20140632 Ver 1_401 Application_20140614

KL E/NFEL DER
8right Peop /e. Right Solutions.
16 June 2014
Mr. William Elliot
USACE Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 -5006
20140632
PAID
Mr. Alan Johnson, Sr. Environmental Specialist
NC Division of Water Resources 401 Permits
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1617
RE: Piedmont Natural Gas Line 28 Replacement Project, Stanly County, North Carolina.
Dear Sirs
Kleinfelder is submitting this Pre - Construction Notification for your consideration in issuing Section
404/401 permits associated with the proposed gas line replacement project. The project will replace an
existing line, installed in the 1950s and 1960s, and result in no loss of jurisdictional waters.
We respectfully request your review and correspondence relating to this application at your earliest
opportunities. This application was prepared following the PCN format, with supplemental responses
provided in an attachment.
Thank you both in advance for your time and consideration of this request. We remain available to
provide additional information or clarifications if and as needed.
Regards,
Christopher Hopper, CFM
Environmental Scientist
3500 Gateway Centre Blvd., Ste 200 U l'
Morrisville, NC 27560
of 919 - 755 -5011 x103 JUN 1 9 1614
cl 919 - 524 -8370
fl 919 - 755 -1414
NR wvA _R QUALITY
Kleinfelder, Inc., Morrisville, NC 27560 p 1919.755.5011 f 1919.755.1414

,PNG Line 29,116 Iacement Project
Stanly County iUbith ^Carolina
NT-AUTHORIZATION FORM
PRO PE RTY11LEGKOESCRIPTiON:
Lot ^No:= M'ultIple'(See'TableA), Parcel,ID:_Muitipfe�(See,Table 1`)
Street Address , Multiple ,prop-- drties,comp'r,f_s'frig itie 'P.iedriionfNaturabGas,(PNG) proposed'Lines28
Replacement'Project;in`,central St4nly�Cou6(y,, North Carolina. The:project area includes 27- portions of
24 °pr6perties,c6mprW g•a total,area�of,.27.2,acres: PNG',holds Teases on each ofsthese p rope Wes'andis,
authorized:to', sue'tfiisrauthorization.
- Owner -Name (printed):
'Telephone No-
The undersigned,` property 'lease,'holde,of,,thejabove referenced properties do,hereby,auitiorize
Christopher Hoppet, of.Kleinfelder,�Inc..to,act on,PNGs behalf -and take -,all -acfions'necessary,for,,the°
, processing ,,issuance,and.acceptance -of a Jurisdiciional,Determination and Section 4041401 Perinits4or'
resources`along;t tie,dhtire 27.2�acre;project.easement'in cent'ral.;Sianly Gouniy,4Norifitarcilina.
We hereby,certify the,above.lnformation submitted'in this request is true-and ac_curatetfo the best of
,our knowledge.
Auth`oriied Signature: / /C✓ j27C�Er.r=
Date: 6 /� �3/2�9�--
A''GCNT `
16- P, 7 hloPper tKt:O i,t
23- Su l �V A-,
Attachments:, Table 1,,Project ^Easement Landowners

Table 1: PNG L'ine,28,Replacement Project, Easement includes portions of each of the below listed
propertiesYin Stanly County, NC.'
Stanly, County°
'PIN
Coordinates (DD)
Size
(ac)
Owner
Latitude
'Longitude
653503102830
35.255958
-80236361
0.39
Michael L. Burris and Patricia B. Pope
653503104422
35:255781
- 80.235804
031
Michael,L Burris,and Patricia B Pope
653401391516
35:255691
-80235231
009
Charles L Adams and Breda S. Adams
653503105271
3525550
- 80.234209
0.65
Stanly,R and Dorothy L Efird (Life Estate)
653401391516
35.-255290
_ 80.232513
0.57
Charles L. Adams and Breda S. Adams
653503314083
35.254996
_ =80 230710,
0.61
Ernest D., Joyce V., and Lucinda C.-Coley
653401391516
352s4639
- 80.228259
1.02
Charles L Adams and Breda S. Adams
,653503314083
35 254220
-80225703
084
Ernest D , Joyce M., and Lucinda C Coley
653401499589
35.254623
- 80.222755
130
Daniel .1 Hildreth
65350450.7,104
"35 254969
- 80.220924
6.62
Phillip °P. PWoc1k,
-
653402598459
35.254078
-80.219455,'
1.24
Warren M. (Life - Estate) and Michelle J.
Paddy, Christina R Carmichael, Gisele Lynn
Hennessey
653402684968
35 252650
- 80.217374
6.63
Pamela 'A Simpson
653402686713
35.251925
- 80.216756
-012
Walter L Bunn Jr. and Gayle B. Bunn,
653402689306
35 251415
- 80.215839
0.87
Ernest D Coley, Joyce M Coley
653402782409
35 251127
- 80.215083
0.15'
Ernest D Coley, Joyce M Coley
653402889255'
35 250687
- 80.209721
3.76
Roger D. Hinson and Paulette P. Hinson_
654401186300
35.249255
- 80.199742
123
John D, Cagle
654401363623,,
35 248025
_ - 80.194534
b.48!,
John D. Cagle
654401368519
35- 247644
- 80:192929'
0.66
Joshua Ross Hudson
654401463583
35 247124
- 80.190733
0 90
Tommie H Burleson
654402563697',
35 246436
-80 187668,,
136
Tommie H. Burleson
:,654404648962
35.244546
- 80.181356
3'42
Glenn -B- Freedman,and Sara M: Freedman
654402953119
35.242940
- 80.175111
0.96
Joel Kent Mabry
654402950291
35.242936
- 80.175289
0.13
Charles H Foreman Jr. and Glenda Foreman
654402958898,
- 35.242478
- 80.173196
6.29
'Ward H. Cagle
654404947936
_ 35.242275
- 80.172824
0.20
Xa Lee and Gina Lee
655401151303,
35.240408
-80168740
294
Bobby M. Morrison
a

O�O� WATF9pG
M >
0
20140632
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number: 3884
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Piedmont Natural Gas Line 28 Pipeline Replacement Project
2b.
County:
Stanly
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Town of Norwood
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
_. - -
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
See Attached
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
. i;k . WA WA_UT_Y
A St &er>ch
3d.
Street address:
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a Applicanbs
❑X Agent ❑ Other, Lspedify
4b
Name
4c
Business name
(if °applicable)
4d
Street address
4e
City, state, zip
4f
Telephone no
4g
Fax no
4h
Email address
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Christopher Hopper
5b
Business name
(if'applicable)
Kleinfelder, Inc
5c
Street address
3500, Gateway Centre, Blvd , Ste 200
5d
City, state, zip
Morrisville, North Carolina 27560
5e
Telephone no
(919) 524 -8370
5f
Fax no
(919) 755 -1414
5g
Email address
chopper @kleinfelder com
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1
Property Identification
1a
Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID,)
Multiple See attached
1b 'Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude Longitude
1c
Property size-
272 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a
Name of nearest body,of water,to proposed, project
Multiple see attached Rocky River (subbasi'n 03- 07 -14)
2b
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
C
2c
River basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
3.
Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions�on the site and the general land use in, the vicinity of the- project,at the time of this
application
The existing site Is a 35- 40,footlwide linear easement maintained in herbaceous vegetation In the vicinity, agricultural and woodland land uses
dominate with a, few,ruralaresidential'properties
3b
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property 0 55
3c
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property 590
3d Explain the purpose ofthe proposed project
See,attached
3e Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
See attached
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determi'nationsiby the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
ro ect includin all riot hases In the ast?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments Request, attached to this PCN -See attached
4b
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c 'If'yes, who delineated ,the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known) Chris Hopper
Agency /Consultant Company- 'Klemfelder, Inc
Other
4d 'If yes, lisi the dates,of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State,determinations�and attach documentation
Request attached However, depending on the ACOE's preference we are not insisting on a PJD for this project Once replacement is complete, no
additional impacts are anticipated until the next replacement is needed All stream and wetland impacts will be temporary, no loss will result
S.
Project History
5a
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
X ,No
ED ❑ El Unknown
5b
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
6.
Future Project Plans
6a
Is this a phased project?
❑X Yes ❑ No
6b If yes, explain
The eastermend ofthis replacement�line`will eventually, connect to roadsideialignments Those alignments are,currently being planned and are not, yet
final Stream and possible wetland crossings are expected within existing NCDOT rights -of -way, but it is not clear ifimpacts will result afthis time
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for,your project (check all that apply)
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2, Wetland Impacts
If there aremetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland,area impacted
2a
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P),or
Temporary T
2b
Type of impact
2c
Type of wetland
2d
Forested
2e
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other,)
2f
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1
See Attached
Choose one
Yes /No
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
W4,
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
2g Total Wetland Impacts-
2h 'Comments
3' Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, them complete'this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b
Type -of impact
3c
Stream name
3d
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT) ?,
3e
Type of
jurisdiction
3f
Average
stream,
width
(feet)
3g
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1
See,Attached
-
S2
Choose one
S31
Choose one
S4
Choose one
S5
Choose one
S6'
Choose,one,
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
31 Comments
Page 4 of 10
,PCN Form — Version 14 January 2009

4 Open Water Impacts,
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic.Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S, then'rndividuall 'list all open water impacts below
4a
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b
Name,of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c
Type of impact
4d
Waterbody
type
4e
Area of impact (acres)
01
'None
Choose one
Choose
O2
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f Total open water impacts
-
4g Comments one -
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below
5a
Pond ID number
'5b,
'Proposed'use or
purpose of pond
�5c
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d
'Stream Impacts,(feet)
5e
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose,one
P2
Choose,one
5f Total:
5g' Comments None
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected,pond surface area (acres)
5j Size of porid'watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation. then vou MUST fill out,Section D of this form
6a Project isyn which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other
6b-
Buffer Impact
number-
Permanent '(P),or
Temporary T
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Stream name
6e
Buffer
mitigation
required? .
6f
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
None
Yes /No
B2
Yes /No
B3 =
Yes /No
B4
Yes /No
B5
Yes /No
B6
Yes /No
6h Total Buffer Impacts
61 Comments None
i
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1 Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe, measures taken to avoid or minimize theproposed impacts in designing project
See,attached
lb Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
See attached
2. Cornpensatory Mitigation for Im acts,to Waters of the U.S.,or,Waters,of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters ofthe State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑,Corps
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be,used for this
project'?
❑ Mitigation,bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3 Complete,if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank- N/A
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and'letter)
Type Choose one
Type Choose one
Type Choose one
Quantity
Quantity
Quantity
3c Comments,
4 Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream, mitigation requested
linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
Choose,one
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)-
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f Non- npanan wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland:mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
N/A
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
,6a Will the,project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
E] Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
6c
6d
6e
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square °feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required:
6g If buffer,mitigation,is required,,discusswhat -type of mitigation is proposed (e g , paymentto private mitigationi bank,
permdtee responsible riparian buffer restoration, 'payment into an approved'in -lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 7 of 10

