20220392 Ver 2_401 Application_20220812

Staff Review Form
NORTH CAROLINA
EnNmnmenfei Qea(Uy
Updated September4, 2020
Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?*
Yes No
ID# *
20220392
Version* 2
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Reviewer List:*
Select Reviewing Office: *
Submittal Type:*
Yes
No
Colleen Cohn:eads\cmcohn
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
401 Application
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?*
Yes
No
How much is owed?* $240.00
$570.00

Project Submittal Form
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk * below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type: * For the Record Only (Courtesy Copy)
New Project
Modification/New Project with Existing ID
More Information Response
Other Agency Comments
Pre -Application Submittal
Re-Issuance\Renewal Request
Stream or Buffer Appeal
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
4/12/2022
Project Contact Information
Name: Alex Hornaday
Who is submitting the information?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
Project Name: Heelan
Is this a public transportation project?
Yes
No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
Yes No Unknown
County (ies)
Wake
Please upload all files that need to be submited.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Heelan PCN_5.11.22_red.pdf
Heelan_prefiling_memo.pdf
Only pdf or kmz files are accepted.
Describe the attachments or
comments:
25.33MB
253.65KB
Updated PCN and attachments, pre -filing meeting notification email
Sign and Submit
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that:
• I, the project proponent, hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the
best of my knowledge and belief.

• I, the project proponent, hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401
certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I agree that submission of this online form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a
written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form.
Signature:
Submittal Date: Is filled in automatically.

Alex Hornaday
From: Ward Marotti
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2022 6:59 AM
To: Phillips, George L CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
Cc: Cohn, Colleen M
Subject: RE: Retreat at Friendship / Heelan / Apex / Wake County / SAW-2020-01098 / Request for Additional
Information
Lyle:
The applicant, engineer and I would like to schedule a meeting to discuss your below comments.
Please advise a date/time that you are available and I will send a Teams invite.
Thanks.
SPANGLER
EVil201414ENTAL, INC.
Ward Marotti
Director - Land & Water Resources
Raleigh • Charlotte • Charleston • Tampa
866-772-6453
Q 980-308-9888
• spanglerenvironmental.com
0 [e-mail]
• 525 N. Tryon St, Suite 1600 Charlotte, NC 28202
moo
Any email message sent by any employee of Spangler Environmental is intended only for the identified recipient. It (and any attachment) is strictly confidential
and may contain attorney -privileged work product. If you have obtained an email by error or you are not the identified recipient, please notify the sender by
calling toll free 1-866-772-6453, then delete the email (and any attachment) from your system. Use of the email (or any attachment) by any person other than
the identified recipient is strictly prohibited.
From: Phillips, George L CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2022 4:25 PM
To: Lisa Long <[e-mail]>
Cc: Cohn, Colleen M <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Retreat at Friendship / Heelan / Apex / Wake County / SAW-2020-01098 / Request for Additional
Information
Ms. Long,
I have reviewed the additional information provided May 11, 2022, and have the following comments/questions that
need to be addressed in order to verify compliance with permit conditions.
1

1) In reviewing the response for comment 1 in the email below it is still unclear if impacts at Impact Area C have
been minimized to the maximum extent practicable as required by general conditions 23 (a) and (b). While the
need for the road connection has been provided the justification for the lot fill has not. NCSAM and NCWAM are
field -based rapid assessment methods and should not be used to predict future function. Additionally, the direct
impact of fill within the wetlands would result in a total loss. Based on past experience, subdivisions have been
designed to avoid wetland fill for the purpose of lot fill. Please redesign to avoid wetland impacts for lot fill or
provide information to support compliance with general conditions 23 (a) and (b).
2) In reviewing the response for comment 2 in the email below it is still unclear if impacts at Impact Area F have
been minimized to the maximum extent practicable as required by general conditions 23 (a) and (b). The
requested justification for the lot fill has not provided. NCSAM and NCWAM are field -based rapid assessment
methods and should not be used to predict future function. Additionally, the direct impact of fill within stream
channel would result in a total loss. Based on past experience, subdivisions have been designed to avoid stream
channel fill for the purpose of lot fill. Please redesign to avoid stream channel impacts for lot fill or provide
information to support compliance with general conditions 23 (a) and (b).
3) Please see comment 5 below. Impacts A and D still show the rip rap dissipator pads as part of the "Temporary
Stream 'No Loss' Impact" on both the maps and the impact table. Impact H maps still labels the rip rap as
"Temporary Stream 'No Loss' Impact" but the impact map appears to have been updated to include the rip rap
as a permanent -no loss impact. Please revise the plans and impact table to show the embedded rip rap as
permanent impacts.
Please submit the above information within 30 days of receipt of this Notification or we may consider your application
withdrawn and close the file. Please email ([e-mail]) me if you have any questions.
Lyle Phillips
Regulatory Specialist
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE-SAW-RG-R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone], Ext. 25.
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is
located at https://regulatory.ops.usace.army.mil/customer-service-survey/ . Thank you for taking the time to visit this
site and complete the survey.
From: Lisa Long
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2022 3:45 PM
To: Phillips, George L CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Cohn, Colleen M <[e-mail]>; Ward Marotti <[e-mail]>; Alex Hornaday
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Retreat at Friendship / Heelan / Apex / Wake County / SAW-2020-01098 / Request for Additional
Information
Hi Lyle,
Please see attached updated PCN, and below response to comments.
1) Based on the application the project proposes to discharge fill material at Impact Area C. The need residential
development is not disputed; however, you have not demonstrated avoidance and minimization to the
maximum extent practicable as required by NWP General Conditions 23(a) and (b). For example, given the scale
2

of the site (455 residential lots), it appears that impacts at Impact Area C for lot fill could be avoided or
minimized while still achieving the project purpose. Please redesign to avoid or minimize to the maximum extent
practicable or provide additional information to justify the proposed fill.
Alternatives to the proposed design in this area were considered (i.e. elimination of the adjacent lots that
resulted in total resource loss and "stubbing" of the road(s) at the crossing). Continuity of the road at this
location is necessary for both traffic connectivity and public safety. As a result, this alternative was removed
from consideration. It was determined that elimination of some or all of the lots north of the required crossing
would negatively impact this feature's hydrology, which would result in significant functional loss, if not
complete impact. To document/quantify this, SEI completed two iterations of the North Carolina Wetland
Assessment Method (WAM; attached). The wetland feature rated medium, based on its existing condition. By
revising the design (conceptually) to avoid fill of this feature, except as necessary for the road, the quality of the
wetland changed from medium to low, due to anticipated changes to hydrologic connectivity, a drastically
reduced/eliminated buffer area, and significant adjacent land use changes. Based on the proposed design, the
loss of the feature's upslope function is accounted for (i.e. included as an impact) and, as a result, a 2:1
mitigation:impact ratio is proposed to offset it (i.e. purchase of mitigation credits within a highly functioning
mitigation site protected in perpetuity under a conservation easement). Please see the attached WAM forms
referenced above: one representing existing conditions (medium rating) and the other considering avoidance of
direct impacts to it (i.e. fill: low rating).
2) Based on the application the project proposes to discharge fill material at Impact Area F. The need residential
development is not disputed; however, you have not demonstrated avoidance and minimization to the
maximum extent practicable as required by NWP General Conditions 23(a) and (b). For example, given the scale
of the site (455 residential lots), it appears that impacts at Impact Area F for lot fill could be avoided or
minimized while still achieving the project purpose. Please redesign to avoid or minimize to the maximum extent
practicable or provide additional information to justify the proposed fill.
Avoidance of direct impacts (i.e. fill) within this area were considered. In order to determine the resultant
impacts to stream function, if any, SEI completed a North Carolina Stream Assessment Method (SAM) evaluation
for this feature, for both existing and anticipated post -construction conditions. The results documented that,
under existing conditions, the stream is of medium functional quality. By avoiding impacts to this feature but
proceeding with development of the adjacent areas (note: this feature was determined by NCDWR to NOT have
at least intermittent hydrology and, as a result, it is NOT subject to the Jordan Lake Buffer Rules) the feature's
quality is rated as low, due to anticipated streamside impacts such as conversion to maintained lawn, drastically
reduced buffer area, and anticipated increases of water quality stressors. Under the proposed design, the loss of
function of the feature's upstream portions are accounted for and offset, using a 2:1 mitigation:impact ratio (i.e.
purchase of mitigation credits within a highly functioning mitigation site protected in perpetuity under a
conservation easement). Please see the attached SAM forms referenced above: one representing existing
conditions (medium rating) and the other considering avoidance of direct impacts to it (i.e. fill: low rating).
3) Generally speaking, elevated boardwalk pilings are evaluated as structures and not a discharge of fill material.
Based on the spacing of the pilings it appears that the proposed activities at Impact Area G does not result in a
permanent discharge of fill material. However, typically boardwalks within forested wetlands are viewed as
permanent conversion impacts because of a partial loss of function through conversion of forested wetlands to
herbaceous wetlands. Conversion impacts would consists of areas that forested wetlands are converted and
maintained as herbaceous wetlands through maintenance in perpetuity. Please update the PCN impact table,
plans and compensatory mitigation plan to account for permanent wetland convers. Typically a 1:1 ratio
compensatory mitigation ratio is required to ensure minimal adverse effects.
Please see updated site plans included in the attached, updated PCN.
3

4) Based on the application the proposed activities will result in a loss of 0.026 acre of streambed and 0.4201 acres
of wetlands. Per General Condition 23 and Regional Condition 7 a compensatory mitigation plan is required.
Typically, compensatory mitigation is required at a 2:1 credit to impact ratio unless otherwise justified based on
evaluation of aquatic function (NCSAM and NCWAM). Please provide a compensatory mitigation plan to include
a proposed mitigation ratio and ILF letter and/or SOA.
Please see SOAs included in the attached, updated PCN.
5) Note: the proposed activities that consists of installation of riprap within streambed is viewed as a permanent
impact because fille will be permanently placed within the streambed. As proposed (embedded to match
preexisting elevations/contours) are typically viewed as permanent impacts that do not result in a total loss of
feature and therefore typically mitigation is not required. It appears that riprap will be installed downstream at
Impact Areas A, D and H.
Please see updated site plans included in the attached, updated PCN.
6) Based on review of the proposed plans (Retreat at Friendship) and review of the previously authorized impacts
for the construction of Horton Ridge Blvd. it is unclear if additional wetland impacts are proposed at wetland
"W13" depicted on the "Wetlands/Stream Map". It appears that impacts to a portion of W13 was authorized,
however, it is unclear if additional impacts are occurring for lot construction. Based on the JD "W13" was
approximately 0.13 acres in size and only 0.09 acres of fill was authorized. If fill is proposed within "W13" for
proposed lot fill then a redesign to avoid and minimize to the maximum extent practicable or additional
information is required to justify the proposed fill (see comment 1 and 2 above).
The acreage calculations within the JD were based on preliminary GPS data, while the quantities in the plans are
based on formal survey data. The latter is more accurate. The Horton Ridge Blvd. application covered 3,996 SF,
which is the entire area of feature W13. Therefore, impacts to the areas depicted currently under lot
development have already been permitted. The feature is shown as an existing condition because the Horton
Ridge impact has not yet been completed.
Best,
SPANGLER
R
EN V1 ROMA EPLTAL. INC.
Lisa Long
Environmental Scientist
Raleigh • Charlotte • Charleston • Tampa
a 866-772-6453
IL 919-689-5283
spanglerenvironmental.com
[e-mail]
4338 Bland Rd., Raleigh, NC 27609
moo
Any email message sent by any employee of Spangler Environmental is intended only for the identified recipient. It (and any attachment) is strictly confidential
and may contain attorney -privileged work product. If you have obtained an email by error or you are not the identified recipient, please notify the sender by
4

calling toll free 1-866-772-6453, then delete the email (and any attachment) from your system. Use of the email (or any attachment) by any person other than the
identified recipient is strictly prohibited.
From: Phillips, George L CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2022 4:04 PM
To: Lisa Long<[e-mail]>
Cc: Cohn, Colleen M <[e-mail]>
Subject: Retreat at Friendship / Heelan / Apex / Wake County / SAW-2020-01098 / Request for Additional Information
Ms. Long,
I have reviewed the above referenced project and need the following comments/questions addressed to evaluate the
proposed activities.
1) Based on the application the project proposes to discharge fill material at Impact Area C. The need residential
development is not disputed; however, you have not demonstrated avoidance and minimization to the
maximum extent practicable as required by NWP General Conditions 23(a) and (b). For example, given the scale
of the site (455 residential lots), it appears that impacts at Impact Area C for lot fill could be avoided or
minimized while still achieving the project purpose. Please redesign to avoid or minimize to the maximum extent
practicable or provide additional information to justify the proposed fill.
2) Based on the application the project proposes to discharge fill material at Impact Area F. The need residential
development is not disputed; however, you have not demonstrated avoidance and minimization to the
maximum extent practicable as required by NWP General Conditions 23(a) and (b). For example, given the scale
of the site (455 residential lots), it appears that impacts at Impact Area F for lot fill could be avoided or
minimized while still achieving the project purpose. Please redesign to avoid or minimize to the maximum extent
practicable or provide additional information to justify the proposed fill.
3) Generally speaking, elevated boardwalk pilings are evaluated as structures and not a discharge of fill material.
Based on the spacing of the pilings it appears that the proposed activities at Impact Area G does not result in a
permanent discharge of fill material. However, typically boardwalks within forested wetlands are viewed as
permanent conversion impacts because of a partial loss of function through conversion of forested wetlands to
herbaceous wetlands. Conversion impacts would consists of areas that forested wetlands are converted and
maintained as herbaceous wetlands through maintenance in perpetuity. Please update the PCN impact table,
plans and compensatory mitigation plan to account for permanent wetland convers. Typically a 1:1 ratio
compensatory mitigation ratio is required to ensure minimal adverse effects.
4) Based on the application the proposed activities will result in a loss of 0.026 acre of streambed and 0.4201 acres
of wetlands. Per General Condition 23 and Regional Condition 7 a compensatory mitigation plan is required.
Typically, compensatory mitigation is required at a 2:1 credit to impact ratio unless otherwise justified based on
evaluation of aquatic function (NCSAM and NCWAM). Please provide a compensatory mitigation plan to include
a proposed mitigation ratio and ILF letter and/or SOA.
5) Note: the proposed activities that consists of installation of riprap within streambed is viewed as a permanent
impacts because fille will be permanently placed within the streambed. As proposed (embedded to match
preexisting elevations/contours) are typically viewed as permanent impacts that do not result in a total loss of
feature and therefore typically mitigation is not required. It appears that riprap will be installed downstream at
Impact Areas A, D and H.
6) Based on review of the proposed plans (Retreat at Friendship) and review of the previously authorized impacts
for the construction of Horton Ridge Blvd. it is unclear if additional wetland impacts are proposed at wetland
"W13" depicted on the "Wetlands/Stream Map". It appears that impacts to a portion of W13 was authorized,
however, it is unclear if additional impacts are occurring for lot construction. Based on the JD "W13" was
approximately 0.13 acres in size and only 0.09 acres of fill was authorized. If fill is proposed within "W13" for
proposed lot fill then a redesign to avoid and minimize to the maximum extent practicable or additional
information is required to justify the proposed fill (see comment 1 and 2 above).
5

Please submit the above information within 30 days of receipt of this Notification or we may consider your application
withdrawn and close the file. Please email ([e-mail]) me if you have any questions.
Lyle Phillips
Regulatory Specialist
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE-SAW-RG-R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone], Ext. 25.
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is
located at https://regulatory.ops.usace.army.mil/customer-service-survey/ . Thank you for taking the time to visit this
site and complete the survey.
6

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑ Section 10 Permit
X Section 404 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes X No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from
the DWQ (check all that apply):
— Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
— Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
X 401 Water Quality Certification
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
X Yes ❑ No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes X No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Heelan
2b. County:
Wake
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
New Hill (being annexed to Apex)
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
*see attached table
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3108 & 3120 Olive Farm Road
3e. City, state, zip:
New Hill, NC 27502
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
X Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
Erica Leatham
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
M/I Homes of Raleigh, LLC
4d. Street address:
1511 Sunday Dr., Suite 100
4e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, 27607
4f. Telephone no.:
919-233-5725
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Alex Hornaday for Ward Marotti
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Spangler Environmental
5c. Street address:
4338 Bland Rd.
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27609
5e. Telephone no.:
919-875-4288
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
*see attached property owner table
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.698395 Longitude: -78.993001
lc. Property size:
140.77 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Little Beaver Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project area is primarily wooded with a power line easement. The surrounding area is primarily occupied by undeveloped and residential land.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 6.06
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 9,444
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project will result in the creation of approximately 455 residential properties.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Bulldozers, excavators, motor graders, off -road trucks, rollers, etc. will be used to clear and grade the sire before residences are constructed.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
X Preliminary Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Maria Polizzi and Lisa Long
Agency/Consultant Company: Spangler Environmental
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
USACE SAW-2020-01098 PJD dated 7/22/2020, Town of Apex Buffer Call 19-003 dated December 11, 2019
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Yes X No Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
X Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Which sections were completed below
for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
X Wetlands X Streams — tributaries
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.06
W2 P
Fill
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.26
W3 P
Fill
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.1
W4 P
Fill
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.0001
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.42
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 -
Choose one
-
-
S2 -
Choose one
-
-
S3 -
Choose one
-
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
540
3i. Comments:
*See attached table
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
X
Other:Jordan Lake
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B1 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments: Buffer impacts are within the Jordan Lake Buffer Area and will be permitted through the Town of Apex.
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The proposed development was designed to avoid impacts to WOTUS to the practicable extent possible. The majority of impacts are due to road
connectivity/access.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Sediment and erosion control measures will be implemented in order to control runoff and other discharges from activities to be conducted in fill areas.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
No
X Yes ❑
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ X Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
fee program
Mitigation
0 Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu
❑ Permittee Responsible
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: Banks are being contacted and SOAs will be provided after response. Wildlands has stated they have available stream credits.
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
X Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
Buffer impacts are within the Jordan Lake Buffer Area and will be permitted through the Town of Apex.
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
X Yes ❑ No
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes X No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
cyo
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
X Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Stormwater will be treated with a series of stormwater control ponds as can be seen in the plans.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Town of Apex
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Town of Apex
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Phase II
NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑Yes ❑ No
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
❑ORW
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
use of public (federal/state) land?
❑ Yes X No
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
❑Yes ❑ No
lc. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
Comments:
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
❑Yes X No
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
Yes X No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The wastewater from this site will be treated through The Town of Apex Water and Sewage department.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat?
❑ Yes
X No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts?
❑ Yes
X No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NC NHP data and an on site inspection, contracted survey for Atlantic Pigtoe
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes
X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
❑ Yes
X No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
On site inspection. SHPO data was not requested for this project.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ No
X Yes
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FIRM panel
Alex Hornaday
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
12 August 2022
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

