20221085 Ver 1_401 Application_20220809

Staff Review Form
NORTH CAROLINA
EnNmnmenfei Qea(Uy
Updated September4, 2020
Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?*
Yes No
ID# *
20221085
Version* 1
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Reviewer List:*
Select Reviewing Office: *
Submittal Type:*
Yes
No
Colleen Cohn:eads\cmcohn
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
401 Application
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?*
Yes
No
How much is owed?* $240.00
$570.00

Project Submittal Form
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk * below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type: * For the Record Only (Courtesy Copy)
New Project
Modification/New Project with Existing ID
More Information Response
Other Agency Comments
Pre -Application Submittal
Re-Issuance\Renewal Request
Stream or Buffer Appeal
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
5/2/2022
Project Contact Information
Name: Alex Hornaday
Who is submitting the information?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
Project Name: Shoccoree II
Is this a public transportation project?
Yes
No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
Yes No Unknown
County (ies)
Durham
Please upload all files that need to be submited.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Shoccoree II PCN.pdf 23.81MB
Shoccoree PreFilingRequest.pdf 172.37KB
Only pdf or kmz files are accepted.
Describe the attachments or
comments:
PCN form, site plans, impact maps, AJD request form, Corps concurrence, pre -filing meeting request w/
date/time stamp
Sign and Submit
By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that:

• I, the project proponent, hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the
best of my knowledge and belief.
• I, the project proponent, hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401
certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I agree that submission of this online form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a
written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form.
Signature:
471/iteiraerfeig
Submittal Date: Is filled in automatically.

Alex Hornaday
From: Lisa Long
Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 9:22 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Prefiling Notification Request for Shoccoree II
Hello,
Please accept this email as a pre -filing meeting request for the above referenced project, located off of Berini Dr. in
Durham, NC.
Thank you,
SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
Lisa Long
Environmental Scientist
Raleigh • Charlotte • Charleston • Tampa
[phone]
919-689-5283
• spanglerenvironmental.com
lisa(c�spanglerenvironmental.com
• 4338 Bland Rd., Raleigh, NC 27609
moo
Any email message sent by any employee of Spangler Environmental is intended only for the identified recipient. It (and any attachment) is strictly confidential
and may contain attorney -privileged work product. If you have obtained an email by error or you are not the identified recipient, please notify the sender by
calling toll free 1-866-772-6453, then delete the email (and any attachment) from your system. Use of the email (or any attachment) by any person other than the
identified recipient is strictly prohibited.
1

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑ Section 10 Permit
X Section 404 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes X No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from
the DWQ (check
— Regular
— Express
all that apply):
❑ Non-404
Jurisdictional General Permit
Buffer Authorization
X 401 Water Quality Certification
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification
X Riparian
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
X Yes ❑ No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes X No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Shoccoree II
2b. County:
Durham
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Durham
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Beazer Homes LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
009573/000265
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Andrew Beck
3d. Street address:
801 Coporate Center Dr., Suite 330
3e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27607
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
X Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Alex Hornaday (for Ward Marotti)
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Spangler Environmental, Inc.
5c. Street address:
4338 Bland Rd
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27609
5e. Telephone no.:
[phone]
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
alex©spanglerenvironmental.com
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
175212, 175209
lb. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 36.03457 Longitude: -78.96225
lc. Property size:
63 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Ellerbe Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS-V, NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The majority of the property is forested with several large clearings interspersed. There are two ponds on the property and several small residential
buildings. The property borders Highway US-85 and is generally surrounded by low -density suburbs.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.38
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 43
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Residential 99 unit housing development
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Bulldozers, excavators, motor graders, off -road trucks, rollers, etc. will be used to clear and grade the proposed development.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
Preliminary X Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Lisa Long
Agency/Consultant Company: Spangler Environmental, Inc.
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
*see attached
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Yes X No Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Which sections were completed below for your project (check
all that apply):
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
X Wetlands X Streams — tributaries X Buffers
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.295
W2 P
Fill
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.074
W3 P
Fill
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.001
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.37
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Excavation
Stream 1
INT
Corps
9
S2 -
Choose one
-
-
S3 -
Choose one
-
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
9
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
X
Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B1 P
Roadway
Stream 1
Yes
1,908
2,843
B2 T
Sewer easement
Stream 1
No
278
598
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
2,186
3,441
6i. Comments: Temporary impact affects 1,499 sq. ft. of Stream 1 Zone 3 as well
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The proposed project was designed to avoid impacts to aquatic resources to the maximum extent practicable. Roads were planned to avoid impact to
open water features while maintaining connectivity. The proposed sewer easement placement is limited by topography and location of town
wastewater treatment lines.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures will be implemented in order to control runoff and other discharges from construction activities.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
No
X Yes ❑
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
X DWQ X Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
fee program
Mitigation
X Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu
❑ Permittee Responsible
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
Mitigation banks are being contacted. SOAs will be sent to the USACE once received.
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
X Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
Roadway construction
1,908
3 (2 for Catawba)
5,724
Zone 2
Roadway construction
2,843
1.5
4,265
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
9,989
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
Payment to private mitigation bank. Mitigation banks are being contacted for SOAs.
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
X Yes ❑ No
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes X No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
cyo
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
X Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
City of Durham
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
X Phase II
X NSW
❑ USMP
X Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑Yes X No
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
❑ORW
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
use of public (federal/state) land?
❑ Yes X No
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
❑Yes ❑ No
lc. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
Comments:
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
❑Yes X No
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
Yes X No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Development will be served by municipal sewer.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat?
❑ Yes
X No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts?
❑ Yes
X No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NCNHP data review and an onsite inspection
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes
X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA EFH mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
❑ Yes
X No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
State Historic Preservation Offices (SHPO) data was not requested for this project. An onsite investigation revealed no evidence of historic resources.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes
X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA NFHL mapper
Ward Marotti/
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
08-09-2022
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

