20090858 Ver 3_Year 3 Monitoring Report_20141030

IVEY- FERGUSON BANK PARCEL
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
MONITORING YEAR 3 REPORT
DWQ PROJECT NUMBER: 09- 0858v3
SEPTEMBER 12, 2014
!ij
McADAMS
Raleigh /Durham ❑ 2905 Meridian Parkway ® Durham, NC 27713
Charlotte ❑ 11301 Carmel Commons Blvd ❑ Suite 111 o Charlotte, NC 28226
McAdamsCo.com°
Designing Tomorrow's Infrastructure & Communities
1
IVEY- FERGUSON BANK PARCEL
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
MONITORING YEAR 3 REPORT
DWQ PROJECT NUMBER: 09- 0858v3
SEPTEMBER 12, 2014
!ij
McADAMS
Raleigh /Durham ❑ 2905 Meridian Parkway ® Durham, NC 27713
Charlotte ❑ 11301 Carmel Commons Blvd ❑ Suite 111 o Charlotte, NC 28226
McAdamsCo.com°
Designing Tomorrow's Infrastructure & Communities

IVEY- FERGUSON
BANK PARCEL
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
MONITORING YEAR 3 REPORT
DWQ # 09 -08580
September 12, 2014

Table of Contents
/D lntroduuUon -- ---------. —... — ........ . ....... .. ..... -- ....... —..|
I l Project Location and Zeocoodon —... ..... .. ....... ..... — . ....... .... ..... .............. i
l.2 Project Goals and Objectives ... --...... --. ..----- .... -------------.—..l
2.0 Vegetation Condition and Comparison ...... ....... ---------------... ....... ..... ..... 2
3.0 Methodology ..... ....... ------ ..— . ..................... .................... . ... . ....... --.2
3.1 Vegetation Monitoring Plots .... ......... .. ..... ................................................ ....... .... ....... 2
32 Photo Stations ....... — ------ --. .... . . .......... ................................................ 2
Appendix A: Site Maps
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Figure 2: Monitoring Year I Exhibit
Appendix B: Veutation Assessment Data
Table 1: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 2: Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegetation Plot
Table 3: Planted Species Comparison by Vegetation Plot
Appendix C: Vepetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Appendix D: Veimilation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets
Appendix E: Photo Stations
I

1.0 Introduction
1.1 Project Location and Description
Located near the intersection of Carl Durham Road and Old Greensboro Road (SR 1005) in
Orange County, North Carolina (Figure 1) is the nutrient mitigation bank known as the Ivey -
Ferguson Bank Site (Site). The Bank Site is located on 3 parcels of land (PIN Numbers:
9758022055, 9758034637, and 9758337836), which are located near the intersection of Carl
Durham Road and Old Greensboro Road. The first parcel of land (PIN Number:
9758022055) is located on the north side of Old Greensboro Road, approximately 450 feet
west of the intersection of Carl Durham Road and Old Greensboro Road. The second parcel
(PIN Number: 9758034637) is located on the west and east side of Carl Durham Road and is
located approximately 1,200 feet north of the intersection of Carl Durham Road and Old
Greensboro Road. The third parcel of land (PIN Number: 9758337836) is located on the
north side of Old Greensboro Road, approximately 2,000 feet east of the intersection of Carl
Durham Road and Old Greensboro Road. Overall, the 3 parcels of land containing the Bank
Site total approximately 218 acres. The purpose of this Bank Site is to improve water quality
within the B. Everett Jordan Lake watershed by providing off -site mitigation for
development (both existing and proposed) requiring nutrient offsets.
The Bank Site is located within the Upper New Hope Arm of the B. Everett Jordan Lake
watershed, inside of 14 -digit USGS HUC 03030002060070. Stormwater runoff from this site
drains into an unnamed tributary of Phils Creek (Stream Index #16- 41- 2- 2- (0.3), which
drains into University Lake approximately 3.4 miles downstream. According to the
Basinwide Information Management System (BIMS), Phils Creek is classified as WS -II;
HQW, NSW in this location (Appendix A. Figure 2 — Monitoring Year 3 Exhibit).
This Bank Site has been established under the terms and conditions of the Cape Fear Basin
Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Mitigation Umbrella Bank (Bank), signed on February 3, 2011,
made and entered into by EBX -EM, LLC (EBX -EM), acting as the Bank Sponsor, and the
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water
Quality (DWQ). The Division of Water Quality is now hereby referred to as Division of
Water Resources (DWR).
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The goals of this nutrient offset mitigation project are to:
To improve the overall water quality and aquatic habitat in and around the unnamed
tributary of Phils Creek by reducing nutrient and sediment loads into the streams
caused by agricultural influences.
To improve the richness and diversity of the plant species within the conservation
easement.
To provide perpetual protection for the unnamed tributary of Phils Creek and
associated riparian and upland buffers
These goals will be met through the following objectives:
By establishing a native plant community to match the endemic plant species at the
Bank Site.
By reducing the quantities of exotic invasive species at the Bank Parcel through
chemical methods.
By establishing a conservation easement to provide long -term protection for the Bank
Site.

