HomeMy WebLinkAbout440011_Inspection_20221011 (2)`l ihte,,r l] 2 zs
Division of Water Resources
E.O.bivislif of Soil iiitt 'ater Conservation
Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: I 1i7//122-1 Arrival Time:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
/v:cv(a,P-
Departure Time:
ng, c f
�I ,r)-my" ni Pos`
r1_1°81_.i r8d ��ytLoS LI iffC.t Cc P-�7Fed-
P I C)/—th,r( e,A,l 2ctt
e�/n, h / - K--a Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
County: Ecriwvvd Region: A/2.0
its S(h �l� �yerba,OW—
CD
Owner Email:
Phone:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
a97� _(
�S' /A) "intimde: �j. �
Longitude:
Swine,
Design Current
Capacity pop. Wet Poul
"Design Current
Capacity PUP._
Cattle
Design Curren
Capacity Pop.;
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Layer
Non -Layer
Dry Poul
.Design Current
Capacity Pop..+..
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes FIN. ❑ NA D NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ratNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
D Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued
Facility Number: t_g_p - /(
Waste Collection & Treatment
Date of Inspection: /oh/ /2 2—
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes IgNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
AiyY 75-aoD
TeS
Observed Freeboard (in): ,Q. t ) /QS
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes V No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 7/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes EiNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 1-Y No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Bonding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C24 S bi 111 o_a7rSil L�e-�_ --recta. (f{�=.( 1—�7k�f e
13. soil Type(a7 '�ebh� A t I I r aalc/ �ozl/e , �.,.% / L Devi/. ad ( .V/ IlS' b mCm
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? / %'C f D 11 le ❑ Yes [`\No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 191No ❑ NA ❑ NE
. 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes .P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination? `Y`
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes j.. No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes igtNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 4No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
0 Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued
Facilir Number:
/(
Date of Inspection: /opt/ 2-7
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
I�-No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? Ifyes, check ❑ Yes 'No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
Ifyes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes [,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes /� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [i1'10 ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes FI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes giNo
❑ Yes➢Io
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
l K (A. A-12-0 I0V eS2 IL L S}a.
MoveAluik- 2015-1 , ( Shush- °lama,il.
%fG.- ' a.r2, (pit,- No Caar.aat G-Re ,
Ufa /a,.ci cpp17Cc,.to,0 SlNca_ SAP /fn.
%S A La1te ka<.
� I I, ref/o
7d `� n re i
2 /tint Gont ll $tQ 1 You Grp tic
JSIc lv V �q L S7
f L b0-e2 Ste
I e S S , oh a-1 (ruub' p€Yfbtt 1 iJ''t7,.o-tcf- (CO,ia J �
b 1 erase e)�,1N -}o Vesc SS,bn , V07, w outd- �v- Cot,..c`d Qv
e..ePUad Wecl G C ton as clou S"'itiL-t haloto 100
C cuAt ccM(e fi Ireskotd.
—(\k2 l�GtS S cte) u-vC• King"( Le- 4ur:, rdr,
rah s GCS-ee�s I o S ut-�Fa a frv5) b ut n a S'� flL
/rGovaS 2VC fee U reJ, (%frL it IO Neu- eec(-e
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date: /b (I
5/72/2020
Facility Number: LIE( -
Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
/o7/r7i
❑ Yes
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ No
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes El No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
(n o-Se •-{'6te S -fvu_e2f-i vr. ei ; (( even.12L L (1 yl eec(
C[ c J -tom N (2_.0S Sfic t`cicLvcl
AS c. C`(eoncecl cce Ht'�t.t, (?co- L.7bzvld hot �1� Sa.4 `ITa
V- CAI 2t✓ I Sifle c- I l vlw jirJD ' ev eu J. a e+u.e d e rev. r fie. a rc-1.t_S
\ce use -t Acti- c i - te, he cLepl iecl c1- t o regi-er *Lai
Cl i )olwruSL s ¥oc,_ '1lue.- 1. &S e plot.
W11y hee. S -to a uocititeJLeJ 6;44, ±ran-o-le-
nn1ca
ralvor lrteS is b cz Sake (ou v� jet overrclapli(
11wS-e (eco-rdS would it-ci#f ha re p rc.J -Pr- (A-C to `CsUe t0)
& o k W bun_ h.e. `Thv-- Led- ou.i v\ f L —E a h d tv, \n c1V -
(-64'Zen/Luz SiteLLIA ¢ {-vo tol e s, av: se .
2e-tow lie e,: dAreSS to Se-(-d re aact- `t om G(Y eSGi5Stn7 6 ( ot,v-
./lavna ' �-�' «,. ca.rnse --A,d0 So. "U v�.c. P;J,sioa3 of- l ctev 2cVouvad
�_` k) t.av Q2uati:+9 i?ajtvwd t :tot-.t Sectbv
Icbrinweg &efi Coe rat ci,1/4,S P✓ojrt
?Cog& w(a,1 CRa
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
A) IUc 8 r5—l�34
5
Ida
5/12/2020