NC0003433_Application Update 2014_20140731

DUKE
ENERGY,
' PROGRESS
Mr. Jeffrey O. Poupart
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources, Wastewater Branch
' 1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1617
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
500 C P & L Road
Moncure, NC 27559
' Mr. Bradley Bennett
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources RECEIVEDDENROWR
' 1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1612
JUL 3 X 2014
Subject: Duke Energy Progress, Inc. Water uuality
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant NPDES Permit NC0003433 Permitting Section
NPDES Application Update
' Dear Messrs. Poupart and Bennett:
Duke Energy Progress, Inc. (Duke Energy) hereby provides this update to the NPDES permit
' application package submitted on December 2, 2010. This amendment reflects current
wastewater and stormwater sources and flows at the Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, Chatham
County.
Enclosed are copies of the affected pages of EPA Forms 1, and 2C, with attachments, that have
changed since our current NPDES wastewater permit became effective in January 2012.
Specifically, the following modified pages are included.
• EPA Form 1;
• EPA Form 2C, pages 1 -4;
• An updated flow chart and description of wastewater flows (Form 2C Attachment 2- Item
II -A, page A2 -1 through A2 -2);
• An updated narrative description of sources of pollution and treatment technologies
(Form 2C Attachment 3 Item II -B, pages A3 -1 through A3 -5); and
• An updated list of potential discharges not covered by analysis (Form 2C Attachment 4
Item VI pages A4 -1 through A4 -2).
The following supplemental information has also been enclosed:
• Seep Monitoring Report for Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant - June /July 2014
• Groundwater Monitoring Program, Sampling, Analysis, and Reporting Plan for Cape
Fear Steam Electric Plant
• Receptor Survey for Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
Duke Energy has also enclosed an updated Form 2F for stormwater outfalls associated with
industrial activities at the Cape Fear Plant that was included with the 2011 NPDES permit
renewal application package. Stormwater outfalls were historically permitted through the plant's
NPDES permit. As you recall, the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (NCDENR) indicated their intent to separate industrial stormwater from the

wastewater permit during the 2011 renewal timeframe. Before the new individual stormwater
permit was issued, Duke Energy submitted a request to withdraw the stormwater application
based on the changed conditions at the plant due to ongoing demolition projects where the
stormwater watersheds no longer drain areas with industrial activity. A request to withdraw the
subject permit application was made in a letter from Mr. Danny Wimberly to Ms. Bethany
Georgoulias dated December 13, 2012 (Form 2F Attachment 2). NCDENR concurred that an
NPDES Stormwater discharge permit was not applicable (Form 2F Attachment 3).
Since January 2013, demolition activities have continued at the site. Duke Energy believes that
the same factors are in place which led NCDENR to determine that an NPDES stormwater
discharge permit is not applicable at this time. Those key factors are:
1. The plant is no longer generating power. Some non - categorical stormwater (drainage from
plant areas) is still being routed to the ash ponds while the plant is being demolished. This
volume of stormwater is diminishing as pump stations are cleaned and removed during the
demolition process.
2. The 2011 draft stormwater permit proposed four stormwater (SW) outfalls ( Outfalls SW001,
SW002, SW003, and SW008). These outfalls are not currently impacted by industrial
activity.
a. Outfalls SW001 and SW008 drain areas from the inactive ash basins. These basins
have not been used in 30+ years, are fully vegetated /forested, and there are no
exposed materials. In the past, NCDENR determined that these outfalls do not
require permit coverage since discharges are not possible in events smaller than the
25 -year, 24 -hour storm.
b. Outfall SW002 was originally proposed to capture runoff from the railroad. Coal is nc
longer being brought onsite by rail (or any other means).
c. Outfall SW003 was originally proposed to contain potential leakage and minimize
environmental impact from an ash sluice line. Ash is no longer being sluiced and the
line has been physically disconnected.
3. There is no storage of raw industrial materials onsite.
4. Stored coal has been removed from the plant site and the remaining area has been covered
with soil and grass in accordance with the approved Erosion and Sedimentation Control
(E &SC) plan.
5. The #2 Fuel oil storage tanks have been removed from the site.
6. The site has an approved E &SC plan and is subject to the Stormwater General Permit for
Construction - Related Activities (NCG010000), also called Construction Stormwater.
7. Should conditions at the site change in a manner that would subject stormwater to industrial
activity, Duke Energy will work with NCDENR to secure the necessary permits.
Based on the above - mentioned factors, Duke Energy believes that the Construction Stormwater
Permit is the appropriate permitting mechanism for this site. However, we are hereby providing an
updated Form 2F with 2010 data (our applicable 'current' application), plus additional storm event
data from historic outfalls SW -002 and SW -003 (Form 2F Attachment 4) to provide NCDENR with a
full characterization of stormwater activities at this site. Duke Energy asks that DENR use this

information to confirm it's previous determination that an individual stormwater permit is not
currently applicable at this site.
If there are any questions regarding this package, please contact either:
• Ms. Toya Ogallo, Environmental Specialist at our North Carolina Regional Headquarters,
phone [phone] or email Letoya .Ogalloo),duke- energy.com, or
• Mr. Larry Baxley, Environmental Professional for the Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant;
phone [phone] or e -mail Larry.BaxleY65�duke- energy.com.
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel
properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or
persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
' Sincerely,
% % r RECEIVEDIDENR /DWR
' JUI._ 3 1 2014
Issa J. Zarzar water uuality
Director Demolition and Plant Retirement Permitting Section
Enclosures
1
1
1

Please print or type in the unshaded areas only
Form Approved OMB No 2040 -0086
FORM
U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
I EPA I D NUMBER
5
rip
1
=.E PA GENERAL INFORMATION
F
\ Consolidated Permits Program
NCD 0 0 0 8 3 0 919 p
GENERAL
(Head the "GeneralInxtrucimn, before warring.)
2 131 14 1 15
LABEL ITEMS
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
If a preprinted label has been provided affix it in the
designated space Review the Information carefully If any of It
I EPA I.D. NUMBER
is incorrect cross through it and enter the correct data in the
appropriate fill -In area below Also it any of the preprinted data
Is absent (the area to the left of the label space lists the
111 FACILITY NAME PLEASE PLACE LABEL IN THIS SPACE mformatwn that should appear). please provide it In the proper
fill -In area(s) below If the label is complete and correct. you
V FACILITY MAILING
need not complete Items I, III, V and VI (except Vl -8 which
ADDRESS
must be completed regardless) Complete all Items A no label
has been provided Refer to the instructions for detailed item
VI FACILITY LOCATION
descriptions and for the legal authorizations under which this
data Is collected
11 POLLUTANT CHARACTERISTICS
INSTRUCTIONS Complete A through J to determine whether you need to submit any permit application forms to the EPA. If you answer "yes" to any questions, you must
submit this form and the supplemental form listed in the parenthesis following the question. Mark "X" in the box in the third column if the supplemental form is attached If
you answer "no" to each question, you need not submit any of these forms You may answer "no" if your activity is excluded from permit requirements, see Section C of the
instructions See also, Section D of the instructions for definitions of bold -faced terms
Mark W
WAX
Yes
NO
FORM
ATTACHED
YES
No
FARM
ATTACHED
SPECIFIC QUESTIONS
SPECIFIC QUESTIONS
A Is this facility a publicly owned treatment works which
B Does or will this facility (either existing or proposed)
results in a discharge to waters of the U.S.? (FORM 2A)
X
include a concentrated animal feeding operation or
X
aquatic animal production facility which results in a
16
to
+9
p
z•
discharge to waters of the U.S.? (FORM 2B)
C. Is this a facility which currently results in discharges to
�/
X
�/
X
D Is this a proposed facility (other than those described in A
X
waters of the U.S. other than those described in A or B
or 8 above) which will result in a discharge to waters of
above? (FORM 2C)
the U.S.? (FORM 2D)
n
z3
z4
r
E Does or will this facility treat, store, or dispose of
F. Do you or will you inject at this facility industrial or
hazardous wastes? (FORM 3)
X
municipal effluent below the lowermost stratum
X
containing, within one quarter mile of the well bore,
underground sources of drinking water? (FORM 4)
26
n
X
31
32
„
G Do you or will you inject at this facility any produced water
H Do you or will you inject at this facility fluids for special
or other fluids which are brought to the surface in
processes such as mining of sulfur by the Frasch process,
connection with conventional oil or natural gas production,
X
solution mining of minerals. in situ combustion of fossil
X
inject fluids used for enhanced recovery of oil or natural
fuel, or recovery of geothermal energy? (FORM 4)
gas, or inject fluids for storage of liquid hydrocarbons?
(FORM 4)
35
36
37
36
N
I Is this facility a proposed stationary source which is one
J Is this facility a proposed stationary source which is
of the 28 industrial categories listed in the instructions and
�/
X
NOT one of the 28 industrial categories listed in the
X
which will potentially emit 100 tons per year of any air
instructions and which will potentially emit 250 tons per
pollutant regulated under the Clean Air Act and may affect
year of any air pollutant regulated under the Clean Air Act
41
41
4
°'
or be located in an attainment area? (FORM 5)
and may affect or be located in an attainment area?
(FORM 5)
III NAME OF FACILITY
c
1
SKIP
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
15
,5 - 29
3G
65
IV FACILITY CONTACT
A. NAME & TITLE (last, first, & title)
B. PHONE (area code & no.)
2
Larry Baxley, Lead EHS Pro essiona
( 1 ) 2 2 -7 6
15
16
45 46 46 4a 51 52- 55
V FACILTY MAILING ADDRESS
A. STREET OR P.O. BOX
J3 3 500 CP &L Road
5 ,5
45
B CITY OR TOWN
C STATE D ZIP CODE
4 Moncure
15 16
C 245 9
40 R 47 51
VI FACILITY LOCATION
A STREET, ROUTE NO. OR OTHER SPECIFIC IDENTIFIER
J5 c 5 0 CP &L Road
5 16
a,
B COUNTY NAME
Chatham
46
70
C CITY OR TOWN
D STATE
E ZIP CODE
F. COUNTY CODE (d knunn)
:6d
M n ure
C
2 5 9 1
3
15
16
40
4t 42
47 st
52 -54
EPA Form 3510 -1 (8 -90)
CONTINUE ON REVERSE

CONTIN11F(] FROM THE FRONT
VII SIC CODES 4-di it, in order of priority)
A. FIRST B SECOND
( specif)
( specify)
7
•5
4 911
'9 19
Elect rlc Power services 7
S
1e +9
C. THIRD D. FOURTH
`
(specijv)
(specify)
7
VIII. OPERATOR INFORMATION
A. NAME
B. Is the name listed in Item
e
Duke Energy Progress, Inc.
VIII -A also the owner?
0 YES ❑ NO
C. STATUS OF OPERATOR (Lnier the appropriate letter into the answer box. tf °Other, specrfy.)
D. PHONE (area code & no.)
F = FEDERAL M = PUBLIC (other rhanjederal nrstate)
S = STATE
W!
( specfy)
A
( 919) 516-1980
O = OTHER (specify)
P = PRIVATE
56
t5 6
I'll. zt iz ze
E. STREET OR P.O. BOX
4 500 CP &L Roa
66
F. CITY OR TOWN
G STATE
H. ZIP CODE
IX. INDIAN LAND
`
Is the facility located on Indian lands7
B
Moncure
NC
27559
❑ YES 0 NO
5]
+s
e Q
u Q
q et
X. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS
A. NPDES Diseha es to Surface W titer
D. PSD Air Emissions om Pro posedSources2
is to tt ie a0
g
N
I
NC0003433
+s
e
!e ao
B. UIC L'nder round In ecnon o Fluids
E. OTHER (specify)
c
T
I I
I I
(specify)
9
U
9
15
to
1 17118
b
t6
t6
tI
ie ]0
C. RCRA Hacardous Wastes
E. OTHER s eci
_
r
c . I (speck)
9
R
9
,e
1 ,6
n +e as
XI. MAP Iiiij
Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending to at least one mile beyond property boundaries. The map must show the outline of the facility, the
location of each of its existing and proposed intake and discharge structures, each of its hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facilities, and each well where it
injects fluids underground. Include all springs, rivers, and other surface water bodies in the map area. See instructions for precise requirements.
XII. NATURE OF BUSINESS (provide a brief description)
The Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant is a retired electric generating facility that formerly consisted of two
coal -fired units and four combined -cycle combustion turbines.
XIII. CERTIFICATION (see instructions)
1 certify under penalty of law that i have personally examined and am familiar with the information submitted in this application and all attachments and that, based on my
inquiry of those persons immediately responsible for obtaining the information contained in the application, I believe that the information is true, accurate, and complete. i
am aware that there are significant penalties for submith'ng false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment.
A. NAME & OFFICIAL TITLE (tvpe or print) B
SIGNATURE
C. DATE SIGNED
Issa J. Zarzar
Director Plant Demo and Retirement
—
COMMENTS FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
JC
u
to ss
EPA Form 3510 -1 (8 -90)

EPA I D NUMBER (copyfrom Item I of Form 1) Form Approved
INCDO00830919 OMB No 2040 -0086
Please print or tvpe in the unshaded areas only Approval expires 3- 31 -98.
FORM U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER
2C ��,EPA EXISTING MANUFACTURING, COMMERCIAL, MINING AND SILVICULTURE OPERATIONS
NPDES Consolidated Permits Program
I OUTFALL LOCATION
For each outfall, list the latitude and longitude of its location to the nearest 15 seconds and the name of the receiving water
A OUTFALL NUMBER
(' r)
B LATITUDE
C LONGITUDE
D RECEIVING WATER (Hume)
1 DEG
2 MIN
3 SEC
1 DEG
2 MIN
3 SEC
007
35
3S
15
79
02
39
Unnamed tributary to Cape Fear River
ll. FLOWS, SOURCES OF POLLUTION, AND TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
A Attach a line drawing showing the water flow through the facility Indicate sources of intake water, operations contributing wastewater to the effluent, and treatment units
labeled to correspond to the more detailed descriptions in Item B Construct a water balance on the line drawing by showing average flows between intakes, operations,
treatment units, and outfalls If a water balance cannot be determined (e g , for certain mining activities), provide a pictorial description of the nature and amount of any
sources of water and any collection or treatment measures
B For each outfall, provide a description of (1) All operations contributing wastewater to the effluent, including process wastewater, sanitary wastewater, cooling water,
and storm water runoff. (2) The average flow contributed by each operation, and (3) The treatment received by the wastewater. Continue on additional sheets if
necessary
1. OUT-
2 OPERATION(S) CONTRIBUTING FLOW
3 TREATMENT
FALL
NO (hut)
a. OPERATION (!„r)
b. AVERAGE FLOW
(include umi.%)
a. DESCRIPTION
b LIST CODES FROM
TABLE 2C -1
)07
Ash pond discharge
2.5 MOD (historic flows
'sedimentation, neutralization
1 -U
Once -thru cooling flow w/ towers
0 MOD
Evaporation
1 -F
Once -thru cooling flow w/o towers
0 MGD
Evaporation
1 -F
Low volume wastes
0 MOD
Sedimentation, neutralization
1 -1J
i -?
Coal pile runoff
0 MOD
sedimentation
1 -U
Storm water runoff (non categorical)
0.1B MOD
Sedimentation
1 -U
Sanitary wastes
0 MOD
Oxidation, sedimentation,
2 -g
1.7
disinfection
2 -F
See Attachment 3 for descriptions.
OFFICIAL USE ONLY (eJJluav t uidelme.c sub- calegones)
EPA Form 3510 -2C (8 -90) PAGE 1 of 4 CONTINUE ON REVERSE

CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT
C Except for storm runoff, leaks, or spills, are any of the discharges described in Items II -A or B intermittent or seasonal'?
❑ YES (complete the following table) W] NO (go to Section 111)
3 FREQUENCY
4. FLOW
a DAYS PER
B TOTAL VOLUME
2 OPERATION(s)
WEEK
b MONTHS
a FLOW RATE (m n!ed1
(.vpecrfi>, uh nn,[i)
1 OUTFALL
NUMBER (hw)
CONTRIBUTING FLOW
(Ira)
(,P-0
merage)
PER YEAR
(.,pecifJ --rage)
C DURATION
1 LONGTERM
2 MAXIMUM
1 LONGTERM
2 MAXIMUM
AVERAGE
DAILY
AVERAGE
DAILY
III. PRODUCTION
A Does an effluent guideline limitation promulgated by EPA under Section 304 of the Clean Water Act apply to your facility?
® YES (complete frem 111 -H) ❑ NO (,Qn to Section 11)
B Are the limitations in the applicable effluent guideline expressed in terms of production (or other measure of operation)?
❑ YES (complete liem 111 -() ® NO (go to Section 11)
C If you answered "yes" to Item III -B, list the quantity which represents an actual measurement of your level of production, expressed in the terms and units used in the
applicable effluent guideline, and indicate the affected outfalls
1. AVERAGE DAILY PRODUCTION
2 AFFECTED OUTFACES
(h,t majall numher%)
a QUANTITY PER DAY
b UNITS OF MEASURE
c OPERATION, PRODUCT, MATERIAL. ETC
(cp,z r1i)
IV IMPROVEMENTS
A. Are you now required by any Federal, State or local authority to meet any implementation schedule for the construction, upgrading or operations of wastewater
treatment equipment or practices or any other environmental programs which may affect the discharges described in this application? This includes, but is not limited to,
permit conditions. administrative or enforcement orders, enforcement compliance schedule letters, stipulations, court orders, and grant or loan conditions
❑ YES (complete thefulluxvng table) NO (go to Item W-8)
1 IDENTIFICATION OF CONDITION,
2 AFFECTED OUTFALLS
3 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
4 FINAL COMPLIANCE DATE
AGREEMENT, ETC
a NO
b SOURCE OF DISCHARGE
a REQUIRED
b PROJECTED
B OPTIONAL You may attach additional sheets describing any additional water pollution control programs (or other environmental projects which may affect your
discharges) you now have underway or which you plan Indicate whether each program is now underway or planned, and indicate your actual or planned schedules for
construction
❑ MARK "X" IF DESCRIPTION OF ADDITIONAL CONTROL PROGRAMS IS ATTACHED
EPA Form 3510 -2C (8 -90) PAGE 2 of 4 CONTINUE ON PAGE 3

IEPA LD NUMBER (copyjrom bent ! rjForm l)
CONTINUED FROM PAGE 2 NCDOOO630919
V INTAKE AND EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS
A B & C See instructions before proceeding — Complete one set of tables for each outfall — Annotate the outfall number in the space provided.
NOTE Tables V -A, V -B, and V -C are included on separate sheets numbered V -1 through V -9
D Use the space below to list any of the pollutants listed in Table 2c -3 of the instructions which you know or have reason to believe is discharged or may be discharged
from any outfall For every pollutant you list. briefly describe the reasons you believe it to be present and report any analytical data in your possession
1 POLLUTANT
2 SOURCE
1 POLLUTANT
2 SOURCE
Asbestos
Trace amounts in insulation
Strontium
Trace amounts in coal
Uranium
Trace amounts in coal
Vanadium
Trace amounts in coal
Zirconium
Trace amounts in coal
VI POTENTIAL DISCHARGES NOT COVERED BY ANALYSIS
Is any pollutant listed in Item V -C a substance or a component of a substance which you currently use or manufacture as an intermediate or final product or byproduct?
® YES (hsr all such pulhuunr% heh)" ) ❑ NO („ r., h •m f7 -B)
The following substances may be present in coal:
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
See Attachment 4 for other potential discharges not covered by analyses.
EPA Form 3510.2C (8 -90) PAGE 3 of 4 CONTINUE ON REVERSE

CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT
VII. BIOLOGICAL TOXICITY TESTING DATA
Do you have any knowledge or reason to believe that any biological test for acute or chronic toxicity has been made on any of your discharges or on a receiving water in
relation to your discharge within the last 3 years?
© YES (identh the test(s) and describe their purposes below) ❑ NO (go to Section VIM
As required by the current NPDES permit chronic toxicity tests have been performed on a quarterly basis on
the combined wastewater dicharge (Outfall 007). All tests have passed for the last three years.
VIII. CONTRACT ANALYSIS INFORMATION
Were any of the analyses reported in Item V performed by a contract laboratory or consulting firm?
® YES (list the name, address, and telephone number of. and pollutants analyzed by, ❑ NO (go to Section LY)
each such laboratory or firm below)
A. NAME
B ADDRESS
C TELEPHONE
D. POLLUTANTS ANALYZED
(area code & no.)
(list)
Pace Analytical Labs
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
(828)254 -7176
All pollutants
2225 Riverside Drive
Asheville, NC 28804
IX. CERTIFICATION
1 certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there
are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
A. NAME & OFFICIAL TITLE (type or print)
B. PHONE NO. (area code & no.)
Issa J. Zarzar, Director Plant Demo and Retirement
(919) 881 -3803
C. SIG ATURE
D. DATE SIGNED
EPA Form 3540 -2C (8 -90) J PAGE 4 of 4
1

' Duke Energy Progress, Inc.
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
NPDES Permit NC0003433
2014 Permit Application Amendment
Attachment 2
Form 2C - Item II -A Line Drawing Flows
Flows
Estimated Average Flow
Comments
A
0.58 MGD
Outfall 001 — West ash pond effluent to effluent channel
(based on historic flows)
B
0.66 MGD
Outfall 005 — East ash pond effluent to effluent channel
(based on historic flows)
C
0
Outfall 003 — Once through cooling water to effluent channel
D
9.24 MGD
Outfall 007 — Discharge to tributary of the Cape Fear River
(based on historic flows from ash ponds)
E
0
Cape Fear River intake
A2 -1

M
M �
M
E
O
O C
O �
z
Z
£c
o
d
IL �
N a
W o.
oQ
a
z
E
CD
a
v
�A
3
ca
L
0
J
Q
d
U
N
E
O
LL
N
C
d
i
U
R
r
a
' C
_R
U d
C �J
N U
' N
U
d
� W
o E
CL
au
T �
C N
W LL
d N
Y Q
7 f6
' � U
R
CD
m O O
C
O �
W s rn
Q
C
O N
12
O p
CL N
m N
W
i
i
N
U L
3
0 O
C �
O �
� L
w U
R
U o
O�
w
U
''L^^
V^Jl
W
Y
C
L
L
C
� o
�o
N

' Duke Energy Progress, Inc. NPDES Permit NC0003433
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant 2014 Permit Application Amendment
' Attachment 3
' Form 2C - Item II -B Description of Operations Contributing Wastewater
The Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant is a retired steam cycle electric generating plant that formerly
consisted of two coal -fired units, two heat recovery boilers and four Internal Combustion (IC) Turbines.
The site was retired in 2011 and is currently being demolished. No industrial activity is currently occurring
onsite.
' All wastewaters formerly generated by the site historically discharged to the effluent channel prior to the
combined outfall ( Outfall 007). Components of the discharges and wastestreams are described below.
' Additionally, a detailed map with the location of various seeps on the property is being provided as part of
this permit application.
Four stormwater outfalls were historically permitted through the NPDES permit. A discussion of those
' outfalls is included in this document following the wastewater discussion.
Chemical constituents contained in the discharges from this site will, in part, be representative of the
naturally- occurring chemical quality of the intake water and will also have chemical constituents of such
quality and quantity associated with similar discharges for fossil generating facilities of this size, type, and
in the geographical location. Either all or part of the elements listed on the Periodic Table, either
singularly or in any combination, may from time to time be contained in the discharge until the ash basins
are permanently closed.
Outfall 007 Combined Wastewater Discharge
' This outfall contains all waste stream flows including West Ash Pond discharge, once - through cooling
water, and East Ash Pond discharge. Outfall 007 is located in the effluent channel approximately 250
' feet downstream of the last internal outfall. Downstream of the effluent channel, the manmade canal
becomes an unnamed tributary which flows to the Cape Fear River.
West Ash Pond 1978 Pond Discharge — Internal Outfall 001
' The West Ash Pond formerly received coal pile runoff, settling basin drains, No. 2 fuel oil tank runoff,
sand bed filter backwash, parking lot drains, equipment cooling tower blowdown and drain, boiler
blowdown, oil unloading area drains, demineralizer regenerate, various yard and floor drains, ash trench
' drain, and miscellaneous low volume wastes. This pond also received bottom and fly ash either by ash
transport system waters or by truck. The ash pond provides treatment by sedimentation, oxidation,
neutralization, equalization, and adsorption. The dry areas of the ash pond may be treated with dust
' suppressant. Although all waste stream contributions to the ash pond will be eliminated, waste water
remaining in the basin will continue to be removed through existing outfalls. As the water in the ash pond
lowers, additional treatment may be brought onsite to ensure the ash pond discharge maintains
compliance with NPDES permitted limits, such as a portable filtration unit. Descriptions of the individual
waste streams are below.
' Coal Pile Runoff
The coal has been removed and the "coal pile area" has been covered with soil and graded in
accordance with an approved Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan. Historically, storm water
runoff from the coal pile was routed to the West Ash Pond for treatment.
' Low Volume Wastes
The low volume wastes retention basin contains an oil water separator and historically received
various plant process wastes streams and stormwater from industrial areas. In 2013 Duke Energy
' submitted to NCDENR a 90- day closure letter for this basin. This basin will be cleaned and breached
I A3 -1

Duke Energy Progress, Inc. NPDES Permit NC0003433 '
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant 2014 Permit Application Amendment
in accordance with that closure letter. Comingled wastewater from this basin flowed to the West Ash
Pond.
Boiler blowdown, drainage, and wastes from the equipment cooling tower and its associated heat
exchangers may have contained minute quantities of treatment chemicals. The small quantities of
these low volume wastes were sent to the low volume wastes retention basin.
Miscellaneous Wastes
Plant area floor and yard drains were routed to the West Ash Pond and included equipment drainage
wash down water, and rainfall runoff. Drains from areas likely to contain oil- filled equipment or
storage were routed to the low volume wastes retention basin which contained an oil /water separator.
Waste oil was disposed of according to the appropriate regulations.
Internal combustion turbine facility false start drain tanks were discharged into the low volume wastes
retention basin.
Cooling tower basin sludge; residuals from the low volume wastes retention basin and the coal pile
ditch; ash trench materials; circulating water tunnel sediment; boiler, electrostatic precipitator, and
associated appurtenances vacuuming sediments; sludge from catch basins, sumps, etc.; and other
miscellaneous low volume wastes from plant process were also transported to the West Ash Pond.
Once - through Cooling Water — Internal Outfall 003
Once - through condenser cooling water for the coal fired units and heat recovery units was withdrawn
from the Cape Fear River, passed through the condenser, and discharged directly into the effluent
channel. Some cooling was accomplished in the effluent channel. When the temperature at Outfall 007
approached 32 °C, cooling towers were placed in service to keep the channel water at or below 32 °C.
East Ash Pond (1985 Pond) — Internal Outfall 005
The East Ash Pond historically received ash transport waters (bottom and fly ash), runoff from yard
drains, air preheater washes, electrostatic precipitator washes, spent sandblast material, sewage
treatment plant effluent, and miscellaneous low volume wastes. The ash pond provides treatment by
sedimentation, oxidation, neutralization, equalization, and adsorption. Descriptions of the individual
historical waste streams are below. Currently no wastestreams are routed to the east ash pond. The dry
areas of the ash pond may be treated with dust suppressant. Although all waste stream contributions to
the ash pond have been eliminated, waste water remaining in the basin will continue to be removed
through existing outfalls. As the water in the ash pond lowers, additional treatment may be brought onsite
to ensure the ash pond discharge maintains compliance with NPDES permitted limits, such as a portable
filtration unit.
Ash Sluice Water
Fly ash and bottom ash from both units were hydraulically conveyed by an ash sluice pipeline to the
ash pond. As needed, alum was added to the ash sluice influent to aid settling.
A Rotamix® system was used to inject urea into Units 5 and 6. In the boiler, the ammonia /urea
reacted with NOx to form water vapor and nitrogen. The system was designed to minimize any
ammonia formation and ammonia slip. Any unreacted ammonia adsorbed on the fly ash from this
system was carried to the ash pond via ash sluice water.
Sanitary Waste Treatment Effluent
Historically, sanitary wastes were treated at an extended aeration package plant prior to discharge to
the East Ash Pond which provided secondary treatment for the effluent. Currently, sanitary wastes
are treated in an onsite septic system permitted by Chatham County. Temporary, portable toilets are
occasionally brought on site as needed to accommodate staffing levels.
Miscellaneous Wastes
Cooling tower basin sludge; residuals from the low volume wastes retention basin and coal pile
retention basin; ash trench materials; circulating water tunnel sediment; boiler, electrostatic
A3 -2

' Duke Energy Progress, Inc. NPDES Permit NC0003433
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant 2014 Permit Application Amendment
' precipitator wash, spent sandblast material, air preheater wash, and other miscellaneous low volume
wastes from plant process were also transported to the East Ash Pond.
Outfalls SW -1, SW -2, SW -3, and SW -8 — Storm Water
' In 2011, Duke Energy Progress applied for an individual stormwater permit (prior to that, stormwater
outfalls were included in the NPDES wastewater permit). During the permitting process, DEP and DENR
' concurred that since there is no industrial activity occurring onsite, the industrial stormwater permit is not
applicable. DEP withdrew the permit application and NCDENR responded with a letter accepting the
application withdrawal. Since 2013, the site has been further demolished and holds an approved Erosion
' and Sedimentation Control Plan, which subjects the site to the requirements of the Construction
Stormwater General Permit.
The following descriptions apply to the SW outfalls identified in DEP's 2011 application for an individual
stormwater permit.
Outfall SW -1 and Outfall SW -8 are legacy riser structures from inactive ash ponds. Discharges of
stormwater from these outfalls are rare and NCDENR has concurred with the estimation that it would take
greater than the 25 -year, 24- hour storm event to generate a discharge from these outfalls. Outfall SW -1
discharges directly into the Cape Fear River and Outfall SW -8 discharges into Shaddox Creek which
flows into the Haw River just above the confluence with the Deep River which forms the Cape Fear River.
Storm water collected along the railroad track between the plant entrance road and the plant site
combines with the drainage of an open field which is directed via Outfall SW -2 into Shaddox Creek that
flows into the Haw River just above the confluence with the Deep River. Historically, coal was moved
along the railroad track, however coal is no longer brought onsite. There is currently no industrial activity
occurring within this drainage area.
Stormwater collected along the roadside swell beside the plant entrance road is directed via Outfall SW -3
towards drainages that go to Shaddox Creek. Historically this location was selected to capture potential
impacts from an ash sluice line that crossed under the entrance road. Ash is no longer sluiced and the
line has been physically disconnected.
Other Wastes
' Herbicide Usage in the Treatment System Ponds
Herbicides are used as needed to control nuisance aquatic vegetation. These herbicides are applied by
licensed applicators, or persons under the immediate supervision of a licensed applicator, in accordance
with the manufacturer's instructions.
A3 -3

' Duke Energy Progress, Inc. NPDES Permit NC0003433
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant 2014 Permit Application Amendment
IAttachment 4
Form 2C - Item VI Potential Discharges Not Covered by Analysis
A4 -1
Estimated
Quantity
Chemical
per ear
ncy
Purpose
Wood fibers in proprietary binder mixture
350 -750
Every 4
Soil stabilizer and dust control
(BioCoverSS)
lb/acre per
months or
for ash pond
application
as needed
Anionic Water Soluble Polymer in
825 gal
Every 4
months or
Soil stabilizer and dust control
Emulsion (EcoGreen Barrier)
as needed
for ash pond
Recycled paper (Country Boy Cellulose
700 bales
Every 4
months or
Soil stabilizer and dust control
Fiber)
as needed
for ash pond
Bentonite, hydrated aluminum silicate
12,500 Ibs
Every 4
months or
Soil stabilizer and dust control
(BEN -GEL)
as needed
for ash pond
Listed chemicals are no longer being utilized for the purposes identified below. However, they
were used during historic operations and trace amounts have the potential to be discharged
during plant demolition.
No Longer
Aluminum sulfate
None
Used
Water treatment flocculent
No Longer
Aluminum chloroh drate
None
Used
Water treatment coagulant
GEBetz Spectrus OX103
(1- bromo -3- chloro -5,5-
No Longer
dimeth Ih dantoin )
None
Used
Biofouling control
No Longer
Biofouling control in sewage
Calcium hypochlorite
None
Used
treatment
Sanuril 115
(calcium hypochlorite and 1- bromo -3-
No Longer
Biofouling control in sewage
chloro-5,5- dim ethyl h dantoin )
None
Used
treatment
AB Cutrine Plus
(copper carbonate, triethanolamine,
No Longer
monoethanolamine )
None
Used
Algae control in ash ponds
Cygent Plus
(alkyl hydroxypoly oxyethylene,
No Longer
d'limonene )
None
Used
Algae control in Ash Ponds
No Longer
VITEC 3000 (proprietary)
None
Used
Antiscalant
No Longer
Oxygen scavenger; passivating
Steamate PAS3040 (proprietary)
None
Used
agent
GEBetz Steamate PAS3040
No Longer
Oxygen scavenger; passivating
h dro uinone
None
Used
agent
GEBetz Steamate NA0240
No Longer
mor holine
None
Used
pH control in condensate
No Longer
Sodium hydroxide
None
Used
pH control
No Longer
Caustic soda (anhydrous)
None
Used
pH control
GEBetz Optisperse HP9410
No Longer
Solids dispersant in boiler, pH
monosodium phosphate)
None
Used
control
A4 -1

