The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20220953 Ver 1_PA 21-06-0007 Richmond (NSR)_20220714 Project Tracking No. 21-06-0007 Vi x:,.;`o' • N 0 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM •• TO,4 t } E NN Y 4,4 This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must '. ;:•e consult separately with the Historic Architecture and Landscapes Team. PROJECT INFORMATION Project No: BPR-R013 County: Richmond WBS No: BP8-R013.1 Document: Federal CE Federal Aid No: Funding: ® State ❑ Federal Federal Permit Required? ® Yes ❑ No Permit Type: NWP 3/NWP 14 Project Description: The project involves the replacement of Bridge 140 over Solomon's Creek on SR 1971 in Richmond County,North Carolina. The archaeological APE measures approximately 1,000ft in length(500ft from each bridge end-point)by 100ft in width(50ft from each side of the SR 1971 center-line). An off-site detour will be utilized during construction activities. SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW Permitting and funding information was reviewed for determining the level of archaeological input required by state and federal laws. Based on the submitted "request for cultural resources review" form,the project is state funded with federal permit interaction. As such, Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act will apply and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) will serve as the lead federal agency. Next, construction design and other data was examined (when applicable) to define the character and extent of potential impacts to the ground surfaces embracing the project locale. The archaeological APE encompasses all areas of potential ground disturbing activity. Once an APE was outlined, a map review and site file search was conducted utilizing on-line resources provided to the NCDOT by the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on Tuesday, June 22, 2021.No NRHP eligible archaeological sites or any other archaeological resources are located within the APE or directly adjacent. Numerous archaeological sites are recorded on this section of the topographic map maintained by OSA. This information does suggest a moderate potential of documenting a site in the APE. Examination of National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), State Study Listed (SL), Locally Designated (LD), Determined Eligible(DE), and Surveyed Site(SS)properties employing resources available on the NCSHPO website is important in establishing the location of noteworthy historic occupations related to a perspective construction impact area. A cross-check of these mapped resources concluded that none of the above properties with potential contributing archaeological components are situated within the APE. In addition, historic maps of Richmond County were appraised to identify former structure locations, land use patterns, cemeteries, or other confirmation of historic occupation in the project vicinity. Archaeological/historical reference materials were inspected as well. In general,the cultural background review established that no previously recorded archaeological sites, cemeteries, or NRHP properties with potential archaeological components are located within the APE. Based on cultural-historical factors, the APE is considered to have a low to moderate potential for the documentation of archaeological resources. 