WQ0004268_More Information (Received)_20090318

.��t- r
5 rt,-Cy //Z& CAT-) 0
s Re ' 'qru PjN S'/TE
Quality Vesetables _
arch I8 2009 HAR
Nathaniel 1) 'Thornburg
Environmental Engineer II
Aquifer ProtectionSection - NCDENR'
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-106
RE:. Application No. WQ0004268
Response to Additional Information Request #2
Allens, Inc. Plant #?
Wastewater Treatinent and Spray Irrigation System
Dear Mr. Thornburg:
Following is the additional infonmation.requested in a letter dated March 4, 2009 regarding the
- Wastewater'Treatment and Spray Irrigation System, for the Allens, Inc. (Allens),facility in
Turkey, North' Carolina (Sampson County). -
General Notes•
1. Submit .a check' in the amount of $1,122.
A check was hand -delivered to. DENR on March 9, 2009. A stamped receipt is attached, ;
(Attachment 1).
2. Format of additional information response.
Each comment is, addressed and -attachments and/or enclosures are identified in the
response' letter.
Property Ownership Documentation ;
1. Written documentation on DOT easement.
Written documentation has been provided by DOT with a cover. letter. dated'March 6,
2009.-'A copy'is provided (Attachment 2).
2. Written documentation on two,private property easements.
Although progress_ has been made,: the final -agreements. are not. yet complete. Therefore,
Allens requests that DWQ separate the pipeline approval from the remaining. project, and
Allens; Inc. FO Box 250 1 305 E. Main Street Siloam_Springs,.AR `72761

r.>
proceed with approval of the irrigation system and the, screening tower at this time. Per
your instruction, the pipeline'aspects have been "ghost -lined" in the enclosed submittal.
Detailed Plans
1. Two copies of amended plan sheets in I Ix17 format — one to Thornburg,,the other to
Hys
Requested plan sheets are.enclosed:
-2. Amend plans to include soil scientist's recommendations for rehabilitation of existing
farm access roads:
The enclosed detailed plans include the soil scientist's recommendation forrehabilitation ,
of the existing farm access roads.
3. Amend Plan Sheet C-105.t4i include location of old well south of Zone.3a.`
There is no old well south of Irrigation Zone 3A. The location of this.well indicated to'
the Division at the time of the, site visit was incorrect. The correct location .is shown on
the plans as submitted as well- WW=6.
Site Map.
1. Include location of all .wells on the site map. .
is There is no old well south of Irrigation Zone 3A. The location of this well
indicated,to the Division at the time of the site visit was incorrect. The correct
location -is shown on the plans as submitted as well'WW-6.
I The site map has been revised to show the proposed monitoring wells which
are shown on Figures 1 and 4 of the Revised HydrogeoloWc Report submitted
withthe-response to Additional Information Request Number 1.
Specifications
1. Amendspecifications to include soil scientist's recommendations for rehabilitation of
existing farm access roads.
The enclosed specifications include the soil scientist's recommendation for rehabilitation
of the existing farm access roads.
Operation and Maintenance Plan
1. Amend O&M Plan to include liming recommendations.
The enclosed O&M Plan include liming recommendation:
2. Amend O&M Planto include crop harvesting' and removal details:
The enclosed O&M Plan includes updated crop harvesting and removal recommendation:
General
1. Outstanding/unpaid wastewater.uermit fee.
Allen checked with their accounting department and confirmed that, although previous
annual permit fees were paid, the fee due on October 17; 2008 had not been paid., We
apologize for this.oversight and note that other fees (air, hazardous waste, etc.) we're paid ,
in a timely manner. Aliens submitted a cover letter to Nathaniel Thornburg with a check
on March 5, 2009. A copy is provided in Attachment 3..
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact.the undersigned at [phone] or
'[e-mail].
Aliens, Inc. I PO..Box 250, 1 305 E. Main Street Siloam Springs, AR 72761. -

lily,
Allen. Inc.
Z&Ws�nski, Cl
Director — Enviranrnental Quality .
cc: Rich.Hayes, DWQ, Raleigh Regional Office
Randy Sipe, DWQ, Washington Regional Office
leers. hic. PO fox 250 309 E.'Miun ttti et 1 Silloa` a Sp. -bags, AR 2 51

Attachment 2
DOT Easement
Aliens, Inc. I PO Box 250 1 305 E. Main Street I Siloam Springs, AR 72761

03/12/2009 09:00 9105960127 ALLENS INC PAGE 02/04.
STATE OF NORTH CARomNA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
13EVERLY EAVES PERDUE DIVISION OF IffCxFIWAYS EUGENE A. CONTi, X.
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
March 6, 2009
Allens, Inc,
Attention: Zachary L. Fuller, PE
MacConnell & Associates, P.C.
5900 Turkey Hwy
Turkey, NC 28393 .
Dear Mr. Fuller:
SUBJECT: Encroachment Agreement on SR 1924
in Sampson County
(Reference Number: E-82-2009-007)
Attached for your files is a copy of Right of Way Encroachment contract properly executed. .
This contract covers the following:.
Installation of approximately 5687 linear feet of 12" DIP Class 53 by trenching •and 60 linear feet
of 12" DR-9 HDPE by directional drill. For irrigation purposes.
This approval is also subject to the attached Special Provisions.
Very truly yours,
H. A. Pope, P.E. .
Division Engineer .
HAP/ARE/dlr
Attachment
cc: Robert Memory
Karcn E. Fussell, P.E.
I24 Division Drive, Wilmington', NC 28401. [phone] Fax [phone]

03/12/2009 09:00 91e5960127 ALLENS INC PAGE 03/e4
y STATE OF NORTH;GAROtINA
ROUTE SR 1924 Rowan Rd, PROJECT N%A'- COUNTY OF Sampson
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF,WAY ENCROACHMENT. "AGREEMENT:
-AND' PRIMARY -AND SECONDARY HIGHWAYS
Allen's,lnc. James Phillips
PO Box 250, Siloam Springs; AR.72761 479-524-6431 4 `
[phone] 8 2 - ZOW A' - 00 7
l.ocAlrAAA:tJ:SS ou ..N�tit Y w;r' TvlzK.f�,uCzb3?3 .
SS sa ro - oa z ti
THIS AGREEME<� +6fYlade and entered into this the 10 day of 20_ by and between the [department
of.Transportation, party of the first part; and Ailens, Inc,
party ,of the second part, .
Route(s
WITNESSET'H...
THAT MEREAS, the party of th`e.second part desires to encroach on the right of way of the public road designated as
;_-'SR. 1924 (Rowan Rd.) , •located aloli9_the west and, north side of roadway,
notAlV fnro/�Y.4n'ten/1f1\ font• in�+ivin Ohs ."..i.�sf.....,...-..iw-. ........�� c...:.....�....a�- ,---"_- -e.� - - - . _. _.._ _...
with the construction' andlor erection of. approximately 5687 linear feet of 12" 0 w trenching and 60 linear feet of -12" DR9
HD PE by directional drill..
WHEREAS, it is to the material advantage of the party of the,,second part to effect this encroachment,,.and the party of
the first part in. the exercise of authority conferred upon it by statute, is willing to permit the encroachment within the limits of the
right of way as indicated;. subject to the conditions of this agreement; .
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED that the party of the first part hereby, grants to the party of the second part the right
and privilege to make this. encroachment as shown on attached plan sheet(s), specifications and special provisions which are
made a. part hereof upon the following conditions, to wit
That the installation, operation, and maintenance of the above described facility will be accomplished in"a000rdanoe with the party of
the first part's latest POLiCIE AND PROCEDURES FOR ACCOMMODATING UTIUTiES ON HiGHWAY RIGHTS-LIF-WAY. and such .
revisions and amendments thereto as may be in effect at the date of this agreement. Information as to these policies.and procedures
may be obtained fmm'the Division Engineer or State Utility Agent of the party of the first part.
That the said,party of the second part binds and obligates himself to install and maintain the encroaching facility in such -safe and
proper, condition that it will not interfere with or endanger travel upon said higtrway, nor'obstnid nor interfere with the proper maintenance
thereof, to reimburse the party of the first part for the cost incurred for any repairs or maintenance to its roadways and structures'
necessary due to the installation and existence "of the facilities of the party of the second part, and if at any time the party of the first part
shall requira.the removal of or changes in the location of the said facilitles,'that the said.party of the second part -binds: himself, his
successors_and assigns, to promptly remove or alter the said facilities, in order to conform to the said requirement, without any cost to the
party of, the first part.
That the party of the seoond part agrees to provide during oonstruotion and,any subsequent maintenance proper signs, signal lights,
flegmen and other'warning devices for the protection of traffic in conformance with:the latest Manual on Unit , Traffic Control Devices
for Streets and Hlohways and.Amendments or Supplements. thereto,.. Informatfon'as to the above rules and regulations may be obtained
from the Division Engineer of the party. of the first part.
That the party of the second parthereby agrees tD indemnify and save harmless the party of the first part from all damages and
claims for damage that may arise by reason of the installation and maintenance of this encroachment. .
That the party of the second part agrees to restore all areas disturbed"during Installation and maintehance to the satisfaction of the -
Division Engineer of the party of the first part The party of the second part agrees to exercise every reasonable precaution during
construction and maintenance to prevent eroding of soil; silting or pollution of rivers, streams; lakes, reservoirs, other water
Impoundments, ground surfaces or other property; or pollution of the air. There shall be compliance with applicable rules'and regulations
of the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management,. North'.Carollna Sedimentation ControlCommission, and with, ordinances
and, regulations of. various counties,, municipalities and other official agencies relating to pollution prevention and control. When any '
installation or maintenance operation -disturbs the, ground surface and existing ground cover, the party of the second part agrees to
remove and replace the sod or otherwise reestablish the'graw cover to meet the satisfaction of the Division Engineer of the party of the .
first part.
That the party of the second part agrees to assume the actual cost of any Inspection of the work considered to be necessa, ry. by the
Division Engineer of the party of the first part, _
That the party of the second part agrees to have available at the construction site,`at'ad times during construction, a copy of this
agreement showing evidence of approval by the party of. the first part. The party of the first. part reserves the right to stop all•work unless . .
evidence of approval can be shown.
Provided the work contained In this agreement is being performed on s completed highway open to`traffic; the party, of the second part
agrees to give written notice to the Division Engineer of the party of the first part when all work contained herein has been completed.
Unless specifically requested by the party of the first part,, written notice of completion of work on highwav,oroiects under annfitnirtinn „gill .

03/12/2009 09: 00 9105960127' • ALLENS, INC' PAGE 04/04
w d teases of qwu mft The carnraetor lhsll netpa'ro* eRher tti►edtr ortndt city. in Itte cwm.*nt Wm omhwtstt by
3edlotr 2t,S Of tnb ReguYtiOtts, IndMrptWpiopt W pfa a tMttt!n the ctu�tracteove,S a progmm 6atdprth b-Appendix 9 -
a 8arteraeone`tor � 1rx �!1CN -A a In gu opa o&ft.avior bycanpe 66
lx lt�:ernegoefellonn lr�rfryct.daror.+.nrk"�be.je►tonmdLgxWStsub=Ma4lhckx nproan.rt�xmnE
' me�rlebaMebaspf•l�u�fnlenl.etu9+et�baonftxclOrorfupAtteF:�Ahe:nol�edt�yr:thecan�tht .
• .. e0rareefOfe bbl�lorte mstfertAe• �nhtrbC!"rand Cf9 RegobNC�l16 feAMRe to nonC+scrbrgr�t►onon.tl�e•prOurKtp a[raae:•cvtor .
brhMloaeturfgin.
d " "� ihe.lfie� prouYl► AlEbdan�ro��..9.e",n. eeld�ien'�oyA,,repquinW"bf' 1he l�uf►>fons, erdhectives .
perndta l*:b. r"eaar:eelnan,
"itKt�a.es meY baddtom�iriatl . the�•Dop,tSeient CfTredepp�fagpg artho F Fl�hweY,AomYVab'allon to 6e PerRnent to . ;
s tobr►gpEae�oov+ltll.,rl� ardlreal)uea:ilq+atednYiM6mmt4oR d"ofao0+�baGtoriaTtltheexdu" _
art Drum, who fau6 or fef mml Ip Mrdrft-W"wtfMh Mm aftba ar dW so oo*$ frle Doperenent of
T oi'ft-t%d" ftfM" ACm#n"I ion ae "Mpfta. •ar>d SMI:" Fft wtot Aflarm n hu mnf to aftl*
e '. ant+3or• oJl" h tha.uonlflLth. eonkacE�de nonoornpf�eteo'wb►tt� �otrpravlabns•afthta
' [:aaQiCr,U�e'DeyiaPtrnEetaf nipaRlYlteneh�Impo+e'yadtwn�ar;attr�s•salter.UlaFea.hl'Hloha®gAdmRuebstlon
meldetemi►ne to•be apprcpNpta tndutlboo, out not 1MMoe0to, ,
' [f) wRhhoidtn(tofpeynf�nttin:it�000Mradarwrttar HmGONroetueflt�iheeonbaetorce�0e►.antllOr "'
(2) m ogatteq,te�sitMetlannrsuspensCunoft�pdMrab4�whotearthparL
f the ca�trmctorahertirst{ude the yrorietonsof Auaptapltt: al'thtougA'P lh every iLom baof. "
�. � proQA6r119rlfs f$1119t�i� t+ndtetas�•ofegtripmenr; untbss'axernp! t�r'H►®Ftle�oJatianp, ardfred>res issued .
pweuant "Mato, The a trAct r'shnit take won eetlox„itl,•inn,ers re a�w, �.n., ......,.,..... _.. __.� .._
- ttt+e�pribrar• .......-. , w.......■,�.suurWmr�ans•N1avQtn7 -
bortCroa�iMrl�e: .. I�utl�7liehm�re+�eoraaarsa,iose►.aacanialr:mt+ntuea>�:erfsrean�- .
A6p4eoiiwHha'so6votAroaor,or�stemrltofsadf"+snedtr4thegeriaoofor'n►eytegelaotiha•OepatbnQ:sd '
TranappRsAon t0 on�f'iflMAlrch Rtlpapaa•b.pivteq tlls,lnitu�41 of fhe Stale, lo•aoxltllotr, are oontraotor mray.>egaeat
the lh�sd stems ie raker fnla•auoh`Wlgaemi t0 prtrf�d111eeta uT'1f1A ttAilgd 5'b1es. -
Rf W (101) ; Maly otthn•Secottd Part mWFN s That fhis•apr6s W. l%tnie and 6CCUr.M copy * the tM
RM (161Yhcorpof*Mv afi revlekmu-to date. .
1N V11l 41M WHEREOF, eats atthe ps6as to this aQre._"rd iias•aaused the same#o b* axeaated ttte'day and
yearlb tob"wdtten.
iTEST OR'WM*-89:
- '� ' �`- tYUt�n911tlsaoorp"eyailonore•rn�nik�+a9ty:rtllaabroanwntRubtimtie�e,atlipe•�atatldbemtaeWdbythsaagocaMa��.
-, :: � �:�v ar�+Ao�waroda►q►amc�t. �ir�ars.�etvarar gnat sna at�mt�bn ar te�s:eenemy or by at. anpowered cny.
~ � ^„--_ -. � OiAbltat�h•on 12etrt lha•Rafo oflir�:vftlm Al6ta� o3:Ri0At ef�•fho �oapraddas In tht"s.oeree�nodl:l'orasoeoutfan� �.nattte vl •
_ ' � •--""- =:�tta 1xtr�rs}pglise abovafie•rra . _ _ - _ . �cadort typed• r+te,ernrtraencartoera�at�ronn'i�+�r�d�snourdbe fyped.aHec4�r..
tM�tt 8+a oppltcoAt not'a cofpon ttren trBe sty rmat ba w(afeeaedtry one p m 1ba addn;ssf tM betee *d In Wa
agreeif+entandther�en:esdfauP�ru�dnhfnetheepeeen�ant.ehouidlie�ed,d➢ee�!betaw,thelrsFani�a ,
Ttdaaq►e�iirentnne+thenwoasnpzntdd,intheikwmafraeatmt�unard,byptaria�'dtawMceahoxdngths.to>lOsafrtg.saPtirahfamlbrmottora,
• 1. .' Allmadfragaatrd rertrps. ... " ..... � .
g• Itnorv+prthtarsnif►.stare!epptreaere�tnaoontrolotaDo�atin�e4,
3 ' txe5anertteo+�re�pwMrbrvropeesaeneeaeaernrfnt
^' F: 1NetlfodoTtnrtaaarlOn.' ,, ' '
8, Di�efI�7DM6sbD1d11��t1Q fFp�fe'B1relIRPMFi14fe►dt0georAtnOnL. eft
7. i oc "jft lA*lw*i ft i eta@bm MOM H' UOM tmmeotogtbtOl ba c1aa9190, I6Cation sHonkt besRowrr by
tlto>.r� eoro r"an ybint; stt'itt s 0ikl�� rOdtl. klaeq�oe4, f io assi=ktn of tllD -
!ww4rf tWakassDepnrtrrrtrrts+aedargt►P bseeenatta►evatlousNtph►vu �iJplbee.orstthe,
t oe vttumsors lfaftle*enaaadarrttic(emmor"andhmoritataimortsla+rtorn
snCioQdtr+eat•to nguegpaR�ota�uqure� ,
. 9. ." Mettwdof IMidtianerilao,dMldnepe:aftl�furss or6rtdpq�, - _ •
tt Or1u,+ptonrxLuaggeR,thadopth-&bww>riareatiryela0:ler!ah.ahtmom, .a)r ka,'afo
1a' .' Wk azs and imm of°anwsm"" wlAV mqutred
1a Qnratderd►vntfdtrrosa6�9r,nailtonaa•roraothodofcrosc�.tior'mp.aad�de� a�„cw.sta '
... , fs-. toCl�lroh'ervants. •
i. Aaj albttunant to.r As m offer dralnepe ebwt„re mvOt losapproved DY the ti¢ad of Btrudune Oes�n in RRa"ll ,
• priartaavi9nt�}vrraterulrncr+t�rettrtetlttothe.piftetWi��tiphea:. �• :.
, 2. /W7anau/db�slaaehrea"Pass/bkeaaa�►tafAeormeMpl�n,•., .
3: • Nq�dmran trefM'dl tdee�nceo orovert4ad;�t atnl �bka eDOYe a1F*nadwasro cpn}tuea tade�mnoes set out in - .
�ttmrate+rapeiitcSa�yOodl; ,
e. Ert�ntlt srmq•e�zlri'ara dkCh Nne'baltdt Iinm ti dd and"S' eannd iQe af�apty in �1 eQerdwb. - -
Ali Vahts':sMM be eigetldndta aM rt�tK oft tibla"ar a.auamiea rognked by0fe Department
6. ; Ad ppe encaegrtelfts as I*-MftW and st WGM edfllltMM Eft mwdmvo mtd gotlferefiwts "I D'epwmmir%
7 . Argr•9p¢dat Pto+rls�tie oraperiftc�e►It<arto Cib �dthe waatc drftiejiielhvd'af G�prfBbttoi�t.that nary be
.'irgt&r�dDythse�e�rt+►idnrnro9eb¢afi�pn�1•aheticatmf�tienAaenaoKhenar�sa�eeniantpta�ed•9�at .
-oath ht mmfm aeraroi tfe:atwam ao Ph" arprawlepa.
- ' e. ' � • Ttk CcpifOftt+rtCs'�vlibn C�Ineersharld by gMen no8a4 ty thm appP�nt ARa'ro adsr�fstan&fg Of trgte�tlpn .
inahlaAd in th)k•�rermei�i:,,
TEITAL P.'W,. .

Attachment 3
Wastewater Permit Fee Payment
Aliens, Inc. PO Box 250 305 E. Main Street I Siloam Springs, AR 72761

_tia UY I&BMOYI28 SIMCL, .
• Quality Vegetables- -
March 5, 2009
Nathaniel D. Thornburg.
NC DENR
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
RE: Permit Fee for Allens, Inc.
Permit No. WQ0004268
Turkey, NC
Dear Mr. Thornburg;
Enclosed find the permit fee for the Allens, Inc. facility located in Turkey, North Carolina
(Permit No. WQ004268). If you have any questions regarding this fee payment, please feel free
to contact me by phone at 479-524-6431 ext 296 or by email at [e-mail]. Thank
you. .. -
Sincerely,
0
Kathryn Yeager
Manager, Environmental Operations
Aliens, Inc.
CC: Tommy Langston, Aliens
Reid Wells, Aliens
Laura-Mushinski, Aliens
Enclosure
Aliens, Inc. • 305 East Main Street • P. 0.. Box 250 • Siloam Springs, Arkansas 72761 • Tel: [phone]

■1tlli l�n&TAr mia VnI IPWER 9EFAI7E nppn-:ITlmn CHECK SILOAM SPRINGS. ARKANSAS
INVOICE DATE
INVOICE NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
AMT, OF INVOICE
CREDIT OR
D SC UNT
NET AMOUNT
g
^/r1
00
936561

SECTION 11872
WASTEWATER IRRIGATION SYSTEM
PART I - GENERAL
1.01 Description of Work
A. The work covered under, this Specification consists of _famishing all labor, tools,
materials, equipment and, supervision required to construct a spray irrigation
wastewater disposal system for the purpose of disposing of treated wastewater
through designated fields.
B. Related work specified elsewhere in these Contract Specifications includes:
1. "Section 15100 -Valves and Related Appurtenances."
1.02 Submittals:
A. Product Data: Submit data for proprietary materials and items, including sprinkler
nozzles, related appurtenances, and others as requested by Engineer.
PART 2-PRODUCTS
- 2.01 Impact Sprinklers
A. Full Circle Impact Sprinklers shall be Senninger Model 8025HR-1-1 1/4" M, 15/32"
nozzles, for operation at 43.1 gpm, 50 psi, and a diameter of 172 feet.
B. Partial Circle Impact Sprinklers shall be Nelson Model F80APV, 15/32" nozzles, for
operation at 44.1 gpm, 50 psi, and a radius of 81 feet.
C. All Impact Sprinklers in Zone 6 shall use 7/16" nozzles.
2.02 Valves
A. Isolation Valves shall be manually operated and be gate valves. The valves shall be
placed upstream of the irrigation zones so that the irrigation system may be isolated in
case of a valve malfunction.
2.03 Control Panel
A. Control panel shall be as specified in Section 12191.
Aliens, Inc. - Plant #7
Wastewater Treatment System Improvements
MacConnell & Associates, P.C. Project No.: A30701.00
Wastewater Irrigation System
11872-1

B. Control panel shall be capable of dosing one field while two pumps are operating.
PART 3 - EXECUTION
3.01 Spray Irrigation Piping
A. The irrigation piping shall be SDR 21 PVC pipe with push on joints. The piping shall
be laid as shown on the plans and shall be -done in accordance with Section 15060 of
-these "specifications.
3.02 , Drainage and Removal of Water.
A. During construction of the irrigation system; the Contractor shall maintain the area of
operations free from all water from any source not needed in construction. Rainfall or .
groundwater shall be removed from the area of operations with the use of sumps and
pumps, drainage ditches or other suitable means. Water removed from any area of
operations shall be transported and released in'a manner that will not have adverse
impact on existing or planned facilities or downstream property.
3.03 Installation
A. Install sprinkler heads and risers as shown on the Contract. Drawings.
3.04 Amendment of Existing Farm Access Roads
A. The following steps shall be taken for amendment : of existing farm access roads
located in the suitable soils/proposed wetted areas of irrigation Zones 16, 17, 18,.and
18a.
1. The use of a sub-soiler, or similar deep -sharked tillage tool to remove compacted
layers below the soil surface. This implement should have a working depth of at
least 18 inches to ensure adequate, disruption of any hard pans that may occur
under the paths.
2. Disking the surface of these areas at the time of crop establishment.
3. Applying lime and starter fertilizers per the 'agronomist recommendations for the
surrounding zonal areas (please refer to the Agronomist. Report prepared by
S&EC, P.A. for further details)-
B. NC'- DWQ may require a reevaluation of these areas by a licensed soil scientist to
ensure that compaction has been properly alleviated prior, to operation of the spray
fields.
END OF SECTION 11872
Aliens, Inc. - Plant # 1 Wastewater Irrigation System
Wastewater Treatment system Improvements
MacConnell & Associates, P.C. Project No.: A30701.00. , 11872-2

Operation and Maintenance Plan
System Operation
The proposed screening facility will operate automatically as the existing pump station doses the
stationary screens.' The screening facility is set up to -operate in two trains, with each train
operating two stationary screens and one screw press. Manually operated valves will allow the
operator .to dose either of the trains, or isolate pieces of equipment for required maintenance.
Augers will transport the vegetable screenings to the screw press. After the water is pressed, out
the vegetable screenings will collect in a hopper. The screenings will be stored until they are
manually emptied into a truck using the discharge auger(s).
Water, from the, facility will flow by gravity to the primary lagoon or the closed -loop
recycle water storage tank. The closed -loop recycle water pump moves water back to the plant to.
flush the gutters,used for transporting vegetable waste out of the plant. Settling .will occur in the
primary lagoon prior to the effluent entering the storage lagoon. The irrigation system will draw
water out of the storage lagoon to dose to the irrigation fields. _The pump station contains three
main irrigation pumps and one jockey pump. A variable frequency drive (VFD) set up is used to
control the,pump operation. Valves will be manually operated in the field to dose the desired
irrigation zone. As valves are opened and closed the VFD will automatically adjust -the flow
based on the pressure,chariges. The pump station contains a jockey pump to maintain the desired
discharge pressure during low flow fluctuations.'
All system, operation should be performed by the Operator in Responsible Charge .(ORC)
or someone working under his direct supervision.
Inclement Weather Operation
The Operator will track and record rainfall, air temperature, and weather conditions on a, daily
basis and report ,this information on the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR). Due to the
manual nature of the irrigation system an operator will be on -site during- a vast majority of the.
irrigation periods. Weather forecasts and actual site conditions will be used ' to monitor for
pending or. actual rain events. Irrigation is stopped if inclement weather is imminent or has
occurred. Visual inspections of the field conditions will be used to determine the acceptable time
to commence irrigation after rain events.
Safety Measures
Access to the proposed pump station and existing irrigation, fields is -restricted by the security
guard at the plant. entrance. The pumps- are protected on other: sides by natural obstacles such as
wetlands and the irrigation lagoon..:
Allen, Inc. - Plant #7
Wastewater Treatment System Improvements
MacConnell & Associates, P.C. Project No.: A30701.00 and A30705.00

The proposed irrigation fields on Rowan Road will be protected from public access by a two
strand barbed wire fence and a gate on the Rowan Road (north) side of the irrigation field. The
Beaman Woods Road (west), side of the field will be fenced from Rowan Road to the woods line.
Access along Beaman Woods Road in the, woods line is also.restricted by a cannel. -Access. to the
irrigation fields 'on, the other south and. east side are restricted through natural buffers ' such as -
creeks, woods, and wetlands, therefore additional, fencing will not be _necessary.
Liming Recommendations
Lime shall be broadcast on the irrigation fields as recommended in the agronomist report: Initial
application recommendation is 0.8 .tons/acre for field sample. F-1 and 1.3 tons/acre for field
sample W-2.
Cropping Scheme
Agronomist recommendations by S&EC and permit requirements shall be followed at all times.
The following is an excerpt as recommended in the permitted agronomist report.
In order to maximize wastewater disposal- from a nutrient -use standpoint, Coastal bermudagrass
has been proposed as the, final receiver crop on the spray areas. _ Coastal bermudagrass, a hybrid
bermudagrass variety, .is a warm season perennial that grows quickly in the summer months and
has a high capacity to assimilate plant nutrients, making it well -suited for wastewater disposal
application. Since bermudagrass goes dormant in the late fall,, wintertime wastewater application
will be accompanied by over -seeding the bermudagrass with winter annual rye. Grass will be
cut, baled and removed off -site on an "as -needed" basis.
Crop Management Considerations
Agronomist recommendations by S&EC and permit requirements shall be followed at all times.
The following is an excerpt as recommended in the -permitted agronomist report.
The optimal time for establishing Coastal bermudagrass using dormant sprigs is February
through March. Seedbed and root zone preparation are key, to having a successful establishment.
The root zone should be prepared by appropriate 'tillage methods.' Sub -soiling should be
considered or areas that have received, heavy traffic or where plowpans have developed from
prior tillage: Following deep tillage, lime; phosphorous and- potassium fertilizer should be
applied and iilcorporated,.into the seedbed asrecommended by the soil test report. Dormant. '
sprigging is the most economical method of establishing large areas of bermudagrass, although
sprigs will- not begin to grow until late March. When planting in the -winter months, sprigs
should be covered with up to 2 inches of soil to protect them from frost. Live sprigs (stolons
with green tops) can be planted in the late spring after'the threat of frost has past.. Although
bermuadagrass can be established using live sprigs until late.summer, early planting dates will
ensure strong rhizome (underground stem) growth, essential for wintertime survival. Only high
quality sources of sprigs certified, by North Carolina Crop Improvement Association should be
Allens, Inc. - Plant #7
Wastewater Treatment System Improvements
MacConnell & Associates, P.C. Project No.: - A30701.00 and A30705.00 ,

I . ►
used for establishment.. To optimize establishment, 30 to 40 lb/ac of starter nitrogen fertilizer
should be applied once growth begins and repeated six to eight weeks later.
Coastal -bermudagrass should be cut every 4 to 5 weeks or when it grows to 12 - 15 inches tall.
Once bermudagrass is overseeded with winter rye in the fall, grass should be cut to a height of 3
inches or less to encourage rye establishment. In the early spring approximately two weeks
before bermudagrass is :expected to turn green, mowing height should be reduced to % to 1-inch
to allow bermudagrass to recover and. out compete the winter rye. Since bermudagrass is very
intolerant to shade, late spring cutting of winter rye should be avoided as it may severely limit
bermudagrass, recovery.
Allens, Inc. - P1a t #7
Wastewater Treatment System Improvements
MacConnell & Associates, P.C. Project No.: A30701.00 and A30705.00

System Maintenance
.To ensure a smooth operating system, regular maintenance shall be performed on each treatment
unit. The maintenance for each unit is detailed on the plans and is displayed in the following
table.
nneratinn and Maintenance Tnckc
Unit
Frequency
Task
Stationary Screens
daily
Check for solids accumulation, blockages, or damages.
Repair as needed.
Screw
daily
Check for solids accumulation, blockages, or damages.
_Presses
Repair as needed. Grease moving parts as required and
perform any specific maintenance tasks recommended by
manufacture at prescribed intervals.
Augers
daily
Check for solids accumulation, blockages, or damages.
Repair as needed. Grease moving parts as required and
perform any specific maintenance tasks recommended by
manufacture at prescribed intervals.
Storage Tank
daily
Inspect for leaks or damage. Repair -as needed.
Pump Station Intake
daily
Clean off debris to ensure unrestricted water flow to wet
Screens
well.
Irrigation Field!
4 - 5 weeks
Mow vegetative cover when it grows to 12 - 15 inches tall.
Vegetation -
See Agronomist Report and Crop Management
Considerations for additional requirements.
Irrigation System:
daily
Check for leaks in force mains and damage to sprinkler
Piping and Distribution
risers, odors, ponding, and erosion to ensure runoff does
Equipment
not occur in irrigation area.
Control Panel and
monthly
Check amp readout and compare to manufacturers
Pump Efficiency
instructions. Refer to manufacture's recommendation for
maintenance of variable frequency drives and controls.
Aliens, Inc. - Plant #7
wastewater Treatment System Improvements
MacConnell & Associates, P.C. Project No.: A30701.00 and A30705.00

Spill Control and Emergency Contact Information
In the event of a spill or bypass the following steps should be taken:
• Internal Communication of the Incident
• Containment of the spilled material
• External Communication of the Incident
• Spill Clean up and Proper Disposal
Contact information is provided in the table below.
Aliens, Inc. Turkey Plant Internal Contacts: .
Tommy Langston
Plant Manager
[phone]
Allen, Inc. Corporate Contacts:
Laura J. Mushinski, CHMM
Director of Environmental Quality
[phone]
Commercial/Private Spill Assistance Contacts:
Kathryn Yeager
Corporate Environmental Specialist
[phone]
Crystal Clean .301 Truck Stop
607 Ellis Road I-95 Business & NC 87 (on US 301)
Durham, NC 27703 Fayetteville, NC
[phone] [phone]
Federal, State,'and Local Notification and Emergency Assistance Contacts:
Sampson County Emergency Management
[phone]
Fire Department
911,
State Emergency Operations Center
[phone]
NCDENR Water Quality Division — Groundwater Section
Fayetteville Regional Office Raleigh Main Office
(910) 48.6-1541 [phone] '
NCDENR Water Quality Division — Aquifer Protection Section
Fayetteville Regional Office Raleigh Main Office
' [phone] [phone]
National Response Center
[phone]
U.S. Coast Guard
[phone]
Allens, Inc. - Plant #7
Wastewater Treatment System Improvements
MacConnell & Associates, P.C. Project No.: A30701:00 and A30705.00

Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
4 ,
HCDEHR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director .
EARL WELLS — VICE PRESIDENT
ALLENS, INC.
POST OFFICE BOX 250
SILOAM SPRINGS, ARKANSAS 72761
March 4, 2009
Subject: Application No. WQ0004268
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Additional Information Request #2
Allen, Inc. Plant'#7
Wastewater Treatment and
Spray Irrigation System -
Sampson County
Dear Mr. Wells:
The Central and Regional Aquifer Protection Section's Express Reviewers have completed our review of
.the additional information package- submitted February 25, 2009.. Additional information is required
before we may complete our review. Please address the following items no later than the close of
business on March 18, 2009.
Please be aware"that you are responsible for meeting all requirements set forth in North Carolina rules and
regulations. Any oversights that occurred in the review of the subject application package are still the
responsibility of the Applicant. In addition, any omissions made in responding to the above items shall
result in future requests for additional information.
Please.reference the subject application number when providing the requested information. All revised
and/or additional documentation shall be signed, sealed and dated, with two (2) copies submitted to
Nathaniel Thornburg at the address below, one (1) copy submitted to Rich Hayes in the Raleigh' Regional
Office, and one (1) copy submitted to Randy Sipe in the Washington Regional Office: Please note that
failure to provide this additional information on or before the above requested date may result in your
application being returned as incomplete.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone]:
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,-
Nathaniel D. Thornburg
Environmental Engineer II
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX 1: 919-715-0588; FAX 2: 919-715-60481 Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwatemuality.oro
An Equal Opportunity l Affirmative Action Employer
One
North Carolina

Mr. Earl Wells
March 4, 2009
Page 2 of 4
cc: Rich Hayes, LSS — Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Randy Sipe — Washington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection.Section
Gary S. MacConnell, PE — MacConnell & Associates, PC
G. Christopher Murray, LSS — Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
Eric G. Lappala, PE — Eagle Resources, P.A.
Mark Allen, LSS — Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
Permit Application File WQ0004268

7
l4r. Earl Wells
/March 4, 2009
J:.
Page 3 of 4
i
General Notes:
1. Upon submittal of the additional information prior to the close of business on Wednesday, March
18f, please submit a check made payable to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources in
the amount of $1,122.' Failure to provide this check by 5:00 pm on March 18"' shall result in the
immediate return of the application package. Failure to provide all requested additional information
In
items shall result in an automatic additional information request and associated fee.
2. - When providing additional information responses to the Division, please provide a response letter
addressing each, comment and provide a reference as to the location of the requested information in
the -updated application package.
Property Ownership Documentation:
1. As previously requested in the additional information letter dated February, 11, 2009, please provide
written documentation from the North Carolina Department of Transportation allowing. an easement
for the wastewater effluent force main to cross Rowan Road (SR 1924).
2. .As previously requested in the additional information letter dated February 11, 2009, provide written
documentation (i.e., copies of the recorded documents) allowing a minimum 5 .foot permanent sewer
easement for the force main construction and operation in the following properties:
Owners: Milton D. & Connie Carr . Sampson County PID:-12098056007
Owners: James D. & Nyda W. Sutton Sampson County PID: 18023244006
Each written easement shall be notarized, signed by all -property owners and recorded in the Sampson
County Register of Deeds.
Detailed Plans:
1. Please provide two (2) -copies of the amended plan sheets submitted February 25`" in 11 x 17 inch
format. One set shall be submitted to Nathaniel Thornburg in the Central Office, and the other set to
Rich Hayes in the Raleigh Regional Office.
2. ,As requested in Question #3 of the Soil Evaluation section of the additional information dated
February 11, 2009, please amend the plans to include the soil scientist's recommendations for
rehabilitating the existing, farm access -roads -in Irrigation Zones 16, 17, 18 and,l8a.
As previo requested, revise Plan Sheet C-i05 of the Wastewater Treatment System Improvements
Plan to tinplude the location of the old well south of Zone 3a. At the time of the site visit it was
sfed that this well would be abandoned. However, a review of the plans does not show -any wells in
this vicinity that have been noted for abandonment.

Mr. Earl Wells
March 4, 2009
Page 4 of 4
Site May:
1. Per Application Instruction O and Rule 15A NCAC 2T .0504(d), ensure the site map to includes the
following information:
a. The location of all wells, streams, springs, lakes, ponds, and other surface drainage features
within 500 feet of all waste treatment, storage and disposal sites. If monitoring wells are
proposed, amend the site map to show their location. on the review boundary.
ude the old well south of Irrigation Zone 3a as described in Detailed Plans Comment #3
above.
ii. Amend the site map to show the proposed monitoring wells shown on Figures 1 and 4 of the
Hydrogeologic Report.
Specifications:
1. As requested previously, amend the specifications to include the soil scientist's recommendations for
rehabilitating the existing farm access roads in Irrigation Zones 16, 17, 18 and 18a.
Operation and Maintenance Plan:
1. Amend the O&M Plan to include the liming recommendations described in the Agronomist Report
responding to Question #3 of the Agronomist Evaluation section of the additional information letter
dated February 11, 2009.
2. Amend the O&M Plan so that the crop harvesting and removal details are consistent with the
recommendations provided in the Agronomy Report.
General:
1. Review of permit number WQ0004268 database files indicate there is an outstanding annual permit
fee for the period beginning August 1, 2008 and ending July 31, 2009. An annual fee in the amount
of $1,310 was due October 17, 2008; however, as of this date, this annual fee has not been paid. The
invoice number for this fee is 2008PR009398.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .0120(b)(5), the Division requires that all outstanding permit annual fees be paid
prior to granting the modification to permit number WQ0004268. If this fee has been paid, please
provide the Division with a copy of the mailed invoice and a copy of the canceled payment.
Otherwise, please submit a check made payable to the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources in the amount of $1,310 for invoice number 2008PR009398 to my attention at 1636 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636. Please ensure this is a separate check than the
additional information fee of $1,122 due March 18th.

