20140677 Ver 1_401 Application_20140614

The John R. McAdams
Company, Inc.
Raleigh / Durham, NC
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, North Carolina 27713
(919) 361 -5000
Charlotte, NC
11301 Carmel Commons Blvd,
Suite 111
Charlotte North Carolina 28226
(704) 527 -0800
'J McADAMS
PAID
June 25, 2014
Michael Parker
Environmental Program Supervisor III
NC Division of Water Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
610 east Center Avenue, suite 310
Mooresville, NC 28115
20140677
DIV:vI , ".,--ER QUALITY
;Ulv 2 u 2014
'l. ,-,v
_. OMIAL OFFICE
Re: Pre - Construction Notification — GC 3890 Authorization Request
Providence Retreat
Charlotte, North Carolina
CSH -14000
Dear Mr. Parker:
On behalf of Classica Homes, McAdams is submitting a Preconstruction
Notification for approval of 401 Water Quality General Certification 3890
associated with the proposed Providence Retreat development is a single -
family residential development, and more specifically, a road crossing aligned
across an unnamed tributary to Rocky Branch. The proposed Providence
Retreat development is located along Country Lane, approximately 0.33 -miles
east of its intersection with Providence Road in Charlotte North Carolina. No
additional impacts to waters of the U.S. are proposed. Please find enclosed
for your review the following items:
- Signed Agent Authorization
- Figure 1 - USGS Quad — Weddington
- Figure 2 - Mecklenburg County Soil Survey (sheet # 12)
- Pre - Construction Notification
- Figure 3.1 — Existing Conditions Map (depicting wetland delineation
verbally confirmed on January 9, 2014)
- Figure 3.2 — Existing Conditions Map with aerial
- Figure 4 — Proposed Impact Map (Overall Site Plan)
-Inset 1 — Plan View
-Inset 1 — Profile View
-Inset 1 — Cross Sections
- Courtesy Copy of Stormwater Management Plan
PROJECT HISTORY & EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The subject property lies within the Catawba River basin and within the City
of Charlotte. The current Mecklenburg County zoning is R -3 Residential.
Land use within the vicinity of the subject property is residential, institutional,
and forested areas. The subject property can be characterized as residential,
McAdamsco.com Designing Tomorrow's Infrastructure & Communities

Mr. William Elliott
Pre - Construction Notification - 29
Providence Retreat
June 25, 2014
Page 2 of 4
containing one residential structure and one shed. Approximately 70 percent
of the subject property is maintained lawn. 'The remaining 30 percent can be
generally characterized as a Dry Mesic Oak - Hickory Forest according the NC
Natural Heritage, Program classification system. The forested areas are located
mostly within the northern and western portions of the subject property. One
perennial stream feature, which is an unnamed tributary to Rocky Branch, is
observed within the northern section of `the subject property. There is an
existing 15 foot wide driveway entrance crossing of the unnamed tributary to
Rocky Branch located in the extreme northwestern section of the property.
Mr. William Elliott (USACE representative) attended an on -site field
concurrence meeting on January 9, 2014 and concurred with the wetland
delineation.
PROPOSED PROJECT:
The proposed Providence Retreat development is a single - family residential
development. The proposed development will consist of approximately 16
single - family lots along with associated roadway, utility, and stormwater
management improvements. To gain access to the subject property, a
proposed road crossing will be aligned across an unnamed tributary to Rocky
Branch. As a result, there are proposed stream impacts associated with the
road crossing. Additional impacts to the unnamed tributary to Rocky Branch
located within the project area not proposed.
Impact Table
Stormwater Management
The proposed development is located within the Catawba River basin with
stormwater runoff from the proposed development draining into Rocky
Branch. Per City of Charlotte regulations; stormwater management on this site
shall meet the stormwater management performance standard's for
development set forth in the Charlotte Post Construction Control Ordinance.
The proposed project will result' in a significant increase in peak flow rates to
downstream properties. To mitigate these impacts, the proposed stormwater
CSH- 14000,
Proposed Impacts for the Providence Retreat
Development
Stream Impact (LF):
145
Wetland Impact (Ac):
0
Open Water Impact (Ac):
0
Stormwater Management
The proposed development is located within the Catawba River basin with
stormwater runoff from the proposed development draining into Rocky
Branch. Per City of Charlotte regulations; stormwater management on this site
shall meet the stormwater management performance standard's for
development set forth in the Charlotte Post Construction Control Ordinance.
The proposed project will result' in a significant increase in peak flow rates to
downstream properties. To mitigate these impacts, the proposed stormwater
CSH- 14000,

'"11 MCADAMS
Mr. Will'iam'Elliott
Pre - Construction Notificatioon - 29
Providence Retreat
June 25, 2014
Page 3 of 4
management facility has been sized such that post - development peak flow
rates are no greater than pre- development levels in the 10 -, and 25 -year storm
events on site. The proposed stormwater wetland is, designed as "TSS -only
efficiency" stormwater wetland according 'the Chapter 4.3 of the Charlotte
Mecklenburg BMP Design Manual (Revised July 1, 2013). The proposed
stormwater Wetland will provide the required 85% TSS removal as well as the
70% total Phosphorus removal required in this watershed. If the development
on this tract is built as proposed within this report, then the .requirements set
forth, in City of Charlotte regulations will be met without additional
stormwater management facilities. However, modifications to the proposed
development may require that this analysis be revised.
AVOIDANCE & MINIMIZATION:
Impacts to the jurisdictional stream located on the subject property have been
avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable; however, due to
infrastructure improvements there are proposed impacts. The existing 15 foot
wide driveway access crossing is currently undersized and structurally
inadequate to accommodate the proposed infrastructure and residential
improvements to the subject property. In addition, the existing driveway
access crossing is located within the extreme northwestern corner of the
subject property. This current alignment causes sighting issues for oncoming
traffic along Country Lane. It would be more conducive, for oncoming traffic,
if the entrance to the subject property were aligned more with the adjacent
driveway entrance located on the opposite side of Country Lane. Therefore,
the proposed crossing alignment into the subject property has been re- aligned
to the east almost, directly opposite of the opposing driveway across, from
Country Lane. In addition, the proposed crossing alignment has been aligned
as close to 90 degrees as possible along the most narrow stream section to
accommodate the necessary road width to access the residential community
and culverts to accommodate the volume of water within the existing stream.
To minimize, the, existing, 15 foot driveway, access wide crossing will be
removed and the stream bank_ s will be stabilized' `to allow for natural stream
formation to occur.
SUMMARY:
The proposed Providence Retreat development is a single - family residential
development. The proposed development will consist of approximately 16
single- family lots along with associated roadway, utility, and stormwater
CSH -14000

McADAMS
Mr. William Elliott
Pre - Construction Notification - 29
Providence Retreat
June 25, 2014
Page 4 of 4
management improvements. Mr. William Elliott (USACE representative)
attended an on -site field concurrence meeting on January 9, 2014 and
concurred with the wetland delineation. To gain access to the subject
property, a proposed road crossing will be aligned across an unnamed
tributary to Rocky Branch resulting in 145 linear feet of stream impacts. The
proposed project is a single and complete project and confined within the
property boundary. Appropriate, land .use control measures will be in place for
areas which will require them. Additional impacts to the unnamed tributary to
Rocky Branch are not proposed. In addition, compensatory mitigation is not
proposed as a result of the proposed impacts.
At this time, we are requesting approval that the proposed construction
activities associated with the Providence Retreat development are authorized
under 401 Water Quality General Certification 3890. Consideration of this
project is greatly appreciated. If you should have any questions or require
additional information, please do not'hesitate to, contact me at, (919) 287 -0890.
Sincerely,
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
George Buchholz, REM PW
Environmental Consult , ant/ roject Manager
Attachments: Listed above
CSH -14000

J
WADAM s
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The CurrentP,ronerty Owner
Name: CRLDC (Rick Jastnski,, Land Manager)
Address: 1101 Wood Ridge Center Drive, #155, Charlotte, NC 28217
Phone: [phone]
Project Name/Description: Providence Retreat
Project Number: CSH -14000 Project Manager: I George Buchholz
Date:
U.S. Army'Corps of Engineers
Attn: William Elliot
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
154 'Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the current property owner, hereby designate and authorize The John R. McAdams Company,
Inc. to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon
,request supplemental ,information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The
1 dayof vNL. W N.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: "This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only
for government officials to enter the property when accompanied by The John R.
McAdams Company, Inc. staff. You should call The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. to
arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the site.
,1���,� 5 * \NV
Print Property Owner
Cc: Mr. Kevin Barnett
NCDENR -DWQ
2090 US Highway 70
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Signature
Raleigh- Durham Charlotte
2905 Meridian Parkway 11301 Carmel Commons Blvd., Suite 111
Durham, North Carolina 27713 Charlotte, North Carolina
(919) 361 -5000 (704) 527 -0800 '
Designing Tomorrow's Infrastructure & Communities
McAdamsCo.com

N PROVIDENCE RETREAT DEVELOPMENT
APRECONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION
FIGURE 1. VICINITY MAP
w
o �,000 Z,000 a,000 0 PROJECT #: CSH -1400
Feet MCA DAM S
1 inch =2,000 feet CHARLOTTE. NORTH CAROLINA J

of W A TEA
o� pG Office Use Only:
Z; r 6' f i 7, Corps action ID no.
° 4 DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
rage 1 ui 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
X Section 404 Permit Section 10 Permit
lb
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number: 3890
1c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
X No
1d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
401 Water Quality Certification — Express Riparian Buffer Authorization
le
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for
DWQ 401 Certification:
X No
For the record only for Corps Permit.
X No
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
X No
1 g
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer
1 h below.
X No
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
X No
2.
Project Information
2a
Name of project:
Providence Retreat
2b
County:
Mecklenburg
2c
Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte ;
2d
Subdivision name:
2e
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
^}
3.
Owner Information W; •
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
54
CRLDC, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company ' ranch
3b
Deed Book and Page No.
DB:29194; PG:988 -992
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Classica Homes (Rick Jasinski, Land Manager)
3d
Street address:
1101 Wood Ridge Center Drive, #155
3e
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28217
3f
Telephone no..
(704)201 -8976
3g
Fax no.:
3h
Email address:
rasinski @classicahomes.com
rage 1 ui 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (ifAifferent from owner)
4a Applicant is
4b Name
Rick Jasinski, Land Manager
4c Business name
(if applicable)
Classica'Homes
4d Street address
1101 Wood Ridge Center Drive, Suite 155
4e City, state, zip
Charlotte, NO 28217
4f Telephone no
04- 201 -8976
4g' Fax no
4h Email address
rlasinski @classicahomes com
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a Name
George Buchholz; Environmental Consultant/Project Manager
5b Business name
(if applicable)
The John R McAdams Company
5c Street address
2905 Meridian Parkway,
5d City, state, zip
Durham, NC 27713
5e Telephone no
919- 287 -0890
5f iFax no
91`9- 361 -2269
5g Email address
buchholz@mcadamsco com
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
I. Property Identification
1a Property identification no (tax PIN or_parcel ID)
3102123
1 b Site coordinates (in decimal degrees) Latitude 35 07457 Longitude -80 76673
1 c Property size
6 0 acres
1 Surface Waters
2a Name of nearest body of water to proposed project
Rocky Branch
2b Water'Quality Classification of nearestxeceiving water
C
2c River'basin
Catawba /HUC 030501030105
3. Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the at the time of this
Aproject
application The subject'property lies within the Catawba River'basin and within the,Citylof Charlotte The current'
Mecklenburg County zoning is R -3 Residential Land use within the vicinity,of`the subject property is residential,
institutional, and forested areas The subject property can be characterized as residential, containing one
residential structure and one shed Approximately 70 percent of the subject, property is maintained lawn The
remaining 30 percent can be generally characterized as a Dry Mesic Oak = Hickory Forest;according -the NC
Natural Heritage Program classification system The�forested areas aredocated mostly within the northern and
western portions of the subject property One perennial stream feature, which is an unnamed tributary to Rocky
Branch, is observed within the northern section of the subject property There is an 15 foot
existing wide
driveway entrance crossing of the unnamed tributary to Rocky Branch located in the extreme northwestern
section of the property,
3b List the total estimated ,acreage of all existing wetlands on the property .0 AC
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property 267,LF
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project The purpose ofthe project is to provide housing to the southeast section,of
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
3a Describe the overall project in detail, including the type,of equipment to be used The proposed Providence
Retreat development,is atsingle- family residential development, The proposed development'will consist of
approximately 16 single - family lots along with associated roadway, utility, and stormwater management improvements
To gain access -to the subject property, a proposed road crossing will be aligned across
an unnamed tributary to Rocky
Branch As a result, there are proposed stream impacts associated with the road crossing Additional impacts to the
unnamed tributary to Rocky Branch located within the project area not proposed Traditional equipment will be used
consisting offront -end loaders, bulldozers, paving equipment, graders, and earth movers
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property
X Yes
/ project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments j
4b If'the Corps made the,junsdictional determination, what
type of determination was made?
X Preliminary
4c If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional
Agency /Consultant Company,
areas? Name (if known)-
Other George Buchholz,
McAdams Co-
4d If,yes, list the dates of the Corps junsdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation Mr
William Elliott (USAGE representative) attended an on -site field concurrence meeting on January 9, 2014 and concurred with
the wetland delineation
5. Project History
5a Have permits or,certifications been requested or obtained
forth is, project (including all prior phases) in the past?
X No
5b If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions

6. Future Project Plans
6a Is this,a phased project? Yes X No
6b If yes, explain
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version-1 4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
Wetlands X Streams — tributaries Buffers Open Waters Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland,area impacted
2a
2b
2c
'2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact-
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary (T)
2g Total,Wetland Impacts:
2h Comments
1. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts �(mcluding temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete
this question,for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
'39
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial (PER) or
Type of
Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)?
jurisdiction
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
Qinear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
R�et)
S1 Permanent
Culvert/Fill
Unnamed Tributary
to Rocky Branch
Perennial
X Corps
4 feet
145 linear
feet
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
145
31 Comments_ See Figure.4, Inset 1 (Plan, Profile, and Cross - Sections)
Page -4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water
of the U S then in ividually list all open water impacts below
4a
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
4b
Name of,waterbody
(if applicable
4c
Type of impact
4d
Waterbody
type
4e
Area of impact (acres)
01
02
03
04
4f Total open water impacts
4g Comments
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below
5a
Pond ID number
5b
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c
Wetland' Impacts (acres)
5d
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e
Upland,
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
P2
5f Total:
5gComments
5hls a dam high hazard permit required?
Yes No If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
5kMethod of construction
6. Buffer`Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact -a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer
impacts below If any impacts require miticlation, then you MUST fill out Section D of'this form
6a Project is in which protected basin?
Neuse Tar - Pamlico Catawba Randleman Other
6b
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)'
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Stream name
6e
Buffer
mitigation
required,?
6f
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g
Zone
impact
(square
feet
61
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
6h Total Buffer Impacts:
61 Comments-
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a ,Specifically,describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project Impacts to the
jurisdictional stream located on the subject property have been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable,
however, due to infrastructure improvements there are proposed impacts The existing 15 foot wide driveway access crossing
is currently undersized and structurally inadequate to accommodate the proposed infrastructure and residential improvements
to the subject property In addition, the existing driveway access crossing is located within the extreme northwestern corner-,of
the subject property This current alignment causes sighting issues for oncoming traffic along Country Lane It would be more
conducive for oncoming traffic, if the entrance to the subject property were aligned more with the adjacent driveway entrance
located on,the opposite side,of Country Lane Therefore, the proposed crossing alignment into the subject property has been
re- aligned to the east almost directly opposite of the opposing driveway across from Country Lane In addition, the proposed
crossing alignment has been aligned as close to 90 degrees as possible along the most narrow stream section to
accommodate the necessary road width to access the residential community and culverts to accommodate the volume of
water within the existing stream To minimize, the existing 15 foot driveway access wide crossing will be removed and the
stream banks will be stabilized to.allow for natural stream formation to occur -
1 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques Proper
sedimentation, and erosion control methods will be utilized during all phases of construction and installation as,descnbed in the
Erosion Control Plan sheet reviewed and approved by the NC Division of Land Quality and City of Charlotte All work will take
place °during dry conditions and can be facilitated from high, non - jurisdictional, stable ground The contractor shall install silt
fence, inlet protection; sediment traps, diversion ditches, tree protection, clearing only as necessary to install,devices All
erosion and-sediment control measures,will be checked for stability and operation following every runoff producing rainfall', but
in no case less than once every week Any needed repairs will be made immediately to maintain all measures designed An
erosion control inspections report is required and will be kept by the owner's representative Temporary seeding and
permanent seeding plans are,included'to restore impacted areas The project will meet all relative requirements of Best
Management Practices and Engineered Stormwater Control Structures as outlined through State and Local Stormwater Rules
'2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the `U.S. or Waters of the State
2a Does the project,require Compensatory Mitigation for
X No
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters,of the State?
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
DWQ Corps
'Mitigation bank
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for
Payment to irnheu fee program,
this project?
Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3'. Complete if'Usin ,a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
Type
Quantity
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Quantity
Type
Quantity
3c Comments
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
4b Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres

4h Comments
5. Complete if Using a Permittee ResponsibleWitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form— Version 1 4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ-
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that
requires buffer mitigation?
X No
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1,5
6f
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what•type of mitigation is`proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee'fund)
6h Comments
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a Does the project, include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers
Yes X No
identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
lb If,yes; then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
_
Yes No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a What is the overall percent imperviousness of,this project?
53%
2b Does this project re uire,a Stormwater Management Plan?
X Yes
2c If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why
2d If this project DOES require a Stormwater° Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative ,descri ption of the plan The
proposed development is located within the Catawba River basin with stormwater runoff from the proposed development
draining into Rocky Branch Per City of Charlotte regulations, stormwater management on this site shall meet the stormwater
management performance standards for development set forth in the Charlotte Post Construction Control Ordinance The
proposed project will result in a significant increase in, peak flow rates to downstream properties To mitigate these impacts, the
proposed stormwater management facility has been sized such that, post-development peak flow rates are no greater than pre -
development levels in the 10 -, and 25 -year storm events on site The proposed stormwater wetland is designed as "TSS -only
efficiency" stormwater wetland according the Chapter 4 3 of the Charlotte - Mecklenburg BMP 'Design Manual (Revised July 1„
2013) The proposed stormwater wetland will provide the required 85% TSS removal ,as well as the 70% total Phosphorus
removal required in this watershed 'If°the development on this tract is built *as proposed within this report, then the requirements
set forth in City of Charlotte regulations will be met without additional stormwater management facilities However, modification
to the proposed development may require that this analysis be revised
2e Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Certified Local Government
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a 'In,which local overnment's jurisdiction isthis project?
City of Charlotte
Phase II
3b Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
NSW
USMP
apply (check all that apply)
Water Supply Watershed
Other
3c 'Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval
been attached? A courtesy copy ofthe SW Management Plan will be
X No
provided upon approval
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
Coastal counties
HQW
4a Which of the following state - implemented stormwater`management programs
ORW
apply (check all that apply)
X Session Law 2006 -246
Other
4b Has the approved Stormwater Management.Plan with proof of approval
X No
been attached?
5. DWQ,401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a Does'the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
X Yes
5b Have all oftlie 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
X Yes
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a Does the project involve an expenditure, of public (federal /state /local) funds or
the use of public (federal /state) land?
X No
1b If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of
an, environmental document pursuant to the'requirements of the National or
Yes No
State (North Carolina)'Environmental Policy Act (NEPA%SEPA)?
1c If you answered "yes" to the above, has the,document review been finalized by
the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of1the NEPA or SEPA final
approval letter)
Yes No
Comments
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a Is,the site in viol'a_tion of'DWQ Wetland Rules (1'5A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland
X No
Standards, or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)? '
2bls this an after - the- fact,permit application?
X No
2clf you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation (s)
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result
in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
X No
3b If you answered'"yes" to the,above, submit a qualitative orquantitativ`e cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent,DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description Providence Retreat is a
residential development in the City of Charlotte The development will consist of approximately 16 single -family lots
along with,associated roadway, utility, and stormwater management, improvements The entire Providence Retreat
project is a single and complete project with appropriate land use control and stormwater measures in place for specific
areasmhich require them
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated
from the proposed,project, or available capacity of the subject facility Waste water will be directed into an existing
treatment facility operated by Mecklenburg County, under agreement with the City of,Charlotte maintained sewer line
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a 'Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species
'or habitat?
X Yes
5b Have you checked with the USF,WS concerning Endangered Species
Act impacts?
X No
5c If yes, indicate the USFW&Field Office you have contacted
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated
Critical Habitat? The USFWS web page (http / /www fws gov /endangered /) and the Natural Heritage virtual workroom
(http / /www ncnho orq /web /nhp /nhp- map - viewer) were, accessed on June 16, 2014 to determine if the project would
impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat Based on this research, the Carolina heelsplitter
(Lasm►gona decorata — E), smooth coneflower (Echmacea laevigata — E), Schweinitz's sunflower (Hel►anthus
schwe►nitzn —'E), and Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii — E) are federally listed species that occur in Mecklenburg
County. The Georgia aster (Symphyotrnchum georglanum) is listed as a candidate species Based on field inspections,
it is believed that no adverse impacts to threatened and endangered species and their known habitat will occur due to
the construction of'the proposed project
6. Essential Fish Habitat °(Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?T
X No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? An interactive map
called the Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Mapper (http / /www habitat noaa gov /protection /efh /efhmapper /) was accessed on
June 16, 2014 to determine if the project will impact Essential Fish Habitat
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that`the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historuaorcultural preservation
X No
status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant
in North Carolina history and archaeology)
What data sources did,you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? A review of
the list of properties and districts in the North Carolina in the National Registry of Historic Places
(hhtp / /www Kpo ncdcr, gov /nrlist htm) was conducted and a preliminary field assessment was conducted for the subject
property Based on the review and field assessment, the proposed project will not occur in or near an area that has been
designated as having historic or cultural preservation status by the state, federal, or tribal governments
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this, project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
X No
8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? The North Carolina, Flood Insurance, Rate Map ,
,3710447800J (issued March 2, 2006) was reviewed and it does not show 100 -year flood area or floodway located on'the
subject property
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Si ature
Date
(Agents signature is,vand only if an authorization
letter from`the a licant' is provided
Page 10 of'l0

