20150031 Ver 1_Application_20150112

020�.yW AT eqq
0 lqiii� ,
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
© Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
M Yes ❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express © Riparian Buffer Authorization
le.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes © No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
© Yes ❑ No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes M No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
NC 41 Pipe Replacement
2b.
County:
Jones
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Trenton
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
50138.1.FR5
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
N/A
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
N/A
3d.
Street address:
105 Pactolus Highway INC 33 P.O. Box 1587
3e.
City, state, zip:
Greenville, NC 27835
3f.
Telephone no.:
252- 439 -2800
3g.
Fax no.:
252- 830 -3341
3h.
Email address:
jbjohnson @ncdot.gov
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: Division 2 Environmental Officer
4b.
Name:
Jay B. Johnson
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
North Carolina Department of Transportation
4d.
Street address:
P.O. Box 1587
4e.
City, state, zip:
Greenville, NC 27835
4f.
Telephone no.:
252 -439 -2800
4g.
Fax no.:
252- 830 -3341
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
N/A
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
5c.
Street address:
5d.
City, state, zip:
5e.
Telephone no.:
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
la.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
lb.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
I Latitude: 35.091724 Longitude: - 77.344484
1c.
Property size:
acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Musselshell Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; Sw, NSW
2c.
River basin:
Neuse
3.
Project Description
3a.
NC
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
41 is a paved North Carolina Highway. Woodlands, agriculture and residences dominate the landscape.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 60
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Pipe to pipe replacement. This is part of a larger resurfacing project.
3e.
The
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
existing 36'36: CMP will be replaced with 2 @ 50'48" CAAP's.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps
of determination
made the jurisdictional determination, what type
was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency /Consultant Company:
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes © No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
Ia. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands Q Streams — tributaries Q Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
WB -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Choose one
Musselshell Creek
PER
DWQ
10
7
S2
Choose one
S3
Choose one
S4 P
Choose one
Musselshell Creek
PER
DWQ
10
7
S5 -
Choose one
-
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
14
31. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
I Filled
Excavated
Pi
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑X Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number-
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
61 P
Special Cut Ditch
Musselshell Creek
No
205
185
B2 P
Fill
Musselshell Creek
No
230
210
B3 P
Fill
Musselshell Creek
No
300
10
B4 P
Special Cut Ditch
Musselshell Creek
No
345
160
B5
Yes/No
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
1,080
565
6i. Comments:Zone 1 Impacts - 0.0248 Acres, Zone 2 Impacts - 0.013 Acres
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
There are 1,080 sq.tt. of buffer zone 1 impacts and 565 sq.ft. of buffer zone 2 impacts due to the pipe replacement.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Use of existing roadway to operate construction equipment.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
0 Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
See Stormwater Management Plan
© Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The proposed pipe replacement will include special cut ditches that are grass lined before the buffers on the
south side of the pipe replacement and a
grassed mate on the north side of the pipe replacement to treat the stormwater.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
DWR 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
[]Session Law 2006 -246
❑X Other: NPDES Permit
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes © No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑x Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b.
if you answered 'yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑x No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑Yes ❑x No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
El Yes 0 No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
El Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Onsite field investigation by Jay Johnson "No Effect"
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NCWRC
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCDOT HEU Historic Architecture and Archaeology - See attached documentation
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes Q No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA FIRM Maps
Jay B. Johnson
01 -08 -2015
Applicant(Agent's Printed Name
Date
Ap c VA is Signature
(Agent's at is id only if an authorization
left fro the Dlicant is rovided.
Page 10 of 10

N
Z
O
N
NC 41 NW 3 APPLICATION
REPLACE EXISTING 36' - 36" CUP WITH 2 @ 50' - 48" CAAP'S
OVER MUSSELSHELL CREEK, TRENTON USGS QUAD MAP
SHEET NUMBER 5 OF THE SOIL SURVEY OF JONES COUNTY
LOWER NEUSE 03020204 NEUSE RIVER BASIN
NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER RULES APPLY
WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 50I38.1.FR5
SCALE: I" =20'
NC 41
E
N
a
N
u
z
0
m
0
N
off, �l1 /1lLL��
\7
DETAIL 'A'
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
( Not to Scale)
— Front
of Ditch
Natural ry'1 ,het Slope
Ground .7 D QUO
Min. D= 1 Ft.
FROM STA. 10 + 50 LT. TO STA. 14 + 50 LT.
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
GRASS LINED
SEE DETAIL 'A'
C
C
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
GRASS LINED
SEE DETAIL 'A'
C
C
Z
0
�Z
W�
Na
a
0
J
JONES,CHARLES /
DB 158 PG 641
i � >
84
BI
BUFFER ZONE I
IMPACTS = 205 Sq.Ft.
BUFFER ZONE 2 N
IMPACTS = 185 Sq.Ft. N N r N
S/ 0o ca m m
PERMANENT STREAM
IMPACTS = 7 LF / I
C
Ilm-
C
BUFFER ZONE I N I
IMPACTS = 345 Sq.Ft. N
BUFFER ZONE 2 m mN
IMPACTS = 160 Sq.Ff. I I
S4
PERMANENT STREAM
IMPACTS = 7 LF
DIXON, ALLIE C
DB 201PG 333
DETAIL 'A'
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Front
o� Ditch
Natural 'yA e< Slope
Ground ?•j D FAO
Min. D= 1 Ft.
FROM STA. 10 + 00 RT. TO STA. 14 + 50 RT.
BUFFER ZONE 1IMPACTS
BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS
F
HOWELL, ELLEN M
DB 172 PG 318
B2
BUFFER ZONE I
IMPACTS = 230 Sq.Ff.
BUFFER ZONE 2
IMPACTS = 210 Sq.Ft.
F
GRASSED SWALE
SEE DETAIL 'B'
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. I SHEET NO.
TOTAL BUFFER IMPACTS:
ZONE 1 = 1080 Sq.Ft. (0.0248 ACRES)
ZONE 2 = 565 Sq.Ft. (0.013 ACRES)
TOTAL STREAM IMPACTS: 14 LINEAR FEET
TOTAL WETLAND IMPACTS:O Sq.Ft.
DETAIL 'B'
GRASSED SWALE
( Not to Scale)
Natural a< Front
Ground :7 D t�\o�te< Ditch
Slope
Min. D= 1 Ft.
FROM STA. 18 + 00 LT. TO STA. 23 + 25 LT.
F !RA- F F F
F F
LINE BA KS W
CL ' I' P RAP
— B3
CIV BUFFER m IMPACTS Z0300 / Sq.Ff.
CO N BUFFER ZONE 2
IMPACTS = /0 Sq.Ft.
GRAY, LORE
DB 98 PG E /90
C�- -
4 0 .•
GRAPHIC SCALE

