Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0055191_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20220801ROY COOPER Governor ELIZABETH S. BISER Secretary RICHARD E. ROGERS, JR. Director Aqua North Carolina, Inc. Attn: Shannon V. Becker 202 Mackenan Dr Cary, NC 27511-6447 NORTH CAROLINA Environmental Quality August 1, 2022 Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection Penman Heights Wastewater Treatment Plant NPDES Permit Number: NC0055191 Randolph County Dear Mr. Becker: Ron Boone, of the Winston-Salem Regional Office (WSRO) of the NC Division of Water Resources (DWR), conducted a compliance evaluation inspection (CEI) of the Melbille Heights wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) on June 27th, 2022. The assistance and cooperation of Shelby Cheek, Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC), was greatly appreciated. Inspection findings are detailed in the attached water compliance inspection report. Please be aware that the Division may take enforcement action against any permittee who fails to comply with any requirement of their permit. Pursuant to NC General Statute (NCGS) 143-215.6A, a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) may be assessed against any person who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of any permit issued pursuant to G.S. 143-215.1. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Boone by phone at 336- 776-9690, or by email at ron.boone@ncdenr.gov. Thank you in advance for your time and attention to this matter. Attachments: 1. Water Compliance Inspection Report cc: Laserfiche GDE NORTH C OLI JA ' omm mr� ep..of o�.i Sincerely, DocuSigned by: �145B49E225C94EA... Lon T. Snider, Regional Supervisor Water Quality Regional Operations Section Winston-Salem Regional Office Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources Winston-Salem Regional Office 1450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300 I Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105 336.776.9800 United States Environmental Protection Agency EPA Washington, D.C. 20460 Water Compliance Inspection Report Form Approved. OMB No. 2040-0057 Approval expires 8-31-98 Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS) Transaction 1 IN Code I 2 IL NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac I 3 I NC0055191 111 121 22/06/27 117 1810I 19I S I 2011 Type 21IIIIII IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIII I IIIIII IIIIIIIIIII P6 Inspection 671 Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring I 70I Evaluation Rating I 711 B1 1 72 QA I N I 73I 1 I I Reserved 74 71 J I I I I I I 180 Section B: Facility Data Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include POTW name and NPDES Dermit Number) Penman Heights WWTP NCSR 1917 High Point NC 27260 Entry Time/Date 02:OOPM 22/06/27 Permit Effective Date 22/01/01 Exit Time/Date 03:OOPM 22/06/27 Permit Expiration Date 26/08/31 Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) /// Shelby Darlene Cheek/ORC/336-362-2007/ Other Facility Data Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number Contacted Thomas J Roberts,202 Mackenan Dr Cary NC 275116447//919-467-8712/9194661583 No Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated) Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenar Records/Reports Self -Monitoring Progran Sludge Handling DispoFacility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Wate Laboratory Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) (See attachment summary) Name(s) Ron and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date Boone DWR/WSRO WQ/336-776-9690/ -DocuSigsened by:p8/1/2022 coover ,G�.e�YJoo,i,e —1..b2QrSereei Signature AS90U... of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date r;iDocuSigned by: -e. T. SA,ac>_ 8/1/2022 145B49E225C94EA... EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete. Page# 1 3I NPDES yr/mo/day N C 0055191 111 121 22/06/27 I17 Inspection Type 18 [j (Cont.) 1 Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) Ron Boone, of the Winston-Salem Regional Office of the NC Division of Water Resources, conducted a compliance evaluation inspection of the Penman Heights WWTP on 6/27/22. The assistance and cooperation of Shelby Cheek, Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC), was greatly appreciated. Inspection findings are detailed below and in the accompanying checklist. Records Review: Operational records were reviewed and found to be complete, current, and compliant. This includes operator visitation logs, operations logs, maintenance logs, and other pertinent records that the operators provided during the inspection. Records are kept for at least 3 years. Analytical records are complete, current, and compliant. The permittee uses Water Tech labs and conducts field parameter analyses in house. Chains of custody, lab reports, etc, were all available for review. All analytical records are kept for at least 5 years. No discrepancies in reporting lab results were noted. The current permit is maintained onsite. Plant Inspection: The influent pump station and equalization basin are fully operational and no issues were noted. The bar screen is operational and in good condition. The aeration basins (AB) appear to be in good condition and the mixed liquor appears healthy. The ABs use diffused aeration and they all appear operational and there are no deadspots in the basins. The clarifiers also appear in good condition and operating properly. The weirs are level and no short circuiting was noticed in the clarifiers. The plant uses chlorine tablets for disinfection and dechlorination tablets for dechlorination. No issues were noted with the chlorinator or dechlorinator. The effluent flow meter is used for reporting and it was just recently calibrated. It reports both a constant flow rate as well as the total flow. The effluent appeared excellent. It was very clear and there is no odor. Fish were seen in the immediate area of the outfall. No permit deficiencies or violations were noted during the inspection. Page# 2 Permit: NC0055191 Inspection Date: 06/27/2022 Owner - Facility: Penman Heights WWTP Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit Yes No NA NE (If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new El El ❑ application? Is the facility as described in the permit? • El El El # Are there any special conditions for the permit? El • El El Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? • ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? • El El El Comment: None Record Keeping Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? Is all required information readily available, complete and current? Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)? Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? Is the chain -of -custody complete? Dates, times and location of sampling Name of individual performing the sampling Results of analysis and calibration Dates of analysis Name of person performing analyses Transported COCs Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters? Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? (If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift? Is the ORC visitation log available and current? Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? Comment: None Laboratory Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory? Yes No NA NE • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ • ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes No NA NE Page# 3 Permit: NC0055191 Inspection Date: 06/27/2022 Owner - Facility: Penman Heights WWTP Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Laboratory Yes No NA NE Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab? # Is the facility using a contract lab? # Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)? Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees? Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees? Comment: None II El El El ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ Upstream / Downstream Sampling Yes No NA NE Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, MODE and sampling location)? Comment: None Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE Is composite sampling flow proportional? ❑ ❑ • ❑ Is sample collected below all treatment units? • ❑ ❑ ❑ Is proper volume collected? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the tubing clean? ❑ ❑ • ❑ # Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 ❑ ❑ ❑ • degrees Celsius)? Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type • ❑ ❑ ❑ representative)? Comment: None Flow Measurement - Effluent # Is flow meter used for reporting? Is flow meter calibrated annually? Is the flow meter operational? (If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? Comment: None Pump Station - Influent Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures? Is the wet well free of excessive grease? Yes No NA NE • ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes No NA NE • ❑ ❑ ❑ Page# 4 Permit: NC0055191 Inspection Date: 06/27/2022 Owner - Facility: Penman Heights WWTP Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Pump Station - Influent Yes No NA NE Are all pumps present? • ❑ ❑ ❑ Are all pumps operable? • ❑ ❑ ❑ Are float controls operable? • ❑ ❑ ❑ Is SCADA telemetry available and operational? • ❑ ❑ ❑ Is audible and visual alarm available and operational? • ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: None Equalization Basins Yes No NA NE Is the basin aerated? • ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the basin free of bypass lines or structures to the natural environment? • ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the basin free of excessive grease? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Are all pumps present? • ❑ ❑ ❑ Are all pumps operable? • ❑ ❑ ❑ Are float controls operable? • ❑ ❑ ❑ Are audible and visual alarms operable? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is basin size/volume adequate? • ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: None Bar Screens Type of bar screen a.Manual b.Mechanical Are the bars adequately screening debris? Is the screen free of excessive debris? Is disposal of screening in compliance? Is the unit in good condition? Comment: None Yes No NA NE • • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE Mode of operation Ext. Air Type of aeration system Diffused Is the basin free of dead spots? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Are surface aerators and mixers operational? ❑ ❑ • ❑ Page# 5 Permit: NC0055191 Inspection Date: 06/27/2022 Owner - Facility: Penman Heights WWTP Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE Are the diffusers operational? • ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process? • ❑ ❑ ❑ Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface? • ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the DO level acceptable? ❑ ❑ ❑ • Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/I) ❑ ❑ ❑ • Comment: None Secondary Clarifier Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater? Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier? Are weirs level? Is the site free of weir blockage? Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting? Is scum removal adequate? Is the site free of excessive floating sludge? Is the drive unit operational? Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)? Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc? Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately'/4 of the sidewall depth) Comment: None Pumps-RAS-WAS Are pumps in place? Are pumps operational? Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site? Comment: None Aerobic Digester Is the capacity adequate? Is the mixing adequate? Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank? # Is the odor acceptable? # Is tankage available for properly waste sludge? Yes No NA NE • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes No NA NE • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ ▪ El El El Yes No NA NE • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ Page# 6 Permit: NC0055191 Inspection Date: 06/27/2022 Owner - Facility: Penman Heights WWTP Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Aerobic Digester Yes No NA NE Comment: None Disinfection -Tablet Yes No NA NE Are tablet chlorinators operational? • ❑ ❑ ❑ Are the tablets the proper size and type? • ❑ ❑ ❑ Number of tubes in use? 4 Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable? ❑ ❑ ❑ • Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup? • ❑ ❑ ❑ Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination? ❑ ❑ ❑ • Comment: None De -chlorination Yes No NA NE Type of system ? Tablet Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)? ❑ • ❑ ❑ Is storage appropriate for cylinders? ❑ ❑ • ❑ # Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers? • ❑ ❑ ❑ Are the tablets the proper size and type? • ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: None Are tablet de -chlorinators operational? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Number of tubes in use? 4 Comment: None Effluent Pipe Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? Comment: None Operations & Maintenance Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable? Comment: None Yes No NA NE • ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes No NA NE • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ Page# 7 Permit: NC0055191 Inspection Date: 06/27/2022 Owner - Facility: Penman Heights WWTP Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE Page# 8