HomeMy WebLinkAbout20141297 Ver 1_Application_20141217�
,�u� _��
�,,,,�.
STATE OF NORTH CA20LINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PAT McCRORY
GOVERNOR
December 17, 2014
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Mr. Dave Bailey
3331 Heritage Trade Dr., Ste. 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Attention: Mr. Dave Bailey and Mr. Dave Wanucha
ANOTHONYJ.TATA
SECRETARY
NC Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Attn: Mr. Dave Wanucha
585 Waughtown St.
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Subject: Notification for the replacement of Bridge #30 over Reddicics Creek on SR 1129
(Groometown Road) in Guilford County. WBS # 17BP.7.R11
Dear Mr. Bailey and Mr. Wanucha,
The North Carolina Departrnent of Transportation is scheduled to replace Bridge #30 with a new bridge
at the same location. I have included the Attachments G& L with a project description and a set of the
project plans. A stormwater management plan is also attached. Please review this project for compliance
by your Division.
We plan to begin construction as soon as possible. If further information is required, please contact Jerry
Parker at (336) 256-2063. Your early review and consideration will be appreciated.
Sincerely,
t � �� ��
J.M. Mills, P.E.
Division Engineer, Division 7
Enclosures
ca Tim Powers, NCDOT
Barry Harrington, Roadside Environmental Field Operations Engineer, NCDOT
Jeremy Warren, NCDOT
Bobby Norris, District 2 Engineer, NCDOT
File Copy
P. 0. Box 14996, Gx�NSSOao, NC 27415-4996
Pr[o�ve (336) 334-3192 Fnx (336) 334-3637
�'��'►'��
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Wafer Resources
Pa( McCrory Tom Reeder John Skvarla, III
Governor Director Secretary
Attachment L: Low Impact Bridge Replacement Process
Low Impact Bridge Project No.: B-N/A County Guilford
Bridge No.30 over Reddick's Creek WBS Element Number 17BP.7.R.11
This project is subject to the Low Impact Bridge Process as agreed to on October 6,
2009. This project meets the documentation requirements and approval procedures
under NEPA, as defined by FHWA, for Low Impact Bridge Replacements. This project
meets the standards of NCDOT's Minimum Criteria Rules.
Date: December 17. 2014
Applicant Name: NCDOT
Applicant Address: 1584 Yancevville Street
Greensboro, NC 27415
Primary Contact for Project: Jerrv A. Parker
Phone No.: 336-256-2063
Is this an after-the-fact application: Yes X No
River Basin: Cape Fear/Randleman Lake Watershed
Stream Classification: 17-8-(0.5): WS-IV:03-06-08
Regulatory Authorization Options for this Activity
Federal: USACE Nationwide General Permit 3— Maintenance
State: General Water Quality Certification #3687 and/or Buffer Authorization
Local: None
Project Description — The project consists of replacing Bridge #30 over Reddick's Creek on
SR 1129 (Groometown Road) and improving roadway approaches. The existing 34' L X 22' W
reinforced concrete deck bridge on I-Beams is structurally deficient and will be replaced with a
new 90' L X 33' W, single span box beam bridge at the same location. The existing bridge has a
sufficiency rating of 39.8. An off-site detour will be utilized during construction. There are no
wetlands within the project area. There are, however, two features — Reddick's Creek (SA) and
a UT to Reddick's Creek (SB) — within the project. There are 91 linear feet of permanent stream
impacts proposed to Reddick's Creek that are restricted to the banks under the bridge for
stabilization purposes (i.e. rip rap will not be within the thalweg of the channel). The project
drainage system also consists of a grated inlet and pipe outfall that drain to an existing roadside
ditch from a dissipator pad that outlets at non erosive velocities prior to the riparian buffer.
Transporla�on Permilfing Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NoM Carolina 27699-1650
Locatiore 512 N Salis6ury SL, Raleigh, Nodh Carolina
Phone:919-707-87B41FAX:919-733-1290
Inlemet: hllp:llportal.ncdenr.orglweb/wq
An Equal Oppodunily 1 AffrtnaGVe Acuon Employer
NonrthCarolina
�aturallr�
Proposed Riparian Buffer impacts include 1,976 square feet in Zone 1 and 1,320 square feet in
Zone 2 to accommodate the wider span bridge and the necessary fill slopes. It should be noted
that there is a buffered, intermittent stream channel that parallels the existing roadway. The
project proposes no impacts to this adjacent channel or its associated riparian area. The
current design maintains the existing transportation facility (ETF) and does not propose to move
the fill slope and/or ditchline further into the riparian area associated with feature SB. A review
was conducted for the presence of Bald Eagle and small whorled pogonia, the only federally
listed protected species for Guilford County. A review of NCNHP mapping showed no known
occurrences of either species.