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
TIP Project No.
State Project No.
Federal Project No.
EB -4411F
36333.3.FD6
STPEB- 0041(32)
A. Project Description: (Include project scope and location and refer to the attached
project location map.)
NC 41, widen from 20' to 26', mill in curb and gutter section and resurface from
Craven County line to MP 21.79 west of Trenton City limits in Jones County.
B. Purpose and Need:
NC 41 will be widened from 20 feet to 26 feet in order to provide two significant
enhancements to this heavily travelled primary roadway. 1) Increase safety by
providing widened recovery areas for motorists. The paved shoulder recovery
area will be widened to one foot throughout the length of the project. The travel
lanes will be widened to 12 feet. 2) NC 41 attracts a large amount of bicycling
and pedestrian traffic. The widened paved shoulder will facilitate safer travel for
these users.
C. Proposed Improvements:
Circle one or more of the following Type II improvements which apply to the
project:
Modernization of a highway by resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation,
reconstruction, adding shoulders, or adding auxiliary lanes (e.g., parking,
weaving, turning, climbing).
a. Restoring, Resurfacing, rehabilitating, and Reconstructing
pavement (3R and 4R improvements)
Widening roadway and shoulders without adding through lanes
C. Modernizing gore treatments
d. Constructing lane improvements (merge, auxiliary, and turn lanes)
Adding shoulder drains
f� Replacing and rehabilitating culverts, inlets, and drainage pipes,
including safety treatments
g. Providing driveway pipes
h. Performing minor bridge widening (less than one through lane)
2. Highway safety or traffic operations improvement projects including the
installation of ramp metering control devices and lighting.
a. Installing ramp metering devices
b. Installing lights
C. Adding or upgrading guardrail
d. Installing safety barriers including Jersey type barriers and pier
protection
e. Installing or replacing impact attenuators
f. Upgrading medians including adding or upgrading median barriers

(7l) Improving intersections including relocation and /or realignment
`}{ Making minor roadway realignment
i. Channelizing traffic
j. Performing clear zone safety improvements including removing
hazards and flattening slopes
k. Implementing traffic aid systems, signals, and motorist aid
1. Installing bridge safety hardware including bridge rail retrofit
Bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement or the construction of
grade separation to replace existing at -grade railroad crossings.
a. Rehabilitating, reconstructing, or replacing bridge approach slabs
b. Rehabilitating or replacing bridge decks
C. Rehabilitating bridges including painting (no red lead paint), scour
repair, fender systems, and minor structural improvements
d. Replacing a bridge (structure and /or fill)
4. Transportation corridor fringe parking facilities.
5. Construction of new truck weigh stations or rest areas.
6. Approvals for disposal of excess right -of -way or for joint or limited use of
right -of -way, where the proposed use does not have significant adverse
impacts.
7. Approvals for changes in access control.
8. Construction of new bus storage and maintenance facilities in areas used
predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such
construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and located on or near
a street with adequate capacity to handle anticipated bus and support
vehicle traffic.
9. Rehabilitation or reconstruction of existing rail and bus buildings and
ancillary facilities where only minor amounts of additional land are
required and there is not a substantial increase in the number of users.
10. Construction of bus transfer facilities (an open area consisting of
passenger shelters, boarding areas, kiosks and related street
improvements) when located in a commercial area or other high activity
center in which there is adequate street capacity for projected bus traffic.
11. Construction of rail storage and maintenance facilities in areas used
predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such
construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and where there is no
significant noise impact on the surrounding community.
12. Acquisition of land for hardship or protective purposes, advance land
acquisition loans under section 3(b) of the UMT Act. Hardship and
protective buying will be permitted only for a particular parcel or a limited
number of parcels. These types of land acquisition qualify for a CE only
where the acquisition will not limit the evaluation of alternatives,
including shifts in alignment for planned construction projects, which may

be required in the NEPA process. No project development on such land
may proceed until the NEPA process has been completed.
D. Special Project Information: (Include Environmental Commitments and Permits
Required.)
NW3

E. Threshold Criteria
The following evaluation of threshold criteria must be completed for Type II
actions
ECOLOGICAL
YES
NO
(1)
Will the project have a substantial impact on any
unique or important natural resource?
X
(2)
Does the project involve habitat where federally
listed endangered or threatened species may occur?
X
(3)
Will the project affect anadromous fish?
X
(4)
If the project involves wetlands, is the amount of
permanent and /or temporary wetland taking less than
one -third (1/3) of an acre and have all practicable measures
to avoid and minimize wetland takings been evaluated?
X
(5)
Will the project require the use of U. S. Forest Service lands?
X
(6)
Will the quality of adjacent water resources be adversely
impacted by proposed construction activities?
X
(7)
Does the project involve waters classified as Outstanding Water
Resources (OWR) and /or High Quality Waters (HQW)?
X
(8)
Will the project require fill in waters of the United States
in any of the designated mountain trout counties?
X
(9)
Does the project involve any known underground storage
tanks (UST's) or hazardous materials sites?
X
PERMITS AND COORDINATION
YES
NO
(10)
If the project is located within a CAMA county, will the
project significantly affect the coastal zone and /or any
"Area of Environmental Concern" (AEC)?
El
X
(11)
Does the project involve Coastal Barrier Resources Act
resources?
X
(12)
Will a U. S. Coast Guard permit be required?�
X
(13)
Will the project result in the modification of any existing
regulatory floodway?
X
4

(14) Will the project require any stream relocations or channel
changes? X
SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND CULTURAL, [RESOURCES YES NO
(15) Will the project induce substantial impacts to planned
growth or land use for the area? X
(16) Will the project require the relocation of any family or
business? X
(17)
Will the project have a disproportionately high and adverse
human health and environmental effect on any minority or
low - income population?
_ X
(18)
If the project involves the acquisition of right of way, is the
amount of right of way acquisition considered minor?
- X `
(19)
Will the project involve any changes in access control?
X _
(20)
Will the project substantially alter the usefulness
and /or land use of adjacent property?
X
(21)
Will the project have an adverse effect on permanent
El
local traffic patterns or community cohesiveness?
X
(22)
Is the project included in an approved thoroughfare plan
��
and /or Transportation Improvement Program (and is,
f
therefore, in conformance with the Clean Air Act of 1990)?
X
(23)
Is the project anticipated to cause an increase in traffic
volumes?
X
(24)
Will traffic be maintained during construction using existing
roads, staged construction, or on -site detours?
X
(25) If the project is a bridge replacement project, will the bridge
be replaced at its existing location (along the existing facility)
and will all construction proposed in association with the I�
bridge replacement project be contained on the existing facility? X
(26) Is there substantial controversy on social, economic, or
environmental grounds concerning the project? X
(27) Is the project consistent with all Federal, State, and local laws
relating to the environmental aspects of the project? X
(28) Will the project have an "effect" on structures /properties
eligible for or listed on the National Register of Historic Places? X

