The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNC0048429_Wasteload Allocation_19860409NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION Facility Name: fr/Y/C7e., Q/--./1-97Ceet- Existing Proposed Permit Nb.://eere7 Pipe No.. Engineer ' Date Rec. 4 - 44,4( _ 2/.1 G/nG a? 9Sa- dot County: Design Capacity (MGD) : ®, t76, 6 .Industrial (% of Flow) : /% Domestic (% of Flow) : / t' Receiving Stream: GL. T/e) /t7666 y Gre .Class: C—AfJ i Sub -Basin: 6'346 O 9 Reference USGS Quad: „4s7 (Please attach) Requestor:ii�C�// ,ems Regional Office /f`/;/971 t . - (Guideline limitations, if applicable, are to be listed on the back of this form.) Design I.rnp .: 7Q10 (cfs) U Drainage Area (mil) : b.15 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) C) Location of D.O. minimum (miles below outfall): I.4 Velocity (fps) : c„ l (c.;' zo Kl (base e, per day): I. Avg. Streamflow (cfs): 30Q2 (cfs) Slope (fpm) I4 CF 2c K2 (base e. per day) : 19. 7-o Effluent Characteristics Monthly Average Comments r� > C r �)a I I ( Original Rev tion Q- 0 0 By: -,_ �� 1I �'(-Pr,ti Comments: Effluent Characteristics ;'onthly t .verage Comments , ti K <n--) -, / ,I> V () , :_-_, 4(' « ; %, 7 '� Fe -cc? l Ce; •-c-f3c-,,,, I U.(-) A c:c ,•--c: -z T( N Reviewed By: I.v z;, Date: -8V 3970 Icy! --r u 9968 N 3966 3965 • 3964 • 11. �'- � it •�—� \ �//, 4 • yy ..�,� _-n.�<� it/r,' . 1 Facility Name Type of Waste Status Receiving Stream Stream Class Subbasin County Regional Office Requestor Date of Request Quad WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM CEDAR VILLAGE DOMESTIC EXISTING UT POKEBERRY CREEK CNSW 030604 CHATHAM RALEIGH WIGGINS 3/25/86 D22SE Wasteflow (mgd) 5-Day BOD (mg/1) Ammonia Nitrogen Dissolved Oxygen TSS (mg/1) Fecal Coliform pH (SU) (mg/1) (mg/1) APARTMENTS Request No. : 2952 Ft FCEgVED p. S%..... 4.yJ APR 21985 Drainage Area (sq mi) : .15 7Q10 (cfs) RALLY;: „,RliONAL a: 9CE Winter 7Q10 (cfs) : 0 30Q2 (cfs) Average Flow (cfs) : .2 RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS SUMMER .005 15 7 6 30 1000 6-9 I,1 WINTER .005 17 12 6 30 1000 6-9. 1.1\ COMMENTS i Recommended by . LE)< Reviewed by: Tech. Support Supervisor Regional Supervisor.,_ Permits & Engineering Date Date_44J Date +•I 1 a co Date_ a Hc_e_s_l_cL,,_ vatt N\ \,,00,,c1,, O`in.I.o�35C;iD 0.i. 1,9 ens, 041c1. (4, 6c�D '$ QA= 4 , o , (DA = 4. 0 \krY1'° fi\ t . 2S 0 026 14 , 0 - I, c„, Lac.- • MODEL RESULTS DISCHARGER CEDAR VILLAGE APARTMENTS RECEIVING STREAM : UT POKEBERRY CREEK THE END D.O. IS 6.49 MG/L THE END CBOD IS 7.79 MG/L THE END NBOD IS 0.00 MG/L THE D.O. MIN. OF SEGMENT 1 IS 5.09 MG/L THIS MINIMUM IS LOCATED AT SEGMENT MILEPOINT 1.40 WHICH IS LOCATED IN REACH NUMBER 2 THE WLA FOR SEGMENT 1 REACH THE WLA FOR SEGMENT 1 REACH THE REQUIRED EFFLUENT D.O. IS THE WASTEFLOW ENTERING SEG 1 THE WLA FOR SEGMENT 1 REACH THE WLA FOR SEGMENT 1 REACH THE REQUIRED EFFLUENT D.O. IS THE WASTEFLOW ENTERING SEG 1 1 IS 43 MG/L OF CBOD 1 IS 0 MG/L OF NBOD 6 MG/L REACH 1 IS .005 MGD 2 IS 0 MG/L OF CBOD 2 IS 0 MG/L OF NBOD 0 MG/L REACH 2 IS 0 MGD *** MODEL SUMMARY DATA *** Discharger : CEDAR VILLAGE APARTMENTS Receiving Stream 7Q10 : UT POKEBERRY CREEK : 0 Design Temperature : 25 -C Subbasin • 030604 Stream Class: CNSW Winter 7Q10 : 0 30Q2 2LEGIMPSIOPE 2 NEACI.TY 2D pfl 2 KL 2 K1 2 K2 2 K2 2 RN 2 KN 2 KNR 2 KNR 2 2 Mile 2 ft2 fpS 2 ft 2 /dal' 2 @20- 2 /dy 2 @20- 2 /dal, 2 @20- 2 idaY 2 @20- 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Segment 1 2 0.802107.502 0.100 2 0.09 2 1.26 2 1.00 221.57 2 19.352 0.00 2 0.00 2 0.00 2 0.00 2 Peach 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Segment 