20151065 Ver 2_Buffer Authorization_Attachments_2022-00680 AJD-PJD Tearsheet (2)_20220830

Action Id. SAW-2022-00680
Requestor:
Address:
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
County: Guilford U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -Guilford / Summerfield
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
NCDOT
Attn: Jerry Parker
1584 Yancevville Street
Greensboro, NC 27415-4996
Size (acres) —361 Nearest Town Greensboro
Nearest Waterway Brush Creek River Basin Cape Fear
USGS HUC 03030002 Coordinates 36.119310, -79.948568
Location description: The project areas area is located along both sides of Interstate Highway 73, between NC Highway 68 and
Ted Johnson Parkway, and also along and extending approximately 0.25 mile from the intersection of Bryan Boulevard and
Burgess Road/North Regional Road, in Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina.
The Approved Jurisdictional Determination Review Areas are shown as the areas within the green -outlined "AJD Areas" on
the attached maps entitled "Jurisdictional Features Map", (Figures 3-1 and 3-2).
The Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Review Areas are shown as the areas within red -outlined "Study Area/PJD
Area" on the attached maps entitled "Jurisdictional Features Map", (Figures 3-1 and 3-2).
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
11 There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33
USC § 403). The waters, including wetlands have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be
sufficiently accurate and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown within the above -described PJD
Review Area on the enclosed delineation map. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the
permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts,
compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a
preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as
if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the
Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an
approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However,
since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be
used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an
effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands at the project area, which is not
sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters, including
wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a
timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waters, including wetlandson the above -described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

SAW-2022-00680
❑ We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
❑ The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the
Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated _. We strongly suggest you
have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this
survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no
change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps
Regulatory Official identified below on _. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may
be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present within the above -described AJD Review Area which are
subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the
law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date
of this notification
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management to determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact David E. Bailey at [phone] or
David.E.Bailev2Ausace. army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: See the Approved and Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination forms, dated 8/16/2022.
D. Remarks:
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed
you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and Request for Appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr. Philip A. Shannin
Administrative Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Floor M9
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8803
AND
PHILIP.A. [e-mail]

SAW-2022-00680
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Date: 2022.08.16 15:37:42 -04'00'
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date of JD: 8/16/2022 Expiration Date of Approved JD: 8/16/2027
Expiration Date of Preliminary JD: Not applicable
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
https://regulatory.ops.usace.army.mil/customer-service-survey/.
Electronic Copies Furnished:
Ryan Conchilla, NCDWR
Nancy Oberle, Three Oaks Engineering