IE. Stormwater Management,and,Diffuse Flow Plan ('required by:DWQ)
1
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a
Does the project Include or Is It.adjacent to protected riparian buffers Identified
❑ Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b
If yes, then Is a diffuse flow plan Included? If no, explain why
❑ Yes ❑ No
'2.,
Stormwater Management Plan
J
2a
What is the overall percent Imperviousness of this project?
0
2b
Does this ro ectre uire a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑x No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why
There will be'no change in impervious, surface area, and no permanent impact resulting from construction
as proposed
2d-
If,this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of'the plan
2e `Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3
Certified Local Govern ment•Stormwater Review
3a
In,which local governmenCs jurisdiction Is this project?
Stanly County
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b
Which of the following locally - Implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other-
.3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑'Yes ❑ No
attached?
4
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a
Which of the following state- implemented, stormwater management programs, apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply),
❑Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater' Management Plan with proof of approval, been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b
Have all of,the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a
Does the project;involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds,or the
❑ Yes X❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b
If you answered "yes' to the above, does,the project require preparation of an
environmental document. pursuant to the requirements of the-National or State
❑ Yes ❑X ,No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
f
1c
If you answered "`yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
-
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or'SEPA final approval
[:]'Yes [-],No
)
Comments
2.
Violations (DWQ, Requirement)
2a
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water orMetland'Standards,
El Yes ® No
or Ripanan Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213 0200)?
2b
Is this an ,after- the -fact permit applications
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c
If you answered "yes "to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3:
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a
Clearly detail the ultimate, treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of,the subject facility
No wastewater will be generated by this project
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

5: enc(angered�Species-,and'--besibnited"C'rlticiiI HabltbC CbiF0§,RequIrea4ht)
5a. Will, this pib'Ject obcurAn or- near awarea,with federally.,,protected,.species or
E]�Yes No
habitat?-
51) Haveyou,checkedmith the USFWS concerning Eqdahge�red Spqpids.Act
Ry6s, ❑ N6
'6c'- I(�yesjndIcaie-4he CR§Ows- Pibld",Qtfice,�y6,wihbV�*,,bohtacted
Mlievillb
5d-1 Wh5t-,d6td kufcesidid-youuseaio-dbterrriine Aether, your :si�te; w0761dii-6i-)act,Endangerbd Sp-@bibs 6� Deslgiiat3d',Cni►caf
Habitat?
hitp I/wwWfW§'gov/raleigh/speciesichtAist/sta-61y htrfil
6'. Essoiltial-Fi`sh-Hdbitai,(C6rpis�Requiremefit)
Will-tliislproject occ r inlor fiddr ah.areb`,d6M nated,asessefitalfisfi:habft4t�
;Yes
16b WHILdata,sources,,did you use`todetermind w6th6ryob-t's 1:61w gb
0 bId-iffi65dt Eshti6(FishH6biWt?
'Ottp /Avww habitit,noaa,gov/protectionlefh/habitaimapper tita -
7. Historic-,or Prehistoric Cultural ,Resources p
,7a YVIII,this1p-rbjbbt,occur in or nearantarea4haf,'t-he-stafe, feaer6kdr ii-Nal
gov9firimbritis havbs8e§iqn'�ito:d,,'��h�-ving-histonc.bt,,-c6lfur-a-l�pr"qs-e��tion
us s
status � N tloi�a*�R! ztoric Trusfde-s-igpa-ti'on,or'plqpert.ies significant in
Elyes (40
]%rth7C6r Iina h-isforVaffd 5fch;fe0f0i-'g-y)?
76 What data sources did,yoU,ute,to,,dbtdrmineWhettferyour site -would'i mbacCh I istorvor archeological ical resources?
PNG.,conlrktdd,�through KJ6infelde?;'-,Wiih-Ai6t�ai6l66l6l,'CoWWI'ti'nis'of-the,'Carolinas, Ar6tiaeolog(6al'investigitions.�y6r6per-fornied along the,
'p-'-
-H,storj�,'Preservatio&
alignment; in&d'elifle&r6ports a6b-.,n—g _Te PNq gj�cflft�e !46'Stite Office.
'R
18a Will thisipr9ject occur,in,a PEIVA-designated ' - 0-' dar-fidodDlaih?
'Y!
131YIP9
Elb If yes, dkolajh'hbvv jYeoj6ct,ff&&fs FEMA requirements
8c WhnsourceN),d1d,y6u Use to4n�kb"We4l9odpl6ifi determindtibn?'
-1 -aFspx?ST=k
P�6,Mrih ja Food liisl�,Information hE�Iistem hitp lifns,nc gov /InsJHome
.�cKrist6phbr,D., Hopper
APplidanyA dht"� Printed,'Ndhie
9
Date
_pIicant/Agent,s,Sigh6tLire,
an�'aAonzition'
-
et licarifis p"ro'vide d')
'Page 1b2of'10

Attachments
PCN Attachments and Text Supplements
Preliminary JD Request Form and Wetland Determination Data Sheets
Figures
1. Project Location Map
2a. Stanly County Soil Map 6 and Albemarle NC USGS Quad Map
2b. Stanly County Soil Map 10 and Aquadale NC USGS Quad Map
3.1 -3.10 PNG Line 28 Replacement, Temporary Impacts Closeups
Appendices
A. Stream and Wetland Impact Details with Stream Crossing Pipeline Profiles
B. Stream Open -Cut Pump Around Detail

PCN Attachments and Text Supplements

PCN Attachment
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
la -c. Property Identification, Site Coordinates, and Property Size
The Line 28 right -of -way crosses 24 properties in 27 property segments (one property has three
crossings and another has two). Listed from west to east, all 27 segment ownerships are listed below.
Each of these owners has been contacted by PNG and is aware of this effort. PNG's lease agreements
include the stipulation that stream and wetland jurisdiction is being established. PNG authorization is all
we anticipate being needed to authorize ACOE JD work along their easement.
Stanly County
PIN
Coordinates (DD)
Size
(ac)
Owner
Latitude
Longitude
653503102830
35.255958
- 80.236361
0.39
Michael L. Burris and Patricia B. Pope
653503104422
35.255781
- 80.235804
0.31
Michael L. Burris and Patricia B. Pope
653401391516
35.255691
- 80.235231
0.09
Charles L. Adams and Breda S. Adams
653503105271
35.25550
- 80.234209
0.65
Stanly R. and Dorothy L. Efird (Life Estate)
653401391516
35.255290
- 80.232513
0.57
Charles L. Adams and Breda S. Adams
653503314083
35.254996
- 80.230710
0.61
Ernest D., Joyce M., and Lucinda C. Coley
653401391516
35.254639
- 80.228259
1.02
Charles L. Adams and Breda S. Adams
653503314083
35.254220
- 80.225703
0.84
Ernest D., Joyce M., and Lucinda C. Coley
653401499589
35.254623
- 80.222755
1.30
Daniel J. Hildreth
653504507104
35.254969
- 80.220924
0.02
Phillip P. Plalock
653402598459
35.254078
- 80.219455
1.24
Warren M. (Life Estate) and Michelle J.
Paddy, Christina R. Carmichael, Gisele Lynn
Hennessey
653402684968
35.252650
- 80.217374
0.63
Pamela A. Simpson
653402686713
35.251925
- 80.216756
0.12
Walter L. Bunn Jr. and Gayle B. Bunn
653402689306
35.251415
- 80.215839
0.87
Ernest D. Coley, Joyce M. Coley
653402782409
35.251127
- 80.215083
0.15
Ernest D. Coley, Joyce M. Coley
653402889255
35.250687
- 80.209721
3.76
Roger D. Hinson and Paulette P. Hinson
654401186300
35.249255
- 80.199742
3.23
John D. Cagle
654401363623
35.248025
- 80.194534
0.48
John D. Cagle
654401368519
35.247644
- 80.192929
0.66
Joshua Ross Hudson
654401463583
35.247124
- 80.190733
0.90
Tommie H. Burleson
654402563697
35.246436
- 80.187668
1.36
Tommie H. Burleson
654404648962
35.244546
- 80.181356
3.42
Glenn B. Freedman and Sara M. Freedman
654402953119
35.242940
- 80.175111
0.96
Joel Kent Mabry
654402950291
35.242936
- 80.175289
0.13
Charles H. Foreman Jr. and Glenda Foreman
654402958898
35.242478
- 80.173196
0.29
Ward H. Cagle
654404947936
35.242275
- 80.172824
0.20
Xa Lee and Gina Lee
655401151303
35.240408
- 80.168740
2.94
Bobby M. Morrison

