20141084 Ver 1_Site Plan_20141013

Corps Submittal Cover Sheet
Please provide the following info
2 0 1 4 1 0 8 4
1 Project Name South Entrance Intersection Improvements
2 Name of Property Owner/Applicant The University of North Carolina at Charlotte
3 Name of Consultant/Agent- Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc
*Agent authorization needs to be attached
4 Related/Previous Action ID number(s) N/A
5 Site Address Intersection of NC 49/University City Blvd and Cameron Blvd.
7. City Charlotte
8 County Mecklenburg
9 Lat 35 301555 Long -80 738365 (Decimal Degrees Please)
10 Quadrangle Name Harrisburi?
11 Waterway Unnamed Tributary to Toby Creek
12 Watershed HUC 03040105/Yadkin 03-07-11
13 Requested Action
X Nationwide Permit # 3
General Permit #
X Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre -Application Request (Mitigation Proposal)
The following information will be completed by the Corps office
AID
Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM Begin Date
Authorization Section 10 Section 404
Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose
Site/Waters Name
Keywords

Kimley>>> Horn
October 9, 2014
Mr William Elliot
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Ms Karen Higgins
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street, 9th Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re 404/401 Permit (Nationwide 3) Application
South Entrance Intersection Improvements
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Mr. Elliot and Ms Higgins
On behalf of our client, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Kinley-Horn is submitting the
enclosed Joint Section 404/401 Preconstruction Notification Application for the above referenced
project for your review pursuant to a Nationwide Permit #3 and General 401 Water Quality
Certification number 3883. This application is to extend an existing piped stream crossing in order to
widen the road shoulder and implement new bicycle and pedestrian lanes The following information
is included as part of this application submittal
• Project Summary Sheet
• Pre -Construction Notification Form
• Project Site Figures
o Figure 1 — Vicinity
o Figure 2 — USGS
o Figure 3 — SSURGO Soils
o Figure 4 — Jurisdictional Features and Improvements
• Construction Drawings for the South Entrance Intersection Improvements
• Project Site Data forms
o USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet
o NCDWQ Stream Identification Form
• Project Site Photo Pages
• Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form
• USACE Meeting Notes — March 10, 2014
The 404/401 (NWP 3) application presents site conditions evaluated by Kimley-Horn staff (Chris
Tmklenberg, PWS) on March 10, 2014. The stream delineation was performed by utilizing survey
prepared by a licensed surveyor (verified by Kimley-Horn)

Kimley>»Horn
Page 2
The project area is located at the intersection of NC Hwy 49/University Blvd and north along
Cameron Blvd in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina The site is located on the campus
of UNC -Charlotte. Existing land use in the vicinity of the project includes institutional and
commercial development. The proposed project seeks to extend an existing 95 linear foot, 48 -inch
reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) The project will result in permanent impacts to 35 linear feet of a
perennial relatively permanent water (P-RPW) to extend the culvert crossing The project requires 20
linear feet of temporary impacts to install impervious dikes and a pump -around to allow work "in the
dry"
Please feel free to contact me at [phone] if you have any questions, or if additional
information is necessary
Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC
Chris Tmklenberg, PWS
Environmental Analyst
Attachments
Cc Brian Kugler, P.E
The University of North Carolina at Charlotte
9201 University City Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28223