By donation of the conservation easement and all of its interests, in perpetuity, to an
accredited or approved land trust or stewardship program.
2.0 Vegetation Condition and Comparison
Current stem counts were calculated using vegetation plot monitoring data. Final stem count
criteria are 320 trees per acre at the end of the five (5) year monitoring (Ivey Ferguson Bank
Parcel - Bank Parcel Development Package, 2010). As of Monitoring Year 3, the Bank Parcel
had 9 plots encompassing 0.2224 acres, containing 140 planted and volunteer stems, which
yielded a density of 630 trees per acre including planted and volunteer species. Vegetation
survival threshold was met for each of the plots except for Vegetation Plots 4 and 5. Summary
tables of the data collected are provided in Appendix B.
During Monitoring Year 3 field investigations, it was determined that Vegetation Plots 4 and 5
did not meet the vegetation survival threshold of 320 trees per acre. Vegetation Plot 5 did not
meet the vegetation survival threshold during the Monitoring Year 2, either. Replanting within
the area of Vegetation Plot 5 was prescribed after Monitoring Year 2 activities. However, due to
a lack of available preferable planting stock and subpar conditions of available planting stock,
replanting efforts were postposed. Therefore, re- planting within the area of Vegetation Plots 4
and 5 (Conservation Easements 4 and 5) will occur sometime between the months of November,
2014 and April, 2015.
During Monitoring Year 3 field investigations, inspection of the fencing was conducted to
determine the condition and structural integrity of the fencing. It was determined that the fencing
was in good condition and remedial actions to the fencing were not warranted.
3.0 Methodolo
3.1 Vegetation Monitoring Plots
All monitoring methodologies follow the most current templates and guidelines provided by EEP
(EEP, 2006; EEP, 2009). All nine (9) vegetation plots installed by McAdams were located in
Monitoring Year 3. Baseline vegetation monitoring was conducted in accordance to CVS -EEP
Protocol for Recording Vegetation (CVS -EEP, v4.2). Table 1 (Appendix B) provides a success
summary for each vegetation monitoring plot which the target density is a minimum of 320 trees
per acre at the end of the five (5) year monitoring period. Table 2 (Appendix B) provides a stem
count total and planted stem total by each individual vegetation plot. Table 3 (Appendix B)
provides a summary of only planted stem counts as compared to planted stem counts of the As
Built.
Vegetation monitoring plots were photographed and are located in Appendix C. Vegetation
Monitoring Plot Data Sheets are provided in Appendix D. Each Vegetation Monitoring Plot
Data Sheet provides measurements, location, and vigor of each planted species within a
respective vegetation monitoring plot.
3.2 Photo Stations
Photo documentation is essential to monitoring the success the Bank Parcel. Photos provide a
visual assessment of the vegetation conditions. All fourteen (14) photo stations installed by
McAdams were located in Monitoring Year 3. Photographs were taken at high resolution using
an Olympus FE -115 5.0 megapixel digital camera. The locations of the photo stations are
depicted in the Monitoring Year 1 Exhibit (Appendix A, Figure 2). Photographs for the photo
stations are located in Appendix E.

4.0 References
EcoEngineering — A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. December 29, 2010.
Ivey- Ferjzuson Proposed Nutrient Offset Restoration Area — Bank Parcel Development
Package
EcoEngineering — A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. August 2012. Ivev-
Ferguson Proposed Nutrient Offset Restoration Area — As -Built Report
Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS -EEP
Protocol for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) October 2004. Guidelines for Riparian
Buffer Restoration.
Available at internet site: http://www.nceep.net/news/reports/buffers.pd
Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) January 15, 2010. Procedural Guidance
and Content Requirements for EEP Monitoring Reports
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) November 7, 2011. Monitoring
Requirements and Performance Standards for Stream and/or Wetland Mitigation
Schafale MP and AS Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina: Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of
Parks and Recreation, Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Raleigh,
North Carolina.

APPENDIX A
Site Maps

' " ' MAM1 -09020 IVEY- FERGUSON j �J �.
'� MAM09020.DWG
BANK PARCEL ��-,,,
gas -os- FIGURE 1. SrM IACATTON MAP MCADivrls � �•
o�E COUNW. MOM CAIMU r�

.mFOO�ww•naassa�ood S'���
va�mO.�w ao�
Wai
son +� vn°
Row= q mm '"Ummmum
raw AM=
vsnm� art�o �arr�me�aeos
ADMUO id KOSnOlM `I dliUCPA A Ili
axmmn fa®mv &OO
,
I
I
us
g g � Sg
III
rat
�a
egg
ig
a
g
4
i
i
d
ism
leaf
-"d
a�
! use fee d ect'teett' c to
ggg og $ ggg9099 9 9,9
I
F F
ma
b. }qg
Wai
rI
g g � Sg
III
rat
�a
egg
ga s
E
rag
d
I
q $r4j
�g
.11 r.
1i;Jej
lea
tea
i'j
aQ
n o
N
CL
A oD
a
Egli
n=it
CL
�r vim
gt �n a ' �
IL
ig
list
RV
gJas
I at
of
g" 8�
$; -got
� a
N
CL 8
S Nm S
R�
a
'
at
RUE:!
rn ��
i
a
ao
r
_N
N
a
fi X aBarm
gg S at
g S!
Vest
dA
op
8

APPENDIX B
Vegetation Assessment Data

Table 1. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Ivey- Ferguson Bank Parcel; Orange County, NC
Monitoring Year 3: August 21, 2014
McAdams Proiect #: MAM -09020
Vegetation Plot ID
Conservation Easement
Area
Vegetation Threshold
Met ?*
Tract Mean
1
9 _
Yes
77%
2
7 _
Yes
3
6
Yes
4
4
No
5
5
No
6
1
Yes
7
t
Yes
8
2
Yes
9
2
Yes
i argm acnsityim a mmimumTt 32u shrubsand desirable trees per acre at{the�end of the fivel(5) year monitoring period according
to the "Ivey- Ferguson Bank Parcel Proposed Nutrient Offset Restoration Area, Bank Parcel Development Package ", approved by
DWQ on December 29, 2010

O
a
A
r
�,
0
Or
W
w
0
0.
.0
O
u
O
F
a
0
U
E
N
d
.a
F
U
z
C
7
U
000
O
O
L
CL
C
a
0
w
d
.r
O
N
N
eo
d
eo
O
a
0
x
u
0
•L
a
E
ae
u
LD
a
d
r
O
I .�
E
�z
� II
Q
0
c
ID
N
if
R
t
F
F N
a
W,
N
O
v'1
O
N
O
O
C
O
G
Vj
O
_
I
N
N
oo
V
N
N
O
M
NO
�
O
a
Q}�
�y
N
r
N
N
O
r
Off
l�7
rlG+
O
tD B
VJ
O
N
N
N
M
-^
N
M
r
In
In
N
M
�,
u
o
0
F
00D0
o,
iL
Z
Cl
O
r
N
00
O
N
N
N^
N
O
O
to
a
4
z
^'
a
00
Qan
N
b
O
N
r
^
N
O
O
'
F
z
M
_
in
z
r
r
M
Z
p;
rOON
m
a
N
vi
O
C
--
N
v
a
Mz
�
�
N
a
00
<•,
�
o
v
0.
F
o
`v3
d
�
r
r
0.
m
o
v
o
M
�
G
AM
U
�
�
A
txt G
C
1°'
c
y
EB
Von
oa
a
L
"_
d
O
C
d
w
m
M
ts
o
i
E
i
y
az
7
L
LD
a
d
r
O
I .�
E
�z
� II
Q
0
c
ID
N
if
R
t
F