Plan
IMPACT LEGEND
i
4.41,__L,s ttk,j
91 AJI
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
(TYP.)
492
\
(WETLAND -WB
PERMANENT WETLAND
IMPACT
0.295 AC (12,833 SF)
PERMANENT ZONE 2
IMPACT
0.065 AC (2,843 SF)
�r "r.
'PERMANENT ZONE 1
IMPACT
0.044 AC (1,908 SF)
PERMANENT STREAM
\" IMPACT
9 LINEAR FEET
0.001 AC (25 SF) / o /
30' ZONE 1 NEUSE 20' ZONE 2 NEUSE
RIPARIAN BUFFER
RIPARIAN BUFFER
11,
G
iiiiiiiiiilliiiim
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
22Iliiiiiiiiusil
FUN �i■i.
!!��:iiiiiiiii��l
PERMANENT ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT
PERMANENT ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT — FILL
IMPACT AREA 1
SHEET 2 OF 5
M:\Projects\BZR\BZR21001\04-Production\Engineering\Exhibits\IM1- Shocccrree II.dwg, 6/27/2022 8:39:15 AM, Tyler Probst
0
GRAPHIC SCALE
30 60
120
linch =60ft.
MCADAMS
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone [phone]
fax [phone]
license number: C-0293, C-187
www.mcadamsco.com
SHOCCOREE II
IMPACT MAP 1
4115 BERINI DR, 3940 SHOCCOREE DR
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
PLAN INFORMATION
PROJECT NO. BMZ-21001
FILENAME BMZ21001-IM1
CHECKED BY JCM
DRAWN BY JBC
SCALE 1"=60'
DATE 05.27.2020

1
502
1
\ N N \\
— �\
\ \ \ 496 \
\ \R g ' \
N \\ \_)
N N
\ N
\
\ 'r
i \ 1
\ \
IMPACT LEGEND
1
1
504
/
/
/
/ Cora/
WETLAN —4NA / / /
/ 0/
PERMANENT WETLAND
IMPACT
0.074 AC (3,214 SF)
7 /
bt%1-�
/ a9b/
/
496
496 _—
--- 494
502
490
492 —
1
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT
IMPACT AREA 2
SHEET 3 OF 5
M:\Projects\BZR\BZR21001\04-Production\Engineering\Exhibits\IM1- Shocccrree II.dwg, 6/27/2022 8:39:20 AM, Tyler Probst
0
GRAPHIC SCALE
10 20
40
1 inch = 20 ft.
MCADAMS
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone [phone]
fax [phone]
license number: C-0293, C-187
www.mcadamsco.com
SHOCCOREE II
IMPACT MAP 2
4115 BERINI DR, 3940 SHOCCOREE DR
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
PLAN INFORMATION
PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
BMZ-21001
B MZ21001-I M 1
JCM
JBC
1"=20'
05.27.2022

470
1 �
/ /
/
IMPACT LEGEND
/
/ /
/
74 /
/ /
/ /
/ v
/
/ v
V
/
WETLAND—WF
PERMANENT WETLAND
IMPACT
(0.001 AC, 50 SF)
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (TYP.)
'.v
'.v .v
'.v .v .v
'.v .v
'.v .v
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT
IMPACT AREA 3
SHEET 4 OF 5
M:\Projects\BZR\BZR21001\04-Production\Engineering\Exhibits\IM1- Shocccrree II.dwg, 6/27/2022 8:39:24 AM, Tyler Probst
0
GRAPHIC SCALE
10 20
40
1 inch = 20 ft.
MCADAMS
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone [phone]
fax [phone]
license number: C-0293, C-187
www.mcadamsco.com
SHOCCOREE II
IMPACT MAP 3
4115 BERINI DR, 3940 SHOCCOREE DR
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
PLAN INFORMATION
PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
BMZ-21001
B MZ21001-I M 1
JCM
JBC
1"=20'
05.27.2022

\
20' ZONE 2
\
RIPARIAN BUF
EUSE
\ER
\
30' ZONE 1 NEUSE N
RIPARIAN BUFFER
N \
\ \
\
\�2
\ \
\R40
\
\
\ \
\ `\ \ \
\ \\ \\
\ \ \ \
\ \\
\ \ \ \ \
\
\
100' ZONE 3 NEUSE
RIPARIAN BUFFER
v
\ \
\\ \
\
\\
IMPACT LEGEND
\
PROPOSED SEWER (TYP.)
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (TYP.)
\
\
\ \ \
\ \
TEMPORARY ZONE 3 IMPACT \ \
(0.034 AC, 1,499 SF) - \
\ \\\
\\
\
\\
ass\\ N
\
\ \\� \
TEMPORARY ZONE 2 IMPACT
(0.014 AC, 598 SF)
TEMPORARY ZONE 1 IMPACT
(0.006 AC, 278 SF)
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ I TEMPORARY ZONE 1 IMPACT
1\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ TEMPORARY ZONE 2 IMPACT
11111111111111111111111111
TEMPORARY ZONE 3 IMPACT
IMPACT AREA 4
SHEET 5 OF 5
M:\Projects\BZR\BZR21001\04-Production\Engineering\Exhibits\IM1- Shocccrree II.dwg, 6/27/2022 8:39:29 AM, Tyler Probst
0
GRAPHIC SCALE
10 20
40
1 inch = 20 ft.
MCADAMS
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone [phone]
fax [phone]
license number: C-0293, C-187
www.mcadamsco.com
SHOCCOREE II
IMPACT MAP 3
4115 BERINI DR, 3940 SHOCCOREE DR
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
PLAN INFORMATION
PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
BMZ-21001
B MZ21001-I M 1
JCM
JBC
1"=20'
05.27.2022

