The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNCG060133_Compliance Evaluation_20210824ROY COOPER Governor ELIZABM S. BISER Secretary BRIAN WRENN Director Cargill Incorporated Attention: Gavin Atkinson 15407 McGinty Road West Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 NORTH CAROLINA F.nvkawav al Quality August 24, 2021 Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection Cargill Feed and Nutrition Barber NPDES Certificate of Coverage — NCG060133 Rowan County, North Carolina Dear Mr. Atkinson, Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection we conducted at the Cargill Feed and Nutrition Barber on August 17, 2021. Please note that in the stormwater inspection report summary we ask that you repair and stabilize eroded areas on site. The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (704) 663-1699 or by E-mail at james.moore@ncdenr.gov. Enclosure c: Laserfiche Sincerely, J es Moore Assistant Regional Engineer ann.n ui.��ena� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources MooresvWe Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue,Sulte301 I Mooresville, North Caroftna28115 704.663.1699 Compliance Inspection Resort Permit: NCGO60133 Effective: 07/01/21 Expiration: 06/30/26 Owner: Cargill Incorporated SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Cargill Feed & Nutrition Barber County: Rowan 9150 Statesville Blvd Region: Mooresville Cleveland NC 27013 Contact Person: Sherrie Suttles Title: Phone: 937-205-4153 Directions to Facility: System Classifications: SWNC, Primary ORC: Certification: Phone: Secondary ORC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Related Permits: Inspection Date: 08/17/2021 Entry Time 11:20AM Exit Time: 01:00PM Primary Inspector: Jesse M McDonnell Phone: 704-235-2139 Secondary Inspector(s): Lily C Kay Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit Inspection Type: Food[Tobacco/Soaps/Cosmetics/Public Warehousing Stormwater Discharge COC Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Question Areas: Storm Water (See attachment summary) Page 1 of 3 £ 10 Z 96ed -suoilsenb Aue aney noA d! aoWo ino joeluoO 'pappels pue paiiedai aq of spaeu OL AEM461H spJenno} 6uw6uieJp lauueyo GLO uNIM pue uiseq ayJ wy}!m uoisoJa loUlIN -poulejulew llann si f4!j!oej ayj `IleJanO -9191dwoo alarm sjuawnoop palelaMeld � pue (dddS) uuo!}uanaJd uoi1nlod .la}ennuuoIs ayl :tiewwnS uolloedsul aul}noll :;lslA Jo; uoseab uotlen{en3 aouel{duio0 adAjL uo400dsul L v/a/80 :a;ea uor;owsul poleiodjooul III6aeO:fQl3ed - JGUMO E£ MODON :;Iuued Permit: NCG060133 Owner - Facility: Cargill Incorporated Inspection Date: 08/17/2021 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? # Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map? # Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"? # Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas? # Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years? # Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices? # Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment? # Does the Plan include a BMP summary? # Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)? # Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan? # Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? # Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)? # Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? # Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program? Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented? Yes No NA NE ■ ❑ ❑❑ ■❑❑❑ ❑ ❑❑ ■ ❑ ❑❑ ■❑❑❑ 1111 ❑■ ■❑❑❑ ■❑❑❑ ❑❑❑■ ■ ❑ ❑❑ ■❑❑❑ ■❑❑❑ ■❑❑❑ Comment: The stormwater polution prevention plan (SWPPP) and related documents were complete. Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? M ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Qualitative monitoring records were avaliable and complete. Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ M ❑ Comment: Analytical monitoring records were avaliable and complete. Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE # Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ # Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Overall the facility is well operated and maintained. Minor erosion was observed within the . channel draining towards Highway 70 and within the basin. These areas need to repaired. Page 3 of 3