Duke Energy Progress, Inc.
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
NPDES Permit NC0003433
2014 Permit Application Amendment
A4 -2
Estimated
Quantity
Chemical
per ear
Frequency
Purpose
No Longer
Solids dispersant in boiler, pH
Disodium phosphate
None
Used
control
No Longer
Solids dispersant in boiler, pH
Trisodium phosphate
None
Used
control
No Longer
Solids dispersant in boiler, pH
Sodium polyphosphate
None
Used
control
Dianodic DN2126
(phosphoric acid, potassium hydroxide,
No Longer
1- H- benzotriazole, methyl tol Itriazole )
None
Used
Corrosion inhibitor
No Longer
NOx control during ozone
Aqueous urea 50%
None
Used
months
No Longer
Citric acid 50%
None
Used
Boiler cleaning
No Longer
Sodium nitrite
None
Used
Boiler cleaning
No Longer
Ammonium bicarbonate
None
Used
Boiler cleaning
No Longer
Soda ash
None
Used
Boiler cleaning, if needed
No Longer
Ammonium persulfate
None
Used
Boiler cleaning, if needed
No Longer
Ammonium bifluoride
None
Used
Boiler cleaning, if needed
No Longer
Sodium bromate
None
Used
Boiler cleaning, if needed
No Longer
Hydrochloric acid
None
Used
Boiler cleaning, if needed
No Longer
Ethyl ened ia m i netetraacetic acid EDTA
None
Used
Boiler cleaning, if needed
No Longer
ChelClean 675 (proprietary)
None
Used
Boiler cleaning, if needed
Renewz
No Longer
sodium hydroxide, potassium silicate
None
Used
Condenser coil cleaning
TC -X10 Plus
No Longer
sodium hydroxide)
None
Used
Steam cleaning
No Longer
RoClean L403 (proprietary)
None
Used
RO membrane cleaning
No Longer
RoClean P111 (proprietary)
None
Used
RO membrane cleaning
No Longer
RoClean P303A (proprietary)
None
Used
RO membrane cleaning
20 Degree Baume Muriatic Acid
No Longer
(hydrochloric acid
None
Used
RO membrane cleaning
No Longer
Morton softener salt
None
Used
RO softener regeneration
No Longer
Cargill salt
None
Used
EDI cleaning
Cl 38B (Alum)
No Longer
aluminum chloroh drate
None
Used
TSS control in ash pond
No Longer
Laundry detergent (e.g., Tide
None
Used
Laundry cleaner
No Longer
Bleach
None
Used
Laundry cleaner
A4 -2

Duke Energy Progress, Inc.
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
NPDES Permit NC0003433
2014 Permit Application Amendment
A4 -3
Estimated
Quantity
Chemical
per ear
Frequency
Purpose
No Longer
Weed herbicide (e.g., Roundup)
None
Used
Weed killer treatment
Ant pesticide
No Longer
(e.g., h drameth Inon inerts
None
Used
Ant killer treatment
No Longer
Alkyl alcohol
None
Used
Freeze conditioning
agent
No Longer
Propylene glycol
None
Used
Freeze conditioning
agent
No Longer
Calcium chloride
None
Used
Freeze conditioning
agent
No Longer
Dieth lene glycol
None
Used
Freeze conditioning
agent
No Longer
Glycerin
None
Used
Freeze conditioning
agent
A4 -3

Please print or type in the unshaded areas only
EPA ID Number (copy from Item 1 of Form
NCD000830919 7
Form Approved OMB No 2040 -0086
Approval expires 5 -31 -92
FORM
2F
NPDES
U S Environmental Protection Agency
iA Washington DC 20460
��`"/ EPA Application for Permit to Discharge Storm Water
Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity
Paperwork Reduction Act Notice
Public reporting burden for this application is estimated to average 28 6 hours per application, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources
gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate, any other aspect
of this collection of information. or suggestions for improving this form. including suggestions which may increase or reduce this burden to Chief, Information Policy
Branch, PM -223, U S Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20460, or Director, Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs. Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503.
I. Outfall Location
For each outfall, list the latitude and longitude of its location to the nearest 15 seconds and the name of the receiving water
A Outfall Number
(list)
B Latitude
C Longitude
D Receiving Water
(name)
SW -001
35
35
50
79
2
55
Shaddox Creek
SW -002
35
35
41
79
2
48
Shaddox Creek
SW -003
35
35
35
79
2
40
Tributary to Shaddox Creek
SW -008
35
34
58
79
3
0
Cape Fear River
II. Improvements
A Are you now required by any Federal. State, or local authority to meet any implementation schedule for the construction, upgrading or operation of wastewater
treatment equipment or practices or any other environmental programs which may affect the discharges described in this application? This includes, but is not limited
to. permit conditions, administrative or enforcement orders, enforcement compliance schedule letters, stipulations, court orders, and grant or loan conditions
1 Identification of Conditions,
Agreements, Etc.
2 Affected Outfalls
3 Brief Description of Project
4 Final
Compliance Date
number
source of discharge
a req
b prof
None
B You may attach additional sheets describing any additional water pollution (or other environmental projects which may affect your discharges) you now have under
way or which you plan Indicate whether each program is now under way or planned, and indicate your actual or planned schedules for construction.
III. Site Drainage Map
Attach a site map showing topography (or indicating the outline of drainage areas served by the outfalls(s) covered in the application if a topographic map is unavailable)
depicting the facility including. each of its intake and discharge structures the drainage area of each storm water outfall, paved areas and buildings within the drainage
area of each storm water outfall, each known past or present areas used for outdoor storage of disposal of significant materials, each existing structural control measure
to reduce pollutants in storm water runoff, materials loading and access areas, areas where pesticides, herbicides, soil conditioners and fertilizers are applied, each of
its hazardous waste treatment, storage or disposal units (including each area not required to have a RCRA permit which is used for accumulating hazardous waste
under 40 CFR 262 34). each well where fluids from the facility are injected underground, springs. and other surface water bodies which received storm water discharges
from the facility
EPA Form 3510 -217 (1 -92) Page 1 of 3 Continue on Page 2

IContinued from the Front
IV. Narrative Description of Pollutant Sources
A For each outfall provide an estimate of the area (include units) of imperious surfaces (including paved areas and building roofs) drained to the outfall . and an estimate of the total surface area
drained by the outfall
Outfall
Area of Impervious Surface
Total Area Drained
Outfall
Area of Impervious Surface
Total Area Drained
Number
(provide units)
(provide units)
Number
(provide units)
(provide units)
SW -001
0 acre
10 acres
SW -002
1 acre
9 acres
SW -003
0 acre
2 acres
SW -008
0 acre
56 acres
B Provide a narrative description of significant materials that are currently or in the past three years have been treated. stored or disposed in a manner to allow exposure
to storm water, method of treatment storage, or disposal, past and present materials management practices employed to minimize contact by these materials with
storm water runoff, materials loading and access areas. and the location, manner. and frequency in which pesticides, herbicides, soil conditioners. and fertilizers are
applied
Outfalls SW -001 and SW -008 would discharge storm water from abandoned ash ponds that have not been used for more than 35 years.
These areas are now covered with vegetation. Previously, NCDENR concurred that it would take greater than a 25 -year storm event
to have storm water discharge from the existing stand pipes in these inactive ash ponds.
Outfall SW -002 discharges storm water from along the east side of a railroad spur that formerly received coal shipments to the
plant. All coal has been removed from site. Two pipes direct flow from this less than one acre area into a field. A collection
point within the field discharges into Shaddox Creek. Approximately one acre of impervious surface, including a roadway and a
gravelled employee parking lot, also drain to this collection point. No herbicides nor fertilizers are applied to the field.
Outfall SW -003 discharges storm water from along the south side of the entrance road. This small, grass -lined area is not
located near any industrial processes at the plant site nor is it located near any portion of the site where coal or other
chemical are unloaded. No herbicides nor fertilizers are applied in this area.
C For each outfall, provide the location and a description of existing structural and nonstructural control measures to reduce pollutants in storm water runoff, and a
description of the treatment the storm water receives, including the schedule and type of maintenance for control and treatment measures and the ultimate disposal
of any solid or fluid wastes other than by discharge.
Outfall
List Codes from
Number
Treatment
Table 2F -1
SW -001 None. 1 -U
SW -002 Rock filter dam at outfall pipe. 4 -A
SW -003 None. 4 -A
SW -008 None. 1 -U
V. Nonstormwater Discharges
A I certify under penalty of law hat the outfall(s) covered by this application have been tested or evaluated for the presence of nonstormwater discharges, and that all
nonstormwater discharged from these outfall(s) are identified in either an accompanying Form 2C or From 2E application for the outfall
Name and Official Title (type or print)
Signature
Date Signed
Larry Baxley, Environmental Spec.
B. Provide a description of the method used, the date of any testing, and the onsite drainage points that were directly observed during a test.
Previously, when the SW outfalls were permitted, the Cape Fear Plant ORC conducted an annual a visual inspection of all storm
water outfalls during an extended period of dry weather. This visual inspection served to ensure that there are no nonstorm
water discharges from the permitted storm water outfalls. Certification statements were signed, dated, and maintained onsite.
VI. Significant Leaks or Spills
Provide existing information regarding the history or significant leaks or spills of toxic or hazardous pollutants at the facility in the last three years, including the
approximate date and location of the spill or leak, and the type and amount of material released
There have been no leaks or spills of toxic or hazardous pollutants at the facilty in the last three years.
EPA Form 3510 -2F (1 -92) Page 2 of 3 Continue on Page 3

EPA ID Number (copy from Item 1 of Form 1)
Continued from Page 2 NCD000830919
II. Discharge Information
A, B, C. & D See instructions before proceeding. Complete one set of tables for each outfall. Annotate the outfall number in the space provided.
Table VII -A, VII -B, VII -C are included on separate sheets numbers VII -1 and VII -2.
E. Potential discharges not covered by analysis - is any toxic pollutant listed in table 2F -2, 2F -3, or 2F-4, a substance or a component of a substance which you
currently use or manufacture as an intermediate or final product or byproduct'?
✓❑ Yes (list all such pollutants below) ❑ No (go to Section U)
Elements that may be present in coal at the plant:
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
III. Biological Toxicity Testing Data
Do you have any knowledge or reason to believe that any biological test for acute or chronic toxicity has been made on any of your discharges or on a receiving water in
relation to your discharge within the last 3 years?
❑ Yes (list all such pollutants below) Q No (go to Section IX)
IX. Contract Analysis Information
Were any of the analyses reported in Item VII performed by a contract laboratory or consulting firm?
❑ Yes (list the name, address, and telephone number of, and pollutants
© No (go to Section X)
analyzed by, each such laboratory or firm below)
A. Name
B Address
C. Area Code & Phone No.
D. Pollutants Analyzed
X. Certification
1 certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure
that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that
there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
A. Name & Official Title (Type Or Print)
B. Area Code and Phone No.
Issa J. Zarzar, Director Demo and Retirement
(919) 881 -3803
C. Signature
D. Date Signed
EPA Form 3510 -2F (1 -92) J Page 3 of 3

EPA ID Number (copy from Item 1 of Form 1) Form Approved. OMB No 2040 -0086
CD900930919 outfall SW -002 Approval expires 5-31-92
VII. Discharge information (Continued from page 3 of Form 2F)
Part A — You must provide the results of at least one analysis for every pollutant in this table Complete one table for each outfall. See instructions for additional details
Pollutant
and
CAS Number
(if available)
Maximum Values
(include units)
Average Values
(include units)
Number
of
Storm
Events
Sampled
Sources of Pollutants
Grab Sample
Taken During
First 20
Minutes
Flow- Weighted
Composite
Grab Sample
Taken During
First 20
Minutes
Flow - Weighted
Composite
Oil and Grease
5 .5 mg /L
N'A
1
Biological Oxygen
Demand (BOD5)
3.6 mg /L
1
Chemical Oxygen
Demand (COD)
43.6 mg /L
1
Total Suspended
Solids JSS)
4.8 mg /L
1
Total Nitrogen
1.62 mg /L
1
Total Phosphorus
0.17 mg /L
pH
Minimum 6.3
Maximum 6.3
Minimum
Maximum
1
Part B — List each pollutant that is limited in an effluent guideline which the facility is subject to or any pollutant listed in the facility's NPDES permit for its process
wastewater (if the facility is operating under an existing NPDES permit) Complete one table for each ouffall. See the instructions for additional details and
requirements
Pollutant
and
CAS Number
(if available)
Maximum Values
(include units)
Average Values
(include units)
Number
of
Storm
Events
Sampled
Sources of Pollutants
Grab Sample
Taken During
First 20
Minutes
Flow- Weighted
Composite
Grab Sample
Taken During
First 20
Minutes
Flow- Weighted
Composite
pH
6.3 SU
N/A
1
JNat.ral environmental processes
TSS
4.8 mg /L
1
Erosion, settled dust /debris
Oil & Grease
5.5 mg /L
N/A
1
May be present in coal along rai:
Temperature
22 degrees C
N/A
1
Ambient
TRC
0.05 mg /L
N/A
1
Chlorination process at plant
Copper, Total
0.007 mg /L
1
May be present in coal along rail
Iron, Total
0.382 mg /L
1
May be present in coal along rail
Arsenic, Total
< 3 ug /L
1
May be present in coal along rail
Mercury
2.41 ng /L
1
May be present in coal along rail
Selenium, Total
< 2 ug /L
1
May be present in coal along rail
Chromium, Total
< 5 ug /L
1
May be present in coal along rail
Nickel, Total
< 5 ug /L
1
May be present in coal along rail
Phosphorus, Tot
0.17 mg /L
1
Natural environmental processes
Ammonia -N
< 0.02 mg /L N
1
Natural environmental processes
Nitrate - Nitrite
0.36 mg /L N
1
Natural environmental processes
Kjeldahl -N
1.24 mg /L
1
Natural environmental processes
Nitrogen, Total
1.62 mg /L
1
Natural environmental processes
Fecal coliform
4950 CFU /100m1
1
Natural environmental processes
*Composite samples not taken, by
permission of NCDWQ.
EPA Form 3510 -2F (1 -92) Page VII -1 Continue on Reverse

Continued from the Front
Part C - List each pollutant shown in Table 2F -2, 2F -3, and 2F -4 that you know or have reason to believe is present See the instructions for additional details and
requirements Complete one table for each outfall
Pollutant
and
CAS Number
(if available)
Maximum Values
(include units)
Average Values
(include units)
Number
of
Storm
Events
Sampled
Sources of Pollutants
Grab Sample
Taken During
First 20
Minutes
Flow- Weighted
Composite
Grab Sample
Taken During
First 20
Minutes
Flow- Weighted
Composite
Aluminum
- --
May be present in coal along rail
Antimony
- --
May be present in coal along rail
Beryllium
- --
May be present in coal along rail
Boron
- --
May be present in coal along rail
Bromide
- --
May be present in coal along rail
Cadmium
- --
May be present in coal along rail
Lead
- --
May be present in coal along rail
Magnesium
- --
May be present in coal along rail
Manganese
- --
May be present in coal along rail
Molybdenum
- --
May be present in coal along rail
Silver
- --
May be present in coal along rail
Thallium
--
May be present in coal along rail
Tin
May be present in coal along rail
Zinc
May be present in coal along rail
Part D — Provide data for the storm event(s) which resulted in the maximum values for the flow weighted composite sample
1
Date of
Storm
Event
2,
Duration
of Storm Event
(in minutes)
3
Total rainfall
during storm event
(in inches)
4.
Number of hours between
beginning of storm measured
and end of previous
measurable rain event
5
Maximum flow rate during
rain event
(gallons/minute or
specify units)
6
Total flow from
rain event
(gallons or specify units)
09/26/2010
thru
09/28/2010
2,160 minutes
3.0 inches
758 hours
2 gallons /minute
1,440 gallons
7. Provide a description of the method of flow measurement or estimate.
Storm water flow was timed with a stopwatch as it filled a bucket to a known volume to measure flow from outfall.
EPA Form 3510 -21F (1 -92) Page VII -2

EPA ID Number (copy from Item 1 of Form f) Form Approved OMB No 2040 -0086
CD000830919 outfall SW -003 Approval expires 5 -31 -92
VII. Discharge information (Continued from page 3 of Form 2F)
Part A - You must provide the results of at least one analysis for every pollutant in this table Complete one table for each outfall See instructions for additional details
Pollutant
and
CAS Number
(if available)
Maximum Values
(include units)
Average Values
(include units)
Number
of
Storm
Events
Sampled
Sources of Pollutants
Grab Sample
Taken During
First 20
Minutes
Flow- Weighted
Composite
Grab Sample
Taken During
First 20
Minutes
Flow- Weighted
Composite
Oil and Grease
< 5 mg /L
N/A
1
Biological Oxygen
Demand (BOD5)
9.3 mg /L
1
Chemical Oxygen
Demand (COD)
67 mg /L
1
Total Suspended
Solids (TSS)
35.2 mg /L
1
Total Nitrogen
1.99 mg /L
1
Total Phosphorus
0.69 mg /L
1
pH
Minimum 5.8
Maximum 5.8
Minimum
Maximum
1
Part B - List each pollutant that is limited in an effluent guideline which the facility is subject to or any pollutant listed in the facility's NPDES permit for its process
wastewater (if the facility is operating under an existing NPDES permit) Complete one table for each outfall See the instructions for additional details and
requirements
Pollutant
and
CAS Number
(if available)
Maximum Values
(include units)
Average Values
(include units)
Number
of
Storm
Events
Sampled
Sources of Pollutants
Grab Sample
Taken During
First 20
Minutes
Flow- Weighted
Composite
Grab Sample
Taken During
First 20
Minutes
Flow- Weighted
Composite
pH
5.8 SU
N/A
Natural environmental processes
TSS
35.2 mg /L
*
Erosion, settled dust /debris
Oil & Grease
< 5 mg /L
N/A
May be present in coal along rail
Temperature
22 degrees C
N/A
Ambient
TRC
0.05 mg /L
N/A
Chlorination process at plant
Copper, Total
0.006 mg /L
May be present in coal along rail
Iron, Total
0.855 mg /L
May be present in coal along rail
Arsenic, Total
< 3 ug /L
May be present in coal along rail
Mercury
5.53 ng /L
May be present in coal along rail
Selenium, Total
2.52 ug /L
May be present in coal along rail
Chromium, Total
< 5 ug /L
May be present in coal along rail
Nickel, Total
< 5 ug /L
May be present in coal along rail
Phosphorus, Tot
0.69 mg /L
Natural environmental processes
Ammonia -N
0.26 mg /L N
Natural environmental processes
Nitrate- Nitrite
< 0.02 mg /L N
Natural environmental processes
Kjeldahl -N
1.99 mg /L
Natural environmental processes
Nitrogen, Total
1.99 mg /L
Natural environmental processes
Fecal coliform
1710 CFU /100mL
Natural environmental processes
*Composite samples not taken, by
permission of NCDWQ.
EPA Form 3510 -2F (1 -92) Page VII -1 Continue on Reverse

Continued from the Front
Part C - List each pollutant shown in Table 2F -2. 2F -3, and 2F-4 that you know or have reason to believe is present See the instructions for additional details and
requirements Complete one table for each outfall
Pollutant
and
CAS Number
(if available)
Maximum Values
(include units)
Average Values
(include units)
Number
of
Storm
Events
Sampled
Sources of Pollutants
Grab Sample
Taken During
First 20
Minutes
Flow- Weighted
Composite
Grab Sample
Taken During
First 20
Minutes
Flow- Weighted
Composite
Aluminum
- --
May be present in coal along rail
Antimony
- --
May be present in coal along rail
Beryllium
- --
May be present in coal along rail
Boron
- --
May be present in coal along rail
Bromide
- --
May be present in coal along rail
Cadmium
- --
May be present in coal along rail
Lead
May be present in coal along rail
Magnesium
- --
May be present in coal along rail
Manganese
- --
May be present in coal along rail
Molybdenum
- --
May be present in coal along rail
Silver
- --
May be present in coal along rail
Thallium
- --
May be present in coal along rail
tin
- --
May be present in coal along rail
Zinc
- --
May be present in coal along rail
Part D — Provide data for the storm event(s) which resulted in the maximum values for the flow weighted composite sample
1
Date of
Storm
Event
2
Duration
of Storm Event
(in minutes)
3
Total rainfall
during storm event
(in inches)
4
Number of hours between
beginning of storm measured
and end of previous
measurable rain event
5.
Maximum flow rate during
rain event
(gallons minute or
specify units)
6
Total flow from
rain event
(gallons or specify units)
09/26/2010
thru
09/28/2010
2,160 minutes
3.0 inches
768 hours
' gallons /minute
720 gallons
7 Provide a description of the method of flow measurement or estimate.
Sl:orm water flow was timed with a stopwatch as it filled a bucket to a known volume to measure flow from outfall.
EPA Form 3510 -21F (1 -92)
Page VII -2

Duke Energy Progress, Inc. NPDES Permit NC0003433
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant 2014 Permit Application Amendment
Form 2F — Attachment 1
Item III Site Drainage Map
2F Al -1

Duke Energy Progress, Inc. NPDES Permit NC0003433 '
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant 2014 Permit Application Amendment
Form 2F — Attachment 1
Item III Topographic Site Drainage Map
2F Al -2

' Duke Energy Progress, Inc. NPDES Permit NC0003433
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant 2014 Permit Application Amendment
Form 2F —Attachment 1
Item III Topographic Site Drainage Map (Zoom)
2F Al -3

Form 2F Attachment 2
C4 Progress Energy
December 13, 2012
File No.: 12520 -R
Ms. Bethany A. Georgoulias
Stormwater Permitting Unit
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1617
Subject: Carolina Power & Light Co. d /b /a Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. (Progress Energy), a
Subsidiary of Duke Energy Inc.
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant ( NPDES NC0003433 /NCS000550 draft)
NPDES Storm Water Permit Application Withdrawal
Dear Ms. Georgoulias:
Progress Energy is hereby withdrawing the Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant NPDES Form 2F Application for
Permit to Discharge Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity submitted to Mr. Tom
Belnick on December 2, 2010. This power plant has ceased all categorical industrial activity and no longer
requires authorization to discharge storm water.
The submitted Form 2F application requested authorization to discharge storm water from four outfalls:
' SW -001, SW -002, SW -003, and SW -008. As acknowledged in the draft individual storm water permit, there
are no discharges from Outfalls SW -001 and SW -008 (inactive ash basins) for events less than a
25 year /24 hour storm, thus, these outfalls are not subject to storm water permitting. No more coal is being
' delivered to the power plant thus authorization for the drainage area along the rail spur, which discharges
via Outfall SW -002, is no longer required. A de minims amount of coal remains along this short spur but this
insignificant amount of material is not expected to cause any environmental impact. The ash sluice line
' crossing the swell at Outfall SW -003 is no longer in use. The line was rinsed and portions of the piping were
removed on November 8, 2012, the last categorical activity to be ceased at the power plant.
' Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Cape fear Swan Plant
500 (AL Road
Mnnrwe. NC 275A

Form 2F Attachment 2
Ms. Bethany A. Georgoulias
Page 2 of 2
December 13, 2012
Because no categorical industrial activity is currently conducted at the Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, no
authorization for the discharge of storm water associated with industrial activity is required. Therefore,
Progress Energy believes that the current NPDES storm water permitting requirements are no longer
applicable. Please respond with concurrence of our understanding by either a letter to me at the power
plant address or an email to Ms. Robin Bryson, Environmental Specialist in our corporate office, at
robin.bryson @penmail.com.
1 certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and
evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Sincerely,
��� n. n G ✓C.��-- fdt�'.
Danny Wimberly
Acting Plant Manager
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
DW /rb
cc: Larry Baxley
Henry Gales
John Velte

1 Form 2F Attachment 3
OF W ATFi9 Michael F. Easley
or 0, WNW Govemor
Vj 7 ��� William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
NCQENR
>_ y North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E„ Director
' Division of Water Quality
October 12, 2005 RECEIVED
1 Ms. Victoria K. Will OCT 17 2005
Cape Fear Steam Plant
1 500 CP & L Road CAPE FEAR PLANT
Moncure, North Carolina 27559
1 Subject: NPDES Permit NC0003433
Cape Fear Steam Plant
Wake County
1 Cie, ky.
Dear Mr- Will:
1 The Division evaluated your request to waive sampling requirements for the stormwater outfalls for the Cape
Fear Steam Plant's renewal application. Five stormwater outfalls are covered under the NPDES permit, SW -1,
SW -2, SW -3, SW-4, and 008. Outfalls SW -1 and 008 drain the area were the old ash ponds were located. The
1 ponds have not been used for more than 30 years and are covered with vegetation. In this case the application
requirements are not applicable because there is no exposed materials or industrial activity. Outfall SW4 drains
an area near the railroad tracks and is tributary to outfall 007. Outfall 007 is the outfall at the discharge canal and
1 is monitored and sampled under the permit. Outfall SW4 is represented by outfall 007, therefore no sampling is
necessary for the application. Outfalls SW -2 and SW -3 drain small areas from the road and railroad line and are
combined with parking and grassy areas. As informed by Progress Energy, these outfalls do not collect enough
1 flow to obtain a representative sample. The sampling and testing requirements for outfalls SW -2 and SW -3 are
also waived for the permit renewal application. At this time the Division is not granting any modifications to the
conditions pertaining to stormwater outfalls in the permit. Due to the proximity of the renewal date,
modifications to the permit pertaining the elimination of outfalls shall be requested with the permit renewal
1 application. If you have any questions please contact Teresa Rodriguez of the NPDES Unit at (919) 733 -5083,
extension 553.
1 Sincerely,
//!K-/ �
1 Gil Vinzani
EAST NPDES Unit Supervisor
1 cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
EAST NPDES Unit Files
i
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer VISIT us ON THE INTERNET @ http: //h2o.enr,state.nc.us /NPDES
1

Duke Energy Progress, Inc NPDES Permit NC0003433
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant 2014 Permit Application Amendment
Form 2F Attachment 4
Current Stormwater Sample Data
nags
B1 Target analyte detected in method blank at or above the reporting limit. Target analyte concentration in
sample was greater than 1 OX the concentration of the target analyte detected in the method blank. Analyte
concentration in sample is not affected by contamination.
M4 M4 - The spike recovery value was unusable since the analyte concentration was disproportionate to the spike level.
The associated Laboratory Control Sample recovery was acceptable.
Outfall
SWO02
Outfall SWO03
Collected Date
Component
Method
Units
MDL
RDL
< or >
Result
Flag
< or >
Result
Flag
07/10/14
COD
HACH 8000
mg /L
3.78
20
39
0
82
0
07/10/14
Chloride
EPA 300.0
mg /L
0.22
1
6.7
0
8.7
0
07/10/14
Fluoride
EPA 300.0
mg /L
0.17
1
<
1
0
<
1
0
07/10/14
Sulfate
EPA 300.0
mg /L
0.36
2
140
0
80
0
07/10/14
Oil and Grease
EPA 1664B
mg /L
5.0
5.0
<
5.0
0
<
5.0
0
07/10/14
Mercury (Hg)
EPA 245.1
ug /L
0.006
0.05
<
0.05
0
<
0.05
0
07/10/14
Aluminum (Al)
EPA 200.7
mg /L
0.002
0.005
3.21
B1
1.23
B1
07/10/14
Barium (Ba)
EPA 200.7
mg /L
0.0001
0.005
0.049
0
0.032
0
07/10/14
Boron (B)
EPA 200.7
mg /L
0.0033
0.05
0.097
0
0.212
0
07/10/14
Calcium (Ca)
EPA 200.7
mg /L
0.007
0.02
25.2
B1, M41
16.9
B1
07/10/14
Hardness
EPA 200.7
mg /L (CaCO3)
0.1273
0.19
119
0
74.4
0
07/10/14
Iron (Fe)
EPA 200.7
mg /L
0.0013
0.01
4.67
0
1.4
0
07/10/14
Magnesium (Mg)
EPA 200.7
mg /L
0.0044
0.005
13.6
0
7.81
0
07/10/14
Manganese (Mn)
EPA 200.7
mg /L
0.0002
0.005
0.188
0
0.972
0
07/10/14
Zinc (Zn)
EPA 200.7
mg /L
0.0026
0.005
0.064
0
0.077
0
07/10/14
Antimony (Sb)
EPA 200.8
ug /L
0.106
1
<
1
0
<
1
0
07/10/14
Arsenic (As)
EPA 200.8
ug /L
0.078
1
2.39
0
1.51
0
07/10/14
Cadmium (Cd)
EPA 200.8
ug /L
0.101
1
<
1
0
<
1
0
07/10/14
Chromium (Cr)
EPA 200.8
ug /L
0.061
1
6.1
0
1.5
0
07/10/14
Copper (Cu)
EPA 200.8
ug /L
0.11
1
17.1
0
5.83
0
07/10/14
Lead (Pb)
EPA 200.8
ug /L
0.065
1
4.9
0
<
1
0
07/10/14
Molybdenum (Mo)
EPA 200.8
ug /L
0.066
1
<
1
0
<
1
0
07/10/14
Nickel (Ni)
EPA 200.8
ug /L
0.194
1
5.48
0
13.2
0
07/10/14
Selenium (Se)
EPA 200.8
ug /L
0.092
1
<
1
0
1.05
0
07/10/14
Thallium (TI) Low Level
EPA 200.8
ug /L
0.134
0.2
<
0.2
0
<
0.2
0
07/10/14
TDS
SM2540C
mg /L
16.75
25
290
0
210
0
07/10/14
TSS
SM2540D
mg /L
6.7
10
62
1 0
1
26
0
nags
B1 Target analyte detected in method blank at or above the reporting limit. Target analyte concentration in
sample was greater than 1 OX the concentration of the target analyte detected in the method blank. Analyte
concentration in sample is not affected by contamination.
M4 M4 - The spike recovery value was unusable since the analyte concentration was disproportionate to the spike level.
The associated Laboratory Control Sample recovery was acceptable.

,trip
syn,T(erra
SEEP MONITORING REPORT —
JUNE /JULY 2014
FOR
CAPE FEAR STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
500 CP &L ROAD
MONCURE, NORTH CAROLINA 27559
CHATHAM COUNTY
NPDES PERMIT #NC0003433
PREPARED FOR
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC.
RALEIGHj, NORTH CAROLINA
(7 DUKE
ENERGY,
PROGRESS
SUBMITTED: JULY 2014
rry ie; CJC PG 1425
Proj eologist
4A k A)te
at y b, NC PG 1328
i Project Manager

Seep Monitoring July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................... ..............................1
2.0 Seep Monitoring ............................................................................... ............................... 2
2.1 Seep Identification ...................................................................... ............................... 2
2.2 Seep Flow Measurement ............................................................ ............................... 2
2.3 Seep Sample Collection .............................................................. ............................... 3
3.0 Recommendations ............................................................................. ..............................5
List of Figures
Figure 1- Site Location Map
Figure 2 - Identified Seeps and Water Quality Sample Locations
List of Tables
Table 1- Seep Locations and Descriptions
Table 2 - Seep Flows and Analytical Results
Table 3 - Analytical Parameters /Methods
List of Appendices
Appendix A - Analytical Sample Handling, Preservation and
Holding Time Requirements
Page 1
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \Cape Fear \Seep Monitoring Plan \Cape Fear Seep Monitoring Plan 7- 30- 14.docx

Seep Monitoring July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
' The following report summarizes an evaluation of the Cape Fear Plant seepage flow
downgradient of the ash ponds toward Shaddox Creek and the Cape Fear River. The
' evaluation included a detailed site reconnaissance to identify potential seeps followed
by the collection of flow measurements and representative water quality samples at
' select locations. The site reconnaissance was conducted during the spring of 2014.
Representative seep locations were evaluated for water quality and flow rates during
' late June to early July 2014.
Wastewater discharges from the ash ponds are permitted by the North Carolina
' Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of Water
Resources (DWR) under National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Permit NC0003433. The purpose of the evaluation was to determine additional
' potential outfalls for inclusion within the permit.
Fifteen seep locations were identified during wet weather conditions in early spring of
' 2014. However, only six locations contained sufficient water for water quality sample
collection in late June to early July 2014. Seven of the sample locations were located
' upstream of the Outfall 007 to the canal on the property.
The low volume of water characteristic of the seeps coupled with the relatively low
' constituent concentrations in the samples, suggest that there is little potential to
influence water quality of Shaddox Creek or the Cape Fear River. If reasonable
potential analyses demonstrate that there is no potential to exceed water quality
standards, then Duke Energy proposes to re- evaluate the seep locations listed in this
document annually over the next 5 -year permit cycle. These annual evaluations would
be documented and would verify the condition of the existing seeps and determine the
presence of new seeps. DWR will be promptly notified if any new seeps are identified
or any significant changes are observed for the existing seeps. If any existing or newly
identified seeps are determined to reach the Cape Fear River and the seepage has
reasonable potential to exceed a water quality standard, Duke Energy will take
measures to either (1) stop the seepage, (2) capture and route the seep so that it is
discharged through a NPDES permitted outfall, or (3) address the seep using Best
Management Plans approved by DWR.
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \Cape Fear \Seep Monitoring Plan \Cape Fear Seep Monitoring Plan 7- 30- 14.docx

Seep Monitoring July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Duke Energy Progress, Inc. (Duke Energy) owns and operates the Cape Fear Steam
Electric Plant (Cape Fear Plant) located on approximately 900 acres in central North
Carolina near Moncure, North Carolina. The Cape Fear Plant is located in Chatham
County along the east bank of the Cape Fear River southeast of Moncure and west of
Corinth Road. The site location is shown on Figure 1.
The Cape Fear Plant began operations in 1923 and additional units were added in the
following years. Throughout its operational history, the Cape Fear Plant employed six
coal -fired units along with four oil - fueled combustion turbine units to produce steam.
Ash generated from coal combustion was stored on -site in ash management ponds.
Operations were terminated at Cape Fear Plant in October 2012 and demolition
activities are currently underway.
Wastewater discharges from the ash ponds are permitted by the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) under National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Permit NC0003433.
This report summarizes an evaluation of seepage flows across the Cape Fear Plant. The
evaluation included a detailed site reconnaissance to identify potential seeps, flow
measurements of identified seeps, and collection of seep water and other surface water
with chemical analysis of collected samples. The site reconnaissance was conducted in
late February 2014. Seep sampling and flow measurements were completed from June
30 through July 2, 2014.
Page 1
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \Cape Fear \Seep Monitoring Plan \Cape Fear Seep Monitoring Plan 7- 30- 14.docx

Seep Monitoring July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
2.0 SEEP MONITORING
' 2.1 Seep Identification
A detailed reconnaissance of the outside perimeter of each historic ash management
' pond present at Cape Fear Plant was conducted in late February 2014 for the purpose of
identifying and locating any potential seeps originating from the ash ponds. Identified
' seeps were described, photographed, noted on a field map, and surveyed as to location
using GPS (Table 1). Identified seeps were further evaluated in June/July 2014. During
the June/July evaluation, it was observed that some of the seeps identified in February
' 2014 were dry reflecting an intermittent or seasonal nature. The locations of seeps
identified are presented on Figure 2.
2.2 Seep Flow Measurement
Flow measurements were made in June/July 2014 at water - bearing seep locations using
' either a Son -Tek F1owTracker ® Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter or the timed - volumetric
method. The F1owTracker® measures stream velocity and discharge using sound
waves. The timed - volumetric method was used at two locations where the flow was
' constrained in a location that prevented the F1owTracker from recording a signal
without interference.
' The timed - volumetric method was employed by collecting a volume of water from the
discharge of the seep directly into an appropriately sized container (graduated cylinder
' or bucket). The entire seep flow was routed to the container. The amount of time (in
seconds) required to collect a known volume of water was recorded. Five timed
volumes were recorded and the flow rate for the seep was calculated based on an
' average of the timed volume measurements.
' The F1owTracker® was used to measure seep flows at the majority of seeps and in the
Shaddox Creek stream channel. The method is designed for streams that can be waded
following established procedures such as the U.S. Geological Survey standards. Use of
' the FlowTracker® was generally limited to channels of sufficient width (approximately
0.5 feet or greater) and depth (approximately 0.17 feet or greater). Flow measurements
(water velocity and depth) within quality control bounds of the instrument were
recorded manually for estimation of discharge at a seep.
' Locations were selected where channel banks were fairly parallel. The channel width
was measured at the water line and recorded. If the channel width was less than one
foot, the average depth was recorded and three velocity measurements were taken. The
' average of the three velocity measurements and the channel volume (depth and width)
were used to calculate the discharge at a given location.
' Page 2
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \Cape Fear \Seep Monitoring Plan \Cape Fear Seep Monitoring Plan 7- 30- 14.docx
1