O
a�
oZ
R�
>' 'o
aV
E
v�
Nm Y
ryryc
N c
N
c
aUo
m�
N
m
d
C
1 N 3
C
Im
j a 9
p W 8
t�WW77 c
W
0-
CL
L m C
V p
N
r C w
O � �
j O �
N m ,m
N > >
CL
C
E ,€
c m F
o E
W c �
W
o p1
o
Nth a
O m O)
m �
C
d
O $ w
c 12
W
c m
O W'
E c
W N
m
E
a m�
7 N
� � E
m 3
L O
N OC
E' Q'bE
rn�
i�
v m m
fa
-C,
g E >
m a,L
7 _
y E
N CL N
} r m
� G N
E
i- j7Q
v N
C 3
W
j � W
m C
N C
.L O N cr
m a,
N Ci
Ev'
m c m
i6 o L
c ,p
CL 8
FE
0
a�Pa
8y�=
c o E $
E m m
b D w
E3QQ�
z C) E

APPENDIX C
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

t
. ., 4i�►��� Jam* .y �'1�/�7. � �'
� '� •r F" � 'r 7� ..1� ,I

VE6E7ATION PLOT 3: VIEW FACIN6 140 °5E.
VE6E7ATION PLOT 4: VIEW FAGIN6 332 °NW.
reaECT ND MAM -09020
IVEy_FERGUSON
BANK PARCEL
THE JOHN
COMMAM09020.DWG
� FILENAME:
d SCALE: AS SHOWN
STATIONS
h9 .NoPHOTO
Durham, No���
DATE:
MCADAMS
7
08-21-14
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

VE6ETATION PLOT 5, VIEW FAGIN6 222 °NW.
VEGETATION PLOT b= VIEW FAGIN6 130 °5E.
PROJECT NO. MAM -09020
y_FE" USON
BANK PARCEL
��M.
2905
THE JOHDMcAdam.C.—
FILENAME: MAM09020.DWG
n
SCALE:
AS SHOWN
PHOTO STATIONS
Durham, No713
No
Ganx
m DATE:
MCADAMS
O 733 564.mm
08-21-14
ORANGE COUNTY, NORM CAROLINA

VE6ETATION PLOT qt VIEW FAGIN6 232 °SW.
PROJECT ND. MAM -09020
IVEY_FERGUS0N
BANK PARCEL
'�
��A17PLM.
2905 MCPANY
FILENAME:
MAM09020.DWG
SCALE:
> As SHOWN
PHOTO STATIONS
Durham, North 713
1117111 McAd�.corn
V: DA IF.
08 -21 -14
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
IMCADAMSI

APPENDIX D
Vegetation Monitoring Data Sheets

Site Ivey Ferguson
Page 1
,tonng Year MY3
Date 8/206014
Area 9
Veg Plot No 1
X -axis
Plot Location
4'N
see sketch below
Ma ID Sclentific {Name Source
MONITORING
YEAR 3 DATA
cm
MY -2 (September, 2013
10 -6W
X
meter
Y
meter
I ddh
millimeter,
Height
centimeter
DBH
cm
Vigor
ddh
millimeter
Height
,centimeter
Notes
1
Quercus launfoha
B
1'
1 3
M
9'03
61
2
Quercus m ra
B
35
1
21,2
151
15
3
15 "34
103
_
3
Quercus n: ra
B
55
1 3
2077
131
3
1627
101
4
Quercus phellos
B _
74
1 5--
1594
123
3
1203
100
5
Ouercus laurridia
B
78
02
1561
122
3
1395
86
6
Betula m ra
B
10
1 1
M
missing
7
Betula m ra
B
97
26
M
missing
8
Quercus phellos
B
7
35
Isis
129
_
3
1843
48
`9
Platanus'occidentahs
B
5
34
M
missing
10
Quercus launfdia
B
28
31
1269
102
3
'8 78
56
11
Platanus occidentalis
B
08
35
M
missing
12
Platanus occidentalis
B
05
59
M
missing
13
Diospyros vv :n:ana
B
24
57
M
missing
14
Quercus m ra
B
41
57
M
missing
15
Quercus m ra
B
64
58
1066
74
3
905
72
16
Quercus launfoha
B_
89
5
M
missing
17
Quercus launfoha
B
Z7
76
M
missing
18
Quercus launfdia
B
53
8'2
591
68
3
missm
19IDiospyros
virainiana
B
3
82
M
miss:
n6a,
20
Quercus launfoha
B
1 e
81
M
miss:
21 lQuercus
phellos I
B 1-0-21-831
1
1
1
M
Imissing
B = bare root Vigor
M = Missing 3 = good condition
D Dead 2 = ;surv:v:ng and likely to,surv:ve`next year
1=
Fen
., = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
y
xy x Existing Fores
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA VOLUNTEER
HEIGHT
CLASSES
cm
- Selentiflc Name
10 -6W
-,50 -100
>100-
L': u:damber s race lue
2
5

Site Ivey-Ferguson
Page 2
,nitonng Year MY3
Date 8/2012014
Area �q
Veg Plot No 1
X-a)as 4?N
1
4
05
U
MMMMMMMMMMMMMM
M___
MMMMM
9 MEM
06-413
MroqMM
m
M04
MMMMMMMME
MMUMMOMMMMMMMM
MM
�_
��CC����S�:Z
M
LCM
M
we
M
Wal
1
U lu
X-AXIS
Lienoies -missing- btem may be missing because of thick herbaceous layer and therefore not visible at the time of
monitoring Stem should be searched for,at location during subsequent Monitoring Years because the stem may grow
above herbaceous layer
Denotes,"Dead" Stemishould still be searched for,at locati6fi during subsequint Monitoring Years because the roots of
3200 Ithwstern may survive and,therefore re-soroutlin'subsequent,Monitoring Years