2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY TEAM"NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED"FORM 1 of2 Project Tracking No. 21-06-0007 Further, topographic, geologic, flood boundary, and NRCS soil survey maps were referenced to evaluate pedeological, geomorphological, hydrological, and other environmental determinants that may have resulted in past occupation at this location. Aerial and on-ground photographs (NCDOT Spatial Data Viewer) and the Google Street View map application (when amenable) were also examined/utilized for additional assessment of disturbances,both natural and human induced,which compromise the integrity of archaeological sites. Environmental/impact factors do not suggest a heightened potential for archaeological resource recovery. (This project falls within a North Carolina County in which the following federally recognized tribes have expressed an interest: Catawba Nation. We recommend that you ensure that this documentation is forwarded to these tribes using the process described in the current NCDOT Tribal Protocol and PA Procedures Manual.) Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE: There are no existing NRHP eligible archaeological sites within the projects APE, and it is unlikely to contain significant, intact, and preserved archaeological deposits. The majority of the APE land surfaces are quite sloped which would have likely discouraged settlement here. As currently proposed as a state funded project, no further consultation is advocated. A finding of "no archaeological survey required"is considered appropriate. SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION See attached: ® Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info n Photos Correspondence Other: FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST: NO ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED Scott Halvorsen 101 6/22/2021 NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST II Date 2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY TEAM"NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED"FORM 2 of 2 k 'E co . a . •,'''\ (V — E Z I I , • co — C., (.9 • „., (I) - ' ..• - 0 . t,,'-' • r 0 ,1 11 Mrant-4 ,-..cfr \` S..,' ..- ci - , ,• N I I.:, , ,. ••• . • (N1 7. • CN . .,„ ,•::::,,•••I. In. ll.Si ce LLI • 1 •— . •L— -. • i __ 8 L•+ € LO I,- .0. -.7 ci LI , . 4 lc a e . i ,( 1, 0 _ 0 o z ty . . '• C = ' f•J, Cs) ! - • .• P . 1 C - • , •• ---,.. .k.l'• 0 , t--;• ' .- . ' ! 1 •. E . ..c , . o . . rY i o ..1- it . ..,-. a) 7.) a.• ' 4,09..,1 0) i . 7.3 1, s•. ' , •0''‘ L. CE) . . - • • ..,,, S-,143.11ot.ti . , • f„ ;.,. t..J t . '. ., t.-.,.-1 ..._ 14.1 ..,.. (NJ 0 N ---.. I's- ---... if) .•, t- - E l'...,Nk.,.; vof'—' .......) .."'" f'-.... r i. .- ''"::: ''.;... 1 '.'.' -'-/- (S) a '` ..."'"'"› \ I 0 O qn k.''' x t ' mil ./', yR - q • U — [y ) T . rn -'f — (r + C . 1M- N U' o • 3 1 h •,., M • 4\ • )'• J •• O — 0 N Y f ..E. rn 0. • • ^ s �` _` , , *** (!x'1 it `U,iI, „,.5 ,....5..,,4 i `---, f,,‘ ,,, i„...i• / ::;;" 70 . • • Ac ' et'''''''4 , //(1 .71 i . -\\ 1 1-,21 „:" c- . . 5. ..\ , .. ,..) „ 0 , .,,,,,) „A „_.,} i - --, , ..., , , (1 ,....„ --..„. ,, . ., -. . ‘,... ,, r t I . , .., .._ i ,,, _„.., \ \ ... .... ,rye'1:1" , 1 i */ Ie.. • \ co t I -,,� • /11 4,...-' "11' r� .` f r / r l •, p -- t.j +�1 ,, lope`; ."'t ')/1:1',:i 1 ./!f\(,.. (4.-} -?(.1 1 -, -.q 1 _,` jig I .,.,-",, - p �> 1 e ,,,,si ):: \\': ') r t 1' 1 i{ t ` r .....-."5 1 h. N. 4 o 1,010 ogi, , _ , , ,i4.4 4.4-!=4 ,,..,.. 4-4 - - .,4 , .. 1co i- ' ,'- ....- ,., - ' ;444 1....--,‘-, -6 ir 3i .. Y tI- P L 1 . S �p�.. Z #.. 4 tl. , . ' • 4 44 ` " tki . t t �# y S t ^a may' 4 :r pp 2 l0 ..'>*:.. 4._ +y ,.s'_ t -{ - 7_ t '*v ;... - ...1E,• -44c: N Of r ate.` -a3 {` It'hf CO 0 t f0 fO N N C -44 = ' *4--1' 't.' 'tt- "A -x4Ft.>1 •'• , a 1 s.4':- 7 I r Y y ,, C rt h,a1 °tf`�' ,' . • # k n d of .coC y Dir 1 +fie !t s 7 ,,4 a, _F r_ ' t ,i' ?," I C ..fit .`; i -., -- 4 Y.,, 1tt.4_ 44 , , cn } a ` *r 14 i_f i 1 x4c4, CO > 5• e V +i • rot n N co ._.a ti : ¢" '+ .r ' �' . i i ` � Nyt. -Pk b `S. T A' j\! li .„ z * , A . . , . R+ , 1, t > "` 4 4 ° 4 S' Q- to t Wk' ' N a) Ln $r $4�t 5` � � �` row i cfl a Et !. 