J
MCADAMS
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
To: Mr. Michael Parker
NC Division of Water Resources
Mooresville, Regional Office
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 310
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Re: Providence Retreat
Pre - Construction Notification
I am sending you the following item(s):
Date
Job No
June 25, 2014
"' FEDERAL EXPRESS —
CSH -14000
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
5
Pre - Construction Notification- GC 3890 Authorization
Request
1
Check for $240
These are transmitted as checked below:
❑ As requested ❑ For your use
® For approval ❑
❑ For review and comment ❑
Remarks:
Copy to:
Signed: r C
George Buchholz, RE, , PWS
Environmental Consultant
Project Manager
Raleigh- Durham Charlotte
2905 Meridian Parkway 11301 Carmel Commons Blvd., Suite 111
Durham, North Carolina 27713 Charlotte, North Carolina
(919) 361 -5000 (704) 527 -0800
Designing Tomorrow's Infrastructure & Communities

North Carolina Secretary of State
Account Login Register
Page 1 of 2
North Carolina
Elaine F. Marshall DEPARTMENTOF THE
Secretary SECRETARYOFSTATE
PO Box 29622 Raleigh, NC 27626-0622 (919 )807 -2000
Date- 7/2/2014
Click hereto
View Document- Filings I File an Annual Report I
JPrint a Pre - populated Annual Report Fillable PDF Form I Amend A Previous Annual Report I
Corporation Names
Name Name'Type
NC CLASSICA HOMES, LLC LEGAL
NC TRILOGY HOMES, LLC PREY LEGAL
Limited Liability Co,mpariy Information
SOSID:
1168579
Status:
Current - Active
Effective Date:
9/24/2010
Citizenship:
DOMESTIC
State of Inc.:
NC
Duration:
PERPETUAL
Annual Report Status-
CURRENT
Registered Agent
Agent Name: LILIEN, ROBERT S
Office Address: 101 NORTH TRYON STREET
SUITE 1900
CHARLOTTE NC 28246 -0103
Mailing Address: 1101 WOODRIDGE CENTER DRIVE
SUITE 155
CHARLOTTE NC 28217 -1952
P,nncipal Office
Office Address:
Mailing Address:
Officers /Company Officials
Title:
Name,
Business Address:
101 NORTH TRYON STREET
SUITE 1900
CHARLOTTE, NC 28246 -0103
1101 WOODRIDGE CENTER DRIVE, SUITE
1'55
CHARLOTTE NC 28217 -1952
MANAGER
ROBERT S LILIEN
101 NORTH TRYON STREET
SUITE 1900
CHARLOTTE NC 28246
http: / /www. secretary. state. nc. us / corporations /Corp.aspx ?Pitemld- 9604104 7/2/2014

N PROVIDENCE RETREAT DEVELOPMENT
PRECONSTRCUTION NOTIFICATION
FIGURE 2. SOIL SURVEY EXHIBIT
J
o 150 soo soa
Feet PROJECT #: CSH -14000 I inch = 30ofeet CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA MCADAMS

� yr •erec ssc woes spivav )w VMnCr V HJZ ON •Z IXYI 1VH0 V, IOZ -60 -90 :aiva an
Coe" :*ON 2•�rt �
mm VOa•.�o mast r ,00 l = • l s
ttt� SNOLI.I NOD JNUSDM - I'S HUMI3
�•�� tatt
'oeu aInM"
Fri �V �� Aj��T /� O�� c�� -ot_ Han :�„vN�tt swvrnr. xor V l�l j,(, 1
O LOC L –H21W oN aaaroaa
d
U-
-1 O
U r
W
(SB OYN) DIY9 w
�o Q II
N N W
W
V) Ld
r i d
Q
O
O Z z w a-
<
O m wv U O
O O W m �_ ... o
V, M w V) do Q�� a; ,� II
pIYU o ZON �.
FLLI t� d.. F- Z i
O
z o ° .c cz o
r vt W Q
i;
m F- m o ~O r,
F- Z N � v
OUP
Qom
Off° I I 0 L
U
J
f n Q J Q
d'Zm
d
it LLI
N O > 9 i
O Q I I
Lit > H 3
W
O
Z d .
N
SON
L) I gao j
�1� W i
V M m J NNN
m Y Q
% a L 3
UO 3 ma Q
W � m
o
- --+, t- Q W N
LJ U z
Of CL O ¢ N
CL Csi
CL 0
�o
ONZ
' `1 /li,' �/ 11 1 {{ { {liiiil'i i i I • '.� d
0
I 1 � 1'•rf�l''�i -
i1 /,''; K
C) Z 1 }I �r 1 lI / ( /J /ii',l'l // I i ve -y��`� I m
�i /� '! %i /.iii /i /:i / `� \`,- \ `�`.` \ _ - - --YH- 1 �•w
le IN
It LLJ
N
PO
LO
a
V)
mZ
\ SFnN
n
Ir l w =)
Wpq
O
�r 0 im
OOOZ
a
\ CD
U � 13 O
W

�uw nD- -Plr -W • 9494 -69L (ooe)
6oZO-D :'oN - -n
9ZZ9Z lwoN wnolmgo
PMO cuommoD PULTaD Ioil I
svfvaropq IH mHor mu.
SN[VUVD 1[ vmnou vo HJ210N ,aLLOlydvHO
Fri I lVaHlHH SONS(IIAOUd
SNOILIGNOO OuLLsIX3 - ZT sxnOiA
bLOZ -60 -90 :31va
.001 = L 33v�s
VOU -o toi ( -H8V4 :3VYVN3ll.i
O LN L —H8J N o� y�3roaa
q�
Q
V
1