Seep Monitoring July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
If the channel width at the water line was between 1.0 and 2.5 feet, velocity and depth
were recorded at a minimum of three locations spaced evenly across the channel. If the
channel width was between 2.5 and 5 feet, velocity and depth were recorded at a
minimum of five evenly spaced locations. An exception to the methodology occurred at
the surface water location on Shaddox Creek because conditions made it unsafe to enter
the stream and access five locations.
Consistent with USGS methodology, velocity measurements were collected at 60% of
water depth.
The averages of the calculated flows (in MGD) for seeps with measurable flow in
June/July 2014 are included in Table 2. Seepage flow is generally variable. Flow may
increase or decrease depending on the amount of rainfall, groundwater levels, weather
conditions, and other variables.
2.3 Sgee===;
LEE e flo w, water from two ash ponds, and four surface
water bodies were sampled during une/July 2014 for water quality analysis. The
sample locations are described in Table 1 and shown on Figure 2.
To prevent dilution from stormwater runoff into seep flows, seep samples were
collected during a period preceded by very low precipitation. For the approximate
three weeks preceding the June/July sample collection, only 0.14 inches of rain fell in the
area as recorded at the Raleigh Executive Jetport (Sanford, NC), located about three
miles west - southwest of the Cape Fear Plant.
Samples were collected from the seep flows directly into sample containers. Care was
taken to avoid disturbing and entraining particulate soil and sediment. During sample
collection, in -situ field parameters (temperature, pH, specific conductance) were
measured utilizing a YSI Pro Plus multi- function meter. Turbidity was also measured
in the field using a Hach 2100Q turbidimeter.
In addition to seep samples collected from seeps, four samples were collected from the
surface water bodies that bound the Cape Fear Plant. Three sample locations (Haw
ver an ape Fear River) were accessed using a personal watercraft. The samples
were collected at a midstream location as a grab sample from a depth of approximately
one meter. The sample from Shaddox Creek was accessed from the shore.
• A surface water sample was collected from the Haw River approximately 200
feet upstream of the northern Plant property line, upstream of Shaddox Creek,
Page 3
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \Cape Fear \Seep Monitoring Plan \Cape Fear Seep Monitoring Plan 7- 30- 14.docx

' Seep Monitoring July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
and upstream of the confluence of the Haw River with the Deep River that forms
' the Cape Fear River.
• A surface water sample was collected from the Cape Fear River downstream of
' the Plant, approximately 300 feet upstream of the railroad trestle that crosses the
river near Brickhaven, NC.
• A surface water sample was collected from the Cape Fear River downstream
near the NC Highway 42 bridge (Avents Ferry Road) upstream from the surface
water intake located on the west side of the Cape Fear River. This location is
approximately 300 feet upstream of the bridge and surface water intake.
• A surface water sample was collected from Shaddox Creek on the north side of
Corinth Road, north of the intersection of Corinth Road and CP &L Drive. This
location is upstream of the Cape Fear Plant.
Samples were also collected of the water in the 1978 and 1985 ash ponds.
Laboratory analyses were conducted by Duke Energy's Huntersville analytical
laboratory and Pace Analytical Laboratories (NC Wastewater Certifications #248 and
12). A summary of the laboratory and field data is provided in Table 2. A listing of
analytical parameters and associated methods are included in Table 3. Sample
handling, storage, and preservation methods are summarized in Appendix A.
Page 4
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ Seep Monitoring Plan\ Cape Fear Seep Monitoring Plan 7- 30- 14.docx

Seep Monitoring July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
The very low discharge of water characteristic of each seep location, including a
number of seep locations that only flow during periods of wet weather, suggests
minimal potential to influence water quality in the Cape Fear River. If ongoing analyses
demonstrates that there is no potential to exceed water quality standards, Duke Energy
proposes to re- evaluate the identified seep locations listed in this document annually
over the next five -year permit cycle. These annual evaluations would be documented
and would verify the condition of the existing seeps and determine the presence of any
newly developed seeps. DWR will be promptly notified if new seeps are identified or
any significant changes are observed for the existing seeps. If any existing or newly
identified seeps are determined to reach the Cape Fear River and the seepage has
reasonable potential to exceed a water quality standard, Duke Energy will take
measures to either (1) stop the seepage, (2) capture and route the seep so that it is
discharged through a NPDES permitted outfall, or (3) address the seep using Best
Management Plans approved by DWR.
Page 5
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \Cape Fear \Seep Monitoring Plan \Cape Fear Seep Monitoring Plan 7- 30- 14.docx

FIGURES

TABLES

a
w
c
,w° °
v °:
M c
a) aa)
v:
�
°
o
- � -
o
t
m
�
3
c
c
c v
3o
v
°
p
w
L
v
Y
°=
d
c
.� '3
L
7
a
°
,
a:
a1
y
N
o
O
Lo
U
U �+
N
u
v
QJ
Q&
c
o
c
Q
Ln
rn
'o
v
°c_
`_
cu °
7
CD tp
°
v
Q
v T
01 UJ
v
E
o
Li
v°
rLO
a>i
LO to
c
tD
al
ro
C
y
O
a
3
O
(n
>'
„
u
-
L
L
C
T
°
O
N
01
7
C" °
T
'
LLJ
,�
ro
o
C
0
V1
O
..�
3
to
aJ
c
T
a
L 7 Q)
o
_0
td
Ln
n
Y
C
E
0
a
7
°
C rp
w
v
CL
0
VI
L
7 fp
C
t
7 a
N
C
(n
aj
v
L
co
n
O
LL
N
-6
.� >
y,, aJ
O
a
r0
C
�
aJ
c
C a)
7
>_
7
U
7
a1
of
>
'L
(O
O
C
C O
o QJ
C aJ
O
L
01
N
LT
in-
QJ
C
_0
L
r0
C 'O
p Ou M
>.
Q'
v '
u
Ln
0
Y
O
n_o
4J
v u
c
3
°
c
a o
t
L
E
0 L
°
a
Q/
L
N
O
C
C
i
V)
a
_�
L= 9
VI
a
O
E
L
y
06
a
C
L
t
aJ
rm0
3
O Ln
L
�`
7
O
ro
L
i
a-+
E L
O
L
U-
°
w
fp
r0
3
U
QJ
L
00 a)
LL -0
a)
—
7
f0
M O al
a
Cl
E
Q)
p 3
6
o
Q L
'0
c
3
o
o
n
c
0)w o
E
U
o
aJ
y
p
Z
C
r0
a L
�.+
a m
O
O
Ln
•--�
O
'O
QJ
v
O
c
i L
ro O
O
p 7
O O
a
a
4J
O
.�
Q)
QJ i QJ
N
L
u
a
p
"O
V
C
C
N O
LL
L
O-
C_
'0
N
L
L
V7
3
L
N
a)
ro
u
N U L
QJ N
O
O
7
.�
°
O
a
7
)
`
Ln
W
y
O
_
° a
C
-0
rc0
N
n N
U ,��,,
u
N O
N
N
7
O
rp
°
U
C
of
o
-0 0
7
O
o
N
o
u
-0
E
°
o
v°
°
a_
m
ro
c
0-
o
c
a
v
3
N
ca
°
_
-0
a)
VI
� 3
L
aj
Ln
00
m
c
c
LL
E
� 3°
C
Y
r
rho
L L
1]
Q1
O
N D
3
N
0
�_ N
Y
V
c
Ou
d
a
aJ Vt -
+'
m
(V
N
K
L
N`
t0 O
Q)
LL
o
a
a
O Z
p
N
a
L
_
y
3 0) 7
a L
G
p
LJ
U
�-
In C
C
O
L C
<T ,�
N
tO
Y
U a]
N 3p
L
y�
aJ
L
y/
C
Q)
N
a)
L E aJ
V
L
X
fa
4)
1
1
aJ
V/ In
C O
L
fa T
7
'O
yL,,
O
N
y,,
Y
+-� m�
C
O
LL
jo
(D
vLn
of
o
o
Q)
n
oLn3
G
L
u
Ln
°
°
L
a
L
3
°
t
o
VI
p
U
Y oc
w
—
m
v
e
o u
a
o°
E
c
o o
o
v
°
ro
3
0
v u
p
L
E
v
> °�
° L
3
y
0
N n
N
=
y
a
N_
C
m
u
L—
U rp
L
O
m
C
O C-
N
i
QJ
QY'
i
01
Q1
M
N
aJ
v=
aJ
Ql
O
C
y
.D
rn
N aJ X
.�
'0
.m
Y
a1 C
3
O
c
m
a
3 c
r`
3
r0
u
°
c
r0
L E C
O
�_
a
M
3
°
L
v
O
(u o
T
L
a)
°
O
L
n
aJ
a)
M
L
�'
Q
O i
'O
Q
O L y
i U
C
E
L
L t0
i QJ
O n
L
v
iN-i
"
Cl °
p
p 7
O O
Ln
-
C
i
C VI
°a
L v7
L ra (a O
c
C
7
ro
N 3
c a
V)
3
a 3
Q)
0-
L o
aJ
v
o
a
v v E
w
'
v
aJ
Ln
'6 OL
_o
N f0
N
(n i
u D
O
7 N
L
L L
O
C E X Q)
0
aL+
O
Lf7
ro fa
L
rp
+' r0
O 'J
t0
U N
01 r0
O
° rn
VI
m 7
Ni
3 0
C
°a
C
C
U
a
3
a~
°
v
u c
v 0
m
0 v
o o
c
v v
�
r a v
a
°
o
a v7
v
o
O
U)
N (n
(3)
�C
v
rp U
.O
"
L
0
m N
n
^ Y
rn
n
E
o ,� o
L
n
L
v
C
E
C
ro
=
v
a
L
T
In
v o
L
m
ro
aJ
QJ
tp L
+�+
-
3 7
O
E
rn
.�
'� 7
.0
L C i
f0
f0
o
a
2
a�
c
U m
a s
v
r
1 L"
LA o
c E
7
° o
L
01
n°
° o
C
u 0 aJ ._
rO
co
Ln
L
c
2
z v
u
L
O
010
�r
C
.�z
C:
c
v
°av
°Y
y
y v
v
v c E
a
rn
0)
v
Na
E
L�
0)
'O
cm
:3 C
L ra
C
>
Ln
O
L
VI
o N
O
_
L
° '�
VI
L
ro O
V1 L ,�
.�
.--1
7
L cu
L 1]
°
aJ
v aJ
,C
°0 3
u
a a
T u
v
m e
L
0
v°
.�
°° aJ
3 rn
Q)
L
+�
Ql
i
a
v
ar
w
v°
B a
E
3
cvQ
.�w
0
y
y'a
3 a
Lnm
co
cm
v 3
E
�c
m
ELEo
o
0
U
0
°
c '
cY
a)
L
i
o
L
o
L v
c
QJ r0
,�
N aJ
O C
'o
0
O
O
o
U L
a
X a+ m VI
a c
N
O
N
E
E p
3°
O
c
aa)
a u
a v
°
_a
L
c
°
y
N-0
o
° a'
3 E 3
o
o
-C
v v
aJ E
E
c
3 o
c°
_
c
a E
° '� a
O
a
m°
3
V
`� °
a
v QJ �°
0
0
_
0
°J
z
a�LJ
o>
°
0) !
°a
-0
w
CL
(n
o f
-0
°J
T
r
o o r v
a
a
E
°
3
3
v
r
E°
u
0p. F-
E
E
aci
a
L ro
3
m
'E aJ
c ro
= N
rn 0
'n
ro '
v
o '^
o v
v L N
v H
o
v v
x
o a
o
v v
o a
n
7 0
°
u v
c
a
a
o
o>
o
o
a 7
E
E
u
yn 3
ro
v
E
L a1
UJ
o
E 3
L
c Ln
LO
L
v°
a
a o
v
n
`' aJ N
C C
V,
(A
w
L y
p O
r
O
v
L
Ln v
co Q)
° 3
aJ
3
YJ
a E
i L
°-2 o
,�
—
=
U M—
U U
+�
aL+ o
L
o
LL QJ
c y
-
° c ca o
(D
td
a
7
n
a
> U
L
m
> w
M
y
a
3 3
0
rn o
'"� Q1
0
i
3 v
of 3 ON
E
N
a
y
o >,
o y
C o
°° L O
C u L
7
7
Y
QJ
N
rO °
° ,°1
c
a
0
m cn
aJ o
r0
v
E 3
O °
y
V)
v
aJ
L
v
01 01
rU
0 v
aJ v
n al
° v
i'
v u= m
L f0
°w
o
v
>
tv
a°
v M
(n aJ
C C
Q7
L
VI 41
Y C
f0
O
CT
a� LL
r0
C Y
�.-1
J
O
ro
C C
O ro
0 m
O w
(o C
aJ aJ
3
aJ
aJ
U
tY
lL
LL
7
7
T E
o
aL-+
E
o
m o
o' aJ
c E
c°
o°
-
o vE c
VI 7 r0
0
3
C aJ
a �°
3
>
��
Q) c
O
LUO
_
°
ut
Q
��
X
o
°�
o
-9--
oL
c
c
r6
O `
U
rD
vim'
fu o
a`J
7
o
v7 C
a'_
aJ a
L
E a
o�
,� o ro
r0
Y c
a 3
C O
o
a
a
y L
w ,., c
C
C
ro
°°
° v
CL ro
E
aJ
o1 3
L v
N
u, 3
ro
O Ln
L p
L L
0
T
ro
n
ro
+�
v
�.-+
c
r0
Q) 01
°
-C-
cn
L
�,
L L
,� �,
L
�, u
aL..�
N aJ
`a
°
r0
a
t-+ VI
p
°c —
u
O 00
Q
a-� r0 -
a
Y
O L
n (0
(I
c
N
r„
- U
c
-- p C
0 z L
Ln
L
Ln
L
E
E
E�
N
E
a°i Y
L
ar v
o°
c a_
�o
—°
� 1-4
c o
'3
m o
a ((A
a,
� o
u C
a, .a
n �
a
a
o
0
0 �,
o 0
O
•--1
Ln
3 L
(�
a
_
E O
rp L N
U
VI r0
V1
O M
V)
r6
aJ N VI
L
L
w
w
w VI
O
aJ
T
(n '0
7 0
O
O L
L
a-� fo
N
aJ
aJ
OL aJ
° U +L.+
p
Y r9
aJ
= Y
ro
rOO a1
a
>'
v
a
N aJ p
0 V
al
i
Y
aJ
a) U
i a'
C
VI C
7
L (n
�--�
o
C n
4!
N
'C
w
o
m
7 L
p ro
E 3
N p_
`J Y
V
U p .0
U -
r0
3
Ip
3
ro
�-+
m
y a-�
ro
0 E
m 7
a n
v E
o
0
°
—
v
v c v
0
u 01
a
a v
u a
a n
a v
E
3
3
3 r
3)
v c o
0 L
o v
rn a
OM
o-0
o L
r0
7 3
E
°i v,
aJ
Q
(n
a c_
(V ro
0 3
a X
3
°
c
v v
4J 3
c
c
v
ar
cu
aJ N
L 7
VI
_ w
C VI
._
m
3
m >
aJ a
.N
o
r9 o
L
0
V1
L o v
U
U V7
M
U Q1
m y
U
M `v
M v v
a L
ra 3
0 01
c
o
u
u
o
.a
a
Cl
°j
ro
3
Lo
.a L
C
aa) a6i
E o
o
o°
3
n L
" x
0
0 3
0
o r
v s
° 0
3 o c o
2
0>
co a
Ln c
cn E
J �
U �
1—
D +�
O v 3
J
J �
a o
a v
u a
� u
� c� u
in
�
cn
cn o
cn �
� Y
C
U)
V
C
0
(n
rn
C
L
L
aJ
aJ
E N
E aJ
C
v
C
v
C
°
0
0
°
0
0
C
v
O
a
C
v
C
v
C
v
C
v
0
E v
E o
r0 io
0 0,
1
a
=
=
=
o
y
o
o
�_
Y
Y
�
°
3 a
v3
(V
3
v
L
E
E
E
C
c
E
c
C
E
m
E
E
E
E
E
o L
c
c
— a,
b y
a,
v
p
p
Cn U
V) V
C U
C U
N
a�J
°J
°J
c
c
w
c
c
a
°
v
w
(V
yJ
c
`^
a
Cl.
n 2
3
3
Q.cr
o
U
o
U
+�
o
U
o
U
+�
+�
o
7
0 7
p 7
.C.
.Cr
,�
to
Q
Q
to
U)
U1
U1
i
co
n
n
N
n
Ln
01
^
.-(
N
O
D1
to
n
M
y
M
M
ti
.--i
V
M ,
1
n
N
N
O
N
O
O
D1
D�
M
f�
N
CO
n
�--�
�
fl)
N
N
.--i
i
V
Ln
1\
n
to
M
Li l
N
L,
Ln
N
O
V
n
M
O
Q1
(,.1
L,
T
N
L
M
�
M
Ln
V
V
V
V
V
�
°
M
I
V'
Ln
°
V
N,
O
O
Q1
O
01
O
Q1
O
Q1
m
O
01
O
01
O
O
O
m
O
Q1
O
O
O
Q1
O
Q1
O
m
C
O
C�
m
0%
O
Q1
O
T
6
1
t\
n
n
n
t\
n
n
t\
t\
f\
t\
n
n
n
J
n
n
t\
n
1
N
Ln
Ln
0)
N
.�
M
n
V
lD
N
M
M
M
O
co
00
to
Ln
W
1
O
n
O
O
m
.--r
V
V
O
.y
O
lD
M
00
9
.--r
0%
O
M
In
r+
N
Ln
O
N
tb
00
0)
tb
u'1
O
Lfl
C
00
V
N
00
tp
N
00
V
In
Ln
01
00
Q1
Q1
N I
07
m
M
m
rv^i

LL
kH
HI'll,
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
c
O
D\
M
IT
N
p
p
1�
0)
ti
O
N
N
0`
M
N
p
O
O
O
Ol
N
M
N
M
N
O
.y
.--I
O
^
N
O
Ln
Ln
QO
Z
O
O
O
O
LL
U
V
v
V
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
O
CO
tD
W
N
N
Ln
In
0�
v7
ID
M
[t
n
p
O
O
rn
O
N
^
,�.i
O
O
O
O
W
~
n
ut
N
N
In
n
O
O
M
Z
M
ti
O
Ln
O
Cl
M
O
^
M
M
U r
N
G Q
3
D
V
V
v
v
V
v
V
v
V
V
V
C
O
N
O
V1
0`
7
N
Qi
O
N
O
O
..-i
V
N
N
0!
n
Ln
"'!
O
co a
Ln
N
.a
..-�
.ni
O
~
O
p
O
V
R
.-�
..-�
.-+
—
T
Ln
M
N
In
N
O
M
LL
z
i
O
O
M
O
O
O
'D
^
O
M
U h
Q
V
v
V
V
v
v
v
V
v
v
V
00 C
O
M
to
r,
a)
V
7
N
H
Ln
O
�
N
Q1
O
I�
01
M
O
n O
N
M
01
'�
O
O
O
O
O
"'�
�"�
lD
N
Ln
O
N
V
Ln
i s
LL L
z
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
"'�
M
.�
U w
Q
v
V
v
v
v
v
V
v
V
v
(7
{A
00
m
.ti
CO
.ti
Ln
n
'D
f'1
M
ti
O^
v1
"'�
"'i
I�
'y
O
'i
J+
M
"'�
O
O
..-i
O�
CO
M
00
N
ti
O
M
M
M
O
O
6
O
O
^
n
U
00
O
O
O
O
n
.a
0
M
CL
O
7
V
V
V
V
V
v
V
v
V
v
v
V
O
N
p
00
V
-
r,
O
N
p
O
p
0
N
M
Q
O
m
M
LL
O
O
O
O
^
U
0
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
ko
V1
O
p
^O
Lr)
N
Lq
01
O
O
Z
l71
M
N
..y
�D
.ti
ri
4
Ln
N
.-+
O•
N
..-�
O
.-i
.--�
.--�
.ti
.ti
.-i
.-1
V'
_
p
N
..-,
d1
N
N
O
O
O
O
O
oM
LL
U
V
V
v
V
V
V
V
v
v
V
V
V
V
v
3-
N
O
O
p
N
M
Q
O
O
Ln
V
O
CJ
N
M
N
O
N
O
to C
ry)
N
~
^
~
M
O
m
u1
Ln
N
7
4•
"�
O
.-i
..-�
• -�
• -�
.-a
,--�
-
t0
�
.-i
O
O
N
O
R
O
O
Q
O
O
Ln
O
N
O
n
N
LL v
o
v
V
V
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
V
n
0
In
O
O
.ti
C)
M
n
O
w
O
ID
co
O
-
In
1�
N
M
ti
Q
O
n
In
N
O
01
M
O
Z
N
„"i
M
In
_;
I,
M
M
N
N
V
..-i
V
O
a,
�
N
O
N
LL
'
O
O
0)
N
U
v
V
v
v
V
v
v
v
v
V
v
v
v
IA
N
O
to
N
O
N
1�
M
n
O?
p
M
n0
N
M
�
p
O
O
•'1
!Il
N
'-I
O
N
r+
O
O
M
.--i
V
M
"'�
N
.--i
N
u'f
O
..-1
.--i
,..i
.--i
.--�
.--�
'-I
0`
.-1
N
O
^
Ln
M
(A
LL
U
00
O
O
O
O
O
V1
N
O
O
0
v
v
v
v
v
v
V
v
V
v
v
v
ti
00
1�
n
M
n
N
N
n
N
O
0
0)
N
N
O
N
O
If!
�
In
..-i
1p
~
O
O
l!1
n
V)
Oi
N
01
t0
M
.-I
O
N
M
O
.a
n
n
Ln
Z
O
O
O
6
NN
n
LL
U
V
V
V
V
V
v
V
v
V
v
V
v
V
0
d o
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J

Table 3
Seep Analytical Methods
Duke Energy Progress, Inc. - Cape Fear Plant
Moncure, North Carolina
Parameter
Method
Reporting Limit
Units
Lab
COD
HACH 8000
20
mg /L
Duke Energy
Aluminum (Al)
EPA 200.7
0.005
mg /L
Duke Energy
Antimony (Sb)
EPA 200.8
1
ug /L
Duke Energy
Arsenic (As)
EPA 200.8
1
ug /L
Duke Energy
Barium (Ba)
EPA 200.7
0.005
mg /L
Duke Energy
Boron (B)
EPA 200.7
0.05
mg /L
Duke Energy
Cadmium (Cd)
EPA 200.8
1
ug /L
Duke Energy
Calcium (Ca)
EPA 200.7
0.1
mg /L
Duke Energy
Chloride
EPA 300.0
5
mg /L
Duke Energy
Chromium (Cr)
EPA 200.8
1
ug /L
Duke Energy
Copper (Cu)
EPA 200.8
1
ug /L
Duke Energy
Fluoride
EPA 300.0
1
mg /L
Duke Energy
Hardness
EPA 200.7
0.19
mg /L (CaCO3)
Duke Energy
Iron (Fe)
EPA 200.7
0.01
mg /L
Duke Energy
Lead (Pb)
EPA 200.8
1
ug /L
Duke Energy
Magnesium (Mg)
EPA 200.7
0.05
mg /L
Duke Energy
Manganese (Mn)
EPA 200.7
0.005
mg /L
Duke Energy
Mercury (Hg)
EPA 245.1
0.05
ug /L
Duke Energy
Molybdenum (Mo)
EPA 200.8
1
ug /L
Duke Energy
Nickel (Ni)
EPA 200.8
1
ug /L
Duke Energy
Oil and Grease
EPA 16648
5.0
mg /L
Pace Analytical
Selenium (Se)
EPA 200.8
1
ug /L
Duke Energy
Sulfate
EPA 300.0
5
mg /L
Duke Energy
TDS
SM2540C
25
mg /L
Duke Energy
Thallium (TI) Low Level
EPA 200.8
0.2
ug /L
Duke Energy
TSS
SM2540D
5
mg /L
Duke Energy
Zinc (Zn)
EPA 200.7
0.005
mg /L
Duke Energy
Prepared By: RBI Checked By: KWW
P: \Progress Energy.1026 \10. NC Sites \01. Seep and NPDES Permit Assistance \CAPE FEAR \Seep Monitoring Plan \Table 3 - Analytical '
Methods.xlsx Page 1 of 1

APPENDIX A
ANALYTICAL SAMPLE HANDLING,
PRESERVATION, AND HOLDING TIME
REQUIREMENTS

Parameter name
Containerl
Preservation' 3
Maximum holding
time °
Table IB— Inorganic Tests:
1. Acidity
P, FP, G
Cool, S6 °C18
14 days.
2. Alkalinity
P, FP, G
Cool, 56 °C1e
14 days.
4. Ammonia
P, FP, G
Cool, <_6 °C18, HISO4 to pH <2
28 days.
9. Biochemical oxygen demand
P, FP, G
Cool, 56 °C1tl
48 hours.
10. Boron
P, FP, or Quartz
HNO3 to pH <2
6 months.
11. Bromide
P, FP, G
None required
28 days.
14. Biochemical oxygen demand, carbonaceous
P, FP G
Cool. <_6 °C"
48 hours.
15. Chemical oxygen demand
P, FP, G
Cool, 56 °C1tl, H2SO4 to pH <2
28 days.
16. Chloride
P, FP, G
None required
28 days.
17. Chlorine, total residual
P, G
None required
Analyze within 15
minutes.
21. Color
P, FP, G
Cool, <_6 °C18
48 hours.
23 -24. Cyanide, total or available (or CATC) and free
P, FP, G
Cool, 56 °C18, NaOH to pH >10'
14 days.
8, reducing agent if oxidizer
present
25. Fluoride
P
None required
28 days.
27. Hardness
P, FP, G
HNO3 or H2SO4 to pH <2
6 months.
28. Hydrogen ion (pH)
P, FP, G
None required
Analyze within 15
minutes.
31, 43. Kjeldahl and organic N
P, FP, G
Cool, 56 °C1tl, HISO4 to pH <2
28 days.
Table IB— Metals:'
18. Chromium VI
P, FP, G
Cool, 56 °C7tl, pH = 9.3 -9.7'
28 days.
35. Mercury (CVAA)
P, FP, G
HNO3 to pH <2
28 days.
35. Mercury (CVAFS)
FP, G; and FP-
5 mUL 12N HCI or 5 mUL BrCl"
90 days."
lined cap"
3, 5 -8, 12, 13, 19, 20, 22, 26, 29, 30, 32 -34, 36, 37, 45,
P, FP, G
HNO3 to pH <2, or at least 24
6 months.
47, 51, 52, 58 -60, 62, 63, 70 -72, 74, 75. Metals, except
hours prior to analysis19
boron, chromium VI, and mercury
38. Nitrate
P, FP, G
Cool, 56 °C1tl
48 hours.
39. Nitrate - nitrite
P, FP, G
Cool, <_6 °C ", H2SO4 to pH <2
28 days.
40. Nitrite
P, FP, G
Cool, 56 °C7tl
48 hours.
41. Oil and grease
G
Cool to <_6 °C1e, HCI or H2SO4 to
28 days.
PH <2
42. Organic Carbon
P, FP, G
Cool to 56 °C18, HCI, H2SO4, or
28 days.
H3PO4 to pH <2
44. Orthophosphate
P, FP, G
Cool. to <_6 °Ci824
Filter within 15 minutes;
Analyze within 48
hours.
46. Oxygen, Dissolved Probe
G, Bottle and top
None required
Analyze within 15
minutes.
47. Winkler
G, Bottle and top
Fix on site and store in dark
8 hours.
48. Phenols
G
Cool, 56 °C18, HzSO4 to pH <2
28 days.
49. Phosphorous (elemental)
G
Cool, <_6 V8
48 hours.
50. Phosphorous, total
P, FP, G
Cool, 56 Ve, H2SO4 to pH <2
28 days.
53. Residue, total
P, FP, G
Cool, <_6 °C18
7 days.
54. Residue, Filterable
P, FP, G
Cool, 56 *C's
7 days.
55. Residue, Nonfilterable (TSS)
P, FP, G
Cool, :56 °Ct8
7 days.
56. Residue, Settleable
P, FP, G
Cool, S6 °C18
48 hours.
57. Residue, Volatile
P, FP, G
Cool, 56 °C18
7 days.
61. Silica
P or Quartz
Cool, 56 °C1°
28 days.
64. Specific conductance
P, FP, G
Cool, <_6 °C1&
28 days.
65. Sulfate
P, FP, G
Cool, S6 °C18
28 days.
66. Sulfide
P, FP, G
Cool, <_6 °C18, add zinc acetate
7 days.
plus sodium hydroxide to pH >9
67. Sulfite
P, FP, G
None required
Analyze within 15
minutes.
68. Surfactants
P, FP, G
Cool, <_6 °C"
48 hours.
69. Temperature
P, FP, G
None required
Analyze.
73. Turbidity
P, FP, G
I Cool, 156 °C18
1 48 hours.
1 "P" is for polyethylene; "FP" is fluoropolymer (polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE); Teflon®), or other fluoropolymer, unless stated otherwise '
in this Table II; "G" is glass; "PA" is any plastic that is made of a sterilizable material (polypropylene or other autoclavable plastic); "LDPE" is
low density polyethylene.
'Except where noted in this Table II and the method for the parameter, preserve each grab sample within 15 minutes of collection. For a
composite sample collected with an automated sample (e.g., using a 24 -hour composite sample; see 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7)(i) or 40 CFR Part '
403, Appendix E), refrigerate the sample at S6 °C during collection unless specified otherwise in this Table II or in the method(s). For a
composite sample to be split into separate aliquots for preservation and/or analysis, maintain the sample at <_6 °C, unless specified otherwise
in this Table II or in the method(s), until collection, splitting, and preservation is completed. Add the preservative to the sample container prior
to sample collection when the preservative will not compromise the integrity of a grab sample, a composite sample, or aliquot split from a

composite sample within 15 minutes of collection. If a composite measurement is required but a composite sample would compromise sample
' integrity, individual grab samples must be collected at prescribed time intervals (e.g., 4 samples over the course of a day, at 6 -hour intervals).
Grab samples must be analyzed separately and the concentrations averaged. Alternatively, grab samples may be collected in the field and
composited in the laboratory if the compositing procedure produces results equivalent to results produced by arithmetic averaging of results of
analysis of individual grab samples. For examples of laboratory compositing procedures, see EPA Method 1664 Rev. A (oil and grease) and
' the procedures at 40 CFR 141.34(f)(14)(iv) and (v) (volatile organics).
3When any sample is to be shipped by common carrier or sent via the U.S. Postal Service, it must comply with the Department of
Transportation Hazardous Materials Regulations (49 CFR part 172). The person offering such material for transportation is responsible for
ensuring such compliance. For the preservation requirement of Table II, the Office of Hazardous Materials, Materials Transportation Bureau,
Department of Transportation has determined that the Hazardous Materials Regulations do not apply to the following materials: Hydrochloric
' acid (HCI) in water solutions at concentrations of 0.04% by weight or less (pH about 1.96 or greater; Nitric acid (HNO3) in water solutions at
concentrations of 0.15% by weight or less (pH about 1.62 or greater); Sulfuric acid (H2SO4) in water solutions at concentrations of 0.35% by
weight or less (pH about 1.15 or greater); and Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) in water solutions at concentrations of 0.080% by weight or less (pH
about 12.30 or less).
' °Samples should be analyzed as soon as possible after collection. The times listed are the maximum times that samples may be held
before the start of analysis and still be considered valid. Samples may be held for longer periods only if the permittee or monitoring laboratory
has data on file to show that, for the specific types of samples under study, the analytes are stable for the longer time, and has received a
variance from the Regional Administrator under Sec. 136.3(e). For a grab sample, the holding time begins at the time of collection. For a
' composite sample collected with an automated sampler (e.g., using a 24 -hour composite sampler; see 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7)(i) or 40 CFR part
403, Appendix E), the holding time begins at the time of the end of collection of the composite sample. For a set of grab samples composited
in the field or laboratory, the holding time begins at the time of collection of the last grab sample in the set. Some samples may not be stable
for the maximum time period given in the table. A permittee or monitoring laboratory is obligated to hold the sample for a shorter time if it
knows that a shorter time is necessary to maintain sample stability. See 136.3(e) for details. The date and time of collection of an individual
' grab sample is the date and time at which the sample is collected. For a set of grab samples to be composited, and that are all collected on
the same calendar date, the date of collection is the date on which the samples are collected. For a set of grab samples to be composited, and
that are collected across two calendar dates, the date of collection is the dates of the two days; e.g., November 14 -15. For a composite
sample collected automatically on a given date, the date of collection is the date on which the sample is collected. For a composite sample
' collected automatically, and that is collected across two calendar dates, the date of collection is the dates of the two days; e.g., November 14-
15. For static - renewal toxicity tests, each grab or composite sample may also be used to prepare test solutions for renewal at 24 h, 48 h,
and /or 72 h after first use, if stored at 0 -6 °C, with minimum head space.
5ASTM D7365 -09a specifies treatment options for samples containing oxidants (e.g., chlorine). Also, Section 9060A of Standard
Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (20th and 21st editions) addresses dechlorination procedures.
' 6Sampling, preservation and mitigating interferences in water samples for analysis of cyanide are described in ASTM D7365 -09a. There
may be interferences that are not mitigated by the analytical test methods or D7365 -09a. Any technique for removal or suppression of
interference may be employed, provided the laboratory demonstrates that it more accurately measures cyanide through quality control
measures described in the analytical test method. Any removal or suppression technique not described in D7365 -09a or the analytical test
' method must be documented along with supporting data.
'For dissolved metals, filter grab samples within 15 minutes of collection and before adding preservatives. For a composite sample
collected with an automated sampler (e.g., using a 24 -hour composite sampler; see 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7)(i) or 40 CFR Part 403, Appendix E),
filter the sample within 15 minutes after completion of collection and before adding preservatives. If it is known or suspected that dissolved
sample integrity will be compromised during collection of a composite sample collected automatically over time (e.g., by interchange of a metal
' between dissolved and suspended forms), collect and filter grab samples to be composited (footnote 2) in place of a composite sample
collected automatically.
'Guidance applies to samples to be analyzed by GC, LC, or GC /MS for specific compounds.
91f the sample is not adjusted to pH 2, then the sample must be analyzed within seven days of sampling.
' 1OThe pH adjustment is not required if acrolein will not be measured. Samples for acrolein receiving no pH adjustment must be analyzed
3
within days of sampling.
"When the extractable analytes of concern fall within a single chemical category, the specified preservative and maximum holding
times should be observed for optimum safeguard of sample integrity (i.e., use all necessary preservatives and hold for the shortest time listed).
' When the analytes of concern fall within two or more chemical categories, the sample may be preserved by cooling to :56 °C, reducing residual
chlorine with 0.008% sodium thiosulfate, storing in the dark, and adjusting the pH to 6 -9; samples preserved in this manner may be held for
seven days before extraction and for forty days after extraction. Exceptions to this optional preservation and holding time procedure are noted
in footnote 5 (regarding the requirement for thiosulfate reduction), and footnotes 12, 13 (regarding the analysis of benzidine).
121f 1,2- diphenylhydrazine is likely to be present, adjust the pH of the sample to 4.0 ±0.2 to prevent rearrangement to benzidine.
' 3Extracts may be stored up to 30 days at <0 °C.
14 For the analysis of diphenylnitrosamine, add 0.008% Na2S2O3 and adjust pH to 7 -10 with NaOH within 24 hours of sampling.
5The pH adjustment may be performed upon receipt at the laboratory and may be omitted if the samples are extracted within 72 hours
of collection. For the analysis of aldrin, add 0.008% Na2S2O3
'
16 Place sufficient ice with the samples in the shipping container to ensure that ice is still present when the samples arrive at the
laboratory. However, even if ice is present when the samples arrive, immediately measure the temperature of the samples and confirm that
the preservation temperature maximum has not been exceeded. In the isolated cases where it can be documented that this holding
temperature cannot be met, the permittee can be given the option of on -site testing or can request a variance. The request for a variance
should include supportive data which show that the toxicity of the effluent samples is not reduced because of the increased holding
' temperature. Aqueous samples must not be frozen. Hand - delivered samples used on the day of collection do not need to be cooled to 0 to 6
°C prior to test initiation.
"Samples collected for the determination of trace level mercury ( <100 ng /L) using EPA Method 1631 must be collected in tightly -
capped fluoropolymer or glass bottles and preserved with BrCI or HCI solution within 48 hours of sample collection. The time to preservation
' may be extended to 28 days if a sample is oxidized in the sample bottle. A sample collected for dissolved trace level mercury should be
filtered in the laboratory within 24 hours of the time of collection. However, if circumstances preclude overnight shipment, the sample should
be filtered in a designated clean area in the field in accordance with procedures given in Method 1669. If sample integrity will not be
maintained by shipment to and filtration in the laboratory, the sample must be filtered in a designated clean area in the field within the time