o'�'OF WAtF'y
a�_ ,
o 1q5E�'11V4111W _1C
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008
- WATER R SOURCES
401' 8 BUFFER PERMITT NG
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 3 or General Permit (GP) number
1c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1 d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ® No
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program
❑ Yes
® No
1g
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes
® No
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a
Name of project
South Entrance Intersection Improvements
2b
County
Mecklenburg
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Charlotte
2d
Subdivision name
N/A
2e
NCDOT only, T I P or state
project no
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
3b
Deed Book and Page No
Deed Book 02475, Page 587
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
Brian Kugler, P E (Senior Project Manager)
3d
Street address
9201 University City Boulevard
3e
City, state, zip
Charlotte, NC 28223
3f
Telephone no
704-687-0522
3g
Fax no
N/A
3h
Email address
bhkugler@uncc edu
- WATER R SOURCES
401' 8 BUFFER PERMITT NG
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify
4b
Name
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
4d
Street address
4e
City, state, zip
4f
Telephone no
4g
Fax no
4h
Email address
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc
5c
Street address
2000 South Boulevard, Suite 440
5d
City, state, zip
Charlotte, NC 28203
5e
Telephone no
704-409-1802
5f
Fax no
5g
Email address
Chris Tinklenberg@Kim ley -Horn com
Page 2 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
N/A
1b Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude 35 301555 Longitude -80 738365
(DD DDDDDD) (-DD DDDDDD)
1c Property size
—1 3 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc ) to
UT to Toby Creek
proposed project
2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
Toby Creek - C
2c River basin
Yadkin
3. Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The project area is located at the intersection of NC Hwy 49/University Blvd and north along Cameron Blvd in
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina The site is located on the campus of UNC -Charlotte Existing land use in the
vicinity of the project includes institutional and commercial development
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
NA
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
—55 If of existing stream within the project area
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
The purpose of the project is to extend and extend an existing piped stream crossing in order to widen the road shoulder
and implement new bicycle and pedestrian lanes
3e Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
The proposed project seeks to extend an existing 95 linear foot, 48 -inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) The project will
result in permanent impacts to 35 linear feet of a perennial relatively permanent water (P-RPW) to extend the culvert crossing
The project requires 20 linear feet of temporary impacts to install impervious dikes and a pump -around to allow work "in the
dry' Equipment will consist of excavators, wheeled backhoes, asphalt pavers, and milling machines
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
Preliminary E] Final
of determination was made?
4c If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company
Name (if known)
Other
4d If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
5. Project History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
El Yes ®No El Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the pasty
5b If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b If yes, explain
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
1a Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h Comments
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 - Impact 1
48 -inch RCP Culvert
UT to TobyPER
Creek
®
® Corps
8
35
® P El
Extension
❑ INT
® DWQ
S1 — Impact 2
Installation of
® PER
® Corps
❑ P ® T
Impervious Dike &
UT to Toby Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
8
20
Pump Around
3h. Total stream and
tributary impacts
55
31 Comments
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑ PEI T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g Comments
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
51 Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g
Buffer impact
number—
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
B1 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑ PEI T
El Yes
❑ No
6h Total buffer impacts
61 Comments
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
The project will utilize particular care to culvert orientation and skew to minimize potential impacts to the stream bed which will
avoid the necessity to install rip -rap dissipation at the pipe inlet The culvert extension will be buried —5 inches below the
existing channel bed to allow for aquatic passage of biotic resources The project will construct a brick "L" end wall to minimize
additional stream impacts The sidewalk was designed to the minimum width required to minimize impacts to the stream
channel during and post -construction
lb Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
Temporary construction impacts will be limited by the installation of an impervious dike and temporary pump around as well as
restoring/stabilizing disturbed areas when construction is complete
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c Comments
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required:
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 7 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
El Yes El No
Comments
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
30%
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why Linear public transportation projects will
be
required to treat stormwater runoff to the Maximum Extent Practicable in accordance with the practices described in the
NCDOT Best Management Practices (BMP) Manual (No new development)
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan
❑ Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
®Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter )
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
The project objective is to widen the road shoulder in order to implement new bicycle and pedestrian lanes
to provide safe
transportation These widening will not result in additional development
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
E:1 Raleigh
5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
❑ Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Database, Pedestrian survey performed by Kimley-Horn staff
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitats
❑ Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Database
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FIRM Panel 4586 (Effective March 2, 2009), Flood Risk
Information System (FRIS)
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
G'� _
10/8/2014
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided )
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
E:1 Raleigh
5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
❑ Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Database, Pedestrian survey performed by Kimley-Horn staff
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitats❑
Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Database
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FIRM Panel 4586 (Effective March 2, 2009), Flood Risk
Information System (FRIS)
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
G� %
10/8/2014
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided )
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

II FILL RUNT A"
1M OU 2i CARARRLS CIO
dec✓J
Figure 1 29
P a
(..m.,ro. JaQ-
e
a
29 24 5tio�
At Al, et R(
49
r
�G
t � � 74
^c�
nn�ies a •�a
C
.L
•ydr�. U� caJ �7 7
29
C
raver-Rd
o �
4
hoc University-RdO
Toby.Cre?K,Ftii
e
•
49
0 .,�
AY
•
N49
Bird o• m<<�
\tea
er G\�i� 24--Katherire�
ooksi
et5�ty� i c
�yOc y
24 P o
a<
pvebll
a, ,
<'1!Rocky-R-i�,e� p< a� ��I F Jmsprdy'
�� ;�c Qom% Rq y �o< JCS �O
c J Cr o �
�a �a m �
Title: Figure 1 - Vicinity Legend:
C3 Project Boundary
0 1,000 2,000 ��W7
Kimley>»Horn UNC CULOTTE
Feet

F '
Jr
i
daw
opyright:62b�,13 National graphic�Societ�cub
Figure 2: USGS 7.5' Topo Quad (Harrisburg) Legend:
("m'Project Boundary
Kimley>>)HornLL!