Signature:
�/Y�v� �Q!�
Print Name: J� � ' ' " � � �''S
Title: �l V � �I �� �/V����'�
LowlMlnlmal Impact Brldge Pro�ect Data Sheet
. . �.... TIP NO � WA. �
. . ��,. WBS �� � 17BP,7.R.71 . . .
` Coun Guillord
� �� � �-� � � Brld�eNumber. s��unureNO.a000ao � ���� � ��� �� �� -�� `�
� DBSCHpt1o0 .BndgeM30overRetltllcksCreekon5R '� �
11291Graamalown Rd,
Ba9in � - CepeFeer�� � �� � � ��
���. Classlticatlon � ws-N� � � � � � �
� SIN. .. . . . . .. ... .. 17-e-(o.$) . _ . .. . ..
Stream : TyPe SA-Perenniel
SB - Inlermmenl
SizO SA' WeMetlWiEfh=70' SB: WettetlWldih=2' �
BankfullWltllh=20 BenkfulWldlh=8'
TyPB ReinkrcedConcrete0eckonl-Beams� � ����
Existing Structure S�� ����-� 3a' z 2z'
����. SuH. Ratin � � �� � as:6 � �
Proposed5tructure T �a � BoxBeam �� � � ���� �
�SIZ6(wiaih-outmouq� 90'x33'
� � USACE Impacls (LF) � SA-Ves � � � � �
Stream SB - Yes .
-�. Non 4041m aGts LF � �� No. �
� �. USACEIm � acts AC � No � �
Wellands -NOn4041m acts AC �� No � �
.. CAMA Im- ects AC .... ... .. No .. . . ..... .. ... ..
� NC DWQ Buffers Im acu� SF � No
�� Buffer A - Iication Re � ulred � >40:tt . YlN . � � � �� No ���
� NC�DWQ�StormWaler PermlC . Parmit Re ui�etl YIN ' � � �� � � � � ��
� Habilat /n �� Small whodad pogonle � Yes �
(Y ) BalAEegle-No
T&E .g BCIeSPfeSenl Smellwhodetlpogonie-No �
P Bela Eegle � No
'.9i000pCIUSfOn SmellWhotleEpogonia-UnreaoNed ���� � � ��
� MoretO�ium �� T e Na . .
` Dates
� ' NativelNatche No
Trout Watere Trout S ecles Present-- No � �
� � � Trout Contlitlons YM � rvo �
WRC Reviewer � � No � � � � � � � �
. ._.. .. CAMAAECS ._. Nc ... . . .... . .. _. .
Essenllal Flsh Habltal � In No
Nav.OPening. . _. . . Yes . .. .. .._...
USCG Permlt No
HlstorlcPro ertles No � � �� �� ��
� � Archaeolo Ical Resources No
� � ��Srlbal. Lands No� � � �� �� � ��� �
.. . . ..4 � Resourcea . .. . . No. _. .. .. . .. ... .. . .
6 � LWCF Resources � Na � �
� � Wlltl antl Scenlc River � � No � � � �- � �� �� �� � � �
Foreat Service Lands No �
NA Area . ... _ .... No . . . .. . .
.. .. . . � FEMA Bu oW � No _ .
� � � � FEMA FIOOtl SIUtl � � �� � � � Yes � �
. . ... _ USTS Hez Mats. . . .. No ... . . . .. . . ... .
RBlocetBB9 No
�� LOCat1D11 � � �AT � � �� 3595379762 � � � � � �
LONG � � -79.88573889
- TwoslreamleatureaweretlellneeledwitMnlhepmjeclslUtlyarea; SlreamSAisiheprimarychennel�undemeatM1"
Britlge Nu 30, Streem SB Is an inlermiltenl, secondery channel Ihal wnlluences vnlh SA in the no�lhwesl
quedrenl ol the pmJect study area� Habdat ie presant (or lhe amell whoded poBania in the faresled po�tion of Ihe
I. proJecl sWtly aree elong Iha waat side ol Groometown ftd. outslde of Ihe NCDOT tlghEOFway. However, lleltlwork
PfoJBCt CollllllBnts wae completetl (OB/26/i'IJ oulside ol ihe recommentletl USFWS aurveywindow for Ihls speGea (mid May-eeAy
July). No suilahle feetling/weler source is located withln 1:0 mile of Ihe sludy erea InclutllnB 660 fool retlius Irom
�� lhe etlge o/ iha eWdy eree to suppotl baltl eagle habltat. Since Ihere wae na foraging habltal wllhln the raview
� aree, e survey of lhe proJecf eluGy erea end ihe area wlihln 6601ee1 of Ihe projecl limits was nol conducled.