Lisa Long
From: Norton, April R CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2021 12:27 PM
To: Lisa Long
Subject: RE: SAW-2021-01325 (Shoccoree II / Berini Dr. / Durham NC / Durham)_Delineation Concurrence
Attachments: SAW-2021-01325 Stream and Wetland Map.pdf
Dear Lisa Long,
Reference is made to Corps Action ID: SAW-2021-01325. Please reference this number on any correspondence regarding
this action.
We have reviewed the information provided by you concerning the aquatic resources, and by copy of this e-mail, are
confirming that the aquatic resources delineation has been verified by the Corps to be a sufficiently accurate and
reliable representation of the location and extent of aquatic resources within the identified review area. The location
and extent of these aquatic resources are shown on the delineation map entitled, "Stream and Wetland Delineation
Map" and dated June 2021.
Regulatory Guidance Letter (RGL) 16-01 https://usace.contentdm.ocic.org/utils/getfile/collection/p16021co119/id/1256
provides guidance for Jurisdictional Determinations (JD) and states, "The Corps generally does not issue a JD of any type
where no JD has been requested." At this time we are only verifying the delineation. This delineation may be relied
upon for use in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory mitigation. This verification does
not address nor include any consideration for geographic jurisdiction on aquatic resources and shall not be interpreted
as such.
This delineation verification is not an Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) and is not an appealable action under
the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an AJD, which is an
appealable action.
If you wish to receive a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD), or an Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD)
please respond accordingly, otherwise nothing further is required and we will not provide any additional
documentation.
**Please note that I will be issuing an AJD for your project. Due to workload volume, it may take 90 - 120 days or more
for the issuance of a standalone JD; however, you may use the delineation for planning and permitting purposes.
Thank you,
April Norton
April R. Norton
Regulatory Division
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE-SAW-RG-R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone], Ext. 57
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
1

From: RaleighNCREG <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2021 12:04 PM
To: Lisa Long <[e-mail]>
Cc: Norton, April R CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>; Thames, Joyce A CIV USARMY CESAW
(USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: SAW-2021-01325 (Shoccoree II / Berini Dr. / Durham NC / Durham)
Good Afternoon,
We received your Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) request. We have assigned the request file number SAW-
2021-01325 and forwarded it to Ms. April Norton for further processing.
Please refer to this file number in all correspondence.
Thank you,
Josephine Schaffer
From: Lisa Long<[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2021 9:58 AM
To: RaleighNCREG <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] JD Request for Shoccoree II
Hello,
Please see the attached AJD request for a property in Durham County, NC.
Best,
Lisa Long
Environmental Scientist
J 866-772-6453 0 919-689-5283
[e-mail]
▪ spanglerenvironmental.com
• 4338 Bland Rd., Raleigh, NC 27609
In 10
09 SPANGLED
DIVNIONOSINTAL.lr .
Any email message sent by any employee of Spangler Environmental is intended only for the identified recipient. It (and
any attachment) is strictly confidential and may contain attorney -privileged work product. If you have obtained an email
by error or you are not the identified recipient, please notify the sender by calling toll free 1-866-772-6453, then delete
the email (and any attachment) from your system. Use of the email (or any attachment) by any person other than the
identified recipient is strictly prohibited.
2

3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www. saw.usace. army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator. aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Depaitiuent of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Berini Dr.
City, State: Durham, NC
County: Durham
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 175212 & 175209
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Spangler Environmental, Inc.
Mailing Address: 4338 Bland Rd.
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Select one:
o
❑
EI
o
Raleigh, NC 27609
919-875-4288
[e-mail]
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name: Curtis Media Group
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
3012 Highwoods Blvd, Suite 201
Raleigh, NC 27604
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3'4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Lisa Long (for Jim Spangler)
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner fl Authorized Agents
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
n A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
n Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization faun/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
✓❑
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
n
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
Size of Property or Review Area 63.39 acres.
nThe property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017
Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
z
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 36.034217°
Longitude: -78.962064°
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
• North Arrow
• Graphical Scale
• Boundary of Review Area
• Date
• Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
• Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
• Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
n
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017
Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
0
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Forma
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
s Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
I. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION
Completion Date of Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD): Select.
ORM Number: (e.g. HQS-2020-00001-MSW).
Associated JDs: N/A or ORM numbers and identifiers (e.g. HQS-2020-00001-MSW-MITSITE).
Review Area Location': State/Territory: NC City: Durham County/Parish/Borough: Durham
Center Coordinates of Review Area: Latitude 36.034217° Longitude /8.962064°
II. FINDINGS
A. Summary: Check all that apply. At least one box from the following list MUST be selected. Complete the
corresponding sections/tables and summarize data sources.
• The review area is comprised entirely of dry land (i.e., there are no waters or water features, including
wetlands, of any kind in the entire review area). Rationale: N/A or describe rationale.
❑ There are "navigable waters of the United States" within Rivers and Harbors Act jurisdiction within the
review area (complete table in Section II.B).
❑x There are "waters of the United States" within Clean Water Act jurisdiction within the review area
(complete appropriate tables in Section II.C).
❑x There are waters or water features excluded from Clean Water Act jurisdiction within the review area
(complete table in Section II.D).
B. Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 Section 10 (§ 10)2
§ 10 Name
§ 10 Size
§ 10 Criteria
Rationale for § 10 Determination
N/A.
N/A N/i
N/A.
N/A.
C. Clean Water Act Section 404
Territorial Seas and Traditional Navigable Waters ((a)(1) waters):3
(a)(1) Name
(a)(1) Size
(a)(1) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(1) Determination
Nlf
Tributaries ((a)(2) waters):
(a)(2) Name
(a)(2) Size
(a)(2) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(2) Determination
SA
43
linear
feet
(a)(2) Intermittent
tributary
contributes
surface water
flow directly or
indirectly to an
(a)(1) water in a
typical year.
N/A.
1 Map(s)/figure(s) are attached to the AJD provided to the requestor.
2 If the navigable water is not subject to the ebb and flow of the tide or included on the District's list of Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 navigable
waters list, do NOT use this document to make the determination. The District must continue to follow the procedure outlined in 33 CFR part 329.14 to
make a Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 navigability determination.
3 A stand-alone TNW determination is completed independently of a request for an AJD. A stand-alone TNW determination is conducted for a specific
segment of river or stream or other type of waterbody, such as a lake, where upstream or downstream limits or lake borders are established. A stand-
alone TNW determination should be completed following applicable guidance and should NOT be documented on the AJD Form.
Page 1 of 3 Form Version 10 June 2020_updated