��1tYEERjyC.
Sit,
v io -
4-f0;:i
IAA ea
S4'
• f - �lh. _.. •:. z-� - .. • v� / •u . • ,. -: _—%/.srRl•7Rltlil[INRi,.�:hlf\\ti F . v.- f� _ - �'�
Legend
�'`"
n.
N
Potential Nonwetland WOUS (Stream) Potential Nonwetland WOUS (Surface Waters) Potential Wetland WOUS
,'r!►'" • `.
Stud Area/PJDArea Streets
y
Oho
l
, dd�� ��� y ..**A
Areas 2ft Contours Culvert
Non jurisdictional Sediment Basin L
DisturbedAJD
Otis y
/FA,
dL ,tip: ;r _ .- .,,,1( -•:
Intermittent
Non -jurisdictional Stormwater Basin 1 Undisturbed
f .4.9 '' Oc
—
— — Perennial
, �'
I ' _�'�
Y
. r! .:'l
Prepared For:
aAr
F li JI
p
¢
Fir ►�5i
OF 1S'
... .,,,�„r, -6k. .� o� tea.: !\ _ T i �/,/, � �.. 1 ��.. j, I.
clik
- r = -_=--• -�rw�� ! c ., : -- +.,.•. F. ,...- ;A� . e +\ ,� F' r
�" •4+•ice 1 ' ll�� `�
�,.. .`rho11P� � `w�''�, /� ��— +
- c■ ; ��—
•.
ti� ; 11
��
� J
�
�l
•< . ; .rw:•
f, ,,, ��
*'+ I Frs !
. ;• � .,eo�f .
2 .x �F: �_
.� `�r2" w ii A�� 1 �1 .��``-- +-~��t
ix
o _ pc ! F�� ' ! II � � 4 + f'% �rf� i R; ` ' � �3
u' ' ' � ' il . �'� TO # :if i.-. .N= '� 1� fir' .1. '. : '. -. .s t .� 'L.:)
0 (41 '�,e:''/1 .. .. CALICO DR
O 4 K a = +!I� I11 ,ter" 4.)
al 1
t.il
4.1i'. �'• 'fir �:40}� lit(
�
.V1. 1l� y . ; /,r QQ �� !�} �z J i '
�j •l l -- f 1 �i p<' 2 —
F 5 � I:. y
k <a
BOOM
Roadway
Access
and
Connectivity
Project
Jurisdictional
Features
Map
Guilford County
North Carolina
4 , IF�� �I .. q y
(:: .411‘ • v
.-.' \ j
��,B0 O -y �� ---- , � 3 — = = tl J
.t re _ ;=--. �\
am- ��1� !' + tom. �, ��/f
.�"' i t +� a L4 " d� )� D-: ~.��:: k � ;; -
z ., �. �� z Ro N t
tti , i4 .j — Q BERTSrCT{ JOSEPH
} �'r° �'�It� '••
'• ` ` s 4 t1��� !�• o �L'`'"` y . �� ,RP R N'"'
a y , ���� ,� , * .4 R i r! bN fE ,1{il _ qt�l 1 °� O 4,W3o WESQ '� ��
o c=_) r r F �i1` _ 11 _ P SEP� B\ v Q Q�
Q = a�' w ' Rp,M Lops S p OLD Q-P�D�
r._ ....t'
2 z r�
� J
WO
` ~� ����� �.
- }
�� s
S CAINDALE DR: /.
w •��"',
_•
-:,.
_
—
'f ; — —
it ------
BBB
BC gD�SG''s�°
. ON Ng F=RPMGERD�O� ��
• B�P oAR�O p�
�' . OFF RPOr- \IV ,;,l1iY o
NON w
O yin , 1 c' 2
n 5 P�Q OG� � Z
� �°P�� BN ° o
1■l _ � BM ,, ', ;.
BF
BG BJ
Date:
April 2022
Scale: 0 250 500 Ft
1R
tit
T�1�3rrt!\1
_
�.
PI I
,�►I►� 'f . ��
�: ' ,i 4
4..1
L� 1i�
.T:�'���1�.�...GRASSWREN�'��
Ct.
--"W =
r` •�
�.. 1,,��:
��-\\ ./11
,`'... -- ,/' �� , BK. WH i�"•
. SB 4• N�J : �1 �..Q.�
— � • _ I�; J ,w •. . .,
.f� _ SG g� �, 'r ►::• ,
`�.r �'� �\O SE { , :� ��� .,� BIB fAf,! l '/ / • r�, A, ', - • _
_.... % ;1. �` .�fiWG.. f ".. : ' ��co'-
l _ '• fir' .. s ��
_ _ o ice; , � :WC WF
► = `
�. - ,� t�k� � •*+� �• �>�r �., � +;• +!�' - ��
U• i f .' . .-!
�, +r;:a • .
,' Ocz
OG 1 q SpPR SB 7,; — - a'O
.• UE OBIN WAY ...P-��1; {�r _ ��` �W� ,...a._ _
`� i .:� )ij it'a 111. w/M � � { A - �� a ! :, f .1
Job No.:
22-107
Drawn By:
NDH
Checked By:
JSM
Ig u
Figure

/zOillEER/it,r
$' .0
e. . c,
�jel'�30*,,+
��.�� r� �-. �s�aA � . -a �+
1'N *
Legend
Potential Nonwetland WOUS (Stream) Potential Nonwetland WOUS (Surface Waters) Potential Wetland WOUS
',i,:i� j, }'f'..
A
Study Area/PJDArea Streets
•
AJD Areas 2ft Contours Culvert
Non -jurisdictional Sediment Basin �i/L_7 Disturbed
`
Intermittent
Non -jurisdictional Stormwater Basin Undisturbed
"
Perennial
/1
Prepared For:
'fir QQQ
OF i
r
1
*
RTy
oti.q
�'
JOSFpHMg
TH 68 RYgNO
NOR MP
OFF RA
r.
.J � -== : -
7
�-r._�'
�
-�—=
- R �':
"'- t ti' O . C �,
AN
:, ,r: 1 meµ
4
=
° oN�THs 1 � „T R 1,• `
8= •
R RgMp .- 1 1 ,'t,:
N q ri. '•,��
/Lip -• '• -
.'
rn ,-� ' b ' ,1*� -:� . -. ..
- =-,z_ - ..„..-;-., ,.4,,
1` - -�r. y '�
] 4 • 4&04=r.s
k -
r lsum
n.t j
s•7 t ! ; w
C ? .1 ? -
•
J' z i ,,, ;
•
/ w a':' -- s( k
z r ;.-
/i;'4
� ;'+:'
'
L - sip idock,
or_
` _ -
Roadway
Access
and
Connectivity
Project
Jurisdictional
Features
Map
Guilford County
North Carolina
" = . ---� °' '~ ,,
w__ -,
. �� -:�� �� ��� //fir a. ��
(siii (‘....-1=.-141.1R•LI
dos QN R� PN 6
—� r --;ems. _ o O) N
J;�
i::
\.-
..
` d4 �� \ c\ i
I'O�
1 . y s.
r '
.., ''
-''�
,.
•L_..---
f J� ,:4' � r...
'11
1W
5,. ri'.•
.�
...� u
-
Ii
f
1
BURGESS
#
s,
,,
RDr
_ _
r
( / /
}J//'/ �f��
1' �f
, i/ ill
' -� ��,_
:y
_ N.
f �
r4,
SL SJ - :
...(
` •
ki
tf j� 1 i x '
�yr
1. `� ,
j. -.
BO's fy�
Date:
April 2022
Scale:
0 125 250 Ft
I I I
Job No.:
22-107
Drawn By:
NDH
Checked By:
JSM
Figure
N_' T 1{1
1 .. . �~ ,, •I it II�,�
-•_Jt • .y - r

