20150955 Ver 1_Meeting Minutes_20121129

ORIGINAL
AUGUST 16, 2012
CONCURRENCE POINT 2A
BRIDGING DECISIONS AND ALIGNMENT REVIEW
Section 404 /NEPA Merger Team Meeting Agreement
Concurrence Point 2A: Bridging Decisions and Alignment Review
Project Name /Description: Topsail Island Bridge Replacement, Pender County, NC
TIP Project No.: B -4929
Federal Aid Project No.: BRSTP -50 (10)
WBS No.: 40233.1.1
Bridging Decisions and Alignment Review
The Project Team has reviewed the bridging and alignments of the seven Detailed Study
Alternatives (DSA) and agreed to carry five of the seven DSAs forward into the Concurrence
Point 3. Alternatives 6 and 7 have been eliminated due to their adverse impacts to Soundside
Park, a Section 4(f) resource, as well as their limited off -site detour options, constructability
concerns and higher overall costs compared with other five DSAs. Alternatives 4, 5, 5R, 11,
and 17 will be carried forward to Concurrence Point 3. Table below shows the begin and end
stations and associated minimum roadway /hydraulic bridge lengths for each DSA.
Detailed Study
Alternative No.
Begin Station
End Station
Minimum
Roadway /Hydraulic Control
Bridge Length (feet)
Alt 4
516 +40
553 +90
3,750
Alt 5
615 +40
652 +16
3,676
Alt 5R
615 +40
651 +94
3,654
A#-6
1
1321+70 rv� 1' 70
520
Alt n Beteuf
21+13
36 +00
4-,437
Ait7
1511+5
1 5 21.i79
4,02-0
A-ra 7 De +te
3
36$90
44&7
Alt 11
919 +00
959 +40
4,040
Alt 17
406 +75
444 +00
3,725
The Project Team met and concurred on this date of August 16, 20A2:
USACE ( EQV NCDOT
USEPA USFWS
NCDCR NCDWQ
FHWA NCWRC
USCG NCDCM
NCDMF NMFS
--•
NORTH CAROLINA TOPSAIL ISLAND BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION T.I.P. No. B -4929
AUGUST 2012

ORIGINAL
CONCURRENCE POINT 2A
AUGUST 16, 2012 BRIDGING DECISIONS AND ALIGNMENT REVIEW
Section 404 /NEPA Merger Team Meeting Aareement
Concurrence Point 2A: Bridging Decisions and Alignment Review
Project Name /Description: Topsail Island Bridge Replacement, Pender County, NC
TIP Project No.: B-4929
Federal Aid Rro ;--,t No.: BRSTP -50 (10)
WBS No.: 40233.1.1
Bridging Decisions and Alignment Review
The Project Team has reviewed the bridging and alignments of the seven Detailed Study
Alternatives (DSA) and agreed to carry five of the seven DSAs forward into the Concurrence
Point 3. Alternatives 6 and 7 have been eliminated due to their adverse impacts to Soundside
Park, a Section 4(f) resource, as well as their limited off -site detour options, constructability
concerns and higher overall costs compared with other five DSAs. Alternatives 4, 5, 5R, 11,
and 17 will be carried forward to Concurrence Point 3. Table below shows the begin and end
stations and associated minimum roadway /hydraulic bridge lengths for each DSA.
Detailed Study
Alternathe Ntr.
BeginSta ©it_.1
_
Sttint>
Minimum
Rtidway lHyt(r2tulia,octtrot,__
Brid e.Len th feet
Alt 4
516 +40
553 +90
3,750
Alt 5
615 +40
652 +16
3,676
Alt 5R
615 +40
651+94
3,654
Att 6
1316 +58
1321+7
629
Alt 6 Bette
21+13
36+89
44P
Alt-7
1611+6
4524 - +78
4;=
Alt 7 - Det
21+13
36+00
4 ;4 7
Alt 11
919 +00
959 +40
4,040
Alt 17
406 +75
444 +00
3,725
The Project Team met and concurred on this date of August 16, 20 2:
USACE
/ g ,t�, 2vi z - NCDOT
USE P
�� /'t ' _ 2i -- 12- USFWS
NCDCR
NCDWQ —
FHWA
NCWRC
USCG
z
NCDCM���,i/� -��,.
NCDMF
NMFS
--•
NORTH CAROLINA TOPSAIL ISLAND BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION T.I.P. No. B-4929
AUGUST 2012