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
Lakes and ponds, and impoundments of jurisdictional waters ((a)(3) waters):
(a)(3) Name
(a)(3) Size
(a)(3) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(3) Determination
PA
3.37
acre(s)
(a)(3) Lake/pond
or impoundment
of a jurisdictional
water contributes
surface water
flow directly or
indirectly to an
(a)(1) water in a
typical year.
Based on site inspection, appears to contribute
surface water flow to an unnamed tributary of Ellerbe
Creek.
PB
0.12
acre(s)
(a)(3) Lake/pond
or impoundment
of a jurisdictional
water contributes
surface water
flow directly or
indirectly to an
(a)(1) water in a
typical year.
Based on site inspection, appears to contribute
surface water flow to an unnamed tributary of Ellerbe
Creek.
Adjacent wetlands ((a)(4) waters):
(a)(4) Name
(a)(4) Size
(a)(4) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(4) Determination
WB
0.26
acre(s)
(a)(4) Wetland
abuts an (a)(1)-
(a)(3) water.
Based on site inspection, abuts PA.
WC
0.02
acre(s)
(a)(4) Wetland
abuts an (a)(1)-
(a)(3) water.
Based on site inspection, abuts PA.
WD
0.004
acre(s)
(a)(4) Wetland
abuts an (a)(1)-
(a)(3) water.
Based on site inspection, abuts PA.
D. Excluded Waters or Features
Excluded waters ((b)(1) — (b)(12)):4
Exclusion Name
Exclusion Size
Exclusions
Rationale for Exclusion Determination
PC
0.001
acre(s)
(b)(1) Lake/pond
or impoundment
that does not
contribute surface
water flow directly
or indirectly to an
(a)(1) water and
is not inundated
by flooding from
N/A.
4 Some excluded waters, such as (b)(2) and (b)(4), may not be specifically identified on the AJD form unless a requestor specifically asks a Corps district
to do so. Corps districts may, in case -by -case instances, choose to identify some or all of these waters within the review area.
5 Because of the broad nature of the (b)(1) exclusion and in an effort to collect data on specific types of waters that would be covered by the (b)(1)
exclusion, four sub -categories of (b)(1) exclusions were administratively created for the purposes of the AJD Form. These four sub -categories are not
new exclusions, but are simply administrative distinctions and remain (b)(1) exclusions as defined by the NWPR.
Page 2 of 3
Form Version 10 June 2020_updated

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
Excluded waters ((b)(1) — (b)(12)):4
Exclusion Name
Exclusion Size
Exclusions
Rationale for Exclusion Determination
an (a)(1)-(a)(3)
water in a typical
year.
V"
0.08
acre(s)
(b)(1) Non-
adjacent wetland.
N/A.
WF
0.02
acre(s)
(b)(1) Non-
adjacent wetland.
N/A.
0.003
acre(s)
(b)(1) Non-
adjacent wetland.
NIA
III. SUPPORTING INFORMATION
A. Select/enter all resources that were used to aid in this determination and attach data/maps to this
document and/or references/citations in the administrative record, as appropriate.
Information submitted by, or on behalf of, the applicant/consultant: Title(s) and date(s)
This information Select. sufficient for purposes of this AJD.
Rationale: N/A or describe rationale for insufficiency (including partial insufficiency).
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: itle(s) and/or date(s).
❑x Photographs: Select. Title(s) and/or date(s).
❑ Corps site visit(s) conducted on: Date(s).
❑ Previous Jurisdictional Determinations (AJDs or PJDs): ORM Number(s) and date(s).
❑ Antecedent Precipitation Tool: provide detailed discussion in Section III.B.
❑x USDA NRCS Soil Survey: 1976 Durham County Soil Survey Sheet 16
❑ USFWS NWI maps: itle(s) and/or date(s).
❑x USGS topographic maps: 2019 Northwest Durham 7.5 Minute
Other data sources used to aid in this determination:
Data Source (select)
Name and/or date and other relevant information
USGS Sources
N/A.
USDA Sources
N/A.
NOAA Sources
N/A.
USACE Sources
N/A.
State/Local/Tribal Sources
N/A.
Other Sources
N/A.
B. Typical year assessment(s): N/A or provide typical year assessment for each relevant data source used
to support the conclusions in the AJD.
C. Additional comments to support AJD: N/A or provide additional discussion as appropriate.
Page 3 of 3 Form Version 10 June 2020_updated

0 125 250
500
750
1,000
•
1
Legend
Property Boundary
Stream
Pond
Jurisdictional Wetlands
Excluded Wetlands
Neuse Riparian Buffer Zone 1 (30-ft)
Neuse Riparian Buffer Zone 2 (20-ft from Z1)
VA
Feet
WC dielft
0, •
gm= othialg4 &AEA,INgOr CINEettbm DeoMeM,
Shocoree II DD
Berini Dr
Durham, North Carolina
June 2021
69
SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
4338 Bland Road Raleigh, NC 27609
919-875-4288
Stream & Wetland
Delineation Map
Map Source:
Durham County GIS

0 125 250
500
750
1,000
i
4
Legend
Property Boundary
Stream
Pond
Jurisdictional Wetlands
Excluded Wetlands
Neuse Riparian Buffer Zone 1 (30-ft)
Neuse Riparian Buffer Zone 2 (20-ft from Z1)
LIL '111•111'1.. 41!
Feet
Shocoree II DD
Berini Dr
Durham, North Carolina
May 2021
69
SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
4338 Bland Road Raleigh, NC 27609
919-875-4288
NRCS Soil Survey Map
Map Source:
1976 Durham County Soil
Survey (Sheet 16)

W
N
s
E
Legend
Property Boundary
Stream
Pond
Jurisdictional Wetlands
Excluded Wetlands
Neuse Riparian Buffer Zone 1 (30-ft)
Neuse Riparian Buffer Zone 2 (20-ft from Z1)
1
Shocoree II DD
Berini Dr
Durham, North Carolina
May 2021
0 125 250
500
Feet
750
1,000
EsrikMaar, GecEj
Ae'roGRID IcN, and 03p8
SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
4338 Bland Road Raleigh, NC 27609
919-875-4288
E. rthst. r
User
G-ographics, CN'ES/AIrbusJJS, USDA,
Co•mmunity
USGS Topographic Map
Map Source:
2019 Northwest Durham
Topographic Quadrangle