(29) Will the project affect any archaeological remains which are
important to history or pre - history? E X
(30) Will the project require the use of Section 4(f) resources
(public parks, recreation lands, wildlife and waterfowl refuges,
historic sites, or historic bridges, as defined in Section 4(f)
of the U. S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966)? X
(31) Will the project result in any conversion of assisted public
recreation sites or facilities to non - recreation uses, as defined
by Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Act
of 1965, as amended? X
(32) Will the project involve construction in, across, or adjacent
to a river designated as a component of or proposed for
inclusion in the Natural System of Wild and Scenic Rivers? X
F. Additimia! Documentation Reclnired for Unfavorable Responses iii Cart F
(Discussion regarding all unfavorable responses in Part E should be provided
below. Additional supporting documentation may be attached, as necessary.)

G. CE Approval
TIP Project No.
State Project No.
Federal -Aid Project No.
EB -4411F
36333.3.FD6
STPEB - 0041(32
Project Description: (Include project scope and location. Attach location map.)
NC 41, Widen from 20' to 26', mill in curb and gutter section and resurface from
Craven County Line to MP 21.79 West of Trenton City limits in Jones County.
Categorical Exclusion Action Classification: (Check one)
X TYPE II(A)
TYPE II(B)
Approved:
zx�/, 711ZI X.
OaYe (Divisic . n roiftnental rcer)
Date ision Engineer
For Type II(B) projects only
Date Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
NO BOXES Checked
ANY BOX is Checked