■
�pv+w.s►ns sst looel Sw V Qv✓, 10 13�HS) , ��Ib' 4LOZ -60 -90
dNlIO2ib'0 H12�ON 3110HO �
gnat ,a�> H,,,o> si3vdAi aisodo�d .� i�nau .05 = xfV�s
PMQ sari 1i toy rjuu"OD I oc I I V
491.1— OlOfl —H21W awvN?cl�
3)o(tlQmlil i dxo ' 1 1 V I� : 13 N D /� 0 d OIOC l -HW4 oN t�aros3,l
r
Q
se arm) mas onr
d, J U
Q
I— a o
w —
m N
�o Q u Q
IV) ,cV w� w
w F—
H V) W U)
+�, Q 00 Q
O Q w Z w Z W
LIZ U z,a O o
z z-
, w w
o.3 m IiL ;w U U U o
�z � � a J V) �
Q °o ° w� -i m -u)
cn O,
z �' w z' In �+
O�U ° �
a O z
Qw� O I-� U`O w0 II
Z0D wQ 0Q OQ �" O
F- -3 C7
Or<m M �o 00
0 vi
0 m w
Qol�
ZO�� N
F- 9 i
I:.
p J J
I I �ZQ 1, Z
I _ m O
U 2
3m
O =Q ° N
i
n
W >I-3: �coN
0 w I gao
O
Z
uj
0- • SNN (Z
�'o w
`\ ♦ ♦
"z it
I
, o' °' O
2
cr a
W gl / I I, ♦ m w w
I I D
iL
Oa I /i I W
L) `1 /// I 1 � / ' ICI I III I
1 9 I I 1 I
� I I 1 I \
pq
Zm I ; 5/ i j i v�,� /m' I 1 I` I II�111 I I I I i I, -
j � 1 6 I 1 I I l \\°/�✓ o'I' `> /� /i �/� � /I'I i�� I I I 111 I I I /� � `� till I
f -
I'
4,--4
Ln
`\ /� ,I I' Ali !i� ii�•r / , / ' / /`'i �� /�, i i� /'' � I \ \\ \ I\ \` \\ o
GNU
cn
LLJ
LLJ
/
1
I -- -�
E=-4
/ Ova -`
LU
Z \ /
�C6N ♦ ` \ \'
Z ♦ . \ \ �\\
JC \
f�- ♦ \`� ``\ `\ `\ \ `� ` `\

� w.96fl96et (ow)
S dQ�►7
Z 133HS)
VNIIO JVD Hi8ON 3110�?1VHO
- VIOZ760 -90
gzm WIlo!B'J gvwx,;Mo4BVo
Sl 3 `d d WJ O,i S O d'O �Ld, : � � �i (1 -� 1A
'05 _ •�L q'jvJ4 Q�
PAM VUMUUWD Ia=o0,IOEI I
'ot�u'�v�oo
s>HVarr�ta t�or �u
"
V I �l ] �] 1 3 I a O '�] ,]
O LOOT —H &w
I V / \
ON L�9f0211
r
a
� U
Q
H
U
r EL
Eli
N
m
N ON
w II Q
(se QYN)_QIN9
uj
W
~
2 of
to w
W
QO Q
OQ
O
W
U
Z w Z
Z a- O
W
a N
Z Z
Q
Z
Q
W` F-
o U
d
...i
w
OZ
w �
n- J
lfi
ul Z
� W
v~i p
J m
QD D \n
U N
II
ZULU
D Of
ZOO
Q-
Qw�
p L)
vO � II
of Q m
m 0
Of O 0 0
Ld
iL
W O
O
Z [n
v
ui
C) H
W
Q O Ll-
C7
z .N zz
J I
O cr U
i
U
C) _j
ZJ
Q
I
3
OUP
o> 9
I
m LLI
< V)
00 W
I—
N
W >P3
W
I
W
°N
c�i a o
z
<
O
Z a- •
O
'°I OD C-4
z
I
Of
K'nZ
I
a
/
ON
r°
1
'
a
W
3
N
J
1
Q 0
Z
m
'
EL
\
�\
`�
/
z
\ 1
I
♦\
m
I'
1 \\
1 \
t t
\
�'--
\
\
I\
a o O \,
\
\
W n
\
FH
`
t ,
\ \
1 \ 1
Z o a
♦
\
\ r
\I I
o
` ' --
``
1 I
•
I
��dm'cM♦I
\�
`.
I
\\
\��\
I I
I I
=ama
_ ♦\
I
U m o
1
�
W
U
U.Z
\\ 1
O m
-44L
H
� (n
J �

i
'rte �l, l�l; A�11o1mncunmlWUU ►ul►rclmn!n!�'anl�l�►�i!IllE
•: I „Id ''�1pi N11 111 ` III! D'IEn 1 ' NI
.r,ll! 111611111116 IU ,�1,N►1,
T,
® ii�i�a�:i! 1�1��1�\ 1�IIu!1�I1►,�111�11111111e�'r. ?Sty, Ip, ti�i�►� 1
r
u.w
ii
LEGEND
LID LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
SUBJECT PROPERTY.
(6'0 AC.)
JURISDICTIONAL PERENNIAL 'STREAM.
(TOTAL ON SUBJECT PROPERTY = 26:7 LF)
PROPOSED JURISDICTIONAL STREAM IMPACT -
(TOTAL = 145 LF)
GRAPHIC SCALE r�PP6y
40 •0 20 40
1 inch = 40 v
OTECT NO I= icm R. MCADAM
HZN -E ASH s 400a °N °T P R �0 VII D E�N C E �R RETREAT E A T 11,
11901 Carmd Commom Blvd.
cAie 1', = 40'
'INSET #1 — PLAN VIEW 9ine111
ft-
RR
Chedotbe,?Natth C.aroltria 28428
_
ATE,-
CHARLOTTE, NORTH
CAROLINA
MCA DAMS
MCADAMS
f1c®ae No 60499
06 -09 -2014
.