Impact
Number
Impact
Name
Type of
Impact
Stream Name
(perJD)
Perennial o
Intermittent
Type of
Jurisdiction
a
Average Stream
Impact length
(LF)
Mitigation
Required?
2:1
Mitigatio
n Ratio
1
A
Permanent
S1
INT
Corps
4.2
106
Y
212
2
D
Permanent
S7
INT
Corps
2.6
69
Y
138
3
F
Permanent
S6
INT
Corps
1.6
190
Y
380
4
H
Permanent
S1
INT
Corps
3.2
65
Y
130
5
A
Temporary
S1
INT
Corps
4.2
24
N
6
D
Temporary
S7
INT
Corps
2.6
37
N
7
H
Temporary
S1
INT
Corps
4.7
19
N
8
H
Permanent
with no loss of
function
S1
INT
Corps
3.7
30
N
TOTAL LF:
540
MITIGATION
CREDITS
NEEDED:
860

PIN
Owner
Address
720092779
CICIN, JERIF CICIN, LISA
104 CORSICA LN, CARY NC 27511-6476
0720090188
PEART, EDWARD A PEART, DEBORAH N
8829 NEW HOPE FARM RD, NEW HILL NC 27562-9179
710987950
KASTELBERG, HENRY STEVEN
8824 NEW HOPE FARM RD, NEW HILL NC 27562-9178
720075965
CAROL B HEELAN IRREVOCABLE TRUST
10046 BISHOPS GATE BLVD, PINEVILLE NC 28134-6568
720181967
CAROL B HEELAN IRREVOCABLE TRUST
10046 BISHOPS GATE BLVD, PINEVILLE NC 28134-6568

ft) Raleigh Division
1511 Sunday Drive,Suite 100
M I HOMES Raleigh,NC 27607
919.828.1106 OFFICE
Welcome to Better 919.882.0963 FAX
November 26, 2019
To Whom It May Concern:
The letter serves to inform you that Mul Homes of Raleigh, LLC located at 1511 Sunday
Drive, Raleigh, NC 27607, as the buyer of record and under contract with the project
owner,George Heelen,Trustee of the Carol B. Heelen Irrevocable Trust, hereby authorizes
Spangler Environmental, Inc. to act as our technical agent for the purposes of
environmental issues, including wetland and stream identification, permitting,mitigation
planning and regulatory agency coordination at the property known as Wake County Real
Estate IDs 0047551 and 0047552. All site visits by regulatory personnel must be
coordinated in advance with our agent, Spangler Environmental, Inc. This letter
supercedes all previous Agent-related correspondence.
The following contact should be copied on all correspondence:
Agent:
James A. Spangler, CEI,A.M.ASCE
Spangler Environmental, Inc
4338 Bland Road
Rqleigh, NC 27609
[phone]
Sincerely,
MP Homes of Raleigh
Erica Leatham,VP Land Acquisition
AUSTIN I CHARLOTTE I CHICAGO I CINCINNATI I [:OLUMBUS I DALLASfFORT WORTH I oErRorr I HOUSTON INDIANAPOLIS
MARYLAND I MINNEAPOLIVS T.PAUL I ORLANDO i RALEIGH I SAN ANTONIO I SARASOTA I TAMPA I VIRGINIA
mihornes.com

D
0
RD.
HUMIE OLIVE
SITE
0
-(•
VICINITY MAP
N.T.5.
NOTES:
I . THE 403 5F (0.009 AC) OF TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT ASSOCIATED WITh THE ROAD
CROSSINGS AT IMPACT AREAS A, D, $ h, RESULTING FROM EMBEDDED RIP RAP IN THE
CHANNEL, WILL RESULT IN NO LOSS OF AQUATIC FUNCTION AND NO MITIGATION IS
PROPOSED FOR THI5 AREA. THIS AMOUNT I5 NOT INCLUDED IN THE TABLE OF OVERALL
IMPACTS, BUT THEY ARE QUANTIFIED ON EACH INDIVIDUAL IMPACT SHEET.
2. THE 264 5F (0.006 AC) OF WETLAND CONVERSION IMPACT AT IMPACT AREA G, RESULTING
FROM THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE WOODEN BOARDWALK OVER A FORESTED WETLAND,
DOES NOT RESULT IN A PERMANENT DISCHARGE OF FILL MATERIAL, BUT IS CONSIDERED
"FUNCTIONAL L055." THI5 AMOUNT I5 NOT INCLUDED IN THE TABLE OF OVERALL IMPACTS,
BUT IT'S QUANTIFIED ON SHEET 5 OF THIS SET OF IMPACT MAPS.
SHEET INDEX
OVERALL IMPACT MAP
2 IMPACT AREA A
3 IMPACT AREA B
4 IMPACT AREA C
5 IMPACT AREA D
0 IMPACT AREA E
7 IMPACT AREA F
8 IMPACT AREA G
9 IMPACT AREA H
f '
1
'AR ROAD
ST" EET)
-r
NOW OR FORM
JILL 4 WILLIAM DAVID G
PIN NO.: 0710-99-022G
ZONING: R-40W
USE: SINGLE FAMILY
PORTION OF KASTELBERG * PEART
TRAITS THAT MAKE UP THE
EXISTING 60' PRIVATE ACCESS
EASEMENT SHALL BE DEDICATED
TO TH'V GOODMAN 4 ALBRECHT
TF'\ACTS (0.69 ACRES)
\
\
,
NOW OR FORMERLY
JAMES 4 JANICE OLIVER
PIN NO.: 07 1 I-90-3580
ZONING: R-40W
USE: SINGLE FAMILY
20'TYPE B
LANDSCAPE
NOW OR FORMERLY
YUMEEWARRA FARM, LLC
PIN NO.: 0710-99-371 2
ZONING: R-40W
USE: SINGLE FAMILY
IMPACT AREA I-1:
S 1 Stream Impact
65 LF / 206 SF (0.005 Ac.)
EX.
POND
NOW OR FORMERLY,
DONNA J. ALBRECHT A
TRUSTEE OF THE DONNA J. AL RE9.(T'
REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST‘''
PIN NO.: 0710-88-9798
ZONING: R-40W
USE: SINGLE FAMILY
NOW OR FORMERLY
CHRISTOPHER KNOUFF 4
CAREY ADAMS-KNOUFF
PIN NO.: 0710-88-91 26
Ow
IMPACT AREA E:
Zone 2 Stream Buffer Impact:
2,239 SF (0.05 Ac.)
AMILY
NOW OR FORMERLY
CHRISTOPHER, KNOUPF
CAREY ADAMS-KNOUFF
PIN NO.: 0710-87-9844
ZONING: R-40W
USE: SINGLE FAMILY
20' TYPE B
LANDSCAPE
BUFFER
1I �;
OLIVE RIDGE
SUBDIVISION;1 ry
I I
IMPACT AREA A:
S 1 Stream Impact:
106 LF / 446 SF (0.0 1 0 ac.)
Zone 1 Stream Buffer Impact:
7,035 SF (0. 1 6 Ac.)
Zone 2 Stream Buffer Impact:
5,880 SF (0. 1 3 Ac.)
,4
11� PROPOSED
OLIVE RIDGE
DSCAPE
BUFFER
111 GREENWAY
1 fieuni@gMi
NOW OR FORMERLY I
NO\YV OR FOR4ERLY
JAMES JANICE OLIVER MILDRED 4 LINDI\ JUDD
PIN NO.: 072 I-00-3444
ZONING: R 40W PIN N().: 072 1-010-5342
USE: SINGLE FAMILY ZONING: R 4 LIJSE: VACANT
NOW OR FORMERLY
ChRISTOPHER GENTILE
PIN NO.: 072 I-00-9530
ZONING: R-40W
USE: SINGLE FAMILY
NOW OR FORMERLY
ROBERT 4 MILDRED KELLY
PIN NO.: 0720-29-4621
ZONING: R-40W
USE: SINGLE FAMILY
AD5RII42
IEL,LIVERO
EX NUM----------------------------------------y
60'A PUBLIC RrW) J------------ -----------------
-------------------------
----------
f/AY
SEMENT
\ NOW OR FORMERLY
v\JAMES 4 JANICE OLIVER v
'�IN NO.: 0721-00-0505
\ ZONING: R-40W
\
, USE: VACANT
25' RIGHT
OF WAY
DEDICATION
20' TYPE B
LANDSCAPE
BUFFER
20' TYPE B
LANDSCAPE
BUFFER
i QZ l
rt"ram 89
11 90
11 10 \
78 1� :
BINI CT.) 77 I \1 \l �2
tit I 93
y 1 94
!1 11 �+
t,
r r �
u' IOI
1 i% IO2
('t!;f1
I 04
fr
/� 11 105
/ /�
L17\/ 108 Dq\
\ 1 28
II 109
ii 'ti N IO
II
Iki- r41•JII
J ' ` \
i a EMI _1 i
�il®S�I�I I ` 124
/` I 3 0
ii®Ki9�]
i_G1r1I \ 1 1 4
tid
wCiilllJ �
iiG1 L! _J \ •\ \1 \ 5 u-J 122 I i
iiir.%v\
1
u ®rxr� I
ii�Kir71 � /' /
ii�Gi'Id�1__N / ® 120
;f �:':.:::..
...::::....„T.:)... ..-,--;-;--,...
y
\_):_,__.:.::---:::>...,.._.., :........, ........::
...... ....'" 1...:14...‘ % :*...j:: ...' i'''.:.- .----...; ' "
11
:■
AHEM iS :EBNIVl::: i.
RETREAT
AT FRIEND5hIP SUBDIVISION
TABLE OF IMPACTS
IMPACT TYPE
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT maims
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT
PERMANENT ZONE I BUFFER IMPACT 1
PERMANENT ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT ,___r
PERMANENT ZONE 3 BUFFER IMPACT
IMPACT A
51 - 106 LF / 446 5F (0.0 I 0 AC)
7,035 5F (0. 1 6 AC)
5,880 5F (0. 1 3 AC)
IMPACT B
WI G - 2,669 5F (0.061 AC)
568 5F (0.0 I AC)
424 5F (0.0 I AC)
282 5F (0.0 I AC)
IMPACT C
WI 1- 1 1 ,420 5F (0.262 AC)
IMPACT D
57 - 69 LF / 177 5F (0.004 AC)
WI - 4,45 1 5F (0.102 AC)
1 ,252 5F (0.03 AC)
3,741 SF (0.09 AC)
IMPACT E
2,239 5F (0.05 AC)
IMPACT F
56 - 1 90 LF / 30 1 5F (0.007 AC)
IMPACT G
IMPACT h
5 1 - 65 LF / 20G 5F (0.005 AC)
TOTAL
430 LF / 1 1 30 5F (0.026 AC)
1 8,540 5F (0.426 AC)
8,855 5F (0.20 AC)
12,284 5F (0.28 AC)
282 5F (0.0 I AC)
it
70' DUKE POWER
EASEMENT (TYP)
50' TYPE B
THOROUGHFARE
IMPACT AREA D:
S7 Stream Impact:
69 LF / 177 SF (0.004 Ac.)
W 1 Wetland Impact:
4,45 1 SF (0.102 Ac.)
Zone 1 Stream Buffer Impact:
I ,252 SF (0.03 Ac.)
Zone 2 Stream Buffer Impact:
3,741 SF (0.09 Ac.)
IMPACT AREA F:
S6 Stream Impact:
190 LF / 301 SF (0.007 ac.)
/iiu
• �ll�ll�ill�t�•{..
ATIEDRAL�."Wit
:!`IV \1
_______________ 140
OOB/'R
UBC?,'VI,5IL.
FLOOD),‹E �/
NOW OR FORMERLY
TOWN OF APEX
PIN NO.: 0720- 1 9-0665
ZONING: CB
USE: VACANT
TO OF CARY
40' ILITY AND
PIPED EASEMENT
D.B. 14_ I , PG. 2679
7
I
\i;T III
n. lO �. i•n FMISlm�an1S11L1mLa�ua ■rrr
VIA VIA s 181l3
g ..
`dt11111Illll1512120; 101111®i1111
• oan N (i7UPT
Ono,
iI�I'I�IIN,1'
i
CIS i
I t�
3.32AC S
DEDICATI
TOWN
PARKS 4 R
AND
OR
EX
NOW OR FORMERLY
TOWN OF APEX
PIN NO.: 0720- 1 9-G27G
ZONING: CB
USE: VACANT
20' TYPE B
LANDSCAPE
BUFFER
W
NOW OR FORMERLY
MAC LILES
PIN NO.: 072 1 - 1 0-7552
ZONING: R-40W
USE: VACANT
IOW OR FORMERLY
24Y 4 JOANNE MEDI;IN
PIN NO.: 072 I-20-030
ZONING: R-40W
',Jr: SINGLE FAMIL'I'
LL
NOW OR FORMERLY
DAVID BOOTH
PIN NO.: 072 1 - 1 0-9 1 43
ZONING: R-40W
USE: VACANT
NOW OR FORMERLY
DAVID 500TH
PIN NO.: 0720- 19-7895
ZONING: R-40W
USE: SINGLE FAMILY
L
,\_
I
I
{ I I
1 I I
I 1 1
/ I 1 1
/
i 1 1 /
/111
i / 1 /
OW ORFORMERL5
TOWN OF APEX y'd I
PI�J NO.: 0720- 1 9-86 1,t/
ZONING: R-40W / L5
SINGLE FAMILY/
/� /
y /
/ /�
/ /
,
NOW OR FORMERLY /' i 0 /
TOWN OF APEX //
PIN NO.: 0720- 1 9-7 ,Y / /
ZONING: CB / / / /
USE: SINGLE FAM'II/ / /'
/ /,
/ / / /
/ /
/ //
/ /
NOW OR FORMERLY
ROBERT * MILDRED KELLY
PIN NO.: 0720-29-4621
ZONING: R-40W
USE: VACANT
NOW OR FORMERLY
A.C. OLEVIQJEIRS
PIN NO.: 070- 19'=g. 13
ZONING:IR-40W ---
USE: COVE
I /
k"MJUILIE LA
KE STATION
111 PROPOSED
III STREETS
41
1`\1,
\\\\,\
IMPACT AREA C:
W 1 1 Wetland Impact
1 ,420 SF (0.262 Ac.)
1 1 NOW OR FMERLY
I� I I JUDITH ROBERT OLIVE
0 / PIN NO.: 0720- 8-503
ZONING: ORK 40W
s/ // USE: SINGLE FAMILY Imo.
�\ 'vD -'_ Imo-
___ .R1: 0.
aL
;ID.GE
1 040144,N4.44:1 • 1; //'
.41
IMPACT AREA G:
W8 Wetland Impact
*Impact due to wooden
boardwalk through forested
wetlands (see note 2)
RI EN D51-I IF
STATE OF N.C.
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
FOR STREAM RESTORATION
IMPACT AREA B:
WI 6 Wetland Impact:
Zone I Stream Buffer Impact:
Zone 2 Stream Buffer Impact:
Zone 3 Stream Buffer Impact:
/I/ LANDSCAPE
BUFFER
•
STATION
PHASE G
rro
NI
PRELIMINARY PLANS
NOT fOK CONSTRUCTION
400
GRAPHIC SCALE
Jones & Cnossen
ENGINEER
Construction Management
Civil Engineering
SUITE 001
PO BOX 1062
APEX, NC 27502
Office: 919-387-1174
Registration: P-0151
www.jonescnossen.com
FOR
REVIEW
ONLY
RETREAT
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
TOWN OF APEX
OVERALL
SCALE
DRAWN
PLK
DATE
REVISION
4/21/22
FROJffCT

/
/
/
/
1/r • 1/r 1/r
/ / / /, / / /
EXISTING W_
(TY . )
ZON - I
P ' V1AI ffNT'
PA T
/
LANDS
07
SI -
TE PORARY
STR AM 'NO
LOSS'
PACT
(7 L /43 5f)
d'R
'4
4_
p A'
-4-
4_ > A'
/
/
/ / /
/ / /
/ / / // / /
/ ///
//7/////
/ / /
/ / oiro / /
/ / / / /
/ // / / / / I ///
/ / / / /
/ / /
/
/
(
d'p d'p
4 n_ 4
p d ' R d
4 - 4
d'p
'4
389
388
ZONE 2 PERfVANIENT
BUFFINPACCT
(3,368 SF)
ZONE 2
PEKMANENT
BUFFED -�'
IMPACT
(70G SF)
d p d'R
4 d_R d' d4�
CATCH
BASIN
( YP.)
4 4
d R d
r_d4 pr•
opeca
AirAgetfrid
/
/ / /
/ / /
/
/
/
/
, //
/ / /
/
/
I
/ S I - TMPORFAR
S'TREA
/MAC'
(I 7 LF/5 I SF)
ZONE I
E RM AE
1.VA WIDTH " BUFF
PU DRAIN. I
ASE. MPA
(3,328 S�F)
RIP -RAP
DISSIPTOR P D
(EMBEDDED IN10
STREk,M BED)
.0004441
4.144411"
‘444•44
HOW
42:10
Moppe
earnito
"Piot
!i i •
VAR.\ WIDTH
PB. \DRAIN.
ZONE 2
P RMAN NT/�
/ /Bl.JffEjK
IMPACT
Si/F)
D. /
WEILAINu5
i' //
/ / /
I / /
i I
/ i I
i I /
/ /
( I/
EirE.
l
EX. REEK TOP
OF SANK (TYP.)
5 I - PERMANE\NT
STREAM /
( I 0,G Lf/446/5f)
I 'ZONE 2
FIERMANENT
BUffEll
I IV PACT
I ( I ,682/5f)
1. ALL EXISTING STREAM AND WETLAND INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A
SURVEY PROVIDED BY ROBINSON PLANTE LAND SURVEYING.
100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN IS PRESENT.
3. THE SITE WAS REVIEVVED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES BY SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. THE TOWN OF APEX STREAM DUFFER DETERMINATION
NUMBER IS 19-003.
270
265
CENTERLINE
MISSION
EXISTING
STREAM
BOTTOM
ELEVATION
HEADWAL
OLIVE
PLACE
i
WINGWALL
(TYF'.)
RIF-RAP
DISSIPATOR PAD
TEMPORARY
IMPACT (TYP.)
(EMBEDDED INTO
CULVERT TO
TO ALLOW
AQUATIC
(ENTIRE LE
BE
FOR
LIFE
GTH)
ERMANENT
IMF'ACT
IMPACT
STREAM
(TYP.)
270
265
IMPACT AREA A - CROSS-SECTION FOR STREAM CROSSING
RETREAT AT FRIENDSHIP
TABLE OF IMPACTS
IMPACTIYPE
IMPACT AREA A
VVETLAND "FUNCTIONAL LOSS" IMPACT
PERMANENT ZONE I BUFFER IMPACT
IBM
7,035 SF (O. I G AC)
PERMANENT ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT
5,660 SF (O. I 3 AC)
PERMANENT ZONE 3 BUFFER IMPACT
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
FRELIMINARY PLANS
NOT fOR CONSTRUCTION
0 10 20
40
GRAPHIC SCALE
Jones & Cnossen
—o
co
Construction Management
Civil Engineering
SUITE 001
PO BOX 1062
APEX, NC 27502
Office: 919-387-1174
Registration: P-0151
www.jonescnossen.com
a_
KT KAT
WAKE COUNTY, NORTh CAROLINA
TOWN OF APEX
SCALE
DRAWN
PLK
DATE
REVISION
4/21/22
2
PROJECT