.___—. . _„'- �...� �..�.......u.w�_....._......._, _ �...._. __,.__..__ _J.. .:....._.., . __..__....
_ . :COmpletedby: /w��.. ~ �.-i . .
___ �—
Leetl n01n r �'.� �
..._ _ ..._.._... _............_ .,...... : ... .«_. � .................�
...., _ .... � .v.>,_.._ _ ., �. . ..W.... _,,.. ,. .
� �� �nm Idf r '
15/012074 >>
�
N
�
�
�
�
� N
�m
d N
A U
�- Z
�o
o r
rn U
O
�
d
C
0
w`
r y
> N
o �
y rn d
y V U
�
a o Y
m a
� d N
�
.. c
o V
Z_
. �
2 fq
"m
L
C = N
E ., z°
�
3
C
.?
U
�
A
E
•c
6
►
C
O
.q
U
.y
N
U
`m
3
�
�
N
C
O
.�
�N
m
U
m
d
H
C
O
a
.�
N
O
0
w
N
0
V
m
>
.�
z
w
.o
a
." F" � a v
� � a
v�i m -°�' � o
O� O'.—d'^tl
ro '� °i � a.
C�°�m"
� � «° �'a A
rn U��.�
�}�b'�d
apd
d a:�'S'a
au � t° �p
���'�d
�bA.;�
���a �
N
�
b � � w Y
� .� m
�.
�����
"P v v
°° ."a .� « �a
«
o.p +�7�j-� w
O? ` t> O
�v�.�+v.�
a�
� 'a
v p P G .d �
'OH�a^°'>
� v .G .�. m
�b3y�
� v y o
�.' �� �° ;; `" m
°' .�� a
a�.�� � °a
a� oyd3
eo �'' ° �o '?
9�>�abi�
m
�yq'd �C � 5A O
" v �a
w 4 � y, �
a�i "' � o
❑ F" m o
W �O .? m .n
w Q G � ,q
y�c°d°:�O
w � � d ti
.. V � Y�OF
��"ay��
�°c � � °' a°JO � U
�
c�a�GG,��"�cQ
w �,y�, ��]1
� 0 A O N � "�
~ '� a Pa'o^ o F
v o" v Pa p,'�
o Ri pp F,G W G�L.�y
F L�
a�.r� ��
bd °'�� o0
a d
F O � � A q �
� Ab� °� m
cw v
8a,����
� � �� o ..
d pp A N P�
b � 0.b
ma.�'a°�
0
� � � � O o
a
� ,n ym�
U CO.� u" O f-i
u � a � p C
mm��aa
.a����Ca
�,��"wvC�
o���
� � +� Oa �Np a
� ?l �E O
N � � o d �
3'�b ��
�a�apa
a � o � Y a
,� " p � o d
vg wg�q
�c�°nda��
� � « b q
� S o � � H
�„�b a� �o
� 4 `� � v � N
� � N'p W��
� ro .�'x a�
a3' a-°,;�a
0
� '� y ,��, o .,q°' �
y>.l-, C
> � o � � � °
� 0 3 °pa �
m �„ o
y d V� Q O y
w 'o^ " n' q _�,''
aaa��oa
m m U'o
� p 'a C w
Uyy m a n
mF T.� �.� q
N N
��� � a�
W
=''Ui°.��.�°
o q a
� � F �i � 3� �
v�2 "„p
° 'd d °' � �
�� � vp'�
�
� �'�.SA ��
t� � .9
d��M�'��
� O
o.0 3 �a�w a�'i
m ��+`� v wF
� `2 � F� 'S v 'a
�.�,��s��
w.,°y •�
� �S y' �2 a'q �i
� L1�
z c�
wQ
z�
a�
��
� �
LLJ
�z
��
w
~ U W
O Q
z �
w�a
� ��
N
�
�
�
r m
H z
U w
a �
�
�
�Q
� N
� a °
w w o
a a
�
a
w
�
� zr
N wc�
za
Qa
s�
s
W3
dN
�ti 1�
O
ry0
�
2y
�� , J
O
�
r G` `���
GJ � J
R��O\ ` /
W
Q �_
3�
W m
W Q �""
Z � N
g � Y
a N Z �
d Z j g1-
W
�
d
I ,
W
0 ,
�I
��
i�
I I
i
il
i
II
I
II
I
II
I
_�I
JLL
�
@
rl
�
�
�
� �
� H °� o W �
�„ a o
��ao�Na
�x°�e�a�z
� °acFiW ��F �
� zwy� �o� cc
� � a�+ oa � o
H �7 P'. P� � 9
� �ry G' W � 'o
A �
W
�
�
,- � e -
�
�
��
�,��
� �
W
� �
��
�
LJ
W
� 0
a o
\ N
�
1
� W
m Q
� U
�
� U
�
I�
a
�
o c�
N
� E m
� ����
zm�
OI N
N
C C U �-
F N N O. � �
Q��j EI-
a
� o� d y a�i
� C C U C �
W Ul N O. E�v O� W
��X t E
� W U a
W
U
Q O_ U V
u E 3 m �
K� Fm E,..