a'ec *� M;r, •�.� 1 '"� "',� ti �y!�r- ' • y '4ii'"1atY r r '3" .:, {�.,t r�
�►4 -� .t, � q 1^C. S `i � � i .�" � � 1 J� E �� � � „ t�V � V r LA ( � •�tfSr� \�!
Wz % ; J �f r , r � �t / :.� ` `F"rr�r r•'l ' ' '� r �' S P � ���y,�. ;-;f .
9 t { � `�,t1 r wF.^-p - s + _ �l d '. �� r• t . ( '` �f�'. �`i'�.� N� ';`�� t� •, -� 1 %1���,+��1 : �.i.• . �4 �
( ,ms`s �„ t � >r �" � <� '.� ���rr.'�r,� ?' �g�T��1 l V � ±vrJ'�1"�•-, �l : � � I .:.�}
b. i� 3-7 /yp� x-_ �. -� JJ�j,'Y. a- - f'�: i� � I� },.• 1 ti r�� � �s�,-r\` \� J- � v/ \ � .
>,r�
t -. �.G�.�
R_9p�.�+- rt ' � c• y.,� r
' �Y, �- �f ` ..-i � mss � • " � ��� � , �f"-> �t �2 �r � �' ,�
� .k ; - • � � «� 1 �, y,� Vis,.
t_
'1'• \�' '� ` _. it - �/ / •` j N' .! �rrTr F ��� a41, ^�,�
r �?�� � ' � •` �i �� , (;yam .�..�
�-

�� - �� � - �_ ; — _ - - � �f-�"m°r-- :, ,-- sem.: il_ ---•-
.2
'lilt
_ f lire • � - _
_ III ylE i'
R,
A L
I l —
i
ca ,�
�l, ; ill ; - �,- - , ' - 1'�• 1 � �! '' i �..,
�-����1, :� til �. � � �_�� � ,, r,�• - � ', �;-
•i r� � Iz 1i f � -
r , I
r �
�[•�r � GJ Ogg-
w
Ic`—' cY � � � --dry „1 l -•� a cit= r }'
> I,
I i� .:_, f v. ' ..1`-� ',r a 1, , �1 � .CMCJ ���j�- �t 1 �. ,��f �'T �� —es .d r, •,�
0 0
i 1r .li
� � —'- �• - -- --- - '!� a -� •- �----1� = �- - - -- � -- ---''-

I
In
CL
a
0
llll
VIII
- f �0/1 , II1I 111 11
-; � lt.II111`111II i 11,1
y �\IIIII`II�111
-- � Illlill�llii
-
� iiiplll I
• -- / 1111,1\
1
- - 11111
- -- - I1Ilt
--_ III
---------------
---------------
>
___—____--
4
Spey/ -M --8110E.- IH%3 8"A 11HM%3 iU3AV,OI H%3LLIHIH%3
coca
ZZ
O
$
a
3REl
q�
�
'
A
I
I
I
Spey/ -M --8110E.- IH%3 8"A 11HM%3 iU3AV,OI H%3LLIHIH%3
2
0
w
J
ZZ
O
$
a
3REl
q�
�
'
A
I
I
I
2
0
w
J

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name Umversity ofNorth Carolina at Charlotte 2. Evaluator's,name Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
3. Date of evaluation- 3/10/2014 4. Time of evaluation. 10.30 am
5. Name of "stream UT to Toby Creek 6. River basin Yadkin
7. Approximate drainage area 30 acres 8. Stream order. 0
9. Length of reach evaluated- 50 ft 10. County: Mecklenburg
11. Site coordmates.(if known) prefer in decimal degrees 12. Subdivision name (if any)
Latitude (ex ,34=872312) , 35 301555 ,Longitude (ex —77 556611) -80 738365
Method location determined (circle) GPS'Topo Sheet Ortho (Aenal),Photo/GIS Other GI Othe Surve, /y GIS
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifjnng,,stream(s) location). Thecreach
under evaluation, is located east of Cameron Blvd iust north of the intersection of Cameron Blvd and' Chancellors PI
14. Proposed channel work (if any) Extend existing RCP culvert.and install constructed riffle at the culvert mlet
15. Recent weather conditions Mostly clear and 70's
16.,Site)conditions at time of visit- 70 degrees,and partly sunny
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters
Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries'Habitat
Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of 'the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area -
19. Does channel appear on USGS' quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use _ % Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
1'5 % Forested �% Cleared / Logged 85 % Other (Institutional).
22. Bankfull width, 6ft 23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank) 4ft
24. Channel slope down center,of stream Flat (0 to 2%) _X_Gentle (2,to 4°/6) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity _Straight X Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation,,stream classification, etc Every characteristic must be+scored using the same ecoregion Assign, points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment -of the stream reach under evaluation If a characteristic, cannot
be�evaluated,due to. site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section , Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g , the, stream flows from a pasture 'mto a forest), the stream
may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach The total score
assigned to a stream reach must range between O,and 100, with a score;of 100 representing a,stream of the,highest,quality
Total Score (from reverse): 65 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 3/10/2014
This channel evaluation form'is mtende&to be used only as a guide.to,assist landowners,and environmental,professionals.in gathering
the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a prelimmary assessment of stream quality The total score
resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval `and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or
requirement Form subject' to change— version,06/03 To Comment, pleaseicall 91,9-876-8441 x,26:

Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet
* These,charactensttcs ardinot assessed ln,coastal streams
#
t Characteristics
R
Eco -re ion'Point.an e
,Score
,Coastal'
Piedmont
Mountain
I
Presence,of flow/ persistent pools'in stream
6-51
0 - 4
0-5
4
,(no flow, or'saturation = 0, strong flow = max`points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
4
extensive alteration = 0,,no,alterahon = maxpoints)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
o-4
0-5
2
(no buffer = 0, contiguous, wide'buffer = maxpoints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0- 4
0-4
2
extensive discharges = 0, no discharges = maxpoints)
a
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
0
(no discharge ='0, spnngs, seeps, wetlands, etc = max points)
U
*-4
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2.
3
no floodplain = 0, extensive floodplain = maxpoints)
2
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
3
a
dee ly entrenched = 0, -frequent flooding = maxpoints)
8
Presence -of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
01
no wetlands = 0,, large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
b-5
0-4
0-3
3
(extensive channelization = 0, natural meander = max points)
_
10
SedimenUmput
0 =,5
0-4
0-4
2
(extensive deposition= 0, lrttle,or no sediment, maxpoints)
11
Size,& diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
o-4
0-5
4
fine, homogenous = 0,' lar e, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of,chaimel,inctsiowor widening
0-5
'0-4
0-,5
3
�+
(dee 1 'incised = 0, stable,bed &banks'= maxpoints)
13
Presence,of major bank failures
0 -,5
0 -,5
0 - 5'
4
(severe erosion'= 0, no erosion, stablc,banks = max• oints)
14
Roof depth and density on banks
=+3
0 - 4
0-5
3
no visible; roots -=,O, dense roots throughout = max points)
-
r%
15 ,
Impact',by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0 - 5
3
(substantial impact =0, no evidence = maxpoints),
16
Presence'of riffle-pool/rtople-pool complexes
0 = 3
0-5
0 - 6
4
F
no'nffleshi les or pools = 0, well-develo ed = max points)
Q
1
Habitat complexity
6-6
0-6
0-6
4
(little or no habitat = 0„frequent, vaned habitats = max points)
P�
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
no shading vegetation = 0, continuous canopy = maxpoints)
x
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
4
(jeeply (deeplyembedded-= 0, loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 =_4
0-5
0 - 5
4
(no evidence = 0, common, numerous types = max points)
0Presence
O
21
of amphibians
(no,evid'ence - 0, common, numerous types =max points)
0-4
0-4
0-4
3
0,
O
22
Pfesence of fish
0-4
0,-4
0-4
0
no evidence = 0, common, numerous types =maxpoints)
_ _
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0 - 5
3
no'evidence = 0, abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
400'
TOTAL SCORE (also enteron first page)
6s
* These,charactensttcs ardinot assessed ln,coastal streams

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date 3/10/2014
South Entrance Improvements
Project/Site % Stream 1
UT to Toby Creek
Latitude 35 301555
Evaluator Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
County Mecklenburg
Longitude -80738365
Total Points: 42
0
1
2
Stream Determination (cir
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermitte Perennialg
Quad Name Harrisburg
if Z 19 or perennial if a 30
2
3
A Geomorphology Subtotal= 23
JAbsent
VWeak
ModerateStrongScore
2
1a
Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
loom
2
Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3 In -channel structure ex riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
ool se uence
0
1
2
3
3
4
Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
WSM
5
Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
EW3W
6
Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3'
MMF3MI
7
Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
2
8
Headcuts
0
1
2
3,
0
9
Grade control
0
0 5
1
1 5
1
10
Natural valley0
0 5
1 1
1 5
3
11
Second or greater order channel
No = 0'
Yes = 3
0
artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions;in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 11
12
Presence of Baseflow
0
41
2
;&
3
13
Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
amilm
14
Leaf litter
1,5
1
05
0
MOM
15
Sediment on plants or debris
0
'05
1
15
15
16
Organic debris lines or piles
0
05
1
15
1
17
Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
1 5
Yes = 3
26 Wetland plants in streambed
3
C Bioloqv Subtotal = 8
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3 2
1
0
3
19 Rooted upland plants In streambed
3 2
1
0
3
20 Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0 1
2
3
2mim
21, Aquatic Mollusks
0_ 1
2
3
0
22 Fish
0_ 05
1
15
21ROOM
23 Cra Ish
0 05
1
1
SIN
24 Amphibians
0 05
1
1 5
=0161M
25 Algae
0 05
1
1 5
0
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5, Other
10KOW
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35'of manual
Notes

