20060452 Ver 3_Year 3 Monitoring Report_20140808

Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Project
Monitoring Report: Year 03
Davidson County, North Carolina
Upper Yadkin River Basin
Cataloging Unit 030401030
EEP Project ID #407
Prepared for:
F"iik
1{a"Iral oIIcilt
rRi€a�wvn
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
217 West Jones St, Suite 3000A
Raleigh, NC 27603

Monitoring Firm:
OMMM14-
d==r"
KCI
ASSOCIATES OF NC
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
4601 Six Forks Rd, Suite 220
Raleigh, NC 27609
(919) 783 -9214
Project Manager: Adam Spiller
Email: adam.spiller&kci.com
Project No: 16133830
January 2014
Design Firm:
Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 33068
Raleigh, NC 27636
(704) 333 -5131

1.0 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. ..............................1
2.0 Monitoring Results ................................................................................................................... ..............................1
3.0 References ................................................................................................................................ ..............................3
Appendices
Appendix A — Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables ...................................................... ..............................4
Figure1. Site Vicinity Map ........................................................................................................... ..............................5
Figure2. Mitigation Planview ...................................................................................................... ..............................6
Table1. Project Components ...................................................................................................... ..............................7
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History ........................................................................... ..............................8
Table3. Project Contacts ............................................................................................................. ..............................9
Table4. Project Attribute Table .................................................................................................. .............................10
Appendix B — Visual Assesment Data ......................................................................................... .............................11
CCPV........................................................................................................................................... .............................12
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assesment ........................................................... .............................18
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assesment .................................................................................. .............................24
Streamand Wetland Photos ....................................................................................................... .............................25
StreamProblem Area Photos ..................................................................................................... .............................32
VegetationPlot Photos ............................................................................................................... .............................33
AppendixC — Vegetation Plot Data ............................................................................................. .............................36
Table 7. Vegetation Plots Woody Stem Success Criteria Attainment Table ............................... .............................37
Table 8. Vegetation Plot Sampling Metadata ............................................................................. .............................37
Table 9. Total and Planted Stem Count by Plot and Species ...................................................... .............................38
AppendixD — Stream Survey Data .............................................................................................. .............................40
Cross - Section Plots ..................................................................................................................... .............................41
LongitudinalProfile Plots ............................................................................................................ .............................58
PebbleCount Plots ..................................................................................................................... .............................65
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary Table ........................................................................ .............................71
Table 11. Monitoring Morphology Data Table ........................................................................... .............................78
AppendixE — Hydrologic Data ..................................................................................................... .............................85
Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events .................................................................................... .............................86
Table 13. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Table ........................................................... .............................86
Groundwater Level Monitoring Well Plots ................................................................................. .............................87

1.1 INTRODUCTION
The Valley Fields Farm (VFF) stream and wetland restoration project comprises 10,071 linear feet of
stream restoration and 8,730 linear feet of stream preservation with approximately 3.1 acres of wetland
restoration and 7.2 acres of wetland enhancement /preservation. Site construction was completed in
June 2008 and plantings were completed in December 2008. This report represents the 3rd year of
monitoring data collection.
1.2 PROJECT LOCATION
The project is within USGS Hydrologic Cataloging Unit (HUC) 03040103030030 of the Yadkin River Basin.
This 14 -digit HUC has been identified as a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) by EEP's Upper Yadkin River
Basin Restoration Priorities Plan 2009. The project is in Davidson County approximately four miles
northwest of High Point and located off of Shadow Valley Road.
1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The restoration of the Valley Fields Farm Site offers an opportunity to add functional stream and
wetland uplift to the Yadkin River Basin. The project goals include the following:
• Preserve stable on -site streams, wetlands, and riparian buffers in catchments draining into the
primary enhancement /restoration reaches
• Enhance and restore (pattern, dimension, and profile) unstable streams using natural channel
design techniques
• Improve water quality of non -point source storm water through Best Management Practices
These goals will be accomplished through implementation of the following objectives:
• Installing in- stream structures such as rock vanes, log vanes, and constructed riffles
• Removing invasive vegetation
• Removing crowns from wetland areas and reconnecting the floodplain by raising the streambed
and /or lowering the floodplain
• Re- establishing a riparian buffer
The survey data were collected with a survey -grade GPS unit between December 4 and 6, 2013. The
stationing for the longitudinal profile is based on the thalweg stationing and has been adjusted to match
grade control structures from previous longitudinal profiles.
The CVS -EEP protocol, Level 2 ( http : / /cvs.bio.unc.edu /methods.htm) was used to collect vegetation data
from the site. The vegetation monitoring was completed on August 1, 2013.
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA

2.1 HYDROLOGY
Four automatic recording groundwater gauges were installed to monitor soil saturation within the upper
12 inches and any surface ponding within the wetland area of the site. Daily data were collected from
the automatic gauges over the growing season to ensure that the water table was within 12 inches of
the surface for a minimum of 7.5% of the growing season (18 days). While there were four Infinity
groundwater gauges installed on the site at the beginning of the growing season, the data on these
gauges could not be collected due to gauge malfunctions. Four new Remote Data Systems gauges were
installed in their place on September 23, 2013. Because of this switch, groundwater monitoring for the
site only occurred for 45 days (21 %) of the growing season and none of the wells showed hydrology
meeting the success criteria within this limited monitoring time frame.
2.2 VEGETATION
The vegetation monitoring success criterion for the planted stream riparian zone is a density of 320
stems per acre after the third year of monitoring and an allowance for 10% mortality in the fourth and
fifth years with a final density of 260 stems per acre. The third -year vegetation monitoring was based on
the Level 2 CVS -EEP vegetation monitoring protocol. There are eighteen permanent vegetation
monitoring plots within the site. The corner stakes of all but six (132, B3, B6, B7, C1, D1) of the eighteen
plots were unable to be located with a metal detector and Trimble GEO XT GPS unit and so their corner
stakes were reinstalled using the Trimble and 250 -foot measuring tapes to properly lay them out.
Additionally, Plot Al was under approximately 1.5 feet of water due to backwater created by a beaver
dam on the main stem and the corners were unable to be located or securely reinstalled. Because the
significant amount of backwater on the floodplain had killed all but a few of the woody stems in the area
around Plot Al, monitoring of this plot did not occur for the current monitoring year. The beaver dam
has since been removed, however, and although the original corner stakes could not be located during
the end of year site walk in December 2013, new corners will be installed in the same manner as the
other plots for Monitoring Year Four.
The site's average density for this monitoring period is 283 planted stems per acre. There are many
volunteer woody stems throughout the site. Including volunteers, the monitoring plots averaged 1,242
total stems per acre. Eleven of the eighteen plots had a planted stem density of less than 320 stems per
acre but of those eleven, only two had a total stem density (including volunteers) of less than 320 stems
per acre. Invasives do not represent a problem within the site, although isolated patches of multiflora
rose (Rosa multiflora), Callery pear (Pyrus calleryana), broadleaf cattail (Typha latifolia), sweet autumn
clematis (Clematis terniflora), and Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum) occur. On the CCPV in
Appendix B, P. calleryana and T. latifolia are represented by two polygons within wetland A -5 (T. latifolia
is the polygon further from the stream). On the left bank around Station 82 +00, C. terniflora is
represented by a polygon bordering the easement. All other polygons represent R. multiflora.
Additionally, during the end of year site walk in December, it was noted that vegetation was being cut
within the easement on both banks from the beginning of Reach B to approximately Station 1520 +00.
EEP was notified of this cutting.
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA

2.3 STREAM
Third -year monitoring found Valley Fields Farm to be stable, with only minor changes from the previous
monitoring conditions. Three beaver dams were noted within the site during an end of year site walk in
December : one dam on Reach Upper A2 (STA — 67 +60, no longer impounding water), another on Reach
Lower A (STA — 95 +40), and a final one just past the end of Reach Lower A (STA — 100 +00). Additionally,
several other beaver dams were removed from the site on September 3, 2013. Reaches A and B both
show the effects of these beaver dams along their lengths and have significant amounts of sediment
deposition within the stream channel, causing aggradation and a lack of bedform features within the
stream. This aggradation has led to a number of structures being noted as missing along both of these
reaches. Additionally, beaver dam impoundment has led to areas of bank scour and erosion along the
entire stream and in several spots has led to a movement of the stream centerline away from the
location documented in the as -built plans. Please see Appendix B Stream Problem Area Photos. These
areas will continue to be watched closely in Monitoring Year Four. The longitudinal and cross - section
data reflect the overall stability of the site despite the problems caused by the beaver. Four of the nine
cross - sections along Reach A show stream bed aggradation ranging from 0.5 to 2.0 feet as compared to
Monitoring Year Two data. The longitudinal profile shows similar levels of aggradation within Upper A
and Lower A but as a whole the site has experienced little change compared to the Monitoring Year Two
data. As a part of the stream success criteria, the stream must experience at least two bankfull events,
each in separate monitoring years. The site has experienced multiple bankfull events since construction,
but due to the extensive backwater created by the beaver dams on the site, none were recorded during
Monitoring Year Three. Summary information /data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or
encroachment and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be
found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Stream centerlines for tributaries D through N
provided by EEP. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in these reports can
be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report and in the Mitigation Plan (formerly the Restoration Plan)
documents available on the EEP's website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the
appendices are available from EEP upon request.
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2006. CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Version 4.0 ( http : / /cvs.bio.unc.edu /methods.htm)
NCEEP. 2009. Upper Yadkin River Basin Restoration Priorities.
(http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/ document_ library / get_ file ?uuid= 7f49dbf7- aclf- 4d56 -83d6-
8ab892d5c672&groupld= 60329)
USACE. 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE, NCDENR -DWQ, USEPA, NCWRC.
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
3

Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA

Appendix A
FIGURE 1. SITE VICINITY MAP
,DKIN
FORSYTH
GUILFORD
DAVIE
DAVIDSON
ROWAN
RANDOLPH
CABARRUS / STANLY---I MONTGOMERY
DAVIDSON
COUNTY
CP
a�
O
Wa /bur �
9'yi9h
a �
CL
County Boundary
Project Site Location
Major Roads
Minor Roads
Cities and Towns
VICINITY MAP
VALLEY FIELDS FARM, EEP #407 �-
�� DAVIDSON COUNTY, NC
nnN &.0astem 1 0 �,o o0 6.000 /� i-O Feet PROGRAM
PROGRAM
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
29
5

Appendix A
FIGURE 2. MITIGATION PLANVIEW
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA

Appendix A
TABLE 1. PROJECT COMPONENTS
Mitigation Credits
Nitrogen
Phosphorous
Riparian
Non - riparian
Stream
Buffer
Nutrient
Nutrient
Wetland
Wetland
Offset
Offset
Type
R
RE
R
RE
R
RE
LF /Acres
10,071
8,730
3.1
7.2
-
-
-
-
-
Credits
10,071
1,746
3.1
2.8
-
-
-
-
-
TOTAL
11,817
5.9
-
-
-
CREDITS
Project Components
Project
Restoration
Component
Stationing/
Existing
Approach (PI,
- or -
Restoration
Mitigation
Footage/
Footage or
- or -
Location
PH, etc.)
Restoration
Ratio
Acreage
Acreage
Reach ID
Equivalent
Upper A
50+00— 80 +78
3,100
P2
Restoration
3,078
1:1
80+78—
Lower A
2,284
P2
Restoration
1,935
1:1
100+13
1500 +00 —
Reach B
2,550
P2
Restoration
2,492
1:1
1524 +92
1000+00—
Reach C
1,560
P1
Restoration
1,489
1:1
1014 +89
200+00—
Reach D
240
P1
Restoration
295
1:1
202 +95
Reach J (Pond
350+00—
Tributary)
350 +61
61
P2
Restoration
61
1:1
100+ —
Reach A
276
-
Restoration
276
1:1
102 +88 9
Reach E
-
2,930
-
Preservation
2,930
5:1
Reach F
-
1,840
-
Preservation
1,840
5:1
Reach G
-
1,200
-
Preservation
1,200
5:1
Reach H
-
1,400
-
Preservation
1,400
5:1
Reach K
-
240
-
Preservation
240
5:1
Reach L
-
700
-
Preservation
700
5:1
Reach M
-
420
-
Preservation
420
5:1
Wetland A -5
-
-
-
Restoration
3.00
1:1
Wetland A -4
-
-
-
Restoration
0.10
1:1
Wetland B -1
-
0.10
-
Enhancement
0.10
2:1
Wetland B -2
-
0.70
-
Enhancement
0.40
2:1
Wetland B -3
-
0.20
-
Enhancement
0.08
2:1
Wetland D -1
-
0.20
-
Enhancement
0.20
2:1
Wetland A -6
-
1.70
-
Enhancement
1.70
2:1
Wetland A -4
-
1.80
-
Enhancement
1.80
2:1
Wetland A -3
-
0.20
-
Enhancement
0.20
2:1
Wetland A -1
-
0.60
-
Preservation
0.60
5:1
Wetland A -2
-
0.50
-
Preservation
0.50
5:1
Wetland A -7
-
0.40
-
Preservation
0.40
5:1
Wetland A -8
-
1.20
-
Preservation
1.20
5:1
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA

Appendix A
Component Summation
Restoration
Level
Stream
feet) (linear
Riparian Wetland
(acres)
Non - riparian Wetland
(acres)
Buffer (acres)
Bu
Upland
(acres)
Final Design —Construction Plans
N/A
Riverine
Non -
riverine
N/A
5/16/2008
Planting
Restoration
10,071
3.1
N/A
11/15/2008
Baseline Monitoring /Report
6/1/2009
Enhancement
Year 1 Monitoring
4.5
3/28/2011
Year 2 Monitoring
11/4/2010
12/15/2011
Enhancement I
-
1/23/2014
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
Enhancement II
-
Creation
-
-
-
Preservation
8,730
2.7
High Quality
Preservation
TOTAL
18,801
10.3
-
TABLE 2. PROJECT ACTIVITY AND REPORTING HISTORY
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete: 5 yrs 7 months
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete: 5 yrs 7 months
Number of Reporting Years: 1
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Actual Completion or
Delivery
Mitigation Plan
N/A
3/1/2006
Final Design —Construction Plans
N/A
1/31/2007
Construction
N/A
5/16/2008
Planting
N/A
5/16/2008
Repair
N/A
11/15/2008
Baseline Monitoring /Report
6/1/2009
8/17/2009
Year 1 Monitoring
10/15/2010
3/28/2011
Year 2 Monitoring
11/4/2010
12/15/2011
Year 3 Monitoring
12/6/2013
1/23/2014
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA

Appendix A
TABLE 3. PROJECT CONTACTS
Design Firm
Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 33068
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636
Phone: [phone]
Construction Contractor
North State Environmental
2889 Lowery Street
Winston - Salem, NC 27101
Phone: [phone]
Planting Contractor
North State Environmental
2889 Lowery Street
Winston - Salem, NC 27101
Phone: [phone]
Monitoring Performers
MY01 -02
Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 33068
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636
Phone: [phone]
MY03
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact: Mr. Adam Spiller
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA