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: NCDOT (Attn: Jerry Parker) File Number: SAW-2022-00680 Date: 8/16/2022
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
x
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
x
SECTION
Additional
or the
I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal
information may be found at or http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx
of the above decision.
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED
information.
•
•
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the
ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all
APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form
approved JD or provide new
the Corps within 60 days of the
rights to appeal the approved JD.
the Corps of Engineers
to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appeal process you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: David E. Bailey
Raleigh Regulatory Office
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
also contact:
MR. PHILIP A. SHANNIN
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL REVIEW OFFICER
CESAD-PDS-O
60 FORSYTH STREET SOUTHWEST, FLOOR M9
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8803
PHONE: [phone]; FAX [phone]
EMAIL: [e-mail]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15-day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: David E. Bailey, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North Carolina
28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Philip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): August 16, 2022
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, NCDOT / WBS 50338 / Boom Roadway Access and
Connectivity Project / Greensboro / Guilford County / Div 7, SAW-2022-00680
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Approved Jurisdictional Determination Review Areas
are shown as the green -outlined "AJD Areas" on the attached map entitled "Jurisdictional Features Map", (Figures 3-1 and 3-2).
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Guilford County City: Greensboro
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 36.118959°N, Long. -79.952731° W
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17 594247.52 3997650.64
Name of nearest waterbody: Brush Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Haw River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): Haw, 03030002
® Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a different
JD form:
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): 4/5/2022
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There 0 "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply):
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
❑ Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non -wetland waters: linear feet, wide, and/or acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: Not Applicable.
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non -regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain: The features labeled "Non -jurisdictional Sediment Basin" or "Non -jurisdictional Stormwater Basin" had
indicators of Ordinary High Water Marks and/or met the three wetland parameters per the 87 Manual. However,
based on my site visit and previous determinations (SAW-2011-00317, SAW-2012-01547), these features were
constructed entirely in uplands. There are no features with Ordinary High Water Marks or the three wetland
parameters above the features which drain into the feature. Further, the areas immediately below the features had
neither hydric soils nor hydrology indicators. As such, per Federal Register pg. 41218, Vol. 51, No. 219,11/13/1986,
Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

-2-
these features constructed in uplands are not considered waters of the US. Lastly, these features was obviously
constructed as part of stormwater treatment requirements for adjacent development, given the visible design aspects
(forebays, water control structures, etc.).
As such, there are no portions of the AJD Review Areas that would be considered waters of the US.
SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non -navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i)
General Area Conditions:
Watershed size:
Drainage area:
Average annual rainfall:
Average annual snowfall:
inches
inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through - tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are
Project waters are
Project waters are
ick List river miles from RPW.
ick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
k List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
° Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the arid
West.

-3-
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5:
Tributary stream order, if known:
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man-made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man -altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: -.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts
❑ Cobbles
❑ Bedrock
❑ Other. Explain:
❑ Sands
❑ Gravel
❑ Vegetation. Type/% cover:
❑ Concrete
❑ Muck
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle/ op of complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry:
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope):
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: Pick List
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: . Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Mk List Explain findings.
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑ shelving
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑ sediment deposition
❑ water staining
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:
❑ the presence of litter and debris
❑ destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ the presence of wrack line
❑ sediment sorting
❑ scour
❑ multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ abrupt change in plant community
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ High Tide Line indicated by: ❑ Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.
6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'lbid.

-4-
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
D Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: BA List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the
floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick Li 7
Approximately acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.
For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)

-5-
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet, wide, Or acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial:
❑ Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet wide.
O Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non-RPWs8 that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
'See Footnote # 3.