WIG -
PERMANENT
ETLAND IMPACT:
� I I SF
/ //
/ EX. /
WETLANDS
/0 (TY/P.) /
CV
00
CV
N
WI6-
PEMANENT
W-TLAND IMPACT:
258_S-F
1
ZONE/ 3
PERMAANENT
/BUFFER/
IMPACT
(282 5F)
/
Lc/ co
(
/a
/
*4 p •
4.‘,*
7 44,
‘••
ii,4*
t "4,4 *
/
OEX . 0
WETLANDS
SCM
MAINTENANCE
ACCESS
EASEMENT
z
Z6NE 2—PERMAANENT
BUFFER
IMPACT
(424 SF)
ZONE I
PERMANENT
BUFFED
_HIV PACT
(568 F)
NOTE:
I . ALL EXISTING STREAM AND WETLAND INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A
SURVEY PROVIDED BY ROBINSON PLANTE LAND SURVEYING.
2. PER PEMA MAP #3720072000J #372007 1 000K DATED 02 MAY 2006, A
100-YEAR PLOODPLAIN IS PRESENT.
3. TFIE SITE WAS REVIEWED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES BY SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. ThE TOWN OF APEX STREAM BUFFER DETERMINATION
NUMBER I5 19-003.
RETREAT AT FRIENDShIP
TABLE OF IMPACTS
IMPACT TYPE
IMPACT AREA B
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT ...11
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT
W 16 - 2,669 5F (0.061 AC)
WETLAND "FUNCTIONAL L055" IMPACT
PERMANENT ZONE I BUFFER IMPACT
WM
568 SF (0.0I AC)
PERMANENT ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT
424 5F (0.0 I AC)
PERMANENT ZONE 3 BUFFER IMPACT
______'''
282 5F (0.0 I AC)
PRELIMINARY PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
0 10 20
Yo.
40
Jones & Cnossen
U
J
J
cL
z
ce
W
W
z
z
W
Construction Management
Civil Engineering
221 N. SALEM ST.
SUITE 001
PO BOX 1062
APEX, NC 27502
Office: 919-387-1174
Registration: P-0151
www.jonescnossen.com
0_
z
0
z
RETREAT
WAKE COUNTY, NORTh1 CAROLINA
TOWN OP APEX
SCALE
I "=20'
DRAWN
PLK
DATE
JANUARY 4, 2022
DEVIS ON
4/2 I /22
USAGE REVIEW
SHEET
GRAPHIC SCALE
3
PROJECT
I 9 I 0

I90
1
co
I 9 I
WI I -
PERMANENT
WETLAND I M PACT:
,253 SF
/V
I92
i
,0
D. WETLAND5
X/ I J- PERMANN/ENI
WETtAI1 IMPACT
I/7 /I
1
YARD INLET
cN
NOTE:
ALL EXISTING STREAM AND WETLAND INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A
SURVEY PROVIDED BY ROBINSON $ PLANTE LAND SURVEYING.
2. PER FEMA MAP #3720072000J $ #372007 I GOOK DATED 02 MAY 2000, A
100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN IS PRESENT.
3. TIP SITE WAS REVIEWED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES BY SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. TINE TOWN OF APEX STREAM DUFFER DETERMINATION
NUMBER IS 19-003.
RETREAT AT FRIENDSHIP
TABLE OF IMPACTS
IMPACT TYPE
IMPACT AREA C
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT ...11
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT
W I I - 1 1 ,420 SF (0.262 AC)
WETLAND "FUNCTIONAL LOSS" IMPACT
PERMANENT ZONE I BUFFER IMPACT
IMES
PERMANENT ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT
PERMANENT ZONE 3 BUFFER IMPACT
-W,-
PRELIMINARY PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
10
20
40
GRAPHIC SCALE
Jones & Cnossen
U
J
J
cL
Z
ce
w
w
Z
(7
Z
w
4111
'c
co
0
J
Construction Management
Civil Engineering
221 N. SALEM ST.
SUITE 001
PO BOX 1062
APEX, NC 27502
Office: 919-387-1174
Registration: P-0151
www.jonescnossen.com
Z
z
RETREAT
WAKE COUNTY, NORTh1 CAROLINA
TOWN OP APEX
U
w
U
SCALE
"=20'
DRAWN
PLK
DATE
JANUARY 4, 2022
REVISION
4/2 I /22
USAGE REVIEW
5hI T
4
PROJECT
I 9 I 0

JU,NE VAKE/STATION
VAR. I DTh
PUBLIC DRAIN.
;ASE.
d/p d.p d d. dR d•D id'p id p d.p d..
d'p
A -'A -'A
d"
0 1
,_7
P0146\RY/
•
1REAI\I ' • 44
LOSS'
IMP C ')
04
21SL1/ / '-iaggli
/44
et
w t1
Pm
(LN) lell
Y
1.
I
•
04
(ip
ir0-
1
Pe
Pets
Peir
POO
O / •
PiP
of Pei •
1
•
10
r
1'0
d' P d' p ,d' p d' p d'
57 /- PERMANENT
STREAM/
\ IMPACT-
(6� LF/17SF)
o
ZONE
f'EItV41EKiT "--7
• BUJ FFER/\ /\
IMPACT / \
(I 00 f)
7 /
/(
• // / / /,-
EX/ WETLANDS
/ /(th.)
�• 4
I P-RAP
DI.SIPA OR
PAD
(E BEDDED
IN O STRE M
BED)
i1d Aobits
+li i r IS 4 qe'•,•r••
1
AN Val artirli:1
•P .7
55:1
VAR. WIDTTPUBLIC
DRAIN.
ZONE 2
ZONE IPERMANENT
P RN/ANENT BUFFER
BUFFER yVIPACT
IMPACT (564F)
(4 \F)
4 d' P .d' p ,d' p
' p d'
CATCh BASIN
(TYP . )
SCM #2
SCM
MAINTENANCE
ACCESS
EASE ENT
PERMANEN
BU
IVP'CT I�
SEWER MAIN TO/BE INSTALLED BY
BORE $ JACK kVITh CASI N , AND
ANThEREFORE WILL NOT RE ULT IN
Y WETLAND OR STREAM�MPACTS
BUFFER
CULVERT
EMBED[
TO ALLO
AQUATI
PASS
(ENTIRE L
295
0+00
0,
JUNE LAKE
STATION
HEADWALL
(TYP.) \--1,1
/-1 NINGWALL
(TYP.)
,_
`�'_
36 RCP
DISS
(EMBEDDED
STREAM
Iff5T15R
IP-P�P,P
PATOR PAD
INTO
BED)
TO BE
ED 0"
FOR
O. W LIFE
ENGTH)
__
STREAM
IMPACT
ETINAM
BOTTOM
ELEVATION
_AGEG`PERMANENT
295
2 + 00
IMPACT AREA D - CROSS-SECTION FOR STREAM CROSSING
NOTE:
I . ALL EXISTING STREAM AND WETLAND INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A
SURVEY PROVIDED BY ROBINSON 4 PLANTE LAND SURVEYING.
2. PER FEMA MAP #3720072000J 4 #372007 1000K DATED 02 MAY 2000, A
100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN 15 PRESENT.
3. THE SITE WAS REVIEWED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES BY SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. THE TOWN OF APEX STREAM BUFFER DETERMINATION
NUMBER IS I 0-003.
RETREAT AT FRIENDSHIP
TABLE OF IMPACTS
IMPACT TYPE
IMPACT AREA D
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT .../1
57 - 69 LE / 177 SF (0.004 AC)
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
57 - 37 LF / 108 5F (0.02 AC)
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT
W I - 4,45 I SF (O. I 0 AC)
WETLAND "FUNCTIONAL LOSS" IMPACT
PERMANENT ZONE I BUFFER IMPACT
I ,252 5F (0.03 AC)
PERMANENT ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT
3
3,74 I SF (0.09 AC)
PERMANENT ZONE 3 BUFFER IMPACT
i_i_i_i_i_i_i_i
PRELIMINARY PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
GRAPHIC SCALE
Jones & Cnossen
0)
'c
0
J
Construction Management
Civil Engineering
221 N. SALEM ST.
SUITE 001
PO BOX 1062
APEX, NC 27502
Office: 919-387-1174
Registration: P-0151
www.jonescnossen.com
SCALE
"=20'
DATE
z
0
z
DRAWN
PLK
JANUARY 4, 2022
REVISION
4/2 I /22
H=-T
PROJ-/T
USAGE REVIEW
5
I 9 I 0

\ \ N
■
•
•
•
• S�
\ S�
405
404
403
/
CM**
10141115
or•oevei
14414*
WSW
•
itee
MA
•
•
•
•
•
A
(
I
ZONE 22
PERVANENT
BUFFER
V PACT
(2,239 SF)
•
1
I
•
1
•
•
NOTE:
I . ALL EXISTING STREAM AND WETLAND INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A
SURVEY PROVIDED BY ROBINSON 4 PLANTE LAND SURVEYING.
2. PER FEMA MAP #3720072000J 4 #372007 1 000K DATED 02 MAY 2000, A
1 00—YEAR FLOODPLAIN 15 PRESENT.
3. THE SITE WAS REVIEWED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES BY SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. THE TOWN OF APEX STREAM BUFFER DETERMINATION
NUMBER IS I 0-003.
RETREAT AT FRIENDSHIP
TABLE OF IMPACTS
IMPACT TYPE
IMPACT AREA E
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT m../1
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT
WETLAND "FUNCTIONAL LOSS" IMPACT
PERMANENT ZONE I BUFFER IMPACT
PERMANENT ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT
2,239 SF (0.05 AC)
PERMANENT ZONE 3 BUFFER IMPACT
i_i_i_i_i_i_i_i
PRELIMINARY PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
0 10 20
GRAPHIC SCALE
40
Jones & Cnossen
U
J
cL
Z
ce
w
w
Z
(7
Z
w
'c
co
0
J
Construction Management
Civil Engineering
221 N. SALEM ST.
SUITE 001
PO BOX 1062
APEX, NC 27502
Office: 919-387-1174
Registration: P-0151
www.jonescnossen.com
SCALE
I "=20'
DATE
DRAWN
PLK
JANUARY 4, 2022
REVISION
4/2 1 /22
PROJECT
USAGE REVIEW
6
I 9 I 0

1!'!
01
01 (
IILipLi LUj°
e,7
•
iK•
i
o ,,00\,
I
P
i
J
EX. CREEK TOP
OF BAN (TYP.)
li 100
NOTE:
1. ALL EXISTING STREAM AND WETLAND INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A
SURVEY PROVIDED BY ROBINSON $ PLANTE LAND SURVEYING.
2. PER FEMA MAP #3720072000J $ #372007 I COOK DATED 02 MAY 2006, A
100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN IS PRESENT.
3. THE SITE WAS REVIEWED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES BY SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. THE TOWN OF APEX STREAM BUFFER DETERMINATION
NUMBER IS 19-003.
RETREAT AT FRIENDSHIP
TABLE OF IMPACTS
IMPACT TYPE
IMPACT AREA F
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT ..../1
56 - 190 LF / 30 I SF (0.007 AC)
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT mu.
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT
WETLAND "FUNCTIONAL LOSS" IMPACT
PERMANENT ZONE I BUFFER IMPACT
PERMANENT ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT
EMU
PERMANENT ZONE 3 BUFFER IMPACT
PRELIMINARY PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
O 10 20
40
Jones & Cnossen
U
J
J
cL
z
ce
w
w
z
z
w
0)
'c
c0
0
J
Construction Management
Civil Engineering
221 N. SALEM ST.
SUITE 001
PO BOX 1062
APEX, NC 27502
Office: 919-387-1174
Registration: P-0151
www.jonescnossen.com
0_
z
0
z
RETREAT
WAKE COUNTY, NORTh1 CAROLINA
TOWN OP APEX
SCALE
I "=20'
DRAWN
PLK
DATE
JANUARY 4, 2022
REVISION
4/2 I /22
USAGE REVIEW
SHEET
GRAPHIC SCALE
7
PROJECT
I 9 I 0

a
/
/ / / /
/, / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / / /
/ / / / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / / /— / - / / / / / / /
/ / /
/ / / / / /
/ / / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / / 0 / / / / / / / /
/ / / / // 00 'R T AN (Zj,YP.)/ / / / / /
FLOODPLAI N
/ / / 0(TYr.)
d' D d' p d' p d' C d' V
a- 'a a 4 4 a a - 'a -'a -'a'a-''a a
'd' id'D d'D 4'D A'pd A'p d'Dad'V A A d'Dad
I I I /
I I >n<
I N
TICS
II I I gf>
r Q
\\
Hr-170
700
O z
70
/ / / / / / / // / / / / /
/ / / / / / / \ / / / / / //
/ / / / / / / /
/ / / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / /
/ / / / / / /
/
li
iviiiiiiirualltalitiii
W8 - WEtLAN D
CONVER5IO0IVIPACT
("FUNCTIONAL LOSS ):
264 SF
1 5' TYPE A LANDSCAPE BUFFffl
/ 1
7
/ ////
/ / / / /
ELEVATED
WOOD
BOARDWALK /0
d' p id' p d'
4 .-7
'
d p` d
4' p 4' p 4' p 4'
10' GREEfNWAY
WOODBURY SUBDIVISION
—
EXISTING UTTL/
SAVER EK SEWER
OUTFALL 40' TOA SAN .
SEWER EASE.
7
-'a_ 'a
d d'p e'
_7L
//cE
'a
p a' p
d'D d'p
A33
NOTE:
1. ALL EXISTING STREAM AND WETLAND INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A
SURVEY PROVIDED BY ROBINSON $ PLANTE LAND SURVEYING.
2. PER FEMA MAP #3720072000J * #372007 I GOOK DATED 02 MAY 200G, A
100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN IS PRESENT.
3. TFIE SITE WAS REVIEWED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES BY SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. TFIE TOWN OF APEX STREAM DUFFER DETERMINATION
NUMBER IS I S-003.
RETREAT AT FRIENDSHIP
TABLE OF IMPACTS
IMPACT TYPE
IMPACT AREA G
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT .../1
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT
WETLAND "FUNCTIONAL LOSS" IMPACT
W8 - 264 SF (0.000 AC)
PERMANENT ZONE I BUFFER IMPACT
PERMANENT ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT
PERMANENT ZONE 3 BUFFER IMPACT
i_i_i_i_i_i_i_i
PRELIMINARY PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
O 10 20
40
GRAPHIC SCALE
Jones & Cnossen
U
J
cL
z
ce
z
z
W
'c
co
0
J
Construction Management
Civil Engineering
221 N. SALEM ST.
SUITE 001
PO BOX 1062
APEX, NC 27502
Office: 919-387-1174
Registration: P-0151
www.jonescnossen.com
0_
Z
z
LL
RETREAT
WAKE COUNTY, NORTh1 CAROLINA
TOWN OP APEX
W
U
SCALE
I "=20'
DRAWN
PLK
DATE
JANUARY 4, 2022
REVISION
4/2 I /22
USAGE REVIEW
SHEET
8
PROJECT
I 9 I 0

