NCC222489_Site Plan or Location Map_20220712

623`00
35° 53' 26" N 1
YrV ,
g
N
r
g
r
n
0
93
Hydrologic Soil Group —Randolph County, North Carolina
623700 624100 624500 624900
35° 51' 42" N
623700 624100 624500 624900
Map Scale: 1:15,700 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
N Myers
0 200 400 800 1200
Feet
0 500 1000 2000 3000
Map projection: Web Mercator Coner000rdinates: WGS84 Edge tics: lfrM Zone 17N WGS84
usoA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
625700
35° 53' 26" N
8
N
r
g
r
n
g
0
g
35° 51' 42" N
625700
in
4/18/2022
Page 1 of 5

Hydrologic Soil Group —Randolph County, North Carolina
MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
0
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Rating
Polygons
0
A
0
A/D
0
B
0
B/D
C
0
C/D
0
D
0
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating
Lines
r 0
A
r 0
A/D
B
B/D
N 0
C
r 0
C/D
r 0
D
r 0
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating
Points
0
A
0
A/D
B
S
B/D
❑ C
0 C/D
0 D
❑ Not rated or not available
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
— Rails
­0 Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Randolph County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 27, Jan 21, 2022
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jul 28, 2019—Jul 30,
2019
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
usoA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/18/2022
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 5

Hydrologic Soil Group -Randolph County, North Carolina
Hydrologic Soil Group
Map unit symbol
Map unit name
Rating
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
ApB
Appling sandy loam, 2 to
B
2.2
0.6%
6 percent slopes
ApC
Appling sandy loam, 6 to
B
54.4
15.4%
10 percent slopes
CcC
Cecil sandy loam, 8 to
A
15.0
4.2%
15 percent slopes
CmA
Chewacla and
B/D
15.7
4.4%
Wehadkee soils, 0 to
2 percent slopes,
frequently flooded
HeB
Helena sandy loam, 2 to
D
10.0
2.8%
6 percent slopes
McB2
Mecklenburg clay loam,
C
5.8
1.6%
2 to 8 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
PaC
Pacolet fine sandy loam,
B
11.7
3.3%
8 to 15 percent slopes
RvA
Riverview sandy loam, 0
B
28.1
7.9%
to 2 percent slopes,
frequently flooded
VaB
Vance sandy loam, 2 to
C
53.8
15.2%
8 percent slopes
VaC
Vance sandy loam, 8 to
C
55.9
15.8%
15 percent slopes
W
Water
0.8
0.2%
WtB
Wynott-Enon complex, 2
D
20.5
5.8%
to 8 percent slopes
WtC
Wynott-Enon complex, 8
D
5.0
1.4%
to 15 percent slopes
WvB2
Wynott-Enon complex, 2
D
29.2
8.3%
to 8 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
WvC2
Wynott-Enon complex, 8
D
45.9
13.0%
to 15 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
Totals for Area of Interest
364.0
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/18/2022
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 5

Hydrologic Soil Group —Randolph County, North Carolina
Description
Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are
assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the
soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive
precipitation from long -duration storms.
The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and
three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows:
Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively
drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water
transmission.
Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These
consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well
drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture.
These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission.
Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist
chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or
soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of
water transmission.
Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell
potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay
layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious
material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission.
If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is
for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in
their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes.
Rating Options
Aggregation Method. Dominant Condition
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/18/2022
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 5

Hydrologic Soil Group —Randolph County, North Carolina
Aggregation is the process by which a set of component attribute values is
reduced to a single value that represents the map unit as a whole.
A map unit is typically composed of one or more "components". A component is
either some type of soil or some nonsoil entity, e.g., rock outcrop. For the
attribute being aggregated, the first step of the aggregation process is to derive
one attribute value for each of a map unit's components. From this set of
component attributes, the next step of the aggregation process derives a single
value that represents the map unit as a whole. Once a single value for each map
unit is derived, a thematic map for soil map units can be rendered. Aggregation
must be done because, on any soil map, map units are delineated but
components are not.
For each of a map unit's components, a corresponding percent composition is
recorded. A percent composition of 60 indicates that the corresponding
component typically makes up approximately 60% of the map unit. Percent
composition is a critical factor in some, but not all, aggregation methods.
The aggregation method "Dominant Condition" first groups like attribute values
for the components in a map unit. For each group, percent composition is set to
the sum of the percent composition of all components participating in that group.
These groups now represent "conditions" rather than components. The attribute
value associated with the group with the highest cumulative percent composition
is returned. If more than one group shares the highest cumulative percent
composition, the corresponding "tie -break" rule determines which value should
be returned. The "tie -break" rule indicates whether the lower or higher group
value should be returned in the case of a percent composition tie. The result
returned by this aggregation method represents the dominant condition
throughout the map unit only when no tie has occurred.
Component Percent Cutoff.- None Specified
Components whose percent composition is below the cutoff value will not be
considered. If no cutoff value is specified, all components in the database will be
considered. The data for some contrasting soils of minor extent may not be in the
database, and therefore are not considered.
Tie -break Rule: Higher
The tie -break rule indicates which value should be selected from a set of multiple
candidate values, or which value should be selected in the event of a percent
composition tie.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/18/2022
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 5 of 5