20100099 Ver 3_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20141118

ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
YEAR 2 (2014)
Pancho Bank Parcel
Pursuant to:
Restoration Systems' Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument for
Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Credits - Neuse River Basin
PREPARED BY:
RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC
1101 HAYNES STREET, SUITE 211
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27604
and
AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
218 SNOW AVENUE
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27603
November 2014

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Restoration Systems (Sponsor) is pleased to provide the North Carolina Division of Water
Resources ( NCDWR) this Year 1 (2013) Annual Monitoring Report for the Pancho Bank Parcel
(Parcel) pursuant to the Restoration Systems' Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer & Nutrient
Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument (Banking Instrument) signed March 17, 2008 between
the Sponsor and the NCDWR.
The Pancho Bank Parcel is located approximately 13 miles west of Goldsboro in western Wayne
County; north of U.S. Highway 13 near the intersection of State Road 1008 (Stevens Mill Road)
and State Road 1105 (Dobbersville Road) (Figure 1, Appendix A). Encompassing 65.62 acres of
land, the Parcel is within the Neuse River Basin 14 -digit United States Geological Survey
(USGS) Cataloging Unit 03020201150050 of the South Atlantic /Gulf Region (North Carolina
Division of Water Quality [ NCDWQ] Subbasin Number 03- 04 -04).
The Parcel was designed and constructed to provide mitigation credits for unavoidable impacts
due to development within the Neuse River Basin. Neuse River riparian buffer mitigation credits
provided by this Parcel are available over the entire Neuse River Basin, United States Geological
Survey (USGS) 6 -digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 030202, per 15A NCAC 02B .0242 (Neuse
River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy: Mitigation Program for Protection
and Maintenance of Existing Riparian Buffers). Mitigation credits for Nutrient Offset are made
available within the Neuse River Basin USGS 8 -digit HUC 03020201 excluding the Falls Lake
Drainage Basin.
Prior to construction activities, Parcel land use was agricultural based and utilized for livestock
grazing and row crop production with degraded forest pockets. Pasture areas were accessible to
livestock and were routinely cleared for hay production, resulting in local disturbances to stream
banks and wetland soil surfaces. Additional land use practices included the maintenance and
removal of riparian vegetation; ditching of adjacent riparian wetlands; and relocation, dredging,
and channelization of onsite streams resulting in degraded water quality and excessive
sedimentation resulting from unstable banks (stream entrenchment, erosion, and bank collapse).
Adjacent land use is currently characterized by pasture land for hay production and livestock
grazing. Prior to construction adjacent landowners installed and will be responsible for the
maintenance of fencing to protect from livestock trespass and damage to Parcel assets.
Parcel construction activities were concluded in early April 2013. An onsite determination for
applicability to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213 .0233) was conducted in
June 2013 and NCDWR approved the Pancho Bank Parcel Development Package on October 4,
2013. The Sponsor currently owns the property in fee simple, a perpetual Conservation Easement
was placed over the Parcel on April 18, 2012. This Parcel was designed and implemented in
concurrence with the Pancho Steam & Wetland Mitigation Bank (Corps Action ID # SAW -2010-
00142).
Restoration of riparian corridors was accomplished in conjuncture with the objectives and
methods outlined by the Pancho Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank. Primary objectives of the
riparian restoration focused on improving water quality, enhancing flood attenuation, and
Year 2 (2014) Monitoring Report Executive Summary
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

