Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20071025 Ver 1_Site Plan_20070920i ~i a CURVE DELTA RADIUS ARC TAN CHORD BEARING w 1 34'25'36" 425.00 255.36 131.67 251.54 N 31'24'25"W W 2 5'44'06" 365.00 36.54 18.28 36.52 N 45'45'11 "W Y 4p1 ~ A 3 0'13'08" 1060.65 4.05 2.03 4.05 N 42'46~36~~W G 1 H 5• v. ~ .5• H~GHwA CIS 4 97'46'17" 25.00 42.66 28.64 37.67 N 67 3'15"E KY`E pRNE 1 Og 5 31'38'07" 295.00 162.88 83.57 160.82 N 70'55'35"E Z too 1 s 0 SITE A p I ~ ~o P=4 0 ~o 0 Ilk 00 TRACT# 5 ~ ~ OAKLAND/VALLEY STREAM PARTNERSHIP, LP. ~ ~ 0 >4 0- ca 02 RECOMBINATION, SUBDIVISION & R.O.W. DEDICATION ~AP ~ q 10 c;d 0 RECORD REF: fn z DEED BOOK 12021, PAGE 657 ~ ~y~i~N,~~~,~~ ~ ~~f`~l3M a~ DEED BOOK 6918, PAGE 831 ~ ~ ~~~-~~n~~j~-`~~" ,~~c; CATION PLAN Ls BOOK OF MAPS 1997, PAGE 1379 ~ ~ r :~,4 (NTS) 2.4190 TOTAL ACRES (GROSS) ~ 1,0(~~- ~S I ~ ~ W 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 ~ ~ 1 n ~ 1 ~ n ~ a 0 0 1 1 ALI R. GHOLIZADEH 1 1 o Q \ THE TOP OF BANK LOCATIONS WERE MARKED (DB 2974, PG. 152) ~ PIN 1726.20-82-8111 0 ~ ~ °oo~ IN THE FIELD BY "MITCHELL ENVIRONMENTALy ZONING: R-~o / o 0 i J ~ AND FIELD VERIFIED (on 9/12/07) BY THE USE: VACANT z w ~ ~ J I ~ 1 ~ o p \ WETLANDS DIVISION OF THE NORTH CAROLINA w / ~ as A ~ o d ~a ~a Q ' ~ I ~Z~'~ I I ~WNY N DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY. / Q c La 4c P :m _ / _Y w U l~ I ~ I ~ ~ J=m ~ / / / W w / / O ~Z~ ~ ~ I S 14'13'2"E~/22.36' W ~ / r' / li a~a?°vvWi ~ I / _ V w ~I ~ ~ / O \ ~ \ ' 2~0 / ? ii ~ W P / / / ~ w ~ ~ \ W w W 00 ~ WINDWARD DOWNS I ~m Z nb8~ ~ ~ sb8 / / / ~ w Y I ~ rn HOMEOWNERS ASSOC. N 0) I~ b / ~ / / / (BOM 1997t PG. 1379) ~ ~ ~ I D B ~ ~1 o / )B 12021, PAGE 065 ~ . ~ , ~ (DB 8205, PG. 928) ?-j ~ Plp~ 1726.20-81-4640 J 2.42 ACRES ~ ~ ~ ~ /o ~ - - ZONING: R-10 ~z ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 zb / nb6\ ~ b5 ~ / ~r USE: SINGLE FAMILY ~ ~ ~l ~ o ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ F ~ i ~ ~r ! I .~M Z ~ ~ / ~ \I ~ ~o e~HC,,~+ ~s,~a~aRa+ 2~.~ ~ ZEN .~~1, ~ DR P -~8~ D R~~ i is r `~S ~ V ~~~K~p ~ I ~ y\ C~ ~6~ e ` Z ~ ~ ~ oP 249 8 III .~o~ I \ 10 SWiGUM X38 BI 8 SWTGU "b y \ 25~ ~ / Emm4 ~ ~ ~ .soot .aswrcu~ii .s~+iac ~ .~oHiac NilgC \ ~ ,'Q ~M~ 2 ~I~FI_ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ A ( N I I ~ BSMRGUM 10 PINf~• NE ~1 ~FIIZKOHIgC X10 PINE . e 9FIIG( G ~1 Swf 8 g1M.t 1 B K \ - ~ l / ~ i ~ ~ ' ! !"i / ' I I ~ ~ ~ M a10HICK .SHIgC•5HIqC ~ ~ •10 BIRCH ~b Z I b ?1 / ~ ~ ~ ~ i % ~ ~ ~ I / i ~ m I I GuAt q~ ~,7( ~Sp2 p~ ~ 1H~ tl(•SHIgC .12 BIRgi p_ .10 BIR(~i TOP OF B ~ ~ / ~ ~/c j! ~ , ~ ~ ~ i I I I , ow \ SSYVTGUM 1a11TGR ~ ~ o ~ GUM .1 ssssssssss I ~ ~ I 10SWTGUM~~ GUM BRICK BRICK ~~N 5HICK •.~I~ 10 SM~(~1M• ~ •1 SVYiGUM 1 ~ t ~ % ~ % BHIgC y .8 SMRGUM ~ / / ~ / / / ` ~ D \ "5~ M .SPINE •BSWi M E 10HICK Z \ .12 PINE 10HICK• .18 ~E 8 SWrGUM ~ ~~M24 GUM / ~ / ~ j ~ / ~ \ I •12 GUM E X10 PINE \ 5 '1~ IJ ( ~ ~~fPIN18 INE 10SNITGUM e1 ;5 ~E 5FIIgC..18 E •B~HI{pC ~ ~ 1 / ~ / ~ ? ~ / / / .5H~1~ 8 SNITWM • ~ ~ ~ 7~ / / ~ / . LOT# 43 LOTS 47 7 LEIGH E.••~ H ~ Z ~ N I 4 PI 12 PINF10 SWT ~ ~BSWiGUM BSWiGUM 5~~p~ 10 SWfGUI~ ~ 5~ j~ 1 j ' / / / / ~ 260 7y i ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 CRISTO A. & MARTHA LOT# 44 LOTS! 45 LOTS 46 CITY OF RALEIGH A. FUENTES FERRIS 5 PROPERTIES RAMONA WHITE BARBARA D. FLOWERS HOUSING AUTHORITY THORITY 2 ~ ~ ~ 13 I I I \ .10 NE' OSWTGUG asp 10PINE ° ~ NE ~rn ~ e10HlgC • .BFNpC ~ / / ~ ~ / ~ / I DB 12146, PG. 2115) ~ O Ir (DB 10936. PG. 762 P N~ 17 6820-8119 2 PINS 1726.20-81-1857 PION 11726.20681 61861 DDB 8682, PG. 2777) 2777 N I e • \ e~0 ~ a N o ' i I~ 4I~ O 12 PI 18 PII~ ,BHIpC ° e10 PI E ~ PIN# 1726.20-81-1927 ZONING: R-10 ZONING: R-10ZONING: R-10 PIN~t 1726.20-81-17 ZONING: R-10 USE: SINGLE FAMILY USE: SINGLE FAMILY USE: SINGLE FAMILY ZONING: EXEMPT -81-1776 H XEMPT e10 PIE ~ / / ~ ~ ~ ~~~1.