Site Ivey Ferguson
Page 1
tonng Year MY3
Date 8/20/2014
Area 7
Vag Plot No 2
X -axis
Plot Location
194 °N
see sketch below
_MONITORING YEAR 3 DATA
MY -2 Se tembe►
2013
10=50
X
Y
ddh
Height
DBH
1
ddh
Height
DBH
Ma ID
Scientific Name
Source
meter
meter
millimeter
centimeter
cm
Vigor
millimeter
centimeter
cm
Notes
I
Quercus phellos
B
14
is
1054
77
3
733
59
—
2
Platanus occidentalis
B
37
13
259
199
3
3976
189
0918
3
Platanus oocidentalis
B
156
06
265
22
,3
4321
232
1 323
4
Quercus phellos
B'
8
04
135
88
3
12 23
B1
5
Quercus phellos
B,
831
261--
2018
' 121
1 ;3
171
94
6
Platanus occidentalis
B
6
- 2 7
300
246
3
6169
280
1 545
7
Platanus occidentalis
B
33
32
315
263
_ 3—
3356
252
1 668
B
Quercus phellos
B
15
36
11 39
75
3
909
60
9
Platanus occidentalis
B
12
61
270
226
3
353
7227
1 251
Insect
10
Platanus omdentalis
B
37
73
310
374
3
3869
309
1'88
Insect
11
Lmodendron tuli dera
B
6
72
1325
102
3
1558
73
12
Quercus" hellos
B.
81
83
1449
74
3
1043
58
13
Quercus phellois
B
77
88
M
missing
14
Lmodendron tulipifera
B
65
92
M
missin
15
Platanus occidentalis
B
41
96
330
36
3
40 49
340
184
msect
16
Quercus hellos
B
83
6
1474
135
3
1073
111
17
Quercusp hellos
B
7 9
4 4
_ 1459
94
3
10 49
- 59
o - ware foci Vigor
M = 'Missing 3 = good'condition
2 = survivmg`and likely to survive, next year
1 = almost surviving and not likely to survive next year Roa
y Ewstin Trees
XY
--------------------------- -------------- - -'Fen -----------
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA VOLUNTEER
HEIGHT CLASSES
cm
Scientific Name
10=50
50 -100
0 100
Plantanus occidentabs,
1

Site Ivey- Ferguson
Page 2
Monitoring Year MY,3
Date 8/20/2014
Area 7
Veg Plot No 2
X -axis 194 614
1
i 0
0,0
238° e
H I'
GO
y o U i a to I
X =AXIS
Denotes "Missing" Stem.may,be missing becaus&of thick herbaceous layer and.therefore not,visible at,the,time of
monitoring Stem�should be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years because the stem may grow
above herbaceous layer
Denotes "Dead" Stem should still be,searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years because the roots of
the stem may survive and therefore re -s mut`in subsequent Monitoring Years
MMMEEMOMMLOW
91DOM
=LOANS
MOMEMMMOMMMM
MEEMMMELGINOMMM
===we
==_
mmmm
MMEMEMINMENISIMME
238° e
H I'
GO
y o U i a to I
X =AXIS
Denotes "Missing" Stem.may,be missing becaus&of thick herbaceous layer and.therefore not,visible at,the,time of
monitoring Stem�should be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years because the stem may grow
above herbaceous layer
Denotes "Dead" Stem should still be,searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years because the roots of
the stem may survive and therefore re -s mut`in subsequent Monitoring Years

Sde Ivey Ferguson
Page 1
3onng Year MY3
'Date 8/20/2014
Area 6
Vag Plot No 3
X -axis
Plot Location
188 °S
see sketch below
Ma 'ID Scientific Name Source
MONITORING
YEAR 3 DATA
Scientific Name
MY -2 Se tember.
2013
> 100
X
meter
Y
meter
ddh
millimeter
Height -
centimeter
cm
Vigor
- ddh
millimeter
Height
centimeter
Notes
1
Fraxmus pennsylvanica
B
23
18
1339
75
3
1,178
62
2
Fraxmus,pennsylvanics
B
46
2
45
40
2
965
45
3
Fraxmus pennsylvanica
B
75
2
1126
122
3
2026
121
4
Fraxmus, enns (vamp
B
91
09
11 -15
88
3
1239
98
5
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
B
87
26
1412
135
3
1353
122
6
Quercus phellos
B
94
51
M
missing
7
Fraxmus pennsylvanica
8
73
42
897
53
2
1348
86
8
Fraxmus pennsylvanica
B
47
47
95
91
3
1262
61
9
Liriodendron tul ifera
B
22
44
1584
69
3
1605
60
10
Quercus m ra
8
14
63
M
missing
,11
Quercus phellos _
B,
39
65
481
44
2
574
45
12
Quercus phellos
B
71
6'3
M
missing
13
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
B
99
55
M,
missing
14
Fraxmus pennsylvanica
B
81
54
M
missing`
15
Fraxmus pennsylvanica
B
98
67
2441
155
13
3
991
37
16
Quercus m ra
B
92
91
M
994
41
17
Quercus phellos
B
64
87
926
50
3
699
29
18
Betula m ra
B
36
87
M
missing
DEAD
19
Quercus phellos
B
1
84
452
35
2
552
35
B =bare root Vigor
M = Missing 3 = good condition
2 = surviving and likely to survive next year
1 = almost surviving and not likely to survive next year
y
Fen
xy x Roa Existing Forest
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA VOLUNTEER
HEIGHT
CLASSES cm
Scientific Name
10.50
50 -100
> 100
Li uxfambar stvraoflua
4
9