Appendix A
TABLE 4. PROJECT ATTRIBUTE TABLE
Project County
Davidson County
Physiographic Region
Piedmont
Ecoregion
Southern Outer Piedmont
River Basin
Yadkin
USGS HUC
3040103030030
NCDWQ Sub -Basin
Yadkin Sub Basin
Within Extent of EEP Watershed Plan
Upper Yadkin River Basin Restoration Priorities 2009
WRC Class
Cool
% of Project Easement Demarcated
1 0%
Beaver Activity Observed During Design Phase
I Yes
Restoration Component Attributes
Reach A
Reach B
Reach C
Reach D
Reach J
Wetland A -5
Drainage Area (sq.mi.)
6.5
2.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
N/A
Stream Order
3
2
1
1
1
N/A
Restored Length (feet)
5660
2492
1489
295
61
N/A
Perennial or Intermittent
P
P
P
P
P
N/A
Watershed Type
IDeveloping
I Developing
IDeveloping
IDev eloping
IDeveloping
N/A
Watershed LULC Distribution
Forest /Wetland
43%
Cultivated
22%
Developed
35%
Watershed Impervious Cover
47%
23.5
1.9
1
1
N/A
NCDWQAU /Index Number
C/3
C/2
C/1
C/1
C/1
N/A
NCDWQ Classification
C
C
C
C
C
N/A
303d Listed
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
N/A
Upstream of 303d Listed Segment
Yes
Yes
Yes
I Yes
Yes
N/A
Reasons for 303d Listing or Stressor
Degraded water quality due to sediment
Total Acreage of Easement
31.0
8.5
2.3
0.5
0.1
N/A
Total Vegetated Acreage within Easement
22.4
6.9
1.7
0.4
0.1
N/A
Total Planted Acreage as Part of Restoration
22.4
6.9
1.7
0.4
0.08
N/A
Rosgen Classification of Pre - Existing
G5
G5
Incised B5
Incised B5
G
N/A
Rosgen Classification of As -Built
B5
135c
C5
135c
Ba
N/A
Valley Type
VIII
VIII
VIII
VIII
VIII
N/A
Valley Slope
0.003
0.005
0.011
0.011
0.15
N/A
Valley Side Slope Range
15 -20%
12 -20%
15 -40%
25 -30%
30 -35%
N/A
Valley Toe Slope Range
2 -3%
1 -3%
3 -5%
10 -14%
1 -2%
N/A
Cowardin Classification
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
NC
Trout Waters Designation
No
No
No
No
No
N/A
Species of Concern, Endangered, Etc.
Greensboro burrowing crayfish is of concern
Dominant Soil Series and Characteristics
Chewacla loam and Wehadkee
loam
Series
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
ChA
Depth
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
80"
Clay%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5 -40%
K
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.28
T
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
10

Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
11

1
SHEET2
F-- 7
U)
Z
0
-250 0 250 500
GRAPHIC SCALE
� r
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT /
SHEET 3
, s
z
� LL
aQ
c N oz
w
X H
LL
— w
o
- -- G
of Q
1�
I\ d z
zo 0
0
LL Lu
� U
\ SHEET 4 ° o ° ; z
\ w w z
SHEET 6 Z o
w J J ¢ o
z U
cwt 0
_ °Z$ >
y /ctiAO, SHEET 5 �� w 0
--
Oq
JAN 2014
SCALE; GRAPHIC
CURRENT
CONDITION
PLAN VIEW
SHEET 1 OF 6

MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 3
LEGEND
EASEMENT BOUNDARY----------------------- - - - - -_ _
AS -BUILT CENTERLINE OF STREAM (RESTORATION)_ -�
STREAM PRESERVATION
PHOTO POINT
ROCK CROSS VANE . ............................... .
CROSS - SECTION
WETLAND PRESERVATION. . ... .
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT
WETLAND RESTORATION ...........................
EASEMENTENCROACHMENT
>
PROJECT CONDITION
BANK EROSION
FLOODPLAIN EROSION ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- --- --- ---
VEG PLOT ABOVE 320 TOTAL
PLANTED STEMS/ACRE
VEG PLOT BELOW 320 TOTAL
PLANTED STEMS/ACRE
INVASIVE SPECIES___ _______________________________
VEG PLOT TOTAL / PLANTED STEM DENSITY
2170/516
STRUCTURE MISSING, BURIED, OR STRESSED - - -
- M / B / S
BEAVER DAM
WETLAND GAUGE
O
i
z
U
w
3
O
a
0 M
LL W
co 0
w W
ir Z_
cl
i Z O_
Z
O
Q
W
w
F_
U)
z
O
Q
U
2
H
O
}z
F
z
D
O
U
z
O
0
Q
I Dc t JAN 2014 I
CURRENT
CONDITION
PLAN VIEW
iSHtti 2 Or 6 1

MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 2
MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 4
e--
Y
U)
z
0
V)
w
rr
/ •�
N
T
0
z
c7 �n
a a
LEGEND
0
o�
EASEMENT BOUNDARY ............................
AS -BUILT CENTERLINE OF STREAM (RESTORATION)_
Q
STREAM PRESERVATION ............................
_ _ _ _ _ _
w
z
J
PHOTO POINT
c�
w
ROCK CROSS VANE__ _________________________ ___ ___
I—
U
CROSS - SECTION
•��
w
__3O
0-
WETLAND PRESERVATION
Z_
z
O
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT
0 co
Q Q
LL W W
U
WETLAND RESTORATION -- ---- ---- ---- ---- --- --- - -_
O
C/) }
EASEMENT ENCROACHMENT
W co Z
Z
PROJECT CONDITION
Z o
z
Z
O
BANK EROSION
J H O
U
O
FLOODPLAIN EROSION
v
3
c)
VEG PLOT ABOVE 320 TOTAL
Q
PLANTED STEMS/ACRE
Q
0
W
VEG PLOT BELOW 320 TOTAL
w
PLANTED STEMS/ACRE
___ --- __________________
U
INVASIVE SPECIES___ _______________________________
­Et JAN 2014
s�nE
- e: GRAPHIC
VEG PLOT TOTAL / PLANTED STEM DENSITY
2170/516
CURRENT
STRUCTURE MISSING, BURIED, OR STRESSED - - - - -
M / B / S
CONDITION
BEAVER DAM
PLAN VIEW
WETLAND GAUGE
O
SHEET 3
OF 6

H
w
w
x
w
w
w
z
x
U
Y
MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 3
_'i
LEGEND
EASEMENT BOUNDARY
VEG PLOT ABOVE 320 TOTAL
AS -BUILT CENTERLINE OF STREAM (RESTORATION)..
STREAM PRESERVATION
PHOTO POINT
ROCK CROSS VANE__ ______________________________'
CROSS - SECTION - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- ---
2170/516
WETLAND PRESERVATION -- ---- ------ ---- ---- - - - --_
M / B / S
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT
WETLAND RESTORATION
O
EASEMENTENCROACHMENT ------ ---- ---- ---- - - - - --
(o
H
H
w
x
U)
w
w
w
z
J
x
U
Q
PROJECT CONDITION
BANK EROSION
FLOODPLAIN EROSION
VEG PLOT ABOVE 320 TOTAL
PLANTED STEMS/ACRE
VEG PLOT BELOW 320 TOTAL
PLANTEDSTEMS/ ACRE ----------- ---- ---- --- -- -----
INVASIVE SPECIES___ _______________________________
VEG PLOT TOTAL / PLANTED STEM DENSITY
2170/516
STRUCTURE MISSING, BURIED, OR STRESSED
M / B / S
BEAVER DAM
WETLAND GAUGE
O
z
0
w
L �
O
0
H
T
O
o�
aQ
oz
�J
0
0
�z
�o
az
�w
a
H
U
w
3
O
of Q
d z_
Z �
O
co
LL W
(o O} Fw
co o z
w w z
z O D
_
w Q Z O
��� o
Q
Q
w
U)
*E: JAN 2014
CURRENT
CONDITION
PLAN VIEW
-T 4 OF 6

LEGEND
PROJECT CONDITION
EASEMENT BOUNDARY... ......
BANK EROSION___-__ _- ___- ___- ___- ___- ___- ___ -___
-_
AS -BUILT CENTERLINE OF STREAM (RESTORATION)_
FLOODPLAIN EROSION ____
STREAM PRESERVATION ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- - -- - --
______
VEG PLOT ABOVE 320 TOTAL
■
PLANTED STEMS /ACRE
PHOTO POINT
VEG PLOT BELOW 320 TOTAL
ROCK CROSS VANE - - - -- - - --
PLANTED STEMS /ACRE
_
CROSS-SECTION
INVASIVE SPECIES. . ... ........
WETLAND PRESERVATION . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- _
VEG PLOT TOTAL / PLANTED STEM DENSITY - - - - ---
2170/516
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT _ .___ _ _ __ _ ____ ___ ____.
_- __
�J
STRUCTURE MISSING, BURIED, OR STRESSED _ _ _ _
_ _ M / B / S
WETLAND RESTORATION ----------------
BEAVER DAM ............................... --
EASEMENTENCROACHMENT ___________---
WETLAND GAUGE - ---- ---- --- --------------- - - - -
-- Q
y�•.1�
0071�..
i
{,%
fr
F IIt
Fr t 4;�i1
r
v
H
w
w
x
cn
w
w
W
Z
2
U
Q
z
0
0f
0
_ oN
0
oz
o No
w a
z s
w
U
w
O
� a
CL z
z
O M
Q Q U
LL W W =
poi cr
W w z Z
LL O
zz D
z
�
3 w
06 °
Q
o
w
w
F-
ire JAN 2014
.ALE. GRAPHIC
CURRENT
CONDITION
PLAN VIEW
HEET 5 OF 6

V
H
W
W
2
U)
W
W
W
Z
J
2
U
Q
mid
5'
'ti +
r'
.9 L:
1 y.
j1
t U)
i � a
\ } c S d
Y
P D 1
O
Z �
i 1
P D 0
aQ
R a r
F Z
�
WETLAND
1# y
a
W> z
VQD01
w
1'
U
Ppo'l
of Q
d Z
O
./ 1 61 /
O
dZ. M
Q Q U
LL < =
U
W
O
♦ n ♦
U Z
W Z_
w ir E }}
LEGEND
PROJECT CONDITION
LL F
Z o z
ZO O0
EASEMENT BOUNDARY ___________- - - - - -_
BANK EROSION
J �
AS -BUILT CENTERLINE OF STREAM (RESTORATION)..
!J
FLOODPLAIN EROSION
Q w O
v C/)
STREAM PRESERVATION
______
_ _
VEG PLOT ABOVE 320 TOTAL
2 Q
n
PLANTED STEMS/ACRE
Q 0
PHOTO POINT
1
W
VEG PLOT BELOW 320 TOTAL
w
ROCK CROSS VANE______ __ _.- _ _ _.- _. -_. -_ .
PLANTEDSTEMS / ACRE___.____________________
CROSS-SECTION -----------------------
INVASIVE SPECIES___ _______________________________
oc,e: JAN 2014
WETLAND PRESERVATION _ _.
- -- -- ---- -- - ----
D
VEG PLOT TOTAL /PLANTED STEM DENSITY
2170/516
rn e GRAPHIC
CURRENT
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
___
r
STRUCTURE MISSING, BURIED, OR STRESSED -
M / B / S
CONDITION
WETLAND RESTORATION
BEAVER DAM
PLAN VIEW
EASEMENT ENCROACHMENT ___- ._- ._- ._- ._ -...
WETLAND GAUGE ----------------------- - - - - --
SHEET 6 OF 6

Appendix B
TABLE 5. VISUAL STREAM MORPHOLOGY STABILITY ASSESMENT
Project Number and Name: 407 - Valley Fields Farm
AssessedLeneth 1,250
Major
Channel
Categor}
1. Bed
Channel
Total
Number in
As -built
Sub - Category
Metric
%Stable,
Performing
as Intended
1. Aegradation - Bar formation /growth sufficient t
1. Vertical Stability
significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include
(Riffle and Run units)
point bars)
2. Degradation -Evidence of downcutting
0
0
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser
2. Riffle Condition*
substrate
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean
Condition
Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
40%
2. Length appropriate ( >300/ of centerline distant
5
between tail of upstream riffle and head of
5
downstrem riffle)
4.7halweg Position
I. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend
12.
5
(Run)
Thalweg centering at downstream of meander
Reach - Upper A
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
%Stable,
Performing
as Intended
65
o
97/0
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
5
2
5
40%
2
5
40%
5
5
100%
5
5
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured /Eroding
tsanx tacxmg vegetative cover reswtmg simpiy irom
4
65
o
97/0
poor growth and/or scour and erosion
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass
2. Undercut
wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts
0
0
100%
that are modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
Totals
4
65
97%
3. Engineered
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged
2
4
50
Structures
boulders or logs.
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
2
4
50 o
2. Grade Control
grade across the sill.
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath
2
4
o
50 /o
2a. Piping
sills or arms.
Bank erosion within the structures extent of
3. Bank Protection
influence does not exceed 15 %. (See guidance for
2
4
50%
this table in E monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool
4. Habitat
Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6
2
4
50%
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
sand based system lacking identifiable riffles
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
18

Appendix B
Project Number and Name: 407 -Valley Fields Farm
Assessed Len th 2,050 Reach -U rA2
Number
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
%Stable,
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Category
Sub - Category
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
1. Aegradation - Bar formation /growth sufficient to
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stabilit y
significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include
0
0
o
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
point bars)
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser
2. Riffle Condition*
substrate
20
55'%
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean
11
20
Condition
Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
2. Length appropriate ( >30% of centerline distance
between tail of upstream riffle and head of
1 1
20
55%
downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend
20
20
100%
(Run)
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander
(Glide)
20
20
100%
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
2. Bank
L Scoured/Eroding
poor growth and/or scour and erosion
4
150
u
96/0
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass
wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts
0
0
100
2. Undercut
that are modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
0
0
100%
113ank slumping, calving, or collapse
Totals
4
150
96%
3. Engineered
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged
13
13
100%
Structures
boulders or logs.
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
13
13
100%
grade across the sill.
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath
13
13
o
100%
sills or arms.
Bank erosion within the structures extent of
3. Bank Protection
influence does not exceed 15 %. (See guidance for
13
13
1001/1,
this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool
4. Habitat
Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio _> 1.6
13
13
100
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
* =sand based system lacking identifiable riffles
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
19

Appendix B
Project Number andName: 407 -Valley Melds farm
Assessed Len th 2,000 Reach - LovwrA
Number
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of %Stable,
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable Performing
Category
Sub - Category
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage as Intended
1. Aegradation - Bar formation /growth sufficient to
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include
0
o
0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
point bars)
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0 100%
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser
2. Riffle Condition*
substrate
-
10
-
01141
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean
0
10
Condition
Bankroll Depth > 1.6)
2. Length appropriate ( >30% of centerline distance
between tail of upstream riffle and head of
0
10
0%
downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend
9
10
90%
(Run)
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander
(Glide)
9
10
90%
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
2. Bank
L Scoured/Eroding
poor growth and/or scour and erosion
4
100
o
98/0
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass
wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts
0
0
100
2. Undercut
that are modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
0
0
100%
113ank slumping, calving, or collapse
Totals
4
100
98°%
3. Engineered
Structures physically intact with no dislodged
0
6
0%
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
boulders or logs.
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
0
6
o
0%
2. Grade Control
grade across the sill.
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath
0
6
o
0 /o
2a. Piping
sills or arms.
Bank erosion within the structures extent of
3. Bank Protection
influence does not exceed 15 %. (See guidance for
0
6
0%
this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool
4. Habitat
Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio _> 1.6
0
6
0%
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
* =sand based system lacking identifiable riffles
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
20