restoring wildlife habitat by planting a forested riparian buffer adjacent to stream channels,
Primary objectives were accomplished by the following.
1. Removing nonpoint sources of pollution associated with agricultural production
including a) removing livestock and b) ceasing the broadcast application of fertilizer,
pesticides, and other agricultural materials into and adjacent to Parcel streams through
treatment of runoff within the forested buffer.
2. Reducing sedimentation within onsite and downstream receiving waters by a) reducing
bank erosion, vegetation maintenance, plowing, and hoof shear adjacent to Parcel
streams, and b) removing livestock from the Parcel.
3. Promoting floodwater attenuation by increasing frictional resistance on floodwaters
crossing Parcel floodplains.
4. Improving aquatic habitat by enhancing stream bed shading and natural detritus input.
5. Providing a terrestrial wildlife corridor and refuge in an area extensively developed for
agricultural production.
6. Restoring and reestablishing natural community structure, habitat diversity, and
functional continuity.
7. Protecting the Parcel's full potential of stream and riparian buffer functions and values in
perpetuity.
The primary objectives were achieved by implementing a two phase restoration plan, which
consisted of the following.
1. Re- establishment of riparian buffer forest up to 200 linear feet from channel margins.
2. Permanent protection of the Parcel in a conservation easement.
Vegetation sampling across the Parcel was above the required average density with 663 planted
tree stems per acre (excluding livestakes) surviving in year 2 (2014). In addition, all individual
plots exceeded success criteria with the exception of Plots 8 and 9, which were each two stems
shy of success. The area surrounding these plots is characterized by compacted soils from
previous agricultural land -use, so planted stem survival is low. Additionally, a small area (soil
borrow area from Site construction) between the main tributary and Kennedy Mill Branch was
observed to have bare, eroded, nutrient poor soil and low planted stem survival. A remedial
action plan for this area including fertilization, installation of erosion control matting, and
replanting with bare root stems, will be developed in late 2014 /early 2015. Further
correspondence with the DWR will occur prior to any action.
Year 2 (2014) Monitoring Report Executive Summary
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVESUMMARY .............................................................................. ............................... i
1.0 MONITORING AND SUCCESS CRITERIA ..................................... ............................... 1
2.0 MITIGATION POTENTIAL ................................................................ ............................... 1
3.0 MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY .......................................... ............................... 1
4.0 REFERENCES ..................................................................................... ............................... 2
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A.
SITE LOCATION MAP AND BACKGROUND TABLES
Figure 1.
Site Location
Table 1.
Project Components and Mitigation Units
Table 2.
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3.
Project Contacts Table
Table 4.
Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Table 5.
Reference Forest Ecosystem
Table 6.
Planted Tree Species
APPENDIX B.
VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figure 2.
Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3.
Mitigation Components and Assets
Marsh Treatment Area Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
APPENDIX C.
VEGETATION PLOT DATA
Table 7.
Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Year 2 (2014) Monitoring Report Table of Contents page i
Pancho Bank Parcel

1.0 MONITORING AND SUCCESS CRITERIA
Restoration monitoring procedures for vegetation will include periodic visual inspection and
annual plant survival and species diversity survey reports. Quantitative sampling of vegetation
will be performed as outlined in the CVS Level 1 -2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2
(Lee et al. 2008). Detailed qualitative and quantitative monitoring is proposed for vegetated
riparian areas. Marsh treatment areas will be visually inspected periodically and reported
qualitatively within the annual monitoring report, which will include photographic record of the
Parcel's assets.
Monitoring of the restoration efforts will be performed for five years or until success criteria are
fulfilled. Restoration Systems shall submit annual monitoring reports to NCDWR no later than
December 31" of each year. Quantitative monitoring will occur at sixteen (16) 10x10 meter
vegetation plots (Figure 2, Appendix B). Vegetation sampling will be performed as outlined in the
CVS Level 1 -2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) in September or
October for the remainder of the monitoring period or until vegetation success criteria are
achieved.
During the first year, vegetation will receive a cursory, visual evaluation on a periodic basis to
ascertain the degree of overtopping of planted elements by nuisance species. Success criteria
within the riparian buffer and nutrient offset restoration areas will be based on the survival of
planted species at a density of 320 stems per acre after five years of monitoring. Natural recruits
will not count towards annual success criteria, but may be taken into account during review by the
NCDWR.
2.0 MITIGATION POTENTIAL
Riparian areas suitable to generate mitigation credit were calculated by measuring 50 linear feet
horizontally from the top of bank on all subject streams for Neuse riparian buffer credit and 200
linear feet from the top of bank on all hydrologically connected conveyances for nutrient offset
mitigation. Riparian buffer credits were measured by the hundredth of an acre and converted into
square feet.
The Parcel will generate 16.35 acres of restored riparian area; of that 11.33 acres will be used
specifically for nutrient offset credit, generating 25,753.31 pounds of nitrogen offset credit (the
NCDWR determined that restored riparian areas at the Parcel would abate 2273.02 pounds per
acre of nitrogen), and the remaining 5.02 acres (218,671.2 sq. ft.) will be used for Neuse riparian
buffer credits. The mitigation provided in the Neuse riparian buffer can be used for either Neuse
riparian buffer credits or nutrient offset credits, but not both. The Sponsor will request and receive
approval of the transfer of any mitigation credits from NCDWR. All mitigation credit assets shall
be shown on the credit ledgers. Figure 3 (Appendix B) and Table 1 (Appendix A) summarize the
Parcel's components and mitigation credits.
3.0 MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY
A remedial action plan will be developed and implemented with the approval of NCDWR in the
event that the Parcel or a specific component of the Parcel fails to achieve success criteria as
outlined above. Other vegetation maintenance and repair activities may include pruning,
mulching, and fertilizing. In the event that exotic invasive plant species require treatment, such
species will be controlled by mechanical (physical removal with the use of a chainsaw) and/or
Year 2 (2014) Monitoring Report Page 1
Pancho Bank Parcel