~'`.' ~~l ~ ~ ~ FAMILY ' ~ ~ Z I ~ f ~ ~5 SM/TGUM 8 SN/TGUM• ~8 PINE X12 PINE • o g~ a I ~ i ~N ~ I • ~RC~ ° 18 PINE I ~ ~ ~ ~ USE: SINGLE FAMILY USE: SINGLE FAMILY .e swrcx,M , ~ i ~j i k~'Y 1 1 Jg~ ~1 ~ ~ / r ~1 n W O W I I ~ 18 PINE a a N v~ rv NE t PINE ~ I I o .t ~ I ~ ( I •~o Pi swrcu~ ~s w~\ ~s ~N EX DI I~ I I I .1.18 PI~~ ~~~•10 PINE ~ i / ~ , 1 12 PI E ~E .~s Hiac / , ~ i~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~j ~ ~ NOTE: 12 PINE• • •12 ~ y_ B HICK .18 ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ , 1 k -Y ' 1 `L INV 264.63 •SSwi'GINA •12 PINE 1. THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO ' ~ I ~ r 1 IqC •20 PNrE ' ~ I I ~ 12 1 12SWTWM .10 PIN 1 ACCURATELY SHOW TREE LOCATIONS, THE E . THE I ~ I I MH 2 ~ ~ •18 ~•1 PIPE .12 PIN~~ ENE 24 24 E PINE / ~ ~i j ~ / ~~`Gti~~ . K'1 p~~~y POSITIONS OF THE STOP OF BANK' TOWIT THE LOCATION OF THE NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER AN 7ER AND ' TOP-2~~ ~8 .10 NE .12 SMITWM t SINTWO PINE / ~ ~ / ~ c~\~ THE EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS OF TH OF TH E I INV=24 ( 24 PINE, ~ .10 PINE .10 I .12 PINE OF THE SITE. NO BOUNDARY SURVEY WAS DON 3 DONE IN CONNECTION WITH THIS MAPPING. THE r ~ I ~ ~i 'r . 4 PINE \ '8 DOGWD~ \ .10HIgC ~ ~ ~I ~ e1 o12PINE\ r~' ~ p~ ' 1\ ~ ~1 e18~ PINE .12 SWfGUM GROSS AREA (INCLUDING R/W) EXISTING MONUMENTATION INDICATED WAS USE 2.42 ACRES TO LOCATE THE PROPERTY. S USED 2. THERE MAY BE OTHER IMPROVEMENTS NOT NOT ~ ~1' 1r ' ~ ~ 1 ~i ~f . 0 SYVfGU .8 SYYT M •12 PNrE 1 ~ ,1~ ~ •24 NE .8 SWTGUM~ ZONING R-10 DEPICTED ON THIS SURVEY. ~11 ~ ~ " ~ N e IqC .12 PINE 1 5 SWTGUM / OWNER OF RECORD 3. THIS TOPOGRAPHIC-PLAT IS NOT FOR AMV REALITY, INC RECORDATION, CONVEYANCES, OR SALES. PO BOX 30274 4. AS STATED IN G.S.#56.1605, THIS IS A CLA RALEIGH, NC 27622-0274 ~A' TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY. A CLASS ~ ~ .BSWTGUM ~ / ~ ~ ~ W ~ ! Z .BHIgC X10 ~ ~ Je~~ REFERENCES: ~ _ •18 PINE ~ / I/ ~ ~ 1~ \ O D.B. 12021 PG. 0657 REFERENCE: w % ~ DEED DATE 6/21/2006 CONC~~AD ~~-t, ~ / ~ ~ / \ ~ SOU7HER~BELL ~ / ~ ~ ~ / BM 1997 PG 1379 ~ ~O PGOO~ ~Og`L~~ ~ ~ P ~ Q~ ,~o ~ y ~~yv WETLANDS CERTIFICATION SEE BENCHMARK INDICATED ON MAP. THE TOP OF BANK LOCATIONS USE TO REFLEC THE NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER WERE MARKED I LEGEND THE FIELD BY "MITCHELL ENVIRONMENTAL". DEFLECT w Z men \ ~ \ ~ - / ~ P 1$, p , P ,KED IN W ~ 09,~~`L6~~G• ~t~F THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT y =i / ~ o ~ a / ~d Zen 11 ~j~ ~Q~~'~ tio~ S~~G ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF Jc,~c,'• SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS ~~pF IRON PIPE FOUND op~ DATE. UNLESS THERE IS A CHANGE IN THE ~ CALCULATED POINT 11 ~ N ~ LAW OF OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS THIS ~ I, JONATHAN H. FLEENER, P.L.S. L-4313, certi IPS IRON PIPE SET W certify w ~ o ~ DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION 1\ o Q ~ MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO that this map was drawn from an actual field ]1 field E=4 Q ~ EN ~ / ~ / R M 26 38 ~ ~ ~ Z Q m EXCEED FIVE (5) YEARS FROM THIS DATE. FIRE HYDRANT survey performed under my direction and d \ ~ j~ i / ~ ~ ~oG ~ THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTILIZING supervision. " 1111,#",", ~ J ~ THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLAND POWER POLE (W/ GUI WATER VALVE DQ ~ Witness my hand and seal this the 17 CAR . G~~~~ ~ DELINEATION MANUAL. O SANITARY MANHOLE LIGHT POLE September, 2007. ~ ~ SANITARY LINE (W/SIZE PIPE) ~ CATCH BASIN ~ ~ APP • i~~ i I~ 'p ' , ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ ~ 'C~ NAME:-------------- ` ~ i ~ X~PN / (SIGNED BY NORTH CAROLINA DEVISIONOF r• ~ \ WATER QUALITY) yy UNDERGROUND GAS ~ ELECTRIC METER - - = ~ r`w . / ~ TITLE:------------------------------- \ ~ DATE:------------------------------- OHE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC SIGN ~'~~l~~ (R) RECORD PLAT GRAPHIC SCALE ~lf~ OHS OVERHEAD SIGNAL f~l MFASl1RFn u ~ i ~ ~ O~(~ 1 rt'`PNZgc~l 6 ~ i ~ ~ N ~ Q~. 2~~~'i ~ BEN<ag1,~~2N~ G~~FPMv Q~N#~pN g~N izo \ ~ ' \ ~ ~ WOODS LINE ? 5/„# TOP OF BANK (BY OTHERS) v5~• U IN FM i inch = 30 it ~ ~ SHEE EET 1 OF 7 TopoZone - USGS Raleigh East (NC) Topo Map Page 1 of 1 topozone St Con 300, i t Y ? ?• ref.,- .'+ r _ ?tr Igo SOL 40 . t~ * t r A-V if l i A` 1 ! 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 km - 0 0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 mi UTM 17 719584E 3969168N (NAD27) USGS Raleigh East (NC) Quadrangle I Projection is UTM Zone 17 NAD83 Datum https://www.topozone.com/print.asp?lat=3 5.843 94&lon=-78.5687&s=24&size=l&u=4&lay... 9/4/2007 WAKE COUN LOB _71 Ul B 2 0 (joins sheet 30) P O'C L L 77 p P "C OC LOD E Vq VVkE APCT 61/0 L.0 ApB2 X� ApC9 Wk I - LOS -CC 0 '2 As- CeC2 B2 L, /,'-'Ae A LOG P c :,A a n) Qc, Wb cec, `eB2 me If wo CeB-, LwC pC2� CIB3 <) Me AP52 kc A U, A -7 \ , I 1�1 p all" A0 C2 ApB2� A 1 vImB2 2 Vvkc 3; Z jN� , " I�pC2� CeB 0 [VI a LwC2 CeB2 N !,Vc Im e rl\ J ApB2 MC2 In - B Vhe C11 ch ApC2 M ws L�LyC2 �/W I 2 rl WkE WO/ Cn LrVD WmB2 LoC LwC2 ApC2 2 VV K -M ApC2 i pG2 ApB2 LoD \lvmc2 '�A cn /AOC2 2 Ap v'l-, ApC2 u < I" E AP ex 0 00 Lo C) 401) ��; L,(2 0 (Lalcy 0 —n ( ' / I — APB L.D C) APC2 LOU), IZ f LwB2 WkF-.r ApC2 y ,4Z Bu V", k C rT-, - �VmB2 Lw NA e E 1'2 0 Ap 0 ApCIt(\_)j CeS,2 f wmB2 0 LOB LwC G R7 WkEZ- J Lo 'ApC2 Z,L M \J WkE APB2 ApK A sheet 50) Vk (Joins R.w. 10 June 2005 City of Raleigh, NC Development Plans Review Center P. O. Box 590, Raleigh, N. C. 2,7602 One Exchange Plaza 3Id Floor Telephone: (919) 516-2626 FAX: (919) 516-2684 www.raleighnc.gov/planning/dprc PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS TO: Aiken & Yelle Associates (phone: 919.877.9992) FAX: 919.877.9979 CONSULTANT EMAIL ADDRESS: ayes(abellsouth.net OWNER EMAIL ADDRESS: mchakrabort5 a nc.rr.com PROJECT NAME: Valley Stream Apartments CASE NUMBER: GH-1-07 INITIAL SUBMITTAL DATE: January 25, 2007 PLAN REVIEW COMMENT CYCLE: 4th DATE COMMENTS SENT: 8/16/07 PLANNER COORDINATING REVIEW: Jacque Baker WHEN YOU RESPOND, PLEASE INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: 1. Include a copy of staff comments, a narrative responding to the comments and location of changes in drawing set. (3- copies of plans and responses please) 2. Please note any changes made to the plans not reflected on response comments. 3. 3 sets of revised plans equal to the number of departments commenting. Please include a digital copy of the site plan in PDF format on disk or CD and (1) 8'/Z" x 11" reduction with every submission of plans. NEW Please return revisions within 10 working days. When you return revised plans, please bring them to the Planning Department, Development Plans Review Center, 3?d floor One Exchange Plaza. Plans are opened and logged-in each day at 3:00 pm, distributed to review staff and discussed each Monday afternoon. Special notices: 1. The time expectation for the first and second (if necessary) staff reviews is 10 days from the Friday following the day of submission. 