ORIGINAL
CONCURRENCE POINT 2A
AUGUST 16, 2012 BRIDGING DECISIONS AND ALIGNMENT REVIEW
Section 4041NEPA Mercer Team Meeting Aureement
Concurrence Point 2A: Bridging Decisions and Alignment Review
Project Name /Description: Topsail Island Bridge Replacement, Pender County, NC
TIP Project No.: B4929
Federal- Aid- Pro,-°ct -No.: BRSTP -50 (10)
WBS No.: 40233.1.1
Bridging Decisions and Alignment Review
The Project Team has reviewed the bridging and alignments of the seven Detailed Study
Alternatives (DSA) and agreed to carry five of the seven DSAs forward into the Concurrence
Point 3. Alternatives 6 and 7 have been eliminated due to their adverse impacts to Soundside
Park, a Section 4(0 resource, as well as their limited off -site detour options, constructability
concerns and higher overall costs compared with other five DSAs. Alternatives 4, 5, 5R, 11,
and 17 will be carried forward to Concurrence Point 3. Table below shows the begin and end
stations and associated minimum roadway /hydraulic bridge lengths for each DSA.
Detained Study
Alternative No
Beg inStatiori .
End Statiotl-
Minimum
Roadway /Hydraulic Gontrai,:.
B
-rid e;t.en th, feet .
Alt 4
516 +40
553 +90
3,750
Alt 5
615 +40
652 +16
3,676
Alt 5R
615 +40
651 +94
3,654
A"
1316+59
4324 +70
520
Alt 6 - Deteu
21*13
36+09
487
41487
Alt- -7
46- 114.60
4-524*70
4;029
Alt -7 - Beteu
21+43
36+08
4�7
Alt 11
919 +00
959 +40
4,040
Alf 17
406 +75
444 +00
3,725
The Project Team met and concurred on this date of August 16, 20 2:
USACE�
NCDOT
°
USEP ,�
-24 r I z
USFWS i
NCDCR
g
NCDWQ i —
FHWA
_ NCWRC
USCG
NCDCM���,�/�
NCDMF
NMFS '-
RPO
NORTH CAROLINA
TOPSAIL ISLAND BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
T.I.P. No. 8-4929
AUGUST 2012

ORIGINAL
AUGUST 16, 2012
CONCURRENCE POINT 2A
BRIDGING DECISIONS AND ALIGNMENT REVIEW
Section 404/NEPA Merger Team Meeting Agreement
Concurrence Point 2A: Bridging Decisions and Alignment Review
Project Name /Description: Topsail island Bridge Replacement, Pender County, NC
TIP Project No.: 8-4929
Federal Aid-Project No,: BRSTP - 50_001
WBS No.: 40233.1.1
Bridging Decisions and Alignment Review
The Project Team has reviewed the bridging and alignments of the seven Detailed Study
Alternatives (DSA) and agreed to carry five of the seven DSAs forward into the Concurrence
Point 3. Alternatives 6 and 7 have been eliminated due to their adverse impacts to Soundside
Paris, a Section 4(0 resource, as well as their limited off -site detour options, constructability
concerns and higher overall costs compared with other five DSA9. Alternatives 4, 5, 5R, 11,
and 17 will be carried forward to Concurrence Point 3. Table below shows the begin and end
stations and associated minimum roadway /hydraulic bridge lengths for each DSA.
Detailed Study
Detailed No,
g gilt 3tatlont.
tend 5tltii t
Minimum
Roadway /Hydraulic Control
Brill e.Len th feat
All 4
516 +40
553 +90
3,750
Alt 5
616 +40
652 +16
3,676
Alt 5R
615 +40 1
651 +94
3,654
Alt 8
4318+-iA
1324*70
620
A44-9etaw
21413
26+00
4
A1-7
16-14 +60
1424*N
1,020
Alt
2+13
26+OA
1
Alt 11
919 +00
959 +40
4,040
Alt 17
406 +75
44400
3,725
The Project Team met and concurred on this date of August 16, 20 2:
USACE g I6.2a 1 Z- NCDOT
USEP X-.1 g_ �1 12- USFWS
NCDCR 4,iz�. ;.' % -c� �% ,,y,.�71 NCDWQ
I'M
FHWA� NCWRC
USCG NCDCM ��� —� -.�
NCDMF �� NMFS
RPO
NORTH CAROLINA TOPSAIL ISLAND BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
DEPARTMENT oKTRANSPORTATION T.I.P. No. 8 -4929
AUGUST 2012