t�gtsi� li rxr
��-r(f}�1�y'�a�
fit Rz
�'�:'�E� -or, �Yrci!'`�1�{� j�•.�'� �� i i\ � tL
77 AM
"'p_+�,,:,t
.��tit ���s e�y�• T~ss•�t
ry
AQ
T$�
��i7�rytyi`rY,'T J..: �'. R.. Y``••.S`'`i'i�g 1
S I — UT to Toby Creek looking
upstream
� � F
++"J �} , SfY• f:i 3 yx^ 1 .f i r �`; a k{SCd"'zF,.K
r- 1 a�r.�+.*'"•+`'":2.
�Y ��"�` Ery _y`x --�
' c
..J}�t , � ,�"i���...�- �s�st'a���.-s � g f -ice � �„ '� �� i - •.
�W5�t �fi�-� • t�f yhy' ' `�. a"`"x `d'.! 1^I'- r "�'n•. •,., `.� .fir ':
A .� ' J a nle , y�*,.,�++'t•i^t ,7�G`f���"fi �-.3Yr�r=`���"-•'`e+. c+.`�4
�;'�.r+�i ; y �,�ra�-..+r-%"�t,,�-���`Ay,'yyr�i. �� j,�` rte. u •. 4��.-.'��
•fes` �
dh (F -� fess 7tJ 1tf-. �.;f-„t s•. y -•t,v
��F � r a � .,✓c ��Y? �Ef� _��• JJ�ai�i �1��,=,b° `, •� .s� a�F�� � �,p�f�
f' .tfi�f�'F':;zY���4{::-.� �`.� ;�... ��f(54�: r, - ✓a:�- � ��"c`.T`�.$��J"� �:,� `'

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD): october8, 20,4
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Brian Kuglar, P E, UNCC
9201 Universdy'Clty Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28223
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The project area is located at the intersection of NC Hwy 49/1.1mversity BIW and north along Cameron BIW in Charlotte„ Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES) ,
State: NC County/parish/borough- Mecklenburg
City: Charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 35 301555 _ _ ON, Long. -80 738365 OW.
Universal Transverse Mercator. UTM 17
Name of nearest waterbody: Unnamed Tributary to Toby,Creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review°area:
Non -wetland waters:
55 linear feet: 8 width (ft) and/or 01 acres.
Cowardin Glass. Rlvenne
Stream Flow: Perennial
Wetlands, NA acres.
Cowardin Class: NA
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal:, NA
Non -Tidal: NA
1

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field' Determination. Date(s): _
THAT
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary,JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and "requested, appropriately reference sources below):
❑✓ Maps,, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant: Kimley-Hom
❑✓ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
appli nt/consultant.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ .Data sheets prepared by the Corps_:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas•
❑ USG8 NHD data
❑ ,USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
❑✓ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 124,000, Hamsburg
0 USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil, Survey.
Citation Meeklenburg,County.SSURGO Sods
❑ National wetlands inventoy map(s). Cite name: _
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s).
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
100 -year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑✓ Photographs: ❑✓ Aerial (Name&'Date): 2014 Mecklenburg county Aerial
❑
Other (Name & Date) I'Site Photos 3-10-2014
Previous, determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑: Other information (please specify):
2
or

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on,the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
,preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other,general permit verification requiring
"pre -construction notification"' (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the,activity, the permit applicant -is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make ,an official determination of
jurisdictional'waters; (2) that the applicant has'the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing ,a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result'in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to'request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (,5) that undertaking
any'activity, in reliance, upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all`
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such'jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal ,or,in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further; an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or'individual
permit'denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C F R. Part 331,
and'that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues. can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA'jurisdiction exists over a site,,,or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
3

This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of,the United `States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the, site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
'(REQUIRED)
In
�, DgiWtyagnaO Dy
duffs tlnklenbeig®klniey-hom com
DN --" VnTenberg@Wmley-hun com
/ Oa1e 2014 09 24 18 51 53-01'00'
G� 1
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

Estimated
Site
Cowardin
amount, of
Class of aquatic
number
Latitude
Longitude
Class
aquatic resource
resource
in review area
1 -
35.301637
-80 738237
Rivenne
0.01
Non -section 10 —
non -wetland