10 working days of the date on this comment sheet. If plans cannot be resubmitted by this time, please contact the plans review coordinator for assistance. If the staff review time exceeds the 10 day expectation, the staff review coordinator will contact you, explain the reason for the delay in review, and commit to a new response time. 8. The development has just enough parking to support 2-bedroom units, please indicate how over flow parking will be handled. Where will visitors park? 9. Can't find the transit easement; please show. 10. A map will be required to be recorded indicating the density transfer from the right of way. This must include total area being transferred out along with number of units being transferred out of the right of way. A note will be required to be placed on the map: A density transfer has been utilized from the xxx dedicated right of way along xxxx Road and this density has been transferred into lot xxxx and the dedicated right of way is not eligible for reimbursement. 11. Will the density be transferred out of the right of way or CM, please specify and why does the plan require a density transfer? 12. A slope easement along both sides of Woodlawn Drive may be required. You may wish to check with Transportation concerning this issue. I understand that both lots will be under one owner now but it may not in the future. 13. The section of parking that makes a left into the buildings must be widen to a 28', if this area is 28' please show the dimension. 14. Can the detention Pond #1 be maintained without disturbing the Conservation Management area? 15. A re-review will be required once the plans are submitted, please include check for $750.00. Third Review Comments (6/1/07) 1. Legal documents will be required for the transit easement. Conditions of approval. 2. Construction drawings will be required 3. With the dedication of the right of way for Jelyn Drive this dedication creates a subdivision, please submits a subdivision application and subdivision plan along with subdivision fee. Please submit this with this next submittal of the group housing revision. 4. Conservation and fire have outstanding issues. 5. Please label lots 2 on lot 2 as Open Space. Please show the lot number mthe lot. Fourth Review Comments (8/16/07) 1. Construction approval will be required. 2. Please include on the front cover S-66-07 along with GH-1-07. 3. Legal documents will be required for the transit easement. Conditions of approval. 4. Conservation and Forestry have outstanding issues. 5. Please remove the note concerning the density transfer from lot 2 to lot 1. Only in a cluster can density be transferred. The density can be transferred out of the right of way as shown. Label on lot 2 "permanent open space" and remove the note. You may show a note on the plan that indicates lot 2 is part of the development and will be used and permanent open space. 6. A re-review fee will be required, please include a check for $750.00. PUBLIC WORKS Kathryn Beard, 516-2157 kathryn.beard(oD_ci raleigh nc us First Review Comments (2/5/07) 1. if construction plans for public and private streets or utilities shown on this plan are required, they must be approved by the Public Works Department prior to issuance of permits or recording of any plat for this development. Contact David Thompson @ 516-2164 for construction plan submittal. 