SETBACK PARAMETER
.NOTES s
er >> �ma io ec'uNn�'""..a ws xx, sw.fl• . uaw9.e ox.ua, exo.,9m
.m.xosix csuwn aeu..x ..,n� .x:u. .. _ .. .. _ ... s.,.•anxa' 2
WE
n a ons er r.a rtO ox .x9w .,." °�° •1MP"01 441K
uS°"uaronc K�E�
N,x:n�a:ox P,u, xo xxo.x . xx sm
xx, m,m.N rouwwmN u. N-1"211
r �•
---------------------- —• swam ...,sac Pxmao
oxEN su ru�iNc
------ _
�-X
�. � �. / , i�/-r''' f, 'J , � • • . y��-�t-.:`r r.,\` �,,a�r �I",:i',omili�
v'-
4 J
l )
POND.:::-i :..: ::.............. ......••: 8
I� ,:• _ ; I : ; NAM. _S 1 _ j_ -%1, r r<.xr� n' ' , %� \,'• •i.�.--:- ::;,'�';
•�_ • '\ /' i � �-io•.,t {III •�\, __ � 11 r�/ � / �/� P` �. _%if, -k •`,
QQQ\\\ \T\ `\ �. y,� i ' `/ / ,,,/, r' �.� `may-' :• ,:�...'\,�
�m'is \yi,rahe i 1 1 1 �'� /: .r/;•'////,,`/I.� f 1 •_____\\ 1.1 -'•
•\. _,, \`-_,. % }/ a' _ � � / 1 • \ \ `�'•� N0. ANTE REDO DE6[RiPMN
a-_-- --
_1', =-P r :Ft, -` J ! , ,�:[„ I•�' -7 Y ( r I r \�x me.m sex 1 `gait ,1 , oz/z9/oe PER wo Ouwrr
`-_1 .�,' '\•,,, ��•�_ �," /•,�% \ ),/: \�y� \ ! •J•• ! '•i 9'dO ,00'tarOan �.. 3 Ol/,6/02 PEH ONNCR
.. / r`�(/_�'�'\^�______._�:�/ •. '/�-` / •l "F_� I y:I •' / \y,� I .�j}'.` �`..•:' 3 PCA NCOENR
/ 1 •':rl '___ j� - / i f \ I / •�Jl ^ ', JI'l{p,•�I x im'rm 1I'�,;, •101210M. P[R NCDENfl
_ -1_.. � ___: ' / \ �� 1 / i� 1\.. �•••• /• •'\ �..1 •i�fi 5 04Or/D, /09 PER NCOENfl /,/ yr �- �`�11 -. "p�`y�-,ram ,•.L�—`,\, -- �' JI _ 1 mr,r'I : �; _- :/ J \`(�^j,j -�� � ;� 1�; PRDJECf vAH�GER: PflaEZ �ENc�xEEN:
"fit) DR.wNGm cmcx ft
CMIL
I \`I%, •A-'\iR---- '^ i� r"i. .; a w/ .1• Ilia
..•. - _ • - .\\,- 1 . -- \ ; '�1 �C{�,,, ..'%F �' ; �'; ' / 111 �I:^ ',% • / j 1 i; . . _ •JUANM' S0. 1006
` \ 1 iJ
.. `.,� � J), , :-«x�,:� r ; `,` 1 s i\ ^�xr;• �' L,' i i F `III
s\.. �. d I �u a p.l- x. sneFiran •. \:� \ `:.,, - , !a ; 'G �1�i3_c �"f L f_ % ' ;fir tI ~\ //. \ �'..•
rj
LEGEND .... l : `—.� �t�.. „ -- • �t\\ �\ f �N•. • .. _MacCONNELL
•��• .
&Associates, P. C.
j GR GRD
en
I
n
,00,„DR,NP
---nxc,n w..s. __------•-' - �: . - uD"R iVM"RDR,N URmD,n nsm
/ .____ '•j."r _ -Y - _ _ _ _ ra:,ue rwr. ,9 macs,o..
\ ALLENS, INC. - PLANT #7
' _ .___-, - ,\'inn -�•___ • 1. �i��4 JIC—�• ` �.
/jr>`—•��\ WASTEWATER
�^ TREATMENT SYSTEM p
i.... IMPROVEMENTS
ism Dxa -�• I � .
P EmexoR
'••...... .................... ;;° SAMPSON COUNTY, NC '
...._...............................
xa,K
sror Eurmx : ..:..:.... SITE MAP gg
an 2
Y _ - IRRIGATION FIELD
9wuw [auPu[Nr uG - ............................. ......•:' ' RA— —E:. ,• ]00• '
w_ _ PROJECT NUMBER DRAwiNG NUMBER g
0 °° 1 0 °' " "xR"• 0 1. zoo 6D God` A30701.00 C-101a

11. Cover crop information:
Use the Nutrient Management in North Carolina's Realistic Yield Expectations webpage
(http://www.soil.ncsu.edu/nmp/ncnmwg/vields/index.phn#county) to determine the PAN (lbs/acre) and Phosphorus.removal
(lbs/acre) rates for each cover crop.
Nitrogen,
Phosphorus
Cover
Soil. Series
%
Removal
Removal
Crop
Slope
Rate
Rate
bs/acre
bs/acre
Hybrid
Wham
0
270
68
Bermuda
Winter
Annual
Wagram
0
50
20
Re
Hybrid
Tarboro
0
200
49
Bermuda
I
Winter
Annual
Tarboro
0
200
49
Re
Hybrid
Noboco
0
299
80
Bermuda
Winter
Annual
Noboco
0
50
20
Rye
Proposed mineralization rate: 0.20 — 0.35 and volatilization rate: 0_5
✓ . Irrigation area based upon the nitrogen balance: 2,205,711 if
l
✓ Irrigation area based upon the phosphorus balance:,5,346,715 i
✓ Irrigation area based upon the water balance: 2,908,802 If
✓ *, **Site is: X hydraulically limited ❑ nutrient limited
*Zone 18 and 18A are nutrient limited
**Phosphorus balance irrigation area exceeds total application area, but phosphorus will be chemically bound`in the
soil and poses a minimal threat of loss through runoff, leaching and/or erosion.
FORM: VMS 12-06 Page 18
,0/

Up MEMORIES Sr N C 8 !9 2
C +.,.,'ff
9 0 3� cbo. fdr Sig 6 ~
f
i
Quality Vegetables
February 23, 2009
Nathaniel Thornburg
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
AquifQr. Protection_ Section
Nan -Discharge Permitting Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
sly: �: �•' -1
Randy Sipe
Washington Regional Office
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
945 Wasbi:ngton Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
RE: Application No. WQ0004268
UL
g �1, FEB 2 2009
DENR RRLOGG�E �G _
Attached are two items requested by the Division in a letter dated February 11, 2009 regarding t h 0 glans
for a. wastewater irrigation system for our facility in Turkey, North Carolina:
1) Ad.ditional analytical data on the wastewater to be irrigated.
2) Approval from NCDENR, Division of Land Resources, for the Erosion and Sedimentation
Qwitml'Plan.
These items are to be considered in conjunction with other information submitted last weQk. Thank you!
Sincerely,
Aliens Inc.
aura J. Mushinski, CI-IMM
Director — Environmental Quality
cc: Zack Fuller, MacConnell
Eric Lappala, Eagle Resources
Tommy Langston/Reid Wells, Aliens - Turkey
Aliens, Inc. PO Box 250 1 305 E. Main Street I Siloam Springs, AR 72761.

Microbac Laboratories, Inc. Page 1 of 1
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
STATE CERT ID.
2592 HOPE MILLS ROAD
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28306 NC #I1
[phone] FAX [phone] NC #37714
R. W. SANDERS, VICE PRESIDENT USDA #3787
http://www.n icrobac.com E-Mail: [e-mail]
CHEMISTRY MICROBIOLOGY - FOOD SAFETY • CONSUMER PRODUCTS
WATER • AIR WASTES • FOOD • PHARMACEUTICALS • NUTRACEUTICALS
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Allens, Inc.
Date Reported:
Ms. Kathryn Yeager
Date Received:
2/16/2009
Post Office Box 250
Order Number:
0902-00435
Siloam Springs, AR
72761 Invoice No.:
Customer #:
A004
Sample Date:
2/16/2009
Permit No. NC TURKEY PLANT Sample Time:
12:15
Sampler: Miller
Subject: Lagoon sample, Part 1 - RUSH
SMP Test Method Result Date Time Tech
�.m.,.. ��.,,t..x,.�,.F�,.p .�-Y�.,...�az�.�.,�.....�.....<,.�_.�.,,_,.�'z..a'x„r£_,.x.,.z.�,-�.:...��._�,,,�..�.:,o-.-,�.'`.r�. .,.�az:>.��a,_�..,.....�„w..... ��.....<�..�'d..... z�` .f.,£��.....�a:�.-.-. x•.,...-...z_...a�:�
CHLORIDE
SM 4500 CI C
180 mg/L
2/17/2009
9:00
HAK
COD
SM 5220 D
862 mg/L
2/17/2009
8:30
ENC
COLIFORM, FECAL
SM18 9222D
5900 cfu/100 ml
2/16/2009
14:50
HAK
pH
FIELD
7.75 sm.
2/16/2009
12:15
RDM
S.A.R. SERIES
0:00
CALCIUM
EPA 200.7
30 ppm
2/18/2009
0:00
CMP
MAGNESIUM
EPA 200.7
13 ppm
2/18/2009
0:00
CMP
SODIUM
EPA 200.7
119 ppm
2/19/2009
0:00
CMP
SODIUM ADSORPTION RATIO
CALCULATION
3.23 ppm
2/20/2009
10:00
BKS
SOLIDS, TOTAL DISSOLVED
SM 2540 C
832 mg/L
2/18/2009
10:30
ENC
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
SM 20th 5310C
170 mg/L
2/18/2009
0:00
CMP
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: % . ri , AQ/rZQr?JLbr
MICROBAC LABORATORIES, INC.
T hank you for your business. We invite your feedback on our level ofservice to you. Please contact the Laboratory Director, Ron Sanders at 910-864-1920 , Robert Morgan,
COO, at [e-mail] or Trevor Boyce, CEO, at [e-mail] with any comments or suggestions.
LAB CODES: N/D = None Detected N/F = None Found <= Less than > = Greater than Est. = Estimated
MEMBER
The data and other information cuntaired on this, and other accompanying documents, retinesent only the sample(s) analyzed and Is rendered upon the
condition that It Is not to bereproduced wholly or In part foradvertising or otter purpose without written approval from the laboratory.
USDA-EPA-NIQSH Testing rood Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research 021

Microbac Laboratories, Inc. Page 1 of 1
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
2592 HOPE MILLS ROAD STATE CERT ID.
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28306 ' NC # I I
[phone] FAX [phone] NC #37714
R. W. SANDERS, VICE PRESIDENT USDA #3787
http://www.microbac.com E-Mail: [e-mail]
I
CHEMISTRY MICROBIOLOGY • FOOD SAFETY • CONSUMER PRODUCTS
WATER AIR - WASTES -FOOD • PHARMACEUTICALS • NUTRACEUTICALS
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Aliens, Inc.
Date Reported:
2/20/2009
Ms. Kathryn Yeager
Date Received:
2/18/2009
Post Office Box 250
Order Number:
0902-00462
Siloam Springs, AR
72761 Invoice No.:
63301
Customer #:
A004
Sample Date:
2/18/2009
Permit No. NC TURKEY PLANT Sample Time:
7:30
Sampler: Wells
Subject: Lagoon sample, Part 2 - RUSH
SMP Test Method Result Date
Time Tech
SOLIDS, TOTAL SUSPENDED SM 2540 D
400 mg/L 2/20/2009 11:30 ENC
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:.
MICROBAC LABORATORIES, INC.
T hank you for your business. We invite your feedback on our level ofservice to you. Please contact the Laboratory Director, Ron Sanders at 910-86.1-1920 , Robert Morgan,
COO, at rniorgait@,microbac.com microbac.com or Trevor Boyce, CEO, at iboyce@,microbac.com with any comments orsuggestions.
LAB CODES: N/D =None Detected N/F = None Found <= Less than > = Greater than Est. = Estimated
MEMBER
The data and other information contained on this, and other accompmying dotummis, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon the
condition that It is not to bereprodmed wholly or In part foradvertising or other purposes without written approval from thelaboratory.
USDA-EPA-NIC6H Testing Food Sanitation Consuldig Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research

C
Allens, Inc
P.O. Box 250
Siloam Springs
AR 72761
North Carolina Division of
Aquifer Protection Section
Non -Discharge Permitting
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
February 21, 2009
Subject: Additionallnformah
Inc —Plant #7
To Whom it May Concern; .
This letter transmits the respo:
Water Quality (DWQ) for the
in the letter from DWQ to All
following:
i
• Check in the amount c
• Revised Soil Scientist
changes have been ma
• Revised Agronomist f
been made) 11
• Revised Water Balanc
• Revised Hydrogeologi
been made)
• Revised Plan sets, Spe
Maintenance Plari (to 1
February 25, 2009)
i
Application
G
If
�C
Quality
Request Response: Modification of Permit WQ0004268, Allens,
s to the Request for Additional Information by the.Division of
;plication for a modification to Permit WQ0004268 as set forth
i, Inc. dated February 11, 2009. This letter also transmits the
$1,122 as requested in the letter.
valuation (map and text without those attachments for which no
J) ,
aluation (without those attachments for which no changes have
and Wet Weather Storage report and map,
Report.(without those attachments for which no changes have
:ications, Engineering Calculations, and Operations and
delivered separately by MacConnell & Associates before or on
1. Item I(1) lists the Applicant's name as Allens, Inc. Due to the Permittee's name changing
from Allen Canning Company to Aliens, Inc. since the last permit issuance, please submit a
properly completed Permit Name Change Application, which may be downloaded at:
Response:
A completed Permit Nan
Application.)
Change Application is attached to this letter as Attachment
1
r.

l
Allens, Inc -
�' P.O. Box 250
-' Siloam Springs
AR 72761
North Carolina Division. of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
Non=Discharge Permitting Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
February.21, 2009
Subject: Additional Inform
Inc — Plant #7
To Whom it May Concern;
This letter transmits the respo.
Water Quality (DWQ) for the
in the letter from DWQ to All
following:,
• Check in the amount c
• Revised Soil Scientist
changes -have been ma
• 'Revised Agronomist E
been made)
Revised Water Balanc
• Revised Hydrogeologi
been made)
• Revised Plan sets, Spe
Maintenance Plan (to 1
.February 25, 2009)
Application !
E,
FEB 2 0 2D179
{'
t DENR RALEIGHOFF1C
._ _ ...i
Request Response: Modification of Permit WQ0004268, Allens,
. n
to the. -Request for Additional, Information by the Division of
dication for a modification to Permit WQ0004268 as set forth
Inc. dated February.11, 2009.' This letter also'transmits the
$1,122 as requested in the letter.
valuation (map and text without those attachments for which no
�) 4
aluation (without those attachments for which no changes have
and Wet Weather Storage report and map
Report (without those attachments for which.no changes have
Lications, Engineering Calculations, and -Operations and
delivered separately by MaXonnell & Associates before or on
1. Item I(1) lists the Applicant'' name as Allens, Inc. Due to the Permittee's name changing
from Allen Canning Company t6 Allens, Inc. since the last permit issuance, please submit a
properly completed Permit Name Change Application, which may be downloaded at:
Response: j
A completed Permit r
Application. I
Change Application is attached to this letter as Attachment
1

i
Application (continued)
2. Amend Item II(3) to state th
Response:
Item II(3) has been amen
attached to this letter.
3. Amend Item H(4) to estate
Response:
Item II(4) has been amen(
attached to this letter.
the facility is existing.
in the revised Permit Application Forrn WWIS 12-06, which is
the facility is using private lands.
in the revised Permit Application Form WWIS 12-06, which is
4. Amend Item II(5) to include the submittal date for the erosion and sedimentation control
plan, and the submittal and approval dates for the Nationwide 12/404 general permit.
Response:
Item 11(5) has been am
5. Amend Item III(5) to ii
In addition, amend the
the case of total susper
provide anticipated de:
effluent concentration
Calculations.
Response:
Item III(5) has been ame
anticipated design efflue:
effluent parameters have
through 11/17/2008.
Values for fecal Coliforr
taken the week of Febru:
6. Amend the table in Applic
distances (i.e., field measu
listed setback parameters.
N/A. Please note per,15A
setback distances shall be
Response:
Application item IV (2) is
and C-101b.
to include the dates requested.
le the estimated influent concentrations for the listed parameters.
to include the average effluent concentration data provided. In
solids and fecal coliforms, if historical data is not available,
d effluent concentrations for these parameters. Please ensure the
is consistent with the nutrient data used in the Agronomic
r
to include estimated concentrations for the influent and
icentrations for fecal Coliforms and TSS. The remaining
filled in using average of quarterly samples from 3/2/2007
and TSS are provided on the laboratory data sheets for samples
16, 2009 and submitted with this response.
on Item IV(2) to include the actual most restrictive setback
l) from the irrigation system and treatment/storage units to the
an actual setback' is greater than 500 feet it shall be marked
"AC 02T .0504(d)(3), each of these actual most restrictive .
►wn on the site map, unless they are greater than 500 feet..
and distances are labeled on attached Site Maps C-101a
OA

_ Application (conthined)
7. Amend Item V(2)(a) to in
addition, also amend this
a hopper, as well as any o
Response: 1'
Application item V (2) (a)
screw presses, four (4) aul
8. Amend Item V(2)(f),to in(
line.
Response: ,
Application item V (2) (f)
9. Amend Item V(2)(i) to inc
Response:
The table in Application It
10. Amend Section VI to inch
Response:
Application Section VI is i
flush storage tank. The dr
polyethylene tank in place
11. The recommended annual
calculated from the hydrae
Based on the Licensed Soi
Evaluation to include, reco:
series.
12. ;
'Response:
The Soils Evaluation'and I
loading rates that include t
additional estimated amou
evapotranspiration exceed;
in the Revised soil Scienti:
Please note that the Recoj
design recommended,ann
Water Balance report and
Jude the stationary screen opening dimensions (i.e., spacings). In
tem to include: two (2) screw presses, two (2) auger conveyors and
'their associated mechanical equipment..
is revised to include stationary screen spacing dimensions, two (2)
er/screw conveyors, and one (1) hopper.
the information for the return pump supplying the gutter flush
revised to include the gutter flush return pump.
the flow meter used in the field irrigation wet well.
V(2)(i) has been amended to include the irrigation flow meter.
the relevant information regarding the gutter flush storage tank.
ised (and slightly modified) to include information for the gutter
ings and,specifications are also revised to include a
the bolted steel tank originally shown.
Jading rates listed in Item VII(7) are actually drainage rates back-
is conductivity (YSAT) tests determined in -the Soils Evaluation.
Scientists professional opinion; amend Item VII(7) and the Soils
emended maximum annual loading -rates for each. of the three soil
f
,,m VII(7) have been revised to include recommended annual
e drainage rated calculated (not back calculated) and an
t to account for those months during which potential
effective precipitation (precipitation minus runoff as described
Evaluation transmitted with this letter
nended Annual Loading Rates are in all cases greater than the
I loading rated from the mounding analysis as shown in the
i Item VII(10}

i
Application (continued)
13. In addition, please amend the table in Item VH(7) to show which fields have the most
dominant soil series. i Also, if a field has minor inclusions of other soil series, please include
that field in parenthesis.
Response:
Because the irrigation zones (fields) do not correspond to soil series boundaries, as
explained in the Hydrogeo�ogic Report, the Table. in item VII(7) cannot be readily modified
to include the requested information. However, Figure 4 of the Revised Hydrogeologic
Report and Figure 1 of thel Water Balance reports have been modified to include the mapped
soil series underneath the zone boundaries. Additionally the following table has been
prepared that gives the area and percentage of each soil series that is contained within each
irrigation zone: 1
Zone
Total i
NorWa Noboco
Goldsboro
Tar Kalm Johns
Area sq ft '
Area sq ft
%
Area sq ft
%
Area sq ft
%
1
83,954
83,954
100.00%
-
0.00%
-
0.00%
2
140,534
140,534
100.00%
-
0.00%
-
0.00%
3
509,224
447,122
87.80%
62,102
12.20%
-
0.00%
A
82,315
1 _ -
0.00%
82,315
100.00%
-
0.00%
5
33,844
1 -
0.00%
33,844
100.00%
-
0:00%
6
84,551
1 -
0.00%
84,551
100.00%
-
0.00%
7
43,455
1 -
0.00%
43,455
100.00%
-
0.00%
8
112,760
50,195
44.51%
62,550
55..47%
-
0.00%
91
34,357
1 -
-0.00%
34,357
100.00%
-
0.00%
10
79,714
79,7141
100.00%
-
0.00%
-
0.00%
11
29,205
28,681
98.21 %
524
1.80%
-
0.00%
12
162,719
161,594
99.31%
1,125
069%
-
0.00%
13
92,965
88,716
95.43%
4,249
4.57%
-
0.00%
14
333,031
284,691
85.48%
48,340
14.52%
-
0.00%
15
42,300
11,611
3.81%
40,689
96.19%
-
0.00%
16
313,696
127,6821
40.72%
185,914
59.28%
-
0.00%
17
99,070
1 61
1 0.06%1
95,845
96.74%
3,164
3.19%
18
1 672,306
1 -
0.00%1
117,322
17.45%
554,984
82.55%
Totall
2,949,900
1 1,4,94,555
897,1811
1 558,148
Table Showing the areas and percentages of each soil series contained within each irrigation
zone.
4

Annlication (continued
14. The Design Annual Load:
rates used in the Hydroge
revise as necessary to pro
Response:
This was an error in upda
Report, Water Balance an
Annual Loading Rates ha
rates in the reports and in
submittal reports. The ex
comments under the Wab
15. Revise Application Item V
nitrogen and phosphorus b;
removal rate and the phosr
for each soil map unit.
Response:
Application Item VII(11)
Rates (in/yr) listed in Item VII(10)(a) do not match the loading
;ic Report, Water Balance and Agronomic Report. Please
consistent numbers throughout the application package.
ig Item VII(10)(a) to be consistent with the Hydrogeologic
Agronomic Reports. We apologize for this oversight The Design
been updated to match those in the reports. Please note that the
em VII(10)(a) are slightly different from those in the original
anation for these slight differences is explained in the response to
Balance Section.
1) to indicate the required irrigation area based upon the
ces. In addition, the cover crop information, the nitrogen
as removal rate must be listed for the most limiting soil type
been revised to include the information requested above.
5

I
Attachments for Application Comments
1. Revised Permit Application Form VMS 12=06
2. Completed Name Change Application Form PNOCF09-06
3. Receipt for check in the amount of $1,1222.00.
6

I
Completed Revised Application Form WWIS 12-06
II
1
I
1
I
I
r
I
I
I
r I

O�0 W AT �9pG
r
� o <
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
WASTEWATER IRRIGATION SYSTEMS APPLICATION
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: WWIS 12-06
The Division of Water Quality (Division) will . not accept this application package unless all the instructions are
followed. Plans, specifications and s�pporting documents shall be prepared in accordance with 15A NCAC 2T
.0100, 15A NCAC 2T .0500 and good engineering practices. Failure to submit all of therequired items will lead to
additional processing and review! time for the permit application.
For more information, links to forms request) d in this application, or for an electronic version of this form, visit the Land Application
Unit (LAU) web site at: hgp:11h2o.enr.state.nc.us/lau/main.html ,
A. Application Form (All Application Packages):
✓ Submit one (1) original and three (3i) copies of the completed and appropriately executed application form. The instructions
(Pages 1 through 4) need not, be submitted. Any content changes made to this form will result in the application package
being returned. The Division will only accept application packages that have been fully completed with all applicable items
,.addressed. +
✓ If the Applicant, is a corporation or company, it must be registered for business with the NC Secretary of State
✓ If the Applicant is. a partnership, sole proprietorship, trade name, or d/b/a, enclose a copy of the certificate filed with the
Register of Deeds in the county of business.
✓ The application must be signed appropriately in accordance .with: 15A NCAC 2T .0106(b). An alternate person may be
designated as the signing official, provided that a delegation letter is provided from a person who meets the referenced
criteria. You may download an example delegation -letter at: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/lau/policies.html#Example.
✓ The facility name on.all forms should be consistent with the facility name on the plans, specifications, agreements, etc.
✓ If this project involves a modification of an existing irrigation system, submit four (4) copies of the most recently issued
existing permit.
✓ If this project is for a renewal'withol t modification, please use the most recent FORM: WWR, which can be downloaded at:
l� .� uuN.iivay.cut.�tatc.u�..u�i tauia�u�.auw�a.uwurrw�. -�
Attachment (All New or Major Modification Application Packages):
✓ Submit a completed and properly executed Watershed Classification Attachment (FORM: WSCA), along with the 8.5" by
11" topographic map locating the facility, for each watershed within the facility location (including irrigation areas). The
most recent version of FORM! WSCA may be found at: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/lau/applications.html#AGREEMENTS.
C. Application Fee (All New or Major Modification Application Packages):
✓ The appropriate application fee can. be determined from the Division's fee schedule found at:
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/lau/fees.html.
✓ . Submit a check or money order in ttie appropriate amount made payable to: North Carolina, Department of Environment and
Natural Resources (NCDENR).
D. Cover Letter (All Application Packages):
✓ Submit one (1) original and three (3) copies of a cover letter, which lists all items and attachments included in the application
package as well as a brief description of the requested permitting action.
✓ if necessary for clarity, include attachments to the application. Such attachments will be considered part•of the application
package and should be numbered to correspond to the section to which they refer.
E. Property Ownership Documentation (I 11 New or Modification Application Packages involving new and/or relocated treatment
or irrigation components): -
✓ Provide either:
✓ Legal documentation of the ownership (such as a contract, deed, article of incorporation, etc.) of the property, or
✓ Written notarized agreement signed by both parties indicating future purchase of the property by the permit applicant and
a -plat or survey map showing the property, or
✓ Written notarized long term lease agreement signed by both parties and specifically indicating intended use of the
property and a plat or survey map showing the property addressed in the lease.
F. Environmental Assessments (May be relquired if public lands and/or monies are used — See 15A NCAC IC .0100 to .0400):
✓ Submit one (1) copy of the Findings Hof No Significant Impact,(FONSI) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
✓ Include information on any mitigating factors) from the Environmental Assessment (EA) that impact the design and/or
construction of the wastewater, treatment and disposal system.
j
FORM: WWIS 12-06 i' Page 1
i
i

G. Certificates of Public Convenience ani
Utility per determination by the NC Utili
✓ Submit four (4) copies of the Certif
thauthorized to hold the utility, franc.
✓ If a Certificate of Public Coriveniei
Utilities Commission's Public Staff
contiguous to an existing franchised
H. , Operational Agreements (All_ New Apl
are to be sold):
✓ Submit one (1) original and three
serving, or currently serves, resider
Necessity (All New Application Packages if the applicant is a Privately -Owned Public
es Commission: hU://www.ncuc.r-ommerce.state.ne.uso:
ate of Public Convenience and Necessity, which demonstrates that the public utility is
se for the area to be served by the wastewater system.
:e and Necessity has not been issued, provide four (4) copies of a letter from the NC
hat states that an application for a franchise has been received, that the service area is
rea, and/or that franchise approval is expected.
!cation Packages if -the applicant is a Homeowners' Association, or a Developer and lots
) copies of.a properly executed operational agreement if the irrigation system will be
ial' or commercial lots that are to be sold. Appropriate forms can be downloaded at:
✓ If applicant is a HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, use the most recent version of FORM: HOA, and submit the following
information: articles of incorporation, bylaws, and current or proposed annual budget.
✓ If applicant is a DEVELOPER that intends -to turn ownership and responsibility of the wastewater -system over to a
homeowners' association, submit the, most recent version of FORM: DEV.
I. Analysis of Wastewater (All New Appl
✓ Submit four (4) copies of a complet
parameters: Total Organic Carbon,'
Nitrogen (NO3-N), Ammonia Nitro]
Total Volatile Organic Compounds,
Trihalomethanes, Toxicity Test Para
✓ A laboratory certified by the Divisio
ration Packages or Modifications that are not 100% Domestic Wasfe):
chemical analysis of the effluent wastewater including but not limited to the following
-day Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BODE), Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Nitrate
en (NH3-N), Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN), pH, Chloride, Total Phosphorus, Phenol,
Fecal Coliform, Calcium, Sodium, Magnesium, Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR), Total.
neters and Total Dissolved Solids in compliance with 15A NCAC 2T.0504(h).
i shall perform all testing.
J. Soil Evaluation (All New Application Packages or Modifications that include new irrigation sites):
✓ Submit four (4) copies of a detailed soil evaluation in accordance with 15A NCAC 2T .0504(b) and current Division Policy
available at: htt"tD)://h2o.ernir.state.nc.us/lau/valicies.html.
K. Water Balance (All New Application Packages or Modifications that include new irrigation sites):
✓ Submit four (4) copies of a completed and accurate water balance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2T .0504(k) and current
u/p
Division Policy available at: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/laolicies.html.
r Agronomist Evaluation (All New Application Packages or Modifications that include new irrigation sites or new cropping
patterns for existing irrigation sites):
✓ Submit four (4) copies of a detailed agronomist evaluation in accordance with 15A NCAC 2T .0504(i) and current Division
Policy available at: htto://h2o.enr.sta�e.nc.us/lau/policies.html.
M. Hydrogeologic Report (All New Application Packages with Design Flows over 25,000 GPD or Modifications involving
increasing the total design flow to over 25,000 GPD):
✓ Submit four (4) copies of a detailed hydrogeologic evaluation in accordance with 15A NCAC 2T .0504(e) and current
. Division Policy available at: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/iqu/policies.html.
N. Detailed Plans (All New or, Modification
✓ Submit four (4) sets of standard size
only) that have been signed, sealed,
.0504(c) and (d). For Modifications,
✓ Plans must include the following mii
✓ A general. location map, a vicini
✓ Plan and profile views of all
mixers, diffusers, flow meters, e
✓ Hydraulic profile from the treatr
✓ Highest drip/spray irrigation n(
locations within the irrigation sy
✓ For automated spray/drip'irriga
precipitation events or when the
✓ A map showing the entire irrig
evaluation. The irrigation pla
spray/drip irrigation zones as &
✓ Plans must depict a completed
FOR CONSTRUCTION,'etc.) 1
labeled with the phrase: FINAL
Application Packages):
plans and two (2) sets of I V by 17" plans (electronic format is acceptable - Adobe PDF
and dated by a NC licensed Professional Engineer in accordance with 15A NCAC 2T
submit plans specific to the modification(s) only.
imum items:
y map and a topographic map.
reatment/storage/disposal units, piping, valves, and equipment (i.e., pumps, blowers,
c.) including dimensions and elevations of all treatment/storage/disposal units.
lent plant headworks to the highest disposal point.
zzle/emitter, locations within the irrigation system of air releases and system drains,
stem of all control valves, and other essential equipment.
ion systems, the design must include equipment to prevent spray/drip irrigation during
soil is in a condition that the spray/drip irrigation wastewater could not be assimilated.
tion area with an overlay of the suitable irrigation area depicted by the soil scientist's
Ls shall show each nozzle/emitter and wetted area (when applicable). Clearly label
y will be operated.
resign and not be labeled with preliminary phrases (e.g., FOR REVIEW ONLY, NOT
hat indicate that they are anything other than final plans. However, the plans may be
DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION.
FORM: NMS 12-06 Page 2

O. Site Map (All New or Modification App
✓ Submit four (4) copies of a stands
acceptable - Adobe PDF only) tha
Professional Land Surveyor in acc(
specific to the modification(s)�only.
✓ The site map shall include t61ollov
✓ A scaled map of the site,; with
showing all facility -related strut
✓ Soil mapping units shown on al
✓ The location of all wells'. (inch
perennial), springs, lakes; pond
disposal site(s).
✓ Delineation of the reviewjand c,
✓ Setbacks as required by I5A NI
✓ Site property boundaries within
✓ All habitable residences or plac
P.
r> _
Specifications (All New or Modification
✓ Submit four (4) sets of specificatioi
accordance with 15A NCAC 2T .05(
✓ Specifications must include the folio
✓ Detailed specifications for each
diffusers, flow meters, etc.),
audible/visual high water'alarm:
✓ Site Work (i.e., earthwork, cleat
✓ Materials (i.e., concrete, masom
✓ Mechanical and Electrical (i.e.,
✓ Means for ensuring quality and
✓ Specifications must represent s
ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTR
However, the specifications
CONSTRUCTION.. '
cation Packages):
d size site map and two (2) copies of an II" by 17" site map (electronic format is
have been signed, sealed, and dated by a NC licensed Professional Engineer and/or
dance with 15A NCAC 2T .0504(d). For Modifications, submit an updated site map
ing minimum items:
)pographic contour intervals not exceeding 10 feet or 25 percent of total site relief and
ores and fences within the treatment, storage and disposal areas.
disposal sites.
ling usage and construction details if available), streams (ephemeral, intermittent, and
, and other surface drainage features within 500 feet of all waste treatment, storage, and
npliance boundaries.
AC 2T .0506.
i00 feet of all waste treatment, storage, and disposal site(s).
>'of public assembly within 500 feet of all waste treatment, storage, and disposal site(s):.
kpplicWon-Packages):
s that have been signed, sealed, -and dated by a NC licensed Professional Engineer in
4(c). For Modifications, submit specifications specific to the modification(s) only.
ving minimum items:
zeatment/storage/disposal unit, piping, valves, equipment (i.e., pumps, blowers, mixers,
nozzleslemitters (if applicable), precipitation/soil moisture sensor (if applicable),
etc.
ng and grubbing, excavation and backfill, fencing, seeding, etc.)
r, steel, method of construction, etc.) -
ontrol panels, transfer switches, generator, etc.)
itegrity of the finished product including leakage and pressure testing.
completed design and not be labeled with preliminary phrases (e.g., FOR REVIEW
TCTION, etc.) that indicate that they are anything other than final specifications.
gay be labeled with the phrase: FINAL DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR
Engineering Calculations (All New or Modification Application Packages):
✓ Submit four (4) copies of alli design calculations that have been signed, sealed; and dated by a NC licensed Professional
Engineer 'in accordance with 15A NCAC 2T .0504(c). For Modifications, submit calculations specific to the modification(s)
only.
✓ Calculations must include the following minimum items:
✓ Hydraulic and pollutant loading (iculations for each treatment unit (Note: "black box" calculations are unacceptable).
✓ Sizing criteria for each treatment unit and associated equipment.
✓ Friction/total dynamic head calculations and system curve analysis for each pump used.
✓ Pump selection information including pump curves.
✓ Manufacturer's information for all packaged treatment units, pumps, blowers, mixers, diffusers, flow meters, etc.
✓ Flotation calculations for all tanks constructed partially or entirely below grade.
✓ Submit the selected drip%spray irrigation system information including manufacturer's information and recommended
installation guidelines.
✓ Irrigation pump capacity should consider reasonable operational control, address multiple zones of the irrigation system,
address variability of nozzle si ing as necessary, and include the ability to irrigate all areas in an appropriate amount of
time.
R. Reliability (All New or Major Modified
✓ Submit documentation of system reli
✓ Ensure that the plans and specificati4
the system instrumentation/controls.
✓ All generators must be capable of po
' I
Application Packages):
lity in accordance with 15A NCAC 2T .0505(1).
detail the generator, the automatic transfer switch, and how -these items interact with
all essential treatment units.
FORM: VMS 12-06 ; I Page 3

S. Operation and Maintenance Plan (All 1,
✓ Submit four (4) copies of an oper
maintained for all systems and incluc
✓ Description of the. operation of
function and by whom the funct
✓ Description of anticipated maint
✓ Include safety measures includu
✓ Spill prevention provisions such
✓ Contact information for plant pe
T. Residuals Management Plan (All Ne
expansion of the treatment system):
✓ Submit a detailed explanation desa
wastewater treatment systemwill b
NCAC 2T .0508.
✓ An evaluation of the residuals storal
production rate and ability to remove
✓ A permit for residuals utilization
disposal/utilization program acceptu
accept the residuals, or that an, applic
✓ If oil or grease removal and collectic
✓ If an on -site restaurant or other bush
will be necessary. Please note that c
U. General (All New or Modification Appli
✓ Please ensure that any systems withi
that Section.
✓ Note that all designs and documenta
✓ Note that if other approvals are nece
the Division may hold approval of tl
✓ Provide documentation of floodway
✓ Sewers tributary to the subject facil
Water Protection Section's requirem
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PAi
w or Major Modification Application Packages):
on and maintenance plan in accordance with 15A NCAC 2T .0507 that shall. be.
at a minimum:
e system in sufficient detail to show what operations are necessary for the system to
is are to be conducted.
g restriction of access to the site and equipment.
as response to upsets and bypasses including how to control, contain and remediate,
sonnel, emergency responders and regulatory agencies.
v or Modification Application Packages that include new treatment systems or an
ing how the residuals (including trash, sediment and grit) that are generated by the
stored, treated, and disposed, in accordance with 15A NCAC 2T .05040) 'and 15A
requirements for the treatment facility based .upon the maximum anticipated residuals
residuals.
or a written commitment to the Permittee of a Department approved residuals
g the residuals which demonstrates that the approved program has. adequate capacity to
ition for approval has been submitted .
i is a designed unit process, please submit an oil/grease disposal plan.
-ss with food preparation is contributing waste to this system an oil/grease disposal plan
*ration and maintenance of all grease traps will be the responsibility of the permittee.
ration Packages):
i the Coastal Area as defined in 15A NCAC 2H .0400 meet all requirements required by
a must conform to all state and federal rules and regulations:
uy for the construction of these facilities (i.e. Wetlands, Stormwater, Dam Safety, etc)
application package to coordinate with other approvals.
mpliance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2T .0105(c)(8)
:s must be applied for separately from this application in accordance with the Surface
is (http•//h2o enr.state.nc.us/oeresn.
CAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DE 70LAND
TMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
IVISION OF WATER QUALITY
QUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
APPLICATION UNIT
1636 MAIL SERVICE
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROI
TELEPHONE NUMBER:;
By Courier/Special Delivery:
2729 CAPITAL BOULEVARD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27604
733-3221 FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: VMS 12-06 1 1 Page 4.