Appendix B
Project Number and Name: 407 -Valley Fields Farm
Assessed Len th 1,275 Reach -U rB
Number
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
%Stable,
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Category
Sub - Category
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
1. Aegradation - Bar formation /growth sufficient to
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stabilit y
significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include
0
0
o
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
point bars)
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0 0 100%
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser
2. Riffle Condition*
substrate
2
100'%
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean
2
2
Condition
Bankroll Depth > 1.6)
2. Length appropriate ( >30% of centerline distance
between tail of upstream riffle and head of
2
2
100%
downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend
2
-
100%
(Run)
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander
(Glide)
2
2
100%
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
2. Bank
L Scoured/Eroding
poor growth and/or scour and erosion
2
61
98%
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass
wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts
100
2. Undercut
that are modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
0
0
100%
113ank slumping, calving, or collapse
Totals
2
61
98%
3. Engineered
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged
2
2
100%
Structures
boulders or logs.
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
2
2
100%
2. Grade Control
grade across the sill.
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath
2
2
o
100%
sills or arms.
Bank erosion within the structures extent of
3. Bank Protection
influence does not exceed 15 %. (See guidance for
2
2
1001/1,
this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool
4. Habitat
Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio _> 1.6
2
2
100
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
* =sand based system lacking identifiable riffles
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
21

Appendix B
Project Number and Name: 407 -Valley Fields Farm
Assessed Len th 1,275 Reach - LovverB
Number
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of %Stable,
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable Performing
Category
Sub - Category
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage as Intended
1. Aegradation - Bar formation /growth sufficient to
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include
0
o
0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
point bars)
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0 0 100%
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser
2. Riffle Condition*
substrate
Z
011//o
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean
0
2
Condition
Bankroll Depth > 1.6)
2. Length appropriate ( >30% of centerline distance
between tail of upstream riffle and head of
0
2
0%
downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend
2
-
100%
(Run)
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander
(Glide)
2
2
100%
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
2. Bank
L Scoured/Eroding
poor growth and/or scour and erosion
3
105
°
96/0
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass
wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts
0
0
100
2. Undercut
that are modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
0
0
100%
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
Totals
3
1 105
96%
3. Engineered
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged
1
I
100%
Structures
boulders or logs.
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
1
I
100%
2. Grade Control
grade across the sill.
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath
1
1
o
100%
sills or arms.
Bank erosion within the structures extent of
3. Bank Protection
influence does not exceed 15 %. (See guidance for
1
1
1001/1,
this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool
4. Habitat
Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio _> 1.6
1
1
100
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
* =sand based system lacking identifiable riffles
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
22

Appendix B
Project Number and Name: 407 -Valley Fields Farm
Assessed Len th 1,500 Reach -C
Number
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
%Stable,
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Category
Sub - Category
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
1. Aegradation - Bar formation /growth sufficient to
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include
0
0
o
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
point bars)
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser
2. Riffle Condition*
substrate
24
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean
1
24
4 io
Condition
Bankroll Depth > 1.6)
2. Length appropriate ( >30% of centerline distance
between tail of upstream riffle and head of
1
24
4%
downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend
24
24
100%
(Run)
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander
(Glide)
24
24
100%
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
2. Bank
L Scoured/Eroding
poor growth and/or scour and erosion
0
0
100%
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass
wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts
0
0
100
2. Undercut
that are modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
0
0
100%
113ank slumping, calving, or collapse
Totals
0
0
100°%
3. Engineered
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged
17
17
100%
Structures
boulders or logs.
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
17
17
100%
grade across the sill.
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath
17
1 7
o
100%
sills or arms.
Bank erosion within the structures extent of
3. Bank Protection
influence does not exceed 15 %. (See guidance for
17
17
1001/1,
this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool
4. Habitat
Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio _> 1.6
17
17
100
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
* =sand based system lacking identifiable riffles
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
23

Appendix B
TABLE 6. VEGETATION CONDITION ASSESMENT
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Project Number and Name: 407 - Valley Fields Farm
PlantedAcreage 81.9 Easement Acreage 97.5
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
%of Planted Acreage
Very limited cover of both woody
Pattern and
1. Bare Areas
0.1 acre
0
0.00
0.0%
and herbaceous material.
Color
Woody stem densities clearly below
2. Low Stem Density
Pattern and
target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5
0.1 acre
0
0.00
0.0%
Areas
Color
stem count criteria.
Total
0
0.00
0.0%
Areas with woody stems of a size
3. Areas of Poor
Pattern and
class that are obviously small given
0.25 acre
0
0.00
0.0%
Growth Rates or Vigor
Color
the monitoring year.
Cumulative Totall
0
0.00
0.0%
4. Invasive Areas of
Areas or points (if too small to
Purple
1,000 SF
16
120
1.2%
Concern
render as polygons at map scale).
Polygon
5. Easement
Areas or points (if too small to
none
Green Polygon
7
1.50
1.5%
Encroachment Areas
render as polygons at map scale).
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
24

Appendix B
STREAM AND WETLAND PHOTOS
PA 01 — 12/18/2013
PA 03 — 12/18/2013
PA 05 — 12/18/2013
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
PA 02 — 12/18/2013
PA 04 — 12/18/2013
PA 06 — 12/18/2013
25

Appendix B
PA 07 — 12/18/2013
PA 09 — 12/18/2013
PA 11 — 12/18/2013
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
PA 08 — 12/18/2013
PA 10 — 12/18/2013
PA 12 — 12/18/2013
26

Appendix B
PA 13 — 12/18/2013
PA 15 — 12/18/2013
{
PA 17 — 12/18/2013
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
PA 14 — 12/18/2013
PA 16 — 12/18/2013
PB 01— 12/18/2013
27

Appendix B
PB 02 — 12/18/2013
PB 04 — 12/18/2013
PB 06 — 12/18/2013
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
PB 03 — 12/18/2013
PB 05 — 12/18/2013
PB 07 — 12/18/2013
28

Appendix B
PB 08 — 12/18/2013
PB 10 — 12/18/2013
PC 01 — 12/18/2013
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
PB 09 — 12/18/2013
PB 11 — 12/18/2013
PC 02 — 12/18/2013
29

Appendix B
PC 03 — 12/18/2013
PC 05 — 12/18/2013
PD 01— 12/18/2013
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
PC 04 — 12/18/2013
PC 06 — 12/18/2013
PD 02 — 12/18/2013
30

Appendix B
PD 03 — 12/18/2013
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
31

Appendix B
STREAM PROBLEM AREA PHOTOS
Bank erosion (Station 79 +00) — 12/18/2013
Thalweg shift (Station 84 +00) — 12/18/2013
Beaver dam (Station 95 +75) — 12/18/2013
Bank erosion (Station 50 +00) — 12/18/2013
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
Beaver dam (Station 99 +75) — 12/18/2013
Deposition (typical along Reach B) — 12/18/2013
32

Appendix B
VEGETATION PLOT PHOTOS
Plot VQA02 — 8/1/2013
Plot VQA03 — 7/31/2013
Plot VQA05 — 8/1/2013
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
Plot VQA07 — 8/1/2013
Plot VQA08 — 7/31/2013
Plot VQA11— 7/31/2013
33

Plot VQA12 — 7/31/2013
Appendix B
Plot VQA13 — 7/31/2013
Plot VQB02 — 7/30/2013
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
Plot VQB03 — 7/29/2013
Plot VQB06 — 7/30/2013
Plot VQB07 — 7/30/2013
34

Appendix B
Plot VQC01— 8/1/2013
Plot VQC03 — 8/1/2013
Plot VQD01— 7/30/2013
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
Plot VQW01— 7/29/2013
Plot VQW04 — 8/1/2013
35

Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
36

Appendix C
TABLE 7. VEGETATION PLOTS WOODY STEM SUCCESS CRITERIA ATTAINMENT TABLE
Success Criteria Achieved /Number of Planted Stems per Acre
Plot Name
MY -01 (2010)
MY -02 (2011)
MY -03 (2013)
MY -04 (2014)
MY -05 (2015)
VQA1
No
Yes
No /0
VQA2
No
No
No /150
VQA3
No
No
No /50
VQA5
Yes
Yes
No /300
VQA7
No
Yes
No /250
VQA8
No
No
Yes /400
VQA11
Yes
Yes
No /300
VQA12
No
Yes
Yes /400
VQA13
Yes
Yes
No /100
VQ132
No
No
No /200
VQ63
Yes
Yes
Yes /450
VQ66
No
No
No /300
VQB7
No
Yes
Yes /350
VQC1
Yes
Yes
Yes /400
VQC3
Yes
Yes
Yes /700
VQD1
No
No
No /150
VQW1
Yes
Yes
No /300
VQW4
No
No
No /300
TABLE 8. VEGETATION PLOT SAMPLING METADATA
Report Prepared By
Tommy Seelinger
Date Prepared
10/25/2013 14:16
Database name
N /Al
Database location
N/A'
1 =no CVs project data was able to be located within EEP's servers
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
37

Appendix C
TABLE 9. TOTAL AND PLANTED STEM COUNT BY PLOT AND SPECIES
Scientific
Common
VQA
VQA
VQA
VQA
VQA
VQA
VQA
VQA
VQA
VQB
VQB
VQB
VQB
VQC
VQC
VQD
VQ
VQ
Name
Name
1
2
3
5
7
8
11
12
13
2
3
6
7
1
3
1
W1
W4
Acer negundo
Box Elder
2
1
2
1
3
Alnus serrulata
Tag Alder
2
1
6
Betula nigra
River Birch
1
3
Celtis loevigata
Sugarberry
1
Cephalanthus
occidentalis
Buttonbush
2
Corpus
Silky
amomum
Dogwood
1
4
1
Corylus
Hazelnut
1
2
americana
Diospyros
Persimmon
1
2
1
virginiana
Froxinus
pennsylvanica
Green Ash
1
4
1
1
1
4
4
Hamamelis
Witch Hazel
1
virginiana
Juglans nigra
Black
Walnut
2
briodendron
tulipifera
Tulip Poplar
1
1
1
Platanus
American
occidentalis
Sycamore
3
2
2
3
4
3
Quercus lyrata
Overcup Oak
1
Quercus phellos
Willow oak
1
1
Salix nigra
Black Willow
1
5
5
1
Salixsericea
Silky Willow
1
1
Ulmus alata
Winged Elm
2
Ulmus
American
americana
Elm
2
1
1
1
Planted Stem Count
o
3
1
5
5
8
6
8
2
4
9
6
7
8
14
3
6
6
Volunteer Stem Count
0
31
41
21
2
14
4
42
15
0
35
19
19
47
8
18
18
11
Species Count
0
4
11
5
5
7
3
7
4
3
6
4
7
8
4
6
6
5
Planted Stems /acre
0
150
50
250
250
400
300
400
100
200
450
300
350
400
700
150
300
300
Total Stems /acre
0
1700
2100
1300
350
1100
500
2500
850
200
2200
1250
1300
2750
1100
1050
1200
850
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
38

Appendix C
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
39
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
MY3
(2013)
MY2 (2011)
MY1 (2010)
MYO (2008)
P -all
T
P -all
IT
P -all
IT
P -all
T
Acer negundo
Boxelder
Tree
9
47
2
2
1
1
1
1
Acerrubrum
Red Maple
Tree
4
1
1
2
2
2
2
Aesculussylvatica
Painted Buckeye
Tree
9
Albizia julibrissin
Mimosa
Tree
1
Alnus serrulata
Tag Alder
Tree
9
1
1
1
1
1
1
Asimina triloba
Paw -paw
Tree
1
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
4
11
2
2
2
1
2
2
Corpinus caroliniona
Hornbeam
Tree
5
2
2
2
2
2
2
Celtis laevigota
Sugarberry
Tree
1
2
1
Cepholonthus occidentalis
Buttonbush
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
Cercis canadensis
Redbud
Tree
1
Cornus amomum
Silky Dogwood
Tree
6
1
3
1
1
1
1
Corylus americans
American Hazelnut
Tree
3
7
Crategeou crus -gali
Cockspur Hawthorn
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Diospyros virginiana
Persimmon
Tree
6
13
4
5
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Tree
16
86
1
4
1
3
1
1
Hamamelis virginiana
Witch Hazel
Tree
1
2
Ilex opoca
American Holly
Tree
1
1
2
uglans nigra
Black Walnut
Tree
2
7
uniperus virginiana
Eastern Redcedar
Tree
2
Lindera benzoin
Spicebush
Tree
14
Liquidambarstyrocifluo
Sweetgum
Tree
75
3
2
Liriodendron tulipero
Tulip Poplar
Tree
3
8
1
3
1
6
1
1
Nyssa sylvatica
Black Gum
Tree
1
Pinus echinato
Shortleaf Pine
Tree
1
1
1
1
Pinus taeda
Loblolly Pine
Tree
1
Plantonus occidentalis
American Sycamore
Tree
17
65
2
5
3
5
3
3
Pyrus calleryona
Callery Pear
Tree
3
Quercus lyrota
Overcup Oak
Tree
1
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Tree
2
4
1
Quercusshumardii
Shumard Oak
Tree
1
1
Quercus sp.
Oak
Tree
1
Solixnigro
Black Willow
Tree
12
55
5
5
Salixsericea
Silky Willow
Tree
2
4
Ulmus alata
Winged Elm
Tree
1
Ulmus americana
American Elm
Tree
5
6
1
2
Ulmus parvifolia
Lacebark Elm
Tree
1
Unknown
1
1
7
1
6
6
6
6
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
1021
429
26
50
26
53
26
26
8
8
8
8
0.20
0.20
0.20
1 0.20
19
25
15
24
15
22
15
15
5161
2170
1311
255.31
131.51
2671
131.5
113,211
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
39

Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
40

Appendix D
CROSS - SECTION PLOTS
River Basin:
Watershed:
XS [D
Bankfull Elevation:
760.8
Yadkin
Valley Fields Farm, MY03
VFF (XS - Al,
64.2
Riffle) Station 75 +65
Drainage Area (sq mi):
6.5
Date:
12/6/2013
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger, M. Koss
5.5
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.7
r
,. t
Station
Elevation
Bank Height Ratio: ■
1.0
0.0
762.07
0.3
761.74
754
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
4.2
761.68
9.0
761.52
13.8
761.26
18.8
761.32
24.0
761.23
28.8
761.22
33.6
761.01
38.1
760.84
42.1
760.69
46.3
760.57
Stream Type C5
47.3
760.07
47.8
757.42
756.95
49.3
757.19
51.1
757.05
53.2
54.4
756.70
56.1
756.33
57.5
755.60
755.34
59.5
756.16
61.3
62.1
758.84
759.31
62.9
759.99
64.8
760.12
67.2
760.80
69.3
761.26
71.5
761.30
76.6
81.3
761.82
762.03
85.9
91.3
761.88
95.7
761.92
101.3
762.12
105.7
762.23
*additonal point not included due to space
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
760.8
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
64.2
Riffle) Station 75 +65
Drainage Area (sq mi):
6.5
Date:
12/6/2013
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger, M. Koss
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
760.8
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
64.2
Bankfull Width:
23.6
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
766.3
Flood Prone Width:
>120
Max Depth at Bankfull:
5.5
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.7
W / D Ratio:
8.7
Entrenchment Ratio:
5.1
Bank Height Ratio: ■
1.0
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
41
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MI'03, VFF (XS - Al, Riffle) Station 75 +65
768
_________________________________________________ _______________________________
766
d
764
e
762
W
760
758
756
754
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Baseline, 2008 MY- 01,2010 MY- 02,2011 tMY- 03,2013 _- _- BankTull __- -Flood Prone Area
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
41

Appendix D
River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
Rr
v 5,
--
Stream Type CS
XS ID
VFF (XS - A2, Riffle Station 74 +70
Drainage Area (sq mi):
(,.5
Date:
12/6/2013
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger, M. Koss
4.6
Station
Elevation
0.0
762.30
0.4
761.87
6.4
10.5
15.6
21.0
26.4
31.4
36.1
761.86
761.82
761.90
761.77
761.49
760.98Y*�I�
761.12
40.8
45.6
761.25
761.03
47.6
761.01
48.7
49.1
759.91
758.32
49.9
756.90
51.3
756.09
52.2
756.38
754
0 20 40 60 80 ]00
Baseline; 2008 M4 -01, 2010 - MY-02,2011 -�- MY -03, 2013 BaNdiill Flood Prone Area
53.6
756.26
54.8
56.4
58.1
59.6
756.49
756.35
756.56
756.81
61.0
757.05
62.4
757.44
64.0
757.73
64.9
758.02
66.5
758.35
68.2
758.63
68.9
70.5
759.20
760.01
72.4
760.67
74.3
77.4
81.0
761.02
761.38
761.82
84.8
761.77
"additonal points not included due to space
River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
Valley Fields Farm, MY03
XS ID
VFF (XS - A2, Riffle Station 74 +70
Drainage Area (sq mi):
(,.5
Date:
12/6/2013
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger, M. Koss
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
760.7
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
67.7
Bankfull Width:
23.6
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
765.3
Flood Prone Width:
>100
Max Depth at Bankfull:
4.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.9
W / D Ratio:
8.2
Entrenchment Ratio:
4.2
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MI'03, VFF (XS - A2, Riffle Station 74 +70
766
764
762
0 760
v
W
758
756
754
0 20 40 60 80 ]00
Baseline; 2008 M4 -01, 2010 - MY-02,2011 -�- MY -03, 2013 BaNdiill Flood Prone Area
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
42

Appendix D
River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
Valley Fields Farm, MY03
XS ID
VFF (XS - A3, Riffle) Station 71 +55
Drainage Area (sq mi):
6.5
Date:
Flood Prone Width:
12/6/2013
Field Crew:
4.0
T. Seelinger, M. Koss
2.4
W / D Ratio:
10.1
Entrenchment Ratio:
3.9
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
760
759
758
757
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Baseline, 2008 MY -01, 2010 MY -02, 2011 � MY -03, 2013 ---- Bankfiill - -- -Flood Prone Area
Station
Elevation
0.0
763.40
0.4
763.23
5.6
763.32
9.7
763.15
12.9
762.56
17.1
762.72
19.2
761.98
- +<
22.3
761.60
23.4
761.01
24.4
760.45
25.5
759.34
26.8
759.05
Stream Type C5
27.9
759.04
29.4
758.95
30.9
758.86
32.1
758.58
33.3
758.13
34.8
758.06
36.6
758.16
757.97
37.6
758.30
38.4
39.5
760.09
40.3
760.91
41.5
761.50
42.9
762.47
44.7
762.65
48.1
762.47
51.4
762.61
56.2
762.90
59.3
763.25
61.7
763.65
65.7
763.95
69.1
764.03
73.8
763.91
78.5
764.04
*additional points not included due to space
River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
Valley Fields Farm, MY03
XS ID
VFF (XS - A3, Riffle) Station 71 +55
Drainage Area (sq mi):
6.5
Date:
Flood Prone Width:
12/6/2013
Field Crew:
4.0
T. Seelinger, M. Koss
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
762.0
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
54.6
Bankfull Width:
23.1
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
766.0
Flood Prone Width:
>90
Max Depth at Bankfull:
4.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.4
W / D Ratio:
10.1
Entrenchment Ratio:
3.9
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MI'03, VFF (XS - A3, Riffle) Station 71 +55
767
766
765
764
763
0
762
761
.v
W
760
759
758
757
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Baseline, 2008 MY -01, 2010 MY -02, 2011 � MY -03, 2013 ---- Bankfiill - -- -Flood Prone Area
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
43

River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
Valley Fields Farm, MY03
XS ID
VFF (XS - A4, Pool) Station 64 +30
Drainage Area (sq mi):
6.5
Date:
12/6/2013
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger, M. Koss
Station
Elevation
0.0
765.73
68.5
765.64
6.9
765.49
10.4
764.97
13.5
764.59
18.5
764.01
19.2
763.21
20.0
759.89
21.1
759.99
22.2
760.16
23.6
760.27
25.0
760.05
26.3
760.00
28.5
759.97
30.0
759.93
31.5
759.78
33.4
759.85
35.2
759.66
35.9
760.24
36.5
763.02
37.6
763.86
39.2
764.46
43.3
764.71
47.6
764.71
51.3
764.87
55.2
764.76
59.4
764.68
63.2
764.63
67.0
764.38
71.0
764.40
75.2
764.31
78.4
764.34
78.6
764.54
Appendix D
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
764.0
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
68.5
Bankfull Width:
19.4
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
-
Flood Prone Width:
-
Max Depth at Bankfull:
4.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
3.5
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
-
Bank Height Ratio:
-
Stream Type CS
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
44
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MY03, VFF (XS - A4, Pool) Station 64 +30
767
766
765
v
5
764
a;
c
763
W
762
761
760
759
758
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Baseline, 2008 -MY-01,2010 -MY-02,2011 ---O-- MY -03, 2013 Bankfiill
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
44

Appendix D
River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
I'
g-
-
Stream Type _ CS
XS ID
VFF (XS - A5, Riffle) Station 58 +12
Drainage Area (sq mi):
(,.5
Date:
12/6/2013
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger, M. Koss
3.0
Station
Elevation
0.0
767.44
0.2
4.1
767.13
767.07
8.0
767.08
11.5
15.5
767.04
766.28
18.6
22.0
23.8
25.4
27.2
28.0
766.07
766.00
766.31
766.40
766.10
765.31
28.9
764.45
29.9
763.89
31.4
763.59
32.3
763.27
33.3
762.90
34.3
762.72
35.6
762.86
36.9
38.4
39.9
762.91
763.05
763.12
41.3
763.27
42.4
763.41
43.3
763.69
44.3
764.03
44.6
765.78
46.3
766.71
47.8
766.83
49.7
766.33
53.1
765.97
56.3
60.6
64.6
765.86
766.05
766.33
69.0
766.46
*additional points not included due to space
River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
Valley Fields Farm, MY03
XS ID
VFF (XS - A5, Riffle) Station 58 +12
Drainage Area (sq mi):
(,.5
Date:
12/6/2013
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger, M. Koss
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
765.7
Bankfull Cross- Sectional Area:
33.4
Bankfull Width:
16.6
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
768.7
Flood Prone Width:
>90
Max Depth at Bankfull:
3.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.0
W / D Ratio:
8.3
Entrenchment Ratio:
5.4
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MY03, VFF (XS - A5, Riffle) Station 58 +12
769
768
767
766
tt
0
765
d
W
764
763
762
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Baseline, 2008 MY-01, 2010 MY -02, 2011 �- MY -03, 2013 � � � •Bankfull � � � •Flood Prone Area
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
45

Appendix D
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
766.9
Yadkin
Valley Fields Farm, MY03
45.4
ry
c
20.2
River Basin:
Watershed:
XS ID
>90
Seelinger, M. Koss
VFF (XS - A6, Riffle) Station 54 +55
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
y
W / D Ratio:
Drainage Area
(sq mi):
4.5
6.5
1.0
______ _ ____________________ ___ __�______�_____________________
Date:
766
12/6/2013
W765
H V R
Field Crew:
764
T.
763
Elevation
768.72
768.54
762
- yypi3l `
, r
Station
0.0
0.2
3.3
768.31
767.50
767.23
767.44
Baseline, 2008 MY- 01,2010 MY -02, 2011 -�- MY -03, 20t3 � � � � Bankfull � � � � Flood Prone Area
-
_-
6.0
9.1
12.1
13.7
767.94
767.95
h
15.7
17.1
766.99
f': ?
18.0
766.51
18.5
764.67
18.9
763.45
763.69
763.71
763.65
763.89
Stream Type CS
20.2
21.3
22.3
23.3
24.5
763.94
764.07
25.7
26.8
764.22
28.0
764.46
764.49
29.5
764.50
30.7
32.1
764.47
764.40
33.4
34.7
764.41
35.9
764.68
37.2
765.44
766.58
37.9
39.3
766.93
42.5
766.98
766.96
46.1
50.0
767.29
767.60
53.1
56.6
768.40
59.7
768.66
*additional points not included due to space
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
766.9
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
45.4
Bankfull Width:
20.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
770.3
Flood Prone Width:
>90
Seelinger, M. Koss
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
766.9
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
45.4
Bankfull Width:
20.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
770.3
Flood Prone Width:
>90
Max Depth at Bankfull:
3.4
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.2
W / D Ratio:
9.0
Entrenchment Ratio:
4.5
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
46
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MY03, VFF (XS - A6, Riffle) Station 54 +55
771
770
769
768
tt
�
767
______ _ ____________________ ___ __�______�_____________________
766
W765
764
763
762
761
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Baseline, 2008 MY- 01,2010 MY -02, 2011 -�- MY -03, 20t3 � � � � Bankfull � � � � Flood Prone Area
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
46

Appendix D
River Basin:
Bankfull Elevation: 7
767.0
Yadkin
4
Watershed:
16.3
Flood Prone Area Elevation: -
Valley Fields Farm, MY03
Flood Prone Width: -
XS ID
Max Depth at Bankfull: 3
3.6
VFF (XS - A7, Pool) Station 54 +15
2.7
Drainage Area (sq mi):
o,
W
6.5
Date:
12/6/2013
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger, M. Koss
Station
Elevation
763
0.0
769.65
0.5
769.34
5.7
769.54
9.0
769.56
11.2
768.70
12.8
768.24
14.8
767.63
20.3
767.41
- -
22.6
767.82
23.9
766.96
24.8
766.37
Stream Type C5
25.0
763.72
26.4
763.61
763.39
27.3
28.5
763.43
29.6
763.55
30.7
763.91
31.7
764.08
33.1
764.14
34.4
764.25
764.32
35.5
36.4
764.41
37.5
764.34
764.77
38.4
39.0
765.62
767.11
40.3
42.1
767.55
44.6
767.75
47.0
767.68
768.18
50.2
768.05
53.0
768.23
57.1
768.27
as
60.3
63.4
768.39
*additional points not included due to space
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation: 7
767.0
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area: 4
43.2
Bankfull Width: 1
16.3
Flood Prone Area Elevation: -
-
Flood Prone Width: -
-
Max Depth at Bankfull: 3
3.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull: 2
2.7
o,
W
766
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
47
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MY03, VFF (XS - A7, Pool) Station 54 +15
770
769
768
v
e
°
767
o,
W
766
765
764
763
762
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Baseline, 2008 MY-01, 2010 MY -02, 2011 � MY -03, 2013 ---- Bankfiill
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
47

Appendix D
River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
Valley Fields Farm, MY03
XS ID
VFF (XS - A10, Riffle) Station 93 +50
Drainage Area (sq mi):
6.5
Date:
12/4/2013
Field Crew:
.,
3.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.0
W / D Ratio:
17.7
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.6
Bank Height Ratio:
I.0
754
753
-
751
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Baseline, 200% MY- 01,2010 MY- 02,2011 tMY- 03,2013 ---- Bankfill - -� -Flood Prone Area
y, _
Station
Elevation
0.0
756.02
0.0
755.68
5.1
755.95
9.0
756.39
13.7
756.63
18.5
756.57
4"
23.5
756.25
27.7
756.27
5
33.5
756.05
Al
36.9
755.41
42.7
755.23
44.0
754.61
Stream Type C5
44.6
753.35
45.3
752.20
751.87
47.0
48.4
752.37
49.8
752.37
51.0
752.19
52.2
752.23
54.3
752.29
55.6
752.19
752.16
57.3
59.1
752.09
60.3
751.91
752.22
60.9
62.2
753.23
753.63
62.9
64.1
753.95
65.2
754.34
66.3
754.75
67.6
754.72
754.82
69.4
754.95
70.4
71.8
755.72
75.2
755.98
*additional points not included due to space
River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
Valley Fields Farm, MY03
XS ID
VFF (XS - A10, Riffle) Station 93 +50
Drainage Area (sq mi):
6.5
Date:
12/4/2013
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger, M. Koss
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
755.5
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
69.3
Bankfull Width:
35.0
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
759.1
Flood Prone Width:
>90
Max Depth at Bankfull:
3.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.0
W / D Ratio:
17.7
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.6
Bank Height Ratio:
I.0
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MI'03, VFF (XS - A10, Riffle) Station 93 +50
76]
760
____________________ __________________
759
758
757
e
°
756
W 755
754
753
752
751
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Baseline, 200% MY- 01,2010 MY- 02,2011 tMY- 03,2013 ---- Bankfill - -� -Flood Prone Area
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
48

Appendix D
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
754.9
Yadkin
Valley Fields Farm, MY03
VFF (XS -
l'
Stream Type CS
l
Y/
River Basin:
(,.5
Watershed:
XS ID
12/4/2013
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger, M. Koss
3.1
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.7
Station
Elevation
0.0
755.24
0.2
4.3
8.2
13.1
18.7
23.1
26.6
31.0
754.72
755.24
755.41
755.43
755.57
755.35
754.87
754.35
34.7
37.7
38.8
754.62
754.79
754.23
39.7
753.19
40.7
753.46
752
42.1
753.15
43.2
753.16
44.7
753.03
46.5
753.11
748
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
- Baseline, 20(18 MY-01, 2010 MY -02, 2011 -�-- MY -03, 2013 � � � • Bankfull � � � •Flood Prone Area
48.5
753.11
50.7
753.13
51.9
752.87
53.3
752.76
54.7
752.44
56.1
752.35
57.6
752.39
59.6
752.14
61.0
751.79
62.4
752.03
63.2
753.21
64.5
755.05
65.7
755.27
69.3
72.0
75.9
755.24
755.52
755.53
78.7
755.98
*additional points not included due to space
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
754.9
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
44.9
All, Riffle) Station 94 +55
Drainage Area (sq mi):
(,.5
Date:
12/4/2013
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger, M. Koss
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
754.9
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
44.9
Bankfull Width:
26.1
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
758.0
Flood Prone Width:
>90
Max Depth at Bankfull:
3.1
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.7
W / D Ratio:
15.2
Entrenchment Ratio:
3.4
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MY03, VFF (XS -All, Riffle) Station 94 +55
762
760
758
m
756
e
� 754
W
752
750
748
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
- Baseline, 20(18 MY-01, 2010 MY -02, 2011 -�-- MY -03, 2013 � � � • Bankfull � � � •Flood Prone Area
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
49