7
7
z
/
,SI -
TEMPORAY
STEAN I'NO
LOS'
IMPACT
(30 LF/ I III SF)
VAR./PUB.
DR./EASE. I STREAM BED)
7
/
EX. CREEK/TOP
OF BAND (TYP.)
VAR. VAR. WI Th
PUB. DR.
EASE.
RIP -RAP/
/
DISSIPATO PAD /g (EMBEDDED INTO
0
/
J
Ij
S I - TEMPORARY
STREAM
IMPACT
(I �LF/90 SF)
EX. POND
TO REMAIN
7
7
7
PLAY LAWN
ON
2
3
HEA
(7
300
CULVERT S
TO ALLOW F(
AQUATIC LI
PASSAGE
(ENTIRE LENG
CENTERLINE
:I SLOPE
(TYP.)
JUNE LAKE
STATION
v'INGWALL
DWALL
YP.) \-__,..._
(TYP.)
_
BE
4" RCP
_
DISSIPATOR
(EMBEDDED
STREAM
RIP -PAP
PAD
INTO
BED)
Lh)
PERMANENT
STREAM
IMPACT
EXISTING
STREAM JJ
BOTTOM
ELEVATION
300
295
290 290
0+00 0+50 I +00 I +50 2+00
IMPACT AREA G - CROSS-SECTION FOR STREAM CROSSING
NOTE:
I . ALL EXISTING STREAM AND WETLAND INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A
SURVEY PROVIDED BY ROBINSON $ PLANTE LAND SURVEYING.
2. PER FEMA MAP #3720072000J $ #372007 I COOK DATED 02 MAY 2006, A
100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN IS PRESENT.
3. THE SITE WAS REVIEWED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES BY SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. THE TOWN OF APEX STREAM BUFFER DETERMINATION
NUMBER IS 19-003.
RETREAT AT FRIENDSHIP
TABLE OF IMPACTS
IMPACT TYPE
IMPACT AREA 1
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT .../1
S 1 - G5 LF / 20G SF (0.005 AC)
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
S I - 49 LF / 20 I SF (0.005 AC)
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT
WETLAND "FUNCTIONAL LOSS" IMPACT
PERMANENT ZONE I BUFFER IMPACT
PERMANENT ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT
PERMANENT ZONE 3 BUFFER IMPACT
PRELIMINARY PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
0 10 20
40
GRAPHIC SCALE
Jones & Cnossen
0)
'c
c0
0
J
Construction Management
Civil Engineering
221 N. SALEM ST.
SUITE 001
PO BOX 1062
APEX, NC 27502
Office: 919-387-1174
Registration: P-0151
www.jonescnossen.com
0_
Z
z
RTRAT
WAKE COUNTY, NORTh1 CAROLINA
TOWN OP APEX
L
W
U
SCALE
I "=20'
DRAWN
PLK
DATE
JANUARY 4, 2022
REVISION
4/2 I /22
USAGE REVIEW
SHEET
9
PROJECT
I 9 I 0

Existing Conditions
NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same
property, identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User
Manual for detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if any supplementary
measurements were performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT / SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Heelan
3. Applicant/owner name: MI Homes of Raleigh
5. County: Wake
7. River Basin: Cape Fear
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach):
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
2. Date of evaluation: 4/28/22
4. Assessor name/organization:
6. Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Beaver Creek
35.694336°,-78.931797°
Lisa Long & Alex Hornaday, SEI
9. Site number (show on attached map): S6 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 276
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 0.1 rI Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 1 13. Is assessment reach a swamp stream? in Yes in No
14. Feature type: in Perennial flow rj Intermittent flow in Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM RATING INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone:
© Mountains (M) in Piedmont (P)
© Inner Coastal Plain (I)
16. Estimated geomorphic ti N-
valley shape (skip for 1:-]a
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip CI Size 1 (< 0.1 mil © Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mil
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
b
(less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
Size 3(0.5to<5mil © Size 4(>_5mi2)
© Outer Coastal Plain (0)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? in Yes in No If Yes, check all that appy to the assessment area.
E Section 10 water r Classified Trout Waters F Water Supply Watershed ( ©1 ©II ow l: IV ©V)
E Essential Fish Habitat r Primary Nursery Area r High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
r Publicly owned property F NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect r Nutrient Sensitive Waters
E Anadromous fish r 303(d) List r CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
E Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
r Designated Critical Habitat (list species):
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? 0 Yes No
1. Channel Water - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
© A
B
t: C
Water throughout assessment reach.
No flow, water in pools only.
No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
© A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is adversely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impounded on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates).
B Not A
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
0 A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
B Not A.
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
0 A
Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
©B NotA
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
0 A < 10% of channel unstable
© B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable
6. Streamside Area Interaction - streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
op, op, Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
©B ©B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
© C 0 C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors - assessment reach/intertidal zone metric

Check all that apply.
7 A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
r B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
E D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
E E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in the "Notes/Sketch"
section.
E F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
7 G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
r H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc.)
WO I Other: No water (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
71.1 Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather - watershed metric
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
✓ A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
f B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
C■ C No drought conditions
9 Large or Dang-:rous Stream - assessment reach metric
© Yes ?id No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types - assessment reach metric
10a. t' Yes in No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
11.
CIA M _Itiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses m
✓ B
✓ lc
flD
I✓E
(lrclude liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
M JItiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
vegetation
M JItiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
Little or no habitat
5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
Submerged aquatic vegetation
Low -tide refugia (pools)
Sand bottom
5% vertical bank along the marsh
Little or no habitat
...............:REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS""""""""""""""
Bedform and Substrate - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
1 la. r Yes .© No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
r A Rifle -run section (evaluate 11c)
7 B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d'
F G Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. lr'riffles sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach - whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain Streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) =
absent. Rare (R) = present but <- 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
00000000
00000000
C A P
© © © Bedrock/saprolite
© © © Boulder (256 - 4096 mm)
© © © Cobble (64 - 256 mm)
© © © Gravel (2 - 64 mm)
© © © Sand (.062 - 2 mm)
© © © Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
© © © Detritus
© 0 0 Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. in Yes in No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12. Aquatic Life - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. r Yes 0 No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. 0 No Water in Other:
12b. r Yes 0 No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check
all that apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
>1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for size 3 and 4 streams.
r Adult frogs
I— Aquatic reptiles
✓ Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
r Beetles (including water pennies)
✓ Caddisfly larvae (Trichoptera [T])
✓ Asian clam (Corbicula)
r Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
I- Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
r Dipterans (true flies)
r Mayfly larvae (Ephemeroptera [E])
r Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
r Midges/mosquito larvae
E Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
✓ Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)

✓ r Other fish
I- r Salamanders/tadpoles
✓ r Snails
I- r Stonefly larvae (Plecoptera [P])
✓ r Tipulid larvae
✓ r Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and
upland runoff.
LB RB
t: A t: A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
B © B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C 0 C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples include: ditches, fill,
soil, compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage - streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
©A ©A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 6 inches deep
B © B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
0 C o C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the
normal wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y DY
N O N
Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
16. Baseflow Contributors - assessment reach metric (skip for size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
7 A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
7 B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
7 C Obstruction that passes some flow during low -flow periods within assessment area (beaver dam, bottom -release dam)
D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron oxidizing bacteria in water indicates seepage)
E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors - assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
7 A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
7 B Obstruction not passing flow during low flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
7 C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
7 D Evidence that the stream -side area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
7 E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
F None of the above
18. Shading - assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
CI A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
0 C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top
of bank out to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
C: A 0 A C: A C: A >- 100-feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
©B ©B ©B From 50 to < 100-feet wide
C © C © C © C From 30 to < 50-feet wide
D © D © D © D From 10 to < 30-feet wide
E ©E ©E ©E < 10-feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
A 0 A Mature forest
©B Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C © C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
D ©D Maintained shrubs
E © E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22: r1
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
©A ©A ©A ©A ©A ©A Row crops
B OB ©B ©B ©B ©B Maintained turf
C 0 C © C © C © C © C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
D 0 D ©D ©D ©D ©D Pasture (active livestock use)

22. Stem Density - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
©. A 0 A Medium to high stem density
©B 0 B Low stem density
Inc Inc No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10-feet wide.
LB RB
© B
©C
ID A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition - First 100 feet of streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes
to assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
©A ©A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native
species, with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
0 B l: B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
©C Inc Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity - assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. in Yes in No Was a conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. in No Water in Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
©A <46 ©B 46to<67 ©C 67to<79 in 79to<230 in >_ 230
Notes/Sketch:
Stream channel alteration is due to the apparent alteration of channel by tire tracks. Please see attached photos for reference.

NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Heelan
Date of Evaluation 4/28/22
Stream Category Pb1 Assessor Name/Organizationia Long & Alex Hornaday,
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Function Class Rating Summary
YES
YES
YES
Intermittent
USACE/ NCDWR
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
(2) Baseflow
(2) Flood Flow
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
HIGH
HIGH
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
NA
NA
LOW
LOW
HIGH
HIGH
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
NO
NO
LOW
NA
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
(2) In -stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
HIGH
HIGH

•
>s� + t r, sL+,'' `'s• ; \ - *„ us es a"1 L. 31 .RZ'i S �a ram"- -
*� .40
- - 1 :1::
, }w
Li S '
iia: L M e 4
' *- r ,Ni:, --7,„,..:---:....%:':-.--,-;-;it,---,C7,-L-4* '-„,i.7.' -
,ad
Yfir a
'I :=4,,..- --'"'-' 1---, r".•''' pi. •••'"'"•fP,,t>4'1/ '';>445 cc-Alur
� �� � �.. , ' � k'�,�It `� r „ �,'
3- , . ' *ta , ,, -�` `S 1,: - `� 9C � 4.,,E14 a �.,1 �.K• �4.
Ems. ` "`�� t r� F -` 1 Y r- 1 . ,Sk Y
sue' ` '$ t k - w. `'�7^{ ' rt �'� ' v, ...r ,?._.
. }
- ` � r9 ``�r. a1. tc . r _ f ,'r'f,'!a •A S,;(- ,,I,: - . � A�,,�
Nairai
Photo 1: S6 View 1
01, )__,111)
SPANGL,ER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

•
vs !�._ ,q a c,e �,y� �'._ 1 r '�• rrra ,..4 —Ale i.0
i'1 r r/ 9� •4. C
ri. I
_ F'�_t. }a - ` ..' �'� _: . -. t:- -, `.•-,Vk ';--,,t- . ! r' t� ,,,, `_gi n` ' i'
'ti=,t„ 'w `� 9 �''' -�Y abx a A ,,, s 4,_ �: yyKo rts . '-, 1, 1 may, .
�^ k,'- c '� -9��„ �sxK �. �-.� Pam. �a. j •�''i!- i8 ':Y q ad aif 'k.; -,. , �
•
fir, RC',y' .e <� �n xr
> - " 1`it-.x r `iil-.'' \ ', Ir ' S.; - ) R1n - ,
S x F ,
,r�„. - � dbY 5 i„ t r" �INE-' ,,` - ,i, �. .. ,4 'Y .hYy y�
,114
V 14.41* l
i ram !- r�t .[
_>�� � �1 � Tfir � � �.: „g, ;.I y-`tom'_ -� ti __-
ems ��( t .4. ,* sir ` L � -
c eY i a k�:Tr ri 'P d 1 '� P -! Y• ,' iy.i • / �
.r ,� n ,a ,L • '3.' "0 rt ,.. a �"r
r.
/t P... 0401.. „l. yk .�1 •.' ' , •, " . j'-tom . r�4 1. ,:yam,. $•7 «i Y
e�lar C 1 7 fj I
_,....._., _ 0:
41,...,4,4
{7 �... � '� �'_ '. S may
0 , .k,. .0
. f• - ,-- p, i * 4.7..f.,..T.,- • , 49 5,,,, -
h ,f• r fi" r-A �-'` O y�' ) j Y4 ._� ti F ��r ^ :.�
Photo 2: S6 View 2
01,11)
SPANGL,ER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

t p- e t+Y, fis. 3' .c�nmt `s i cr o° _9 4 tf ,rg�; ' Ac t t..,
R'c y� - 1 .c • v r I -.+-
.3604.,„
.s 3.asy,� eg :.y s r
i. v4 is Y �( ^fA� � '] .di36 ' `_•� k S Y' _
N. ,
X..:�` Tt�— .� �i -,f'�► ,-o-� w jrin�-�r � �`'`'td�;, '�", ;°�` ✓(fs `4 R�,�� Jj .,. -_'
1
lor
�' F✓�^ ` - ir
:4 - L' --A
•
•
•
ate. . �
., .• $ •B -. r . ' ....-,} A _ :�4^* :\ -,4 f*? . c am•
�r . s�e F�
y�y�-, V J �vim, { 4
�� '"'f ':.. kkF esa ,,r ,fig h t� rdht _: r9a.+„,, . jr , 41:
.-,,,:.,,4,,,,-.'.v:-.,,-;_1,-,•..-,...44., ' • .,.'"•- „-.-..7_, '...,..„:,,.'.,„..,,-„,t*-:7,,-7'
t > ;RBI a 1I'L•
. �•
ILK
3 , �
10,410
� �� = " -ritir. + @ ice F T� R '`�k- r
— �- .-.nrt� �, � is C an. } �-t vi'T c�• � ,€ � `6..,� '�
iF ib'� 4, : r
i • �'
4r-- s� 0
J `• l. 4 7 �•-
!':.4 i `�';.+ir �
40-----.."
r`1 �?: �- .-ail - �.,.- - . .: ' - -
Photo 3: S6 View 3
g)
SPANGL,ER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

'7 . ; ...
•-•!. ,- ,, ----:
, ., , - 4-,;_e_ --? -:,..•':: 1,.1 ' f- ;4' ': --•;-;.; 4 ----
. .,,...- • ., - --4,•„-„it., --,4 ..,:- --,'„,,-"A.: : ,,-,,r
._ ,, ..-. m-,5,-, _;-‘;„ r,..:1,,t„r, ,- 0,0 t.7-im.- -At,'-'t•-' '-''-',' - .:-".;:;;,-'4',.." .C-..,-- -"--'4'',•---7". t7.**"...-
r -''rr-la '''''.''.4.P.-4`rr. '- :::' /d All d•'' .0. '..ar r •s-0,-,r- = -- -1-' 4-; ,,',..;•••; "4:•f- r -4_,--,;.,
.-.. ,, .,,,,,,.„5 , 4,,...„•,...**.•#, ,.4 _., _1` , .."„ ''',7...-,45.-, ;.1-4-,x.. .., -d•dir- ..- t.•a - ,- ,...:71,rr-r{:---.14,_
` 'r"."..iis ' e'--7.,.ae.-,* ''• `d A--,/.... - '4 -""• 41''`'' 4.,_ .-44. 'r- r r. -..• .''' ,r3 -". --..... As, sa i- • 4.- -, -,.. -
-' "- .- ...'' i: `..ik'1!ri‘`:; 1 ar.,•%' , "1" - , ,.......- '." .- '''' ifitM r"-kw . - 1W- 44"
ffi ir Cfis+ ,A -' --- - -=•- -....,!--- '
': ,..-,----"t:-.1K.- k' --lk 17.--'-••,-T;,,.. i ; ' - -,,,':..= --4.• --....._ t. k÷..citiA.-,,,,,,,,,,,,k,-* i''f- ,14.-xri, - 4'''-' ' '''-'40%-t
-_-. -- ..4.-......-, -74. 4c-e4t . --4:A-A t • -fitt-m- •, . ,- '''.--4 !l'iri'041.4.11i:-4-.T.a:'._."\..t' "i'l--..--e ' ..--,--'' ',.,M.-4.'''' - ' ' - 5' -
''',"' -:". ',-44', -'rr7:-'d:7, .- _,.4K4.4:----d''';14.. `,:r r AS-c.-- "'"'r.'`'-e..A . '"- -..r,T .7.e?..i -." .''.4'.-• '- " 4.. ' S '- ''''':_ -"-',. ' -- '-."S -
:.' "7f.-- - `..-1.--,-.2.,-'--.0-;•.,' ''.1;-.."--:i- ' ' :4''' ' .`• '...t.'..!:,---7-_.„"_, ' 4"----. _. , ' - - - ' .'•7. ''4 -,-,-; --7"..- •-' .-.-.
Ityjoi*.401110.„
••,......--
'''44sr.,..,,r-- .„.,'!-V- -. ,.., 4 ' -,,-,'.7 --- -, -' ,-.- - •4:-.•.,-.1 'I ' -"--- ----- • - ••''4f i - '
' ----` -.:f."::'..7r,'•;2•---,.-` -1-. 't..':'-4-': • -014'- -1444..'" •-- --4: 4 •'-. -5Vv-" ' -
''.... -4..."'" -"-....T...r,...,,,; -_-:.--'-?` -4"- '''+`.4. Z: -_- ;-.'-'.ig..4 - ''...ii'' '•.',W"'•-.„. - • '''.ir."..'""tir
-.--''..--..-;." -S i'-' -'•:, .--'30.t ''.' '----4 '•.,,41,
..,..p...n. „..,, _ e"...t.4 '.. ' '4
-•''''''W-1...'- r":. '• - ''' ..-.5; .'"' . -,=-":..,,,,..:1...:4 ,,..„:_ ...... ' ' r- .. '"•-4, 4-.-._.. .•:[" . rt,,z 7_,.- r.- :- , _, , :
_ , ,,!,...,4 - -ff'-6i.- '_,-' '' \''15.- ' ''''0'41V;aq...-:.- --.4,e' 4 - -.'.-- -1 '' -.::-.4,,,,-" •;--•-, •---,.•--- -
21'1,- .!-,--,,,-"-_,,,,,.• ••• ,,,s• -.11.-?4, ...., i•--_,...-. A -..--
.•_. --,-7,- . •-: A.-4: _...mr.g.,"'" .... ,-,1‹.e. '..-.•-- g "."'-'11-0 - - , ''',1,4,.
-
a , ,
'' "'''''''- .1-t-i.CAtt '.,,,r-%"/•-'.""j_`'' -w •, ,..4,`_.*.' •'..•-• _.zog,,,11._, . _
" " ' '• “'" .-- -- --- '-47; ..."`''.."4.6. .4'..-..?..414,,,... ':, ix -.•-•-•,0 -.. . --,...-.- --.4.., -c.ILL-0-,
*-:. sni-2"- ---A-c.-;-- .".'W.54•4 .,,,-57.04g „, -.„,...4)41ite „. ,• ..-r,,,-, , ,_ ,..._ , , .-..1.•,. -414,41..1.-,." ,,.......;7.-4,:.1", ,..-•
'-', ..+21, '1,--. i..,1.'"V,A.k.c..„;"'-:tirN4...,..... . '- - l' --,--4,043.'''. - '- -. I. *-1,41)Iiiti
15_7r-... -":-<S, -.4;r!-:.-- 1:0,;*.'5,' -''''*eti4.-4°.,:('"-'4•Ttr.` 't4r . 4 - '=:-„wie-- •,i''.-,-...%-v_p,--,. -*.W.,-.';,!-.'..t-: -- .'",4_,-- c'•>';'-----
4.4 ,. "(40..0,-':e7.A:_._.;, --17) .-t4,1-,;!,4' ir744...1.t. -5-', '-4 , ' -_-r-7.4;41 5'. - -- ' ,-..A;;•-•'` -' '14-;44'4, - - . -74 := ':-q '
". 7747 . f 7;=,,' 'r- - --•- - 1 A/.....•."• -..--- ' ..,41 ,1. ....• ". At, da"---.4 c !.' „liklik;$11.7.5 "".1*7-1,, - - ." lb '',, -- ":`,; -fel
---•-.. .;V:'..-4""r..2".1 4 - '41,,',0 .„. • --Itt - %, 1, ,,,,-:%.• .., .,-,-..,,,,A4040.7‘ ,..`../..--71-.,,. ,-J_ ,,Mi. 5 . ....,,, _ 7 ,t4.....,
k 41.•''..1` .c-''..14:e- -' -"'.. i-_,:dW ' " .':•.'"--- .... .
---.-Ii'
•-:.7-".:".."-:rtc. r`:,.2,erAk . ;ir.lio-4 .:11.--"4';• - - ..;477 4 _
•_ ':'!-'. ''-t."'''' '-'---,,f: W '' ,z.. _=,.....:-.....z.,„.., ---;,- :,..../...„ . '
...,.- . i •~.ir . - _ ..- - 1 • -,.
0.,,Ner,, : - •- ----_.7---:‘.- -.J.-, -__" .1,e.40E-7-1-i,-, _-
•
, : ' - 4. '.--A, • errjaiaN, 141....- . .k.r' '6'4'."..,,,- ••• -"" . "-, ` , "..
e \- --,""""'" - - '_ ‘‘'''' ",- .-' \Fes.'• ,;-?,,Ar ,it.,:4.-Nr- ,„vir.3 114 vows' ....i,,,,,A, - _ , . .
,
- q
as,....7ruk.i Apt": 4-I I*,-' ' ,--"`„•--pl, ' ,P-,..1",,A; . -(4V--,A, ' .•- 0 ' ,,',140.- •. A,,...--.-;4.,.t: Or ,. !•.- . t. ••-•
-- "IF'•,,-0,-...„0,•,- -4°'...r. •t•L, -.''' •••,•.„..._-.,..)F.4.7•-i-.... -:-•,-;* h -*•"" ;' ,,,,,r7 6
es - -,.=. . •i ,L,0 ._47-4'..1,,,,,.-; 74- - »..- .= . ,...,, i ,... -,,,,, ,- .. .st-:zr, ,,,- let. - ----- -, • ., - =i- . ,
, •
kr,- t- --.k' -,.•,-1,41,,r4%,/1/4." ,- 4,- r,-„,..-1-' ',''AL ..- k""i-' '' ' ' 14 -- '-;i'.41:' 44".
.2. - 4,0' ';-, -41'' ..../eF s. ,"-tef., ,:, • '"•".".,.,..),„ 4 1,- ''''. w? 'A.. -.r, .4 :li Ike. .„ ..' -.116.4"., , ,,..,sa
,k,tf?"1. '2 "' .t' . .,, t` , ' - T r'..., , , ;" 44ri.-s .r.t... -. xt '': ',' ' N''' 1' ---r. .. • - N-,,,,, *7-; ., '
°I.,....• ' ,,,,yoth A. ' -,-- ' ."'11P'. .7,Or , 1--q - . .4 . ', ',A,,t_IA (:. ••the*.-• * - . - ' -
40
fr,ga y,„„7,.2.. s-1.,,,..-4 .,,,..m ,•-,... Ilk_ -f-0.• 4.0,-,;;--.. ••it, „ . - e 4'... . . ' or* r, '' .1 ...' .' 44t.
y ' . ''.7 ,,4„,,..,,, .- a,.:47"2=c,,,, 7..474, x -. ... ; 1 1. • - ..„. , -? ,,,,,ra ,, at.: lie - •
b ,
:" .-- - ,;•,,,'f.,:-•• -14 i -0.6.. -..„,L... "..a-t• ,e,a' .::„.. -, '• : '4*-•' 4:-.7. • `0,-," :4".4 a '4,,- c,-.14.AP? • ' " ' • - -••
,r40.Alleir*,;_ty...'., pai, , --;,,.., 7,. .„,- r,-4 _,...ni .j, '''Ci, -;--•'•--k. ' . •:::„:_,_ ,,,,.-t.... , ,,F. ,_ • • . „..e.. . .1.. :
4f• *V
,,,2. -i- r' -- - 'Alre ,'";-it_•' --,;,-'; 4':'' .4,1‘• ..4,-;:fr'.- -'-v-k- ' • -4*- , ,, -4,.''' . * -'-- -
0- - 11.trit '•-7- tr"? -Lk ' % '&' -Al?,- .• .
4
:7,-,"f",,t*".A4 i.# 71-,' tojc.i.-, 112-,:, 4Z 4 • .:,---4-- -- ' 'i 4
•41,4„..-,i,„ ,-; ,•,-e•- t4.....-4.-
.. • ,,...4-.;•••0,, , -,.,,, ---= '
. .,.......a"
Photo 4: S6 View
GI
SpANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