PROJECT No. CSH -14000
° R O VI D E N C E RETREAT
IJ
0
v
�lf��,��3333�J�339�0
MeANY. INC
s a o
4,
a SCALE: 1 20
INSET #1 - PROFILE VIEW
swee iii
Cbarbtte, NmtL Cuvlma 28228
Y
4 unTe:
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
U
� o
(am 7 �NM� co.cum
06 -09 -2014
�
U
8 o
R
R o
>:
0
120311
o
R
i
R
a• �
8
R
PROJECT No. CSH -14000
° R O VI D E N C E RETREAT
IJ
T'Mjo®
FILENAME' CSH- 14000 -INSET
MeANY. INC
a SCALE: 1 20
INSET #1 - PROFILE VIEW
swee iii
Cbarbtte, NmtL Cuvlma 28228
Y
4 unTe:
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
(am 7 �NM� co.cum
06 -09 -2014

Inset
A —A
11,
Inset B —B
INSET
�
(EM
c
INSET # 1' — SECTION
6'40
11301 Carmel Commons Bhi&
swm 111
OP
GSE
RAPE
MEN
DAQ
MCADAMS]
411-5 dams
"Tom' "M
014
XISTI
G
640
1111111111111,12
AM
MI
640
P1
11
630
mill
630
milli
630
v
—
MENNEN
625
625
■11�II��1��I�
■■
E/G ti'
■IIL��L�I
■■
0' +00
0 +56
0
+0�0
63410
0 +5'6
625
GRAPHIC SCALE
625
40
0 20 40
80
1 inch = 40 ft
640
PROVIDENCE T
11,
�JOMP R . DW- �
INSET
�
(EM
c
INSET # 1' — SECTION
6'40
11301 Carmel Commons Bhi&
swm 111
OP
GSE
cam oar. North c�o�ma aeaxs
w� �ra� w • rw� w
CHAI2I.ORTE. ," ORI�i �IdNA
MCADAMS]
411-5 dams
"Tom' "M
014
XISTI
G
630
630
■11�II��1��I�
■■
■IIL��L�I
■■
V
63410
625
625
E/G �.
}
d
�
Obi
�
N
�
O
M
N
M
640
PROVIDENCE T
11,
�JOMP R . DW- �
INSET
�
(EM
c
INSET # 1' — SECTION
6'40
11301 Carmel Commons Bhi&
swm 111
OP
GSE
cam oar. North c�o�ma aeaxs
w� �ra� w • rw� w
CHAI2I.ORTE. ," ORI�i �IdNA
MCADAMS]
411-5 dams
"Tom' "M
014
XISTI
G
630
630
V
63410
625
625
E/G �.
}
d
�
Obi
�
N
�
O
M
N
M
N
M
n
00
PROVIDENCE T
11,
�JOMP R . DW- �
INSET
�
(EM
c
INSET # 1' — SECTION
11301 Carmel Commons Bhi&
swm 111
cam oar. North c�o�ma aeaxs
w� �ra� w • rw� w
CHAI2I.ORTE. ," ORI�i �IdNA
MCADAMS]
411-5 dams
"Tom' "M
014

PROVIDENCE RETREAT
Stormwater Impact Analysis and Final Design of Stormwater Management Facility
General Description
Located along Country Lane, approximately 0.33 -miles east of its intersection with Providence
Road in Charlotte North Carolina, is the proposed single - family residential development
currently known as Providence Retreat. Proposed development on this site will consist of the
construction of 16 single - family homes, along with associated roadway, utility, and stormwater
management improvements.
The proposed development is located within the Catawba River basin with stormwater runoff
from the proposed development draining into Rocky Branch. Per City of Charlotte regulations,
stormwater management on this site shall meet the stormwater management performance
standards for development set forth in the Charlotte Post Construction Control Ordinance. These
are as follows:
,Sec. 18 -141 Standards for the Central Catawba District
(b)- Standards for high density protects, Any drainage area within a project boundary in the Central
Catawba ,district is considered high density when said drainage area has greaten than 24 percent built
upon area as determined by the methodology established in the design manual Such high- density
projects shall implement stormwater treatment systems that comply'with each of the following standards
(1) Stormwater quality treatment volume. Stormwater quality treatment systems shall treat the
runoff generated from the first inch of rainfall
(2) Stormwater quality treatment All structural stormwater treatment systems used to meet
these requirements shall be designed to, have a minimum of 85% average annual removal for
total suspended solids Low impact development techniques as described in the design
manual can be used to meet this requirement
(3) Stormwater treatment system design General engineering design criteria for all projects
shall be in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H 1008(c), as explained in the design manual-
(4) Stream buffers The S W I M stream buffer requirements apply, in the Central Catawba as
described in the city's zoning ordmance, chapter 12. In addition, intermittent and perennial
streams_ within the project boundary shall be delineated by a certified professional using
U S Army Corps of Engineers and N C' Division of Water Quality methodology and shall be
shown in ,the stormwater manageriient permit application along with all buffer areas All
perennial and intermittent streams draining less than 50 acres shall have a minimum 30foot
vegetated buffer ,including a ten foot zone adjacent to the bank Disturbance of the buffer is
allowed, however, any disturbed area must be revegetated and disturbance of the ten foot
zone adjacent to the bank shall require stream bank stabilization using bioengineering
techniques as specified in the design manual- All perennial and intermittent streams draining
greater ,than or equal to 5,0 acres and less than 300 acres shall have a 35 foot buffer with
two zones, including stream side and upland Streams draining greater than or equal to 300
acres and less than 640 acres shall have a 50 foot buffer with three zones, including stream
side, managed use and upland Streams draining greater than or equal to 640 acres shall
have a 100 foot buffer, plus 50 percent of the area of the flood fringe beyond 1,00 feet This
buffer shall consist of three zones, including stream side, managed use and upland All
buffers shall be measured from the top of the bank on both sides of the stream The uses
allowed in the different buffer zones as described in the S. W I M stream buffer requirements