UNITED STATES STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
�OG'z DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
22'30" �S4"`E 85 89 rco 4 INE 90
o, - - -_ r,__ - ¢ 3KM TO J.S.M 20' 3 5554111IT
' 17'30" 262 193
35 °07'30" -- - -- -
30890=,N
41
- 8R US S G R E A T D O V E R /� S W \ M P
t 14.5 / \
t6
"\
_,-
13.5
145
Bell I
I
"
1
3887 \ �
d bail
_T- 11.5 P ,y. -_ • � �, %� �•/ � . � ' - � � � � ='_ -1
ill _ 7 � -� '� ! �0 r •� �> _ � � �� -'�•.�
r
I - � � `• � r /' I _ - y -„sue •w r
1I \
'V --�/ Friendship.
- _ Water . -
of
Tan
- � k
74.5
•I -
sand I
0
p.
I
- � -"��.. � '■" '�_ � j/ ,..rte 1fl � 1�
7685 1. , , �
- \ Andrews i5.0
J Chapel .
I � x75.
5' o
op
BRAO
tem
X9.5
P ='Cem r5o
13.0
�N
lo
9 t3.5
i
J
L
U {
CN
3 PI 73
11.5 " 13
8.5
.
.LVarren -
\ ��
.I `j
3683 l
1124 � __ 4;
Q•Id f i! t x 5.5
� ' • one
1
'� i -8 High 5ch -
9 0
t
- l
lo r
•Comm C4TR \ y •j. �• , • C ♦ /j
a
I
Iil Race
- _
� _-�- - - ,� / �, • -, I we -! Cent
-
1,
70 l �� ,!C. � �- _ i - a 6.5 �l
x5.5 - b
fo
:
° 1
a
N81
x T-50
TRENTON QUADRANGLE
NORTH CAROLINA
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
SE14 TRENT RIVER 15' QUADRANGLE SP
2 520 000 FEET 77 °15'
35 °07'30"
mss
500 000
FEET
3887
m86
CONVERSION
SCALES
Feet Meters
15aoa
4500
5'
30DO
9000
30M
4000
8000
13000
7000 _
44
12000
2000
3500
tlDDa
e er .30485
2'30" ,'
• I j"
J _ l r3.0 y r, - - ._ V 9 1332 • 2 .6096
= -
,. 3
_. ,n • tzs 1 - I .291144
I25 2'31Y 4 92
o d ci 4.5 5 1.5240
(WCTI TV)
1.8288
11 ( 1 21336
8b
_ - P2.0 • ,� -- - j _ - -j ,.. .�. -/ S ` ' - 8 2.4384
_ (1325
9 23432
10 3.0480
13.5 -
r# 'I Quaker Neck �o
• l M Ie r COUNT CI b 6'
15.0 yI,K ap G ova Y u t �' To conv¢rl feet ro molars
6
. - 011 \ multiply
6
3048
x 15A � /
m . Jones • • • , / - , .. •7.5 .µ. - 027 Y
_ ///
High Sch; • , . � t t5 cl To Convert meters to lee(
13.0 �f _ _ - - - o multiply by 3.2808
'g79 � --� �..� �- ray I i � net _
1j J- >:5
13:0
SO
j x 15.0 Cem - `\ ( p % 8.0
x 140 F tth
. - Ch }
14.n•
r"
i
x6.5 ,
_
OAX GROVE X78
3676 - -� -., - -- -- •r3.5 AIRFIELD
. '-` --�• ©livers / ,y
I
Crossroads _
•Morris i = y _
.,v. Chapel "f - �6.-- .;,... - '677
3677
�-
1 _
to ' 14.0 I i Ce 3 P1ney Grove / �
111 4 r�
,s W 1 T E j O A K , P O C O S I N ;4.5 = - i `
lr�JJ "` x2.0
Q7 J m7V N
J y CeJ �l l
3676
I JJ Free Will
m
• BLis.O
_
F 'M A N N F O R E Chapel S T .14.5
460 000
Pik-
FEET
° , 1' _ f aos ss I -
84 2 490 000 FEET 185 3- f
77° 22'30" 8 20' 138 UACKSONVILLENE) - - 190 - -
90 17'30" 35 °00'
X92 � NTERIOR- QEOLO�'iCpL SuRVEV RESrCry iRG N < _10 @3 77"15'
55531V Mf *,4 KM TO U.B. 17 '94"r "E
Produced by the United States Geological Survey SCALE 1:24 000 MAYSVILLE 14 KM
a Control by USGS, NOS /NOAH, and North Calrolina Geodetic Survey * ROAD CLASSIFICATfON ��hs
0 MN 1 .5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2
Primary highway, Light -duty road, hard or
G photographs 7 a GN 1 1000 .5 MILES 2000' hard surface ....... improved surface ...
�5 h� Compiled by photogrammetnc methods from aerial 0 METERS 1000
taken 1977. Field checked 1979. Map edited 19$2 0 � Secondary highway.
Projection and 10,000 -foot grid ticks. North Calrolina coordinate ��
t33 MILS � 1°20' loco- 0 1000 2000_ 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 4000 10000 hard surface....... Unimproved road...
system {Lambert Conformal conic) 24 MILS _ - - - -� --
FEET Interstate Route U. S. Route State Route
1000 -meter Universal Transverse Mercator grid, zone 18 CONTOUR INTERVAL 2 METERS
1927 North American Datum
To place on the predicted North American Datum 1983 SUPPLEMENTARY CONTOUR INTERVAL I METER
DASHED SUPPLEMENTARY CONTOURS ARE APPROXIMATE �� N. C. y
move the projection lines 13 meters south and UTM GRID AND 1982 MAGNETIC NORTH NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 TRENTON N. G.
27 meters west as shown by dashed corner ticks DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET CONTROL ELEVATIONS SHOWN TO THE NEAREST 0.1 METER
OTHER ELEVATIONS SHOWN TO THE NEAREST 0.5 METER QUADRANGLE LOCATION SF14 TRENT RIVER 15' QUADRANGLE
Short dashed blue lines indicate elliptical bay outlines
visible on aerial photographs THIS MAP COMPLIES WITH NATIONAL MAP ACCURACY STANDARDS N3500 - W7715/7.5 CONTOURS AND ELEVATIONS
FOR SALE BY U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY,, RESTON, VIRGINIA 22092 IN METERS 1982
Fine red dashed lines indicate selected fence and field lines where A FOLDER DESCRIBING TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS AND SYMBOLS IS AVAILABLE ON REQUEST
generally visible on aerial photographs. This information is unchecked
DMA 5554 Ill SE- SERIES V842
30DO
9000
30M
2'500
8000
7000 _
2000
6000
5000
'881
1500
e er .30485
2'30" ,'
• I j"
J _ l r3.0 y r, - - ._ V 9 1332 • 2 .6096
= -
,. 3
_. ,n • tzs 1 - I .291144
I25 2'31Y 4 92
o d ci 4.5 5 1.5240
(WCTI TV)
1.8288
11 ( 1 21336
8b
_ - P2.0 • ,� -- - j _ - -j ,.. .�. -/ S ` ' - 8 2.4384
_ (1325
9 23432
10 3.0480
13.5 -
r# 'I Quaker Neck �o
• l M Ie r COUNT CI b 6'
15.0 yI,K ap G ova Y u t �' To conv¢rl feet ro molars
6
. - 011 \ multiply
6
3048
x 15A � /
m . Jones • • • , / - , .. •7.5 .µ. - 027 Y
_ ///
High Sch; • , . � t t5 cl To Convert meters to lee(
13.0 �f _ _ - - - o multiply by 3.2808
'g79 � --� �..� �- ray I i � net _
1j J- >:5
13:0
SO
j x 15.0 Cem - `\ ( p % 8.0
x 140 F tth
. - Ch }
14.n•
r"
i
x6.5 ,
_
OAX GROVE X78
3676 - -� -., - -- -- •r3.5 AIRFIELD
. '-` --�• ©livers / ,y
I
Crossroads _
•Morris i = y _
.,v. Chapel "f - �6.-- .;,... - '677
3677
�-
1 _
to ' 14.0 I i Ce 3 P1ney Grove / �
111 4 r�
,s W 1 T E j O A K , P O C O S I N ;4.5 = - i `
lr�JJ "` x2.0
Q7 J m7V N
J y CeJ �l l
3676
I JJ Free Will
m
• BLis.O
_