1 2 1.902 25.002 0.100 2 0.09 2 0.99 2 0.79 2 5.02 2 4.502 0.00 2 0.00 2 0.00 2 0.00 2 Reach 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 *** INPUT DATA SUMMARY *** 2 F''loW 2 CBOD 2 MOD 2 D.O. 2 2 as 2 up9/1 2 no. 2 nig/I 2 Segment 1 Reach 1 2 2 2 2 2 Waste 2 0.008 2 43.000 2 0.000 2 6.000 2 HeadWaters2 0.000 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 Tributary 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 * pmoff 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 Segment 1 Reach 2 2 2 2 2 2 Waste 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 Th butazy 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 * Runoff 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 * Runoff flaw is in cfs/mi 1 P MODEL RESULTS DISCHARGER : CEDAR VILLAGE APARTMENTS RECEIVING STREAM : UT POKEBERRY CREEK THE END D.O. IS 6.20 MG/L THE END CBOD IS 22.08 MG/L THE END NBOD IS 0.00 MG/L THE D.O. MIN. OF SEGMENT 1 IS 5.06 MG/L THIS MINIMUM IS LOCATED AT SEGMENT MILEPOINT 1.60 WHICH IS LOCATED IN REACH NUMBER 2 THE WLA FOR SEGMENT 1 REACH THE WLA FOR SEGMENT 1 REACH THE REQUIRED EFFLUENT D.O. IS THE WASTEFLOW ENTERING SEG 1 THE WLA FOR SEGMENT 1 REACH THE WLA FOR SEGMENT 1 REACH THE REQUIRED EFFLUENT D.O. IS THE WASTEFLOW ENTERING SEG 1 1 IS 65 MG/L OF CBOD 1 IS 0 MG/L OF NBOD 6 MG/L REACH 1 IS .005 MGD 2 IS 0 2 IS 0 0 MG/L REACH 2 MG/L OF CBOD MG/L OF NBOD IS 0 MGD *** MODEL SUMMARY DATA *** Discharger : CEDAR VILLAGE APARTMENTS Receiving Stream : UT POKEBERRY CREEK 7Q10 : 0 Design Temperature : 15 -C Subbasin : 030604 Stream Class: CNSW Winter 7Q10 : 0 30Q2 2LENOTH2SLOPE 2 VELOCITY 2DEPIH 2 Kl 2 Kl 2 K2 2 K2 2 KN 2 KN 2 KNR 2 KNR 2 2 mile 2ft/mi 2 fps 2 ft 2 /day 2 @20- 2 /day 2 @20- 2 /day 2 @20- 2 /day 2 @20- 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Segment 1 2 0.802107.502 0.100 2 0.09 2 0.79 2 1.00 217.36 2 19.352 0.00 2 0.00 2 0.00 2 0.00 2 Reath 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Segment 1 2 1.902 25.002 0.100 2 0.09 2 0.63 2 0.79 2 4.04 2 4.502 0.00 2 0.00 2 0.00 2 0.00 2 Reach 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 *** INPUT DATA SUMMARY *** 2 Flow 2 CBOD 2 NBCD 2 D.O. 2 2 CfS 2 mg4 2 /3 2 g/ 1 2 Segment 1 Raad1 1 2 2 2 2 2 Waste 2 0.008 2 65.000 2 0.000 2 6.000 2 Bea waters2 0.000 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 Tributary 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 * Ruoff 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 Segment 1 Reach 2 2 2 2 2 2 Waste 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 Tributary 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 * Runoff 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 0.000 2 * Runoff flow is in cfs/mi le DTVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT January 20, 1989 MEMORANDUM TO: Centra]. Files FROM: Marcia L. Toler-McCullen i lA THRU : J. Trevor Clements V(/ SUBJECT: Cedar Village Apartments NC0048429 / Chatham County Permit Map Attached is a copy of the topographical map with the correct point source location for the facility, Cedar Village Apartments. The point source indicated on the map in the permit shows a discharge which is flowing into Cub Creek in the 03-06-06 subbasin. There was also a WLA done in February, 1986 with this point of discharge. This information is incorrect and should be voided. The point source indicated on the map in the Techni- cal Service Modeling Files for the WLA done in April, 1986 has the discharge flowing correctly into a UT to Pokeberry Creek. This information is correct showing the current effluent