090017_Routine_20220916

Facility Number
11
(,Division of Water Resources
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
�F ct I(472._
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 16 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
9- as
Arrival Time:
q:15RM
Farm Name: Riven rOtfl)2X, Ftrm
Owner Name:
Ronald AII-eN
Mailing Address: t^:�
Physical Address:
Departure Time:
0:
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: k 1 Q Region: ft
Facility Contact: Nebo
Onsite Representative:
came
Certified Operator: J b€ Q I v N1
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title: -re wec
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: Pc-Up1-ag�
Certification Number: (p�W 8
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine.
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
>'Wean
to Feeder
i2 I (p 0
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
ry'Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
•
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes nNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑NA ❑NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continu/

Facility Number: q - �1
Waste Collection & Treatment
Date of Inspection: q. jjp• 22
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 tructure 6
Identifier: i f 9 9--
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
19
ya 1?3___
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes 'NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable(�Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑J Application Outside of Approved Area
De 12. Crop Type(s): r 1 blIud c 1 OVeIgee4 , 101 f Fet I gIe
13. Soil Type(s): L tMigCiCkl R.Q1NC) w"lirIUYlt "
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ Yes \ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 1 No El NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes N. No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
['Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis El Waste Transfers El Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes InNo El NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: q - 1 -]
Date of Inspection: 1(p
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes IN No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
.NNo ❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
LI Yes No
Comments °(refer to question #) , Explain any VES answers and/or aanyadditional recommendations,or any other commea
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
fay r-en-etc It good
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
KAtI� ftrifint 5teve 5vyivN
adote 401-1-einat
Phone: go, {to. c1`
Date:I•4W a2
5/12/2020