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Shoccoree II
City/County: Durham/Durham
Sampling Date: 5/28/2021
Applicant/Owner: Spangler Environmental, Inc for Edens Land State: NC Sampling Point: UPL
Investigator(s): Lisa Long Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Ridge
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave
Slope (%): 0-3
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Southern Piedmont Lat: 36034548°.Long: -78.963924° Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: HeB—Helena sandy loam, 2 6%slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No
Remarks:
About a month of drought prior to site visit.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑
=
❑
m
❑
M
❑
0
❑
❑
M
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: UPL
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1 Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda)
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
3 FAC
2. Red maple (Acer rubrum) 5 Y FAC
3 Willow oak (Quercus laurifolia) 5 Y FACW
4 Post oak (Quercus stellata) 5 Y UPL
5.
6.
7.
18 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 9 20% of total cover: 3.6
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1 Sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua) 60 Y FAC
2. Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda)
3 Red maple (Acer rubrum)
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
40 FAC
10 FAC
110
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 55 20% of total cover:
10.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: UPL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0-2 2.5Y 4/3 100
2-20 2.5Y 5/4 100
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (A1)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Texture
sandy loam
sandy loam
Remarks
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
❑MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
RPiedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
111 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ (MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

_ _ i ~ fi ti ai s 7' 1. • "�r '. s%,1/�
14
r' /1,! �! -• 11. ` 1 ' +�
071
'0,;•.1,1..,
4 `: ` .IfiJce2,'Y.„., .
yyam► + '+..
ic_. , ...,, ,., ,, N. ,,,,,__ _
)--
(Nr(1 11 t I')'-'• .../ s--„.ioe ,-... '' -1,6,,,i, Jr? -4/ ..-- :- .•,. -:, -ik\„--,f„, .. ..... - ‘.-•--) ...
4v etc f
•
r'‹ . -4- '';'. i'''-'''''' ': ‘1.-4,}7-'-•'f . ' '--, r-•-•
® 'G � V� � I A I � / --
/A .P
ilt
ft
t, '';_';,••,:. ,••
,...
{ � �I ,•,„..,,,•: ), ..., - ',,,, •A ./ . „•,,,
J .��r iw' ,.j ,;-s, , 4" -4/._ )7:
': k�i • ',
•
•
•
...� `l 4. ,..'1
- .., ! _ " •`; +- 4.. . : ._.. ��.
i,i 1,?. -: --.,„:-',. - ---'-' : .-. ' ' • ..--. ..... " .-
it
•
ems ,- • ,i f - •
.,� ` may: \r �` rib'/Or
''.
1 -'�4- _
/E
j1• :,} i ,i,• Yl� ' '1( Yi Y.,,c..--714',A641! -4k, . . ...;,-=--, - -,x, % :--_.::: 24., i .
1 a - . V ��—�'4i
„r
Photo 1: Upland soil sample
09
SPANGL,ER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

,
wvz.
ti
-k ei4 * 10,1-
4 n
.
tq
•
«v .'`- =• . , 'ate
S _ -''Aa
4 : .? bJ'ayy� k- .4117 W� _ 4k r e- - ws..
. : �t \.". a `.y\ .,- , b' t s !g a.--',/ S-i _ ,7,27-Z, •= T,:
J - ` '4 `c`a „sip. ""„_'1 • ,s s' mac,:.,=�z; '
bk rtr, fit; 7,-,-. ' A _ : p b: -`
�':' ,.. ,a,�L y+y (yid`j.. ra ,. t v _,,
Photo 2: Upland
09
SPANGL,ER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Shoccoree II
City/County: Durham/Durham
Sampling Date: 5/28/2021
Applicant/Owner: Spangler Environmental, Inc for Edens Land State: NC Sampling Point: WA
Investigator(s): Lisa Long Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-10%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.036329° Long: -78.961147°
Soil Map Unit Name: ApB—Appling sandy loam, 2-6% slopes
NWI classification:
Datum: NAD83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
About a month of drought prior to site visit.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑
=
❑
m
❑
M
=
❑
❑
✓
M
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
✓
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
/
❑
❑
❑
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WA
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1 Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1 Red maple (Acer rubrum)
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
40 Y FAC
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
2. Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
3 Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda)
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 17.5
5
20
10
35
10.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
FAC
FAC
FAC
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
50% of total cover:
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
2
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
FACU species
UPL species
Column Totals:
Multiply by:
x 1 =
x 2 =
x3=
x 4 =
x5=
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WA
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0-2 10YR 3/3 100
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
2-16 2.5Y 7/1 80 7.5YR 5/8
16-24 2.5Y 8/1 80 7.5YR 5/8
M
20 C M
Texture
loamy sand
loamy sand
20 C M loamy sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (A1)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Remarks
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
❑MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
RPiedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
111 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ (MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X
No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

I 111. ' r - `'.
7 .... 44 . ... _ .
i,„ .
6 ,1111 44;60167 A IF as4), 4. ilh ,
.�
er.
�1
de a 11110 ' kilik. '
'II ee le
1
i
/1 •
s
. A.
41.
rilk
i
A
•t
0. , AD lio, ....
Photo 1: WA soil sample
451)
SPANGL,ER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

" ti a,:11 !t
,9a .fie' -r kT`„ 1,, t";R _r Pg iii c -'''� -_ [ 3a� -� .
� �.� r 1 w-PL'Al •
•
` a 's ' X e.t `s q .. t k' +r
� . itr
m� r 1' y ' 5 ., 5 Tim s ✓i
. .,...„_.,...
;� .,� rRr �:.•
:, fi- ' ! ., , '� ^'
n r k! +S
—__' — -' - -fir—
a - - ..fir ,.— - - - �'r 3.r-. - a'." _ _� 4 f'
\ ,--- -
_ 1 . am . ;~
_ ,v rII r `
•
—
: 'sfi -f i -
•
,- - Z- x t. f ` .G ` f { i --may`' ► _ :
j Itik
, y4k�a , 3
Y 7i
f ! vim''- t •r 17' , �� 1
A h
• �� 6 � F �Y day ,'� »
F ■ „
��� f ri Y,e dAlt `� - .w��
i.
Photo 2: WA
611
SPANGL,ER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Shoccoree II
City/County: Durham/Durham
Sampling Date: 5/28/2021
Applicant/Owner: Spangler Environmental, Inc for Edens Land State: NC Sampling Point: WB
Investigator(s): Lisa Long Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): drainage
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.035283° Long: 78.962206°
Slope (%): 6-10
Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Helena sandy loam, 6-10% slopes NWI classification: riverine
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
About a month of drought prior to site visit.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑
=
❑
m
❑
M
=
❑
❑
✓
M
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
✓
,/
❑
❑
❑
❑
/
❑
❑
❑
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 16-20
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WB
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1 Red maple (Acer rubrum)
2. Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
3 Elm (Ulmus americana)
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
20 FAC
40 Y FAC
10 FACW
70
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 35 20% of total cover:
1 Stiltgrass (Microstegium vimenium)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50 Y FAC
50
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1 Grapevine (Vitis rotundifolia)
2.
3.
4.
5.
60 Y FAC
60
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WB
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0-1 10YR 3/3 100
1-12 5Y 4/2 93
12-20 2.5Y 4/1 93
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
7.5YR 5/6 7 C M
Texture
sandy loam
sandy loam
7.5YR 5/6 7 C M clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (A1)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Remarks
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
❑MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
RPiedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
111 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ (MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X
No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

•
'407 0
4110
k. w I •
a 1 y'
it . .,
- ...� T r '', 1 .- rb.
;,
P
like
9 y, 1 1 . t
p p i
C frA•'•
r4 •, • ,•1, 14c,"
,I I,
�� �y. k ' �.,y, •f t` I
.i ., 14 x 4
w%., i • f 'f., ,
t
1.04104*41466 . .
Photo 1: WB soil sample
01. )_-.110
SPANGL,ER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

���� � �' r ' � i, F �'�L, ' �� ° v {�a � ) "r� 9 �N .� �5mg1Pyr
hyit
✓! .� it 4k yam* j�
"?dd 'fit/ fi .e, / 1
M1� 141 `'1 'N,', r fir �ai,,,8,,\ \ 'h 4.^•. Y '-_.'" ) yam/' .
a it,, ` -1.4 �� i E dr.
' �4 .11h r?`{ "''--� `."7.w'Z41� , `'' rk , t iF\' i
• .4 v i. *+8t. ,+*s.•^.,,�...r s it .,,, "� '+a`.+. ). .y.{ \
rr + ai a iM1 i � ��+�q. '• �� a►M " +. :. P
FFM, y, � , ,140 '�1 h.. ,.may i , . Y d 1
AI
•
„'! S �
• '.'iV ,G '. 1,
•
f- .a.. - � =�,� - w - ' 1,
'47;7 7' °::!-
77*
•�
'
' °A ' '1."' i6;.• • "(OF ' - ' 'II:, ..,Z._ ; '4e-,...7/''.7i,''.0. -","'.:4-t- "Vt:," ,4,
hi
'tsx
'd- fit. * -• rr��i �. Z 4jar y; � p ,
sr-
'• 74';'-'' 4' 451'..- K.-... - Photo 1: WB
g)
SPANGL,ER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Shoccoree II
City/County: Durham/Durham
Sampling Date: 5/28/2021
Applicant/Owner: Spangler Environmental, Inc for Edens Land State: NC Sampling Point: WC
Investigator(s): Lisa Long Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Lake edge Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-3
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.033503° Long: -78.961884°
Soil Map Unit Name: ApB—Appling sandy loam, 2-6% slopes
NWI classification: N/A
Datum: NAD83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
About a month of drought prior to site visit.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
✓
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑
0
m
❑
M
❑
0
M
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
✓
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
✓
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 8-in
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WC
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1 Reed (Juncus effusus)
50% of total cover:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
70 Y FACW
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WC
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0-1 2.5Y 4/3 100
1-4 5Y 4/2 93
4-18 2.5Y 5/4 95
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture
2.5Y 6/6 7 C M
2.5Y 6/6 5 C M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (A1)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Remarks
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
❑MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
RPiedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ (MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X
No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

41Milkitirk' 4 lifli .'1.alt I i 1
tit
• `t .
,ii
rr' r ' ' .
:, F
Yka +
A.
it 41.11 . • ( "y ^.-
..4 ibolig, . ‘.... ,:,., . . •. ‘.. 4'..# .4 14,71,4.- .• ' - , ••-•• .- - '''-,•:'• ,14: .1r
Ai
N
• h ► IF -. itC`
- d ; i
go
:,
, V Er.le , . i :i . k. -' . ._
I' ...
... .. iiorik .,
i, ' ,- -,),,- ,..
„ -.,,,, . ,.. :''''• ;
Ili 40,di: le
i i: AI
tilitH,t A • F �F •
!! 4614,
µ a
`$ ,
b
4. t
A 41 ', • " '"?.. •:, ,,,,,,.. . '' A IP .4,
r _ ►
,
dila,
t \ •
r
Photo 1: WC soil sample
19
SPANGL,ER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