I.
t,
O�Ot W AT 4�9�G
I
r
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
WASTEWATER IRRIGATION SYSTEMS APPLICATION
;FORM: WWIS 12-06
(THIS FORM I YBE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
Application Number: (to be completed by DWQ)
I
GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant's name (See Instruction A : Allen. Inc.
Applicant type: ❑ Individual ®Corporation ❑ General Partnership ❑ Privately Owned Public Utility,
❑ Federal ❑ State El Municipal ❑ County
Signature authority's name: Earl Wells (per 15A NCAC 2T .01061Title: Vice President — Science and Technology
Applicant's mailing address: PO Box 250
City: Siloam Springs State: AR Zip: 72761-
Telephone number: 479 228=0102 Fax number: 479 524- 5�91 Email Address: lmushinski(),,allen.com
2. Facility name (name ofjthe subdivision, shopping center, etc.): Allen. Inc. — Plant #7
Facility's physical address: 5900 Turkey HigbM
City: Turkey State: NC Zip: 82 393-9703 -County: Sampson
Wastewater Treatment Facility: Latitude: 340 59' 02" Longitude: -780 13' 8" USGS Map Name: Turkey
3. Consulting Engineer's name: Gary S I McConnell License Number:-017069 Finn: McCConnell & Assoc PC "
Engineer's mailing address: P.O. Box 129
City: Morrisville _State: NC Zip: 27560-
Telephone number: (919 467711239 Fax number: 919 319-6510 Email Address: QsmmacassocAbellsouth.net
4. Consulting Soil Scientist's name: G. Christopher Murray License Number: 1284 Firm: Soil & Environmental Consultants
P.A-
Soil Scientist's mailing address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
City: Raleigh State: NC Zip: 27614- "
Telephone number: (2U9 846-5200 Fax number: 919) W-94467 Email Address: mg=asandec.com ,
5. Consulting Geologist's name: Eric G. Lappal& P.E. License Number- 026990 `Finn: Eaele Resources, P.A.
i -
Geologist's mailing address: 4005 Lake Springs Court .
City: Raleigh State: NC Zip: 27613-1525
Telephone number: 919 345-1013 Fax number: 888 453-0958 Email Address: elappala(@,OWeresources.com
6. Consulting Agronomist's name: Mark All Firm: Soil & Environmental Consultants P.A.
Agronomist's mailing address:' 11010 Raven Ridge Road
City: Raleigh State: NC Zip: 72 614
Telephone number: 919 846-�900 Fax number. 919 446-9467 Email Address: mallen sandec.com
- r
FORM: VMS 12-06
i
i

U. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Project is: ❑ New Major
2. Fee submitted: (See Instruc
.3. Facility status: Existing j
Was this s
4. Does this project utilize: ❑ public
5. What is the status of the following
Minor Modification
Existing Permit No.: WQ0004268, issue date: August 25, 2006
Proposed
n approved for reclaimed disposal under 15A NCAC 2H .0219(k)? ❑ Yes or ® No
Is and/or ® private funds; ❑ public lands and/or ® private lands
opriate permits/certifications?
'Permit/Certification
Submitted
Approved
Permit/Certification No.
Agency Reviewer
Erosion & Sedimentation
Control Plan
2/3/09
2/13/09
Samps-007
Jodi Pace
Nationwide 12 or 404
12/12/08
12/29/2008
SAW-2008-01230
Ronnie Smith
Wetlands 401
N/A
Stormwater Management Plan
I N/A
Dam Safety
N/A
Sewer System
N/A
Other:
N/A
`
6. Does the project comply with all setbacks found in the river basin rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, list non -compliant setbacks:
' 7. Is the project in a Coastal Area as defined per 15A NCAC 2H .0403? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, verify that the facility will comply with the following requirements in 15A NCAC 2H .404(g) as applicable:
✓ Is aerated flow equalization of At least 25% average daily flow provided? ❑ Yes or ❑ No
✓ How will noise and odor; be con trolled?
✓ Are all essential treatment units provided in duplicate? ❑ Yes or ❑ No
✓ Is there an impounded public surface water supply within 500 feet of the wetted area? ❑ Yes or ❑ No
✓ Is there a public shallow ground' water supply (less than 50 feet deep) within 500 feet of the facility? ❑ Yes or ❑ No
✓ Is the disposal loading rate gre ter than 10 gallons per day per square foot (GPD/fi )? El Yes or ❑ No
✓ How much green area is provided? square feet (ft )
✓ Is the green area shown on the iplans?.El Yes or ❑ No
FORM: VMS 12-06 Page 6

III. INFORMATION ON WASTEWATEI
_ 1. What is the origin of the wastewater
condominiums; etc.)? Vegetable pra
2. Volume of wastewater flow for this I
proposed irrigation'systems
3. Explanation of how wastewater flow
wastewater irrigation system
/ 4.
5.
GENERATION:
..e., school, subdivision, hospital, municipality, shopping center, industry, apartments,
415,000 gallons per day (GPD), facility -wide total including existing and
determined (15A NCAC 2T .0114(c)): flow metering data from existing
Type of Establishment
Basis of Flow.
Flow Per Unit
Number of Units
Total
Vegetable processing
, Gallons/day
gallons
1
415,000
I Gallons/
Gallons/
Gallons/
Gallons/
i
Gallons/
Gallons/
Gallons/
Gallons/
Total
I
Nature of wastewater: ❑ 100% Domestic Waste (residential, commercial, etc)
® 100% Industrial
❑ Combination of Industrial and Domestic Waste: % Domestic % Industrial
❑ Municipal waste (town, city, etc.)
Is there a Pretreatment Program in effect? ❑Yes or ❑ No
Wastewater characteristics (See 154 NCAC 2T .0505(b)):
Parameter
Estimated Influent Concentration
Designed Effluent Concentration
month average)
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BODS)
700 mg/1
509 mg/1
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
I
2000 mg/I
1500 mg/I
Ammonia Nitrogen (NH3-N)
I
10 mg/1
16 mg/1
Nitrate Nitrogen (NO3-N)
I -
<0.1 mg/I
0.36 mg/I
Nitrite Nitrogen (NOZ N) !
I
<0.1 mg/1
0 mg/I
Total Nitrogen
75 mg/I
53 mg/I
Total Phosphorus
1
15-mg/I
12 mg/1
Total Kjeldhal Nitrogen
1�
V � x � r #
SIV
48 mg/1
x�.
Fecal Coliforms J
� �,���� �� ".�'- �:
.per 100 ml
FORM: VMS 12-06 Page 7

IV. GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATi
--� 1. Brief project description: 69.37 acr
' 2. In accordance with 15A NCAG 2T
treatment/storage units to each part
iditional spravfield and force main from existing wet weather storage
provide the minimum distance in feet from the facility's irrigation system and
(distances greater than 500 feet may be marked N/A):
1
Treatment/Storage
Setback Parameter
Irrigation System
Units
Any habitable residence or place of assembly under separate ownership or not
402
No Known within
to be maintained as part of the ro'ect site
500 feet
Any habitable residence or place of assembly owned by the permittee to be
No Known withinilv
maintained as part of the ` ro' ect site
500 feet__
Any private or public water supply source
134 feet (well)
400 feet (well)
Surface waters (streams — intermittent and perennial, perennial waterbodies,
100 feet
50
and
Groundwater lowering ditches (whe± the bottom of the ditch intersects the`gg
100 feetMa
SHWT)
x - tjL4 .r. P yr
Subsurface groundwater lowering di-ainage systems
100 feetINyam
s
'
Surface water diversions (ephemeral streams, waterways, ditches)
100 feet,y
�-
4 5
Any well with exception of monitoing wells
134 feet
400
No Known within
An roe line
Y property rtY
181 feet
500 feet
Top To of slope of embankments or cuts
P Pe
of two feet or more in vertical height
No Known within
500 feet'
���'�`�'
Any water line from a disposal system
No Known within
500 feetINS
r
5v
No Known within
Any swimming pool
P
+
500 feetr
Public right of way
150 feetY:,g
kfiSF
Approx. 400 feet,
Nitrification field
(Assume houses on
"4 Visit 4r�y�,
{.
SVp �lCi
Any building foundation or basement
� -
402 feet
I
No Known within
Impounded public water supplies
500 feet�4,+�
Public shallow supply
(less than 50 feet deep)
No Known within
�
groundwater,
500 feet
3
FORM: VMS 12-06 1 1 Page 8

! 1
✓ Does the Applicant intend on complying with 15A NCAC 2T .0506(c)? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, complete the following table:
Designed Effluent
Designed Effluent
Parameter
Estimated Influent'
Concentration
Concentration
Concentration
i(monthly
averse(daily
maximum
BiODhemical Oxygen Demand
I mg/I
mg/I
mg/l
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
mg/l
mg/1.
mg/I
Ammonia Nitrogen (NH3-N)'
I mg/1
mg/l.
mg/I
Nitrate Nitrogen (NO3-N)
I mg/1
mg/1
�3 r
Fecal Coliforms
n
I = `pf}lk
per 100 ml
per 100 ml
Turbidity
E 4�
I
5 w J
NTUs
w '� -'- �.Y � „��n� t
�_:t�"��'yr ��.
✓ .If any setback is not met, how w
increased potential for health co:
3. The treatment and disposal facilities
measures shall be shown on submint
with 15A NCAC 2T .0505(q):,Fencv
4. What is the 100-year flood elevation
✓ Are any treatment units or wette
If yes, briefly describe which tre
protect them against flooding: _
If yes, does the Applicant,have
5. Method to provide system reliability
6. What is the specified method of dish
✓ If chlorine, specify detention tin
part of the wastewater system cl
✓ If ultraviolet (UV), specify the r
7. How many days of residuals storage
1 the project provide equal or better protection of the Waters of the State with no
;,ems or nuisance conditions?
rust be secured to prevent unauthorized. entry. Details and notations of restricted access
l plans and specifications. Briefly describe the measures being taken in accordance
and signage
Varies — See Drawing Sheet feet mean sea level. Source: FEMA Web Service
areas located within the 100-year flood plain? ❑ Yes or ® No .
tment units and/or irrigation areas are affected: , and the measures being taken to
mentation of compliance with § 143 Article 21 Part 6? ❑ Yes or ❑ No
15A NCAC 2T .0505(1) (See Instruction R): See ReliabilitYStatement
,ction? N/A — existing treatments sy tem
provided:. minutes (30 minutes minimum required). Please indicate in what
rine contact time occurs (i.e. chlorine contact chamber):
nber of banks: . total lamps: and maximum capacity: gpm.
e provided (15A NCAC 2T .0505(o))? NIA
FORM: VMS 12-06 Page 9

i
V. DESIGN INFORMATION FOR NEW OR MODIFIED PORTIONS OF THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
r 1. Type of treatment system (fixed film, suspended growth, etc):
2. Provide the number and dimensions If each treatment unit, and provide their location in the specifications and plans. If an
item is not applicable, do not fill in the requested information:
a. PRELIMINARY TREATMENT (i.e., physical operations such as large solids screening and equalization to remove
problem characteristics such as abrasive grit and clogging rags, as well as to dampen high flows):
Number
Manufacturer
Dimensions (ft)
Volume
Plan Sheet
Specification
Treatment Unit
of Units
or Material
/ Spacings in
allons
Number
Page Number
Stationary Screen
4
Lys
72 in. wide/0.10
N/A
M-101 /
11309-1
inspacings
Screw Presses
2
Lyco
N/A
M-101
11308-1 .
Auger/screw
'
Jim Myers &
I
M-101
14310-1
conveyors
4
Son orequal)N/A
Hopper
I 12 gauge steel
12.67' x 11.17' x
38 cubic
M-102/1v1-
11870-1
�l
8.5'
yards
103
Select
i
I
b. PRIMARY TREATMENT (i.e., physical operations such as fine screening and sedimentation to remove floating and
settable solids):
Treatment Unit
Number
of Units
Manufacturer
or Material
Dimensions (ft)
/ S acin mm
Volume
(gallons)Number
Plau Sheet
ification
Number
�Pn�
Select
1
Select
Select
c. SECONDARY / TERTIARY TREATMENT (i.e., biological and chemical processes to remove organics and nutrients)
Treatment Unit
Number
of Units
Manufacturer
or Material(gallons)
Dimensions (ft)
Volume
Plan Sheet
Number
Specification
Page Number
Select
Select
I
Select
Select
Select
Select
Select
Select
l
!
'i
FORM: VMS 12-06
Page 10

d. DISINFECTION
Treatment Unit
Number
of Units
Manufacturer
� or Material(gallons)
Dimensions (ft)
Volume
Plan Sheet
Number
Specification
Page Number
Select
Select
Select
e. RESIDUAL TREATMENT
Treatment Unit
Number
of Units
Manufactures'
or Material ,
Dimensions (ft)
Volume
(gallons)Number
Plan Sheet
Specification
Page Number
Select
Select
Select
Location
Number
of Pumps
Purpose
I
Manufacturer I
Type
Ca aci
Plan Sheet
Number
Specification
Page Number
GPM
TDH-
Wet Well
;.3 :
I Irrigation
Goulds
875
348
M-102
12191-1
Wet Well
1
Jockey
Goulds
25
349
M-102
M-102
Gutter Flush Water
Storage Tank
1
Gutter Flush
Return
Fairbanks Morse
/Solids Handlin
75
50
C-104
01910-1
.
1
e. BLOWERS
Location
No: of
Blowers
Units Served
Manufacturer /
Type
Capacity
(CF
Plan Sheet
Number
Specification
Page Number
FORM: NMS 12-06 Page 11

h. MDMRS
Location
- No. of
Mixers
Units ServedType
'Manufacturer/
Power
(hp)
Plan Sheet
Number
-Specification
Pa a Number
-
1
i. RECORDING DEVICES & RELIABILITY
Device
Number
Maximum
Manufacturer
Location
Plan Sheet
Number
Specification
Page Number
of Units
Capacity
Flow Meter
;1
I 5,500 gpm
Khrone `
Station
M-102
12191-12
Select
Select
Select
Select
0
01
F6W. WWIS 12-06
i
Page 12
k

VI. DESIGN INFORMATION FOR STOI
r� - 1. Provide the number of earthen imp(
2. Are any impoundments designed to
If Yes; please specify which impou
3. Are impoundment(s) designed to in
4. Provide the design measures propo:
5. Provide the location of each design
3E EWPOUNDMENTS
iments in the system: None — Permitted existing impoundment
eive adjacent surface runoff- ❑ Yes or ® No
nent: N/A and the drainage area: N/A tl
le a discharge point (pipe, emergency spillway, etc)? ® Yes or ❑ No
for impoundment liner protection from wind driven wave action: N/A
ment in the specifications and engineering plans for each storage unit:
a Impoundment
Storage p
I
Plan Sheet
Number
Specification
Page Number
Liner material (15A NCAC 2T .OSOII
(e) and'(f))?
® S nthetic
ClayS-105
,
13205-1
El Concrete
Q Steel
Liner installation and testing 'requirements
1
; ; < 4r = rt �;E
; z` v tU.,� r
N/A
N/A.
Inside berm surface dimensions (L
x W x H)
12' Dia.
ft
1 12.5 ft
S-105
13205-1
Bottom dimensions (L x W)
l
12' Dia.
ft
S-105
13205-1
Embankment side slope
I
N/A: N/A
S-105
13205-1
Mean seasonal high water table depth
*
N/A ft
S-105
13205-1
Finished grade elevation
140.00 R
S-105
13205-1
Depth from bottom to top of embankment
12.5 ft
S-105
13205-1
Total volume i
1,413.72 if 10,575-
gallons
S405
13205-1
Design freeboard
N/A ft
S-105
13205-1
Depth of minimum liquid level (above
liquid level
permanent
0 ft
S-105
13205-1
Effective volume provided,** 1
1,413.72 ft 10,575
gallons
S-105
13205-1-
Effective storage time provided l
0.025 days
S-105
13205-1
* NOTE: The liner shall be prot
** NOTE:. The storage volume sl
pipe) and maximum a
j,
FORM: WWIS 12-06
rrom impacts or me wasonai mgu wmv, taulu — iicwoocuy-
be calculated between the top of any permanent liquid level (as indicated by outlet
ble liquid level in the impoundment.
Page 13

VII.
r�
I
DESIGN INFORMATION FOR' IRRIGATION SYSTEM
1. The irrigation system is: ® Spray ❑ Drip
2. Disposal system is: ❑ existing proposed.
3. If applicable, provide the location ofeach design element in the specifications and engineering plans:
Plan Sheet
Specification
Irrigation Pump Tank I
-
Number
Page Number
Internal dimensions (L x W x H or (p
x H)
ft
ft
ft
Total volume
fe
gallons
Dosing volume
ft
gallons
Audible 8c visual alarms
-M 3
I.
Equipment to prevent irrigation dunng
rain events
4. Listany equipment (note sheet numl
(pump hoist, odor control equipmen
5. Minimum depth to mean seasonal hi
feet below ground surface. Must be
2T .0505(p). '
6. Are there any artificial drainage or N
If Yes, please explain if the soil scie
maintained or modified: A drainage
7. Loading rates recommended by the
;r of the plans or page number in the specifications) not specifically mentioned above
etc.):
h water table within irrigation field(s) per Soil Scientist's Evaluation: 1_5
t least one -foot vertical separation between SHWT and ground surface per 15A NCAC
movement structures within 200 feet of any irrigation area? ® Yes or ❑ No
report addresses artificial structures,and please indicate.if structures are to be
Scientist Evaluation:
If Seasonal,
Fields within
Recommended Loading
Recommended Loading
Loading
list
Soil Series
Soil Area
Rate
Rate
Recommended
appropriate
(ate
(atein/yr
months
Norfolk/Wagram
1,2,3,8,10,11,1
2,13,14,15,16
0.5
112.7,
® Annual
❑ Seasonal
Goldsboro/
3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1
Annual
Noboco
1,12,1314,15,
0.5
92.1
El Seasonal
16,17
®Annual
Tarboro / Kalmia
17,18,18a
0.5
337.7
❑ Seasonal
❑ Annual
Seasonal
❑ Annual
Seasonal
See Table attached to Response to (Comment Application 12..
8. Design loading rates are equal or less than the loading rates recommended by Soil Scientist? ® Yes or ElNo
If No, explain why 15A NCAC 2T .0505(n) is not met: -'
FORM: WWIS 12-06 Page 14

i�
9. Provide the following location:info i ation for the approximate center of each irrigation field / zone:
)held / Zone
Latitude
Longitude
1
340
58'
22.89 "
-78 °
14'
35.06 "
2
34 °
58'
20.81 "
-78 °
14'
38.37 " .
3
34 °
58 '
15.33 "
-78 °
14'.
36.57 "
4
340
I 58 '
11.16 "
-78 °
14'
36.75 "
5
340
58,
8.73 "
-78 °
14'
39.78 "
6
34 °
58 '
6.99 "
-78 °
14'
39.42 "
7
34 °
+ 58 '
16.12 "
-78 °
14'
31.97 "
8
34 °
58 '
12.10 "
-78 ° ,
14'
26.97 "
9
34 °
58 '
7.06 "
-78 °
14'
30.17 "
10
34 °
58 '
19.71 "
-78 °
14'
20.62 "
11
340
58 '
16.40 "
-78 °
14'
21.93 "
12
34
58 '
11.191,
-78 °
14'
22.97 "
13
340
58'
6.74 "
-78 '°
14'
24.60 "
14
340
58 '
17.01 "
-78 °
14'
14.48 "
15
34 °
58 '
9.04 "
-78 °
14'
18.03 "
16
; 34;0
58 '
3.75 "
-78 °
14'
13.05
17
34 ° l
58'
4.97 "
-78 °
14'
8.17 "
18
34'0
58 '
8.4 "
-78 °
13 '
58.8 "
18a
34:0
58'
8.4"
-78 0
14'
6.00 "
I
o
r
rr
o
r
n
o
a
r
rr
O
,
II
_ O
I
II
1 o I
r
rr
_ 0
r
rr
O j
, I
r
rr
_ O
r
rr
✓ Level of accuracy?
✓ Method of measure
✓ Datum? NAD 83
FORM: VMS 12-06

r
t%
10. Irrigation Design (fill in the appropriate information for either a spray or drip irrigation system):
a. Spray Irrigation:
!
Field /Zone
Design Area (ftz)
Number of
Nozzles
Maximum Irrigation
Precipitation Rate in/hr
Design Annual Loading
Rate in/ r
1
71,3121
8
0.37
63.32
2
140,6341
13
0.36
50.64
3
506,035
39
0.30
51.05
4
82,315
6
0.28
9.37
5
33,844
4
0.46
9.26
6
84,551
11
0.50
36.77
7
43,455�
5
0.44
27.73
8
11 2,7601
10
0.34
33.96
9
34,3671
3
0.34
22.48
10
57,9011
8
0.39
65.62
11
29,205
3
0.40
62.13
12
162,719
12
0.28
61.13
13
92,965
7
0.29
57.54
14
328,855
31
0.36
61.72
15
42,300
2
0.18
57.30
16
313,595
23
0.28
58.25
17
99,0691
7.
0.27
9.91
18
386,376'
32
0.32
57.52
18a
285,931
26
0.35
57.52
•
I
Total
2,908,0821
0�� ��
.. Ws',2Fa4� 4sk
z��'
rF&..Y�µ.'".
,...b x1R'.-' ,..Mm
Note: Zones 18 and 18a are nutrient limited all other zones are hydraulically limited.
Spray Irrigation Design Element
Plan Sheet
Number
Specification
Page Number
Wetted diameter of nozzles
1
ft
Wetted area of nozzles
f
Nozzle capacity
gpm
Nozzle manufacturer / model
1
/
Elevation of highest nozzle;
ft
FORM: WWIS 12-06 1 Page 16

i
Professional Engineer's Certification,
I v S. MacConnell +
I
and consistent with the`information supplied in
of my knowledge. I further attest that to the be
application package and its instruction as well
developed certain portions of this submittal pa(
reviewed this material and have judged it4o be
143-215.6A and 143-215.6B, any -person .who I
package shall be guilty of a.Class 2 misdemean
$25,000 per violation.
North Carolina Professional Engineer's seal, sil
f.
Applicant's Certification (signing authority in
I, . Wells
(signing authority
attest that this application for Allens, Inc
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and
from this non -discharge system to surface WE
penalties, injunctive relief, and/or criminal pi
of this permit be violated. I also understand
required supporting information and attachm
further certify that the applicant or any affilie
facility without proper closure, does not have
compliant with any active compliance scliedi
with NC General Statutes 143-215.6A and 11
certification in any application package shall
well as civil penalties up to $25,000 per viol•
i
Signature:
- 1
I
attest that this application for Allen. Inc Plant No. 7
has been reviewed by me and is, accurate, complete
.e engineering plans, calculations, and allother supporting documentation to the best
of my knowledge the proposed design has been prepared in accordance with this all applicable regulations. and statutes. Although other professionals may have .
Lge, inclusion of these materials under my signature and seal signifies that I have
insistent with the proposed design: Note: In accordance with NC General Statutes
)wingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any application
which may include a fine not to exceed $10,000 as well as civil -penalties up to
nature, and date:
•
�O69
%cS�'�.4-.SEER .•' �� 0 `�
Z/�;�00 c oNN X`N �0
st be in compliance with 15A NCAC 2T .0106(b)):
Vice President
(title)
No. 7
(facility name)
mplete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that any discharge of wastewater
s or the land will -result in an immediate enforcement action that may include civil
,cution. I will make no claim against the Division of Water Quality should.a condition.
; if all'required parts of this application package are not completed and that if all
s are not included, this application. package will,be returned to me as incomplete. l"
gas not been convicted of an environmental crime, has not abandoned a wastewater
outstanding civil penalty where.all appeals have been exhausted or abandoned, are
and do not have any overdue-annual.fees under Rule 2T .0105: Note: In accordance
15.6B, any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or
guilty of a. Class 2 misdemeanor, which may include . -a fine not to exceed $10,000 as
Date: Februga-20, 2009

Completed Name Change Application Form PNOCF09-06
8

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
PERMIT NAME/OWNERSHIP CHANGE FORM
.Any changes made to this form will result in the application being returned.
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
For more information, visit our web site'at. http://h2o.enr.state.nc.usl7aulmain.html
I. REQUIRED ITEMS
1. Submit one original of the completed and appropriately executed Permit Name/Ownership Change Form.
For a change of ownership, the certificationmust be signed by iboth the current permit holder and the new
applicant. For a name change only, the certification must be signed by the applicant.
2. Provide legal documentation of the transfer of ownership (such as a contract, deed, article of incorporation,
etc.) for ownership changes.
3; Change of Ownership Applications for Homeowners Associations (HOAs) shall include the HOAs bylaws,
covenants, etc. [15A 2T J0115(c)]
4. Submit a properly executed Operation and Maintenance Agreement for all Single Family Residence Surface
Irrigation permits requesting a change of ownership.
I
II. CURRENT PERMIYINFORMATION
WQ0004268 (spray irrigation) and NCG500004 (cooling water)
1. . Permit'number: i
2. Permit holder's name: Algen Canning Company
3. Permit's signing official's name and title: Earl Wells
(Person legally responsible for permit)
Vice President
4. Mailing address: PO Box 250
City: Siloam Springs I
Telephone number; (479i ) 524-6431
III. NEW OWNER/NAME INI
1. This request for a permit
a. Change in owner
X b. Name change on
c. Other (please ex]
i
i
i ( 3 2. New owner's name (nan
FORM: PNOCF 09-06
(title)
State: ARZip: 72761
Facsimile number: (479 ) 524-9591.
ge is a result of:
of property/company
Aliens, Inc. (company name)
Aliens, Inc. - Plant #7 (facility name)
to be used in permit): Allens, Inc.
Page 1 of 2 -

3. New owner's or signing
4. Mailing address: PO E
City: Siloam Springs
Telephone number: (4
IV. CERTIFICATION
1. Current Permittee's Certi1
I
reviewed and is accurate
this application are not c
included, this applicatio
responsible for complianc
Signature:
2. Applicant's Certification:
I, Earl Wells
reviewed and is accurate
r this application are not c
-- included, this application
affiliate has not been con
proper closure, does no
abandoned, are compliar
under Rule 2T .0105.
Signature:
THE COMPLETED
NORTH CAROLINA
1636 MAIL SERVICE
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROL
's name and title: Earl Wells
(Person legally responsible for permit)
Vice President
250
State: AR
524-9591
(title)
Zip: 72761
Facsimile.number: (479 ) 524-9591
, attest. that this application' for name/ownership change has been
A complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of
mpleted and that if all required supporting information and .attachments are not
package will be returned as incomplete. I understand I will continue to be
with the current permit until a new permit is issued.
, 'attest that this application for name/ownership .change has been
A complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of
mpleted and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not
ackage will be returned as incomplete. : I further certify that the applicant or any
cted of an environmental crime, has not abandoned a wastewater facility without
have an outstanding civil penalty where all appeals have been exhausted or
with any active compliance schedule, and do not have, any overdue annual fees
a -!3 -OY ;
TION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND, \
S, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
►EPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
LAND APPLICATION UNIT
Via.Courier / Special Delivery:
'TER 2728 CAPITAL BOULEVARD
27699-1636 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27604
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: PNOCF 09-06 ; Page 2 of 2

North Carolina Secretary of State'
Page 1 of 1
Elaine F.
Secret
CORPORATIONS
Corporations Home
Search By Corporate Name
Search For New & Dissolved
Search By Registered Agent
Important Notice
Resale of Tickets Online
I
Corporations FAQ
Homeowners' Association FAQ
Tobacco Manufacturers
Unincorporated Non -Profits
Dissolution Reports
Non -Profit Reports
Verify Certification
Online Annual Reports
LINKS & LEGISLATION
KBBE B2B Annual Reports
SOSID Number Correction
2001 Bill Summaries
1999 Senate Bills
Annual Reports 1997
Corporations 1997
Register for E-Procurement
Dept. of Revenue
ONLINE ORDERS
Start An Order
New Payment Procedures
CONTACT US
Corporations Division
TOOLS
Secretary of State Home
I.
Secretary& State Site Map
Printable Page
North Carolina D EPARTM E N 1 OF THE
SECRETARY OF STATE
PO Box 29622 Raleigh, NC 27626-0622 [phone]
Date: 2111 /2009
Click here to:
View Document Filings I Sign Up for E-Notifications I
18- Print apre-populated Annual Report Form, I Annual Report Count I File
an Annual Report I
Corporation Names
Name Name Type
NC Aliens, inc. Legal
NC Allen Canning Company Prev Legal
Business Corporation Information
SOSID:
0304238
Status:
Current -Active
Date Formed:
4/10/1992
Citizenship:
Foreign
State of Inc.:
AR
Duration:
Perpetual
Registered Agent
Agent Name: CT Corporation System
Registered Office Address: 150 Fayetteville St., Box 1011
Raleigh NC 27601.
Registered Mailing 150 Fayetteville St., Box 1011
Address: Raleigh NC 27601
Principal Office Address: 3b5 East Main Street
Siloam Springs AR 72761
Principal Mailing Address: PO Box 250
Siloam Springs AR 72761-0250
-Stock
Class Shares
99 SEE CERT 0
No Par Value Par Value
0
http://www.secretary.state.ne.us/corporations/Corp.aspx?PitemId=4784734 2/11/2009

M day of Decefiber 2006.
Secmtary of State

Copy of check in the am'ount of $1,1222.00.
t�
I
9

DETACH THIS VOUCHER BEFORE DEPOSITING CHECK SILOAM SPRINGS. ARKANSAS
INVOICE DATE
INVOICE NUMBER
I
DESCRIPTION
AMT. OF INVOICE
CREDIT OR
DISCOUNT
NET AMOUNT
i
y
I
AF
I
..
I.
11
936490

Existing Permit
1. Please provide a table'that includes the name, acreage, instantaneous and annual loading
rates, latitude, fongitude and nearest downstream waterbody for each irrigation field. In
addition,'existing permit conditions11.7. and 11.8. mention annual and 'seasonal loading rates,
and conditions 11.9. and H. I0. include. PAN loading rates for sites A, Band C: Which, fields
have annual or seasonal loading rates? Does site D have a PAN loading rate?
_ i
Response:
See the following table.
Aliens, Inc. - Turkey
Existing Permit Summary for Rowan Road Additional
Information Request
i
Instanteous
Annual
Latitude
Longitude
Nearest
Field
Classifi-
Acreage
Loading
Loading
PAN Loading Rate
(approx
center
(approx
center �
Downstream
Name
cation
Rate II
Rate
point)
point)
Wa�m� y
not to
62.36
300 (coastal
A
Year-
39.3
exceed
inches 112-
bermuda) + 50.
34.9822
-78.2238
Six runs
round
acres
0.251
month
(winter rye) = 350
Creek
Inches/hour
period
lb/acre
not to
62.36
300 (coastal
B
Year-
exceed
inches ! 12-
ber uda) + 50
34.9806
-78.2222
Six runs
round
0.25�
month
(winter rye) = 350
Creek
24.4
inches/hour
period
lb/acre
acres
not to
62.36
250 (coastal
C
Year-
exceed
inches ! 12-
bennuda) + 50
34.9827
-78.2173
Six runs
round
0.251
month
(winter rye) = 300
Creek
inches
hour
period
lb/acre
D
Seasonal
36.6 �
not to
exceed
:42.98
inches / 12-
No PAN limit in
permit but 250
34.9778
-78.2199
Six runs
C reek
acres
0.25
I
month
Ib/acre is assumed
I
period
"I
10

I -
Proberty Ownership Documentation
1. Please provide written documentation from the North Carolina Department of Transportation
allowing an easement for the wastewater effluent force main to cross Rowan Road (SR :
1924).
Response:
This information is pending and will be transmitted as soon as it is available.
2. Provide written documentation (i.e., copies of the,recorded documents) allowing a minimum
5 foot permanent sewer easement for the force main construction and operation in the
following properties: It
Owners: Milton D. & Connie Carr Sampson County PID: 12098056007.
Owners: James D. & Nyda W. Sutton Sampson County PID: 18023244006
,i
Response:
This information is pending and will be transmitted as soon as it is available.
3. Each written easement shall be notarized, signed by all property owners and recorded in the
Sampson.County Register of Deeds.
Response: .
This information is pending and will be'transmitted as soon as it is available.
•
11

Analysis of Wastewater
L Please verify that the tabular effluent data provided in the application was analyzed by a
Division certified laboratory. Copies of the laboratory data sheets shall suffice. In addition,
Application Instruction I and 15A NCAC 02T .0504(h) require that the following parameters
also be tested: Total Orpnic Carbon; Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD); pH; Chloride;
Phenol; Total Volatile Organic Compounds; Fecal Coliform; and Sodium Adsorption Ration
(SAR).
Response:
The laboratory data sheets for the data provided in the table attached to the original
Application are attached to this response. Additionally, the laboratory data sheets for
samples taken the week o February 16 will be, submitted under separate cover.
12

I
I.
i Attachment for 11
i
Characterization Comment 1.
13

_ abac Laboratories, Inch o, 7121 P;R_ i /i 1
Apr.. 4. 2007 6:23P icrobac-Fayetteville
FAYETTEVILLE bMS10N STATE CERT M.
2592 HOPE MILLS ROAD
PAYETTEVRYE, NC 28306 NC Ml I
[phone] PAX (9I0) 864-8774 NC #i37714
R. W. SANDERS, VICE PRESIDENT USDA ##3787
http://www.miaoixc.coin E-NWL- [e-mail]
Allen Canning Company
Ms. Kaibrlm Yeager
Past Office Box 256
Siloam SprizW, Alt 72761
Permit No, WQ0004268
Sampler: Jones
Subject: Effluent aample - 3/Yr
sw T®st
ARSENIC
900, 5-day
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM, TOM
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MBV=Y
NICKEL
NTTRWEN, NMATE
NFiROGEN, AMMONIA
NITROGEN, PLANT AVAILABLE
MTROMN, TOTAL loELDAHL
PH
P 09HOWS, TOTAL
SODIUM
SMMS, TOTAL
ZINC
1
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Date Repotted:
3/31/2007
Date Received:
3/2 M7
Order Number:
0703-00006
Invoice No.:
51264
Customert
A004
Sample Bate:
3f7i1007
Sample Time:.
15:15
Method
Result
Data
Time Tech
EPA 200.8
- <0.01 PPm
3/13/2007
12:32 CHI
EPA 405.1
1736 mg/E:
3/2/2007
17:00 MA1
EPA 213.1
<0.10 ppm
3/21/2M7
7:00 RA5
EPA 200.8
31 Ppm
3/14/2007
11:37 CHI
EPA 248.1
<0.10 PPM
3/23/2007
14:30 RAS
EPA 239.1
<0.1 PPm
3/29/2007
17:00 RWS
ERA 206.7
16 PPm
3/14/2007
11:37 CHI
EPA 245.1
<0.0002 ppm
3/9/2007
11:21 CHI
EPA 249.1
0.13 ppm
3/79/2007
17,00 RWS
EPA 353.3
0.12 mg/L
3/8/2007 -
. 7e10 OCR
EPA 350.2
24.6 mg/L
3/12/2007
9:30 RAS
CALCULATION
18.15 Mg/L.
3/2GMF
17:00 BKS
EPA 351.3
43.7 mR/L
3/9/2007
7.30 RAS
EPA 150A
S.02 s.U.
3/2/2007
17:00 (M
EPA 365.2
11.6 mg/L
3/7/2007
11:25 OCR
EPA 273.1
229 ppM
3/23/x007
9:00 RAS
SM18 254OG
0.16 %
3/6/2007
11:30 MAI
EPA 289.1
0.42 ppm
3/21/2007
7.00 RM
RESPECTFULLY SUBMTTTBD: .
MICROBAC LABORATORIES, INC-
Thank youl brYaur Luahte= Wa bevi f yo►e /e dbacE on nee kW off W y,, l�feodt eoneact thF aY�' Director, Rdt Sand s a! 910.84�•!9?D, R06e�tJllovg+�,
GOO. CEO at [e-mail]"eW/A any coal Or MgPVOM
Wo CODES: NO NOW DOOM N/F - NOW, F Ind <= lwss than T = aceeter than ESL = fisdmWd M6t�QER
fie eWa aid oy>ert�omm�oo m NkR and otbei amempnmip Ooaw�, Rpiexntaeit.the eta anah�d antl H tetdNed upon the
awww that it a +wF w be gat otltlaed 44Y or e+ part for sdv s" ar *fir wpowwww w om 0FVM 1'om ft tebagmty-
tt�4{1�OStt ITWing Mood siao;te9w Caaaian9 O+mimi ad Mipobiobgiftl M�y�ea tit! p�ifi I

® Microbac Laboratories, Inc. Page 1 of 1
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION STATE CERT ID.
2592 HOPE MILLS ROAD
FAYETTEVILLE, NC- 28306 NC #11
[phone] FAX [phone] NC #37714
R. W. SANDERS, VICE PRESIDENT USDA #3787
http://www.microbac.com F Mail: [e-mail]
CHEMISTRY- MILKU131UL.tK y •-rUUll'bt1rz1 T - uui4bu m r.K rKULUI. I J
WATER - AIR • WASTES • FOOD PHARMACEUTICALS • NUTRACEUTICALS
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Allen Canning Company Date Reported: 8/32007
Ms. Kathryn Yeager Data Received: 7/112007
Post Office Box 250 - Order Number: 0707-00016
Siloam Springs, AR .72761 Invoice No.: 53545
Customer #: A004
Sample Date: 7/112007
Permit No. WQ0004268 1 Sample Time: 11:40
Sampler:
Subject: Effluent sample - 3/Yr
SNP Test Method Result Date Time Tech
ARSENIC
EPA 200.8
<0.01 ppm
7/19/2007
.19:15
CHI
SOD, 5-ft
EPA 405.1
179 mg/L
7/12/2007
10:14
MAI
CADMIUM
EPA 213.1
<0.10 ppm
7/18/2007
14:40
RAS
CALCIUM
EPA 200.8
34 ppm
7/19/2007
19:15
CHI
CHROMIUM, TOTAL
EPA 218.1
<0.10 PPm
• 7/31/2007
15:10
RWS
-LEAD
EPA 239.1
<0.1 PPrn
7/24/2007
18:35
RWS
MAGNESIUM
EPA 200.8 '
20 ppm
7/19/2007
19,15 =
CHI
MERCURY
EPA 200.8
<0.0002 ppm -
7/19/2007
19:15
CHI
NICKEL
EPA 249.1
<0.1 Ppm
7/27/2007
18:40
RWS
NITROGEN, NITRATE .
EPA 353.3
<0.1 mg/L
7/11/2007
16:10
DCR
NITROGEN, AMMONIA
ti EA k 350.2
37.5 mg/L
7/12/2007
9:00
RAS
NITROGEN, PLANT AVAILABLE
CALCULATION
27.4 mg/L
7/23/2007
17:00
BKS
NITROGEN, TOTAL KIEL.DAHL
EPA 351.3
63.0 mg/L
7/12/2007 _
9:30
RAS
PH •
EPA 150.1
8.10 S.U.
7/11/2007
14:57
MA3
-PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL
EPA 365.2
16.1 mg/L -
7/24/2007
8:55
DCR
SODIUM
EPA 273.1
492 ppm
7/31/2007
15:00
RWS
SOLIDS, TOTAL
SM18 254OG
0.15 %
7/13/2007
11:00
RAS
ZINC
EPA 289.1
<0.10 ppm
7/18/2007 .
14:40
RAS
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
MICROBAC LABORATORMS, INC.
7hwAyou fary w bw1== Wa 1nvitt yaw fiedbacA oe ovr level of aervtoe to ym Please caatact dre Labmmwy Dtnctor, Ron Sandsra at 9I0-861-I920 , Rober[ Margmr,
-j rmorgmtrerobac.corn or Trevor Bayee, CEO, at [e-mail] with: any comments or suggestions.
LAB CODES: N/D =None Detected N/F = Nane'Found < = Less thm } = Greater than Est = Estimated
MEMBER
The anti and ~ trdarnaft conned on ads, and over awxnp npg dowanm; regrew, onq thesaniPw(s) anay W and is reimb d upon the
aMWM tlat it is not to tie mpwLu w ftw or in pat for adve ashy ar othc paPasm wow wbw approral t m ft uboratery: -
r USnA EPA MOSFf restln� g Pood Sanlb Corou� M a�dnkal uM M�aobldcBiml Mayses and Resea�df

® Mier obac Laboratories, Inc.
Pie 1 of l
FAYETfEVILLE DIVISION
STATE CERT ID.
2592 HOPE MILLS ROAD
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28306
ID ' [phone] FAX [phone]
NC #11
NC #37714
R W. SANDERS, VICE PRESIDENT
USDA #3787
http://www.miaobac.c:om F MaR- =sandersQ,microbac.com
i
CHEMISTRY • MICROBIOLOGY • FOOD SAFETY • CONSUMER PRODUCTS
WAT�R. • AIR • WASTES • FOOD • PHARMACEUTICALS • NUTRACEUTICALS
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Allens,.Inc. Date Reported.
3/192008
Ms. Kathryn. Yeager - Date Received:
3/32008
Post Office Box 250 Order Number
0803-M l I
Siloam Springs, AR 7�2761 Invoice No.:
57525.
Customer #:
A604
Sample Date:
3132008
Permit No. ' Sample Time:
9:52
— — Sampler —Miller -_ - _
-
Subject: Effluent sample -13/Yr
SMP Test Method Result Date
Time Tech
ARSENIC EPA 200.8 ' <0.010 ppm 3/5/2008
15:00 CHI
BOD, 5-day ; . SM 5210 B 146 mg/L 3/5/2008
9.30 DCR
CADMIUM -SM 3111 B .: <0.050 ppm 3/121200.8
8:07 RAS
-1 CALCIUM EPA 200.8 32 ppm 3/5/2008 .
15:00 CHI
CHROMIUM, TOTAL SM 3111.1) .. - <0.100 pptn 3/11/2009
15:09 RAS
LEAD SM 3113 B <0:001 ppm 3/11/2008
14:31 RAS
MAGNESIUM SM 3111D 15.7 ppm '3/12/2008
11,38 RAS
MERCURY EPA 245.1 <0.00020 ppm 3/7/2008
7.50 CHI "
NICKEL SM 3111 B <0.100 ppm 3/12/20D8
6:19 RAS
NITROGEN, NITRATE SM 4500 NO3 E ' <0.1 mg/L 3/5/2008
15:00 HAK
NITROGEN, AMMONIA i SM 4500 NH3 D 6.33 mg/L 3/il/2008
9:45 HAK
NITROGEN, PLANT AVAILABLE CALCULATION 18.25 mg/L 3/19/2008
17:00 BKS
NITROGEN, TOTAL KJELDAHL SM 4500 N (org) C 56.6 mg/L 311%WM
8:00 HAK
PH SM 4500 H B 7.54 s.0 3/3/2008
13:2. DOR
PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL I SM 4500 P E 9.58'mg/L 3/13/20M
12:0P Dat
SODIUM SM 3111 B 157 ppm 3112120M
9:35 RAS -
SOLIDS, TOTAL SM 2540 G 0.14 % 3/10/2008
14:48 HAK
ZINC i SM 3111 B 0.171 ppm .-3/11/2008
17:37 RAS
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
MICROBAC LABORATORIES, INC.
7itmfkyou for ytwr business. We my* yourfeedback on ow keel to ywt. Pkawe contact the Laboratory Dn actor, Rat Son*n at 910.664-1920 , Robert Mwgam
rM; qt r mwgan @mic obaacom or M nw Boyce., CEO, at tbayce@mi robaacan With any co mima or suggestimm
LAB CODES: NID None Doodad NIF = Nye Foued <= Less than > = o eatw than Fat. = Estimated
The dote ad alt* taformwW CWtA ed I th6, ad o0w a=wvetMm d-mw% aP �Y sanpk(s) attalymd attd b terdeted itpan the MEIMIBER
mtt - , I Old R is not bD be repadjvW wAt* or to patt for a Aff tg or affix pt+Pe "IdwAt wrtun approW from the taborataty.
llS EPA-MM Tes" Pond gfftatlm fb00TAcal and I9006iobgw M*" atd Reoardt