period necessary to maintain sample integrity. A sample that has been collected for determination of total or dissolved trace level mercury
must be analyzed within 90 days of sample collection. '
18Aqueous samples must be preserved at 56 °C, and should not be frozen unless data demonstrating that sample freezing does not
adversely impact sample integrity is maintained on file and accepted as valid by the regulatory authority. Also, for purposes of NPDES
monitoring, the specification of " <_ °C" is used in place of the "4 °C" and " <4 °C" sample temperature requirements listed in some methods. It is
not necessary to measure the sample temperature to three significant figures (1 /100th of 1 degree); rather, three significant figures are '
specified so that rounding down to 6 °C may not be used to meet the <_6 °C requirement. The preservation temperature does not apply to
samples that are analyzed immediately (less than 15 minutes).
19An aqueous sample may be collected and shipped without acid preservation. However, acid must be added at least 24 hours before
analysis to dissolve any metals that adsorb to the container walls. If the sample must be analyzed within 24 hours of collection, add the acid
immediately (see footnote 2). Soil and sediment samples do not need to be preserved with acid. The allowances in this footnote supersede the ,
preservation and holding time requirements in the approved metals methods.
20To achieve the 28 -day holding time, use the ammonium sulfate buffer solution specified in EPA Method 218.6. The allowance in this
footnote supersedes preservation and holding time requirements in the approved hexavalent chromium methods, unless this supersession
would compromise the measurement, in which case requirements in the method must be followed. '
21Holding time is calculated from time of sample collection to elution for samples shipped to the laboratory in bulk and calculated from
the time of sample filtration to elution for samples filtered in the field.
22 Sample analysis should begin as soon as possible after receipt; sample incubation must be started no later than 8 hours from time of
collection.
23For fecal coliform samples for sewage sludge (biosolids) only, the holding time is extended to 24 hours for the following sample types ,
using either EPA Method 1680 (LTB -EC) or 1681 (A -1): Class A composted, Class B aerobically digested, and Class B anaerobically digested.
24 The immediate filtration requirement in orthophosphate measurement is to assess the dissolved or bio- available form of
orthophosphorus (i.e., that which passes through a 0.45 - micron filter), hence the requirement to filter the sample immediately upon collection
(i.e., within 15 minutes of collection). '
[38 FR 28758, Oct. 16, 1973

synTerra
GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM
' SAMPLING, ANALYSIS, AND REPORTING
PLAN
FOR
' CAPE FEAR STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
500 CP &L DRIVE
' MONCURE, NORTH CAROLINA 27559
NPDES PERMIT ##NC0003433
PREPARED FOR
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC.
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
(� DUKE
ENERGY.
PROGRESS
SUBMITTED: JULY 2014
Je ry iE, NC 1425
Projec eologist
i
athy ebb, NC PG 1328
Project Manager

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
1.0
Introduction ....................................................................................... ..............................1
2.0
Site Description ................................................................................ ............................... 2
2.1
Plant and Ash Management Areas ........................................... ............................... 2
2.2
Ash Management Area Description ......................................... ............................... 2
3.0
Site Geology and Hydrogeology ................................................... ............................... 4
3.1
Geologic Framework .................................................................. ............................... 4
3.2
Hydrogeologic Framework ....................................................... ............................... 4
4.0
Monitoring Program ........................................................................ ............................... 6
4.1
Regulatory Requirements for Groundwater Monitoring ...... ............................... 6
4.2
Description of Groundwater Monitoring System .................. ............................... 7
4.3
Monitoring Frequency ................................................................ ............................... 7
4.4
Sample Parameters and Methods ............................................. ............................... 7
4.5
Data Quality Objectives ............................................................. ............................... 8
5.0
Sampling Procedures ....................................................................... ............................... 9
5.1
Sampling Equipment and Cleaning Procedures .................... ............................... 9
5.2
Groundwater Sampling ............................................................. ............................... 9
5.2.1 Development of Monitoring Wells ..................................... ............................... 9
5.2.2 Groundwater Level and Total Depth Measurements ...... ............................... 9
5.2.3 Well Purging and Sampling ................................................ .............................10
5.3
Sample Collection ....................................................................... .............................11
5.4
Sample Containers, Volume, Preservation, and Holding Time ........................11
5.5
Sample Tracking .......................................................................... .............................11
5.6
Sample Labeling .......................................................................... .............................11
5.7
Field Documentation .................................................................. .............................12
5.8
Chain -of- Custody Record .......................................................... .............................13
5.9
Sample Custody, Shipment, and Laboratory Receipt ............ .............................13
6.0
Analytical Procedures ..................................................................... .............................15
7.0
Internal Quality Control Checks ................................................... .............................16
8.0
Validation of Field Data Package ................................................. .............................18
9.0
Validation of Laboratory Data ....................................................... .............................19
10.0
Report Submittal ............................................................................ ...............................
20
11.0
References .......................................................................................... .............................21
Page i
P: \Duke Energy Progress. 1026 \Cape Fear \GW Sampling and Analysis Plan\Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30 -
2014.docx

' Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
' List of Figures
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Site Location Map
Sample Location Map
Typical Monitoring Well Construction Details
Example Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheet
Example Field Sampling Calibration Form
Chain -of- Custody Record and Analysis Request Form
North Carolina Groundwater Sampling Checklist
' List of Tables
' Table 1- Monitoring Well Information
Table 2 - Sample Parameters, Analytical Methods, Containers, Preservatives, and
Holding Times
List of Appendices
' Appendix A - Boring Logs and Well Construction Records
Appendix B - Permit Condition A (9) Attachment XX, Version 1.0, dated
' November 12, 2010
IPage ii
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \Cape Fear \GW Sampling and Analysis Plan\Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7 -30-
1 2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This Groundwater Monitoring Program Sampling, Analysis, and Reporting Plan (Plan)
is developed to support the Duke Energy Progress, Inc. (Duke Energy) requirement for
groundwater monitoring around the Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant (Cape Fear Plant)
ash management area operated under NPDES Permit NC0003433.
This Plan describes the groundwater monitoring network, methodologies of field
sampling, record - keeping protocols, analytical procedures, data quality objectives, data
validation, and reporting that will be used for the Cape Fear Plant ash management
area groundwater monitoring program.
Page 1
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \Cape Fear \GW Sampling and Analysis Plan\Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30 -
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
1
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
' 2.1 Plant and Ash Management Areas
Duke Energy Progress, Inc. owns and operates the Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant (Cape
' Fear Plant) located on approximately 900 acres in central North Carolina near Moncure,
North Carolina. The Cape Fear Plant is located in Chatham County along the east bank
' of the Cape Fear River southeast of Moncure and west of Corinth Road. The site
location is shown on Figure 1.
The Cape Fear Plant began operations in 1923. Additional units were added from 1924
to 1969. Throughout its operational history, the Cape Fear Plant employed various
combinations of six coal -fired units along with four oil- fueled combustion turbine units
to produce steam. Ash generated from coal combustion was stored on -site in ash
management ponds. Operations were terminated at the Cape Fear Plant in October
2012 and demolition activities are currently underway.
2.2 Ash Management Area Description
Ash generated from coal combustion throughout the operational history of the Plant
was stored in on -site ash management ponds. Throughout most of its history, ash was
conveyed as a slurry to the ash ponds. Five ash management ponds have historically
been used at the Cape Fear Plant and are referenced using the date of construction:
1956, 1963, 1970, 1978, and 1985. The 1956 ash pond is located north of the former
power plant, and the remaining ash ponds are located south of the power plant area.
The 1963 and 1970 ash ponds were constructed on the west side of the Plant property
adjacent to the Cape Fear River. The 1978 ash pond was constructed east of and
abutting the 1963 and 1970 ash ponds. The 1985 ash pond was constructed east of the
existing ash ponds between the discharge canal and Corinth Road. The ash ponds are
impounded by earthen dams. A 500 -foot compliance boundary encircles the ash
management areas. The ash pond locations are indicated on Figure 2.
Currently, the 1956, 1963, and 1970 ash ponds are entirely covered with vegetation
(both hardwood and pine trees). No free - standing water is present in the 1956 or 1963
ash ponds. Only a very small area near the southern end of the 1970 ash pond is
seasonally wet. The 1978 ash pond is partially vegetation - covered (both trees and
scrub), and a portion of the southern end of the ash pond retains water. The 1985 ash
pond has some grass cover and ponded water in the southwest corner of the ash pond.
Page 2
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \Cape Fear \GW Sampling and Analysis Plan \Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30 -
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014 '
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
Wastewater discharges from the ash ponds are permitted by the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of Water '
Resources (DWR) under National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Permit NC0003433. Permitted outfall locations are indicated on Figure 2. '
Page 3 '
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \Cape Fear \GW Sampling and Analysis Plan \Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30 -
2014.docx

' Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
■
3.0 SITE GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY
3.1 Geologic Framework
Topographically, the Cape Fear Plant is situated in the Piedmont plateau region of
central North Carolina, only a few miles north and west of the contact between the
Piedmont and the North Carolina Coastal Plain. The Piedmont is characterized by well-
' rounded hills and rolling ridges. Elevations in the area of the Cape Fear Plant are
between 150 and 200 feet above mean sea level.
' Geologically, the Plant is located within the Deep River Basin (specifically the northern
portion of the Sanford Sub - basin), an irregular, half graben structural feature of Triassic
' age. In the area of the Plant, the basin is surrounded by and presumably underlain by
igneous and metamorphic rocks of the Carolina Terrane (formerly Carolina Slate Belt)
rocks. Over time, continental sediments filled the basin to great thicknesses and have
' subsequently been cut by numerous diabase dikes. The stratigraphy of the basin,
consistent with other basins in North Carolina and Virginia, is represented by a lower
' sequence of coarse - grained arkosic sandstone and conglomerate; a middle sequence of
siltstone, shale, and thin coal deposits; and an upper sequence of sandstone, mudstone,
siltstone, and conglomerate. In general, the strata of the Deep River Basin dip gently to
' the east (Horton and Zullo, 1991).
According to the Geologic Map of North Carolina (1985), the Cape Fear Plant is situated
within the rocks of the Pekin Formation of the Chatham Group; although, the Plant
appears to be situated just at the gradational contact of the Pekin Formation with the
Cumnock Formation. The Geologic Map of North Carolina describes each of these units as
being comprised of fluvial sedimentary rocks such as conglomerate, sandstone, and
mudstone. These general observations are consistent with site - specific observations
from drilling activities at the Cape Fear Plant, which generally describe the sedimentary
rocks underlying the Plant as brown to gray mudstones and siltstones.
■ Rocks of the Piedmont, except where exposed in road cuts, stream channels, and steep
hillsides, are covered with unconsolidated material formed from the in -situ chemical
' and physical breakdown of the bedrock. This unconsolidated material is referred to as
saprolite or residuum. Direct observations at the Cape Fear Plant confirm the presence
' of residuum, developed above the sedimentary rocks of the Plant area, that is generally
15 to 30 feet thick and extends from the ground surface to the contact with rock.
' 3.2 Hydrogeologic Framework
Groundwater within the Piedmont exists under unconfined, also known as water table,
conditions within the residuum and /or saprolite zones and in the fractures and joints of
Page 4
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \Cape Fear \GW Sampling and Analysis Plan\Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30 -
2014.docx
■

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
the underlying bedrock. The water table and bedrock aquifers are interconnected. The
residuum acts as a reservoir for water supply to the fractures and joints in the
underlying bedrock. Shallow groundwater generally flows from local recharge zones in
topographically high areas, such as ridges, toward groundwater discharge zones, such
as stream valleys. Ridge and topographic high areas may serve as groundwater
recharge zones. Groundwater flow patterns in recharge areas tend to develop a
somewhat radial pattern from the center of the recharge area outward toward the
discharge areas and are expected to mimic surface topography. The closest surface
water discharge for the subject property occurs to the west as small, perennial and
intermittent streams and creeks flow toward and discharge to the Cape Fear River, a
large regional river. The predominant flow direction for groundwater is to the west
and west - southwest.
Groundwater beneath the Plant area occurs within the residuum at depths ranging
from about 10 feet to about 20 feet below the ground surface. Depths to groundwater in
wells completed in the shallow bedrock are similar. Groundwater elevations from
paired wells typically show slight downward vertical gradients in upland areas and an
upward gradient near the Cape Fear River. Analysis of potentiometric data for Plant
wells confirms that groundwater flows from upland areas located east of the Plant
towards the west - southwest with discharge to the Cape Fear River. The approximate
groundwater gradient for June 2014 data was 10.55 feet (vertical change) over 4,200 feet
(horizontal distance) or 2.5 feet /1,000 feet as measured from upgradient well CMW -5 to
downgradient well CMW -1.
Page 5
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \Cape Fear \GW Sampling and Analysis Plan \Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30 -
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
4.0 MONITORING PROGRAM
4.1 Regulatory Requirements for Groundwater Monitoring
The NPDES program regulates wastewater discharges to surface waters to ensure that
surface water quality standards are maintained. Cape Fear operates under NPDES
Permit NC0003433 (effective September 1, 2011) which authorizes discharge as follows:
West Ash Pond (Internal Outfall 0011- This outfall discharges the following
treated wastewaters to outfall 007: ash sluice waters (bottom and fly), coal pile
runoff, No. 2 fuel oil tank runoff, settling basin drains, sand bed filter backwash,
parking lot drains, equipment cooling tower blowdown and drain, boiler
blowdown, metal cleaning waste, oil unloading area drains, softener regenerate,
demineralizer regenerate, acid /caustic sump wastewater, yard and floor drains,
and ash trench drain wastewater.
• Once - Through Cooling Water and Stormwater (Internal Outfall 003).
• East Ash Pond (Internal Outfall 005): This outfall discharges the following
wastewaters to outfall 007: ash sluice waters (bottom and fly), runoff from yard
drains, air preheater washes, electrostatic precipitator washes, metal cleaning
wastes, spent sandblast material, and treated sanitary wastewater.
• Combined Wastewater to the Cape Fear River ( Outfall 007): This outfall is a
combination of all internal outfalls.
In addition to surface water monitoring, the NPDES permit requires groundwater
monitoring. Permit Condition A (6) Attachment XX, Version 1.0, dated March 30, 2011,
lists the groundwater monitoring wells to be sampled, the parameters and constituents
to be measured and analyzed, and the requirements for sampling frequency and results
reporting. Attachment XX also provides requirements for well location and well
construction. The as -built well information is summarized in Table 1 and the
constituent list, analytical methods, preservatives and holding times are summarized in
Table 2. The well logs for the listed wells are provided in Appendix A. A copy of
Attachment XX is included as Appendix B.
The compliance boundary for groundwater quality associated with the Cape Fear Plant
ash management area is defined in accordance with 15A NCAC 02L .0107(a) as being
established at either 500 feet from the waste boundary or at the property boundary,
whichever is closer to the source.
Page 6
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \Cape Fear \GW Sampling and Analysis Plan\Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30 -
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
In accordance with the March 30, 2011 Groundwater Monitoring Plan, analytical results
have been submitted to the Department of Water Resources (DWR) before the last day
of the month following the date of sampling. In the future, analytical results will be
submitted to the DWR within 60 days of the date of sampling.
4.2 Description of Groundwater Monitoring System
The current groundwater monitoring plan for the Cape Fear Plant includes the
sampling of 13 wells. These 13 wells include two background wells and 11
downgradient wells. The locations of the monitoring wells, the waste boundary, and
the compliance boundary are shown on Figure 2. Well construction data is provided in
Table 1 and Appendix A. Figure 3 is an example of the construction of a typical
monitoring well.
Based on water levels measured from site wells, the general direction of groundwater
flow is to the west and southwest, toward the Cape Fear River. The site wells provide
monitoring data for the groundwater downgradient of the ash management area.
The compliance monitoring network includes two background monitoring wells,
BGMW -4 and BGTMW -4, one upgradient compliance boundary monitoring well,
CMW -5, plus 10 monitoring wells located in side - gradient and downgradient positions
along the compliance boundary.
Wells BGTMW -4, CTMW -1, CTMW -2, CTMW -7, and CTMW -8 were installed in the
upper bedrock and were paired with shallow wells BTMW -4, CMW -1, CMW -2, CMW -
7, and CMW -8, which were installed above the bedrock, to monitor the vertical
hydraulic gradient in the area and aquifer conditions within the shallow bedrock. The
remainder of the compliance boundary wells, CMW -3, CMW -5, and CMW -6, were
installed in the saprolite or residuum, above bedrock.
Groundwater monitoring for the compliance wells began in December 2010.
4.3 Monitoring Frequency
The monitoring wells will be sampled three times per year in March, June, and October.
4.4 Sample Parameters and Methods
The monitoring program consists of sampling and analysis for parameters and
constituents identified in Permit Condition A (6), Attachment XX of the NPDES permit
(Appendix B).
The parameters and the analytical methods are presented in Table 2.
Page 7
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \Cape Fear \GW Sampling and Analysis Plan\Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30 -
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
The analytical results for the detection monitoring program will be compared to the NC
2L Standards or the site - specific background concentrations.
4.5 Data Quality Objectives
The overall Quality Assurance (QA) objective is to ensure that reliable data of known
and acceptable quality are provided. All measurements will be documented to yield
results that are representative of the groundwater quality. Data will be calculated and
reported in units as required by the North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources (NCDENR).
The analytical QA objectives for precision, accuracy, and completeness have been
established by the laboratory(s) in accordance with the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) or other accepted agencies for each measurement variable where
possible. The objectives are outlined in the Duke Energy Analytical Laboratory
Procedures Manual and are available upon request.
Appropriate methods have been selected to meet applicable standards for groundwater
quality. Instances may occur, however, in which the condition of the sample will not
allow detection of the desired limits for various parameters either because of matrix
interference or high analyte concentrations requiring sample dilution. The laboratory(s)
will provide sufficient documentation with each data package to notify reviewers about
any analytical problems with the data, if needed.
Page 8
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \Cape Fear \GW Sampling and Analysis Plan\Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30 -
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
5.0 SAMPLING PROCEDURES
5.1 Sampling Equipment and Cleaning Procedures
Development and sampling equipment shall be selected to ensure that materials are
compatible with the sample parameters and comply with state and federal regulatory
requirements for sampling.
New disposable sampling equipment (peristaltic pump tubing) is used for each
monitoring well sampled. For non - dedicated equipment used, such as water level
tapes, the equipment will be cleaned before and after use in each well in accordance
with standard EPA - approved cleaning procedures for field equipment. This standard is
outlined in the Standard Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance Manual,
Engineering Support Branch, EPA Region IV, February 1, 1991 as revised December 20,
2011.
5.2 Groundwater Sampling
5.2.1 Development of Monitoring Wells
Monitoring wells addressed in this sampling plan have been developed.
If new monitoring wells are installed, they will be developed prior to initial
sampling. Development removes silt that has settled into the bottom of the well
following installation and removes fine silt and clay particles from the well
screen and sand -pack surrounding the screen. Well development is necessary to
eliminate potential clogging and enhance well performance. Development
involves removing an estimated ten or more well volumes from the well using a
submersible pump with up- and -down agitation to loosen particles from the well
screen. If the turbidity for a well increases over time, the well may be re-
developed to restore conditions.
5.2.2 Groundwater Level and Total Depth Measurements
Water level measurements are collected and recorded to determine the
groundwater elevation and flow direction. Site monitoring wells have been
surveyed to determine the elevation of the top of well casing (TOC). Water level
measurements are referenced to the TOC and recorded to the nearest one -
hundredth of a foot.
Water level measurements are made with an electronic measuring device
consisting of a spool of dual- conductor wire and sensor. When the sensor comes
in contact with water, the circuit is closed and a meter light and /or buzzer
Page 9
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \Cape Fear \GW Sampling and Analysis Plan\Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30 -
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
attached to the spool signal the contact. When the signal is sounded, the water
level is recorded on the Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheet (Figure 4). To
minimize sample turbidity, low flow sample methods are used whenever
' possible. Using low -flow sampling techniques, the volume of the stagnant water
in the well is not calculated and the total well depth is not routinely measured to
avoid disturbing the bottom sediments. If conditions indicate a possible problem
' with the integrity of a well, the total well depth may be measured.
5.2.3 Well Purging and Sampling
' The selection of purging technique is dependent on the hydrogeologic properties
of the aquifer and hydraulic characteristics of each well. Hydraulic conductivity,
' water column, well volume, screen length, and other information are evaluated
to select the purging technique to acquire groundwater representative of the
aquifer conditions. At the Cape Fear Plant, a low -flow purging technique has
been selected as the most appropriate technique to minimize sample turbidity.
' During low -flow purging and sampling, groundwater is pumped into a flow -
through chamber at flow rates that minimize or stabilize water level drawdown
within the well. At the Cape Fear Plant, low -flow sampling is conducted using a
' peristaltic pump with new tubing. The intake for the tubing is lowered to the
mid -point of the screened interval. A multi- parameter water quality monitoring
' instrument is used to measure field indicator parameters within the flow -
through chamber during purging. Measurements include pH, specific
conductance, and temperature.
Indicator parameters are measured over time (usually at 3 -5 minute intervals).
When parameters have stabilized within ±0.2 pH units and ±10 percent for
' temperature and specific conductivity over three consecutive readings,
representative groundwater has been achieved for sampling. Turbidity is not a
' required stabilization parameter, however turbidity levels of 10 NTU or less are
targeted.
The Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheet (Figure 4) is used to record purge data
and field measurements.
' Instrument calibration is performed and documented before the beginning of the
sampling event, at midday, and after each sampling event. The pH subsystem is
' calibrated with two pH standards (pH 7.0 and 4.0) bracketing the expected
groundwater pH. The specific conductance subsystem is calibrated using two
IPage 10
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \Cape Fear \GW Sampling and Analysis Plan\Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30 -
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NCO003433 SynTerra
standards bracketing the expected groundwater conductivity. Calibration results
are recorded on a Field Sampling Calibration Form (Figure 5).
5.3 Sample Collection
Groundwater samples are collected after the indicator parameters have stabilized.
Sampling personnel wear new, clean, disposable, non - powdered nitrile gloves at each
location. Samples are collected in the order of the volatilization sensitivity of the
parameters:
• Metals, metalloids, and selenium
• Sulfate, nitrate and chloride
• Total dissolved solids
Groundwater samples are preserved and stored according to parameter- specific
methods and delivered to the laboratory under proper Chain -of- Custody (COC)
procedures. All pertinent notations, water -level measurements, removed well volumes,
and indicator parameters are documented on the Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheet
(Figure 4).
5.4 Sample Containers, Volume, Preservation, and Holding Time
Sample containers supplied by the laboratory shall be new and pre - cleaned as approved
by EPA procedures appropriate for the parameters of interest. Table 2 summarizes the
sample containers, sample volume, preservation procedures, and holding times
required for each type of sample and parameter for the monitoring program. Sample
containers will be kept closed until used. Sample containers will be provided by Duke
Energy or vendor laboratories.
5.5 Sample Tracking
The COC procedures allow for tracking the possession and handling of individual
samples from the time of field collection through laboratory analysis and report
preparation. Samples are logged by the laboratory with a unique tracking number for
each sample. An example of the COC Record is provided as Figure 6.
5.6 Sample Labeling
Sample containers shall be pre - labeled and organized prior to field activities as part of
the pre - sampling staging process. As samples are collected, the sampling personnel
write the following information directly on the label: sampling date and time, and
initials of sample collector. This information is also recorded on the Groundwater
Monitoring Data Sheet (Figure 4) and the COC Record (Figure 6).
Page 11
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \Cape Fear \GW Sampling and Analysis Plan\Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30 -
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
5.7 Field Documentation
' Field documentation from each sampling event is recorded on the Groundwater
Monitoring Data Sheets (Figure 4), the Field Sampling Calibration Form (Figure 5), and
the Chain -of- Custody Record (Figure 6). Additionally, a Groundwater Sampling Site
' Checklist (Figure 7), or equivalent, is completed indicating information about the
monitoring wells such as proper identification (ID) tag and condition of protective
' casing and pad. Field notations shall be made during the course of the field work to
document the following information:
' • Identification of well
• Well depth
• Static water level depth and measurement technique
• Well yield — high or low
• Purge volume or pumping rate
' • Sample identification numbers
• Well evacuation procedure /equipment
' • Sample withdrawal procedure /equipment
• Date and time of collection
' • Types of sample containers used
• Identification of replicates or blind samples
' • Preservative(s) used
• Parameters requested for analysis
' • Field analysis data and methods
• Sample distribution and transporter
' • Field observations during sampling event
• Name of sample collector(s)
' • Climatic conditions including estimate of air temperature
' The Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheet, Field Sampling Calibration Form, and COC
Record and Analysis Request Form will be filed by project and date. Recorded entries
will be made on electronic forms or on paper forms in indelible ink. Errors on paper
' documents will be corrected by drawing a line through the error, initialing and dating
the correction, and starting a new entry on the next line (if necessary).
' Page 12
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear\ GW Sampling and Analysis Plan \ Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30 -
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
5.8 Chain -of- Custody Record
The COC Record (Figure 6) accompanies the sample(s), traces sample possession from
time of collection to delivery to the laboratory(s), and clearly identifies which sample
containers have been designated for each requested analysis. The record includes the
following types of information:
• Sample identification number
• Signature of collector
• Date and time of collection
• Sample type (e.g., groundwater, immiscible layer)
• Identification of well
• Number of containers
• Parameters requested for analysis
• Preservative(s) used
• Signature of persons involved in the chain of possession
• Inclusive dates of possession
5.9 Sample Custody, Shipment, and Laboratory Receipt
For the purpose of these procedures, a sample is considered in custody if it is:
• In actual possession of the responsible person
• In view, after being in physical possession
• Locked or sealed in a manner so that no one can tamper with it after having been
in physical custody or in a secured area restricted to authorized personnel.
Samples shall be maintained in the custody of the sampling crew during the sampling
event. At the end of each sampling day and prior to the transfer of the samples off site,
entries shall be completed on the COC form for all samples. Upon transfer of custody,
the COC form is signed by a sampling crew member, including the date and time. If
outside vendor laboratories are utilized, samples shall be delivered to these facilities by
Duke Energy personnel or courier.
COC forms received by the laboratory(s) shall be signed and dated by the respective
supervising scientist(s) or their designee (at the Duke Energy Analytical Lab Services
lab) or the laboratory sample custodian (at vendor labs) immediately following receipt
by the laboratory. The analysts at the laboratory(s) maintain a sample tracking record
Page 13
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \Cape Fear \GW Sampling and Analysis Plan\Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30 -
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
that will follow each sample through all stages of laboratory processing. The sample
' tracking records show the date of sample extraction or preparation and analysis. These
records are used to determine compliance with holding time limits during lab audits
and data validation.
Custody procedures followed by Duke Energy Analytical Lab Services laboratory
' personnel are described in detail in the Duke Energy Analytical Lab Services
Procedures Manual.
tPage 14
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \Cape Fear \GW Sampling and Analysis Plan\Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30 -
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NCO003433 SynTerra
6.0 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
The main analytical laboratory used in this program is the Duke Energy Analytical
Laboratory Services: N.C. Drinking Water (NC37804) and Wastewater ( #248)
Certifications. The organizational structure and staff qualifications of the laboratory are
discussed in its generic Quality Assurance Program (QAP). The QAP and the
Analytical Laboratory Procedures Manual are available for review upon request.
Vendor laboratories that meet EPA and North Carolina certification requirements may
be used for analyses with approval by Duke Energy.
The analytical procedures used for the samples analyzed for this Groundwater
Monitoring Program are listed in Table 2. Specific conductance, field pH, and
temperature are measured in the field according to the Duke Energy Groundwater
Monitoring and Sample Collection Procedure or the instrument manufacturer
instructions.
Page 15
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \Cape Fear \GW Sampling and Analysis Plan \Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30 -
2014.docx

' Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
7.0 INTERNAL QUALITY CONTROL CHECKS
' Internal laboratory quality control (QC) checks used b the laboratories are described in
rY q tY ( Y
' each laboratory's generic QAP and procedures manual. Using the internal laboratory
QC checks, the laboratories demonstrate the ability to produce acceptable results using
the methods specified.
Internal quality control checks for sampling procedures and laboratory analyses will be
conducted with each sampling event. These checks will consist of the preparation and
' submittal of field blanks, trip (travel) blanks, and /or field replicates for analysis of all
parameters at frequencies described in the laboratory(s) procedures manuals.
' The field QC blanks and replicates that may be included as internal QC checks are
described below. The specific type and number of blanks used may vary depending on
the sampling event and will be determined by the Duke Energy field sampling
personnel:
' • Field Blanks: A field blank consists of a sample container filled in the field with
organic free, deionized, or distilled water prepared and preserved in the same
manner as the samples. The field blank is transported to the laboratory with the
samples and analyzed along with the field samples for the constituents of
interest to check for contamination imparted to the samples by the sample
' container, preservative, or other exogenous sources. Field blanks are typically
utilized for each sampling event. The field blanks are typically analyzed for
major anions, cations and metals.
• Trip Blanks: A trip (travel) blank is a sample container filled with organic -free
water in the laboratory that travels unopened with the sample bottles. Trip
blanks are typically utilized when sampling for volatile organic compounds. The
' trip blank is returned to the laboratory with the field samples and analyzed
along with the field samples for parameters of interest.
' • Equipment Blanks: If non - dedicated equipment is used, it is recommended that
equipment blanks be collected. The field equipment is cleaned following
documented cleaning protocols. An aliquot of the final control rinse water is
' passed over the cleaned equipment directly into a sample container and
submitted for analyses.
IPage 16
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear\ GW Sampling and Analysis Plan \ Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30 -
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014 '
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
• Field Replicates: A field replicate is a duplicate sample prepared at the sampling
locations from equal portions of all sample aliquots combined to make the ,
sample. Both the field replicate and the sample are collected at the same time, in
the same container type, preserved in the same way, and analyzed by the same '
laboratory as a measure of sampling and analytical precision.
Page 17 ,
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \Cape Fear \GW Sampling and Analysis Plan\Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30 -
2014.docx

' Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
8.0 VALIDATION OF FIELD DATA PACKAGE
The field data acka a includes all of the field records and measurements developed by
P g P
' the sampling team personnel. The field data package validation will be performed by
Duke Energy personnel. The procedure for validation consists of the following:
' • A review of field data contained on the Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheets for
completeness.
' • Verification that equipment blanks, field blanks, and trip blanks were properly
prepared, identified, and analyzed.
' • A check of the Field Sampling Calibration Form for equipment calibration and
instrument conditions.
' • A review of the COC Record for proper completion, signatures of field personnel
and the laboratory sample custodian, dates and times, and for verification that
' the correct analyses were specified.
I Page 18
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \Cape Fear \GW Sampling and Analysis Plan\Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30 -
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014 '
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
9.0 VALIDATION OF LABORATORY DATA
The laboratory ill perform a validation review of the submitted samples and ,
rY P P
analytical results to ensure that the laboratory QA /QC requirements are acceptable. '
Page 19 '
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \Cape Fear \GW Sampling and Analysis Plan \Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30 -
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
1
10.0 REPORT SUBMITTAL
' Two copies of the report of the monitoring results for the compliance wells will be
' submitted to the DWR within 60 days of the date of sampling. The monitoring results
will be submitted on NCDENR Form GW- 59CCR.
The DWR will be notified in the event that vendor lab analyses have not been
completed within this time frame. Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheets, Field
Calibration Forms, Chain -of- Custody Records, Laboratory QA data, and Data
Validation Checklists shall be kept on file by Duke Energy and are available upon
IPage 20
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \Cape Fear \GW Sampling and Analysis Plan\Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30 -
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014 '
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
11.0 REFERENCES
Horton, .
W
. Jr. and V. A. Zullo, 1991, The Geology '
1 gy of the Carolinas — Carolina
Geological Society Fiftieth Anniversary Volume, The University of Tennessee '
Press, Knoxville, TN.
North Carolina Geological Survey, 1985, Geologic map of North Carolina: North '
Carolina Geological Survey, General Geologic Map, scale 1:500000.
Page 21 '
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \Cape Fear \GW Sampling and Analysis Plan \Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30 -
2014.docx