2a. Name of nearest water body to proposed project
All project area streams are either named or unnamed Class C tributaries of Rocky River (Index 3 -17) in
the Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin. Streams in or adjacent to the project corridor are numbered in Figures
2a and 2b over USGS and Soil Survey maps, and Figures 3.1 through 3.10 over 2012 aerial photography.
Each is listed below with by name and usage classification. Not all will be impacted by construction of
the replacement line.
Stream 1: UT Hardy Creek (Index 3- 17 -42)
Stream 2: Hardy Creek (Index 3- 17 -42)
Stream 3: UT Ugly Creek (Index 3- 17 -42 -1)
Stream 4: UT Ugly Creek (Index 3- 17 -42 -1)
Stream 5: UT Ugly Creek (Index 3- 17 -42 -1)
Stream 6: UT Ugly Creek (Index 3- 17 -42 -1)
Stream 7: Ugly Creek (Index 3- 17 -42 -1)
Stream 8: UT Ugly Creek (Index 3- 17 -42 -1)
Stream 9: UT Little Long Creek (Index 3- 17 -31 -4)
Stream 10: UT Little Long Creek (Index 3- 17 -31 -4)
Stream 11: UT Little Long Creek (Index 3- 17 -31 -4)
3b. Estimated acreage of all wetlands on the property
Within the existing 6.3 mile 50 -foot wide right of way, 14 wetlands occur and comprise 24,072.7 square
feet (0.55 acre). Most wetland features in the right -of -way are contiguous with larger off -site features
that have not been estimated for this project.
3c. Estimated length of all streams on the property
Within the existing 6.3 mile 50 -foot wide right of way, ten streams with a combined length of 590 linear
feet occur. All of these streams are either perennial or intermittent and associated with larger off -site
features that have not been estimated for this project.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project
The proposed project is the replacement of an existing three- inch gas line, installed in the 1950s and
60s. Portions of the existing line are in disrepair, and replacement is being constructed as part of regular
maintenance by PNG.
3e. Explain the project in detail, including equipment to be used
The existing line three -inch line will remain in service until the replacement comes on -line. The new line
will be six inches in diameter, and follow the alignment provided in the attached figures. While PNG
controls a 50 -foot wide easement along the line, it is not expected that all of this width will be
disturbed. Line replacement is expected to average about 500 -1,000 feet of line per day.
Minimum separations are being maintained for safety reasons, and crossings of the lines are being
minimized, although most of the replacement line will be installed within the pre- existing corridor. The
trench will average between three and four feet in depth, so large construction equipment will not be
required. Typical construction vehicles will include trench excavators and back -hoes. One stream

crossing, along the main stem of'Hardy`Creek will be directionally drilled to minimize environmental
impacts. However, due to shallow bedrock,across the project area „most will be open -cut- Best
management practices to be utilized at each crossing, detailed in Plan Sheets 1 -4 in Appendix A
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
2. Wetland Impacts
Impact No.
Type of Impact
Type of
Forested
Type,of
Area of Impact
Temporary (,T)
Wetland
Jurisdiction
(sq ft ),
or Permanent,
(P)
CA (T)
Pipeline
PEM
N
404/401
0
Installation
PFO
Y
0
CB (T)
Pipeline
PENT
N
404/401
1987
Installation
CC (T)
Pipeline,
PENT
N
404/401
678.5
Installation
CD (T)
Pipeline
PFO
Y
404/401
1247
Installation
CE (T)
Pipeline
PEM
N
404/401
8049
Installation
PFO
Y
4842
CF (T)
Pipeline
PEM
N
404/401
4992
Installation
_
CG (T)
Pipeline
PEM
N
404/401
1,482.7
Installation
CH (T)
Pipeline
PEM
N
404/401
3,4906
Installation
CK (T)
Pipeline
PEM
N
404/401
190.3
Installation
CL(T)
Pipeline
PEM
N
404/401
2,198.4
Installation
PFO
Y
1,0083
CM (T)
Pipeline
PEM
N
404/401
1,3463
Installation
`PFO
Y _ _
116.1
CN (T)
Pipeline,
PEM
N
404/401
647 9
Installation
PFO
Y
_
2685
CO (T)
Pipeline
PEM
N
404/401
1,616 9
Installation
CP (T)
Pipeline
PEM
N
404/401
4,8999
Installation
Total
20,056.1

3. Stream Impacts
Stream No.
Temporary
(T),
Permanent
IN
Type of
Impact
Stream
Name
Perennial or
Intermittent
(PER or INT)
Type of
Jurisdiction
Average
Stream
Width
Linear
Impact
1 (T)
Open Cut
UT Hardy Cr.
PER
401/401
4
50
2 (T)
HDD — None
Hardy Cr.
PER
401/401
25
0
3 (T)
Open Cut
UT Ugly Cr.
INT
401/401
2
50
5 (T)
Open Cut
UT Ugly Cr.
PER
401/401
4
52
6 (T)
Open Cut
UT Ugly Cr.
INT
401/401
2
72
7 (T)
Open Cut
UT Ugly Cr.
PER
401/401
6
50
8 (T)
Open Cut
Ugly Cr.
PER
401/401
4
77
9 (T)
Open Cut
UT Little
Long Cr.
PER
401/401
6
65
10 (T)
Open Cut
UT Little
Long Cr.
PER
401/401
6
67
11 (T)
Open Cut
UT Little
Long Cr.
INT
401/401
2
53
Total
536
D. Impact Justification and Minimization
Ia. Minimization and avoidance through design
Wetlands and waters: The original line was installed in the 1950s and 1960s, before stream or wetland
permitting requirements or environmental best management practices had been developed. Most
deviations from parallel installation are being proposed to accomplish jurisdictional crossings in
compliance with current recommendations (e.g. perpendicular crossings). In stream and wetland areas,
the maximum construction corridor is being restricted to 50 -feet wide.
Threatened and Endangered Species: During environmental investigations along project corridors,
Kleinfelder located a previously undocumented population of white wild indigo (Baptisia olbo), a North
Carolina Threatened plant species. PNG was notified and immediately contacted the North Carolina
Natural Heritage Program to verify identifications. Once verified, PNG initiated contact with the North
Carolina Plant Conservation Program (PCP) to revise construction plans for sensitivity to this species.
Because the population occurs near a bend in the project alignment, temporary staging and
construction areas are required to accommodate equipment and space for necessary welding at pipe
joints. These areas were originally designed over the population's location, but are being relocated to
an adjacent agricultural field. Project designers are requiring that all construction in this area occur in a
single day (i.e. no overnight open pits or multi -day disturbance). Due to this species' deep tap -roots and
overall difficulty adjusting to impacts, the retired line will be abandoned in place in this location.

Preliminary JD Request Form and Wetland Determination Data Sheets

Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A Report Completion Date for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (JDY. 13 Jun 14
B Name and Address of person requesting Preliminary JD! Chris Hopper, Kleinfelder-
C District Office, File Name, and Number.
D. Project Location(s) and Background Information- Stanly County, North Carolina
Site Number
Latitude
Longitude
Cowardin
Amount'in
Class of
Class
review area
Aquatic
(sq. ft ) '
Resource
CA
35 24334427
_ 80.17666009
PEM /PFO
401648
Non - tidal, Non
Section 10
CB
35 242948132
-80 17543724
PEM /PFO
198.74
Non- tidal, Non
Section 10
CC
35 249765629
- 80.20208157
PEM /PFO
67854
Non - tidal, Non
Section 10
CD
35 249810858
-80 20201693
PFO
12473
Non - tidal, Non
Section, 10
CE
35`248887574
- 80.19823897
PEM /PFO
1289 12
Non-Udal, Non
Section 10
CF
35 248173491
-80 19531523
PEM /PFO
499.17
Non - tidal, Non
Section 10
CG
35.240909519
- 80.16993783
PEM
149266
Non - tidal, Non
Section 10
CH
35 244804939
-80 18285520
PEM
349056
Non- tidal, Non
Section 10`
CK
35 254523968
- 80.22758479
PEM /PFO
11033
Non - tidal, Non
Section 10
CL
35.255066487
-80 22163852
PEM /PFO
3206.71
Non - tidal, Non
Section 10
CM
35 251346063
-80 21560179
PEM /PFO
1462 42,
Non - tidal, Non
Section 10
CN
35 250988039
-80 21376011
PEM /PFO
91637
Non - tidal, Non
Section 10
CO
35.25080655
- 80.21121474
PEM /PSS
1616.94
Non - tidal, Non
Section 10
CP
35 250773267
-80 21045953
PEM /PSS
4899.90
Non - tidal, Non
Section 10
Name•of any water'bodies on theisite that have been identified as Section 10 1waters•
Tidal None
Non - Tidal- None

E. Review performed for Site Evaluation (Check all that apply)
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date.
[]Field Determination. Dates)
SUPPORTING DATA
Data reviewed for preliminary JD (Check all that-apply — checked items should be included in case file
and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below) ,
✓ Maps, plans, plots, or plat submitted on behalf of the applicant /consultant
✓ Data sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the applicant /consultant
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps
❑ Corps navigable waters' study
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrological Atlas
❑ USGS HND data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
✓U S. Geological'Survey map(s) 24k Albemarle and Aquadale, NC
✓USDA Natural Resources Conservation, Service Soil Survey Sheets.6 and 10 Citation
Stephens, Ronald B , 1989 Soil Survey of Stanly County, North Carolina United States Department of
Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, and Eugene Mellette, North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and
Community Development, North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, North Carolina Agricultural Extension
Service, and the Stanly County-Board of Commissioners 76 pp, plus tables,and figures
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s) Cite name
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s)
❑ FEMA /FIRM maps
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation'is (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
✓Photographs
✓ Aerial' (Name & Date)'NRCS 2012, Countywide Orthophotograph,,Stanly County

❑ Other (Name & Date)
❑ Previous Determmabon(s) File no and date of,response letter
❑ Other Information (please specify)
12 June 2014
Signature and Date of Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager person,requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED) (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
The,signature is impracticable)

