Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout110011_Inspection_20221101Division of Water Resources Division of Soil and Water Conservation Other Agency Facility Number:110011 ActiveFacility Status:Permit:AWC110011 Denied Access Inspection Type:Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date: Reason for Visit:Routine BuncombeCounty:Region:Asheville Date of Visit:11/01/2022 Entry Time:10:00 am Exit Time:12:00 pm Incident #: Lyndel FarmFarm Name:Owner Email:+1ccows@bellsouth.net Owner:Nancy Bonham Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Status: Location of Farm: 90 Bonham Rd Arden NC 287048709 90 Bonham Rd Compliant Not Compliant Integrator: Latitude:Longitude: Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application Records and Documents Take Hwy. 191 South to Avery Creek Road. Turn left onto Pennsylvania Road, then left onto Bonham Road. Go to the dead end. Question Areas: 828-684-6046 35° 27' 21''82° 35' 41'' Arden NC 28704 Judith L BonhamCertified Operator: Secondary OIC(s): 997082Operator Certification Number: On-Site Representative(s):Name Title Phone On-site representative Lynn Bonham 828-606-8645 Primary Inspector:Timothy R Fox Phone:828-296-4500 Inspector Signature:Date: Secondary Inspector(s): Inspection Summary: Tim Fox with ARO, DWR inspected the site. Lyn Bonham assisted during the inspection. Narrative: Wastewater from the dairy facility and rain falling on the feedlot flow by gravity to the waste storage pond through buried PVC pipes. Solid Waste (manure, beddng, and feed) are scraped daily from the feedlot and lounging area and stored in a dry staking facility. Calibration will be due in 2023. Soils completed in 2021 due again in 2024(every 3 years) waste analysis provided. spot checked field 12-4 Pictures in file. Need 6.0 CE Hours by 1/1/2025 Page 1 of 5 Inspection Date: Owner:Facility Number: Reason for Visit:Inspection Type: AWC110011 Nancy Bonham 110011 11/01/22 Compliance Inspection Routine Permit: Current promotionsDesign CapacityRegulated Operations Cattle Cattle - Milk Cow 200 178 Total Design Capacity: Total SSLW: 200 280,000 Waste Structures Observed Freeboard Designated Freeboard Closed Date Built DateIdentifierType Effective Date Waste Pond 01 05/30/1989 27.60 03/24/2005 Page 2 of 5 Inspection Date: Owner:Facility Number: Reason for Visit:Inspection Type: AWC110011 Nancy Bonham 110011 11/01/22 Compliance Inspection Routine Permit: Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: Structure Application Field Other a. Was conveyance man-made? b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application Yes No NA NE 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? Hydraulic Overload? Frozen Ground? Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? PAN? Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? Total Phosphorus? Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? Outside of acceptable crop window? Evidence of wind drift? Application outside of application area? Crop Type 1 Corn (Silage) Page 3 of 5 Inspection Date: Owner:Facility Number: Reason for Visit:Inspection Type: AWC110011 Nancy Bonham 110011 11/01/22 Compliance Inspection Routine Permit: Waste Application Yes No NA NE Crop Type 2 Fescue (Hay, Pasture) Crop Type 3 Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Oats) Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Braddock Soil Type 2 Dillard Soil Type 3 Evard Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Records and Documents Yes No NA NE 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? Checklists? Design? Maps? Lease Agreements? Other? If Other, please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? Weekly Freeboard? Waste Analysis? Soil analysis? Waste Transfers? Weather code? Rainfall? Stocking? Page 4 of 5 Inspection Date: Owner:Facility Number: Reason for Visit:Inspection Type: AWC110011 Nancy Bonham 110011 11/01/22 Compliance Inspection Routine Permit: Records and Documents Yes No NA NE Crop yields? 120 Minute inspections? Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate box(es) below: Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? Page 5 of 5