Evaluated as if feature were preserved and other
proposed development was instituted.
NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #:
NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same
property, identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User
Manual for detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if any supplementary
measurements were performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT / SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Heelan
3. Applicant/owner name: MI Homes of Raleigh
5. County: Wake
7. River Basin: Cape Fear
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach):
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): S6
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet):
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 1
14. Feature type: in Perennial flow in Intermittent flow
STREAM RATING INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone:
16. Estimated geomorphic
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream):
17. Watershed size: (skip
2. Date of evaluation: 4/28/22
4. Assessor name/organization:
6. Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Beaver Creek
35.694336°,-78.931797°
Lisa Long & Alex Hornaday, SEI
10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 276
0.1 ri Unable to assess channel depth.
13. Is assessment reach a swamp stream? in Yes in No
© Tidal Marsh Stream
© Mountains (M) in Piedmont (P)
© Inner Coastal Plain (I)
ti l
(more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope)
CI Size 1 (< 0.1 mil © Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mil
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
b
(less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
© Size 3(0.5to<5mil © Size 4(>_5mi2)
© Outer Coastal Plain (0)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? in Yes in No If Yes, check all that appy to the assessment area.
rl Section 10 water r] Classiified Trout Waters rI Water Supply Watershed ( © I © II © III l: IV © V)
El Essential Fish Habitat El Primary Nursery Area [1 High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
fl Publicly owned property VI NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect ri Nutrient Sensitive Waters
l Anadromous fish r1303(d) List r CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
fl Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
El Designated Critical Habitat (list species):
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? C Yes © No
1. Channel Water - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
© A Water throughout assessment reach.
© B No flow, water in pools only.
C: C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
© A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is adversely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impounded on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates).
B Not A
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
0 A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
B Not A.
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
0 A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
B NotA
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
0 A < 10% of channel unstable
© B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable
6. Streamside Area Interaction - streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
©A ©A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
©B ©B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors - assessment reach/intertidal zone metric

Check all that apply.
✓ i A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in the "Notes/Sketch"
section.
Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc.)
Other: No water (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
Little to no stressors
El
r�C
✓ I D
✓ �E
r F
rlG
✓ l H
FI
7IJ
8. Recent Weather - watershed metric
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
© A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
C No drought conditions
9 Large or Dangerous Stream - assessment reach metric
0 Yes ❑' No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types - assessment reach metric
10a. ❑ Yes ❑ No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment
A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
✓ l B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
vegetation
rl C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
rl D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
E Little or no habitat
reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
✓ I F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
FIG
rH
✓ l l
FP
f IK
Submerged aquatic vegetation
Low -tide refugia (pools)
Sand bottom
5% vertical bank along the marsh
Little or no habitat
..........................******:REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS""""""""""""""
11. Bedform and Substrate - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. in Yes in No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
IT A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
rl B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d'
C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffles sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach - whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain Streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) =
absent, Rare (R) = present but <- 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
CI CI CI
CI CI CI
CI CI CI
CI CI CI
CI CI CI
CI CI CI
CI CI CI
O
© © Bedrock/saprolite
© © Boulder (256 - 4096 mm)
© © Cobble (64 - 256 mm)
© © Gravel (2 - 64 mm)
© © Sand (.062 - 2 mm)
© © Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
© © Detritus
0 Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11 d. in Yes © No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12. Aquatic Life - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. in Yes CI No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. 0 No Water in Other:
12b. in Yes in No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check
all that apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
-1-1771-I l 1T fl1 1T-
>1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for size 3 and 4 streams.
IT Adult frogs
IT Aquatic reptiles
r Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
IT Beetles (including water pennies)
r Caddisfly larvae (Trichoptera [T])
I- Asian clam (Corbicula)
r Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
I- Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
r Dipterans (true flies)
I- Mayfly larvae (Ephemeroptera [E])
✓ Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
r Midges/mosquito larvae
IT Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
IT Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)

✓ r Other fish
r r Salamanders/tadpoles
✓ r Snails
✓ r Stonefly larvae (Plecoptera [P1)
r r Tipulid larvae
✓ r Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and
upland runoff.
LB RB
© A © A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
© B © B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C: C 0 C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples include: ditches, fill,
soil, compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage - streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
©A ©A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 6 inches deep
© B © B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
0 C o C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the
normal wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y DY
MN MN
Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
16. Baseflow Contributors - assessment reach metric (skip for size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
Obstruction that passes some flow during low -flow periods within assessment area (beaver dam, bottom -release dam)
Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron oxidizing bacteria in water indicates seepage)
Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors - assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
El A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
r� B Obstruction not passing flow during low flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
r� C Urban stream ( 24% impervious surface for watershed)
r1 D Evidence that the stream -side area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
ri E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
F None of the above
18. Shading - assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
© A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
C: B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
cc Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top
of bank out to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
©A ©A ©A ©A >- 100-feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
©B ©B ©B ©B From 50 to < 100-feet wide
© C 0 C © C © C From 30 to < 50-feet wide
© D 0 D © D © D From 10 to < 30-feet wide
0 E m E DE E < 10-feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
©A ©A Mature forest
© B © B Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C: C C: C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
© D © D Maintained shrubs
© E © E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22: El
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
©A ©A ©A ©A ©A ©A Row crops
©B C: B Maintained turf
© C © C © C © C © C © C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
©D ©D ©D ©D ©D ©D Pasture (active livestock use)

22. Stem Density - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
© A © A Medium to high stem density
©B ©B Low stem density
Inc C: C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10-feet wide.
LB RB
[IA
© B
0' C
A
B
C
The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition - First 100 feet of streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes
to assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
©A ©A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native
species, with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B ©B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
cc Inc Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity - assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. in Yes in No Was a conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. in No Water in Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
©A <46 ©B 46to<67 ©C 67to<79 in 79to<230 in >_ 230
Notes/Sketch:
Stream channel alteration is due to the apparent alteration of channel by tire tracks. Please see attached photos for reference.

NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Heelan
Date of Evaluation 4/28/22
Stream Category Pb1 Assessor Name/Organizationia Long & Alex Hornaday,
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Function Class Rating Summary
YES
YES
YES
Intermittent
USACE/ NCDWR
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
(2) Baseflow
(2) Flood Flow
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
HIGH
HIGH
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
NA
NA
LOW
LOW
HIGH
HIGH
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
NO
NO
LOW
NA
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
(2) In -stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
HIGH
HIGH

NC WAM WETLAND ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 5
Existing Conditions
USACE AID#: NCDWR #:
Project Name Heelan Date of Evaluation 4/28/2022
Applicant/Owner Name MI Homes of Raleigh Wetland Site Name W11
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization Lisa Long and Alex Hornaday, SEI
Level III Ecoregion Piedmont Nearest Named Water Body Beaver Creek
River Basin Cape Fear USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit 03030002
County Wake NCDWR Region Raleigh
al Yes O No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude (deci-degrees) 35.694336, -78.931797
Evidence
Please
appropriate,
to
Is
of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
circle and/or make note on last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if
in recent past (for instance, approximately within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited
the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby
septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
the assessment area intensively managed? • Yes p No
Regulatory
I-
r
F
r
r
r
r
r
r
What
Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? O Yes • No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
Anadromous fish
Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
Publicly owned property
N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
Designated NCNHP reference community
Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
Blackwater
Brownwater
Q
0
17
Is
Is
Does
Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) • Lunar • Wind • Both
the assessment area on a coastal island? go Yes O No
the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? • Yes p No
the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? fYes C[]. No
1. Ground Surface ConditionNegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure
(VS) in the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable,
then rate the assessment area based on evidence of an effect.
GS VS
DA ©A Not severely altered
B roil Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing,
less diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and
duration (Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only,
while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
DA DA Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
B © B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
C © C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation
change) (examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column for each group below. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland
type (WT).
AA WT
3a. DA DA Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 foot deep
©B ©B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
MC ©C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
0 D CD Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. DA Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
DB Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure - assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape
feature. Make soil observations within the 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for
regional indicators.
4a. ©A Sandy soil
El B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
© C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. EA Soil ribbon < 1 inch
B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch
4c. QA No peat or muck presence
© B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland - opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub).
Examples of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
in A in A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
B B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
Inc Inc Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use - opportunity metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources
draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the
assessment area (5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M). Effective riparian buffers
are considered to be 50 feet wide in the Coastal Plain and Piedmont ecoregions and 30 feet wide in the Blue Ridge Mountains ecoregion.
WS 5M 2M
fIA rIA r A >_ 10% impervious surfaces
r1 B rl B r B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants)
r� C rl C r C >- 20% coverage of pasture
r� D ri D r D >_ 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
FIE ri E r E >_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
r� F rl F r F >_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land
FIG ri G r G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent dainage and/or overbank flow from affectio the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer - assessment area/wetland complex condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
©Yes ONo If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is weltand? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
O A >_ 50 feet
O B From 30 to < 50 feet
O C From 15 to < 30 feet
© D From 5 to < 15 feet
© E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
<- 15-feet wide D > 15-feet wide 0 Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
O Yes in No
7e. Is tributary or other open water sheltered or exposed?
© Sheltered - adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
© Exposed - adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes
and Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp
Forest only)
Check a box in each column. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and the wetland complex at the
assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
DA ©A >_ 100feet
©B © B From 80 to < 100 feet
©C From 50 to < 80 feet
C: D C: D From 40 to < 50 feet
©E ©E From 30 to < 40 feet
©F ©F From 15 to < 30 feet
©G ©G From 5 to < 15 feet
©H ©H <5feet

9. Inundation Duration - assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
CA Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition - assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
En A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
©B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT WC FW (if applicable)
©A ©A ©A >_ 500 acres
B ©B ©B From 100 to < 500 acres
©C ©C ©C From 50 to < 100 acres
©D ©D ©D From 25 to < 50 acres
©E ©E ©E From 10 to < 25 acres
©F ©F ©F From 5 to < 10 acres
©G ©G ©G From 1 to < 5 acres
©H ©H ©H From 0.5 to < 1 acre
M IIDID From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
©J ©J ©J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
©K ©K ©K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness - wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
©A Pocosin is the full extent (>- 90%) of its natural landscape size.
©B Pocosin is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas - landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
metric naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility
line corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, fields (pasture open and agriculture), or water > 300 feet wide.
Well Loosely
©A ®A >_ 500 acres
B B From 100 to < 500 acres
©C ©C From 50 to < 100 acres
©D ©D From 10 to < 50 acres
©E ©E < 10 acres
©F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
©Yes © No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect - wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non -forested areas >- 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors and clear -cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directiions? If the assessment area is clear-cut,
select option "C."
MA 0
CB 1 to 4
©C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition - assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
©A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
©B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or
clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
E C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in
at least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity - assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
©A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (<10% cover of exotics).
©B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
MC Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (>50% cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
E Yes © No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
©A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation
© B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider structure
in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA WT
CA EA Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
©B ©B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
©C ©C Canopy sparse or absent
©A ©A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
©B ©B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
CC EC Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
©A ©A Dense shrub layer
©B ©B Moderate density shrub layer
CC CC Shrub layer sparse or absent
CA CA Dense herb layer
©B ©B Moderate density herb layer
©C ©C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
©A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12-inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
CB NotA
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Shrub Mid -Story Canopy
EA
B
© C
Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12-inch DBH.
Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
©A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
�B NotA
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater
Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
©A ©B
ED
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization,
diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
EA Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
®B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
©C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
©D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes

Wetland Site Name
Wetland Type
NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
W11
Headwater Forest
Date
4/28/2022
Assessor Name/Organization Long and Alex Hornaday
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
Sub -function Rating Summary
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Function Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Particulate Change
Soluble Change
Physical Change
Pollution Change
Condition
Condition
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
NA
NA
MEDIUM
LOW
NA
NA
NA
Habitat
Physical Structure
Landscape Patch Structure
Vegetation Composition
Condition
Condition
Condition
MEDIUM
HIGH
LOW
Function Rating Summary
Function
Metrics/Notes
Rating
Hydrology
Water Quality
Habitat
Condition
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
HIGH
HIGH
MEDIUM
Overall Wetland Rating
HIGH

4 } .-.404.,:,Ii, :14 -,i,, ....%,..„ .0,,, . i.40 - , .. .„,.,.,,,,- ,,,, ,i4s, iii _- , ,_,- it., ,i, , • --,k- ,
ite 1
>Ai 1 :+ ‘1,..
" 4 .7. � #b, fi I ;g ' +� "„r�t_p • aR#F F 7 '.
t5., :is( if,- $.14.,,., A 17-.,;- ,,, t I,..:::: --,".2,41*:.401.7=1 ---1-.7r4i1S,. „„.„0,,i'J---..0!4,-,',:s"..;,-';';i:li,,,,
i ki_ -,,,Aqi: , „i‘:.„. ---tlf 14**', IOC ,,,..i-.24 .r41:r i 0.r.': i,),4iei--4, , .,,,,' -PL-'-..ft., - f '.`:::-,c".44, or ',' f.-1-'4tv-: '
;14.f,__ iti'4'.,111::;:i:::.it.j4.1.'-I, ' I 1 41,-''' I: .1.1,t1 0,...-„,:ifr-::.,,i,:: ;,,,, x. ,-..:;
, r' .:',-,!
,,' ..--;
4 ii„
11)
` } `� 1 i _,-•a I� i t �- ' ` r off-;,
` r
•-,i
I IA. 1 ICI 9, 4�'% - 1 i43G.� Jc
4 o' ,' i Pill t ' ,Is. ,t _.,,„ ,i,,‘,, •‘
1eti e co,
,Yxw ii , kii
Ley - f
''* wr e` a ,"
.
• ''`4,_4*,:fic*-).% *'
. '
t7 _ 3 4
x� i
4 a
: w a
Photo 1: Wll View 1
GI
SPANGL,ER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

