town of Rose Hill is requesting renewal of its NPDES Permit No. NC 0056863 based on the
documentation submitted with this letter.
The Town of Rose Hill WWTP owns and operates an advanced secondary WWTP. This plant is
permitted for 0.45 MGD discharge through a NPDES Permit. The current average flow at the
WWTP is 0.2468. The Town has two industrial users (IUPs) with a combined flow of 0.067
MGD.
The Town is currently in a Preliminary Engineering Report (PER) — Wastewater Treatment
System Study for necessary upgrades and sanitary sewer rehabilitation. The study is consisting
of long term wastewater needs, identification and verification of the sewage system to determine
infiltration and inflow, establishment of sewage collection system improvements needed, and an
engineering alternatives analysis to determine the most cost effective means of meeting the
present and future wastewater needs for the Town.
The WWTP was upgraded from a Minor Permit to a Major Permit in January 2011. This
upgrade requires additional testing which could not be met for the NPDES Permit renewal due
August 1, 2011. Given the time frame to conduct and present true representation of the treatment
process at the plant, particular sections of the permit (Part D and Part E) could not be completed.
In a conversation with various regulatory agencies, it was determined that the Town could
submit follow-up test results. In a particular conversation on May 10, 2011; Jackie Nowell with
NCDENR stated that since we were upgraded in January 2011, we could complete Part E
(Toxicity; both species) in the second quarter and a Total Pollutant (Part D) in the third quarter
of 2011.
RUB
I JUL - 6 2011
Gi__NR1tA�.�� TEF (DUALITY
POINT SOUP.':;E BRANCH

Rose Hill Wastewater Treatment Plant # 1
Permit No. NC 0056863
Section B3 Narrative
Influent enters by gravity to the head works of the plant. From this unit, flow is conveyed by
two screw pumps to a channel which consist of two bar screens. Wastewater then flows to an
oxidation ditch which provides secondary treatment utilizing the activated sludge process.
Oxidation ditch effluent flows in equal proportion to three clarifiers acting in parallel. Flow
from the clarifiers then travels through piping to a chlorine contact chamber where disinfection is
achieved by gas chlorine injection. The effluent is then dechlorinated and discharged by gravity
outfall to Reedy Creek.
Sludge from the clarifiers flows to a wet well which is then pumped into the aerobic digester.
Return activated sludge gravity flows back to the head works and the process is repeated. The
waste sludge is diverted to a sludge holding tank. The waste sludge is periodically hauled from
the plant site by a contractor to a permitted land disposal site.

0.45 MGD Rose Hill WWTP
a.)
a`
aJ
cI
4.;l
Effluent w(
Post
Chlorine .0-Aeration R
Basin ----.
Basin
Flow Meter
Influent
No. 1
RAS
WAS
Flow Schematic
FIGURE 1
Oxidation Ditch
Comminuter/
Bar Screen
--� Waste Sludge
I -Pumping Station
WAS
1
Y RAS
l
�---Supernatant Line � ` RAS
Screw Pum
Flow Splitter Box
Raw Sewage/Liquid Lines
Sludge Lines
Return Activated Sludge
Waste Activated Sludge
A-1
Control
Building
El
Chemical Feed
Building