F 'M A N N F O R E Chapel S T .14.5
460 000
Pik-
FEET
° , 1' _ f aos ss I -
84 2 490 000 FEET 185 3- f
77° 22'30" 8 20' 138 UACKSONVILLENE) - - 190 - -
90 17'30" 35 °00'
X92 � NTERIOR- QEOLO�'iCpL SuRVEV RESrCry iRG N < _10 @3 77"15'
55531V Mf *,4 KM TO U.B. 17 '94"r "E
Produced by the United States Geological Survey SCALE 1:24 000 MAYSVILLE 14 KM
a Control by USGS, NOS /NOAH, and North Calrolina Geodetic Survey * ROAD CLASSIFICATfON ��hs
0 MN 1 .5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2
Primary highway, Light -duty road, hard or
G photographs 7 a GN 1 1000 .5 MILES 2000' hard surface ....... improved surface ...
�5 h� Compiled by photogrammetnc methods from aerial 0 METERS 1000
taken 1977. Field checked 1979. Map edited 19$2 0 � Secondary highway.
Projection and 10,000 -foot grid ticks. North Calrolina coordinate ��
t33 MILS � 1°20' loco- 0 1000 2000_ 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 4000 10000 hard surface....... Unimproved road...
system {Lambert Conformal conic) 24 MILS _ - - - -� --
FEET Interstate Route U. S. Route State Route
1000 -meter Universal Transverse Mercator grid, zone 18 CONTOUR INTERVAL 2 METERS
1927 North American Datum
To place on the predicted North American Datum 1983 SUPPLEMENTARY CONTOUR INTERVAL I METER
DASHED SUPPLEMENTARY CONTOURS ARE APPROXIMATE �� N. C. y
move the projection lines 13 meters south and UTM GRID AND 1982 MAGNETIC NORTH NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 TRENTON N. G.
27 meters west as shown by dashed corner ticks DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET CONTROL ELEVATIONS SHOWN TO THE NEAREST 0.1 METER
OTHER ELEVATIONS SHOWN TO THE NEAREST 0.5 METER QUADRANGLE LOCATION SF14 TRENT RIVER 15' QUADRANGLE
Short dashed blue lines indicate elliptical bay outlines
visible on aerial photographs THIS MAP COMPLIES WITH NATIONAL MAP ACCURACY STANDARDS N3500 - W7715/7.5 CONTOURS AND ELEVATIONS
FOR SALE BY U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY,, RESTON, VIRGINIA 22092 IN METERS 1982
Fine red dashed lines indicate selected fence and field lines where A FOLDER DESCRIBING TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS AND SYMBOLS IS AVAILABLE ON REQUEST
generally visible on aerial photographs. This information is unchecked
DMA 5554 Ill SE- SERIES V842
4000
30M
900
800
100
'881
2000
600
500
400
1000
300
200
IN
0
Feet
0
M i
e er .30485
2'30" ,'
• I j"
J _ l r3.0 y r, - - ._ V 9 1332 • 2 .6096
= -
,. 3
_. ,n • tzs 1 - I .291144
I25 2'31Y 4 92
o d ci 4.5 5 1.5240
(WCTI TV)
1.8288
11 ( 1 21336
8b
_ - P2.0 • ,� -- - j _ - -j ,.. .�. -/ S ` ' - 8 2.4384
_ (1325
9 23432
10 3.0480
13.5 -
r# 'I Quaker Neck �o
• l M Ie r COUNT CI b 6'
15.0 yI,K ap G ova Y u t �' To conv¢rl feet ro molars
6
. - 011 \ multiply
6
3048
x 15A � /
m . Jones • • • , / - , .. •7.5 .µ. - 027 Y
_ ///
High Sch; • , . � t t5 cl To Convert meters to lee(
13.0 �f _ _ - - - o multiply by 3.2808
'g79 � --� �..� �- ray I i � net _
1j J- >:5
13:0
SO
j x 15.0 Cem - `\ ( p % 8.0
x 140 F tth
. - Ch }
14.n•
r"
i
x6.5 ,
_
OAX GROVE X78
3676 - -� -., - -- -- •r3.5 AIRFIELD
. '-` --�• ©livers / ,y
I
Crossroads _
•Morris i = y _
.,v. Chapel "f - �6.-- .;,... - '677
3677
�-
1 _
to ' 14.0 I i Ce 3 P1ney Grove / �
111 4 r�
,s W 1 T E j O A K , P O C O S I N ;4.5 = - i `
lr�JJ "` x2.0
Q7 J m7V N
J y CeJ �l l
3676
I JJ Free Will
m
• BLis.O
_
F 'M A N N F O R E Chapel S T .14.5
460 000
Pik-
FEET
° , 1' _ f aos ss I -
84 2 490 000 FEET 185 3- f
77° 22'30" 8 20' 138 UACKSONVILLENE) - - 190 - -
90 17'30" 35 °00'
X92 � NTERIOR- QEOLO�'iCpL SuRVEV RESrCry iRG N < _10 @3 77"15'
55531V Mf *,4 KM TO U.B. 17 '94"r "E
Produced by the United States Geological Survey SCALE 1:24 000 MAYSVILLE 14 KM
a Control by USGS, NOS /NOAH, and North Calrolina Geodetic Survey * ROAD CLASSIFICATfON ��hs
0 MN 1 .5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2
Primary highway, Light -duty road, hard or
G photographs 7 a GN 1 1000 .5 MILES 2000' hard surface ....... improved surface ...
�5 h� Compiled by photogrammetnc methods from aerial 0 METERS 1000
taken 1977. Field checked 1979. Map edited 19$2 0 � Secondary highway.
Projection and 10,000 -foot grid ticks. North Calrolina coordinate ��
t33 MILS � 1°20' loco- 0 1000 2000_ 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 4000 10000 hard surface....... Unimproved road...
system {Lambert Conformal conic) 24 MILS _ - - - -� --
FEET Interstate Route U. S. Route State Route
1000 -meter Universal Transverse Mercator grid, zone 18 CONTOUR INTERVAL 2 METERS
1927 North American Datum
To place on the predicted North American Datum 1983 SUPPLEMENTARY CONTOUR INTERVAL I METER
DASHED SUPPLEMENTARY CONTOURS ARE APPROXIMATE �� N. C. y
move the projection lines 13 meters south and UTM GRID AND 1982 MAGNETIC NORTH NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 TRENTON N. G.
27 meters west as shown by dashed corner ticks DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET CONTROL ELEVATIONS SHOWN TO THE NEAREST 0.1 METER
OTHER ELEVATIONS SHOWN TO THE NEAREST 0.5 METER QUADRANGLE LOCATION SF14 TRENT RIVER 15' QUADRANGLE
Short dashed blue lines indicate elliptical bay outlines
visible on aerial photographs THIS MAP COMPLIES WITH NATIONAL MAP ACCURACY STANDARDS N3500 - W7715/7.5 CONTOURS AND ELEVATIONS
FOR SALE BY U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY,, RESTON, VIRGINIA 22092 IN METERS 1982
Fine red dashed lines indicate selected fence and field lines where A FOLDER DESCRIBING TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS AND SYMBOLS IS AVAILABLE ON REQUEST
generally visible on aerial photographs. This information is unchecked
DMA 5554 Ill SE- SERIES V842

