NC0021121_Pretreatment Audit Inspection Report_20220824

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
RICHARD E. ROGERS, JR.
Director
Chris Marion
WWTP Supervisor
City of Mount Airy
P.O. Box 70
Mount Airy, North Carolina 27030
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
August 24, 2022
SUBJECT: Pretreatment Audit Inspection (PAI)
City of Mount Airy
NPDES# NC0021121
Surry County
Dear Mr. Marion:
On August 11, 2022 a Pretreatment Audit Inspection (PAI) was performed by Jim Gonsiewski of
the Winston-Salem Regional Office. Mr. Chris Marion was present for the inspection. The purpose
of this inspection was to determine the effectiveness of the City's pretreatment program, which
included a detailed file review, review of the POTW performance, planning, sampling, and
compliance judgement program, and adherence to the enforcement response plan (ERP).
Additionally, an inspection of the Texwipe facility was conducted in conjunction with an
inspection by the City of Mount Airy.
Background
This is a 7 MGD permitted facility. The City has one (1) Significant Industrial User (SIU)
(Texwipe) which is non -categorical. This facility entered the pretreatment program in July 2022.
A former SIU, Professional Rental Services, rescinded their permit in May 2022.
POTW Interview
There are no plant problems related to pretreatment issues and no NPDES permit limit or
monitoring violations were recorded from January 2021 through July 2022. The facility is very
well operated.
Pretreatment Program Elements Review
The Headworks Analysis (HWA) renewal was submitted on April 23, 2021. This HWA is
currently under review.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300 I Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
336.776.9800

The last Industrial Waste Survey (IWS) was submitted on October 30, 2018. The IWS was
approved on January 7, 2019. The next IWS is due on October 31, 2023.
The Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO) was approved on October 25, 2012.
The Enforcement Response Plan (ERP) was approved on February 5, 2020.
The Long -Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP) was approved on December 15, 2021.
LTMP File Review
The Long -Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP) is being conducted at the proper locations and
frequencies.
Industrial User Permit (IUP) File Review
A review of the file for Texwipe (#0001) revealed that the monitoring data was well organized and
compliant.
The slug control plan for Texwipe (#0001) is currently being developed by the SIU.
Action Items
No other action items were noted.
The pretreatment program is considered satisfactory. Mr. Marion runs an excellent pretreatment
program. If you have any questions please contact Jim Gonsiewski or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
[Docu$i9ned by:
-OA T. SM;ty
145B49E225C94EA..
Lon T. Snider
Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ — WSRO
Enclosure: PAI Report
cc: PERCS Unit — Mike Montebello (Electronic Copy)
WSRO Electronic Files
Laserfiche Files
I CAFKXD_E
D•Wrlme111N 01Ybmmmbtl WM\ Jr."
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300 I Raleigh, North Carolina 27105
336.776.9800

NIC6i;
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
PRETREATMENT AUDIT REPORT
Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Background Information [Complete prior to audit; review Program Info Database Sheet(s)I
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: City of Mt. Airy WWTP
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Chris Marion, Chris Holland
3. Title(s): WWTP Supervisor, Assistant WWTP Supervisor
4. Address of POTW:
Mailing P.O. Box 70
City Mt. Airy, NC Zip Code 27030
Phone Number [phone] Fax Number 336-719-7517 E-Mail cmarion(a,mtairv.org
5. Audit Date 08/11/2022
6. Last Inspection Date: 01/26/2021 Inspection Type: ® PCI ❑ Audit
7. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s) ? ® Yes ❑ No
If No, Explain.
8. In the last year has the POTW experienced any NPDES or Sludge Permit compliance problems? ❑ Yes ® No
If Yes, Explain.
9. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
Order Type and Number: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA
Parameters Covered Under Order
ICIS Coding
Main Program Permit Number
INICI0I012 I1 I1 12I1 I
MM/DD/YY
108I 11 I221
10. Current Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)? 1
11. Number of SIUs with No IUP, or with an Expired IUP? 0
12. Number of SIUs Not Inspected by POTW in Last Calendar Year? 0
13. Number of SIUs Not Sampled by POTW in Last Calendar Year? 0
14. Number of SIUs in SNC for Limits Violations During Either of Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? 0
15. Number of SIUs in SNC for Reporting During Either of Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods?
16. Number of SIUs in SNC with Pretreatment Schedule?
17. Number of SIUs on Schedules?
18. Current Number of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
0
0
0
0
19. Number of CIUs in SNC? 0
NC DWR Pretreatment Audit Form
Revised: December 2016 Past !

20. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW- Review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of each Program Element
in their File, complete with all supporting documents and PERCS Approval Letter, and dates consistent with Program Info:
Program Element
Last Submittal
Date In file?
Last Approval
Date In file
Date Next Due,
If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
04/23/2021
►1 Yes ❑ No
08/16/2017
/1 Yes ❑ No
Currently in Review
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
10/30/2018
/1 Yes ❑ No
01/07/2019
/1 Yes ❑ No
10/31/2023
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
10/02/2012
/1 Yes ❑ No
10/25/2012
/i Yes ❑ No
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
01/13/2020
►/ Yes ❑ No
02/05/2020
/1 Yes ❑ No
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
04/26/2021
/1 Yes ❑ No
12/15/2021
// Yes ❑ No
Legal Authority (Sewer Use Ordinance-SUO)
21. Do you have any towns and/or areas from which you receive wastewater which are not in your annexed jurisdiction?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, Please list these towns and/or areas.
22. If yes to #21, Do you have current Interjurisdictional Agreements (IJAs) or other Contracts? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA
A copy, if not already submitted, should be sent to Division.
23. If yes to #21, Have you had any trouble working with these towns or districts? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA
If yes, Explain.
24. Date of Last SUO Adoption by Local Council 01/17/2013
25. Have you had any problems interpreting or enforcing any part of the SUO? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, Explain.
Enforcement (Enforcement Response Plan-ERP)
26. Did you send a copy of the ERP to your industries? ® Yes ❑ No Dated 2/05/2020
If no, POTW must send copy within 30 days.
27. Have you had any problems interpreting or enforcing any part of the ERP (i.e. any adjudication, improper enforcement, etc?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, Explain.
28. List Industries under a Schedule or Order and Type of Schedule or Order
N/A
Resources
29. Please Rate the Following: S=Satisfacto
M=Marginal U=Unsatisfacto
Rating
Explanation, if Unsatisfactory
Personnel Available for Maintaining
POTW's Pretreatment Program
AS ❑M ❑U
Access to POTW Vehicles for
Sampling, Inspections, and
Emergencies
►1S ❑M ❑U
Access to Operable Sampling
Equipment
//S ❑M ❑U
Availability of Funds if Needed for
Additional Sampling and/or Analysis
// S ❑ M ❑ U
Reference Materials
►1S ❑M ❑U
Staff Training (i.e. Annual and
Regional Workshops, Etc.)
AS ❑M ❑ U
Computer Equipment (Hardware and
Software)
►1 S ❑ M ❑ U
NC DWR Pretreatment Audit Form
Revised: December 2016
Page 2