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Line 28 Replacement
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas
Investigator(s): Kleinfelder
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P Lat: 35.243
Soil Map Unit Name: Oakboro silt loam, 4 -15% slopes
City /County: Stanly County
State: NC
Section, Township.. Range: Stanly County
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope ( %): 2 -6
Long -80177 Datum: NAD83 NCSP
NWI classification: PEM
Sampling Date: 29Apr- 02May, 14
_ Sampling Point: WTL Typ 1
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes E) No O (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation �, Soil ❑ . or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes G) No 0
Are Vegetation �, Soil ❑ or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes • No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes • No within a Wetland? Yes _ no No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes • No �t
Remarks:
Wetland Type 1 is a maintained herbaceous right -of -way across Oakboro soils. Wetlands CA, CC. and CD Occur within this soil series within the project corridor
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required.
check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (A1)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (814)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3)
Q Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (816)
❑ Water Marks (61)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
L! Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (63)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes Q No
Q Depth (inches): 0-6
Water Table Present? Yes _Q_ No
O Depth (inches): 0 -10
Saturation Present? Yes Q No
©• Depth (inches): 0 -10
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well. aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3000
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Cover Species? Status
F�
0 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size. 5 feet
1 Onoclea sensibilis
2
Ludwigia palustris
ILI
Scirpus cyperinus
4
Juncas effusus
5
Boehmeria cylindrica
6.
FACU species
7.
UPL species 0
8.
Column Totals: 0
9.
10.
11.
E
12,
Herb Stratum (Plot size. 5 feet
1 Onoclea sensibilis
2
Ludwigia palustris
3
Scirpus cyperinus
4
Juncas effusus
5
Boehmeria cylindrica
6.
FACU species
7.
UPL species 0
8.
Column Totals: 0
9.
10.
11.
12,
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet )
1 Toxicodendron radicans
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
0 = Total Cover
10 ❑ FACW
10
15 FAC ✓ FACW
5 F] FACW
5
45 = Total Cover
10 EZI FAC
F .
10 = Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sampling Point: WTL Typ 1
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW. or FAC 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW. or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species 0
x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 0
(A) 0 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation �
Present? Yes n'1- No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

=1
Sampling Point: WTL Typ 1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0 to 8 10YR6 /2 70% 1 OYR 5/6 30% M
0%
0%
0%
0%
Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. `Location: PL =Pore Lininq, M= Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
D Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
✓
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
D
Umbric Surface (F13) (111136,122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
fL"J'I
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type: Becrock
Depth (inches): 8 -10
Remarks:
Shallow bedrock precluded deeper sample.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Q No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site , Line 28 Replacement City /County Stanly County Sampling Date 29Apr- 02May, 14
Applicant/Owner Piedmont Natural Gas State NC Sampling Point WTL Typ 2'
Investigator(s) Kleinfelder Section, Township, Range Stanly County
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none) COncaVe Slope ( %) 2 -6
Subregion +'(LRR,or MLRA) LRR P Lat `35 245 Long -80 183 Datum NAD83 NCSP
Soil Map Unit Name Goldston very channery silt loam, 4 -15% slopes NWI classification PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time,of year? Yes E) No ® (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation �, Sod ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly,,disturbed? Are "Normal,Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation El , Sod ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks-)
SUMMARY OF'FINDINGS — Attach site map,showing sampling point locations, transects, important features; etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Soil Present? Yes No--8-
within a Wetland? Yes ADL No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Not
Remarks
Wetland'Type 2 is a maintained'herbaceous right -of -way across Goldston soils ,Wetlands CB, CE CH, CK, Cb „and,CP occur in this setting
HYDROLOGY
Wetland'Hydrology Indicators*
Secondary Indicators (minimum.of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required. -check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
❑; Surfacewater (A1)1
❑ True,Aquatic Plants (614)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surfaceh(138)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (610)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres on,Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss,Tnm Lines (816),
❑ Water Marks (61)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment'Deposits (82)
❑iRecent Iron Reduction in Tdled'Soils (C6)
❑✓ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crusti(B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation'Visible on,Aenal Imagery (67)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water - Stained Leaves (69)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna,(B13)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface +Water Present? Yes ® No
E) Depth (inches) 0
Water Table Present? Yes _ No
Depth (inches) 0
Saturation Present? 'Yes,—Q— No
�Depth (inches) 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
mcludes, capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well „aerial photos, previous inspections) „if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point WTL Typ 2
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 ) % Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW. or FAC 6 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
6
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
—
5.
F-1
'.
That Are OBL, FACW. or FAC 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8.
Total % Cover of Multiply by
0 = Total
_
Cover
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet )
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2,
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species 0 x5= 0
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
q.
6
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
�
7
8.
Ell - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
10.
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
0 = Total Cover
5 feet
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1 Onoclea sensibilis 5 ❑ FACW
2 Ludwigia palustris 10 j
irgini FAC
3 Lycopus virginicus 5 ✓ FACW :q
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
OBL
q Juncos effusus 5
?{
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5 Boehmeria cylindrica 5
�
FACW
6
7.
height.
8.
—
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants. excluding vines, less
9.
.
10.
Herb – All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
11
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
30 =Total
Cover
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
15 feet
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
height.
1 Toxicodendron radicans 10
❑✓
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5
6.
Vegetation
Present? Yes n. No
10 = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version

SOIL Sampling Point: WTL Typ 2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % TVDe Loc
Texture Remarks
0 to 8 10YR6/2 70%
10YR 5/6 30%
0%
0%
0%
0% _
Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix. MS= Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (A1)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (At 0) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
D Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
F] Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
- Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type. Becrock
Depth (inches): 8 -10
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No O
Remarks:
Shallow bedrock precluded deeper sample
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Line 28 Replacement City /County: Stanly County Sampling Date: 29Apr- 02May, 14
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: WTL Typ 3
Investigator(s): Kleinfelder Section, Township, Range: Stanly County
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.). Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none). concave Slope ( %): 2 -6
Subregion (LRR or MLRA). LRR P Lat: 35.248 Long: - 80.195 Datum: NAD83 NCSP
Soil Map Unit Name: Misenheimer channery silt loam, 0 -4% NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes E) No 0 (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil ❑ . or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes G) No
Are Vegetation Q, Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes El No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Wetland Type 3 is a maintained herbaceous right -of -way across Misenheimer soils. Wetlands CF, CG, CL, and CN occur in this setting.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (814)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
B Crayfish Burrows (C8)
✓ Drift Deposits (133) ❑Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑
❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (84) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (65)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water - Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (613)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes _ 0 No Q Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes 0 No-0— Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WTL Typ 3
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 ) % Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. I
That Are OBL, FACW. or FAC: 6 (A)
2. � _-
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
W (
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
6.
7
IliliiM
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8.
F1
OBL species x 1 =
0 = Total Cover
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet )
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species 0 x5= 0
3.
F-1
4.
F-1
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
5.
.-
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6
�
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
g
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
10
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
0 = Total
5 feet
Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'
1 Onoclea sensibilis 5
❑✓
FACW )
(Explain)
2 Ludwigia palustris 10
OBIL �{
3 Lycopus virginicus 5
FA®
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
✓
Juncos effusus 5
,/
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
q
5 Boehmeria cylindrica 5
6
j
7.
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9.
n. DB
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
than
10.
Herb —All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
11
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
30 = Total
Cover
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size. 15 feet )
height.
1 Toxicodendron radicans 10
❑✓
2.
Hydrophytic
3.
W.
4.
5
Rpm
Vegetation
Present? Yes ne No
6.
10 = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: WTL Typ 3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tw Loc Texture Remarks
0 to 8 10YR6 /2 70% 10YR 516 30%
0% 0%
0%
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: Becrock
Depth (inches): 8 -10
Remarks:
0%
RM= Reduced Matrix, MS =M
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
.� Depleted Matrix (173)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Shallow bedrock precluded deeper sample.
in: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
D Coast Prairie Redox (At 6)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
"Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes G No 0
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Line 28 Replacement City/County: Stanly County Sampling Date: 29Apr- 02May, 14
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: WTL Typ 4
Investigator(s): Kleinfelder Section, Township, Range: Stanly County
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): C�d Slope ( %): 2 6
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat 35.251 Long: - 80.216 Datum NAD83 NCSP
Soil Map Unit Name: Badin channery silt loam, 2 -8% slopes NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes E) No 0 (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil ❑ . or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No 0
Are Vegetation �, Soil ❑ . or-Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes • No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes • No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes • No
Remarks:
Wetland Type 4 is a maintained herbaceous right -of -way across Badin soils. Wetland CM is the only wetland that occurs in this setting
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3) Q Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
F1
❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes Q No 0 Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Q Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge. monitoring well. aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WTL Typ 4
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 ) % Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. ®
That Are OBL, FACW. or FAC: 6 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3. _
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
4. s
—
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
r
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
i
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8
0 = Total
Cover
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet )
FACW species x 2 =
1,
�
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species 0 x5= 0
2.
3.
4.
F-1
Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)
_
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
�
_-
6
�
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
9
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
10
4 - Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
0 = Total Cover
5 feet
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1 Onoclea sensibilis 5 ❑ FACW ",
2 Ludwigia palustris 10 OBL
3 Lycopus virginicus 5 ✓ FACW -�
'Indicators of hydric sail and wetland hydrology must
r7i OBL 1A
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4 Juncas effusus 5
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5 Boehmeha cylindrica 5 FACW ;,j
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6.
n
7.
height.
8.
Sapling /Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
i 10.
Herb —All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
12.
30 = Total
Cover
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet
height.
1 Toxicodendron radicans 10
❑✓
FAC -ti
2.
Hydrophytic
3.
•I
4.
5
g.
w
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
10 = Total
Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: WTL Typ 4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
L�J1
(inches) Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) %
Tvoe LoC
0 to 8 10YR6 /2
70%
10YR 516 30%
JWM _
Red Parent Material (TF2)
0%
0%
Other (Explain in Remarks)
0%
0%
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: Becrock
Depth (inches): 8 -10
Texture Remarks
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
F1 Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
H MLRA 136)
Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Remarks:
Shallow bedrock precluded deeper sample.
m: PL =Pore Lininq, M= Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
2 cm Muck (Al 0) (MLRA 147)
L�J1
Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6)
(MLRA 147, 148)
D
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes G No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Line 28 Replacement City /County: Stanly County Sampling Date: 29Apr- 02May, 14
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point WTL Typ 5
Investigator(s): Kleinfelder Section, Township, Range: Stanly County
Landform (hillslope, terrace. etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope ( %): 2 -6
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P Lat. 35.243 Long: - 80.177 Datum: NAD83 NCSP
Soil Map unit Name: Oakboro silt loam, 4 -15% slopes NWI classification: PFO
Are Climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes E) No O (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation �, Soil ❑ . or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes E) No 0
Are Vegetation �, Soil ❑ . or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes • No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes • No within a Wetland? Yes no No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes • No
Remarks:
Wetland Type 5 is a mature hardwood swamp forest adjacent to PNG's existing maintained right of way across Oakboro soils. Wetlands CA occurs within this soil series within the project corridor.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (814)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3) 0 Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
8✓ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (65)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes G) No 0 Depth (inches): 0 -6
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 0 -10
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 0-10
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos. previous inspections), if available
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WTL Typ 5
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
Ulmus amencana
40
�/1
FACW;
That Are OBL, FACW. or FAC: 12 (A)
2 Quercus phellos 10
✓
Total Number of Dominant
✓
3. Acer rubrum 10
12
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4
Juniperus virginiana
5
—
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of. Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
7
8
WIM
65 = Total Cover
Sapling
/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet
)
FACW species x 2 =
1
Ligustrum sinense
20
✓
Fi
FAC species x 3 =
2
Quercus phellos
10
1 ✓
F+,
FACU species x 4 =
3.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
F
UPL species 0 x5= 0
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
4.
6
�
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
g
3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
10.
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
5 feet
40
= Total
Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1
Onoclea sensibilis
10
FACW]
OBL
'Indicators of soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 Ludwigia palustris 10
FV1
3 Zephyranthes atamasca 5
FACW
FACW,
Juncas effusus 5
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4
5 Boehmena cylindrica 5
FACW,j
6'
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
Sapling /Shrub — Woody plants. excluding vines, less
g.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
10.
Herb — All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
11
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
35 =Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet
)
height.
1
Toxicodendron radicans
10
❑✓
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5.
6,
Vegetation �
Present? Yes � No
10
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point WTL Typ 5
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) color (moist) % TvDe' Loc` Texture Remarks
0 to 8 10YR6/2 70% 10YR 5/6 30% M
0%
0%
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
BThick Dark Surface (Al 2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Tvoe: Becrock
Depth (inches): 8 -10
Remarks:
0%
0%
RM= Reduced Matrix. MS= Masked Sand Grains
2Locatiom PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
F] Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present.
unless disturbed or problematic.
Shallow bedrock precluded deeper sample.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes (2) No O
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version
Dark Surface (S7)
H
2 cm Muck (At 0) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
✓
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
F] Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present.
unless disturbed or problematic.
Shallow bedrock precluded deeper sample.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes (2) No O
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