Q
�
� c !/�
� C U N N
F E� E� o 0
U � -
Q a
� � N
c °
F- � m c � m
� U � v
�
W
a
° �m
_ `m--
Q c a�i � m
J U — � v
W U � V c
� a o 9
� �^ m o
� � c �
Z 3 v
a W
H
W N
� 9
a � c �
E—'� �
F LL j v
>
C y
C
V
C _ C
10 _ N �
E LL 3 ....
d
a
m
r-, rn
a
� T � m
�� ~ lh E
� M m
� N X m
(� o x
m m
M �
0 0
o � 10
Ot «4 'n
'� o °m �
� v � y
� �
J R1
N
J
«� O F
(/J Z Q
H
, , -
., '
. -
,
. -
� I'Il�
�
II
I'1'
'I'I
III
"I
. �11'll"1 '111�
�11111111111''1'11"1�
: ��1�1111'1111'1111111�
� ' ��1�1'''11"'111''1''�
��'�"'1'1'1'1'1111'1�
. �1'1'I'lll"'1'lll""
, �1'�"111"'111'11'11
.. ' ' �I'1'1'lllllllll"11
.
.
-. : :
.
-
NO SURVEY REQUIR�D FORM
PROJECT INrORMATION
P�roject No.
WBS No:
F.A. No:
STR. #400030
42608.1.ST7
n/a
Federal (USACE) Pernzit Required?
Projec! T'rncking No. (Lrlerno( UseJ
10-03-0007 I
�--- -------�
County.• Guilford
Document. Minimum Criteria Sheet
Funding: ❑ State � Federal
❑ Yes ❑ No Permit Type:
Project Description:Replacement of Bridge No. 30 on SRI129 in Gz�idford County, North Carolina. The
NCDOT proposes to replace the siructurally deficient structure along with some minor ditch-line impacts
within a 400ft. (+ the bridge length) long and 80ft. wide archaeological APE area centered upon Bridge
No. 30 and [he SR1129 cenler-line. On-srte detoairs will NOT be utilized for the project.
5UMMARY OF CULTIIRAL RESOURC�S I2�VIEW
Brief description of review nctivities, results of revrew, and concdusians:
A map review and site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on Tuesday,
April 30, 2010. This work disclosed the location of NO previously recorded archaeological sites situated
within the project's APE or adjacent to the APE, but did illustrate a number of recorded archaeological
sites that had been recorded within the general vicinity of the project study area. A review of Guilford
County National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) listed archaeological properties illustrated that no
sucli resources were situated within or proximal to the APE. Furthermore, topographic maps, historic
maps (NC maps website), USDA soit survey maps, aerial photographs, and the Google street view map
application were utilized/inspected to gauge environmental factors that may haue contributed to historic
or prehistoric sertlement within the project limits, and to assess the level of modem, slope, agricultural,
hydrological, and other erosive-type disturbances witUin and surrounding the archaeological APE.
BriefF,xplanation ofwhy the available informatian provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there nre na t�nidentified historic properties in tl�e APE:
Archaeological site potential within the proposed APE impact area is relatively non-existent. Due to the
diminutive nature of this bridge replacement, the sloping and disturbed ground surfaces contained witliin
and adjacent to the existing r-o-w, and relatively minute construction footprint using no on-site
construction detours, tlie project, as proposed, is unlikely to affect any significairt NRIIP eligible cultural
resources. No further archaeological wark is recommended.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: � Map(s) � Previous Survey Info � Photos
❑ Photocopy of County Swvey Notes
FINDING BY NCDOT CULTURAI. RESOURC�S PROF�SSIONAL
NO SURVEY REOUIRED
❑Con�espondence
••Nn SnrreV Reguirrod"/nrro fru' Minor7innspnrioHon Prn(ecu a.r Onolified In !he Jpp7Yrngrarmm�lrc Agr'eenrenl.
NCD07'.4rchnenlnyy �F Hisror'ic Archilecnire Grm�ps
"No 9�rveY Reqinred"jarm forMinor TnnrsP�rlalion !'rnjecls a�' Qunl fed in �he 2007 P�rogrmm�inlic AgremnenL
NCD07'ArxLnenln��Ye Hi.rinrie Arcltlmcnire Grmrrys
�/• 1 " � `\ • a Ja - � \ \- �
� e � ► � r �y��,' i �� � y ` � ��
� � ` e� ► '-r r�
�—
� � �.i
� ` ; �� .. .. h �
� ♦�1 ��
� _ _� � - _
t ��
i t �
.