FIGURES

ABOVEGROUND WELL PROTECTOR
(4 INCH X 4 INCH X 5 FOOT STEEL CASING WITH
HINGLD LOCKABLL LID)
2' 6' TO 3' 0' (NOMINAL)
STICK—UP
NEAT CEMENT OR NEAT CEMENT BENTONITE
MIX FROM BENTONITE SEAL TO GROUND
SURFACE
WELL SCREEN
(0.010" MANUFACTURED SLOTS, TYPICAL)
WELL PACKING
(TYP. #1 OR #2 SAND)
MALE PVC PLUG
DRILL J" DIAMETER VENT HOLE BELOW
PLUG
2" DIA. PVC
WELL CASING GROUND SURFACE
+ CONCRETE PAD
L� 6' MIN. 2 FT X 2 FT SQUARE
BORING
(S' NOMINAL DIAMETER)
BENTONITE SEAL
2' -G" (MINIMUM)
2' -0' (MINIMUM)
SCRLLN LLNGIH VARILS
(5' TO 15' TYP.)
61' OF WELL SAND
ical Well Construction Details
(no scale)
INFORMATION PROVIDED BY DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS. LLC
148 RIVER STREET, SUITE 220
PHONE (864) SOUTH CAROLINA 29601 FIGURE 3
PHONE [phone]
http. / /www.synterracorp.com GENERALIZED WELL SCHEMATIC
DRAWN BY H. Frank Date. 7/10/2014 CAPE FEAR STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
synTerra PROJECT MANAGER. Kathy Webb
P. \Progress Energy. 1026110. NC Sites\01. Seep and NPDES Permit Assistance \CAPE FEAR \Sampling and Analysis Plan\

FIGURE 4
WATER LEVEL
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC
"'
TEMPERATURE
CONDUCTANCE
CAPE FEAR PLAN
pH
LOW FLOW SAMPLING LOG
TURBIDITY'
FIELD PERSONNEL:
'
synTerm
WEATHER: ❑ SUNNY ❑
OVERCAST ❑ RAIN TEMPERATURE (APPROX):
148 River Street, Suite 220
NOTES:
'
Greenville, South Carolina 29601
NOTES
[phone]. (864) 421 -9909 Fax
www. synTerracorp. com
WELL ID:
PUMP/TUBING INTAKE DEPTH: (FT)
START PURGE TIME: ,
MEASURING POINT:
START PURGE DATE:
END PURGE TIME:
WELL DIAMETER:
(IN) END PURGE DATE:
FINAL READING TIME: '
WELL DEPTH:
(FT) TOTAL VOLUME PURGED: (GAL)
DEPTH TO WATER:
(FT) SAMPLE DATE:
SAMPLE COLLECTION
K
TIME: ,
PURGE METHOD: ❑ Grundfos Pump
❑ 12 Volt Pump ❑ Peristaltic Pump ❑ Dedicated Pump
❑ Teflon Bailer ❑ Polyethylene Bailer
SAMPLE METHOD: ❑ Grundfos Pump
❑ 12 Volt Pump ❑ Peristaltic Pump ❑ Dedicated Pump
❑ Teflon Bailer ❑ Polyethylene Bailer
COMMENTS: FIELD VEHICLE ACCESSIBLE ❑ YES ❑ NO
Associated midday /end -of -day pH check within t0.1 std unts? ❑ YES ❑ NO. If NO, pH data reported on this sheet should be considered as
flagged accordingly
SynTerra is not NC-certified for these parameters. Data collected for information purposes only
WELL TAG PROTECTIVE CASING LOCK CAP CONCRETE PAD
] GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONI
WATER LEVEL
FLOW RATE
TEMPERATURE
CONDUCTANCE
DO
pH
ORP'
TURBIDITY'
TIME
(FT)
(m L/min)
(° Celsius)
(µS /cm)
(mg /L)
(su)
(mV)
(NTU)
NOTES
K
O
K
J
w
Z
52
r
w
Z
52
r
f-
¢
.�i,
S
g
N
O
O
O
J
O
O
V
17
V
a
o-
0-
w
Z
E
E
E
O
=
c
=
w
CONSTITUENTS SAMPLED
COMMENTS: FIELD VEHICLE ACCESSIBLE ❑ YES ❑ NO
Associated midday /end -of -day pH check within t0.1 std unts? ❑ YES ❑ NO. If NO, pH data reported on this sheet should be considered as
flagged accordingly
SynTerra is not NC-certified for these parameters. Data collected for information purposes only
WELL TAG PROTECTIVE CASING LOCK CAP CONCRETE PAD
] GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONI
NUMBER
OF
CONTAINERS
PRESERVATION
K
O
K
J
w
Z
52
r
w
Z
52
r
f-
¢
.�i,
S
g
N
O
O
O
J
O
O
V
17
V
a
o-
0-
w
Z
E
E
E
O
=
c
=
w
CONSTITUENTS SAMPLED
°
J
°
_
C
_
o
COMMENTS: FIELD VEHICLE ACCESSIBLE ❑ YES ❑ NO
Associated midday /end -of -day pH check within t0.1 std unts? ❑ YES ❑ NO. If NO, pH data reported on this sheet should be considered as
flagged accordingly
SynTerra is not NC-certified for these parameters. Data collected for information purposes only
WELL TAG PROTECTIVE CASING LOCK CAP CONCRETE PAD
] GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONI

L7
synTerra
Instrument ID: YSI- 556 -MPS
Analyst:
Instrument Calibration Log
SynTerra Corporation
148 River Street, Suite 220
Greenville, South Carolina 29601
NC Field Parameter Certification No. 5591
Date:
Location:
pH Initial Calibration (standard units)
Reference Method: SW846 9040C
Cal. Time Cal. Buffer 4.0 Cal. Buffer 7.0 Cal Buffer 10.0 *Check Buffer 7.0
*pH buffer checks are to be within ±0.1 pH units of the standards true value
4 Buffer Reference: 10 Buffer Reference:
7 Buffer Reference: Check Buffer Reference:
n caiwation cneCK tstanaara units
Time I Check Buffer True Value I *Check Buffer Measured Value
Mid -Day
End -of -Day
Other
*pFf buffer checks are to be within ± 0.1 pH units of the standards true value
Check Buffer Reference: Action Required:
Specific Conductance (umhos /cm)
Reference Method: SW846 9050A
Time
Calibration Std 1413
Verification Std 1413
Initial Cal
Meter DO Reading
m /L
Correction
Factor
Theoretical DO
m /L
Mid -Day
Not Applicable
End -of -Day
Not Applicable
Mid -Day
*Verification standard ± 10 percent of the standards true value
Calibration Standard Reference:
Action Required:
Verification Standard Reference:
Dissolved Oxygen (mg /L)
Reference Method: SM 4500 O G -2001
Fheoretical DO= DO from "Dissolved Oxygen Meter Calibration Verification I able at ambient temp X t_ or rection Factor at Barometric Pressure
Theoretical DO and Meter DO reading within ±0.5 mg/I, if not calibrate meter.
Action Required:
FIGURE 5 - EXAMPLE FIELD SAMPLING CALIBRATION FORM
Time
Temp
°C
Barometric Pressure
mm H
Meter DO Reading
m /L
Correction
Factor
Theoretical DO
m /L
Initial
Mid -Day
End -of -Day
Fheoretical DO= DO from "Dissolved Oxygen Meter Calibration Verification I able at ambient temp X t_ or rection Factor at Barometric Pressure
Theoretical DO and Meter DO reading within ±0.5 mg/I, if not calibrate meter.
Action Required:
FIGURE 5 - EXAMPLE FIELD SAMPLING CALIBRATION FORM

sGauieluoo }o # leloloz
:IO¢w
0
z
LL ,L
v
O
F-
a
N
n
O H O J
of suwnloo
� � U
m
alaldwoo
2
Zo
h
m
O
CL
m — O
d U
N N
0
>
>
�
a
N
_ a
co L Q
I
w
a+
9
._..
I UI UI O
Z a U) O
I
c
to
3 w r
cm LIJ 1 c J ? a
j •A � o Z
J
0
I E N U p
0.
C.
• o
i O LL
N
V
I c
N
•�
a
a
w
J
m
I�
D
U
N
N
N
D
O d
c
I
V
m
C
x Z
ICI x 0
11
d
o
!
U)
o
c)
v
m
�I 0
M
o
O
N 0 a
to
01
d v
LL I m
Q
=
N
7
N °
1
j
F • V
yl "
J
d
UJ ! ;
E
a`
c
LU
w'
tY!
fA
U
�1
m
m
N
JI
Q'
N
N
QI
I
Oj
m
QI
!
OI
to
i
cm
c
c
>
ik
O
m
m
QI._._._._._._._I
OI i
yl I
DI N I
U. d
LL I
OI
rn
Q! .0 c ao m.
I
�
N t7
U! •3 Z h o�
I ; m Lf
I u_ `=N�1
i � a a
i m m cn 0!
c O m —
I Q Cox >o"I
n
I ` M y �I
=
w O 7
I U = I
I Y •� I
I I
N �
N
O c
c
)
U �
� N
N
N �
C
W�
m �
� a
N a
L L
LL
91 dwoo
Gl
F..
C �
O m
- c
0
c
0
� V d
w E
a —
o t=
U
E
�,t D
z
C
0
L
a
n
0
z
LL ,L
v
O
F-
a
N
n
d
U
c
of suwnloo
a
0.
m
alaldwoo
2
7
>,
m
O
CL
�.. _.. _.. .._
•
0
N N
0
>
>
a`
a
N
_ a
co L Q
m
w
a+
9
._..
_..
c
to
d
d
J
0
a
0.
C.
m
N
V
a
N
•�
a
a
w
m
m
m
D
Z
N
N
D
V
d
V
m
C
C
d
o
!
U)
o
a
v
m
IL
M
-n
00
alaldwoo;snw jawolsno
D
0
o.
0
Y
N
d
O O
E
d
L
U
c
�
7
p
m
of suwnloo
a
0.
m
alaldwoo
2
7
>,
m
CL
�.. _.. _.. .._
•
0
N N
0
>
>
U
3
O A m
d 0
N
_ a
co L Q
m
m
punoiewnl
pansap aleolpul aseeld'
luepodwi `jawolsno
E E E E
0 0 0 0
E E E E
a d d
o is io w io
o n a a O
`m
E
m
of suwnloo
aleudoidde
v
alaldwoo
c
jawolsn0
>,
CL
�.. _.. _.. .._
•
._.
_..
0
>
>
>
._.
m
m
m
_..
9
._..
_..
c
d
d
d
J
CL
a
0.
m
V
V
V
N
Q
a
a
w
E E E E
a d d
o is io w io
o n a a O
`m
E
T
�I
Q
�I
Ll
NBIJ
of suwnloo
aleudoidde
alaldwoo
of
jawolsn0
>,
�.. _.. _.. .._
•
._.
_..
.._
._.
_..
.._
._.
_..
.._
._.
_..
.._
._..
_..
m
mar
m
J
m
m
m
m
I O
7
L
L
O
.N
d
W L
J
Q
=
N
7
N
7
1
j
E
J
c
c
fA
U
N
N
N
T
�I
Q
�I
Ll

CATLIN
E LL LOG Eny "Mandsciamists
- t , I * C — — -, SHEET 0 - F 1
LOCATION: Moncure
PROJECT NO.: 210036 STATE: NC COUNTY: Chatham
PROJECT NAME: LOGGED BY: Justin Heter WELL 10:
Progress Energy Cape Fear
DRILLER, John E. Wood L-III . C. MW-1
NORTHING: 6665926.6T_EA_ STING: 1985167.5 CREW: Roger Caulder
SYSTEM: NCSP NA_P_§i(U LOCATION: SW of site .along .river, of TMW- I T.O.C. ELEV.: 165.67 DRILL MACHINE: CIVIE 45B AN IMETHOD_ H.S. Augers 9.4 TOTAL DEPTH: 16.0
START DATE: 8/24/10 1 FINISH DATE: 8/24/10 24 HOUR DTW: 8.7 WELL DEPTH: 15.0
BLOW COUNT OVA SOIL AND ROCK WELL
DEPTH I li,n (",r,) LAB. 0 DEPTH DESCRIPTION ELEVATION DETAIL
3-4
0.0 LAND SURFACE 162.3 D 0
L
(CL) - Brown SILTY CLAY. Soft, Uniform,
Medium plasticity. Moist. No odor,
3.0
M 40 1563
(SMICL) - Brown CLAYEY to SANDY SILT. 6.0
Low plasticity. Soft, Moist,
.0 156 3
8.0
W 0 H Sat.
(CL) - Brown CLAY w/ trace SILT. Soft- High
plasticity. Saturated at 8.5' BLS.
13.0
4V0 Ill 1 1 Sat. 14.2 148.1
(SIP) - Brown fine SAND w/ some CLAY. 15.0
Saturated,
1•6.3
Boring Terminated at Elevation 146.3 ft
nunto'lite Pellets 102 Medium Sand •
3.5
16.0

WELL Lf` CATLIN
F.IIgI000IY and $CiCOlisl!
Na �.,,.., N� _SHEET 1 OF
PROJECT NO.: 210036 STATE. NC COUNTY: Chatham !LOCATION: MOnCure
PROJECT NAME: f LOGGED BY. Justin Heter WELL 10:
Progress Energy Cape Fear I — - _ - - --
�_ DRILLER: John E. Wood, III C TMW -1
NORTHING: 666936.5 EASTING: 1985163.3 CREW: Roger.Caulder
_ f ..____...
SYSTEM: N C S P NA 83 USft _ I BORING LOCATION: SW of site along river, N. of MW-1 T.O.C. ELEV.: 166_04
DRILL MACHINE: CME 45B AN METHOD: H.S. AugefS/M . 0 HOUR DTW: 0.0 TOTAL DEPTH: 53.0
START DATE: 8/24/10 FINISH DATE: 8/26/10 24 HOUR DTW: 7.1 WELL DEPT 53.0
- - -- -- -- - -- -- .IDEPTI . - - - - -- - _ -- -- - - -.._
DEPTH f SLOW COUNT OVA LAB I ° L SOIL AND ROCK WELL
Gm Gm Gin Gin (PPM) S c ` -- DESCRIPTION - -- ELEVATION DETAIL_ -
3.0
owlia3
8.0 �W.I.o .I._H.
3.0
ME
60/
4 1 10160/
0.0 LAND SURFACE
M
Sat.
Sat. KIl� 14 0
(CL) - Brown SILTY CLAY. Uniform. Medium
plasticity. Soft. Moist.
(SM/CL) - Brown CLAYEY to SANDY SILT.
Low plasticity. Soft. Moist.
(CL) - Brown CLAY w/ trace SILT. Soft. High
plasticity. Saturated at 8.5' BLS.
(SP) - Fine SAND w/ some CLAY. Saturated.
163.4
(HWR) - "Driller notes very hard /dense layering
16.0 -17' BLS. Hard rock.
Sat. 0 19.0 (CL) - Brown SILTY CLAY w/ high plasticity.
1494
0Portland Cement Sentonits Pellets F�/2 Medium Sand
S -
tr -
19.0

CATLIN
WELL LOG Engineen And SC.CMISIS
SHEET 2 OF 3
PROJECT NO.: 210036 STATE: NC COUNTY: Chatham ILOCATION: Moncure
PROJECT NAME: Progress Energy Cape Fear LOGGED BY: Justin Heter WELL ID:
NORTHING: EAST111 G: 1985163.3 CREW: Roggr�aulder
SYSTEM: NCSP NAD 83 (USft) BORING LOCATION: SW of 5ite along river. . of MW-1 T.O.C. ELEV.: 166.04
DRILLMACHINE: CME45BATV METHOD: H.S. Augers/M.R. 0 HOUR DTW: 0.0 TOTALDEPTH: 53.0
START DATE: 8/24/10 FINISH DATE: 8/26/10 7.1 WELL DEPTH: 53.0
BLOW COUNT OvA 0 SOIL AND ROCK ELL
60/1 |
1l1� ' [ -
(HWR'Wmathmdrockm/large gravel-sized
pieces ofgnonhe/gneioo/quadz grains (from
appearance).
*Driller notes continuous hard/rock
layering/could not drill deeper using hollow
v/am ougoro,
**From drilling mud flow outfall, rock appears to
have switched at 43' BLS to a less hard,
fragmented mudstone. (continued)
^
E_J Portland Cement 0 Bentonite Pellels F-102 Medium Same
sm
wv

and 5mm tr"b
WELL LOG �- CATI,IN
l inymcars
" " "` SHEET 3 OF 3
PROJECT NO,:
— 210036 STATE: _NC _COUNTY: _ _ Chatham_ _ LOCATION: Moncure
PROJECT NAME: Progress Energy Cape Fear LOGGED BY: Justin Het_er WELL ID:
-- - - - -- - - ---- -- - -- —
____ _ 666936.5 __ _ DRILLER: John_ E. Wood, III C TMW -1
NORTHING — EASTING ^— 1985163.3_ CREW: Roger Caulder _
SYSTEM: NCSP NAD 83_(U$ftj BORING LOCATION: SW of sqe.a.iong river. N. of MW -1 T.O.C. ELEV.:_1_66.04
DRILL MACHINE CME 45B ATV METHOD: H S Augers /M.R. 0 HOUR DTW: 0.0 TOTAL DEPTH: 53.0
START DATE: 8/24/10 FINISH DATE: 8/26/10 24 HOUR DTW: 7.1 WELL DEPTH: 53.0
DEPTH BLOW COUNT It OVA ( LAB. ° o SOIL AND ROCK WELL
61n Out ' cm oro (ppm) I s G DEPTH DESCRIPTION ELEVATION DETAIL
R
I x
N N �
x x Qa
•-
x
x x
x x �N
x x
x z
48.0 - - R x (HWR) - Gray SHALY MUDSTONE. Very -
k k ,
1160/ i ? p x x ' dense. Friable. Moderate amounts of soft
x x CLAY w/ moderate plasticity. Clay is wet.
II _ x 'Driller notes not feeling any changes in
— x x
hardness in layering w/ depth/ no structural -
x x faults /fractures.
x x At 48' BLS, gray very consolidated f-
x x MUDSTONE w/ friable /brittle shale -like
x k properties. Dry. Breaks up to VF dust.
x x
x x (continued)
x x
53.0 -- x x 63.0 1104 63.0 3.0-
- 60/ Boring Terminated at Elevation 110.4 ft
i r I
I
I
r
u
I '
I
1
rl I
EJPortland Cement E Bentonits Pellets L1 1112 Medium Send

L L LOG 100yj Engineers and SemalMs
SHEET 1 OF 1
210
PROJECT NO.: - - 036 COUNTY: Chatham LOCATION: Moncure
PROJECT NAME: Progress Energy Cape Fear LOGGED BY: Justin Heter WELL ID:
DRILLER: John E. Wood, III
NORTHING:--, -,- 671 --- 1-9 8 4 6-7-7 —6 CREW: Roger C MW-2
-- _q_qt4lder
SYSTEM: NCSP NAD 83 (pSft) BORING LOCATION: Left side of N. pond alo g river.. T.O.C. ELEV.: 169.40
F ..
DRILL MACHINE: CM_ E 0 HOUR I)Tk
45B ATV METHOD: H.S. Augers 9.5 TOTAL DEPTH: 14.0
Ho
START DATE: 8/30/10 FINISH DATE: 8/30/10 24 HOUR DTW: WELL DEPTH: 14.0
T—i-
DEPTH LAB
BLOW COUNT OVA M L 0 SOIL AND ROCK WELL
G in riin 6in om (PP(TI)
S G DEPTH DESCRIPTION ELEVATION DETAIL
2.5
0.0 LAND SURFACE 166.6 00
(SCICL) - Brown CLAYEY SAND to SANDY
CLAY. Organic debris. Uniform. Loose/soft.
Moist.
3.0
4 3 3 1 D e. 0 162,6 4.0
W 0 11 Sat, (SP) - brown very fine SAND. Loose. Az�
Uniform. Dry.
—T. . At 8' BLS. some CLAY. Saturated.
14.0 152.6 14.0
Boring Terminated at Elevation 152.6 ft
U
Lj-
NBontondis Pellets 1-1 92 Medium Sand

I CATLIN
WELL LOG 1,1jim"'N and sclenlmls
SHEET 1 OF 3
PROJECT NO,: 210036 LSTATE: N C COUNTY: Chatham LOCATION: Moncure
PROJECT NAME: I LOGGED BY: Justin Heter WELL ID:
Progress Energy Cape Fear
DRILLER: John E. Wood III
- - C. TMW-2
NORTHING: _67-i6 1_ 38.6 EASTING: 1984675.5 cgW: Roqer Caulder
SYSTEM: NCSP NAD 83 (USft) BORING LOCATION: Left side of N. pond, N. of MW-2 T.O.C. ELEV.: 169.17
DRILL MACHINE: CME45B ATV METHOD: H.S. Augers/M.R. O HOUR DTW: 0.0 TOTAL DEPTH: 53.0
START DATE: 8/30/10 FINISH DATE: 9/1/10 24 HOUR DTW: I WELL DEPTMI 53.0
BLOW COUNT OVA M L SOIL AND ROCK WELL
DEPTH LAB, 0
6m Gin 6.n Gin (PPM) s rf DEPTH DESCRIPTION ELEVATION DETAIL
10.0 LAND SURFACE 166.5
(SC/CL) - Brown CLAYEY SAND to SANDY
CLAY. Organic debris. Uniform. Moist.
4.0 40 1625 —
4 3 2 D
x
x
x
(SP) - Brown very fine SAND. Loose.
8.0 Uniform. Dry,
At 8' BLS, of SAND w/ some CLAY. Saturated.
W 0 H Sat.
12.0 154_5
ol
(C L) • Brownish-gray very high plasticity CLAY.
(From auger cuttings/pulled augers)
149.0
18.0
2 16 18 52 D (IAWR) - Brownish-gray unform ROCK. Very
hard. Thickly bedded. Very granitic in
appearance. Very finely grained rock.
17.5-19.5' intermitten rock layers.
19.5-40' dense rock.
Portland Cement E Rentonite PeRetti El #2 Medium Sand
U0

WELL LOG ?0° �- CATLIN
EnyurocK dnd SCicndals
"' SHEET 2 OF 3
W10 0Y�lw+. NC
PROJECT N0:_ _ 210036 STATE: NC COUNTY: Chatham LOCATION: Moncure
PROJECT NAME: LOGGED BY: Justin Heter WELL ID:
Progress Energy Cape Fear - -- -- --
DRILLER :_ _ John E. Wood III C TMW -2
NORTHING_: 67153_8.8 FASTING; _ 1984675.5 CREW: — Roger Caulder
SYSTEM; NCSP NAD H3 (USft) I BORING LOCATION: Lett side or N. pond, of MW -2 T.O.C. ELEV.: 169.17
- _ j —.
DRILL MACHINE: CME 45B ATV METHOD. H S Augers /M.R. 0 HOUR DTW: 0.0 TOTAL DEPTH_ 53.0
START DATE:_ 8/30/10 FINISH DATE 9/1/10 _ 24 HOUR DTW: WELL DEPTH 53.0
DEPTH BLOW COUNT I OVA I LAB. ( ° L SOIL AND ROCK WELL
f,+n Gm Gm din ` (PPM) } G DEPTH DESCRIPTION ELEVATION DETAIL
x
x
x
x
x
Y
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
X
(HWR) - Brownish -gray unform ROCK. Very
hard. Thickly bedded. Very granitic in
appearance. Very finely grained rock.
17.5 -19.5' intermitten rock layers.
19.5 -40' dense rock. (continued)
Li— I W 4D.D
(HWR) - 'Driller notes decrease in hardness,
though still very hard rock layering.
Gray VF rock dusUrock fragments. Some
CLAY. Brittle. SILTSTONE characteristics.
Medium hardness. Thickly bedded. Thin
layers of clay (lenses) throughout siltstone
layer.
uPortland Cement MSentonito Pellets 11 82 Medium Sand
42.6

L � CATLIN
WELL Eagweent and xcuenbyls
J1° V SHEET 3 OF 3
PROJECT NO.: 210036 1 STATE` NC COUNTY: _ Chatham - _ LOCATION_ MorlCUre
PROJECT NAME: LOGGED BY: Justin Heter WELL ID:
Progress Energy Cape Fear - . _ ___...
DRILLER: John. E. Wood III C TMW -2
NORTHING: 671538.8 jEASTING: 1984675.5 CREW: ,Roger Caulder _
SYSTEM: NCSP NAD 83 V. ft BORING LOCATION: Left side of N. pond, N. of MW -2 T.O.C. ELEV.: 169.17
DRILL MACHINE: CME 45B AN METHOD: H.S. Aug( 0 0.0 TOTAL DEPTH_ 53.0
START DATE_ 8/30/10 FINISH DATE_ 9/1110 24 HOUR DTW: -___ WELL DEPTH:_ 5_ _3.0
13LOW COUNT OVA o SOIL AND ROCK WELL
DEPTH LAB. , o
Gin Gm bin tin Win) S G DEPTH DESCRIPTION ELEVATION DETAIL
x x
x x i
{ I : x x i ..-
1 I I x
48.0 t
100
0.'2- -
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x _ 62.5
53.0 113 5 63.0
Boring Terminated at Elevation 113.5 ft
Portland Cement Bentomte Pellets 1:1 92 Medium Sand
!x x
ix x
x x
(HWR) - 'Driller notes decrease in hardness,
though still very hard rock layering.
ua
h
ry
D
% x
Gray VF rock dust/rock fragments. Some
x x
CLAY. Brittle. SILTSTONE characteristics,
x x
Medium hardness. Thickly bedded. Thin
x x layers
of clay (lenses) throughout siltstone
x x
x x
layer. (continued)
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x _ 62.5
53.0 113 5 63.0
Boring Terminated at Elevation 113.5 ft
Portland Cement Bentomte Pellets 1:1 92 Medium Sand

v CATLIN
LOG WELL Vnti.ncomj,.dScientists
�,00'a
SHEET 1 OF 1
PROJECT NO.: 210036 STATE: NC COUNTY: Chatham LOCATION: MOnCure
PROJECT NAME: _ i LOGGED BY: .Justin Heter WELL ID:
Progress Energy Cape Fear -- - - -_ _.
DRILLER: John E. - _ .._. �_
EASTlNG: 19850209 j NORTHING: 0
er.Cautder
SYSTEM: NCSP NAD_83.(USft) BORING LOCATION: NW of site along river T.O.C. 175.96
DRILL MACHINE: CME 45B AN _ METHOD: _ H.S. Aug rS 0 HOUR D_TW: 10.5 TOTAL DEPTH: 15.0
START DATE: _ 9_/2_/10_ FINISH DATE: 9/2/10 24 HOUR DTW: _ WELL DEPTH: _ 15.0
DEPTH BLOW COUNT OVA LAB M o SOIL AND ROCK WELL
Gin Gm Gm Din (ppm) g r' DEPTH DESCRIPTION ELEVATION DETAIL
a.�
LAND SURFACE _— 172.7 00
3.0 -- - - (SP) - Brown fine SAND w/ organic debris. 3.0
Grades to very Fine- grained SAND to SILT
4 7 7 M SAND. Medium dense. Uniform. Moist.
5.0
i ( (CL) - 'Driller notes very hard CLAY layer
- 6.5 -8' BLS.
8.0 ... l8D —'--- - -- -- 1647_
X3'8 6 M
_ _.____,_• -_ _ (SP) - Brown fine SAND. Uniform. Medium o�
dense. Moist. s
Ito 1017
(HW - *Driller notes very hard rock layer
tz o 10 -1 V BLS, possible mudstone w/ granitic 160.7
-- appearance _
13.0 I
_.... -�
(SP) - Brown fine SAND. Loose. Uniform.
2 3 2 Sat. Saturated.
i
157 7 16.0 -
Boring Terminated at Elevation 157.7 ft
i f
i l
i
®9ontonile Pellets LJ112 Medium Sand

LOG -� CATLIN E L "�" Engmcomind Scientists
W
SHEET 1 OF 1
PROJECT NO_: 210036 I STATE: NC_ COUNTY: - Chatham LOCATION: Moncure
PROJECT NAME: LOGGED BY: Justin Heter WELL 1D:
Progress Energy Cape Fear ------- - - - - --
_ DRILLER: John E. Wood III 5 6MW-4
NORTHING:_ _ 672664,4 EASTING: _ 1986489.6 CREW: Roger Caulder
SYSTEM: NCSP NAD 83 (USft) _ _BORING LOCATION: NE cornet of site. along traintracks T.O.C. ELEV.: 180.74
DRILL MACHINE: CME 45B AN METHOD: 124 a HOUR DTW: 17.1 TOTAL DEPTH: 19.0
START DATE: 7/28/10 FINISH DATE: .--.--,--7/28/10 HOUR DTW: WELL DEPTH:_19.0
DEPTH BLOW COUN r I OVA LAB SOIL AND ROCK WELL
Gm II Gtn Gin Gut ! Win) c DESCRIPTION DETAIL
_ -_ -- - - - -L�� _^ DEPTH ELEVATION
3.0
0.0 LAND SURFACE 177.7 00
INI
V
(CL) - Gray CLAY. Moderate plasticity. h
Uniform (From cuttings)
4.0 -- - - At 4' BLS, brown CLAY w/ some SIL TY CLAY
W/ low plasticity. Moist.
3 7 10 12 I M
I
7.0
7 5 170.2
90
t
2 3 4 5 W
(SM) - Brown SILTY SAND wl trace CLAY.
Uniform. Low plasticity. Medium
dense /medium stiff. Wet.
o�
14.0 -- - �.14 ► - 163 4 9
1 2 2 3-1 Sat. _ -- __ -- --
(SP) - Brown fine SAND. Uniform. Loose.
Saturated.
Boring Terminated at Elevation 158.7 ft
PeNets 1 112 Mediium Sand

WELL
LUG
�6 LATLIN
Engineers and Scientists
210036
N4rrlrglon, NC SHEET 1 OF 2
PROJECT NO.: 210036
STATE: NC
COUNTY: Chatham
LOCATION: Moncure
PROJECT NAME: progress Energy Cape Fear
_
LOGGED BY: Justin Heter
WELL ID:
DRILLER: John E. Wood III
NORTHING: 672664.4
EASTING: 1986489.6
CREW: Josh O'Connell
BGTMW -4
SYSTEM: NCSP NAD 83 (USft ) I BORING LOCATION: Paged with BGMW -4
T,O.C. ELEV.:
DRILL MACHINE: CME 45B AN 'METHOD: H.S. Augers/ M.R.
0 HOUR DTW: 22.3
TOTAL DEPTH: 50.0
START DATE: 11/16/110 FINISH DATE: 11/18/10
24 HOUR DTW; 16,9
WELL DEPTH: 48.0
DEPTH
BLOW COUNT
sin Ern sin ein
OVA
(PPM)
FLAB.
°
e
��
G
SOIL AND ROCK
DEPTH DESCRIPTION
WELL
DETAIL
3.s
0.0 LAND SURFACE
00
(SP) - Dark brown fine SAND w/ organics.
Uniform. Medium dense. Moist.
30
-
4.0
3
7
10
12
M
_
(CL) - Brown SANDY CLAY. Low plasticity.
9.0
Uniform. Med. stiff. Moist.
_
2
3
_
4
5
rw
I
I
5
14.0
14.0
°
1
2
2
3
Sat.
(GW) - HARD WEATHERED ROCK.
16,0
(CL) - Inierlayered CLAY and ROCK
U
Q
18.0
A
N
(GW) - HARD WEATHERED ROCK
ieo
N
_
6
5
5
6
W
(SP) - Brown very fine SAND to SILTY SAND.
Unifrom. Medium dense.
23.0
23.0
(SW) - Brown fine SAND w/ GRAVELS and
12
23
50/1
2'
W
24.0 some CLAY.
24.0
2Bentonrte Grout Bentonde Pellets El #2 Medium Sand

i
i
C
1 C
�~ CATLIN 1E L L LO G ms's Engineers and Scientists
SHEET 2 OF 2
PROJECT NO.: 210036 STATE: NC COUNTY: Chatham LOCATION: Moncure
PROJECT NAME: LOGGED BY: Justin Heter WELL ID:
Progress Energy Cape Fear DRILLER: John E. Wood III
NORTHING: 672664.4 EASTING: 1986489.6 CREW: Josh O'Connell BGTMW -4
SYSTEM. NCSP NAn R3 n IE;ftI I RnPINr t nrATWW•o,;,e ....kk Qt16a5h1 A T n P n ry .
DRILL MACHINE: CME 45B ATV
METHOD: H.S. Augers/ M.R.
0 HOUR DTW: 22.3
TOTAL DEPTH: 50.0
START DATE: 11/16/10
FINISH DATE_: 11/18/10
24 HOUR DTW: 16.9
WELL DEPTH: 48.0
DEPTH
BLOW COUNT
OVA
LAB
M
o
SOIL AND ROCK
WELL
Bin sin sin sin
(Ppm)
Is
G
DEPTH DESCRIPTION
DETAIL
(GW) - HARD WEATHERED ROCK, very
hard /dense. Appears to be a sandstone.
zs.o
27 0 Thickly bedded. Large gravel -sized rocks
coming from auger cuttings. 'Took —31h to
28 0
28 o drill from 26 -36' BLS. continued
(SW) - GRAVELLY SAND w/ fragmented
27
60/
D
weathered rock.
(CL) - Gray SILTY CLAY. Low plasticity.
2'
_ _
Brittle. Stiff. Dry. Grading to a MUDSTONE.
37 D
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
(GW) - Very dense /hard layering, MUDSTONE.
x x
Drill rig could not easily penetrate (Tricone bit
x x
having difficulty). Auger cuttings reveal
x x fragmented
coarse grains, silty clay,trace
x x
quarWcrystalline grains. Softer layer 33 -34'
x x
BLS, possibly fracture or sand vein.
x x
x x
x x
36.0
i
x x
x x
x x
38 U
38.0
(GC) - Soft layer of fragmented rock
(MUDSTONE) and SILTY CLAY. Some very
fine to coarse grained SAND. Bit more easily
penetrated through this layer than above layer.
42.0
43.0
5
I
(CL) - Gray SILTY CLAY. Very dense. Brittle.
s°
60/
M
Low plasticity. Moist. Mudstone appearance.
^
2'
450
x x
x x
x
x
x x
x x
x x
"
x x
x x (GW)
- S.A.A. 31 -38' BLS. `While drilling, mud
x x
in boring dropped to 16.5' BLS, possibly into
48.0
x x
cavity from 38.42' BLS.
48 a
48.0
60/
1'
M
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
50.0
Boring Terminated at Depth 50.0 fS
tN Bentonite Grout Sentonite Pelets r I #2 Medium Sand