:n1__9
LUC.—
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
2592 HOPE MILLS ROAD
LI
'STATE CERT ID.
FAYE-ITEVILLE, NC 28306
NC-#! I
[phone] FAX (910) & 4-9774
R. W. SANDERS, VICE
NC #37714
0117
http://www.miccobac.cofn
E-Mail: r3=[e-mail]
CHEMISTRY'l
MJCRCW IOLOGY I FOOD SAFETY - CON
MER PRODUCTS
WATM­ AIR -1-WAS-7M -FOOD - PHARMACEUTICALS -
CEUT7CALS
MS
CERTIFICATE OF ANAL
13
Allen Cafuims Company
,
Date Reported:
12/10/2007
M3. Kathryn YeW
Date Received:
11/1612007
Post Office Box 250
Orda Number.
0711-00003
Siloam Springs, AR 72761
55807
Customer #:
A004
Sample Date:
11/10007
Permit No.
Sample Time:
9:34
Sampler. Kerr
Subjc= Effluent sample - 3/Yi
SNIP Test,
Method. Reswt
Dve
Time Tack
ARSWC
SOD, 5-day
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM, TOTAL
LEAD
MAUMIUM
MERCURY
NICKEL
NITROGEN, NITRATE
NrrROGENf -AMMONIA
NITROGEN. PLANT AVAILABLE
NIT=M, TOTAL KIELDAHL
PH
PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL
SODIUM
SOLIDS, TOTAL
ZINC
EPA 200.8
<0.010 PPM
EPA 40S.1
346 ffKJIL
EPA 213.1
4.100 pprn
EPA 200.8
36 ppm
EPA 210.1
<0.100 ppm
EPA 239.1
<0. 100 Wn
EPA 200.6
18 pDrn
EPA 245.1.
<OX0020 ppm
EPA 249.1
<0300 PPM
EPA 353.3
<0.1 mg/L
EPA 350:2
.1,82.MW
CALCULATION
17.16 mg/L
EPA 351.3
56.0 mg/L
EPA 150.1
6.90 S.U.
SM 4500 P E
7.82 mgX
EPA 273.1
170 ppm -
SM18 25406
0.17%.,
EPA 289.1
0.67 PPM
.11126/2M7
19,09
CHI
11/16/2W7
15:13
KAJ
I1/29f2W
17:00
RAS
11/26f2007
19:09
CHI
111301 2007
11.141
RAS
11/29/2007
17-28
PAS
11/2612007
190
CHI
1112712007
1112
CHI
11/29/Z007
180
RAS
11116/2007
13-40
DCR
RAS
11/26/2007
17.,00
RKS
11/20/2007
8:00
RAS
11/16/2007
14:03
MA)
12110/2007
10:00
OCR
11/29/2007
20:07
RAS
.11
./19/2M7
10;30
RAS
11/29/2007
14:40
RAS
RESPEC77=Y. SUBMITTED:
M NU ROBAC LABORATORIES, INC.
7hankyet for Your busiflut Wewviz#yoyrfee4dbka4rAot,. &w1qfrcntegtvy&A P1ccncon&ct*LabomtovyD
Coo, &(rma-gan@microbaccum Or 7)vwr Bo)a, CEO; of 6 . *)w&icrob",com with any oftwWr 0r4vgF"
kBCODES: N/1D=NoneDcfccW N/F-NbncFound .- Less than >=Qc1krthin I MEMBER
N dm &N cum kftnwbwxwvd in ft and o0w emampqft dwummh mWeRM -1y the _Wkjj vmVjw vW is re VVW upon mt
w"An drat it n not two be L*0-"fi* or In pad for adygo" or 0VW pub wiliM wKw MpvvW from the 'a-vtm-
(j5E)A RAMSH T trod SVRe4Q"C4D0SUjdflg

CI�STRY• • ]
WATER • AIR •I
:,,Alpena, Ine.
Ms. KAduyn Yeager
Pod Office I3ox 1%
Siloam Springs, AR 72761-
PM*t No.
Sampler: Mtller '
Subject EffluM sample - 3/Yr i
ARSENIC
BOD, S*y
CADMWM
/
OMMUM =AL.^
LEAD
MAGNEMM
MUM
NICKEL
NITROGEN, NITRATE
NITROGEN, AMP""
NITRDCF+ J1, KAIiTAMARE
NITROGEN, TOTAL 108 DAHL
PH
MOSPHOru1S, TOTAL
$ODIUM
S IIDS TOTAL
Mtcrobac Laboratofles, h1c.
rngc
FAYETTEMLEDDIMON
STATE CERT M.
2592 HOPE MIS ROAD
FAYETIAVII LE,NC 28306
NC#11 .
_NC - 377M .....-. .
I
R. W. SANDERS, VICE PRESIDIM
USDA #3797
http://wwwx icrobac.com E-B64 [e-mail]
[(ROBIOLOCiY FOOD SAFETY->CONSUMi PRODUCTS
ISM • FOOD • PEARMACEEMCALS • NMRACSMCALS
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
SM SM-B
SM 3I11 B
EPA•200.a
SM3111D
SH 31�11 B
SM 31U D
EPA 2�4E1
SM 3ni B
SM 4500 NO3 E
5M4i 0IMD
C11LL1AATION
y SM 49D0 N (ap) C
SM 4500 H S
SM 45DD P E
SM 3111 B
SM 2540 G
7�bk�wrJe►�w►boNsu. A'eTeNJspgvJfndbaricanoa►/erda�sc
Coo. a! reor1m ar_wm erTmwBoDm CEO. ar rbo co&M
'• �,DDES: run—T4ouaDaeeicd'"II/F�I�ene�nad'd- ';<rl�t'
-- mea�a.ed,ecrrtavatm�wY.a�
amdYnbRtYnatbEergoae
' II�A�laQ9lTac
Date Repotted:
7/30/2008
Date Reocived:
MM
Order Number.
0807-00006
InvoiceNo.:
59978
Cuswmer #:
A,004 .
Sample Date:
7n/2008
Sample Time:
10:40 '
Rewh Date 77=e
Tech
<0.01 ppm
361 mg/L
<0.001,ppm
2s ppm
<0.10.ppm
2.16 ppm
193 ppm
<0 2 MM
<0.1.00 ppm
4.100 nVJL.
24.2 MaX
1943 MWL
473 MOL
&05 c1L
14.4 mp/L
n0 ppm
D.1196
A4 Sm --
7/16iMM
23:2
CHI
7JWM
9:00
OCR
7/77/I00B
10.'M
PAS
.7/17/2008
16:37
as -
7/]3/7008
12:43
RAS
7/14/M
MM
RAS
7/2S AM
15:47
RAS
7/1%MM
14:79
GII
7/2ZJ20N
11t03
RAS
7/9vw
7:45
RAS
7110/M
10:00
3EM
7/29/1008
17.00
80
MUM
9:15
.3EM
7/7/1008
14.20
DCR
7/21/2008
10-M
DCt
7j29/=
10:46
PAS
7/13/200B
17.05
RAS
7/13/2008
17A0
RAS
R SPECITULLY SL)BM rrED.
MICRI)BAC LABORATORIES, INC.
iot ay4e Plebe eonraet drc La6eo�oryDirecmv; IMa �+ a+970�6f-1920. RoberJ�o►�ti
roba�eeaarirlfh aeynowumNra�a�lgaAr
r-'>=GnmtQmen--E&---T�eamd................ . .........._....... ..._.:._... _ ..
/,.emL7M1'h/k��.f.AP.•tOI+Y.s..0�.1.1�d.Od t:it.Yl.a ipOp u. -
ww4orbPtftr 1eWaaatlerpNp�wbut��r�p�Itmmtl�Y4f�r.
ftd&d MCMxM oeml�dlteaflolopolMbtesao0�a�rE1

Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
Page 1 of 1
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
STATE CERT ID.
2592 HOPE MILLS ROAD
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28306
[phone] FAX [phone]
NC #11
NC #37714
R W. SANDERS, VICE PRESIDENT
USDA #3787
http://www.microbac.com E-Mal [e-mail]
CIUMSTRY
MICROBIOLOGY - FOOD SAFETY • CONSUMER PRODUCTS
WATER •'AIR
WASTES • FOOD • PHAPMACEUTICALS • NUIRACEUTICALS
Aliens, Inc.
Ms. Kathryn Yeager
Post Office Box 250
Siloam Springs, AR 72761
Permit No.
Sampler: Miller
Subject: Effluent sample - 3/Yr
SMP Test
ARSENIC
SOD, 5-day
CADMIUM
1 CALCIUM
% CHROMIUM, TOTAL
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MERCURY
NICKEL
NITROGEN, NITRATE
NITROGEN, AMMONIA
NITROGEN, PLANTAVAnAiu
NrrROGEN, TOTAL KIELDAHL
pH -exam& 15 min hold time
PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL
SODIUM
SOLIDS, TOTAL
ZINC
Tlwnk youfor your business. We invite yourfeedback on our level o
COO, at [e-mail] or Trevor Boyce, CEO, at tboycei
J
LAB CODES: N/D = None Detected N/F = None Found <
The data and other triomwstcn con
cmdaoa out R is not eD bt
USDA-U*MQ
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Date Reported:
11/30/2008
Date Received:
11/17/2008
Order Number-
0811-00005
Invoice No.:
61828
Customer #:
A004
'Sample Date:
11/17/2008
Sample Time:
10:36
,200.8
52100
3111 B
� 200.8
3111 B
3111 B
3111 B
� 245.1
3111 B
4500 NO3 E
4500 NH3 D
45M N (org) C
4500 H B
4500 P E
31118
2540 G
3111 B
<0.010 mg/L
282 mg/L
<0.050 ppm
37 mg/L
<0.05 ppm
<0.1 PPm
16.3 ppm
<0.00020 ppm
<0.1 PPm
1.91 mg/L
0.34 m9fL
8.6 m91L
22.1 mg/L
6.53 sm.
9.69 mg/L
170 ppm
0.15 %
0.108 PPM
11/21/2008
11/19/2008
11/20/2008
11/21/2008
11/20/2008
11/20/2008
11/26/2008
11/21/2008
11/20/2008
11/19/2008
11/20/2008
111301M
11/24/2008
11/17/2008
11/25/2008
11/24/2008
11/17/2008
11/20/2008
Time
12:19
10:30
16:32
12:19
18:05
15:57
13:47
11:17
16:55
15:00 ,
11:00
17:00
11:45
14:10
8:00
17:33
11:00
9:24
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
MICROBAC LABORATORIES, INC.
e to you. Please contact the Laboratory Director, Ron Sanders at 910.864-1920, Robert Morgan,
bac.com with any comments or suggestions.
CHI
DCR
RAS
CHI
RAS
RAS
RAS
CHI
RAS
ENC
RAS
BKS
RAS
DCR
DCR
RAS
ENC
RAS
thtm > = Greater than Est. = Estid
Yt�ttlElt{:1t
on Mts, and odd aowmmnyim dxwneMs, .wesad ants cample(s) arelyad and k tendered upon tl�e
duped wh* or in part for adverts g or other puposes watcut wrtaen appwd twin the tabordtory.
MW Food SanfmUon lbsesu hV CtrnVW ud Mloobbtoglot AW)1Ses and Re;QWCh
0

i;
Soil Evaluation i
1. Revise the soil map to
unit.
the clayey soil area in Zone-18 from the Tarboro/Kahnia map
Response:
The soil map has been removed to remove the clayey soil area and the revised map is
included in the Revised Soil Evaluation report.
2. See Application Question 11.
Response:
See response to Applicafi
3, P1an.Sheet C-107 shows a
abandoned. Amend the S
remove compaction from
not cause ponding or: runc
have been modified to inc
Please note the permit ma
areas prior to operation to
Response:
The following recominen4
L_
Several access roads for ,farn
soils/proposed wetted areas c
abandoned per the, design enj
removal of compaction from
1). The use of a sub-!
layers below the
18 inches to ensue
paths.
Question # -11
existing farm road in Zones 16, 47, 18a and i 8b that is to be
1 Evaluation to. include. any necessary rehabilitation needed to
e existing farm road, such that the proposed irrigation rates will
in these areas.. Please -also ensure,the plans and specifications
ode any rehabilitation work done on the existing' farm road soils:
include a condition requiring a soil scientist to reevaluate these
nsure proper irrigation rates have been set.
ion -has been added to the revised Soil Evaluation:
Q access IMMUS
nachinery exist' on this property, and are found within the suitable
irrigation.Zones 16, 17 18 and 18a. These roads are to be
peer. S&EC recommends the following to ensure the adequate
tese areas:
iler, or similar deep-shanked tillage tool to remove compacted
it surface. 'This implement should have a working depth of at, least
adequate disruption of any hard pans that may occur under the .
2) Disking the surface of these areas at the time of crop establishment.
3) Applying time and starter fertilizers per the agronomist recommendations for the
surrounding zonal areas -(please refer to the Agronomist Report prepared by S&EC,
P.A. for further details).
The combination of tillage outlined above and the establishment of a healthy cover crop will
be the best way to prevent ponding or runoff in these compacted.areas. It should be noted
that NC DWQ may require a reevaluation of these areas by a licensed, soil scientist to ensure
that compaction has been properly alleviated prior to operation of the spray fields.
14

Water Balance
1. Since the facility's permitted flow capacity is not increasing and/or spray irrigation area is
not decreasing, the. Division performed a cursory review of the submittedwater balance, and
is not approving or disapproving the methodology and results contained therein. When a
future permit modification is submitted to increase the permitted flow capacity; please ensure
the water balance meets the requirements in Application Instruction K, Rule 15A NCAC 02T
.0504(k) and the Aquifer Protection Section's Water Balance Calculation Policy located at
the following web address: I rt_ T
Response:
Because the recommended annual hydraulic loading rates are derived from the Water
Balance which, in turd uses drainage rates from the mounding analysis; the Revised Water
Balance and Wet. Weather Storage report is submitted with this response: Please note that the
recommended rates are slightly different from those in the report submitted with the, original
application. These slight differences are the result of correcting the 8&,,% wettest annual
precipitation amount from 52.2 in/yr in the Water Balance submitted with the original
application to the 55 'ui/yr. All analyses that depend upon this change in the Hydrogeologic
Report, the Soils Evaluation and the Agronomist Evaluation have been revised to correct for
this change..
Note that the annual and sE
were specified from the Al
from mounding analysis.
Please note that the slight
information in the Water F
Balance Report to agree ei
Evaluation. The values in
Revised Agronomist Evab
irrigation rates for Zones 1:8 and 18a in -the Water Balance
ist Evaluation, and that they are 80% of the values derived
;rences in the tables on Figure ,l from tables showing the same
ice Report result from rounding the values in the Water
[y with the Revised Application and the Revised Agronomist
Revised Application, Irrigation System Plan Sheets, and the
►n are correct.
15

Agronomist, Evaluation
1. The Annual Hydraulic Lo
the loading rates listed in
consistent numbers throu€
Response:
Item VII(10) has been rev
Revised Agronomic Evah
2.. Revise the agronomy rep(
each map unit. This will r
Noboco (Goldsboro/Nobc
realistic yield expectation
over application of nitrogi
use the -decreased wetted
Rate (in/yr) used in the agronomic .calculations do not match
cation Item VII(10)(a). Please revise as necessary to provide
the application package.
to show the same Annual Hydraulic Loading Rates used in the
to provide agronomic calculations for the most limiting soil in
wire separate calculations on Wagram (Norfolk/Wagram unit),
unit), and Tarboro (Tarboro/Kalmia unit) soils. Using the
NE) for the most favorable soil in each map unit could result in
and phosphorus in the areas of less productive soils. Be sure to
'gage in Zone 18 when revising the calculations.
Response:
See attached revised', agronomist report and associated map. On the attached map, soils
information from S&EC'sl soils map was overlain onto the proposed irrigation zones and the
most limiting soil map unit within each zone was used for determining Realistic Yield
Expectations. Specifically, RYE data for Wagram soils was used for the Norfolk/Wagram
unit,.Noboco soils data was used for the Goldsboro/Noboco unit and Tarboro soils data was
used for the Tarboro/Kahnia unit.. Based on these revisions, Zone 18 and 18A have been
shown to be seasonally nutrient limited and irrigation rates have been reduced to match crop
removal capabilities: It should be noted that RYE data was only altered for the bermudagrass
crop. Winter annual', rye RYE values were not altered since the estimates were conservative
values in the -initial agronomist -report.. Additional references that substantiate the proposed
winter annual rye nutrient 1 applications are also included in the revised agronomist report.
3. The submitted soil analysi
5.4, which are at levels no
etc. Accordingly, the soil
acre to field sample F-1 aj
pH.' Amend the agronomy
proposed spray irrigation
maintenance manual inclu
Response: '
See attached revised!a
NutrientlHeavy Metal
recommendations.
show the proposed irrigation fields have pH levels from 4.7 to
ideal for microbial uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, ',
analysis results recommend the addition of 0.8 tons of lime per- -
11.3 tons of lime per acre to field- sample W-2 to increase the field
t report to include the recommendation of adding lime to the
elds, and please ensure the plans, specifications and operation and -
ie the liming recommendations.
report under section."Soil Sample Results and
paragraph 1 for additional information concerning liming
16

4. In order to utilize the winter mineralization rate of 0.17, the Applicant shall .demonstrate to
the Division the -validity of this value. At a minimum, the Applicant shall provide written
justification for using this methodology and shall cite and include the referenced materials on
Page 4 of the Agronomist Report.' These materials include:
Response:
Please refer to the attacht
mineralization rates base
provided literature. As a
the proposed wintertime
mineralization rate is bas
(month of October).'; Ad(
report.
.5. The USDA Sampson Coi
.would prefer the Applica
1936 to December 2007
Response:
Please refer to Table 5 in
and Nitrogen Loading" sl
6. The 1987 Doran and
. soil'temperature; and
Response:
Please refer to Appendix
additional literature that
microbial activity.
7. The 1999 Brady and Wei
atmospheric temperature.
Response:
Please refer to Appendix
revised agronomist report for a monthly analysis of estimated
on the previously described literature as well as additionally
ssult of the additional mineralization rate analysis, S&EC revised .
October -February) mineralization rate to 0.20. - This revised
i on the most conservative value obtained in the monthly analysis
tional information can be found in the attached revised agronomist
ty Soil Survey average daily temperatures (Note: The Division
be consistent and use the water balance temperature from January
vice versa);
attached revised agronomist report in the "Wastewater Analysis
reference suggesting soil microbial activity is dependent upon
of the attached revised agronomist report for this and
ztiates the relationship between soil temperature and soil
reference suggesting surface soil temperatures vary with
of the attached -revised agronomist report.
17

8. The Division also recon
through February) of mi
each monthly mineraliz,
mineralization rate. If t
winter PAN application
mineralization rates. In
be accounted for in the
variable winter PAN mi
Response:
Please refer to the attac
mineralization rates'ba.,
mineralization rate anal
mineralization rate to 0
conservative value obtc
information can be fom
ends the Applicant provide a monthly analysis (for October
ralization rates based on the above referenced materials. Using
)n rate, the Applicant shall determine the most conservative
most conservative mineralization rate is not selected, then the
all be broken down into smaller time frames to account for varying
ldition, the Division agrees that remnant organic nitrogen needs to
nmer PAN, or possibly. through an iterative process in the winter if
ralization rates are selected.
drevised agronomist report for a monthly analysis of estimated
ion the previously described literature. As a result of the additional
,,is, S&EC revised the proposed winter time (October -February)
if. This revised mineralization rate is based on the most
ed in the monthly analysis (month of October). Additional
in the attached revised agronomist report.
18

Hvdroeeolosie Report_
1. Please revise Figures 1
visit north of irrigation
the model and the resul
Response: ,
Figure 4 has been revis
on Figure I In the orig
location of the Rowan 1
regional features. The
orthophotos taken in 1 c
This pond was origina
Detailed Plans comme
Aliens, Inc., this pond
Consequently the mod
the watertabW and he
I
I
We have added the po
head elevation of 105
hydraulic conductivit3
elevation of 101 feet.
contours from this rev
the statistics used to a
the areas where the mi
within one foot of the
the pond. There !is no
Figure 4. j
2. Existing water wells'
and are discussed in t
not show the location
all five wells.
Response:
In preparing Figure 4
inadvertently cut off.
been revised to show
property owned -by A
added to Table 1 and
None of the wells
location map inter
irrigation zones 're
be impossible to (
included on the R
id 4 to show the existing irrigation pond observed during the ,site
)ne 7. Does the presence of this pond affect the calibration of
of the mounding analysis?
to show the existing -irrigation pond. This pond was not shown
report because it is only a location map intended to show the
ad property and the proposed irrigation zones relative to
Tect location of the pond as determined from historical infrared
is included on the Revised Figure 4.
used to store irrigation water pumped via the pipe mentioned in
13. Based upon information provided by Tommy Langston of
is not been used to. store irrigation water for many years.
calibration and mounding analysis assumed it was a `window in
a did not serve to provide additional recharge to groundwater.
id into the model using a River boundary condition with a river
bet, a bed conductance of 12 fe/day/ft (the same value as the
of the upper sand, assuming a bed thickness of 1 ft), and a bottom
Che revised watertable elevation contours and depth to water
lion are shown on Revised Figure 4. There was no difference in
less model calibration and there is not a discernible difference in
deled watertable under the 80*'% wettest year condition was
and surface with the exception of the area down gradient (east) of
)roposed irrigation zone in'this area as can be seen from Revised
W-1 through WW-5 have been identified in the vicinity -of the site
report text and shown in Table 1; however, Figures 1 and 4 do
'well WW-2. Please revise the figures to show the locations of
the northern portion of the Well Inventory Boundary was
WW-2 is located north of Rowan Road in this area. Figure 4 has
he location of WW-2. An additional well (WW-6) located on
lens, Inc. was located just prior to the site visit. This well has been
o Figure 4.
shown on Figure 1 in the original report because it is only a
to show the location of the Rowan Road property and the proposed
e to regional features. 'Because of the scale of this map, it would
guish the wells and their labels. The correct location and labels are
d Figure 4.
19

T=c I
Hvdroaeolosic Report (cont
3. The values for annual
groundwater flow mo(
a discrepancy between
of the model and/or th
percentile annual prec
value and is it consist(
Response:
Different climatic day
analysis because;the p
dry,.conditions and the
condition.. The calibr,
pumping test by S&M
was input to the land
runoff), the calibrated
used for calibration.
i
The calibrated model
May, or 39.42 in/yea
revised Water Balanc(
surface runoff of 9.84
Clinton 2S station ext
to extend the record f(
of the Revised Water
is caused by rounding
j
The water levels ;used
number of available v
the U.S DroughtMon
leading up to and inct
abnormally dry condii
calibrate the model is
36 inches per year coi
the Revised Water Ba
The mounding
required by 15.
in Table 2 of 0
minus 80''%o vu
Therefore not c
calibration and
values used on
irecipitation and evapotranspiration (ET) used to calibrate the .
el are different that. those used in the water balance. Why, is there
the two sets of values and does this discrepancy affect the validity
water balance? Also the amount of precipitation used for the 80`h
pitation-in the mounding analysis is not given. What was this
it with the. corresponding value used in the water balance?
was used for the calibration of the model and for the mounding
,riod used'for model calibration represented average to slightly
conditions required for mounding'analysis are the 80"% wettest
red model used values -of hydraulic -conductivity determined.by the
?. Because the only variable adjusted d\during model calibration
irfacee-of effective precipitation (precipitation minus surface
nodel,can be used to evaluate climatic conditions other than that
sed the average, annual effective precipitation value of 0.009
The value of effective precipitation shown in Table 2 of the
report is 39.35 in/yr (average precipitation of 49.19 in/yr minus
n/yr) which,was derived from 41 years of climatic data from the .
tided to 71 years using the Clinton 2 NE station. The method used
this station using the Clinton 2NE.station is explained on page 4
ialance report. The difference between 39.42 in/yr and 39.35 in/yr
To three significant figures, both values round to 0.009 May.
.calibration were measured m April 2006 because -the largest
measured in -one day was available for that date. According to
(h!W://drought.unl.edu/dm/archiVe.html), for the 3 months
ig this date, Sampson county was in an average to slightly
. Therefore using the average annual effective precipitation to .
sonable. Similarly, the calibration used the average PET rate of -
ited with the Priestley -Taylor equation as shown in Table 1 of
x report.
uses a value of effective precipitation of 44 inches per year as
.62T. This value was taken from the climatic analysis as; shown
�d Water Balance report (W' % wettest precipitation of 55-in/yr
face runoff of -11 inches per year).
the values of effective. precipitation and ET used for model
hg analysis consistent with those in the Water Balance report, the
from the water balance report.
20

4. In the discussion of boi
of the report, it is ment:
upper surface of the me
intercepts the land surf
mounding analysis the
compliance boundary i
proposed drainage feat
V
Response:
The areas where the mi
boundary.with and wit]
have been added to the
conditions the areas in
the land surface are slij
land surface without in
increase of 1.97 acres.
location.
[dary conditions used in the groundwater flow model on page 15
ned that drain boundary conditions were assigned to the entire
[el (ground surface), allowing the site, to drain if the water table
;e. please expand the report to discuss whether or not during the
,ater table was observed to intercept the land surface within the
areas other than existing surface water features and existing or
,ed watertable "intersects the land surface within the compliance
t irrigation for recharge expected during the 80th% wettest year
vised Figure 4. As can be seen by this Figure, under these -
low lying portions of drainages where the watertable_intersects
y expanded. The total area where the watertable intersects the
Lion is 2.22 acres, and with irrigation is 4.19 acres, or an
-.se increases are not considered significant because of their
5. Monitoring wells R-2 and R-3 are located essentially at the edge of the delineated
wetlands around irrigation Zone 18. If.groundwater contamination is detected in these
wells what will be the Applicant's plan of action to address this situation; given the
presence of the wetlands between the wells and the compliance boundary?
Response:
All monitoring wells
NCAC .02L .01'08.
the plan of action,is t
located so as to be on the review boundary as required by 15A
eedence of 2L groundwater standards is detected in these wells
• Confirm the exceedence by re -sampling the well and submitting the sample(s) and
the required field quality control samples for analysis by both the laboratory
reporting the exceedence and a second state certified laboratory; and
If the exceeder
.0106(d)(1) wil
(d) Arty person
authority of a I
concentration ,
(1) at or beyon
calculations or
operational col
boundary; or s
design or ppern
boundary; and
designee.
e is -confirmed, then the requirements of 15A NCAC .02L
be implemented:
9,nducting or controlling an activity which is conducted under the
knit issued by the Division and which results in an increase in
a substance in excess of the standards:
a review boundary; shall demonstrate, through predictive
modeling, that natural site conditions, facility design and
rols will prevent a violation of standards at the compliance
limit a plan for alteration of existing site conditions, facility,
ional controls that will prevent a violation at the compliance
nplement that plan upon its approval by the Director, or his
21

6. The results of background groundwater quality analyses performed at the site presented
in Table 12 indicate that the 2L groundwater quality standard for nitrate was exceeded in
monitoring well R-8, which appears to be in an upgradient location at the site, based on
the groundwater flow contours shown on Figure 4. Given that upgradient groundwater
quality already exceeds 2L standards at the site, how does the Applicant propose to
evaluate groundwater quality in the monitoring wells during the operation'of the spray
fields so that any impacts to groundwater quality from the fields can be detected?
Response:
The compliance wells ere established and sampled prior to the submittal of the permit
in anticipation of a permit requirement to include such monitoring. -These wells are on a
schedule of sampling eve ery three months to obtain data and information on seasonal
variations in background water quality prior to the application of any effluent on the
Rowan Road fields. Tlie results of this .sampling and analysis will be used establish
reasonable background concentrations at the downgradient monitoring locations.
Following issuance of the Permit Modification, it is anticipated that the Rowan Road
monitoring wells will be sampled on the same schedule and for the same constituents and
parameters used for the! monitoring wells required under the existing Permit. Because the
down gradient wells are located at the Review Boundary as required by 15A NCAC .02L
.0108, if and exceedence of the 2L groundwater standards id detected, the plan of action
willbe as set forth in the response to Comment 5 above.
Please -note that the sli
Hydrogeologic Report
Balance Report result
exactly with the Revis
Agronomist Evaluatioi
Sheets, and the Revise
it differences in the tables on Figure 4 of the Revised
-om the tables showing the same information in the Water
)m rounding the values in the Water Balance Report to agree
l Application, the Irrigation Plan Sheets, and the Revised
The values in the Revised Application, Irrigation System Plan
Agronomist Evaluation are correct.
VA
22

i
r
Detailed Plans
r
➢ Screening Facility Plan Sheets
1. Sheets .C-161 and C 102 show a return storage tank, return pump and a gutter flush line
returning back to the, processing plant. Please note this operation is not a reuse, but a closed- .
loop recycle system finder Section .1000 of Subchapter 02T. In order to permit this
operation, the following items need to be addressed:
a The application package states this recycle water is used to flush gutters. Please
explain what hese gutters are (function, material of construction, location, etc.) and
whether or not they drain back to the screening facility. Also, is the recycle water
proposed for any other uses?
Response:
The gutters are used in the canning facility to transport vegetable waste products into the
wastewater system. r used to flush the gutters will be piped to the existing wet well
outside the plant' and pumped back to the screening facility. There are no other proposed
uses for the recycle water at this time.
b. Is the screening facility open to the atmosphere (i.e., is it housed or roofed) and have
the potential -to receive precipitation and/or stormwater?
If the screening f. ility is not housed or roofed, then the.proposed closed-loop'recycle
system will require its own permit under Section .1000 of Subchapter 02T. If this is
the case, all mention of the closed -loop recycle system shall be removed from this
application and a new application shall.be submitted using the following form:
http://www.newaterqu - ity.org/lau/docwnents/CLRS12-06.doc.
. r
If the screening facility is covered or housed, such that precipitation and/or
stormwater cannot enter the wastewater stream, then the proposed closed -loop
operation may be deemed permitted under 15A NCAC 02T .1003(a)(1) and thus
included in this nrdischarge permit (WQ0004268).
Response:
The screening fac
entering the wash
individual screen
0
will be covered so as to prevent precipitation and/or stormwater
,r stream. Please see revised detail 2 on sheet M-101 for the
;rs. Note 1 is included for additional clarity.
23
a

2. Plan Sheets C-101 and C-102, as well as aerial imagery show as railroad crossing the Allens,
Inc. property, as well as a spur near the processing plant. If the railroad and/or spur are not
exclusively, owned and operated by Allens, Inc., the Applicant shall submit written
documentation from the railroad owner allowing an easement for the wastewater influent line
and recycle gutter flush He to cross the railroad and. spur..
If an easement has been p
addition, provide written
new construction activitie
construction is already co
Response: i•
Per email from Tommy L
is CSX property. The em
Master granting permissi(
railroad .track. Please see
In addition, we have
section.
;viously granted for crossing these-ra.il lines, please provide. In
)cumentation from the railroad owner stating they are aware that
will be occurring underneath these two rail lines (unless new
gyred junder an existing easement agreement).
,gston (Allen) the rail siding belongs to Allens and the main line
l also includes correspondence from John Earp, CSX T Road
to install a new carrier pipe in the existing pipe sleeve under the
tached email dated February 13, 2009.
the original agreement with CSX as an attachment to this
3. Amend the plans to include a cross sectional detail of the proposed railroad crossings.
Response:
Railroad crossing detail 1 I is added to sheet C-104.
4. Please clarify whether or not the existing screening facility is to be'abandoned. If so, provide
a list of all equipment listed in the current permit description that is to be abandoned.
Response:
Equipment in the current r
5. Please amend Sheet C-1W
C-104.
Response:
Sheet C-102 is revised to
frame and grate covers, an
to show the location of the applicable details specified on Sheet
iow locations of the gutter flush'return pump, catch basins with
I spill curb.
24

➢ Force Main and Irrigation Plan Sheets
-' L. See Soil Evaluation Question #3:
Response:
See response to Soil Evaluation Question #3
2. See Agronomist Evaluation Question #4.
Response:
See response to Agronomist Evaluation 44
3. Amend the plans to include a cross -sectional detail of the proposed wetlands crossings in
Wetlands A, B, C, E and G. If all crossings are identical, a general cross section is
acceptable.
Response:
Wetland crossing directional drill cross -sectional detail is added to sheet D-104. All
crossings are the same except for the directional drill length.
4. Amend the plans to include a cross -sectional detail of the proposed Rowan Road (SR 1924)
crossing.
Response:
Rowan Road (SR 1924) crossing directional drill cross -sectional detail is added to sheet D-
104.
5. Amend the plans to include a generic detail of the "proposed 12' spray access" road
crossings.
Response:
Detail of road crossings over irrigation lines are included on new detail sheet D-105.
6. Amend the plans to includ a details for the spray field fencing and signage, as well as the
location of the fencing an signage on the irrigation plan sheets.
Response:
Spray field fencing and signage details are added to sheet D-102.
7. Revise Plan Sheet C-105 to include the following:
a. The pond north of Zone 7;
b. The location of the old well south of Zone 3a; and
C. The location of the inhabited residence and well north of Zone 10.
Each of these changes shall be determined if the required setbacks have been maintained.
Response:
Sheet C-105 is revised to innclude the requested information and setbacks are maintained.
d
25

+ Detailed Plans —Force Main and Irriaation Plan Sheets continued).
8. The provided e-mail message from the Fayetteville Regional Office's Surface Water
Protection Section approving the use of a subsurface groundwater lowering drain in irrigation
Zone 18 stated that this approval was given with the understanding that the outlet of this .
drain would be located some distance from the wetland boundary. The outlet for the drain
shown on Sheet C-107 is approximately 20 feet from the wetland boundary. Is this location
consistent with the approval given by the Fayetteville Regional Office's Surface Water
Protection Section?
Response:
The approval given by the . Ken Averitte of the Fayetteville Regional Office's Water
Protection Section (email dated January. 9, 2009) stated:
2) It is my understanding that the outlet of the ditch will be located some distance from
the; wetland boundary.Jhe
The outlet should be sufficiently stabilized or armored to prevent
erosion and minimize potential for development of ahead cut in the channel. Die
flow through vegetation is -recommended
The outlet of the drain has been located so that it is approximately 55 feet from the closest
boundary of the wetland boundary. Because no minimum distance was provided in 1Ar.
Averitte's approval and because the outlet will be constructed with an energy dissipater as
described in the response to Comment 9 of this section, and because there is existing
vegetation in the natural depression leading to the wetland boundary from the edge of the
dissipater to allow diffuse flow through vegetation, the location is consistent with the
approval provided.
9. Provide a detail of the proposed energy dissipater. Please note the permit will likely require
regularly scheduled. grab samples be taken from this discharge pipe, therefore ensure the
discharge pipe is designed appropriately.
Response:
The detail of the propose
105. The downstream en
allow the proper collectic
revised plan Sheet D-105
energy dissipater is provided in the revised plan set at Sheet D-
of the proposed drain has been designed with an access port to
of grab samples of water discharging from the drain as shown on
26

f,
10. Revise Plan Sheets G 107 and C=113. to remove irrigation in the location of the clayey soil at
the extreme northwest part of Zone 18. The soil in this area cannot be irrigated at the same
rate asthe rest of Zone 18. In order to permit irrigation in this area more detailed soils
information will be required. Amend the application and engineering calculations as
necessary.
Resuonse•
Plan sheets C-107 and C-113 have been revised to remove the area described in the
comment. This has resulted in the designation of the portion of the previously defined Zone
18 on the east as Zone 18 and the portion on the west as Zone 18a. These revised areas and
Zone designations are also shown on Figures 1 and 4 of the Revised Hydrogeologic Report
and Figure 1 of the Revised Water Balance Report. The revised zones have also been used to
revise the Soil Scientist and;Agronomy reports.
11. Amend Plan Sheets C-1
south through the site be
15, and 16 on the east.
Resaonse:
Assuming the comment
C-106, and C-107 have
12. The groundwater lowerin
to be placed around the a
if this filter fabric becom
Division recommends thi
demonstrate that the;: dray
simulation performed by
esponse
Detail 2 of Sheet D-1021
i
C-106 and C-107 to include the exiting ditch extending north-
mn irrigation Zones 10, 11, 12, and 13 on the west and Zones 14,
s to the existing ditch not the exiting ditch, Plan Sheets C-105,
amended to show all referenced ditches.
drain trench detail on Detail 2 of Sheet D-102 shows a filter fabric
gregate surrounding the drain pipe. The Division is concerned that
clogged, the effectiveness of the drain will be reduced. The
fabric be -removed from the design, unless the engineer can
will continue to operate in the manner depicted in the model
ie hydrogeologistf the fabric becomes clogged.
been revised to remove the filter fabric.
9
27

13. During the site visit an approximately 6-inch diameter PVC pipe'was observed in the existing
ditch east of irrigation Zones S and 6, near monitoring well R-6. The extent of the pipe that
crosses the ditch should be determined, as well as- its purpose. If the pipe is to remain in
place during operation of the irrigation fields, its location' and extent should be shown on the
detailed plans.
Resuonse•
The 6-inch diameter PVC pipe referenced in the comment was originally, used to convey
water'from Rowan Branch�uphill to the now -unused irrigation pond referenced in Comment.
7 of this section. The' approximate location of this pipe is shown on the revised Site Map.
This pipe will be capped a both the'upstream and downstream ends as part of site
preparation for the irrigation system. If the pipe, is encountered during construction of access
roads and/or irrigation piping, the upstream and down stream ends of the pipe where
encountered will be capped and the locations of the caps documented.
28

29

From: Earp, John Jr.,[mailto:John [e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:34 PM
To: Tommy Langston
Cc: Earp, John Jr.
Subject: Allen Canning culvert pipe
Mr. Tommy Langston Iat Allen Canning in Turkey N.C. has
permission to install a new pipe into the existing pipe under the
railroad track behind the plant on the Clinton spur at mp ACA 196.2. It
is understood that Mr. Langston or any one involved are not to'disturb
the railroad tracks:in any way:,
CSX T Road master
John Earp
919-464-7880
------------------------ ---------=------
This email transmission and any accompanying attachments may contain CSX
privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the
intended addressee. Any dissemination,.distribution, copying or action
taken in reliance on the contents of this email by anyone other than the
intended recipient is strictly.prohibited. If you have received this
email in error please immediately delete it and notify sender at the
above CSX email address. Sender and CSX accept no liability for any
damage caused directly of indirectly by receipt of this email.
30

.3-Page CSX Agreement
31
I

i
l' 500 Water Street, SC J180
cam V
Jacksonville, FL 32202
[phone]
TRANSPORTATION
Bill Wright
Contracts -Utility Group
Administrative Services
October 24, 1990
When corresponding, please
Refer to: File 36284-BW
Ms. Melinda Davis
Vice President and Treasurer
Allen Canning Company
305 East Main
P. 0. Box 250
Siloam Springs, AR 72761
Joan of Are Company
P. 0. Box 222
Turkey, NC 28394
Dear Ms. Davis and Sir',s:
Attached are your duplicate -originals of fully executed assignment
whereby effective July 2, 1990, agreement dated May 21, 1976, Agreement No.
SCL-23450 with Joan of,Arc Company, is assigned to Allen Canning Company.
Very truly yours,
Bill Wright,
Attachments
i
I
rr

CSXT Form 3064-Sheet 1
May 1990
RE-36284
ADMIN\330250C.BWP
ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENT
FOR VALUE RECEIVED, JOAN OF.ARC"COMPANY, an Illinois.corporation,
hereinafter referred to as "Assignor," does hereby assign, set over, and
transfer, effective
to ALLEN CANNING COMPANY, whose
mailing address is 305 East Main, P. 0. Box 250, Siloam Springs, Arkansas
72761, hereinafter referred to as. "Assignee," all right, title 'and interest
of Assignor in the following lease, license or agreement: with SEABOARD COAST
LINE RAILROAD COMPANY„ now known as CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., hereinafter
referred to as "Lessor," to wit:
Lease No. SCL-023450 dated May 21, 1976, covering water pipeline at or
near Turkey, North Carolina, hereinafter referred to as "Agreement."
Assignor discharges Lessor from any and all past and present claims and
obligations pursuant to said Agreement, to the Effective Date of this
Assignment, and releases all future rights therein against Lessor.
Further, by this'Assignment and Consent, Assignor is removed from all
liability on the'Agreement as of the Effective Date hereof, and Lessor shall
have rights against Assignee only.
WITNESS the hand(s) and seal(s) of Assignor(s) as of the Effective Date
above.
WITNESS(ES):
ASSIGNOR: JOAN OF ARC COMPANY
(n.k .The Pillsbury Company) ,
By h (SEAL)
le: .�

CSXT Form 3064-Sheet 2
May .1990
ACCEPTANCE BY ASSIGNEE
In consideration of the foregoing Assignment, ASSIGNEE hereby assumes
and covenants and agrees to be bound by, carry out, perform, observe and
abide by, all the terms, obligations and conditions of said Agreement
arising as of the effective date hereof, -as if an original party thereto
with Assignor. l 1
In consideration forlthis Assignment and Consent, ASSIGNEE agrees to
pay LESSOR. :the lump sum of ONE HUNDRED AND NQ/100 U.S. DOLLARS ($100.00)'
upon execution of the Assignment and Consent.
In further consideration for -this Assignment and Consent, ASSIGNEE
agrees that, in lieu of rental set forth in'said Agreement, the rental or
license fee thereunder shall be $50,00 'per annum, payable annually as of the
Effective Date above: All other items contained. shall remain as if
republished herein.
WITNESS the hand(s) and seal(s) of Assignee(s) as of the Effective Date
above.
WITNESS(ES): ASSIGNEE: ALLEN CANNING COMPANY
G! (tcc.: ByAt,
`'�✓ (SEA. 7,,C..c-•.�.,c.x�c.-._� ��-,�t-, :�,."..,.-w�i
CONSENT TO ASSIGNMENT
In consideration of the above, LESSOR hereby consents and agrees to the
foregoing Assignment of Agreement to Assignee; effective as of the date of
transfer and assignment hereinabove provided.
This consent shall not be construed by any party hereto as a waiver or
consent to any further orisubsequent sublease, assignment or transfer of the.
rights, duties and/or obligations, in whole or in part, of said Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said LESSOR has caused these present, to be
executed by its duly authorized officer, ,this",, day of �� ,
19 40 -
WITNESS(ES): CSX TRANSP ON, NC.
'.� By
tl
Director- racts
CSX Rail Transport
1