't4k:- '1,.. .'.:''' ',_. ., ._.,., i:1,,.._4,,,.., — ,i A___e---,.,0"4----vey,:‘.1,:1,4*.-, 1.*;.4.,-/-:,`,1. ''-.7 v"."`'PM '-} ..,,),...--?r" .;44.e, --..- 1.6-it'-v---'
,-,,,-„,r .=„, :?..,.: .,,,,,_ , ,...„1..„—:- _i.,„. .-,-,,.. 4-, ...,tri7;40, ,,,,,,L..!„41 ,4;_, 1 1,, .,; . ..., .:,_,,,.. rk..„,...-7,,*I:/t-,I k7,i1,
•7
.$-t';.,..N-;t-•o':i
-- -+ 4 �' t '44
k' ti'i 2 'Y =,i=t k' tENj 0 ,-_ ' ,. ' mo d r. '+"s .^ '' _'
i ,v.,• -•,,,,, ,..—,_: - , -,,,,,..,,r.w4 -1- .„•_.‘„,...-.....4 -.; it,t.-'',, No; e.,„,, .:), ,t,. A i.r,-, ,-„,,...A.z.,:ff4z4..1. h. „ ,r--,-,-* ..,,,,
. ,i_k, ,,,,,,,:-.,,,tt,,..-- ...: , , 2.,, -,...,;:a4, ,.:,.4,,-;,,,, ..1.,,,,,,,,, 4,47;6%47 ,,, 4.t..•*,..40044 , 74 ,t,,--„f . ,. p_.-0,t ,,,,,---.rf.:-*.:,..r.,#,I,---„: „allifv-h*Ir"----44.'„ . -.:
•
r� ,,, r �'� r=;r�' a `.T' ,V ' c r- - -. "cc
1 - _ x's:. u4 x. Ip _ 04 .,� :,rev^. F f r ''� •rev.,° #.� r
t a-' 0 01 rNfr r a h 2' t
, .
._
_. cF ,y `" - m -- ..�..
.0', • iliAle.T.7;
,},,,ry Imo- - - :. ��
1 7 5
•
Photo 2: W 11 View 2
01, )__,111)
SPANGL,ER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

NC WAM WETLAND ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 5
USACE AID#: NCDWR #
Evaluated as if feature were
preserved and other proposed
development was instituted.
Project Name Heelan Date of Evaluation 4/28/2022
Applicant/Owner Name MI Homes of Raleigh Wetland Site Name W11
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization Lisa Long and Alex Hornaday, SEI
Level III Ecoregion Piedmont Nearest Named Water Body Beaver Creek
River Basin Cape Fear USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit 03030002
County Wake NCDWR Region Raleigh
Yes 171No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude (deci-degrees) 35.694336, -78.931797
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if
appropriate, in recent past (for instance, approximately within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited
to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby
septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? DYes .� No
Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? inYes ONo If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
I— Anadromous fish
✓ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
✓ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
✓ Publicly owned property
I— N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
✓ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
Designated NCNHP reference community
Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
Blackwater
Brownwater
I I Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) © Lunar ❑Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ©Yes .D No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver?
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions?
El Yes inNo
fYes r. No
1. Ground Surface ConditionNegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure
(VS) in the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable,
then rate the assessment area based on evidence of an effect.
GS VS
DA DA Not severely altered
inB FIB Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing,
less diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and
duration (Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only,
while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
DA ©A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
©B ©B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
[C C: C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation
change) (examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column for each group below. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland
type (WT).
AA WT
3a. DA DA Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 foot deep
©B 0B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
DC ©C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C: D r: D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. ©A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
©B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
C: C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure - assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape
feature. Make soil observations within the 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for
regional indicators.
4a. CIA Sandy soil
(: B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
© C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
CID Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
• E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. DA Soil ribbon < 1 inch
© B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch
4c. El No peat or muck presence
©B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland - opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub).
Examples of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
El DA Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
B FIB Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
OC Inc Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use - opportunity metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources
draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the
assessment area (5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M). Effective riparian buffers
are considered to be 50 feet wide in the Coastal Plain and Piedmont ecoregions and 30 feet wide in the Blue Ridge Mountains ecoregion.
WS 5M 2M
El fIA r A >_ 10% impervious surfaces
rl6 rlB r B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants)
FIC FIC f- C >- 20% coverage of pasture
EI ii FID E D >_ 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
E f-lE F E >_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
(-� F [I F f F >_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land
FIG FIG i- G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent dainage and/or overbank flow from affectio the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer - assessment area/wetland complex condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
El Yes El No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is weltand? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
0 A >_ 50 feet
B From 30 to < 50 feet
C From 15 to < 30 feet
• D From 5 to < 15 feet
❑ E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
❑ <- 15-feet wide ❑ > 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
0 Yes ❑ No
7e. Is tributary or other open water sheltered or exposed?
0 Sheltered - adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
© Exposed - adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes
and Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp
Forest only)
Check a box in each column. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and the wetland complex at the
assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
OA CIA >_ 100 feet
OB OB From 80 to < 100 feet
OC OC From 50 to < 80 feet
(: D C: D From 40 to < 50 feet
O E 0 E From 30 to < 40 feet
OF OF From 15 to < 30 feet
OG OG From 5 to < 15 feet
OH FAH < 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration - assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
CA Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
❑ B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
❑C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition - assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
El Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
CB Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
©C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT WC FW (if applicable)
©A ©A ©A >_ 500 acres
©B ©B ©B From 100 to < 500 acres
©C ©C ©C From 50 to < 100 acres
©D ©D ©D From 25 to < 50 acres
©E ©E ©E From 10 to < 25 acres
©F OF ©F From 5 to < 10 acres
©G ©G ©G From 1 to < 5 acres
©H ©H ©H From 0.5 to < 1 acre
El ICI El From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
©J ©J ©J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
©K ©K ©K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness - wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
A Pocosin is the full extent (>- 90%) of its natural landscape size.
B Pocosin is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas - landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
metric naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility
line corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, fields (pasture open and agriculture), or water > 300 feet wide.
Well Loosely
©A ®A >_ 500 acres
©B ©B From 100 to < 500 acres
©C ©C From 50 to < 100 acres
©D ©D From 10 to < 50 acres
©E ©E < 10 acres
EF IEF Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
©Yes © No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect - wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non -forested areas >- 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors and clear -cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directiions? If the assessment area is clear-cut,
select option "C."
©A 0
CB 1 to 4
EC 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition - assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
©A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
©B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or
clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
EC Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in
at least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity - assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (<10% cover of exotics).
©B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
EC Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (>50% cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
C Yes © No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
©A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation
©B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider structure
in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA WT
CA EA Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
©B ©B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
©C ©C Canopy sparse or absent
©A ©A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
©B ©B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
CC CC Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
©A ©A Dense shrub layer
©B ©B Moderate density shrub layer
EC CC Shrub layer sparse or absent
CA CA Dense herb layer
©B ©B Moderate density herb layer
©C ©C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
©A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12-inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
Shrub Mid -Story Canopy
EB
Not A
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
EA Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12-inch DBH.
C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
©A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
EB NotA
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater
Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
©A ©B ©C
r ..,
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization,
diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
©A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
®B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
©C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
E D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes

Wetland Site Name
Wetland Type
NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
W11
Headwater Forest
Date
4/28/2022
Assessor Name/Organization Long and Alex Hornaday
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
Sub -function Rating Summary
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Function Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Particulate Change
Soluble Change
Physical Change
Pollution Change
Condition
Condition
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
LOW
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
Habitat
Physical Structure
Landscape Patch Structure
Vegetation Composition
Condition
Condition
Condition
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
Function Rating Summary
Function
Metrics/Notes
Rating
Hydrology
Water Quality
Habitat
Condition
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
LOW
LOW
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating
LOW

WILDLANDS
HOLDINGS
Stream Credits Statement of Availability
Cape Fear 02 Jordan Lake - Haw River Subwatershed
March 23, 2022
MI Homes of Raleigh, LLC
1511 Sunday Dr, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
Attn: Ms. Erica Leatham
RE: Availability of Stream Credits for the "Heelan" project
Bank Name: Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument (UMBI)
Bank Site: UT to Pine Hill Branch Mitigation Site / South Fork Mitigation Site / Bethel Branch
Mitigation Site
Bank Sponsor: Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2016-00219 / SAW-2016-00219 / SAW-2016-02365
Permittee: MI Homes of Raleigh, LLC
Stream Credits Needed: 860.00 LF
Stream Credits Available: 1,660.07 LF
Cape Fear 03030002 River Basin - Haw River Subwatershed
Dear Ms. Leatham,
Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC currently has sufficient stream credits from the Cane Creek Umbrella
Mitigation Banking Instrument: UT to Pine Hill Branch Mitigation Site, South Fork Mitigation Site, and
Bethel Branch Mitigation Site to satisfy the stream mitigation requirements related to the above -
mentioned project. The project is located within the Haw River Subwatershed of the service area (HUC
03030002) of the Bank.
This letter is simply a statement of availability of credits as of the date written. Although current
inventory is high, the letter is not a guarantee of availability as credits will be sold on a first come, first
serve basis. An invoice for this transaction will be sent upon your request and we will formally reserve
both the credits and price quoted for a period of 30 days from the invoice at no cost.
Final transfer of credits will occur upon completion of the Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form within
the 404 permit.
We appreciate the opportunity to assist you with your mitigation requirements. Please contact me at
[phone] x124 or [e-mail] if you have any questions or need any additional
information.
Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC • Wildlands Engineering, Inc • 1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 28203

WILDLANDS
HOLDINGS
Sincerely,
Ashley N. Yarsinske
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Marketing & Credit Sales
[e-mail]
0: [phone] ext. 124
M: [phone]
Cc: Ms. Lisa Long, Environmental Scientist I Spangler Environmental, Inc.
Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC • Wildlands Engineering, Inc • 1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 28203

fires
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC Stream and Wetland Banks
Statement of Availability May 5, 2022
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Lyle Phillips
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Center, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re Project: Heelan/Retreats at Friendship
This document confirms that the MI Homes of Raleigh, LLC (Applicant) for the Heelan/Retreats at
Friendship (Project) has expressed an interest to utilize 0.15 Riparian Wetland Mitigation Credits
from the EBX sponsored RES Cape Fear 02 Umbrella Mitigation Bank, specifically 0.15 Wetland credits
from the Cloud & Banner Site, in the Cape Fear HUC 03030002. As the official Bank Sponsor,
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC, attests to the fact that mitigation is available for reservation at
this time.
These mitigation credits are not considered secured, and consequently are eligible to be used for alternate
purposes by the Bank Sponsor, until payment in full is received from the Applicant resulting in the
issuance of a Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate by the bank acknowledging that the Applicant has
fully secured credits from the bank and the Banker has accepted full responsibility for the mitigation
obligation requiring the credits/units.
The Banker will issue the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate within three (3) days of receipt of the
purchase price. Banker shall provide to Applicant a copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate and
a documented copy of the debit of credits from the Bank Official Credit Ledger(s), indicating the permit
number and the resource type secured by the applicant. A copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer
Certificate, with an updated Official Credit Ledger will also be sent to regulatory agencies showing the
proper documentation.
Please contact me at 919-209-1055 or [e-mail] if you have any questions.
Best Regards,
Amy Staley
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
701 E. Bay Street, Suite 306
Charleston, SC 29403

KCIENGINEERS • SCIENTISTS • SURVEYORS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
4505 Falls of Neuse Road Suite 400 Raleigh, NC 27609 [phone] [phone] Fax
May 6, 2022
Ms. Erica Leatham
MI Homes of Raleigh, LLC
1511 Sunday Dr, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
Subject: Statement of Availability — Riparian Wetland Credits
Project: Heelan/Retreats at Friendship, SAW-2020-01098
Dear Ms. Leatham,
This letter serves to confirm that KCI Technologies Inc. (KCI) has availability of 0.328 riparian wetland
credits in HUC 03030002 of the Cape Fear River Basin to help satisfy the obligation for your Heelan/Retreats
at Friendship project. These credits are associated with the Black Bull Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank.
This letter does not serve to reserve these credits. If you would like to reserve these credits, please provide us
a request and we can reserve the credits for a period of time.
Sincerely,
Adam Spiller
KCI Technologies, Inc.
Senior Associate

)41K
ROY COOPER a . ,'
Governor {ELIZABETH 5,BISERet:el
Secretary .�rpa'srt':.
MARC RECKTENWALD NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
May 10, 2022
Erica Leatham
M/I Homes of Raleigh, LLC
1511 Sunday Drive Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27607 Expiration of Acceptance: 11/10/2022
Project: Heelan/Retreat at Friendship County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in-
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in-lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin Impact Location Impact Type Impact Quantity
(8-digit HUC)
Cape Fear 03030002 Riparian Wetland 0.70
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In-Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and
15A NCAC 02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in-lieu fee mitigation program.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Atli,i/jtittyk_,6,
FOR James. B Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
cc: Lisa Long, agent
Worth Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
2!7 West Jones Street 11652 Mail Service Center ftaIeigh,North Carolina 27699 1652
.all INA
a�I a 919.707.8976

Freshwater Mussel Survey Report
Friendship Station Phases 5&6-SAW-2020-00386
Little Beaver Creek
Wake County, North Carolina
'154
S?i Y w ,_� Y"° p,--, ' , . II ,��•� l P v 1�
3r g vifir
--1: tatiliti..0.41 , ,
.7€ ` :i yes
4 ,;.,' __�,+e,_, - Ea r+� -
tr., / r 4.-,
i ter +
�yal
ti.. . -
Little Beaver Creek(facing upstream)
Prepared For:
69
SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
Ward Marotti
Spangler Environmental
Charlotte, North Carolina
February 2022

Prepared by:
1 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 600
Raleigh, NC 27603
Contact Person:
Chris Sheats
[e-mail]
919-417-2732

1.0 INTRODUCTION
Freshwater mussel surveys were conducted in Little Beaver Creek based on recommendations
by the United States Fish and Wildlife Services (USFWS) for Preconstruction Notification (PCN)
SAW 2020-00386. The site is located approximately three miles upstream of the confluence
with Jordan Lake of the Cape Fear River Basin. The United States Fish and Wildlife Services
(USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) GIS planning tool lists one
"Threatened" aquatic species, Atlantic Pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni), as potentially being affected
by the project.
SEPI Inc., was contracted by Spangler Environmental, Inc. to conduct surveys targeting the
Atlantic Pigtoe as part of the permitting process that requires an evaluation of potential
project -related impacts to federally protected species.
2.0 PROTECTED SPECIES DESCRIPTION
2.1 Atlantic Pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni)
2.1.1 Species Characteristics
The Atlantic Pigtoe is a freshwater mussel reaching up to 60mm in length. This species is
characterized by having a sub -rhomboidal shaped shell with a distinct posterior ridge. The
umbo is elevated well above the dorsal margin and the beak cavity is shallow. The periostracum
is yellow to dark brown and has a parchment- like texture (Bogan 2002, Bogan and Alderman
2008). Pseudocardinal and lateral teeth are well developed except for the anterior
pseudocardinal tooth in the right valve, while the interdental tooth is absent in the left valve
(USFWS 2018b).
The Atlantic Pigtoe is a tachytictic breeder, gravid females have been found from late June to
early July (Fuller 1973). Fish hosts for this species include Bluegill Sunfish, Shield Darter,
Longnose Dace, Rosefin Shiner and Creek Chub (Watters and O'Dee 1997, Wolf and Emrick
2011).
2.1.2 Distribution and Habitat Requirements
The Atlantic Pigtoe is endemic to the southern Atlantic Slope and is found from the Ogeechee
River Basin in Georgia to the James River Basin in Virginia. In North Carolina, this species is
known from the Catawba, Pee Dee, Cape Fear, Neuse, Tar -Pamlico and Roanoke River Basins
(Johnson 1970, Bogan 2002). This species can be found in medium to large streams with clean,
swift waters and a stable gravel or sand and gravel substrate. Individuals are often found on the
downstream edge of riffle areas.

4.0 SURVEY EFFORTS
Atlantic Pigtoe surveys were conducted by Chris Sheats (ES Permit # 22-ES00558) and Tori
Fowler on February 1, 2022.
4.1 Methodology
Freshwater mussel surveys were completed by a 2-person survey team using bathyscopes,
visual and tactile survey methods. The survey reach extended from 500 meters downstream of
the proposed Permanent Wetland Impact 2 to 100 meters upstream of the proposed
Permanent Wetland Impact 3 (Appendix A).
5.0 RESULTS
Freshwater mussel surveys were conducted for a total of 4 person hours within Little Beaver
Creek. During the survey, all UTs flowing into Little Beaver Creek within the survey reach were
evaluated for appropriate Atlantic Pigtoe habitat, and none was observed. No Atlantic Pigtoe
individuals were observed during survey. No freshwater mussels, clams, or snails were observed
during this survey.
During the survey, Little Beaver Creek's stream width was 0.5 to 2 meters with depths ranging
from 0.25 to 1 meter in the downstream portion of the survey. Substrate was dominated by
unconsolidated sand and silt with few areas of gravel present. Pool and run habitats were
present within the reach. Water levels were normal, and visibility was clear during surveys. This
site had 90% forest cover with narrow, wooded buffers and a surrounding natural, sub -urban
land -use. Beginning just downstream of Permanent Stream Impact 1, the stream channel is
inundated from a series of beaver dams ranging from 1.5-2.5 meters in height and expanding 3
to 6 meters across Little Beaver Creek floodplain. The floodplain was inundated with very little
flow.
6.0 DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS
Atlantic Pigtoe was not observed in Little Beaver Creek. Based on the distance to known
occurrences of Atlantic Pigtoe individuals and the results of this survey, this project is not
anticipated to have negative impacts to the Atlantic Pigtoe. Due to the presence of habitat, the
project biological conclusion for Atlantic Pigtoe is "May Affect; Not Likely to Adversely Affect".
Critical habitat is not present in the survey reach, therefore the biological conclusion for critical
habitat is "No Effect". The survey efforts detailed in the report serve to update species
information within the surveyed portions of Little Beaver Creek.
Atlantic Pigtoe
Biological Conclusion: May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect
Habitat for the species was observed but no individuals were found.
Biological Conclusion for Critical Habitat: No Effect
Proposed critical habitat for Atlantic Pigtoe is not located within the study area, suggesting that
the proposed project will have no effect on proposed critical habitat for this species.