2. Add 15'x350' sight triangles for the proposed site driveway. 3. Add a note stating: "Within the sight triangles shown on this plan, no obstruction between 2 feet and 8 feet in height above the curb line elevation shall be located in whole or part. Obstructions include but are not limited to any berm, foliage, fence, wall, sign, or other object". 4. Relocate the proposed access on Valley Stream Drive onto Kyle Drive. 5. Dimension the non-curb and gutter portion of Kyle Drive. 6. Construct a 5-foot concrete sidewalk on Kyle Drive. PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING: PLANNING DEPARTMENT COORDINATING PLANNER Jacque Baker 516-2630, email Jacaue.Bak??, n? ?? JS, First Review Comments (2/8/07): 1. Based on City Council resolution (1993) 208, that established a policy requiring developers of tracts outside the City limits that are connected to the public utility system to petition for annexation into the City Limits at the time of development of the property, a condition of approval of this plan will be that the owner submit a petition for annexation after the approval of the preliminary plan, and prior to recordin of lot or issuance of any construction permits. Karen Duke (516-2654) can provide information on g petitions for annexation. 2. Please remove "S" and replace with GH-1-07 to the front cover of the drawing set for ease of reference. 3. Please show the CM on the map along with the wide of the CM. Please remove all buildings/ pavement from the CM. It is difficult at this time to indicate exactly where the CM is located. 4. Please correct the zoning on the cover sheet to read R-10 with CM. 5. Please show the correct date/application on the cover sheet. This information can be taken from the GH application that was completed. 6. Need to know the number of bedrooms. This information is required for parking calculations. The cover sheet indicates data information shown on sheet 2 but can't find this information on sheet 2. 7. It is shown on the plan that no transitional protective yard is required. Please see code section 10- 2082.9(b)(3) Transition yards next to vacant property. If the density of this project exceeds 7-units an acre a transitional protective yard is required adjacent to the vacant property. This yard will be %2 of a type "D" yard. 8. Please show total acreage of open space required total acreage provided. This needs to be shown in a site date table. 9. Please show total acreage of tree save area and indicate if the tree save area is located with prima, secondary, etc. This needs to be in a site data table. rY 10. On sheet 4 of 7 please explain this information shown. What do the heavy dark lines represent? What is the 1.73-acres across Kyle Drive represent? 11. On sheet 4 of 7 "Kyle" is located in the middle of Valley Stream Drive? 12. How will someone including heavy equipment get to Detention Pond #1 to clean or repair this area? It seems as if the dumpster is currently located in the path of the pond. 13. Please show the zoning to the south. 14. Please complete the Wake County form and return with 2nd review comments. 15. Need to widen the entrance to 28'b/b due to parking along this area. 16. Tree Conservation map will be required to be recorded prior to building permit issuance. Condition of approval. 17. Tree Conservation map will be required to be recorded prior to building permit issuance. Condition of approval. 18. Legal documents will be required for the transit easement. Condition of approval. 