Site Ivey-Ferguson
Page 2
..onitonfig Year MY3
Date 8/20/2014
Area 6
Veg Plot No 3
X-axis 1880S
0
0
X-AXIS
O)enotes "Missing" Stem may be missing,because of thick herbaceous layer and therefore not visible at the time of
nonitoring Stem should be searched for at location during subsequent: Monitoring Years because the stem ma'y,grow
ibove herbaceous � layer
)enotes "Dead,' Stem should still be,searched'forat location during gubsequent,Moniforing Ye6rs because the roots o
he stem may survive,and therefore re-sprout in subsequent Mondoring'Years
140°
-
N�3S�' ■
■ ■
■��75
WAN
0
X-AXIS
O)enotes "Missing" Stem may be missing,because of thick herbaceous layer and therefore not visible at the time of
nonitoring Stem should be searched for at location during subsequent: Monitoring Years because the stem ma'y,grow
ibove herbaceous � layer
)enotes "Dead,' Stem should still be,searched'forat location during gubsequent,Moniforing Ye6rs because the roots o
he stem may survive,and therefore re-sprout in subsequent Mondoring'Years
140°
-
N�3S�' ■
■ ■
■��75
O)enotes "Missing" Stem may be missing,because of thick herbaceous layer and therefore not visible at the time of
nonitoring Stem should be searched for at location during subsequent: Monitoring Years because the stem ma'y,grow
ibove herbaceous � layer
)enotes "Dead,' Stem should still be,searched'forat location during gubsequent,Moniforing Ye6rs because the roots o
he stem may survive,and therefore re-sprout in subsequent Mondoring'Years
140°
-

Site Ivey Ferguson
Page 1
,odng Year MY3
Date 8/20/2014;
Area 4
Veg Plot No 4
X-axis
Plot Location
14 °N
see sketch below
Ma ID Scientific Name Source
MONITORING YEAR -3 DATA _
MY -2 (Sep tember, 2013
cm
X
meter
Y
meter
ddh
millimeter
Height
centimeter
DBH
cm
Vigo
ddh
millimeter
Height
centimeter
Notes
1
Diospyros virginiand
B-
43
15
M
missing
2
Comus Honda
B
62
'18
M
75
77
Deer
3
Comus Honda
B_
85
_ 23
M
1249
91
Deer
_4
Comus flonda
B
82
55
M
951
86
Deer
'5
Comus Honda
B
59
44
M
missm
6
Comus flonda
B
38
39
M
missing
7
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
B
09
28
95
46
2
992
54
B
Comus flonda -
B
07
54
M
545
__ 67
Deer _
9
Frazinus pennsylViihiaii
B
33
64
77
54
2
856
57
10
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
B
57
7,1
811
51
2
6189
71
11
Comus Honda
B
8
8'2
M
missin
12
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
B
28
88
10671
63
2
1048
61
13
Fraxinus,pennsylvahica
B
04
82
1149
67
2
1345
68
B = bare root Vigor 3 = good condibon, 2 = surviving and likely to survive next year, 1 = almost surviving and not likely ,
to survive next year,
y
Existing Drainage
Feature
xy x
— Existing Fores
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA VOLUNTEER
HEIGHT
CLASSES
cm
Scientific Name
10 -50
50 100
> 100
Li wdambar styraciflua
1
8

Site 'Ivey-F6rguson
Page 2
..onitonng Year MY3
DaW- 8/20/2014
Area 4
Vag Plot No 4
X-axis 14ON
1(
05
u/1—\
3320
0
'0 0 r a to I U
X-AXIS
)enotes "Missing" Stem may be missing'because of thick herbaceous layer and therefore not visible at the time of monitoring
Item shou-Id'be searched foeat location during subsequent Monitoring Years because the stem may grow above herbaceous
iyer
)enotes "Dead" Stem should still be gearched'f6r at location during subsequent Monitoring Years because the roots of the
tem may survive and therefore re-sprout in subsequent Monitoring Years
11MMMOMM,
MMMEMMO-M
Mi
==OEM
LIONEENEEMMEM
M-000MMEMMEN
=on
nAl
=
MMEMEN,
=0511"IMM90M
MOMMENEEMOOMMM
u/1—\
3320
0
'0 0 r a to I U
X-AXIS
)enotes "Missing" Stem may be missing'because of thick herbaceous layer and therefore not visible at the time of monitoring
Item shou-Id'be searched foeat location during subsequent Monitoring Years because the stem may grow above herbaceous
iyer
)enotes "Dead" Stem should still be gearched'f6r at location during subsequent Monitoring Years because the roots of the
tem may survive and therefore re-sprout in subsequent Monitoring Years

Site Ivey Ferguson
Page 1
Boring Year MY3
Date 8120/2014
Area 5
Veg Plot No 5
X -axis
Plot Location
274 °W
see sketch below
Map Scientlfic,Name Source
MONITORING
YEAR 3 DATA
Scientific Name
MY -2 Se ember.
2013
> 100
X
meter.
Y
meter,
ddh
millimeter,
Height
centimeter
DBH
cm
Vigor
g
ddh
millimeter
Height
centimeter
Notes
1
Quercus launfolia
B
011
13
,3 35
35
2
36
28
Res rout
2
Quercus launfolia
B
0`3
34
11 63
74
2
11 85,
54
3
Quercus launfolia
B
2
77
11 °52
41
2
1028
34
4
Quercus launfofia
B
17
52
6166
42
2
7
32
5
Quercus launfolia
B
21
21
943
56
2
971
52
Res rout
6
Corpus florida
B
42
26
M
missing
7
Corpus Honda
B
39
49
M
missing
8
Quercus launfolia
B
39
75
M
missing
9
Quercus hellos_
B
63
72
789
_ _ 60
.
2
1025
59
10
Corpus florida
B
63
46
M
missing
11
Linodendrontuli i%ra
B
6 ^3
23
M
missing
12
Linodendron tul f6ra
B
+8'4
16
M
missm
13
Linodendron tul ifera
B
86
44
M
missing
14
Linodendron tul fera
B
85
71
M_
_ _ 103
30
DEER
15
Quercus launfolia
B
66
'3 1
935
54
2
B = bare root Vigor ^3 = good condition, 2 = surviving and likely to survive next year, 1 = almost surviving and not likely
to survive next year
M = Missing
Fenc
Utility Easement
y
Gat
,
,
,
xY
Fen
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA VOLUNTEER
HEIGHT CLASSES
cm
Scientific Name
1050
50 -100
> 100
Li wdambar strycifula
3
4
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
Fenc '
,
,
o Road ,
^' 1