Kimley*Hord,
UNC -Charlotte
South Entrance
USACE Meeting
SUBJECT: USACE — SouthEntrance PROJECT: UNC Charlotte—'South' Entrance Improvements
DATE: March 10, 2014 TIME: 1.00 PM
PLACE: UNC Charlotte— Facilities Management 206
o General project descriptions and assumptions were,discussed
o USACE'agrees,the project isian 'Independent, Utility,.
o' Based on the purpose.and need.for pedestrian and bike safety, the USACE will not require'an
individual permit and can issue a Nationwide permit.#3 (Maintenance) to construct the project.
o, Based on -,,the minimal natureof the impacts and the, purpose and need.of,the project, USACE will
not require mitigation for the Nationwide permit #3 if under 50'.
o A,specific example of how the USACE has handled a recent phased project was described by the
USACE They outlined the process of pursuing a 'Master Plan Individual Permit'
o USACE suggested'UNCC perform a jurisdiction determination that could'mitially be,valid of five (5)
years Extensions would likely be available if need longer.
o Any conversion of jurisdictional, open water to,a storm -water management facility would require an
Individual Permit in order to construct It was,suggested to meet with the USACE once a consultant
is on board with pond conversion concepts to -determine permitting steps
o Alternatives'to an Individual Permit in order to construct future:stormwater,bmp's were discussed,
USACE-suggested stream restoration which can be permitted under a Nationwide Permit #27.
o UNCC inquired about potentially•setting up,an on-site, prnvateimitigation bank in order to' off -set
potential future development. USACE,has no issues with°this, however, state law may prevent
,UNCC from establishment of -a private mitigation bank in NC.
o USACE and.KHA visited the, project area USACE did not have any further comments or
suggestions,regarding the proposed widemng�and confirmed that the work,could be completed
under the NW#3, permit.
Page 1 of 1
REPRESENTING
_ATTENDEES
Brian'Kugler
UNC Charlotte (UNCC)
Peter Franz
UNCC
Scott Jones
U S -,Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE)
William Elliot
USACE,
Steve Blakley
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc (KHA)
Ben Taylor
KHA
Chris Tinklenberg
KHA
GENERAL SEQUENCE OF DISCUSSIONS
o General project descriptions and assumptions were,discussed
o USACE'agrees,the project isian 'Independent, Utility,.
o' Based on the purpose.and need.for pedestrian and bike safety, the USACE will not require'an
individual permit and can issue a Nationwide permit.#3 (Maintenance) to construct the project.
o, Based on -,,the minimal natureof the impacts and the, purpose and need.of,the project, USACE will
not require mitigation for the Nationwide permit #3 if under 50'.
o A,specific example of how the USACE has handled a recent phased project was described by the
USACE They outlined the process of pursuing a 'Master Plan Individual Permit'
o USACE suggested'UNCC perform a jurisdiction determination that could'mitially be,valid of five (5)
years Extensions would likely be available if need longer.
o Any conversion of jurisdictional, open water to,a storm -water management facility would require an
Individual Permit in order to construct It was,suggested to meet with the USACE once a consultant
is on board with pond conversion concepts to -determine permitting steps
o Alternatives'to an Individual Permit in order to construct future:stormwater,bmp's were discussed,
USACE-suggested stream restoration which can be permitted under a Nationwide Permit #27.
o UNCC inquired about potentially•setting up,an on-site, prnvateimitigation bank in order to' off -set
potential future development. USACE,has no issues with°this, however, state law may prevent
,UNCC from establishment of -a private mitigation bank in NC.
o USACE and.KHA visited the, project area USACE did not have any further comments or
suggestions,regarding the proposed widemng�and confirmed that the work,could be completed
under the NW#3, permit.
Page 1 of 1