Site Map �.
L Per Application Instructic
the plan set) copies and tv.
Response:
Four (4) 24" x 36" stand f
included with this submitl
2. Per Application Instructic
includes the following inf
a. The location iof all
features within 50
monitoring wells f
review boundary.
b. The compliance aj
c. Actual most restril
Application Item 1
d. Show the location
treatment and disc
e. All habitable, resic
treatment, storage
f. Revise the irrigati
section above (i.e.
Response:
The site map(s) have be
3. Due to the size of the p:
and each map shall incl
facilities.
Each map shall contain
it. Site Map 1—;Was
applicable) and th
b. Site Map 2 —,Spra
Response:
Two site maps_ have been
submittal. ?
d
10, provide four (4) standard size stand alone (i.e., separate from
o (2) 11 by 17-inch stand alone copies of the site map.
site maps and two (2)11" x ' 17" stand alone maps are
O and Rule 15A NCAC 2T .0504(d)o ensure the site map to
mation:
yells, streams, springs, lakes, ponds, and other surface drainage
feet of all waste treatment, storage and disposal sites. If
e proposed, amend the site map to show their location on the
1 review boundaries ,for the irrigation fields.
ive. setbacks as required by 15A NCAC 02T .0506, -and as listed in
if all property boundaries within 500 feet of the wastewater
sal sites.
nces or places of public assembly within 500 feet of all waste,
nd disposal sites.
a areas depending upon the, comments in the Detailed Plans
Zone 18).
revised to include the requested information.
t "
:t, the Division recommends providing two (2) separate site maps,
the above required information within 500 feet of these specified
following:
water Screening Facility, Closed -Loop Recycle Facility (if
Irrigation Wet Well.
Irrigation Facility.
showing the areas in 3(a) and 3(b) and are included in this
32

Specifications i
1. See Soil Evaluation Ques
Response:
See response to Soil Eval
2. See Agronomist Evaluati4
I
Response:
See response to Agronom
3. Will the.proposed irrigati,
irrigation during inclemei
will the Applicant pc'even
Operation and Maintenan
Response:
Allens tracks and records
and reports this informati
manual nature of the, exis
Operator. in Responsible 4
Weatherr forecasts and acl
events. Irrigation is stopi
inspections of the field a
irrigation after rain event;
#3.
;ion # 3
Question A.
A Evaluation # 4
n system contain precipitation or soil moisture sensors to prevent
: weather? If so, amend the plans and specifications. If not, how
irrigation during inclement weather? If manually, amend the
e Plan to include these requirements. .
ainfall,'air temperature, and weather conditions on a daily basis
n on the Discharge Monitoring Report (I)MR). Because of the
ng and proposed irrigation systems, an operator (and typically the
harge) is on -site during the vast majority of the irrigation periods.
ial site conditions are used to monitor for pending or actual rain
A if inclement weather is imminent or has occurred. Visual
iditioris are used,to determine the acceptable time to commence
33

i
Engineering Calculations
1... Remove the term reclaimed from the system description, and either replace with closed -loop
recycle if deemed permitted under 15A NCAC 02T .1003(a)(1), or delete completely if the
closed -loop recycle system requires a permit under Section .1000 of Subchapter 02T.
Response:
System description is revised with the term closed -loop recycle. Covers will be provided on
the stationary screen to keep rainwater out of the system.
2. Amend the Engineering Calculations to include calculations verifying the recommended
instantaneous and annual loading rates for each irrigation zone will be met based upon zone
area, pump capacity, pump run time and nozzle capacity. In addition, amend the calculations
to include a table with the anticipated daily and annual disposal flow allocated for each
irrigation -zone.
Response:
The Engineering Calculations have been amended as requested.
L
34

Vperanon ana maintenance rlan
1. See Agronomist Evaluation Question #4.
Response:
See response to Agronomist Evaluation # 4
2. ' See Specifications Questi I n #3 (if necessary).
Response: .
O&M plan is revised to in accordance with response #3 under Specifications.
3. Per 15ANCAC 2T .0507, please amend the submitted Operation and Maintenance(O & M) .
Plan for the wastewater treatment.and spray irrigation system. This O & M'plan shall.
include at a minimum:
➢ Describe the operaon of the system in sufficient detail to show what operations are
necessary for." the system to function and by whom the functions are to be conducted.
➢ ' Describe anticipated maintenance of the system.
➢ Include provisions for safety measures including restriction of access to the site and
equipment.
➢ Include spill control provisions such as response to upsets and bypasses including
control, containment and remediation, as well as contact information for plant
personnel, emergency responders and regulatory agencies.
Response:
The Operation and Mainte ance Plan has been amended to include the information requested
above.
4. Remove the term reclaimed water ,pump, and replace with closed -loop recycle pump or delete
completely based upon the answer to Detailed Plans Question #1 for the screening facility.
Response:,
The term -reclaimed water pump is replaced with closed -loop recycle pump.
5. Amend the O&M Plan to state that mowed crops shall be harvested and removed from the
site. Please consult with the Agronomist and facility operations personnel to determine an
appropriate length of time to remove the harvested crop.
Response:
O&M plan is revised to sate that. mowed crops shall be harvested and removed from the site
including appropriate length of time to remove the harvested crop.
35

i
Engineering Calculations
1. Remove the term reclaimed from, the system description, and either replace with closed -loop .
recycle if deemed permitted under 15A NCAC 02T .1003(a)(1), or delete completely if the
closed -loop recycle system requires .a permit under Section..1000 of Subchapter 02T.
Response:
System description is revised with the term closed -loop recycle. Covers will be provided on
the stationary screen to keep rainwater out of the system.
I Amend the Engineering Calculations to include calculations verifying the recommended
instantaneous and annual loading rates for each irrigation zone will be met based upon zone
area, pump capacity, ,pump run time and nozzle capacity. In addition, amend'the calculations
to include a table with the anticipated daily, and annual disposal flow allocated for each
irrigation zone.
Response:
The Engineering Calculations have been amended as requested.
i
34

i
1. - See Agronomist
Response:.
See response to Agro
2. See Specifications
Response:
O&M plan -is revised to in
3. Per 15A'NCAC 2T .0507,
Plan for the wastewater tre
include at a minimum:
➢ Describe the opera
necessary forthe s;
➢ Describe anticipate
➢ Include provisions
equipment.
Include spill contr<
control, .containme
personnel, emerges
Response:
The Operation and Mainte
above.
4. Remove the "term reclai
completely based upon
Question #4.
Evaluation # 4
#3 (if necessary).
i
ccordance with response #3 under Specifications.
lease amend the submitted Operation and Maintenance.(0 & M)
tment and spray irrigation system'. This O & M plan shall
)n of the system in sufficient detail to show what operations are
tem to function and by whom the functions are to be conducted.
maintenance of the system.
)r safety measures including restriction of access to the site and
provisions such as response to upsets and bypasses including
and remediation, as well as contact information for -plant
y responders and regulatory agencies.
iance Plan has been amended to. include the information requested
l water pump; and replace with closed -loop recycle pump or delete
answer to Detailed Plans Question #1 for the screening facility.
Response:
The term reclaimed water pump is replaced with closed -loop recycle pump.
5. Amend the O&M Plan to state that mowed crops shall be harvested and. removed from the
site., Please consult with the Agronomist and facility. operations personnel to determine an
appropriate length of time to remove the harvested crop.
Response:.
O&M plan is revised; to sate that mowed crops shall be harvested and removed from the site
including appropriate length of time to remove the harvested crop.
35

i
Residuals Manaeement;
1. What is done with the solk
currently or proposed to be
written commitment from
adequate capacity to accepi,
Resuonse•
The residuals are disposed
response.
1
i
I
r
s removed at the proposed new screening facility? If this waste is
given to a residuals disposal/utilization program, please provide a
L permitted residuals disposal/utilization program stating they have
the residuals.
of at McGill Environmental Systems per the letter attached to this
s 36

t_
P.O. Box 61
Harrells, NC 28444
TEL: [phone]
I LL 1 AXE 910-532-2542
www.mcgulcompost.com
February 13, 2009
Tommy Langston
Allen Canning
Dear Mr. Langston,
McGill Environmental Syste s has capacity to accept and process your residuals at our
Sampson County Compost Plant (permit number WQ 00006816).
Please feel free to contact me as your needs arise.
Best regards,
Steve Coclunan
McGill Environmental Systems
Office 919-362-1161
Mobile [phone]
Email scockman(2mc illy compost.com
37

If you require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely yours,
38

Water Balance and Wet -Weather Storage Analyses
Aliens, Inc. Plant # 7
Permit WQ0004268
Rowan Road Irrigation Fields,
Sampson County, Nokh Carolina
December 17, 2008
Revised February 21-, 2009
Allens Water Balance Report F
Eric G. Lappala, P.E., P.R.
4005 Lake Springs Court
Raleigh, NC 27613
I

Contents
1. Introduction:.......,
I.I.
Purpose ....................
1.2.
Disclaimer ... 1 ....
2. Data Sources ....
3. Sprayfield Buffer.
4. Irrigation Areas,
5. Water Balance Ec
5.1.
Climate and Runoff
5.1.1.
Precipitation (F
:5.1.2.
Surface Runoff
5.1.3.
Potential Evapc
5.2.
Precipitation on and
5.3.
. Soils and Drainage (
6. - Monthly Water B
7. Conclusions........
Attachment A. --Water
Attachment A (contim
Attachment A (contim
Attachment A (conclui
List of Figures 1!
Figure 1.—Rowan Roa&,,Spr,
Figure 2. -- Net Precipitation
WIT
...............................................................................................1
............. I ....................... ...........................4............... ............. 1
...................................................................................................... 2
...................................................................................... ..............2
...................................... .. ..
uations.................................................................. :............................4
Data for Water Balance..........................................:....................... 4
CP)................................................................................................. 4
(SRO)............................:.................:..................:........................... 5
transpiration(PET)........................................................................ 5
Evaporation from Storage Reservoir Surfaces ...................
GWQ) for Water Balance............................................................... 7
31anceAnalysis ....................... :........................................................9
...............................................................................................12
Balance Computation....................................................................13
ed): -Water Balance Computation....:............................................14
ed): -Water Balance Computation.................................................15
led). --Water Balance Computation...............................................16
Zones and Buffered Areas ............................................................ 3
'CP-SRO) and PET by Month ....... ................................. .... 6
List of Tables
Table I. --Climatic and Runo , Data Used for Water Balance.......::.....................................:......... 5
Table 2.-- Drainage Coefficients and Drainage Rates Recommended by S&EC in Soil Scientist
Report. I .......................................:....... 7
.............................................................................................
Table 1—Drainage (Recharge) Rates from Groundwater Mounding Analysis and Equivalent
Drainage Coefficients Computed Geometric Mean ksats for the Most Restrictive Soil. Unit
Within each Irrigation Zone. :....................................... 8
.............................................................. . .
Table 4.-- Recommended Average Annual Hydraulic Loading Rates and Wet Weather Storage
Requirements for the Rowan Road Irrigation Zones....................................................................10
Table 5.--Recommended Monthly, Seasonal,and Annual Irrigation Rates in Inches Based Upon
the80th % Wettest Year ...... .............. ................... ......................................................11
Allen Water Balance
09.doc

roe K'escurco
1. Introduction
This report. documents the results of water balance and wet weather storage requirement
calculations in. support of the application for a modification to non -discharge permit WQ0004268
for additional sprayfield areas for the disposal of treated wastewater: This permit modification
does not request additional wastewater treatment capacity above the present limit of 415,000
gallons per day and consequently will not require the permitting and construction of additional
wet -weather storage capacity) This project was performed by Eagle Resources, P.A. ,under
contract to Allens Inc.
The area that includes the additional sprayfield capacity is referred to as the Rowan Road site
which comprises approximately 353 acres lying south of Rowan Road and east of State Road
1933, approximately 3.6!milesi west-southwest of Turkey, NC (Figure 1). The topographic relief
at the site is flat, and elevations range from approximately 80 to 135 feet. All elevations in this
report are reported relative to the 1988 North. American Vertical Datum (NAVD88).
This report includes revisions that respond to questions and comments by the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality set forth in the letter dated February 11, 2009 requesting additional
information for the application for the modification of Permit WQ0004268.
1.1. Purpose
This water balance study has been completed in support of the non -discharge permit as required
by 15A NC AC 02T.0504 (k).
The purpose of the water balance study is to provide recommended hydraulic loading rates and
the necessary volume for storage of reclaimed water when irrigation is not possible or desirable
during wet , weather periods and the recommended 'hydraulic loading rates based upon the
hydraulic characteristics of sprayfield soils and underlying groundwater system.;
The permit modification being applied for does not increase the total existing permitted.
wastewater flow, and the existing permit includes adequate storage for that flow rate.
-'.Consequently additional calculations should not be necessary in .support- of the permit
modification. However,!we have included a statistical analysis of the historic wastewater flows
generated at the plant for'the period from April 2000 through March 2008.
The analyses described in this report conform to the requirements of Water Balance Calculation
Policy recently issued.by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ)'.
This water balance -modifies
Scientist Evaluation Report
explicitly incorporate . con
-evapotranspiration and soil
incorporates all of these; facts
have been reduced from the
North Carolina Division of Water 1
Chief, Aquifer Protection Seciion, S
2 Soil & Environmental Consultant
Allen Canning Project Sampson Coi
Aliens Water Balance Report—Revised-0
seasonal hydraulic loading rates as recommended by -the Soil
the Rowan Road site2 Group (2006). Those rates did not
ration the balance between precipitation, runoff, and
Zage to groundwater (recharge). This water balance report
Additionally, the soil drainage rates used in the water. balance
3 recommended by S&EC. to avoid mounding of the seasonal
uality, 2008, Water Balance Calculation Policy. Memorandum from Ted Bush
rtember 12, 2008.
2008. Soil Series and Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Verification Report
ity, NC
H 09.doc 1

�a�%�i'eeSarC
high watertable. The drainage'rates used were determined by mounding analyses described in
the -Hydrogeologic Study for Rowan Road3.
1.2. Disclaimer
Some analyses contained in this report relied upon data and information provided by others.
Eagle Resources P.A. makes no representations regarding the completeness, accuracy and
reliability of that data and information.
2. Data -Sources
The following data sources were used for this report:
• Soil Series and Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Verification Report by S&EC2;
Eagle Resources,'Hydrogeologic Report3;
• Existing permit number WQ0004268
• Monthly climatic station data including precipitation, minimum and maximum 'air
temperature for the dinton 2 S climatic .station, period of record used: January 1936
through December 200�6.
• Monthly average 'solar Iradiation data for the Raleigh Durham International Airport
3. Sprayfield Buffers
The water balance analysis first determined the gross area available for irrigation' by removing
soil areas mapped by the S&EC that fell within the aggregate of all sprayfield buffers in which
no irrigation is allowed under 15A NCAC 02T.0500. These buffers are shown on Figure 1 and
comprise the following: I
1. 400 feet from any residence or publicly -occupied building;
2. 100 feet from any water.well;
3. 150 feet from the! property boundary; _
4. 100 feet from any stream, wetland or other water body; and
5. 100 feet from any groundwater lowering drain.
The locations of water wells and residences were determined by field investigation and high
resolution aerial photography.
I
i
3 Eagle Resources, P.A. 2008 Hydrogeologic Report - Aliens Canning Facility Sampson county, NC.
Aliens Water Balance Report Revised_022109.doc 2

eaje K'ewaas
Figure 1.—Rowan Road Spray Zones and Buffered Areas.
(In Pocket)
Allens Water Balance
09.doc
3

�--' 4. Irrigation Areas
The boundaries of the spray zones were determined by Eale Resources using .the procedure
described in. the Hydrogeologic Report � for Rowan Road that maximized drainage under
irrigation areas while keeping the depth to the watertable greater than one foot.,
-
5. Water Balance Equations'
Water balance calculations were performed using the, following equation:
St = St-1 + [.Inflowt ] - [ Outflowt ]; or
St = St-1 + [ Qt * At + AR . CPt /12 ] — [ IA + AR • EVPt /12 ] (1)
(1) • i
Where: St —Storage required at the end of month t, Ac-Ft;
St-1 - Storage required at end of previous month, Ac-Ft;
AR = Surface area of area draining to all storage cells, Ac;,
PCPs = Precipitation during month t, inches;
Qt Flow of reclaimed water, Ac-Ft/day;
At = time between month t and t-1, in days
no of days for each month;
1A = Allowable irrigation during month, ac-ft la)
Ax * (PBTt + SRO t + GWQxt - PCPt) / 12;
Ax = Total sprayfield area, acres;
EVPt Evaporation from free water surface during month t = 0.6 *PET, inches;
PETt Potential Evapotranspiration for month t, inches;
SROt = Surface Runoff for month t, inches; and
GWQxt = Drainage to groundwater for Soil Area x during month t, inches.
Equation 1 was solved using �Vlicrosofft Excel® spreadsheet with at least two annual cycles that
demonstrated a convergent solution to wet weather storage requirements.
5.1. Climate and 'Runoff Data for Water Balance
Climatic data from the Clinton 2S and Clinton 2 NE were used for the water balance. The,
Clinton 2S- period of record used was January 1936 through December 1976., The Clinton 2 NE
period of record is January 1971 through December 2006. � Regression was used.to'develop linear
relationship between the two stations for monthly precipitation and mean monthly temperature
by using the period January 1971 through December 1976 for which data is present for both
stations. These regression equations were used to extend the Clinton -2S record from January
1977 through December 2006 i o use in the water balance.
5.1.1. Precipitation (PCP) In accordance with recommendations of NC DWQ, the 8e percentile wettest year for the period
of record from 1936 to 2007 was used for the water balance analysis. Table 1 shows the values
st monthly precipitation used for the water balance:
of average and the 80a` wette
Allens Water Balance Report Revised_022109.doc 4
i

WekewC65
Month
Average
Precip
80th
Wettest
Preci
Surface Runoff
Average
PET
Ave rage
80th Wettest
SRO
SRO
in/mo
% of
Preci
SRO
% of
Preci
in/mo
in/mo I
in/mo
in/mo
Jan 1
3.73
4.171
0.75
20%
0.83
20%
1.26
Feb
1 3.25
3.6311
0.65
20%
0.73
20%
1.56
Mar
1 4.02
4.5011
0.80
20%
0.90
20%
2.52
Apr
1 3.38
3.7811
0.68
20%
0.76
20%
3.53
May
3.88
4.341
0.78 '
20%
0.87
20%
4.36
Jun
1 5.02
5.61
1 1.00
- 20%
1.12
20%
4.75
Jul
6.30
7.051
1.26
20%
1.41
20%
4.79
Au
5.70
6.371
1.14
20%
1.27
20%
4.45
Se
4.54
5.0811
0.91
20%
1.02
20%
3.40
Oct
. 3.06
3.4311
0.61
20%__,_
_0.69
20%1
2.64
Nov
3.12
3.48
1 0.62
20%1
0.70
20%
1.58
Dec
3.20
3.571
0.64
20%
0.71
20%
1.16
Annuall
49.19
;55.0011
9.84
20%
11.00
20%
36.00
Table 1.-Climatic-and Runoff Dal
5.1.2. Surface Runoff (S
Because the precipitation uses
80th percent wettest condition,
condition. Consequently, the
of the monthly 80 percentile
5.1'.3. Potential
PET was calculated using the
energy balance equation: Thi
sensible heat and the loss of
modifies the Penman equatior,
energy term by constant�(apF;
general surroundings are!;wet c
PET =.IEP ap, S (R. -
s+y ;
Where A = latent heat of vap
Ep = potential water va
s slope of the; satur
y _ = thermodynamic f
R„ = net radiative flux
G = sensible soil hea
By ignoring the advective (w
humid conditions expected in
applicable to the Allen'§ pro
Taylor Equation for sites in N
the on-line CRONOS databa
using hourly and daily data c
Aliens Water Balance
Used for Water Balance.
ZO).
I for the wet weather.. storage water balance calculations uses the
the surface runoff used should also reflect the 8e percent wettest
iverage monthly surface runoff values were computed using 20%
vettest precipitation discussed above.
inspiration (PET)
Priestly -Taylor equation which is a simplification of the Penman
Penman Equation accounts for the balance between radiant and
latent heat by advection (wind)., The. Priestly -Taylor equation
by ignoring the advective term and by multiplying the remaining
= 0.7) to estimate Ep from climatic data for conditions when the
r humid:
J).
rization of water,
or flux density,
Ion vapor density curve,
ychrometcic constant,
ensity, and
flux density.
[),term in the Penman equation, and using aPET, to account for
rayfield environments, the Priestly -Taylor Equation is the most
t. Several recent publications support the use of the Priestly-
h Carolina. The North Carolina State C limate Office maintains
to assist the agricultural industry in determining Potential ET
ected at stations throughout North Carolina. This agency uses
09.doc
5

�a�e �'escr�-ces
both the Penman -Monteith and the Priestly -Taylor equations to compute PET. Table 1 shows
the monthly values of PET used for the water balance, and Figure 2 shows the monthly balance
between net precipitation (PCP SRO) and PET.
6.00
■ 80th % Wettest
PCP- SRO
5.00
■ PET
d
4.00
c
m
3
-
3.00
r
w
c
2.00
1.00
Jan Feb Mir Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Figure 2. — Net Precipitation
and PET by Month.
Allens Water Balance Report —Revised 0221 09.doc
6

We Pemm5
5.Z Precipitation
Surfaces
This water balance does
27 acre wet weather stor
5.3. Soils and Dra
The method recommend
for the drainage comp(
coefficient of 0.05. to 0.1
least permeable horizon
horizons and recommenc
in Table 2.
and Evaporation from Storage Reservoir
ounts for precipitation on and evaporation from the existing
reservoir.
gage (GWQ) for Water Balance
I by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality to account
ent of the water balance equation is to apply a drainage
that is multiplied by the vertical hydraulic conductivity of the
Csat). The S&EC conducted measurements ,of Ksat in these
i applied drainage coefficients ranging from 1 to 7% as shown
Soil Ma Unit
Geometric
Mean
Ksat
in/hr
Recommended
Drainage
Coefficient
Drainage
in/hr
intyr
Norfolk ! Wa ram
0.316
4%
0.0126
110.7
Goldsboro / Noboco '
0.147
.7%
0.0103
90.1
Tarboro / Kalmia
I 3.83
1%
0.0383
335.7
Table 2.-- Drainage Coefficients and Drainage Rates Recommended by S&EC in Soil Scientist
Report.
The drainage values ,used for this water balance analysis and report were determined by
initially applying the values from Table 2 to the groundwater flow model as recharge
and then making the;necessary adjustments irrigation zones and drainage rates to prevent
the modeled steady state watertable from being within one foot of the land surface while
maximizing the applied irrigation rates. The method used to derive both. the irrigation
zones and the drainage rates to use in the water balance is described in the
Hydrogeologic Report for the Rowan Road siO.
This process resulted in Ighteen (18) irrigation zones: Table 3 shows the zones, areas,
and drainage rates determined from the mounding analysis. Table 3 also includes the
equivalent .drainage,; coefficients . computed as the ratio between drainage rate from
mounding analysis and the geometric mean.Ksat value for the most restrictive soil within
each zones. Because all the equivalent drainage. coefficienis are less than the values
recommended by S&EC, the drainage rates used. in the water balance all are less than
those recommended by S&EC.
4 Eagle Resources, 2009,
Irrigation Fields Sampson
Aliens Water Balance Report_
i
*logic Report Aliens, Inc. Plant # 7 Permit WQ0004268 Rowan Road
North Carolina (Revised February 16, 2009.
022109.doc 7
L

ea*&Wa5
Mean Ksat
Calculated
Drainage
Capacity
Most
for Most
Equivalent
I
from
Mounding
Restrictive
Restrictive
Drainage
Irrigation
Area
(Analysis
Soil within
Soil In
Coef-
Zone
Ac
,nfw
k in/yr
Zone
Zone intwk
ficient
�R
M
Nofolk/
Zone 2
3.23
1.12
58.63
Wagrarn
53.09
2.117%
o
mZone ,w�,­,,,.
. . . . . . . . . . .
6T
Z813/!
Goldsboro/
Zone 4
-1.89,
031
16.28
Noboco
24.70
1.263%
251
Goldsboro/
Zone 6
1.94,
0.86
44.77
Noboco
24.70
3.474%
-G616b6roh-�
4
zone�
K1,
K
UVj
14
"t". N
Goldsboro/
Zone 8
I.80
2.59
41.97
Noboco
24.70
3.257%
Nofolk/
Zone 10
1.33
I.79
1 73.62
Wagrarn
53.09
2.658%
ql,
06"
lI
Goldsboro/
Zone 12
3.74
0.79
69.13
Noboco
24.70
5.365%
nnw-­
Jo
3, 40-40
Goldsboro/
Zone 14
7.55,
0.79
69.72
Noboco
24.70
5.410%
PIP
Goldsboro/
Zone 16
7.20
0.79
66.25
Noboco
24.70
5.141%
OINNWEN
RM
P
Zones 18 &
Goldsboro/
18a
15.43
0.79
79.80
Noboco
24.701
6.193%
Table 3,-Drainage (Recharge) Rates from Groundwater Mounding Analysis and Equivalent
Drainage Coefficients Computed Geometric Mean Ksats for the Most Restrictive Soil Unit Within
each Irrigation Zone. i
Allens Water Balance Report-Revis46d-022109.doc

6. Monthly.,W
The monthly water bale
season application rates
in a convergent water b.
adequate wet weather s
irrigation cannot be app]
Table 4 shows the resull
the mounding analysis fc
per year on zone 5 to 71
for the Rowan Road Fi4
commended values in Ta
Report and are nutrient
80% of the hvdraulically
Table 5 shows the recc
(March -September) sea
of the. wet and dry sea,
upon the mounding; ai
recommended seasonal
from the Agronomist E
- The convergent required
Road irrigation zones is
irrigation zones will hav(
capacity of 415,000 ,gallo.
applied to the existing fie
existing and Rowan Roa
existing and Rowan Road
required.
r Balance Analysis
equation was solved to determine the wet season and. dry
the combination of the old and new sprayfields that resulted
ice solution. A convergent solution is required to assure that
tge capacity is available to hold water during periods when
it recommended average annual hydraulic loading rates from
zones 1-17. The annual average rates range from 9.26 inches
0 inches per year on zone 18. The annual irrigation capacity
Is is 245,000 gallons per day as shown in Table 4. The re
e 4 for Zones 18 andl8a are those provided by the Agonomist
mited. The Nutrient -limited rates for Zones 18 and 18a are
mited rates.
;nded seasonal rates for the wet (October -February). and dry
as well as. the average annual rate weighted for the duration
The recommended seasonal rates for Zones 1-17 are based
;is and therefore- are hydraulically limited. However, the
annual rates for -Zones 18 and 18a.are those that are provided
ition and are nutrient limited
yet weather storage for the 66.76 acres comprising the Rowan
.57 million gallons asshown in Table 4. The Rowan Road
the ' capacity to handle approximately 45% of the permitted
per day, leaving a balance of 228,250 gallons per day to be
Is. Assuming that the ratio of irrigation capacity between the
fields .is equal to the ratio of storage requirements for the
ields a.total.storage capacity of 14.6 million gallons would be
It is estimated that the ex� fisting reservoir has, a storage' capacity of at least 20 million
gallons assuming an,;effective surface area of 27 acres and an effective average depth of
2.5 feet. Consequently, Ithe existing storage reservoir provides adequate capacityto
handle the full 415,000 gallons per day.
4
Attachment A shows the
for the eighteen (18)',irriga
requirements. Although Z
and on form W W102-06,,
monthly convergent water balance solution that is broken out
tion zones and the maximum wet weather storage -
ane 18 comprises. Zone 18 and Zone 18a as shown on Figure 1
they are combined for the purposes of this report. .
Aliens Water Balance Report' Revised_022109.doc 9

e&je A = ra5
Net
Most
Precip -
Maximum Net
Itrictive
Res
Evap on
I
Irrigation Capacity of Sprayfields
Wastewater Flow
Irrigation
Area
Soil within
Storage
Zone
Ac
Zone
intwk
intyr
ac-fUyr
(ac-ftlyr)
gal/day
ac-ftfyr
77
TOT
WW-.I
m
� 5 t
Xj
� ofolk/
Zone 2
3.23
W I a ram
0.97
50.641
13.61
3.59
8,943
10.03
,
R
,-I ", "-,-
.9
-, 1.,k
'N' I",
o
- --
ONO,
-, .4&--
:;-Iqg�- e -,
1 11
p- T
-��g%
3`037r
.7
.003
Goldsboro/
Zone 4 -
1.89
1
Noboco
0.18
9.37
1.48
0.39
9 70,
1.09
sb!o
@q
-g� g
NZ®.
-
V11
.
Z07WW4PDQcP%2t
.
Goldsboro/
Zone 6
1.94
Noboco
0.71
36.77
5.95
1.57,
3,907
4.38
0; %
M'V R
'
Goldsboro/
Zone 8
2.56
Nbboco
0.65
33.96
7.33
1.93
4,812
1- 5.39
Nofolk/
Zone 10
1.33
W,agram
1.26
65.62
7.27
1.92
4,775
5.35
w
o
-N%
Go,1dsboro/
Zone 12
3.74
Roboco
1.18
61.13
19.03
5.02
12,501
14.01
R-
Goldsboro/
Zone 14
7.55
1 N.oboco
1.19
61.72
3
10.24
25,507
28.59
t 0
Y'-�-
�77*77P
�MNH OM
I8.83
A
,
;g
ona 10.
I
LMAVI
Goldsboro/
Zone 16
7.20
Noboco
1.12
58.25
34.95
9.21
22,956,
25.73
V
13500roi
2 u
Q
amp.,
Zones 18 &
Goldsboro/
18 a
15.43
oboco
1.11
57.52
73.98
19.50
48,598
54.48
Total
Application
66.76
285.07
Total
Area
6.57
M al
L-
Analysis' Date
2120109
187,239
GPD
351Days
Table 4.- Recommended Av4
Requirements for the Rowan
Limited from the Azronomis
Annual Hydraulic Loading Rates and Wet Weather Storage
I Irrigation Zones. Note Rates for Zones 18 and 18a are Nutrient -
Aliens Water Balance Report Revis I ed 022109.doc 10

WS Pffmrae5
Irrigation Rates (Wastewater
Rus Precip-Evap on Storage) Based upon 80th % w ettest year (inches)
Zone
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr:
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct ,
Nov
Dec
Annual
Oct -Feb)
Sep
Zone 1
3.98
4.17
4.97
6.37
6.
6.12
5.21
5.40
5.20
5.95
4.66
4.35
69.32
23.12
40.20
Zone 2
2.90 1
3.19
3.90
5.32
587 1
5.08
4.13
4.32
4.16
4.88
3.61
3.28
50.64
17.85
32.78
Zone 3
2.94
3.22 '
3.93
5.36
5.90
5.11
4.17
4.36
4.19
4.91
3.65
3.31
51.05
18.02
33.02
Zone 4
-
-
0.30
1.84
2.27
1.60
0.54
0.73
0.68
1.28
0.13
-
9.37
1.41
7.96
Zone 5
-
-
0.29
1.83
2.26
1.59
0.53
0.71
0.66
9.27
0.12
-
9.26
1.39
7.87
Zone 6
1.72
2.12
2.72
4.18
4.69
3.94
2.96
3.15
3.02
3.70
2.47
2.10
36.77
12.12
24.65
Zone 7
0.96
1.42
1.95
3.44
3.92
3.20
2.19
2.38
228
2.93
1.73
1.33
27.73
8.38
19.35
Zone 8
1.49
1.90
2.48
3.95
4.45
3.71
2.72
2.9,1
2.79
3.46
2.24
1.86
33.96
' 10.96
23.00
Zone 9
0.51
1.01
1.51
3.01
3.48
2.77
1.74
1.93
1.84
2.49
1.30
0.89
22.48
' 6.20
16.28
-10
4.17
4.35
5.17
6.55
7.14
.
6.31
5.41
5.59
5.39
6.16
4.84
4.55
65.62
24.06
41.56
Zone 11
3.88
4.08
4.87
6.27'
6.84
6.02
5.11
5.30
5.10
1
5.85
4.56
4.25
62.13
22.62
39.51
Zone 12
3.79
4.00
4.79
6.19
6.76
1 5.94
5.02
5.21
5.02
5.77
4.47
1 4.17
61.13
22.20
38.93
Zone 13
3.49
3.73
4.48
5.89
6.45
5.65
4.72
4.91
4.72
5.46
4.18
3.86
57.54
20.72
36.82
Zone 14
3.84
4.05
4.84
6.23
6.81
5.99
5.07
5.26
5.07
5.82
4.52
4.22
61.72
22.45
39.27
Zone 15
3.471
3.71
4.46
5.87
6.43
5.61
4.70-
4.89
1 4.70
5.44
4.16
3.84
57.30
20.61
36.69
Zone 16
3.55
3.78
4.54
5.95
6.51
5.71
4.78
4.97
4.78
5.52
4.24
3.92
58.25
21.01
37.24
Zone 17
-
-
0.36
1.9d
2.33
1.66
0.60
0:79
0.74
1.34
0.19
-
9.91
1 1.53
8.38
Zones 18 &
18a
4.98
4.54
1 4.81
1 4.66
4.81
1 4.66
4.81
4.81
1 4.66
4.98
4.82
4.98
57.52
24.29
33.23
Note: Zones 18 and 18a are nutrient limited rather
Revised Agronomist Evaluation. _
than hydraulically_ limited. The Rates listed are from appendix 2g of the
I
J
Table 5.-Recommended Monthly, Seasonal, and Annual Irrigation Rates in Inches Based Upon the
80th % Wettest Year.
Allens Water Balance Report_ Revised_022109.doc 1 j

W6 kes a.5
7. Conclusions
This report presents a mon
for the expanded wastew
irrigation fields for the A
analysis is based upon the
minus losses from evapoi
years of local climatic data
The analysis used soil are
recommended by S&EC.
irrigation rates were based
analyses showed that ;the li
be at least one foot.
The annual average hydrat;
to 71.80 inches per year or,
Zones 18 and 18a owing tc
recommended rate used in
The annual irrigation capai
Wet weather storage' requ
million gallons. for the Ro
combination of the existin
the estimated total permit i
1
I
Aliens Water Balance Report
water balance analysis used to design wet weather storage
.treatment facilities for the Rowan Road supplemental
Canning Facility, Sampson County, NC. The storage
percentile wettest condition (combination of precipitation
piration, runoff, and drainage to groundwater) using 72
: extends from 1936 to 2007.
mapped by S&EC'as well as "and initial soil drainage rates
The final irrigation zone boundaries and recommended
on drainage rates that groundwater modeling and -mounding
ly depth to groundwater during the 80d'% wettest year would
.ically-limited rates range from 9.26 inches per year on zone 5
zone 18 and 18a. However, because of nutrient limitations in
the sandy.soils in the Tarboro/Noboco series, the maximum.
he water balance for Zones 18 and 18a is 57.5 inches/hear.
ity for the Rowan Road Fields is 210,183 gallons per day.
reents for, the convergent water balance solution are 6.57
van Road fields and an estimated 14.6 million gallons for the,
fields'and the Rowan Road fields. This volume is less than
d capacity of the existing reservoir of 20 million gallons.
022109.doc
12