ffimll III At1► Ili Q mill I akTffZI_1ILerilaby -A iTi IIT, • . . i . i OWT- 11 TOMIN
Project/Site: Line 28 Replacement City /County: Stanly County Sampling Date: 29Apr- 02May, 14
Applicant/Owner Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: WTL Typ 6
Investigator(s): Kleinfelder Section, Township, Range: Stanly County
Landform (hillslope. terrace. etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none) concave Slope ( %): 2 -6
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P Lat: 35.245 Long - 80.183 Datum: NAD83 NCSP
Soil Map Unit Name: Goldston very channery silt loam, 4 -15% slopes NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes O No ® (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation F, Soil ❑ . or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No 0
Are Vegetation ]:1. Soil ❑ . or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes El No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No=
Remarks:
Wetland Type 6 is a mature hardwood swamp forest adjacent to PNG's existing maintained right of way across. Wetland GE occurs in this setting.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (614)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑ Drainage Patterns (610)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑� Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑✓ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (63)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes O No
Q Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes —0— No
0 Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes 0 No
E) Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well. aerial photos, previous inspections).. if available
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10
11
12
Onoclea sensibilis 5
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 )
% Cover
Species? Status
1 Quercus phellos
30
�/ FAM
2 Acer rubrum
20
FA(,M
✓
FACC
3 Liquidambar styraciflua
15
✓
FAC
w.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Siva
8.
D
".
65
= Total
Cover
Saplinq /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet
)
1 Celtis laevigata
20
FAC V"
2 Liquidambar stryactilflua
10
FAC I
3 Ligustrum sinense
15
FACU r4
4.
5.
-Q-
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
45
= Total
Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 feet )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10
11
12
Onoclea sensibilis 5
❑✓
oi=
Ludwigia palustris 10 _
OBL species
Lycopus virginicus 5
✓
FACW'
OBI;
Juncas effusus 5 _F,/�]
Boehmeria cylindrica 5
x 3 -
FACU species
FA(,M
UPL species 0
x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 0
(A) 0 (B)
30 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet )
1 Toxicodendron radicans 10 2
2. -E ._
3.
4.
5.
6. LL
10 = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sampling Point: WTL Typ 6
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW. or FAC: 12 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 12 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW. or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of.
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 -
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species 0
x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 0
(A) 0 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
H drophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes _n No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point. WTL Typ 6
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe- Loe Texture Remarks
0 to 8 10YR6/2 70% 10YR 5/6 30% M
0%
0%
Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: Becrock
Depth (inches): 88 =10
0%
0%
RM= Reduced Matrix. MS= Masked Sand Grains.
'Location PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
F] Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Remarks:
Shallow bedrock precluded deeper sample.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes E) No O
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version
Dark Surface (S7)
D
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
D
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
✓
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
F] Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Remarks:
Shallow bedrock precluded deeper sample.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes E) No O
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Line 28 Replacement City /County Stanly County Sampling Date: 29Apr- 02May, 14
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: WTL Typ 7
Investigator(s): Kleinfelder Section, Township, Range Stanly County
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope ( %): 2 -6
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35.245 Long - 80.183 Datum: NAD83 NCSP
Soil Map Unit Name: Misenheimer channery silt loam, 0 -4% slopes NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes G) No O (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation _a, Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No 0
Are Vegetation 1:1 , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes • No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes • No within a Wetland? Yes . No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes • No
Remarks:
Wetland Type 7 is a mature hardwood swamp forest adjacent to PNG's existing maintained right of way across. Wetland CN occurs in this setting
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required;
check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (814)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3)
Pl Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (816)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
El Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
8 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (134)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No �) Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes -0 No
E) Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes 0 No
E) Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well. aerial photos, previous inspections), if available.
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30x30 )
1 Quercus phellos
2. Acer rubrum
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size 15 feet
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Cover Species? Status
30
20 ✓
15 ✓
65 = Total Cover
Celtis laevigata 20 AR_
Liquidambar stryactilflua 10
-
Ligustrum sinense 15
P(I
_
Juncas effusus
5
Boehmeria cylindrica
6.
5
7.
FACW
-,:_
8.
Column Totals: 0
9.
10.
11.
12.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 feet )
1 Onoclea sensibilis
2
Ludwigia palustris
3
Lycopus virginicus
4
Juncas effusus
5
Boehmeria cylindrica
6.
5
7.
FACW
-,:_
8.
Column Totals: 0
9.
10.
11.
12.
❑✓
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet )
1 Toxicodendron radicans
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
45 = Total Cover
5
❑
FACW4j
N
Multiply by:
OBL species
5
5
�/
FAC
FACWtJ
OBL 1
5
F,_/�
5
✓
FACW
-,:_
x5= 0
Column Totals: 0
(A) 0 (B)
30 = Total
10
❑✓
Cover
FAC;
Cover
10 = Total
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sampling Point: WTL Typ 7
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW. or FAC: 12 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 12 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of.
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species 0
x5= 0
Column Totals: 0
(A) 0 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Ell - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present. unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH). regardless of
height-
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes a No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: WTL Typ 7
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe Lac' Texture Remarks
0 to 8 10YR6 /2 70% 10YR 5/6 30% M
0%
0%
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: Becrock
Depth (inches): 8 -10
Remarks:
0%
0%
RM= Reduced Matrix. MS= Masked Sand Grains
Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
FJIron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Shallow bedrock precluded deeper sample.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Q No O
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version
Dark Surface (S7)
D
H
2 cm Muck (Al 0) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
✓
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
FJIron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Shallow bedrock precluded deeper sample.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Q No O
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site. Line 28 Replacement City /County: Stanly County Sampling Date: 29Apr- 02May, 14
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: INC Sampling Point: WTL Typ 8
Investigator(s): Kleinfelder Section, Township, Range: Stanly County
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex.. none): concave Slope ( %): 2 -6
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat 35.243 Long: -80 -177 Datum: NAD83 NCSP
Soil Map Unit Name: Badin channery silt loam NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes 0 No O (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation �, Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes Q No C
Are Vegetation �, Soil ❑ or Hydrology �_ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes • No
Is the Sampled Area '`
Hydric Soil Present? Yes • No within a Wetland? Yes no No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes • No 0
Remarks:
Wetland Type 8 is a mature hardwood swamp forest adjacent to PNG's existing maintained right of way across. Welland CM occurs in this setting
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
F71 Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
e Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (613)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No Q Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes —0— No Q Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes 0 No
E' Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge. monitoring well. aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WTL Typ 8
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 ) % Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Quercus phellos 30
That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC 12 (A)
2 Acerrubrum 20
✓
Total Number of Dominant
3 Liquidambar styraciflua 15
✓
FAC
12
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
6.
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8
?
Total % Cover of Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
65 = Total Cover
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet )
FACW species x 2 =
1 Celtis laevigata 20 FACW 6
FAC species x 3 =
2 Liquidambar stryactilflua 10 ✓ FAC
FV
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species 0 x5= 0
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
3 Ligustrum sinense 15
0
FACU'
4.
F-1
5.
171
t(
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6
�
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9 —
10.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
45 = Total Cover
5 feet
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'
1 Onoclea sensibilis 5 ❑ FACW ',
(Explain)
2 Ludwigia palustris 10 F,—/] OBL
3 Lycopus virginicus 5 ✓ FACW :Z
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
OBL
be present. unless disturbed or problematic.
4 Juncas effusus 5
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5 Boehmeria cylindrica 5 FACW:
6
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub —Woody plants, excluding vines, less
g•
in. DB
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
than
10.
Herb — All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
11
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
30 = Total
Cover
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet )
height.
1 Toxicodendron radicans 10
❑
FAC,
2.
3."
.
4.
.1
Hydrophytic
5
Cover
Vegetation
Present? Yes n. No n
6.
10 = Total
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: WTL Typ 8
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe' Loc Texture Remarks
0 to 8 10YR6/2 70°% 10YR 5/6 30°% M
0% 0%
0% 0%
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
H
2 cm Muck (At 0) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
✓
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
eSandy
Redox (S5)
liJi Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type. Becrock
Depth (inches): 8 -10
Hydric
Soil Present? Yes G No 0
Remarks:
Shallow bedrock precluded deeper sample
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site Line 28 Replacement_ City /County Stanly County Sampling Date 29Apr- 02May, 14
Apphcant/Owner 'Pledmont,Natural Gas _ State NC Sampling Point UPL Typ 1
Investigator(s) Klelnfelder Section, Township, Range Stanly County
Landform (hdlslope, terrace, etc ) Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none) cwo a1%e Slope ( %) 2-6
Subreglom(LRR or MLRA) LRR P Lat- 35 251 Long -80 212 Datum NAD831NCSP
Soil Map Unit Name Goldston very channery silt loam, 4 -15% slopes NWI classification None
Are�cllmatic / hydrologic conditions on,the site typical for this time,of'year? Yes 01 No ® (If no, ezplaln in'Remarks )
Are Vegetation = Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present?
Yes 0 No 0
Are Vegetation _LJ Sod ❑ , o' Hydrology, ❑ naturally'problematic? (If needed, explain any answersiln Remarks )
SUMMARY'OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes O No °
° Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes No 'within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks
Upland Type.1 is a very typical upland community across the project area, over Goldston sods Because of Goldston's prevalence adjacent to all wetland areas impacted, this form serves as each
wetland's corresponding upland data form
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators.
Secondary, Indicators (minimum ofotwo required)
Primary Indicators4minlmum , of one,ls required, check all'that applyY —
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
❑ Hlgh'Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor, (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (610)
❑'Saturation.(A3)
❑ Oxidlzed'Rhizospheres,on Living, Roots i(C3)
❑ Moss Trim Llnes,(1316)
❑ Water Marks (B1,)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (62)
❑ Regent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (C6)
® Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Deposits (133)
❑ Thin Muck,Surface (C7)
❑ �Saturatlon Visible, on Aerial Imagefy'(C9)
❑Drift
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Other (Explaln,in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants -(D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Vislblelon Aerial' Imagery (67)
❑ �ShallowAqudard (D3)
❑ Water - Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Mlcrotopographic Relief (134)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (613)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field'Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes - O No E) Depth (Inches) 0
Water TableaPresent? Yes No
Depth,(Inches) 0
Saturation Present? Yes Q No
O Depth (Inches) 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Includes capillary fringe)
Descnbe Recorded Data,(stream gauge,,monitonng well, aerial photos, prevlous,lnspectlons), If available
Remarks
I
US,Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 )
1 Quercus alba
2 Quercus rubra
3 Quercus phellos
4 Pinus taeda
5.
6.
7.
8.
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet )
1 Quercus rubra
2 Juniperus virginiana
3 Prunus serotina
4 Acer rubrum
5 Corpus florida
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 feet )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet
1 Toxicodendron radicans
2 Vitis rotundifolia
3.
4.
5.
6.
Sampling Point. UPL Typ 1
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
40
V
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW or FAC: 2 (A)
30
v1
FACU
10
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
6
Species Across All Strata: (B)
10
FAC
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
""
Total % Cover of Multiply by
90
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
10
F�
FAC species x 3 =
40
✓
Frl�
FACU species x 4 =
15
F_71
FAQ
UPL species 0 x5= 0
5
F—]
FAC Al
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
5
F]
FA
Prevalence Index = B/A =
H drophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
(n
�L
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
75
= Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
n
—
I�
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
_.,. be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling /Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non- woody) plants. regardless
of size. and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
0 = Total Cover Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
10 FAC'
10 FAC
t
® Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
20 = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Yes n No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point. UPL Typ 1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvpe' Loc Texture Remarks
0 to 7 7.5YR 4/3 100% 0%
7 -14 10YR 5/4 100%
0%
Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion. RM= Reduced Matrix, M
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
8 Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type Becrock
Depth (inches): 8 -10
Remarks:
0%
0%
Sand Grains. Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
IL�J1
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes O No 0
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