30. Does the POTW have an adequate data management system to run the pretreatment program? ® Yes ❑ No
Explain Yes or No. The POTW capacity is 7 MGD. Currently it is treating 1.4 MGD.
31. How does the POTW recover the cost of the Pretreatment Program from their industries? Explain.
The annual costs for the program are calculated in May and, if needed, the fee schedule is adjusted July 1st
Public Perception/ Participation
32. Are there any local issues affecting the pretreatment program (e.g.. odor, plant closing, new or proposed plants)?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, Explain.
33. Has any one from the public ever requested to review pretreatment program files? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, Explain procedure. If no, how would the request be addressed? A request would be submitted directly to the POTW.
34. Has any industry ever requested that certain information remain confidential from the public? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, Explain
procedure for determining whether information qualified for confidential status, as well as procedure for keeping files confidential
from public. If no how would the request be addressed? The potential for trade secrets are discussed with each SIU. Any
information can be locked up if requested by the SIU. Would need to submit a request to the SIU if private entity wanted
to view confidential documents.
35. In addition to annual inspection, does the POTW periodically meet with industries to discuss pretreatment? ® Yes ❑ No
36. Is the public notified about changes in the SUO or Local Limits? ❑ Yes ® No
37. Were all industries in SNC published in the last notice? ❑ Yes ® No
NA — none were in SNC
Permitting (Industrial Waste Survey-IWS)
38. How does the POTW become aware of new or changed Users? The Surry County Economic Development Team and
the Planning Committee Board monitors all businesses, including all new or potential businesses.
39. Once the POTW becomes aware of new or changed Users, how does the POTW determine which industries have the
reasonable potential to adversely impact the WWTP and therefore require a new permit or a permit revision? (Who is an
SIU?) JW Short form, SIU determination inspection, long form/permit application, background sampling.
40. Does the POTW receive waste from any groundwater remediation projects (petroleum, CERCLA) or landfill leachate?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, How many are there
Please list each site and how it is permitted, if applicable? One. Surry County Landfill (Local Industrial User
Permit). Discharge since 1999. Limit on flow only. POTW monitors the discharge.
41. Does the POTW accept waste by (mark if applicable) ® Truck ['Dedicated Pipe ❑ NA
42. If the POTW accepts trucked waste, what controls are placed on this waste? (example. designated point, samples drawn,
manifests required) Manifests, Permit Application, SWDP — Septic Waste Discharge Permit. There are five
pumping permits and two port-a-john permits.
43. How does the POTW allocate its loading to industries? Mark all that apply
❑ Uniform Limits ® Historical Industry Need ❑ By Surcharge ❑ Categorical Limits ❑ Other
Explain Other:
44. Review POTW's copies of current allocation tables for each WWTP. Are there any over allocations? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, what parameters are over allocated?
45. if yes to #44, What is being done to address the over allocations? (short-term IUPs, HWA to be revised, pollutant study, etc.)
N/A
46. Does the POTW keep pollutant loading in reserve for future growth / safety? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, what percentage of each parameter 15%
47. Has the POTW experienced any difficulty in allocation? (for example: adjudication by an industry) ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, Explain.
NC DWR Pretreatment Audit Form
Revised: December 2016 Page 3

48. How does the POTW decide on which pollutants to limit in the permits? Monitor for? (for example: were only those pollutants
listed on the application limited; categorical parameters; NPDES Pollutants of Concern)
NPDES pollutants of concern, LTMP parameters, 503 regulations.
49. How does the POTW decide what the monitoring frequency should be for the various pollutants in industry permits? Explain.
Initially the POTW samples POCs 3 times in 6 months, then samples 2 times annually to monitor POCs for the facility.
Frequency for industry is based on numerous factors including, but not limited to, volume of discharge, typical load of
discharge, types of pollutants (e.g. primary or additional), potential to impact POTW, available loading at POTW.
Permit Compliance
50. Does the POTW currently have or during the past year had any permits under adjudication? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, which industries? What was (will be) the outcome of the adjudication?
51. Demonstrate how the POTW judges compliance. This should include compliance judgment on all violations of limits, reporting
requirements, and permit conditions, as well as for SNC. Compliance judgement spreadsheet is used for all pollutant
judgements along with the ERP.
52. Does the POTW use the Division's model inspection form or equivalent? ® Yes E No
If no, does the POTW form include all Division data? ❑ Yes ❑ No
53. Were all SIUs evaluated for the need of a slug/spill control plan during their most recent inspections? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, Explain.
54. What criteria are used to determine if a slug/spill control plan is needed?
If there is the potential for a spill or release of chemicals and if required by the IUP.
55. What criteria does the POTW use to determine if a submitted slug/spill control plan is adequate?
Reviewed with the SIU during inspections.
56. How does the POTW decide where the sample point for an SIU should be located?
What is required by the IUP.
57. Has the POTW established a procedure to ensure that representative samples will be taken by the POTW or SIU each time?
(example: correct location; proper programming of sampler; clean equipment; swirling the sample bucket uniformly)
POTW: ® Yes ❑ No SIU: ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, Explain. Samples are collected by POTW personnel
following required sampling procedures and submitted to a contract laboratory using chains of custody and proper
preservation.
58. Who performs sample analysis for the POTW for Metals Meritech
Conventional Parameters Meritech
Organics Meritech
59. Explain the Chain of Custody Procedure used for both in house and commercial lab samples.
Chain of custody forms are completed for all samples. POTW conducts all sampling. The commercial lab picks up samples
three days a week.
Long/Short Term Monitoring Plan (L/STMP) and Headworks Analysis (HWA)
60a. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® YES ❑ NO
60b. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? ® YES ❑ NO
60c. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in Table or Equivalent? ® YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? ® YES 0 NO
60d. All LTMP/STMP effluent data on Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR)? ® YES ❑ NO Division Inspector, verify yourself!
60e. If NO to any above, list violations
60f. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑ YES ® NO
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
61. Do you complete your own headworks analysis (HWA) ? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, who completes your HWA? Phone ( ) --
62. Do you have plans to revise your HWA in the near future? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, what is the reason for the revision? (mark all that apply) [Increased average flow ❑NPDES limits change
['More LTMP data available ['Resolve over allocation 05 year expiration ['Other
NC DWR Pretreatment Audit Form
Revised: December 2016 Page 4

