820052_Routine Inspection_20220719

kDIvl87oIl"t/
A4ix $ai aYY+4.+ A#4tk-
;Ditfsionxof` of t* :W�d
QthpA,gene31p»"t4„al'
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
lc? 22
Arrival Time:
J1ohn hoP2 �-
Owner Name: Sohn hO€
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Departure Time:
I1 00
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: 9 Regionfl lI
ENTERED TO
',.,ASERr ICHE
JUL G 4 CO22
CAM?).
Onsite Representative:
Title:
DiEQIOWR WOROS
FYYE._r-,i-\;,,:_et?r-ninrttat fFF€C.F
Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: Certification Number: p`Off
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
339#Y9 hd $5MX g.xi A:.,.# b#MitY ea 3ti#s#Rd3kb+#£Os#tx5
4<4**iqA##}n PYex%d 4x+3 !a�% ##qqPPg4i 3#A ?? 4#}M
##$�4A4}}d4.5 ikp##.%kdY'd{pi!fi#i✓ esjPrv1}U n nrrait4§il#55i',*n
#E4tt%$#,AS4%d40+tffipm#M's4#Nt t' bk¢33k*RY 5#q%4A#d#dd%b3
8N $R.Yx4Y8 Sk //��yy%%{{yy,�(( .•'R i}rDy ��pAd <t}k#
td#pdAtu nefx.V4 A'bAxxy �4`4*44 +d d%:nY0.t
P#3 ktb-» as Amw a bx vn�e6 Nx%E+A:YIX{#YdC 4.tia#ki k+id#ti}E'+exv
k ffibX#4nY Jry 4tp rkt #d £Y3kAXb .iF %#8*.. k4 a{Rv#Src b. T. Yf 4t*p#XSdG
Yn'#4*4 #%§4tt Mvx* Udtl45j{§44e5%tt*:�3nab3,j�4
tR'..A A£Yhfessignr•.#\}urgent .Y# »Y+43q*A}t klU#I'.v A¢P5' a#4
Ke#M1ixdf{i 48%d .SdtrPA RYY#$ 44 SA. {#Ad .?#Ai t4N#H#4s$4
Ab:1 r,lJt }++3Y#(e�h y. {p .; fl fir# v46 f34 M1 yd_##v"AY .mx4¢tib, p}-1y,,
d3k tA:t§44# Pty,aP xyt tek Hl�#`+ kS "n4Pb #M1r4'X •{Y Ix.x at4�+#b*k#x§&64
P
t3h^4 4%} eY xx:'ei t%s4#P#§#.#4 .1% %#�; i#A^Nib #G4+ktv"4K R%#t4
&$k
uY1 n
esrffn}AV+
k #4
gy(y�.gp
5+-YiP 84'-`V
#kY�tiAt
$$k #$4 j£R
#fa4Wkd+G b±ii4
Is+a $4.3#fi3
7� d•+d
bk{S .
Atl# T#ffi'd
$M1F$
RA4
M1#
M4
Wean to Finish
A4
Layer
Dairy Cow
2`$I
Wean to Feeder
r
Non Layer
+f=
Dairy Calf
f
+ +
Feeder to Finish
amexszx
*8
,ffiffi##
�.#x.#trR#tk +#n+#{: wt$ o-ka44
44 144*44 da*a>4 4i*Ae
5$b##44aPeq °{TM
dyd=+��`�'%�¢
d v"AN UBP# A 42i d4
�*Quftryyti�a
--w
4A4 mdY+t
+)+x�$'�'la
Dairy Heifer Dai
Farrow to Wean
id§a
�+gd5Y6A44Ads+aAP
#vd@fa
*kitx�I
�(
il�{�'
# P YC"'4
'oP
Dry Cow
td
E4�
Farrow to Feeder
Non -Dairy
q
df
Farrow to Finish
ka•Layers
Beef Stocker
)
Gilts
a:
Non -La ers --
Beef Feeder
Boars
¢
Pullets --4
Beef Brood Cow
i .Yd#Rq Ah%Yfi»B4h d'%4 >Yry
ik0k5 #M AbirtA##Y^+x.xR. A k4
td*441* t X"d#t4% Rd !
. 4#§3dJIy�jq, ixuLP# Ya t tntr
d pA $AM1l#/t}t{ttq %#atrANxi
A.v # • no. xkdR3
iv> #X 4d5 no. .,
Mb€4{SY bkt}5p 4
�stkltY #A4+##t
#4++� rvrt$SR#k#ta
3 x
{#tr
Rat
--4
$
Turkeys
X +rcn
th #'6}§kd
xi xb+5
C§' 4txt#k+3+i
RMm Y{di,
iq=l.
- bta eS+k
N...s d k§NbdK#frq$D4,,
M.*4 k#P4ttbfrt
id tk 8ik Fa t25SS}IX$
4a$tb S+PM»a#$##344 Ri
k#4dtxda#.3 Y#+s0.d4*44 fl}
,1$}attr 4RR.y pxx5 di 3$5db
ika4'kd#'ik ALa,un ...r++dt$ rv4k#ii.
$NSv44i4$f4 p+Y
#Ci#y BA tk &k8
9$d5d9##N#6
ig3+ 5&'.. 4
kp% $b}
Y#pm4dUU
�u tr+t4$`'�5�'i"b
4Xk
xx£■Turkey Poults
9
A4
+k§I
t#fr#+.+
4i
a+tl
Y53�Other
--t#-PS
£baa<a-+ar .. avv+, a5t en3 v*x+43Yx-titx-
" "• .. pax .a•u.tx+rvx+.,
* YF#+i+t}w
tk+aa.
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 1 Structure 2
Structure 3 Structure 4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of' any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public heal
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes IRNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window n ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): ctQ Lt611
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 5
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
13. Soil Type(s): gl all l -om
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Rainfall
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 6 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
h or environmental threat, notify DWR
Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes kNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes kNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes \ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
o ❑ NA
❑ NA
No ❑ NA
N1/4No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Other:
❑ Yes t]No ❑NA El NE
❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
❑ Yes 6 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes al ❑NA ❑NE
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes bNo ❑NA ❑NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes fig No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes C No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes tl No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes b No ❑ NA ❑ NE
onsatsnnvroiert"e
move fl€Q5 bt+ lageoN I
wire curt-im iogoon 2.
finicfl bcu'l\ng I��y
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:1
4
Page 3 of 3
Date:
5/12/2020