chemical methods (aquatic approved herbicide) in accordance with North Carolina Department of
Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations.
4.0 REFERENCES
Griffith, G.E., J.M. Omernik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H. McNab, D.R. Lenat, T.F.
MacPherson, J.B. Glover, and V.B. Shelbourne. 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina and
South Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS -EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation. Version 4.2. North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Neuse River Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy 15A NCAC 2B .0233,
15A NCAC 02B .024 1, and 15A NCAC 02B .0242
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement
Program. Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration. October 2004
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina: Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks
and Recreation, N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. Raleigh,
North Carolina.
Year 2 (2014) Monitoring Report Page 2
Pancho Bank Parcel

APPENDIX A.
SITE LOCATION MAP
AND BACKGROUND TABLES
Figure 1. Site Location
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Units
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Table 5. Reference Forest Ecosystem
Table 6. Planted Tree Species
Year 2 (2014) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

s N
j i
JOHNSTON REEN �; I
WAYNE
ENOIR J t.,
9034
\ SAMPSON
DUPLIN
r
— k
o • _ 4
`
:Goldsboro
a R r -
�
e
r
a O
-Q
Pancho
*•7/r.._ Bank
_
-0 = Parcel
y Directions to the Site from Raleigh, NC:
fi•r�,,, t I -> Travel east on U.S. Highway 70
Travel - 37 miles on U.S. Highway 70 to the intersection
' r °N� ; — i C Q} - with Martin Livestock Road
Turn Martin Livestock Road
right at (0.7 mile)
i s Turn right at Progressive Church Road (4 miles)
Turn left at Brogden Road (0.5 mile)
-> Turn right at Richardson Bridge Road (5.3 miles)
-> Turn left at T- intersection onto Harper House Road,
0 0.5 1 2 3 4 which becomes Stevens Mill Road (1.3 miles)
Miles — -> The Bank is located where Kennedy Mill Branch crosses
Stevens Mill Road
Scale 1:120,000 -' "` -> Latitude: 35.3337550 N, Longitude: 78.192699° W
Dwn. By:
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
SITE LOCATION
CLF /KRJ
FIGURE
Date:
Jan 2014
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
PANCHO BANK PARCEL
Project:
jL 919- 215 -1693
Wayne County, North Carolina
13 -010