Explain,
63. In general, what is the most limiting criteria of your HWA? ®Inhibition ❑ Pass Through ESludge Quality
64. Do you see any way to increase your loading in the future (Example: obtaining more land for sludge disposal)? ❑ Yes ® No
Explain.
Summary
65. Do you plan any significant changes to the pretreatment program or changes to the WWTP that may affect pretreatment?
None planned.
NC DWR Pretreatment Audit Form
Revised: December 2016 Paee 5

INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS AND 1 IU INSPECTION
66. User Name
1. ITW Texwipe 2. NA
3. NA
67. IUP Number
0001
68. Does File Contain Current Permit?
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
69. Permit Expiration Date
06/30/27
70. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
NA
71. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit Issue Date? Completed 7/20/2016; permit renewed January
1, 2017.
/1 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
72. Does File Contain Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
Inspected 12/10/2020
/1 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
73. a. Does File Contain Slug/Spill Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
a. ■ Yes 75No
b. Yes ■ No
a. ■ Yes ❑No
b. •Yes ■ No
a. ■ Yes ❑No
b. •Yes ■ No
74. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
❑Yes❑NoON/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
75. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
a. ►5 Yes ■ No
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a. •Yes ■ No
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
a. ■ Yes ❑No
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
76. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did POTW Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP, including Flow?
/1 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
77. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
/1 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
78. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP, including Flow?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
79. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports on
time?
❑Yes❑No®NIA
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
80a. For categorical IUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
file include process/dilution flows as Required by IUP?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
80b. For categorical IUs with Production based limits, does file include
production rates and/or flows as Required by IUP?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
81. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did POTW Identify All
Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
❑ Yes ❑ No
None
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
82. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did POTW Identify All
Reporting Non -Compliance from SIU Sampling?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
83. a. Was POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW within 30 Days?
c. If applicable, did POTW resample and obtain results within 30 days of
becoming aware of SIU limit violations in the POTW's sampling of SIU?
a.❑Yes ❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
c ❑Yes❑No®NIA
a.❑Yes ❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑NIA
c.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
a.❑Yes ❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
c.❑Yes❑NopN/A
84. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was SIU in SNC?
❑ Yes /1 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
85. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken as
Specified in POTW's ERP (NOVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
86. Does File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑NoON/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
87. Does File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑NoON/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
88. a. Does File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
a.❑Yes❑NopN/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
89. Did POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any Requested
Information For You?
❑ Yes // No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
Well organized files. All requested information was easily accessible. The SIU was recently permitted and is currently developing
the slug/spill control plan
NC DWR Pretreatment Audit Form Revised: December 2016
Page 6