N
W+ E
S
End Map 1 - NC 41
Begin Map 2 - NC 41
�J
T1,
RELOCATE DITCHES IN THIS
AREA. BOTH SIDES OF PROJ.
Begin Map 1 - NC 41
NC 41 -VICINITY MAP
JONES COUNTY
S�1
Map 1 Project No.: WBS 2CR.10521.7
Map 2 Project No.: WBS 2CR.10251.12
US -70
End Map 2 - NC 41
CRAVEN COUNTY
JONES COUNTY \
�4S
ss
�s
r�
REPLACE 36" CMP CROSS -LINE
35d 05.56 N
77d 20.58 N
Note:
60' Right of Way in area of ditch relocation. Set ditches back to right -of -way to accomodate
26' wide pavement section.

2490000 FEET 2500000 FEET
500000 FEET 77 °21'30 "W 77 °21'0 "W 77 °20'30 "W 77 °20'0 "W 500000 FEET
r �s?
_ w
usselshelrl Creek ',
20�
41
35.6
M1 o ZONE AE
35 °6'30 "N
35 °6'30 "N
i
Gibb Ln _ �sy 3$.6
X92 33.2
�aa
., .
1
r ; Greek 35 °6'0 "N
35 °6'0 "N
A 7Fry Aso
-'+ fOO NIES WIN Y
V LV 1RV VUl\l. Vl \� 1 LL t.'11 \LR"t1 >�:7 - /f ■ �
7S6 f
N ' j
s:
ZONE AE Island tas.
Branch
Swamp !/
32.3
c � v
�c
41
c "
age
vas, 0
35 °5'30 "N
35 °5'30 "N
lima "I
A� 100
r
1� r
r T
d',: usselshel2 �reelc 'Ao,
�s 095
o��a
,doe° � ► � Charity Ln
C _ N
490000 FEET N', N �s0 490000 FEET
77 °21'30 "W 77 °21'0 "W 77 °20'30 "W 77 °20'0 "W
2490000 FEET 2500000 FEET
FEMA'S C-ODPEnAFrNG TECHNICAL POTHER
This digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) was produced through a unique
cooperative partnership between the State of North Carolina and the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The State of North Carolina has
implemented a long term approach to floodplain management to decrease the
costs associated with flooding. This is demonstrated by the State's commitment
to map flood hazard areas at the local level. As a part of this effort, the State of
North Carolina has joined in a Cooperating Technical State agreement with
FEMA to produce and maintain this digital FIRM.
FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION NOTES TO USERS SCALE
SEE FIS REPORT FOR ZONE DESCRIPTIONS AND INDEX MAP
THE INFORMATION DEPICTED ON THIS MAP AND SUPPORTING
DOCUMENTATION ARE ALSO AVAILABLE IN DIGITAL FORMATAT
HTTP: / /FRIS.NC.GOV /FRIS
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
Zone A, V, A99
With BFE or Depth zone AE, A0, AH, VE, AR
SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD AREAS
OTHER AREAS OF
FLOOD HAZARD
OTHER
AREAS
GENERAL
STRUCTURES
OTHER
FEATURES
-- - -- Coastal Transect Baseline
Profile Baseline
Hydrographic Feature
Limit of Study
Jurisdiction Boundary
For information and questions about this map, available products associated with this FIRM including
Regulatory Floodway
historic versions of this FIRM, how to order products or the National Flood Insurance Program in general,
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas
please call the FEMA Map Information eXchange at 1- 877 -FEMA -MAP (1- 877 - 336 -2627) or visit the FEMA Map
of 1% Annual Chance Flood with Average
Datum: NAD 1983 (Horizontal), NAVD 1988 (Vertical)
Depth Less Than One Foot or With Drainage
Areas of Less Than One Square Mile zone x
1 inch = 500 feet 1.6 000
Future Conditions 1% Annual
,
Chance Flood Hazard zone x
0 250 500 1,000
Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee
Feet
See Notes zone x
(Meters
Areas Determined to be Outside the
0 75 150 300
0.2% Annual Chance Floodplain zone x
------- - - - - --
Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer
PANEL LOCATOR
Accredited or Provisionally Accredited
_
Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
I I I
Non - accredited Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
BM5510 X
North Carolina Geodetic Survey bench mark
BM5510 0
National Geodetic Survey bench mark
BM5510�
Contractor Est. NCFMP Survey bench mark
parties should visit the FEMA Website at http: / /www.fema.gov /business /nfip /index.shtm.
Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance
Water Surface Elevation (BFE)
sa - - - - -
Coastal Transect
-- - -- Coastal Transect Baseline
Profile Baseline
Hydrographic Feature
Limit of Study
Jurisdiction Boundary
For information and questions about this map, available products associated with this FIRM including
Map Projection:
historic versions of this FIRM, how to order products or the National Flood Insurance Program in general,
North Carolina State Plane Projection Feet (Zone 3200)
please call the FEMA Map Information eXchange at 1- 877 -FEMA -MAP (1- 877 - 336 -2627) or visit the FEMA Map
Service Center website at http: / /msc.fema.gov. An accompanying Flood Insurance Study report, Letter of Map
Datum: NAD 1983 (Horizontal), NAVD 1988 (Vertical)
Revision (LOMR) or Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) revising portions of this panel, and digital versions of this
FIRM may be available. Visit the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program website at http: / /www.ncf[oodmaps.com
the FEMA Map Service Center.
1 inch = 500 feet 1.6 000
or contact
,
Communities annexing land on adjacent FIRM panels must obtain a current copy of the adjacent panel as well as
0 250 500 1,000
the current FIRM Index. These may be ordered directly from the Map Service Center at the number listed above.
Feet
For community and countywide map dates refer to the Flood Insurance Study report for this jurisdiction.
(Meters
To determine if flood insurance is available in the community, contact your Insurance agent or call the National
0 75 150 300
Flood Insurance Program at 1- 800 - 638 -6620.
Base map information shown on this FIRM was provided in digital format by the North Carolina Floodplain
Mapping Program (NCFMP). The source of this information can be determined from the metadata available in the
PANEL LOCATOR
digital FLOOD database and in the Technical Support Data Notebook (TSDN).
_
ACCREDITED LEVEE NOTES TO USERS: If an accredited levee note appears on this panel check with your local
community to obtain more information, such as the estimated level of protection provided (which may exceed the
1- percent - annual- chance level) and Emergency Action Plan, on the levee system(s) shown as providing protection.
To mitigate flood risk in residual risk areas, property owners and residents are encouraged to consider flood
insurance and floodproofing or other protective measures. For more information on flood insurance, interested
r,
parties should visit the FEMA Website at http: / /www.fema.gov /business /nfip /index.shtm.
ti-
I �
PROVISIONALLY ACCREDITED LEVEE NOTES TO USERS: If a Provisionally Accredited Levee (PAL) note
appears on this panel, check with your local community to obtain more information, such as the estimated level of
,/
protection provided (which may exceed the 1- percent - annual- chance level) and Emergency Action Plan, on the
LENOIR COUNTY 4534 4544 4554
CRAVEN COUNTY
levee system(s) shown as providing protection. To maintain accreditation, the levee owner or community is
; \�
required to submit the data and documentation necessary to comply with Section 65.10 of the NFIP regulations.
4562•, 4582
If the community or owner does not provide the necessary data and documentation or if the data and documentation
,4542
I .�
provided indicates the levee system does not comply with Section 65.10 requirements, FEMA will revise the flood
,
hazard and risk information for this area to reflect de- accreditation of the levee system. To mitigate flood risk in
residual risk areas, property owners and residents are encouraged to consider flood insurance and floodproofing
4520 4540 4560 4580 5500 5520 r.
\�
or other protective measures. For more information on flood insurance, interested parties should visit the FEMA
\�
Website at http: / /www.fema.gov /business /nfip /index.shtm.
% 4489 4499 5449
4408 %4428 4448 4468 5408 5428 '
LIMIT OF MODERATE WAVE ACTION NOTES TO USERS: For some coastal flooding zones the AE Zone
; / 4488 4498 5448 5458 5'468
category has been divided by a Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA). The LiMWA represents the approximate
3497 .� 44874497 5427 5437 54475457 1 '
landward limit of the 1.5 -foot breaking wave. The effects of wave hazards between the VE Zone and the LiMWA
F46 4406 4426 4446 4466 5406 5466
(or between the shoreline and the LiMWA for areas where VE Zones are not identified) will be similar to, but less
3486 3496 4486 4496 5426 5436 5446 5456 1
severe than those in the VE Zone.
4405 41 4425 4435 5425 5435 1
3484 - - 4464 4484 5404 5444 5464
Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA)
_ _4_444
4404 44244434 54245434
-
COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM (CBRS) NOTE
4462 x•44!$2 5402 . 5422 5442 5462
DUPLIN COUNTY `
This map may include approximate boundaries of the CBRS for informational purposes only. Flood insurance is not
available within CBRS areas for structures that are newly built or substantially improved on or after the date(s)
indicated on the map. For more information see http:// www. fws. gov/ habitatconservation /coastal_barrier.html, the
5420? 5440 5.460 5480
FIS Report, or call the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Customer Service Center at 1- 800 - 344 -WILD.
CBRS Area \ Otherwise Protected Area
I r,
F5328 },5348 5368' —53-8.—
ONSLOW COUNTY
PENDER COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM
NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
cc FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
NORTH CAROLINA ` pR==FC
0 4 �°
0
PANEL 4499
No SEG
FE . ,
cc Panel Contains:
.L COMMUNITY CID PANEL SUFFIX
y fr�`T JONES COUNTY 370379 4499 J
0
0
cc
a
.0
4_1
cc
Z
MAP NUMBER
3720449900J
MAP REVISED
07/02/04