7.0 LITERATURE CITED
Bogan, AE. 2002. Workbook and Key to the Freshwater Bivalves of North Carolina. North
Carolina Freshwater Mussel Conservation Partnership, Raleigh, NC 101 pp, 10 color
plates.
Bogan, AE and Alderman, J. 2008. Workbook and key to the freshwater bivalves of South
Carolina. Revised Second Edition.
Fuller, SLH. 1973. Fusconaia masoni (Conrad 1834) (Bivalvia: Unionacea) in the Atlantic drainage
of the Southeastern United States. Malacological Review 6:105-117.
Johnson, R.I. 1970. The systematics and zoogeography of the Unionidae (Mollusca: Bivalvia) of
the southern Atlantic Slope region. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology
140(6):263-449.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2018b. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants;
Threatened Species Status With Section 4(d) Rule and Critical Habitat Designation for
Atlantic Pigtoe. 50 CFR 17: 83 FR 51570, 51570-51609 Docket No. FWS-R4-ES-20180046.
Watters, G.T. and S.H. O'Dee 1997. Identification of potential host: Elliptio fisheriana (Lea,
1838), Fusconaia masoni (Conrad, 1834), Fusconaia flava (Rafinesque, 1820), and
Pleurobema clava (Lamarck, 1819). Triannual Unionid Report No. 13:38.
Wolf, ED and Emrick V. 2011. Propagation and Culture of Species at Risk Atlantic Pigtoe.

APPENDIX A
Figure

OVERALL WETLAND 4 STREAM IMPACTS
PREVIOUSLY
APPROVED
PERMANENT
WETLAND IMPACT
(SAW-2020-00356)
P1 V10U51Z
PAPPR❑VED 4 —
>rRMANEN7
STREAM IMPACT
(SAW-20204035Q
TOTAL NEW
PFRMANFNT
Ws7LANDIMPAcr
TOTAL NFW
PERMANENT
STREAM IMPACT
NO PERMANENT LO55
5TREAM IMPACT
TOTAL PROJECT
WETLAND IMPACT
TOTAL PROJECT
STREAM IMPACT
1 1 450 SF
i0.272 AC)
295 5F
(0.007 AC.)
1,522 5F
(0.042 AC)
198 LF
1468 SF
(0.034 AC.)
76 5F CI 5 1f)
3,672 5F
(0.314 AC)
1,763 5F
(0.041 AC.)
f'FMAN.N-1
STREAM
IMPACT # I
PERMANENT
WETLAND
IMPACT #2
PERMANENT STREAM
IMPACT #2
0 I00 200
GI A ThIC 5CALff
400
FLIWANENT
WETLAND
M PACT # !
1.-2W
5
5EPIEIACER
16. 2021
14q,1-5

Requestor:
Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail:
Size (acres)
Nearest Waterway
USGS HUC
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2020-01098 County: Wake U.S.G.S. Quad: NC- New Hill
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Spangler Environmental
Maria Polizzi
4338 Bland Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
919-875-4288
m a ria(asp angle renviro n m ental. co m
131 Nearest Town New Hill
Little Beaver Creek River Basin Cane Fear
03030002 Coordinates Latitude: 35.6970
Longitude: -78.9310
Location description: The project site is approximately 131 acres located adjacent to Humie Olive Road to the north, Olive
Farm Road to the east, and Little Beaver Creek to the south, near the town of Apex, Wake County, North Carolina.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated February 2020.
Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determining
compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource
protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be
affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part
331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further
instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403).
However, since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands at the project area, which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters,
including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waters, including wetlandson the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
❑ The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. We strongly

SAW-2020-01098
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once
verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided
there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below onDATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact James Lastin2er at 919-554-4884 ext 32 or
James.C.Lastinger(ausace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the preliminary jurisdictional determination
form dated 07/22/2020.
D. Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Phillip Shannin, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date of JD: 07/22/2020 Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable

SAW-2020-01098
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cmapex/f?p=136:4:0
Copy fumished:

PROCESS AND
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Spangler Environmental, Maria Polizzi File Number: SAW-2020-01098 Date: 07/22/2020
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
x
SECTION
Additional
ctrAg
I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
information may be found at or http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for fmal
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED
•
signature
rights
•
this
PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit
to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional
permit.
APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal
it to the district engineer for fmal
your work is authorized. Your
in its entirety, and waive all
determinations associated with the
certain terms and conditions therein,
Process by completing Section II of
the division engineer within 60 days
form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
Administrative Appeal Process by
must be received by the division
D: APPROVED
information.
•
•
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the
ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all
APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form
approved JD or provide new
the Corps within 60 days of the
rights to appeal the approved JD.
the Corps of Engineers
to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED
PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the
review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
information that the review officer has determined is needed to
Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
the location of information that is already in the administrative
However, you may provide additional information to clarify
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appeal process you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: James Lastinger
Raleigh Regulatory Office
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
If you only have questions regarding
also contact:
Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative
the appeal process you may
Appeal Review Officer
South Atlantic Division
CESAD-PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15-day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: James Lastinger , 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 07/22/2020
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Spangler Environmental, Maria Polizzi, 4338
Bland Road, Raleigh, NC 27609
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Heelan Tract, SAW-2020-
01098
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The project site is approximately
131 acres located adjacent to Humie Olive Road to the north, Olive Farm Road to the east, and Little Beaver
Creek to the south, near the town of Apex, Wake County, North Carolina.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES
AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Wake City: New Hill
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.6970 Longitude: -78.9310
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Little Beaver Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
▪ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): multiple site visits on February 5, 2020 and June 2, 2020
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO
REGULATORY JURISDICTION
Site Number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated
amount of
aquatic
resources in
review area
(acreage and
linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs.
non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section 404
or Section 10/404)
W1
35.69873700
-78.92802700
0.86
Wetland
Section 404
W2
35.69687000
-78.93343500
0.15
Wetland
Section 404
W3
35.69389400
-78.93426600
0.1
Wetland
Section 404
W4
35.69309400
-78.93477000
2.17
Wetland
Section 404
W5
35.69224900
-78.93354400
0.15
Wetland
Section 404
W8
35.69424200
-78.55890000
2.11
Wetland
Section 404
W9
35.69500000
-78.92900000
0.31
Wetland
Section 404
W10
35.69500000
-78.93400000
0.01
Wetland
Section 404
W11
35.69700000
-78.93100000
0.29
Wetland
Section 404
W12
35.69700000
-78.92900000
0.23
Wetland
Section 404
W13
35.69500000
-78.93100000
0.13
Wetland
Section 404
W14
35.69200000
-78.93000000
0.54
Wetland
Section 404
W15
35.69500000
-78.92900000
0.08
Wetland
Section 404
W16
35.69300000
-78.93100000
0.56
Wetland
Section 404
W17
35.69300000
-78.93200000
0.03
Wetland
Section 404
W18
35.70100000
-78.93900000
0.05
Wetland
Section 404

S1
35.41650000
-78.55780000
2979
Non -Wetland
Section 404
S2
35.69231000
-78.93080000
2057
Non -Wetland
Section 404
S3
35.69500000
-78.93800000
392
Non -Wetland
Section 404
S4
35.69219000
-78.93287000
154
Non -Wetland
Section 404
S5
35.69423000
-78.92970000
343
Non -Wetland
Section 404
S6
35.69300000
-78.93200000
252
Non -Wetland
Section 404
S7
35.35696600
-78.92850000
2035
Non -Wetland
Section 404
S8
35.69300000
-78.93000000
782
Non -Wetland
Section 404
S9
35.69700000
-78.93800000
398
Non -Wetland
Section 404
P1
35.69961000
-78.93230000
0.53
Non -Wetland
Section 404
P2
35.69879000
-78.93271000
0.5
Non -Wetland
Section 404
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN),
or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant
has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the
permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make
an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to
request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that
basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation
being required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual
permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit
authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with
all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps
has determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit
authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or
undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD
constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that
activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any
administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in
any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will
be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make
an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review
area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the
Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that
there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of the U.S. on the
subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could be affected by
the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply) Checked items are included in the administrative
record and are appropriately cited:
▪ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: attached dated February 2020
▪ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor. Datasheets:
▪ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
▪ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
▪ USGS NHD data:
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps:
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name- New Hill Quad
▪ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS websoil survey
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name- USFWS NWI
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
▪ FEMA/FIRM maps: NC FIRM maps
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
® Otherinformation(pleasespecify): USGS 3DEP bare earth DEM hillshade and LiDAR
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps
and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
07/22/2020
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the established
time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to fmalizing an action.

W
E
Legend
Contour_Wake
Potentially Jurisdictional Stream
/ Area not evaluated
Approximate Project Boundary
Potentially Jurisdictional Non -wetland
Potentially Jurisdictional Wetland
500 750 1,00'
Heelan
3108 & 3120 Olive Farm Road
New Hill, NC
February 2020
is9
SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
4338 Bland Road Raleigh, NC 27609
919-875-4288
Wetlands/Streams Map
map source:
Wake County GIS

Maria Polizzi
Senior Scientist — Land Resources
Spangler Environmental, Inc.
4338 Bland Road, Raleigh, NC 27609
Subject:
December 11, 2019
Stream Buffer Determination
Heelan, Olive Farm Road
Cape Fear —Jordan Lake Watershed
Dear Maria Polizzi,
WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
Apex 19-003
On December 6th, 2019, Mr. James Misciagno met with you at the subject site to evaluate Twelve (12)
drainage features and determine if they are subject to the Town of Apex (Town) riparian buffer rules.
Based on the information obtained during the site visit and per the requirements set forth in Section
6.1.11 of the Town Unified Development Ordinance (LIDO), I concur with the stream classifications as
shown on the attached sketch dated December03, 2019 and initialed by James Misciagno.
Drainage,
Feature
S1A
Shown as
on USGS
Intermittent
Shown as on
Soil Survey
Perennial
Determination made
in the field
Ephemeral
Determined Buffer
Width
0 feet
S1B
Intermittent
Perennial
Intermittent
50 feet
S3A
Not Present
Intermittent
Ephemeral
0 feet
S3B
Not Present
Intermittent
Ephemeral
0 feet
S4
Not Present
Not Present
No call needed
0 feet
S5
Not Present
Intermittent
Intermittent
50 feet
S6A
Not Present
Intermittent
Ephemeral
0 feet
S7A
Intermittent
Intermittent
Ephemeral
0 feet
S7B
Intermittent
Intermittent
Intermittent
50 feet
S8
Intermittent
Intermittent
Intermittent
50 feet

59
Not Present
Intermittent
Ephemeral
0 feet
510
Not Present
Not Present
No call needed
0 feet
*Streams S4, S5 and 510 were all delineated by Spangler Environmental on their sketch map and all fall
within the perennial stream buffer that was not contested on the southern portion of the property;
therefore, call sheets were not required, but features were verified by James Misciagno in the field on
December 6th, 2019.
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute a determination made by the Division of Water Resources (DWR) or Delegated Local
Authority in the Jordan Lake watershed may request a determination by the DWR Director.
An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter or from the date the affected
party (including downstream and/or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A request for a
determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Karen Higgins, DWR —401 &
Buffer Permitting Unit; 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617. Otherwise the appeal
procedure will be in accordance with UDO Section 6.1.11.
If you dispute the Director's determination, you may file a petition for an administrative hearing. You
must file the petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings within sixty (60) days of receipt of this
notice of decision. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings
during normal office hours. The Office of Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday
between the hours of 8:00am and 5:00pm, except for official State holidays.
To request a hearing, send the original and one (1) copy of the petition to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-6714. A copy of the petition must also be served
to the Department of Natural Resources, c/o Mary Penny Thompson, General Counsel, 1601 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal within
sixty (60) days. This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries
should be directed to the US Army Corp of Engineers (Raleigh Regulator Field Office) at [phone].
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Michael S. Deaton, PE
Stormwater & Utility Engineering Manager
Attachments
TOWN OF APEX
The Peak of Good Living
PO Box 25o Apex, NC 27502 I [phone] I www.apexnc.org

Riparian Buffer Call
Application
This application is required to be fully completed and submitted to Town staff prior to conducting a buffer call. Please submit the application
package electronically to [e-mail].
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Owners}:
Site Address:
Multiple (see table with owner and deed information)
3108 & 3120 Olive Farm Road, New Hill, NC
CONSULTANT INFORMATION (If applicable)
Name:
Address:
Email:
Phone:
CHECKLIST
Spangler Environmental, Inc.
4338 Bland Rd. Raleigh, NC, 27609
[e-mail]
919-875-4288
Please place a checkmark in the spaces provided below to indicate that the required information has been provided with this submittal.
Right of Entry Form
X
NCDEQStream Identification Forms
(v. 4.11}
X
Sketch Map*
X
Topo Map (most recent version)
X
1970 Wake County Soil Survey Map
X
*Sketch map should show all drainage features on the property with all applicable riparian buffers shown. Please clearly indicate or list which
features are being called with this application.
NOTES
SIGNATURE (Consultant or Responsible Party)
0y my signature below, 1 certify that the information provided with this application is accurate and truthful.
7� Pete;
Date:
11/22/19
Town of Apex Water Resources Department Revised 5/14/2019

N dl a e
± ),__
N
N
1 I I O kr r. _
1 1 Y �� i
I I ert.rj'e- Or' Ill
• 10 JAW ,T
i K I" 'E. 'Wig* 1 ' Ilk 01 t . 4 4
•
' . k j't *
aI I�
em Ic
111!
1111\0; , fi^' 1 Y� i . i
I, j
p . �. 654 i. . :IN , 11 4 •- .T Wiyi i li,:•,j
17
d ICI `may 11�{ '"1 ill
..Y1 '7 ' J 1 I
00,
'I F11 I :c1,,, P I LEI
e f^R lly , • l
z//iii
.,61/11 /'
1 ' J, 41011 i '- "t
Ifi
p` dN A zi �".I ) Syr
1 ',„ , ti )
' wk1:11.%1NS1$1.-‘' .i. J iii
VVri
iota! 4 7-.: .
..,,/ • ,
�C I. y Ct B2
0 155 310 620 930 1,2414
. ' Legend
y ' , Approximate Property Boundary
Feet
it i.._L ,d•C' r u-I ------ --- --.-- --a- FL .;,, r '-- --: "-- --- -- ' -- --" --- --_-' _--
Heelan 69
3108 & 3120 Olive Farm Road SPANGLER 1970 Soil Survey Map
New Hill, NC ENVIRONMENTAL,INC.
May 2019 4338 Bland Road Raleigh, NC 27609 map source:
919-875-4288 Wake County GIS
c,
113' liin 1131B+ 01 ,

0 145 290
580
870
1,16(
r .
111
Feet
Heelan
3108 & 3120 Olive Farm Road
New Hill, NC
May 2019
USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP.Elevation
Program, Geographic Names Infor ration System, National Hydrography
Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset and
National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecc
Bureau TIGER/Line data USFS.Road Data; Nature
Department of State Humanitarian Information Jni
Centers for Environmental Information, U.S. Coast
refreshed August, 2019.
69
SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
4338 Bland Road Raleigh, NC 27609
919-875-4288
Legend
QProject Boundary
Wetlands/Streams Map
map source:
Wake County GIS

16p
ii , 4 .
i.
,,..4, I
•
,t;¢t-� `1 P2 '/ i. , M€� ' :.
4, Ord! ,
fie f
4•''I's f . i
tt '
.
: IV.a 1 i; /'r !!. S7
' r r -
`t'- , l , {yamr prR
S6 € v .� ,-• ., 0
lio 4 y ,
irk �'` i',T i ��y ,V.
• S5 � fir'
F1
1F.
.7- , 1' _ irf , • Yl
M r ! ',•: - r' S40 1 - - re. •4'. Y
S4 �'.
41 '- - (4 1 LI
Albf` , , Legend
` ; . I _
ttq�� S8 0 Stream ID Form Locations
S9 �� _ Stream
ff
�' r .; Approximate Property Boundary
� Pond
50 ft.Buffer
too 200 400 aao so,
I __I 100 ft.Buffer "'
Feet 1,'
Heelanfj?
3108 & 3120 Olive Farm Road SPANGLER Wetlands/Streams Map
New Hill, NC ENVIRONMENTAL,INC.
May 2019 4338 Bland Road Raleigh, NC 27609 map source:
19-875-4288 Wake County GIS
in-'rif+ I ? I3I ? b1

:Wtj. N�
-3M aoiq

NC DW Streati> Idcntitication Form Version 4.11 0.00(rs41615C/121
Date; 1{_(1 I 1191 ProlectlSite: ..{,P are Latitude: V. 1
Evaluator: Tim ,so 9ter County: Way.. Longitude: SIf t S i b
Total Points: r S Stream Determl i circle one) Other
if 19 is al mast inf a 30• Ephemeral . 'erennfal e.g.Quad Name:
N t i9 orpofennral ff z 30' ! r
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal=0•) ) Absent Weak Moderate _ Str ng
1"Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2
2.Sinuosity of channel along thalweg _ 0 1 3
3.ln-channel structure:ex.riffle-pool,step-pool, 0 2 3
r 0 ripple-pool sequence
/ 4.Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 © 3
/\`It 5.Adivelrelict floodplaiin 0 rl 3
�.4 6.Depositional bars or benches 0 2 3
Y q 7.Recent alluvial deposits 0 , ] 2 3
6. Headcuts 1 __ 2 3
9.Grade control 0 7 •.5 1 1.5
10.Natural valley 0 0 .(4,: 0 1.5
11.Second or greater order channel Yes=3
a adiricial ditches are not rated;see digussions in manual
V B. Hydrology (Subtotal= _t-•4„ ) G 1
Is 12.Presence of Baseflow 0 ' 2 3
y 13.Iron oxidizing bacteria .�( ) 1 2 3
/� 14.Leaf titter 1.5 1 0.5
Cffi
1O 15.Sediment on plants or debris 0fi _
1 1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles 0 1 1.5
17.Soil-based evidence of higp water table? No=0 Yes=3
C. Biology (Subtotal= 5 t, IN)
18.Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 r 0
19.Rooted upland plants In streambed 3 0
20.Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 6. 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks (..4) 1 • 2 3
_22.Fish g 0.5 1 1.5
23,Crayfish 0.5 1 1,5
24.Amphibians 0.5 1 1.5
25,Algae _i 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed F CW=0.75 OBL=1.5 Other=0
'perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
5113
1