INDUSTRY INSPECTION ICIS CODING:
Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY
I NI CI 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 I 1 12 1 1 1 1 08 1 11 1 22 1
I. Industry Inspected: ITW Texwipe
2. Industry Address: 645 West Pine Street, Mt. Airy, NC 27030
3. Type of Industry/Product: Cloth Wipes for Medical. Automotive, and Computer Applications.
4. Industry Contact: Carl Whitaker Title: Engineer/Maintenance Manager Phone: [phone] Fax: Does the
POTW Use the Division Model Inspection Form or Equivalent? ® Yes ❑ No
6. Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspection Thoroughly?
Comments:
A. Initial interview ® Yes ❑ No
B. Plant Tour ® Yes ❑ No
C. Pretreatment Tour ❑ Yes ❑ No No pretreatment unit
D. Sampling Review ® Yes ❑ No
E. Exit Interview ® Yes ❑ No
Industrial Inspection Comments:
Met with Carl Whitaker, Facility Engineer/Maintenance Manager at 10:10 AM 8/11/2022. Facility is Located at 645 West Pine
Street in Mt. Airy and was constructed in 1995. Previously occupied by Hanes Brands which fabricated cloth wipes until
December 2019. Purchased by Texwipe in 2020. Facility is operational with machines fabricating cloth wipes. The facility is
230,000 square feet. 55 individuals work at the facility in three 8-hour shifts 5 days a week. One clean room is located at the
facility for packaging sterile medical wipes. The facility is expanding to the second floor where Hanes Brands previously operated
their cloth wipe manufacturing. After the cloth is fabricated, washed (a 6-hour wash cycle), and dried, it is placed on rolls for
shipment. The facility is permitted for 200,000 gallons per day of de -ionized wash water which is sent to the POTW. Current
flow is approximately 120,000 gpd. Discharge began in January 2022. The POTW conducted a SIU determination inspection
in May 2022. The permit was dated July 1, 2022.
Audit SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Audit Comments: A very well run program.
Requirements: None
Recommendations: None
NOD: ❑ Yes ® No
NOV: ❑ Yes ® No
QNCR: ❑ Yes ® No
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory
Marginal ❑ Unsatisfactory ❑
Audit COMPLETED BY: Jim Gonsiewski DATE: 08/24/2022
Michael Montebello - PERCS and Winston-Salem Regional Office
NC DWR Pretreatment Audit Form
Revised: December 2016 Page 7

United States Environmental Protection Agency
E PA Washington. D.C. 20460
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Form Approved.
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A. National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code
1 1,_, 1 2 u
211111 11 l
NPDES yr/molday Inspection
3 I NC0021121 111 121 22/08/11 117
Type
18191
I I 1 1 I
Inspector Fac Type
191 s I 201
1 I I II 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1
I II 1 I I 1 I r6
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA Reserved
671I 7015 I 711 1 72 1 N 1 731 1 I74 79 1 1 1 1 1 1 180
1
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Mount Airy WWTP
US Hwy 52 S
Mount Airy NC 27030
Entry Time/Date
09:50AM 22/08/11
Permit Effective Date
20/11/01
Exit Time/Date
11:50AM 22/08/11
Permit Expiration Date
25/02/28
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
1/1
Christopher S Marion/ORC/336-786-3597/
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Ricky George Dean,174 Ashly Ln Mount Airy NC 27030/Utilities Maintenance
Supervisor f ORC/336-786-3586/ No
Section C Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit • Records/Reports Pretreatment
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s)
Jim J Gonsiewski
of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Docusi9ned by:
Lp,.... DWR/Division of Water Quality/336-776-9704/
�ot�ie.wi..\ct 8/24/2022
E197B66F179D45F
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
DocuSigned by: 8/24/2022
1n. ^r. MdV
EPA F3rm1 2(W9=94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page# 1

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type
31 NC0021121 11 121 22/08/11 17 18 I r, I
(Cont.)
1
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
On August 11, 2022 a Pretreatment Audit Inspection (PAI) was performed by Jim Gonsiewski of the
Winston-Salem Regional Office. Mr. Chris Marion was present for the inspection. The purpose of this
inspection was to determine the effectiveness of the City's pretreatment program, which included a
detailed file review, review of the POTW performance, planning, sampling, and compliance judgement
program, and adherence to the enforcement response plan (ERP). Additionally, an inspection of the
Texwipe facility was conducted in conjunction with an inspection by the City of Mount Airy.
Background
This is a 7 MGD permitted facility. The City has one (1) Significant Industrial User (SIU) (Texwipe)
which is non -categorical. This facility entered the pretreatment program in July 2022. A former SIU,
Professional Rental Services, rescinded their permit in May 2022
POTW Interview
There are no plant problems related to pretreatment issues and no NPDES permit limit or monitoring
violations were recorded from January 2021 through July 2022. The facility is very well operated.
Action Items
No action items were noted.
Page# 2

Permit: NC0021121 Owner - Facility: Mount Airy VWVfP
Inspection Date: 08/11/2022
Inspection Type: Pretreatment Audit
Permit
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
Comment:
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ IN ❑
▪ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 3