Site Ivey-Ferguson
'Page 2
monitoring Year MY3
Date 8/20/2014
Area 5
Veg Plot No 5
X-axis 274OW
1 (
05
010
O
2220
-t X -AXIS a 0 r a U I u
AS
)enotes "Missing" Stem may be missing because of1thick herbaceous, layer and therefore,not visible at the time of
ionitoring Stem should be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years,because the steffi, may grow
bove herbaceous layer
lenotes "Dead" Stem should still be searched for at location dunng subsequent Monitoring Years because the roots a
ie stem may survive and therefore re-sprout in subsequent Monitoring Years
MMLORMor�co-ll�lilm�om
Rmnmrelbi�nn
1900
O
2220
-t X -AXIS a 0 r a U I u
AS
)enotes "Missing" Stem may be missing because of1thick herbaceous, layer and therefore,not visible at the time of
ionitoring Stem should be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years,because the steffi, may grow
bove herbaceous layer
lenotes "Dead" Stem should still be searched for at location dunng subsequent Monitoring Years because the roots a
ie stem may survive and therefore re-sprout in subsequent Monitoring Years

Site Ivey Ferguson
Page , 1
,toring Year MY3
Date 6/2012014
Area 1
Vag Plot No 6
X -axis
176 °N
Plot Location
see sketch below
Ma ID SclentiflcName_ _ Soume'meter
MONITORING
YEAR 3'DATA
— Scientific,Name
MY -2 Se ember.
2013
>100
X
Y
meter
I ddh
mlllimeteri
Height,
centimeter
I DBH
cin
Vigor
— ddh
millimeter
Height
centimeter
Notes
1
Quercus phellos
B
27
06
4,49
37
2
844
35
2
Linodendron tuli ifera
B
4
2
81
49
3
1062
44
Deer
3
Quercus ni ra
B
74
14
761
21
2
5'68
42
Res rout
4
Fraxinus I*nnsylvanica
B
84
3
1248
72
3
1206
57
Insect
5
Linodendron,tuli ifera
B
66
35
761
58
3
1059
56
Insect
6
Quercus phellos
B
42
Al
767
78--
1
_ 698
66
Res rout
7
Framnua, enns Ivarnca
B
24
471
13182
103
3
1359
76
Insect
8
Corpus flonda
B
08
53
'M
missing
Dead
9
Fraxinus p6rinsylvanica
B
8
16
113
3
1505
82
Insect
10
Corpus flonda
B
--23
4
84
773
63
2
555
64
Deer
11
Comus Ronda
B
16
95
missing
12
Linodendron tuli dera
B
5
61
934
65
3
1366
66
13
Quercus ni ra
B
59
64
M
Imissing
Dead
14
Quercus phellos
B
53
82.
M
Imissing
15
Comus florlda
B
46
951
M
Imissing
16
Quercus launfolia
B
46
941
M Imissing
17
DioWyros vii iniana
B
88
98
1271
66
3
103
53
Insect
o - ueie fuui Vigor 3 = good condition, 2 = surviving and likely to survive next year, 1 = almost surviving and not likely
to survive next year
M = Missing
-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Fen -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
y
xy x Existing,Fores i
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA VOLUNTEER
HEIGHT
CLASSES cm
— Scientific,Name
10 -50
50 -100
>100
Ulmus americans
3

Site Ivey-Ferguson
Page 2
.,onitonng Year MY3
Date 8/20/2014
Area I
Veg Plot No 6
X-axis 1760SE
1
0 f, 9
O,C
130°
0
1300
0
X -AXIS W I a V lu
)enotes "Missing" Stem may be missing because of thick'herbaceous layer and therefore not visible at the time of
nonitoring Stem should be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years because the stem may grow
ibove herbaceous layer
)enotes "Dead" Stem should still be searched for at location dunng subsequent Monitoring Years because the roots o
ie stem may survive and therefore re-sprout in subsequent Monitoring Years
!ORA
MONEEMEMNOMMMM
,
MENEEMMMOMENVENEMEN
WOO-OUNEEMEN
0
EMMENOMM
I no
EMMINNESEEMEEME
MMEMOrIdENNERNEMEEMN
MENNOWOMMEMEMEENE
MOMMOMMMMMM
=
=son
W"OEMEEMEEMEEM
130°
0
1300
0
X -AXIS W I a V lu
)enotes "Missing" Stem may be missing because of thick'herbaceous layer and therefore not visible at the time of
nonitoring Stem should be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years because the stem may grow
ibove herbaceous layer
)enotes "Dead" Stem should still be searched for at location dunng subsequent Monitoring Years because the roots o
ie stem may survive and therefore re-sprout in subsequent Monitoring Years