za?(e &2rcrs
wu_ L. A 1AI-6 C2 11 wws 91irra�nn4�4inn
i��� as r'r>*a%n r� t 7��'i$i{{�
X`£ � F�GG�
vu ik
r Y '�`? T1 � �� •7•S
p`t _;' ('�3/ ""f v
`+{t 1 � � �;
7 1
r" �' �P Lr F?I+1 Se'Sa� 1 �:-r C�� I { ,+dry+.'.
i
�`✓'�m
M 1 fX u�' f +���j,
��. ' C, 'j h��F{+��1d.�1��tC >�F ��
4 "
ry {4,
wr F
'�nj �.•!•r�u�x'{f� �y�+t X�tllyti
�„ Y £�7
i""pt
) '.E�� ��! M •/' i las itf�j r1X. ;.
�+�F� 1
Zone 2
s.v�,3� Zdt1e 3
Zone 4
.;§i
G
... _.. ..-.
Avero0e
SRO ®
9L �
c
B0th %
8Dth Si
PET
0.2z 8016
,E 9�.{:+, �,t
DtNIF Shin
J
Dreln- Sum of
�`^
Dteln- S�i1mW �tdpe9a
T' 1 ` 1 � }
%
Drain-
Sum of
Days per
Average
Wettest
Driest
PMalley.
Wetteal
of w,^ fir . ,
�.te0r aC �c' `•@an
'
age Losses
Ird etlon
LOade. n
t
' H'
age
Losses Ind aeon
e:i Connate v T n t ,
Year Mo
month
Pred
Precl
Prod;
Taylor
Pr
,Loner ..: R•1
t
igrJler
-�_.
OP,D„f;
Inches Inches
Inches AllOPD
..ailei
•Irlchea sittehee �Inchee
Ae1Fl a OPD
Inches
Inches Inches All OPD
,hkher gl[whea. ,Inehea po•Ft �OPD.;,;,;
Inches
Inches
Inches
Inches
Inches
Inches , Ineham „14UFta
", ,' 0.54;
4.98 7.07
2.90 0.78 8,197
i . 0 :� 2:.
2:84 '='. ;888;
1.38
3.4.3.
Jon
3
3.73
.17
3.03
3.03
2.64
.26
1.56
0.83
0.73
iO :3.88
5,52 7,80 4.17 ` 0:;7
6,567
4.51 6.82
3.19 0.86 9.895
4:57 .BAS- 322
3.12 35,981
1.28
3.55 - -
125 3S3 - -
Feb
28.25
325
US OAT 4.971 0M
7,132
4.98 8.39
3.80 1.05 11,006
5.01 1 8.421 3.93
3.801 39,904
1.381
4.80 1 0.30 0.05 497 1
1.37 4.78 020 0.02 198
Mar
31
4.02
4.50
3.27
2.52
O.DO
0.76
5.88 10.74 8.37 097
9,434
4.62 8-10'
5:32- -1.43-15:544-
4:85` `9:13'. -5,36-
`5:19' `•58;322-
-1:34-
-5:62' -1.84- `0:28- --3;155"
--1:32 -5:81---1:83' -0:12'-1:288' -
A r
30
3.38
3.70
2,75
3.SJ
0.87
5.05 11.25 6.941 0.95
9,958
4.98 10.20
5.87 1.58 16.577
5.01 1 10.241 5.90
5.71 60.041
1.38
8.61 2.27 0.36 3,780 1
1.37 eAO 225 0.15 1,537
may
31
3.86
4.34
3A5
4.08
4.36
4.75
1.12 1
SAS 11.73 6.121 OA4
9,072
4.82 10.69
5.06 1.37 14,831
. 4.85 10.72 5.11
4.95 53,756
1.34
7,21 1.80 0.25 2.7381
1.32 720 1.59 0.10 1 117
Jun
1
30
5.02
5.81
7.05
5.13
4.79
1.41
e.W 1226 5.21 1 071
7,473
4.98 11.18
4.13 1.11 11,680
SAi 11.21 4.17
4.03 42AD8
1.38
7.59 0.54 O.OB 892
1.37 7.57 0.53 0.03 358
Jul
31
6.30
4.64
4.45
1.27
6A5 11.78 5.401 074
7744
4.98 1 10.70
4.32 1.18 12,212
5.01 10.73 4.38
422 44;327
1.36
7.10 0.73 0.11 1,204
1.37 7.D8 0.71. 0.05 468
Aua
311
5.70
6.37
5.08 1
3.701
3.40
1.D2
5.86 1028 5.201 071
7,704
4.821 9.24
4.16 1.12 12,134
4.95 927 4.19
4.06 44,045
1.34
5.76 0.68 0.11 1.158
1.321 5.75 0.66 0.04 467
sap
301
4.54
1
2.64
0.89
6.05 9.38 5.951 OA1
8,637
4.98 1 8.30
4.88 1.31 13,776
5.01 8.34 4.91
4.75 40.957
1.38
4.71 128 0.20 2,120
1.37 4A9 1.271 0.08 883
Oct
311
3.06
3.431
2.49
0.70 1
SAS 8A4 4.661 094-
8,B98
4.82 1 7.10
3.61 0.97 10,546
4.85 7.13 3.65
3.53 38,325
1.34
3.621 0.13 0.02 227
1.32 3.60 0.121 0.01 B5
Nov
301
3.12
3.481
2.53 1
2.00
1.58
t.te
0.71 1
6.05 - 7.03 4.35 OM
8.244
4.98 6.85
3.28 0.88 925E
5.01, ' 6.88. 3.31
321 1 33,686
1.38
3.26 -
1.37 324 - -
Dec
Jan
31
31
3.20
3.73
3.571
4,17 1
3.03
1.26
0.83 1
6.05 8.15 3.98 0
5,706
4.98 7.07
2.90 0,78 8,197
5.01 1 MO 2.94
2.841 29.868
1.38
3.47 - - -
1.37 3, - - -
Feb
26.25
3.25
3.831
2.84
1.58
0.731
5.52 7.00 4.17 657
6,687
4.53 6.B2
3.19 0.86 9,895
4:57. --6.85 322
3.121 35,981
1.26
3.55 - - -
125 3.53 - - -
4.50
3.27
2.52
0.90
6.05 9.47 4.97 OM
7,132
4.98 8.39
3.90 1.05 11,0D6
5.01 8.42 3.93
3.801 39,984
1.38
4.80 0.30 0.05 497
1.37 4.78 0.29 0.02 198
Mar
31
4.02
3.53•
0.76
5.86 10.14 6.37 0:87
9,434
4.82 9.10
5.321 1.43 15.544
4.85 GAT 6.38
5.191 56,322
1.34
5.82 1.84 0.29 3,155
1.32 SA7 1.83 0.12 1,288
Apr
30
3.38
3.78
2.75
4.36
0.87
11.28 6.94 0,95
9,958
4.9e 10.20
5.87 1.58 16,577
5.01 .10.24 5.90
5.711 60.041
1.38
6.61 2.27 0.36 3.760
1.37 6.60 2.26 0.15 1.537
May
31
3.88
4.341
3.15
4.75
1.12
.6.05
5.88 ' 11.73 6.12 0.84.
' 9.072
4.82 10.69
5.08 1.37 14,831
4.85 10.72 5.11
4.951 53,756
1.34
7.21 1.80 025 2,738
1.32 720 1.59 0.10 1.117
Jun
2
30
5.02
5,61
4.08
4.79
1.41
1
6.05 1226 521 01
7,473
4.96 11.18
4.13 1.11 11,680
5.011121 4.17
4.03 42AD9
1.38
7.50 0.54 0.08 892
1.37 7.571 0.53 0.03 358
Jul
31
6.30
7.05
5.13
1.271
8.05 11,78 5.401 0.74
7,744
498 10.70
4.32 Lie 12,212
5.01 10.73 4.38
422 44,3Z7
1.38
7.10 0.73 CIA 1,204
1.37 7.09 0.71 0.05 488
Aug31
5.70
6.37
4.64
4.45
1.02
5.86 1028 5201.OL71
7,704
4.82 9.24
4.18 1.12 12,134
4.85 927 4.1e
4.08 44,045
1.34
5.76 0.88 0.11 1.158
1.32 5.75 1 0.661 0.04 487
Sep
30
4.54
5.08
3.70
3.40
- 9.38 5.951 0L81
8,537
4.98 8.30
4.88 1.31 13,776
5.01 8:34 4.91
4.75 49,95T
1.38
4.71 1.28 0.20 2.120
1.37 4.89 1.27 1 . 0.08 BB3
Oct
31
3.08
3.431
2.49
2.64
0.89
- 0.05
5.88. -6.14 .4.661 0,64
•6,898
4.82 7.10
3.61 0.97 10,546
4.35 7.13 3.65
3.53 381325
1.34
3.62 0.13 0.02 227
1.32 3.60 0.121 0.01 85
Nov
30
3.12
3.48
2.53
1.58
0.70
0.71
6.05.. ?.03 A.35 1 R59"
6,244
4.98 6.85
3.28 0.88 9,258
5.01 BANS 3.31
321 33,888.
1.38
3.28 -
- 1.37 324
Dec
Jan
31
1 311
320
3.
3.57
4.17
2.60
3.03
1.18
1.26
0.83
-
1 6.U5 B.jS 3.981 CLS4'.
,706
4.98 7.07
2.90 0.78 8,197
5.01 7:10 2.94
2.84 29,868
1.38
3.47 - - ---1.37
3.48
Feb
1 28.251
3.25
3.63
2.64
1.56
0.731
5.52
7.80�
4.171
0.57
6,567
4.53
6.82
3.19
1 0.86
9,895
4.67
0.85.
322
3.12
35,e81
1.26
3.55
-
-
-
126
3.53
-
-
-
3.27
2.52
0.901
6.05
BAT
4.971
0A8'
7,132
4.98
8.39
3.901
1.05
11,006
5.01
8.42
3.93
3.80
1 38984
1.38
4.80
0.30
0.05
497
1.37
4.78
029
042
196
Mar
1 311
4.02
4.50
0.78
1 5.88
10.14
6.37
CL87
9;434
4.82
9.10
5.32
1,43
15.544
US
9.13
US
5.191
56,322
1.34
5.82
1.84
0.29
3.155
1.32
5.61
1.63
0.12
1,288
Apr
1 301
3.38
3.78
2.75
3.53
6.05
1128
8.94
.
0,95
9,958
4.98
10.20
5.87
1.58
16,577
5.01
1024
5.90
5.71
1 00.041
1.38
6.61
2.27
0.36
3,700
1.37
0.80
225
0.15
1.537
May
311
3.88
4.34
3.15
4.38
4.75
0.87
1.12
5.88
11.73
8.12
C.84
9.072
4.82
10.69
5.08
1.37
14,831
4.95.
10.72
SA
4,95
53,756
1.34
7.21
1.60
0.25
2,738
1.32
720
1.59
0.10
1,117
3
Jun
30
5.02
5.67
4.08
4.79
1.41
6.05
1226
5.21
1 0.71
7,473
4.98
11.18
4.13
1.11
11,680
5.01
1121
4.17
4.031
42,409
1.38
7.59
0.54
0.08
892
1.37
7.57
0.53
0.03
35B
Jul
311
6.30
7.06
1 SA3
4.45
1.27
8.05
11.78
5.40
0.74
7,744
4.98
10.70
4.32
1.161
12,212
5.01
10.73.
4.38
422.
44,327
1.38
7.10
0.73
0.11
1204
1.37
7.09
O.71
0.05
4B8
A
311
5.70
6.37
4.641
5f88
mae
5.20
0.71
7,704
4.821
924
4.18
1,121
12,134
4.65
9.27
4.19
4.00
44,046
1.34
5.76
0.68
0.11
1,158
1.32
5.75
- 0.68
0.04
467
Se
301
4.54
5.08
3.701
3.40
1.02
0.06
9.381
1
5.95
0A1,
8.537
4.98
8.30
4.88
1.31
13,776
1 5.01
8.34
4.91
4.75
40.957
1.38
4.71
1.28
0.20
2.120
1.37
4.69
127
0.08
883
Oct
311
3.08
3.43
2.49
2.64
0.69
8,14
1 4.86
'0.84
6,808
4.82
7.10
3.61
0.97
10,548
4.85:
7.13
3AS
3.63
38325
1.34
3.62
0,13
0.02
227
1.32
3.60
0.12
0.01
BS
Nov
30
3.12
3.48
2.53
1.58
0.70
5.88
8.08
7.93
4.35
6,244
4.98
6.85
3.28
0.88
9,258
5.01
6A8
3.31
3.21
r 33,688
1.38
3.26
1.37
324
Dec
31
3.20
3.57
4.17
2.60
3.03
LAB
1.26
0.71
0.03
8.05
•
8.5
3.98
.0.69-
0.54
.
5,706
4.90
7.07
2.90
0.78
8,197
5.01
7.10
2.94
2.84
29,888
1.38
3.47
-
1,37
3,
-
Jan
Feb
31
28.25
3.73
3.25
3.83
2.84
1.58
0.73
5:52
7.80
4.1Z.
6.57
-6,567
4.53
6.82
3,19
O,BB
9,895
4.5T
_ 8.85
'122
3.12.
35,BBA
1.28
3.55
-
-
-
125
3S3
-
-
-
4.50
327
2.52
0.90
6.05
8.47
- 4.97
:0.68
7,132
4.98
8.39
3.90
1.05
11,006
5.01
8.42
3.93
3.80
39,994
1.38
4.80
0.30
0.05
497
1.37
4.76
US
0.02
198
4
Mar
31
4.02
5.88
10.14
6.37
1.87
9,434
4.82
9.10
5.32
1.43
15,544
4.85.
9.13
5.38
5.19
58,322
1.34
5.62
1,84
0.29
3,155
1.32
591
1.83
0.12
1288
r
30
3.38
3.78
2.75
3.53
0.76
0.87
'$AS
8.f)4
BJ35
'9958
4,86
10.20
5.87
1.SB
16,577
5:01.
10.24
5.SO
5.71
60,041
1.38
8.e1
2.27
0.36
3,780
1.37
BAO
228
0.15
1,537
M
31
3.88
4.34
3.15
4.36
6.88
.41.28
41.73
8.12
r,B4.
9;072
4.62
iD.88
5.08
1.37
14,831
4:85`'
10.72
5.11
4.85
57,756
1.34
7.21
1.60
0.25
2,738
1.32
720
1.59
0.10
1,117
Jun
30
5.02
S.Bi
4.08
4.75
1.12
Allens Water Balance Report_Revlsed_022109.doc

Attachment A (continued). --Water Balance Computation.
Mo
Days per
month
Average
Pred
%
Wettest
Precl
80th %PET
Dryent
Pred
Preistley-
T hr
0,2r80%
Wettest
Pr
fi 1,f�'a �* r,•
i •t, ,k 2fiAei k e,55r ..,
Zone 2a
�
ONE",M
9 sZaha 3H
Zone4
1�>�80th
�EHa�11-•
r19dBe
51,nfK11"',
s�[mi 01^zt
j ,gCFcr yt
,.+»I .. .S. t_}. y.:t
Drain-
a
Sum at
Losses
I atlonage
t'�tf
Dtellr-
Bllm of
tMget(o
F��
{ w=
Drelrr
Sum ofry
Lsses
I etbnYear
Inches
inches
Inches
Inches
Inches
Iritllas'
tbehed111efree
„AC -Et?
�n GPD {;;
Inches
Inches
Inches
Ac-Ft
GPD
tntlie3
�ltwtbff
:`rinehea
_
Ao•�F.'[.
y. uGPD�'
Inches
Inches
Inches
Alt
GPD
Ineht6
+InctMe
rlilchae,
,rAtrF,tr
, Y GPD:
31
3.73
4.17
3.03
1.28
0.83
.,8, -RJ.73
- 53.88
.na l
16 ,'5,706:
4.98
7.07
2.90
0.78
8,197
-: "5.01
r.. ,10•
§? 2-94.
' ` •
':��2%lifal
1.38
3.47
-
-
"r*1:3 �..:3
'"'-
•-�''
--=�
2825
725
3.83
2.84
1.58
0.73
SSZ'.
117
' "MST
"' '.0,587
4.53
6.82
3.19
0.86
9,895
-4.57
' ".615i
3, 2•
3.12.
35,261
1.26
3.55
-
-
. -125.
--3.53
bFeb
31
4.02
4.50
327
2.52
0.90
.- S.W
4.97
OA8?
'. 7,132
4.98
8.39
3.90
US
11.008
510'1
BA2.
3.93
3.80
39,984:
1.38
4.80
0.30
0.05
497
1.37
4.78'
� 029
-0.02
1g8
30
-3:38
-3:78-
-2.75-
-3:53-
-0:78
`5:88'
-637."-037.
-4:82'
-9:10"
-UT
-1-.43"
-15;544'
-4:M
`9:13'
`5.38"
"5:1g'
``-58,322�
-1:34-
-5.62'
-1184"
-"0.29'
"3;155'
--1:32'
-5.81-
-1;t13�
-0.12-
-1,288,
31
3.88
4.34
3.15
4.38
0.87
- 8.05-
6.94
0.95-
--9A34'
8,958
4.98
10.20
5.87
1.58
18,577
5.01
1024
5.80
5.71
60,041
1.38
6.61
2.27
0.36
3,700
1,37
0.60
228
0.15
1.537
Jun
30
5.02
5.61
4.08
4.75
1.12
5.88
6.12
OA4.
9,072
4.82
Meg
5.08
1.37
14,831
4.65
10.72
5.11
4.95
53756
1.34
7.21
1.60
0.25
2,738
1.32
720
1.69
0.10
1117
1
Jul
31
6.30
7.05
5.13
4.79
1.41
8.05
521
_0:71
7473
4.98
11.18
4.13
1.11
11,680
5.01
11.21
4.17
4.03
42,409
1.38
7.59
0.54
9.08
892
1.37
7S70.53
0.03
358
Au
31
5.70
8.37
4.64
4.45
1.27
$.OS
5.40
0.74r
7,744
4.98
10.70
4.32
1.16
12,212
S.D1
10.73
4.38
422
44327
1.38
7.10
0.73
0.11
1204
1.37
7.09
0.71
0.05
488
Sep
30
4,54
5.05
3.70
3.40
1.02
5.88
1028
.520
0.717
7,7041
4.82
9.24
4.16
1.12
12.134
4.85
8.27
4.18
4.06
44,045
1.34
5.78
0.65
0.11
1.158
1.32
5.75
0.66
0.04
487
Oct
31
3.08
3AS
2A9
2.64
0,69
8.05
9.38
5.95
0:Bb.
8,537
4.98
8.30
4.88
1.31
13.776
5.01
8.34
4.91
4.75
49.957
1.38
4.71
1.28
0.20
2,120
1.37
4.69
127
0.08
883
Nov
30
3.12
3AB
2.53
1.58
0.70
S.W.
8.14
4.68
0,64
6.898
4.82
7.10
3.61
0.97
10,546
4.85-
7.13
3.85
3.53
38,325
1.34
3.62
0.13
0.02
227
1.32
3A0
0.12
0.01
85
Dec
31
320
3.57
2.60
1.16
0.71
- "8.05
7$3
4.35
0.59
6244
4.98
8.85
3.28
0.88
.9,258
5.01,
6.88
3.31
321
33,688
1.38
3.28
-
1.37
324
-
-
Jan
31
313
4,17
3.03
1.26
0.83
5.05
0.15
3.98
0.54
5.708
4.98
7.07
2.90
0.78
8,197
5,01
7.10
2.94
2.84
29,068
1.38
3.47
-
-
1.37
3.
-
Feb
2825
3.25
3.63
2.64
1.56
0.73
5.52
7.80
4.17
0.57-
. 6,567
4.53
6.82
3.19
0.86
9,895
1 4.57
6.85
3.22
3.12
35.981
1.26
3.55
-
-
125
3.53
-
Mar
311
4.02
4.50
327
2.52
0.90
6.05:
.9.47
4.97'
0.88.-,
7,132
4.98
8.38
3.90
1.05
1 11,006
5.01
8.42
3.93
3.80
39.984
1.38
4.80
0.30
0.05
497
1.37
4.78
0.29
OA2
lee
Apt
30
3.38
3.78
2.75
3.53
0.76
5.80
10.14
6.37
- 0.67
- 9,434
4.82
9.10
5.32
1.43
15,644
4.65
9.13
5,38
5.19
56,322
1.34
5.62
1.84
029
3.155
1.32
5.81
1.83
0.12
1268
May
31
3.88
4.34
3.15
4.36
0.87
8.05
11.281
6.94
- 0.95
9,958
4.98
10.20
5.87
1.58
16,577
5.01
1024
5.90
5.71
60.041
1.38
6.61
2.27
0.38
1 3,760
1.37
8.60
2281
0.15
1,537
Jun
30
SM
5081
4.08
415
1.12
5,8S
11.73
6.12
0.84,
9,072
4.82
10.69
5.08
1.37
14,831
4.35
10.72
5.11
4.95
• 53,756
1.34
7.21
1.60
0.25
2,738
1.32
720
I.S91
0.10
1,117
2
Jul
31
6.30
7.05
5.13
4.79
1.41
8.05
1228
521
0 T1-
7,473
4.98
11.18
4.13
1.11
11.680
5.01
1121
4.17
4.03
42,409
1.38
7.59
0.54
0.08
892
1.37
7,57
0.53
0.03
358
Aug31
5.70
6.37
4.64
4.45
1.27
8.05:
11.78
SAO
D.74
7744
4.98
10.70
4.32
1.16
12,212
5.01
10.73
4.36
422
44,327
1.38
7.10
0.73
0.11
1,204
1.37
7.00
0.71
0.05'
456
Sep
30
4,54
5.08
3.70
3.40
1.02
8.56.
1028
5.20-
0.T1
7704
4.62
9.24
4.16
1.12
12,134
4.85
927
4.19
.4.06
44,145
1.34
5.76
0.66
0.11
1,158
1.32
5.75
0.66
0.04
487
Oct
31
3.06
3.43
2.49
2.54
0.69
6.05
.9.38
5.95
0.81
8,537
4.98
8.30
4.88
1.31
13,776
5.01
8.34
4.91
4.75
49.957
1.38
4.71
1.28
0.20
2,120
1.37
4.89
127
0.08
863
Nov
30
3.12
3.48
2.53
1.58
0.70
5.85
8.14
4.66
0.64.
6,898
4.82
7.10
3.61
0.97
10,546
4,85
7.13•
3.65
3.531
38,325
1.34
3.62
0.13
0.02
227
1.32
3.00
0.12
0.01
85
Dec
31
320
.3.57
2,80
1AG
0.71
8.05
7.93
4.35
O.59
.8244
4.98
6.85
3.28
0.88
9.258
5.01
8.88
3.31
321
33,688
1.38
3.26
-
1.37
324
-
Jan
31
3.73
4.17
103
1.28
0.63
1 6.051
8.15
3.98
- 0.54
5,706
4.98
1 7.07
2.90
0.78
8.197
5.01.
7. 0
2.94
2.84
29,868
1.38
3.47
-
-
-
1.37
3.46
-
-
-
Feb
2825
3.25
3.63
2.64
1.56
0.73
1 5.52
:7.80
4.171
037
6,557
4,53
1 6.82
3.19
0.86
9,895
- 4.57,
6.85.
322
3.12
35,961
1.26
3.55
125
3.53
Mar
31
4.02
4.50
3.27
2.52
0.901
8.05
9.47
4.971
ORB
7,132
4.98
8.39
3A0
1.05
11,006
5.01
8.42
3.93
3.80
39.984
1.38
4.80
0.30
0.05
497
1.37
4.78
029
0.02
196
A r
30
3.38
3.78
2.75
3.53
0.76
5.88
10A4
6.37
097.
9,434
4.82
9.10
5.32
1.43
15,544
4.85
0.13
5.38
5.19
58,322
1.34
5.62
1.84
0.29
3,155
1.32
5.61
1.83
0.12
1,288
May
31
3.88
4.34
3.15
4.36
0.87
8.05
1128
6.94
035
9,958
4.98
10.20
5.87
1.58
16,577
5.01
1024
5.90
5.71
60.041
1.38
6.61
2.27
0.36
3,760
1.37
8.60
2.26
0.15
1,537
Jun
30
5.02
5.61
4.08
4.75
1.12
5AB
11.73
6.12
094
9,072
4.82
10.69
5.08
1.37
14.831
4.85
10.72
5.11
4.95
53.756
1.34
7.21
1.60
0.25
2,738
1.32
720
1.59
0.10
1.117
3
Jul
311
6.30
7.05
5.13
4.79
1.41
6.05
1226
521
071
7473
4.98
11.18
4.13
1.11
11,680
5.01
11.21
4.17
4.03
42,409
1.38
7.59
0.54
0.08
892
1.37
7.57
0.63
0.03
358
Aug311
5.70
6.37
4,64
4.45
1.27
Botts
IUS
5.40
024
7,744
4.98
10.70
4.32
1.18
12,212
5.01
10.73
4.38
4.22
44,327
1.38
7.10
0.73
0.11
1,204
1.37
7.09
0.71
US
486
Sap
301
4.54
5,08
3.70
3.40
1.02
5.88
1028
5.20
071
7,7G4
4.82
9.24
4.18
1.12
12,134
4,85
9.27
4.19
4.08
44,045
1034
5.76
0.68
0.11
1,158
1.32
5.75
0.66
0.04
467
Oct
311
3.D6
3.43
2.49
2.64
0.69
GAS
9.38
5.95
021
8,537
4.98
8.30
4.88
1.31
13.776
SM
8.34
4.91
4.75
49,957
1.38
1 4.71
1.28
0.20
2.120
1.37
4.69
127
0.08
883
Nov
301
3.12
3.48
2.53
1.58
0.70
5.86
8.14
4.68
0384
8,898
4.82
7.10
3.61
OX
10,546
4.85
7.13
3.86
3.53
38.325
1.34
3.62
0.13
0.02
227
1.32
3A0
0.12
0.01
85
Dec
31
3.20
3.57
2.60
1.16
0,71
6A5
'7.93'
4.35
059
6,2M
4.98
8.85
3.28
0.88
9258
5.01
1 6.88
3.31�
321
33.083
1.38
3.28
1.37
3.2
-
-
Jan
31
3.73
4.17
3.03
1.26
0.83
6.05
8.
3J38
--O-A
5,706
4.98
7-OT
2.90
0,76
8,197
6.01
1 7.10
2.94.
2,
2 ,808
1.38
3.47
-
1.37
3.46
-
-
-
Feb
28,25
3.25
3.63
2.64
1.56
0.73
6.52'
*7.80
4.17
057-
6,567
4.53
6.82
3.19
0.86
9,895
4.571
6.85
3.M
- 3.12
35,981
1.26
3.55
-
1.25
3.53
Mar
31
4.02
4.50
327
2.52
0.90
6.05
9A7•
- 4.97
OAS
7,132
4.98
8.39
3.90
1.05
11,006
5.01
C42
3.93
3.80
39.984.
1.38
4.80
0.30
0.05
497
1.37
4.76
0.29
0.02
198
4
A r
30
3.38
3.78
1 2,75
3,53
0,76
5:88
10.14
6.37
OX
9;434
4.82
9.10
5.32
1.43
15.544
4.85
9.13
5.30
5.19
58,322
1.34
5.62
1.84
0.28
3,155
1.32
5.81
1.87
0.12
1288
Me
31
3.88
4.34
3.15
4,38
0,87
6.05
1128
8.94.
1)85
9,858
4.88
10.20
S.B7
1.58
18,577
1.01
1024
5.90
5.71.
80,041
1.38
6.81
2.27
0.38
3,780
1.37
6A0
228
0.15
1,537
Jun
30
5.02
1 5.611
4.05
4.75
1.12
5.86
11.73
6.12
-0.84
9,072
4.82
10.69
1 5.08
1 1.37
14,831
4.85
I 10.72
S,iT
4.95
S3,758
1.34
7.21
1.60
0.25
2,738
1.32
720
1.SB
0.10
1,117
Aliens Water Balance Report_Rovised_022100.doc 14

0a*&arces
Attachment
A (continued).
--Water
Balance Computation �.
Year
Mo
Days per
month
Average
Prot
BOOT%
Wettest
PreG
Both%
Dryest
Prat
PET
ProlsOey-
Taylor
x606
WettestC5'lelm'
Pred
11.�iutta•�k <�" .�9 r "x t� � s;1,
��"`�Y,��h�3�e�}}i.�� JS �3M1" 47 4
y�%L'r`1'1,ii vt`, ri" Pe�`3;��"'"'`.G�iy� vi
Su1no}�Ir,�r'-•�` r;�
U 1:oue+7`-'A' '*h. xr,IF.!�;..s .rS':
Zone 12,>s5u�.
Dreln- bum of Ird9eOo
age Losses n
x '� �,� {q.: 4 4"�r:,yyt i r%
Llrr. Y} [�('t.1 '� L Y e . .�•
r;�f ;{7`i.,, 2oM.13z_ ,c` .&, a
Irh. .r i"1 �4dr '-y j� .,, j: ,,r,.;,
�D Buropf tAipe6o y,';y '`'<
a`Ype z .LOeefi: n, .n".s. ,ti �. �,. ., a.-C7:='!
Zone 14
Drain, Sum of IrrlBsOo;Drelrt-Y
e8e Losses n
r h'��y%�{ :i`�i�yj*�,r�R"`�w�, �k�ixf�s
�w' C� f �✓_. ,�° j�rS��C'. Zlk'.S ^#f 8�e�.
fY t ".r�y
{4h .�,,n7in *uLiA9`16 .'• rka tra T
Su1AOf Ir11pa0o 4'1�`-�'�4P,j
Inches
Inches
Inches
Inches
Inches
Ll hee_�
tOCt1M
�+tnrhes
e l -
,� OPD ",
_.-
Inches
Inches
Inches
Ac-Ft
OPD
Itk�!es
Inohe4
-tnohae
Ai Ft.
�.�.0_PO:4w
Inches
Inches
Inches
Ac-Ft
OPD
Ii1eMC
'IAtAn
, IncltsL
- b,Fl,
„_ t3i±0,?�_s_
_
Jan
31
3.
4.1
3.03
1.26
0
„tr
^' 88
_;
-=e22•
, Y2�..
S.B
7.96
3.79
1. B
1240
:
Y'5;07
L
9
I
"'0.
5.92
8.01
3.84
2.42
,405
.
,7.34
i8
Fab
28.25
3.25
3.63
2.84
1.58
0.73
� 5:42
7.7t
�•4,OB
. `'023
0 2;029,
5.35
7.63
4.00
125
14,373
7.30;
3.73
0.88
7;842
5.39
7.68
4.05
2.55
29,377
SAS
3.71
_r: 0.30
3 60-
Mar
31
4.02
4.50
3.27
2.52
0.90
6.96
"` 9.37'.
-- 4.87
-027,:
' Y;681
5.87
9.28
4.79
1.49
15.660
'S.SB
8.98
4.48
0.80
8,37.7
5.92
9.33
4.84
3.04
31,979
5.54
8.95
4A8
0.38
3,783
A r
30
3.3-
3.78
2.75
3,53
0.78
5.76'
'-.10.05'
"-'8:27'
-O.W,
--3.803'
-5:68-
-8:98'
-6:19'
-1:93'
-20;914-
-5138'
'8:0T
f'S:88-
"1:05'
'-11'378-
-5:73'
-10:01'
-8:23'
'-7:92'
-42;597
-6:38:
-9:05'
-5.67-
-0:47-
-5 158• -
Me
31
3.88
4.34
3.15
4.36
0.87
'5.95
1Y.18�
.,'.884'
''�'"0.38
,-%-.4,018
5.87
11.09
8.76
2.10
22.110
5.56'
. 10.79�
GAS
� AS
� 12,062�
5.92
11.14
6.81
428
45,013
,5.54'
-10.77.
6,43
� �0.82�
,'IS 70
Jun
30
5.02
5.61
4.08
4.75
1.12
5.78
11,63
'0.02
'" ON
-3,865
5.68
11.55
5.94
1.05
20,OB9
5.38
1125
5AS
1.00
10,907
5.73
11.80
5.99
3.77
40,829
5.38.
'11.23
- 5.63
. "- 0.46:
--4044
1
Jul
31
8.30
7.05
SA3
4.70
1.41
5.95
:12-16.
5.11
.-.029:
`.3;000
5.87
12.07
5,02
1.66
18,440
5.562
-'11.77
4.72
.. 0.84
' 8,823
5.92
12.12
5.07
3,19
33,555
5.54
1US
.'4,70
0.38
•3'886
Aug31
5.70
6.37
4.84
4.45
1.27
5.05
11.97
.620"
' -'0.30,.
.�^ `3,111
5.87
11.59
5.21
1.82
17,057
5.Sa
" 1128,
4.91
0.87
"' .. 9,175
5.92
11.64
5.26
3.31
34.801
5.54
.11.25
.. 4.89.
OAO
:4155.
Se
30
4.54
5.08
3.70
3.40
1.02
- -5.76
'10.18.
. 3.10
, 0.285
3,095
5.88
10.10
5.02
1.56
16,966
.'5,38.:
'1110
4.72�
0.84"
9,123
5.73
10.15
5.07
3.19
34.018
5.35
9.78
4.70
.0.36
�4133
Oct
31
3,D8
3.43
2.49
2.64
0.68
.• 5.05
,` 0.28
-� 5:85
:"'0.33;;:.
3,438
5.87
9.19
5.77
1.80
18,867
5.58'
8.09
5.46
.'0.97'.
10,209
5.92
924
5.82
3.66
38,460
5.54:
8.B7
5:44.
0.44;
.; 4,627
Nov
30
3.12
3.48
2.53
1.58
0.70
` 5.76'
.8."
=:4.56
'� 025
'`<. 2,765
5.68
7.96
4.47
1.39
15,127
-..:5.38
US
4A8
0.74-
� 8,072
5.73
8.01
4.52
2.85
30,901
5.36
! 7.64
-` 4.16
0.34'
. 3,655
Dec '
31
3.20
3.57
2.60
1.16
0.71
'5.95-
7.83
;':425
§.": 024::"'
2,497'
5.87
7.74
4.17
1.30
13,836
5.58
'. 7A4-
.. 3.8G
' 0.69'
.7,220
5.92
7.79
4.22
2.65
27,887
. 5.54,
. ,7.41
•I .3.04
0.31
3,267
ion
31
3,73
4.17
3.03
1.26
0.83
- .95
8,
3.88
022.
- 2,277
5.87
7.96
3.79
1.18
12,407
5.56
7.65
3A9'
o.t12'
6,519
5.92
8.01
3.84
2.42
25,405
.54
.G3
3.4
0.28
- 2.90
Feb
28.25
3.25
3.63
2.64
1.56
0.73
5.42
7.71
4.08.
023
Z629
5.35
7.63
4.00
1.25
14,373
6.07
7.38
3.73
0.66
7.642
5.39
7.68
4.05
2.55
29,377
5.05
7.34
3.71
0.30
3.459
Mar
31
4.02
4.5D
327
2.52
0.90
. 5.25
9.37
�4.87
027
21861
5.87
9.28
4.79
1.49
15.660
5.56
8.98:
4.48
0.80
8,377
5.92
9.33
4.84
3.04
31,979
5.54
8.95
4.48
� 0.36
3,793
Apr
30
3.38
3.78
2.75
3.53
0.76
5.76
10.05
' 6.27i
- 0.35`
-' 3,803
5.68
9.96
6.19
1.93.
20,914
-5.36
9.67
5.89
1.05
11,379
5.73
10.01
6.23
3.92
42,597
5.38
9.65
5.87
0.47
5.159
May
31
3.88
4.34
3.15
4.30
0.87
5.05
. 11.18-
6.84.
- 0.38-
4,018
5.87
11.09
6.78
2.10
22,110
5.66
10.79
6.45
1.15
12,082
5.92
11.14
6.61
4.28
45,013
5.54
10.7,7
6.43
0.52
5,470
Jun
30
5.02
5.61
4.08
4.75
1.12
5.76.
11.63'
'6.02
0.34'
s 3,655
5.68
11.55
5.94
1.85
213.089
5.38
- 1125
5.65
1.00-
10.907
5.73
11.80
5,99
3.77
40,929
6.36
11.23.
5.63
OAS
4,944
2
Jul
31
6.30
7.05
5.13
4.79
1.41
5.95.
1216'
"5.11
, 020
'.[ 3;000-
5.87
12.07
5.02
1.56
16.440
5.66..:11.77
4.72
0.84
0,623
5.92
12.12
5.07
3,18
33,555
5.54
. 11.75
4.70
..0.38
3.996
Aug31
5.70
6.37
4.84
4.45
1.27
".5,96
�11:67-
5.30.
'0.30
?, 3.111
5.87
11.59
521
1.62
17,057
'5.58
1128
4.91
0.67
8,175
5.92
11.64
5.26
3.31
34,801
5.54
1126
4.09
OAO.
4158
Se
30
4.54
5.08
3.70
3.40
1.02
6.78.
140.1E
:'S,10,
-, 028.:
3,00
5.88
10.10
5.02
1.58
16,966
-•,Us
0.80
4.72
0.84
9,123
5.73
10.15
5.07
3.19
34,81E
5.36
9.T8
.-.4.70
.0.38
4,133
Oct
31
3.06
3A3
2.49
2.64
0.69
5.95
-928:
.5.85"
0.33.
' ..: 3438
5.87
9.19
5.77
1.80
18,867
5.S6
. 0.80
' S.48
0.97
10,209
5.92
9.24
5.82
3.60
38.460
- 5.54:
8.87
5.44
0.44
482E
Nov
30
3.12
3.48
2S3
1.58
0.70
�r'S:78
. ';0.04`
'4,58-
-,.` -025
".2785.
5.08
7.98
4.4E
1.39
15,12E
• 538+
7.08
, 4.1E
* 0:T4
- 8,072
5.73
8.01
4.52
2.85
30,901
5.387.84
4:1&
034
.. ; 3655
-
Dec
31
3.20
3.57
2.60
1.16
0.71
,: 5.95
7.03:
'.'i425
.z024
;...,2,497
5.87
7.74
4.17
1.311
13,636
';•5.56.
'.-7.44
3.88
.0.69,
. 7=0
5.92
7.79
4.22
2.65
27,887
5.54
7.41.
3.84..
i; ,0.31
3,287,
Jan
31
3. 3
4.1
- 3.03
.26
0.83
- .9
.8. .
'3.88
:.A22.
:- 2,2
5.8E
7.96
3.79
1.18
12,407
".
.6
-3. 8;
'" .62'
"`6, 9
5.92
8.01
3.84
2.42
,405
5.
.63.
'; 3: 7
28
Feb
28.25
3.25
3.63
2.84
1.56
0.73
5.42
'7.71
�4.08'-'023`
'2629
5.35
7.63
4.00
1.25
14,373
:5.07
7.36
3.73
0.66
7,842
5.39
7,68
4.05
2.55
20,3T7
5.05
.7.34
3.71
030
3,459
Mar
31
4.02
4.50
3.27
2.52
0.90
5.D5'
"9.37
4.87
02T
2.881
5.8E
9.28
4.79
1.49
15,660
"5.56
3.98
4ANS
0.80'.
.8,377
5.92
.9.33
4.84
3.04
31,979
5.64
8.06
4.46
0.3E
3.793
Apr
30
3.38
3.78
2.75
3.53
0.76
5.78
10.05
627.
0.35
3,803
5.68
9.96
6.19
1.93
20,914
5.38
9.67
5.89
1.05
11,379
5.73
10.01
6.23
3.92
42.597
5.38.
9.65
5.87
0.47-
5,159
Me
31
3.88
4.34
3.15
4.36
0.87
S.G5
11.18
6.84
0.38
4,018
5.87
11.09
6.78
2.10
22,110
5.58
10.70
GAS
1.15
12,062
5.02
11.14
6.81
4.28
45,013
5.S4
10.77
6.43.
0.52
5,470
Jun
30
5.02
5.61
4.08
4.75
1.12
5.76
11.63
6.02
0,34-
3,055
5.60
11.55
5.94
1.85
20,089
5.38
11:25
5.65
1.00
10,007
5.73
11.60
5.09
3.77
40,929
5.3E
11.23
�5.63�
0.46
4,044
3
Jul
31
6.30
7.05
5.13
4.76
1.41
5;95
12.10
5.11-
029
3.008
5.87
12.07
5.02
1.56
16,440
5.58
11.77
4.72
0.84
8.323
5.92
12.12
5.07
3.19
33,555
5.54
11.75
4.70
0.3E
3,998
-
Aug31
5.70
6.3E
4.64
4.45
1.27
5.95
11.67
5.301
0.30.
3,111
5.87
11.59
5.21
1.62
17,057
5.50
1128
4.91
0.87
8,175
5.92
-11.64
5.26
3.31
34,801
5.54
11.281
4.891
0.40
4,158
Sep
301
4.54
5.08
1 3.701
3.40
1.o2j
5.70
10.18
5.101
028.
- 3,095.
5.8E
10.10
5.02
1.56"
16,966
5.38.
6.80
4.72
0.84
9,123
5.73
10.15
5.07
3.19
34.818
.5.36
9.78
1 4.70
0.38
4,133
Oct
311
US
3.43
1 2.49
1 2.64
0.69
5.05
9.28'
5.85
'0.33
3,438
5.87
9.19
5.77
1.80
18.867
5.58
8.89
5.46
0.97
10,209
5.92
9.24
5.82
3.66
38,460
5.54
8.871
5.44
0.44
4,627
Nov
301
3.12
3.48
1 2.53
1 1.58
0.70
5.78
.8.04
4.56
0.25
2,7651
5.68
7.96
4.47
1.39
15,127
5.38
7.68
4.18
0.74
8,072
5.73
8.01
4.52
2.85
30.901
5.38
7.641
4.18
0.34
3.655
Dec
31
3.20
3.5E
1 2.60
IAA
0.71
5.95
7.83
4.25
0.24
2,497
5.87
7.74
4.17
1.30
13,638
5.5E
7.44
3.96
0.89
7,22D
5.92
7.79
4.22
2.65
27.887
5.54
7.41
3.84
0.31
3287
Jon
31
3.73
4,1E
3.03
1.26
0.83
,95
8.04
3.88
022
2277
5.87
7.96
3.79
1.18
12,407
S.SB
7.85
3.49
0,62
6.519
5.92
8.01
3.84
2A2
25A05
5.54
.83
3.4
028
2,948
Feb
28.25
3.25
3.83
2.64
1.5E
0.73
5.42
7.71
4.08
023
2,829
5.35
7.63
4.00
1.25
14,373
5.0E
7.38
3.73
OJiB
7,8/2
5.39
7.88
4,05
2.51
29,377
5.05
7.34
3.71
0.30
3A59
Met
31
4,02
4.50
3.27
2.52
.0.90
5.05
9.37
4.87
0.27'
2,861
5.87
9.28
4.79
1.49
15,880
5.56
8.98
4.48
0.80
Q377
5.92
9.31
4.84
3.04
31.979
5.54
8.95
4.46
0.38
3,793
4
Apr
30
3.38
3.78
2.75
3.53
0.76
5.76
10.05
, 627
OM:
3,803
5.68
9.96
6.19
1.93
20.914
6.38
9.87
5.89
1.05
11,379
5.73
10.01
8.23
3.92
42,59E
"5.30
8.85
5.8E
OA7
5,159
may
31
3.88
4.34
1 3.15
4.38
0.8E
5.95
11.18
'8.84
0.3E
4,018
5.8E
11.09
8.78
2.1D
22,110
5:58
10.79
GAS
1.15
12,082
5.92
11.14
6.81
4.28
45.013
5.54
10.7E
8A3
D.62
5,470
Jun
30
5,02
5.61
4.08
4.75
1.12
5.78
11.83
6.021
0434
` 3,655
5.68
11.55
5.94
1.85
20,089
5,38
- 11.25
5.65
1.00
10,90E
5.73
11.80
S.BB
].77
40,929
5.38
11.23
5.83
0.40
4,944
Allens Water Balance Report_Revlsed 022109.doc