19. Further review will be required. Second Review Comments (4/25/07) 1. Legal documents will be required for the transit easement. Condition of approval. 2. Tree Conservation map will be required to be recorded prior to building permit issuance. Condition of approval. 3. Tree Conservation map will be required to be recorded prior to building permit issuance. Condition of approval. 4. What will the lot on south side of Woodlawn Drive become? number and acreage due to the dedication of the right of wayV ill this be open space? This will need a lot 5. Construction drawings will be required for Woodlawn Drive. 6. Future Woodlawn Drive should be renamed Future Jelynn Street. Please correct. 7. Waterline must be extended into Jelynn Street per Public Utilites. Second Review Comments (4123107) 1. The sight triangle outsid to to the Sheet 2, should be hatched or #8 (sight triangle) tat ag n`Allastreet trees'failing within easement". Also add dd n no the sight triangles shown on this plan shall be limbed-up between 2 feet and 8 feet in height above the curb line elevation". 2. Provide a typical section for the improvements on Kyle Drive. 3. Future Woodlawn Drive should be renamed Future Jelynn Street. easements o 4. Please label the right-of-way dedication ' for and we ucurb0&pgutter ands5'ps dewalk alongnJelynneach 5. Fee-in-Lieu payment of $17,80 pavement, (length = 90') is required prior to plat recording. The fee estimate has been prepared and sent to the coordinating planner. lchair ramps 6. Show and label the WC access ramps at the onsewhehe Kyle rive. sidewalk is Single equi edeeWhen s dewalkeisonot installed at all public/private street the wh elchair required, curb is to be depressed at all rap locations. Verify Dria is a double wheelchaatramp as es required ramp at the intersection of Kyle Drive and Valley Stream 7. Revise the Fee-in-lieu note shown on Sheet 2 to read: Developer to pay a Fee-In-Lieu for 90 LF of a 41' b-b curb and gutter street with a 5 sidewalk. Third Review Comments (5121107) rive names on all plan sheets. Future Jelynn Drive is and 1. Please revise the Jelynn Drive ream Drive las it Dwill tie directly to a partially developed Jelynn Drive to the correct to the east of Valley S east. Woodlawn Drive is to the west of Valley Stream Drive. 2. Label the sight triangles and either shade or hatch and label the sight easement. (comment #1 from second review). Fourth Review Comments (811412007) 1. No additional comments. TRANSIT DIVISION Aaron Hair 890-3449, Aaron.hair@ci.raleigh.nc.us First Review Comments (112107) 1. Please provide a 15' x 20' Transit Easement --60' to the northeast of Kyle and Valley Stream. Second Review Comments (4126107) 1. See comment above. STORMWATER ENGINEERING Susan Locklear (susan locklear5ci raleiah.nc.us) Jay Sikes 516-2155, James sikes(fti raleiah.nc.us First Review Comments: (2/7/07) 1. Delineate flood prone soiis to assure that proposed development is not encroaching into them. 2. Label Neuse River Buffer as 50' from top of bank. 3. Neuse River Buffer is shown measured from the centerline of the stream. Thus, there is a concern that a building encroachment may exist. 4. Permanently preserved undisturbed open space will have to be recorded as such prior to building permit. 5. Further review will be required. Second Review Comments (4124107) 1. Stream channel is still in question due to the existence of two 60" RCP's. 2. Ensure that the Neuse River Buffer is accurately delineated and label the buffer as "50' from top of bank". 