Site Ivey'Ferguson
Page 1
,tonng Year MY3
Date 8/20/2014
Area 1
Vag Plot No 7
X -axis 3161N
Plot Location
see sketch below
_ Ma ID Scientific Name Source
MONITORING YEAR 3 DATA
CLASSES
MY -2 (Soot
ember. 2013
10 -50
X
meter
Y
meter
I ddh
millimeter
Height
centimeter
DOH
cm
Vigor
ddh
millimeter
Height
centimeter
Notes
1
Wraxinus pennsylvanica
B
23
-07
1126
97
3
1178
84
2
Fraxmus pennsylvanica
B
7A
14
8
81
3
737
49
3
Lmodendron tul ifera
B
89
1 1
915
39
2
15'8
68
4
Lmodendrondul ifera
B
87
26
1557
68
3
1038
35
5
Fraxmus pennsylvanica
B
4*6
18
1_
M
752
-156
Deer
6
Quercus phellos
B
2
23
434
62
3
408
42
7
Lmodendron tuli dery
B
19
4
925
.73
3
1327
_ 58
Deer
8
Lmodendron4ul dera
B
411
47
—
M
Imissing
9
Lmodendron tul fera
B
33
51
M
missing
10
Corpus Honda
B
4'9
-46---
M
missing
11
Corpus fionda_
B
75
43
109
70
2
992
57
12
Lmodendron tuh`dera
B
58
97
M
missing
13
Fraxinus,perfnsylvanica
B
75
97
M
missing
14
Betula m ra
B
98
'95
M
missing
15
L'inodendron tul fera
B
74
7,91
1067
55
3
985
— 32
'16
Diospyros virginiana _
B
g 5
--7151
2577
180
1 3
3
721
47
;
17
Lmodendron tul sera
B
415
77
11'21
36
_ _
2
1418
44
Deer
18
Fraxmus pennsylvanica
B
34
7,7
928
58
3
871
60
19
Fraxmus pennsylvanica
B
01
85
7 63'
54
3
661--
38
o - Ua e , Wt vigor s = good condition, z = surviving and likely to survive next year, 1 = almost surviving and not likely
to survive next year
M = Missing
-- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Fen -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
y
xY x Existing Fores
CURRENT MONITORINGIYEAR DATA VOLUNTEER-
HEIGHT
CLASSES
cm
Scientific Name
10 -50
50 -100
>100
Li wdambar styraciflua
10
_6
Nyasa syivabca
5
Ulmus americans
18
g

Site Ivey-Ferguson
Page 2
Monitoring Year MY3
Date 8/20/2014
Area 1
Veg Plot No 7
X-axis 316°N,
1
4
0
0,0
NOMMOMMMMMOMMONSIONE
101,
"Nam
SSMMCNE
Ow-
MmENO=Cif
INEMMMIEMMLONOMMEREE
ONE
MEEMLOMMEMENSIONMENEE
276°
0
2760
0
a 0 i 0 & l
X-AXIS
)enotes "Missing" Stem may be missing,because of thick herbaceous layer and therefore not visible at,the time of
nonitoring Stem should be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years because the stem may grow
ibove herbaceous layer
)enotes"Dead" Stem should still be searched for at location d unng, subsequent Monitoring Years because the roots o
he,stem may survive and therefore re-sprout in subsequent Monitoring Years

Site Ivey Ferguson
Page 1
-„ndonng Year MY3
Date 8/21/2014
Area 2
VegtPlot No 8
X -axis
Plot Location
238 °N
see sketch below
Ma ID Scientific Name Source
MONITORING
YEAR 3 DATA
MY -2 Se tember
2013
50 =100
X
meter
Y
meter
ddh
mdlimeter
Height
centimeter
DBH
cm
Vigor
g
ddh
millimeter,
--Height
centimeter
DBH
cm
Notes
1
Fraxmus pennsylvanica
B
01
1,2
2092
132
3
1712
94
2
Fraxinus'pennsylvaFnica
B
22
14
2311
172
1 1
3
2228-
120
3
Fraxmus pennsylvanica
B
46
06
M
missing
4
Fraxmus pennsylvanice
B
69
09
M
missing
5
Fraxmus pennsylvanica,
B
92
08
_ 3371
173
1 19
3
2697
137
261
6
Quercus phellos
B
9'5
' 2'6
1444
76
3
12'05
67
7
Fraxmus pennsylvanica
B
67
24
1596
_ 106
3
1534
72
8
Fraxinus pennsyivanica
B
46
21
212
112
3
1674
73
9
Fraxmus pennsytvanica
B
05
47
3241
185
125
3_
2374
140
416
10
Fraxmus perinsylvanica
B
38
49
2277
124
3
16'23
66
11
Quercus phellos
8
69
49
812
75
3
837
48
12
Quercus phellos
B
98
57
1565
83
3
1495
87
13
Quercus phellos
B
92
8
1589
151
1 09
3
1286
85
14
lanodendron tul fora
8
71
78
8
45
3
951
37
15
Ouercus phellos
B
41
7 -3
M
missing
16
Quercus phellos
B
19
6 7
1 17'38
120
3 _
_ 1499
78
17
Lmodendron tul fera
B
68
92
21 19
95
3
1939
74
18
Lmodendron tul dera
B
43
93
M
missing
19
Quercus phellos
B
17
91
159
1181
3
1 1137
60
20
_
B
211
IB
I
I
I
I
I
-
B = bare root Vigor 3 = good condilion, 2= surviving and likely to survive next year, 1 = almost surviving and'not likely to survive
next year
IM = Missing
y
Drama a Feature �dL -�
1 Existing Forest
J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Fen -- - - _ - - - -
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA VOLUNTEER
HEIGHT CLASSES
cm
Scientific Name
10150
50 =100
1 > 100
N ssa s Ivatica
2

Site Ivey-Ferguson
Page 2
Monitoring Year MY3
Date 8/21/2014
Area 2
Veg Plot No 8
X-axis 236ON
1 (
1
0'5
0,OM!7
O
1920
14 o f a W lu
X-AXIS
)enotes "Missing" Stem may be missing because of thick herbaceous layer and therefore not visiblwat the time of
ionitoring Stem should be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Yearis because the stem may grow
bove herbaceous layer
►enotes "Dead" Stem should,still be searched,for'at location during subsequent Monitoring Years because the roots -0
ie stem may survive and ther6fore,re-sprout in subsequen-t,Monitoring Years
MMMME
EMELPS-ONEMEN,
1
0'5
0,OM!7
O
1920
14 o f a W lu
X-AXIS
)enotes "Missing" Stem may be missing because of thick herbaceous layer and therefore not visiblwat the time of
ionitoring Stem should be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Yearis because the stem may grow
bove herbaceous layer
►enotes "Dead" Stem should,still be searched,for'at location during subsequent Monitoring Years because the roots -0
ie stem may survive and ther6fore,re-sprout in subsequen-t,Monitoring Years