Appendix D
River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
Valley Fields Farm, MY03
XS ID
VFF (XS - B 1, Riffle) Station 1503 +75
Drainage Area (sq mi):
2.3
Date:
12/4/2013
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger, M. Koss
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
v 766
W
769.3
Flood Prone Width:
764
89.9
Max Depth at Bankfull:
762
3.2
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
760
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
2.4
W / D Ratio:
10.2
Entrenchment Ratio:
�
3.7
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Station
Elevation
0.0
772.26
0.4
3.2
772.04
772.17
6.9
772.12
10.7
772.35
15.0
772.32
A OF-
19.2
772.43
22.3
772.31
- -
25.3
771.38
27.7
770.61
30.4
769.77
33.3
768.84
Stream Type
C5
36.1
767.89
39.3
767.04
766.59
41.6
47.0
766.60
51.6
766.80
55.4
767.06
59.0
767.16
62.3
766.98
65.5
766.79
66.3
765.71
67.4
764.81
68.7
764.29
70.1
763.77
763.70
71.2
763.77
72.1
73.1
763.86
74.2
763.79
75.3
763.68
76.4
763.55
763.39
77.4
78.4
763.28
763.24
79.4
80.4
763.10
*additional points not included due to space
River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
Valley Fields Farm, MY03
XS ID
VFF (XS - B 1, Riffle) Station 1503 +75
Drainage Area (sq mi):
2.3
Date:
12/4/2013
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger, M. Koss
SUMMARY DATA
774
Bankfull Elevation:
772
766.1
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
770
v
�
58.0
Bankfull Width:
768
e
0
24.3
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
v 766
W
769.3
Flood Prone Width:
764
89.9
Max Depth at Bankfull:
762
3.2
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
760
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
2.4
W / D Ratio:
10.2
Entrenchment Ratio:
�
3.7
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MI'03, VFF (XS - Bl, Riffle) Station 1503 +75
774
772
770
v
�
768
e
0
v 766
W
764
762
760
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Baseline, 200% MY- 01,2010 MY- 02,2011 � -MY- 03,2013 ---- Bankfill - -� -Flood Prone Area
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
50

Appendix D
River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
Valley Fields Farm, MY03
XS ID
VFF (XS - B2, Riffle) Station 1054 +20
Drainage Area (sq mi):
2.3
Date:
d_
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger, M. Koss
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
766
W
769.0
Flood Prone Width:
764
97.2
s
762
3.1
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
760
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
2.3
W / D Ratio:
12.2
Entrenchment Ratio:
�
Station
Elevation
1.0
0.0
772.24
0.3
772.07
3.6
772.28
8.8
772.28
12.9
772.46
14.7
772.48
17.8
771.44
21.3
770.25
24.2
769.22
r
27.4
768.17
30.7
767.31
35.0
766.67
Stream Type C5
39.4
766.48
42.9
766.54
767.01
47.3
50.8
767.18
54.6
767.09
58.6
767.11
"77
62.5
767.00
65.2
766.29
67.0
765.92
765.73
68.6
69.2
765.74
69.8
764.13
763.46
71.3
763.59
72.2
763.52
73.2
74.2
763.59
75.0
763.57
763.42
76.1
762.94
77.8
763.07
79.0
763.21
80.3
763.04
81.3
83.1
763.03
*additional points not included due to space
River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
Valley Fields Farm, MY03
XS ID
VFF (XS - B2, Riffle) Station 1054 +20
Drainage Area (sq mi):
2.3
Date:
12/4/2013
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger, M. Koss
SUMMARY DATA
774
Bankfull Elevation:
772
765.9
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
770
�
62.1
Bankfull Width:
768
e
0
27.5
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
766
W
769.0
Flood Prone Width:
764
97.2
Max Depth at Bankfull:
762
3.1
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
760
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
2.3
W / D Ratio:
12.2
Entrenchment Ratio:
�
3.5
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MI'03, VFF (XS - B2, Riffle) Station 1054 +20
774
772
770
�
_ _
768
e
0
766
W
_ _______________________________ ______________ _______________________�_
764
762
760
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Baseline, 200% MY- 01,2010 MY- 02,2011 � -MY- 03,2013 ---- Bankfill - -� -Flood Prone Area
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
51

Appendix D
River Basin:
768
Yadkin
Station 1516 +50
Watershed:
2.3
Date:
Valley Fields Farm, MY03
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger, M. Koss
XS ID
763.9
VFF (XS - B3, Riffle)
90.8
Max Depth at Bankfull:
3.2
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.6
W / D Ratio:
14.2
Entrenchment Ratio:
�
3.9
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Station
Elevation
756
0 20 40 60 SO 100 120
Baseline, 200% MY- 01,2010 MY- 02,2011 tMY- 03,2013 ---- Bankfill - -� -Flood Prone Area
0.0
766.38
0.3
766.20
4.6
766.27
8.9
766.23
12.6
766.05
14.7
16.8
765.19
764.23
€ r
19.5
22.1
763.40
762.13
24.1
761.43
26.2
761.00
29.0
760.71
Stream Type B5
31.8
760.71
36.0
760.88
760.74
39.7
43.5
761.24
45.9
761.07
47.1
760.64
48.1
759.63
49.4
758.94
50.3
758.69
51.1
758.26
52.1
757.76
757.79
53.0
757.68
54.1
55.2
757.75
757.48
56.1
57.2
757.47
58.3
757.71
757.92
59.2
758.24
60.0
758.29
61.3
758.46
62.3
759.03
63.2
64.3
759.51
*additional points not included due to space
SUMMARY DATA
768
Bankfull Elevation:
Station 1516 +50
Drainage Area (sq mi):
2.3
Date:
12/4/2013
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger, M. Koss
SUMMARY DATA
768
Bankfull Elevation:
760.7
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
37.5
Bankfull Width:
23.1
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
763.9
Flood Prone Width:
90.8
Max Depth at Bankfull:
3.2
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.6
W / D Ratio:
14.2
Entrenchment Ratio:
�
3.9
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MI'03, VFF (XS - B3, Riffle) Station 1516 +50
768
766
764
u
--- - - - --- ---------- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - ----- - - - - --
e
°
762
v
W----------
- - - - -- ----- - - - - -- - - -- ------------------- - - - - --
760
758
756
0 20 40 60 SO 100 120
Baseline, 200% MY- 01,2010 MY- 02,2011 tMY- 03,2013 ---- Bankfill - -� -Flood Prone Area
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
52

Appendix D
River Basin:
766
Yadkin
765
a
Watershed:
764
763
Valley Fields Farm, MY03
XS ID
VFF (XS - B4, Pool) Station 1516 +90
1
Drainage Area (sq mi):
2.3
Date:
12/4/2013
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger, M. Koss
Station
Elevation
0.4
764.93
5.2
764.63
9.8
764.52
'
16.8
764.40
19.3
763.96
�-
�s-
26.4
761.54
29.1
761.05
32.8
760.70
Stream Type BS
36.7
760.80
39.8
760.66
760.48
43.6
47.3
760.50
48.8
759.88
49.8
759.53
50.7
758.69
51.3
758.06
52.8
758.16
55.1
758.27
56.5
758.16
57.7
757.95
58.9
757.79
61.8
757.47
63.4
757.44
64.9
757.52
65.1
758.34
759.05
66.2
67.4
759.82
ase
760.99
69.5
72.4
761.28
*additional points not included due to space
SUMMARY DATA
0.0 765.29
Bankfull Elevation: 760.4
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area: 35.6
Bankfull Width: 19.7
Flood Prone Area Elevation: -
13.6 764.56
Flood Prone Width: -
Max Depth at Bankfull: 3.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull: 2.0
21.4 763.20
W / D Ratio: -
24.1 762.51
Entrenchment Ratio: -
Bank Height Ratio:
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MY03, VFF (XS - B4, Pool) Station 1516 +90
766
765
764
763
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MY03, VFF (XS - B4, Pool) Station 1516 +90
766
765
764
763
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
53

River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
Valley Fields Farm, MY03
XS ID
VFF (XS - C1, Riffle) Station 1003 +15
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.2
Date:
12/5/2013
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger, M. Koss
Station
Elevation
0.0
777.17
0.7
776.59
4.1
776.67
7.5
776.51
12.1
776.27
16.0
775.93
21.0
775.90
24.7
775.36
26.4
775.44
27.7
774.83
28.4
774.51
29.4
773.80
30.5
773.69
31.5
773.72
32.4
773.97
33.1
775.35
33.7
775.62
35.7
775.47
39.3
775.59
41.8
776.32
46.0
776.84
49.2
777.24
52.5
777.59
56.1
778.30
59.3
778.51
63.6
778.68
67.9
779.00
74.2
779.30
76.0
779.46
76.2
780.02
Appendix D
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
775.3
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area: A&
5.6
Bankfull Width: IL,
5.8
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
776.9
Flood Prone Width:
46.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.0
W / D Ratio:
6.0
Entrenchment Ratio:
7.9
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Stream Type CS
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MY03, VFF (XS - Cl, Riffle) Station 1003 +15
781
780
779
778
v
777
0
°
----------------------- ------------ ------- - - -- ---------------------
776
o, 776
W
- - - -7P!-!! -- - -
---------------- -- --------------------------------------
775
774
773
772
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Ba ine, 200% -MY-01,2010 MY-02,2011 � MY -03, 2013 ---- Bankfull - -- -Flood Prone Area
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
54

River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
Valley Fields Farm, MY03
XS ID
VFF (XS - C2, Pool) Station 1004 +00
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.2
Date:
12/5/2013
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger, M. Koss
Station
Elevation
0.0
776.17
02
775.56
7.5
776.06
13.0
775.83
17.2
775.73
21.5
775.63
25.8
775.26
29.3
774.71
32.2
774.75
33.0
774.17
33.7
773.77
34.9
773.07
36.1
773.33
37.4
773.05
38.4
773.81
39.0
774.71
40.2
775.37
44.2
775.13
49.5
775.23
54.4
775.85
58.1
776.38
62.4
776.35
66.4
776.29
70.7
776.11
74.9
775.82
77.9
775.81
78.1
776.15
Appendix D
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
774.0
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
3.3
Bankfull Width:
5.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
-
Flood Prone Width:
-
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.9
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.6
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
-
Bank Height Ratio:
-
Stream Type CS
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
55
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MY03, VFF (XS - C2, Pool) Station 1004 +00
777
777
776
m
776
775
0
775
W
774
774
773
773
772
772
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Baseline, 2008 -MY-01,2010 -MY-02,2011 --4--MY-03,2013 Bankfiill
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
55

River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
Valley Fields Farm, W03
XS ID
VFF (XS - C3, Riffle) Station 1007 +10
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.2
Date:
12/5/2013
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger, M. Koss
Station
Elevation
0.0
770.43
0.3
770.07
5.0
770.05
10.6
769.76
15.2
769.89
19.3
769.61
23.4
769.31
25.9
769.57
26.8
769.21
27.7
768.48
28.8
768.21
30.2
768.28
31.2
768.39
31.8
768.88
33.3
769.43
36.7
769.62
40.3
769.81
44.9
770.33
48.6
770.28
48.9
770.73
Appendix D
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
769.2
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
3.9
Bankfull Width:
5.8
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
770.2
Flood Prone Width:
43.4
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.7
W / D Ratio:
8.6
Entrenchment Ratio:
7.5
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Stream Type CS
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MY03, VFF (XS - C3, Riffle) Station 1007 +10
771
771
770
d
770
e
0
c
d 769
769
768
768
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
BasOm,.2008 MY- 01,2010 MY- 02,2011 AMY- 03,2013 ---- HankfWl - -- -Flood Prone Area.
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
56

River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
Valley Fields Farm, MY03
XS ID
VFF (XS - C4, Riffle) Station 1011 +10
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.2
Date:
12/5/2013
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger, M. Koss
Station
Elevation
0.0
771.75
0.3
771.23
4.8
771.22
9.2
771.17
13.0
771.02
15.3
770.13
17.3
769.29
19.7
768.39
22.0
768.00
24.3
767.53
25.4
766.96
26.5
766.31
27.0
765.88
28.0
765.75
29.1
765.70
30.0
766.90
31.3
767.40
32.8
767.67
35.4
767.62
38.5
768.34
41.4
768.55
45.2
768.33
49.2
768.17
52.8
768.11
55.6
768.03
55.8
768.27
Appendix D
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
767.4
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area: IL
5.1
Bankfull Width: IL,
4.6
Flood Prone Area Elevation: MOMI
769.1
Flood Prone Width,
38.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.1
W / D Ratio:
4.1
Entrenchment Ratio:
8.3
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Stream Type CS
Yadkin River Basin, Valley Fields Farm, MY03, VFF (XS - C4, Riffle) Station 1011 +10
773
772
771
770
v
0
______________________ ----------- ___________ _------------ __________________
769
0
0 768
- -------- -- ----------------------------
767
766
765
764
0 10 20 30 40 50
Baseline, 200% -MY-01,2010 -MY-02,2011 t MY -03, 2013 ---- Bankfull - -- -Flood Prone Area
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
57

Appendix D
LONGITUDINAL PROFILE PLOTS
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
58
Longitudinal Profile
Valley Fields Farm
EEP Project Number - 407
Station 50 +00 -58 +40 (Upper A)
768
■
S BKF — 0.0011x + 772.89 ■ ■
- ■
766
■
■
---------- - -
- - -- Sws = -0.0017x + 773.57
---------------------
764
-----------------------------------
762
760
5000 5100
5200 5300 5400
5500 5600 5700 5800
5900
Baseline 2008 MY -01 2010 MY -02 2011 MY -03 2013 O Structures ■ Bankfull -----Water Surface BKF Slope
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
58

Appendix D
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
G�;7
Longitudinal Profile
Valley Fields Farm
EEP Project Number - 407
Station 62 +60 -81 +50 (Upper A2)
766
■
■
■
■
764
SBKF = - 0.0042x + 791.29
■
762
■
_ Beaver Dam
— -- - - - - --
760
- - - - --
�
r"
—` SWS = - 0.0038x + 786.14
I
758
---- - - - - --
--W?
■
756
_
754
752
T
6260 6460
6660 6860
7060 7260 7460 7660 7860 8060
Baseline 2008 MY -01 2010
MY -02 2011 MY -03 2013 O Structure ■ Bankfull - - - -- Water Surface BKF Slope
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
G�;7

Appendix D
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
,3i7
Longitudinal Profile
Valley Fields Farm
EEP Project Number - 407
Station 82 +00 -98 +00 (Lower A)
758
■
757
■
■
SBKr = - 0.0015x + 769.25
756
■ ■
■ ■
Backwater from
■ ■ ■
dam ■
■
755
SW5 = - 0.0005x + 758.87
__
- -
- - - - -� -
____ - -__
- - - --
Beaver Dam
754
753
_.AA
'e -'rA-
752
_IJr
Al 1 1[ A
Jn
-
751
750
749
8200
8400 8600 8800 9000 9200
9400 9600 9800
Baseline 2008 MY- 012010 MY -02 2011 t MY -03 2013 ■ Bankfull -----Water Surface
BKF Slope WS Slope
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
,3i7

Appendix D
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
61
Longitudinal Profile
Valley Fields Farm
EEP Project Number - 407
Station 155 +25 - 158 +25 (Upper B)
766
■
■
765
■
SBKF = - 0.0052x + 846.33
■
764
■
763
-- - - - - --
----------- --------- ---------------------------------- - - - - -- -- - - - --�
SwS = - 0.0036x + 818.31
762
- - - - - --
--------------------- - - - - -- -----------------
I
761
760
759
15525
15575 15625 15675
15725 15775 15825
Baseline 2008 MY -01 2010 MY -02 2011 t MY -03 2013 O Structures ■ Bankfull
- - - -- Water Surface BKF Slope WS Slope
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
61

Appendix D
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
62
Longitudinal Profile
Valley Fields Farm
EEP Project Number - 407
Station 167 +25 - 170 +50 (Lower B)
762 -
■
SBKF - - 0.0088x + 908.14
761
■
760
759
■
758
------------------
Sws 0.0041x + 82616
------- _
757
----------------------- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- - - - - --
- - - --
-
756
755
16725
16775 16825
16875 16925 16975 17025
Baseline 2008 MY -01 2010 MY -02 2011
—4— MY -03 2013 O Structures ■ Bankfull - - - -- Water Surface BKF Slope WS Slope
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
62

Appendix D
Longitudinal Profile
Valley Fields Farm
EEP Project Number - 407
Station 100 +00 - 107 +00 (Reach Q
780
778
■
SBKF = - 0.0094x + 872.52
■
S ws — - 0.0093x + 870.29
- --- _ —
776
—" ■
----------- ■ ■
■
774
■
VIV-- '------------ - - - - -- ■
--------- ■
772
770
768
10000 10100 10200 10300 10400 10500 10600 10700
Baseline 2008 MY- 012010 MY -02 2011 MY -03 2013 O Structures ■ Bankfull - - - -- Water Surface BKF Slope WS Slope
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
M.