WELL
L
f�'' E..ATLIN
Engineers and SclenfisLS
Z'0O
'✓Cmvyton,
NC SHEET 1 OF 1
— _
PROJECT NO.: 210036 I STATE: NC COUNTY: Chatham
LOCATION: Moncure
PROJECT NAME: Progress Energy Cape Fear
LOGGED BY: Justin Heter
WELL ID:
DRILLER: William J. Miller
CMW -5
NORTHING:
EASTING:
CREW: Josh O'Connell
SYSTEM:
BORING LOCATION:Along Road near Substation
T.O.C. ELEV.:
DRILL MACHINE: CME 45B AN
METHOD: H.S. Au ers
HOUR DTW: 15.0
TOTAL DEPTH: 21.0
START DATE: 11/19/10
FINISH DATE: 11/19/1 O 124
HOUR DTW: NM
WELL DEPTH: 20,0
DEPTH
BLOW COUNT
OVA
LAB
o
o
SOIL AND ROCK
WELL
Gin sn sin sin
(PPm)
s
G
DEPTH DESCRIPTION
DETAIL
3.5
0.0 LAND SURFACE
0.0
(SC) - Brown fine SAND to CLAYEY SAND.
Some SANDY CLAY. Medium dense.
Uniform Moist.
3.0
3 --
G
6
11
16
19
M
(ML) - Brown CLAYEY SILT to SILTY CLAY.
Low plasticity. Stiff, Uniform. Moist,
so
8.0
9.0
3
5
6
6
M
(SM/ML) - Brown very fine SAND to SILT w/
trace CLAYEY SILT Uniform. Medium stiff.
10,0
Moist.
14.0
14 a
--
2
3
3
4
(SP) •Brown very fine SAND to SILTY SAND.o
o
Uniform. Wet @ 15' BLS.
IGO
(GW) - Very hard rock.
175
19.0
1 190
8
7
6
5
Sat.
(SP) - Brown fine SAND w/ trace SILTSTONE
20.0
20,0
fragments. Loose. Saturated.
21.0
Boring Terminated at Depth 21.0 ft
FM Bentonite Pellets U. Medium Sand

WELL
LOU
�- �'ATLIN
Engineers and Sctentiats
_
z "oss
NHrtLryrun, IJL SHEET 1 OF 1
_PROJECT NO.: 210036 STATE: NC COUNTY: Chatham
LOCATION: Moncure
PROJECT NAME: Progress Energy Cape Fear
LOGGED BY: Rick Garrett
WELL ID:
DRILLER: William J. Miller
CMW-7
NORTHING: FASTING:
CREW: RO er Caulder
SYSTEM:
BORING LOCATION: S. of'78 Ash Pond nested w1 CTMW -7
T.O.C. ELEV.:
DRILL MACHINE: CME 45B ATV
METHOD: H.S. Au erS
0 HOUR DTW: 17.0
TOTAL DEPTH: 26.0
START DATE: 12/1/10
FINISH DATE: 12/1110
24 HOUR DTW: 17.9
WELL DEPTH: 26.5
DEPTH
BLOW COUNT
OVA
LAB
o
a
SOIL AND ROCK
WELL
6:n 6in Gin sin
(ppm)
s
G
DEPTH DESCRIPTION
DETAIL
7.5
I
I
0.0 LAND SURFACE
no
4.0
4.0
(SP) - Brown- orange SAND w/ SILT, very
3
6
6
5
D
fine- grained. Firm. Moderately well - sorted.
6.0 Dry-
0
z
u
9.0
+
G 0
iV
-
L ND
4
7
9
6
D
and CLAY. staining. Reddish-brown iron ry
fine grained. Firm. Dry,
110
17.0
14.0
14.0
i
-- _
(CL) - CLAY wl SAND and SILT.
5
9 112
14
D
Reddish - orange and tan mottled. Low to
'_I
1s c medium plasticity. Firm. Dry.
I
- — - -- -
16.5
19.0
-
f
19 o
2
3
4
4
W
0/z
(CL) - Tan and gray SILTY CLAY. Low
plasticity. Soft. Wet,
21.0
o
0
�g
24.0
—
24 c
-
1
(SP) - Brown and orange medium to coarse
4
6
6
5
W
grained SAND wl some SILT. Poorly sorted.
Subangular. Friable. Wet.
25,0
Boring Terminated at Depth 26.0 ft
25.5 26.5
98entonite Pellets 0#2 Medium Sand

WELL
LOG
�' �- 'ATLIN
Enpinven and scientists
ztoo.6 SHEET 1 OF 3
1 "T wgl�n. NC
PROJECT NO.:_ 210036
STATE; NC COUNTY Chatham
LOCATION: Moncure
PROJECT NAME: Progress Energy Cape Fear I LOGGED BY: Rick Garrett
WELL ID:
DRILLER: William J. Miller
NORTHING:
EASTING: _ , CREW; Ro er CauIder
CTMW -7
SYSTEM:
BORING LOCATION: s. of'78 Ash Pond nested w/ CMW -7 T.O.C.
ELEV.:
DRILL MACHINE: CME 45B ATV
METHOD: H.S. Augers/ M.R.
0 HOUR DTW: 35.0 1 TOTAL
DEPTH: 50.0
START DATE: 12/2/10
FINISH DATE: 12/3/10
24 HOUR DTW: 35.0
WELL DEPTH: 48.0
DEPTH
BLOW COUNT
OVA
LAB
o
o
SOIL AND ROCK
WELL
sin sin sin sin
(PPm)
g
G
DEPTH DESCRIPTION
DETAIL
3.5
D 0 LAND SURFACE
1 0.0
4.0
4.0
t
(SP) - Brown and orange SAND w/ SILT. Very
D
fine grained. Firm. Moderately well sorted.
Dry.
50
9.0
9.0
(SM /CL) - Brown and orange SILT w/ very fine
D
grained SAND and CLAY. Reddish -brown iron
staining. Firm. Dry.
ii o
14.0
140
(CL) - CLAY w/ SAND and SILT. Reddish
N
D
orange and tan mottled. Low to medium
o
plasticity. Firm, Dry.
as 0
U
a
c:
l
V
fi
N
"V
19.0
W
(CL) - Tan and gray SILTY CLAY. Low
plasticity. Soft. Wet.
21.0
Bentonite Grout Bentonite Pellets El #2 Medium Sand

c
f
(4
S
f
C
D
C
a
1111 E L L
L U G
�� C.ATLIN
'a, Engineers and Scientists
21�"s SHEET 2 OF 3
wawywn, tic
PROJECT NO.: 210036 STATE: NC COUNTY: Chatham
LOCATION: Moncure
PROJECT NAME: progress Energy Cape Fear
LOGGED BY: Rick Garrett
WELL ID:
DRILLER: William J. Miller
CTMW -7
NORTHING:
FASTING:
CREW: Roger Caulder
SYSTEM:
BORING LOCATIONS. of'76 Ash Pond nested w/ CMW -7
T.O.C. ELEV.:
DRILL MACHINE: CME 45B AN
METHOD: H.S. Augers/ M.R.
a HOUR DTW: 35.0
TOTAL DEPTH: 50.0
START DATE: 12/2/10
FINISH DATE_ : 12/3/10
24 HOUR DTW: 35.0
WELL DEPTH: 48.0
DEPTH
BLOW COUNT
16,.
OVA
LAB.
°
o
SOIL AND ROCK
WELL
16in sin sm
(PPM)
S
G
DEPTH DESCRIPTION
DETAIL
24.0
24.0
(SP) - Brown and orange medium to coarse
VV
SAND w/ some SILT. Poorly sorted.
25.0
Subangular. Friable. Wet-
260
28.0
—
2e.0
x x
X x
X X
(GW) - SHALE /SILTSTONE. Purple /dark gray.
50
W
X X
Highly weathered. Firm. Alternating bends of
29.0
X X
fissility. (partial recovery)
X
30 0
_�
33.0
33.0
X X
X X
X
33.5
25
63/
2.
-
D
X
X X
X x
(GM-S.A.A. w/ greasy talc -like texture. Dry.
X x
X x
35 0
38 0
-
-
3e.0
38.0
70�
-
x
X
X
(GW) - S.A.A. Medium green, dark gray, purple
15
32
--
D
% X
and brown stain. Less fissilie. Highly
X X
weathered. Dry.
x x
40.0
O U
43.0
43.0
"a
s d
mi
X X
501
2'
D
X X
x x
X X
X x
X x
(GW) - S.A.A. Reddish -brown color.
hL
0Bentonite Grout Bentonite Pellets U #2 Medium Sand

i
4
C
--^- CATLIN
WELL LOG Engineers and Scientists
va°0o�.uc SHEET 3 OF 3
PROJECT NO.: 210036 1 STATE: NC COUNTY Chatham LOCATION Mon r
PROJECT NAME:
Progress Energy Cape Fear-
LOGGED BY: Rick Garrett
Cue _
WELL ID:
NORTHING: EAST NNG.-
DRILLER: William J. Miller
CREW; Roger Caulder
CTMW -%
SYSTEM:
BORING LOCATION: S. of '78 Ash Pond nested w/ CMW -7
_
T.O.C. ELEV.:
DRILL MACHINE: CME 45B ATV
METHOD: H.S. Augers/ M.R.
0 HOUR DTW: 35.0
TOTAL DEPTH: 50.0
START DATE: 12/2/10
FINISH DATE. 12/3/10
24 HOUR DTW: 35.0
WELL DEPTH: 48.0_
DEPTH
BLOW COUNT
OVA
LAB
M
o
SOIL AND ROCK
WELL
sin sin sin sin
(ppm)
s
G
DEPTH DESCRIPTION
DETAIL
48.0
48.0
48.0 48.0
x x
x
65/
2•
-
-
D
x
x x
X x
(GVV) - S.A.A. Thin lens w/ higher fissility.
_
x x
x x
50 0
_
j
I
I
I
'
Boring Terminated at Depth 50.0 ft
M Bentonite Grout ffleentonite Pellets Li #2 Medium Sand

' WELL
LOG
1�.' ATLIN
Engineers and ScIenllsts
'10 SHEET 1 OF 1
PROJECT NO.: 210036 STATE: NC COUNTY: Chatham
_
LOCATION: Moncure _
PROJECT NAME: Progress Energy Cape Fear
LOGGED BY: Justin Heter
WELL ID:
DRILLER: William J. Miller
CMW -8
NORTHING:
EASTING:
CREW: Roger Caulder
SYSTEM:
BORING LOCATION: Along river W. of'63P70 Ash Pond
T.O.C. ELEV.:
DRILL MACHINE: CME 45B ATV
METHOD: H.S. Augers
1 0 HOUR DTW: 6.5
TOTAL DEPTH: 16.0
START DATE: 11/30110
FINISH DATE: 11/30/10
124 HOUR DTW: 7.6
WELL DEPTH: 15.0
BLOW COUNT
OVA
M
o
SOIL AND ROCK
WELL
DEPTH
sin sin sin sin
(PPM)
LAB
s
�
DEPTH DESCRIPTION
DETAIL
3.5
0.0 LAND SURFACE
o.0
CL
o
i
fs
m
(SP /SC) - Brown fine SAND w/ SANDY CLAY.
Organic debris. Moist.
3.0
4.0
40
- -- -
(SP /SC) - Brown fine SAND w/ trace CLAY
1
1
t
1
W
grading to SANDY to SILTY CLAY, Soft.
S.o
Loose Wet @5 5' BLS.
6.0
9.0
0.0
- -
W
O
H
-
Sat.
(SC /CL) - Gray SANDY to SILTY CLAY.
s
Uniform. Soft. Moderate plasticity. Saturated.
C1 N
14.0
140
-
(SM /CL) - Brown and gray CLAYEY SILT to
O
2
2
6
Sat.
SILTY CLAY. Medium stiff. Uniform.
16.0
15.0
Saturated.
160
I
_
Boring Terminated at Depth 16.0 ft
Bentonite Pellets J92 Medium Sand

C
C
c
c
c
C
n
c
z
Bemo ^.de Gaut Bentonite Pellets [�...'tt2 Medium Sand
�'ATLIN
WELL LOU
Engineer and Scientists
36
z,W3o
Wminpinn, I7C SHEET 1 OF 3
PROJECT NO.: 210036
STATE: NC
_ _
COUNTY: Chatham
_
LOCATION: Moncure
PROJECT NAME: Progress Energy Cape Fear
LOGGED BY: Justin Heter
WELL ID:
DRILLER: John E. Wood III
CTMW -8
NORTHING: EASTING:
CREW: Josh O'Connell
SYSTEM:
_
BORING LOCATION:Alon river W. of'63 /'70 Ash Pond
T.O.C. ELEV.:
DRILL MACHINE: CME 45B ATV
METHOD: H.S. Au ers/ M.R.
0 HOUR DTW: 16.5
1 TOTAL DEPTH: 50.5
START DATE: 11/23/10
FINISH DATE: 11/30/10
24 HOUR DTW: 16.5
WELL DEPTH: 48.5
BLOW COUNT OVA
o
o
SOIL AND ROCK
WELL
DEPTH
sin o,n 6in 6in (PPM)
LAB
s
G
DEPTH DESCRIPTION
DETAIL
0.0 LAND SURFACE
00
(SP) - Dark brown fine SAND. Uniform.
Organic debris. Moist.
3.0
40—
40
—
—
__
2
2
1
Sat.
(SP /SM) - S.A.A. w/ some SILTY to CLAYEY
SAND. Saturated at 5' BLS.
55
rJ- .0
I
W
0
H
I
I
Sat.
(CL) - Brown SILTY CLAY. Moderate plasticity.
Soft. Saturated.
1os
v
i
I
1 d.�
14.0
to
W
0
H
Sat.
(SP /SC) - Gray fine SAND to CLAYEY SAND.
Loose. Uniform. Saturated.
t 5.5
V
J
4
G
t
_
19.0
,a.o
N
N
2
2
12
Sat.
(ML) - Gray SILTY. Loose /soft. Uniform,
Saturated. Hard rock at base of sample.
2T5
(HWR) - Dark gray MUDSTONE. Very hard
I
\,�
rock. Thickly bedded. Consolidated. Uniform.
Bemo ^.de Gaut Bentonite Pellets [�...'tt2 Medium Sand

i
1 `
r
C
C
c
a
WELL
LOG
I2! �- C�ATLIN
Engineers and Scienlisb
c r—y. wi�,..p -, tic SHEET 2 OF 3
PROJECT NO.: 210036
STATE: NC
COUNTY: Chatham
_
LOCATION: Moncure
PROJECT NAME:
Progress Energy Cape Fear
LOGGED BY: Justin Heter
WELL ID:
DRILLER: John E. Wood III
CTMW -8
NORTHING:
EASTING:
CREW: Josh O'Connell
SYSTEM:
BORING LOCATION: Along river W. of'63P70 Ash Pond
T.O.C. ELEV.:
DRILL MACHINE: CME 45B ATV
METHOD: H.S. Au ers/ M.R.
10 HOUR DTW: 16.5
TOTAL DEPTH: 50.5
START DATE: 11/23/10
FINISH DATE: 11/30/10
24 HOUR DTW: 16.5
WELL DEPTH: 48.5
DEPTH
BLOW COUNT
OVA
LAB.
M
o
SOIL AND ROCK
WELL
61n bin I On bin
(PPM)
S
G
DEPTH DESCRIPTION
DETAIL
1 (HWR) -Dark gray MUDSTONE. Very hard
22.0—
rock. Thickly bedded. Consolidated. Uniform.
(continued)
.
23 5
(CL) Gray CLAY w/ MUDSTONE like grains.
24.0
24.0
18
33
51
M
Very consolidated clay. Low plastcity. Very
stiff. Moist.
I
25 S
_
29.0
29 0
_29.5 (CL) S.A.A.
30
40
42
M
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x
_
x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
(CL) - Dark gray MUDSTONE interlayered w/
x x
CLAY and SILT. Very stiff. Friable. Moderate
x x
x x
plasticity. Saturated.
34.0
x x
x x
x x
-1001
2-
-
Sat.
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
X x
X x
360
36.5
38.5
39.0
39.0
56/
x x
(CL) - Gray CLAY w/ moderate plasticity. Very
44
2
--
M
x x
stiff. Trace stone fragments. Easily broken.
x x
AO 5 Shaley mudstone. Friable. Moist.
p U
�7
na
-
� v
44.0
AN 0
fi
x x
100
M
x x
(CL) - S.A.A.
MBentonite Grout Bentonite Pellets uk2 Medium Sand

l WELL LOG
PROJECT NO.: 210036 I STATE:
PROJECT NAME: Progress Energ
NORTHING: EAST
SYSTEM:
DRILL MACHINE: CME 458 ATV
START DATE: 11/23/10
DEPTH BLOW COUNT OVA
LAB
bin bin bin bin (PPM)
49.0
100
2�
IN
NC COUNTY: Chatham
y Cape Fear LOGGED BY:
DRILLER:
G; CREW:
BORING LOCATION: Along river W. of'63f70
IETHOD: H.S. AU ers/ M.R.
INISH DATE: 11/30/10
0 o SOIL AN
s G DEPTH DESCRI
M x x con rnue
x x
C.ATLIN
Englneens and Scientists
v "M-4t SHEET 3 OF 3
2100 6 NC
LOCATION: Moncure
Justin Heter WELL ID: M
John E. Wood, III CTMW -8
Josh O'Connell _
Ash Pond T.O.C. ELEV.: _
0 HOUR DTW: 16.5 TOTAL DEPTH: 50.5
24 HOUR DTW: 16.5 WELL DEPTH: 48.5
D ROCK WELL
PTION DETAIL
48.5 40,5
x x
W x x (CL) Gray SHALEY MUDSTONE w/ SILTY
x x CLAY. Very stiff. Friable. Wet. Low plasticity.
x x 50.5
Boring Terminated at Depth 50.5 ft
F0 Bentonile Grout Bentonite Pellets 0 #2 Medium Sand

N�N lLS1UFVTI / L wEL CONS rtuc °rrcN RECORD
North Carolina Department DI• Fnvirunmcnt and ,N:uura) Resources - Division uh 1Vatcr 011alily
"�'• °"' WELL CON'FRAUVOR CER'F1F1CA'1'10N #: 2799
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
John E. Wood, III _
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
CATLIN Engineers and Scientis_t_s_ _
Wolf Contractor Company Name
220 Old Dairy Road
Street Address
____Wilmington ___North Carolina 2.8405
city or rows Slate Lip Code
(_11 0 ) - 452 -5861
Area code - Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT #: N/A
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT # (if applicable)' N/A
SITE WELL ID # (it applicabl cmm 1
3. WELL USE (Check One Box): Monitoring ® MuniapauPublic ❑
Industrial/Commercial 0 Agricultural ❑ Recovery ❑ injection ❑
I rngahon ❑ Other ❑ (list use).
DATE DRILLED: August 24, 2010
4. WELL LOCATION:
500 CP &L Road, 27559
" "'_ (STroo aFN ma, u��- Communily ubarvisan. La No arcol, iV �u 1i a�
cITY: Moncure COUNTY: Chatham
TOPOGRAPHIC I LAND SETTING (check approprialo box)
❑Slope ❑Valley ®Flat ❑Ridge []Other: _
LATITUDE: 35.58285 DD
LONGITUDE, ___._. 79.05000 DO
Latitude /longitude source: ® GPS ❑ Topo. map
(Location orwell must he shown on a USGS topo map and
attached to this form it not using a UPS)
5. FACILITY (Narne of the busnass where the —11,3 located)
Proqress Energy Cape Fear Plant N/A
Facility Name Facility 10 # (if applicable)
500 CP &L Road __
Street Address
Moncure _ NC 27559
City or Town State Zip Code
Steve Cahoon _
Contact Name
410 South Wilmington S_ teet
Mailing Address
Raleigh NC 27601
City or Town State Zip Code
(919)- 546 -7457
Area code - Phone number
I 6. WELL DETAILS:
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 15
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑
I c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 8.77 _– FT.
(Use " +" if Above Top of Casing)
d. TOP OF CASING IS-3 �w FT Above Land Surface'
rop of casing terminated ador below land surface may require
a variance in accordance with 1SA NCAC 2C.0110.
o, YIELD (gpm); N/A METHOD OF TEST: NIA
I. DISINFECTION: Type NIA Amount: NIA
g, WATER ZONES (depth):
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top .. Bottom Top Bottom
7. CASING:
ThWe
Depth
Diameter
ghs/
t
Material
Top 0 _
Bottom
_ 5
Ft.._
2 in
SCh. 40
PVC
Top
Bottom
Ft.
in.
_
Top _
Bottom
___
—Ft
8. GROUT:
Depth
Material
Method
Top _
Bottom
Top 1
Bottom
_ 15
Ft.
_
Top
Bottom
Ft.
9. SCREEN:
Depth
Diameter
Slot Size
Material
Top 5
Bottom
15
Ft.
2 In.
Slot .010 in..
PVC_
Top
Bottom _,_,Ft.,_____
in.
Top _
Bottom
—Ft.
_In.
in.
10. SAND /GRAVEL PACK:
Depth
Size
Material
Top 3.5
Bottom '-
15
Ft.
#2 Medium
Torpedo Sand
Top
Bottom
Ft.
_
Top
Bottom
Ft.
11. DRILLING LOG
Top Bottom
!
12. REMARKS;
Formation Description
= -- SEE...
JITTACHED - -..
100 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 7HIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO T14E WELL OWNER
NO ® fl�ij J r�"f Y_ to
701 S(NATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
n E. Wood, III
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
' Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quallty - Information Processing, Modified from
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1617, Phone No. (919) 807 -6300 Form GW -1b
Rev. 2/09

.�'� • ; NvN Rr:S/DENTIAL wvu, CONs,mUCTION RECORD
North ('arolina Departnxnt of lalvir ninenl and Natural Resources - Division of Water Ouulity
:";•w WH :LL (:ON'1'RAC'I'O1( CER'I'IHICA'I'ION #: 2799
I. WELL CONTRACTOR:
John E. Wood, III___ _
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
Wet, Contractor Company Name
220 Old Dairy Road
;lreotAddrosa
Wilmington_ __North Carolina 28405
ty or raven 5!aIa Zip Code
( 910) - 452 -5861
Area code - Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT a: N/A
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT # (If applicable): N/A
SITE WELL ID # (if applicably TMW -1
3. WELL USE (Check One Box)' Momtonng DU Mmncrpal /public C-17
IndushraYCommerctal ❑ AgrcWtural ❑ Recovery 0 Injection tJ
Irrgahon 0 Obfer 0 put use) _.......
DATE DRILLED: AUpust 26. 2010
4. WELL LOCATION:
_ 500 CP &L Road, 27559
( reel ema.Aum6ers. u,rrwn� „p vsrilo`.LOI No, orce. Xw ono
CITY- MOncure COUNTY: Chatham
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING (check appropriate box)
❑Slope ❑Valley ®Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other:
LATITUDE. 35.58285 DO
LONGITUDE: 79.05000 DD
Latitude /longitude source. DO GPS ❑ Topo. map
(location or well must be shown on a USGS logo map and
attached to thm form if not using a GPS.)
5. FACILITY (Name of the business wnere mowto is located)
Progress Energy Cape Fear Plant N/A
Facility Name Facility ID # (if applicable)
_ 500 CP&L Road
Street Address
_Moncure NC 27559
City or Town State Zip Code
Steve Cahoon
Contact Name
410 South Wilmington Street _
Mailing Address
Raleigh __ _ NC _ 27601
City or Town State Zip Code
(919)- 546 -7457
Area code - Phone number
6. WELL DETAILS:
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 53
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑
c. WATER LEVEL BeIpw Top of Casing: 7.06 FT.
(Use " +" if Above Top of Casing
z.k.,q
d. TOP OF CASING IS 3G' FT Above Land Surface'
' Top of casing terminated after below land surface may require
a variance in accordance with 16A NCAC 2C.0111.
o. YIELD (gpm): NIA METHOD OF TEST: N/A
f. DISINFECTION: Typo N/A Amount: NIA
g. WATER ZONES (depth):
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
7. CASING:
Thickness/
Depth
Diameter Weight Material
Top 0
Bottom
.. 38
Ft.• 2 in. Sch. 40 PVC _
'Top
Bottom
Top
Bottom
a. GROUT:
Depth
Material Method
Top 0
Bottom
_ 19
Ft.Portland Cement _ Tremie
Top 19
Bottom
35
—Ft Bent. Pellets Surface Pour
Top —__
Bottom
, -_Ft.
—
9. SCREEN:
Depth
Diameter Slot Size Material
Top 38—
Bottom
53
Ft. 2 in. Slot .010 in. PVC
Top
Bottom
_
'Ft.
Ft. in. in.
Top
Bottom
in. in.
10. SANDIGRAVEL
PACK:
Depth
Size Material
Top 35
Bottom
53
Ft. #2 Medium Torpedo Sand
Top
Bottom
_
Ft.
Top
Bottom
Ft.
11. DRILLING LOG
Top Bottom
Formation Description
r
SEE
/
_ATTACHED
12. REMARKS:
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
1SA NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. AND THAT A COPY OF THIS I
RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER
NO ® \� itlr�
St NATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE '
John E. Wood, III
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality - Information Processing, Modified from ,
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1617, Phone No, [phone] Form GW -1b
Rev. 2109

NON RESIDEN IAL NVEIA, CONS- 1'KU(:TION RECORD
North Carolina Department of Fnviromncnl and Natural Resources - Division ol' IV;iivr Qwilily
"rw ^ Wr:l.1, C'ON'fK/1C"['O12 c;r;1t 1'1F[c,� r1ON tt: 2799
L :'�o
1. WELL CONTRACTOR: d. TOP OF CASING IS FT Above Land Surface'
John E. Wood, Iii rnp ul casing tanninated aUat below rand surface may reyuito
' Well Contractor (Indw�du. al; Name a va-1ce in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.e111.
CATLIN En Ineers and Scientists o. YIELD (gpm): NIA METHOD OF TEST: NIA
'Nell Contractor Company Islarne 1. DISINFECTION: T
220 Old Dairy _Road - ype NIA Amount: NIA
_ _ y. WATER ZONES (depth):
9lreel Address - ^- _ _ - --
Wilmin ton North_ Carolina 28_405 lop . Bottom Top . Bottom
cey or Town Slate Zip Code Top Bottom Top Bottom
(-2_1 0 ) - 452 -5861 Top Bottom Top Bottom
' Area code • Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION 7. CASING: Thickness/
Depth Diameter Weight Material
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT # N/A Top 0 — Bottom 4 Ft. 2 in. Sch. 40 PVC
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT # (if applicable): N/A Top Bottom Ft. In
' SITE WELL ID # (If applicablGMW -2 Top Bottom ---Ft.---in. _
3. WELL USE (Check One Box): Monitoring N Municipal/Public ❑ 6, GROUT:
Industrial /Commercial ❑ Agncultwal ❑ Recovery ❑ Injection ❑ Depth Material Method
irrigation ❑ Other ❑ (list use) _ _.._. _____ Top ,__ Bottom _Ft.
Top _ 1 Bottom 3 Ft.
DATE DRILLED: August 30 2010 Top Bottom Ft. _ •_ _ _
4. WELL LOCATION:
9. SCREEN: —
500 CPB�L Road, 27559 depth Diameter Slot Size Material
15healms umbers i_nrmn�avly.SuUOivswn 1 cl u ?ai[t+l.p �n aj Top 4 Bottom 14 Ft. 2 III, Slot .010 In. PVC
CITY MOncure COUNTY Chatham Top _- _._ Bottom Ft In.
' TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING Top Bottom
(chock appropriate Cox)
a lope ❑Valley Flat 17Ridge ❑Other 10. SANDIGRAVELPACK:
Depth Size Material
LATITUDE: __ - -_35 594925 DD Top 3 Bottom ­14—Ft. #2 Medium Torpedo Sand
79.051459 — B
LONGITUDE: DD Top Bottom Ft.
Latitude /longitude source: I$I GPS ❑ Topo. map Top Bottom Ft. _
(Location of well must be shown on a USGS Topo map and
attached to this form it not using a GPS.) 11. DRILLING LOG
5. FACILITY (Narne of Iho businovS whore t110 well is locatod ) Top Bottom Formation Description
Prog ress Energy Cape_F_ear Plant N/A
Facility Facility Name Facility ID # (if applicable)
' 500 CP &L Road --
Street Address /
_
Moncure NC 27559
City or Town Slate Zip Code __ -__ :ATTACHED---
' Steve Cahoon _ —
Contact Name /
410 South Wilmington Street
Mailing Address 12. REMARKS:
' Raleigh NC 27601 —
City or Town Slate Zip Code
(919)- 546 -7457
Area Code - Phone number 100 HERFRY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
• 1SA NCAC 2C. WELL CONSTRUCTION SIANOARDS. AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
' RECORD HAS OEEN PROVIDED 10 THE WELL OWNER
6, WELL DETAILS:
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 14
t
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO ®
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing:
' 11.4 Si NATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR
.._ DATE
(Use " +" if Above Fop of Casing) FT ohn E. Wood, III
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONST UCTING THE WELL
' Submit within 30 days of completion to: Dlvlslon of Water Quality - Information Processing, Modified from
1617 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617, Phone No. (919) 807 -6300 Form GW -1b
Rev. 2/09

NONRESIDENTIAL WILL CONs-rltuccrlON RECORD
North Carolina Dcpaitinent of I:nvirunnlent ;old N:dural Rl:sources - Division of Waler Otiality
1VP.I.L CON'I'RAC'I'OIt CI?R'I'IFICA'['ION #: 2799
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
John E._Wood, III _
Will Contactor (Ind vrdual) Name -- - - — -� - - -- - —
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
Wet, Cunlractor Company Name
_220 Old_Dairy Road
;creel Address — -•" - -- - - -� -- --
Wllmington North Carolina 2840_5_
City of fown ylate --- .- -- -/,p Code
(910)- 452 -5861
area code - Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT #: N/A
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT # (if applicable): N/A
SITE WELL ID # (If applicabICTMW -2
3. WELL USE (Check One Boxy Monitoring ® Munfcrpal/Pubnc ❑
Industrial /Commercial IJ Agncullural ❑ Recovery ❑ Injection ❑
Irrigation ❑ Other ❑ (Irel use) _ _- ____�____• __
DATE DRILLED: September 1. 2010
4. WELL LOCATION:
500 CP &L Road, 27559
(tilletl Bma. wl era. ---,— ll y ubaiwS.On- 1 o o arc ip'C—.,TQT - --
CITY Moncure COUNTY: Chatham
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING (check appropriate box)
❑Slope ❑ Valley ® Flat ❑ Ridge ❑ Other:
LATITUDE: -_ 35.594925 DD
LONGITUDE: 79.051459 DD
Lalitude /longitude source DO CPS ❑ Topo map
(Location of well must be shown on If USGS Topo map and
attached to this Corm d not using a GPS )
5. FACILITY .Name of the uusaress whore Inv wen ,s Ineareu
Progress Energy Cape Fear Plant NIA
Facility Name Facility ID # (if applicable)
_. 500 CP&L Road
Street Address
Moncure NC 27559
City or Town Stale Zip Code
Steve Cahoon
Contact Name
410 South Wilmington Street
Mailing Address
Raleigh NC 27601
City or Town State Zip Code
9( 11- 546 -7457
Area code - Phone number
6. WELL DETAILS:
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 53
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casin ' 0.0 FT
(Use "+" If Above Top of Cas,ng
Z.rr7
d. TOP OF CASING IS_ -.; _ FT Above Land Surface'
Top of easing termmated atior below land surface may require
a variance in accordance with niA NCAC 2C.11111111.
o. YIELD (gpm): N/A METHOD OF TEST: N/A
1. DISINFECTION: Type N/A Amount: WA�
g. WATER ZONES (depth):
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top ` Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
7. CASING:
Thickness/
Depth
Diameter Weight Material
Top 0
Bottom
42.5
Ft..
2 in. Sch.40 PVC_
Top
Bottom
Ft.
— in-—
Top
Bottom
�Ft.
In. — —_
8. GROUT:
Depth
Material Method
Top 0
Bottom
__21
Ft.Portland
Cement Tremie
Top 21
Bottom
40
Ft.
Bent. Pellets Surface Pour
Top
Bottom
—
Ft.
9. SCREEN:
Depth
Diameter Slot Size Material
Top 42.5
Bottom
52.5
Ft.
2 in. Slot .010 in. PVC
Top
Bottom
Ft.
in. In.
Top
Botlom
Ft.
in. in.
10. SANDIGRAVEL PACK:
Depth
Size Material
Top 40
Bottom
53
Ft.
#2 Medium Torpedo Sand
Top !_
Bottom
Ft.
Top
Bottom
Ft.
11. DRILLING
LOG
Top Bottom
Formation Description
1
/
/
/
12. REMARKS:
--- —.SEE_ —
= ATTACHED
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY 1HAT TH'S WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITIr
ISA NCAC 2C WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. AND THAr A COPY OF THUS
RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER
SIGNATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
John E. Wood, III
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of compiotion to: Division of Water Quality • Information P►ocossing,
1617 Mail Service Cantor, Raleigh, NC 27699.1617, Phone No. (919) 807 -6300
Modified from
Form GW -1b
Rev 2/09

i niF"r`o,
NvN RESIDENII
N,mh ('arnlitm I)gmrtnTCni oft {nvirunm
WILL CONTRACTOR CER]
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
John_ E. Wood, III
Wall Conlraclor IlntLwduaq Name ^'
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
Wall Conlraclor Company Warne -
220 Old Dairy Road
street Address -- -- -- -- ----- "- - - - - --
Wilming North Carolina 28405
City or rown Slats -- - -- l,p Code
( 910 ) - 452 -5861
.Lea code - Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT #: N/A
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT # (If applicable). N/A
SITE WELL ID # (if applicablCMW -3
3. WELL USE (Check One Box). Monitoring ® Mun,croaliPublic f❑1
Induslral/Comlmercml LJ Agricultural ❑ Recovery ❑ lgechon O
Irngabon ❑ �11nar ❑ (hstuse) _ -__ _ "_.__ _.,__
DATE DRILLED: September 2, 2010
4, WELL LOCATION:
500 CP &L Road, 27559
(Slreei n"amo. nnaui7 Cornmundy � -S iiodwsron, Loi Nv. Pricer ip "�ti o� --"
CITY. MOncure COUNTY: Chatham
TOPOGRAPHIC l LAND SETTING icheck appropriato box)
❑Slope ❑Valley IDOFlat ❑Ridge ❑O(her: _
LATITUDE. 35.598991 DD
LONGITUDE::..___ 79.050386 DD
Latitude /longitude source ® GPS ❑ TODD. reap
fi ocabon of well must be shown on a USGS topo map and
arrached to this form if not using a GPS )
5. FACILITY (Name ut tho basinese where the well is mcatod )
Progress Energy Cape Fear Plant N/A
Facility Name Facility ID # (if applicable)
500 CP &L Road
Street Address
Moncure NC 27559
City or Town State 'Lip Code
Steve Cahoon
Contact Name
_4410 South Wilmington Street
Mailing Address — —
Raleigh NC _ 27601
City or Town State Lip Code
(919)- 546 -7457
Area code - Phone number
6. WELL DETAILS:
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 15
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO DO
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 10.5 FT.
(Use " +" if Above Top of Casing
4 %VFl,1A'0NS l'12L!C I'1ON RECORD
ent and Nalurul RcsoiirCL'Y - Divi,,ltrn ul 1V;ttcr ( )Ililill�
'I FICATION #: 2799
3. z�
d. TOP OF CASING 13 FT Above Land Surface'
• Top vl casing terminated aver below land surface may reyulre
a varianco In accordance mth 15A NCAC 2C.0113.
o. YIELD (gpm): N/A METHOD OF TEST: NNE
f. DISINFECTION: Type N/A Amount: N/A
g. WATER ZONES (depth):
Top _ Bottom Top —_ Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom fop Bottom
7. CASING:
Thickness/
Depth
Diameter Weight Material
Top 0—
Bottom
5
Ft 2 in. Sch. 40 _ PVC_
—
—Ft
Top
Bottom
In.
Top
Bottom
Fl. In. —
8. GROUT:
Depth
Material Method
Top
Bottom
Ft. -- ----
Top 1
Bottom
3
'Ft.
_- --_ —__
Ft. __
-
Top
Bottom
9. SCREEN:
Depth
Diameter Slot Size Material
Top _ 5
Bottom
15
Ft 2 In. Slot 010 in. PVC
Top _ ._
Bottom
-
Top —
Bottom
-
10. SAND /GRAVEL PACK:
Depth
Size Material
Top 3
Bottom
15
Ft. #2 Medium Torpedo Sand
Top
Bottom
Ft.
Top __
Bottom _
—Ft.
11. DRILLING LOG
Top Bottom
Formation Description
_ATTACHED - - -.__
—:
12. REMARKS:
1 DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY Or THIS
RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER
I —Pl— cJ
VIC, NATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR UATE
n E . Wood III
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
' Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality - Information Processing, Modified from
1617 Mail Service Conter, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1617, Phone No. [phone] Form GW -1b
Rev 2/09
1

