820249_Routine Inspection_20220803

-A-s-
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: I f ' $ —Arrival Time:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
rqs-
Departure Time:
Owner Email:
Phone:
County Region: / �U
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: f,4/ ,5 �jGtfad; Title: �GfS' c, Phone:
Onsite Representative: SGccs.—
Certified Operator: 007 nrite/
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number: 7T,3�11'D
Certification Number:
Longitude:
l
99
Wean
i
to
Finish
B
1t:
yyC
"t
'I�
y
Layer
�I
®
;v
S a 2
iE 13N���
QnCr
i
'i
N
Dairy
k
Cow
at
i�i; il���,l
IA
}
l
i
t tl
Wean to Feeder
ei,7400o
#9S7)b
Non -La er
!
Dairy
Calf
r s�
Feeder to Finish
{{
'v,
Dairy
Heifer
Farrow to Wean'
Dry
Cow
Farrow to Feeder
1, a
#
„„i
a
®•:
;
Non
-Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
fipl�F
Beef
Stocker
Gilts
`i
Non -Layers
,
Beef
Feeder
Boars
�jr
Pullets
Beef
Brood Cow
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
(,0
Other
1
�
�� •tt,=, � a
dt
1,
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Eliro ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes El< ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 2... - 9 ler
Date of Inspection: 5---:-��j-
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes [/] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Erg-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [r No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application �,�
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes L/J "'cIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [P<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area/
f../fin / ac.,AitaC 'cro( I X e, Pl ttOre— v-a a . ram fir' • /� a A01 9,
13. Soil Type(s): c Lacr7�lp�- LL- ez-e.— �' 7i/7t
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 2'ffo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 0 Yes ❑-N6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes a'�Io 0 NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes Q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents r,,< 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes E❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes Q'l Imo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 1211fod
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑14o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued
12. Crop Type(s):
Yes
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
I]NZ ❑NA ❑NE
❑Yes ago ❑NA ❑NE

Facility Number: 0-- 9 if
Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
IonaA &
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
J-e"d 1 -circ zf t11 c&
6.,-,61,j A.1erati- t:Ar/C v7 500,
r rt-d.
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 4/z2-37,3---0/S/
Date: /S .7 ,2432-
5/12/2020