3. Provide drainage area map. the calculations. Show this pond, to scale, and all related drainage . A detention pond is now listed within 4 to it. 5. Show Q2 & Q10 in a tabular form on the plans. 6. More info is needed on the flood analysis. Provide electronic copy of the run, a work map, show cross sections used, etc. 7. Further review required. Third Review Comments (5/17/07) ject- 1. Susan Locer is properly shown. Staff has v si ed this site and doesrnot agree with 2. Staff does not t agree ree that t buff p what is shown on the plans. Staff believes the proposed budding encroaches into the buffer, as does the proposed level spreader. This will not be allowed without DWQ approval. review 3. There is a 30 day review time for the flood study in the submittal. Tshed floodwaly.e performed at this time to ensure this development is o proposed 4. Impervious area for future Jelynn Dr. must be accounted for in nitrogen calculations and runoff year storms? calculations. 2 and 10 5. Where is preliminary sizing calculation intended to be recorded detention undisturbed 6. Demonstrate on plans the areas open space. 7. How is the total denuded area going to be 1.044 ac and the impervious and managed open space to be 1.14 ac? 8. Further review required. Fourth Review Comments (8/13/07) 1. Current concept is not buildable without encroachment into the ripDWQ (L bufferMyott). upon being 2. At this point staff will not approve this preliminary plan as shown. complete their contacted staff, indicated that there DWQ informed storm ater'staff thatthey recommended review of potential buffer encroachments. intervals and the buffer be located from thee that the top of bank restaked at the recommended end d restaking work be performed. DWQ is to be points. Staff is going to require that that provided with a set of plans with the survey points shown vfor er loproval be shown on the preliminary 3. Staff is requiring that the survey points of the DWQ app plans. 4. Further review required. PUBLIC UTILITIES Cesar Sanchez 857 4540, email: cesar sanchezCa?ci raleiah.nc.us First Review Comments (2/1/07) 1. Minimum size for a fire line is 6" and for a private distribution system is 4". 2. Show existing water main in Kyle Drive and/or extend a 12" water main across the entire frontage. 3. Show reference for existing sanitary sewer easement. 4. Label existing 15" sewer main. Second Review Comments (4/23/07) detail W-34 OR make the split behind the fire line 1. Either show a fire/domestic split for each building per to eliminate the master domestic backflow. Individual backflow devices for each building will still be required. accep 2. Check with the fire department the nosee lWoodlawnllDeve It configration ha elt be cotnstl uct rem. 3. Show an 8" water line proposed NN D v JE M Y ?i YN J3 ??o 41 OADWA m to n =ICA w cn W wad o ? co T ? ~ J ?? L.j J w ; d OOf Q ?N VJ <Ir JV V, I \ R N /?I i z -C OR W \t? \ \ 0 ! IN, OLO -T \ v \ _-\t LLJ 17 00 ° IN, LL) U A%. Of x LLJ u P, (if M ! 6 Of :D FL C.i 1,04 10 V y N +49 0 F Q N, op \ \ U\ \ j OJ T Or• OL? A9. x F a a+43.5 W a `LM ` J J + / \ wrc z ~ + 2 KEYSTONE E W f IN, ` " o • " ?6? (1?3A2lf1S J.8) -110s C38VZVH uiq nn ?? N \ \?? 000-13 _j0 3NI-1 ' X v \ ?\ \ \? ? ,C m ? w > Li X n 254^ w m n a0 j/ 9IV los x8 y U \ N Z 2 Z m QJV Gild Nil m RI Y, 30 /25a 0 a o `5 /,I o ° 56 QUO 6?'? / ti . Eg s \ `\\ 0 10 \ o v° N r SS 5 ' m o . u Z 1? `150' \ ?`/ ? \os?? / a 258 ( SS ; M / ???ot? A Ly' IN, _ ( W ?.? .J \\ \ - !$ \\ 260-- m T.n gm PROP &I ALK _-=?awi nn ED ? 00 31pNIS :3S Z?'\ ?. ?M .Tt 70 'tP _ `d'. ij - \\ \ ci Z9_e 9z?NiNp2n l? 6MP'?A3a-Sldd-dIHIW\s?de?rurw\[o?d?u6sp?sps\:?