820131_routine_20220810

IIrn, I IOI Ad 1Si-
Divisionof Water Resources`
Division of Soiland Water Conservation:
OthersAgency.
Type of Visit: ') Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 6.Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
0•2 _
Arrival Time:
a: 0
rficfrtthuR faro
Departure Time:
Owner Name: J oh fl 1
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: campg oN Region:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: I1 1 Cjp Phone:
g m rl-h
Onsite Representative: c alit) RI I Vv 1
Certified Operator: ca III
Back-up Operator: �) V I l D RD"lcl I
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number: 11-1 0/
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes
No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑,Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
O Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑NA ❑NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - - 131
Waste Collection & Treatment
Date of Inspection: Q,•
p'J2-
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes [I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes t No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 9
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): opt dg ?j
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? IX Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 1J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes IN No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable CropunnWindow' / ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): ge tnt} (.I W O V J € d (_II - "-I)
13. Soil Type(s): N r)tfoI K R O I n c, L t o t'
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 1A. Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. D Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey
1,Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
at) —9 - 91)20
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes fi No
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) `�`�
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes INkNo
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
IN No
No
No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA El NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
El NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
#{-citm hQs amengi7-ent fur. corN Siigge/NoApi TON
-I. on igqpon irq. remove tre2c off bQLK s�de oF IggoDN, c+ohf
Want fo GI:ea-4e
Move dour- Iq goon -f oo Glee ; dory"
bare c1recs. Continue wor ltr ng on banKs
Lggoon rn et-ec r vp ccrov cl f-eTiGe 1in-e
mU Ke Sure cows don l- damage IugotoN.
i5. c iecr up befmicico f► e ci lots of
w eect C . LAN -�i e lcl n-eX t- +-o
LAgooN
s1jd9€: io.71--z1
Wgl ,te:in.0'22,g;IT22,ll.')-21
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
fo
eve
Phone:
qu')N Date:s-
Page 3 of 3
5/12/2020