� �
_ r
1 �
ti ;� �� �9� �
I 85
�
, � ��._ �
�` � � ♦ ' � 1
� `
�i � B � � Z
_ �=. 8 7 m I�
� � -, - � 1 � � 70 ,
1 1 � /
` � _ � I
1 � ✓
� � ` _
1" � _
� ` 7 � � �j' p '��
1 � � � .. _ h
'�� � 1 � .. �� + �' �, � �. `
ti I
Y� �� � 7 I i � �� �
r � � � � ���
� � , ' ' � � 1
J � � � � � \
/ — I � f.♦
f ` ' \
/ `
� \
�
1 �
' ` I1, ,
1 � .. _ I 6
� _ q ` _ —'' �
� .,�— i �
i A � \^�
�.�_, ;_ . �, ) _
85 � _ — — —
U
H
�a
�, �
I �I �
�1
'' .
�_�_, �
��
�
� �
�4s �r
�
�
�
���
��
�� �
I
; . `�
GUILFORD 30
1^
,
�•-
,r' r
i'
� :r
�f
� a "
<
�;.�'. � Groomal�wn Rd - _
r� � ;t
.� _���� '
7r
�
Gr,00m�EO Rtl? -
� i� � �
,.., „
, , •• ,_
e.
_ . _ . _ _ __ _ . _ � � ;.' . � ' . . �� ,. �__
1 ,
h
. . � rinomefown Rd
i� �
�w
k7�
���1.
�
� �roome�o;twn Rel -
, .� _
NO SURVEY REQUIRED F'ORM
PROJECT INTORMaTION
Prqject No: Str. # 400030
WBS No: 42608.1. ST7
F.A. No:
Federal (USACE) Permit Reyuired?
Counry.•
Document:
Projecf 7rucking No. (lnlernnlU.se)
� I
� ]0-03-0007
L..-- __------_
Guilford
PCE
Fundiiig: ❑ 5tate
❑ Yes ❑ No Pernlit Tj�pe:
� Federal
Prnject Description:
Replace Bridge No. 400030 on SR 1129 in kind with off-site detours. There will be minor ditch-line
impacts. Area of potential effects (AP�) is 40' either way from the centerliue of the Uridge and 200' from
eitUer end of the bridge.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL R�SOURCES REVIEW
/3rief'description of review activi.!ies, resulls of review, nnd conclussons:
Review of HPO quad maps, historiaaesignations roster, avd indexes was undertaken on 7 April 2010.
Based on this review, there are no existiug NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS properties in the Area of Potential
EfFects. The CRS also reviewed Google Maps Streetview and aerial photographs and there are no
properties over fifty years of age locnted witl�in the specified 400-foot APE.
Bridge No. 400030 is a 1952 steel stringer b:idge that is not eligible for National Register listing
according to the NCDOT Historic Bridge suivey.
BrieJ'Explanalion ofwhy the m�nilafile infnrmation provide,s a relinhle basis,far reasonably predicting
lhni Ghere cn-e »o unrdentifed historic properties in theAPE.•
Aerial photographs and background research indicated that there are no properties over fifly years of age
in the specified 400' APE corridor.
FINDING BY NCDOT CULTURAL R�SOURCES PROF�SSIONAL
NO SURVEY REOUIRED — Histaric Architecture
Cultural
8!�°a-1 G 7a � a
••No Surrev Rer/uireA'.Inrn� ('or Minm''I'r'mis�mrmtlm� R'rJectr n.c QunlilirAin ILe 1407 R'ngrnnrumlic Agreemenl.
NCDOT Arc4nenlu� R 1lisloric ArcLirecOn'e Grm�ps
llate
g������� U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
�
� . � Trust Resources List
�
Endangered Species Act Species List (USFWS Endangered Species Program).
There are a total of t threatened or endangered species on your species ]ist. Species on this list should be considered in an effects
analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fishes may appear on
the species list because a project could cause downstream effects on the species. Critical habitats listed under the Has Critical
Habitat column may or may not lie within your project area. See the CriNcal habimts within your project area section below for critical
habitat that lies within your project area. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions.
Species that should be considered in an effects analysis for your project:
Flowering Plants Status Has Critical Habitat Contact
Small Whorled pogonia Threatened snecies Raleigh Ecological
(Isotria medeoloides) info Services Field Office
Critical habitats within your project area:
There are no critical habitats within your project area.
FWS National �ldlife Refuges (USFWS National �ldlife Refuges Program).
There are no refuges found within the vicinity of your project.