Appendix D
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
64
Longitudinal Profile
Valley Fields Farm
EEP Project Number - 407
Station 107 +00 - 114 +90 (Reach Q
772
■
770
-3A
— SBKF = - 0.0094x + 872.52
768
SWS = - 0.0093x + 870.29
766
_
` -- --------
764
762
760
10700
10800 10900 11000 11100 11200 11300 11400
Baseline 2008 MY- 012010 MY -02 2011 --4-- MY -03 2013 O Structures ■ Bankfull - - - -- Water Surface BKF Slope WS Slope
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
64

Appendix D
PEBBLE COUNT PLOTS
Cross - Section
Al Riffle - VFF
W-03
Item% Cum% Cumulative Percent
10% 10% 1
10% 20% 0.9
10% 30% 0.8
10% 40% 0 0.7
30% 70% a 0.6
20% 90% �`� 0.5
° 0.4
10% 100%
0% 10000 j 0.3
0.2
0% 100%
0.1
0% 100%
0
00/0 100% 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
0% 100% ParticleSize - Millimeters
0% 100%
t MY-01 t MY -02 t MY -03
0% 100%
0% 100%
Individual Class Percentage
0% 100%
0% 100% 1
00/0 100% 0.9
0% 100% 0.8
0.7
0% 100% °y 0.6
00/0 100%
r, 0.5
0% 100% 0.4
00/0 100% 0.3
0% 100% 4 0.2
1000/. 100% 0.1
Q .--i N M 7 V �c l 0 O, O ..- ^ ^ 7 �2 ^2 �. �2 Z A
ParticelSize - Millimeters
■ MY -03
65
Particle
Millimeter
Material
Count
Silt /Clay
< 0.062
S/C
10
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-125
.125-25
.25-50
.50-1
1-2
S
A
N
D
S
10
10
10
30
20
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2-4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8-11.3
11.3 - 16
16 -22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
10
Small
Small
Large
Large
64 -90
90-128
128-180
180-256
C
O
B
L
Small
Small
Medium
Lrg- Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512-1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK IF
Total
100
Size (mm)
Type I
D50
0.63
silt /clay
10%
D84
1.6
sand
80%
D95
2.8
gravel
10%
cobble 0%
Restoration Site
Carolina, PA
Valley Fields Farm Stream
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North

Appendix D
Cross - Section
A2 Riffle
- WIT MY
-03
Cumulative Percent
1
Particle
Millimeter
Material
Count
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
0%
0%
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-125
.125-25
.25-50
.50-1
1-2
S
A
N
D
S
0%
0%
0.9
0.8
0%
0%
5
5%
5%
c 0.7
0.6
20
20%
25%
a
35
35%
60%
0.5
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2 - 4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8 -11.3
11.3 -16
16 -22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
35
35%
95%
a 0.4
5
5%
100%
° 0.3
U
j 0%
100%
0.2
0%
100%
0.1
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 loo 1000 10000
ParticleSize - Millimeters
--- tW -02
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
Individual Class Percentage
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90-128
128-180
180-256
C
0
B
L
0%
10000
0%
100%
1
0.9
° 0.8
d
d 0.7
° 0.6
0.5
0%
100%
0%
100%
Small
Small
Medium
Lrg- Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512- 1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
�j
0.4
b
0%
100%
: 0.3
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
0%
100%
-0 02
Total
100
100%
100%
0.1
0
Size (iron)
1 T ype
N M d h D 00 O O y M �+ �i N N N N
Particel Size - Millimeters
D50
1.6
silt/clay
0%
D84
3.2
sand
60%
■ MY -03
D95
4
gravel
40%
cobble
0%
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA 66

Cross - Section A3 Riffle - VFF NR'-03
Particle
Millimeter
Material
Count
Item%
Cum%
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
0%
0%
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-125
.125-25
.25-50
.50- 1
1 - 2
S
A
N
D
S
0%
0%
0%
0%
2
2%
2%
16
16%
18%
31
31%
49%
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2-4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8-11.3
11.3 - 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
36
36%
85%
10
100/0
95%
5
5%
1000/0
0%
1000/0
0%
1000/0
0%
1000/0
0%
1000/0
0%
1000/0
0%
1000/0
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90-128
128-180
180-256
C
O
I3
L
0%
1000/0
0%
1000/0
0%
1000/0
0%
1000/0
Small
Small
Medium
Lrg- Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512-1024
1024-2048
I3
1.
D
R
0%
1000/0
0%
1000/0
0%
1000/0
0%
1000/0
Bedrock
>2048
BD RK
0%
1000/0
Total
100
1000/0
100%
Size (mm) I
Type
T_
D50
2
silt /clay
00/0
D84
3.9
sand
49%
D95
6
gravel
51%
cobble
0%
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
Appendix D
Cumulative Percent
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
d 0.6
a
0.5
a
0 0.4
a 0.3
U
0.2
0.1
0
0.01 0.1 1 10
Particle Size - Millimeters
t MY -01 MY -02
1
0.9
V 0.8
0.7
0.6
U 0.5
0.4
a
0.3
$ 0.2
0.1
0
Individual Class Percentage
Particel Size - Millimeters
■ MY -03
100 1000 10000
---*— MY -03
67

Cross-Section A10 Riffle - VFF MY-03
Particle
Millimeter
Material
Count
Item%
Cum%
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
0%
0%
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-125
.125-25
.25-50
.50- 1
1 - 2
S
A
N
D
S
10
10%
10%
10
100/0
20%
10
100/0
30%
0%
30%
26
26%
56%
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2-4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8-11.3
11.3 - 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
27
27%
83%
10
100/0
93%
3
3%
96%
3
3%
99%
1
1%
1000/0
0%
1000/0
0%
1000/0
0%
1000/0
0%
100%
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90-128
128-180
180 -256
C
O
B
L
0%
1000/0
0%
1000/0
0%
1000/0
0%
1000/0
Small
Small
Medium
Lrg- Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512-1024
1024 -2048
B
L
D
R
0%
1000/0
0%
1000/0
0%
1000/0
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
0%
�11
Total
100
100%
1 100%
Size (mm)
Type JL
D50 1.7
silt /clay
00/0
D84 4.2
sand
56%
D95 7.3
gravel
44%
cobble
0%
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
Appendix D
Cumulative Percent
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
E3
u 0.6
a
0.5
a
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.01 0.1 1 10
Particle Size - Millimeters
I MY -01 t MY -02
1
0.9
V 0.8
0.7
a
0.6
U 0.5
b 0.4
.5 0.3
S 0.2
0.1
0
Individual Class Percentage
Pa rti eel Size - Millimeters
■ MY -03
100 1000 10000
t MY -03
68

Appendix D
Cross - Section
B1 Riffle
- VFFNW
--03
Cumulative Percent
1
liz
Particle
Millimeter
Material
Count
Item%
Cum%
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
0%
0° /,
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-125
.125-25
.25-50
.50- 1
1 - 2
S
A
N
D
S
0%
0%
0.9
2
2%
2%
0.8
3
3%
5%
� 0.7
21
20%
25%
0.6
37
36%
61%
a 0.5
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2-4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8-11.3
11.3 - 16
16 -22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
Ci
R
A
V
E
L
S
34
33%
93%
0.4
4
4%
97%
j 0.3
2
2%
99%
0.2
1
1%
1000/0
0.1
0
0.01 0.1 1 l0 100 1000 10000
ParticleSize - Millimeters
t t
MY -01 t MY -02 MY -03
0%
1000/0
0%
1000/0
0%
1000/0
0%
100%
0%
1000/0
Individual Class Percentage
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90-128
128-180
180-256
C
O
B
L
0%
1000/0
0%
1000/0
I
0%
1000/0
0.9
0%
100%
0.8
Small
Small
Medium
Lrg- Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512-1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
0%
1000/0
0" 0.6
0%
1000/0
0.5
0%
1000/0
U
a 0.4
0%
100%
0.3
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
0%
100%
S 0.2
Total
104
100%
100%
0.1
Size (mm)
Type
Q .• N M 7 V 0 l W O N M 7 o2 a� O N N N N
PartieelSize - Millimeters
■ MY -03
D50
1.6
silt /clay
00/0
D84
3.3
sand
61%
D95
4.8
gravel
39%
cobble
0%
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA 69

Appendix D
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA 70
Cross - Section
C3 Riffle - VFF MY
-03
Cumulative Percent
1
0.9
Particle
Millimeter
Material
Count
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
0%
0%
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
062-125 .125
.125-25
.25-50
.50 - 1
1 - 2
S
A
N
D
S
0%
0%
0.8
L
0%
0%
0.7
15
15%
15%
c
0.6
18
18%
33%
■`
w
0.5
1 21
21%
54%
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2 - 4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8 - 11.3
11.3-16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
14
14%
68%
0.4
3
1 3%
71%
0.3
1
1 %
72%
0.2
0%
72%
o.l
1
1%
73%
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 loo 1000 l0000
Particle Size - Millimeters
AMY -01 f MY -02 t MY-03
2
2%
75%
3
3%
78%
6
6%
84%
7
7%
91%
Individual Class Percentage
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90-128
128-180
180-256
C
O
B
L
2
2%
93%
4
4%
97%
1
0.9
$ 0.8
a 0.7
h 0.6
U 0.5
; 0.4
s 0.3
a
E 0.2
2
2%
99%
1
1 %
100%
Small
Small
Medium
Lrg- Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512-1024
1024-2048
R
L
D
R
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
0%
100%
Total
100
100%
100%
0.1
Size (mm)
T _
0
ParticelSize - Millimeters
D50
1.8
silt/clay
0%
D84
45
sand
54%
D95
110
gravel
30%
■MY -03
cobble
9%
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA 70

Appendix D
TABLE 10. BASELINE STREAM DATA SUMMARY TABLE
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
I = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in -line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing survey data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser /slope
4 -Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value /needed only if then exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
71
Table 10a.1 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Valley Fields Farm /407 - U er A: 800 feet
Parameter
Gauge'
I Regional Curve
Pre - Existing Condition
I
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Mad
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width ft
.5
.5
5.7
9.
5.
. 5
Flood prone Width ft
0.
23.3
5
9.9
5.
6
0.7
.4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
.2206
2.4544
2.3375
.7
.5
5
'Bankfull Max De th ft
1.9
1
1.2
1.5333
1.5
1.9
3
2.9
2.8
3
3.2
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
52.257
57.758
55.008
30.9
1
2.7
10.2
8.9
19
3
57.5
50.1
55.1
60.1
2
Width /De th Ratio
=7
7
.7
5.
4.
5
Entrenchment Ratio
75
74667
'Bank Height Ratioll
I
I
I
I
1
1 2.8
1
1
1 1.1
11.33331
1.4
1 1.5
1
1 3
1
77-1
1
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
31
61
0.0337
0.017310.0961
0.0
1
Pool Length (ft
W555.7
Pool Max depth ft
4;R
Pool Spacing (ft
77
5.3
3 .7
.6
5
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
36
5 7
43.
7 8 .3 5.
6.
5
7.
7 .
Radius of Curvature (ft)
17
72 248
3
16.4
29.5 22 5
14.7
5
60
90
120
10.
45.7
49.2 79.8
28.527
5
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
0.9341
3.956 13.626
3
1.7
3.7 6.8
1.7
6
2
3
0.3
.5
2.6
6
Meander Wavelength (ft)
76
3 9
3
.7
.3 4 1320.6
106.5
24U
3
60
7
302.2
12927' 3.
25 2
Meander Width Ratio
4.1758
7.8571 10.169
3
7.6
10.9 11.2 15.5
3.1
5
8
10
12
4.0
10.1
19.8
7.9637
5
ransport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) 11alel
1
1
0.31824
0.560976
0.386724
Max part size mm mobilized at ban fulli
1
1
23.64698193
42.68793974
28.97191657
Stream Power (transport capacity) W /mz
45.2088
46.71576
50.48316
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
G5c /F5
B4/E5/C4
B5c /C5
C5
Bankfull Velocity fps
4.172214.
6.9
4.2
4.382940109
Bankfull Discharge (cfs
213.1
Valley length (ft)
Channel Thalweg length ft
Sinuosity ft
1.1
1.1 -1.3
1.2
Water Surface Slope (Channel) ft/ft)
0.003
0.0080 - 0.0215
0.0028
0.0029
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.003
0.0082- 0.0522
0.0031
0.0024
3Bankfull Flood lain Area acres
4 % of Reach with Eroding Bank
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
I = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in -line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing survey data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser /slope
4 -Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value /needed only if then exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
71

Appendix D
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in
I = Thy f,,. fl,­ ­vmcr ­...,.I» .1' I.,f_­rl.,., f..,.., h.,rh rl,P I ICrC
3. Utilizing survey data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplam area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser /slope
4 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value /needed only if then exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
72
Table 10a.2 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Valley Fields Farm /407 - U er A2: 1,850 feet
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre- Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Mod
Max
SD
n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
l
Bankfull Width ft
2 .502
22.66
72T. 58
.55
.5
5.7
5.
Flood ron Width ft
3.7
75.5
5
5.
78.6
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.2206
2. 5 4
.3375
2.7
.75
.5
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
3.4
3.45
3.5
2
1.2
1.5333
1.5
1.9
3
2.9
3.2
3.5
4
3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
52.257
57.758
55.008
40.4
45
49.6
2
2.7
10.2
8.9
19
3
57.5
55.2
62.2
69
3
Width /Depth Ratio
5.
=5
7
.7
5.
5.
Entrenchment Ratio
.6
1 4.25
.5
7
.5
.2
'Bank Height Ratioll
I
I
1
1 1.5
1 1.8
1
1 2.1
1
1 2
1 1.1
11.33331
1.4
1 1.5
1
1 3
1
1 1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1 1
1
3
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
3 .3
5
Riffle Slope ft/ft
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max depth (ft
Pool Spacin ft
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth ft
3
5 7 6
6
4 .2
79. 4. 05.
0
5
7. 7.
Radius of Curvature (ft)
7. 5 .5 7.
.5 5
.7
5
0
45.7
7 . .5 7
Rc:Bankfull width (ft /ft)
0.8459
5.3 3.7 17 6
6
1.7
4.1 3.7 6.8
1.7
6
2
1 3
1 4
0.3
1.5
2.6 .1153
Meander Wavelength (ft)
58
39.8 58.5 228 65.9
6
44.7
.3 320.6
06.5
6
24U
300
360
7
302.2
292.. 6 3.9 25 2
Meander Width Ratio
2.5
.15 5.
6
7.6
0.9 .2 5.5
3.
5
8
0
2
.8
1 9.7 8.0 0
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress com etenc lb/f'
0.5148
0.560976
1.07328
Max part size mm mobilized at bankfulli
1
39.03306101
42.68793974
1
83.92826353
Stream Power (transport capacity) W1m'J
1
45.2088
46.71576
1
129.59856
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
G5 /Incised E5
B4/E5/C4
135c/C5
C5
Bankfull Velocity fps
.3
4.9 -5.7
4.2
3.882636656
Bankfull Discharge cfs
;U .5
53.6
2 S
241.1
Valley length (ft)
Channel Thalwe length ft
Sinuosity ft
1.0 -1.1
1.1 -1.3
1.2
Water Surface Sloe Channel ft/ft
0.0025 - 0.0040
0.0080 - 0.0215
0.0028
0.0036
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.0030 - 0.0035
0.0082 - 0.0522
0.0031
0.0036
3Bankfull Flood lain Area acres
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in
I = Thy f,,. fl,­ ­vmcr ­...,.I» .1' I.,f_­rl.,., f..,.., h.,rh rl,P I ICrC
3. Utilizing survey data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplam area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser /slope
4 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value /needed only if then exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
72