v
0
T
0
m
0
OD
ud
�r
0
N
of
0
V
a
0
v
0
V
NNca
1.1.:
0
E
00
CO
0
N
1j
Oi
X
III
F-
00
X2X
W
F-
w
J
U
r
x_
W
F
m
X
w
w
J
U
�I
O
O
r
4
O
N
F
00
_
X
w
I
r
0
O
Q
U
I
0
rn
ca
c
0
4)
U
0
0
a�
0
M
U
U
z
d'
N
Lo
0
X
a
I
J
U
ui
E
m
0
/
r CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION (,TYP.) 4 f / / ! -- � f , \\ \i 1 I 1 { J
/ / f l / r 1. r \ 1 I / ! / _ _ _ ,,, ° � .... � � `` ```` `,,\ f / 1 / �' / / � �, -�' .-- � ✓ r r ,:
. J � t (I ! ! ( ' I 1 \ � �•. -`_ `" -�- / / .J -° r �.- � .- ° s ° ° r '' �' ``- (~� \ ` \\ / d f / / / / f / / - r -- .._ s / .-- " .-"f -� ,.,.... _ _ .� \ � \ \ \� \ � • i fr f ✓ r ; .� ._._ ---., \ r �� / , s' r / r / �„ > ' �, s
INV, - 629.I8
CB -INV. = 630,02
I / / / / / f f j :� f ✓ III -- f _ ' `RIM: 642,4£8
f f / \• \� : �. ! �- .� tPW -IN: 639.01-
/ � 1 1 / I f f f t f `� �'` ; d 0 �, l III , �- •-„ \ \ \\ \ / / •,. ..-_ ..-- -�• ..- ° J - -- _ .� ° -� . .-°� f ,� �.. ,- �, .
- `!N_V_0_UT: (.3'9.01
\ � \ � // I / / / I ! tf /j / / i f/ / /(� � k \ \,� `°�U III! � � �: r- �•- ° r,, ..-• `- -- .- _..._ __, ...,. - ✓' - _:,.°\ � \�\ _ ° °.� -- �.= 1°.° -r =- °' ='": `- ° �--1 '..�- - -�° P -�- `_ _.. — - °•-Y _ ° o �°' e.-r�' I � ..� e / / !
�-
i 4- L.-.OF 1-8 "jRcp_-.. _ -- "'
� � � I I I I i I } l t 1 f / / / f / e / i � 1 \` = ~'•j�`�;�.` -_.�- �- / ..-'" .,- ° _ _.. � - - �. ,._ _ � _ ,�''.. � .� -� .J - f •"� � _,,..J ' ,- ° ,,,. i �� i t
/ f _
I ~,, _
l o
/ J•
�...�- J• -' J -° "� -- `' ,-- °' `°` -° - �8 -�'. -- -' �. �" .w- -' ' - �- -' --' � :�;," �� �
. r , , r f r °i \ / / ^ • � / 1 / r\ _" ( ~\ , �I ' . I ,� - / - _mo� ...'. . w.-:`. - - 1 r. -"'f - � ' " / f�1 � I f ;.. � • - ~ • ; . _ f...� J . - � ` '_ "_ . i J r . .{. _./ vr. .. . - -.� - - ' - � `.= J'� ° �.`:— �.fi:x: -� s - ; CC m- �i ,° �` / .- � ,{ � // j - � ' '° �. a< . � °`-e�ms _�,.,'„ . _ . = � • -I -° ` � _ "- �—"` ' ' � J - _ � , -= f „ l � .r .= -���� - -' ` - � " , - _ � , ' l � 4 � ' /r J / „ . "••- ' ' � . �J � •� ' r :� = f �, ,=,” ", . � � �.! ,� , '� -.�_ - .- .°-� ' .�- - . ., _ J M -� ' � _ .J, - �. � -- � .°� „ ^ � . - ° "-`� _ ^ - / ' >.' -.,� , - ` -J ." �! _ .t, ' _ _ � : ; - - ° _ - ” - "- ,, .• - . "_ . '- - -J °- - w - . - ruRr° +O-�wI" NJ C � r'K V I" � �" - - ! - -- J \ "\
�2-x° •^4 �I H ��. 4 �
1 A 1 :- 6 N 26 +00
c � ® CURVE 4
2 5 +00
am
C]€CRET DIAIv4 0
o . \
'- -�'- .' +•. � - . ,..` - 125.74-
F
� f I
..�
I
I
t
..
I I l �- �•-�_ ., �.,. - ,.�. J ,,,, � 1 -�` - \' --' �` ° \ \ _ -- -- - � t t \ \ 1 I �- I I I 1 �` ~ ` -.. -� .,,_ '` �- - ...,. x x- ---.-x
i {"� 1 I 0 / �' .� /� \1 1. "` t \ - l \\ 0\ \\ \1 I I ! '� ! l l I { �~ ~1L FNS~
/'� ° �� I" j` `_ °� \J - -- -��
I �`� "�:;�,�"�,`�,�= �.,�,.��� ;. f -y ..... -- r„ -- ,,. ° ,,,. ° { l� f \ C'`t / I ,.-. ° �... d, s� � 1'� ~ � y ...- -- ✓ ---� 11 t 6 { 1� t `+ it \ 1{ . x-- �t- -x.��- dJ I 7I � 1t ( �- .,,. ,� �°- .� ~ --_ ,� �" ...,. ~ °- ...� ~ -- ..,. ,� --� ..,,. ~