Project Tracking No.:13 -12 -0004
13 -12 -0004
Qadl NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not
t
�4D valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the
" Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group. Q
PROJECT INFORMATION
Pno ectNo: ? County: Jones
WPBS No: 2CR.10521.7 Document: MCC
F.A. No: ? Funding: ❑ State ® Federal
Federal Permit Required? ®Yes ❑ No Permit Type: NWP 3
Project Description: NCDOT intends to widen and resurface NC 41 in Jones County. As a part of this
project NCDOT Division 2 intends to relocate ditch -lines within existing right -of -way (ROW) along a 2.5-
mile (roughly 4 kilometer) long section of NC 41. Additionally, they intend to replace a 36'36" corrugated
metal pipe with a 50'48" corrugated metal pipe within existing ROW. Existing ROW along this portion of
NC 41 is 60 feet (nearly 18.3 meters) wide and no additional ROW or temporary easements are currently
proposed. At the time of the review, the project had not yet been assigned a project number or federal -aid
number though such funding is anticipated.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Briefdescription ofreview activities, results ofreview, and conclusions:
A review of the site maps and files archived at the North Carolina Office of State Archaeology (OSA) was
conducted on December 20, 2013. No previously identified archaeological resources are located within the
APE; it should be noted, however, that a few archaeological sites are located near the southern end of the
APE along with the Trenton Historic District. In 2003, the North Carolina State Historic Preservation
Office and OSA conducted an archaeological review for the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 13 on NC
41 over Musselshell Creek (TIP No. B -4168; ER 03- 0949). At that time, no further archaeological
investigations were recommended. As currently proposed no further archaeological investigations are
required for the project.
BriefExplanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis lot reasonablypredicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
As noted above, the proposed changes to ditch -lines along NC 41 should occur entirely within the disturbed
existing ROW. The likelihood of encountering intact NRHP - eligible archaeological resources is significantly
low. Additionally, OSA reviewed a portion of the current APE in 2003 and came to the same conclusion.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ® Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info ❑ Photos ❑Correspondence
❑ Other:
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
NO ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED
Shane C. Petersen January 17, 2014
NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST II Date
"No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED ° form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
1 of 3

Project Tracking No.: 13-12-0004
Aerial photograph of NC 41 from its intersection with SR 1322, Old New Bern Road, to its intersection with SR 1002, Wyse Fork Road (Ten Mile Fork
Road).
"No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED " form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
2 of 3

JJ ;� water
loll V , - - -? .� 7 Tank
NI
��-
` ,�A, is � � , -� SMOdPr� • • �
Io
i
4 : A
cW
Project Tracking NoA3 -12 -0004
TTi@#It6n
o -
a
xis. � \• • • � � f `• S•�''�rj ?, `` 1 �j!
•
Ib-
IN
. `SR 172,:1 Ili 1 °Narras A; I :
44 11y'fv
r
TteMon _
1
Detail of the USGS Trenton, NC (1982) quadrangle, 7.5- minute series topographic map; the blue line to the south of the project area (purple) denotes the
Trenton Historic District.
"No ARCHAEOLOGY SUR VEYREQUIRED " form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
3 of 3

NC 41 - VICINITY MAP INSET
JONES COUNTY
N
z
W E
SR -1002 l
S
7�
c�
S�
REPLACE 36" CMP CROSS -LINE
35d 05.56 N
77d 20.58 N
RELOCATE DITCHES TO R/W
ON NC 41, FROM SR 1322 TO SR 1002
BOTH SIDES OF THE PROJ.
SR-1322
.� ".7 Tre
r
Project No.: WBS 2CR.10521.7
Note:
60' Right of Way in area of ditch relocation. Set ditches back to right -of -way to accomodate
26' wide pavement section.

Project Tracking No. (Internal Use)
13 -12 -0004
�* HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED FORM
y This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
t is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
36333.3FD6
County:
Jones
WBSNo.:
2CR.10521.7
Document
Minimum Criteria Sheet
T e:
Fed. Aid No:
STPEB- 0041(32)
Funding:
® State ® Federal
Federal
® Yes ❑ No
Permit
Nationwide 3
Permit(s):
Type(s):
Project Description:
Widen and resurface NC 41. Relocate ditches and replace existing 36' -36" CMP with 50' -48" CMP.
Project length is 2.5
miles. The right -of -way will remain the same. The detour route is NC 41 to SR 1319
to SR 1002 to NC 41.
No improvements are being made to the detour route.
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
❑ There are no National Register - listed or Study Listed properties within the project's area of
potential effects.
® There are no properties less than fifty years old which are considered to meet Criteria
Consideration G within the project's area of potential effects.
❑ There are no properties within the project's area of potential effects.
® There are properties over fifty years old within the area of potential effects, but they do not
meet the criteria for listing on the National Register.
® There are no historic properties present or affected by this project. (Attach any notes or
documents as needed.)
Date of field visit: 1 /14/14
Description of review activities, results, and conclusions:
Review of HPO quad maps, HPOweb GIS mapping, historic designations roster, and indexes was
conducted on 12/20/13. Based on this review, there is one National Register- Listed property, the Trenton
Historic District (JN0005) and five Surveyed Sites within the Area of Potential Effects (APE). There are
no SL, DE, or LL properties within the APE. Yancey County property and tax records were reviewed
which revealed several more properties within or near the APE over the age of fifty years old, most of
them residential and dating to the twentieth century except for those in the Trenton Historic District,
which also include nineteenth century commercial, ecclesiastical, and residential buildings. The APE
begins in Trenton and runs northward to the Craven County line, and consists of rural forested and cleared
farm land with residences interspersed along the roadways. It is not clear whether the SS properties over
the age of fifty would be eligible for the NRHP, therefore a survey was needed to assess their condition
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007
Programmatic Agreement.
Page 1 of 6