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 1 F ro)ect!Slte: \. ,1 atn Latitude: C.__-.0c
Evaluator: 1 5 Urt Aye_,. County: Walt Longitude: e 0 t1.2C,4-rd ,,..�
Total l points: Stream Determination(circle one) Other �.cy r -L
Stream Is at least intennlltenliftt+ml Intermittent Perennial e.g.Quad Nerve: d� �7
ffzf9or perennial ifa30'
A.Geomorphology (Subtotal=
,'')/ Absent W k l Moderate Strong
_ e 3
1"Continuity of channel bed and hank 0 1 2 3
2.Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0
3.In-channel structure:ex.riffle-pool,slap-pool, 1 2 3
ripple-pool sequence - 1 2 3
4.Particle size of stream substrate 0
5.Active/relict B 0 2 3oodplain 1 2 3
6.Depositional bars or benches 0
n 1 3
2
7.Recent alluvial deposits 1 - 2 3
B. Headcut$ 0 0 _ / t`J
} 7 1 1.5
9.Grade control tii 1.5
10.Natural valley 0 0.5
co 11.Second or greater order channel I
0--0 Yes=3
"artificial ditches are not rated:see dis ions in manual
B.Hydrology (Subtotal= ) 2 3
12.Presence of Baseflow - 1 3
13.Iron oxidizing bacteria 1 2
14.Leaf litter 1. -
1 0.5 3
-
�J 15.Sediment on plants or debris Y 0.5 i 1.5
0 5 1 1,5
16.Organic debris lines or piles 0
17.Soil-based evidence of high water table?
_� Yes=3
C.Biology (Subtotal= 1 ,-tl) 3 2 8____7 01B.Fibrous roots in streambed 0
19.Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2
- Q 1 2 3
20.Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) , 1 2 3
_21.Aquatic Mollusks 0 5 1 1.5
22.Fish 0.5Ill i 1.5
23.Crayfish 1.5
24 0.5 1
.Amphibians t 11 - �, i 1.5
25.Algae
26.Welland plants In streambed _ CW OBL=1,5 Other=0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.Sea p.35 of manual.
i Notes: l l ,{ �p,� ram{ { J �/�
Sketch: ._ee -I 1r 6. 1 U` eg' 'Y' \l 1�) ).4i.'1 S{ ►-\
5

OIL
NC DW Stream Identification Form Version 4.1 i
Date: 11 11 rig Project/slto: 1,14,640 Latitude: t�
Evaluator: 71m IW n r County: r.lQ,> Longitude: �45� c
c�
Total Points: Stream Determination(circle one) Other 3
SGaem Is et feast fnlerrnitteel �, .om intermittent Perennial e.g.gene Name:
if z 19 orperannlal if 2 30'
A.Geomorphology (Subtotal= ?j Absent Weak Mo rate Strong
la Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 7 3
2.Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 3
3.In-channel structure:ex.riffle-pool,step-pool, rn) i 2 3
ripple-pool sequence �1s 2 3
4.Particle size of stream substrate 0 5.Active/relict floodplain 0 _7 3
ta
6.Depositonal bars or benchest2 3 2 3
7.Recent alluvial deposits
1
8. >ieadcuts 1 2 31,5
I 9.Grade contra! 0 1
10.Natural valley 0 0,6 1.5
11.Second or greater order channel Ati=0� Yes=3
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discugslons in manual
B.Hydrology (Subtotal= " _ ) k
12.Presence of Basetlow 1 2 3
13.iron oxidizing bacteria
1 2 3
14.Leaf fitter 1.5 1 0.5
15.Sediment on plants or debris a . 0.5 1 _ 1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles V 0,6 1 1.5YOS-3
17.Soil-based evidence of high water table? ' '
C.Biology (Subtotal=_ 0 ) 1 r�
18.Fibrous roots In streambed 3 2 �c9PGS
19.Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1
20.Macrobenthos(note diversity end abundance) 0 1 2
3
21.Aquatic Mollusks C+ 1 2 3
0.6 1J1.5
22.Fish ita
t 0.5 11,5
23.Crayfish i 5
24.Amphibiansla 0.5 1
25.Algae
0 0,5 11,5 •
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5
"perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes: I 1kL /���� j�nn �{ r j/�^Sketch: S 3N �V -t Gr U°, y '�tI Ca I1 } 1'6 Atli rraC IK
C to(c_ci cc 1
CM c-d', t\-V s Ccm ( 1 v4m d f Sg-
. 5126- d
. 4 0,,,,v) duo 0-- bolm
, y„),(,) s3 . ss
yrh ( cd 9

611.1MIIIIIMIM111111111111111117
NC 1)WQ Stream identification Form Version 4,11
Date: ‘1' r "9 ProjecUSlte: ` Latitude: ��� S�
Evaluator: t S'^ct rat�i� county; wage. Longitude: �5i,�t C{)(�n ��
Total Points: 9tre otormlrmitte(circle ono) other
Stream is at MastrnternStten! �� lamer Intermittent Perennial e.g.t7aadName:ilz f9orpa+Enniali(t30'
A.Geomorphology (Subtotal=W •� Absent Weak Moderato t Strand
1'Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 _
2.Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2
3.In-channel structure,ex.riffle-pool,step-pool, 1 2 3
ripple-Pool sequence 1 3
4.Particle size of stream substrate 0
5.Activetrelicl floodplain 0 t
7 3
6.Depositional bars or benches 0
3
7.Recent alluvial deposits (0 #`r 2 3
S. cuts 0 Ra. 1.5
9 Grad
e control — 1,5
10.Natural valley 0 0,5 — ,
11.Second or greater order channel
No=0 Yes=3 _ ,
a artificial ditdes are nal rated;see dlscessss"ens in manual
_
B.Hydrology (Subtotal= 2 r 3
12.Presence of Baseflow t
11 2r3'
�13.Iron oxidizing bacteria 1 0-5
14 Leaf[liter 0 5 1 1.5
15.Sediment on plants or debris 1 1 5
16.Organic debris lines or plies 0 0.5�� Yes=3
17.Soil-based evidence of high w'er table? —
C. Biolo. (Subtotal- 3 2 1 ,�
16 Fibrous roots in streambed _ 3 2 1 4
19.Rooted upland plants in streambed 1 2 3
20-Macrobenthos(note diversity end abundance) 1 2 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks IlD 0 5 1 1.5
22.Fish D.5 1 1.5
23 Crayfish0$ 1 1.5
_24.Ampriibfans i- 0.5 1 1.5
25.Algae FACW a 0.75; OBL=1.5 er= I
26.Wetland plants in streambed
'perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes:Sketch: 533
Q,Q\f-w\oil,
04
Apr • n -���

NC 1)W Stream Identification Form Version 4,11 C tkailA b4
Date: l 11 f f q ProJecli8lte: \A eitA Qrn Latitude: see.crPS
Evaluator, Tim S,rco°jut.r County: WA Longitude:
Total Points: JStrarte Determination(circle one) Other
Stream IS el least Intormiltent I hamara�ntermlttenl Perennial r e.g.Quad Name:
if z f9orperattnratrtz30` l
A.Geomorphology (Subtotal= Absent Weak Moderate Strong l
1°Continuity of channel bed and ban 0 1 3
2.Sinuosity at channel along thalweg 0 1 _ - t -
3.In-channel structure:ex,riffle-pool.step-pool, 1 2 3
ripple-pool sequence - 2 3 _
4.Particle size of stream substrate 0 1
5.Active/relict 2 3
1 ivelrelict flondplain 2 3
6.Depositional bars or benches 0
7.Recent alluvial deposits +a 1 2 3 -
0 1 3 -
8. Headcuts 15
9.Grade control 0
10. 63 0 5 7 1 1.5
Natural valley Yes=3
11.Second or greater order channel
'artificial ditches are not rated:see discussIpns In manual
B.Hydrology (Subtotal= J ) - - 2 3
12.Presence of Basetlow 76 1 -
13.Iron oxidizing bacteria 1 3
1 2 2
14,Leaf litter /��7 0.5 /1� 1.5
15.Sediment on plants or debris - C CD J 1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5
17.Sail-based evidence of high water table? y�,b Yes=3
C. Biology (Subtotal= J
18.Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2, 1
0
3 z 1
19.Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 2 - 3
20.Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) , 1 2 3
21,Aquatic Mollusks I - 0.5 1 1.5 -
23.
23.Crayfish
ra ayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
if) q 5 1 1.5
24.Amphibians !� 0 5 1 1.5
25.Algae iJ FACW=0.76; OBL=1. er
26.Wetland plants in stream bed
'perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: N /1 a
i
I
a YV\ 1 2-'1 1 1 i ( -6c 1

',_ NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 (a++q Cfol y Ak1SIN
Date: I I /-7 /0 Project/Site: i eci0. 41 Latitude: Cres
r r V-
Evaluator: Ti ir 3 pay* County: \„ I Longitude: ty"1°��n4'1�1'v
Total Points: v • ii Determination(circle one) Other
Stream is et feast intermittent 10
MIZI:ti, Intermittent Perennial e.g.Quad Name:
if>-t 9 or perennial if a 30'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= )C61 Absent Weak Modrate Strong
la Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 (2J 3
2.Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 3 -
3.In-channel structure:ex.riffle-pool,step-pool, 1 2 3
ripple-pool sequence
4.Particle size of stream substrate 0 7 2 3
5.Active/relict floodplain 0 2 3
6.Depositional bars or benches _ 1 _ 2 31
7.Recent alluvial deposits g 2 3
6. Headcuts O f 2 3
9.Grade control 0 - 1 1.5
10.Natural valley 0 1 1.5
11.Second or greater order channel Yes=3
-a artificial ditches are not rated;see disons in manual
8. Hydrology (Subtotal= Li )
12.Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
14256.
13.Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2
14.Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 "0
15.Sediment on plants or debris (j 0.5 1 1 5
16.Organic debris lines or piles 0 --_ 0.5 1 1.5
17.Soil-based evidence of high rater table? , iNo= Yes=3
C. Biology (Subtotal= `L )
18.Fibrous roots in streambed 3 CD -- 1 0
19.Rooted upland plants in streambed 2 1
20,Macrobenthos{note diversity and abundance) 1 2' 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks 1 1
2 3
22.Fish � } 0.5 1 1.5 •
23.Crayfish 0.5 1 1.5
24.Amphibians 0.5 1 1.5
i
25.Algae _ 0,5 1 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other&D)
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
~Notes: ��f'
Sketch: Cir) 6{ --L k 14I-C oe c I Y r c M Ss--1 Oin 9 ('
4 sia

NC DW Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 6 . tn (fn
Date: I ( /l/I q ProJect/Site: H,ed air\ Latitude: see, &-f'5
Evaluator: J(m `,(t/J ir County: t j/o k� Longitude: P9(d WI'1
Total Points: 1 i Stream Deferral circle one) Other
Sln9am is of least fnrennitfenl 1(2 la or perennial if a 30' Ephemeral ►•erennlal e.g.Quad Name:
II4' 7
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= l( '5") Absent _ Weak Moderate Stro g '
1 n Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 2
2.Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 -1 2 3 _
3.In-channel structure:ex.riffle-pool,step-pool, 0 1 2 3
ripple-pool sequence
4.Particle size of stream substrate 0 7 2 3
5.Active/relict floodplain 0 2 3
6.Depositional bars or benches 0 J---7 2 3
7.Recent alluvial deposits 0 2 3
' 8. Headcuis 0 ` 2 3
' 9.Grade control 0 .5J) 1,5 _
10.Natural valley 0 •••`���0.5 1.5
11.Second or greater order channel No=0 Yes=3
d artificial ditches are not rated;see Acuspns in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal= -I ' )
12.Presence of Basetlow 0 1 Q, l 3
13.Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2
•
14.Leaf litter 1.5 1 _ 0.5 0
15.Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 G2 1.5
16.Organic debris lines cc piles 0 7 1 1.5
17.Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 es
C. Biology (Subtotal= 76-r7' )
18.Fibrous roots In streambed 3 2 1
�
19.Rooted upland plants in streambed _, 2 1 0
20.Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 ) 2 3
21.Aqualic Mollusks 0 - 2 3
22.Fish 0 ff `'J 1 1.5
23.Crayfish 0 i 7 1 1.5
24.Amphibians 0 r .3 ----) 1 1,5
25.Algae 0 (El ---?1 1 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.7'' OBL=1.5 Other=0
'perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods.Seep.35 of manna.
-
Notes:
Sketch:
S--) 0

re I Z
NC DW Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 • cc�� r I
Date: ProJectl8'fe: � a h Latitude:350-. 1)�,J oh, 'V
_
Evaluator J tr' County:U4 j Longitude:%''.1 JJ i j.} a�j'Ilk
Total Points. V,e. tie. Stream Deform' circle one) Other
Stream Is al'coda Intemdlth1 Ephemeral rmittent Perennial e.g,Quad Name:
If a 19 or perennial if 30'
A. Geomorpho�y (Subtotal= Absent Weak Moderate Sr
1a.Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2
2,Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 Vil 3
3.In-channel structure:ex.riffle-pool,step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence {�J 1 2 3
4.Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 3
5.Active/relict floodplaln 0 �1 2 3
6.Depositional bars ar benches 0 2 3
7.Recent alluvial deposits 0 2 3 _
8. Headcuts 0 ,_-. , 2 3
9,Grade controlCO
1.5
10. Natural valley 0 5 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel lie _ , Yes=3
a artificial ditches are not rated;see did usslons In manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal=^ -..-.._)
12.Presence of Baseftow 0 1 vi �ir�.
13.Iron oxidizing bacteria ] 1 2 _ 3��
14.Leaf litter �5 1 0.5 �:! _
15.Sediment on plants or debris () 0.5 1 1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17.Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 .:--
C. Biology (Subtotal=V, .'_ )
18.Fibrous roots In streambed r 2 1 0
19,Rooted upland plants in streambed (`) 1 0
20.Macrobenthos(note diversify and abundance) (0) Y 1 2 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks 1 2 3
22.Fish 0.5 1 1.5
23.Crayfish _ 0.5 1 1 5
24.Amphibians 0 �ff53 1 1.5
25.Algae 3 5 1 1.5
26.Wetland plants In streambed FACW 0. 'j OBL=1.5 Other=0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes:yrt?rlf--., `5
Sketch: r'

- ., �- --
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 C° r
Date: Project/Site: 1 11 Latitude: .4 ii 1,1041 i;r
Evaluator; i m 5 ry � , County; �d Longitude r t-/ xli J i24 : JJ Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 1J�t� termination(circle one) Other
if lg.erporennialif 30 (`emer Intermittent Perennial e.g,4tradNama;
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 1 U) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1"Continuity of channel bed and bank IIIWO • 1 2 3
2.Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 ) 2 3
3.In-channel structure:ex.riffle-pool,step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence (9 1 2 3
4.Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 OP 3
5.Active/relict floodplaln 0 01 --CP2 3
8.Depositional bars or benches 2 3
7.Recent alluvial deposits r' 1 2 3
B. Headcuts ;t _ 1 2 3
9.Grade control r 0.5 1 1.5
10.Natural valley J 0 ~<-43 1 1.5
11.Second or greater order channel (()=0� Yes=3
a artificial ditches are nol rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal=
12.Presence of Baseflow �%Q 1 2 3
13.Iron oxidizing bacteria 1 2
14.Leaf litter 5 1 0.5
15.Sediment on plants or debris St 0.5 1 1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles 0.5 1 1.5
17.Soil-based evidence of highater table?, rtyto= Yes=3
/
C. Biology (Subtotal= - �4"
18.Fibrous roots in streambed 2 1 0
1111
01V 7'
19.Rooted upland plants in streambed '!j. 2 1 trr,
20.Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks ( V 1 2 3
.
22.Fish .o 0.5 1 1.5
23.Crayfish a 0.5 1 1,5
24.Amphibians CO) 0.5 1 1,5
25.Algae ig) 0.5 1 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual
Notes: g' _ 4= I i" 1•- I t 'Leif' ( S b J
-"---.1)
I
Sketch: �J
fles-k) 1
iiiiirmr.,.._ ...„_ ... ._ -.
,------- � / DI cr mil9

WW1 1.CAR('I iN;.\ Ritli ft ("WINTRY
WAKE CI)UN I 1
This Right of Entry is executed this '2z1id day November , 20 rq
MI Homes of Raleigh and Spangtet Environmental, tr:r, how 4 authorized agent _ ")
WHEREAS, the Gown of Apo( ("Town') Is beekitig to make a stream buffer
determination .taro,,-.;the property known as I leel. n in the Tiiwu trt'
New Hill , North Carolina and designated as PIN M (see Matted tabivl by• the
•
Wake County Revenue Department(the"Subject Property"):
'WHEREAS, the authorized agents _ are agreeable to Irroride the Town with this
Right of Entry.under• the terms and conditions stated herein so that the above referenced
determination may proceed_
NOW THI•RE'.I'ORE. in light of the above premises, the authorized agent __ d„
hereby grant and giro freely and without coercion, the right of-aces and entry to the
Subject Property on the terms and ennc1iti❑ns as stated below;
t The Town of Apex and it_i contractors may enter the Subject Property for the
purpose of conducting on-site envltonntent-al investigations and issuing a
determination based on those investigations as it relates to stream buffer
determination
x This Right of Entry does not convey to the Town any title or ownership
interest to the Subject Property
j The Town and ti+ euililuyee5, contrsr•tors, agents and rep eirtlt,.ttives enter
upon the Subject Property at their own rho and assume all risks whited to
• the property.
4.. `I'1w undersigned agreer,and warrants to]told harmless tit,:'1'r,wo of Apex.its
Ss therm ractor anti discharges and
agcnr•ic�+, cic�pdrinlrnts, tcrnttilt.trir., and r t
waives any action, either equitable or legal that arise fr•otis the actitiitio
described alxwt on the property e_Ncept in the cnwc• of negligence b} the
Town.
ti _
ti ;tors 1- •74) _ •
Ity: i IL177 -
ay,.