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Pancho Bank Parcel, Wayne County, NC
Mitigation Credits
Nutrient Offset (Nitrogen only)
Restoration
Restoration Equivalent
11.33
--
Projects Components
Existing
Acreage
Restoration
/
Mit. Ratio
Restoration
Acreage
Mitigation /
Acre
Comment
11.33
Restoration
(1:1)
11.33
2273.02 lbs. /
acre
Cessation of current land use practices,
removing invasive species, and planting
with native forest vegetation.
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Nutrient Offset Credits lbs.
Restoration
11.33 acres = 25,753.31 lbs.
Totals
11.33 acres = 25,753.31 lbs.
Neuse Riparian Buffer
Restoration
Restoration Equivalent
5.02
--
Projects Components
Existing
Acreage
Restoration
/
Mit. Ratio
Restoration
Acreage
Mitigation /
Acre
Comment
5.02
Restoration
(1:1)
5.02
43,560 sq. ft. /
acre
Cessation of current land use practices,
removing invasive species, and planting
with native forest vegetation.
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Neuse Riparian Buffer Credits (sq. ft.)
Restoration
5.02 acres = 218,671.2 sq. ft.
Totals
5.02 acres = 218,671.2 sq. ft.
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Pancho Bank Parcel, Wayne County, NC
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Completion or Delivery
Restoration Systems Neuse UMBI
NA
March 2008
BPDP
NA
September 2013
Conservation Easement
NA
April 2012
Construction
NA
April 2013
Bare Root Planting
NA
March 2013
As -Built & Baseline Monitoring Document
July 2013
January 2014
Year 1 (2013) Annual Monitoring
October 2013
January 2014
Year 2 (2014) Annual Monitoring
August 2014
October 2014
Year 2 (2014) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Pancho Mitigation Bank
Mitigation Provider
Restoration Systems
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
County
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Wayne
George Howard and John Preyer 919 - 755 -9490
Designer
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Project Coordinates (latitude and
longitude)
218 Snow Avenue
35.333755° N, - 78.192699° W (NAD 83 /WGS 84)
Raleigh, NC 27603
Physiographic Province
Grant Lewis 919 - 215 -1693
Construction and Seeding Contractor
Land Mechanic Designs
780 Landmark Road
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
Willow Spring, NC 27592
Lloyd Glover 919 - 639 -6132
Planting Contractor
Carolina Silvics
908 Indian Trail Road
Project Drainage Area, Total Outfall (miles)
Edenton, NC 27932
+/-3.3
Mary Margaret McKinney 252- 482 -8491
Nursery Stock Suppliers
ArborGen 888 - 888 -7158
As -built Surveyor
K2 Design Group
Cropland and Pasture
5688 US Highway 70 East
Goldsboro, NC 27534
John Rudolph 919- 751 -0075
Baseline Data Collection &
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Annual Monitoring
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Grant Lewis 919 - 215 -1693
Table 4. Project Baseline Information & Attributes Table
Pancho Bank Parcel, Wavne Countv, NC
Project Information
Project Name
Pancho
County
Wayne
Project Area (acres)
65.62
Project Coordinates (latitude and
longitude)
35.333755° N, - 78.192699° W (NAD 83 /WGS 84)
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Southeastern Floodplains and Low Terraces &
Rolling Coastal Plain
River Basin
Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
03020201
USGS Hydrologic Unit
14 -digit
03020201150050
DWQ Sub -basin
03 -04 -06
Project Drainage Area, Total Outfall (miles)
+/-3.3
Project Drainage Area Impervious Area
< 5%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Cropland and Pasture
Year 2 (2014) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

Table 5. Reference Forest Ecosystem
Pancho Bank Parcel, Wayne County, NC
Onsite Observations + Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest & Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwoods
Canopy Species
Understory Species
Red maple (Acer rubrum)
Red maple (Acer rubrum)
River birch (Betula ni a)
River birch (Betula ni a
Pecan (Carya illinoinensis )
Ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana)
American beech (Fagus grandifolia)
Coastal sweetpepperbush (Clethra alnifolia)
American holly (Ilex opaca)
Dogwood (Cornus florida)
Sweet gum Li uidambar s raci ua
Sourwood (Diospyros vir iniana)
Tulip poplar (Liriodendrum tuli i era )
American holly (Ilex o aca
Black gum (Nyssa biflora)
Virginia sweetspire (Itea virginica)
Water oak (Quercus nigra)
Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxii)
Tulip poplar (Liriodendrum tuli i era
Cherrybark oak (Quercus pagoda)
Common sweetleaf (Symplocos tinctoria)
Willow oak (Quercus phellos)
Winged elm (Ulmus alata)
Winged elm (Ulmus alata)
Highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum)
American elm (Ulmus americana)
Year 2 (2014) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