and significance and assess the Trenton Historic District for any potential effects from
The field survey was conducted on January 14, 2014. The project area was evaluated and properties
architecturally or historically interesting including the surveyed sites were documented. The first resource
consisted of the Trenton Historic District, a National Register- Listed district consisting of nineteenth and
twentieth vernacular buildings exhibiting a mix of residential, commercial, civic, and ecclesiastical
architecture. Trenton is the small market town and county seat of a traditional farming county. Although
the project stretches through the middle of the Trenton Historic District on NC 41, because the work
merely consists of resurfacing and milling, no properties in the district will be affected by the project
including street features and landscaping. There will be no ditch work or widening in the historic district.
NC 41, intersection with Jones Street E, downtown Trenton, Jones County, facing
Intersection of NC 41 /Jones Street and Market Street, downtown Trenton, Jones County, facing west.
Surveyed Site JN0308, The Trent River Bridge, is located on NC41 north of the historic district. It
appears to be a federally - funded bridge project built in 1959 with "Texas Classic' railing and stepped
concrete detail at the ends of the bridge railing. The Trent River Bridge will not be resurfaced; the only
work consists of milling at each end.
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qmlified in the 1007
Programmatic Agreement.
Page 2 of 6

FJ'JJq -
la
As'n P
Trent River Bridge (JN0308), NC 41, Jones County, facing north.
6
�4YVn'Y ._•
Trent River Bridge (JN0308), NC 41, Jones County, facing northwest.
The architectural historian looked at a few properties over the age of fifty years old that had not been
surveyed before, however, neither possessed enough historic integrity to be considered for eligibility to
the NRHP.
Three surveyed sites within the project APE are residential properties that belonged to the Ward family.
The Robert Ward House (JN0271) was confirmed to be gone, as was the Willy Ward House (JN0270).
This leaves the Robert Ward, Jr. House (JN0264), 1 -story frame cottage with new metal hipped roof and
three -bay fagade. A hipped porch supported by metal posts atop brick piers shelters the fagade and wraps
around to the south of the house. The Robert Ward, Jr. House property is not architecturally outstanding
and is an example of a common house type in Jones County. Additionally, it will not be affected by the
project activities.
Historic Architecture and landscapes NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTEDform for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007
Programn alic Agreement.
Page 3 of 6

v
Robert Ward Jr. House (JN0364), NC 41, Jones County, facing west.
Another surveyed site near the project area is the Friendship Original Free Will Baptist Church (JN0251)
and associated cemetery. The frame, three -bay church with Gothic Revival elements features a front -
gabled roof and portico supported by four pillars. The building is topped with a hipped tower with conical
wooden spire. A sizable cemetery sits to its east, containing a variety of markers laid out in orderly rows.
The Friendship Original Free Will Baptist Church property sits far enough away from the project area, at
least 200 feet, that it will not be affected by project construction activities.
'ounty, facing north.
The intersection of NC 41 and Wyse Fork Road also contains properties over the age of fifty years old,
including a store, a one -story frame house, and a house that formerly was a store. The work at this
intersection in addition to the general project description will include reconfiguration of the islands within
the intersection. None of the properties sitting at the intersection appear to contain the architectural or
historical significance to be considered for eligibility to the NRHP.
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects w Qnaltfied in the 1007
Programmatic Agreement.
Page 4 of 6

'Ir', 4-I= `.t'- _..
Intersection of NC 41 and Wyse Fork Road, Jones County, facing west.
Tobacco Barn. NC 41. Jones Countv. facing north.
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Tran pormtion Projects as Qualified to the 1007
Programmatic Agreement.
Page 5 of 6

Because the project activities will not affect any historic properties and the properties and surveyed sites
evaluated within the APE did not appear eligible for the NRHP, NCDOT Historic Architecture makes a
finding of "No Historic Properties Present /Affected" for this project.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
®Map(s) []Previous Survey Info. ®Photos ❑Correspondence ❑Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Historic Architecture and Landscapes — NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
Historian
Date
llisloric Archilecleme and Inndscapes NO 111STOR/C PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form far Minor Trmispoi lotion Projects as Qunlijied is the 2007
Pe ogrammn(ic AgreemeN.
Page 6 of 6

NC 41 - VICINITY MAP INSET
JONES COUNTY
N
W + E
5
REPLACE 36" CMP CROSS -LINE
35d 05.56 N
77d 20.58 N
RELOCATE DITCHES TO RNV
ON INC 41, FROM SR 1322 TO SR 1002
BOTH SIDES OF THE PROD.
I.
Project No.: WBS 2CR.10521.7
Note:
60' Right of Way in area of ditch relocation. Set ditches back to right -of -way to accomodate
26' wide pavement section.

■
December 20, 2013
• NR Individual Listing
• NR Listing, Gone
�r NRHD Center Point
NCHPO GIS, Jones County
CRAVEN
End Project
w,))y war,(
H-0a V
(JN02*l f
JONES 1 _ �YiemolSh P QY�'gir0.� FiJa G�^wcV1
2nd Wwd
-
,... Tien} R� ver *�
66 dq
2 Begin Project
e
1:104,002
0 0.75 1.5 3 mi
0 1.25 2.5 5 km
Sou Res: Esri, Oelnrnna, N VTEG, USGS, treermp, iPC, NRCM, Eari
Japan, METI, Esn Chna (Hong Kang), Esri (ThWand), T=Tbm 2013

S7REET VIEW ... � • a a �.
580 N (aroina 41 -
Tr ntor%NC2 °.,555- apptonmateaddr n v • < I i / a I i / .�►- _
ly
tu
AP
4 _ Syr
r
—
N
Hideimagery
a
Earth C> 322 tna 41 ` - G> 322 Norttl Caro" 41 47 322 North Caaire 41 <� 322 North Cardina 41 G,
to Map
Imager ptvre:Sep2012 North Camlina4l ®2014GO gle Tarns Pdvaoy Feyorta