in the jurisdiction's zoning ordinance, chapter 12, as well as the other provisions of the
S W I M ordinance shall apply in the Central Catawba district (except buffer widths)
(5) Stormwater volume control Stormwater treatment systems shall be installed to control the
volume, leaving the project site at post- development for the one -year, 24 -hour storm except I-
1 and I -2 zoned developments which are exempt from, this requirement Runoff volume
drawdown time shall be �a „mmimufii of 48 hours, but,not7more than 1,20 hours
(6) Stormwater peak control For residential land disturbing activities exceeding 24 percent
built -upon area, peak control shall be installed for the, appropriate storm frequency (i e,
10 -, 25 -, 50- or 100 year, six -hour) as determined by the, flood analysis provided by the
owner or designee using the criteria specified in the design manual or if a downstream,
analysis is not performed the peak shall be controlled for °the ten-year and 25 year, six -hour
storms For commercial land disturbing activities exceeding 24 percent built -upon area,
peak control shall be installed for the ten-year, six -hour storm and additional peak control
provided for the appropriate storm frequency (i e, 25 -, 50- or 100 year, six -hour) as
determined by the stormwater administrator based on a downstream flood analysis provided
by the owner or designee using the criteria specified in the design manual or if a
downstream analysis is not performed the peak shall be controlled for the ten-year and 25-
year, six -hour storms Controlling the one-year, 24 -hour volume achieves'peak control'for
the two -year, six -hour storm For I -1 and I -2 zoned developments, peak control shall' be
installed for 'the two-year and ten-year, six -hour storms and additional peak control
provided for the appropriate storm frequency (i e, 25 -, 50- or 1,00 year, six -hour) based on a
downstream flood analysis or f a downstream analysis is not performed the peak shall be
controlled for the two-year, ten-year and 25 -year, six -hour storms The emergency overflow
and outlet works for any pond or wetland constructed as a,stormwater BMP shall be capable
of safely passing a discharge with a minimum recurrence frequency as specified in the
design manual For detention basins, the temporary storage capacity shall be restored within
72 hours Requirements of the Dam Safety Act shall be met when,applicable
To meet the above stormwater management standards,, a stormwater wetland is proposed. Please
refer to the appropriate section of this report for additional information.
Calculation Methodolozy
• Rainfall data for this analysis was taken from the City of-Charlotte BMP Design Manual.
Please reference the precipitation information section within this report for additional
information.
Using maps contained - within the Mecklenburg County Soil Survey, the on -site soils were
determined to range from hydrologic soil group (HSG) `B' soils to HSG `C' soils. Since
the method chosen to compute pre- and post- development peak flow rates and runoff
volumes is' dependent upon the soil type, care was taken when selecting the appropriate
Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS, CN). A composite SCS CN was
computed for each pre- and post - development sub - basin. For example; Subbasin # 1 A in
the pre - development analysis consists of approximately 64% HSG `B' soils and 3,6%
HSG `C' soils. Therefore, for the open area cover ,condition, the composite SCS CN is
computed as follows (assuming good condition):
Composite Open SCS CN = (64% x 61)+ (36% x 74) = 66

• A composite SCS Curve Number was calculated for both the pre- and post - development
condition for each ,subbasin using ,SCS curve numbers and land cover conditions. Land
cover conditions for the pre- development condition were taken from recent survey
prepared by The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. and Mecklenburg County GIS. Land
cover conditions for the post - development condition were taken from the proposed
development plan.
• For the ,purposes of computing the pre - development storm events, a 50% open and 50%
wooded condition was assumed for the sub - basins yielding less than 50% wooded area in
pre - development conditions.
• The upstream drainage areas shown in this analysis stop at the property line in order to
effectively control runoff from the site without "watering down" the impact from the
proposed development. Please note that no offsite drainage is directed to the stormwater
facility.
• The time of concentration was calculated using SCS TR -55 (Segmental Approach, 1986).
The Tc flow path was divided into three segments: overland flow, concentrated flow, and
channel flow. The travel time was then computed for each segment, from which the
overall time of concentration was determined by taking the sum of each segmental time.
• The post - development time of concentration to the proposed stormwater management
facility is assumed to be 5 minutes. This provides a, conservative estimate of facility size
for design, purposes.
• PondPack Version V8i was used in determining the pre- & post - development, peak flow
rates for the 10 -, 25 -, and 100 -year storm events, as well as routing calculations for the
proposed stormwater management facility.
• A stormwater wetland is proposed on this site to treat / manage stormwater runoff from,
the proposed development. This facility is based on City of Charlotte design standards.
• For 100 -year storm routing calculations, a "worst case condition" was modeled in order to
insure the proposed facility would safely pass the 100 -year storm event. The starting
water surface elevation in each facility, just prior to the 100 -year storm event, is at the
secondary spillway elevation. This scenario could occur as a result of a clogged siphon or
a rainfall event that lingers for several days. This could also occur as a result of several
rainfall events in a series, before the siphon has an opportunity to draw down the storage
pool.
Discussion of Results
Peak.Runoff Control Requirements
`The, proposed project will result in .a significant increase in peak flow rates to downstream
ro
pperties. To mitigate these impacts, the proposed stormwater management facility has been
sized -such that post - development peak flow rates are no greater than pre - development levels in
the 10 -, and 25 -year storm events on site.
Pollutant and Nutrient Control Requirements
The proposed stormwater wetland is designed as "TSS -only efficiency" stormwater wetland
according the Chapter 4.3 of the Charlotte - Mecklenburg BMP Design Manual (Revised July 1,
2013). The proposed stormwater wetland will provide the required 85% TSS removal as well as
the 70% total Phosphorus removal required in this watershed.
3'

Conclusion
If the development on this tract is built as proposed within this report, then the requirements set
forth in City of Charlotte regulations will be met without additional stormwater management
facilities. However, modifications to the proposed development may require that this analysis be
revised. Some modifications that would require this analysis to be revised include:
1. The proposed site impervious surface exceeds the amount accounted for in this report.
2. The post - development watershed breaks change significantly from those used to prepare
this report.
The above modifications may result in the assumptions' within this report becoming invalid. The
computations within this report will need to be revisited if any of the above conditions become
apparent as development of'the proposed site moves forward.
4