Table 6. Planted Tree Species
Pancho Bank Parcel, Wavne Countv, NC
Vegetation Association: Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest & Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwoods
Total
Area (Acres) Total= 48.9 acres
3.6
17.5
27.8
Vegetation Association:
Streamside
Assemblage
Mesic Mixed
Hardwood Forest
Coastal Plain
Bottomland
Hardwoods
Species
Number
Planted
% of
Total
Number
Planted
% of
Total
Number
Planted
% of
Total
River birch (Betula nigra)
1,100
47.8
1,000
3.02
2,100
American elderberry (Sambucus canadensis)
2,300
52.2
2,300
American Beech (Fagus grandifolia)
1,850
5.59
1,850
Northern red oak (Quercus rubra)
5,800
17.53
5,800
White oak (Quercus alba)
5,850
17.69
5,850
Black cherry (Prunus serotina)
5,000
15.12
5,000
Persimmon (Diospyros virginiana)
5,300
16.02
5,300
Flowering dogwood (Cornus florida)
2,000
6.05
2,000
American tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipifera)
1,000
3.02
1,000
6.91
2,000
Southern red oak (Quercus falcata var. pagodifolia)
2,800
8.47
2,800
Florida maple (Acer saccharumsubsp. floridanum)
2,475
7.49
2,475
Black tupelo (Nyssa sylvatica)
2,800
19.34
2,800
Swamp chestnut aak (Quercus michauxii)
2,800
19.34
2,800
Willow oak (Quercus phellos)
2,800
19.34
2,800
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
1,850
12.78
1,850
Bald cypress (Taxodium distichum)
2,000
13.82
2,000
Bitternut Hickory (Carya cordiformis)
975
6.74
975
Shagbark hickory (Carya ovate)
250
1.73
250
Total
3,400
100%
33,075
100%
14,475
100%
50,950
Year 2 (2014) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

APPENDIX B.
VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3. Mitigation Components and Assets
Marsh Treatment Area Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Year 2 (2014) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

Pancho Bank Parcel
Marsh Treatment Area
Fixed Station Photographs
Taken November, 2014
Year 2 (2014) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

Pancho Bank Parcel
Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken August 12 -13, 2014
Plot 6
Year 2 (2014) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

Pancho Bank Parcel
Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken August 12 -13, 2014 (continued)
Plot 7
Plot 9
Plot 11
Year 2 (2014) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

Pancho Bank Parcel
Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken August 12 -13, 2014 (continued)
Plot 13
Plot 15
Year 2 (2014) Monitoring Report
Pancho Bank Parcel
Plot 14
Appendices

APPENDIX C.
VEGETATION PLOT DATA
Table 7. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Year 2 (2014) Monitoring Report
Pancho Bank Parcel
Appendices

Table 7. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
neither Project Code 001. Project Name: Pancho Nutrient Offset
Current Plot Data (MY2 2014)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
001 -01 -0001
001 -01 -0002
001 -01 -0003
001 -01 -0004
001 -01 -0005
001 -01 -0006
001 -01 -0007
001 -01 -0008
001 -01 -0009
001 -01 -0010
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Acer floridanum
Southern Sugar Maple,
Tree
8
8
8
1
1
1
2
2
2
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
16
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
S
1
1
31
12
8
8
8
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
Carya
hickory
Tree
Carya cordiformis
bitternut hickory
Tree
4
4
4
Carya ovata
shagbark hickory
Tree
1
1
1
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
3
3
3
Cornus florida
flowering dogwood
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
Fagus grandifolia
American beech
Tree
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
5
5
13
1
1
1
3
3
3
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
23
80
26
10
S
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
Nyssa
tupelo
Tree
1
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
3
3
3
3
3
3
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
4
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
Quercus
oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
7
7
7
2
2
2
8
8
8
7
7
7
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
3
3
3
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
5
5
5
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
9
9
9
Ulmus alata
winged elm
Tree
Ulmus americans
JAmerican elm
Tree
1
Vaccinium corymbosum
highbush blueberry
Shrub
I
1
51
51
5
1
1
1
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
13
131
13
101
101
41
14
141
115
16
161
73
17
17
39
221
221
22
21
21
22
6
6
11
61
6
6
13
13
17
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
L,2
4
5
5
6
4
4
7
5
5
7
5
5
7
7
7
7
4
4
5
:fl
::=
6
5
5
5
6
6
7
S26.11
404.71
404.71
16591
S66.61
566.6
4654
647.51647.51
29S41
6881
6881
15781890.31
890.31
890.31849.81
849.81
890.3
242.81
242.8
445.2
242.81
242.81
242.81
526.1
526.1
688
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% P -all = Planting including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% T includes natural recruits