NoN RESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
North Carolina Dcparunent of Frivinmment and Natural Resources - Division of Water (hlalily
NVE LL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION It: 2799
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
John E. Wood, III
Well Contraclor II•ulwrd;ran,Jame
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists_
Well Conlractor Company Narne v
220 Old Dairy Road
:itreol Address
Wilmington __North Carolina_ 28405
Cdy or ruwn Stale — Zip Code
( 910 ) - 452 -5861
Area code - Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT #. N/A
OTHER ASSOCIATED P RMIT N (if applicable): N/A
SITE WELL ID if (if app�J0MW-4
3. WELL USE (Check One Box): Monitoring ® MunicrpaltPublic ❑
IndusinaltCommercial (] Agricultural ❑ Recovery E) Injection ❑
Irugaton 0 Other ❑ (list use]' ._.•.__.._.._
DATE DRILLED: July 28, 2010
4. WELL LOCATION:
500 CPBL Road 27559
- -- ( Iroel amo, en• Comm- ulxlmsron. of arc ry We)
CITY: MORCure COUNTY: Chatham
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING (check appropriate box)
❑Slope ❑Valley ®Flat DRidge ❑Other•
LATITUDE: __ _35.598101 OD
LONGITUDE: 79.045451 DD
Latitude /longitude source (o GPS ❑ Topo. map
(Location o/ ive /l must be shown on a USGS Topo ,nap and
attached to finis form it not using a GPS I
S. FACILITY IName of Ina business where Ins wows localad )
Progress Energy CCa e Fear Plant N/A
Facility Name Facility ID # (if applicable)
_ 500 CP&L Road _
Street Address
Moncure NC 27559
City or Town Stale Zip Code
Steve Cahoon
Contact Name
410 South Wilmington Street _ V_
Mailing Address
Raleigh NC 27601
City or Town State Zip Code
(919)- 546 -7457
Area code - Phone number
6. WELL DETAILS:
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 19
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 17.07 FT
(Use " +" if Above Top of Casing)
30`1
d. TOP OF CASING IaJ7W' -_ FT Above Land Surface'
' Top of easmy tarminaled actor balow land sunace may require
a vvnanca at accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.0119.
o. YIELD (gpm): NIA METHOD OF TEST: NIA
I. DISINFECTION: Typo NIA Amount: NIA
g. WATER ZONES (depth):
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
T. CASING: Depth Diameter Thickness/ s
Weight Material
Top 0 Bottom 9 Ft. 2 in. Sch.40 PVC
Top Bottom Ft. in. — —
Top Bottom
8. GROUT: Depth Material Method
Top _. Bottom
Top 2� Bottom 7 Ft. _
Top Bottom Ft.
9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
Top 9 Bottom 19 Ft. 2 in. Slot .D10 in. PVC _
Top Bottom Ft. In. in.
Top Bottom Ft, in. in.
1D, SAND /GRAVEL PACK:
Depth Size Material
'Top _ 7 Bottom 19 Ft. #2 Medium Torpedo Sand
Top Bottom Ft. _
Top Bottom Ft —
11. DRILLING LOG
Top Bottom Formation Description
SEE
< `ATTACHED
/
12. REMARKS:
I DO HERFBY CERTIFY THAT Pits WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C. WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. AND THAT A COPY Of PAS
RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER
t J
o
NO
SIG ATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
John E. Wood, III
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality • Information Processing, Modified from '
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617, Phone No. [phone] Form GW -1b
Rev. 2/09

'� w.SiArF
NON RESIDENTIAL WELL CONS'T'RUCTION IZECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division Of Rater Quality
WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION ##: 2799
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
John E. Wood, III
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
Well Cortractor Company Name
220 Old Dairy Road
Street Address
Wilmington North Carolina 28405
City or Town State Zip Code
( 910 ) - 452 -5861
Area code - Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT #: N/A
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT # (if applicable) N/A
SITE WELL ID # (if applicable) BGTMW -4
3. WELL USE(Check One Box): Monitoring ® Municipaupubiic❑
Industrial /Commercial❑ Agricultural ❑ Recovery ❑ In!'ection ❑
Irrigation ❑ Other ❑ (list use). _
DATE DRILLED: November 18, 2010
4. WELL LOCATION:
500 CP &L Road, 27559
( trees Norco, wr nars Communly, Subdms,on of o arcel. -p Co e
CITY: Moncure COUNTY: Chatham
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING (check appropnate box)
❑Slope ❑Valley ®Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other
LATITUDE 35.598101 DD
LONGITUDE _ 79.045451 DO
Latitude /longitude source: ® GPS ❑ Topo map
(Location or well must be shown on a USGS topo map and
attached to thrs'onn i(not using a GPS )
5. FACILITY (Narre of The bi,si�ess where We wal' is located)
Progress Energy Cape Fear Plant N/A
Facility Name Facility ID # (if applicable)
500 CP &L Road
Street Address
Moncure NC 27559
City or Town State Zip Code
Steve Cahoon
' Contact Name _
410 South Wilmington Street
Mailing Address -
Raleigh NC 27601
' City or Town State Zip Code
(919)- 546 -7457
Area code - Phone number
' 6. WELL DETAILS:
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 48
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO
c. WATER LEVEL B91ow To of Casing: 20.4 FT.
(Use " +" If Above op of Casing)
d. TOP OF CASING Is 3.50 FT. Above Land Surface'
- Top of casing terminated attor below land surface may require
a variance in accordance with ISA NCAC 2C.0118.
e. YIELD (gpm): N/A METHOD OF TEST: N/A
f. DISINFECTION: Type NIA Amount: NIA
g. WATER ZONES(depth):
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
7. CASING:
Thickness/
Depth
Diameter Weight
Material
Top �0
Bottom
38
Ft.
2 in. Sch.40
PVC
Top 0
Bottom
26
Ft.
4 in. Sch.40
_
Top
Bottom
Ft.
in.
8. GROUT:
Depth
Material
Method
Top
Bottom
Ft.
Top 24
Bottom
36
Ft.
Bent. Pellets Surface Pour
Top
Bottom
Ft.
9. SCREEN:
Depth
Diameter Slot Size
Material
Top 38
Bottom
48
Ft.
2 in. Slot .010 in.
PVC_
Top
Bottom
Ft.
in, in.
Top
Bottom
_ _Ft.____in.
10. SAND /GRAVEL PACK:
Depth
Size
Material
Top 36
Bottom
_48
FL
#2 Medium Torpedo Sand
Top
Bottom
Ft.
Top __
Bottom
Ft.
11. DRILLING LOG
Top Bottom Formation Description
r
/
SEE
= ATTACHED _
/
/
12. REMARKS
100 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
ISA NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL ONMER.
�0.��9 / �- r
ATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
,y6hn E. Wood, III
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
' Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality - Information Processing, Modified from
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1617, Phone No. [phone] Form GW -1b
Rev. 2109

r NON RESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Quality
`d Gw:��'' WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION #: 2927
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
William J. Miller
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
Well Contractor Company Name
220 Old Dairy Road
Street Address
Wilmington North Carolina 28405
City or Town Stale Zip Code
( 910 ) - 452-5861
Area code • Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT # N/A
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT # (if applicable) N/A
SITE WELL ID # (If applicable) CM V V-5
3. WELL USE(Check One Boxy Monitoring ® MunicipaVPubllc❑
Industrial /Commercial❑ Agricultural ❑ Recovery ❑ Injection ❑
Irrigation ❑ Other ❑ (list use).
DATED RIL LED: November 19, 2010
4. WELL LOCATION:
—�'�- 500 CP &L Road, 27559
L,-1. B61 142ma, Numbers. Community. u dwlslon, oTAO FarC81, Lip Code)
CITY. Moncure COUNTY: Chatham
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING (check appropriate box)
❑Slope ❑Valley ®Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other:
LATITUDE: 35.592378 DO
LONGITUDE: - 79.040033 DO
Latitude /longitude source: ❑ GPS ❑ Topo. map
(Location of welf must be shown on a USGS topo map and
attached to this form if not using a GPS)
5. FACILITY (Name of the business where the well is 'ocated.)
Progress Energy Cape Fear Plant N/A
Facility Name Facility ID # (if applicable)
500 CP &L Road _
Street Address
Moncure T NC 27559
City or Town State Zip Code
Steve Cahoon ___
Contact Name
410 South Wilmington Street
Mailing Address
Raleigh NC 27601
City or Town State Zip Code
(919)- 546 -7457
Area code - Phone number
6. WELL DETAILS:
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 20
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO
C. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 18.5 FT.
(Use " +" if Above Top of Casing)
d. TOP OF CASING IS 3.50 FT. Above Land Surface'
' Top of casing terminated aVor below land surface may require
a variance In aecordanco with 15A NCAC 2C.0118.
e. YIELD (gpm): NIA METHOD OF TEST: N/A
I. DISINFECTION: Type N/A Amount: NIA
g. WATER ZONES(depth):
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
7. CASING:
Thickness/
Depth
Diameter
Weight
Material
Top 0
Bottom
10
Ft.
2 in.
Sch.40
PVC
Top
Bottom
Ft.
In.
Top
Bottom
Ft.
in.
8. GROUT:
Depth
Material
Method
Top __`
Bottom
Ft.
Top 1
Bottom
8
Ft.
Top
Bottom
Ft.
9. SCREEN:
Depth
Diameter
Slot Size
Material
Top 10
Bottom
20
Ft.
— 2 in.
Slot .o10 in.
_ PVC
Top
Bottom
Ft.
in.
in.
Top
Bottom
Ft.
in.
in.
10. SAND /GRAVEL PACK:
Depth
Size
Material
Top 8
Bottom
20
Ft.
#2 Medium Torpedo Sand
Top
Bottom
Ft.
Top
Bottom
Ft,
11. DRILLING LOG
Top Bottom Formation Description
/
J
1
--SEE
-ATTACHED
/
12. REMARKS:
I DO HEREBY CERIIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C, WELL CONS rRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THATA COPY OF THIS
RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER
SIGNATURE CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
William J. Miller
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality - Information Processing, Modified from ,
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617, Phone No. (919) 807 -6300 Form GV1/ -1 b
Rev. 2109

�. SrA7t y
r N
•4 •awn vy��
d
NONRESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Quality
WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION #: 2799
1. WELL CONTRACTOR;
John E. Wood, III
Weir Contractor (individual) Name
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists _
Well Contractor Company NaTe
220 Old Dairy Road
Street Address
Wilmington North Carolina 28405
City or Town state Zip Code
( 910) - 452 -5861
Area code - Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT #: N/A
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT # (if applicable) N/A
SITE WELL 10 # (if applicable) CMW-6
3. WELL USE(Check One Box): Monitoring ® MunicipaUPu bloc
❑
IndustrlaUCommemial❑ Agricuttural❑ Recovery ❑ Injection ❑
Imgauon ❑ Other ❑ (list use)
DATE DRILLED: NOVember 22, 2010
4. WELL LOCATION:
500 CP &L Road, 27559
l Sit eel Name. Num bets. C ommunity, uU vision, tot No.. arcel, Zip Code)
CITY: MOncure COUNTY. Chatham
TOPOGRAPHIC /LAND SETTING (check appropriate box)
❑Slope ❑Valley ®Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other
LATITUDE: 35.58634 DD
LONGITUDE. -79.037447 DO
Latitude /longitude source: ❑ GPS ❑ Topo map
(Location or well must be shown on a USGS topo map and
attached to this form if not using a GPS )
5. FACILITY ;Name of the D: smess where the weil a rccatod )
—Progress Energy Cape Fear Plant N/A
Facility Name Facility ID # (if applicable)
500 CP &L Road
Street Address
Moncure NC 27559
City or Town State Zip Code
Steve Cahoon
Contact Name
410 South Wilmington Street
Mailing Address
Raleigh _ NC 27601
City or Town State Zip Code
(919)- 546 -7457
Area code - Phone number
6, WELL DETAILS:
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 14
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing- 9 FT,
(Use " +" if Above Top of Casing)
d. TOP OF CASING IS_ 3.50 FT. Above Land Surface'
Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require
a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.0118.
e. YIELD (gpm): N/A METHOD OF TEST: N/A
f. DISINFECTION: Type N/A Amount: N/A
g. WATER ZONES(depth):
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
7. CASING:
Thickness/
Depth
Diameter ight Material
Top __ 0
Bottom 4
Ft.
2 in. Sch, 40 PVC
Top
Bottom
Ft.
in.
Top
Bottom
Ft.
in.
8. GROUT:
Depth
Material Method
Top
Bottom
Ft.
Top 0.5
Bottom 2
Ft.
Top _`
Bottom
Ft,
9. SCREEN:
Depth
Diameter Slot Size Material
Top 4_
Bottom 14
Ft.
2 in. Slot .010 in. PVC
Top
Bottom
Ft.
in in.
Top
Bottom
Ft.
in. in
10. SAND /GRAVEL PACK:
Depth
Size Material
Top 2
Bottom 14
Ft.
#2 Medium Torpedo Sand_
Top
Bottom
Ft.
Top __
Bottom
Ft.
11. DRILLING
LOG
Top Bottom
Formation Description
Or
or
Or
/
/
12. REMARKS:
_SEE -_
-ATTACHED
I DO HEREBY CERTICY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WATH
1SA NCAC 2C. WELL CONS ]RUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIOED TO 7HF. WELL OWNER.
S NATURE OF CER11FIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
ohn E. Wood, III
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
' Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality - Information Processing, Modified from
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1617, Phone No. (919) 807 -6300 Form GW -1b
Rev. 2/09

d es 5TA1F a
NON .RESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
f` North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Quality
�i•J
``° WELL CONTRACTOR CERTII+ICATION #: 2927
I. WELL CONTRACTOR:
William J. Miller
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
Well Contractor Company Name
220 Old Dairy Road
Street Address
Wilmington North Carolina 28405
City or Town State Zip Code
( 910) - 452 -5861
Area code - Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT # N/A
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT # (if applicable] N/A
SITE WELL ID # (if applicable) CMw -7
3, WELL USE(Check One Box): f0onitonng ® MLnicIDa1 /Public0
Industrial /Commercial❑ Agncultural ❑ Recovery ❑ Injection ❑
Irrigation ❑ Other ❑ (list use):
DATE DRILLED: December 1. 2010
4. WELL LOCATION:
500 CP &L Road, 27559
hea ame, unborn, ornmurvly, ub rvuion, o o., Parc.1, Zip odeF—
CITY MOncure COUNTY: Chatham
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING (check appropriate box)
❑Slope ❑Valley ®Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other:
LATITUDE: 35.587335 DD
LONGITUDE: -79.044238 DD
Latitude /longitude source: ❑ GPS ❑ Topo. snap
(Location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map and
attached to this roan if not using a GPs.)
5. FACI LITY (Name of the business where the well s located.)
Progress Energy Cape Fear Plant N/A
Facility Name Facility ID # (if applicable)
500 CP &L Road
Street Address
Moncure NC 27559
City or Town State Zip Code
Steve Cahoon
Contact Name
410 South Wilmington Street
Mailing Address
Raleigh NC 27601
City or Town State Zip Code
(919)- 546 -7457
Area code - Phone number
6. WELL DETAILS:
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 26.5
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO CM
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Caging? 21.4 FT.
(Use " +" if Above Top of Casing)
d. TOP OF CASING Is 3.50 FT Above Land Surface'
Top of casing terminated atior below land surface may require
a variance in accordance with 1!A NCAC 2C.0118,
e. YIELD (gpm): NIA METHOD OF TEST:
f. DISINFECTION: Type NIA Amount: NIA
g. WATER ZONES(depth):
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top _ Bottom
7. CASING:
Thickness/
Depth
Diameter Weight
Material
Top 0
Bottom
16.5 Ft. 2 in. Sch.40
PVC
Top
Bottom
Ft. in.
Top
Bottom
Ft. in
'
8. GROUT:
Depth
Material
Method
Top
Bottom
Ft.
Top 1
Bottom
13 Ft.
'
Top
Bottom
Ft.
9. SCREEN:
Depth
Diameter Slot Size
Material
Top 16.5
Bottom
26,5 Ft. 2 in. Slot .010 in.
PVC '
Top
Bottom
Ft. in. in.
Top
Bottom
Ft. in. in.
10. SAND /GRAVEL PACK:
'
Depth
Size
Material
Top 13
Bottom
26.5 Ft. #2 Medium Torpedo Sand
Top
Bottom
Ft.—
Top
Bottom
Ft.
11. DRILLING
LOG
Top Bottom
Formation Description
SEE-
,
:ATTACHED-
12, REMARKS:
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY MAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ,
15A NCAC 2C. WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
SIGNATURE -OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
William J. Miller '
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality - Information Processing, Modified from '
1617 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1617, Phone No, [phone] Form GW -1b
Rev. 2/09

S1,
~�
NONRESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
. - North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Quality
WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION #: 2927
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
William J. Miller
Well Contractor (fndiviaual) Name
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
N /all Contractor Company Name
220 Old Dairy Road
Street Address
Wilmington North Carolina 28405
City or Town State Zip Code
( 910 ) - 452 -5861
Area code - Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT #: N/A
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT # (if applicable): N/A
SITE WELL ID # (if applicable) CTMW -7
3. WELL USE(Check One Box): Monitoring ® Municipal /Public❑
Industrial /Commercial❑ Agricultural ❑ Recovery ❑ Injection ❑
Irrigation ❑ Other ❑ (list use).
DATE DRILLED: December 3, 2010
4. WELL LOCATION:
500 CP &L Road, 27559
? trees Nome, Numbefs . .nmm.mey, , �xliviS �On, of Nn. Parcel. 2,p Cocal
CITY: MOncure COUNTY: Chatham
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING (check appropriate box)
❑Slope ❑Valley ®Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other:
LATITUDE: 35.587335 DD
LONGITUDE: - 79.044238 DD
Latitude /longitude source: ❑ GPS ❑ Topo. map
(Location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map and
attached to this form if not using a GPS.)
5. FACILITY (Name or the business wire the well is located)
Progress Energy Cape Fear P_ lant N/A
Facility Name Facility ID # (If applicable)
500 CP&L Road
Street Address
Moncure NC 27559
City or Town State Zip Code
Steve Cahoon _
Contact Name
410 South Wilmington Street
Mailing Address
Raleigh NC 27601
City or Town State Zip Code
(919)- 546 -7457
Area code - Phone number
6. WELL DETAILS:
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 48
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑
c. WATER LEVEL B91ow Top of Casin • 38.5 FT.
(Use " +" if Above Top of Casing
d. TOP OF CASING Is 3.50 FT. Above Land Surface'
Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface, may require
a variance In accordance with 15A NCAC 20.0110.
a. YIELD (gpm): L/ METHOD OF TEST: N,,,_y/A
f. DISINFECTION: Type N/A Amount: NIA
g. WATER ZONES(depth):
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
7. CASING:
Thickness/
Depth
Diameter Weight
Material
Top 0
Bottom
38
Ft.
2 in. Sch.40
PVC
Top 0
Bottom
29
Ft.
4 in. Sch.40
Top
Bottom
Ft.
in.
8. GROUT:
Depth
Material
Method
Top
Bottom
Ft.
Top 25
Bottom
33.5
Ft.
Bent Pellets Surface Pour
Top
Bottom
Ft.
9. SCREEN:
Depth
Diameter Slot Size
Material
Top 38
Bottom
48
Ft._
2 in. Slot .010 in.
PVC
Top __
Bottom
--Ft.---in.
--in.
Top
Bottom
Ft.
in. in.
10. SAND /GRAVEL PACK:
Depth
Size
Material
Top 33.5
Bottom
48
Ft.
#2 Medium Torpedo Sand
Top
Bottom
Ft.
Top __
Bottom
Ft.
11. DRILLING LOG
Top Bottom
/
)
/
/
/
/
/
12. REMARKS:
Formation Description
SEE
-ATTACHED
I DO HEREBY CE.RTIfY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE wiTH
15A NCAC 2C WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAI A COPY OF THIS
RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED IO THE WELL OWNER
NO
SIG ATURE O ERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
William J. Miller
rmiry i tU NAMt Ur t tnbUN CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality - Information Processing, Modified from
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1617, Phone No. (919) 807 -6300 Form GW -1b
Rev. 2/09

K d � �• o
NONRESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Quality
WELL CON'T'RACTOR CERTIFICATION #: 2927
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
William J. Miller
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
Well Contractor Company Name
220 Old Dairy Road
Street Address
Wilmington North Carolina 28405
City or Town State Zip Code
( 910) - 452 -5861
Area code Ohone number
2. WELL INFORMATION
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT #: N/A
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT # (if applicable): N/A
SITE WELL ID # (if applicable) CMW -8
3. WELL USE(Check One Box): Monitoring ® Municipal.'Public❑
Industrial /Commercial❑ Agricultural ❑ Recovery ❑ Injection ❑
Irrigation ❑ Other ❑ (list use):
DATE DRILLED: November 30, 2010
4• WELL LOCATION:
500 CP &L Road, 27559
;reef Name. Numbers. CommuFity, subffwsion. Lot No.. Parcel, _:a nee
CITY Moncure COUNTY: Chatham
TOPOGRAPHIC /LAND SETTING (check appropriate box)
❑Slope ❑Valley ®Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other:
LATITUDE: 35.588286 DD
LONGITUDE: -79.051394 DD
Latitude /longitude source: ❑ GPS ❑ Topo. map
(Loca(ion of wet/must be shown on a USGS topo map and
attached to this form if not using a GPS.)
6. FACILITY (Name of the business where the wall is located.)
Progress Energy Cape Fear Plant N/A
Facility Name Facility ID # (if applicable)
500 CP &L Road
Street Address
Moncure NC 27559
City or Town State Zip Code
Steve Cahoon
Contact Name
410 South Wilmington Street
Mailing Address
Raleigh NC 27601
City or Town State Zip Code
(919)- 546 -7457
Area code - Phone number
6. WELL DETAILS:
a, TOTAL DEPTH: 15
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO CM
C. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casin 1 1.1 FT.
(Use " +" if Above Top of Casing
d. TOP OF CASING Is 3.50 FT. Above Land Surface'
Top of casing terminated aHor below land surface may require
a variance In accordance with 13A NCAC 2C.0118.
e. YIELD (gpm): Nj/) METHOD OF TEST: N/
f. DISINFECTION: Type N/A Amount: NIA
g. WATERZONES(depth):
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
7. CASING:
Thickness/
Depth
Diameter Weight
Material
Top 0
Bottom 5
Ft.
2 in. Sch.40
PVC
Top
Bottom
Ft.
in.
Top
Bottom
Ft.
in.
8. GROUT:
Depth
Material
Method
Top
Bottom
Ft.
Top 1
Bottom 3
Ft.
Top
Bottom
FL
9, SCREEN:
Depth
Diameter Slot Size
Material
: Top 5
Bottom 15
Ft.
2 in. Slot .010 in.
PVC
Top
Bottom
Ft,
in. in.
Top
Bottom
Ft.
in. in.
• 10. SAND /GRAVEL PACK:
Depth
Size
Material
Top 3
Bottom 15
Ft,
#2 Medium Torpedo Sand
Top
Bottom
Ft.
Top
Bottom
Ft.
• 11. DRILLING LOG
Top Bottom Formation Description
/
SEE
= ATTACHED
/
/
12. REMARKS:
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 7C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER
SIGNATU OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
William J. Miller
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality - Information Processing, Modified from '
1617 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1617, Phone No. (919) 807 -6300 Form GW -ib
Rev. 2109

J SfAT'^ o
I
NONRESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
North Carolina Department of Friviruninent and Natural Resources - Division of eater Quality
WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION #: 2799
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
_John E. Wood, III
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
Well Contractor Company Name
220 Old Dairy Road
Street Address
Wilmington North Carolina 28405
City or Town State Zip Code
( 910 ) - 452 -5861
Area code - Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT #. N/A
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT # (if applicable): N/A
SITE WELL ID # (if applicable) CTM W -8
3. WELL USE(Check One Box)' Monitoring ® Munir.pal/Public❑
Industrial /Commercial❑ Agricultural ❑ Recovery ❑ Injection ❑
Irrigation ❑ Other ❑ (list use) _
DATE DRILLED: November 30, 2010
4. WELL LOCATION:
500 CP &L Road, 27559
I.Veet Name. .,taws, u•nrrunny. u dwis+on, -)_n1 T,TO .1'aco,
CITY Moncure COUNTY: Chatham
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING (check appropriate box)
❑Slope ❑Valley ®Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other
LATITUDE 35.588286 DD
LONGITUDE: _ —__ -79.051394 DD
Latitude /longitude source: ❑ GPS ❑ Topo. map
(Location of woll must be shown on a USGS topo rnap and
attached to this form If not using a GPS.)
5. FACILITY (Name of d:e business wru(e the wall is localed.)
Progress Energy Cape Fear Plant N/A
Facility Name Facility ID # (if applicable)
500 CP &L Road
Street Address
' —
Moncure
NC
27559
City or Town
State
Zip Code
Steve Cahoon
Weight
Material
Contact Name
Bottom
38.5 Ft.
410 South Wilmington Street
Sch.40
PVC
Mailing Address
Bottom
24 Ft.
Raleigh
NC
27601
City or Town
State
Zip Code
(919)- 546 -7457
Area code - Phone number
Depth
' 6. WELL DETAILS: —
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 48.5
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑
' c. WATER LEVEL 89low Top of Casing' 20 FT.
(Use " +" if Above Top of Casing)
d. TOP OF CASING is 3 -50 FT. Above Land Surface'
'Top of casing teritllnaled atior below land surlace may require
a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.0118.
e. YIELD (gpm): NIA METHOD OF TEST: N/A
f. DISINFECTION: Type NIA Amount: N/A
g. WATER ZONES(depth):
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
7. CASING:
Thickness/
Depth
Diameter
Weight
Material
Top 0
Bottom
38.5 Ft.
2 in.
Sch.40
PVC
Top 0
Bottom
24 Ft.
4 in.
SCh.40
Top
Bottom
Ft.
in.
8. GROUT:
Depth
Material
Method
Top
Bottom
Ft.
Top 22
Bottom
36.5 Ft.
Bent. Pellets Surface
Pour
Top
Bottom
Ft.
9. SCREEN:
Depth
Diameter
Slot Size
Material
Top 38.5_
Bottom
48.5 Fl.
2 in
Slot .010 in.
PVC
Top
Bottom
—Ft.--in.
Ft.
in.
in.
Top
Bottom
__ _Ft._
_
in.
10. SAND /GRAVEL PACK:
Depth Size Material
Top 36.5 Bottom - 48.5 Ft. #2 Medium Torpedo Sand_
Top Bottom Ft.
Top Bottom Ft.
11, DRILLING LOG
Top Bottom Formation Description
/
/
:ATTACHED
12. REMARKS:
DO HEREBY CERTIFY MAT THIS VvFLI. WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE VATH
15A NCAC 2C. VVLLL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
NO ® : U
J01 NATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
n E. Wood, III
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality - Information Processing, Modified from
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1617, Phone No. (919) 807 -5300 Form GW -1b
Rev. 2109

APPENDIX B
CAPE FEAR STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT I
PERMIT CONDITION A(6) I
ATTACHMENT XX,, VERSION 1.0 '
MARCH 30,f 2011

' Beverly Eaves Peroue
Governor
,"A
NCDENR
North CaroMa Departmen� of Environment and Naiura' F,esoures
Division of Water quality
Coleen H Sullins Dee - reeman
Dire .-to;
Secretary
March 30, 2011
RECEIVED APR 04 70n
Mr. -John Toepfer
Senior Environmental Technical Specialist
Progress Energy Service Company, LLC
410 South Wilmington Street
PEB 4
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
Subject. Cape Fear Steam Station
Revised Final Groundwater Monitoring Plans and Maps
Dear Mr. Toepfer:
Attached is the revised final Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the Cape Fear facility. This plan
will supersede the final Groundwater Monitoring Plan for Cape Fear dated 3/17/1 L The map
attached with the 3/17/11 Groundwater Monitoring Plan can be used with this revised version as
has not changed.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Eric Smith at (919) 715 -6196 or me at (919)
715 -6699.
Sincerely,
r C_ UJ;C6
Debra J. Watts
Supervisor — Groundwater Protection Unit
Attachments
' cc: APS Central Office Files w/ attachments
SWP — NPDES (Sergei Chernikov) w/ attachments
Raleigh Regional Office — APS
AWFEP PROTECTION ;EOTION
' 1636 Mad serrrce Center Rak igrr Ncrth C arpona ` c95 -1636
L,;mncr 2725 Gaom Boulevar, Rate -ah Nora; Caroona 2760:
DIV* Pa4 -1 2221 Fn; 1<,.'i5 "' 2 J1S- '15.604v
•�]E� -.ti), ..US'.OTE'S °IYrCe' -8'= ���$•6i4°
mwrne= www.r.
raternuakV 0rp "
One
ntnrthCai-��1in:;
�'1 X71111 1411

A. (6) GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION AND SAMPLING
1. The permittee shall conduct groundwater monitoring as may be required to determine
the compliance of this NPDES permitted facility with the current groundwater Standards
found under 15A NCAC 2L .0200
2. WELL CONSTRUCTION. Within 120 days of permit issuance, monitoring wells, as
proposed on Attachment XX, shall be installed to monitor groundwater quality.
a. Monitoring wells shall be constructed in accordance with 15A NCAC 02C .0108
(Standards of Construction for Wells Other than Water Supply) and any other
jurisdictional laws and regulations pertaining to well construction, The general
locations for all monitoring welt are indicated on Attachment XX.
b. Within 30 days of completion of well construction, a completed Well
Construction Record (Form GW -1) must be submitted for each monitoring well
to Division of Water Quality, Aquifer Protection Section, 1636 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1636.
C. The Raleigh Regional Office, telephone number (919) 791 -4200 shall approve
the location of new monitoring wells prior to installation. The regional office
shall be notified at least 48 hours prior to the construction of any monitoring
well and such notification to the Aquifer Protection Section's regional supervisor
shall be made from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Monday through Friday,
excluding State Holidays.
d. Within 60 days of completion of the monitoring wells, the Permittee shall
submit two original copies of a site map with a scale no greater than 1 -inch
equals 500 feet. At a minimum, the map shall include the following
information:
i. The location and identity of each monitoring well.
ii. The location of major components of the waste disposal system.
iii. The location of property boundaries within 500 feet of the disposal
areas.
iv. The latitude and longitude of the established horizontal control
monument.
V. The elevation of the top of the well casing (i.e., measuring point)
relative to a common datum.
vi. The depth of water below the measuring point at the time the
measuring point is established.
vii. The location of compliance and review boundaries.
viii. The date the map is prepared and /or revised.
ix. Topographic contours in no more than ten (10) foot intervals
e. The above information should be overlaid on the most recent aerial photograph
taken of the site. Control monuments shall be installed in such a manner and
made of such materials that the monument will not be destroyed due to
activities taking place on the property. The map and any supporting
documentation shall be sent to the Division of Water Quality, Aquifer Protection
Section, 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1636.
f. The well(s) must be constructed by a North Carolina Certified Well Contractor,
the property owner, or the property lessee according to General Statutes 87-
98.4. If the construction is not performed by a certified well contractor, the
property owner or lessee, provided they are a natural person, must physically
perform the actual well construction activities.
NC0003433 - Cape Fear Steam Station
Groundwater Monitoring Plan
Page I of 4
129 11 '

g. The monitoring wells shall be regularly maintained. Such maintenance shall
include ensuring that the well caps are rust -free and locked at all times, the
outer casing is upright and undamaged, and the well does not serve as a conduit
for contamination.
3. GROUNDWATER SAMPLING AND COMPLIANCE. Monitoring wells shall be sampled after
construction and thereafter at the frequencies and for the parameters as specified in
Attachment XX. All maps, well construction forms, well abandonment forms and
monitoring data shall refer to the permit number and the well nomenclature as
provided on Attachment XX.
�. Per 15A NCAC 02H .0800, a Division certified laboratory shall conduct all
laboratory analyses for the required effluent, groundwater or surface water
parameters.
b. The measurement of water levels shall be made prior to purging the wells. The
depth to water in each well shall be measured from the surveyed point on the
top of the casing. The measurement of pH shall be made after purging and prior
to sampling for the remaining parameters.
C. The measuring points (top of well casing) of all monitoring wells shall be
surveyed to provide the relative elevation of the measuring point for each
monitoring well. The measuring points (top of casing) of all monitoring wells
shall be surveyed relative to a common datum.
d. For monitoring wells that are not located at the Compliance Boundary, the
Compliance Monitoring Form (GW- 59CCR) is not required. However, predictive
calculations or modeling shall be submitted to the Regional Office annually (i.e.
12 months after permit issuance) demonstrating groundwater quality standards
at the Compliance Boundary.
e. Two copies of the monitoring well sampling shall be submitted on a Compliance
Monitoring Form (GW- 59CCR), and received no later than the last working day
of the month following the sampling month. Copies of the laboratory analyses
shall be kept on site, and made available upon request. The Compliance
Monitoring Form (GW- 59CCR) shall include this permit number and the
appropriate well identification number. All information shall be submitted to
the following address:
Division of Water Quality
Information Processing Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1617
f. For groundwater samples that exceed the ground water quality standards in
15A NCAC 02L .0202, the Regional Office shall be contacted within 30 days after
submission of the groundwater monitoring report; an evaluation may be
required to determine the impact of the waste disposal activities. Failure to do
so may subject the permittee to a Notice of Violation, fines, and /or penalties.
NC0003433 — Cape Fear Steam Station
Groundwater Monitorirn, Plan
Paee 2 of 4
3 "_'9 11

4. COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY. Part of this disposal system was individually permitted prior
to December 30, 1983; therefore, the compliance boundary is established at either 500
feet from the effluent disposal area, or at the property boundary, whichever is closest to
the effluent disposal area. This compliance boundary shall be specified in accordance
with 15A NCAC 02L .0107(a). Part of this disposal system was individually permitted
after December 30, 1983 (1985 Pond), therefore, the compliance boundary is
established 250 feet from the effluent disposal area, or 50 feet inside the property
boundary, whichever is closer to the effluent disposal area. This compliance boundary
shall be specified in accordance with 15A NCAC 02L .0107(b). An exceedance of
groundwater standards at or beyond th:- compliance boundary is subject to remediation
action according to 15A NCAC 02L .0106(c) as well as enforcement actions in accordance
with North Carolina General Statute 143- 215.6A through 143- 215.6C.
NCUOU 3433 - Cape Fear Steam Station
Groundwater Monitoring Plan
Pare 3 of 4
3129'11 1

ATTACHMENT XX — GROUNDWATER MONITORING PLAN
Permit Number: NC0003433
Version 1.0
WELL
NOMENCLATURE
PARAMETER DESCRIPTION FREQUENCY
Monitoring Wells:
CM"'-I, CTMW -1,
CMW -2, CTMW' -2,
CMW -3, CMW-5, CMW-
6, CM"'-7, CTMW-7,
CMW' -8, CTMW' -8,
BGMW -4, BGTMW' -4
Aluminum
Chloride
Mercury
TDS
Thallium
Water Level March. June.
Zinc October
Antimony
Chromium
Nickel
Arsenic
Copper
Nitrate
Barium
Iron
N
Boron
Lead
Selenium
Cadmium
Manganese
Sulfate
Note 1: For locations of monitoring wells, see attached map.
Note 2: Monitoring revisions may be considered, as applicable, if there are no significant detections prior to permit
renewal.
NC0003433 - Cape Fear Steam Station
Groundwater Monitoring Plan Paee 4 of 4 3;29'1 1

N
K
7
0 t
z Z
zp
U
Oz
ZFo
O <On
SOQ
Zzw
W � W
Cif !
Up
,
U O
2
< 0
N N
6 o <
f K
tVV<
O
J i
i�
c�`�i
U'
a
s
F
b
R�
LL9
H
ono
IN `EE
Al 18$
�c,�x�BGs
€f,O WpWO
�Ut Qm
z�Ufi4E3
• n
:c 33 g
z. d.:

1610
syn,T(erra
RECEPTOR SURVEY
FOR
CAPE FEAR STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
500 CP &L DRIVE
MONCURE, NORTH CAROLINA 27559
NPDES PERMIT ##NC0003433
PREPARED FOR
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC.
RALEIGH,. NORTH CAROLINA
\C�
ENERGY,
PROGRESS
SUBMITTED: JULY 2014
/Jerry y ie, 1J PG 1425
Proje' eologist
kikh yAebb, NC PG 1328
Project Manager

Receptor Survey July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................... ..............................1
2.0 Background ....................................................................................... ............................... 2
2.1
Plant Description ......................................................................... ............................... 2
2.2
Description of Surrounding Properties ................................... ............................... 2
3.0
Receptor Survey Activities ............................................................. ............................... 3
3.1
NCDENR Records Review ........................................................ ............................... 3
3.2
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Records Review ........... ............................... 3
3.3
USGS Hydrography Review ..................................................... ............................... 3
3.4
SynTerra Field Survey ................................................................ ............................... 4
3.5
Previous Water Supply Well Survey Information ................. ............................... 4
4.0
Findings ............................................................................................. ............................... 5
4.1
NCDENR Records ....................................................................... ............................... 5
4.2
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Records ......................... ............................... 5
4.3
USGS Hydrography Review ..................................................... ............................... 5
4.4
SynTerra Field Survey ................................................................ ............................... 5
4.5
Summary of Geosyntec Survey Findings ................................ ............................... 7
4.6
Summary of Receptor Survey Findings ................................... ............................... 7
List of Figures
Figure 1- Site Location Map
Figure 2 - Receptor Survey Map
List of Tables
Table 1 - Water Supply Wells
List of Appendices
Appendix A - EDR Report
Page i
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \Cape Fear \Receptor Survey \Cape Fear Receptor Survey 7- 30- 14.docx

Receptor Survey July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Duke Energy Progress, Inc. (Duke Energy) owns and operates the Cape Fear Steam
Electric Plant (Cape Fear Plant) located on approximately 900 acres in central North
Carolina near Moncure, North Carolina. The Cape Fear Plant is located in Chatham
County along the east bank of the Cape Fear River southeast of Moncure and west of
Corinth Road. The site location is shown on Figure 1.
The Cape Fear Plant began operations in 1923 and additional units were added in the
' following years. Throughout its operational history, the Cape Fear Plant employed six
coal -fired units along with four oil - fueled combustion turbine units to produce steam.
Ash generated from coal combustion was stored on -site in ash management ponds.
Operations were terminated at the Cape Fear Plant in October 2012 and demolition
activities are currently underway.
Wastewater discharges from the ash ponds are permitted by the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of Water
Resources (DWR) under National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Permit NC0003433.
SynTerra has completed a receptor survey to identify water supply wells, public water
supplies, surface water bodies, and wellhead protection areas (if present) within a 0.5
mile radius of the Cape Fear Plant ash management area compliance boundary (Figure
2). The compliance boundary for groundwater quality in relation to the ash
management area is defined in accordance with 15A NCAC 02L .0107(a) as being
established at either 500 feet from the waste boundary or at the property boundary,
whichever is closer to the source.
The survey scope and findings are presented in the following sections.
Page 1
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \Cape Fear \ Receptor Survey \Cape Fear Receptor Survey 7- 30- 14.docx

Receptor Survey July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
2.0 BACKGROUND
2.1 Plant Description
The Cape Fear Plant began operations in 1923 and additional units were added in the
following years. Six coal -fired units, in combination with four oil- fueled combustion
turbine units, were employed throughout the operational history of the plant to
produce steam. Ash generated from coal combustion was stored on -site in ash
management ponds that were constructed in 1956, 1963, 1970, 1978, and 1985.
Operations were terminated at Cape Fear Plant in October 2012 and demolition
activities are currently underway.
Wastewater discharges from the ash ponds are permitted by the NCDENR under
NPDES Permit NC0003433. The permit allows for the discharge of wastewater at four
outfalls to an "unnamed tributary to the Cape Fear River ". Upstream of the Outfall 007
the water body is referred to as the "Canal ". Downstream of Outfall 007 it is referred to
as "Unnamed Tributary". Outfall 001 is an internal outfall from the "West Ash Pond"
(1978 ash pond). Outfall 003 is an internal outfall from once - through cooling water and
stormwater. Outfall 005 is an internal outfall from the "East Ash Pond" (1985 ash
pond). Outfall 007 is a combination of all of the internal outfalls.
2.2 Description of Surrounding Properties
Properties within a 0.5 mile radius of the Cape Fear Plant compliance boundary are
located in southeastern Chatham County and eastern Lee County, North Carolina. Lee
County, located west of the Cape Fear Plant, is physically separated from the Cape Fear
Plant by the Haw, Deep, and Cape Fear Rivers. The Deep and Haw Rivers come
together northwest of the Cape Fear Plant property to form the Cape Fear River.
Property uses within the 0.5 mile radius include residential, recreational, industrial, and
agricultural. Figure 2 depicts the properties surrounding the Cape Fear Plant.
Page 2
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ Receptor Survey \ Cape Fear Receptor Survey 7- 30- 14.docx

Receptor Survey July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
3.0 RECEPTOR SURVEY ACTIVITIES
3.1 NCDENR Records Review
' SynTerra reviewed the NCDENR Department of Environmental Health (DEH) Public
Water Supply Section's (PWSS) Public Water Supply Water Sources Geographic
Information System (GIS) point data set (pwsws.shp) and the Water Distribution Map
' Service (WDMS) data set obtained from the NC OneMap GeoSpatial Portal
(http: // data. nconemap. com/ geoportal /catalog/main/home.page) to identify public water
supply sources and water supply lines within a 0.5 mile radius of the Cape Fear Plant
compliance boundary.
According to the NC OneMap website, the Public Water Supply Water Sources point
data was current through November 18, 2009, and that it is the most current GIS data
set of public water supply locations available from North Carolina state agencies. The
' GIS point data for the public water supply wells includes, but is not limited to,
information such as public water supply (PWS) system identification numbers,
' ownership information, PWS source type, well depth, and well yield. The WDMS data
set contains information on municipal water lines and other appurtenances.
' On June 24, 2014, SynTerra reviewed the NCDENR Division of Water Resources (DWR)
Source Water Assessment Program (SWAP) online database for public water supply
sources to identify wells located within a 0.5 mile radius of the compliance boundary; to
' confirm the location of wells included in the Public Water Supply Water Sources GIS
point data set, and to identify wellhead protection areas located within a 0.5 mile radius
' of the compliance boundary. The NCDENR SWAP database provides detailed
assessments of public drinking water intakes and wellhead protection areas in North
Carolina. The website address is: ( http: / /swap.ncwater.org/website /swap /viewer.htm).
3.2 Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Records Review
' A review of public database information provided by Environmental Data Resources,
Inc. (EDR) was also conducted. The public water well information has been
incorporated in the summary table (Table 1) and on Figure 2. A copy of the EDR report
' is included as Appendix A.
3.3 USGS Hydrography Review
' SynTerra reviewed the United States Geological Survey (USGS) National Hydrography
Dataset (NHD) obtained from the USGS National Map Viewer
' (http: / /viewer.nationalmap.gov /viewer /) to identify surface waters within a 0.5 mile
radius of the compliance boundary.
I Page 3
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \Cape Fear \Receptor Survey \Cape Fear Receptor Survey 7- 30- 14.docx

Receptor Survey July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
3.4 SynTerra Field Survey
During February, March, and April 2014, SynTerra personnel conducted vehicular
surveys along public roads located within 0.5 mile of the compliance boundary.
Observations on property use, apparent proximity to available municipal water lines,
and structures that may represent potential water supply wells were noted. Field
observations were checked against parcel ownership information available through the
Chatham County and Lee County on -line GIS databases.
The GIS websites for both Chatham County and Lee County were reviewed for water
line information. The presence of water lines managed by Chatham County Utilities &
Water Division was noted in the area of Cape Fear Plant; although, for a number of
residences, both a possible water well structure and the presence of a water line were
observed. Mr. Leonard McBryde (Chatham County Utilities & Water Division) was
contacted for information about which residences were connected to municipal water
lines. Mr. McBryde declined to provide the requested information and referred any
further inquiries to the County's attorney. SynTerra made no further attempt to acquire
public water use information. Municipal water lines do not serve the area of Lee
County included in this water well survey.
3.5 Previous Water Supply Well Survey Information
The results of a previous receptor survey conducted by Geosyntec Consultants in
November 2013 have been incorporated into the findings of this report.
Page 4
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \Receptor Survey \Cape Fear Receptor Survey 7- 30- 14.docx

' Receptor Survey July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
4.0 FINDINGS
' 4.1 NCDENR Records
' No public water supply wells were identified in the Public Water Supply Water Sources
GIS point data set (obtained from NC OneMap GeoSpatial Portal) or on the NCDENR
SWAP online database within a 0.5 mile radius of the ash management area compliance
' boundary.
No wellhead protection areas were identified on the NCDENR SWAP online database
' within a 0.5 mile radius of the compliance boundary.
4.2 Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Records
' A review of public database information provided by Environmental Data Resources,
Inc. (EDR) was also conducted. No water wells or public water supply systems within a
' 0.5 mile radius of the compliance boundary were noted in the EDR report. A copy of
the EDR report is included as Appendix A.
4.3 USGS Hydrography Review
The Cape Fear Plant is bounded on the west by the Haw River and the Cape Fear River.
' The Haw River bounds the property from its confluence with Shaddox Creek south to
its confluence with the Deep River, a distance of about 1,200 feet. The Haw River and
Deep River come together to form the Cape Fear River which extends along the western
' side of the Cape Fear Plant property for about two miles (river distance). The Haw,
Deep, and Cape Fear Rivers flow south. Shaddox Creek is a perennial stream that flows
' generally from northeast to the west and enters the Cape Fear Plant property in the
northeast corner of the property, eventually discharging to the Haw River. Several
small intermittent streams enter the property from the northeast and east and flow
through in the eastern and southern part of the property, eventually discharging to the
"canal ". A small stream flows through the southern portion of the property and
' discharges to the Cape Fear River. The unnamed tributary partially discharges to the
Cape Fear River at the southern end of the property and also continues to the south to
Buckhorn Dam.
' Two perennial streams (Womble's Creek and Little Shaddox Creek) are indicated on the
west side of the Cape Fear River in Lee County.
' 4.4 SynTerra Field Survey
SynTerra conducted a visual reconnaissance of the survey area by driving public road-
' ways and noting properties that appeared to be developed or occupied. Structures
resembling water supply wells or well houses were noted where visible and are shown
Page 5
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \Cape Fear \Receptor Survey \Cape Fear Receptor Survey 7- 30- 14.docx

Receptor Survey July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NCO003433 SynTerra
on Figure 2 as reported /observed water supply wells (DW). Observations related to the
survey area are presented below:
Corinth Road (North of Cape Fear Plant) - Chatham County. This area is
upgradient of the compliance boundary. A municipal water line is located along
Corinth Road. Three large industrial facilities are located north of Cape Fear
Plant along Corinth Road. No wells were observed.
Corinth Road (East /Southeast of Cape Fear Plant) - Chatham County. This area
is upgradient of the compliance boundary. A municipal water line is located
along Corinth Road. Two residences are located within or very near to the 0.5
mile distance from the compliance boundary (east /southeast) that appear to have
water well structures. An additional three occupied residences and one
unoccupied property are located just outside of the 0.5 mile distance and were
observed to have suspected water well structures. For these properties, direct
visual observation of a structure likely housing a water well was made.
Depending on the installation date for the municipal water line that runs along
Corinth Road, it appears that private water supply wells may have been in use
prior to the installation of municipal water lines for most residences.
River Point Road (Northwest of Cape Fear Plant) - Chatham County. River
Point Road is located on the northwest (far) side of the Haw River and
upgradient of the compliance boundary. River Point Road is serviced by a
municipal water line. Occupied residential properties are located along River
Point Road. The area is bounded on the east by the Haw River, on the west by
the Deep River and on the south by the confluence of these rivers into the Cape
Fear River. One property within the survey area appears to have a structure that
may contain a water well. A municipal water line and water meters were
observed for the residences.
• Nottingham Lane/Farmington Lane (West of Cape Fear Plant) - Lee County.
This area is located on the west side of the Cape Fear River which is a large,
regional hydraulic boundary for groundwater; therefore, the area is not within
the shallow groundwater flow path of the Cape Fear Plant. Thirteen residences
are located in Lee County, North Carolina within or near approximately 0.5 miles
of the compliance boundary. There are no municipal water lines in the area;
therefore, it is assumed that occupied residences are served by water wells.
Surface Water Intakes. Two surface water intakes were noted during field
reconnaissance activities (Figure 2). A surface water intake on the Cape Fear
River, located west of the power plant, was historically used for plant operations.
Page 6
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ Receptor Survey \ Cape Fear Receptor Survey 7- 30- 14.docx

' Receptor Survey July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
Currently, water from this intake is periodically used for dust control during site
' demolition work. Drinking water is not supplied by the intake.
' Beyond the survey area, an active surface water intake is located on the Cape
Fear River approximately 2.5 miles downstream of the Cape Fear Plant. The
intake structure is located near the west bank of the river where NC Highway 42
(Avents Ferry Road) crosses the Cape Fear River. This intake is maintained by
the City of Sanford/Lee County Water Utilities Division and is the primary water
' supply for the Sanford and Lee County area (according to information on the
City of Sanford Public Works website).
' 4.5 Summary of Geosyntec Survey Findings
A receptor survey conducted by Geosyntec Consultants (November 2013) focused on an
area within 1,500 feet of the compliance boundary and included a search for potential
' water supply wells, surface water bodies, and wetlands. The survey identified a total of
14 properties that appeared to have a structure that indicated the presence of a water
' supply well within 1,500 feet of the compliance boundary. The survey identified three
surface water features: the Haw River, the Cape Fear River, and the Deep River. The
survey identified 11.6 acres of freshwater emergent wetlands, 11.3 acres of freshwater
' ponds, and 366 acres of freshwater forested /shrub wetlands with 1,500 feet of the
compliance boundary.
4.6 Summary of Receptor Survey Findings
A summary of the receptor survey findings is provided below. Assumed and observed
water supply well locations are shown on Figure 2. The well locations are numbered on
the map to cross - reference information provided in Table 1. The table summarizes
property location and owner information where a water supply well may be present.
• No drinking water wells were identified downgradient of the compliance
boundary.
No wellhead protection areas were identified within a 0.5 mile radius of the
compliance boundary.
• Approximately 20 possible water supply wells were observed, or are assumed to
be located, within 0.5 mile radius of the compliance boundary, but each well
location is either upgradient of the compliance boundary or across a regional
groundwater divide (Haw and Cape Fear Rivers).
Page 7
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026\ Cape Fear\ Receptor Survey\ Cape Fear Receptor Survey 7- 30- 14.docx

Receptor Survey July 2014 '
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
• A number of surface water features are present within the 0.5 mile radius of the
compliance boundary. The surface water features flow toward the Cape Fear
River which bounds the Cape Fear Plant on the west for a distance of about two
miles, flowing south.
• One former surface water intake is located adjacent to the Plant and is only used
for dust control during ongoing site demolition activities.
Page 8 1
P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \Receptor Survey \Cape Fear Receptor Survey 7- 30- 14.docx

FIGURES

TABLE

a c
c q
oa
(� V
w �L
u
c d
qW
CL E
E
oar
u ur c
lu
= c
w
E4, 3ELLm
V
w T O GZ
al ¢C M
C q V O
m < V
O N C
N �
3 �
a Q
�a
w T
- Or
i w
N W
O w
c Y
L �
3
w
3 -
>' 3
nn ?
� a
l a
w N
� y
a m
w 3
> w
w �
N >
a
o n
r w
o E�
s
LE
0
o
0
o
C
C
C
O
O
C
C E
71 -
E
C
W
C
N
c
c
N
w
=
3 c
m e
;
_
=
a ^w
O
u
c
a
O!
N
o
w
c
y
m
o
m
-m
a
T
m
.O
c
n
n
C cu
n
cm
n
n
_
; c
E
E
# c
; c
ai
>
>
-
>
>
a
m
'°
c o
c
^
.0 a
m
o
m-
E
Ems
° v
w
E E
c
_
c
=
cl
Y E
o°
3
a
a
o
o
3
o
0
a°
c o
c
o
E"
Y
yc
o
of c
c
v�
o�
m
o�
a
v
'E o
o.t
E"
o w
w
c
o ^y
1p
3
t0
3
E"
o w
o o
m
o
m
o
°
c
0
m
0
m
C
w
w q
w`
m
c v
c
c
v_
o+
o
O
o
c a
._>
ca
3
vLwi
3
a .�
wa
.0 0_
'V D_
av
a
uwi O
w
C
°
Vwi
w
twn
E
(u
uw1
z
c
-
_
vv
Zi
ov
ov
c
w:
c E
E E
Za
u
`am
F
v
w
w
c
?
a 3
vc
o
a 3
ao
E
00
E-
a 3
�"
c
w
w
w
w
v
w
y o
°
c w
w
C_
C_
C_
C_
C
m c;
ip
O v
w C
U Ot
` N
T
j N
a
d C
o w
c a
O Q
c v
O a
w G
_
->
-
-
-
-
`v
° c
o
o
o
o
v
v
o
n
w
m a
°E
v m
y
t cm
u
ID'
'^
i v
>
3=
c
3
3
3
3
Q
i°
v�
v;
v-
N
U
oy
n`o
y
n
n
2�
n
n
E w
N
O
-v
w m
c>
c >_
au
ov
ov
-u
w m
�G
c
N aGG
_v
., a.
._ Q'
;
E N
3
CC
E
E
w
>
>
3
Ow
c>
a
w�
cy
o
°c i
Ey
v
n
E
E
3 o
_.
E
E
E
E W
a°
o
yN
..�
a°
�u
N
c 3
-
E
E m
E
E
m V
w
q V
am,
a w
o
u
o
u
E W
> o
c
E
>
c
>
c
w>
c
>
c
v
°yam
�LL
Nn
v o
o ,�
3o
N
Nn
3 `�
3 '�
o
c
v°
v
v
v
n a
wE
a
a
> O
m w
m m
r_, w
.J w
m
o
c a`1
o
c v
vNia
m m
w
w
w
w
O
w
w
wm
w�
w'u+
wN
V
w_
>
aiw
>
ui QY
... U
w-
> �'
w
w
Z Z.
w
>
vm
o w
o
c U
w
c o
w
c w
w�
c w
w"
c°
w a
c
w y
c
w y
c o
w
v
o
a
o
v
o
N v
o
o°
u,
N a
o=
N a
o
u
9 o
a ._
a
a ._
a w
a
v ._
0
o
`1
m
'N w
�^
o
"N
w°
w
d°
w a
m a
d°
a
d°
a
Q
v n
v y
o w
y
o w
w
o w
o w
`w
vw
vN
on
v c
w o
vc
w o
v�
w on
vV
w
vV
w
_
v
d p
U v
`c
m
U
L m
V V
m
U V
m
C
a
V V
m
U U
`c
m
iY
'a "�
.o nn
..
a .n
n
n on
'uw
on
n
�a
=yE
v
=wS
�a
=wE
'^ a
=wE
. -
'^ a
'^ a
�°
�y
�y
u°
u'w
u'O
,°a
°O
vE
vE
Sri
Oon
Oo
Om`
Oio
Oo
O�
O
0
3°
3n°
3°
3°
z
3°
3°
V
U
F
w
f
Y
g
=
x
O
K
3
O
J
O
Z
w
J
d$
a'
Y
=
V1
Y
Y
O
J
Z
U
J
J
Z
W
m
nU.,i
R]
d
z
QQ
O
g
z
QQ
Z
Y
=
Z
=
J
Y
O
w
Z
Z<
>
LL
CQ
?
LL
w
O
u
z
O
o
m
=
i

APPENDIX A
EDR REPORT

Duke Energy - Cape Fear
500CP and LRd.
Moncure, NC 27559
Inquiry Number: 3887529.1s
March 21, 2014
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
www.edrnet.comt.com Shelton, CT 06484 I
CEDRO E nvironmental Data ReSOUrces Inc Tow Free:2.0050

TABLE OF CONTENTS
ISECTION
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
PAGE
Physical Setting Source Addendum___________ _______________________________
A -1
Physical Setting Source Summary ____________ _______________________________
A -2
Physical Setting Source Map_________________ _______________________________
A -8
Physical Setting Source Map Findings_________ _______________________________
A -9
Physical Setting Source Records Searched_____ _______________________________
A -12
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1- 800 - 352 -0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS ". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2014 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC3887529.1 s Page 1

GEOCHECW - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE REPORT
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
DUKE ENERGY - CAPE FEAR
500 C P AND L RD.
MONCURE, NC 27559
TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES
Latitude (North):
35.5932 - 35° 35' 35.52"
Longitude (West):
79.0508 - 79° 3'2.88"
Universal Tranverse Mercator:
Zone 17
UTM X (Meters):
676589.8
UTM Y (Meters):
3940379.2
Elevation:
186 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Target Property Map:
Most Recent Revision
35079 -E1 MONCURE, NC
1993
EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principal investigative components:
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the
geologic strata.
TC3887529.1s Page 1

GEOCHEcW( - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
' Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site - specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other
sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
' Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
' TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
General Topographic Gradient: General SE
ISURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES
0
W
0
Uj
North
TP
South
TP
0 1/2 1 Miles
Target Property Elevation: 186 ft.
Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated
on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified.
TC3887529.1 s Page 2

GEOCHECW - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways
and bodies of water).
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
Target Property County
CHATHAM, NC
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property
Additional Panels in search area:
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Quad at Target Property
MONCURE
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
FEMA Flood
Electronic Data
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map
37037C - FEMA DFIRM Flood data
37105C - FEMA DFIRM Flood data
NWI Electronic
Data Coverage
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map
Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the
environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
AQUIFLOW ,
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION
MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW
TC3887529.1s Page 3

GEOCHECKJ - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary
to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil
characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes
move more quickly through sandy - gravelly types of soils than silty - clayey types of soils.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT
GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Era: Mesozoic Category: Stratified Sequence
System: Triassic
Series: Triassic
Code: Tr (decoded above as Era, System & Series)
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil
Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information
for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns
in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps.
The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data.
Soil Component Name:
CHEWACLA
Soil Surface Texture:
silt loam
Hydrologic Group:
Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class:
Somewhat poorly. Soils commonly have a layer with low hydraulic
conductivity, wet state high in profile, etc. Depth to water table is
1 to 3 feet.
Hydric Status: Soil meets the requirements for a hydric soil.
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: HIGH
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 60 inches
Depth to Bedrock Max: > 60 inches
TC3887529.1 s Page 4

GEOCHECK% - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
Permeability
Soil Reaction
Rate (in /hr)
(pH)
1
0 inches
8 inches
silt loam
Silt -Clay
FINE - GRAINED
Max: 2.00
Max: 6.50
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 0.60
Min: 4.50
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty
50 %), silt.
Soils.
2
8 inches
24 inches
silt loam
Silt -Clay
FINE - GRAINED
Max: 2.00
Max: 6.50
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 0.60
Min: 4.50
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty
50 %), silt.
Soils.
3
24 inches
34 inches
sandy clay loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE - GRAINED
Max: 2.00
Max: 6.50
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 0.60
Min: 4.50
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
4
34 inches
58 inches
silt loam
Silt -Clay
FINE - GRAINED
Max: 2.00
Max: 7.80
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 0.60
Min: 4.50
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty
50 %), silt.
Soils.
5
58 inches
70 inches
variable
Not reported
Not reported
Max: 0.00
Max: 0.00
Min: 0.00
Min: 0.00
OTHER SOIL TYPES IN AREA
Based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data, the following additional subordinant soil types may '
appear within the general area of target property.
Soil Surface Textures: loam
loamy sand
Surficial Soil Types: loam
loamy sand
Shallow Soil Types: sandy clay loam '
clay
clay loam
Deeper Soil Types: stratified '
loamy sand
sand
TC3887529.1s Page 5

GEOCHECW' - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
EDR Local /Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental
professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
DATABASE
SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)
Federal USGS
1.000
Federal FRDS PWS
1.000
State Database
1.000
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No Wells Found
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No PWS System Found
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No Wells Found
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
NORTH CAROLINA Ni
ID
NC50003979
NC50006257
NC50007240
NC50016122
kTURAL HERITAGE ELEMENT OCCURRENCES
Class
Plants
Plants
Plants
Plants
TC3887529.1s Page 6

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
NORTH CAROLINA SIGNIFICANT NATURAL HERITAGE AREAS DATABASE:
ID Name
NC10002041 LOWER MONCURE ROAD WETLANDS NORTH
NC10002042 LOWER MONCURE ROAD WETLANDS SOUTH
NORTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE RESOURCES COMMISSION GAME LANDS DATABASE
Site Name
NC30000588
NC30000589
NC30000608
TC3887529.1s Page 7

PHVCIC_AI CFTTINIr CC)IIR[_F MOP _ 'A RR71;74 1c
"/0,
Ire`,
MIKE
rA
IN
s
MUM&
County Boundary
Major Roads
Contour Lines
Power transmission lines
Earthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater
® Water Wells
Public Water Supply Wells
' Cluster of Multiple Icons
SITE NAME: Duke Energy - Cape Fear
ADDRESS: 500 C P and L Rd.
Moncure NC 27559
LAT /LONG: 35.5932 / 79.0508
s, bo rd C
rI
POP
CA
W W46
lown
0 11 V! ]MIS
Groundwater Flow Direction Wildlife Areas
G I Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location Natural Areas
G v Groundwater Flow Varies at Location o Rare & Endangered Species
® 100 -year flood zone
500 -year flood zone
■ National Wetland Inventory
CLIENT:
SynTerra
CONTACT:
Richard Jacobs
INQUIRY #:
3887529.1s
DATE:
March 21, 2014 11:08 am

GEOCHECKn- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Map ID
Direction
NC—WILD
Distance
Databas . DR In N jmb .r
Chatham
NC-WILD NC30000588
Site Name:
Chatham
Owner:
Carolina Power & Light
Site Type:
Safety Zone Acres: 521.32861328125
Status:
PRV County: CHATHAM
TC3887529.1 s Page 9
NC—WILD
NC30000589
Site Name:
Chatham
Owner:
Carolina Power & Light
Site Type:
Game Land
Acres:
100.830940246582
Status:
PRV
County:
CHATHAM
NC—WILD
NC30000608
Site Name:
Chatham
Owner:
Carolina Power & Light
Site Type:
Game Land
Acres:
2364.48852539062
Status:
PRV
County:
CHATHAM
NC_NHEO
NC50003979
GIS ID:
12510
Classification by Type:
Plants
Occurrence Status:
X
NC_NHEO
NC50006257
GIS ID:
81615
Classification by Type:
Plants
Occurrence Status:
Historic, no evidence of destruction
NC_NHEO
NC50007240
GIS ID:
41947
Classification by Type:
Plants
Occurrence Status:
Extant
TC3887529.1 s Page 9

GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance Database EDR ID Number
GISID: 91947
Classification by Type: Plants
Occurrence Status: Extant
Site Name:
Quality:
Acres per Polygon:
Site Name:
Quality:
Acres per Polygon:
NC_NHEO NC50016122
NC_SNHA NC10002041
LOWER MONCURE ROAD WETLANDS NORTH
Not Reported
153.27
NC_SNHA NC10002042
LOWER MONCURE ROAD WETLANDS SOUTH
Not Reported
31.79
TC3887529.1 s Page 10

GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
AREA RADON INFORMATION
Federal EPA Radon Zone for CHATHAM County: 3
Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi /L.
Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi /L and <- 4 pCi /L.
Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi /L.
Federal Area Radon Information for CHATHAM COUNTY, NC
Number of sites tested: 3
Area
Average Activity
% <4 pCi /L
Living Area - 1st Floor
-0.033 pCi /L
100%
Living Area - 2nd Floor
Not Reported
Not Reported
Basement
0.900 pCi /L
100%
% 4 -20 pCi /L % >20 pCi /L
0% 0%
Not Reported Not Reported
0% 0%
TC3887529.1 s Page 11

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
' TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
' Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 75 Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds
to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000 -scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data
with consistent elevation units and projection.
' HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal
' Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100 -year and 500 -year flood zones as defined by FEMA.
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
' State Wetlands Data: Wetlands Inventory
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOWR Information System
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
' flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has
extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table
information.
' GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
' Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital
representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
' Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national
Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil
survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation
of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed ( SSURGO)
soil survey maps.
SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS)
Telephone: 800 - 672 -5559
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Services, mapping
scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to
' construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic ( SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the
original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county
natural resource planning and management.
TC3887529.1 s Page A -12

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: 202 - 564 -3750
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at
least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.
PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: 202 - 564 -3750
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after
August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).
USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS)
This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface
water and /or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.
STATE RECORDS
North Carolina Public Water Supply Wells
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: [phone]
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
NC Natural Areas: Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A polygon converage identifying sites (terrestrial or aquatic that have particular biodiversity significance.
A site's significance may be due to the presenceof rare species, rare or hight quality natural communities, or
other important ecological features.
NC Game Lands: Wildlife Resources Commission Game Lands
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
All publicly owned game lands managed by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and as listed in Hunting
and Fishing Maps.
NC Natural Heritage Sites: Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Sites
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A point coverage identifying locations of rare and endangered species, occurrences of exemplary or unique natural
ecosystems (terrestrial or aquatic), and special animal habitats (e.g., colonial waterbird nesting sites).
RADON
State Database: NC Radon
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Radon Statistical and Non Statiscal Data
Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: 703 - 356 -4020
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.
The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at
private sources such as universities and research institutions.
TC3887529.1 s Page A -13 1

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
' Telephone: 703 - 356 -4020
Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor
radon levels.
' OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities
Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800 - 457 -6656
' Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
' Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR's Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared
in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
' © 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
1
TC3887529.1 s Page A -14