3 sae * N ., C z z ti .N 6. N A 000090E 006Z9BE 000198E OOZ1,98E 009098E 000088E OOt E N v� co M Sb,9b o6L •mr. :smar� MS4�96 o6C N O C(0 a) r 1 Il 4 4- f . Ca - •'1-‘7.' „, .,...fr A. ;v CL OeU . p fv � .41 u ttkt-. ip '/ O am ts/ .y�L ,__.1. • 1-- , .. . -'r . ..i j .r • is • •Q V '6f t - �a V T .c • O Q V D �' Q 4 7 , p 1,, N. T'o O �V " s s4 4 ; Z "• % m IMP g a O, Qcts co •o wx )1 U F m 1. Q m f :Z___)-"*.e- 4 ty.�.'r V \ Q Q p ^ O y i• . 1 f p f cid �y QO. Q �. O� f", to` f 1 Jet Z a Z ttg Q ? U, di Q�Q V q�\ co $ V a1' )•,* 2 j-ti d) 9 r. m lc' 17.itut(7.'I' -.:, F, \,,,. CO •x s_ CD ma �C�c, a x Q a-31 d ,. o 3 �.;._ i,° . Z I t o 0 1 Z Q H M.E£.OS dC - f - - M.EE AS 06L QI 000098E OOMOR 008198E 00A98E 009098E 000098E OOtfhBE hl z z It N 3� fA Soil Map-Richmond County,North Carolina Bridge 140 Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in A01 Percent of AOI AcB Ailey loamy sand,0 to 8 427.0 12.4% percent slopes AcC Ailey loamy sand,8 to 15 290.4 8.4% percent slopes AgC Ailey gravelly loamy sand,8 to 237.3 6.9% 15 percent slopes AgD Ailey gravelly loamy sand,15 114.0 3.3% to 25 percent slopes CaC Candor and Wakulla soils,8 to 0.5 0.0% 15 percent slopes ChA Chewacla loam,0 to 2 percent 23.3 0.7% slopes,frequently flooded JmA Johnston mucky loam,0 to 2 195.9 5.7% percent slopes,frequently flooded MaC Masada sandy loam,8 to 15 73.5 2.1% percent slopes NoA Norfolk loamy sand,0 to 2 66.8 1.9% percent slopes NoB Norfolk loamy sand,2 to 6 870.8 25.2% percent slopes OrA Orangeburg loamy sand,0 to 2 184.6 5.3% percent slopes OrB Orangeburg loamy sand,2 to 6 194.5 5.6% percent slopes PaD Pacolet gravelly sandy loam, 183.9 5.3% 15 to 35 percent slopes PcA Paxville fine sandy loam,0 to 2 3.7 0.1% percent slopes PoA Pelion loamy sand,0 to 2 5.4 0.2% percent slopes PoB Pelion loamy sand,2 to 8 149.8 4.3% percent slopes PoC Pelion loamy sand,8 to 15 78.1 2.3% percent slopes TbA Turbeville sandy loam,0 to 2 2.2 0.1% percent slopes TbB Turbeville sandy loam,2 to 8 45.6 1.3% percent slopes UwD Georgeville silt loam, 15 to 25 141.9 4.1% percent slopes W Water 36.5 1.1% WcB Wakulla and Candor soils,0 to 127.8 3.7% 8 percent slopes USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/7/2021 aim Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4 it ..41MMI•O• ..i } ter. 274 11 -4.47--)1,....___y--- - .. E ti. +7.i Y1 F r ,.../ ( J� ■; r 1 1%:?1,?:).4 ( i as, . ei i \ • . ,„ /1:4 ( ). \ .)\-\, .1. ...,...-.'„!....‘,....de\--:7"e.,-„ .,,,,.., 1 : .-.'...6„., ./ ..,:j . r 4 i ti ..\-4........ ......-5,-.6 ..P....., f i . . ) yili ' '4.'"-' --.. .j 2 .+N. J 4? :- + if/ Cif t / "= ti '--,, } ;' r if 11r , - -. \ \—re------'-- '.----'‘N, :\ _ 4.4•--,.. "........._ .,,...- "'",-.......—a'-,,.---- ......„.„..- _ • _ Lam` `~ h 4� =1 �.,,r-^ fry -•,__„ 7(p l —... z i, - L„ 11 # _�' ,;L `- • ... I. f ` 4) ) (..-----„.„, .... � �, -,..__.-----? IV\ -r. ..- . 4-' 64 7 ,. ------- V r / ........ \ - --. 1 \ • V A‘4Th. N'l \ \ ...." •,•,..:;7.41...4 s N b rti .,..,:1121 '''... ..—'``..._ ') ) k--7,--,, a �� , y \41/4 1 r ,.\\__ / ,� / f p`' 2' ...7 (*., . iffirilli .'''''' • • r ' �z - t -`w. ~""' -J. ;'/ ; 21E2: Esr`i,'DigitalG oe,GepEye arthstarGeotgrahc __ " - # CrCmESAirbuDS,USDA,USGSyAeroGRID,IGN,and teG1S Jomjty i r■ f Portion of the Rockingham topographic map illustrating the location and boundaries of the archaeological APE in Richmond County, North Carolina. 11 ui f. . 4 4 ' 111101t1H1 ' 1 ._ 4 ` t .. ,,E ' V. *';.tin. k. r rA fit. 1 t. ' A - ituf `..- gip y S • « a+ _ ; i , ..,,,,e,r, :, ic ,i ii �'` 4, h7 / I 'fir .A v •k . -_P -- - - - FAill ; { -mow ;... * �l i. '7' A f illy J a -..4 Y ►.. s L. a � dtot c, 3 4 iy V[ 4` fit, I e[sue DtktietK,Geo ye,C !`n PG-og aphies4 ARC-GIS aerial shape file map illustrating the location and boundaries of the archaeological APE in Richmond County, North Carolina.