Figures
1. Project Location Map
2a. Stanly County Soil Map 6 and Albemarle NC USGS Quad Map
2b. Stanly County Soil Map 10 and Aquadale NC USGS Quad Map
3.1 -3.10 PNG Line 28 Replacement, Temporary Impacts Closeups

s
IF

Soo
is. OL RD
_
OV
.1630 DOO FEET '70 571
0 U50 1,300 2,600 3,90 5.200
tates Geobglcal Survey Feet
GS84). Projection and 1
erse Niercator, Zone 17S 7' 58' 7
oordinate System of 1983 1-4 —214U 1000
1PN 20143951 001A PING Lim 28 Replacensenit FIGURE
[DRAWN 2 Jun 14 Smly Cwrty Sod Map 6
DRAWN BY Chopper'
To

0 750 1,500
�CC • CD
1230" CE
TU
- CF
500
1
G
$6 J
Zl-
S STANLY•SCHOOL RD fa 1 U91 t
Wlatland Wetland Name
Stream S# I Stream Number
�J r
Replaoement Line Alignment
n,• �MOrm.mn �nuww on the ynp.c np•sanaMn nks M•n mmpre nom . rawly N A'
sourua•Mnwerct to dr•rq•wlM�a noece NMiwNir maY•aM np•a•netbnw 1,
wn .,pmss or copra. as to •«mur. oomprrnna. tanrm.::. of r�yn m m•
uae or auto nbrm•kan Tnis Oxumanl is rat 1—w lw uN •s ♦ h, our r ped�cl
a a a.a4n.e or �nanwa a a oomrr,k:Mn rragn 4•cunme rn. �. or miwa.
of tM iNpmekon <onaine on Inis P•Ar'K r•p•anWOn a •1 rM aor oak el M
wM woe or mnuavq tn. �mormakon
3.000
4.500 6.000
Feet
574
575
10'
`76
CI��
/�..
CJ
CH
CA
M CB
5g0
�i
a
CG 0
0'
lJr
(\
PN 20140951.011A
pNG Line 211 Replacement
FiGURF
DRAWN'. 2 Jun 14
\
Stanly County Soo Map 10
KLE /NFEL0ER
anghr Aeople.
Aight Snludwe.
Ynvw klenfelder corn
DRAWN BY'. Ch per
ARuadale NC, 7.5 Mn.Topo
2b
CHECKEDBY JCriap
KlenfelderSouthpstInc
3500 Gateway Centre Blvd, Ste 200
MornsYAle North CaroAna, 27550
FILE NAME. Fig2E_
Aouadale Tom Sotl.=d

r
.. F
Z
LLJ
'Yo
' • �: _ jT �''e Imo'„ - .�
■ � � '� a ��.. .'1' `
y, arat ►r ., '• ,s'. � y
a 5
FF
le
�'` •rye �� "�.y. ���`"' -� ��
EE �
A- r
p ' W
I Pat
0 lip
JOW

m m c n rry
E t9 -
v°�i
0- U) U) W a 71 U) N
om
d r
RUC
gz
i E C ( m
Yi"
0 10 O
- 9 02
E
o m
F � i
O
JC d
` s
oy I �a
!20-
goog
F ii¢u ^n I
m wag�gz I �.
� a
o
I - ,
! Z-;;;j�
low-
o
Y
U
f'1
li

I-

tk
Qo.
fe I
-io
OAR - JE

E 2 f E z f
L uz
2r2! e c -
$ \ \ \) / \ k \
0 | |
wIff_
_Iwo
k �
-
..�
�
c.
_a
.�
@
» �
� o
§ �
2 .
)k i -\
\ /\o\{
!|� RMa
| } \)2a
zfJƒ
J §;
)��!
�).
J!|
k$
� .
k j
z�
!
§ra
&
|w: b
film
jai
]$
!
� \

Appendix A
Stream and Wetland Impact Details with Stream Crossing Pipeline Profiles

2
O e
Q �
U
� o
z 6
U
z E Q � Z a O
5�0 ? O ¢ U w 3 w J i
° C i p ° o w J z qa w i z �p ° a g i
T °0. °9 �X (Yl(� `7� i o ?� w z i ? g d> a w
7 Lo�J x a w w w a° s a w OZ O
„s w Z _ °z z u kr a z w a a a o o N °z
❑ a a W a a❑ ❑ w w a a
Q z z z z z z z z z z Q `" 6 \� Z w
Z i=1 J g
x x x x x x x x x x o ¢ w w v
y w w w w w w w w w w a a ❑ ❑
uj
o g °pYsv p = I
Q
a a V � � CY
cn
W (� ap
Z 00 Z
21 W a0 w I �
W
r
oir ! w
/ i
La Oz
i 17 i\ s 0
\ \ Q O
j
\ Z
X,
�- apo
W Z o
\ \ ytn, \ \ uj ch
tj
F 2
R LL R �
j U W R
Il} N
' ta► u
U 2
= 2
r z
I L) o w
/ U 4
p O O O <
W
N
w, // Q ooYy�v Q o
Q 1 Q� a
Z / A� Z z ' W
LU
S pg1 0 0 2
Z Q °p�2 g a
ao ap
H X° W X L +
w o f-Z
W J
°' inw(D
i� ru Ci r
ps> Si R R LL
�? 91,00.01 R
2
=
Om O O U i
? Y♦ a O N ?_ Z
° W Z IJL o •.-
W U N U u
(aj
w 0 d °
K °w + R K N w
LLJ
_g g
v�
Yr O C
� N
r 2 n
U 'o o b om
00.8 g U J
°
a Z
NW(D
w
oLLo
N N ry N LL
� N
1 �9a
.1w
U
N d N N
W N a +
1 1
W
j
1 I r
T-
0 i.
w I +
1 �1 rf N S O O O O O
m n m n
°
a a a a a
1 1 j ►"j° 0
11 Q n W C)�
11 ! ooar U J
r
W Ln
s
3