Site Ivey Ferguson
Page 1
tonng Year MY3
Date 8/21/2014
Area 2
Veg Plot No _ 9
X -axis
Plot Location
270"N
see sketch below
Ma ID Scientific -Name Source
MONITORING YEAR 3 DATA
CLASSES
MY -2 (Sep tember.
2013
10 -50
X
meter
Y
meter
ddh
millimeter
Het ht
centimeter
DBH
cm
Vigor
g
ddh
millimeter
Height
centimeter
DBH
cm
Notes
1
Linodendron tuli ifera
B
2
29
D
935
44
Stressed
2
Quercus hellos
B
67
27
1083
80
3
8109
55
3
Quercus re ra
B
6
54
M
missing
_ 4
Lmodendron'tuli ifera
B
24
57
M
missing
5
Fraxmus` erns Iva ica
B
2
9
2739
184
1 09
3
2475
147
0 647
8
Fraxinus pennsylvantca
B
E6
88
1642
160
1 03
3
1966
133
7
Quercus launfolia
B
10
87
63
38
2
47
41
8
Quercus phellos
B
41
03
M
missing
9
Betula m ra
B
65
04
M
missing
10
Lmodendron tuli ifera
B
99
25
M
missin
11
Betula ni ra _
B
39
26
M
missin
Dead
12
Betula ni ra
B
77
28
915
85
3
1718
107
Insect-
13
Quercus phellos
B
77
25
765
67
3
979
55
14
Quercus ni ra
B
9'9
- 54
755
49
i
1
649
56
15Lmodendron4uli
ifera
B
'9
53
__
_
D
1841
64
16
Linodendron tuli ifera
B
6,8
56
M
missing
17
Linodendron4uli rfera
B
0 5
- 6
1436
-109
3
1159
80
_
Stressed
18
Betula m ra
B
4
57
226
139
099
3
1596
102
Insect
19
Quercus Iaunfoiia
4
88
1591
109
3
1478
97
B = bare root Vigor ,3 = good condition, 2 = surviving and likely to survive next year, 1 = almost, surviving and not likely to survive
next year
M = Missing
y
Fence
6a
XY
x Fence stmg Forest
-- - - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
N ssa s Ivatica
HEIGHT
CLASSES
cm
Scientific Name
10 -50
50 -100
> 100 _
Ulmus amencana
5
5
Li uidambar styraciflua
10
18

Site Ivey- Ferguson
Page 2
.mitormg`Year MY3
Date 8/21/2014
Area 2
Veg Plot No 9
X-axis 270 °N
1
E
E
e
e
1
05
0,0 05 1
00"OvEms-MMOSEEMMEM
MEEMOWMENIMMEENNER
MEEMEEMEEMEEMEE
MEN
LISIEN
O
232°
1 S 4 0 0 / a a iv
X -AXIS
Denotes "Missing"' Stem may be missing because of thick herbaceous layer and °therefore}no't visible at the tirreiof
monitoring Stem should be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years because the stem may grow
above herbaceous layer
Denotes ',Dead" Stem should still be searched for at location dunng'subsequent, Mon dornng Years because the roots of
the stem may survive and'therefore re-sprout in subsequent Monitoring Years

APPENDIX E
Photo Stations

PHOTO STATION 11 VIEW FACIN& 30'N.
PHOTO STATION 21 VIEW 162 °SE.
PROJECT ND. MAM -09020
IVEy_FERGUSON
BANK PARCEL
TiiB JOHN PAW. I'NC.
29055 M�d Park —
FILENAME:
a MAM09020.DWG
d SCALE:
1 " = 1, 000'
°�' .North Carn029 Z»I3
>W
PHOTO STATIONS
Ilcrnx No.: C -0293
DATE; 08 -21 -14
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
MCADAMS
�eoo»33- 5sas�n�,n.��

PHOTO STATION 3: VIEW EAGINO 34 °N.
PHOTO STATION 4: VIEW 28 °5E.
PROJECT \0. MAM -09020
IVEy_FERGUSON
BANK PARCEL
!!Jj
TiiE JOi3I411 ikAl]AM3
001P'W�•
2905 Mertdlan Parkway
FILENAME: MAM09020.DWG
L" SCALE:
" _ 1,000'
PHOTO STATIONS
Durham, North C. lma 27713
�: m.�am
U DATE.
MCADAMS
(800)
08-21-4
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

PHOTO STATION 5: VIEW FACIN6 54 °NE.
PHOTO STATION 6: VIEW 218 °S.
ROJECT ND. MAM -09020 IVEY- FERGUSON
'� 1iZ JOHN R INC. Dig
EtLE "AMe: MAM09020.DWG BANK PARCEL COMPANY. IIiC
2905 MerShcan Parkway
cp
SCALE : 1 _ 1 ' 000 Durham, North Carolina 27713 PHOTO STATIONS (8W) 73 �: AddamnCo.mm
DATE: 08_21_14 ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA MCADAMS

PHOTO STATION "I: VIEW PAGING 310 °104.
PHOTO STATION 8: VIEW 22 °N.
PROJECT ND. MAM -09020
IVEy_FERGUSON
BANK PARCEL
'�
T}IS UNMANS
n Parkway
c FILENAME:
MAM09020.DWG
SCALE: ,° _ ,,000'
h—, N.fth
Durham, North Carolina 27713
PHOTO STATIONS
L>— No.:60293
X800'733 SC�1&�MrAdameCo.mm
DATE:
MCADAMS
08 -21 -14
ORANGE COUNTY, NORM CAROLINA

AV
,� I, � -�� �,ti � % � I it �� s-; � � � d � . • �I � J � � Ala a � ,��
A
I E

PHOTO STATION II: VIEN FAGIN6 312 °NW.
19 Vol • .-]Z II MWAI; t :I rm. ij:1
PROJECT \O. MAM -09020
IVEY_FERGUSON
BANK PARCEL
111Z JOHN R ]frAMN5
��` INC.
n Parkway
S FILENAME: MAM09020.DWG
j
SCALE:
1" — 1, 0 0 0
h9 , No fth
Durham, North Ca'ollna 27713
s
PHOTO STATIONS
Lj— No.: C -0293
(800) 733 5Eri&• bl�AdameCu.rom
DATE:
MC/ADAMS
08-21-14
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

PROJECT
NO.
MAM -09020
C1
a
F1LENAMF:
MAM09020.DWG
a scAt.e::
1" - 1,000'
('/; DATE:
n8-71-14