•
N"vAkn' ' � •
i c
X
s 'i' �! rs le �I f � �rl.
i�•d"C
1 �< ! ,' y ��o - . 7
� � I • �' I , °' ) � �TLi �� k�r t P �l { ) r' I i� ., � � � k1
,.1
j f 3 r SSi 1 ,I a Z c¢ q q, d .. y� ,1 f I f �' �h f ,! f t �' ', `iii, 7�� ai dy a'
�l� �� r V u 4 ,,� a1 s '_ M„ � i .�� . .fi r gar • • -.f/
- - � •�- G rif f'L s,�s's,s#a�� Ir E�� w � �t�d r � .a �:
\ • •
-"� • f 6 � • t. xn s, � f:'.,."'b � 5,t ''"•x l
V f . •
.-3 fir. . Ir� _
L 1
r:
Photo 2: WC
09
SPANGL,ER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Shoccoree II
Applicant/Owner: Spangler Environmental, Inc for Edens Land
City/County: Durham/Durham
Sampling Date: 5/28/2021
State: NC Sampling Point: WD
Investigator(s): Lisa Long Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 0-3
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.033951 ° Long: -78.963567°
Soil Map Unit Name: HeC—Helena sandy loam,
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology
6-10%slopes
for this time of year? Yes
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
NWI classification: N/A
Datum: NAD83
No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
Yes X
Yes X
No
No
No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes X
No
Remarks:
About a month of drought prior to site visit.
Small, sparsely vegetated feature. Determination based on hydrology and soils.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑
0
❑
m
❑
M
=
❑
❑
❑
M
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
✓
,/
❑
❑
❑
❑
/
❑
❑
❑
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 1-in
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WD
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover:
10.
11.
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Small, sparsely vegetated feature. Determination based on hydrology and soils.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WD
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0-1 2.5Y 4/3 100
1-20 2.5Y 5/1 93
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
10YR 5/6 7 C M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (A1)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Texture
sandy loam
sandy loam
Remarks
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
❑MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
RPiedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
111 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ (MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X
No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

/
; '' ti' ' F. " I r -01,,a` 4�rwi7 tea, `- . .�
-
..1 y' .: '1fr4' rl , ?h ' 1 : .
,y it r� i
_,i� .sa ,x' �,� 3r/ Air s.ry a v „�t, ..' .:
r Iiii,y ..c. ,%,4,4.7-- . ,..1,,,!_.,-,..-,-,,..,,,......,:r:- ,„,..04,:ri- ,,,,.,, ,,._-_,..i.m—,1 _ s .`
r ,§ � `'!4! �`� • a l '"
4-
4,3-
cam, .` e'
t �. ! £} ,' A
-x . s_t , C. l• r "
f 1
Photo 1: WD soil sample
19
SPANGL,ER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

y� a
K
4
r arse
T a 1 _,R• .„yq z b
•
•
_--„ 4,•0,4 "e - ' :s .•, '•� +r .c..'. ems, str' wrl, pai+% s - �i0 ma `r . 2 ` , ; + " "sr s> .. . ". r s w .r ,x:' M„ty:+ * —y' h / '� ' .wet ' „V . �� tr `:,. ., J �w wCsp, ! �.dti l_ [ lr }d s L 2 .,.s� , � iw � ,r ..f:w D,'" .a„ a _ Photo 2: W5 _�. `-s 09
SPANGL,ER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Shoccoree II
City/County: Durham/Durham
Sampling Date: 5/28/2021
Applicant/Owner: Spangler Environmental, Inc for Edens Land State: NC Sampling Point: WE
Investigator(s): Lisa Long Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): drainageway
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave
Slope (%): 6-10
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Southern Piedmont Lat: 36.034041 ° Long: -78.963870° Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Helena sandy loam, 6 10%slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
About a month of drought prior to site visit.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑
=
❑
m
❑
M
=
❑
❑
❑
M
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
✓
,/
❑
❑
❑
❑
✓
❑
❑
❑
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WE
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
50% of total cover:
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
1 Globe Flatsedge (Cyperus echinatus) 5 Y FACU
2. Stiltgrass (Microstegium vimenium)
3 FAC
3 Hop Sedge (Carex lupulina) 5 Y OBL
4 Common rush (Juncus effusus)
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
3 FACW
16
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 8 20% of total cover: 3.2
1 Greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia) 5 Y FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WE
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0-2 2.5Y 4/3
2-20 2.5Y 6/2 90
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
10YR 5/8 10 C M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (A1)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Texture
loamy sand
loamy sand
Remarks
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
❑MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
RPiedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
111 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ (MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X
No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

' th'!-•
' . t,' ,,' '''..:':. • ,o,..•,•'',, 4 ‘1\ '
"n
, .
• ,.. ' ••'".':.s.;,•;,.,.:' ''-',,:'''l,.:—.. ' ',
'\
,..., .-','. - • '
'''..‘ \",. '44,..,;' .''' %" '''' L'''', '• • •'
"*
'''k,.,44,11','' ' ', 2 •,'''''',4t,'' ''1-.4' •.. •,
'•-• , :,'' ..,z ,-S.:4,,,,„ ,_, ',.q, ,. . ,;,' z-i';,,.A,,..v',,li5,...„- _, „„. .,
'-\- '. 14,, -,- .- -',. . y•iy.:-:,.---„ ,.. ',--, , ' .,,,,,::,..,:, '.. ";,,,„ - . , . i;i
, - • . - -,.,. _,..,-, ---:,- .----,1 .--/ , ,,-'''',„,' ;,. ..,,,-,,:,.,4, , , ;', ...' / '
.- - - 1,7,fl..--7 _`.., ,v.:":'''..,.,..„,.,„ = ' .....,' 7, ', 0,. .". ' ,•." . ,”,' .„. ,
,
[
- - '—' • .- --''','.. - ,''''-',-- 1, It.t`",,se7,74Y4 i ' ', 11: —• '''' , .7' 'e,, ,-, „ii„ti,
j
''7„':----,..',"--3-,4-1-:-.--..„,'_4,4-'7` -' ,_ . -, ., '---4 ' ' . ,.c -,, ., :, ,i ,.., , . " ' '.',-•' )
.',, ., ''-''., ' ., - "'.;-. -4 ' • ' '', ' - ''. — = ' ii
71..
-7,---- ,
-.4
'-'
; -'-.----'•- --7,'`.4-:---
...-
t :; .,,::,1,;,z..,.1._-A,.-.--,„,t,-ii,A,,,-,,-15.•): .
'
, t t ,„ , 7 '-,,,4.1' , r, :-•,!,..,, '-_,,..,Agi.•.,,,;;0it,-I?-;ix-1 ',.. ._- 7,— ,
--'‘ .,*--,'-\:', '-- '''.14, lollrii*: 7,.-c:-,'Y.; -4,-'''-z-l':-,-'''.°..,,,, taa4r4,41..:4' :;----72--i,,,`,'- •
r-,- .4.$:. ,--',"`"44 -,',.7..; At- r:,,,, '•-tti.s, ' ' 4,',..- '' .`,'•• ; • ;',. , i.--;kEel:- "7..: . , -4.- '- . '
'kJ ''...;W '-'''' ?k i i•'' vt., ,* -,.8. .,,,w. :-.It'
-*-i,-.s s,x'.t:.,"'.s;'4'..•a`,.-,,1:,"'„,,•`--i',...'.,o1',4,m','t,',;-o,''t',t'4.e,-.'e.t'.',1-,4?.':.
z,'))„,...-....",.?.'.",4,„„...,,.4`,„-:t-.,i,,,-t4.F.;4.r-AV''',.:"',".'.,?.•,'i-':-,-,t'),:,-I,..-i'..,',F.1•wc,,...t,.,•-.;-,..7f.,,.".,1,•,,-,74,.-,,,,,;..6.'.,4•.,-„'1„,-:-:i:.ki''1'1.t,.of,.,,?'NJ,,,-,,-,. ,
41 p L .--.;3-
-,4,
,., 4
/ if ;
-,4 :,.,,:, ',4_'
.g.:
_ . ,-...4%...-..,,, , ... i
I I,
e 4., -acelt - -`,..'. ''' .:
-- .. '17L' • .' 4 h''PA-. , .
., 4.,„ , ,. it,,,--4,.;-
. -
Photo 1: WE soil sample
GI
SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

