WQ0000520_Staff Report_20220318

XigIEC:V?
State of North Carolina
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Staff Report
March 18, 2022
To: DWR Central Office — WQ, Non -Discharge Unit
Attn: Erik Saunders
Application No.: WQ0000520
Facility name: Burlington RLAP
From: Caitlin Caudle
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Note: This form has been adapted from the non -discharge facility staff report to document the review of both non -discharge and NPDES permit applications and/or renewals. Please complete all sections as they are applicable.
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ® Yes or ❑ No
a. Date of site visit: 3/4/2022, 3/8/2022, 3/16/2022, 3/17/2022
b. Site visit conducted by: C. Caudle
c. Inspection report attached? ® Yes or ❑ No
d. Person contacted: Shane Fletcher and their contact information: (336) 675 - 5927
II. EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs) for the facility? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
ORC: Shane Fletcher Certificate #: 988745 Backup ORC: James Blackwell Certificate #:990715
2. Are the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal
system? ® Yes or ❑ No
3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils, topography, depth to water table, etc) maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? ® Yes or ❑ No
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit (e.g., drainage added, new wells inside the compliance
boundary, new development, etc.)? ® Yes or n No
If yes, please explain: Maps included in the application reflect most recent field conditions.
5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? ® Yes or ❑ No
6. Are the existing application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) still acceptable? ® Yes or ❑ No
7. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? n Yes or ® No
8. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ® Yes or ❑ No
9. Has a review of all self -monitoring data been conducted (e.g., NDMR, NDAR, GW, AR)? ® Yes or ❑ No
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review: All annual reports reflect compliance with the permit
in this permit cycle except for 2017.
10. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑ Yes or ® No
11. Check all that apply:
® No compliance issues n Current enforcement action(s) n Currently under JOC
❑ Notice(s) of violation ❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium
Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
12. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
Yes ®No❑N/A
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 1 of 3

III. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or ® No
2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non -Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an
additional information request:
Item
Reason
Revised maps.
Revised maps are needed for NC-AM-128-01, NC-AM-019-04, and NC -AM -
125-01.
Soils evaluation for areas
added to NC-AM-016-04.
This area has recently been cleared of timber but was not included in the
original application area. A soils evaluation is needed to add this to the
application area. The second area has also been recently cleared of structures
and was not included in the original application area. See included map for
more information.
Updated LASC.
• An area was excluded in NC-AM-128-01 and an updated acreages is needed.
• A house has been constructed within 200ft of the parcel boundary of NC-AM-
125-01. A house buffer needs to be added and the acreage of this field updated.
3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
Condition
Reason
I.2
This permit condition has been satisfied.
I.3
This permit condition has been satisfied.
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued:
5. Recommendation: ® Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
® Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office
n Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
❑ Issue
❑ Deny (Please state reasons: ) DocuSigned by:
6. Signature of report preparer: DocuSigned by: �. CattiA,
Signature of regional supervisor: Le,- T. SMIu- '-8B834968199D49D...
Date: 3 /17/2 02 2 145B49E225C94EA...
IV. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
See documents included in Staff Report Package.
• Revised CH-39 LOA
• Revised CH-40 LOA
• CS-113-05 FSF
• CS-113-06 vicinity map
• CS-113 topo map
• Updated LASC
• AM-016-01 through 04 map
• NC-AM-019-04 comments
• NC-AM-128-01 comments
• Soil evaluation
• Inspection summary
• Comments on all fields remaining in permit
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 2 of 3

There are several fields where houses are currently under construction. How should the permittee approach providing
updated maps that reflect all new habitable residences? There are currently four fields that need updated maps, or will
need an updated map, to reflect new dwellings. This is likely to be a reoccurring problem due to development in the
area.
Maps have been marked with the changes to the application areas and can be provided if requested.
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 3 of 3