('�,a ®•� _ �'�,�"•�� 5� -� � ,-r �,,, -'" „"� ° ` p,.e ./ „r .''� ..•' ) l 1 / \ / °� ("...- `� °'^ ^' 1 -Y°� I . �"" ,� � � � ,_,..... -- f f ` \ i � t � ! I t / � � `'., �` '�,. "" e ~ "'� ..,,. ` "„ � `' �--, ...� `' ".�, _ �~ -....
T �,..� �;. -�" �` •,..- r,, -' ,.3,�V'dy=- 'G3�t�5"' .2� ..-' f •• I � r.,..� /� / t _,... �.. _.....- / \ x / I i i / �'' `„ ° ~
INV. .90
_ ! °• °/' !• °- X ✓' ' i °'' °� 'i /% /f '/
/ / / r ;.gin: � / �=wti:,.,� ���: .�/ .,�> • ;� �� ;p:r:,y : A;n r / << < >.. � . - , ���:�.;., � � "' ` < r,�;«�., �;;.�..; .=° .
=• ,- �'" � / 1 ! / � � ' ' � i i I f ( I i W-2
x INV. 64099 INV, 64129' INV OUT: 6/ 3 j 9�.00
g , 0 INV, 64077 REMOVE PIPE
TO N C 49
` �
�
P I P E COLL A R AND EXTEND 2 4" R CP
UNIVERSITY CITY RIM: 643.38
BOULEVARD �
INV IN: 638.88 , ~
Ff f i i f l f / I � ( / ! / /
INV, = 39,83`
/ / 1/1 / x-77 LF OF 18" RCP CAD 0.48%
CB -3
RIM: 642.48
23 LF OF 18" RCP ® 4.54% INV IN: 638.64
INV OUT: 638.64
PLACE MANHOLE ON END OF EXISTING 48" PIPE
RIM: 640.17
INV IN: 630.75
INV IN: 631.00
30 LF OF 48" RCP ® 4.18%
PROPOSED 'V° DITCH WITH PERMANENT SOIL REINFORCEMENT MAT.
BRICK "L" ENDWALL, 48" PIPE, NCDOT 838.15
PROPOSED 'V' DITCH WITH PERMANENT SOIL REINFORCEMENT MAT.
DOUBLE ROW
SILT FENCE (TYP.)
DISTURBED AREA (TYP.)
PROPOSED 48" RCP CULVERT — UT TO TOBY CREEK:
S1 — IMPACT 1 35 LF OF IMPACTS (FOR PERMANENT CULVERT)
S1 — IMPACT 2 20 LF OF IMPACTS (TEMPORARY DIKE AND PUMP
AROUND FOR CULVERT CONSTRUCTION)
EXISTING
GUARDRAIL
12" X 4" CONCRETE
BANDING
•Tip -7= �. �� � �_;
EXISTING GUARDRAIL
1+00
MATCH
EXISTING
�-4'--1
BIKE
LANE
2' -0"
0$"
1-0" SAWCUT
SECTION L- TYPICAL
x.31
3.1
\ lb
If lll
TO CAMPUS
PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND EROSION
CONTROL INFORMATION
41 7L,
74' PROPOSED STORM LABEL
OB
—>-- DIVERSION DITCH
DRAINAGE AREA
SILT FENCE
0= OEM DISTURBED AREA
CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION
- CLDSM 30.15
AM
ROCK INLET SEDIMENT TRAP
ROCK CHECK DAM
�u1G'ID�
© 2014
U)
z
O
U)
w
w
r�
uj
r F-
O W
co
LL
Q W
O
w 0
VVV
656
QUO
I.I.1
co CL
W Q
_M
D
Z
656
652
WCC®
oW
0
— 652
U
® Z
a Z -
ri
F-
F_
O
-I- ci r� M
-
648 _
— - --
`"'° —
to z z
_
_
648
(o D _. _ – — _ —._�—
�m_
nZ - - --
—
v
_
-t0 - --
_.– _ --
44 I
I
`' ;,
q
.644
�� - - - - -- W
CC Z
��
•
�
640
....- �.
. w
� z
640
s
636
636
- - --
632
LF ­OF- r- RCP_�....4:78�._... -..._.
-
\
632
-- 95-- L�-OF-- 48".. -R£R ®... -.1 68:0
_
628
628
624
624
—
620
'; 620
ffj pej
d- d-
Lo co
EXISTING
GUARDRAIL
12" X 4" CONCRETE
BANDING
•Tip -7= �. �� � �_;
EXISTING GUARDRAIL
1+00
MATCH
EXISTING
�-4'--1
BIKE
LANE
2' -0"
0$"
1-0" SAWCUT
SECTION L- TYPICAL
x.31
3.1
\ lb
If lll
TO CAMPUS
PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND EROSION
CONTROL INFORMATION
41 7L,
74' PROPOSED STORM LABEL
OB
—>-- DIVERSION DITCH
DRAINAGE AREA
SILT FENCE
0= OEM DISTURBED AREA
CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION
- CLDSM 30.15
AM
ROCK INLET SEDIMENT TRAP
ROCK CHECK DAM
�u1G'ID�
© 2014
U)
z
O
U)
w
w
r�
uj
r F-
O W
co
LL
Q W
O
w 0
Q
U�
Zo
QUO
I.I.1
co CL
W Q
_M
D
Z
W
J
WCC®
oW
0
W W
U
® Z
a Z -
DESIGNED BY: TRB
co
x
I.I.1
U
ui
F-
F_
DESIGNED BY: TRB