The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRe_ I-3306 A - Mitigation Confirmation (4)Carpenter, Kristi From: Turchy, Michael A Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2022 2:23 PM To: Conchilla, Ryan Subject: Re: 1-3306 A - Mitigation Confirmation Hi Ryan, The numbers you provided look good. Thanks for the opportunity to review. -Michael From: Conchilla, Ryan <ryan.conchiIla@ncdenr.gov> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2022 10:57 AM To: Turchy, Michael A <maturchy@ncdot.gov> Subject: RE: 1-3306 A - Mitigation Confirmation Good morning Michael, I'm following up on the email below. If you can provide clarification on mitigation by Thursday (8/18) it would be appreciated. The application is approaching the deadline for the response period. Ryan Conchilla, PWS Environmental Specialist II 401 and Buffer Transportation Permitting Branch (DOT Divisions 7+8) Division of Water Resources, NC Department of Environmental Quality Ryan.Conchilla@ncdenr.gov From: Turchy, Michael A <maturchy@ncdot.gov> Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2022 3:02 PM To: Conchilla, Ryan <ryan.conchilla@ncdenr.gov> Subject: Re: 1-3306 A - Mitigation Confirmation Hi Ryan, Your numbers are correct... however, could you hold on to this for another couple of days? David Bailey sent me a mitigation question, but I could not get his numbers to work, so I'd like to talk though it with him to verify there's no error on the mitigation numbers. I'll reach back out to you in a day or two when Dave and I have a chance to verify everything. Thanks, Michael Michael Turchy Environmental Coordination and Permitting [ECAP] Group Leader Environmental Analysis Unit 919 818 7427 mobile 919 707 6157 office maturchy(cbncdot.gov https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental/EAU/ECAP From: Conchilla, Ryan <ryan.conchilla@ncdenr.gov> Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2022 1:32 PM To: Turchy, Michael A <maturchy@ncdot.gov> Subject: 1-3306 A - Mitigation Confirmation Hi Michael, Thanks for the update below. I'm finalizing the Permitting Conditions for this project and writing for confirmation regarding the wetland and buffer impacts and the corresponding mitigation. Can you confirm the credits and impact totals secured through DMS and private banks listed below are accurate? Compensatory mitigation for impacts to 0.20 acres of wetlands is required. We understand that you have chosen to perform compensatory mitigation for impacts to wetlands through the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) (formerly NCEEP), and that the DMS has agreed to implement the mitigation for the project. DMS has indicated in a letter dated June 21, 2022 that they will assume responsibility for satisfying the federal Clean Water Act compensatory mitigation requirements for the above -referenced project, in accordance with DMS's Mitigation Banking Instrument signed July 28, 2010. Compensatory mitigation of 0.33 acres for the approved wetland impacts shall be required. We understand that you have chosen to perform compensatory mitigation for impacts to protected wetlands through purchase of 0.33 Mitigation credits from the Pancho Wetland Mitigation Bank, operated by EBX. Mitigation for unavoidable impacts to wetlands shall be provided in the Cape Fear River Basin and done in accordance with [15A NCAC 2H.0506(h)]. The mitigation bank has indicated in a letter dated February 21, 2018 that they have available credits for satisfying the compensatory mitigation requirements for the above -referenced project. No impacts to wetlands can occur until NC Division of Water Resources receives a copy of payment receipt for these credits purchased from the wetland Mitigation Bank. Compensatory mitigation for impacts to 571 square feet of protected riparian buffers in Zone 1 shall be required. We understand that you have chosen to perform compensatory mitigation for impacts to protected buffers through use