Careces
Attachment A (concluded): -Water Balance Computation.
Zane 16
v ,,y�».,Mr r .$�,Zar10.}'�' � �„ ,w z,Ey,v
Zone 18
i
nav ''r
°
r
^ �`"'
a iu� afMer W �'�5,1i. �'
'
,
.
Average
SRO (ai
Days
80th %
80th %
PET
x 80%
Y
r n
�a� ,, y
ti
Total
Preclp
In
Total In
to
Evap
from
Total
Out of
per
Average
Wettest
Dryest
PreleBey
Wettest
Drelrf
Sum of
trigalbl
�Ori6y
1 1'/toi
rngetbt! .r.1 i I,yw
Drain-
Sumof
.
£
I
on
Storage
1MNfP
Storage
Storage
Storage
End of Month Storage
Year
Nb
month
Reelp
Reclp
Reclp
Taylor
Reeip
eqe
Losses
n i
Yq(f
Lanee
w 0 ' i, 1t k. i
age
Losses
-
irrigation
.
Inches
Ac-FfDPD
1peftaK
ilnaapo.Rt
�'QI'+b".;
fiches
hchec
Inches
- -
-Ac-Fl
GPO
- Ac-Ft -
Ay -Ft
Ae-Fl
-AoFt-
Ac-Fl
A. -Ft
Ao-Fl-
Days
Mal
Inches
fiches
fiches
Inches
fiches
fiches
fiches
ncme
`-?C"
1i.77
8.88
4.70
4.98
8.40
87,301
78.59
8.37
17.81
27.10
1.70
20.28
8.00
12
2.25
Jan
31
3.73
4.17
3.03
7.26
0.83
5.82
7.71
3.55
2.13
22370
-;132�
, 3.
d3A0
-a.
<' 1
v.= "'
4 5'-r
6.17
8.48
4.83
4.54
5.84
87,301
19.05
8.17
1823
24.40
2.11
27.16
10.15
18
3.31
Feb
28.25
31
325
4.02"
333
4:50"
2.64
-3:2T
1.56
-2:52"
0.73
-0:90-
5.12
-5:82'
7.41
-9:04-
3.78
-4:54-
2.27
-2:72-
ZB 758
-28;040
„ .iP14^
4i9B,
A0,38,
,0l07
�-3�jM
-8.77-
-tOAB-
-5.69-
-4.81-
-8.19"
-65,034_
_22.35:
-10.1-1-
-17.81_
_27.03"
-3.40_
_25,74
12.33
21
4.02 _
Mai
Apr
30
3.38
3.76
2.75
3.53
0.78
5.44
9.73
5.95
3.57
38764
s'140
s S88J
190
0'38
w 3j920;;
8.55
10.84
7.08
4.66
5.99
85,034
28.27
8.50
17.24
25.74
4.77
33.04
5.03
9
1.64
31
3.88
4.34
3.15
4.36
0.87
5.82
10.85
0.51
3.91
"41 009
, 144
: 6.07;:
233
t1:44
" ,i4:848''
0,77
12.00
7.66
4.81
6.19
65,034
30.78
8.78
17.81
27.57
5.88
38.67
May
Jun
30
5.02
5.61
4.08
4.75
1.12
5.44
11.31
5.71
3.42
37,174
o- .1!40
72Z'.
� 1 88
0 W
3+417.i
6.55
12.43
6.82
4.68
5.80
85,034
27.23
12.62
1724
29.68
e.41
33.64
-
1
6.30
7.05
5.13
4.79
1.41
5.82
11.83
4.78
2.87
30142
.,,T44x
$ 7.85;:'
,00,1,;Q11
z'I"x,'�,%'rQ9B`:'
8.77
12.98
5.93
4.81
6.19
65,034
23.37
15.86
17.81
33.87
'8.47
28.84
3.83
7
1.25
Jul
31
6.37
4.64
4.45
1.27
5.62
11.34
4.97
2.88
31331
;if 44
?310?
0T9
:0:13
t tx1';S7f^`
0.77
12.49
8.12
4.81
6.19
65,034
24.17
14,34
17.61
32.18
0.00
30,18
5.81
10
1.89
Aug
31
5.70
4.54
6.08
3.70
3.40
1.02
5.44
9.88
4.78
2.87
31158
`%21=i40
YSsB2;
074
_0:94
<J 510
6.55
10.98
5.89
4.60
5,99
65,034
23.28
11.43
1724
28.67
4.60
27.88
8.81
11
2.15
Sep
30
5.52
3,31
34,820
`1';1:44
+i4 Th
r, i 34
3���025
kx 2;874t`
8.77
10.10
8.67
4.98
6.40
67,301
26.76
7.71
17.81
25.52
3.56
30.32
1.81
3
0.59
Oct
31
3,06
3.43
2.49
2.64
0.88
5.82
8.95
2.54
27,611
's3.80i'
019,,
i�`0.04
6.55
8.83
5.35
4.82
8.20
67,301
21.16
7.84
17.24
25.08
2.14
23.30
3.59
6
1.17
Nov
30
3.12
3.48
2.53
-
1.58
0.70
0.71
5.44
5.62
7.72
7.50
4.24
3.92
2.35
24737
,A'40
d3,.M
%.:M
i
,.id388i�
' $
6.77
8.65
5.07
4.98
6.40
67,301
20.04
8.04
17.81
25.85
1.56
21.60
7.84.
14
2.56
Dec
31
3.20
3. 3
3.57
4.17
2.60
3.03
LAB
1,28
0.83
5.62
3.55.
2.13
22,370
,'
3; t
N
.<
6.77
8.86
4.70
4.98
6.40
67.301
18.59
9.3
17.81
27.19
1.70
20.28
14.75
28
.81
Jan
31
2.04
1.58
0.73
5.12
.71
7.41
3.78
2.27
26,158
,4,1:32
+3!80%
._
6.17
8.46
4.83
4.54
5.84
67,301
10.05
8.17
16.23
24.40
2,11
21.18
17.99
31
5.88
i Feb
28.25
3.25
3.03
4.50
3.27
2.52
0.90
5.82
B.IM
4.54
2.72
28,640
�,�'=ti44
'`4:80
-,.,
Q38
_^
s4•97721"
6.77
10.19
S.BB
4.01
8.19
05,034
22.35
10.11.
17.81
27.83
3.40
25.74
20.18
35
0.57
Mar
31
4.02
0.76
5.44
9.73
5.95
3.57
38784
?1:40
=5,88=
,.
i90
r'392M
6.55
.10.84
7.OB
4.88
5.99
85,034
28.27
8.50
fl24
25.74
4.77
33.04
12.88
22
4.23
Apr
30
3.38
3.78
2.75
3.53
4.38
0.87
5.62
t0.85
8.51
3.01
41068
233
,0.38
-^0:44
i :4R40r,
8.77
12.00
7.66
4.81
8.19
65.034
30,7E
9.70
17.81
27.57
5.89
38.67.
3.78
7
1.23
May
31
3.88
5.02
4.34
5.81
3,15
4.08
4.75
1.12
6.44
11.31
5.71
3.42
37174
i.,ii144
?„OAA0
<„B.BL,
727W'
166
r.O,31
i3'417;:
6.55
12.43
8.82
4.88
5.99
85,034
27.23
12.62
17.24
20.80
6.41
33.64
-
-
2 Jun
30
5.13
4.78
1.41
5.02
11.83
4.78
2.87
30,142
rc" 1.44
+ T,88a
i011{
t�:11'-"Iew
0.77
12.98
5.93
4.81
6.19
65,034
23.37
15.86
17.81
33.67
8.47
29.84
3.83
7
1.25
Jul
31
8,30
7.05
8.37
4.64
4.45
127
5.62
11.34
4.97
2.98.
31331
�.1i44t
�7ae'�
.„n0.80,
079
",O tb��.'�ii511i,4
6.77
12.49
6.12
4.81
6.19
65,034
24A7
14.34
17.81
32.16
6.00
30.18
5.81
10
1.89
Aug
31
5.70
1.02
5.44
9.86
4.78
2.87
31156
55.82:.'.
074
id t4
a i1"t618¢
6.55
10.98
5.89
4.66
5.99
65,034
23.26
11A3
17.24
28.67
4,60
27J88
6.61
11
2.15
I Sep
301
4.54
5108
3.70
1 3.40
2.84
0.69
5.82
8.05
5.52
3.31
34820
,,•"O
;,'GY d4
t,4.17}
.;M134,
rN 0.25,
8.77
10,10
BA7
4.B8
8.40
87,301
28.78
7.71
17.81
25.52
3.SB
30.32
1.81
3
O.SB
I Oct
31
3.06
3.43
2.48
5.44
7.72
4.24
2.54
27,611
� A
453E8u
0t9
- 004
.198a
8,55
8.83
5.35
4.82
820
87,301
21.18
7.84
1724
25.08
2.14
23.30
3.59
B
1.17
Nov
30
3.12
3.48
2.53
1.58
_ 0.70
7.50
3.92
2.35
24,737
r:1�44
;332's
s
�-:'.'r
8.77
0.65
-5.07
4.98
8.40
87,301
20.04
8.04
17:81
25.05
1.58
21.60
7.84
14
2.58
i Dec
311
320
3.57
2.80
1 1.18
0.71
5.82
3.55
2.13
22370
-'1
73; 333,
r,7
.�:xr
-
.<
8.77
8.86
4.70
4.98
6.40
6 ,301
18.58
9.37
17.81
27.19
1.70
20.28
14.75
28
4.81
Jan
- 31
3.73
4.1
3.03
1.26
0.83
0.73
5.62
5.12
..71
7.41
3.78
2.27
1 28,158
'.e',i'.32
'_`3.80
�- "'
.%�,..„.y
6.17
8.46
4.83
4.54
5.84
67.301
19.05
8.17
16.23
24.40
2.11
21.18
17.99
,31
5.86
Feb
2825
325
3.63
2.64
1.56
2.52
0.96
5.62
9.04
4.54
2.72
28640
sS444
"4,88:;
.
038,
,z-:
'il Ol
{:,i'7216:^.
8.77
10.10
5.69
4.81
0.19
65,034
22.35
10.11
V.81
27.93
3.40
25.74
20.18
35
1 8.57
Mar
31
4.02
4.50
3.27
3.53
0.76
5.44
9.73
5.95
3.57
38,764
6.55
10.84
7.06
4.66
5.90
85,034
28.27
8.50
1724
25.74
4.77
33.04
12.88
22
4.20
Apr
30
3.36
3.78
2.75
3.15
4.38
0.87
5.62
10.85
6.51
3.91
41069
!,„kC.44
e`BA7i
2.33
;`044
i 4;84W
8.77
12.00
7.06
4.81
6.19
e5,034
30.78
9.76
17.81
27.57
5.89
36.87
3.78
7
1.23
May
31
3.88
5.02
4.34
5.01
4.08
4.75
1.12
5.44
11.31
5.71
3.42
37174
:1 40
t ?,27s.
1.eB
;031
3;4172.
6.55
12.43
6.82
4.66
5.09
65.034
27.23
12.62
17.24
29.86
8.41
33.64
-
-
-
3 Jun
30
4.78
1.41
5.82
11.83
4.78
2.87
30142
"eh85?:
,.OAO
i:011
�.3 .1198s
0.77
12.98
5.93
4.81
6.19
65.034
23.37
15.86
17.81
33.67
BA7
20.84
3.83
7
1.25
JUI
31
0.30
7.05
5.13
4.45
1.27
11.34
4.97
2.98
31331
.Y1i44
fi1:1.44
{' T'CB.
a 070
*.015
''i. .1";61tzi
0.T7
12.49
6.12
4.81
8.19
65,034
24.17
14.34
17.81
32.16
8.00
30.18
5.01
10
1.89
Aug
31
5.70
8.37
4.04
3.40
1.02
.5.82
5.44
9.66
4.78
2.87
31,156
f•'1sl
$.82,4
ur0 T4
1iG 14
T S;S161
8,55
10.98
5.89
4.06
5.99
65,034
2328
11.43
17.24
28.67
4.80
27.88
6.67
11
2.15
Sep
30
4.54
5.08
3.70
5.62
8.95
5.52
1 3.31
34,820
a.,144t,
2,874
8.77
10.10
6.87
4.98
6.40
67,301
26.78
7.71
17.81
25.52
3.56
30.32
1.81
3
0.59
Oct
31
3.OB
3.43
2,49
2.64
0.69
4.24
1 2.54
27611
„X:14O
a'0'19,
'398'!
6.55
8.83
5.35
4.82
6.20
87,301
21.16
7.84
17.24
25.08
2.14
23.30
3.59
6
1.17
Nov
30
3,12
3.48
2.53
1.58
0.70
5.44
7.72
2.35
24737
9; 144
,',:3:80?
*
,6;3O04
5„`
SN=..r..i>
6.77
8.65
5.07
4.98
1 6.40
07.301
20.04
8.04
17.81
25.85
1.58
21.60
7.84
14
2.56
Dec
31
320
3.57
2.00
1.16
0.71
5.62
7.50
3.92
t i3t32'--.
y .,
s
i�
�.
�i
�- :k
6.77
8.88
4.70
4.B8
8.40
67,301
18.59
9.37
17.81
27.19
1.70
20.28
14.75
20
.B1
Jan
31
3. 3
4.17
3.03
1.28
0,83
5.62
7.71
3.55
2.13
22.370
. 3:;
.i
t.' %'
6.17
8.46
4.83
4.54
5.84
87,301
19.05
8.17
18.23
24.40
2.11
21.16
17.89
31
5.88
Feb
28.25
325
3.63
2.64
1.56
0.73
5.12
7.41
3.78
227
, 28 158
a'1.32.
, ;3.1i0s,
�-ts'
31
4.02
4.50
3.27
2.52
0.90
5.62
9.04
4.54
2.725
28640
C,144t
'498:.
038.
UA7t
v'�-z4nj':
6.77
10.19
5.69
4.81
8.19
85,034
22.35
10.11
17.81
27.93
3.40
2.5.74
26.11
35
0.57
4 Mar
0.76
5.44
9.73
5.95
3.571
30,784
-1'40
1.90
,,038
»'s,3,924.
- 8.55
10.84
7.08
4.88
5.99
85,034
28.27
8S0
1724
25.74
4.77
33.1M
12.88
22
_ 4.20
Apr
30
3.38
3.7B
'4.34
2.75
3.15
3.53
4.36
O.B7
5.82
10.85
8.51
3,91
41069
a�at 44
,5,88r
8.8T°
s233
044
1,r;048'--.
8.77
12.00
7.88
4.81
8.18
85,034
30.78
9.76
17.81
27.57
5.89
38.87
3.78
7
1.23
Nhy
31
3.BB
5.44
11.31
5.71
3.42
37174
vi�!t 40
:7,27:';
r.1.86
:;9,31
< %3'417;
8.55
12.43
8.82
4.66
5.90
85,034
27.23
12.02
17.24
29.86
8.41
33.84
Jun
30
5.02
5.61
4.08
4.75.
1.12
Aliens Water Balance Report_Revlsea_022109.aoc

James D. Simons,
Director and State
Allen Ca
Attn: Tor
P.O. Box
Siloam S
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
PE'Land Quality Section Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
ogist Dee Freeman, Secretary
February 13, 2009
LETTER OF APPROVAL
Company
Langston, Plant Manager
AR 72761-
RE: Proj ct Name: Allen Canning Company Wastewater Treatment System Improvements
Acres Approved: 23.56
Project ID: Samps-2006-007
ty: Sampson Turkey Rowan Road -(SR 1924)
Basin: Cape Fear' Stream Classification: Other
fitted By: MacConnell & Associates, P.C.
Received by LQS: 2/6/2009
Type:, Revised
Dear Mr.
This office has reviewed.the subject erosion and sedimentation control plan. We find the
plan to be acceptable and hereby issue this Letter of Approval. The enclosed Certificate of
Approval m ist be posted at the job site. This plan approval shall expire three (3) years following
the date of approval, if no land -disturbing activity has been undertaken, as is required by Title
15A NCAC 4B .0129.
Title 15A NCAC 4B .0118(a) requires that a copy of the approved erosion control plan be
on file at th job site. Also, this -letter gives the notice required by G.S. 113A-61.1(a) of our right.
of periodic i rispection to insure compliance with the approved plan.
No Carolina's Sedimentation Pollution Control Act is performance -oriented, requiring
protection o existing natural resources and adjoining properties. If, following the
commencement of this project, the erosion and sedimentation control plan is inadequate to meet
the requirerr ents of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 (North Carolina General
Statute 113 -51 through 66), this office may require. revisions to the plan and implementation of
the revisio to insure compliance with the Act.
Fayett ville Regional Office 2.25 Green Street — Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301
Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone]-Internet: http://www.dir.enr.state.nc.us/pages/landgualitysection.htmi
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled / 10% Post Consumer Paper

Letter of Ap�roval
Allen Canning Company
February 13 2009
Page 2 of 3
The.developer is responsible -for obtaining any and all permits and approvals necessary for the
development of this project prior to the commencement of this land disturbing activity. This could
include agencies such as the Division of Water Quality's stormwater regulations, their enforcement
requirements within Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, the Environmental Protection Agency and/or
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' jurisdiction of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, the Division of
Solid Waste Management's landfill regulations, local County or Municipalities' ordinances, or others
that may be required. This approval cannot supersede any other permit or approval; however, in the
case of a Cease and Desist Order from the Corps of Engineers, that Order would only apply to wetland
areas. All upland areas would still have to be in compliance with the N.C. Sedimentation Pollution
Control Act.:
If any area on site falls within the jurisdiction of Section 401 or 404 of the Clean Water
Act, the developer is responsible for compliance with the requirements of the Division of Water
Quality,. the Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) respectively.
Any erosion control measures that fall within jurisdictional wetland areas must be approved by
the aforemeni`tioned agencies prior to installation. The Land Quality Section must be notified of a
relocation of the measures in question to the transition point between the wetlands and the
uplands to assure that the migration of sediment will not occur. If that relocation presents a
problem or contradicts any requirements of either DWQ, .the Corps, or the EPA, it is the
responsibility of the developer to inform the Land Quality Section regional office so that an
adequate contingency plan can be made to assure sufficient erosion control remains on site.
Failure to do aso will be considered a violation of this approval.
Please be aware that your project will be covered by the enclosed NPDES General
Stormwater Permit NCGO1000 (Construction Activities). You should first become familiar with
all of the requirements for compliance with the enclosed general permit.
Please note that this approval is based in part on the accuracy of the information provided
in the Financial Responsibility Form, which you provided. You are requested to file an amended
form if there is. any change in the information included on the form. In addition, it would be
helpful if you notify this office of the proposed starting date for this project. Please notify us if
you plan to h4.ve a preconstruction conference.
Your cooperation is appreciated.
Sincerely,
I
Jodi Pace, EI
Land Quality Section

Letter of A proval
Allen C g Company
February 1 , 2009
Page 3 of 3
Enclosures:
cc:
Roy
Certificate of Approval
NPDES Permit
onnell & Associates, P.C.
Wilson, Building Inspector
da Henson, Division of Water Quality
Quality Section - Fayetteville Regional Office File

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
=0, KAIS, l)E S Stormwater Discharge Perini[
for Construction Activities
Cover Sheet for NCG010000 Last Revised 10/20/2008
Did you know?
In North Carolina,
excess Stormwater
volumes and blan-
kets of sediment
covering aquatic
habitat cause more
streams in the state
to lose their ability
to support aquatic
life than any other
pollution problemz.
What is it?
This is your Stormwater Permit. It is
separate from your Erosion and Sedi-
mentation Control (E&SC) Plan.
Your project is subject to this permit in
addition to the approved E&SC Plan
because all construction activities dis-
turbing 1 or more acres of land are sub -
Jett to stormwater_ permitting reouire-
ments under the National Pollutant Dis-
charge Elimination System (NPDES).
You have been given a copy of General
Permit No. NCGO10000 (attached) and
granted coverage under this General
Stormwater Permit.
Why is this permit required,
and why is it important?
Federal regulations adopted by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
and North Carolina Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) require an NPDES
permit for your project. The EPA has
delegated DWQ authority to administer
the NPDES program in North Carolina.
You must comply with the applicable
terms and conditions of this Stormwater
Permit, and you are subject to enforce-
ment by the Division of Water Quality
for any violations.
In just one rain
event, poor
erosion & sedi-
ment control
practices can
contribute
nearly a ton of
sediment per
Sediment -filled creek down-
stream of a construction site.
acre to a
stream2. That can cause long-term
devastation to receiving waters!
So remember, compliance with this per-
mit helps protect our lakes, streams, riv-
ers, and coastal waters.
2From PollutantFaportfrom Vanous Land Uses in the
UPPerNeuseAiverBasin (Line, Daniel E. et al.) and
DWQ staff communication with authors about the
study.
What does this permit require me to do?
You should read and become familiar
with the provisions and conditions of
this permit. Here are highlights:
You must implement the Erosion and
Sedimentation Control Plan approved
for your project by the N.C. Division of
Land Resources (DLR) or by an ap-
proved local program. Adherence to
.that E&SC Plan is an enforceable
component of the Stormwater Permit.
'Frnm the Draft Nomh t..vlina wazer erratio
Assessmtnt and impaired WatersVst (2004 inte-
grated 305(b) and 303(d) Report).
You must inspect all erosion and
sedimentation control facilities at
least once a week. If you dis-
charge to certain impaired waters,
you must inspect these facilities
twice a week (see permit). Im-
paired waters on the latest EPA
approved 303(d) list as a result of
construction -related parameters
can be found here:
h tl.p://h2o.en r.stsate.nc.uE3!su/
eon.siructionROM
You must inspect all E&SC facili-
ties within 24 hours after any
storm event greater than a half
inch (during a 24-hr period).
You must observe runoff at your
stormwater outfalls just as often as
above for characteristics listed in
the permit (clarity, solids, etc.).
You must keen records of these
inspections.
,.15`co r'Ya� yF w rr
You must provide the operation and
maintenance (C&AO necessary to
maintain optimal performance of
stormwater controls_ This means
take corrective action if E&SC
facilities are not operating properly!

PAGE 2 NPDES STORMWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT COVER SHEET FOR NCGO10000
What does this permit require me to do? (cont.)
0&M includes things like:
✓ Regularly cleaning out sedi-
mentation basins
✓ Stabilizing eroded banks or
spillway structures
✓ Repairing/clearing out inlets
and outlets
✓ Repairing piping, seepage, me-
chanical damage
✓ Repairing silt fence damage
Regular inspections are a chance to
check impacts to nearby waters. If
you observe significant amounts of
sediment in the stream, notify
the DWQ regional office within
24 hours and provide written no-
tice within 5 days (See Part II, Sec-
tion E of the Permit). Please copy
correspondence to DLR_
What do I need to
keep on site?
✓ Copy of the approved E&SC
Plan, including any revisions
✓ A rain gauge
✓ Records of rainfall amounts
and dates
✓ Records of E&SC facility/Best
Management Practice (BMP)
inspections
✓ Records of stormwater dis-
charge outfall and stream in-
spections/observations. (See
attached example log sheet).
Do I need to file a
Notice of Intent (NOI)?
No. Once your E&SC PIan is
approved, you are automatically
covered under NCG010000, and you
do not need to file an NOI for a Cer-
tificate of Coverage (COC) from
DWQ. However, if you do not wish
to be covered by this General
Permit, you must apply to DWQ for
an individual NPDES Stormwater
Permit_
"'«'�+"'i-.
You must prevent stormwater con-
taminatioz from equipment used
during construction. This includes
preventing spills of oil, fuels, cool-
ants, hydraulic fluids, etc.
You must follow federal guidelines
and label rr strictions when using
Who inspects me
for what?
DWQ coordinates with the Division
of Land Resources' Land Quality
Section to ensure compliance with
NC Rules and'I,Regulations regard-
ing construction activities and their
impact on water quality. That
means your operation is subject to
enforcement by both Divisions.
In general, DLR staff will be in-
specting your site on a regular ba-
sis. However, DWQ staff may per -
herbicides, pesticides, and fertiliz-
ers.
You must properly dispose of
demolition debris and other build-
ing material.
You must properly manage dis-
posal of litter and sanitary waste.
Take compliance seriously! Projects
that violate Stormwater Permit con-
ditions and/or have unauthorized
water quality impacts are subject to
fines. Civil penalties of up to
$25,000.00 per day for each viola-
tion may be assessed.
form inspections as well. These
inspections may be routine in na-
ture, or the result of public com-
plaints or problems reported by
DLR.
,,'NC DLR (or a delegated local pro-
gram) will inspect the site for
compliance with your approved
E&SC Plan.
✓ NC DWQ investigates complaints
and inspects for adverse impacts
to water quality and stream stan-
dard violations (such as sediment
in the stream).
✓ NC DWQ may inspect the site for
compliance with this Stormwater
Permit.
Who can help me with questions?
Questions about Stormwater Permit requirements can be ad-
dressed to the Division of Water Quality Regional Offices:
Asheville Office.........
(828)
964500
Washington Office........
[phone]
Fayetteville Office......
(910)
33-3300
Wilmington Office........
(910) 796-72I5
Mooresville Office......
(704)
3-1699
Winston-Salem Office....
[phone]
Raleigh Office...........
(919)
91-4200
Central Office
[phone]
more information about�e Programs of the Division of Water
StorInWater Pe tting Unit, see our home page at:
hup. / /h2o_ mr. state. nc. its /su /storm water hen I

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
pF WATeg
°bud most-Cojoutzomctaon Storin-water
o Y anavement Perini ill ' Pl'd�' satin
Last Revised 9/15/2008 , 4�
How is this permit different from a
Construction Stormwater Permit?
".Post -construction" refers to permanent stormwater management measures that
will stay in place once the project is built —not just during construction. In certain ar-
eas, a post -construction permit is required in addition to a general permit for the
construction activity (coverage under NCGO10000). Also, other local. post -construction
requirements may apply.
What is this new permitting program?
Stormwater Constructed Wetland
In 2006 the. North Carolina General Assembly enacted Session Law 2006-246 to implement post -construction storm -
water management requirements for development activities in North. Carolina. The act requires that new develop-
ment in specific areas meet the post -construction requirements beginning July 1, 2007. Post -construction. permits
under this program will be issued by the Division of eater Quality (DWQ) under the State Stormwater Permitting
Program or by a delegated IocaI program.
Who needs a post -construction permit?
New development that will disturb one acre or more of land —or that is part of a larger plan that will
disturb at Ieast an acre —and located within areas outlined in the Session Law will need a permit. Coverage
areas include: designated Phase Il municipalities; the potential extra -territorial jurisdiction (ETJ) of those munici-
palities (1- to 3-miles beyond incorporated boundaries, depending on the population); "urbanizing areas": and. entire
counties that are "tipped in" (including all und.esi.gnated cities there). Currently there are 26 tipped counties, but
more could come into the program in the future. Also, local governments —including counties —may choose to imple-
ment post -construction programs throughout their jurisdictions.
The affected area around a municipality .is called the `'Municipal Sphere of Influence" (IVISI). If the municipality is not
exercising its planning and zoning authority there, DVGrQ will issue post -construction permits in the 1VISI--as long as
another local authority (the county, for example) is not implementing a post -construction program.
How do 1 know if my project is in one of these areas?
Right now, over 1.20 municipalities in North Carolina have been designated Phase I1, and post -construction applies
throughout 26 counties, as well as in portions of 19 other counties. NC DWQ collaborated with the Center for Geo-
graphic Information and Analysis (CGIA) to create an interactive web -based map viewer to determine if a project
is located in a Phase Il area. Go to:
http://h2o.enr.state.tic.lis/su/Msi_n1aps.htm Always be sure to verify whether the local'gover.nment
requires more stringent stormwater controls.
You can enter the project address or geographic coordinates, and the map will tell you if the project is
located in an area that requires a post -construction permit. The map provides guidance for all stormwater
permitting programs :in NC —not just Phase II areas. This map viewer will be updated periodically to reflect: more
current municipal boundaries; areas subject to other State Stormwater. Programs (e.g., High Quality Wagers); new
designations; etc. However, map revisions will not occur as often as the changes. It is important to check the list of
updates and corrections on this website. As with any system of this type, the interactive map is simply a tool to help
you in making your final determination about your responsibilities for permit coverage.

PAGE POST -CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMITTING PROGRAM
What does this permit do?
A stormwater permit governs the design, installation, and construction of stormwater management and control prac-
tices on the site. These measures don't just include structural Best Management Practices (BMPs), but also other ele-
ments of site design for stormwater management. The permit is intended to provide a mechanism for the review, ap-
proval, and inspection of the proposed stormwater management methods for the development or redevelopment site,
including structural BMPs and other techniques such as low -impact or low -density design. Requirements for deed re-
strictions, operation and maintenance, annual inspections, and reporting and record -keeping are also part of the per-
mit.
Aren't there already stormwater permit programs in places?
Yes, and some of those programs "satisfy" the new post -
construction requirements. As of today, those are:
✓ Water Supply Watershed Protection Program
(including Randleman Lake)
✓ Freshwater Iiigh Quality Waters (HQW)
✓ Freshwater Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW)
✓ Neuse Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) Management
Strategy
✓ Tar -Pamlico NSW Management Strategy
However, some programs may have overlapping or more
stringent requirements. For example, where both the
Neuse NSW and Water Supply Protection requirements
apply, stormwater post -construction design constraints for
both programs apply. Where one program is more
stringent, the more stringent requirement will apply.
How do 1 apply for permit coverage?
Within the corporate limits and the planning jurisdiction of a permitted municipality, the post -construction permit
will normally come from the local government. Please contact the local government for instructions about the local
post -construction program. Some counties may also be delegated to implement a post -construction program in their.
jurisdiction. The interactive map website should help guide you to the appropriate permitting authority.
If your project is not located within a permitted municipality's limits or ETJ or within a delegated county area, you
must apply to DWQ for permit coverage. The application fee is $505. Application information can be found at:
h2o.enr.state.ne-us/.,;u/bmp-forms.htm.
NOTE —If the municipality was designated but then exempted from Phase 11 permitting (post -construction still
applies), or if the project is in a coastal county community, but the post -construction program has not yet begun in that
jurisdiction, you must apply to DWQ for a permit.
Who can help one with questions?
A number of general questions can be answered by reviewing the information on our Post -Construction Website at:
h ttpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.US/SUI122si_post-colistru ctioii.htln
If you have further questions you can contact our Division:
By email at: phase [e-mail]
By mail at: Stormwater Permitting Unit
NC Division of Water Quality,
161.7 Mail Service Center �.
:Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
By phone at: (91.9) 807-6300 — askfor staff in the Stormwater Permitting Unit

STORMWATER INSPECTIONS FOR GENERAL PERMIT NCG010000 — LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES
PROJECT:
--MONITORING FOR THE WEEK BEGINNING:
All erosion and sedimentation control facilities and sto . rmwater discharge outfalls must be inspected at least once (twice, if on 303(d) listed stream . for construction
related parameters*) per seven calendar days and within 24 hours of a rainfall of 0.5 inches per 24 hours. Perinittee must keep a record of inspections.
RAINFALL: Gau2e must be maintained nn.qitp
mounfl.
6c
By this signature, I certify (in accordance with Part 11
Section R, 10 of the NCGO10000 permit) that this report is
accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signature of Pdrinittee or Designee)
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL FACILITIES INSPECTED: Identification of all facilities may require additional pages.
R20'r
f Infoin
Ing
ENO i-s'
OBSERVATIONS OF RUNOFF AT STORMWATER DISCHARGE OtTFALLS: Take immediate corrective action to control the discharge of sediments outside the
disturbed limits of the site. May require additional pages.
fin4 ,
a of is
dam eft
Ha
MOM
-19 0 vi4u
c ons!.-,.--
taken
ti
;4!�Ak
R 9,61jil
el
Wwli
_pr _
10 ar.
Ide f
. .....
t�Y need
to'14ttac
A
Clarity: Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge.where I is clear and 10 is very cloudy
Floating Solids: Choose.the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the discharge where I is no solids and 10 the surface is -covered in floating solids
Suspended Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended •-solids in the discharge where I is no'solids and 10 is extremely muddy
Has all land disturbing construction been completed? (Y/N) Has the final permanent grio . und cover been completed & established? (Y/N)
3.03(d) listed streams for construction,related parameters — The latest approved list may be obtained from the Division of Water Quality, or from the following website location:
http://h2o.enr.state, nc.uslsulconstrucfion3O3d

NOTICE
TIME LIMIT FOR GROUND COVER
HAS CHANGED!
gr(
�ective October 1, .2005 the limit for establishing
and cover on slopes has changed to 21 calendar
days.
SECTION 2. G.S. 1.1.3A-57(2) reads as rewritten:.-
1113A-57. Mandatory standards for land -disturbing activity.
No la d-disturbing activity subject to this Article shall be
undert ken except in accordance with ' the following mandatory
require�nents:
(2)
The angle for graded slopes aid fills shall be no greater than
the angle that can be retained by vegetative. cover or other
'adequate erosion -control devices or structures. In any event,
lopes left exposed will, within 21 calendar days of
completion of any phase of grading, be planted or otherwise
provided with temporary or permanent ground cover,
devices, or structures sufficient to restrain erosion.

CERTIFICATE OF PLAN APPROVAL
The postin'g of this certificate certifies that an erosion and sedimentation control plan has been
approved for this project by the North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
in .accordance with North Carolina General Statute 113A — 57 -(4) and
b d 11 3A L. 54 (d) (4) and
I�Tnrf Car Aina Administrative Code, Title 15A, Chapter 4B.0 1.07 (c)'. This certificate must -'be. --
hosted at the. primary entrance of the job site before co
nstruction begins and until establishment of
)ermanent'groundcover. as required by North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15A, Chapter
M.OM (b).
.Allen Canning Company Wastewater Treatment System Improvements— Sampson Cot'
I 11ty
Project Name and Location
FebrUary 13, 2009
Date of Plan Approval.
.-NCDENR
I.- ,
Regional Engineer

Permit No. NCG010000
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE STORMWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina. General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended,
All owners or operators of stormwater. point source discharges associated with construction
activities including clearing, grading and excavation activities resulting in the disturbance 'of
land are hereby authorized to discharge stormwater to the surface waters of North Carolina or to
a separate storm sewer system conveying stormwater to the surface waters.
The General Permit shall become effective on October 1, 2008.
The General Permit shall expire at midnight on June 30, 2009.
Signed this day October 20, 2008.
Coleen H. Sullins, Directcvv
Division of Water Quality
By the Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Page 1 of 20 Pages

Permit No. NCGO10000
PERMITTED ACTIVITIES
Until this permit expires or is modified or revoked, the permittee is authorized to discharge
stormwater which has been adequately treated and managed in accordance with an approved
Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan by the North Carolina Division of Land Resources,
Land Quality Section, or a delegated local program under the provisions and requirements of
North Carolina General Statute 113A - 54.1 to the surface waters of North Carolina or to a
separate storm sewer system. All discharges shall be in accordance with the attached schedules
as follows:
Part I: Monitoring, Controls, and Limitations for Permitted Discharges
Part H: Standard Conditions
Any other point source discharge to surface waters of the state is prohibited unless covered by
another permit, authorization or approval. The discharges allowed by this General Permit shall
not cause or contribute to violations of Water Quality Standards. Discharges allowed by this
permit must meet applicable wetland standards as outlined in 15A NCAC 2B .0230 and .0231
and water quality certification requirements as outlined in 15A NCAC 2H .0500.
This permit does not relieve the permittee from .responsibility for compliance with any other
applicable federal, state, or local law, rule, standard, ordinance, order, judgment, or decree.
General Permit Coverage
This General Permit is applicable to point source discharges from construction activities
disturbing five acres of land prior to March 10, 2003. As of March 10, 2003, this permit will be
applicable to point source discharges of stormwater from construction activities disturbing one or
more acres of land. The submission of a proposed Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan to
the Division of Land Resources or delegated local program shall be considered to take the place
of a Notice of Intent for coverage under this General Permit for those projects requiring this
Permit coverage. Coverage under this General Permit shall become effective upon issuance of an
approval for the Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan by the Land Quality Section of the
Division of Land Resources or delegated local program. Prior to the commencement of
construction and land disturbing activities .approval of the Erosion and Sedimentation Control
Plan shall be obtained.
Any owner or operator not wishing to be covered or limited by this General Permit may make
application for an individual NPDES permit in accordance with NPDES procedures in 15A
NCAC 2H .0100, stating the reasons supporting the request. Any application for an individual
permit should be made at least 180 days prior to the time the permit is needed .
This General Permit does not cover activities or discharges covered by an individual NPDES
permit until the individual permit has expired or has been rescinded. Any person conducting an
activity covered by an individual permit but which could be covered by this General Permit may
request that the individual permit be rescinded and coverage under this General Permit be
provided_
Page 2 of 20 Pages

Permit No. NCGO10000
PART I
MONITORING, CONTROLS, AND LIMITATIONS FOR PERMITTED DISCHARGES
SECTION A: FINAL LIMITATIONS AND CONTROLS FOR STORMWATER
DISCHARGES
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the
Permittee is authorized to discharge stormwater associated with construction activity. Such
discharges shall be controlled, limited and monitored as specified below.
1. Prior to the commencement of construction, the pemuttee shall submit for approval a
Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (plan) to the Department of Environment, and
Natural Resources, Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section, (or.an approved
local program) pursuant to the requirements of NC G.S. 113A-54.1 and in conformity
with rules adopted by the North Carolina Sedimentation Control Commission.
2. The Permittee shall implement the plan, which has been approved by the approval
authority. The approved plan is considered a requirement or condition of this general
permit. Deviation from the approved. plan, or approved amendment to the plan, shall
constitute a violation of the terms and conditions of this general_ permit except that
deviation from the approved plan will be allowed (1) to correct an emergency situation
where sediments are being discharged off the site or (2) when minor modifications have
been made for the purpose of improving the performance of the erosion and
sedimentation control measures and notification of the minor modification has been made
to the Division of Land Resources (or approved local program). Such a deviation from
the approved plan shall be noted on the approved plan maintained at the job site. During
active construction, a copy of the approved plan shall be maintained on the site.
3. Equipment utilized during the -construction activity on a site . must be operated and
maintained in such a manner as to prevent the potential or actual pollution of the surface
or ground waters of the state. Fuels, lubricants, coolants, and hydraulic fluids, or any
other petroleum products, shall not be discharged onto the ground or into surface waters.
Spent fluids shall be disposed of in a manner so as not to enter the waters, surface or
ground, of the -state and in accordance with applicable state and federal disposal
regulations. Any spilled fluids shall be cleaned up to the extent practicable and disposed
of in a manner so as not to allow their entry into the waters, surface or ground, of the
state.
4. Herbicide, pesticide, and fertilizer usage during - the construction activity shall be
consistent with the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act and shall be in
accordance with label restrictions.
Page 3 of 20 Pages

Permit No. NCG010000
5. All wastes composed of building materials shall be disposed of in accordance with North
Carolina General Statutes, Chapter 130A, Article 9 - Solid Waste Management, and rules
governing the disposal of solid waste (North Carolina Administrative Code Section 15A
NCAC 13B).
6. The'Permittee shall control the management and disposal of litter and sanitary waste from
the site such that no adverse impacts to water quality occur.
Page 4 of 20 Pages

Permit No. NCGO10000
SECTION B: MINIMUM MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Minimum monitoring and reporting requirements are as follows unless otherwise approved in
writing by the Director of the Division of Water Quality.
1. All erosion and sedimentation control facilities shall be inspected by or under the
direction of the permittee at least once every seven calendar days (at least twice every
seven days for those facilities discharging to waters of the State listed on the latest EPA
approved 303(d) list for construction related indicators of impairment such as turbidity or
sedimentation**) and within 24 hours after any storm event of greater that 0.5 inches of
rain per 24 hour period. A rain gauge shall be maintained on the site and a record of the
rainfall amounts and dates shall be kept by the permittee.
(** The latest approved list may be obtained from the Division of Water Quality, or from
the following website location: http✓/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/construction303d)
2. Once land disturbance has begun on the site, stormwater runoff discharges shall be
inspected by observation for stormwater discharge characteristics as defined below at the
frequency in #1 above to evaluate the effectiveness of the pollution control facilities or
practices. If any visible sedimentation is leaving the disturbed limits of the site,
corrective action shall be taken immediately to control the discharge of sediments outside
the disturbed limits.
Stormwater Discharge
Characteristics
Monitoring
T el
Monitoring
Loeation2
Clarity
SDO
Floating Solids
SDO
Suspended Solids
SDO
Oil Sheen
SDO
Other obvious indicators
of stormwater pollution
SDO
Footnotes:
1 Monitoring Type: The monitoring requires a qualitative observation of each
stormwater outfall. No analytical testing or sampling is required.
2 Sample Location: Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
The operator shall keep a record of inspections. Visible sedimentation found outside of
the disturbed limits shall be recorded and a brief explanation kept with the records as to
the measures taken to control future releases. Any measures taken to clean up the
sediment that has left the disturbed limits shall also be recorded. These records shall be
-made available to DWQ or authorized agent upon request.
Page 5 of 20 Pages

Permit No. NCGO10000
SECTION C: SCHEDULE OF COMPLIANCE
1. The permittee shall comply with Final Limitations and Controls -specified for stormwater
discharges once disturbance has begun on the site and until completion of construction or
development and the establishment of a permanent ground cover..
2. During construction and until the completion of a construction or development and the
establishment of a permanent ground cover, the permittee shall provide the operation and
maintenance necessary to operate the storm water controls at optimum efficiency.
Page 6 of 20 Pages

