20141298 Ver 1_More Info Received_20141230

Wetland and Natural Resource
Consultants, Inc
December 19, 2014
WNR Project #: SG -1001
US Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Ms Tasha Alexander
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 -5006
Re: Permit Addendum
Town of Mooresville Golf Course Renovation
Iredell County (Parcel ID- 2817337967000)
200 Golf Course Dr., Mooresville, Iredell County, NC
Tasha:
As per our discussions this week, the mitigation section of this permit application was
inadvertently omitted. Enclosed for your review is a revised PCN, photographs of the wetland
impact areas, descriptions of the wetlands proposed for impacts, and a proposed mitigation
summary As soon as RIBITS is available I will determine whether the proposed mitigation
credits will be purchased for a private bank or whether an application to EEP will be necessary.
Please correspond if we need to provide any additional assistance or information necessary to
assist you with your review and issuance of the requested permit approval. Please feel free to
call with any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
� " Z# " d /& 4--t WV
Jennifer L Robertson
Mooresville Office
3158 Charlotte Hwy
Mooresville, NC 28117

`Q�pF SAT �9QG
Q 'f
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 1 4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1 4 January 2009
I�
I�
f
1
}
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 42 or General Permit (GP) number
1 c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ® No
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program
❑ Yes
® No
1g
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes
® No
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑Yes
No
2.
Project Information
2a
Name of project
Mooresville Golf Course
2b
County
Iredell
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Mooresville
2d
Subdivision name
not applicable
2e
NCDOT only, T I P or state
project no
not applicable
3.
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
Town of Mooresville
3b
Deed Book and Page No
27753 and 652,
rr
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
not applicable
-
nr-r,`
3d
Street address
200 Golf Course Drive
L-
Y
3e
City, state, zip
Mooresville, NC, 28115
DENR - WATEt? N,74 -. iF r j�_
3f
Telephone no
704 - 663 -2539
1 i hS FFER -
Frtiih) �
3g
Fax no
3h
Email address
jyoung@ci mooresville nc us
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1 4 January 2009
I�
I�
f
1
}

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify
4b
Name
same as above
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
same as above
4d
Street address
same as above
4e
City, state, zip
same as above
4f
Telephone no
same as above
4g
Fax no
4h
Email address
same as above
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Jennifer L Robertson
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants
5c
Street address
3158 Charlotte Hwy
5d
City, state, zip
Mooresville, NC 28117
5e
Telephone no
704- 512 -1206
5f
Fax no
704- 663 -2927
5g
Email address
Jennifer robertson @wetland - consultants com
Page 2 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a
Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
4656490902, 4656488484, 4656662889, 4657306442
lb
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude 035 576418 Longitude - 080 835457
1c
Property size
+/- 5 5 (project area) acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project
Reeds Creek
2b
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
C
2c
River basin
Catawba
3.
Project Description
3a
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application The site is an existing golf course Residential and commercial development surrounds the project
3b
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property 0 83 acres
3c
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property 443 linear feet
3d
Explain the purpose of the proposed project Update the 1949 and 1977 course designs for better play and use of space
3e
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used Heavy earth moving equipment will be
used to re -grade the area, fill in open water features, and do final shaping for golf realignment
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments in process with the Corps
4b
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known) Chris Huysman and Tamp Bandy
Agency /Consultant Company WNR
Other
4d
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
in process with the Corps
5.
Project History
5a
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
5b
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
2006, JD Request
6.
Future Project Plans
6a
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
16b
If yes, explain
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ® Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts I
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of Jurisdiction
Area of
number
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Corps (404, 10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
0 047
W1 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes /No
Corps
(Impact
2)
0 006
W2 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes /No
Corps
(Impact
3)
033
W3 P
Fill
Floodplain Pool
Yes /No
Corps
(Impact
4)
Oil
W4 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes /No
Corps
(Impact
7)
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
2g. Total wetland impacts:
0 493
2h Comments no comments
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of Jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
Si P
Fill
UT Reeds Crk
PER
Corps
4
86
(Impact 6)
S2 -
Choose one
-
-
S3 -
Choose one
-
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
I Choose one
-
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
3h Total stream and tributary impacts:
86
31 Comments
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
Open water
impact number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c
Type of impact
4d
Waterbody
type
4e
Area of impact (acres)
01 P
Serpentine Pond (Impact 1)
Excavation
Pond
1 93 temp (0 36 loss)
02 P
NJ Pond (Site 5)
Fill
Pond
465
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f Total open water impacts:
036
4g Comments the work at impact #1 will involved temporary impacts to 1 93 acres of open water with a permanent loss of
0 36 acre of open water
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below
5a
Pond ID
number
5b
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f Total:
5g Comments This pond will replace an existing open water feature There will be a loss of 0 36 acres of open water area
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, permit ID no no dam proposed
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
1 57
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
not applicable
5k Method of construction
excavate existing pond into temp sed basin then final pond shaping
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a.Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other
6b
Buffer impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Stream name
6e
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 -
Yes /No
B2 -
Yes /No
B3 -
Yes /No
B4 -
Yes /No
B5 -
Yes /No
B6 -
Yes /No
6h Total buffer impacts:
61 Comments no comments
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
The stream and wetland impacts have been minimized or avoided to the maximum extent possible
1b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
Erosion control measuses will be taken to stabilize all disturbed areas
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
® Yes ❑ No
2b
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ® Corps
2c
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
® Mitigation bank
®Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a
Name of Mitigation Bank to be determined once RIBITS is available
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type Riparian wetland
Type Choose one
Type Choose one
Quantity 1 acre
Quantity
Quantity
3c Comments 0 493 acre of total wetland impact (0 33 good quality wetlands and 0 163 acre of poor quality wetlands)
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b
Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
Choose one
4d
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e
Riparian wetland mitigation requested
1 acres
4f
Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h
Comments if no riparian wetland credits are available for sale from a bank, an application to EEP will be submitted
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
not applicable
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
6c
6d
6e
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
none
none
3 (2 for Catawba)
none
Zone 2
none
none
1 5
none
6f Total buffer mitigation required:
none
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
not applicable
6h Comments no comments
Page 7 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