of the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) (formerly NCEEP). Mitigation for unavoidable impacts to Neuse River Riparian Buffers shall be provided in the Neuse (Upper Falls Lake) River Basin and done in accordance with 15A NCAC .02B .0714. The DMS has indicated in a letter dated June 22, 2022 that they will assume responsibility for satisfying the compensatory mitigation requirements for the above -referenced project, in accordance with DMS's Mitigation Banking Instrument signed June 14, 2016. Ryan Conchilla, PWS Environmental Specialist II 401 and Buffer Transportation Permitting Branch (DOT Divisions 7+8) Division of Water Resources, NC Department of Environmental Quality Ryan.Conchilla@ncdenr.gov From: Turchy, Michael A <maturchy@ncdot.gov> Sent: Monday, August 8, 2022 11:26 PM To: David. E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil; Conchilla, Ryan <ryan.conchilla@ncdenr.gov> Subject: 1-3306 A Stream Typo Noted Dave & Ryan - While working through the PBO payment summary, we noted a typo in the permit application that actually goes back to the NRTR and JD. Streams SK and SJ were labeled "UT to New Hope Creek". They should actually be "UT to Stony Creek." This is a name change only. The HUC is correct, the impacts, and the mitigation values are correct. From page 7 of 19 of the Permit Application Cover Letter: Stream Impacts in HUC 3020201 (continued) Stream Permit Site No. Name/ Status/Class HUC Permanent Length Temporary Mitiga io i JD ID Impact Type Impact (acres) Required UT to Perm. Fill (loss) 8 -- 8 (2:1) Cates Intermittent Bank Creek Stabilization 13 -- -- 8 3020201 Embedded SE C; NSW rip -rap Temporary Fill <0.01 -- UT to New Perm. Fill (loss) 40 -- 40 (2:1) Stony Perennial Bank -- -- -- 9A Creek 3020201 Stabilization Embedded 20 -- 20 (1:1) DVS-V; SK NSW rip-ap Temporary Fill <0.01 -- UT to New Perm. Fill (loss) 65 -- 65 (2:1) HHony Perennial Bank -- -- -- 9B Creek 3020201 Stabilization Embedded -- -- -- SK, SJ WS-V; NSW rip -rap Thanks, Michael Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. Ltd— Ia-3M A AreamayPONo[es mi Cm air8: _o,, Au at 8,-11:2—N Dave & Ryan - While working through the PBO payment summary, we noted a typo in the permit application that actually goes back to the NRTR and JD. in s SK and SJ were labeled "UT to New Hope Creek". They should actually be "UT to Stony Creek." This is a name change only. The HUC is correct, the impacts, and the mitigation values are correct. From page 7 cf 19 of the Permit Application Cover Letter: stream Imnacts In AIJC 3020201 fcmmmacdl Stream Permanent Temporary ACOE DWR Permit Site No. Name/ Status/Class C Impact Length Impact Mitigation Mitigation Impact Description/ Avoidance and Minimization JD ID Type (acres) Required Required Perm. Fill Bank 8 __ 8 (2:1) UC.eka[es Intermittent Extension of 30" RCP. Bank Stabilization for the new extension. 13 -- -- -- 8 3020201 Stabilization Embedded SE C; NSW Existing channel was utilized, and rip mp was limited to the banks only. Temporary <0.01 -- -- ll Fill UTto New Perm. Fill (loss) 40 -- 40 (2:1) -- A new channel needs to be constructed to tie the existing stream to the new 84" bore andjack. Rope Stony Perennial The charnel loss is due to the abandoned channel. There is embedded rip rap for the last section Bank __ _. ._ Creek oftie no. 9A 3020201 Stabilization Embedded 20 __ 20 (1.1) SK WS-V; NSW Rip rap will be embedded flush with the existing channel where it ties back to the existing Temporary <0.01 __ -- channel. Fill UT to New Penn. Fill foes 66 -- 65 (2:1) -- A newchannel needs to be constructed to tie the existing stream to the new 84" bore and jack Mope Stony Perennial The channel loss is due to the abandoned channel Impacts to stream SK and SJ were grouped 9B Creek 3020201 Stabilization -- -- -- -- together as the impact occurs at the confluence SK, SJ WS-V; NSW Embedded Steepened slopes were utilized to bring the slope stakes in and reduce impacts. Thanks, Michael