fU I I
HL4
p
o 0
O
0
+
I,
I �
I ntn
+ +1 y
+��B
Z
I v��
l 7Cro
� o
W
/oo'�21
5�
z
W o w
y
LL w
Q Q
/1
�WN/
w
Q
x
Z Z
" Z
z '
U U g
ZL>
x -...
= 0 =
Z Q Z Q �,
°
0CC0 =
Q
F-
J00 j00 Ll-
°/W �
w W W
Q , Q
o
5?
<e
r
R R w
W�
BUJ
o
z
yLV I.r / a fJiwO0
(~ Z
fnwf`
N
~
W C) r
F- H
W
ti
w w
00.1 U
Z aes ` 21 J =
co
�UQ oer ZU¢�
Qp zsr W g00
.'
W � LL a
U J a WW U CC)
i
o
o
NWr ?W�
fU I I
HL4
Q
O O O
Op
Li
I,
I �
I ntn
+ +1 y
+��B
Z
I v��
l 7Cro
� o
W
WN W
0
W /
z
W o w
y
LL w
Q Q
/1
�WN/
w
Q
�W/
w
Z Z
" Z
Z
U U g
ZL>
x -...
= 0 =
Z Q Z Q �,
& J :` =
O, 00 +601 Q
0CC0 =
Q
F-
J00 j00 Ll-
°/W �
G
W U0) W U�
VLV i/
c Ur\ o UJ
r� a
W�
BUJ
W G W.N-
z
yLV I.r / a fJiwO0
(~ Z
fnwf`
fU I I
Q
O O O
Op
Li
fj
Q
+ +1 y
+��B
Z
N
W
z
W o w
y
II
goa
U
~ rn
I
N od+
Q >i
W U
w oc
"t
c;
x -...
p
Q
W
o
a � 28
0 W
I
'
II
oU�+
ZUI~i
Z
I +
J 0 d
N
~
W C) r
oo +
Z ca
�w�
_ N
Q
N
W Q
i 1
� 00 +yz
iN W1
U
0
N in
a
O
Q
w
Q
F-
z
Ug
Cl CT
1
U
QoU-
F-
U
Z rn
r
nnLL
U
z
ui
° U
R
uS
I
z
o W
U
m
� F
z
0
9 ¢
O
2
r
x
L)
c�
N
ea
z
as
0
o U
¢ a
D
O N Y
x
z
z O a
a, C) w 3 w tr
❑ z > <
w
r0 Q < ❑ 30 ❑
O❑ 1 < O w - x z < z
X� w 0 a? a w z z a L Lj
g
w U r > w O z W W W a N Z:
?? < o a P as LL a a❑ o °w r
LLI z z z z z z z z z z 0 0 w
F- F- r F F r a a z z
T) D N N 41 T) N N D N 0 O J
w w w w w w w w w w 1 a 0 0
I I I
I I I
I I < I I
O
°m
C7
N
U
I I
I I
� I
L:_
r
O O O
Op
R
LL R w
R
r � O
♦N
-}
O
Z
U i
2 U
U
z
W o w
y
II
U
-�
tai
x -...
+
p
N
o
'r w
R
K w
o >
I=
S
-
'
II
i
a
N
a
°z
a
rn
o°
a
Ch r
r ♦
o U
¢ a
D
O N Y
x
z
z O a
a, C) w 3 w tr
❑ z > <
w
r0 Q < ❑ 30 ❑
O❑ 1 < O w - x z < z
X� w 0 a? a w z z a L Lj
g
w U r > w O z W W W a N Z:
?? < o a P as LL a a❑ o °w r
LLI z z z z z z z z z z 0 0 w
F- F- r F F r a a z z
T) D N N 41 T) N N D N 0 O J
w w w w w w w w w w 1 a 0 0
I I I
I I I
I I < I I
O
°m
C7
N
U
I I
I I
� I
L:_

U CQ
O
K �
LLI
WY881 �� <
LLI
N =
U
a
Qp
z �
w N w o
r �
r
r
00Y2St
!
r
1
r
00`$t
i
✓ ,rg ri
!
\ V � gg► I
�4 �^ Ybft /�►
I
c4i
z
2
w
Q
W
Q
H
z
W
LO _
U
Q
W � W
H J
Z
U7Wu)
h!
e
Ze► i
_._ � v, p0♦t
W
LL Z LLI
0
& p£1
a U OLCL
�/ J �Q
LLJ
U
Z
W
O W
Yi LLo
Un
2
O �J
pN
N
O W
Yf
v
2
a
is Z�
O O
n
w
LL
z
(`7
N
r
2
0
Si c
0
LU
"1U
z
ui a T�
e a
'I
w z
4 c
� a
z o
o
n
! -C4
4
RR
F
x
x
U
r z
�o
�R
x
Y$
ru
Z w C G
u W
a
(\ o c � o
VV F
RR>
8
7 U
O �
h
Y
K
O
oc v p W 3 z
O 5 0 Q 7 O z
8 W z z z 0 z
i y C p J W W W �
twi F- W w O z w w w
a o a P n LL n a o o ow w
w w
z z z z z z z z z z o p a ug
P F F P F P P F F F- n n z z
M) T M) N f0 Vl La W 41 D O O 7 J
n w w a a LOU 0
I I I I
I � I
;` p0Y£lt
/
A
Y
(WU
2�r
• c`�d ^
Z
W I
?
��
W
' Q
v
U
x
{/
Y i l ppsrlt
W O
X
C..) LL
Lu W
>�
x
; o
W W
h o0•p <I `�
Z Z
I/
Q = M =
UN
Z Q W Q
Q O Q
eW
/
O
J0 c/)w�W
os► 1
PoY69j
WUCd'UJ
`�
W m U1 W U')
r �
r
r
00Y2St
!
r
1
r
00`$t
i
✓ ,rg ri
!
\ V � gg► I
�4 �^ Ybft /�►
I
c4i
z
2
w
Q
W
Q
H
z
W
LO _
U
Q
W � W
H J
Z
U7Wu)
h!
e
Ze► i
_._ � v, p0♦t
W
LL Z LLI
0
& p£1
a U OLCL
�/ J �Q
LLJ
U
Z
W
O W
Yi LLo
Un
2
O �J
pN
N
O W
Yf
v
2
a
is Z�
O O
n
w
LL
z
(`7
N
r
2
0
Si c
0
LU
"1U
z
ui a T�
e a
'I
w z
4 c
� a
z o
o
n
! -C4
4
RR
F
x
x
U
r z
�o
�R
x
Y$
ru
Z w C G
u W
a
(\ o c � o
VV F
RR>
8
7 U
O �
h
Y
K
O
oc v p W 3 z
O 5 0 Q 7 O z
8 W z z z 0 z
i y C p J W W W �
twi F- W w O z w w w
a o a P n LL n a o o ow w
w w
z z z z z z z z z z o p a ug
P F F P F P P F F F- n n z z
M) T M) N f0 Vl La W 41 D O O 7 J
n w w a a LOU 0
I I I I
I � I

Z / _
J ` o
X49
09D
°w BC►
o ti 9C►
v
v
W
N
W
y p 2
xj Z U
QOH
s+ W U Q
U ,^
Q 2 V!
U
N 3wo
W
w
x
o
N
o� F
N ir
g
z
w
U
N
H
N O
J
o
J/ /
r z
Q
d
o r �
w
O Y U
ON 61
Q
o u
a
Z
m W
U
D
O
Z Q
Y
LL
0 CO
U
a
x
W Z
W -
z
Z
Ov
¢
O
3
u�
¢
w ❑
0 Q a
❑
w
z
�O
>
a
❑
z❑ tt
i U)
❑ O
° o
w
w
z z
as
w
w
'x' w cw>
�i
w O
w
z
w w
w
a u~i
3
? z a
—❑ a
P a
E
a a
a 1
CL
o w
w
z z z
z z
cD o
z z
cD
z
o o
z z
w
o
vi
o w
w
r F
N cn( rn(
cn y(r
vi u�
rn
rn fn
a
O
a z
O :i
z
7
w w w
I
I
w w
w w
w
w w
d
a
O
I
O
g
I...I
Z
W
\4 09,
W
St LL
F
R R LL
,+
v
Q
aCppN
��P
II
O
o 2
U
Li
pN
�V-
III
p0
Q\
O >
i
Z
g'
n
'�
Z
W
°
W
r _
U
'
\
p
z U-
n
a 0
<
J O d
WSW
\ //;
+
� U J
W U M
cnWO�
�
�W�
e�
v
Z / _
J ` o
X49
09D
°w BC►
o ti 9C►
v
v
W
N
W
y p 2
xj Z U
QOH
s+ W U Q
U ,^
Q 2 V!
U
N 3wo
W
w
x
o
N
o� F
N ir
g
z
w
U
N
H
N O
J
J/ /
r z
Q
d
o r �
W
O Y U
ON 61
Q
o u
a
Z
m W
U
Z Q
Y
LL
0 CO
W Z
W -
Z / _
J ` o
X49
09D
°w BC►
o ti 9C►
v
v
W
N
W
y p 2
xj Z U
QOH
s+ W U Q
U ,^
Q 2 V!
U
N 3wo
W
w
x
o
N
o� F
N ir
g
z
w
U
N
H
N O
J

Appendix B
Stream Open -Cut Pump- Around Detail

0
°
Ic
o
z
w,
Z
J
N
' X
0 W
Om
o
>
ow
3 r
,0 p
-
E a
w
� a
�8
U) T
Z
:Ii
Z
Z,
o k a< r
a
��w
uNi N
3
m
a Q
° 30
.09
Y Q W S
w
MO = Za1
O
?
p w
O W
cr `� �■
m
o
am
or
r
�w S ao a r
ow <N r 0 a? °
r, ,� o
p OS
V
'm�W
a_
wm
U
U
W J
d,
w
rN
a
OW , w o o$ 6 o
im- =z'
d
m
a
i7
Q
K
Z'O
U LL 2 R 2 F I° W >
W 6 t
Z
O
i
r
2
i
m
wa
�Q F p ap m
m
r
mW'W3
Q
_
w
Q
!
a
I I
N
°
FAN
N fH W
Q W ° Z a m <
JmN°
Z 3 w0
NiwS
¢
w
N
J
i1)
d
w2
Oy 2 2 mO N J
1-Z WNU m N
,g
Ym�'O
S
D
< N
I
}
F
fO
�/
fro
$��
10 0�'r
w
O LLm m ,O
gopa
R WNW
ma
Z- m
_
�O
N m
- w ],FW N? W 2,
- w 0 m� 2 w 0 (7,Y �_
LLONm
a Q Z z�
�
m U y
O
w m
O
d
MOT,
Z <§m m J 2 W
Z' ��m
0 0
LL'�2
Z
Q Z
°jN
i°
°
<
I I
-
O 2OF �>
��V, r0pw3 O� NKC�
_Qwp
(n
OIp
0LL°
�� iym
cr
Rl
W a W J W F �LLN1N
;rOy
ly. Nw
U
lO �
0 Z�
W O
r U-
_
w
I I�
_ O __
�z
U mz� �3 �n�
- g0_ m N =� aQ�Q
I�rc
-aa
-
oq'�yLL -z
Oaww
OF
F -
Z
°
O Z__
a
�` Ord
2 2N
I�I z° aR
Q
N
-1
�d
yU �V= Cr 2O5
a0 om 3z
r0�2
3mo�
Q'
F-
wfrllN0
]WG
I
m C-
> 0
Xa O
(7
-°
ZO
mlm
r° W U' JJJ Z2 O F
F.
QNpLL °`j
WiZ W
Ll�
F
N
CCCW���
1 J
N
-
I
C7
I
Zm F?Q',
W ,�J%00 q>Q
Jim Z N'w j N ¢'�y"
O'2
Z
°
2
aaW ,Ui
2 W
Z
y
W
w
a
<w adN2Z�m, mLLl
N,m O F Q U U N
�'
m O r
J
}-
p
w
N m
N
pJFaza�OC� Q�Wpm3Nrc
?sgm>x3 Qm
°a
F
J_
Q
x
m
Q
�� W
m
rrcra
pr 0�(?N�p
,mm JNm V�mm w,mLLWNOw
7fr2 w
a < <^ 03�'za
{II
~tL
a
OU
O
$Jwn4
m <z
c�s_m�� 3,L3 gnu
a
0
m,w k"
2wwr
0ZL<
yoOU
2I
F
zl
'ZN
WH
viaQ
XF ]Z
N m a N m
xN_x
W
�� rah
-
.0
�? Oa 0
Z
m
p UQ
N aW�
r
W Q
�
z
N
W
a
r
N
a
5
O
°: �crroamm�mo�
0
W
Z
0
Q
yU
N
r
w
Im
O is
z
O'
Z
Z
wi
� W 2
O
<
w
U
(9 a U Z
'
p m
W
Om
zx
2'r
v3 ri
O
?Ir0
2N
agog
r
mwa--
Y
JrQ¢
0 Qdm�wo
ec�
N
2
U
w°
��_�
ra>>
f 0a
m
¢
m wa U
�[ ma
�3w
u< z
r_mt
3
w°
3t°i'bN¢iol
N
z
wW
wk¢
mQ� —
0
aY
�F
H
j
wOQO Ny
'NSm� 00
I
�w
'
8m,
w
O
z i=
m g
Um
I
o °z
O
$
v
u z
I
z0
U-
LL
a
a N
m
Q
2r
I
w
fO o
°
` Fm<
pFa 0
0
x?: w
ww
J2
�mU a
�
I
O?
W�O
7
l
O
0
2
32
zw3
�
J K
L N W w
J
UI
J
as
m�
w p
_
sl
Q
o
11 m,t a
x
= 51
-a
W
z
°m'�
FI
o
f
oma
w2
I
C7
g rFN
o,
z
I
°
w
z mIR
m
m
u
=W
w
w i w'
O
w
a,
im
a-
z a
w
N
I>
la
I IIIII 1114111 ¢ U tz
111 111
1
Q
Q.
-
N
Or a
N 0
raarer - N 000
i 0 LL N m m
W
CO f
w W.
m a
ma O N
CO z
N
>
m OJtpO
�u F33iF
�m ] a
Fm a
OLL
_
r
Wm�z ° °`zo
a O , <1�,i
HI
i p
a w z z m w
z
2
Q
Q U O moo
o
F
oa
U
w�
a w
O^
>a}
-C
9 3
V�
-
� p
10�b1s
w N
LLN'
Np
��'
m F
a0
mQ U rm
■
U)
m
0.0
I
W
Omw
xgi
XMI-
C7
M- kR Tw m N
Q
3,u
a'
aa,ow3cm�,aw�z
_
■
■
'
RJ
J h ■ K
a ■ r
0 I zQ
p
Z
g
F'
m
0
x
y
a
W,
11)
0
z r,N
'¢'�
Na
O
3?r
�°
Q'
N
°
'°
n a-
N O
° '
N
po
r
ml m 01 w z m -W,
,m a N m 2�F t%> W m �' w F,wa ° J
- aa-ri�Qm °'FpWr3 LL-W WJ
N gw rOz -m.NN wOLLw
m oar a Up
W
'
O
m I UW
W
z
N
w f
10
5
Wa° RwOwm
yw Jr'O z m Y a 5� mwaVC�
w
L) 'V
'Q
<
O Q a OQ
W
(D
Wmaw
F (D
z
ONILL Nw W U000N wO mwz
N O
m,
■
C7 ■
N
CL
Q Uo
Z
F-,W
LL Qa U' i m
mW W-2 Z Z,f p a
mq >(7ZUz
m
m
't
YQW¢
O � � O K
O
LL
a
X.
I N
a
j U
�; � p
����K F 'W" Q`J
0< m� X, n D o a� � -, W a
o "N
■
I rc ■ -zN
'�
R °ms
mCOZO,z ° °cJmwg� >'�wak
O
1yp..
■
r ■ w
m �2
ILA
O
(7
°
W
m
O
rap
8Rm
pWJriZWOVI�F mr?NH�WW
W 2aJ a,W W.O(D' N°oN W'NLLwU
Nz
4
r
■
Q rLL
m ■ oLL
Z
r
2
W
Ci�LL
ZWD
wm
o
mULL= F zQZ wz aw�wOw
¢wzr r mRUmNm
°wwmzNa
L
z o
I
<
'w z
a o
,'m
'? ■
1 I
�\ ,
m a ■ a
w I rc iz
i O 0
U m
O
U
F
W
'w
J
Y
a r
0 `z
>J¢¢
ofw,
3 m,
z
O',�3yS
w,'1
la
VN
�, O,
W
m 3rcX¢ O'J_m
z �'w,�0 iU �0 OWiU�< wU
g x =,r'i� > w- x m X r'�,a NIJ
U O'N (9,o'w m LL,OI m N
r �, W O
ow
U.
7
w
N
r N m I
a , ■
m 0
W
w
O>
Z W
I
r
N
N f�
�i
w ° o N z'° o W O w
Z r N
N<< W W 2 O N- w N Y m W
W W,p
N
o
7
O
I a I
2
3
i t N
W a -2
Q Q
Q a
Q I Qa J O
3o�mOyyinw�NCVra�xaw
U
u�
r
M,a,,,n
•„
i
I o ■
■
y
W
z pQY
S
Wpm
w
SNym1
U'wr�Fw -Nmm Vpmw wQ ra a
U1✓-Wao WOgw =m °m�`.
a0g °zwa �l`Rm 3T,:),>
a
m
W'
U, <�
m
�,O
w,
•
,
c„ 1,
„n,u „n, „
„
,. ,i„,,, o
z
,,, • W R'w
•'
Z
5 N
m
z
w
Z
r
<
2 w J
W LL
m-
w
�:
WSW 9 �,O'a v� w. w � W �IW ¢'J
r W,J Z Z m W m m' m,N ❑
m . > m N 'F
i s z g
U' W > N O W ° O'�'p aw p 2
w
W
F=
J
'2
J
K
VE,�
„ m SZ 00
,� �i� „ ,
N
J
ul �i
i
w
2mpOw Nw4lQz JpNF7
N
JN
Q c2i w'w
,' INNQ
r
w
U)i wx0
w
�WwNU?UmmWmarF2N3
W
° w jaK Z~ gw m 1< - <wzmw a�
NwW
QW
'wWWO
O
N
O.0
O7,�
2 2 m
F-
? w 0
2Ur
w W w a 0
J x
=
U
O
m
< H, U' o
9Vl 2ymw
2,
r,W
z,
mr
V I m,�
LLU'pt, WaW T.
Q
p 'w
a w
Jd- N�
''• O,m`3 -aa
Z
N,^
�qqU
c��
m
w a
a
g
r, U
N,
z
'�'
o� IJp3' (�o mm° o
m' Nww
zw
N m
m ��
�Z
mwH'
,p rONOQNQma'
R Q210 m� ,,w
W
L
>gw I
O r2';~
w
�'J,N'°
J 70Q
a�
m w
QmQ z
K a
W
O
LLOaal�w a�7m�Q =Z�
N mama W a� SN (,<m �°
rg0mm,a
W
N
NON
aw?
w
wgrmm aQ
�QQNw 3
r
LLS'mlr
O
3
O
p °JamU' _Nw W.<
<
0OU
NN
m <3
mwlW -,FZ3W
03¢y_?m
J
Q
U_
wZ� 2
x_0.]
Ewa
w
(7
w
2 SO
��oz
p
>
wLL >NJFrmZ dNUZ °7 zP(m'J�
U¢a1z °O ZOwm UaU '�
<m <�g
��
vriavg
Fw�
NOW
w3w7QOQaoa
-�wa V,Q,�
ON'W m'Xr0
O.F
'tea ?m
w
o0�3
>2 p
3W ZJ
<
W:� ,m°�o3mw,LL�
g -wI U2pmma awmw
(7, VJ0 1° = JWW
Q
az
r2
2 W,m W 2 7 N a W N N F
° r
m
':N NI 0,�,� 0
Np_
m w Z Q�w,m J,2 0 2= =?
m`a'a < Z lL < r �Ir,LL'i
O
�-
wo�
Z� N
(D
Z
aO'
rat+
O