FWS Migratory Birds (USFWS Migratory Bird Programl.
The protection of birds is regulated by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (BGEPA). Any activity, intentional or unintentional, resulting in take of migratory birds,
including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec.
10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be
unintentionally killed ar injured by otherwise lawful activities. For more information regarding these Acts see:
h�m •//www fw�ov/migratorvbirds/RegulationsandPolicies html.
All project proponents are responsible for complying with the appropriate regulations protecting birds when
planning and developing a project. To meet these conservarion obligations, proponents should identify potential
or existing project-related impacts to migratory birds and their habitat and develop and implement conservation
measures that avoid, minimize, or compensate for these impacts. The Service's Birds of Conservation Concern
09/30/2014 Information, Planning, and Conservation System (IPAC) Page 7 of 6
Version 1.4
San S ouci Ferry Ramp35.91 321°-76.8 177 51°
0 1 20.5 Miles
³
Shoreline Stabilization on SR 1500San Souci RoadBertie County Quad Name W oodard
xx
ARTMEN
N
A
S
O
H
DEP
T
O
F
T
R
A
S
P
OR
T
T
IO N
T
ATE
O
F
N
R
T
C
AROLINA
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
L
E
N
G
T
H
L
E
T
T
I
N
G
D
A
T
E
:
S
T
A
T
E
S
T
A
T
E
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
R
E
F
E
R
E
N
C
E
N
O
.
S
T
A
T
E
P
R
O
J
.
N
O
.
F.
A
.
P
R
O
J
.
N
O
.
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
N
O
.
T
O
T
A
L
S
H
E
E
T
S
N
.
C
.
SH
E
E
T
1
P
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
O
f
f
i
c
e
o
f
:
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
O
F
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
S
2
0
1
2
S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
:
T
Y
P
E
O
F
W
O
R
K
:
DI
V
I
SI
ON
OF
H
I
GH
WA
Y
S
ST
A
T
E
OF
N
OR
T
H
C
A
R
OL
I
N
A
1
1
3
A
i
r
p
o
r
t
D
r
.
,
E
d
e
n
t
o
n
,
N
C
2
7
9
3
2
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
O
N
E
D
D
C
U
N
I
T
D
R
A
W
N
B
Y
:
D
.
H
.
S
T
A
L
L
I
N
G
S
B
E
R
T
I
E
C
O
U
N
T
Y
S
H
O
R
E
L
I
N
E
S
T
A
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
1
.
2
0
0
8
1
1
2
1.2008112WBS ELEM ENT:LENGT
H
O
F
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
=
0
.
2
M
I
LE
S
5
F
E
R
R
Y
R
A
M
P
T
O
0
.
2
M
I
L
E
S
N
O
R
T
H
S
R
15
0
0
S
A
N
S
O
U
C
I
R
D
F
R
O
M
PROJECTVICINITY MAP
R
a
n
d
o
l
p
h
B
R
u
s
s
e
l
l
1
1
1
P
o
n
d
R
d
W
i
n
d
s
o
r
N
C
2
7
9
8
3
7
5
0
/
4
0
30 L.F.100 L.F.
5
5
L
.
F
.
3
0
L
.
F
.
2
5
L
.
F
.
W
i
n
d
s
o
r
N
C
2
7
9
8
3
A
M
L
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
4
2
1
W
h
i
t
e
O
a
k
R
d
2
2
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
I
M
P
A
C
T
:
4
3
0
F
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
T
O
T
A
L
S
O
P
E
N
W
A
T
E
R
I
M
P
A
C
T
:
7
3
2
F
T
S
H
O
R
E
L
I
N
E
S
T
A
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
:
2
4
0
L
.
F
.
8
9
9
/
5
6
1
C
a
s
h
i
e
R
i
v
e
r
SCALE 1"=50’
LEGENDEXISTINGPROPOSED
STATE
O
F
N
O
RTH
CAROLINA
DEPARTMEN
T
O
F
T
R
A
N
SPOR
T
A
T
ION
D
R
A
W
N
B
Y
:
D
A
T
E
:
C
O
U
N
T
Y
:
S
C
A
L
E
:
Q
U
A
D
:
B
A
S
I
N
:
W
B
S
#
:
S
H
E
E
T
#
:
D
.
H
.
S
T
A
L
L
I
N
G
S
E
D
E
N
T
O
N
,
N
C
2
7
9
3
2
(
2
5
2
)
4
8
2
-
1
8
5
0
1
1
3
A
I
R
P
O
R
T
D
R
.
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
1
NO
R
T
H
C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
D
E
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
O
F
T
R
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
P
L
A
N
V
I
E
W
D
E
T
A
I
L
E
D
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
L
A
T
.