limitations. This information has been confirmed with Bob Mangum at the Raleigh Regional Office. Therefore, on all records/databases the Cedar Village Apartments / NPDES #NC0048429 is an existing facility within the 03-06-04 subbasin, discharging into a UT to Pokeberry Creek. Please enclose this correspondence in your files. If further information is required, please contact me at 733-5083, ext. 516. MLT:mlt Attachments cc: Arthur Mouberry Bob Mangum WLA File NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION Facility Name: (('k v /'/� P� Q Existing Proposed 0 Permit No .: //cow 4 A9 Z Design Capacity (MGD) : CP, ea $ Industrial (% of Flow) : Pipe tb • Engineer - Date Rec. # z/A e7.n a 96--a3 .NK dot County: Date Domestic (% of Flow) : / ff,G Receiving Stream: e,t-. /get-eie7 C rei Class : C A tJ i" Sub -Basin: Reference USGS Quad: „Q .s- (Please attach) Requestor : 1e rf ,es- Regional Office / -`/, ./ 74,1! W C (Guideline limitations, if applicable, are to be listed on the back of this form.) Design imp.: 7Q10 (cfs) (.) Drainage Area (mi2) . D . 1 5 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) (_.) Location of D.O. minimum (miles below outfall) : 1.4 Velocity (fps) : C,1 Avg. Streamflow (cfs) : 30Q2 (cfs) Slope (fpm) 1 G-4, S Kl (base e, per day) : 1. v K2 (base e . :r day) (9. 3 s CG Z U Effluent Characteristics Monthly Average Comments 3U 05 1 5 P LP ; 'rl (luivv)1., tits-z-/J DO CO ii*-0 , , T 30 ►., /' e_c TA (tA CI,orM loco A 0u (_ 1-) _ ( _ 9 6 Ct Original tion on 0 0 ed By: Comments: i-ey Effluent 1 Characteristics :'ontnly l:verage Comments B000--; 14 /1 1)31 A, , . t-k-An..) I a n-7 1_ 4 re -CO( cv(-C,r1,-, 1(i )C) /roo k--12 c)A4 le-9 sC& , Reviewed By: Date: 1/l0/0 4) 3969 it , isul� 50'.4\ • j lvi / \ BY k.____ b�'r r y / �\,� Jn.- I)) ). 7...--,...-------N ___ .(--=---Z,_,..., ---0"-- --lit 3966 3965 ��`, _ _ \ `_ _.-- �� 1 r , u►�/oi 45 ••r. •_•�1 -:/r.. ,;; •• i ; 4 t f ir��'--,,, Lairm-tic]cJ2-iill1V, rc1 • r, H w i Facility Name: Existing Proposed NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION Engineer # 1 , /o/77PS _ a /a SW ate /6AV Permit tab : /V(' p Q Jll"/2 9 Design Capacity (MGD): 6,, OD Industrial (% of Flow): Receiving Stream: GC• T 4J 6;4.6 cZ."- 4-_-_„ Class: Pipe I�b//�' County: /7/�f Domestic (% of Flow) : /dd,%$ Sub -Basin: Reference USGS Quad: .1)�.Z f, (Please attach) Requestor: `i%ie �(//4c4:;-tf Regional Office (Guideline limitations, if applicable, are to be listed on- he back of this form.) Design Temp.: �,5'C 7Q10 (cfs) Q Drain i Win Location of D.O. minimum (mil els bela out Velocity (fps) : lS *(1 e Area (m ) : (t)•/ Effluent Characteristics hbhly Ave�te `' Comments 3Ds (9/9 /"1 (Yf 3IV (i/n /-0 l a Po ir/}/tr /,) 6 , TT 0 ? = I me /� T55 m`) �o Fee. (.n1. Ur oo ,I) l ODD .1K(5U) b,-9 Comments: Pied BY: /w /0 Date Rec. Avg. Streamflow (cfs): O. / 30Q2 fs ) Slope (fp(n) jd 0 K2 (base e. per day) : /9. 4`14' 6-8Y Effluent Characteristics r ;:onthly ).verage Comments &,I j s I-J 6 io ty do 6149 i,e) p fec-Col. (/oon J I p ll l,50) ZP -'1 Corn- d P - * 4ite.vn, paAI au-e!`tccg e 20 dha vn ezg.t. &adxyynd t U Q -UO4 . C'b6c,, - Reviewed By: 4rAacvrri, [the . Le. ah.c is a.2c 210 l5/-(/ Date: • 4 Z y �• I l i-- k'• •� 1 (;; 'Chapel, • ^tom 'y,. .- �,. . t ...t- ---, • ;•tip\ t.% i( • r ^� 1 0 • ! 41N,/ ' iA Sm 11 o rcr Is Lc. ec..-v C5DA1/4PN 1.-1..J1/46 cio • 1, �,•• • • IIP,/i • • i• ♦.—r - • r'? - 337!• at+..--►J sC lib tJ 1 L P. 61L3 • P.o. ex,* 421 G♦.,x. F.. wl G 27610 Zt, -tam o tom.- 8► of • • i• r •- �l•.� t. • 114 •� • • .. - • r • • .• l:xP�c04's 1 \3k\1 • l .- �►' • r'"N't• ,t J