Appendix D
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
I = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in -line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing survey data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodpIam area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser /slope
4 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value /needed only if then exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
73
Table 10a.3 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Valley Fields Farm /407 - Lower A: 1,400 feet
Parameter
Gauge'
I Regional Curve
Pre- Existing Condition
I
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Mad
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Mod
Max
SD
n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Mod
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width ft
5.
7.
.5
7
5.7
5.
Flood prone Width ft
5
5.
78.6
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.5939
2,76-69-
2.730
.5
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
3.5
1
1.2
1.5333
1.5
1.9
3
2.9
3.2
3.5
4
3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
72.699
80.351
76.525
91.3
1
2.7
10.2
8.9
19
3
57.5
55.2
62.2
69
3
Width /Depth Ratio
67
.7
5.
5.
Entrenchment Ratio
.4
1
75
7=7
.5
'Bank Height Rati
1.7
1
1.1
1.3333
1.4
1.5
3
1
1
1
1
3
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
Riffle Slope ft/ft
Pool Length (ft
Pool Max depth (ft
Pool Spacing
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth ft
3
5 7 6
6
4
7 05.
20
5
7. 7.
Radius of Curvature (ft)
7. 5 .5 7.
.5 5
.7
5
45.7
7 . .5 7
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
2
5.3 3.7 17 6
6
1.7
4.1 3.7 6.8
1.7
6
2 3
4
0.3
1.5
2.6 .1153
Meander Wavelength (ft)
58
39.8 58.5 228 65.9
6
.7
.3 320.6
06.5
6
240 30
36
7
302.2
292.. 613.9 25 . 2
Meander Width Ratio
.5
.6 5.4
6
7.6
0.9 .2 5.5
3.
5
2
.8
1 19.7 8.010
ransport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f'
1.11072
0.560976
1.07328
Max part size mm mobilized at bankfull
1
86.98116865
42.68793974
1
83.92826353
Stream Power transport capacity) W1m'J
1
134.11944
46.71576
129.59856
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
G5 /Incised E5
B4/E5/C4
135c /C5
C5
Bankfull Velocity fps )
4.254114
701914.4
4.9 -5.7
4.2
3.882636656
Bankfull Discharge cfs
3 :eb.b4
3:e5.5
I 3bU.61
1342.68
241.1
Valley length (ft)
Channel Thalweg length ft
Sinuosity ft
1.0 -1.1
1.1 -1.3
1.2
Water Surface Sloe Channel ft/ft
0.0025 - 0.0040
0.0080- 0.0215
0.0028
0.0015
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.0030 - 0.0035
0.0082 - 0.0522
0.0031
0.002
3Bankfull Flood lain Area acres
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
I = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in -line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing survey data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodpIam area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser /slope
4 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value /needed only if then exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
73

Appendix D
Table 10a.4 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Valley Fields Farm /407 - U er B: 200 feet
Parameter
Gauge'
I Regional Curve
Pre- Existing Condition I Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width ft
5.5
7. 7
. 5
5.
5.
7.5
.4
Flood prone Width ft
5
5.
.5
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
.8069
.997
.902
K2.
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.5
2.7
2.8
2
1.5333
1.5
1.9
3
2.3
3.1
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
33.717
37.267
35.492
27.1
31.7
36.2
2
10.2
8.9
19
3
43.1
42.4
1
Width /Depth Ratio
7.
7.
7.5
7
.7
7.5
Entrenchment Ratio
16.46671
8.8
1 9.1
1
1 3
1 2.2
11 11
4.
'Bank Height Ratioll
I
I
1
1 2.6
1 2.8
1
1 3
1
1 2
1.1
11.33331
1.4
1 1.5
1
1 3
1
1 1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
61
0.0337
0.017310.0961
0.0
1
Pool Length (ft
Pool Max depth (ft
Pool Spacing ft
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth ft 5 4 75 3 7 05. 0 .7 7 6.
Radius of Curvature (ft) 5 5. 7 7 .5 5 .7 5 55 55.4 5 .5 5
Rc:Bankfull width (ft /ft) 1 6.8667 4.9 14.7 3 1.7 4.1 3.7 6.8 1.7 6 2 3.0182 4 2.4 6
Meander Wavelength (ft) 08 358.67 296 672 3 4 .7 .3 320.6 06.5 6 220 275 330 8.2 327.6 266.7 62 1201.061 6
Meander Width Ratio 7 3.267 IU.2 1 C5.6 3 f.b IU.9 .2 I Ib.b 3.1 5 8 1 lu 1 12 IZ.b 5
ransport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f'
1.716624
0.559728
0.067392
Max part size mm mobilized at bankfull
136.9105109
42.58898812
4.691537038
Stream Power (transport capacity) W1m'J
1
1 197.41176
58.77144
8.137584
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
G5 /Incised E5
B4/E5/C4
B5c /C5
E5
Bankfull Velocity fps
4.066114.494114.2801
4.5 -5.6
4.2
3.837264151
Bankfull Discharge cfs
4, 3 1
1 159.5
I I 5 1. 91
162.7
Valley length (ft)
Channel Thalweg length ft
Sinuosity ft
1.1
1.1 -1.3
1.1
Water Surface Sloe Channel ft/ft
0.0046
0.0080 - 0.0215
0.0039
Flat
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.0131
0.0082 - 0.0522
0.0047
0.0047
3Bankfull Flood lain Area acres
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
I = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in -line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing survey data produce an estimate of the bankfulI floodpIam area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser /slope
4 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value /needed only if then exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
74

Appendix D
Table 10a.5 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Valley Fields Farm /407 - Lower B: 230 feet
Parameter
Gauge'
I Regional Curve
Pre- Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Mod
Max
SD
n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Mad
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width ft
7.
7.
5.
5.7
5.
7.5
.4
Flood prone Width ft
53.
5.
.5
91.3
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
.8602
2.056
1.958
.5
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.5
2.7
2.8
2
1.2
1.5333
1.5
1.9
3
2.3
2.9
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
35.869
39.645
37.757
27.1
31.7
36.2
2
2.7
10.2
8.9
19
3
43.1
67.8
1
Width /Depth Ratio
77----77--
7.5
7
.7
7.5
.5
Entrenchment Ratio
.5
7=7
'Bank Height Ratioll
I
I
1
1 2.6
1 2.8
1
1 3
1
1 2
1 1.1
11.33331
1.4
1 1.5
3
1
1
1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
Riffle Slope ft/ft
Pool Length (ft
Pool Max depth (ft
Pool Spacin ft
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth ft 29 50 46 75 3 7 5. 7 .7 7 6 4
Radius of Curvature (ft) 5 5. 7 7 .5 5 .7 5 57 5 55.4 5 .5 5
Rc:Bankfull width (ft /ft) 1 6.8667 4.9 14.7 3 1.7 4.1 3.7 6.8 1.7 6 2.0727 3.0909 4.1455 1.0 6
Meander Wavelength (ft) 08 358.67 296 672 3 44.7 .3 320.6 06.5 6 227 28 3 8.2 327.6 266.7 62 1201.061 6
18.254b
Meander Width Ratio 7 23.267 3.6 7. 0.9 .2 5.5 3. 5 0.3 7 2. 5.5 5
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb /f2
1.716624
0.559728
0.5826912
Max part size mm mobilized at bankfulli
1
1 136.9105109
42.58898812
1 44.41116115
Stream Power (transport capacity) W1m'J
1
1 197.41176
58.77144
1 100.514232
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
G5 /Incised E5
B4/E5/C4
135c /C5
B5
Bankfull Velocity fps
4.080914.510514.2957
4.5 -5.6
4.2
2.399705015
Bankfull Discharge cfs
I b4.Ub
I 11U.6
62.9
162.7
Valley length (ft)
Channel Thalweg length ft
Sinuosity ft
1.1
1.1 -1.3
1.1
Water Surface Sloe Channel ft/ft
0.0046
0.0080 - 0.0215
0.0039
0.0035
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.0131
0.0082- 0.0522
0.0047
0.0047
3Bankfull Flood lain Area acres
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
I = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in -line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing survey data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodpIam area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser /slope
4 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value /needed only if then exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
75

Appendix D
Table 10a.6 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Valley Fields Farm /407 - Reach C: 1,400 feet
Parameter
Gauge'
Regional Curve
Pre- Existing Condition
I Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Mad
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Mad
Max
SD
n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width ft
5.
5. 77
5.4 7
7
5.7
5.
.5
.5
Flood prone Width ft
53.
5.
5.
5.
.5
.7
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7927
0. 76
0. 3 5
.5
.7
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
0.9
1
1.2
1.5333
1.5
1.9
3
1.2
1.1
1.5333
1.7
1.8
3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft'
5.8553
6.4716
6.1634
3.3
1
2.7
10.2
8.9
19
3
7.8
7.5
9.6
8.9
12.4
3
Width /Depth Ratio7
7
.7
7.
7
5.
Entrenchment Ratio
.5
16.4667
3.5
7=3
3.6
1 4.4
'Bank Height Ratioll
I
I
I
I
I
I 1
I
I
1 1
1 1.1
11.33331
1.4
1 1.5
1
1 3
1
1 1
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1
3
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
3
9
Riffle Slope ft/ft
7
Pool Length (ft
Pool Max depth (ft
JEV
Pool Spacing
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth ft 7 05. 3 5 7. .4 .4 7
Radius of Curvature (ft) .4 .5 5 .7 5 5 4 .5 .7 5 .5 5
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) 1.7 4.1 3.7 6.8 1.7 6 2 13.04351 4 2.3 2.7 2.3 4.2 0.9237 6
Meander Wavelength (ft) 44.7 141.3 1 114 1320.7 106.5 1 6 92 1 lit. I lid 72.5 187.8 1 131.2 595.1 237.0 6
I I
Meander Width Ratio I I I I I I t.b IU.9 I ll.Z I lb.b 3.1 1 5 8 I lu 1 12 b.1 lb.b 9.7 42.5 I b.0ji6ii
ransport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f'
0.643968
0.370656
Max part size mm mobilized at bankfull
49.28807318
27.71871363
Stream Power (transport capacity) W1m'J
1
129.59856
1 123.57072
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Incised B5
B4/E5/C4
C5 /E5
E5
Bankfull Velocity fps
3.668214.0543
118612
6.5
3.1
18.28089888
Bankfull Discharge cfs
.609
9
123.199
21.6
Valley length (ft)
Channel Thalweg length ft
Sinuosity ft
1.1 -1.3
1.1
Water Surface Sloe Channel ft/ft
0.0080 - 0.0215
0.0066
0.0099
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.0082 - 0.0522
0.0086
0.0095
313ankfull Flood lain Area acres
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in
I = Thy f,,. fl,­ ­vmcr ­...,.I» .1' I.,f_­rl.,., f..,.., h.,rh rl,P I ICrC
3. Utilizing survey data produce an estimate of the bankfulI floodpIam area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser /slope
4 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value /needed only if then exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
76

Appendix D
Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Valley Fields Farm /407
Parameter
Pre- Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
As -built /Baseline
'Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S X
10
20
30
40
0
30
10
40
20
0
30
10
40
20
0
SC % I Sa% / G% / C% / B% I Be%
16
1.18
69.41
29.41
0
0
2.85
31.7
59.76
4.06
0.82
0.81
Upper A (800 feet)
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / dlP / dlsP (mm
0,6
0.93
1.35
6.49
9.96
0.43
2.25
12.08
39.69
71.35
ZEntrenchment Class <1.5 / 1.5 -1.99 / 2.04.915.0-9.9 / >1
800
0
0
0
0
X
X
0
0
0
300
500
'Incision Class <1.2 / 1.2 -1.49 / 1.5 -1.99 / >2.
0
0
200
600
x
800
0
0
0
Parameter
Pre - Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
As- built /Baseline
RI% / Ru% / P% / G% / SIX
10
10
20
60
0
30
10
40
20
0
30
10
40
20
0
SC% I Sa% / G% / C% / B% I Be-/,
14
60
26
0
0
0
2.85
31.7
59.76
4.06
0.82
0.81
Upper A2 (1,850 feet)
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 I d95 /diP /disP (mm
0.09
0.65
1.25
6.16
11.3
0.43
2.25
12.08
39.69
71.35
ZEntrenchment Class <1.5 / 1.5 -1.99 / 2.0 -4.9 15.0-9.9 / >1
1500
350
0
0
0
X
x
0
0
0
0
1850
3Incision Class <1.2 / 1.2 -1.49 / 1.5 -1.99 / >2.
0
0
1000
850
x
1850
0
0
0
Parameter
Pre- Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
As- built /Baseline
rRi % / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
5
30
5
80
0
30
1.0
40
20
0
30
10
40
20
0
'SC % I Sa% / G% / C% / B% I Be %
8.33
33.3
58.3
0
0
0
2.85
31.7
59.76
4.06
0.82
0.81
Lower A (1,400 feet)
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 d95 / dip / disP (mm)
0.19
1.5
2.62
8.88
11.3
0.43
2.25
12.08
39.69
71.35
ZEntrenchment Class <1.5 / 1.5 -1.99 / 2.0 -4.91 5.0 -9.9 / >10
100
900
400
0
0
X
X
0
0
1400
0
0
'Incision Class <1.2 /1.2-1.49 /1.5-1.99 / >2.0
0
0
1200
200
x
1400
0
01
0
Parameter
Pre- Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
As- built/Baseline
'Ri% / Ru% I P% l G% I S%
10
10
30
50
0
30
10
40
20
0
30
10
40
20
0
SC % I Sa% / G% / C% / B% I Be%
0
19
81
0
0
0
2.85
31.7
59.76
4.06
0.82
0.81
Reach B (430 feet)
d16 / d35 / d50 / d841 d95 /diP /disP (mm)
1.81
a
7.01
22.23
29.83
0.43
2.25
12.08
39.69
71.35
ZEntrenchment Class <1.5 / 1.5 -1.99 / 2.0- 4.915.0 -9.9 / > 10
430
0
0
0
0
X
X
0
0
430
0
0
Incision Class <1.2 / 1_2 -1.49 / 1.5 -1.99 / >2.0
0
0
0
430
x
430
0
0
0
Parameter
Pre- Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
As- built /Baseline
Ri % / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
30
10
40
20
0
30
10
40
20
0
SC% I Sa% / G% / C% / B% 1 Be%
18.63
34.31
47.06
0
0
0
2.85
31.7
59.76
4.06
0.82
0.81
Reach C (1,400 feet)
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 /diP /disP (mm)
0.05
1.17
1.86
5.67
7.49
0.43
2.25
12.08
39.69
71.35
ZEntrenchment Class <1.5 / 1.5 -1.99 / 2.0- 4.915.0 -9.9 / >10
600
800
0
0
0
x
x
0
0
1000
400
0
Incision Class <1.2/1.2-1.49/1.5-1.99/>2.0,
1000
400
0
0
X
1400
0
0
0
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
2 = Entrenchment Class - Assign /bin the reach footage into the classes indicated and provide the percentage of the total reach footage in each class in the table. This will result from the measured cross - sections as well as visual estimates
3 = Assign /bin the reach footage into the classes indicated and provide the percentage of the total reach footage in each class in the table. This will result from the measured cross - sections as well as the longitudinal profile
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
77