E
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
❑ Yes ® No
lb
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
Less than 24% impervious %
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why Less than 24% impervious
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
3b
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply)
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
❑ ORW
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
® Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
® Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
lb
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
®No
letter )
Comments maintenance of an existing facility
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
not applicable
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
-
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NCDENR Natural Heritage Program Map Viewer and GIs Layer
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCHPO GIS Service
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA - designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements the project will include removal of an existing dam, any potential
upstream flooding will be alleviated by the removal of the dam
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA NFHL GIS layer
Jennifer L Robertson
�"4& �
December 15,
2014
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

t -
+� jti1
;':4
r-=� 'Z, 4
N61.441
,�
4 n �'t Zji tpr : w ..�t
i +a p rCSac t
,, • - .� s- - .�'�4" r .l" �. r�"'?a j w ,y w. rht• k'": � �,,rrku�.. °` X � �.." r� � � d ,ti''�i
.rte, � �' k �'i•t'� -"„ � � 1ti. � 1 �. rs i + � .�.a rx a r �' 'r a'�h, i k M ?
. � � ,r,ys %;, to r #c ij r�`✓ r..Y� �.�% !yt',�Y' c ;��,yyr � i. id
' S" '!• 4- fin,-- �.`+y�:. C5 ,� ,y 'x•+��hs� �'''4 '� i , v�'� y., ��A.q,.•,. L }u r `v' �
i r � t r"' �'y5 �i-"��1 � f t t•�5,�+ 1 I a, �-yn tJ•+; a `?��- 's�•�q1 r+� i�1�r �, ; j� r i t
..� ' - � -._'4� �'k r��l.�� �" �,7�au ��� �� `�Ta� •''"'i is �i�':'4�`' ?�� rY� ��.3��'f����.
_ - _. ,`ts... _. �-, _ u?.r ?r.. -�!'- d ..1 t. � h. Sit .�. I,i r_ T _ Lr,• 1+ - ..x.t.�t1. a
fix• try✓ � `� . ,r.:' 1� ? "�:, ay if �Wy + Y�:i.
r
fir, d 1« dia & t 4� sr
, � r
lie
vj
.mpact #2, 0.047 acre Impact #3, 0.006 acr
r
d rr
rM
re
t x
RZ-

Wetland Descriptions (proposed for impacts) and Mitigation Summary
Impact #2 (0 047 acre) This linear wetland feature has been ditched in the past There is a large spoil
pile that parallels this wetland There is not herbaceous plant life within this wetland due to the shading
from pines and other trees This wetland is considered poor quality due to the past disturbance and lack
of good quality habitat However, the applicant is proposing to mitigate for the loss of this wetland at a
2:1 ratio (0.094 acre)
Impact #3 (0.006 acre) This linear wetland feature has also been ditched in the past. This wetland is
surrounded by maintained fairways and rough areas This is an herbaceous wetland and considered
poor quality due to the past disturbance and continual maintenance surrounding the area. However,
the applicant is proposing to mitigate for the loss of this wetland at a 2 1 ratio (0 012 acre).
Impact #4 (0 33 acre) This wetland occurs along a golf fairway and adjacent to Reeds Creek. This
wetland is considered good quality. This wetland consists of herbaceous plants, shrubs, and trees The
applicant is proposing to mitigate for the loss of this wetland at a 2.1 ratio (0 66 acre).
Impact #7• (0.11 acre)- This wetland occurs at the green of a golf hole in a cove of an existing pond The
vegetation within this wetland is regularly cut to maintain a view of the green. The stream flowing
through this wetland will not be impacted This wetland consists of herbaceous vegetation and is
considered poor quality due to the regular maintenance. However, the applicant is proposing to
mitigation for the loss of this wetland at a 2:1 ratio (0.22 acre)
Mitigation Summary Proposed wetland impacts total 0 493 acre The applicant is proposing to mitigate
for all of the wetland impacts at a 2.1 ratio (0 986 acre, payment being made for 1 acre) even though
three of the four wetland areas are considered poor quality Proposed mitigation for these impacts will
be payment into a mitigation bank or payment into EEP for 1 acre