-6-
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet, wide.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly abutting an RPW:
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet, wide.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
F. NON -JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

-7-
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
❑ Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
® Other: (explain, if not covered above): The features labeled "Non -jurisdictional Sediment Basin" or "Non -jurisdictional
Stormwater Basin" had indicators of Ordinary High Water Marks and/or met the three wetland parameters per the 87
Manual. However, based on my site visit and previous determinations (SAW-2011-00317, SAW-2012-01547), these
features were constructed entirely in uplands. There are no features with Ordinary High Water Marks or the three
wetland parameters above the features which drain into the feature. Further, the areas immediately below the features
had neither hydric soils nor hydrology indicators. As such, per Federal Register pg. 41218, Vol. 51, No. 219, 11/13/1986,
these features constructed in uplands are not considered waters of the US. Lastly, these features was obviously constructed
as part of stormwater treatment requirements for adjacent development, given the visible design aspects (forebays, water
control structures, etc.).
As such, there are no areas of the AJD Review Areas that would be considered waters of the US.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, wide.
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
® Wetlands: 1.3 acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, wide.
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: Aerial, soils, and topo maps (Three Oaks)
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24K; Guilford
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Guilford Co. Soil Survey
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): 2018 NCCGIA
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: SAW-2011-00317, SAW-2012-01547
Applicable/supporting case law:
Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
Other information (please specify): QL2 LiDAR (NC SDD website)
ODDS ®❑❑❑❑®®
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 16-AUG-2022
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:
Parker, Jerry
NCDOT Division Seven
P.O. Box 14996
Greensboro, NC 27415
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
SAW, NCDOT / WBS 50338 / Boom Roadway Access and Connectivity Project / Greensboro / Guilford
County / Div 7, SAW-2022-00680
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR AQUATIC
RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Guilford County
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 36.118959° Long.: -79.952731°
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17
Name of nearest waterbody: Brush Creek
City: Greensboro
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
© Field Determination. Date(s): 4/5/2022
Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the established time frame, the
district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action.
Page 1 of 4

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO
REGULATORY JURISDICTION.
Site Number
Latitude (decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic
resource in review
area (acreage and
linear feet, if
applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic
authority to which
the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e.,
Section 404 or
Section 10/404)
Stream SA
36.120637
-79.957066
174 feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Stream SB
36.118979
-79.952972
3680 feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Stream SC
36.120427
-79.956783
92.8835 feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Stream SD
36.119725
-79.953022
555.6972 feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Stream SE
36.11727
-79.952729
50.2006 feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Stream SF -I
36.11764
-79.95261
368.3486 feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Stream SF-P
36.11819
-79.951997
242.45 feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Stream SG -I
36.118722
-79.948495
110 feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Stream SG-P
36.117783
-79.948842
182 feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Stream SH
36.117309
-79.946185
740.7478 feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Stream SI
36.106167
-79.954773
306.6594 feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Stream SJ
36.106048
-79.954411
169.9839 feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Stream SK
36.105949
-79.95513
308.2234 feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Stream SL
36.106011
-79.954999
54.3959 feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Wetland WA
36.118959
-79.952731
0.0094 acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland WB
36.117846
-79.950395
0.0295 acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland WC
36.117568
-79.948952
1.4416 acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland WD
36.117697
-79.950021
0.0622 acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland WE
36.116353
-79.947076
0.0158 acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland WF
36.116587
-79.946916
0.0258 acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland WG
36.117157
-79.946342
0.0054 acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland WH
36.118106
-79.946022
0.0565 acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland WJ
36.105959
-79.956481
0.1383 acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland WL
36.105803
-79.954874
0.0819 acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland WM
36.106208
-79.954584
0.0489 acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland WN
36.107445
-79.9554
0.2205 acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland WO
36.120353
-79.95326
0.02 acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland WP
36.119304
-79.953093
0.01 acres
Wetland
Section 404
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the established time frame, the
district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action.
Page 2 of 4

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain
an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed
the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be
appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -construction notification"
(PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit
applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware
that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which
does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has
the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the
right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP
or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and
thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever
mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity
in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the
applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a
proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either
an AJD or a PJD, the.JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can
be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal,
it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists
over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional
aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as
soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there
"may be" navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic
features in the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the established time frame, the
district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action.
Page 3 of 4

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
O Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Vicinity Map, Topo Map, Aerial Map, LiDAR Map
O Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
O Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUG maps.
• U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24,000 1997 Guilford, NC
®❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: 1977 Guilford County Soil Survey
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
0 Photographs: 0 Aerial (Name & Date): NCOneMap Orthoimagery
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
El Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:"CDOTProject l-511QlPTIProject SAW-2012-01547
N
❑ Other information (please specify): QL2 LiDAR (NC SDD Website) SAW-2011-00317
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later iurisdictional
determinations.
Date: 2022.08.16
14:50:48 -04'00'
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
°kik- 3r,i7-
ignatur nd date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.