Appendix D
TABLE 11. MONITORING MORPHOLOGY DATA TABLE
Table 11a. Monitoring Data -Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters -Cross Sections)
Valley Fields Farm /407
Cross Section Al (Riffle)
Cross Section A2 (Riffle)
Cross Section A3 (Riffle)
Cross Section A4 (Pool)
Cross Section AS (Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
760.8
760.8
760.8
760.8
760.7
760.7
760.7
760.7
762.0
762.0
762.0
762.0
764.0
764.0
764.0
764.0
765.7
7657
765.7
765.7
Bankfull Width (ft)
31.1
33.3
37.3
23.6
38.2
30.8
37.1
23.6
30.1
33.4
29.7
23.1
31.1
27.5
32.0
19.4
31.0
29.9
23.2
16.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
>120
>120
>120
>120
>100
>100
>100
>100
>90
>90
>90
>90
-
-
-
-
>90
>90
>90
>90
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.0
2.3
2.1
2.7
1.9
3.0
1.9
2.9
1.8
1.7
2.0
2.4
1 2.2
2.8
2.4
3.5
1.6
1.2
1.5
2.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.4
1 5.2
5.6
5.5
4.0
5.7
4.6
4.6
3.2
3.6
3.8
4.0
4.0
5.2
5.1
4.3
2.8
3.1
2.9
3.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
62.5
76.4
79.1
64.2
72.8
92.8
69.1
67.7
55.2
57.4
59.5
54.6
69.0
75.9
78.2
68.5
50.1
35.5
35.3
33.4
Bankfull Width /Depth Ratio
15.5
14.6
17.6
8.7
20.1
10.2
19.9
8.2
16.4
19.4
14.8
10.1
-
-
-
-
19.1
25.1
15.2
8.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
4.1
3.8
3.4
5.1
2.9
3.6
3.0
4.2
3.0
2.7
3.1
3.9
3.0
3.1
4.0
5.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft)
147.0
156.0
199.5
190.2
154.0
176.0
193.1
185.8
149.0
154.0
189.6
162.1
165.0
184.0
215.4
187.0
133.0
114.0
125.7
136.9
d50 (mm)
6.7
1 1.4
0.6
15.3
1 1.4
1.6
15.6
26.6
1 2.0
Cross Section A6 (Riffle)
Cross Section A7 (Pool)
Cross Section A10 (Riffle)
Cross Section All (Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline Bankfull elevation'
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
766.9
766.9
766.9
766.9
767.0
767.0
767.0
767.0
755.5
755.5
755.5
755.5
754.9
754.9
754.9
754.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
38.3
34.7
26.2
20.2
29.1
27.2
27.4
16.3
41.3
47.1
42.9
35.0
72.2
41.6
41.5
26.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
>90
>90
>90
>90
-
-
-
-
>90
>90
>90
>90
1 >90
>90
>90
>90
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.9
2.2
2.6
2.2
2.1
2.0
2.0
2.7
2.3
2.3
1.7
2.0
1.9
1.8
1.5
1.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.7
4.7
4.7
3.4
3.2
3.9
4.0
3.6
4.0
3.8
3.8
3.6
5.1
3.5
3.6
3.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
71.0
75.6
68.7
45.4
60.1
54.8
54.7
43.2
1
95.5
85.4
74.0
69.3
137.4
74.6
61.4
44.9
Bankfull Width /Depth Ratio
20.6
16.0
10.0
9.0
-
-
-
-
17.9
26.0
24.8
17.7
38.0
23.1
28.0
15.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
2.2
2.4
3.2
4.5
2.8
2.3
2.9
2.6
1.8
2.5
2.6
3.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft)
166.0
172.0
200.0
166.7
168.0
162.0
189.1
166.9
448.0
440.0
456.7
455.2
596.0
539.0
565.0
547.9
d50 (mm)
1.7
Cross Section B1 (Riffle)
Cross Section B2 (Riffle)
Cross Section B3 (Riffle)
Cross Section B4 (Pool)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
766.1
766.1
766.1
766.1
765.9
765.9
765.9
765.9
760.7
7607
760.7
7601
760.4
760.4
760.4
760.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
21.4
36.4
22.8
24.3
35.7
34.3
33.7
27.5
48.4
44.4
22.1
23.1
44.1
38.3
27.9
19.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
88.1
98.7
88.6
89.9
106.1
106.7
99.6
97.2
91.3
93.7
96.5
90.8
-
-
-
-
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.0
1.8
2.4
2.4
1.9
2.4
2.3
2.3
1.4
1.2
2.0
1.6
1.3
1.3
1.6
2.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.1
1 4.3
3.1
3.2
4.0
4.0
3.4
3.1
2.9
3.2
3.5
3.2
3.2
2.8
2.8
3.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
42.4
66.6
54.7
58.0
67.7
81.5
75.9
62.1
67.8
55.3
44.0
37.5
57.7
49.1
43.8
35.6
Bankfull Width /Depth Ratio
10.8
19.9
9.5
10.2
18.8
14.4
15.0
12.2
34.5
35.8
11.1
14.2
-
-
-
-
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
4.1
2.7
3.9
3.7
3.0
3.1
3.0
3.5
1.9
2.1
4.4
3.9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Sectional Area between end pins ft2
586.0
619.0
574.2
616.2
690.0
718.0
638.3
688.0
582.0
571.0
549.2
563.8
479.0
431.0
444.3
433.3
d50 (mm)
1.4
1.6
1.6
Cross Section Cl (Riffle)
Cross Section C2 (Pool)
Cross Section C3 (Riffle)
Cross Section C4 (Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
7753
775.3
775.3
775.3
774.0
774.0
774.0
774.0
769.2
769.2
769.2
769.2
767.4
767.4
767.4
767.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.0
11.7
7.6
5.8
12.9
5.9
5.5
5.2
13.5
14.1
19.0
5.8
8.9
11.2
11.9
4.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
48.5
50.4
48.0
46.0
592
54.5
71.3
-
48.7
48.7
48.7
43.4
39.6
40.8
41.5
38.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
0.8
0.8
1.0
0.9
1.1
1.4
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.7
1.0
0.8
0.9
1.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.8
2.1
1.5
1.6
2.0
1.9
2.0
0.9
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.0
1.7
2.6
2.4
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
12.4
9.1
6.1
5.6
12.0
6.3
7.6
3.3
7.5
5.7
8.4
3.9
8.9
9.4
10.2
5.1
Bankfull Width /Depth Ratio
15.9
14.9
9.4
6.0
13.9
5.5
4.0
-
24.0
34.4
43.3
8.6
8.9
133
13.8
41
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
3.5
4.3
6.3
6.2
4.6
9.3
12.9
3.6
3.5
2.6
7.5
4.4
3.7
3.5
8.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft)
199.0
199.0
238.1
241.9
53.0
52.0
53.5
52.1
39.0
33.0
60.7
51.9
142.0
133.0
165.1
102.7
d50 (mm)
8.6
57.0
1.8
1 = Widths and depths for monitoring resurvey will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional /depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "it is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
78

Appendix D
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value /needed only if the n exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
79
Exhibit Table 11b.1 Monitoring Data -Stream Reach Data Summary
Valley Fields Farm/407 - Upper A: 800 feet
, .- ..
• - ..-
� ll
� ll
�
� ll
�0
r ll
t lr•
�
t �l•
�©
t rl.
t r
�
� t •
��
������������
I,Ie,n datawill nottypically be collected unlessvisual data, dimensional data or profiledata indicate
significant shifts from baseline
Additional Reach Parameters
l ll
l lr�.
l 111
l �l
lrl •
111
���
111
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value /needed only if the n exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
79

Appendix D
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value /needed only if the n exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
Exhibit Table 11b.2 Monitoring Data -Stream Reach Data Summary
Valley Fields Farm/407 ..• t feet
• - ..-
t ll
t ll�
�
t �
�©
t rl
t ll.
�
t �l
�©
t �l.
t t
����
t �l:
t �l:
�
t l�:
�0������������
OEM
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate
significant shifts from baseline
Additional Reach Parameters
lit
1 11'
1 11
1 11
Itrl-
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value /needed only if the n exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA

Appendix D
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of valuelneeded only if the n exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
81
Exhibit Table 11b.3 Monitoring Data -Stream Reach Data Summary
Valley Fields Farm/447 - Lower A: ii feet
No identifiable riffles or pools
Pattern datawill nottypically be collected unlessvisual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate
MMEM®E■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■
r rr
r rrr�
�
i rrr
err
rri
i�r
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of valuelneeded only if the n exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
81

=MMMMM

Appendix D
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 =The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; SilUClay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, lisp = max subpave
4. = Of value /needed only if the n exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
83
Table Exhibit 11 b.5 Monitoring D. Data Summary
Valley Fields Farm/407 f feet
®R imiikyiir-iiiiiiii
Noidentifiablepools
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate
significantshiftsfrombaseline
Addifitional Reach Parameters
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 =The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; SilUClay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, lisp = max subpave
4. = Of value /needed only if the n exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
83

Appendix D
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; SilYClay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value /needed only if the n exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
84
Exhibit Table 11b.6 Monitoring Data -Stream Reach Data Summary
Valley Fields Farm/407 - Reach C: it feet
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
•
r
r r r
r r
r r
..
p
..
r r�
r r
�p
r r
r�
��C�
r r
r r��
r�
®������������
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate
significant shifts from baseline
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; SilYClay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value /needed only if the n exceeds 3
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
84

Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
85

Appendix E
TABLE 12. VERIFICATION OF BANKFULL EVENTS
Date of Data
Date of
MY -01 (2010)
Photo #
MY -03 (2013)*
MY -04 (2014)
Method
Collection
Occurrence
No /0
(if available)
7/8/2010
N/A
Wrackline observed in floodplain
See MY -02
(0 %)
report
11/4/2010
N/A
Wrackline observed at bankfull
See MY -02
CE3
(48.2 %)
report
4/10/2010
N/A
Wrackline observed at bankfull
See MY -02
Yes /86
Yes /21
No /0
report
11/2/2011
N/A
Wrackline observed at bankfull
See MY -02
(0 %)
report
TABLE 13. WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERIA ATTAINMENT TABLE
Success Criteria Achieved /Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season (Percentage)
Gauge Name
MY -01 (2010)
MY -02 (2011)
MY -03 (2013)*
MY -04 (2014)
MY -05 (2015)
Yes /103
Yes /67
No /0
CE1
(45.6 %)
(29.6 %)
(0 %)
Yes /109
Yes /68
No /0
CE3
(48.2 %)
(30.1 %)
(0 %)
Yes /86
Yes /21
No /0
CE4
(38.1 %)
(9.3 %)
(0 %)
Yes /97
Yes /38
No /0
CE6
(42.9 %)
(16.8 %)
(0 %)
*Gauges reinstalled 9/23/2013, monitoring only occurred for 21% of growing season
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
NN

Appendix E
GROUNDWATER LEVEL MONITORING WELL PLOTS
0.0
Begin Growing
Valley Fields Farm
Reference Gauge CE1
2013 -MY03
4
End Growin
Season
Season
-5.0
3/26/2013
11/6/2013
3.5
-10.0
3
-15.0
2.5
A -20.0
_
2
w
3 -25.0
Gauge
.�
installed
ai
9/23/2013
1.5
Z. -30.0
C7
1
-35.0
-40.0
0.5
0
-45.0
M
M M
M M M M M
M M
M M
M M M M M M M M M
M
M M M
M M M M M
M
M
M
M
O
N
O O
N N
O O O O O
N N N N N
O O
N N
O O
N N
O O O O O O O O O
N N N N N N N N N
O
N
O O O
N N N
O O O O O
N N N N N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
M kn o0 C�
N M
O O
M
vii 1,0 � 00 C� (71
O
M
M �t W) kn "C
O
r-
N
0\0
011
O
M
N
N
N If)
N N N 0\0
Vl
N
N�-i
N\i
Date
Gauge CEl Jurisdictional Depth
Rainfall
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA 87

Appendix E
Valley Fields Farm
Wetland Gauge CE3
2013 -NW03
M
-5.0
-10.0
-15.0
A -20.0
�r -25.0
a
0
-30.0
-35.0
-40.0
Begin Growing
Season
3/26/2013
End Growini
Season
11/6/2013
Gauge installed
9/23/2013
U 11
1
-45.0
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M M
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O O
N N
M
N
M
N
d'
kn
00
M
O1�
O
c�
O
M
�
W
�c
t—
00
C�
O.,
00
N
M
N
M
h
k n
�
00
N
O\ O
c�+i
N
N
N
M
M
It
N
It
Wn
N
W)
N
D
r
N
r-
00
00
O\
O"
—
O
N
O
,--
—
N
—
—
N N
Date
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
4
3.5
3
2.5 _
C
2 w
1.5
1
0.5
0
88

Appendix E
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
89
Valley Fields Farm
Wetland Gauge CE4
2013 -MY03
4
0.0
Begin Growing
End Growing
Season
Season
-5.0
3/26/2013
11/6/2013
3.5
-10.0
-3
-15.0
2.5
a
A
-20.0
'1
2
w
-25.0
a
Gauge installed
1.5
-30.0
9/20/2013
'
1
-35.0
-40.0
0.5
-45.0
0
M M M M M M M M
M
M M M M M M M M M M
M M
M
M
M M
M M M
M
M
M M
M M
O O O O O O O O
N N N N N N N N
O
N
O O O O O O O O O O
N N N N N N N N N N
O O
N N
O
N
O
N
O O
N N
O O O
N N N
O
N
O
N
O O
N N
O O
N N
--� N M M It kn 00 C�
N N M
O
M
O r+ N M ' M �c r­ 00
N M N N
01 C�
N
N
M
N
�t
W)
b
� 00
N
01 O
M
-
M
-
"0
kn k �D
00
00
00
\
C> 01
N
O O
N
Date
Gauge CE4 Jurisdictional Depth
Rainfall
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
89

Appendix E
Valley Fields Farm
Wetland Gauge CE6
2013 -MY03
0.0 Begin Growing End Growing 4
Season Season
-5.0 3/26/2013 11/6/2013 3.5
-10.0
3
-15.0
2.5
A -20.0
2 w
3
-25.0 Gauge installed
9/23/2013 a
a 1.5
-30.0
1
-35.0
-40.0
0.5
-45.0 0
M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
O O O O O (= O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
--� N M M d' kn 00 01 O O v) r— 00 01 01 N M � W) v') r- 00 01 O
N N N M c`+� N 'A N N - -- N N M N N N N M
--� •--� N N M M I W) Vl \O r— r— 00 00 01 01 --� O O '--� --� --� •--� N N
Date
Gauge CE6 Jurisdictional Depth Rainfall
Valley Fields Farm Stream Restoration Site
NCEEP Project #407
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA 90