=
3
5
.
9
1
3
2
1
0
N
L
O
N
G
.
=
7
6
.
8
1
7
7
5
1
W
B
E
R
T
I
E
W
O
O
D
A
R
D
R
O
A
N
O
K
E
SH
O
R
E
L
I
N
E
S
T
A
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
O
N
S
R
1
5
0
0
S
A
N
S
O
U
C
I
R
D
xx
1
.
2
0
0
8
1
1
2
Cashie River
S
R
1
5
0
0
W
L
B
W
L
B
1
"
=
1
0
’
T
U
R
N
A
R
O
U
N
D
STABILIZATION PROPOSED SHORELINE
2
O
P
E
N
W
A
T
E
R
I
M
P
A
C
T
:
19
8
F
T
2
GATERAMP FERRYNWL
G
R
A
V
E
L
EXISTING RIP RAP
8
’
1
0
’
1
6’
G
R
A
V
E
L
R
D
S
A
N
S
O
U
C
I
R
D
12’
R
a
n
d
o
l
p
h
B
R
u
s
s
e
l
l
111
P
o
n
d
R
d
W
i
n
d
s
o
r
N
C
2
7
9
8
3
7
5
0
/
4
0
100’ +-
30’ +-
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
I
M
P
A
C
T
:
4
3
0
F
T
E
D
G
E
O
F
G
R
A
V
E
L
(CLASS B RIP RAP)
2
O
F
5
J
U
L
Y
2
5
,
2
0
1
4
M
A
P
1
T
O
T
A
L
S
P
L
A
N
V
I
E
W
D
E
T
A
I
L
E
D
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
STATE
O
F
N
O
RTH
CAROLINA
DEPARTMEN
T
O
F
T
R
A
N
SPOR
T
A
T
ION
D
R
A
W
N
B
Y
:
D
A
T
E
:
C
O
U
N
T
Y
:
S
C
A
L
E
:
Q
U
A
D
:
B
A
S
I
N
:
W
B
S
#
:
S
H
E
E
T
#
:
D
.
H
.
S
T
A
L
L
I
N
G
S
E
D
E
N
T
O
N
,
N
C
2
7
9
3
2
(
2
5
2
)
4
8
2
-
1
8
5
0
1
1
3
A
I
R
P
O
R
T
D
R
.
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
1
NO
R
T
H
C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
D
E
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
O
F
T
R
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
L
A
T
.
=
3
5
.
9
1
3
2
1
0
N
L
O
N
G
.
=
7
6
.
8
1
7
7
5
1
W
B
E
R
T
I
E
W
O
O
D
A
R
D
R
O
A
N
O
K
E
SH
O
R
E
L
I
N
E
S
T
A
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
O
N
S
R
1
5
0
0
S
A
N
S
O
U
C
I
R
D
1
.
2
0
0
8
1
1
2
LEGENDEXISTINGPROPOSED Cashie R
i
v
e
r
S
T
A
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
S
H
O
R
E
L
I
N
E
SR 1500SAN SOUCI RD
N
O
T
E
:
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
S
H
O
R
E
L
I
N
E
S
T
A
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
T
O
M
A
P
S
2
-
4
1
"
=
5
’
WLB NWL
12
’
-
14
’
G
r
a
v
e
l R
d
6
’
2
5
’
-
5
5
’
+-
Rand
o
lp
h
B
R
u
s
s
e
ll
111
P
o
n
d
R
d
Wind
s
o
r
N
C
2
7
9
8
3
7
5
0
/
4
0
2
O
P
E
N
W
A
T
E
R
I
M
P
A
C
T
:
5
3
4
F
T
(
3
L
O
C
A
T
IO
N
S
)
B
E
P
L
A
C
E
D
O
N
T
O
P
O
F
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
R
I
P
R
A
P
EDGE OF GRAVEL
(
C
L
A
S
S
B
R
I
P
R
A
P
)
J
U
L
Y
2
5
,
2
0
1
4
3
O
F
5
M
A
P
S
2
-
4
T
O
T
A
L
S
L
E
G
E
N
D
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
STATE
O
F
N
O
RTH
CAROLINA
DEPARTMEN
T
O
F
T
R
A
N
SPOR
T
A
T
ION
D
R
A
W
N
B
Y
:
D
A
T
E
:
C
O
U
N
T
Y
:
S
C
A
L
E
:
Q
U
A
D
:
B
A
S
I
N
:
W
B
S
#
:
S
H
E
E
T
#
:
D
.
H
.
S
T
A
L
L
I
N
G
S
E
D
E
N
T
O
N
,
N
C
2
7
9
3
2
(
2
5
2
)
4
8
2
-
1
8
5
0
1
1
3
A
I
R
P
O
R
T
D
R
.