Permit No. NCGO10000
PART II
STANDARD CONDITIONS
SECTION A: DEFINTTIONS
1. Act or "the Act" or CWA
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Clean Water Act, as
amended, 33 USC 1251, et. seq.
2. Best Management Practices (BMPs)
Schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures, -and other
management practices to prevent or reduce the pollution of waters of the United States.
BMPs also include treatment requirements, operation procedures, and practices to control
plant site runoff, spillage or leaks, sludge or waste disposal, or drainage from raw
material storage.
3. DWO or Division
The Division of Water Quality, Department of Environment, and Natural Resources.
4. Director
The Director of the Division of Water Quality, the permit issuing authority.
5. EMC
The North Carolina Environmental Management Commission.
6. Permittee
The person who signed as the financially responsible party on the Erosion and
Sedimentation Control Plan.
7. Point Source Discharge
Any discernible, confined and discrete conveyance, including but specifically not limited
to, any pipe, ditch,channel, tunnel, conduit, well, discrete fissure, container; rolling stock,
or concentrated animal feeding operation from which pollutants are or may be discharged
to waters of the state.
8. Administrator
Page 7 of 20 Pages

Permit No. NCGO10000
The Adminstrator of the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.
SECTION B: GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. Duty to ComAly.
The permittee must comply with all conditions of this general permit. Any permit
noncompliance constitutes a violation of the Clean Water Act and is grounds for:
enforcement action; certificate of coverage termination, revocation and reissuance, or
modification; or denial of a certificate of coverage upon renewal application.
(a) The permittee shall comply with effluent standards or prohibitions established under
section 307(a) of the Clean Water Act for toxic pollutants and with standards for sewage
sludge use or disposal established under section 405(d) of the CWA within the time
provided in the regulations that establish these standards or prohibitions or standards for
sewage sludge use or disposal, even if the permit has not yet been modified to incorporate
the requirement.
(b) The Clean Water Act provides that any person who violates section 301, 302, 306,
307, 308, 318 or 405 of the Act, or any permit condition or limitation implementing any
such sections in a permit issued under section 402, or any requirement imposed in a
pretreatment program approved under sections 402(a)(3) or 402(b)(8) of the Act, is
subject to a civil penalty not. to exceed $27,000per day for each violation. The Clean
Water Act provides that -any person who negligently violates sections 301, 302, 306, 307,'
308, 318, or 405 of the Act, or any condition or limitation implementing any of such
sections in a permit issued under section 402 of the Act, or any requirement imposed in a
pretreatment program approved under section 402(a)(3) or 402(b)(8) of the Act, is subject
to criminal penalties of $2,560 to $25,000 per day of violation, or imprisonment of not
more than 1 year, or both. In the case of a second or subsequent conviction for a
negligent violation, a person shall be subject to criminal penalties of not more than
$50,000 per day of violation, or by imprisonment of not more than 2 years, or both. Any
person who knowingly violates such sections, or such conditions or Iimitations is subject
to criminal penalties of $5,000 to $50,000 per day of violation, or imprisonment for not
more than 3 years, or both. In the case of a second or subsequent conviction for a
knowing violation, a person shall be subject to criminal penalties of not more than
$100,000 per day of violation, or imprisonment of not more than 6 years,. or both. Any
person who knowingly violates section 301, 302, 303, 306, 307, 308, 319 or 405 of the
Act, or any permit condition or limitation implementing any of such sections in a permit
issued under section 402 of the Act, and who knows at that time that he thereby places
another person in imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury, shall, upon
conviction, be subject to a fine of not more than $250,000 or imprisonment of not more
than 15 years, or both. In the case of a second or subsequent conviction for a knowing
endangerment violation, a person shall be subject to a fine of not more than $500,000 or
by imprisonment of not more than 30 years, or both. An organization, as defined in
section 309(e)(3)(B)(iii) of the CWA, shall, upon conviction of violating the imminent
danger provision, be subject to a fine of not more than $1,000,000 and can be fined up to
$2,000,000 for second or subsequent convictions.
Page 8 of 20 Pages

Permit No. NCGOIOOOC
(c) Under state law, a daily civil penalty of not more than ten thousand dollars
($10,000) per violation may be assessed against any person who violates or fails to act in
accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit. [Ref: NC General
Statutes 143-215.6A].
(d) Any person may be assessed an administrative penalty by the Administrator for
violating section 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318 or 405 of this Act, or any permit condition
or limitation implementing any of such sections in a permit issued under section 402 of
this Act. Administrative penalties for Class I violations are not to exceed $11,000 per
violation, with the maximum amount of any Class I penalty assessed not to exceed
$27,500. Penalties for Class If violations are not to exceed $11,000 per day for each day
during which the violation continues, with the maximum amount of any Class R penalty
not to exceed $137,500.
2. Duty to Mitigate
The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge in
violation of this general permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting
human health or the environment.
3. Civil and Criminal Liability
Except as provided in Section C. of this permit regarding bypassing of stormwater'control
facilities, nothing in this general permit shall be construed to relieve the permittee from
any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties for noncompliance pursuant to NCGS 143-
215.3, 143-215.6A, 143-215.6B, 143-215.6C or Section 309 of the Federal Act, 33 USC
1319. Furthermore, the permittee is responsible for consequential damages, such as fish
kills, even though the responsibility for effective compliance may be temporarily
suspended.
4. Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability
Nothing in this general permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal
action or relieve the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties to which
the permittee is or may be subject to under NCGS 143-215.75 et seq. or Section 311 of the
Federal Act, 33 USC 1321. Furthermore, the permittee is responsible for consequential
damages, such as fish kills, even though the responsibility for effective compliance may
be temporarily suspended.
5. Property Rights
The issuance of this general permit does not convey any property rights in either real or
personal property, or any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private
property or any invasion of personal rights, nor any infringement of Federal, State or local
laws or regulations.
Page 9 of 20 Pages

Permit No. NCGO10000
A
7.
a
Severability
The provisions of this general permit are severable, and if any provision of this general
permit, or the application of any provision of this general permit to any circumstances, is
held invalid, the- application of such 'piovision to other circumstances, and the remainder
of this general permit, shall not be affected thereby.
Duty to Provide Information
The permittee shall furnish to the Director, within a reasonable time, any information
which the Director may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying,
revoking and reissuing, or terminating the certificate of coverage issued pursuant to this
general permit or to determine compliance with this general permit. The permittee shall
also furnish to the Director upon request, copies of records required to be kept by this
general permit.
When an Individual Permit ma by a Required
The Director may require any owner/operator authorized to discharge under a certificate
of coverage issued pursuant to this general permit to apply for and obtain an individual
permit or an alternative general permit. Any interested person may petition the Director
to require an individual permit pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0127. Cases where an
individual permit may be required include, but are not limited to, the following:
a. The discharger is a significant contributor of pollutants;
b. Conditions at the permitted site change, altering the constituents and/or
characteristics of the discharge such that the discharge no longer qualifies for a
General Permit;
C. The discharge violates the terms or conditions of this general permit;
d. A change has occurred in the availability of demonstrated technology or practices
for the control or abatement of pollutants applicable to the point source;
e. Effluent limitations are promulgated for the point sources covered by this general
permit;
f. A water quality management plan containing requirements applicable to such
point sources is approved after the issuance of this general permit.
g. The Director determines at his own discretion that an individual permit is
required.
When an Individual Pennit may be Requested
Page 10 of 20 Pages

Permit No. NCGO10000
Any permittee operating under this general permit may request to be excluded from the
coverage of this general permit by applying for an individual permit. When an individual
permit is issued to an owner/operator the applicability of this general permit is
automatically terminated on the effective date of the individual permit.
10. Signatory Requirements
a. All applications, reports, or information submitted to the Director shall be signed and
certified as follows:
(1) For a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer. For the purpose of this
Section, a responsible corporate officer means: (a) a president, secretary, treasurer
or vice president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or
any other person who performs similar policy or decision making functions for the
corporation, or (b) the manager of one or more manufacturing production or
operating facilities provided the manager is authorized to make management
decisions which govern the operation of the regulated facility including having the
explicit or implicit duty of making major capital investment recommendations,
and initiating and directing other comprehensive measures to assure long term
environmental compliance with environmental laws and regulations; the manager
can ensure that the necessary systems established or actions taken to gather
complete, and accurate information for permit application requirements; and where
authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in
accordance with corporate procedures.
(2) For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor,
respectively; or
(3) For a municipality, State, Federal, or other public agency: by either a principal
executive officer or ranking elected official.
b. All reports required by the general permit and other information requested by the Director
shall be signed by a person described above or by a duly authorized representative of that
person. A person is a duly authorized representative only if:
(1) The authorization is made in writing by a person described above;
(2) The authorization specified either an individual or a position having responsibility
for the overall operation of the regulated facility or activity, such as the position
of plant manager, operator of a well or well field, superintendent, a position of
equivalent responsibility, or an individual or position having overall responsibility
for environmental matters for the company. (A duly authorized representative may
thus be either a named individual or any individual occupying a named position.);
and
(3) The written authorization is submitted to the Director.
Page 11 of 20 Pages

Permit No. NCGO10000
Any person signing a document under paragraphs a. or b. of this section shall make the
following certification:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were
prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system• designed
to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information
submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system,
or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the
information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing
violations."
11. General Permit Modification Revocation and Reissuance or Termination
The issuance of this general permit does not prohibit the Director from reopening and
modifying the general permit, revoking and reissuing the general permit, or terminating
the general permit as allowed by the laws, rules, and regulations contained in Title 40,
Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 122 and 123; Title 15A of the North Carolina
Administrative Code, Subchapter 2H .0100; and North Carolina General Statute 143-
215.1 et. seq.
Page 12 of 20 Pages

Permit No. NCGO10000
SECTION C: OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF POLLUTION CONTROLS
1. Proper Operation and Maintenance,
The permittee shall at all 'times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of
treatment and control (and related appurtenances) which are installed or used by the
permit tee to achieve compliance with the conditions of this general permit.
2. Need to Halt or Reduce not a Defense
It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been
necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the
condition of this general permit.
3. Bypassing of Stormwater Control Facilities
a. Definitions
(1) "Bypass" means the intentional diversion of stormwater from any portion of a
stormwater control facility including:. the collection system, which is not a
designed -or established or operating mode for the facility.
(2) "Severe property damage" means substantial , physical damage to property,
damage to the control facilities which causes them to become inoperable, or
substantial and permanent loss of natural resources which can reasonably be
expected to occur in the absence of a bypass.- Severe property.damage does not
mean economic loss caused by delays in production.
b. Bypass Not Exceeding Limitations.
The permittee may allow any bypass to occur which does not cause effluent limitations to
be exceeded, but only if it also is for essential maintenance to assure efficient operation.
These bypasses are not subject to the provisions of Paragraphs c. and d_ of this. section.
C. Notice
(1) Anticipated bypass. If the permittee knows in advance of the need for a bypass, it
shall submit prior notice, if possible at least ten days before the date of the bypass;
including an evaluation of the anticipated quality and effect of the bypass.
(2) Unanticipated bypass. The permittee shall submit notice within 24 hours of an
unanticipated bypass as required in Part H, E. I(b)(1) of this general permit. (24-
hour notice).
d. Prohibition of Bypass
Page 13 of 20 Pages

Permit No. NCG010000
Bypass is prohibited and the Director may take enforcement action against a permittee
for bypass, unless:
(1) Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury or severe property
damage;
(2) There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such as the use of auxiliary
control facilities, retention of stormwater or maintenance during normal periods of
equipment downtime or dry weather. This condition is not satisfied- if adequate
backup controls should have been installed in the exercise of reasonable
engineering judgment to prevent a bypass which occurred during normal periods
of equipment downtime or preventive maintenance; and
(3) The permittee submitted notices as required under Paragraph c. of this section.
The Director may approve an anticipated bypass, after considering its adverse effects, if
the Director determines that it will meet the three conditions listed above in Paragraph d.
of this section.
4. Upsets
a. Definition
"Upset " means an exceptional incident in which there is unintentional and temporary
noncompliance with technology based permit effluent limitations because of factors
beyond the reasonable control of the permittee. An upset does not include
noncompliance to the extent caused by operational error, improperly designed treatment
or control facilities, inadequate treatment or control facilities, lack of preventive
maintenance, or careless or improper operation.
b. Effect of an Upset.
An upset constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with
technology based permit effluent limitations if the requirements of paragraph c. of this
condition are met. No determination made during administrative review of claims that
noncompliance was caused by upset, and before an action for noncompliance, is final
administrative action subject to judicial review.
Conditions Necessary for a Demonstration of Upset
A permittee who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset shall demonstrate,
through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that:
(1) An upset occurred and that the permittee can identify the causes) of the upset;
2) . The permitted facility was at the time being properly operated; and
Page 14 of 20 Pages

Permit No. NCG01000(
(3) The permittee submitted notice of the upset as required in Part II, E. 3. (b) (2) of
this general permit.
(4) The permittee complied with any remedial measures required under Part II, A. 2.
of this general permit.
d. Burden of Proof
In any enforcement proceeding the permittee seeking to establish the occurrence of an
upset has the burden of proof.
Page 15 of 20 Pages

Permit No. NCGO10000
SECTION D: MONITORING AND RECORDS
1. Representative Sampling
Samples collected and measurements taken, as required herein, shall be characteristic of
the volume and nature of the permitted discharge. Samples shall be taken on a day and
time that is characteristic of the discharge. All samples shall be taken before the
discharge joins or is diluted by any other waste stream, body of water, or substance. .
2. Penalties for Tampering
The Clean Water Act provides that any person who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly
renders inaccurate, any monitoring device or method required to be maintained under this
general permit shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 per
violation, or by imprisonment for not more than two years per violation, or by both. 'If a
conviction of a person is for a violation committed after a first conviction of such person
under this paragraph, punishment is a fine of not more that $20,000 per day of violation,
or by imprisonment of not more than 4 years, or both.
3. Records Retention
The permittee shall retain records of all monitoring information and copies of all reports
required by this general permit, for a period of at least 5 years from the date of the
sample, measurement, report or application. This period may be extended by request of
the Director at any time.
4. Recording Results
For each measurement, sample, inspection or maintenance activity performed or taken
pursuant to the requirements of this general permit, the pernuttee shall record the
following information:
a. The date, exact place, and time of sampling, measurements, inspection or
maintenance activity;
b. The individual(s) who performed the sampling, measurements, inspection or
maintenance activity;
C. The date(s) analyses were performed;
d. The individual(s) who performed the analyses;
e. The analytical techniques or methods used; and
f. The results of such analyses.
Page 16 of 20 Pages

Permit No. NCGO10000
5. Inspection and Entry
The permittee shall allow the Director, or an authorized representative (including an
authorized contractor acting as a representative of the Director), or in the. case of a facility
which discharges through a municipal separate storm sewer system, an authorized
representative of a municipal operator or the separate storm sewer system receiving the
discharge, upon the presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required
by law, to;
a. Enter upon the permittee's premises where a regulated facility or activity is located
or conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this general
permit;
b. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under
the conditions of this general permit;
C. Inspect at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and
control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this
general permit; and
d. Sample or monitor at reasonable times, for the purposes of assuring general
permit compliance or as otherwise authorized by the Clean Water Act, any
substances or parameters at any location.
Page 17 of 20 Pages

Permit No. NCGO10000
SECTION E: REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Planned Changes
The permittee shall give notice to the Director as soon as possible of any planned
physical alterations or additions to the permitted facility. Notice is required only when:
a. The alteration or addition to a permitted facility may meet one of the criteria for
determining whether a facility is a new source in 40 CFR Part 122.29 (b); or
b. The alteration or addition could significantly change the nature or increase the
quantity of pollutants discharged. This notification applies to pollutants which are
subject neither to effluent limitations in the general permit, nor to notification
requirements under 40 CFR Part 122.42 (a) (1).
2. Anticipated Noncompliance
The permittee shall give advance notice to the Director of any planned changes in the
permitted facility or activity which may result in noncompliance with the general permit
requirements.
3.. Twenty-four Hour Reporting
a. The permittee shall report to the central office or the appropriate regional office any
noncompliance which may endanger health or the environment. Any information shall be
provided orally within 24 hours from the time the permittee became aware of the
circumstances. A written submission shall also be provided within 5 days of the time the
permittee becomes aware of the circumstances.
The written submission shall contain a description of the noncompliance, and its causes;
the period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times, and if the noncompliance
has not been corrected, the anticipated time it is expected to continue; and steps taken or
planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent- reoccurrence of the noncompliance.
b. The following shall be included as information which must be reported within 24 hours
under this paragraph:
(1) Any unanticipated bypass which exceeds any effluent limitation in the general
permit.
(2) Any upset which exceeds any effluent limitation in the general permit.
(3) Violation of a maximum daily discharge limitation for any of the pollutants listed
by the Director in the general permit to be reported within 24 hours.
Page 18 of 20 Pages

Permit No. NCGOl0000
N
The Director may waive the written report on a case -by -case basis for reports under
paragraph b. above of this condition if the oral report has been received within 24 hours.
Other Information
Where the permittee becomes aware that it failed to submit any relevant facts in any
report to the Director, it shall promptly submit such facts or information.
Availability of Reports
Except for data determined to be confidential under NCGS 143-215.3(a)(2) or Section
308 of the Federal Act, 33 USC 1318, all reports prepared in accordance with the terms
shall be available for public inspection at the offices of the Division of Water Quality. As
required by the Act, discharge data shall not be considered confidential. Knowingly
making any false statement. on any such report may result in the imposition of criminal
penalties as provided for in NCGS 143-215.613 or in Section 309 of the Federal Act.
Penalties for Falsification of Reports
The Clean Water Act provides that any person who knowingly makes any false statement,
representation, or certification in any record or other document submitted or required to.
be maintained under this' general permit, including monitoring reports or reports of
compliance or noncompliance shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more
than $10,000 per violation, or by imprisonment for not more than two years per violation,
or by both.
Page 19 of 20 Pages

Permit No. NCGO10000
SECTION F: LIMITATIONS REOPENER
This general permit shall be modified or alternatively, revoked and reissued, to comply with any
applicable effluent guideline or water quality standard issued or approved under Sections 302(b)
(2) (c), and (d), 304(b) (2) and 307(a) of the Clean Water Act, if the effluent guideline or water
quality standard so issued or approved:
a. contains different conditions or is otherwise more stringent than any effluent
Iimitation in the general permit; or
b. controls any pollutant not limited in the general permit.
The general permit as modified or reissued under this paragraph shall also contain any other
requirements in the Act then applicable.
Page 20 of 20 Pages

-; NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director .
February 11, 2009
EARL WELLS — VICE PRESIDENT
ALLENS, INC.
POST OFFICE BOX 250
SILOAM SPRINGS, ARKANSAS 72761
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: Application No. WQ0004268
Additional Information Request
Allens, Inc. = Plant #7
Wastewater Treatment and
Spray Irrigation System
Sampson County
Dear Mr. Wells:
The Central and Regional Aquifer Protection Section's Express Reviewers have completed their review
of the additional information package submitted January 28, 2009. Additional information is required
before we may complete our review. Please address the following items no later than the close of
business on February 25, 2009. ,
Please be aware that you are responsible for meeting all requirements set forth in North Carolina rules and
regulations. Any oversights that occurred in the review of the subject application package are still the
responsibility of the applicant. In addition, any omissions made in responding to the above items shall
result in future requests for additional information.
Please reference the subject application number when providing the requested information. All -revised
and/or additional documentation shall be signed, sealed and dated, with two (2) copies submitted to
Nathaniel Thornburg at the address below, one (1) copy submitted to Rich Hayes in the Raleigh Regional
Office, and one (1) copy submitted to Randy Sipe in the Washington Regional Office. Please note that_
failure to provide this additional information on or before the above requested date may result in your
application being returned as incomplete.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
Nathaniel D. Thornburg
Environmental Engineer II
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX 1: 9197715-0588; FAX 2: 919-715, 60481 Customer Service:1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterouality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
One
NofthCarolina
NatarallY

Mr. Earl Wells
FE'ruary 11, 2009
Page 2 of 11
cc: Rich Hayes, LSS — Raleigh Regional Office; Aquifer Protection Section
Randy Sipe — Washington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Gary S. MacConnell, PE — MacConnell & Associates, PC
G. Christopher Murray, LSS — Soil & Environmental Consultants,-P.A.
Eric G. Lappala, PE — Eagle Resources, P.A.
Mark Allen, LSS — Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
Permit Application File WQ0004268

Mr. Earl Wells
February11, 2009
Page 3 of 11
General Notes:
1. Upon submittal of the additional information prior to the close of business on Wednesday, February
25`h, please submit a check made payable to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources in
the amount of $1,122. Failure to provide this check by 5:00 pm on February 25`h shall result in the
immediate return of the.applicatioii package. Failure to provide all requested additional information
items shall result in an automatic additional information request and associated fee.
2. When providing additional. information responses to the Division, please provide a response letter
addressing each comment and provide a reference as to the location of the requested information in
the updated application package.
Application
1. Item I(1) lists the Applicant's name as Aliens, Inc. Since the Permittee's name has changed from
Allen Canning Company to Allens, Inc. since the last permit issuance, please submit a properly
completed Permit Name Change Application, which may be downloaded at-
http://www.ncwaterqualiiy.org/lau/docuinents/PNOCF09-06.pdf.
2. Amend Item II(3) to state that the facility is existing.
3. Amend Item II(4) to state the facility is using private lands:
4. Amend Item II(5) to include the submittal date'for the erosion and sedimentation control plan, and the
submittal and approval dates for the Nationwide 12/404 general permit.
5. Amend Item III(5) to include the estimated influent concentrations for the listed parameters. In
addition, amend the table to include the average effluent concentration data provided. In the case of
total suspended solids and fecal coliforms, if historical data is not available, provide anticipated
designed effluent concentrations for these parameters. Please ensure the effluent concentration data is
consistent with the nutrient data used in the Agronomic Calculations.
a
6: Amend the table in Application Item IV(2) to include the actual most restrictive setback distances
(i.e., field measured) from the irrigation system and treatment/storage units to the listed setback
parameters. If an actual setback is greater than 500 feet it shall be marked N/A. Please note per 15A
NCAC 02T .0504(d)(3), each of these actual most restrictive setback distances shall be shown on the
site map unless.they are greater than 500 feet.
7. Amend Item V(2)(a) to include the stationary screen opening dimensions (i.e., spacings). In addition,
also amend. this item to include: two (2) screw presses, two (2) auger conveyors and a hopper, as well
as any of their associated mechanical equipment.
8. Amend Item V(2)(f) to include the information for the return pump supplying the gutter flush line.
9. Amend Item V(2)(i) to include the flow meter used in the field irrigation wet well.
10. Amend Section VI to include the relevant information regarding the gutter flush storage tank.

Mr.,Earl Wells
February 11, 2009
Page 4 of 11
Application (continued):
11. The recommended annual loading rates listed in Item VII(7) are actually drainage rates back -
calculated from the hydraulic conductivity (KsAT) tests determined in the Soils Evaluation. Based on
the Licensed Soil Scientists professional opinion, amend Item VII(7) and the Soils Evaluation to
include recommended maximum annual loading rates for each of the three soil series.
In addition, please amend the table in Item VII(7) to show which fields have the most dominant -soil .
series. Also, if a field has minor inclusions of another soil series, please include that field in
parenthesis.
12. The Design Annual Loading Rates (in/yr) listed in Item VII(10)(a) do not match the loading rates
used in the Hydrogeologic Report, Water Balance and Agronomic Report. Please revise as necessary
to provide consistent numbers throughout the application package.
13. Revise Application Item VII(11) to indicate the required irrigation area based upon the nitrogen and
phosphorus balances. In addition, the cover crop information, the nitrogen removal rate, and the
phosphorus removal rate must be listed for the most limiting soil,type.for each soil map unit.
Existing Permit:
l . Please provide a table that includes the name, acreage, instantaneous and annual loading rates,
latitude, longitude and nearest downstream waterbody for each irrigation field. In -addition, existing
permit conditions II.7. and II.8. mention annual and seasonal loading rates, and conditions II.9. and
II.10. include PAN loading -rates for sites A, B and C. Which fields have annual or seasonal loading
rates? Does site D have a PAN loading rate?
Please note this information is not due atAhe February 25th deadline, however, these issues will need
to be addressed prior to issuance of this permit modification.
Property Ownership Documentation:
1. Please provide written documentation from the North Carolina Department of Transportation
allowing an easement for the wastewater effluent force main to cross Rowan Road (SR 1924).
2. Provide written documentation (i.e., copies of the recorded documents) allowing a minimum 5 foot
permanent sewer easement for the force main construction and operation in the following properties:
Owners: Milton D. & Connie Carr Sampson County. PID: 12098056007
Owners: James D. & Nyda W. Sutton Sampson County PID: 18023244006
Each written easement shall be notarized, signed by all property owners and `recorded in the Sampson
County Register of Deeds.
Analysis of Wastewater:
Please verify -that the tabular effluent data provided in the application was analyzed by a Division
certified laboratory. Copies of the laboratory data sheets shall suffice. In addition, Application
Instruction I and 15A NCAC 02T .0504(h) require that the following parameters also be tested: Total
Organic Carbon; Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD); pH; Chloride; Phenol; Total Volatile Organic
Compounds; Fecal Coliform; and Sodium Adsorption Ration (SAR).

Mr.,Earl Wells
February 1.1, 2009
Page 5 of 11
Soil Evaluation:
1. Revise the soil map to remove.the clayey soil area in Zone 18 from the Tarboro/Kalmia map unit.
2. See Application Question #11.
Plan Sheet C-107 shows an existing -farm road in Zones 16, 17,.18a and 18b that is to be abandoned.
Amend the Soil Evaluation to include any necessary rehabilitation or reconstruction needed to remove
compaction from the existing farm road, such that the proposed irrigation rates will not cause ponding
or runoff in these areas. Please also ensure the plans. and specifications have been modified to include
any rehabilitation/recbnstruction work done on the existing farm road soils. Please note the permit
may include a condition requiring a soil scientist to reevaluate these areas to ensure -proper irrigation
rates have been set.
Water Balance:
1. Since the facility's permitted flow capacity is not increasing and/or spray irrigation area is not
decreasing, the Division performed a cursory review of the submitted water balance, and is not
approving or disapproving the methodology and results contained therein. When a future permit
modification is submitted to increase the permitted flow capacity, please ensure the water balance
meets the requirements in Application Instruction K, Rule 15A NCAC 02T .0504(k) and the Aquifer
Protection Section's Water Balance Calculation Policy located at the following web address:
http://www.ncwateMuali .org/lau/documents/WaterBalanceCalculationPolicy.pdf.
Agronomist Evaluation:
1. The Annual Hydraulic Loading Rate (in/yr) used in the agronomic calculations do not match the
loading rates listed in Application Item VII(10)(a). Please revise as necessary to provide consistent
numbers throughout the application package.
2. Revise the agronomy report to provide agronomic calculations for the most limiting soil in each map
unit. This will require separate calculations on Wagram (Norfolk/Wagram unit), Noboco
(Goldsboro/Noboco unit), and Tarboro (Tarboro/Kalmia unit) soils. Using the realistic yield
expectation (RYE) for the most favorable soil in each map unit could result in over'application of
nitrogen and phosphorus in the areas of less productive soils. Be sure to use the decreased wetted
acreage in Zone 18 when revising the calculations.
3. The submitted soil analyses show the proposed irrigation fields have pH levels from 4.7 to 5.4, Which
are at levels not ideal for microbial uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, etc. Accordingly, the
soil analysis results recommend the addition of 0.8 tons of lime per acre to field sample F-1 and 1.3
tons of lime per acre to field sample W-2 to increase the field pH. Amend the agronomist report to
,include the recommendation of adding lime to the proposed spray irrigation fields, and please ensure
the plans, specifications and operation and maintenance manual include the liming recommendations.

Mr. Earl Wells
February 11, 2009
Page 6 of 11
Agronomist Evaluation (continued):
4. In order to utilize the winter mineralization rate of 0.17, the Applicant shall demonstrate to the
Division the validity of this value. At a minimum, the Applicant shall provide written justification for
using this methodology and shall cite and include the referenced materials on Page 4 of the
Agronomist Report. These materials include:
➢ The USDA Sampson County Soil Survey average daily temperatures (Note: The Division would
prefer the Applicant be consistent and use the water balance temperature from January 1936 to
December 2007);
➢ The 1987 Doran and Smith reference suggesting soil microbial activity is dependent upon soil
temperature; and
➢ The 1999 Brady and Weil reference suggesting surface soil temperatures vary with atmospheric.
temperature.
The Division also recommends the Applicant provide a monthly analysis (for October through
February) of mineralization rates based on the above referenced materials. Using each monthly
mineralization rate, the Applicant shall determine the most conservative mineralization rate. If the
most conservative mineralization rate is not selected, then the winter PAN application shall be'broken
down into smaller time frames to account for varying mineralization rates. In addition, the Division
agrees that remnant organic nitrogen needs to be accounted for in the summer PAN or possibly
through an iterative process in the winter, if variable winter PAN mineralization rates are selected.
Hydrogeologic Report:
1. Please revise Figures 1 and 4 to show the existing irrigation pond observed during the site visit east of
irrigation zones 2 and 3. Does the presence of this pond affect the calibration of the model and the
results of the mounding analysis?
2. Existing water wells WW-1 through WW-5 have been identified in the vicinity of the site and are
discussed in the report text and shown in Table 1; however, Figures 1 and 4 do not show the location
of well WW-2. Please revise the figures to show the locations of all five wells.
The values for annual precipitation and evapotranspiration (ET) used to calibrate the groundwater
flow model are different that those used in the water balance. Why is there a discrepancy between the
two sets of values,and does this discrepancy affect the validity of the model and/or the water balance?
Also, the amount of precipitation used for the 801h percentile annual precipitation in the mounding
analysis is not given. What was this value and is it consistent with the corresponding value used in
the water balance?
4. In the discussion of boundary conditions used in the groundwater flow model on page 15 of the
report, it is mentioned that drain boundary conditions were assigned to the entire upper surface of the
model (ground surface) allowing the site to drain if the water table intercepts the land surface. Please
expand the report to discuss whether or not during the mounding analysis the water table was
observed to intercept the land surface within the compliance boundary in areas other that existing
surface water features and existing or proposed drainage features.
5. Monitoring wells R-2 and R-3 are located essentially at the edge of the delineated wetlands around
irrigation zone 18. If groundwater contamination is detected in these wells what will be the
applicant's plan of action to address this situation, given the presence of the wetlands between the
wells and the compliance boundary?

Mr. Earl Wells
February 11, 2009
Page 7 of 11
Hydrogeologic Report (continued):
The results of background groundwater quality analyses performed at the site presented in Table 12
indicate that the 2L groundwater quality standard for nitrate was exceeded in monitoring well R-8,
which appears to be in an upgradient location at the site, based on the groundwater flow contours
shown on Figure 4. Given that upgradient groundwater quality already exceeds 2L standards at the
site, how does the applicant propose to evaluate groundwater quality in the monitoring wells during
the operation of the spray fields so that any impacts to groundwater quality from the fields can be
detected?
Detailed Plans:
➢ Screening Facility Plan Sheets
Sheets C-101 and C-102 show a return storage tank, return pump and a gutter flush line returning
back to the processing plant. Please note this operation is not a reuse, but a closed -loop recycle
system under Section .1000 of Subchapter 02T. In order to permit this operation, the following
items need to be addressed:
a. The application package states this recycle water is used to flush gutters. Please explain what
these gutters are (function, material of construction, location, etc.) and whether or not they
drain back to the screening facility. Also, is the recycle water proposed for any other uses?
b. Is the screening facility open to the atmosphere (i.e., is it housed or roofed) and have the
potential to receive precipitation and/or stormwater?
If the screening facility is not housed or roofed, then the proposed closed -loop recycle system will
require its own permit under Section .1000 of Subchapter 02T. If this is the case, all mention of
the closed -loop recycle system shall be removed from this application anda. new application shall
be submitted using the following form: http://www.ncwaterqualiiy.org/lau/documents/CLRS12-
06.doc.
If the screening facility 'is covered or housed, such that precipitation and/or stormwater cannot
enter the wastewater stream, then the proposed closed -loop operation may be deemed permitted
under 15A NCAC 02T .I003(a)(1) and thus included in this non -discharge permit (WQ0004268).
2. Plan Sheets C-101 and C-102, as well as aerial imagery show a railroad crossing the Allens, Inc.
property, as well as a spur near the processing plant. If the railroad and/or spur are not
exclusively owned and operated by Allens, Inc., the Applicant shall submit written -
documentation from the railroad owner allowing an easement for the wastewater influent line and
recycle gutter flush line to cross the railroad and spur.
If an easement has been previously granted for crossing these rail lines, please provide. In
addition, provide written documentation from the railroad owner stating they are aware that new
construction activities will be occurring underneath these two rail lines (unless new construction
is already covered under an existing easement agreement).
3. Amend the plans to include a cross sectional detail of the proposed railroad crossings.
4. -Please clarify whether or not the existing screening facility is to be abandoned. If so, provide a
list of all equipment listed in the current permit description that is to be abandoned.

Mr.,Earl Wells
February 11, 2009
Page 8 of 1 1
Detailed Plans (continued):
5. Please amend Sheet C-102 to show the location of the applicable details specified on Sheet C-
104.
➢ Force Main and Irrigation Plan Sheets
1. See -Soil Evaluation Question #3.
2. See Agronomist Evaluation Question #4.
3. Amend the plans to include a cross -sectional detail of the proposed wetlands crossings in
Wetlands A, B, C, E and G. If all crossings are identical, a general cross section is acceptable.
4. Amend the plans to include a cross -sectional detail of the proposed Rowan Road (SR 1924)
crossing.
5. Amend the plans to include a generic detail of the "proposed 12' spray access" road crossings.
6. Amend the plans to include details for the spray field fencing and signage, as well as the location
of the fencing and signage on the irrigation plan sheets.
7. Revise Plan Sheet C-105 to include the following:
a. The pond north of Zone 7;
b. The location of the old well south of Zone 3a; and
c. The location of the inhabited residence and well north of Zone. 10.
Each of these changes shall be determined if the required setbacks have been maintained.
8. The provided e-mail message from the Fayetteville Regional Office's Surface Water Protection
Section approving the use of a subsurface groundwater lowering drain in irrigation zone 18 stated
that this approval was given with the understanding that the outlet of this drain would be located
some distance from the wetland boundary. The outlet for the drain shown on Sheet C-107 is only
approximately 20 feet from the wetland boundary. Is this location consistent with the approval
given by the Surface Water Protection Section regional office?
9. Provide a detail of this proposed energy dissipater. Please note the permit will likely require
regularly scheduled grab samples be taken from this discharge pipe, therefore ensure the .
discharge pipe is designed appropriately.
10. Revise Plan Sheets C-107 and C-113 to remove irrigation in the location of the clayey soil at the
extreme northwest part of Zone 18. The soil in this area cannot be irrigated. at the same rate as the
rest of Zone 18. In order to permit irrigation in this area more detailed soils information will be
required. Amend the application and engineering calculations as necessary.
11. Amend Plan Sheets C-105, C-106 and C-107 to include the exiting ditch extending north -south
through the site between irrigation zones 10, 11, 12, and 13 on the west and zones 14, 15, and 16
on the east.

Mr. F-arl Wells
February 11, 2009
Page 9 of 11
Detailed Plans (continued):
12. The groundwater lowering drain trench detail on Detail 2 of Sheet D-102 shows a filter fabric to
be placed around the aggregate surrounding the drain pipe. The Division is concerned that if this
filter fabric becomes clogged, the effectiveness of the drain will be reduced. The Division
recommends this fabric be removed from the design, unless the engineer can prove that the drain
will continue to operate in the manner depicted in the model simulation performed by the
hydrogeologist if the fabric becomes clogged.
13. During the site visit an approximately 6-inch diameter PVC pipe was observed in the existing
ditch east of irrigation zones 5 and 6, near monitoring well R-6. The extent of the pipe that
crosses the ditch should be determined, as well as its purpose. If the pipe is to remain in place
during operation of the irrigation -fields, its location and extent should be shown on the detailed
plans.
Site Map:
Per Application Instruction O, provide four (4) standard size stand alone (i.e., separate from the plan
set) copies and two (2) 11 by 17-inch stand alone copies of the site map.
2. Per Application Instruction O and Rule 15A NCAC 2T .0504(d), ensure the site map to includes the
following. information:
a. The location of all wells, streams, springs, lakes, ponds, and other surface drainage features
within 500 feet of all waste treatment, storage and disposal sites. If monitoring wells are
proposed, amend the site map to show their location on the review boundary.
b. The compliance and review boundaries for the irrigation fields.
c. Actual most restrictive setbacks as required by 15A NCAC 02T .0506, and -as listed in
Application Item IV(2).
d. Show the location of all property boundaries within 500 feet of the wastewater treatment and
disposal sites.
e. All habitable residences or places of public assembly within 500 feet of all waste treatment,
storage and disposal sites.
f. Revise the irrigation areas depending upon the comments in the Detailed Plans section above.
3. Due to the size of the project, the Division recommends providing two (2) separate site maps, and
each map shall include the above required information within 500 feet -of these 'specified facilities.
Each map shall contain the following:
a. Site Map 1 — Wastewater Screening Facility, Closed -Loop Recycle Facility (if applicable) and the
Irrigation Wet Well.
b. Site Map 2 — Spray Irrigation Facility.

Mr. Earl Wells
February 11, 2009
Page 10 of 11
Specifications:
L. See Soil Evaluation Question #3.
2. See Agronomist Evaluation Question #4.
3. Will the proposed irrigation system contain precipitation or soil moisture sensors to prevent irrigation
during,inclement weather? If so, amend the plans and specifications. If not, how will the Applicant
prevent irrigation during inclement weather? If manually, amend the Operation and Maintenance
agreement to include these requirements.
En[Zineering Calculations:
1. Remove the term reclaimed from the system description, and either replace with closed -loop recycle
if deemed permitted under 15A NCAC 02T .1003(a)(1), or delete completely if the closed -loop
recycle system requires a permit under Section .1000 of Subchapter 02T.
2. Amend the Engineering Calculations to include calculations verifying the recommended
instantaneous and annual loading rates for each irrigation zone will be met based upon zone area,
pump capacity, pump run time and nozzle capacity. In addition, amend the calculations to include a
table with the anticipated daily and annual disposal flow allocated for each irrigation zone.
Operation and Maintenance Plan:
1. See Agronomist Evaluation Question #4.
2. See Specifications Question #3 (if necessary).
3. Per 15A NCAC 2T .0507, please amend the submitted Operation and Maintenance (O & M) Plan for
the wastewater treatment and spray irrigation system. This O & M plan shall include at a minimum:
✓ Describe the operation of the system in sufficient detail to show what operations are necessary for
the system to function and by whom the functions are to be conducted.
✓ Describe anticipated maintenance of the system.
✓ Includ.e provisions for safety measures including restriction of access.to the site and equipment.
✓ Include spill control provisions such as response to upsets and bypasses including control,
containment and remediation, as well as contact information for plant personnel, emergency
responders and regulatory agencies.
4. Remove the term reclaimed water pump, and replace with closed -loop recycle pump or delete
completely based upon the answer to Detailed Plans Question #1 for the screening facility.
5. Amend the O&M Plan to state that mowed crops shall be harvested and removed from the site.
Please consult with the Agronomist and facility_ operations people to determine an appropriate length
of time to remove the harvested crop.

Mr. Earl Wells
February 11, 2009
,,;.rage 11 of 11
Residuals Management:
1. What is done with the solids removed at the proposed new screening facilityT.If this waste, is
currently or proposed to be given to a residuals disposal/utilization program, please provide a written
commitment from a permitted residuals disposal/utilization program stating hey have adequate
capacity to accept the residuals.

Allens Hydro and Water Balance Reports on FTP. site
Subject: Allens Hydro and Water Balance Reports on FTP site
From: "egl" <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 19:20:55 -0500
To: "'Jim Barber"' <[e-mail]>
CC: "'Laura Mushinski"' <[e-mail]>, "'Rich Hayes"' <[e-mail]>,
"'Randy Sipe"' <[e-mail]>
Jim,
You can download both of these reports from my ftp site as follows:
Type the following into the address bar of your Windows. Explorer (NOT Internet Explorer):
ftp://aliens.eagleresources.comCcDeagleresources.com
A dialog box will come up asking for a user name and password. If it is already not filled in or if it is not equal to
the following, enter it: allens.eagleresources.com
The password is eagle
The Hydro report is about 4 MB and the water balance report is about 165 Kb
The water quality data for the new compliance wells in in table 12 on p 23 of the hydro report
Let me know if you have any problems accessing the reports
Eric
PPlease consider the environment before printing this material.
. j
Asf�4� 7� &nd Sd6r]crr .�;tr rsgrati rr-msQ,'�ri irs
Eric Lappala, P.E., CPHG, -Eagle Resources-P.A.
President 4005 Lake Springs Court
Raleigh, NC
27613
tel: [phone]
fax: [phone]
[e-mail] mobile: [phone]
Want a signature like this:
1 of 1 2/9/2009 9:53 AM.