' .
, ,„,.,
�` ' 1 4 ice +r�F ai,.; d. e= A`_ J " - fd
..,
,,__L..
...
, ,
..
-...
..,
_._,..*„... . ...,. , ._\ ,,\,',.. .,,,-, : -,- , :•:- '-'..- . :- - .
y "' .''�,, "'y: , y % i ij z f�' q.
�ttfA . , ,,,_.
p�z
� k
- ��"., � r 1 ' 4 n d ` � , - .
t. .a a44- °! pk �j .. - - ; • -
44
hi y > h _ ' l Y,. A eate: y: . �'B'.. "- ,i _ .
S s',c ,s a x sr.f
:I.,'Alva,* ..,-,,,,,ata„V-",.-• .-e A,-_4'0" ' -- :;-'mv._ 4.;i AL'A'Pp"A'_ ,sot --,,,,,`ILL-- •'•.,,..:. ., ',;47404' ":,,t1 -....4---,.._1-.2:44-LAI$2.4.`"w•-'1"--,",:--F,. ".----,cr"-.-- TAA.:":?.L'7.i
S y'
•{ "G � .AE ! :- � - p 3
3.�`• , '
�y t- - d v,T,_r 1'• irk.s - S > f 1`Y `,`'.yzx, l+»rwaV�
"/ �T 'y l a s •O � t- ` L- M . ' F e r n.i.�•
q'�- • " k ' �' k '
%
/ 'N Sit z4 _s w vY ��- ' •
Photo 2: WE
gill
SPANGL,ER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Shoccoree II
City/County: Durham/Durham
Sampling Date: 5/28/2021
Applicant/Owner: Spangler Environmental, Inc for Edens Land State: NC Sampling Point: WF
Investigator(s): Lisa Long Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): drainageway
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave
Slope (%): 5-10
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Southern Piedmont Lat: 36034472°.Long: -78.964181 ° Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: HeC—Helena sandy loam, 6-10%slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
About a month of drought prior to site visit.
Small, sparsely vegetated feature. Determination based on hydrology and soils.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑
=
❑
m
❑
M
=
❑
❑
❑
M
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
✓
,/
❑
❑
❑
❑
/
❑
❑
❑
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WF
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover:
10.
11.
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Small, sparsely vegetated feature. Determination based on hydrology and soils.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WF
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0-1 2.5Y 7/6 100
1-20 2.5Y 6/2 85
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
2.5Y7/6 15 C M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (A1)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Texture
loamy sand
loamy sand
Remarks
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
❑MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
RPiedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
111 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ (MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X
No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

P•A �'?.'. MrAa ;+ use' '�f .�' _?V yy``
ii�"+ ` 1'
y} � tr
x 'a 4.tie`'��5 ' S 'Y ', k t e •
a5 a J $ y� ��, 3 t✓ 1
,,,,,,,,. :,..,-,-...,.:,, ,•.-4-•• "4"..''''
xih �
•9%Y�'r�r - .' a q , },fir �"Y ay�_ r9F -
cr+ ..4 h''SA .{'e ,\, -,,,, J'S, f! w ,� � " Z't, T- 4 -++S,Y "" Y v
i. �. . .y fit S '' _ . 1 Mvf te a. /i fiY�/ ' , --, -.7A•-- ' . 4 ..",,,a,.i.,‘ - :. ;',,t,',''.",.-, ..:''.:.,. ..',.. - .-.:;;',4,:''',',.., ,t,' '..4.-
`.s'tr ` L r t� ,d 4 n I• f,`'� fA
•
_.I A • i, ` .V't %Ike
may f .e 4 j" - {+
_,4?-; iit" •- `4 q;,+.�`,•:
J , _ ids .,, '"
00,
as sd + -' • '
4,1
4
4(..„..40,
Kb�#' s'}� Z�n y �'���Y �x•. '�R
fey ¢� 51 .14
�"{ w '': �" ik ., dam4. 4
I \ P _:„y d
„10,... ,..) "4 t
06-
'Y. � �` W ., • �r F� Sty
e
Photo 1: WF soil sample
69
SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

�{ 'tv '., 'a4'` r., 3- I ''+�Jk'
"T •_ of d _
1. lit
E k TTT
. . . -,i'''A g- ,: ,
T. ^yl
—N.
IIi lit4 c• i..1 •
x�
fit i{¢�i ,. vy �'
-<2= - —ham,
•�9�F
y_. ': "iG' - 4-ram
- k },. hi s ;.k
•
>. } _ fir ` / 'i;
-• -.` 1.,,O1M4,-..tV),:;?,1:.,. ----„-- - iti.N4'31' '.' -:''"'"'''''''''
q y
Av.,- -mir, 1.v . _ -
Photo 2: WF
611
SPANGL,ER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.