The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About410013_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20220630Facility Number Division of Water Resources 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency Type of Visit: aCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Farm Name: Wn`k CLctc ,( Do 1 \ Owner Name: s.) Q n gple_ ns Departure Time: 10 MI5 Owner Email: Phone: County: (-A A 1 (►YC\ Region: WS'� Mailing Address: R 7 rj 5 (Ali l C e (\ C ( c e\cr I c2) t OiA1 li Sl l ‘'n vv+ r�- / N 7 q-7 11-1 Physical Address: Facility Contact: { 6mi l-1 IA OpV--i 6c-, Title: Onsite Representative: Integrator: Certified Operator: Certification Number: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Phone: Certification Number: Latitude: JO 6 I u' Z 4 " Longitude: jyc Is() C, ss 2q and 1AYv1 1-01- ofl) pl1 rLe:16%\itic \Zc� 00 1to01-1,n� 'Lai ()j Wh0-e Cer,.v \LA Swine Design Current Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars Other Design Current Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Layer Non -Layer Design Current Dr v Poultry Capacity Pop. Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults Other Cattle Design Current Capacity Pop. X Dairy Cow 5 0 Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer 2-0 Dry Cow Li<r Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? n Yes ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ N> ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 0 NE Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑No ❑NA ❑NE Page 1 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued Facility Number: 1 13 Date of Inspection: 0I 3 Q 1 Z Z Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? "Yes No n NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ YesNo n NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: IA12,9r;( Li" Lowex (,Z) Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): >(y6 tf g" 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes PKINo ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? 1 I . Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Ai Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes i,gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes JNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12, Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes pNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? n Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ni-No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? n Yes 'No ❑ NA 0 NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check n Yes ''No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ['Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ['Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE - waste Appfitatitrrr Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis— Soil Analysis Waste Transfers ainfall �Stocking.❑-Ctup Yic1d ❑ 126 Mu,utt. Inspce+itpn Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections -81► , ❑ YesiNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No aNA ❑ NE 5/12/2020 Continued • 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? Page 2 of 3 Facility Number: Date of Inspection: 4()I72- 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes FiNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ErNA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? n Yes i.No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? 0 Yes JNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 2PANo ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? tog y10 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? n Yes ECNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? n Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? n Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). ebo,ovA ,n _k_s tvasr-t ono ►ysls week/ly CktbOard' 1)'11 tiVY1 co vrcA e3 Of\ 1 a C� 7. S'h' `� ` Ar- t Skit t-,-3 04 019 .1-0 Pi' l l . N{o w i vt cx- a• e vv\bd.ti 1- i-C P 665 ible_ . MY- dow vt-40 (y_ o twTs 6-P L . C tkvl\9 (0, ,, 6,/,_ 2 - Zo7 3. o'n s o\ i d , ,2,1 W i prei.r Sk v,„. . *no Spitck&sli V) �v-Ar k5 y-ew 41ON WctS a,Y\C SPs, G\\ (a1oee. ?emu .4 Ctn.if0A Qtke,)ruve. .0 van r,,nrrc, Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: � J �t(Catkau. Phone: n. V\ Qyi &&& � D 50(Zbzz Page 3 of 3 5/12/2020 Date: