20000900 Ver 1_Fax_20000615

08/lb/00 10:15
tom` i ~ ~ ~ j
. - I it '
I I '~ , ;
860 W.
i
i
To: .John
C)ur~li
': Fax: .919.
Phone: 97 9.
Re: Neus
INNOVATIVE DESIG
f ~I
- i ~ ~ '
j;
' N ST:, RALEIGH, NC 27603, 919.832:6303 FAX ':919.83'2.3339'
I ' }.
(' ./
,. ;.
.,
ey. NC'~Div.~ Of Water From: Louis J Qerics, AiA ~ ''
''
:5959; ; Pages: 3 - K
~:
:9726 j Date: 6.15.00
- r
fool
J
I
~ Urgent ~ , ~ r Revi w ; ~ Please Comment fi] Nlease ~rtepry L1 Please
';
,,
John:
I had' tried tc
He told me
1 project today
The problem
' the wetland
rules took e1
from Februai
Thompson, ~ ,
property nigh
Our c[lent
We believe
by using a s
We can disp
electricity as
fossil plant,
pounds of rii
i ten times a~~
i
iCC
i ch Bob; Zaczecki this morning to talk with him about our Hi~bum Dr. project.-
~terday that you all would be discussing the Division stai~f position on the
He appears do be out of the office now, as is Todd St .James.
(,
ttie site is the date it was recorded. Apparently, the staff; feels we can do
~~ an engineering point of view, but the site map was recorded after the Neuse '
ct so we have a legal impediment Raleigh s Planning Commission held it up
'~ , 1996 to August 1997 with constant .requests for revisions. Mary Penny
s~s-tant~ Attorney General is also of the opinion we 'do not have any vested
j
owever, still ask the Commission for a variance. ~ ,
~~
~~ we 'can thoroughly exceed the nitrogen mitigation: that is required on the site
system for the building's hot water, space heating and so`,me of its cooling.
ie 43,0i pounds of NOx with the solar system vs. electricity if we look at the
ng on site,; primary energy. If we trace the energy; back up tthe wire to an old
:can remove almost 2900 pounds or Ivt~x, wrnG1 I am assuming is about 970
@n. ' If we assume we are displacing natural gas aS o `nergy, we are still
of what would be required to be removed by w nds m f lion. Both Todd
~ !
'i
i~
. ! i
~i ~ i
.~
}-~

08/16/00 10:18 INNOVATIVE DEBIG f~002
'~ ~ i ~ ~~,
i ~ ~ ~ ~
` ~ I ! ' June 152000 '
k !
j' ! i,
and Mary f~enn Thompson have urged us to make that point to t#~e EMC. We know the
history of tt~ a ei hteer~',varfances requested so far, but we still have tq try. l~ou never know.
We still need 8 staff ;review of the wettan~~ r. _~___.~ ,. _ _. _ ~wo~oping,t regardless of the `
position yo~ all ke Before the EMC. And we need to get is alt together Icy the end of next
week so we ca .get our package to the EMC members. ~ Additionally, I rtes to be on a plane
•, to a conference Como ~ w 'afternoon and not back until next Thursday afterr~oon.
' ~; ; '
j ~, since B~b d Taid, especially Todd, are out today and tomorrow, is tlSere any way Mac
McIntyre d myself ~ can 'meet with you today or tomorrow morning to ;discuss; our site
j engineering pf s? Ft would be a great help. -
~ I
j Please call e ~ 832.6303 at your earliest convenience. ; ';
~ ~
Thank you very niuch~ ~ ~ ~ ;
j
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ _
-.
i
.I ,. ~
,j
1i
1 ~ ~ ~ I ~ `
~ I j '
I: I , ~ !
~ 1 , ! ' ~ '.
~ i
,. ! ~ i .
~~ ~ ~ i
i t
~ ~ ,
' i ~'
i i ~ ~ 1 '
i ~ ~ ~ I '
~ i i ~,
~ ~ ;~ ~ t
i ~ ~
~ ~ ' ~ ~~
~. ~ ~~
~ ~' ~ `t
P~ 2 ~ ~ .
~-
i
i F i
jIr i
i ~ ' ~
1
1 ~ ~ l i

~ osiiaioo io:ia
j
.~ ~ ,
~ Avoided N ~ Hilbit~~ ~D~.` Congregate Care
~,
I ! -
~ ; , ~ ~ Area in Acres Nino en
Hard',Surtb
Nousce~ Rive ce G
r b' ontriK
Prop t~1'ton to .
~ed Plan
0.345
;
4#/a I :1.38
8#!a I ~ ~ I ~ ~ 2.76
~I ~ i
Requir~ed~ % en Removal
4#!a f ', i 0.552
8~/ac/yrI ~ 1.104
~ooj
i
6/14/00 '
i
Im~irovement
Avoided N bx tS y Solar.'. ~ ~~ ~%

Contributid ,1
n
i ;
Energy Unit
NOx
Re~rtoval

Solar Repla ~ ; ~ kWh :0.05# NOx/kWh I
Etedxi tea' in ,ite 86708.00 433.54 432.44
Electricity Gen' rated.@Ofd, 15%
Eftident Pa~nrer larit~ ' ! : 578053.33 ~ ~ 2890.27 ~ 2889.16
Electricity Gen ~ rated '(b?' New, 30%
Efident PMuvec Plant 2$9026.67 1445.;13
i ! nrl
~ ~ -_ , i .. MMBtu ~.17#/MMBty
Natural Gas H'
Conlin' (,i Site ling, Wot Water ~
I '
295.85
; ' 35.50
1444.03 ;
j ,
;:. ,
34.40