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
1
NO
R
T
H
C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
D
E
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
O
F
T
R
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
J
U
L
Y
2
5
,
2
0
1
4
L
A
T
.
=
3
5
.
9
1
3
2
1
0
N
L
O
N
G
.
=
7
6
.
8
1
7
7
5
1
W
B
E
R
T
I
E
W
O
O
D
A
R
D
R
O
A
N
O
K
E
SH
O
R
E
L
I
N
E
S
T
A
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
O
N
S
R
1
5
0
0
S
A
N
S
O
U
C
I
R
D
1
.
2
0
0
8
1
1
2
1
"
=
5
’
-
C
R
O
S
S
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
DETAIL SECTION
N
W
L
CL
S
T
A
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
S
H
O
R
E
L
I
N
E
(
C
L
A
S
S
B
R
I
P
R
A
P
)
F
I
L
T
E
R
F
A
B
R
I
C
-8’+2’+-GRAVEL EDGE OF
M
U
D
L
I
N
E
NOTE:
O
F
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
1
0
.
0
0
’
LC
DETA
I
L
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
-
E
N
D
V
I
E
W
2
PROPOSED CLASS B
A
N
D
C
L
A
S
S
I
I
R
I
P
R
A
P
T
O
B
E
P
L
A
C
E
D
O
N
T
O
P
O
F
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
R
I
P
R
A
P
WATER LEVEL: 9.75’11.00’PROPOSED RIP RAP TOP OF
C
a
s
h
i
e
R
i
v
e
r
C
a
s
h
i
e
R
i
v
e
r
-
MAP
1
3
0
’
-
10
0
’
+
(
V
A
R
I
A
B
L
E
)
-5’+30’+--100’+
4
O
F
5
M
A
P
1
(
2
L
O
C
A
T
IO
N
S
)
2
O
P
E
N
W
A
T
E
R
I
M
P
A
C
T
:
19
8
F
T
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
I
M
P
A
C
T
:
4
3
0
F
T
M
A
P
1
T
O
T
A
L
S
MAPS
2
-
4
L
E
G
E
N
D
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
STATE
O
F
N
O
RTH
CAROLINA
DEPARTMEN
T
O
F
T
R
A
N
SPOR
T
A
T
ION
D
R
A
W
N
B
Y
:
D
A
T
E
:
C
O
U
N
T
Y
:
S
C
A
L
E
:
Q
U
A
D
:
B
A
S
I
N
:
W
B
S
#
:
S
H
E
E
T
#
:
D
.
H
.
S
T
A
L
L
I
N
G
S
E
D
E
N
T
O
N
,
N
C
2
7
9
3
2
(
2
5
2
)
4
8
2
-
1
8
5
0
1
1
3
A
I
R
P
O
R
T
D
R
.
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
1
NO
R
T
H
C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
D
E
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
O
F
T
R
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
J
U
L
Y
2
5
,
2
0
1
4
L
A
T
.
=
3
5
.
9
1
3
2
1
0
N
L
O
N
G
.
=
7
6
.
8
1
7
7
5
1
W
B
E
R
T
I
E
W
O
O
D
A
R
D
R
O
A
N
O
K
E
S
H
O
R
E
L
I
N
E
S
T
A
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
O
N
S
R
1
5
0
0
S
A
N
S
O
U
C
I
R
D
1
.
2
0
0
8
1
1
2
1
"
=
5
’
-
C
R
O
S
S
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
DETAIL SECTION
N
W
L
CL
S
T
A
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
S
H
O
R
E
L
I
N
E
(
C
L
A
S
S
B
R
I
P
R
A
P
)
EXISTING RIP RAP
F
I
L
T
E
R
F
A
B
R
I
C
-6’+3’+-GRAVEL EDGE OF
M
U
D
L
I
N
E
NOTE:
O
F
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
1
0
.
0
0
’
LC
DETA
I
L
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
-
E
N
D
V
I
E
W
2
O
P
E
N
W
A
T
E
R
I
M
P
A
C
T
:
5
3
4
F
T
PROPOSED CLASS B
A
N
D
C
L
A
S
S
I
I
R
I
P
R
A
P
T
O
B
E
P
L
A
C
E
D
O
N
T
O
P
O
F
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
R
I
P
R
A
P
WATER LEVEL: 9.75’11.00’PROPOSED RIP RAP TOP OF
C
a
s
h
i
e
R
i
v
e
r
C
a
s
h
i
e
R
i
v
e
r
2
5
’
-
5
5
’
+-
(
3
L
O
C
A
T
IO
N
S
)
5
O
F
5
M
A
P
S
2
-
4
M
A
P
S
2
-
4
T
O
T
A
L